NC0006033_Wasteload Allocation_19940712

NPDES WASTE LOAD ALLOCATION
PERMIT NO.: NC0006033
pERMr= NAME: Cramerton Automotive Products, L. P.
FACHM NAME: Cramerton Automotive Products
Facility Status: _ Existing
Permit Status: Renewal
Major -4 Minor
Pipe No.: 001
Design Capacity: 4.0 MGD
Domestic (% of Flow): 21 %
Industrial (% of Flow): 79%
Comments: v i OCR i CrtCCs. A'r'FAC H t�— D
RECEIVING STREAM: South Fork Catawba River
Class: WS-III
Sub -Basin: 03-08-36
Reference USGS Quad: (please attach)
County: Gaston
Regional Office:_ Mooresville Regional Office
Previous Exp. Date: 8/31/94 Treatment Plant Class: III
Classification changes within three miles:
Requested by: Greg Nizich U 5 0 Date:=
Prepared by: Lca� Date: 7
Reviewed by: t
. ;
—F>6-p I ►5
L,kajo-- w a.
3/1 ie
Modeler Date Rec. #
am
Drainage Area (mil) 63S Avg. Streamflow (cfs): 810
7Q10 (cfs) Jay Winter 7Q10 (cfs) d3 0 30Q2 (cfs)
Toxicity Limits: IWC i, % % Acute/ hronic
Instream Monitoring:`
Parameters )eCa � Ca /.
Upstream Y Location C.rar,.r-�zK ip,-
Downstream,_ Location UO i �nr er,�—
Effluent
Characteristics
Alan rays
A
Oa /.
BOD5 00/fir/
333.9
NH�3-N-(_mg/1)
/,YOA;4r mtckt
;r;4"iv
�+*)
. 7
d/ .2
TSS �
13 od-
F. Col. (/100 ml)
a Da
Y00
pH (SU)
6
6'
C oD(lhr/
S; I �f
f 0, 379
00
.
Cltlo/in,.,
�bni�dy'
Comments:

March 16, 1994
Cramerton Automotive (Formerly JPS), NC0006033
Effluent Guideline Limitations
Effluent Characteristics
Monthly
Average pb/da)
Daily
Maximum (lb/day)
Comments-
BODS
333.4
668.8
OD
5,189.4
1097 .
Includes ocation for Umsfiing synU etic fibers
TSS
1,302
29
Sulfide
13.6
27.
Phenols,
6.8
13.6
Total Chromium
6.8
13.6
H
6 to 9
6 to 9-
Type of Product Produced
Lbs/Daj Produced
Effluent Guideline Reference
Knit D emr and Finishing
62.
40 CFR 410.52 (Subpart E, Knit Fabric)
Low Water Process
41 (Subpart , Low Water)
Yarn Dyemg
409000
40 UR-710.72u art G. Stock Yarn

s _ I J LL-14-1994 07 s 53 FROM DEHNR MOORESV I LIE
c
r
CBAMMt'ttiy1V AU'POMO'FJVE
PRODUCTS, L R
A JMI&gren JOW YOftre
P.O. �
Ea* P4ad
emnertm, N.C. 28032
[phone]
FAX (704) W-7655
July 13, 1994
TO 1-919-733-9919 P.01
Mr, D. Rex Gleason I
Dept. of Natural Resources
and Community Development '
P.O. Box 950
Mooresville, N.C. 28115
Re: Cramerton Automotive Products, L.P.
NPDES Permit No. NC0006033
Dear Mr. Gleason:
We have reviewed the preliminary waste load allocation provided
by the Department of'Environmental Management to our Cramerton
Plant and we wish to make several comments.
Limitations for Total Phosphorous and Total Nitrogen are very loW
requiring almost state--of-the-art levels of treatment. Due to
the design of our treatment system, considerable time and effort
will be needed to develop the best technology to aocomplish this.
As I understand the Lake Wylie study, the data indicates that
contribution of these nutrients is considerably less by our waste
treatment system than other sources ie area.t of most fact
municiple
conservation of these nutrients are 30 t allowable delay Of
type wastewater systems. Consequently,
elittle impact on the lake.
shavntUi
meeting these standards
I suggest that. implementation of these limits occur in the next
round of permits to allow sufficient time to properly study our
options of treatment. Since textile process wastes are normally
deficient in nutrients,(and we are treating about 20 of the Town
of Cramerton's waste) we need to evaluate the impact of our
discharge to the river.
I appreciate the impact of nutrients on the aforand the need
the
tO
reduce the levels, I believe that 0Ur requestY until
next round of permits t5 years will allow t�or for our
to properly develop an appropriatestrategy
addition to our treatment system.
5 ' ere
i
Robert G. Kaufman posy -it" Fax Note 7s�� ° 7-0
Plant Engineering ' Manageriltr1 d From
Phcna #� Phone
RGK/ltd * 19I�' - �° '�
TOTP- P.01

r +_
C RAMEw7ox) AvT-c;,
NC000, Go 33
A) Low wAr et 2, 000#/o- Y
m9I
-
=*/PA
�o GFi� 4� ( , 3 D. MAX Y. M 0. U
�k
M oNT -)
5 0 D q 0,7
43,,a
C. o-D z , 9- ) , 9
173.
86.g
Tss 1.4 0,7
86, $
--
4.3, 4
/-
6� Kai ►`I' D YE1 �G F, ss-i, �, (GZ, ovU4/DA
�p,P,ciiv� srf�N , w S /J77-�Ei7c
C � Y
4-0 c,r--n 4ro,62
�5
E/D�y� -
801�, S,D 26- �
3�6
ASS
C0-r) (oU+20 3o+-)b
4�1tab
Z�r "
TSS z. 10,47
Ph e^ c, o 11 0,05
3 , )
0.or
C) YAAAI DYcI1Q U 40, 000V IN, y
0 �3 �t
=10A-
40 (,F2 4)0.7Z Q -Mo
M�
50 tD (P, S- 3.9-
CoD s'y, (0 42.3
5, Zys; z
Z) Co22 i
-r55 1-7.L1 T.7 - I107T,?
5n,4 -
Su4 o,2I1 0.IZ
1H.9
'7,4
Phtno ( 0112 0,0 (0
7.4
3,7
Gr o IQ_ 0.0(0
7,4
3.7
0`rA C. S DAJ Y)
-
DAM x. M 0 hrrhf Arc,
33y,9
TS�S Z., cp
PhOrwl s

FACT SHEET FOR WASTELOAD ALLOCATION
N.C. DEFT. �OtEALTH,
Facility Name: Cramerton Automotive Products, L P .r�iTU �wL9$OURCEs
NPDES No.: NC0006033 21 1994
Type of Waste: Industrial - 79%, Domestic 2l%. JUN
Facility Status: Existing
Permit Status: Renewal
Receiving Stream: South Fork Catawba River N111bUURESgla REG'ONAt OFF whola!
Si
Stream Classification: WS-III
Subbasin: 03-08-36
County: Gaston Stream Characteristic:
Regional Office: Moorseville &G- USGS #
Requestor: Greg Nizitch Date:
Date of Request: 3/16194 Drainage Area (mi2): 635
Topo Quad: G14NE Summer 7Q10 (cfs): 125
Winter 7Q10 (cfs): 230
Average Flow (cfs): 810
30Q2 (cfs):
IWC (%): 4.7
�o -
t' r"
L 'o
Wasteload Allocation Summary
A calibrated QUALM water quality model was used to perform a wasteload allocation 0 s°
oxygen consuming wastes. Existing limits for BOD and NH3 are consistent with modeling rests
and anticipated Catawba basinwide management strategies.
Based on the 1992 Lake Wylie r?ort, the facility should be required to meet best available
nutrient removal limits. The facility should be given a five year schedule in order to meet new C'
nutrient limits. =+
Total residual chlorine has been high, averaging 910 ug/1 in 1993.
S ial Schedule Requirements and additional comments from Reviewers:
Recommended by: ill l,bm=� Date: 6 /'l 9y
Reviewed by c LL1
Instream Assessment: h'1 - C. . �l}7 W / Date: t l I I U c1 .
Regional Supervisor:
Permits & Engineering:
RETURN TO TECHNICAL SUPPORT BY: j U L 16 1994

2
Type of Toxicity Test:
Existing Limit:
Recommended Limit:
Monitoring Schedule:
Existing Limits
Wasteflowi4.0 MGD
BOD5 (lbs/day):
TSS (lbs/day):
pH (Sin:
COD (Ibs/day):
Fecal col. (#/100ml):
Chromium (Ibs/day):
NH3-N (µg/1):
Nickel (µg/1):
Total Phos W--( It )
Total Nitrogen ):t ;y )
Cyanide (µg/1):
Phenols (Ibs/day):
Mercury(µg/1):
Sulfide (Ibs/day):
Chlorine (µg/l):
Recommended Limits
Wasteflow4.0 MGD
BOD5 Obs/day):
TSS (Ibs/day):
pH (Sin:
COD (Ibs/day):
Fecal col. (#/100ml):
Chromium (lbs/day):
NH3-N (µg/1):
Nickel (µg/1):
Total Phos ):(Tr Q)
Total Nitrogen *gM, lrh P
Cyanide (µg/1)• V
Phenols (Ibs/day):
Mercury (µg/1):
Sulfide (lbs/day):
Chlorine (µg/1):
TOWSAIETALS/CONVENTIONAL PARAMETERS
Chronic (Ceriodaphnia)
4.7%
4.7%
Mar, June, Sept, Dec.
Daily Max.
Monthly Average
532
304
1618
809
6-9
7399
3474
400
200
8.9
4.5
Monitor weekly
Monitor
Monitor
0.7 and 21 ug/l
Monitor
Daily Max.
Monthly Average
WQ or EL
668.8
333.4
EL
2604
1302
EL
6-9
EL
10,378
5,189
EL
400
200
EL
13.6
6.8
EL
Monitor weekly
0.5*
WQ
4.0* &r) 8 L0wjefjVQ
0.7 and 21 ug/1 WQ
Monitor
* Facility should be giiven 5 year schedule in order to meet TP and IN limits.
Limits Changes Due To:
Change in 7Q10 data
Change in stream classification
Relocation of discharge
Change in wasteflow
New Guideline Limitatios
Other (Lake Wylie Study and Report)
x BOD5, COD, TSS, Chromium.
x TP,TN
--x,_ Parameter(s) are water quality limited. For some parameters, the available load capacity of the immediate
receiving water will be consumed This may affect future water quality based effluent limitations for additional
dischargers within this portion of the watershed.

3
INSTREAM MONITORING REQUIREMENTS
Upstream Location: Cramerton Bridge
Downstream Location: Upper Armstrong Bridge
Parameters: Temp., DO, Cond., Fecal col.
Special instream monitoring locations or monitoring frequencies:
MISCELLANEOUS INFORMATION & SPECIAL CONDMONS
Adeauacv of Existing Treatment
Has the facility demonstrated the ability to meet the proposed new limits with existing treatment
facilities? Yes No
If no, which parameters cannot be met?
Would a "phasing in" of the new limits be appropriate? Yes No
If yes, please provide a schedule (and basis for that schedule) with the regional
office recommendations:
If no, why not?
Wasteload sent to EPA? (Major) (Y or N)
(If yes, then attach schematic, toxics spreadsheet, copy of model, or, if not modeled, then old
assumptions that were made, and description of how it fits into basinwide plan)
Additional Information attached? Y (Y or N) If yes, explain with attachments.
Toxicity Test sheet
kll-A NoAj
00 pw-P(A- char%

Facility Name �rQ�1 * � c- P�vdf Permit # A/000 �OJU Pipe #
CHRONIC TOXICITY PASS/FAIL PERMIT LIMIT (QRTRLY)
The effluent discharge shall at no time exhibit chronic toxicity using test procedures outlined in:
1.) The North Carolina Ceriodaphnia chronic effluent bioassay procedure (North Carolina Chronic Bioassay
Procedure - Revised *September 1989) or subsequent versions.
The effluent concentration at which there may be no observable inhibition of reproduction or significant mortality
is ' .7 % (defined as treatment two in the North Carolina procedure document). The permit holder shall perform
auartedy monitoring using this procedure to establish compliance with the permit condition. The first test will be
pe ormed after thi days from the effective date of this permit during the months of
ar Xv„ x1.c . Effluent sampling for this testis shall be performed at the NPDE S
permitted final effl ent discharge below all treatment processes.
g ses.
All toxicity testing results required as part of this permit condition will be entered on the Effluent Discharge
Monitoring Form (MR-1) for the month in which it was performed, using the parameter code TGP3B.
Additionally, DEM Form AT-1 (original) is to be sent to the following address:
Attention: Environmental Sciences Branch
North Carolina Division of
Environmental Management
4401 Reedy Creek Road
Raleigh, N.C. 27607
Test data shall be complete and accurate and include all supporting chemical/physical measurements performed in
association with the toxicity tests, as well as all dose/response data. Total residual chlorine of the effluent toxicity
sample must be measured and reported if chlorine is employed for disinfection of the waste stream.
Should any single quarterly monitoring indicate a failure to meet specified limits, then monthly monitoring will
begin immediately until such time that a single test is passed. Upon passing, this monthly test requirement will
revert to quarterly in the months specified above.
Should any test data from this monitoring requirement or tests performed by the North Carolina Division of
Environmental Management indicate potential impacts to the receiving stream, this permit may be re -opened and
modified to include alternate monitoring requirements or limits.
NOTE: Failure to achieve test conditions as specified in the cited document, such as minimum control organism
survival and appropriate environmental controls, shall constitute an invalid test and will require immediate
retesting(within 30 days of initial monitoring event). Failure to submit suitable test results will constitute
noncompliance with monitoring requirements.
7Q 10 i � S cfs
Permitted Flow Y • d MGD
IWC 1-2 %
Basin & Sub -basin CeAwr. 03-od - C
Receiving Stream Jo,A F zwk Ck wL�.
County e_n
Recommended by:
i
QCL P/F Version 9191

8.0
7.0
6.0
c 5.0
4.0
O
0 3.0
2.0
1.0
0.0
Predicted Dissolved Oxygen in the South Fork Catawba River during 7Q10
Conditions
Cramerton Automotive
Distance (Miles)
Spencer Mountain (Upstream) Armstrong Bridge (downstream)

WLA Notes
SRB
6/14/94
NC000603 3
Cramerton Automotive Products
SRB 6/14/94
Cramerton Automotive Products has applied for a renewal of there 4.0 MGD
discharge permit. Over the past two years the facility has been in compliance with all
permit limits.
A calibrated QUAL2E model of the South Fork Catawba River was used to
evaluate the impact of the facility on instream DO concentrations. The model predicts that
existing limits for oxygen consuming waste will protect the DO standard.
Cramerton Automotive Products has a significant nutrient component to its
discharge. In 1993, the average TP concentration was 2.5 mg/l and the average TN
concentration was 8.1 mg/1. Per the Lake Wylie Nutrient Management Strategy, it is
recommended that the facility be given a TP limit of 0.5 mg/1 and a TN limit of 4 mg/1..
The facility should be given a five year schedule in order to meet these new limits.
Effluent concentrations of chlorine have been high, averaging 0.91 mg/1 over the
past year.
Upstream -downstream monitoring do not suggest that instream DO or Fecal
coliform violations have occurred as a result of the discharge during the past two
summers. However, high instream Fecal coliform are indicated both above and below the
discharge. Instream Fecal coliform counts as high as 1350 per 100 ml have been recorded.

Monthly••
Discharger:. - • • • - Products
Permit Number:111.1
Receiving -•m: South Fork• • ••
••• 030836
' •
-��-
-I
��Film-�

�R
BURLINGTON
RESEARCH
February 22, 1994
Mr. Bob Kauffman
Cramerton Automotive Products
P.O. Box 279
Cramerton, NC 28032
Dear Mr. Kauffman:
Aquatic Bioassay Testing
Aquatic Toxicity Reduction Evaluations
Chemical Product Environmental Assessments
NPDES Testing
Reporting & Data Handling Services
Accompanying this letter is an APA Report for analyses conducted on the composite and grab
effluent samples received by BRI on January 28, 1994. After reviewing the report, sign the
last page (Page 13 of 13) and mail two (2) completed copies to:
Central Files
Division of Environmental Management
NCDEHNR
P.O. Box 29535
Raleigh, NC 27626
The unbound Analytical Report should not be submitted to the State but should be retained
for your files.
If you have any questions after reviewing the Report, please do not hesitate to call,
Sincerely,
BURIJOLqGTON RESEARCH, INC.
M A
Richard A. Diehl
Vice President, Toxicological &
Biological Services
RADJpmt
Enclosure: APA Report
615 Huffman Mill Road • Burlington, NC 27215 * Tel. [phone] • Fax [phone] Ext. 202

• f r r-P GG 7`i CiG • L Iril I UU1%L-.LI 1V 1 v1 1 1\L-JL.P V-1 1 � • .r• .. �
ANNUAL POLLUTANT ANALYSIS KOWITORING REQUIREMENT
REPORTING FORM A
(Revised June 1990)
1. Facility Information
NPOES Permit No: MCOOM033 Discharge (Pipe) Noi 001 Year: 1994
Facility Name: Cramerten Automotive Products LP Class: ITT County: Gaston
Person(s) Collecting Samples: Bcb_Sisk, C. Parton_, ,
Status of facility wastewater treatment operation on day of sampling: Typical : Yes X No
If no, explain briefly:
Analytical Laboratory: Burlinaton Research_ Inc. (LN* 94-01-506)
11. Sampling
24 hr composite for main sample/grab sample for purgeable fraction
Date Sampled: (composite sample)
Sampling begun (date, time).- Wednesday_ January 26, 1994: 0800
Sampling finished (date, time): Thursday, January 27, 1994: 0800
Date and time sampled (grab sample): Thursday. January 27, 1994s 0800 rr
Corresponding sample taken for toxicity testing:
No X
Page 1 of 13

I L-AP L(.. O-t CJW' A. Lr11 1 LJkJI\Li1 1V 1 \/1 1 1\L...ILI-11\1.1 1 �r
t t
INSTRUCTIONS
The purpose of this document and the NC DEHNR memo of October 30, 1990 (Tedder)/mailing of December 1990 is to standard-
ize the sampling, analysis and reporting procedures to be used for the Annual Pollutant Analysis Monitoring (APAM) Require-
ment as described in the permit.
Saul i no
1 - Take a 2A-hour composite sample from the final effluent during mid -week (Wednesday through Friday). Collect a grab
sempte for the volatile organic fraction when collection of the 24-hour composite sample is completed. FoiLow any other
sampling instructions provided by the laboratory performing the analysis.
2 - Indicate in the space provided on Page 1 of 13 this page whether a corresponding sample for toxicity testing was taken.
3 - Make note of any unusual wastewater treatment operating conditions occurring on the day of sampling in the space pro-
vided on Page 1 of 13.
A is
6 - Analyze the effluent for pollutants listed on the APAM form, including those to be identified and approximately quan-
tified under the 10 significant peaks rule, using appropriate EPA -approved methods for each of the analytic fractions.
Other analytical methods can be substituted only with prior, written approval of the Director of the Division of Environmen-
tal Management (DEM). Read and distribute to the laboratory performing the analysis the accompanying memo (Tedder, October
1990) clarifying analytical requirements.
5 - identify chemicals to be analyzed for according to the 10 significant peaks rule (as described in item 2 of the Annual
Pollutant Analysis Monitoring Requirement in the permit) using a GC/MS library search. Tentative identification is all that
is required; confirmation by standard injection is not necessary. Estimate the concentration of each based on an internal
standard having the closest retention time.
Reporting
6 - Ruentitatien Limit Targets that should be met are listed on this Revised APAM Reporting Form A. Report the use of any
higher quantition limit and an explanation as to why the listed quantitation limit target could not be met, Examples of
acceptable reasons for not meeting a quantitation limit target could be high background concentrations in a sample, or the
necessity for sample fraction dilution to bring a chemical to within a quantifiable concentration. List any quantitation
Limit different (whether higher or loner) from the target in the column provided for the purpose.
7 - if a chemical is found to be below the quantitation limit, report the concentration detected as Less than Car <s) the
quantitation limit in the appropriate space. Provide a concentration estimate for chemicals detected in concentrations
greater than the detection Limit and less than the quantitation limit. Enter the detection limit in parentheses beside the
estimate. Chemicals detected in concentrations above the quantitation limits must be quantified, quantitation limit and
detection limit are defined in the NC DEHNR memo (Tedder, October 1990). Enter the total number of peaks detected in
each analytic fraction in the appropriate space on this Revised APAM Form A. Report all concentrations in units of micro-
grams per liter (ug/L) and metals as total recoverable metat. If no peaks to be identified under the 10 significant peaks
rule are observed, enter "none'1 in the space provided for "other" compounds in each appropriate analytic fraction section.
Provide the concentration estimate and retention time for "unknown's as well as for "significant peaks' for which a struc-
tural assignment can be made.
8 - If "significant peaks" are found, provide probable molecular weight, library match probability, retention time, ident-
ification basis, and MS scan number each. In addition, list internal standards and their retention times.
9 - In the section labeled "Organic Analytical Information", CPage 11 of 13) include for each organic fraction the method,
extraction technique, GC operating conditions, and surrogate recovery. Report the size of the GC/MS library being utilized
in the appropriate space.
10 - Use copies of this Annual Pollutant Analysis Monitoring Revised Form A to report the results of the analysis. Both
the analytical Laboratory representative and the facility operator in responsible charge should sign completed forms
(last page).
11 - Mail two completed copies of the form (and the laboratory report, if submitted to the facility on a different form)
to: ATTN: Central Fites, Division of Environmental Management, HC DEHNR, P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, NC 27626. Mail the APAM
form separately from Discharge Monitoring Reports.
-
Page 2 of 13

A. Purgeable (Volatile Organic) Fraction, EPA Method 624
Number of chemicals detected in Fraction 2
Fraction STORET Number 84085
STORET
Number Conpound
ouantitation
Limit Target
Ouantitation
Limit*
Concentration
Detected
GC/Ms
Confirmation?
1. PoLLutants to he ana yz ror:
c 097r)—
(ug/L)
tug/L)
Yes
No
-34210
Acro ein
100
—�1.�
NO
Yes
Airy onitri Le
100
27—
NO
Yes
Benzene
—�—
ND
Tea
Br ie lorcmethane
5
1
3.9
Yes
32104
Browform
r—
�—
ND
Yes
Bromomet ane
------- TF—
------- T—
NO
Yes
21-dr
Carbon tetrae on e
5
1
ND
Yes
34301
ChLorobenzene
6
1
ND
Yes
-q3TT
Chioroethane
--w—
NO
T
-3079-
F-ch Forroethyl vinyl other
10
1
ND
�al
Yes
32106
Chloroform
5
1
Yes
-3ZZW
ChLoromethane
-- — - Tr—
—��
ND
Yes
32105
Di bromochloromethane
5
1
NO
Yes
,1-Dic oroei ane
—��
�—
ND
Yes
-343M-
-Dic oroei ane
5
ND
Yes
34501
1,1-Dichloroethytene
5
1
NO
Yes
34546
trans-1,2-DichloroethyLene
5
1
ND
Yes
-3ZSZr
1,2-DichLoropropane
�—
ND
Yes
34704
cis 1,3-Dichloropropene
5
1
NO
Yes
34699
trans 1,3-Diehlorapropene
5
1
NO
Yes
Et y zene
�—
��
ND
Yes
34423
Methylene chloride
5
1
NO
Yes
34516
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroehtane
7
1
NO
Yes
TetraG oroei y ene
�—
NO
Yes
3010
Toluene -
6
1
ND
Yes
-Tric oroet ane
1
NO
Yes
-TriG oroei ane
NO
Yes
39180
Trichloroethylene
5
1
ND
Yes
34488
Trichlorofluromethane
10
—�
ND
Yes
34I77-
vinyt chLorlde
�--- IT—
-
ND
—Yes
*��ai
event roim ouantitation Limit
target.
ND=None Detected. < and < a = As per instructions.
Page 3 of 13

t 1 LAJ LL J'•7 Wqj- .LC_rU 1 LVI\l.,.il IV ! vi 1 1♦`.dL..fll\\.{ 1
- r -
Y
A2. Other Purgeebtes Cup to 10 highest peaks).
Compound -
Probable
Molecular
weight
Est.
Conc.
CUOA)
Library Match
Probability
C%)
Retention
Time (RT)
CMin)
Identification Basis
CCheck at that appty)
scan
Runber
Library
Match
Manual
interpretation
RT
None
Comptete only if non -targeted compounds are present;
•
Internet Standard
Retention
Time
(Min)
Pente uoro nzene
7 S
1,4-Difluore zone
18.
C or nzene - d5.
1,4-Dichlorobenzene - &
31.1.5
Pase 4 of 13

• � 1 1 `� VV �1 CJV' iLrll 1 i/Vl�`il IV 1 v� 1 1�`v`I ����.� �
9
B. Acid Extracteble Fraction EPA Method 625
Number of chemicals detected in Fraction
Fraction STORET Number 45562
STORET
Humber Compound
Quantization
Limit Target
Quantization
Limit*
concentration
Detected
GC/MS
Confirmation?
1. PolLutants to be ana yZ or;
U L)
(ug/L)
(ug/L)
Yes
No
34452
�34
4-Chlorc-3-methylpheno
HD
—Yes
2-Worophviot
10
ND
Yes
34601—
34606
3!4616 '
, - Mc oro eno
NO
Yes
2,4-Dimethyl eno
10
ND
—Yes
2,4-Dinitrcpheno
NO
Yes
es
�34657-
34591
3
r
3494
-Met y - , - initro eno
ND
--
2-Nitrophenol
10
KD
Yes
4-witrophenoL
50
NO
Yes
y
PentachlorophonoL
NO
Yes
Yes
Phenol
10
ND
73=
,-Trichlorophenol
10
ND
*[f dt
Brent trom auantitation Limit
target
ND --None Detected. < and < > = As per instructions.
Page 5 of 13

82. Other Acid Extractables Cup to 10 highest peaks).
identification Basis
(Check all that apply)
Probable Est. Library Match Retention
Compound Molecular Conc. Probability Time (RT) Library Manual Sean
Weight Ws/L) (%) (Min) Match Interpretation RT Number
None
w
�Y
Cou pleze only if non -targeted compounds are present:
Internal Standard
Retention
Time
(Min)
1,6 - 0ichlorobenzene -
Naphthalene -d81
Acena t ene -
• 48
Phenanthrene - d10
26.37
Chrysene - 12
36.35
Pery ene d12
-
Page 6 of 13

• ; 1. `� `V J� VV iV.1 u 1 ✓VI�`il IV 1 V• • • •�r/�• •• •V•
f,
0
�1 •
C. Base/Neutral Fraction, EPA Method 625
Number of chemicals detected in Fraction
Fraction STORET Number 45563
STORET
Number Compound
Quentitation
Limit target
Cug/L)
Qua ntitation
Limit*
(us/L)
Concentration
Detected
WOO
Gs/ns
Confirmation?
Yes No
1. PoLLutanzs to be ana yz or:
34205
Aeenaphthene
10
NO
Yes
�a
Acenapht y ene
10
ND
Ye6
-L2'2
Ant racene
r_—
39120
Benzldine
so
ND
Yes
Benz (a) anthracene
ND
Yes
10
36526
3azr
Benzo (a) pyrene
es
ND
6enzo (b) ftuorahthene
10
ND
Yes
31 D
-3-4521
Benzo C9 i) perylene
10
ND
Yes
5446
Benzo ( ) f Luorenthene
10
ND
Yes
342 8
Bis(2-chloroet oxy) methane
ND
Yes
3z 4-T?-
Bls(2-chtorcethyl) ether
ND
i
Yes
10
34283
B s( -c oroiscpropy ) ether
ND
Yes
9
Sis(2-et y exy ) phthalate
10
ND
Yes
33— 4636-
/6-BromophenyL phenyl ether
10
ND
Yes
3429
ButyL benzyLt a ate
ND
Yes
10
34581
2-Ch orona thalene
10
ND
Yes
3- 9i
- lorophenyl phenyl ether
10
ND
Yes
-31-320
Chrysene
10
ND
Yes
D1 nz (a,h) anthracene
10
ND
Yes
34556
,2-Dichlorobenzene
10
ND
Yes
NO
Yes�
54566
1.3-Dichtorahenzene
10
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
ND
Yes
10
-Trb3r
3,3-Diehlorobenzi ine
20
ND
Yes
Diet y t a ate
ND
Yes
10
743 1
pimethyl pht B ate
10
ND
Yes
39110
Di-n- ty phthalate
20
21.6
i
Yes
-3K6T -
,-Dinitroto uene
10
ND
Yes
,-Dinitroto uene
10
No
Yes
34626
36 96
Di-n-octyl phthalate
10
NO
Yes
1,2-Diphenythydrazine
To
ND
Yes
343 6
Ftuorenthene
10
NO
Yes
34381
Fluorene
10
ND
Yes
Continued.
ND=None Detected. < and < > As per intructions.
Page 7 of 13

IL r.
C. Base/NeutraL Fraction (Continued)
STOREY
Number Compound
ouantitation
Limit Target
ouantitation
Limit*
concentration
Detected
UcM5
Confir=tion?
1. Pollutants to be analyzed or:
(ug/L)
_ (ug/L)
(ug/L)
Yes
No
00
3439T—
�34386
HexachLoroMnftene
10
ND
Yes
Yes
Yes
Hexachlorobut iene
10
WD
HexachLorocycLopenvadiene
10
ND
ND
34396-
Nexachloroet ane
10
Yes
Yes
34403
34�
Indent ,2,3-cd) pyrene
10
ND
lacphorone
ND
Yes
34696
Na lene
t a
10
NO
Yes
Yes
34447-
Nitrobenzene
ND
34438
N-m tros tmethylamine
10
KD
Yes
44 88
1
ND
Yes
M•nitroso- i-n-propyLemine
34433
10
ND
Yes
N-n trosodiphenylamine
-31-1661 -
10
No
Yes
Phenanthrene
3 ZW
KD
Yes
10
Pyrene
10
ND
Yes
72,-Trichlorobeniene
'If—fif different from quantmtation target.
KD=done Detected. < and < 2, = As per instructions.
Page 8 of 13

i 1 LLO . " J'9 G.11-/ • i ..11 II / `N.d1 •V al Iv . v. . • .�r�. .. -
V. Other ease/Neutrals (up to 10 highest peaks)_
Retention
Library Manual Scan
-identification Basis
(Check all that apply)
(M;n) Match Interpretation RI Number
"3S; �� x
Probable
Est.
Library Match
Complete only if non -targeted compounds are present:
Retention
Internal Standard
Time
(Min)
11.85
1.4 - Dichlorobenzene -
Naphthalene -
15.71
Acenaphthene -
Phenent retie - d10
Chrysene - d12'
Pervlene -
Page 9 of 13

a
i
!'
D. Orsanochlorine/Orgenophosphorus Pesticides and PC8's
Number of chemicals detected in Fraction 0
Fraction STORET Number 00188
STORET Quentitation Quantitation Concentration
Number Compound Limit Terget Limit* Detected
1. PoMutants to be ana yz or: (ug/L) (ug/L) tug L)
Organochlorine Pesticides/PC81s: EPA Method 8030
aldrin 0.05 0.25 ND
39337 a a-BHC OA5 .25 ND
38 @eta-SHC 0.05 0.2-5
3Q 9 Delta-aHe 0.1 0.25 ND
39340 Gamma-BHC (Lindane) 0.05 0.25-
39350 Chlor ane 0.2 0.25 ND
39310 '-DDD .2 ND
39325- ,6'-DDE .1 0.25 ND
39300 4,4'-DDT 0.1 0.25 ND
39380 Dte rin 0.02 0.25 ND
'r Endesulfan I WOO 0.1 0.25 NO
-3I76- Endosulfan II (beta) .1 0.25 NO
34351 FnX;Fu-Lfan sulfate 0.T 0.25 ND
'PT9-0 Endrin O.D6o. No
-3630 Endrin al ehy e o.2 0.25 ND
3 194 0 Heptachtor 0.05 6.25 ND
39420 Heptac or epoxide 0.8 0.25 ND
39480 Met oxychtor 0. O.ZS ND
3- 75 5 Mirex 0. 0.25 ND
3� Toxaphene 2.4 2.5 KD
34671 Fee 1016 0.5 1.0 ND
PCB 1221 0.5 1.0 ND
39492 PCB 1232 0.5 1.0 Nb
39496 PCB 0.5 .0 ND
39 0 PCB 1248 0.5 1.0 IUD
39504 PCB 1254 1.0 1.0 ND
39508 PCB 1 1.0 1.0 ND
NDOone Detected. < and < > > As per instructions.
* values listed are quantitation limits consistently achievable in wastewater matrices.
Con
Dual Col.
Yes
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
rmat
ow
GC/MS
Yes
No
Page 10 of 13

( 1 LL.I• LL .J"Y G.Iv • i.J(-11 1 LIJI \V it �V 1 v� i � \�...ir..� - \\.� �
D. Pesticides (Continued).
STORET Compound
Number
Quatitation I
Limit Target
I
ouantitation
Limit*
Concentration
Detected
Contirmationa
Dual Col. GC/KS
Yes No Yes No
Y
,_�—
Y
1. Po utants to be analyzed for:
prganophosphorus Pesticides; EPA Method
(ug/L)
625 8080
(ug/L)
-
(ug/L)
3
Demeton
RD
40
i
Parat ion (ethyl)
0.6
ND
E. Herbicides, EPA Method 8150
Number of chemicals detectid in Fraction 0
Fraction STORET Number 00148
STORET
ouantitation
Quantitation
Number Compound
Limit Target
Limit*
(ug/L)
(USA)
1. Pollutants to be analyz or:
0.1
39790
-D
12
39045
0.1
Si vex
397/4.
2
0.1
.2-3-T
�If different
rom qusntitstion limit
target
NDallone Detectable.
and < > r. As per instructions.
Organic Analytical Information:
Concentration
Detected
conTirmationr
Dual Column
WOO
Yes
Y
No
ND
ND
T
ND
Organic Fraction
Method
Extraction
GC Operating Conditions
Column Description
Surrogates (Spikes)
Batch
N/A
Continuous
Length X ID, Film Thickness,
Column Type, Carrier Gas & Flow
Rate, Teaperature Program
Compound
Recovery
Purgeeble
624
75m x 0. jam, 3.Omm, D-V-624
Bromo uoro nzene
He, cc/min. 36 C ( Min).
1,2•D�c oroet ane-d4
C a C/min. C, 10 C/min.
o uene-
-
Acid Extractable
`25
X
30m x 0.32 m, , D8-5
-F uorophenol
Pheno -d —�
, , ri bromopheno t+�
2-Ftuorabi WenyL7732—
Nitrobenzene- 30
-Ter eny -d14 94
-Phenol
o, 2cc/min., 40 C (4 min)
X
C, V C/min.
Base/Neutral Ext.
625
30M x 0.32mn, 1.0mn, DO- ,
He, cc/min., 40 C (4min)
3200 C, 80 C/min.
Example:
Acid Extractable
625
X
30m x 0.2 mm, 0-0 urn, DB-5,
He, 30 Wsec, 4gC (4 min) -
270 C, 10 lmin
GC/MS Library size
(number
of reference
spectra):
42,222
Page 11 of 13

� 1 LPL/ " �1 (.11� • ill /1 1 vI..11 ♦►�i1 �V � v � 1 •�v�1 N ♦V� �
� � f
F. Metals and Other Chemicals
wumber of Metals and other Chemicals (as listed below) detected in Sample
9
Fraction STORET Muaber 78240
STORE? Quantitation 4uentitation
Limit*
Concentration
Detected
Number Compound Limit Target
. PoLlutants to ana YZ or: (ug/L)
WO
OWL)
011uz A uminun 50
50
-220
0 9-1 Ant mony 50
*
01002 Arsenic 10
BDL
0—�� Beryllium
5**
60L
27 cwbiun 2
0.5'=
BOL
5
D
—01034 Mromium
01042copper 22**
0
-1051 lead 10
1*s
-- 3
711905- Mercury 0.2
BDL
01!' 067 N i c e 10
01147— Selenium
5**
SOL
-UTVr 5
TIr
L
s ver
010922tnc 10
79
2. Other Inorganics:
0100 Barium 500
Chloride 1000
500
0
BDL
��, Cyanl
"OWT Fluoride 0
100
2W
If 0erent from quantitetion limit target
by Graphite Furnace AA. Mercury analyzed ey
Cold vapor Method. Zinc analyzed by
'* Lowest Cuantitstion Limit attainable
Flame AA and Barium anetyzed by ICP/AES.
BDL = Delow Detection Limit
Page 12 of 13

• 1 LL LL J�f C.II.J • 1"7fi1 1 1JVI %L-&I 1V I" 1 I "..d`1-11 %%-I 1
� � r
Analytical Laboratory Representatives:
' w
A-j!-TV
Dr. David Y. Chang
senior Scientist, Chromatogrehy services, Manager
Made G. Edwards
Operations officer
Date
Facility Operator in Responsible Charge CORQ :
I certify that this report is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge:
Signed: Date:
Page 13 of 13

BFB TUNE CHECK REPORT
1991 CLP Criteria
'Datafile : BFBO131 Date : 01/31/94
Scan No. : 402 to 404 - 391 Time : 10:26
50 ng BFB.
M/E
ION ABUNDANCE CRITERIA
ABUNDANCE
TUNE
50
8.0
- 40.0% OF MASS 95
14.22
PASS
75
30.0
- 66.0% OF MASS 95
34.05
PASS
95
Base
Peak, 100% relative abundance
100.00
PASS
96
5.0
- 9.0% of mass 95
6.57
PASS
173
Less
than 2.0% of mass 174
0.31(
0.5)1
PASS
174
50.0
- 120.0% of mass 95
68.97
PASS
175
4.0
- 9.0% of mass 174
4.74(
6.9)1
PASS
176
93.0
- 101.0% of mass 174
65.52(
95.0)1
PASS
177
5.0
- 9.0% of mass 176
4.20(
6.4)2
PASS

f LLB GG 7�i YJG • 14Y'1!'1 rjum-L1 1%3 1 VI 1 1xr-QL- tl\%,1 1
DFTPP TUNE CHECK REPORT
1986 SW 846 Criteria
•Datafile DFT0204
Scan No. 302
50 ng DFTPP
Analysis Date : 02/04/94
Analysis Time : 15:50
M/E ION ABUNDANCE CRITERIA ABUNDANCE TUNE
1
30. .- 60.0% of mass 1
36.82
PASS
68
Less than 2.0% of mass 69
0.00(
0.0)1
PASS
69
Mass 69 relative abundance
40.59
PASS
70
Less then 2.0% of mass 69
0.00(
0.0)1
PASS
127
40.0 - 60.0% of mass 198
40.59
PASS
197
Less than ids of mass 198
0.00
PASS
198
Base peak, 100% relative abundance
100.00
PASS
199
5 - 9% of mass 198
6.69
PASS
275
10 - 30% of mass 198
21.03
PASS
365
greater than 1.0% of mass 198
1.99
PASS
441
Present, but less then mass 443
11.09
PASS
442
>40% of mass 198
69.04
PASS
443
17 - 23% of mass 442
13.28(
19.2)2
PASS

r.r-D' Gc. 74 YJti- L4mi i rjum-Li-uz i Vil me z)r-rtr%k n tug iJ
j. Analytical Services • Aquatic Bioassay Testing • Aquatic Toxicity Reduction Evaluations
AATCC Testing Services a NPDES Testing • Reporting ilr Data Handling Services
PMN Aquatic B,oassay EvaluationS
a '
Burlington
Research Post Office Box 2481 9615 Huffman Mill Road o [phone] -P Burlington. NC 27216.2481
ANNUAL POLLUTANT ANALYSIS MONITORING (APAK REQUIREMENT
Facility Information
Please provide the following information so that it can be entered on the APAM Reporting Form
A (Revised June 1990) that will be submitted to you by Burlington Research.
Facility Name: NC Cramerton Automotive Products LP.
NPDES Permit Number: NC 00
06033
III
Class:
Person(s) Collecting Samples (please print):
Discharge (Pipe) Number. 001
County:
Gaston
Bob Sisk
C, Parton
Status of facility wastewater treatment operation on day of sampling:
Typical:
If no, explain briefly:
X Yes No
Was a corresponding sample taken and submitted to BRI or another laboratory for toxicity
testing?
Yes
X No
Please RETURN this Facility Information sheet with your samples and a completed Chain of
Custody Recoid. Accurate collection information includes composite and grab sample collection
dates and tunes_
o:lapa\facilinf

F c
1111
lurlington
tesearch
$15 "Ullman M111 A02d 1.
Sudinglaq, NC 2M5
Cole) 584aw
Fax t9:9) SB4•M564. Ext. 202
SAMPLE
ID
FOR CLIENT USE:
CHAIN OF CUSTODY RECORD
Cramerton
Automotive Products
LR CONTACT PERSON, Bob SISK
Y
.w
;LIENT:
4ZO-A8257522
Phone Number:
Cn
'acilityisite r
t: C
'
r
`
Purchase Order 4:
R
;ampler: (Print) Bob
Sisk (Signature)
FOR LAB
SAMPLETYPE
USE ONLY
o.
SAMPLE
COLLECTION
NO. OF
O
x
COMPOSITE
CON- ANALYSES
TAINERS REQUIRED
yy..
W 1-
0
1-- ^„
~
Q
O RAt3
SENT
M L
w d
u¢i
DATE DATE
W
N z
•--
W
j
TIME TIME
HAND AUTO
F-
a
G
STARTED ENDED
•
C
J
8 ; 00Ai•1 8 : 0041
11 II Il
11 It II
1727/94 1/27/94
1/27/94 1/27/94
re)
Shipped by: (Signature)
Method of Shipment: FEDERAL EXPRESS
FOR LAB USE ONLY
Received in Lab FROM: (Signature)
Method of Shipment:
].tjCpEM
AEAM CHLORIDLIFLUORIDE
2
EPA 625 ACID EXTRACT Base Neutral Pestiside
X
X
1
METALS
X
1
TOTAL CYANIDE
X
3
EPA 624 YOLATILES Li 'd
by: (Signature)
Dale: Time:
by: (Signature)
Dale: Time:
cefve fa l•ab
Si ature)
Date: Time:
/ /`�
•
F
J
�
Sample late city Co ment:
- 0%9 . ^"r%4,�Tnev I:n4rle1nt i--CLIENT- ACKNOWLEOQEMENT
A. a FATS A CaL ►Q iNI

10:30 FROM DEI-W M70F ESJILLE TO
Post -It" brand fax transmittal memo 7671 Iaof pages . 4-
/ Fa%Fp� Fa%I
II �d`('• �3• (oD O
DEM RPLEIG-1 P.01
RECEIVED JUN 011992
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment, Health and Natural Resources
Division of Pnvitonmental Management
512 North Salistwry Street • Raleigh, North Carolina 27611
James G. Martin, Governor George T. Everett, Ph, D.
William W. Cobey, Jr., Secretary Director
May 29, 1992
Mr. Robert G. Kaufman
Cramerton Automotive Products, L P.
PO Sox 279
Cramerton, NO 28032
Subject: NPDES Permit No. NC0006033
Cramerton Automotive Products, L. P.
Gaston County
Dear Mr. Kaufman:
On March 16, 1992, the Division of Environmental Management issued NPDES Permit No.
NC0006033 to Cramerton Automotive Products, L. P. A review of the permit file has Indicated
that an error was inadvertently made in the permit. Accordingly, we are forwarding herewith
modifications to the subject permit to correct the error. These permit modifications are issued
to change the monitoring frequency for sulfides, total chromium, and ammonia as nitrogen from
weekly to monthly monitoring.
Please find enclosed an amended effluent page which should be inserted into your permit.
The old effluent page should be discarded. All other terms and conditions contained In the original
permit remain unchanged and in full effect. These permit modifications are issued pursuant to
the requirements of North Carolina General Statutes 143.215.1 and the Memorandum of
Agreement between North Carolina and the U. S. Environmental Protection Agency.
If any parts, measurement frequencles or sampling requirements Contained in this permit
are unacceptable to you, you have the right to an adjudicatory hearing upon written request
within thirty (30) days following receipt of this letter. This request must be in the form of a
written petition, conforming to Chapter 1508 of the North Carolina General Statutes, and filed
with the Office of Administrative Hearings, Post Off -se Drawer 27447, Raleigh, North Carolina
27611-7447. Unless such demand is made, this decision shall be final and binding.
Pollution Prevvmon Pays
P.O. Box 27687, Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-7687 Telephone [phone]
An Equal Opportunity A1Tumadvt Action P.mploya

3
r
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
May 27, 1992
• r+
t0 r';
lJ
MEMORANDUM TO: Don Safrit r/ r: =Irn
ui;z rr
FROM: D. Rex Gleason ;"�; C.
co m� r-
PREPARED BY: Richard Bridgeman _ t,-,3-c
SUBJECT: Cramerton Automotive Products, L.P. w �;
NPDES Permit No. NC0006033
cs�
Gaston County
Enclosed is a copy of a memorandum (with attachment) dated
March 23, 1992 which concerns a telephone request on 20 March
from Robert Kaufman of the subject Company. Mr. Kaufman had
advised this Office that the reissued Permit, which became
effective on March 16, 1992, included erroneous monitoring
frequencies. The memorandum substantiated Mr. Kaufman's concerns -
and requested that the Permits and Engineering Unit take
appropriate action to resolve the issue.
On 20 May the writer received another call from Mr. Kaufman
advising him that the Company had not been notified of any action
relative to the 20 March telephone request.
Although aware of the explicit hearing request instructions
contained in the Permit cover letter, this Office is concerned
that the Division's inaction on what should have been a simple
procedure to correct its own error may have precluded the
Permittee's right to make a formal request for an adjudicatory
hearing.
As requested in the previous memorandum, if appropriate,
please reissue a corrected Permit or notify the Permittee that
the Permit issued effective March 16, 1992 is final and binding.
Please advise this Office if further information or action
is needed.
Enclosure
cc: Steve Tedder
Mack Wiggins
rmb

DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
March 23, 1992
MEMORANDUM TO: Don Safrit �/
FROM: D. Rex Gleason �1/�13
PREPARED BY: Richard Bridgeman".�
SUBJECT: Cramerton Automotive Products, L.P.
NPDES NO. NC0006033
Gaston County
Effective March 16, 1992, the subject Permit was reissued to
reflect a change in name and ownership, as well as to update the
permit to current DEM_regulations (Fecal Coliform limit).
The writerreceived notification (telephone) from Mr. Robert
Kaufman with Cramerton Automotive Products on 20 March that
mistakes may have been made in the reissued subject Permit.
Based on a file review, be advised that it may not have been
appropriate to use the Permit issued August 14, 1989 (effective
September 1, 1989) as a guide for reissuance. Correspondence
from DEM dated October 18, 1989 advised the former permittee (JPS
Autoproducts Corporation) that the Permit had been modified to
reflect changes in accordance with a request from the Company.
The modified Permit changed the monitoring frequencies for Total
Chromium, Sulfides, and Ammonia Nitrogen from weekly to monthly.
A copy of the Permit modification is enclosed for
clarification. As appropriate, please correct the just issued
Permit. Should it be determined that a revision is not
appropriate, the Permittee, Mr. Robert Kaufman (704/825-7505),
should be notified, since the Company may wish to file for an
adjudicatory hearing.
Please advise this Office if further information or action
is needed.
Enclosure
cc: Mack Wiggins
P

,JJ'Y
State of North Carolina
Department of Natural Resources and Community Development
Division of Environmental Management
512 North Salisbury Street • Raleigh, North Carolina 27611
James G. Martin, Governor
William W. Cobey, Jr., Secretary
Mr. Sam Griggs
JPS Autoproducts Corporation
PO Box 208
Greenville, SC 29602
Dear Mr. Griggs:
R. Paul Wilms
Director
T. C. T'::r7. Or NATURAL
October 18, 1989 " "-C" AND
F DLt'cLOr.1rTN-F
Subject: Modificationkr>'hPI E -L- 7iiAl OFF14
Permit No. NC0006033
JPS Autoproducts Corporation
Gaston County
In accordance with your request for permit modification, the Division of Environmental
Management is forwarding herewith a modification to the subject permit. This modification is to
require monthly instead of weekly monitoring requirements for total chromium, sulfides, and
ammonia as nitrogen.
A revised effluent sheet is attached and should be inserted into your permit. The old
effluent sheet should be discarded.
All other terms and conditions contained in the original permit remain unchanged and in full
effect. This modification is issued pursuant to the requirements of North Carolina General Statute
143-215.1 and the Memorandum of Agreement between North Carolina and the U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency dated December 6, 1983. This permit modification becomes
effective immediately.
If this decision is unacceptable to you, you have the right to an adjudicatory hearing upon
written request within thirty (30) days following receipt of this letter. This request must be in the
form of a written petition, conforming to Chapter 150B of the North Carolina General Statutes,
and filed with the Office of Administrative Hearings, Post Office Drawer 11666, Raleigh, North
Carolina, 27604. Unless such a demand is made, this decision shall be final and binding.
Pollution Prevention Pays
P.O. Box 27687, Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-7687 Telephone [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer

If you have any questions concerning this permit, please contact Mr. Dale 4vercash at
telephone number [phone].
Sincerely,
i
R. Paul Wilms
1
Enclosure
cc: Central Files
.Mooresville Regional Office
Technical Support Branch
Mr. Jim Patrick, EPA
J

A. (1) . 1<I'F AMW LIMITATIONS AND MONITORING REQUIREMENTS Final
During the period beginning on the effective date of the Permit and
Permittee is authorized to discharge from outfall(s) serial number(s) 001.
and monitored by the Permittee as specified below:
Effluent Characteristics
Discharge Limitations
Lbs da
Monthly Avg. Daily Max.
Flow
BOD, 5Day, 20 Degrees C
304.0
532.0
Total Suspended Residue
809.0
1618.0
COD
3474.0
7399.0
Sulfide
8.9
17.8
Phenols
0.7
Total Chromium
4.5
8.9
Temperature
,Dissolved Oxygen
Conductivity
NH3 as N
Total Residual Chlorine
Fecal Coliform (geometric
mean)
Total Nitrogen (NO2 + NO3
+ TKN)
Total Phosphorus
Chronic Toxicity ****
Pollutant Analysis ****'*
Other Units (Specify)
Monthly Avg. Daily Max.
4.0 MGD
-h-*
1000.00,/100 ml
21.0 ug/1
1
2000 4100 ml
NPDES No. NC000603::, f.
lasting until expiration, L;•
Such discharges shall be limited
Monitoring
Requirements
**Measurement
Sample
*Sample
Fre ency
Type
Location
Continuous
Recording
I or E
Daily
Composite
E
Daily
Composite
E
Weekly
Composite
E
Monthly
Grab
E
Weekly
Grab
E
Monthly
Composite
E
Daily
Grab
E, U, D
`
Grab
U, D
Grab
U, D
Monthly
Composite
E
Daily
Grab
E
Daily
Grab
E, U, D
Monthly
Composite
E
Monthly
Composite
E
Quarterly
Composite
E
Annually
E
* I - Influent, E - Effluent, U - Upstream at bridge just above outfall, D - Downstream at upper Armstrong Bridge.
All stream samples shall be grab samples.
Daily stream sampling frequency may be reduced at each sampling station to one time per week except during the
months of June, July, August, and September when the frequency must be no less that three times per week at each
sampling station.
** Daily means every day on which a wastewater discharge occurs except Saturdays, Sundays, and legal holidays.
*** The temperature of the effluent shall be such as not to cause an increase in the temperature of the receiving
stream of more that 2.8 Degrees C and*in no case cause the ambient water temperature to exceed 32 Degrees C.
**** Chronic Toxicity (Ceriadophnia) P/F at 4.7%, March, June, September, December, See Part III, Condition No. G.
See Part III, Condition No. H.
The pH shall not be less than 6.0 standard units nor greater than 9.0 standard units and shall be monitored
daily at the effluent.
There shall be no discharge of floating solids or visible foam in other than trace amounts.

% <J ? A
■
45*RgTad 47Mc)—l7 ✓E
X = -2 9 /�
2 �
7 /L
�co
z sr`% pug ,WOOLQ �
r" . 2MClo7�R I daYr+C,S � G C'ldYl
2 -3 m4ox-oivl m a5lna C
XAi-,AJ C��KaG �� ��y�,,kJ 4
.far ,
��nI
y l/� �v/ �Iz�i�vfovi ✓c : ��w+s

dy►SW�o
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment, Health and Natural Resources
Division of Environmental Management
512 North Salisbury Street • Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535
James G. Martin, Governor George T. Everett, Ph.D.
William W. Cobey, Jr., Secretary Director
March 16, 1992
Mr. Robert G. Kaufman
Cramerton Automotive Products, L. P.
PO Box 279
Cramerton, NC 28032
Subject: NPDES No. NC0006033
Cramerton Automotive Products, L. P.
formerly issued to
JPS Autoproducts Corporation
Gaston County
Dear Mr. Kaufman:
In accordance with your request received February 20, 1992, we are forwarding
herewith the subject permit now issued to Cramerton Automotive Products, L. P. The only
changes in this permit are in name and ownership as well as update the permit to current DEM
regulations. This permit is issued pursuant to the requirements of North Carolina General
Statute 143-215.1 and the Memorandum of Agreement between North Carolina and the U. S.
Environmental Protection Agency dated December 6, 1983.
If any parts, measurement frequencies or sampling requirements contained in this
permit are unacceptable to you, you have the right to an adjudicatory hearing upon written
request within thirty (30) days following receipt of this letter. This request must be in the
form of a written petition, conforming to Chapter 150B of the North Carolina General Statutes,
and filed with the Office of Administrative Hearings, Post Office Drawer 27447, Raleigh, North
Carolina 27611-7447. Unless such demand is made, this decision shall be final and binding.
Please take notice that this permit is not transferable. Part Il, E.4. addresses the
requirements to be followed in case of change in ownership or control of this discharge.
This permit does not affect the legal requirement to obtain other permits which may be
required by the Division of Environmental Management or permits required by the Division of
Land Resources, Coastal Area Management Act or any other Federal or Local governmental
permit that may be required.
Pollution Prevention Pays
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone] -
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer

If you have any questions concerning this permit, please contact Mr. Mack Wiggins at
telephone number 919/733-5083.
inc eIy,
George T. Eve
Director
cc: Mr. Jim Patrick, EPA
Mooresville Regional Office
Compliance
Central Files
Technical Support Branch

North Carolina Division of Environmental Management
Water Quality Section/intensive Survey Group
August 2, 1991
To: Ruth Swanek
Through: Jay Sauber
From: Howard Bryant 141K O
Subject: Long term BOD Analysis for JPS Autoproducts Corporation (100%)
County: Gaston
NPDES # NC0006033
Receiving Stream: South Fork Catawba River
Sub -basin: 30836
MY
BM
NH3--N
TKN-N
NOX-N
TN-N
0
0.53
1.2
1.70
2.9
5
2.68
0.20
2.2
1.70
3.9
10
4.32
0.34
1.6
1.70
3.3
15
5.60
0.43
2.2
1.60
3.8
20
6.73
0.46
2.0
1.60
3.6
25
7.95
0.39
2.3
1.70
4.0
30
10.12
0.03
1.1
2.00
3.1
35
11.21
40
11.94
50
13.29
60
14.68
0.01
1.3
1.90
3.2
70
16.02
80
16.80
90
17.49
100
18.20
110
18.72
120
19.21
Date Collected: March 27, 1991
Collected
by: K. Smith
Test
evaluation: excellent
0 8 0 0- 0 8 0 0
pH: 7.9
Seeded:
seeded
cc: Central Files
Regional Water Quality Supervisor