20160372 Ver 2_StonyFork_97085_MY5_2023_20240226

Monitoring Report MY05

Stony Fork Restoration Site
Upper Neuse River Basin - 03020201
Monitoring Year 05
DMS Contract 6830

DMS Project Number 97085
DWR #: 2016-0372
USACE Action ID: 2016-00875
Johnston County, North Carolina

Prepared for:
NCDMS, 1652 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1652

Monitoring Data Collected: 2023
Date Submitted: January 2024
Stony Fork Restoration Site KCI Associates of NC, PA
DMS Project # 97085 2023-MY05

Monitoring and Design Firm

Prepared by:

KCI Associates of North Carolina
4505 Falls of Neuse Road
Suite 400
Raleigh, NC 27609
[phone]

Project Contact: Adam Spiller
Email: [e-mail]

KCI ASSOCIATES OF N ORTH C AROLINA, P.A. www.kci.com
Employee-Owned Since 1988

MEMORANDUM

Date: February 26, 2024
To: Danielle Mir, DMS Project Manager
From: Adam Spiller, Project Manager
KCI Associates of North Carolina, PA
Subject: MY-05 Monitoring Report Comments
Stony Fork DMS #6830, Contract 006830
Neuse River Basin CU 030202018
Johnston County, North Carolina

Please find below our responses in italics to the MY-05 Monitoring Report comments from NCDMS
received on February 14, 2024 for the Stony Fork Restoration Site.

1. Table 1 - Please display credits to 3-decimal places.
KCI Response: This error has been corrected.

2. CCPV – DMS recommends showing the non-credited streams inside the easement with a
symbology of a grey /black line labeled “non-credited stream.” Below is a rough sketch of the
estimated locations of these streams.
KCI Response: At the start of the project, the features in question were determined to not
constitute streams. These ephemeral drains were stabilized as part of the project and have been
added to the CCPV and labeled “Stabilized Drainages.”

3. A thick patch of pines is starting to grow downstream of the external crossing (Sherill Farm Dr)
on SF2. Please keep an eye on it and thin it if necessary.
KCI Response: KCI will monitor the pine and other nuisance vegetation on site and treat as
necessary.

4. Mature privet was found sparsely throughout the project. Please continue treatment.
KCI Response: KCI will continue to monitor and treat invasives as necessary.

Sincerely,

Adam Spiller
Project Manager

E NGINEERS  S CIENTISTS  S URVEYORS  C ONSTRUCTION M ANAGERS
4505 Falls of Neuse Road Suite 400 Raleigh, NC 27609 [phone] [phone] Fax
Stony Fork Restoration Site KCI Associates of NC, PA
DMS Project # 97085 2023-MY05
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Project Summary ........................................................................................................................................... 1
Monitoring Results ........................................................................................................................................ 2
Figure 1. Project Site Vicinity Map .............................................................................................................. 4
References ..................................................................................................................................................... 5

Appendix A – Background Tables
Table 1. Project Components and Mitigation Credits ................................................................................... 7
Table 2. Project Activity and Reporting History .......................................................................................... 8
Table 3. Project Contacts .............................................................................................................................. 9
Table 4. Project Information ....................................................................................................................... 10

Appendix B – Visual Assessment Data
CCPV .......................................................................................................................................................... 13
Table 5. Visual Stream Morphology Assessment ....................................................................................... 18
Table 6. Vegetation Condition Assessment ................................................................................................ 24
Photo Reference Points ............................................................................................................................... 25
Permanent Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos .......................................................................................... 29
Random Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos .............................................................................................. 32
Easement Encroachment Area Photos ........................................................................................................ 33

Appendix C – Vegetation Plot Data
Table 7. Stem Count Total and Planted by Plot and Species ...................................................................... 35

Appendix D – Stream Measurement and Geomorphology Data
Table 8. Cross-section Morphology Data Table ......................................................................................... 39
Cross-section Monitoring Plots ................................................................................................................... 42

Appendix E – Hydrologic Data
Table 9. Verification of Bankfull Events .................................................................................................... 59
Bankfull Verification and Precipitation Plot ............................................................................................... 60
Table 10. Verification of Stream Flow ....................................................................................................... 61
Table 11. Stream Flow Criteria Attainment ................................................................................................ 61
Stream Flow Verification and Precipitation Plots ....................................................................................... 62

Stony Fork Restoration Site KCI Associates of NC, PA
DMS Project # 97085 1 2023-MY05
PROJECT SUMMARY
The Stony Fork Restoration Site (SFRS) was completed in May 2019 and restored a total of 6,810 linear
feet of stream and 949,747 square feet of riparian buffer under the Neuse Buffer Rule (NCAC Rule 15A
02B.029). The SFRS is a riparian system in the Upper Neuse River Basin (03020201 8-digit cataloging
unit) in Johnston County, North Carolina. The site’s natural hydrologic regime had been substantially
modified through the relocation and straightening of the existing stream channels, impacted by land
clearing, and cleared of any riparian buffer. This completed project will restore impacted agricultural and
timber lands to a stable stream ecosystem with a functional riparian buffer and floodplain access.

The SFRS is protected by a 24.4 acre permanent conservation easement, held by the State of North
Carolina. The site is located approximately 5.5 miles north of Benson, NC. Specifically, the site is 0.2
mile west on Elevation Road from its intersection with Federal Road (SR-1331).

The North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (NCEEP) published the Neuse River Basin
Priorities in 2010. These were updated in for the Neuse 01 cataloging unit (CU) in 2015 due to extensive
mitigation needs and changes in watershed conditions since 2010. The project 14 digit CU
(03020201150010) was identified as a Targeted Local Watershed (TLW) in the updated priorities. The
goals and priorities for the SFRS are based on the information presented in the Neuse River Basin
Restoration Priorities: maintaining and enhancing water quality, restoring hydrology, and improving fish
and wildlife habitat (NCEEP, 2009). The project will support the following basin priorities:
‐ Managing stormwater runoff
‐ Improving/restoring riparian buffers
‐ Reducing sediment loading
‐ Improving stream stability

The goals for the project are to:
‐ Restore channelized and agriculture impacted streams to stable C/Cb channels.
‐ Restore a forested riparian buffer to provide bank stability, filtration, and shading.

The project goals will be addressed through the following objectives:
‐ Relocate a channelized stream to its historic landscape position.
‐ Install cross-sections sized to the bankfull discharge.
‐ Create bedform diversity with pools, riffles, and habitat structures
‐ Plant the site with native trees and shrubs and an herbaceous seed mix.

Project planting and construction were completed in May 2019. The SFRS involved restoration and
establishment of a functioning stream ecosystem with 6,810 linear feet of stream restored by re-
meandering the stream and by tying the bankfull elevation to the historic floodplain where feasible. The
entire site was planted to establish a forested riparian buffer. The site was constructed as designed with no
major modifications from the design plan. The monitoring components were installed in May 2019. Four
automatic recording pressure transducer stream gauges that take a reading every 10 minutes were installed
in the upper third of T1, T1-A, T2 and T3 to document flow within those reaches. Cameras were installed
in the vicinity of each of these gauges and set to record a short video once a day to provide additional
verification of flow. An additional automatic recording pressure transducer stream gauge was installed
near the bottom of the main stem (SF3) to record the occurrence of bankfull events. To determine the
success of the planted mitigation areas, seven 10 m x 10 m permanent vegetation monitoring plots were
established. An additional five 10 m x 10 m random vegetation monitoring plots were sampled as well.
The locations of the planted stems relative to the origin were recorded within the permanent plots and the
species and height of each planted stem were recorded for all plots. Any volunteers found within the plots
were also grouped into size categories by species but separate from the planted stems. Twelve permanent
photo reference points were established and will be taken annually. Sixteen permanent cross-sections
Stony Fork Restoration Site KCI Associates of NC, PA
DMS Project # 97085 2 2023-MY05
(eight riffle cross-sections and eight pool cross-sections) were also established and a detailed longitudinal
profile of the stream was taken. Wolman pebble counts were performed at all of the riffle cross-sections
in MY00-03 and were discontinued starting in MY05. The cross-section measurements will be repeated in
future monitoring years, but the longitudinal profile will only be repeated if there are concerns about bed
elevation adjustments. Reports will be submitted to DMS each year.

Vegetative success criteria for the stream mitigation is 260 woody stems/acre after five years, and 210
woody stems/acre after seven years. Trees in each plot must average seven feet in height at Year 5 and ten
feet in height at Year 7. Volunteer species must be present for a minimum of two growing seasons and
must be a species from the approved planting list to count toward vegetative success. A single species
may not account for more than 50% of the required number of stems within any plot. A minimum of four
bankfull events must also be recorded during the monitoring period. All project streams must show a
minimum of 30 continuous days of flow within a calendar year for three out of the first four years of
monitoring. Bank height ratios (BHR) should not exceed 1.2 and the entrenchment ratios (ER) should be
2.2 or greater. BHR and ER at any measured riffle cross-section should not change more than 10% from
the baseline condition during any given monitoring interval (e.g. no more than 10% between years 1 and
2, 2 and 3, 3 and 5, or 5 and 7). Visual assessments will also be used to identify problem areas.

Vegetative success criteria for the areas proposed for riparian buffer credit is 260 woody stems/acre at the
end of five years of monitoring. Trees in each plot must average seven feet in height at Year 5. There
should be a minimum of four native hardwood tree species, with no species accounting for greater than
50% of the stems. Volunteer species must be from the approved planting list to count toward vegetative
success.

MONITORING RESULTS
The fifth-year vegetation monitoring was conducted between August 16 and 17, 2023. The site averaged
482 planted stems/acre across all 12 plots. All twelve of the plots had greater than 260 planted stems/acre.
Including volunteers, the site averaged 1,143 total stems/acre. All the plots met the success criteria. In
general, the site is well vegetated, with widespread herbaceous coverage and many healthy planted stems.
Ongoing treatment of Chinese privet and kudzu continued in MY05. These treatments have been repeated
several times during the growing season in each year since the site was constructed and will be continued
throughout the monitoring period.

The stream gauge near the bottom of SF3 recorded three bankfull events in 2023. All four stream flow
gauges recorded at least 30 consecutive days of flow. The gauge on T1 recorded flow for a maximum of
140 days. The gauge on T1A recorded flow for a maximum of 174 days and the gauges on T2 and T3
recorded flow for a maximum of 85 days and 157 consecutive days, respectively. The data from the flow
gauges was further backed up by the cameras on site. The cameras on T1 and T1A showed flow for a
maximum of 40 and 167 days, respectively. The cameras on T2 and T3 showed flow for a maximum of
74 days and 104 days respectively. Differences in the number of days recorded by the cameras and the
gauges are largely due to periods of time when the cameras become obscured by vegetation during the
growing season or low flow that was not picked up by the gauges.

The fifth-year cross-section survey was completed between July 19 and 24, 2023 and found that for the
majority of the site, the dimensions of the stream are as designed, with some small variation as is typical
for stream restoration projects. Both of the cross-sections on T3 (XS9 and 10) show significant levels of
aggradation. Since only the bottom 129 feet of this stream are located within the bounds of the project,
there is a large sediment source in the form of heavily eroding banks and headcuts just upstream from the
project reach. This issue is further compounded by the small size of this reach compared to SF1, which it
flows into. When SF1 experiences an overbank event, sediment that is deposited on the floodplain is also
deposited in T3. This combined with the upstream sediment source has led to large amounts of sediment
Stony Fork Restoration Site KCI Associates of NC, PA
DMS Project # 97085 3 2023-MY05
being processed through this small reach and has caused the channel alignment to shift slightly. Despite
this shift, the stream is still functioning as a stream with a defined bed and bank and has been processing
the accumulated sediment. Please see Appendix B – Visual Assessment Data for photos of this reach and
Appendix E – Hydrologic Data for a detailed record of the flow in this reach in 2023.

At a site visit on November 18, 2021, it was noted that an outlet from a sediment retention pond had been
dug through the site easement and to the project stream. This encroachment occurred on the right bank,
approximately 150 feet upstream of the crossing on Reach SF2. Upon noticing this encroachment, KCI
immediately notified the developer responsible as well as the responsible agencies. The outlet and
sediment pond were filled in and on May 5, 2022 the area inside the easement that had been impacted was
planted with 29 one-gallon containerized trees. Please see Appendix C – Vegetation Data for a list of the
species and quantity planted in this area. In addition to the above violation, several property owners in the
Sherrill Farms Phase 1 subdivision have stored vehicles and a trampoline within the easement. Sherrill
Farms LLC was contacted about these encroachments in 2018, 2019, and 2021. In early 2022, a fence was
installed along the easement boundary where these encroachments were occurring.

KCI has been monitoring the encroachment area since it was first noted in MY03. This area was replanted
in 2022 with gallon size containerized trees and has been revegetating well since then. No further signs of
encroachment have been noted in this area. This area, as well as the rest of the boundary will continue to
be monitored for any signs of encroachment. The site boundaries were inspected on December 7, 2023.
During this inspection, several signs that had come off their posts were noted. Two areas of scalloping
were also noted. The first of these is located just downstream of the confluence of T1 and the main stem
and was 0.006 acres in size. The second is located at the very end of the project and was 0.059 acres in
size. KCI is in contact with the landowners about these encroachments and will be installing additional
easement markings in these areas, as well as repairing the other damaged signs. 
o
o
o
ooo
o
o
oo
o
o
o
o
oooo o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
ooo o
o
o
oo
o
o
o
o
o
ooo
o
o
o
oooo o
o
o oo
o
ooo
o
ooo
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
oooo o
o
oo
o
oo
o
o o
o
o
o
o
o
oo
o
o
o o
o
o
o
o
oooooooo ooo oooooo oooooo oooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo oooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo
o
oo o
o o
oo
o
o
o
oo
o
o
o
o
o
ooo
o
oo o
oo
o
o
oo
o
o
o
o
o o
oo
o
o
ooo
o
oooo
o
o
o
o
oo
ooo
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o o ooo
o
o
oo
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
oo
o
o
o
o
o
o
oo
o o
o
o
oo
o
o
o
o
oo
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
ÊÚ
§¨¦40
§¨¦95
50
27
242
242
£¤301
BENSON
B l a c k Creek
ÊÚ
WAKE
JOHNSTON
WAYNE
NASH
SAMPSON
HARNETT
WILSON
ÊÚ Project Site Location
County Boundary
Major Roads
Minor Roads
o Airports (none within a 5-mi radius)
Major Rivers and Streams
Cities and Towns
Eleva
t
i
o
n

R
d
F
e
d
e
r
a
l

R
d
Ü 0 10.5
Miles
FIGURE 1. VICINITY MAP, STONY FORK RESTORATION SITE, JOHNSTON COUNTY, NC
Stony Fork Restoration Site KCI Associates of NC, PA
DMS Project # 97085 5 2023-MY05
REFERENCES

NCDEQ, Division of Mitigation Services. March 2015. 2015 Neuse 03020201 Priorities. Last
accessed at:
http://portal.ncdenr.org/c/document_library/get_file?uuid=340a3f58‐336b‐42bf‐bab2‐fb6
63cbfd78d&groupId=60329

NCDENR, Ecosystem Enhancement Program. 2014. NCDENR, Ecosystem Enhancement
Program. 2014. Stream and Wetland Mitigation Monitoring Guidelines. Last
accessed1/2016 at:
http://portal.ncdenr.org/c/document_library/get_file?p_l_id=60409&folderId=18877169
&name=DLFE-86604.pdf

NCDENR, Ecosystem Enhancement Program. 2014. Stream and Wetland Mitigation Monitoring
Guidelines. Last accessed 6/2015 at:
http://portal.ncdenr.org/c/document_library/get_file?p_l_id=60409&folderId=18877169
&name=DLFE-86606.pdf

NC Wetland Functional Assessment Team. 2010. NC Wetland Assessment Method (NC WAM)
User Manual, version 4.1. Last accessed 11/2012 at:
http://portal.ncdenr.org/c/document_library/get_file?uuid=76f3c58b-dab8-4960-ba43-
45b7faf06f4c&groupId=38364

Schafale, M.P. and A.S. Weakley. 2012. Guide to the Natural Communities of North Carolina:
Fourth Approximation. Natural Heritage Program, Division of Parks and Recreation,
N.C. Department of Environment and Natural Resources. Raleigh, NC.

Soil Survey Staff, Natural Resources Conservation Service, United States Department of
Agriculture. Soil Survey of Johnston County, North Carolina. 1994
Stony Fork Restoration Site KCI Associates of NC, PA
DMS Project # 97085 6 2023-MY05

APPENDIX A

Background Tables

Stony Fork Restoration Site KCI Associates of NC, PA
DMS Project # 97085 7 2023-MY05
*Mitigation Plan footage used for credit calculations. **Crossings have been removed from creditable linear footage for all project streams

Table 1. Project Components and Mitigation Credits
Stony Fork Restoration Site, DMS Project #97085
Mitigation Credits

Stream Riparian
Wetland
Non-riparian
Wetland Buffer
Nitrogen
Nutrient
Offset
Phosphorous
Nutrient
Offset
Type R RE R RE R RE R RE
Linear
Feet/Acres 6,405 405 450,285 sf 499,462 sf
Credits 6,405 181 425,434 59,904
TOTAL
CREDITS 6,585.933 480,337.942
Project Components
Project
Component
-or-
Reach ID
Stationing/
Location
Existing
Footage/
Square Footage
Approach
(PI, PII
etc.)
Restoration
-or-
Restoration
Equivalent
MP
Restoration
Footage*
As-built
Restoration
Footage
Mitigation
Ratio
SF1 10+00 – 21+55 1,235 PI/PII R 1,155 1,155 1:1
SF2 21+55 – 49+54 2,453 PI R 2,707** 2,714** 1:1
SF3 49+54 – 56+08 618 PI R 624** 624** 1:1
T1 100+00 – 105+10 365 PI/PII R 510 510 1:1
T1A 150+00 – 151+59 47 PI/PII R 159 159 1:1
T2-1 200+00 – 203+34 327 N/A EII 334 334 2.5:1
T2-2 203+34 – 206+71 326 PI/PII R 337 337 1:1
T2-3 206+71 – 215+26 780 PI/PII R 855 855 1:1
T3-1 300+00 – 300+71 72 PI/PII EI 71 71 1.5:1
T3-2 300+71 – 301+29 82 PI/PII R 58 58 1:1
Buffer
Restoration
TOB to 100’
N/A 413,194 N/A R 413,194 413,194 100%
Buffer
Restoration
101-200’
N/A 37,091 N/A R 37,091 37,091 33%
Buffer
Enhancement
TOB to 100’
N/A 74,802 N/A E 74,802 74,802 50%
Buffer
Preservation
TOB to 100’
N/A 424,660 N/A P 424,660 424,660 10%
Stony Fork Restoration Site KCI Associates of NC, PA
DMS Project # 97085 8 2023-MY05

Activity or Report Data Collection Complete Actual Completion or
Delivery
Mitigation Plan September 5, 2018
Final Design - Construction Plans Oct. 15, 2018
Construction Grading Completed May 3, 2019
Planting Completed May 6 2019
Baseline Monitoring/Report May 2019 July 2018
Vegetation Monitoring May 9, 2019
Stream Survey May 15, 2019
Invasive Treatment Summer 2019
Year 1 Monitoring November 2019 January 2020
Vegetation Monitoring November 5, 2019
Stream Survey November 11, 2019
Invasive Treatment Summer 2020
Year 2 Monitoring November 2020 January 2021
Vegetation Monitoring September 4, 2020
Stream Survey June 29, 2020
Invasive Treatment Summer 2021
Year 3 Monitoring November 2021 December 2021
Vegetation Monitoring August 30, 2021
Stream Survey August 30, 2021
Year 4 Monitoring December 2022 January 2023
Year 5 Monitoring December 2023 January 2024
Vegetation Monitoring August 17, 2023
Stream Survey July 24, 2021
Table 2. Project Activity & Reporting History
Stony Fork Restoration Sites, DMS Project #97085

Component Summation
Restoration Level Stream
(linear feet)
Riparian Wetlands
(Acres)
Non-Riparian
Wetlands
(Acres)
Buffer (square feet)
Riverine Non-Riverine
Restoration 6,405 450,285
Enhancement 74,802
Enhancement I 71
Enhancement II 334
Creation
Preservation 424,660
(175,029 allowable for credit)
High Quality
Preservation
TOTAL CREDITS 6,585.933 480,337.942
Stony Fork Restoration Site KCI Associates of NC, PA
DMS Project # 97085 9 2023-MY05

Table 3. Project Contacts
Stony Fork Restoration Site, DMS Project #97085
Design Firm KCI Associates of North Carolina
4505 Falls of Neuse Road
Suite 400
Raleigh, NC 27609
Contact: Mr. Adam Spiller
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Construction Contractor Fluvial Solutions, Inc.
Stony Fork and T3 PO Box 28749
Raleigh, NC 27611
Contact: Mr. Peter Jelenevsky
Phone: [phone]
Construction Contractor KCI Environmental Technologies and Construction
T1, T1A, and T2 4505 Falls of Neuse Road, Suite 400
Raleigh, NC 27609
Contact: Mr. Kevin O’Briant
Phone: [phone]
Planting Contractor Bruton Natural Systems, Inc.
PO Box 1197
Fremont, NC 27830
Contact: Mr. Charlie Bruton
Phone: [phone]
Monitoring Performers
KCI Associates of North Carolina
4505 Falls of Neuse Road
Suite 400
Raleigh, NC 27609
Contact: Mr. Adam Spiller
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Stony Fork Restoration Site KCI Associates of NC, PA
DMS Project # 97085 10 2023-MY05
Table 4. Project Information
Stony Fork Restoration Site, DMS Project #97085
Project Name Stony Fork Restoration Site
County Johnston County
Project Area (acres) 24.4 acres
Project Coordinates (lat. and long.) 35°26'55.0"N, 78°31'18.5"W
Project Watershed Summary Information
Physiographic Province Coastal Plain
River Basin Neuse
USGS Hydrologic Unit 8-digit 03020201 USGS Hydrologic Unit 14-digit 03020201150010
DWQ Sub-basin 03-04-04
Project Drainage Area (acres) 497 acres
Project Drainage Area Percentage of
Impervious Area 5%
CGIA Land Use Classification
Managed Herbaceous Cover 53% (262 ac), Mixed Hardwoods/Conifers 31% (150 ac), Low
Density Developed 9% (42 ac), Medium Density Residential 5% (24 ac),
Transportation/Impervious 3% (13 ac)
Existing Reach Summary Information
Parameters Stony Fork T1 and T1A T2 T3
Length of reach (linear feet) 3,141 412 1,433 154
Drainage area (acres) 497 12 150 29
Perennial, Intermittent, Ephemeral Perennial Intermittent Perennial Intermittent
NCDWQ Water Quality
Classification C; NSW C; NSW C; NSW C; NSW
Stream Classification (exisiting) G4c G4 G4 G4
Stream Classifcation (proposed) C4 C4 C4 C4
Evolutionary trend (Simon) Channelized, Stage III Channelized, Stage III Channelized, Stage III Modified with
pond, Stage III
FEMA classification None None None None
Existing Wetland Summary Information
Parameters
Size of Wetland (acres) 0.33 (WA and WE) 0.06 (WB) 0.14 (WC and WF)
Wetland Type Headwater Forest Bottomland Hardwood
Forest Non-Tidal Freshwater Marsh
Mapped Soil Series Gilead sandy loam Bibb sandy loam Bibb sandy loam
Drainage class Moderately Well
Drained Poorly Drained Poorly Drained
Soil Hydric Status Non-hydric Hydric Hydric
Source of Hydrology Surface Water Stream Floodplain Stream Floodplain
Restoration or Enhancement Method N/A N/A N/A

Stony Fork Restoration Site KCI Associates of NC, PA
DMS Project # 97085 11 2023-MY05
Regulatory Considerations
Regulation Applicable? Resolved? Supporting
Documentation
Waters of the United States – Section
404 Yes Yes 404 permit
Waters of the United States – Section
401 Yes Yes 401 permit
Endangered Species Act No N/A N/A
Historic Preservation Act No N/A N/A
Coastal Zone Management Act
(CZMA)/ Coastal Area Management
Act (CAMA)
No N/A N/A
FEMA Floodplain Compliance No Yes
Essential Fisheries Habitat No N/A N/A

Stony Fork Restoration Site KCI Associates of NC, PA
DMS Project # 97085 12 2023-MY05

APPENDIX B

Visual Assessment Data

^_
^_
^_
^_
^_
^_
Start SF1
T2-1
SF2
T2-2
T1 T1A
T3-1 T3-2
T2-3
SF3
Sheet 1
Sheet 4
Sheet 3
Sheet 2
Source: Esri, Maxar, Earthstar Geographics, and the GIS User Community
Source: Google Earth, 2018
CURRENT CONDITIONS PLANVIEW STONY FORK RESTORATION SITEJOHNSTON COUNTY, NC ±0 300150
Feet
Project Easement
Stream Mitigation
R (6,405 lf / 6,405 SMCs)
EI (71 lf / 47 SMCs)
EII (334 lf / 134 SMCs)
Buffer Mitigation
R 0-100'(413,194 sf / 413,194 credits)
R 101-200'(37,091 sf / 12,240 credits)
E (74,802 sf / 37,401 credits)
P (424,660 sf / 17,503 credits)
Stabilized Drainages
Easement Encroachment
Cross-Sections
^_Photo Points
Flow Gauge
Camera
Bankfull Gauge
Vegetation Monitoring Plots
Success Criteria Met
Success Criteria Not Met
Overview
^_
^_
Start SF1
SF2
T1 T1A
T3-1 T3-2
27+0
0
2
6
+
0
0
25
+
0
0
24+00
2
3
+
0
0
22
+
0
0
21+
0
0
2
0
+
0
0
19+00
1
8
+
0
0
1
7
+
0
0
16+00
1
5
+
0
0
14+
0
0
13+
0
0
12
+
0
0
11
+
0
0
10
+
0
0
301+00
300+00
151
+
0
0
1
5
0
+
0
0
10
4
+
0
0
103
+
0
0
102+00
101+00
100+
0
0
29
+
0
0
28+
0
0
2
1
1
2
3 4
9
12
11
10
4
1
R1
R5
R2
Source: Esri, Maxar, Earthstar Geographics, and the GIS User Community
Source: Google Earth, 2018
CURRENT CONDITIONS PLANVIEW STONY FORK RESTORATION SITEJOHNSTON COUNTY, NC ±0 10050
Feet
Project Easement
Stream Mitigation
R (6,405 lf / 6,405 SMCs)
EI (71 lf / 47 SMCs)
EII (334 lf / 134 SMCs)
Buffer Mitigation
R 0-100'(413,194 sf / 413,194 credits)
R 101-200'(37,091 sf / 12,240 credits)
E (74,802 sf / 37,401 credits)
P (424,660 sf / 17,503 credits)
Stabilized Drainages
Easement Encroachment
Cross-Sections
^_Photo Points
Flow Gauge
Camera
Bankfull Gauge
Vegetation Monitoring Plots
Success Criteria Met
Success Criteria Not Met
SHEET 1 of 4
^_
27+0
0
4
2
+
0
0
4
1
+
0
0
40+00
3
9
+
0
0
3
8
+
0
0
37+00
36+0
0
35
+
0
0
34+00
33
+
0
0
32
+
0
0
31
+
0
0
3
0
+
0
0
29
+
0
0
28+
0
0
44
+
0
0
43+00
3
5
6
3 4
2
3
R3
Source: Esri, Maxar, Earthstar Geographics, and the GIS User Community
Source: Google Earth, 2018
CURRENT CONDITIONS PLANVIEW STONY FORK RESTORATION SITEJOHNSTON COUNTY, NC ±0 10050
Feet
Project Easement
Stream Mitigation
R (6,405 lf / 6,405 SMCs)
EI (71 lf / 47 SMCs)
EII (334 lf / 134 SMCs)
Buffer Mitigation
R 0-100'(413,194 sf / 413,194 credits)
R 101-200'(37,091 sf / 12,240 credits)
E (74,802 sf / 37,401 credits)
P (424,660 sf / 17,503 credits)
Stabilized Drainages
Easement Encroachment
Cross-Sections
^_Photo Points
Flow Gauge
Camera
Bankfull Gauge
Vegetation Monitoring Plots
Success Criteria Met
Success Criteria Not Met
SHEET 2 of 4
^_
^_
T2-3
SF3
4
2
+
0
0
4
1
+
0
0
5
6
+
0
0
55
+
0
0
54+00
53
+
0
0
52+00
51+
0
0
50+
0
0
48+00
47
+
0
0
46
+
0
0
45+00
44
+
0
0
43+00
21
4
+
0
0
213+00
212+00211+
0
0
210
+
0
0
20
9
+
0
0
4
9
+
0
0
21
5
+
0
0
20
8
+
0
0
20
7
+
0
0
206+00
6
5
7
5
6
8
16
15
7
6
3
R4
Source: Esri, Maxar, Earthstar Geographics, and the GIS User Community
Source: Google Earth, 2018
CURRENT CONDITIONS PLANVIEW STONY FORK RESTORATION SITEJOHNSTON COUNTY, NC ±0 10050
Feet
Project Easement
Stream Mitigation
R (6,405 lf / 6,405 SMCs)
EI (71 lf / 47 SMCs)
EII (334 lf / 134 SMCs)
Buffer Mitigation
R 0-100'(413,194 sf / 413,194 credits)
R 101-200'(37,091 sf / 12,240 credits)
E (74,802 sf / 37,401 credits)
P (424,660 sf / 17,503 credits)
Stabilized Drainages
Easement Encroachment
Cross-Sections
^_Photo Points
Flow Gauge
Camera
Bankfull Gauge
Vegetation Monitoring Plots
Success Criteria Met
Success Criteria Not Met
SHEET 3 of 4
^_
^_
T2-1 T2-2
T2-3
SF3
51+
0
0
50+
0
0
48+00
21
4
+
0
0
213+00
212+00211+
0
0
210
+
0
0
20
9
+
0
0
4
9
+
0
0
21
5
+
0
0
20
8
+
0
0
20
7
+
0
0
206+00
205+00
204+00
203
+
0
0
202+00
201+0
0
20
0
+
0
0
4
5
7
16
15
1413
5
6
7
R4
Source: Esri, Maxar, Earthstar Geographics, and the GIS User Community
Source: Google Earth, 2018
CURRENT CONDITIONS PLANVIEW STONY FORK RESTORATION SITEJOHNSTON COUNTY, NC ±0 10050
Feet
Project Easement
Stream Mitigation
R (6,405 lf / 6,405 SMCs)
EI (71 lf / 47 SMCs)
EII (334 lf / 134 SMCs)
Buffer Mitigation
R 0-100'(413,194 sf / 413,194 credits)
R 101-200'(37,091 sf / 12,240 credits)
E (74,802 sf / 37,401 credits)
P (424,660 sf / 17,503 credits)
Stabilized Drainages
Easement Encroachment
Cross-Sections
^_Photo Points
Flow Gauge
Camera
Bankfull Gauge
Vegetation Monitoring Plots
Success Criteria Met
Success Criteria Not Met
SHEET 4 of 4
Stony Fork Restoration Site KCI Associates of NC, PA
DMS Project # 97085 18 2023-MY05
Table 5 Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment
Stony Fork Stream Restoration Site, DMS Project#97085
Reach ID SF1
Assessed Length 1,155
1. Bed 1. Aggradation - Bar formation/growth sufficient to significantly deflect
flow laterally (not to include point bars)0 0 100%
2. Degradation - Evidence of downcutting 0 0 100%
2. Riffle Condition 1. Texture/Substrate - Riffle maintains coarser substrate 18 18 100%
1. Depth Sufficient (Max Pool Depth : Mean Bankfull Depth > 1.6)17 17 100%
2. Length appropriate (>30% of centerline distance between tail of
upstream riffle and head of downstrem riffle)17 17 100%
1. Thalweg centering at upstream of meander bend (Run) 17 17 100%
2. Thalweg centering at downstream of meander (Glide) 17 17 100%
2. Bank 1. Scoured/Eroding Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting simply from poor growth and/or
scour and erosion 0 0 100%
2. Undercut
Banks undercut/overhanging to the extent that mass wasting appears
likely. Does NOT include undercuts that are modest, appear sustainable
and are providing habitat.
0 0 100%
3. Mass Wasting Bank slumping, calving, or collapse 0 0 100%
0 0 100%
3. Engineered
Structures 1. Overall Integrity Structures physically intact with no dislodged boulders or logs. 5 5 100%
2. Grade Control Grade control structures exhibiting maintenance of grade across the sill. 5 5 100%
2a. Piping Structures lacking any substantial flow underneath sills or arms. 5 5 100%
3. Bank Protection Bank erosion within the structures extent of influence does not exceed
15%. (See guidance for this table in EEP monitoring guidance document) 5 5 100%
4. Habitat Pool forming structures maintaining ~ Max Pool Depth : Mean Bankfull
Depth ratio > 1.6 Rootwads/logs providing some cover at base-flow.5 5 100%
Major Channel
Category
Channel
Sub-Category Metric
Number Stable,
Performing as
Intended
Total Number
in As-built
Number of
Unstable
Segments
1. Vertical Stability
(Riffle and Run units)
Totals
3. Meander Pool
Condition
4.Thalweg Position
Amount of
Unstable
Footage
% Stable,
Performing as
Intended

Stony Fork Restoration Site KCI Associates of NC, PA
DMS Project # 97085 19 2023-MY05
Table 5 Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment
Stony Fork Stream Restoration Site, DMS Project#97085
Reach ID SF2
Assessed Length 2,802
1. Bed 1. Aggradation - Bar formation/growth sufficient to significantly deflect
flow laterally (not to include point bars)0 0 100%
2. Degradation - Evidence of downcutting 0 0 100%
2. Riffle Condition 1. Texture/Substrate - Riffle maintains coarser substrate 36 36 100%
1. Depth Sufficient (Max Pool Depth : Mean Bankfull Depth > 1.6)35 35 100%
2. Length appropriate (>30% of centerline distance between tail of
upstream riffle and head of downstrem riffle)35 35 100%
1. Thalweg centering at upstream of meander bend (Run)35 35 100%
2. Thalweg centering at downstream of meander (Glide)35 35 100%
2. Bank 1. Scoured/Eroding Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting simply from poor growth and/or
scour and erosion 0 0 100%
2. Undercut
Banks undercut/overhanging to the extent that mass wasting appears
likely. Does NOT include undercuts that are modest, appear sustainable
and are providing habitat.
0 0 100%
3. Mass Wasting Bank slumping, calving, or collapse 0 0 100%
0 0 100%
3. Engineered
Structures 1. Overall Integrity Structures physically intact with no dislodged boulders or logs. 8 8 100%
2. Grade Control Grade control structures exhibiting maintenance of grade across the sill. 8 8 100%
2a. Piping Structures lacking any substantial flow underneath sills or arms. 8 8 100%
3. Bank Protection Bank erosion within the structures extent of influence does not exceed
15%. (See guidance for this table in EEP monitoring guidance document) 8 8 100%
4. Habitat Pool forming structures maintaining ~ Max Pool Depth : Mean Bankfull
Depth ratio > 1.6 Rootwads/logs providing some cover at base-flow.8 8 100%
Amount of
Unstable
Footage
% Stable,
Performing as
Intended
1. Vertical Stability
(Riffle and Run units)
Totals
3. Meander Pool
Condition
4.Thalweg Position
Major Channel
Category
Channel
Sub-Category Metric
Number Stable,
Performing as
Intended
Total Number
in As-built
Number of
Unstable
Segments

Stony Fork Restoration Site KCI Associates of NC, PA
DMS Project # 97085 20 2023-MY05
Table 5 Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment
Stony Fork Stream Restoration Site, DMS Project#97085
Reach ID SF3
Assessed Length 618
1. Aggradation - Bar formation/growth sufficient to significantly deflect
flow laterally (not to include point bars)0 0 100%
2. Degradation - Evidence of downcutting 0 0 100%
2. Riffle Condition 1. Texture/Substrate - Riffle maintains coarser substrate 9 9 100%
1. Depth Sufficient (Max Pool Depth : Mean Bankfull Depth > 1.6)8 8 100%
2. Length appropriate (>30% of centerline distance between tail of
upstream riffle and head of downstrem riffle)8 8 100%
1. Thalweg centering at upstream of meander bend (Run)8 8 100%
2. Thalweg centering at downstream of meander (Glide)8 8 100%
1. Scoured/Eroding Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting simply from poor growth and/or
scour and erosion 0 0 100%
2. Undercut
Banks undercut/overhanging to the extent that mass wasting appears
likely. Does NOT include undercuts that are modest, appear sustainable
and are providing habitat.
0 0 100%
3. Mass Wasting Bank slumping, calving, or collapse 0 0 100%
0 0 100%
1. Overall Integrity Structures physically intact with no dislodged boulders or logs. 1 1 100%
2. Grade Control Grade control structures exhibiting maintenance of grade across the sill. 1 1 100%
2a. Piping Structures lacking any substantial flow underneath sills or arms. 1 1 100%
3. Bank Protection Bank erosion within the structures extent of influence does not exceed
15%. (See guidance for this table in EEP monitoring guidance document) 1 1 100%
4. Habitat Pool forming structures maintaining ~ Max Pool Depth : Mean Bankfull
Depth ratio > 1.6 Rootwads/logs providing some cover at base-flow.1 1 100%
2. Bank
3. Engineered
Structures
Major Channel
Category
Channel
Sub-Category Metric
Number Stable,
Performing as
Intended
Total Number
in As-built
Number of
Unstable
Segments
1. Vertical Stability
(Riffle and Run units)
Totals
3. Meander Pool
Condition
4.Thalweg Position
1. Bed
Amount of
Unstable
Footage
% Stable,
Performing as
Intended

Stony Fork Restoration Site KCI Associates of NC, PA
DMS Project # 97085 21 2023-MY05
Table 5 Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment
Stony Fork Stream Restoration Site, DMS Project#97085
Reach ID T1
Assessed Length 365
1. Aggradation - Bar formation/growth sufficient to significantly deflect
flow laterally (not to include point bars)0 0 100%
2. Degradation - Evidence of downcutting 0 0 100%
2. Riffle Condition 1. Texture/Substrate - Riffle maintains coarser substrate 13 13 100%
1. Depth Sufficient (Max Pool Depth : Mean Bankfull Depth > 1.6)12 12 100%
2. Length appropriate (>30% of centerline distance between tail of
upstream riffle and head of downstrem riffle)12 12 100%
1. Thalweg centering at upstream of meander bend (Run)12 12 100%
2. Thalweg centering at downstream of meander (Glide)12 12 100%
1. Scoured/Eroding Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting simply from poor growth and/or
scour and erosion 0 0 100%
2. Undercut
Banks undercut/overhanging to the extent that mass wasting appears
likely. Does NOT include undercuts that are modest, appear sustainable
and are providing habitat.
0 0 100%
3. Mass Wasting Bank slumping, calving, or collapse 0 0 100%
0 0 100%
1. Overall Integrity Structures physically intact with no dislodged boulders or logs. 4 4 100%
2. Grade Control Grade control structures exhibiting maintenance of grade across the sill. 4 4 100%
2a. Piping Structures lacking any substantial flow underneath sills or arms. 4 4 100%
3. Bank Protection Bank erosion within the structures extent of influence does not exceed
15%. (See guidance for this table in EEP monitoring guidance document) 4 4 100%
4. Habitat Pool forming structures maintaining ~ Max Pool Depth : Mean Bankfull
Depth ratio > 1.6 Rootwads/logs providing some cover at base-flow.4 4 100%
Amount of
Unstable
Footage
% Stable,
Performing as
Intended
1. Bed
2. Bank
1. Vertical Stability
(Riffle and Run units)
Totals
3. Meander Pool
Condition
4.Thalweg Position
3. Engineered
Structures
Major Channel
Category
Channel
Sub-Category Metric
Number Stable,
Performing as
Intended
Total Number
in As-built
Number of
Unstable
Segments

Stony Fork Restoration Site KCI Associates of NC, PA
DMS Project # 97085 22 2023-MY05
Table 5 Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment
Stony Fork Stream Restoration Site, DMS Project#97085
Reach ID T2
Assessed Length 1,433
1. Aggradation - Bar formation/growth sufficient to significantly deflect
flow laterally (not to include point bars)0 0 100%
2. Degradation - Evidence of downcutting 0 0 100%
2. Riffle Condition 1. Texture/Substrate - Riffle maintains coarser substrate 27 27 100%
1. Depth Sufficient (Max Pool Depth : Mean Bankfull Depth > 1.6)26 26 100%
2. Length appropriate (>30% of centerline distance between tail of
upstream riffle and head of downstrem riffle)26 26 100%
1. Thalweg centering at upstream of meander bend (Run)26 26 100%
2. Thalweg centering at downstream of meander (Glide)26 26 100%
1. Scoured/Eroding Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting simply from poor growth and/or
scour and erosion 0 0 100%
2. Undercut
Banks undercut/overhanging to the extent that mass wasting appears
likely. Does NOT include undercuts that are modest, appear sustainable
and are providing habitat.
0 0 100%
3. Mass Wasting Bank slumping, calving, or collapse 0 0 100%
0 0 100%
1. Overall Integrity Structures physically intact with no dislodged boulders or logs. 7 7 100%
2. Grade Control Grade control structures exhibiting maintenance of grade across the sill. 7 7 100%
2a. Piping Structures lacking any substantial flow underneath sills or arms. 7 7 100%
3. Bank Protection Bank erosion within the structures extent of influence does not exceed
15%. (See guidance for this table in EEP monitoring guidance document) 7 7 100%
4. Habitat Pool forming structures maintaining ~ Max Pool Depth : Mean Bankfull
Depth ratio > 1.6 Rootwads/logs providing some cover at base-flow.7 7 100%
2. Bank
3. Engineered
Structures
Amount of
Unstable
Footage
% Stable,
Performing as
Intended
1. Vertical Stability
(Riffle and Run units)
Totals
3. Meander Pool
Condition
4.Thalweg Position
1. Bed
Major Channel
Category
Channel
Sub-Category Metric
Number Stable,
Performing as
Intended
Total Number
in As-built
Number of
Unstable
Segments

Stony Fork Restoration Site KCI Associates of NC, PA
DMS Project # 97085 23 2023-MY05
Table 5 Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment
Stony Fork Stream Restoration Site, DMS Project#97085
Reach ID T3
Assessed Length 154
1. Aggradation - Bar formation/growth sufficient to significantly deflect
flow laterally (not to include point bars)1 93 40%
2. Degradation - Evidence of downcutting 0 0 100%
2. Riffle Condition 1. Texture/Substrate - Riffle maintains coarser substrate 3 3 100%
1. Depth Sufficient (Max Pool Depth : Mean Bankfull Depth > 1.6)0 2 0%
2. Length appropriate (>30% of centerline distance between tail of
upstream riffle and head of downstrem riffle)2 2 100%
1. Thalweg centering at upstream of meander bend (Run)2 2 100%
2. Thalweg centering at downstream of meander (Glide)2 2 100%
1. Scoured/Eroding Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting simply from poor growth and/or
scour and erosion 0 0 100%
2. Undercut
Banks undercut/overhanging to the extent that mass wasting appears
likely. Does NOT include undercuts that are modest, appear sustainable
and are providing habitat.
0 0 100%
3. Mass Wasting Bank slumping, calving, or collapse 0 0 100%
0 0 100%
1. Overall Integrity Structures physically intact with no dislodged boulders or logs. N/A N/A N/A
2. Grade Control Grade control structures exhibiting maintenance of grade across the sill. N/A N/A N/A
2a. Piping Structures lacking any substantial flow underneath sills or arms. N/A N/A N/A
3. Bank Protection Bank erosion within the structures extent of influence does not exceed
15%. (See guidance for this table in EEP monitoring guidance document) N/A N/A N/A
4. Habitat Pool forming structures maintaining ~ Max Pool Depth : Mean Bankfull
Depth ratio > 1.6 Rootwads/logs providing some cover at base-flow.N/A N/A N/A
Metric
Number Stable,
Performing as
Intended
Total Number
in As-built
Number of
Unstable
Segments
1. Vertical Stability
(Riffle and Run units)
Totals
3. Meander Pool
Condition
4.Thalweg Position
1. Bed
2. Bank
3. Engineered
Structures
Amount of
Unstable
Footage
% Stable,
Performing as
Intended
Major Channel
Category
Channel
Sub-Category

Stony Fork Restoration Site KCI Associates of NC, PA
DMS Project # 97085 24 2023-MY05

Table 6 Vegetation Condition Assessment
Stony Fork Stream Restoration Site, DMS Project# 97085
Planted Acreage 24.4
Vegetation Category Definitions
Mapping
Threshold CCPV Depiction
Number of
Polygons
Combined
Acreage
% of Planted
Acreage
1. Bare Areas Very limited cover of both woody and
herbaceous material.0.1 acres Pattern and Color 0 0.00 0.0%
2. Low Stem Density Areas Woody stem densities clearly below target levels
based on MY3, 4, or 5 stem count criteria.0.1 acres Pattern and Color 0 0.00 0.0%
0 0.00 0.0%
3. Areas of Poor Growth Rates or Vigor Areas with woody stems of a size class that are
obviously small given the monitoring year.0.25 acres Pattern and Color 0 0.00 0.0%
0 0.00 0.0%
Easement Acreage 9.5
Vegetation Category Definitions
Mapping
Threshold CCPV Depiction
Number of
Polygons
Combined
Acreage
% of Easement
Acreage
4. Invasive Areas of Concern Areas or points (if too small to render as
polygons at map scale).1000 SF Pattern and Color 0 0.00 0.0%
5. Easement Encroachment Areas Areas or points (if too small to render as
polygons at map scale).none Pattern and Color 2 0.07 0.7%
Total
Cumulative Total
Stony Fork Restoration Site KCI Associates of NC, PA
DMS Project # 97085 25 2023-MY05

Photo Reference Photos

PP1U – MY-00 – 5/15/19 PP1U – MY-05 – 12/7/23

PP1D – MY-00 – 5/15/19 PP1D – MY-05 – 12/7/23

PP2U – MY-00 – 5/15/19 PP2U – MY-05 – 12/7/23
Stony Fork Restoration Site KCI Associates of NC, PA
DMS Project # 97085 26 2023-MY05

PP2D – MY-00 – 5/15/19 PP2D – MY-05 – 12/7/23

PP3U – MY-00 – 5/15/19 PP3U – MY-05 – 12/7/23

PP3D – MY-00 – 5/15/19 PP3D – MY-05 – 12/7/23

Stony Fork Restoration Site KCI Associates of NC, PA
DMS Project # 97085 27 2023-MY05

PP4U – MY-00 – 5/15/19 PP4U – MY-05 – 12/7/23

PP4D – MY-00 – 5/15/19 PP4D – MY-05 – 12/7/23

PP5U – MY-00 – 5/15/19 PP5U – MY-05 – 12/7/23

Stony Fork Restoration Site KCI Associates of NC, PA
DMS Project # 97085 28 2023-MY05

PP5D – MY-00 – 5/15/19 PP5D – MY-05 – 12/7/23

PP6U – MY-00 – 5/15/19 PP6U – MY-05 – 12/7/23

PP6D – MY-00 – 5/15/19 PP6D – MY-05 – 12/7/23

Stony Fork Restoration Site KCI Associates of NC, PA
DMS Project # 97085 29 2023-MY05

Permanent Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos

Vegetation Plot 1 – MY-00 – 5/15/19 Vegetation Plot 1 – MY-05 – 8/16/23

Vegetation Plot 2 – MY-00 – 5/15/19 Vegetation Plot 2 – MY-05 – 8/16/23

Vegetation Plot 3 – MY-00 – 5/15/19 Vegetation Plot 3 – MY-05 – 8/17/23
Stony Fork Restoration Site KCI Associates of NC, PA
DMS Project # 97085 30 2023-MY05

Vegetation Plot 4 – MY-00 – 5/15/19 Vegetation Plot 4 – MY-05 – 8/16/23

Vegetation Plot 5 – MY-00 – 5/15/19 Vegetation Plot 5 – MY-05 – 8/17/23

Vegetation Plot 6 – MY-00 – 5/15/19 Vegetation Plot 6 – MY-05 – 8/17/23

Stony Fork Restoration Site KCI Associates of NC, PA
DMS Project # 97085 31 2023-MY05

Vegetation Plot 7 – MY-00 – 5/15/19 Vegetation Plot 7 – MY-05 – 8/17/23

Stony Fork Restoration Site KCI Associates of NC, PA
DMS Project # 97085 32 2023-MY05

Random Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos

Vegetation Plot R1 – MY-05 – 8/16/23 Vegetation Plot R2 – MY-05 – 8/16/23

Vegetation Plot R3 – MY-05 – 8/17/23 Vegetation Plot R4 – MY-05 – 8/17/23

Vegetation Plot R5 – MY-05 – 8/16/23

Stony Fork Restoration Site KCI Associates of NC, PA
DMS Project # 97085 33 2023-MY05

Easement Encroachment Area Photos

Scalloping near the bottom of the site, with approximate easement line – 12/7/23

Stony Fork Restoration Site KCI Associates of NC, PA
DMS Project # 97085 34 2023-MY05

APPENDIX C

Vegetation Plot Data

Stony Fork Restoration Site KCI Associates of NC, PA
DMS Project # 97085 35 2023-MY05

Planted Total Planted Total Planted Total Planted Total Planted Total Planted Total Planted Total
2
4 4 44 11 22 1 1 33 1 1
11 5 5
43311
1
44
2 2 44 44
40 7 1 11 4
3 3 22 11 11
112
2111111112211
55 1 1 1 1
22 11 11
1
84132 6
10 1 1 1 1 1
11
11
33 11
7
1 3 11 33 66 11 1 1
12 80 12 32 11 25 16 33 10 13 12 12 12 22
512510686115 777810
486 3,237 486 1,295 445 1,012 647 1,335 405 526 486 486 486 890
Table 7. Stem Count by Plot and Species
Stony Fork Restoration Site, DMS Project #97085
Current Plot Data (MY05 2023)
Plot 06 Plot 7
11
0.02 0.02
Plot 05
Species
Oak (Quercus sp.)
Pawpaw (Asimina triloba )
Plot 02 Plot 03 Plot 04
Eastern Baccharis (Baccharis halimifolia )
Plot 01
Species count
Stems per ACRE
White Oak (Quercus alba )
Willow Oak (Quercus phellos )
American Elm (Ulmus americana )
American Holly (Illex opaca )
American Persimmon (Diospyros virginiana )
American Sycamore (Platanus occidentalis )
Bald Cypress (Taxodium distichum )
Black Willow (Salix nigra )
Elderberry (Sambucus canadensis )
Green Ash (Fraxinus pennsylvanica )
Loblolly Pine (Pinus taeda )
Pin Oak (Quercus palustris )
Red Maple (Acer rubrum )
Red Oak (Quercus rubra )
River Birch (Betula nigra )
Silky Dogwood (Cornus amomum )
Spicebush (Lindera benzoin )
Sugar Berry (Celtis laevigata )
Swamp Chestnut Oak (Quercus michauxii )
Sweet Bay (Magnolia virginiana )
Sweetgum (Liquidambar styraciflua )
Tulip Poplar (Liriodendron tulipifera )
Water Oak (Quercus nigra )
Wax Myrtle (Myrica cerifera )
11
Unknown
Stem count
1
Winged Sumac (Rhus copallinum )
11size (ares)
0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02size (ACRES)0.02

Stony Fork Restoration Site KCI Associates of NC, PA
DMS Project # 97085 36 2023-MY05

Planted Total Planted Total Planted Total Planted Total Planted Total
22
1
33
4 4 33 66 55
11
33 33 11
11 2 2
2 2 55 55 44
18 1 3
11 11 11
22
1 1 55 11 99
11
11 11
11211 3
11
11 1 1
9 10 17471620212410 21
56575868712
364 405 688 1,902 647 809 850 971 405 850
Winged Sumac (Rhus copallinum )
11size (ares)
0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02size (ACRES)0.02
11
Unknown
Stem count
1
Sweet Bay (Magnolia virginiana )
Sweetgum (Liquidambar styraciflua )
Tulip Poplar (Liriodendron tulipifera )
Water Oak (Quercus nigra )
Wax Myrtle (Myrica cerifera )
River Birch (Betula nigra )
Silky Dogwood (Cornus amomum )
Spicebush (Lindera benzoin )
Sugar Berry (Celtis laevigata )
Swamp Chestnut Oak (Quercus michauxii )
Species count
Stems per ACRE
White Oak (Quercus alba )
Willow Oak (Quercus phellos )
American Elm (Ulmus americana )
American Holly (Illex opaca )
American Persimmon (Diospyros virginiana )
American Sycamore (Platanus occidentalis )
Bald Cypress (Taxodium distichum )
Black Willow (Salix nigra )
Elderberry (Sambucus canadensis )
Green Ash (Fraxinus pennsylvanica )
Loblolly Pine (Pinus taeda )
Pin Oak (Quercus palustris )
R ed Maple (Acer rubrum )
Red Oak (Quercus rubra )
Oak (Quercus sp.)
Pawpaw (Asimina triloba )
Plot R2 Plot R3 Plot R4
Eastern Baccharis (Baccharis halimifolia )
Plot R1 Plot R5
Species
Table 7. Stem Count by Plot and Species
Stony Fork Restoration Site, DMS Project #97085
Current Plot Data (MY05 2023)

Stony Fork Restoration Site KCI Associates of NC, PA
DMS Project # 97085 37 2023-MY05

Planted Total Planted Total Planted Total Planted Total Planted Total
63
11
33 2244
34 34 37 37 43 44 40 40 9 9
77 55 557711
11 15 1 7 2 6 2
1
77 4 31122
26 26 37 37 31 31 25 25 29 29
85 13 30 2 2
1 1 18 18
2
10 10 9 9 11 11 7 7 3 3
8654112
22
23 25 13 14 27 27 17 17 2 2
8 8 7 7 10 10 8 8 10 10
1
22
66 66 557777
11111
51 20 11 2 8
213 1112 6814201414
11 11
221
5 5 4 5 5 6 12 15 1 4
7
15 17 19 19 23 23 30 30 3 3
4 4 199 199
158 339 149 208 170 232 187 212 301 307
14 23 11 20 12 19 18 20 15 17
533 1,143 502 701 573 782 631 715 1,015 1,035
12 12
size (ares)
0.30 0.30 0.30 0.30
size (ACRES)0.30
Tulip Poplar (Liriodendron tulipifera )
Water Oak (Quercus nigra )
Wax Myrtle (Myrica cerifera )
12 12
Unknown
Stem count
12
Winged Sumac (Rhus copallinum )
Spicebush (Lindera benzoin )
Sugar Berry (Celtis laevigata )
Swamp Chestnut Oak (Quercus michauxii )
Sweet Bay (Magnolia virginiana )
Sweetgum (Liquidambar styraciflua )
Pin Oak (Quercus palustris )
Red Maple (Acer rubrum )
Red Oak (Quercus rubra )
River Birch (Betula nigra )
Silky Dogwood (Cornus amomum )
Annual Means
Species count
Stems per ACRE
Table 7. Stem Count by Plot and Species
Stony Fork Restoration Site, DMS Project #97085
White Oak (Quercus alba )
Willow Oak (Quercus phellos )
American Elm (Ulmus americana )
American Holly (Illex opaca )
American Persimmon (Diospyros virginiana )
American Sycamore (Platanus occidentalis )
Bald Cypress (Taxodium distichum )
Black Willow (Salix nigra )
Elderberry (Sambucus canadensis )
Green Ash (Fraxinus pennsylvanica )
Loblolly Pine (Pinus taeda )
MY00 (2019)
Species
Oak (Quercus sp.)
Pawpaw (Asimina triloba )
MY03 (2021) MY02 (2020) MY01 (2019)
Eastern Baccharis (Baccharis halimifolia )
MY05 (2023)
Stony Fork Restoration Site KCI Associates of NC, PA
DMS Project # 97085 38 2023-MY05 

APPENDIX D

Stream Measurement and Geomorphology Data

Stony Fork Restoration Site KCI Associates of NC, PA
DMS Project # 97085 39 2023-MY05 
Dimension and Substrate
Base MY1 MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7 MY+ Base MY1 MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7 MY+ Base MY1 MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7 MY+
Bankfull Elevation (ft) based on AB BKF area 206.8 206.7 206.7 206.6 206.8 206.6 206.6 206.6 206.6 206.6 192.5 192.5 192.4 192.6 192.5
Bankfull Width (ft) 12.6 11.7 11.6 8.0 10.8 9.3 11.0 10.2 11.3 10.2 12.6 11.9 12.5 12.5 13.0
Floodprone Width (ft) - - - - ->80 >80 >80 >80 >80 53.3 53.2 50.1 52.7 55.4
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft) 0.9 1.0 1.0 1.4 1.1 0.8 0.6 0.7 0.6 0.7 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
Bankfull Max Depth (ft) 1.9 2.0 2.1 2.3 2.2 1.2 1.1 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.6 1.7 1.5 1.5 1.6
Cross-Sectional Area (ft2) based on AB BKF area 11.5 11.5 11.5 11.5 11.5 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 12.5 12.5 12.5 12.5 12.5
Cross-Sectional Area (ft2) based on AB BKF elevation 11.5 11.9 12.1 12.9 11.1 7.0 7.1 6.8 6.4 6.5 12.5 13.2 13.8 11.6 12.9
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio - - - - -12.2 17.3 14.8 18.3 14.9 12.8 11.4 12.6 12.5 13.5
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio - - - - -8.7 7.2 8.0 7.2 7.9 4.2 4.5 4.0 4.2 4.3
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio - - - - -1.0 0.9 1.0 0.8 0.8 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.9 1.0
d50 (mm) - - - - -22 32 24 48 -38 46 20 69 -
Base MY1 MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7 MY+ Base MY1 MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7 MY+ Base MY1 MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7 MY+
Bankfull Elevation (ft) based on AB BKF area 192.0 191.9 191.9 191.9 192.0 182.1 182.2 182.2 182.3 182.2 181.7 181.8 181.7 181.7 181.6
Bankfull Width (ft) 12.5 13.0 12.4 12.7 14.2 12.2 13.6 13.2 14.2 13.2 12.0 13.1 11.5 11.2 10.3
Floodprone Width (ft) - - - - ->80 >80 >80 >80 >80 - - - - -
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft) 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.0 0.9 0.8 0.8 0.7 0.8 1.2 1.1 1.3 1.3 1.4
Bankfull Max Depth (ft) 1.9 2.1 2.1 2.2 2.0 1.4 1.3 1.3 1.4 1.4 2.4 2.4 2.5 2.4 2.4
Cross-Sectional Area (ft2) based on AB BKF area 13.6 13.6 13.6 13.6 13.6 10.6 10.6 10.6 10.6 10.6 14.5 14.5 14.5 14.5 14.5
Cross-Sectional Area (ft2) based on AB BKF elevation 13.6 14.5 15.2 14.6 13.8 10.6 10.1 9.3 8.2 9.8 14.5 14.3 15.2 15.0 16.2
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio - -- - -14.1 17.4 16.4 19.1 16.5 - - - - -
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio - - - - -6.6 5.9 6.1 5.7 6.1 - - - - -
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio - - - - -1.0 1.0 1.0 0.9 1.0 - - - - -
d50 (mm) - - - - -52 44 25 36 -- - - - -
Table 8. Cross Section Dimensional Morphology Summary
Stony Fork Stream Restoration Site, DMS Project #97085
Cross-Section 1 (Pool)
Station 13+58, SF
Cross-Section 2 (Riffle)
Station 13+85, SF
Cross-Section 3 (Riffle)
Station 22+44, SF
Cross-Section 4 (Pool)
Station 26+17, SF
Cross-Section 5 (Riffle)
Station 35+12, SF
Cross-Section 6 (Pool)
Station 41+94, SF

Stony Fork Restoration Site KCI Associates of NC, PA
DMS Project # 97085 40 2023-MY05 
Base MY1 MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7 MY+ Base MY1 MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7 MY+ Base MY1 MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7 MY+
Bankfull Elevation (ft) based on AB BKF area 176.0 176.0 176.0 176.0 176.0 175.3 175.2 175.2 175.3 175.1 207.0 206.9 207.3 207.8 207.8
Bankfull Width (ft) 11.6 13.4 14.2 13.9 15.3 13.5 14.5 15.7 11.4 13.6 5.5 5.9 8.2 5.5 8.5
Floodprone Width (ft) >90 >90 >90 >90 >90 - - - - -- - - - -
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft) 1.1 1.0 0.9 0.9 0.8 1.5 1.4 1.3 1.8 1.5 0.7 0.6 0.4 0.7 0.4
Bankfull Max Depth (ft) 1.7 1.6 1.8 1.6 1.6 2.7 2.7 2.5 2.8 2.6 1.1 1.1 0.8 0.8 0.7
Cross-Sectional Area (ft2) based on AB BKF area 12.8 12.8 12.8 12.8 12.8 20.7 20.7 20.7 20.7 20.7 3.7 3.7 3.7 3.7 3..7
Cross-Sectional Area (ft2) based on AB BKF elevation 12.8 13.2 13.3 13.0 12.7 20.7 21.4 21.5 20.0 22.9 3.7 4.0 2.0 0.0 0.0
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio 10.4 14.0 15.7 15.0 18.3 - - - - - - - - - -
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio 8.0 6.8 6.5 6.6 5.9 - - - - - - - - - -
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.9 - - - - - - - - - -
d50 (mm) 16 29 41 65 - - - - - - - - - -
Base MY1 MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7 MY+ Base MY1 MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7 MY+ Base MY1 MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7 MY+
Bankfull Elevation (ft) based on AB BKF area 207.1 207.1 207.2 207.3 207.4 198.4 198.3 198.3 198.3 198.3 198.4 198.3 198.3 198.4 198.5
Bankfull Width (ft) 6.2 5.5 5.4 6.8 7.1 6.0 5.8 5.7 6.1 5.9 7.5 7.3 7.4 7.3 7.4
Floodprone Width (ft) 38.0 39.4 41.5 34.1 41.5 >60 >60 >60 >60 >60 - - - - -
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft) 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.6 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7
Bankfull Max Depth (ft) 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.4 0.5 0.7 0.7 0.6 0.7 0.6 1.2 1.2 1.1 1.2 1.1
Cross-Sectional Area (ft2) based on AB BKF area 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 4.8 4.8 4.8 4.8 4.8
Cross-Sectional Area (ft2) based on AB BKF elevation 2.2 2.1 1.8 1.1 0.5 2.0 2.6 2.6 2.2 2.3 4.8 5.5 5.3 5.0 4.3
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio 17.7 13.7 13.4 20.9 22.9 18.3 17.1 16.0 18.5 17.6 - - - - -
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio 6.1 7.2 7.7 5.0 5.9 10.9 10.9 11.2 10.7 10.8 - - - - -
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio 1.0 0.9 0.8 1.2 1.0 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.1 1.0 - - - - -
d50 (mm) 18 20 2.5 0.062 - 78 75 57 66 - - - - - -
Table 8. Cross Section Dimensional Morphology Summary
Stony Fork Stream Restoration Site, DMS Project #97085
Cross-Section 7 (Riffle)
Station 42+58, SF
Cross-Section 8 (Pool)
Station 57+19, SF
Cross-Section 9 (Pool)
Station 57+44, T3
Cross-Section 12 (Pool)
Station 99+25, T1
Cross-Section 10 (Riffle)
Station 96+69, T3
Cross-Section 11 (Riffle)
Station 99+07, T1

Stony Fork Restoration Site KCI Associates of NC, PA
DMS Project # 97085 41 2023-MY05 
Base MY1 MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7 MY+ Base MY1 MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7 MY+ Base MY1 MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7 MY+
Bankfull Elevation (ft) based on AB BKF area 188.4 188.4 188.2 188.4 188.4 187.9 187.9 188.0 188.0 188.0 180.9 180.8 180.7 180.6 180.9
Bankfull Width (ft) 11.3 12.7 9.5 8.1 11.5 9.7 11.8 11.1 11.5 12.7 11.8 11.7 10.9 10.4 11.8
Floodprone Width (ft) - - - - - 43.4 46.8 47.2 48.9 50.7 - - - - -
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft) 0.8 0.7 1.0 1.2 0.8 0.6 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.1 1.0
Bankfull Max Depth (ft) 1.5 1.4 1.7 2.1 1.9 1.0 1.1 1.1 1.2 1.2 1.8 1.9 1.8 1.9 1.9
Cross-Sectional Area (ft2) based on AB BKF area 9.3 9.3 9.3 9.3 9.3 5.8 5.8 5.8 5.8 5.8 11.2 11.2 11.2 11.2 11.2
Cross-Sectional Area (ft2) based on AB BKF elevation 9.3 8.7 11.0 9.0 9.6 5.8 5.3 4.4 4.6 4.8 11.2 11.8 12.8 14.0 11.3
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio - -- - -16.4 24.0 21.4 22.9 28.0 - - - - -
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio - - - - -4.5 4.0 4.2 4.3 4.0 - - - - -
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio - - - - -1.0 0.8 0.9 0.8 0.8 - - - - -
d50 (mm) - - - - -42 16 1.4 2 -- - - - -
Base MY1 MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7 MY+
Bankfull Elevation (ft) based on AB BKF area 180.7 180.7 180.8 180.8 180.8
Bankfull Width (ft) 8.6 9.9 10.0 9.9 9.2
Floodprone Width (ft) >80 >80 >80 >80 >80
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft) 0.7 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.7
Bankfull Max Depth (ft) 1.2 1.1 1.0 1.0 1.1
Cross-Sectional Area (ft2) based on AB BKF area 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0
Cross-Sectional Area (ft2) based on AB BKF elevation 6.0 5.8 5.2 5.1 5.6
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio 12.3 16.3 16.6 16.4 14.1
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio 9.4 8.3 7.6 8.1 8.8
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio 1.0 1.0 0.9 0.9 0.9
d50 (mm) 45 44 37 11 -
Table 8. Cross Section Dimensional Morphology Summary
Stony Fork Stream Restoration Site, DMS Project #97085
Cross-Section 13 (Pool)
Station 252+25, T2
Cross-Section 14 (Riffle)
Station 225+97, T2
Cross-Section 15 (Pool)
Station 226+04, T2
Cross-Section 16 (Riffle)
Station 252+25, T2

Cross-Section Plots
Station Elevation
0.0 208.52 85.6 206.70 206.79
5.1 207.98 88.1 206.72 11.5
8.8 207.61 88.2 206.88 11.1
12.3 207.33 10.8
14.7 207.23 ---
18.2 207.19 ---
22.1 207.24 2.2
27.3 207.11 1.1
33.4 207.13 ---
38.4 207.12 ---
45.9 206.95 ---
47.1 206.96 204.6
49.2 206.76
51.0 206.37
51.6 206.36
51.9 205.98
52.2 205.82
52.9 205.46
53.8 205.31
54.1 205.14
54.5 204.65
55.3 204.59
55.9 204.80
56.5 204.91
56.7 204.93
57.7 205.58
58.1 205.60
58.3 206.28
58.9 206.51
59.9 206.85
62.0 206.85
63.5 207.06
64.3 207.44
66.2 207.71
73.2 207.49
80.2 206.99
River Basin:Neuse River
Site:Stony Fork
XS ID XS1
Drainage Area (sq mi):0.28
Date:7/24/2023
Field Crew:T. Seelinger/E. Teague/ C. Kleven
W / D Ratio:
SUMMARY DATA
Bankfull Elevation (ft) - Based on AB-Bankfull Area
Bankfull Cross-Sectional Area:
Bankfull Width:
Flood Prone Area Elevation:
Flood Prone Width:
Max Depth at Bankfull:
Mean Depth at Bankfull:
Total Cross-Sectional Area:
Entrenchment Ratio:
Bank Height Ratio:
Thalweg Elevation:
204
205
206
207
208
209
0 1020304050607080
El
e
v
a
t
i
o
n

(
f
e
e
t
)
Station (feet)
Stony Fork, XS1, Pool, SF
Bankfull MY00 MY01 MY02 MY03 MY05
Cross-Section Plots
Station Elevation
0.0000 208.2690 206.62
0.0677 208.0340 7.0
4.8614 207.8300 6.5
8.3538 207.6810 10.2
14.4387 207.2670 207.9
21.2078 206.8330 80.8
27.2292 206.5630 1.3
31.9171 206.7470 0.7
35.3864 206.4910 14.9
38.8833 206.8720 7.9
42.0408 206.7890 0.8
42.9235 206.7160 205.3
44.1759 206.5350
45.2628 206.4030
45.9116 206.2250
46.2732 205.9740
46.7009 205.7230
47.7917 205.4950
48.0540 205.4280
48.6447 205.3440
49.0837 205.3250
50.4301 205.5520
51.0532 205.4660
51.8120 206.0080
52.6052 206.3830
53.8286 206.6120
56.5000 206.6030
59.0637 206.5730
61.6345 206.4990
65.2497 206.5870
70.4505 206.8980
74.1058 207.0060
77.8656 206.8680
83.6099 206.7000
83.7147 206.9980
Total Cross-Sectional Area:
Bankfull Width:
Flood Prone Area Elevation:
Flood Prone Width:
Max Depth at Bankfull:
Mean Depth at Bankfull:
W / D Ratio:
Entrenchment Ratio:
Bank Height Ratio:
Thalweg Elevation:
SUMMARY DATA
Bankfull Elevation (ft) - Based on AB-Bankfull Area
Bankfull Cross-Sectional Area:
Date:7/24/2023
Field Crew:T. Seelinger/E. Teague/ C. Kleven
Drainage Area (sq mi):0.28
River Basin:Neuse River
Site:Stony Fork
XS ID XS2
205
206
206
207
207
208
208
209
209
0 1020304050607080
El
e
v
a
t
i
o
n

(
f
e
e
t
)
Station (feet)
Stony Fork, XS2, Riffle, SF
Bankfull Flood Prone Area MY00 MY01 MY02 MY03 MY05
Cross-Section Plots
Station Elevation
0.0 195.60 192.48
0.1 195.34 12.5
4.1 195.37 12.9
8.7 195.05 13.0
13.5 194.71 194.1
15.9 194.00 55.4
20.2 193.35 1.6
24.4 193.08 1.0
28.8 192.71 13.5
32.7 192.69 4.3
36.0 192.66 1.0
37.3 192.58 190.9
38.8 192.17
40.7 191.59
41.6 191.22
42.2 190.88
43.7 190.89
45.2 190.93
46.9 191.11
48.3 191.71
49.2 192.22
50.0 192.46
54.0 192.60
58.8 192.70
62.8 193.16
66.4 193.72
71.0 194.06
71.0 194.51
Total Cross-Sectional Area:
Bankfull Width:
Flood Prone Area Elevation:
Flood Prone Width:
Max Depth at Bankfull:
Mean Depth at Bankfull:
W / D Ratio:
Entrenchment Ratio:
Bank Height Ratio:
Thalweg Elevation:
SUMMARY DATA
Bankfull Elevation (ft) - Based on AB-Bankfull Area
Bankfull Cross-Sectional Area:
Date:7/24/2023
Field Crew:T. Seelinger/E. Teague/ C. Kleven
Drainage Area (sq mi):0.46
River Basin:Neuse River
Site:Stony Fork
XS ID XS3
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
0 10203040506070
El
e
v
a
t
i
o
n

(
f
e
e
t
)
Station (feet)
Stony Fork, XS3, Riffle, SF
Bankfull Flood Prone Area MY00 MY01 MY02 MY03 MY05
Cross-Section Plots
Station Elevation
0.0 195.23 191.98
0.1 194.87 13.6
4.2 194.46 13.8
8.5 194.20 14.2
12.7 193.88 ---
15.2 193.48 ---
17.6 192.94 2.0
19.6 192.81 1.0
22.6 192.25 ---
24.5 192.32 ---
25.3 192.08 ---
26.5 191.23 190.0
27.7 190.55
29.4 190.01
31.7 190.00
32.3 190.47
33.7 191.28
35.8 191.54
37.8 191.85
41.4 192.10
46.1 192.14
50.6 192.15
52.9 192.47
57.6 192.84
61.6 192.94
Total Cross-Sectional Area:
Bankfull Width:
Flood Prone Area Elevation:
Flood Prone Width:
Max Depth at Bankfull:
Mean Depth at Bankfull:
W / D Ratio:
Entrenchment Ratio:
Bank Height Ratio:
Thalweg Elevation:
SUMMARY DATA
Bankfull Elevation (ft) - Based on AB-Bankfull Area
Bankfull Cross-Sectional Area:
Date:7/24/2023
Field Crew:T. Seelinger/E. Teague/ C. Kleven
Drainage Area (sq mi):0.46
River Basin:Neuse River
Site:Stony Fork
XS ID XS4
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
0 102030405060
El
e
v
a
t
i
o
n

(
f
e
e
t
)
Station (feet)
Stony Fork, XS4, Pool, SF
Bankfull MY00 MY01 MY02 MY03 MY05
Cross-Section Plots
Station Elevation
0.0 183.06 182.20
0.0 182.49 10.6
4.2 182.26 9.8
10.3 182.55 13.2
15.8 182.41 183.6
21.0 182.57 80.7
26.9 182.52 1.4
30.1 182.22 0.8
31.0 182.28 16.5
33.2 181.75 6.1
34.2 181.50 1.0
35.2 181.11 180.8
35.8 180.92
37.0 180.92
37.7 180.80
39.4 180.78
40.2 180.95
40.7 181.32
42.6 181.82
43.9 182.11
44.7 182.21
47.8 182.41
51.8 182.44
56.6 182.68
61.2 182.46
66.1 182.53
71.6 182.60
75.9 182.55
80.4 182.64
80.7 183.27
Total Cross-Sectional Area:
Bankfull Width:
Flood Prone Area Elevation:
Flood Prone Width:
Max Depth at Bankfull:
Mean Depth at Bankfull:
W / D Ratio:
Entrenchment Ratio:
Bank Height Ratio:
Thalweg Elevation:
SUMMARY DATA
Bankfull Elevation (ft) - Based on AB-Bankfull Area
Bankfull Cross-Sectional Area:
Date:7/24/2023
Field Crew:T. Seelinger/E. Teague/ C. Kleven
Drainage Area (sq mi):0.46
River Basin:Neuse River
Site:Stony Fork
XS ID XS5
180
181
182
183
184
0 1020304050607080
El
e
v
a
t
i
o
n

(
f
e
e
t
)
Station (feet)
Stony Fork, XS5, Riffle, SF
Bankfull Flood Prone Area MY00 MY01 MY02 MY03 MY05
Cross-Section Plots
Station Elevation
0.0 183.31 79.7 182.72 181.59
0.0 183.26 81.0 182.64 14.5
1.0 183.01 81.1 183.12 16.2
2.3 182.79 10.3
5.2 182.62 ---
7.3 182.60 ---
8.5 182.43 2.4
11.0 182.15 1.4
13.8 182.09 ---
15.8 181.99 ---
18.2 181.78 ---
20.6 181.79 179.2
21.4 181.77
22.5 181.49
23.1 181.24
23.3 180.69
24.0 179.71
25.3 179.21
26.4 179.19
27.8 179.43
29.1 179.79
29.5 180.20
30.0 180.70
31.4 181.43
33.1 181.69
34.3 181.90
38.0 181.91
42.1 181.75
45.2 181.75
49.2 181.70
53.5 182.01
56.4 182.20
60.6 182.46
68.5 182.41
72.8 182.55
76.9 182.67
Total Cross-Sectional Area:
Bankfull Width:
Flood Prone Area Elevation:
Flood Prone Width:
Max Depth at Bankfull:
Mean Depth at Bankfull:
W / D Ratio:
Entrenchment Ratio:
Bank Height Ratio:
Thalweg Elevation:
SUMMARY DATA
Bankfull Elevation (ft) - Based on AB-Bankfull Area
Bankfull Cross-Sectional Area:
Date:7/24/2023
Field Crew:T. Seelinger/E. Teague/ C. Kleven
Drainage Area (sq mi):0.46
River Basin:Neuse River
Site:Stony Fork
XS ID XS6
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
0 1020304050607080
El
e
v
a
t
i
o
n

(
f
e
e
t
)
Station (feet)
Stony Fork, XS6, Pool, SF
Bankfull MY00 MY01 MY02 MY03 MY05
Cross-Section Plots
Station Elevation
0.0 177.93 176.03
5.7 176.63 12.8
10.7 176.42 12.7
15.4 176.21 15.3
20.5 176.10 177.7
26.2 176.02 91.2
31.5 176.04 1.6
36.8 176.30 0.8
38.2 176.20 18.3
39.7 175.89 5.9
40.8 175.54 0.9
41.9 175.25 174.4
42.3 175.10
42.6 174.80
43.3 174.43
44.1 174.40
45.8 174.47
47.0 174.46
48.0 174.72
48.4 175.12
49.4 175.19
50.3 175.49
52.2 175.89
54.5 176.04
59.9 175.93
63.9 175.80
68.8 175.93
72.1 176.07
75.9 176.20
79.1 176.18
83.6 176.49
87.5 176.57
90.3 176.81
92.4 176.86
Total Cross-Sectional Area:
Bankfull Width:
Flood Prone Area Elevation:
Flood Prone Width:
Max Depth at Bankfull:
Mean Depth at Bankfull:
W / D Ratio:
Entrenchment Ratio:
Bank Height Ratio:
Thalweg Elevation:
SUMMARY DATA
Bankfull Elevation (ft) - Based on AB-Bankfull Area
Bankfull Cross-Sectional Area:
Date:7/24/2023
Field Crew:T. Seelinger/E. Teague/ C. Kleven
Drainage Area (sq mi):0.83
River Basin:Neuse River
Site:Stony Fork
XS ID XS7
174
175
176
177
178
179
0 102030405060708090
El
e
v
a
t
i
o
n

(
f
e
e
t
)
Station (feet)
Stony Fork, XS7, Riffle, SF
Bankfull Flood Prone Area MY00 MY01 MY02 MY03 MY05
Cross-Section Plots
Station Elevation
0.0 176.49 175.10
0.1 175.95 20.7
4.8 175.58 22.9
9.6 175.60 13.6
14.9 175.67 ---
20.6 175.61 ---
25.7 175.53 2.6
33.7 175.48 1.5
40.4 175.20 ---
44.1 174.96 ---
44.8 174.64 ---
46.3 174.40 172.5
47.0 174.12
47.8 173.39
49.3 172.84
50.5 172.50
52.2 172.58
53.1 172.78
54.3 172.92
55.1 173.53
55.7 174.21
56.3 174.75
57.7 175.12
58.4 175.29
61.7 175.38
66.4 175.39
71.9 175.78
76.1 176.13
78.6 176.43
80.9 176.66
80.9 177.61
Total Cross-Sectional Area:
Bankfull Width:
Flood Prone Area Elevation:
Flood Prone Width:
Max Depth at Bankfull:
Mean Depth at Bankfull:
W / D Ratio:
Entrenchment Ratio:
Bank Height Ratio:
Thalweg Elevation:
SUMMARY DATA
Bankfull Elevation (ft) - Based on AB-Bankfull Area
Bankfull Cross-Sectional Area:
Date:7/24/2023
Field Crew:T. Seelinger/E. Teague/ C. Kleven
Drainage Area (sq mi):0.83
River Basin:Neuse River
Site:Stony Fork
XS ID XS8
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
0 1020304050607080
El
e
v
a
t
i
o
n

(
f
e
e
t
)
Station (feet)
Stony Fork, XS8, Pool, SF
Bankfull MY00 MY01 MY02 MY03 MY05
Cross-Section Plots
Station Elevation
0.0 210.82 60.5 209.3750 207.79
-0.1 210.30 3.7
3.2 210.23 0.0
7.3 209.95 8.5
9.4 209.82 ---
11.4 209.23 ---
13.2 208.72 0.7
16.9 207.92 0.4
19.3 207.53 ---
21.1 207.49 ---
23.6 207.57 ---
24.5 207.51 207.1
25.3 207.42
25.8 207.24
26.3 207.23
26.6 207.11
27.2 207.22
27.8 207.21
28.7 207.37
29.6 207.21
30.4 207.39
30.9 207.49
32.1 207.59
33.3 207.57
34.9 207.54
36.2 207.35
37.5 207.32
40.9 207.36
43.4 207.42
46.6 207.66
48.3 207.77
51.9 208.11
54.4 208.39
57.0 208.60
59.4 208.88
60.5 208.89
Total Cross-Sectional Area:
Bankfull Width:
Flood Prone Area Elevation:
Flood Prone Width:
Max Depth at Bankfull:
Mean Depth at Bankfull:
W / D Ratio:
Entrenchment Ratio:
Bank Height Ratio:
Thalweg Elevation:
SUMMARY DATA
Bankfull Elevation (ft) - Based on AB-Bankfull Area
Bankfull Cross-Sectional Area:
Date:7/24/2023
Field Crew:T. Seelinger/E. Teague/ C. Kleven
Drainage Area (sq mi):0.04
River Basin:Neuse River
Site:Stony Fork
XS ID XS9
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
0 102030405060
El
e
v
a
t
i
o
n

(
f
e
e
t
)
Station (feet)
Stony Fork, XS9, Pool, T3
Bankfull MY00 MY01 MY02 MY03 MY05
Cross-Section Plots
Station Elevation
0.0 209.74 207.37
3.8 208.99 2.2
8.6 208.58 0.5
16.1 208.14 7.1
24.5 207.69 207.9
33.8 207.62 41.5
38.1 207.62 0.5
40.3 207.51 0.3
41.3 207.35 22.9
42.5 207.08 5.9
43.2 207.06 1.0
43.8 207.04 206.9
44.6 207.02
45.7 206.87
46.4 206.95
47.1 206.93
47.6 207.21
48.2 207.36
49.5 207.36
52.4 207.37
56.8 207.21
59.0 207.63
63.7 207.96
67.3 208.27
70.1 208.43
71.9 208.43
71.9 209.11
Total Cross-Sectional Area:
Bankfull Width:
Flood Prone Area Elevation:
Flood Prone Width:
Max Depth at Bankfull:
Mean Depth at Bankfull:
W / D Ratio:
Entrenchment Ratio:
Bank Height Ratio:
Thalweg Elevation:
SUMMARY DATA
Bankfull Elevation (ft) - Based on AB-Bankfull Area
Bankfull Cross-Sectional Area:
Date:7/24/2023
Field Crew:T. Seelinger/E. Teague/ C. Kleven
Drainage Area (sq mi):0.04
River Basin:Neuse River
Site:Stony Fork
XS ID XS10
206
207
208
209
210
211
0 10203040506070
El
e
v
a
t
i
o
n

(
f
e
e
t
)
Station (feet)
Stony Fork, XS10, Riffle, T3
Bankfull Flood Prone Area MY00 MY01 MY02 MY03 MY05
Cross-Section Plots
Station Elevation
0.0 199.12 198.32
0.1 198.81 2.0
4.6 198.70 2.3
9.3 198.88 5.9
14.1 198.71 199.0
17.2 198.66 63.8
22.4 198.60 0.6
28.0 198.47 0.3
31.6 198.63 17.6
33.7 198.50 10.8
35.2 198.43 1.0
36.1 198.34 197.7
37.3 198.19
38.2 197.89
38.6 197.69
39.2 197.68
40.2 197.85
41.1 197.97
41.5 198.17
42.3 198.35
44.6 198.54
46.7 198.52
50.5 198.64
54.8 198.70
59.4 198.76
63.8 198.94
67.3 199.35
72.4 199.47
72.5 199.79
Total Cross-Sectional Area:
Bankfull Width:
Flood Prone Area Elevation:
Flood Prone Width:
Max Depth at Bankfull:
Mean Depth at Bankfull:
W / D Ratio:
Entrenchment Ratio:
Bank Height Ratio:
Thalweg Elevation:
SUMMARY DATA
Bankfull Elevation (ft) - Based on AB-Bankfull Area
Bankfull Cross-Sectional Area:
Date:7/24/2023
Field Crew:T. Seelinger/E. Teague/ C. Kleven
Drainage Area (sq mi):0.02
River Basin:Neuse River
Site:Stony Fork
XS ID XS11
197
198
198
199
199
200
200
201
201
0 10203040506070
El
e
v
a
t
i
o
n

(
f
e
e
t
)
Station (feet)
Stony Fork, XS11, Riffle, T1
Bankfull Flood Prone Area MY00 MY01 MY02 MY03 MY05
Cross-Section Plots
Station Elevation
0.0 199.24 198.47
0.0 198.96 4.8
6.9 198.95 4.3
12.9 198.82 7.4
19.0 198.69 ---
25.6 198.53 ---
31.5 198.58 1.1
37.2 198.60 0.7
37.5 198.56 ---
41.6 198.51 ---
42.5 198.19 ---
43.5 197.99 197.4
44.1 197.76
44.7 197.58
45.2 197.43
45.7 197.42
46.3 197.39
46.7 197.39
47.4 197.59
48.1 197.96
48.3 198.15
49.4 198.62
50.3 198.51
52.5 198.67
54.0 198.70
55.5 199.01
58.0 199.51
61.5 199.72
64.1 199.77
67.5 199.81
71.0 199.81
75.2 200.03
Total Cross-Sectional Area:
Bankfull Width:
Flood Prone Area Elevation:
Flood Prone Width:
Max Depth at Bankfull:
Mean Depth at Bankfull:
W / D Ratio:
Entrenchment Ratio:
Bank Height Ratio:
Thalweg Elevation:
SUMMARY DATA
Bankfull Elevation (ft) - Based on AB-Bankfull Area
Bankfull Cross-Sectional Area:
Date:7/24/2023
Field Crew:T. Seelinger/E. Teague/ C. Kleven
Drainage Area (sq mi):0.02
River Basin:Neuse River
Site:Stony Fork
XS ID XS12
196
197
198
199
200
201
0 10203040506070
El
e
v
a
t
i
o
n

(
f
e
e
t
)
Station (feet)
Stony Fork, XS12, Pool, T1
Bankfull MY00 MY01 MY02 MY03 MY05
Cross-Section Plots
Station Elevation
0.0 190.20 188.35
2.9 189.40 9.3
7.1 189.06 9.6
13.5 188.48 11.5
17.4 188.46 ---
22.2 188.38 ---
27.1 188.37 1.9
31.7 188.75 0.8
35.3 188.18 ---
37.1 188.07 ---
38.6 187.96 ---
39.2 187.69 186.4
40.1 187.05
40.6 186.65
41.8 186.43
43.0 186.48
43.9 187.49
44.9 188.14
46.1 188.48
49.9 188.69
53.2 189.14
59.2 189.56
62.5 189.95
62.6 190.51
Total Cross-Sectional Area:
Bankfull Width:
Flood Prone Area Elevation:
Flood Prone Width:
Max Depth at Bankfull:
Mean Depth at Bankfull:
W / D Ratio:
Entrenchment Ratio:
Bank Height Ratio:
Thalweg Elevation:
SUMMARY DATA
Bankfull Elevation (ft) - Based on AB-Bankfull Area
Bankfull Cross-Sectional Area:
Date:7/24/2023
Field Crew:T. Seelinger/E. Teague/ C. Kleven
Drainage Area (sq mi):0.14
River Basin:Neuse River
Site:Stony Fork
XS ID XS13
186
187
188
189
190
191
0 102030405060
El
e
v
a
t
i
o
n

(
f
e
e
t
)
Station (feet)
Stony Fork, XS13, Pool, T2
Bankfull MY00 MY01 MY02 MY03 MY05
Cross-Section Plots
Station Elevation
0.0 190.40 187.99
0.1 189.65 5.8
5.2 189.14 4.8
10.9 188.59 12.7
16.9 188.26 189.2
23.1 188.17 50.7
28.9 188.01 1.2
31.3 187.97 0.5
35.1 187.76 28.0
36.0 187.56 4.0
36.8 186.92 0.8
38.1 186.83 186.8
39.6 186.99
39.9 187.21
41.6 187.73
42.9 188.08
46.9 188.27
51.7 188.50
56.5 189.31
62.3 189.72
62.3 190.54
Total Cross-Sectional Area:
Bankfull Width:
Flood Prone Area Elevation:
Flood Prone Width:
Max Depth at Bankfull:
Mean Depth at Bankfull:
W / D Ratio:
Entrenchment Ratio:
Bank Height Ratio:
Thalweg Elevation:
SUMMARY DATA
Bankfull Elevation (ft) - Based on AB-Bankfull Area
Bankfull Cross-Sectional Area:
Date:7/24/2023
Field Crew:T. Seelinger/E. Teague/ C. Kleven
Drainage Area (sq mi):0.14
River Basin:Neuse River
Site:Stony Fork
XS ID XS14
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
0 102030405060
El
e
v
a
t
i
o
n

(
f
e
e
t
)
Station (feet)
Stony Fork, XS14, Riffle, T2
Bankfull Flood Prone Area MY00 MY01 MY02 MY03 MY05
Cross-Section Plots
Station Elevation
0.0 183.66 180.86
4.2 182.41 11.2
8.2 182.22 11.3
15.5 181.59 11.8
21.0 181.83 ---
26.3 181.51 ---
28.0 181.28 1.9
32.7 181.04 1.0
35.6 180.90 ---
36.4 180.90 ---
38.6 180.55 ---
40.1 180.34 178.9
41.0 179.82
42.1 179.87
43.2 179.85
44.2 179.65
44.9 179.33
46.2 178.93
47.2 179.38
47.5 179.55
48.1 179.68
48.5 180.90
50.1 181.21
54.4 181.60
61.5 181.95
70.5 181.99
76.6 181.83
76.6 182.53
Total Cross-Sectional Area:
Bankfull Width:
Flood Prone Area Elevation:
Flood Prone Width:
Max Depth at Bankfull:
Mean Depth at Bankfull:
W / D Ratio:
Entrenchment Ratio:
Bank Height Ratio:
Thalweg Elevation:
SUMMARY DATA
Bankfull Elevation (ft) - Based on AB-Bankfull Area
Bankfull Cross-Sectional Area:
Date:7/24/2023
Field Crew:T. Seelinger/E. Teague/ C. Kleven
Drainage Area (sq mi):0.22
River Basin:Neuse River
Site:Stony Fork
XS ID XS15
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
0 10203040506070
El
e
v
a
t
i
o
n

(
f
e
e
t
)
Station (feet)
Stony Fork, XS15, Pool, T2
Bankfull MY00 MY01 MY02 MY03 MY05
Cross-Section Plots
Station Elevation
0.0 183.72 180.77
3.4 182.56 6.0
8.6 181.95 5.6
14.2 181.40 9.2
21.1 181.19 181.9
27.2 181.00 81.1
34.0 180.90 1.1
35.0 180.78 0.7
37.0 180.29 14.1
37.8 180.05 8.8
39.2 179.99 0.9
40.8 179.75 179.7
41.8 179.68
42.7 179.71
43.1 180.48
44.2 180.68
50.0 180.69
56.0 181.16
63.2 181.42
68.4 181.57
73.5 181.51
79.7 181.77
85.7 181.65
90.4 181.48
90.5 182.33
River Basin:Neuse River
Site:Stony Fork
XS ID XS16
Drainage Area (sq mi):0.22
Date:7/24/2023
Field Crew:T. Seelinger/E. Teague/ C. Kleven
SUMMARY DATA
Bankfull Elevation (ft) - Based on AB-Bankfull Area
Bankfull Cross-Sectional Area:
Thalweg Elevation:
Total Cross-Sectional Area:
Bankfull Width:
Flood Prone Area Elevation:
Flood Prone Width:
Max Depth at Bankfull:
Mean Depth at Bankfull:
W / D Ratio:
Entrenchment Ratio:
Bank Height Ratio:
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
0 102030405060708090
El
e
v
a
t
i
o
n

(
f
e
e
t
)
Station (feet)
Stony Fork, XS16, Riffle, T2
Bankfull Flood Prone Area MY00 MY01 MY02 MY03 MY05
Stony Fork Restoration Site KCI Associates of NC, PA
DMS Project # 97085 58 2023-MY05 

APPENDIX E

Hydrologic Data

Stony Fork Restoration Site KCI Associates of NC, PA
DMS Project # 97085 59 2023-MY05 
Table 9. Verification of Bankfull Events
Stony Fork Restoration Site, DMS Project #97085
Monitoring Year Date of Occurrence Method
MY01
July 12, 2019 Onsite stream gauge
July 23, 2019 Onsite stream gauge
August 14, 2019 Onsite stream gauge
September 5, 2019 Onsite stream gauge
October 13, 2019 Onsite stream gauge
October 20, 2019 Onsite stream gauge
MY02
February 6, 2020 Onsite stream gauge
February 22, 2020 Onsite stream gauge
July 23, 2020 Onsite stream gauge
August 4, 2020 Onsite stream gauge
August 15, 2020 Onsite stream gauge
August 31, 2020 Onsite stream gauge
September 25, 2020 Onsite stream gauge
September 29, 2020 Onsite stream gauge
MY03
February 16, 2021 Onsite stream gauge
June 9, 2021 Onsite stream gauge
July 8, 2021 Onsite stream gauge
July 19, 2021 Onsite stream gauge
July 27, 2021 Onsite stream gauge
MY04
January 23, 2022 Onsite stream gauge
January 30, 2022 Onsite stream gauge
September 10, 2022 Onsite stream gauge
MY05
April 30, 2023 Onsite stream gauge
July 7, 2023 Onsite stream gauge
July 14, 2023 Onsite stream gauge

0.0
1.0
2.0
3.0
4.0
178
179
180
181
182
1-
J
a
n
-
2
3
10
-
J
a
n
-
2
3
19
-
J
a
n
-
2
3
28
-
J
a
n
-
2
3
6-
F
e
b
-
2
3
15
-
F
e
b
-
2
3
24
-
F
e
b
-
2
3
5-
M
a
r
-
2
3
14
-
M
a
r
-
2
3
23
-
M
a
r
-
2
3
1-
A
p
r
-
2
3
10
-
A
p
r
-
2
3
19
-
A
p
r
-
2
3
28
-
A
p
r
-
2
3
7-
M
a
y
-
2
3
16
-
M
a
y
-
2
3
25
-
M
a
y
-
2
3
3-
J
u
n
-
2
3
12
-
J
u
n
-
2
3
21
-
J
u
n
-
2
3
30
-
J
u
n
-
2
3
9-
J
u
l
-
2
3
18
-
J
u
l
-
2
3
27
-
J
u
l
-
2
3
5-
A
u
g
-
2
3
14
-
A
u
g
-
2
3
23
-
A
u
g
-
2
3
1-
S
e
p
-
2
3
10
-
S
e
p
-
2
3
19
-
S
e
p
-
2
3
28
-
S
e
p
-
2
3
7-
O
c
t
-
2
3
16
-
O
c
t
-
2
3
25
-
O
c
t
-
2
3
3-
N
o
v
-
2
3
12
-
N
o
v
-
2
3
21
-
N
o
v
-
2
3
30
-
N
o
v
-
2
3
9-
D
e
c
-
2
3
18
-
D
e
c
-
2
3
27
-
D
e
c
-
2
3
Ra
i
n
f
a
l
l

(
i
n
)
St
r
e
a
m

S
t
a
g
e

E
l
e
v
a
t
i
o
n

(
f
t
)
Date
Stony Fork Restoration Site
Hydrograph
Stream Gauge SF Main
Rainfall Sensor Depth Stream Bed Elevation Stream Stage Elevation Bankfull Elevation
Gauge malfunction
Stony Fork Restoration Site KCI Associates of NC, PA
DMS Project # 97085 61 2023-MY05 
Table 10. Verification of Stream Flow
Stony Fork Restoration Site, DMS Project #97085
Gauge Camera
Reach Dates Achieving
Maximum
Consecutive
Days
Dates Achieving
Maximum
Consecutive
Days
T1
January 1 – June 10;
June 20 – August 13;
August 28 – November 5
161 February 22 – April 2 40
T1A January 1 – June 17;
June 20 – November 5 139
January 1 – June 16;
June 20 – August 12;
August 30 – November 2
167
T2
January 29 – March 15;
March 21 – June 13;
June 21 – August 1;
August 14 – November 5
85 February 22 – May 6 74
T3 January 1 – June 7 157 February 22 – June 5;
October 3 – December 7 104

Table 11. Stream Flow Criteria Attainment
Stony Fork Restoration Site, DMS Project #97085
Greater than 30 Days of Flow/Max Consecutive Days
Reach MY-01
2019
MY-02
2020
MY-03
2021
MY-04
2022
MY-05
2023
MY-06
2024
MY-07
2025
T1
(Gauge) Yes/60 Yes/152 Yes/147 Yes/158 Yes/161
T1
(Camera) * * Yes/76 Yes/56 Yes/40
T1A
(Gauge) Yes/182 Yes/152 Yes/259 Yes/174 Yes/139
T1A
(Camera) Yes/46 Yes/183 Yes/41 Yes/149 Yes/167
T2
(Gauge) Yes/85 Yes/152 Yes/115 Yes/155 Yes/85
T2
(Camera) Yes/84 Yes/53 Yes/75 Yes/118 Yes/74
T3
(Gauge) Yes/55 Yes/152 Yes/256 Yes/46 Yes/157
T3
(Camera) Yes/55 * Yes/106 Yes/154 Yes/104
*Camera obscured or malfunctioned for most of the year

0.0
1.0
2.0
3.0
4.0
203
204
205
1-
J
a
n
-
2
3
10
-
J
a
n
-
2
3
19
-
J
a
n
-
2
3
28
-
J
a
n
-
2
3
6-
F
e
b
-
2
3
15
-
F
e
b
-
2
3
24
-
F
e
b
-
2
3
5-
M
a
r
-
2
3
14
-
M
a
r
-
2
3
23
-
M
a
r
-
2
3
1-
A
p
r
-
2
3
10
-
A
p
r
-
2
3
19
-
A
p
r
-
2
3
28
-
A
p
r
-
2
3
7-
M
a
y
-
2
3
16
-
M
a
y
-
2
3
25
-
M
a
y
-
2
3
3-
J
u
n
-
2
3
12
-
J
u
n
-
2
3
21
-
J
u
n
-
2
3
30
-
J
u
n
-
2
3
9-
J
u
l
-
2
3
18
-
J
u
l
-
2
3
27
-
J
u
l
-
2
3
5-
A
u
g
-
2
3
14
-
A
u
g
-
2
3
23
-
A
u
g
-
2
3
1-
S
e
p
-
2
3
10
-
S
e
p
-
2
3
19
-
S
e
p
-
2
3
28
-
S
e
p
-
2
3
7-
O
c
t
-
2
3
16
-
O
c
t
-
2
3
25
-
O
c
t
-
2
3
3-
N
o
v
-
2
3
12
-
N
o
v
-
2
3
21
-
N
o
v
-
2
3
30
-
N
o
v
-
2
3
9-
D
e
c
-
2
3
18
-
D
e
c
-
2
3
27
-
D
e
c
-
2
3
Ra
i
n
f
a
l
l

(
i
n
)
St
r
e
a
m

S
t
a
g
e

E
l
e
v
a
t
i
o
n

(
f
t
)
Date
Stony Fork Restoration Site
Hydrograph
T1 Stream Flow Gauge
Rainfall Stream Stage Elevation Stream Bed Elevation Sensor Elevation Flow Elevation Stream Flow (Camera)
161 Days 70 Days
Camera obscured
55 Days
0.0
1.0
2.0
3.0
4.0
201
202
203
204
205
1-
J
a
n
-
2
3
10
-
J
a
n
-
2
3
19
-
J
a
n
-
2
3
28
-
J
a
n
-
2
3
6-
F
e
b
-
2
3
15
-
F
e
b
-
2
3
24
-
F
e
b
-
2
3
5-
M
a
r
-
2
3
14
-
M
a
r
-
2
3
23
-
M
a
r
-
2
3
1-
A
p
r
-
2
3
10
-
A
p
r
-
2
3
19
-
A
p
r
-
2
3
28
-
A
p
r
-
2
3
7-
M
a
y
-
2
3
16
-
M
a
y
-
2
3
25
-
M
a
y
-
2
3
3-
J
u
n
-
2
3
12
-
J
u
n
-
2
3
21
-
J
u
n
-
2
3
30
-
J
u
n
-
2
3
9-
J
u
l
-
2
3
18
-
J
u
l
-
2
3
27
-
J
u
l
-
2
3
5-
A
u
g
-
2
3
14
-
A
u
g
-
2
3
23
-
A
u
g
-
2
3
1-
S
e
p
-
2
3
10
-
S
e
p
-
2
3
19
-
S
e
p
-
2
3
28
-
S
e
p
-
2
3
7-
O
c
t
-
2
3
16
-
O
c
t
-
2
3
25
-
O
c
t
-
2
3
3-
N
o
v
-
2
3
12
-
N
o
v
-
2
3
21
-
N
o
v
-
2
3
30
-
N
o
v
-
2
3
9-
D
e
c
-
2
3
18
-
D
e
c
-
2
3
27
-
D
e
c
-
2
3
Ra
i
n
f
a
l
l
St
r
e
a
m

S
t
a
g
e

E
l
e
v
a
t
i
o
n

(
f
t
)
Date
Stony Fork Restoration Site
Hydrograph
T1-A Stream Flow Gauge
Rainfall Stream Stage Elevation Stream Bed Elevation Sensor Depth Flow Elevation Stream Flow (Camera)
116 Days
Camera obscured
139 Days
0.0
1.0
2.0
3.0
4.0
186
187
188
189
190
1-
J
a
n
-
2
3
10
-
J
a
n
-
2
3
19
-
J
a
n
-
2
3
28
-
J
a
n
-
2
3
6-
F
e
b
-
2
3
15
-
F
e
b
-
2
3
24
-
F
e
b
-
2
3
5-
M
a
r
-
2
3
14
-
M
a
r
-
2
3
23
-
M
a
r
-
2
3
1-
A
p
r
-
2
3
10
-
A
p
r
-
2
3
19
-
A
p
r
-
2
3
28
-
A
p
r
-
2
3
7-
M
a
y
-
2
3
16
-
M
a
y
-
2
3
25
-
M
a
y
-
2
3
3-
J
u
n
-
2
3
12
-
J
u
n
-
2
3
21
-
J
u
n
-
2
3
30
-
J
u
n
-
2
3
9-
J
u
l
-
2
3
18
-
J
u
l
-
2
3
27
-
J
u
l
-
2
3
5-
A
u
g
-
2
3
14
-
A
u
g
-
2
3
23
-
A
u
g
-
2
3
1-
S
e
p
-
2
3
10
-
S
e
p
-
2
3
19
-
S
e
p
-
2
3
28
-
S
e
p
-
2
3
7-
O
c
t
-
2
3
16
-
O
c
t
-
2
3
25
-
O
c
t
-
2
3
3-
N
o
v
-
2
3
12
-
N
o
v
-
2
3
21
-
N
o
v
-
2
3
30
-
N
o
v
-
2
3
9-
D
e
c
-
2
3
18
-
D
e
c
-
2
3
27
-
D
e
c
-
2
3
Ra
i
n
f
a
l
l

(
i
n
)
St
r
e
a
m

S
t
a
g
e

E
l
e
v
a
t
i
o
n

(
f
t
)
Date
Stony Fork Restoration Site
Hydrograph
T2 Stream Flow Gauge
Rainfall Stream Stage Elevation Stream Bed Elevation Flow Elevation Stream Flow (Camera)Sensor Depth
46 Days 70 Days
Camera malfunction
85 Days 42 Days
0.0
1.0
2.0
3.0
4.0
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
1-
J
a
n
-
2
3
10
-
J
a
n
-
2
3
19
-
J
a
n
-
2
3
28
-
J
a
n
-
2
3
6-
F
e
b
-
2
3
15
-
F
e
b
-
2
3
24
-
F
e
b
-
2
3
5-
M
a
r
-
2
3
14
-
M
a
r
-
2
3
23
-
M
a
r
-
2
3
1-
A
p
r
-
2
3
10
-
A
p
r
-
2
3
19
-
A
p
r
-
2
3
28
-
A
p
r
-
2
3
7-
M
a
y
-
2
3
16
-
M
a
y
-
2
3
25
-
M
a
y
-
2
3
3-
J
u
n
-
2
3
12
-
J
u
n
-
2
3
21
-
J
u
n
-
2
3
30
-
J
u
n
-
2
3
9-
J
u
l
-
2
3
18
-
J
u
l
-
2
3
27
-
J
u
l
-
2
3
5-
A
u
g
-
2
3
14
-
A
u
g
-
2
3
23
-
A
u
g
-
2
3
1-
S
e
p
-
2
3
10
-
S
e
p
-
2
3
19
-
S
e
p
-
2
3
28
-
S
e
p
-
2
3
7-
O
c
t
-
2
3
16
-
O
c
t
-
2
3
25
-
O
c
t
-
2
3
3-
N
o
v
-
2
3
12
-
N
o
v
-
2
3
21
-
N
o
v
-
2
3
30
-
N
o
v
-
2
3
9-
D
e
c
-
2
3
18
-
D
e
c
-
2
3
27
-
D
e
c
-
2
3
Ra
i
n
f
a
l
l
St
r
e
a
m

S
t
a
g
e

E
l
e
v
a
t
i
o
n

(
f
t
)
Date
Stony Fork Restoration Site
Hydrograph
T3 Stream Flow Gauge
Rainfall Stream Stage Elevation Stream Bed Elevation Sensor Depth Flow Elevation Stream Flow (Camera)
157 Days
Gauge malfunction
Camera malfunction