20150618 Ver 2_401 Application_20151015

�0 ISe V�
October 21, 2015
To: N.C. Division of Water Resources
401 and Buffer Permitting Unit
Attn: Cherri Smith '1
512 N. Salisbury Street OCT 2
Raleigh, NC 27604 I
NR • WATER fiESOURCE8
From: Sean Clark 40� i 0
SEPI Engineering & Construction
1025 Wade Avenue
Raleigh, NC 27605
Re: Revised Townes at Cheswick Subdivision Revised Buffer Compliance Application
Raleigh, NC
SEPI Project # EN14.029
On behalf of the owner and developer Ashton Raleigh Residential LLC, please find
attached a revised complete application and supplemental information requesting
written concurrence from the N.C. Division of Water Resources (DWR) that the
activities proposed below may proceed under General Water Quality Certification 3890.
DWR #15 -0618 and SAW- 2014 -01762 correspond to the section 401 and 404
approvals previously received for proposed temporary impacts to streams (20 LF) and
wetlands (0.01 acre) on the property resulting from the installation of a sewer line.
DWR #15 -0618 also approved buffer impacts associated with the sewer line
installation (Z1:1,245 ft2, Z2:905 ft2) as well as buffer impacts associated with the
discharge of a stormwater BMP device (Z1:650 ft2, Z2:420 ft2) . These impacts have
not yet occurred.
Within the previously approved site plan, off -site stormwater discharge was
determined to threaten the stability of existing adjacent structures (e.g. houses). At
the request of the City of Raleigh, the original outfall was moved due to complaints
from adjacent landowners. The stability of an adjacent tributary's stream bank was
also being compromised as a result of the stormwater discharge.
To address these issues the City of Raleigh requested that the stormwater discharge
point be revised. A site meeting with Ms. Cherri Smith of DWR; Sean Clark of SEPI;
representatives from the City of Raleigh; and representatives of Ashton Raleigh
Residential was held on September 18, 2015 to discuss the concerns and evaluate
potential solutions.
In an effort to minimize future stream bank impacts and threats to adjacent structures
the approval of Impacts 3 and 4 as depicted and described in this submittal are
requested. The newly proposed Impact 3 (Z1:1,955 ft2; Z2:2,100 ft2) will discharge
stormwater away from the existing structures and direct stormwater discharge into Big
Branch. The stormwater angle of entry into Big Branch has been reduced from a
perpendicular angle to that of approximately 300 in order to protect the stream bank
opposite the discharge point. The newly proposed Impact 4 (Z1:20 ft2; Z2:300 ft2)
will stabilize and protect the impacted stream bank and revegetate this area. Given
Page 1 of 2

the circumstances, all newly proposed buffer impacts are considered "Allowable" within
the table of uses as per page 5 of 15A NCAC 02B .0233.
We;are respectfully requesting that the existing DWR #15 -0618 be revised to include
the.additional Impacts 3 and 4 described.
Project Name
Project Type
Owner / Applicant
County
Nearest Town
Waterbody Name
Index Number
Class
USGS Cataloging Unit
PROJECT SUMMARY
Townes at Cheswick Subdivision
Residential
Ashton Raleigh Residential LLC
Wake
Raleigh
UT to Big Branch
27 -33 -17
C; NSW
03020201
IMPACT SUMMARY
Total Stream Impact (linear feet):
Stream Impact (acres):
Wetland Impact (acres):
Open Water Impact (acres):
Total Impact to Waters of the U.S. (acres)
Total Zone 1 Buffer Impact (acres):
Total Zone 2 Buffer Impact (acres):
20 temporary (previously approved)
0.002 temporary (previously
approved)
0.01 temporary (previously
approved)
0
0.012 temporary
0.05 permanent, 0.03 temporary
0.058 permanent, 0.02 temporary
If you have any questions, please call me at (919) 573 -9931.
Sincerely,
SEPI Engineering & Construction
an k -��
Environmental Division Manager
Attachments:
Revised Pre - construction Notification (PCN) Application Form
Agent Authorization Form
Surface Water Determination Letter (NBRRO #14 -424)
401 Approval (DWR # 15 -0618)
404 Approval (SAW- 2014- 01762)
USGS Topographic Quad Map
Soil Survey Map
Revised Overall Impact Map /Impact Map Details (3 sheets)
Check for $240 Application Fee to DWQ
Page 2 of 2

of WATf9
a���p Office Use Only:
fo/�` -+w` -^ Corps action ID no.
E o DWQ project no.
J \i Form Version 1.4 January 2009
'W]
Pre - Construction Notification (PCN) Form
A. Applicant Information
1. Processing
1 a. Type(s) of approval sought from the Corps: ❑ Section 404 Permit ❑ Section 10 Permit
1b. Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: 29 or General Permit (GP) number:
1c. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps? ® Yes
1 d. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply):
® 401 Water Quality Certification — Regular ❑ Non -404 Jurisdictional General Permit
❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Express ® Riparian Buffer Authorization
1e. Is this notification solely for the record For the record only for DWQ
because written approval is not required? 401 Certification:
❑ Yes ® No
1f. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation
of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank or in -lieu
fee program.
1 g. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1 h
below.
1 h. Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)?
2. Project Information
2a. Name of project:
Townes at Cheswick
2b. County:
Wake
2c. Nearest municipality / town:
Raleigh
2d. Subdivision name:
Townes at Cheswick
2e. NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state
N/A
project no:
3. Owner Information
3a. Name(s) on Recorded Deed:
Ashton Raleigh Residential LLC
3b. Deed Book and Page No.
DB 015944 DP 01603
3c. Responsible Party (for LLC if
N/A
applicable):
3d. Street address:
5711 Six Forks Rd Suite # 300
3e. City, state, zip:
Raleigh, NC 27609
3f. Telephone no.:
(919) 369 -1842
3g. Fax no.:
N/A
3h. Email address:
morgan.bryan @ashtonwoods.com
110.
For the record only for Corps Permit:
® Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
Page 1 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

4. Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a. Applicant is: ❑ Agent ® Other, specify: Developer
4b. Name:
4c.
Business name
(if applicable):
4d.
Street address:
4e.
City, state, zip:
4f.
Telephone no.:
4g. Fax no.:
4h. Email address:
Ashton Raleigh Residential, LLC
5711 Six Forks Road, #300
Raleigh, NC 27607
(919) 232 -0039
N/A
5. Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable)
5a. Name: Sean Clark
5b. Business name SEPI Engineering & Construction
(if applicable):
5c. Street address: 1025 Wade Ave.
5d. City, state, zip:
5e. Telephone no.:
5f. Fax no.:
5g. Email address:
Raleigh, NC 27606
919- 573 -9931
919- 789 -9591
sclark @sepiengineering.com
Page 2 of 11

B. Project Information and Prior Project History
1. Property Identification
1a. Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID):
1 b. Site coordinates (in decimal degrees):
1 c. Property size:
2. Surface Waters
2a. Name of nearest body of water to proposed project:
2b. Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water:
2c. River basin:
1715064029
Latitude: 35.8272 Longitude: - 78.6278
10.89 acres
UT to Big Branch
C; NSW
Neuse
3. Project Description
3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application:
The site is currently forested and is located inside the beltline of Raleigh which is in central Wake County, North Carolina.
The site contains a sewer line easement that runs northeast / southwest and is located in the eastern portion of the
property. The elevation of the site ranges from approximately 254 feet above mean sea level (msl) in the southeastern tip
of the property to an elevation of approximately 206 msl in the southwestern tip of the property. The project is a proposed
townhome site and grading has begun. Although riparian buffer and stream impacts have previously been approved,
these impacts have not yet occurred.
3b. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property: less than 0.10 acres
3c. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property: 194 linear feet
3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:
The purpose of the project is to provide additional housing to meet the demand for single - family homes in the area. The
newly proposed buffer impacts result from the need to safely discharge off -site stormwater without impacting existing
homes and structures.
3e. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
The project is a single - family townhome residential development that proposes 89 home lots. The project will include the
construction of stormwater devices, roads, and other utilities needed to support such a project. Heavy equipment typically
used for residential construction projects will be utilized (e.g. excavators, back hoes, etc.). The newly proposed buffer
impacts will result from placing a discharge point in the riparian buffer.
4. Jurisdictional Determinations
4a. Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the ® Yes ❑ No ❑ Unknown
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property / Comments: A site meeting was held with the USACE in
project (including all prior phases) in the past? October of 2014.
4b. If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type
of determination was made?
4c. If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Name (if known): Sean Clark
® Preliminary ❑ Final
Agency /Consultant Company: SEPI Engineering and
Construction, Inc.
Other:
4d. If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation. The NC
DWR (DWQ at the time) reviewed the streams onsite and issued a buffer and I/P letter (NBRRO #14 -424) on November
7, 2014. A preliminary jurisdictional determination was issued on 7/31/2015 (SAW- 2014 - 01762). A NCDWR 401 Water
Quality Certification was issued 7/08/2015 (DWR # 15- 0618).
5. Project History
5a. Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for ® Yes - ❑ No ❑ Unknown
this project (including all prior phases) in the past?
5b. If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions.
Preliminary jurisdictional determination (SAW- 2014 - 01762) issued 7/31/2015. NCDWR Buffer and I/P Letter (NBRRO #14-
424) issued 11/4/2014. NCDWR 401 Certification (DWR #15 -0618) issued 7/08/2015.
Page 3 of 11
PCN Form - Version 1.4 January 2009

B. Project Information and Prior Project History
6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project? I ❑ Yes ® No
6b. If yes, explain.
Page 4 of 11

C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1a. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply):
® Wetlands ® Streams - tributaries ® Buffers ❑ Open Waters ❑ Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted.
2a. 2b. 2c. 2d. 2e. 2f.
Wetland impact Type of jurisdiction
number Type of impact Type of wetland Forested Corps (404, 10) or Area of impact
Permanent (P) or (if known) DWQ (401, other) (acres)
Temporary (T)
Impact 1 (T) Bottomland
(Previously Excavation Hardwood Forest Yes Corps 0.01
approved)
2g. Total wetland impacts 0.01
2h. Comments: Stormwater pipe installation.
3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including
temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete
this
question for all stream sites impacted.
3a. 3b. 3c.
3d. 3e.
3f.
3g•
Stream impact Type of impact Stream name
Perennial Type of jurisdiction
Average stream
Impact
number
(PER) or
width
length
Permanent (P) or
intermitte
(feet)
(linear
Temporary (T)
nt (I NT)?
feet)
Impact 1 (T) Previously
(Previously approved Utility UT to Big Branch
PER Corps
3.5
20
approved) line installation
3h. Total stream and tributary impacts 20
3i. Comments: The proposed stream impact quantified above was previously approved and the approval is still valid.
4. Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U.S. then individually list all open water impacts below.
4a. 4b. 4c. 4d. 4e.
Open water Name of
impact number - waterbody Type of impact Waterbody type
Permanent (P) or (if applicable)
Temporary (T)
01 Choose one Choose One Choose
4f. Total open water impacts
4g. Comments: There are no proposed impacts to open waters.
Area of impact (acres)
0
Page 5 of 11
PCN Form - Version 1.4 January 2009

5. Pond or Lake Construction
If pond or ake construction proposed, then complete the chart below.
5a. 5b. 5c. 5d. 5e.
Wetland Impacts (acres) Stream Impacts (feet) Upland
Pond ID Proposed use or (acres)
number purpose of pond
Flooded Filled Excavated Flooded Filled Excavated Flooded
P1 Choose One
P2 Choose One
5f. Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
5g. Comments: There are no proposed ponds or lakes within jurisdictional areas on the project.
5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required?
❑ Yes ❑ No If yes, permit ID no:
5i. Expected pond surface area (acres):
5j. Size of pond watershed (acres):
5k. Method of construction:
6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts
below. If any impacts require mitigation, then you MUST fill out Section D of this form.
6a.Project is in which protected basin? ® Neuse ❑ Tar - Pamlico ❑ Catawba ❑ Randleman ❑ Other:
6b. 6c. 6d. 6e. 6f. 6g.
Buffer impact
number —
Permanent (P) or
Temporary (T)
Impact 1 (P)
(previously
approved)
Impact 2 (T)
(previously
approved)
Impact 3 (P)-
New
Impact 4 (T)
Reason for
impact Stream
name
Stormwater UT to Big
outlet Branch
Buffer mitigation required?
No
Zone 1 impact
(square feet)
650
Zone 2 impact
(square feet)
420
Sewer UT to Big No 1345 905
crossing Branch
Stormwater Big Branch No 1955 2100
outlet
Riparian
buffer repair Big Branch No 20 300
and
stabilization
6h. Total buffer impacts 3970 3725
6i. Comments: Impact 3: Within the previously approved site plan, off -site stormwater discharge was determined to threaten
the stability of existing adjacent structures (e.g. houses). At the City's request the original outfall was moved due to
complaints from adjacent landowners. The stability of an adjacent tributary's stream bank was also being compromised as a
result of the stormwater discharge. The proposed Impact 4 above will stabilize and protect the impacted stream bank and
revegetate this area. The proposed Impact 3 above will discharge stormwater away from the structures and direct stormwater
discharge into Big Branch. The stormwater angle of entry into Big Branch has been reduced from a perpendicular angle to that
of approximately 30° in order to protect the stream bank opposite the discharge point. Given the circumstances, all newly
proposed buffer impacts are considered "Allowable" within the table of uses as per page 5 of 15A NCAC 02B .0233.
Page 6 of 11

D. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
1 a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project.
The applicant requested a detailed delineation of streams and wetlands within the proposed project boundaries prior to
preparing the site plan in order to insure the limitation of impacts to the natural environment. Following the delineation the
proposed alignment was shifted in places to minimize impacts to jurisdictional features and riparian buffers. Complete
avoidance of streams was not practicable because the existing sewer line that the project will tie into is located on the
opposite side of the stream from the project thereby requiring a stream crossing. Areas in addition to the riparian buffers
were left as open space along the drainage providing additional buffering of the jurisdictional areas. The utility crossing
was oriented to provide as close to a perpendicular crossing as possible to further minimize impacts.
Several stormwater discharge point options were reviewed to minimize and reduce direct and indirect impacts to buffers
and streams. Additionally, the support and permission of adjacent property owners was needed because the applicant did
not own the property immediately adjacent to Big Branch.
1 b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques.
Stream banks within the temporary impact area of the utility installation will be stabilized immediately after the installation
and the buffer areas will be seeded. Road slopes will be seeded and stabilized once construction of the road crossing has
occurred. The proposed limits of disturbance will be flagged in the field to avoid and minimize any unnecessary and
unintentional impacts to the buffered and jurisdictional areas.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for
impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
2b. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply):
2c. If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this
project?
3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a. Name of Mitigation Bank: N/A
3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter)
❑ Yes ® No
❑ DWQ ❑ Corps
❑ Mitigation bank
❑ Payment to in -lieu fee program
❑ Permittee Responsible Mitigation
Type: Choose one Quantity
Type: Choose one Quantity
Type: Choose one Quantity
Page 7 of 11

3c. Comments:
4. Complete if Making a Payment to In -lieu Fee Program
4a. Approval letter from in -lieu fee program is attached. ❑ Yes
4b. Stream mitigation requested: linear feet
4c. If using stream mitigation, stream temperature: Choose one
4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only): square feet
4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested: acres
4f. Non - riparian wetland mitigation requested: acres
4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested: acres
4h. Comments:
5. Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a. If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan.
6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) — required by DWQ
6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires ❑ Yes ® No
buffer mitigation?
6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the
amount of mitigation required.
6c. 6d. 6e.
Zone Reason for impact Total impact Multiplier Required mitigation
(square feet) (square feet)
Zone 1 3 (2 for Catawba)
Zone 2 1.5
6f. Total buffer mitigation required:
6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank,
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in -lieu fee fund).
6h. Comments:
Page 8 of 11

E. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1. Diffuse Flow Plan
1a. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified ® Yes ❑ No
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
1 b. If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why.
Comments: The revised Diffuse Flow Plan and revised overall stormwater plan are ❑ Yes ® No
currently being reviewed by the City of Raleigh's Stormwater Review. The City of
Raleigh is a certified entity responsible for approving stormwater.
2. Stormwater Management Plan
2a. What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project? 45%
2b. Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan? ® Yes ❑ No
2c. If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why:
2d. If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative description of the plan:
Stormwater from the site will be directed to two Stormwater Management Extended Detention Wetlands, one in the
western and one in the southeastern portion of the project. These devices have been designed to meet current standards
and will be approved by the City of Raleigh (designated authority). Preliminary approval has been obtained and the
revised plan is being reviewed; however, the final approval from the City requires the issuance of the conditional Buffer
compliance and 401/404 permit.
2e. Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan?
3. Certified Local Government Stormwater Review
3a. In which local government's jurisdiction is this project?
3b. Which of the following locally - implemented stormwater management programs
apply (check all that apply):
3c. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
attached?
4. DWQ Stormwater Program Review
4a. Which of the following state - implemented stormwater management programs apply
(check all that apply):
4b. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
attached?
5. DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
5a. Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements?
5b. Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met?
City of Raleigh
Raleigh
® Phase II
® NSW
❑ USMP
❑ Water Supply Watershed
❑ Other:
❑ Yes ® No
❑
Coastal counties
❑
HQW
❑
ORW
®
Session Law 2006 -246
❑
Other:
❑ Yes ® No
® Yes ❑ No
® Yes ❑ No
Page 9 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

F. Supplementary Information
1. Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
1 a. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal /state /local) funds or the ❑ Yes ® No
use of public (federal /state) land?
1 b. If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State ❑ Yes ❑ No
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
1c. If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
letter.) ❑ Yes ❑ No
Comments: A Programmatic Categorical Exclusion has been prepared for this
document.
2. Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a. Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards, ❑ Yes ® No
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)?
2b. Is this an after - the -fact permit application?
❑ Yes ® No
2c. If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s):
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a. Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in ❑ Yes ® No
additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?
3b. If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
We have reviewed the "DRAFT Internal Policy, Cumulative Impacts and the 401 Water Quality Certification and Isolated
Wetland Programs" document prepared by NC Division of Water Quality on April 10, 2004, version 2.1. The proposed
development does not meet any of the "growth stimulating" criteria. The project will be located in the already heavily
developed city of Raleigh and will have no transportation impacts.
4. Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a. Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non- discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
The project will tie into existing City of Raleigh sanitary sewer lines.
Page 10 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or ❑ Yes ® No
habitat?
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act ❑ Yes ® No
impacts?
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted.
5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat?
A query of NC Natural Heritage Elemental Occurrences database (June 2015) was made and it was found that there are no
elemental occurrences of federally listed species within two miles of the project.
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat? I ❑ Yes ® No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
The proposed project takes place in Wake County which is not near any coastal or tidal habitat that would support EFH
(i.e. salt marshes, oyster reefs, etc.).
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation ❑ Yes ® No
status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
http: / /gis.ncdcr.gov /hpoweb/ 'Records check at the State Historic Preservation Office or the Office of State Archeology
were not performed. Utilizing the HPOWEB GIS mapping service, a 2 -mile radius search, which occurred on October 16,
2015 yielded no records on or immediately adjacent to the subject property. Several sites were within the 2 -mile radius
however the project should have no adverse effect.
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. -Will this project occur in a FEMA- designated 100 -year floodplain? I ® Yes ❑ No
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements: The area of the property within the floodplain is not being built upon
and will have no effect on flood waters.
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination?
http: / /fris .nc.gov /fris /index.aspx ?FIPS= 183 &ST =NC &user = General %20Public
Sean Clark 10/21/2015
Applicant/Agent's Printed Name A`pplicant/Agent's Signature Date
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant
is provided.)
Pagel 1 of 11

AGENT AUTHORIZATION FORM
All Blanks to Be Filled in By the Current Landowner or Municipal Official
Name: Ashton Raleigh Residential, LLC: Attn: Morgan Bn,an
Address: 5711 Six Forks Road. Suite #300
Raleigh, NC 27609
Phone: [phone]
Project Name /Description: "Townes at Cheswick SEPI Project # EN 14.029
Date: June 10, 2015
The Department of the Army
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Wilmington District
P.O. Box 1890
Wilmington, NC 28402
Attn: David Shaeffer
Field Office: Raleigh
Re: Wetlands and Streams Related Consulting and Permitting
To Whom It May Concern:
1, the current landowner or municipal official, hereby designate and authorize SEP]
Engineering & Construction, Inc to act in my behalf as my agent in the processing of
permit applications; to furnish upon request supplemental information in support of
applications, etc. from this day forward. The I0'' day of June, 2015.
This notification supersedes any previous correspondence concerning the agent for this
project.
Notice: This authorization, for liability, and professional courtesy reasons, is
valid only for government officials to enter the property when accompanied by
SEPI staff. You should call SEPI to arrange a prior to visiting the site.
BY: Morgan Brvan BY: i/4
Print Name of Landowner or Signature of 1!andZ ¢f or Municipal
Municipal Official's Name Official

NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Pat McCrory
Governor
November 7, 2014
Gaddy Real Properties LLC
702 Oberlin Rd. Ste. 410
Raleigh, NC 27605
John E. Skvarla, III
Secretary
Subject: Buffer Determination
N B RRO# 14 -424
Wake County
Determination Type:
Buffer Call Isolated or EIP Call
® Neuse (15A NCAC 213 .0233)
❑ Tar - Pamlico (15A NCAC 2B .0259) Ephemeral /Intermittent/Perennial Determination
❑
E] Jordan (15A NCAC 26 .0267) Isolated Wetland Determination
Project Name: Wake Towne Dr.
Location /Directions: Property is located north end of Wake Towne Dr. SW of Beltline
Subject Stream: Big Branch
Determination Date: October 30, 2014
Feature /Flag Not Subject E /1 /P*
Subject To
To Buffers
Buffers
A I X P
B I X P
C I X I E
*E /l /P - Ephemeral/]ntennittent/Peremlial
Staff: James Graham
Sit art @ Stop(a) Soil USGS
Survey Topo
throughout throughout X X
throughout throughout I X i
I
Explanation: The feature(s) listed above has or have been located on the Soil Survey of Wake County, North
Carolina or the most recent copy of the USGS Topographic map at a 1:24,000 scale. Each feature that is checked
"Not Subject" has been determined not to be a stream or is not present on the property. Features that are checked
"Subject" have been located on the property and possess characteristics that qualify it to be a stream. There may be
other streams located on your property that do not show up on the maps referenced above but, still may be
One
NorthCarolina
Naturally
North Carolina Division of Water Resources 1628 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699 -1628 Phone [phone]
Internet: www ncwaterclualitv.orq Location 3800 Barrett Drive Raleigh, NC 27609 Fax [phone]
An Equal Opportunity /Affirmative Action Employer- 50% Recycledt10% Post Consumer Paper

Wake Towne Dr
Wake County
November 7. 2014
Page 2 of 2
considered
_lurisdictional according to the US Army Corps of Engineers and /or to the Division of Water Resources
(DWR).
This on -site determination shall expire five (5) years from the date of this letter. Landowners or affected parties that
dispute a determination made by the DWR or Delegated Local Authority may request a determination by the
Director. An appeal request must be made within sixty (60) days of date of this letter or from the date the affected
party (including downstream and /or adjacent owners) is notified of this letter. A request for a determination by the
Director shall be referred to the Director in writing c/o Karen Higgins, DWR WeQSCaPe Unit, 1650 Mail Service
Center, Raleigh, NC 27699.
This determination is final and binding unless, as detailed above, you ask for a hearing or appeal within sixty (60)
days.
The owner /future owners should notify the Division of Water Resources (including any other Local, State, and
Federal Agencies) of this decision concerning any future correspondences regarding the subject property (stated
above). This project may require a Section 404/401 Permit for the proposed activity. Any inquiries should be
directed to the Division of Water Resources (Central Office) at (919)- 807 -6300, and the US Army Corp of Engineers
(Raleigh Regulatory Field Office) at (919)- 554 -4884.
If you have questions regarding this determination, please feel free to contact Jantes Graham at (919) 791 -4256
Respectfully. ! `
Danny Smit�Supervisor
Water Quality Section
Raleigh Regional Office
cc: RRO /SWP File Copy
Sean Clark
SI:PI
1025 Wade Ave.
Raleigh. NC 27605

(
. �s � � ✓, t r •,b -�? � h:�b`!7. �` a-4 is 't !
' 4 ? 1
�yx
tz : Y
.� -.
tr
Feature A
Big Branc
h
lr. fir. '::` i .��,� .f' ;t�.i•
may.. �. }.,,+ yq •' .�� "�� .��� "� y'
i
`.LY
}
{ x? • f Y -� ,? f ¢'{ $r .a'q{`�f a `j'1 fr a.1
e r -�;il ' \' s n, 'fir r•F "� - to Y i :.'mod i fi.�+
'+�` i` yn xC� d•^tf. 'Th '� SY b t _. { . f xd M, "�y��'•'.+6'�,.i } j •t 'T :
Plfk.
1
f -\ ,rte - � ti d ,'�fR era � !� r�A f ,�,,,,'� y� i s i •
is

, Cedar,' `
- :�Ho11 w Hilljf
Ov
MAp�y ,. -,� �, •� ',;j w. y - �y+.�`' - "` t k'-_•a'i3 .-n Di Jtri'-- Y".,...� OR i i �� ..- �,0 .� .. -.4 s "cQ+ q i t _ r H r aric 0* Vzi f TRAIL
NGLEN p
-
Sri" aitR0i7OR 4':' :� u ';h .cY' ' epFIELOf�D
EST
Nor v +, p5 , __.. » s A 'qE
FR�R N PR• i r' _ —A.,
30. dE'i:+
SaBR0 ONO'
r x: itTµfiELq '�'`' I.�,keinun ` c -C .y ;�•• 1 PEB
OR �. \. t- 4. / + ; _ ! }ar . - ". INGWAY
p , STRI�GE \l , :' , •' L NEM
- OXNALKS'f,s- � � -�, �,,,r� f� � +�-'�' i� 'v i' �•�C`f' ? � 1
„- �,�`'��`�Hicicary:��_ �- ,�'•'� , r 'dick ���;� -� ��, ° `_'",�",�k'`;f'�o� -�
,c,arCllff' . t ; �' =`� �!''i{..?. "�"':,'COMPJtiNRD7 t ����4 �� "` i;
1B ' CP1U� t }•.:.0 f �''' Y '. +t l• OtG - %'QP''
• r-' S i `�AyFa� ,', �0__ ��'�� ,l r ST£1NBEC9 �OR FSr v
�I !..• :r ROWAN ST 1 F --AIM
z e
(1;' r ts��";� - , ` `�' �, ' `, k _•'C ;rte 't +'t!• . ,to° . " :_°_i. -, � .` ',Z�'; j r,� ' 3 �- - f � :: -•-� h •j j - �" ; tl ,
1�. F ♦ ^iy�.- tO� NW ©p(�• mid `. \ ltoct `i `v "�+7 HAROIMONTR60�4 -�%
.i a • i• .�• �, v+ ,^ LN` <^J; � \� V � O �` C� :)-: �' t � � AtC�t{ =r^w'`.,?._..�• � .. .. 4g ��i �,
{7` °.,�`.;•+�.��f -}�;r ��r r�•• •- 'E�:�tXY,,'�,� ,C e- ��`�,a� . ;: . -- � O
`1,M� „pL f;'= �yl�'!_. %'�f �,.< ice,•- ..- 1`+�;.,titi�_. ,k;
C e -t,p� ��v .� \� '',” •� `'ti,�.^., aSO
Ai
tv�. -'•4° ? �. �` �' ��l��r,�`e� 1�dF U ��� �pa0 ��' - ��Bp �:
.A7AW ?r `,✓ r.N h,
URR/TUCK ORi ; ^ f (' ' t Cy t f S Ski • . _. a Z84N5 DR 1 ` \' ` }' -i v.. J
VRCN :17 M' MILL; T„ ; t ►lr r \ o
RAM6�WfbqD ._ 3i `j '• C'�_ COl
B Ap6i .OR
x
� `Gr:' , f t�.V � } ' �t.l r �t • �'. L$ fie. i-', , ;iA �'IN t1G pLi.'�: ,� ` - 2,1 • � f , a'- ��, J/ r
't� #I�' ;� s t 7 ';ci tPark'.,g r
�`it'��L T .,.,rr• `_ �: f: Feature A �P '• =' -' _ { r"`° -'�� c
HT'Riai?nsboraiigl?. ;q t'�t��'� gig Branc
1!" i11 /' t { '�"aQriJZI r.'t,, ifr', ,� •A�< OOR ;` y i',i fi` i'_~` "N- � i
250
. �'� `Y� • _ l: • . `r}_i'�` +,• , b5�, i i�.'�/ i ` :'7• - , J , `. V : / i t, i . i ; ,'f'•.,- y'S'fL.
_� `'�:.�•_ _ ••;y9 t`� _l f1 „',i� ft;r:. {^�„fi.,`y;; . ! i1 `�'� �,` �` : v r , 1.;r a!!�!, g,
,'" ' _ ^ �_: �t iV�: \ t`' 'C°RXS rqp � ' :•.l. � �' ,! ::J PO f.` � ,u, r --
f ' - ���� 'i -`� \!: ,. !f " , , ' i ice* , x' l •, \ _ ' ,
OM t'S /.Y RKS { '+ J <, _ l•
'3eiglhts- q! I,'�•:,K�nri�are', . '� ; ��;Y'; (� {r= :�:�';� . �'�`_ :• ' , - - �.. �i.. �'. t'_��-= = t � ; � - -..
l . ''•,� T tl�j " -'" i' Oda ti Y;JJI r' ' h 'v4
-'' 'r� 1'i',l. 4�v .. k C1 "`: (r�' �;. '1E�'= ''! r • ides i '20D,�. -:c' •i i r• :J'"
4"X DIt.�J' , ! "x +�+, .,L''•i• r� _
� 1 � gY &� S- �'- •••}•.i • RtOGE;ADy �`y >''P1Nf'a ,"�', �Q. �_.-ri � fir•_ :�M_, -�� • �Sl1f._LS. 11'ICxER OR i'
�SST_..k` i
.,.may .0f.�'. .. RO; _.\ `�� O i,- 'f '•� Mf
\ 5, �� ..-'' +i•1 x ' • E4�� '� �' t..-`• .�' 1 lt.. _ v " ta'� i � - �' / } j
�s R? , o ; : �� ,. z. -�� • F figure
J -= ' • ' : i,,.. ` -: r : • fr' 'E WHITipr..�►�` 1►11 ap
.- USGS a�
Towne �riv
Map Location Wake ye County
E Wa 0
GRANVItL EN 14.029.0
FRpNKLtN
DURHAM
2013 c s Y t
Ruaphy N a
O
usGS TO Og rQuadrag 0 N
Rajeigh West
Ralelgh East Quadrangle
N
® August 14, 2014
WAKE 2,333 feet t
;HAT AM 1 inch
�OHNSTON ��

• TE: Streams and wetlands were confirmed by
on October 16, 2014. Streams were confi
i'
on October 1 y
At
v
+Y'. .. ,. ,,3 V L• +�� iLYj,i,4 .t, J \:3r if4r i+
}
z _
Big Branch
IT
1 x \
Xt
r
::V. f '
ut
Wetland
Project Study Area
Streams
Perennial
� � •sue- - 1i _ � ,t ,� j.
A
L
-t,
- Intermittent (confirmed • •
Stream f ) • !
Buffers
_
4
t . ^a; -t 4 4 D- .''� �L.K,z • "'' f 4. " 1:: r\ shy rs k. s Snl .1 i r�

'�
NC®ENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Pat McCrory
Governor
July 8, 2015
Ashton Raleigh Residential, LLC
Attn: Morgan Bryan
5711 Six Forks Rd., Ste. 300
Raleigh, NC 27609
Donald R. van der Vaart
Secretary
DWR # 15 -0618
Wake County
Subject: APPROVAL OF 401 WATER QUALITY CERTIFICATION WITH ADDITIONAL CONDITIONS
AUTHORIZATION CERTIFICATE PER THE NEUSE RIVER BASIN RIPARIAN BUFFER
PROTECTION RULES (15A NCAC 028 .0233) WITH ADDITIONAL CONDITIONS
Townes at Cheswick
Dear Mr. Bryan:
You have our approval for the impacts listed below for the purpose described in your
application dated June 19, 2015 and received by the Division of Water Resources (Division) on
June 19, 2015. These impacts are covered by the attached Water Quality General Certification
Number 3890 and the conditions listed below. This certification is associated with the use of
Nationwide Permit Number 29 once it is issued to you by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers.
Please note that you should get any other federal, state or local permits before proceeding with
your project, including those required by (but not limited to) Sediment and Erosion Control,
Non - Discharge, and Water Supply Watershed regulations.
This approval requires you to follow the conditions listed in the enclosed certification and the
following additional conditions:
The following impacts are hereby approved provided that all of the other specific and
general conditions of the Certification and Buffer Rules are met. No other impacts are
approved, including incidental impacts. [15A NCAC 02B .0506(b)(c) and 15A NCAC 02B
.0233(8)]
Division of Water Resources, Raleigh Regional Office, Water Quality Operations Section http : / /portal.ncdenr.org /web /wq /aps
1628 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699 -1628 Phone: [phone]
Location: 3800 Barrett Drive, Raleigh, NC 27609 Fax: [phone]
An Equal Opportunity 1 Affirmative Action Employer— Made in part by recycled paper

Townes at Cheswick
DWR# 15 -0618
401 AND BUFFER APPROVAL
Page 2 of 4
Type of Impact
Amount Approved
Amount Approved
(units)
(units)
Permanent
Temporary
Wetland
0 (acres)
0.01 (acres)
Stream
( 0 (linear feet)
20 (linear feet)
Buffers —zone 1
650 (square feet)
0 (square feet)
Impact #1
Buffers —Zone 2
420 (square feet)
0 (square feet)
Impact #1
Buffers —zone 1
0 (square feet)
1,345 (square feet)
Impact #2
Buffers —Zone 2
0 (square feet)
905 (square feet)
Impact #2
2. Stormwater Management Plan (SMP) Approval from Local Community Required
You are required to provide one copy (hard copy or digital) of the approved SMP, including
plan details on full -sized plan sheets, with proof of the City of Raleigh's approval. The
approved SMP shall be submitted to the DWR 401 & Buffer Permitting Unit (1617 Mail
Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699 -1617) before any impacts authorized in this certification
occur. After it is approved and submitted to the Division, the SMP may not be modified
without prior written authorization from the City of Raleigh. If the SMP is modified in the
future, then you shall provide one modified SMP with proof of approval to the DWR 401 &
Buffer Permitting Unit prior to the commencement of the modifications. [15A NCAC 02H
.0506(b)(5)]
3. No Waste, Spoil, Solids, or Fill of Anv Kind
No waste, spoil, solids, or fill of any kind shall occur in wetlands, waters, or riparian areas
beyond the footprint of the impacts depicted in the Pre - Construction Notification. All
construction activities, including the design, installation, operation, and maintenance of
sediment and erosion control Best Management Practices, shall be performed so that no
violations of state water quality standards, statutes, or rules occur. [15A NCAC 02H .0501
and .0502]
4. Protective Fencing
The outside buffer, wetland or water boundary and along the construction corridor within
these boundaries approved under this authorization shall be clearly marked with orange
warning fencing (or similar high visibility material) for the areas that have been approved to
infringe within the buffer, wetland or water prior to any land disturbing activities to ensure
compliance with 15 NCAC 02H.0500. [15A NCAC 02H .0506 (b)(2) and (c)(2) and 15A NCAC
02H.0507 (c)]

Townes at Cheswick
DWR# 15 -0618
401 AND BUFFER APPROVAL
Page 3 of 4
S. This approval is for the purpose and design described in your application. The plans and
specifications for this project are incorporated by reference as part of the Certification and
Buffer Authorization. If you change your project, you must notify the Division and you may
be required to submit'a new application package with the appropriate fee. If the property is
sold, the new owner must be given a copy of this approval letter and General Certification
and is responsible for complying with all conditions. [15A NCAC 02B .0507(d)(2)]
6. This approval and its conditions are final and binding unless contested. [G.S. 143 - 215.51
This Certification and Buffer Authorization can be contested as provided in Articles 3 and 4 of
General Statute 150B by filing a written petition for an administrative hearing to the Office of
Administrative Hearings (hereby known as OAH). A petition form may be obtained from the
OAH at htti): / /www.ncoah.com/ or by calling the OAH Clerk's Office at (919) 431 -3000 for
information.
Within thirty (30) calendar days of receipt of this notice, a petition must be filed with the
OAH. A petition is considered filed when the original and one (1) copy along with any
applicable OAH filing fee is received in the OAH during normal office hours (Monday through
Friday between 8:00am and 5:00pm, excluding official state holidays).
The petition may be faxed to the OAH at (919) 431 -3100, provided the original and one copy of
the petition along with any applicable OAH filing fee is received by the OAH within five (5)
business days following the faxed transmission.
Mailing address for the OAH:
If sending by First Class Mail If sending via delivery service
via the US Postal Service: (e.g. UPS, FedEx):
Office of Administrative Hearings Office of Administrative Hearings
6714 Mail Service Center 1711 New Hope Church Road
Raleigh, NC 27699 -6714 Raleigh, NC 27609 -6285
One (1) copy of the petition must also be served to DENR:
Sam Hayes, General Counsel
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
1601 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699 -1601
Please send one (1) copy of the petition to DWR:

If sending by First Class Mail
via the US Postal Service:
Karen Higgins
NC DENR -DWR -401 & Buffer
Permitting Unit
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699 -1617
Townes at Cheswick
DWR# 15 -0618
401 AND BUFFER APPROVAL
Page 4 of 4
If sending via delivery service
(e.g. UPS, FedEx):
Karen Higgins
NC DENR -DWR -401 & Buffer
Permitting Unit
512 N. Salisbury Street
Raleigh, NC 27604
This letter completes the review of the Division under section 401 of the Clean Water Act and
the Neuse Riparian Buffer Rules as described in 15A NCAC 02B .0233. Please contact Cherri
Smith at 919 - 791 -4251 or cherri.smithCcDncdenr.eov if you have any questions or concerns.
Sincerely,
�D-I 12 (- -��
Danny Smit
Supervisor, Water Quality Regional Operations Section
Enclosure: GC 3890
cc: U.S. Army Corps of Engineers; Raleigh Regulatory Field Office; 3331 Heritage Trade
Drive, Ste. 105; Wake Forest, NC 27597
Sean Clark; SEPI Engineering & Construction; 1025 Wade Ave.; Raleigh, NC 27606
DWR RRO 401 /Riparian Buffer file

U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
WILMINGTON DISTRICT
Action Id. SAW - 2014 -01762 County: Wake U.S.G.S. Quad: NC- RALEIGH WEST
GENERAL PERMIT (REGIONAL AND NATIONWIDE) VERIFICATION
Permittee: Ashton Raleigh Residential. LLC
Brvan Morgan
Address: 5711 Six Forks Road, Suite 300
Raleigh, North Carolina, 27609
Telephone .N umber: 919 - 369 -1842
Size (acres) 10.89 Nearest Town Raleigh
Nearest Waterway Big- Branch River Basin Upper Neuse
USGS HUC 03020201 Coordinates Latitude: 35.8271
Longitude: - 78.6278
Location description: The 0oicet area is located at the terminus of Wake Towne Drive. PIN: 1715064029.,
Description of projects area and activity: This verification authorizes the nlaeement_of fill material in 0.01 acres of wetlands'and,
20 linear feet °of stream to facilitate the installation-of a stormwater nine associated with the construction of a residential
developtn'ent. J
Applicable Law: ® Section 404 (Clean Water Act, 33 USC 1344)
❑ Section 10 (Rivers and Harbors Act, 33 USC 403)
Authorization: Nationwide Permit Number: 29 Residential Developments
SEE ATTACHED NWP GENERAL AND REGIONAL CONDITIONS
Your work is authorized by the above referenced permit provided it is accomplished in strict accordance with the enclosed
Conditions, your application signed and dated June 19, 2015, and the enclosed plans Sheets 1 -2 dated Jutie.4, 2015. Any
violation of the attached conditions or deviation °from your submitted plans may subject the permittee to a stop work order, a
restoration order, a Class I administrative penalty, and /or appropriate legal action.
This verification will remain valid until the expiration date identified below unless the nationwide authorization is modified,
suspended or revoked: If, prior to the expiration date identified below, the nationwide permit authorization is reissued and /or
modified, this verification will remain valid until the expiration date identified below, provided it complies with all requirements of
the modified nationwide permit. If the nationwide permit authorization expires or is suspended, revoked, or is modified, such that the
activity would no `longer comply with the terms and conditions of the nationwide permit, activities which have commenced (i.e., are
under construction) or are under contract to commence in reliance upon the nationwide permit, will remain authorized provided the
activity is completed within twelve months of the date of the nationwide permit's expiration, modification or revocation, unless
discretionary authority has been exercised on a case -by -case basis to modify, suspend'or revoke the authorization.
Activities subject to Section 404 (as indicated above) may also require an individual Section 401 Water Quality Certification. You
should contact the NC Division of Water Quality (telephone [phone]) to determine Section 401 requirements. For activities
occurring within the twenty coastal counties subject to regulation under the Coastal Area Management Act (CAMA), prior to
beginning work you must contact the N.C. Division of Coastal Management in Morehead City, NC, at (252) 808 -2808.
This Department of the Army verification does not relieve the permittee of the responsibility to obtain any other °required Federal,
State or local approvals /permits.
If there are any questions regarding this verification, any of the conditions of the Permit, or the Corps of Engineers regulatory
program, please contact David Shaeffer at919 -554 -4884 X31 or David. L.Shae ffer(a usaee.armv.mil.
Corps Regulatory Official: S- Date: 7/31/2015
Expiration Date of Verification: 03/1812017

SA11'- 2014 -01762
Determination of Jurisdiction:
A. ® Based on preliminary information, there appear to be waters of the US including wetlands within the above described project
area. This preliminary determination is not an appealable action under the Regulatory Program Administrative Appeal Process
( Reference 33 CFR Part 331). See preliminary jurisdictional determination form dated July 31, 2015.
B. ❑ There are Navigable Waters of the United States within the above described project area subject to the permit requirements of
Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act and Section 404 of the Clean Water Act. Unless there is a change in the law or our
published regulations, this determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this
notification.
C. ❑ There are waters of the US and /or wetlands within the above described project area subject to the permit requirements of
Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (CWA)(33 USC § 1344). Unless there is a change in the law or our published regulations,
this determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this notification.
D. ❑ The jurisdictional areas within the above described project area have been identified under a previous action. Please reference
jurisdictional determination issued . Action ID: SAW -
Basis For Determination: Based on information submitted by the aonlicant, the areas identified on the
delineation man. Figure 3 dated October 14. 2014, exhibit criteria for waters of the U.S. as defined in 33 CFR 328.3,
Reeulatory Guidance Letter 05 -05, the Jurisdictional Determination Form Instructional Guidebook (i.e. Rananos Guidance),
the 1987 Wetland Delineation Manual, and the Regional Sunulement to the 1987 Manual: Eastern Piedmont and Mountains
v2.0.
Remarks: None.
F. Attention USDA Program Participants
This delineation /determination has been conducted to identify the limits of Corps' Clean Water Act jurisdiction for the particular site
identified in this request. The delineation /determination may not be valid for the wetland conservation provisions of the Food Security
Act of 1985. If you or your tenant are USDA Program participants, or anticipate participation in USDA programs, you should request
a certified wetland determination from the local office of the Natural Resources Conservation Service, prior to starting work.
F. Appeals Information (This information applies only to approved jurisdictional determinations as indicated in B and C
above).
This correspondence constitutes an approved jurisdictional determination for the above described site. If you object to this
determination, you may request an administrative appeal under Corps regulations at 33 CFR Part 331. Enclosed you will find a
Notification of Appeal Process (NAP) fact sheet and request for appeal (RFA) form. If you request to appeal this determination _you
must submit a completed RFA form to the following address:
US Army Corps of Engineers
South Atlantic Division
Attn: Jason Steele, Review Officer
60 Forsyth Street SW, Room 1OM15
Atlanta, Georgia 30303 -8801
Phone: [phone]
In order for an RFA to be accepted by the Corps, the Corps must determine that it is complete, that it meets the criteria for appeal
under 33 CFR part 331.5, and that it has been received by the Division Office within 60 days of the date of the NAP. Should you
decide to submit an RFA form, it must be received at the above address by not applicable.
* *It is not necessary to submit 11 RFA form to the Division Office if you do not object to the determination in this correspondence. **
Corps Regulatory Official:
David Shaeffer
Date of JD: 7/31/2015

SAW- 2014 -01762
The Wilmington District is committed to providing the highest level of support to the public. To help us ensure we
continue to do so, please complete our customer Satisfaction Survey online at htto : / /r"ulatorv.usacesurvev.com /.
Copy furnished:
Agent: SEPI Engineering and Construction
Sean Clark
Address: 1025 Wade Avenue
Raleigh. North Carolina. 27605
Telephone Number: 919 -573 -9931

Action ID Number: SAW- 2014 -01762 County: Wake
Permittee: Ashton Raleiuh Residential, LLC
Brvan Morean
Project Name: Ashton Raleigh Residential, LLC, Townes at Cheswick
Date Verification Issued: 7/31/2015
Project Manager: David Shaeffer
Upon completion of the activity authorized by this permit and any mitigation required by the permit,
sign this certification and return it to the following address:
US ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
WILMINGTON DISTRICT
Attn: David Shaeffer
Please note that your permitted activity is subject to a compliance inspection by a U. S. Army Corps of
Engineers representative. Failure to comply with any terms or conditions of this authorization may
result in the Corps suspending, modifying or revoking the authorization and /or issuing a Class I
administrative penalty, or initiating other appropriate legal action.
I hereby certify that the work authorized by the above referenced permit has been completed in
accordance with the terms and condition of the said permit, and required mitigation was completed in
accordance with the permit conditions.
Signature of Permittee Date

xS` ., t U _ •.L::..k':.' ,S" ...,. _.y„_ L: ' [ S "°�,,. ... r. 'sue r ;� -.'��. }�^.:
.NO IFICA�T_LIONOF %ADM { ISTRtA TT,t�E "ApPE�AL,©PInIOtVSGA�ND PR®CESSAND3''' r r
,�. � ' „q,v 3'r�” `.. � .t,t`.•,.�; Tx� >l�.a;.e�_�.T= ,�,:�,
I'1E`Slt.li'�R1Rit`r.�tt�
APEALt : "'
Applicant: Ashton Raleigh Residential, LLC, Bryan File Number: SAW- 2014 -01762 Date: 7/31/2015
Morgan
Attached is: See Section below
❑ INITIAL PROFFERED PERMIT (Standard Permit or Letter of permission) A
i ❑ PROFFERED PERMIT (Standard Permit or Letter of permission) B
❑ PERMIT DENIAL C
❑ APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION D
�( PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION E
_ - ' L -- t Ott �, q..■rd
CTIQN,Ir The followtrigtdentifies yoiir;r "igfits and ;options regardmg,amadin�ntstrative appeal'6 fit he above dectston
Additional „infofination maybe foiirid at of httpa / /vrwvv:usace:arrriY �ri�l %Ivtission "s' /.CiJilWorks/Re i�lato�yPf� Jamajk(dPer1nt s PA the;Corps regulatiorisat 33;CFR`Par•331: ,
A: INITIAL PROFFERED PERMIT: You may acceptor object to the permit.
ACCEPT: if you received a Standard Permit, you may sign the permit document and return it to the district engineer for final
authorization. If you received a Letter of Pennission (LOP), you may accept the LOP and your work is authorized. Your
signature on the Standard Permit or acceptance of the LOP means that you accept the permit in its entirety, and waive all
rights to appeal the permit, including its terms and conditions, and approved jurisdictional determinations associated with the
permit. ,
OBJECT: If you object to the permit (Standard or LOP) because of certain terms and conditions therein, you may request
that the permit be modified accordingly. You must complete Section iI of this form and return the form to the district
engineer. Your objections must be received by the district engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice, or you will
forfeit your right to appeal the permit in the future. Upon receipt of your letter, the district engineer will evaluate your
objections and may: (a) modify the permit to address all of your concerns, (b) modify the permit to address some of your
objections, or (c) not modify the permit having determined that the permit should be issued as previously written. After
evaluating your objections, the district engineer will send you a proffered permit for your reconsideration, as indicated in
Section B below.
B: PROFFERED PERMIT: You may accept or appeal the permit
A ACCEPT: If you received a Standard Permit, you may sign the permit document and return it to the district engineer for final
authorization. If you received a Letter of Pennission (LOP), you may accept the LOP and your work is authorized. Your
signature on the Standard Permit or acceptance of the LOP means that you accept the permit in its entirety, and waive all
rights to appeal the permit, including its terms and conditions, and approved jurisdictional determinations associated with the
permit.
o APPEAL: If you choose to decline the proffered,permit (Standard or LOP) because of certain terms and conditions therein,
you may appeal the declined permit under the Corps of Engineers Administrative Appeal Process by completing Section 11 of
this form and sending the form to the division engineer. This form must be received by the division engineer within 60 days
of the date of this notice.
C: PERMIT DENIAL: You may appeal the denial of a permit under the Corps of Engineers Administrative Appeal Process by
completing Section It of this form and sending the form to the division engineer. This form must be received by the division
engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice.
D: APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION: You may accept or appeal the approved JD or provide new
information.
• ACCEPT: You do not need to notify the Corps to accept an approved JD. Failure to notify the Corps within 60 days of the
date of this notice, means that you accept the approved JD in its entirety, and waive all rights to appeal the approved JD.
• APPEAL: If you disagree with the approved JD, you may appeal the approved JD under the Corps of Engineers
Administrative Appeal Process by completing Section 11 of this form and sending the form to the district engineer. This form
must be received by the division engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice.

E: PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION: You do not need to respond to the Corps regarding the
preliminary JD. The Preliminary JD is not appealable. If you wish, you may request an approved JD (which may be appealed),
by contacting the Corps district for further instruction. Also you may provide new information for further consideration by the
Corps to reevaluate the JD.
SECTION II - REQUEST FOR APPEAL or OBJECTIONS TO AN INITIAL PROFFERED PERMIT
REASONS FOR APPEAL OR OBJECTIONS: (Describe your reasons for appealing the decision or your objections to an initial
proffered pen-nit in clear concise statements. You may attach additional information to this form to clarify where your reasons or
objections are addressed in the administrative record.)
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: The appeal is limited to a review of the administrative record, the Corps memorandum for the
record of the appeal conference or meeting, and any supplemental information that the review officer has determined is needed to
clarify the administrative record. Neither the appellant nor the Corps may add new information or analyses to the record.
However, you may provide additional information to clarify the location of information that is already in the administrative
record. --
POINT OF CONTACT FOR QUESTIONS OR INFORMATION:
If you have questions regarding this decision and /or the If you only have questions regarding the appeal process you may
appeal process you may contact: also contact:
District Engineer, Wilmington Regulatory Division, Attn: Mr. Jason Steele, Administrative Appeal Review Officer
David Shaeffer, 3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105, CESAD -PDO
Wake Forest, North Carolina 27587 U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, South Atlantic Division
60 Forsyth Street, Room iOM15
Atlanta, Georgia 30303 -8801
Phone: [phone]
RiGHT OF ENTRY: Your signature below grants the right of entry to Corps of Engineers personnel, and any government
consultants, to conduct investigations of the project site during the course of the appeal process. You will be provided a 15 day
notice of any site investigation, and will have the opportunit to participate in all site investi rations.
Date: Telephone number:
Signature of appellant or agent.
For appeals on Initial Proffered Permits send this form: to:
District Engineer, Wilmington Regulatory Division, Attn: David Shaeffer, 69 Darlington Avenue, Wilmington, North Carolina
28403
For Permit denials, Proffered Permits and approved Jtirisdictional Determinations send tltis form to:
Division Engineer, Commander, U.S. Army Engineer Division, South Atlantic, Attn: Mr. Jason Steele, Administrative Appeal
Officer, CESAD -PDO, 60 Forsyth Street, Room IOM 15, Atlanta, Georgia 30303 -8801
Phone: [phone]

RECEIVE'
SEP 1 1 2014
RALEIGH REGULATORY
ATTACHMENT A FIELD OFFICE
PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION FORM W __
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
A. REPORT COMPLETION DATE FOR PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL
DETERMINATION (JD): 7 /�J/120 13
B. NAME AND ADDRESS OF PERSON REQUESTING PRELIMINARY JD:
Sean Clark 1025 Wade Ave Raleigh, NC 27605
919 573 9931 sclark @sepiengineering.com
C. DISTRICT OFFICE, FILE ME, AND NUMBS
h ,,n ()p IEEE f
D. PROJECT LOCATION(S) AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION: TOLJ r't �s
The 10.98 acre project is located at the end of Wake Town Drive C'�
(USE THE ATTACHED TABLE TO DOCUMENT MULTIPLE WATERBODIES AT DIFFERENT
SITES)
State: NC County /parish /borough: Wake City: Raleigh
Center coordinates of site (lat /long in degree decimal format):
Lat. 35.827302 °N; Long. - 78.627411 °W.
Universal Transverse Mercator: zone 17
Name of nearest waterbody: Big Branch
Identify (estimate) amount of waters in the review area:
Non - wetland waters:
See table linear feet: see table width (ft) and /or See table acres.
COwardin Class: See table
Stream Flow: See table
Wetlands: NA acres.
COwardln Class: NA
Name of any water bodies on the site that have been identified as Section 10
waters:
Tidal: NA
Non - Tidal: NA

E. REVIEW PERFORMED FOR SITE EVALUATION (CHECK ALL THAT
APPLY):
❑ Office (Desk) Determination. Date:
5d Field Determination. Date(s): it OJ IIAO I 4
SUPPORTING DATA. Data reviewed for preliminary JD
(check all that apply - checked items should be included in case file and,
where checked and requested, appropriately reference sources below):
0 Maps, plans, plots or plat submitted by or on behalf of the
applicant/consultant:
0 Data sheets prepared /submitted by or on behalf of the
applicant/consultant.
Office concurs with data sheets /delineation report.
Office does not concur with data sheets /delineation report.
❑ Data sheets prepared by the Corps:
❑ Corps navigable waters' study:
❑ U.S. Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas:
❑ USGS NHD data
❑ USGS 8 and 12 digit HUC maps
❑✓ U.S. Geological Survey map(s). Cite scale & quad name: 2,333 Raleigh East and Raleigh West
® USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey.
Citation: Wake Co Soil Survey, November 1970
❑ National wetlands inventory map(s). Cite name:
❑ State /Local wetland inventory map(s):
❑ FEMA/FIRM maps:
❑ 100 -year Floodplain Elevation is:
(National Geodectic Vertical Datum of 1929)
❑ Photographs: ❑ Aerial (Name & Date): or
❑ Other (Name & Date):
❑ Previous determination (s). File no. and date of response letter:
❑ Other information (please specify):

1. The Corps of Engineers believes that there may be jurisdictional waters of the
United States on the subject site, and the permit applicant or other affected party
who requested this preliminary JD is hereby advised of his or her option to
request and obtain an approved jurisdictional determination (JD) for that site.
Nevertheless, the permit applicant or other person who requested this
preliminary JD has declined to exercise the option to obtain an approved JD in
this instance and at this time.
2. In any circumstance where a permit applicant obtains an individual permit, or
a Nationwide General Permit (NWP) or other general permit verification requiring
"pre- construction notification" (PCN), or requests verification for a non - reporting
NWP or other general permit, and the permit applicant has not requested an
approved JD for the activity, the permit applicant is hereby made aware of the
following: (1) the permit applicant has elected to seek a permit authorization
based on a preliminary JD, which does not make an official determination of
jurisdictional waters; (2) that the applicant has the option to request an approved
JD before accepting the terms and conditions of the permit authorization, and
that basing a permit authorization on an approved JD could possibly result in less
compensatory mitigation being required or different special conditions; (3) that
the applicant has the right to request an individual permit rather than accepting
the terms and conditions of the NWP or other general permit authorization; (4)
that the applicant can accept a permit authorization and thereby agree to comply
with all the terms and conditions of that permit, including whatever mitigation
requirements the Corps has determined to be necessary; (5) that undertaking
any activity in reliance upon the subject permit authorization without requesting
an approved JD constitutes the applicant's acceptance of the use of the
preliminary JD, but that either form of JD will be processed as soon as is
practicable; (6) accepting a permit authorization (e.g., signing a proffered
individual permit) or undertaking any activity in reliance on any form of Corps
permit authorization based on a preliminary JD constitutes agreement that all
wetlands and other water bodies on the site affected in any way by that activity
are jurisdictional waters of the United States, and precludes any challenge to
such jurisdiction in any administrative or judicial compliance or enforcement
action, or in any administrative appeal or in any Federal court; and (7) whether
the applicant elects to use either an approved JD or a preliminary JD, that JD
will be processed as soon as is practicable. Further, an approved JD, a proffered
individual permit (and all terms and conditions contained therein), or individual
permit denial can be administratively appealed pursuant to 33 C.F.R. Part 331,
and that in any administrative appeal, jurisdictional issues can be raised (see 33
C.F.R. 331.5(a)(2)). If, during that administrative appeal, it becomes necessary
to make an official determination whether CWA jurisdiction exists over a site, or
to provide an official delineation of jurisdictional waters on the site, the Corps will
provide an approved JD to accomplish that result, as soon as is practicable.

This preliminary JD finds that there "may be" waters of the United States on the
subject project site, and identifies all aquatic features on the site that could be
affected by the proposed activity, based on the following information:
IMPORTANT NOTE: The information recorded on this form has not
necessarily been verified by the Corps and should not be relied upon for
later iurisdictional determinations.
Q;L and date of
Regulatory Project Manager
(REQUIRED)
7/12112D
Signature and date of
person requesting preliminary JD
(REQUIRED, unless obtaining
the signature is impracticable)

LOr��
JUN 19 2015
{I I{ AT _ RALE,GN REGULATORY
I W / I i -1 , ! � , FFICE
IirBtfrN.OA,6, -RAYD M N E U S E RIVER BASIN COVER
NOR=&DAW - NAM I WETLAND AND BUFFER IMPACT EXHIBITS SHEET IOF2
RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA
MW-26T STATISTIC$
A5NTM RALMH FVDIDEdVIL LIZ
519 SIX FORKS ROAD. RITTE WO
RAWNSH, W. 27609
K4XE 0AW POW
TIISO64019 P R5a0"' e
ZONRN6 OD OPI.2 (909 Aa R-9 MA4 Aa NTH SHOD I 1, 2 OM AT
TOTAL AIWA
11.211 AC
PF✓ aS CAE LLM -
'-'046, 548 -19
P WAIF OPEN SPACE
+a AC
AREA IN TON117 :1015
406 AC
AFSk IN RWIT -OF4W
++I AO
' TOTAL NIMM OF WTS
84
DE SAW (HD BLON55 LOCATED ON R-4 DISTRICT)
71 IIVAC
IMPERVIOUS CALCULATIONS
AIWA IN E011145 IM9A/IO13 WWMFS
00 AC
64 PERCWNT 566 AC /1255 Aa BM0115
615
OFVN SPACE CALCULATIONS
aw#44EL
TOTAL TRACT 50
1255 AC
OPEN SPACE RFl MRO (10%10755==
IM AC
OPEN SPACE PRWD07 IINCUM ALL AFWA OUfSIDEOF TONHOUSE LOI51
711 AC
PE AWA6E OF OPEN SPACE PROVIDED (T>f / O-W
915%
CONSULTANT:
PRIEST,CRAVEN & ASSOCIATES, INC.
PLANNERS / LANDSCAPE DESIGNERS / SURVEYORS / ENGINEERS
3803 - B COMPUTER DRIVE. SUITE 104, RALEIGH, N.C. 27609
PHONE 919 / 781 -0300 FAX 919 / 782 -1288
EMAIL PCAQPRIESTCRAVEN.CO,%4 FIRM #: C -0488
VICINITY MAP
IMPACT TABLE
IMPACT IMPACT TYPE PURPOSE
NdAMBER LOGATION
I SHEET 1 OF 2 ZI AND Z2 STORM PIPE
2 SHEET I OF 2 ZI, Z2, CH, 114 IW 5EYIER PIPE
CN a CHANNEL, JIh • JJRISDICTIONAL WrLAND, IM - 154LATED HETL.AND, .
NO=NWSEWTERZI - ZONE I. Z2aZ%IE2
GENERAL NOTES:
I. BOUNDARY 9dOINAT10N 15 TAKEN FROM A FIELD W;NST' PREPARED BY THIS OFFICE.
2 517E TOPO6RAP96 INFOFaFNTIO N 15 TAKEN FROM 615 DATA AVAILABLE ONAW NIH RAKE COUNTY
9. PLAID -TTRIC HEORKATWH FOR AREAS OUTSIDE OF THIS SITE ARE TARN FROM MAKE COUNTY 615
RFCRKATION.
4. ALL MATERIAL5 AND CGNSTR IXTION 5FNLL BE IN 5TRICT ACCORDANCE NTH THE CITY OF RALEIGH,
NCR7T, AID WMR STANOAR05 AN7 5P ICATONS
5. TEMA DESIGNATED FLOOD ZONES ARE LOCATED ON THIS PROPERTY PER FLOOD PM85 1705 1 1115
6 NO WA OWFE2 WACTS SIINI OCCUR PRIOR TO APPROVAL FROM NCDEHR.
SHEET INDEX
I OF 6 COVER SHEET ONNER AND APPLICANT:
2 OF 6 TOO' SCALE OVERALL LAYOUT
Ashton Raleigh Residential, LLC
5711 Six Forks Rd. #300, Raleigh, NC 27609
IMPAC,T5
Phone[phone]
PE
iMANg
TEMP.
IMPORTANT
IWORTANT
UN- IMPORTANT I.N-IMPORTANT
I WIORTANT IMPORTANT UN- IMPORTANT I.N- IFGTORTANT
YNEIUNJ<i
N�
CNIANNIEL
aw#44EL
CHANNEL CWJI4EL
CHAN1E1 CANADZ3 CHANA®_ CHANOaL
SUF195Z
EI)WfER
KILAND IMPACT PETI,lJlD IMPACT
BIT-FtR
NNEH �T
IMPACT
IMPACT
IMPACT
IMPACT
IMPACT IMPACT
IMIPACT IMPACT IMPACT IMPACT
IMPACT
IMPACT
"INN MTHIN
IMPACT
REASON FOR
I
IMPACT Y NO.
PERK
TEMP.
PERM. TEM..
PERM. TEW. FW;!K TEW.
ZONE 1
ZONE 2
ZONE I ZONE 2
TOTAL-
IMPACT
(SP)
(5P)
(5F)
(9P)
(5P) (SPJ
(LPJ 0.P) (LFJ (LP)
(SF)
(5F)
(SFJ (9FJ
TSF
.
I I
I
_ _
_ _ _ _
650
420
- -
1=
STORM POND OUTLET'
2 I
.615
-
I l0
= -
- ZO - =
LW
9O9
- =
2250
5EYIER PIPE
- TOTALS,
- I 615
- I TO
- -
_ 20 - -
1945
1925
I - 1 -
I 9920
JRI6IW11. DATE) 4, 20{5 '.
F \lNm W41EG15 \WIIlgG1]01�•PJI
001 lMPI Ni[6 • ,Wl Tp� \D6\M ?RN9 IWIQ\ )MKT MV pp
. y O'4 ]p15 - IP M N1 . !Bi
.
e

�i�� /.► "� 4�• -:� -- .:��
,,,,,`//�..'' � �/�fj � -: ` •1`'11
: \\ � �' . ��r�a�,+A�._ ice'• �����Iil� � 7J � ;1� � ry,,��`
i+i ( \`�� \ \ \� �_ : ,�j, �� ° �r i . �• ���i ,.!vlw,�Ciir♦��.:rFi���o,��� r :ii+i'� a �r
' / • ;�. 1° ��1� � ` :I r � �„r,l�l�i„�I�I�I���i��� in•, �'-11� � �1��y, ` +� �
•, • � , � ���i`� ~,tip +`�.,
�nrr�a.
ur.a.
MORN
WIWI
M.
ifiiif . ■ ,

,
Yaj,K -E-. , PURDUE Sr -
cy
FSTE. N
R GLEN DR O' Fp R y y
1 Quail Nogen �•• _ -
H9110W Cedar W
x ELD PR PINECROFr pqV O � I /AN TRAIL Di?
NORTHFI z „ P
Fp %HALL S7 I.a1CQIIlUllt n a 9EERFIELD AD
WFSTRI06E�DR , -o v � .• r O �" �
H
Briarcliff o o X I ' ` PEBBLEBROOK DR
`iekory Hills 1l1��{ MEMINGwq} DR
-', - it i � - -.. c � �° •�
C Cko
- ROWAN ST FarriOr
E OMPN` -, '� O yFyr
Hills OR; � aqo J iblloN �_� 4 �� 4,,�
r �
N G� i r+ a ��op '3a 23 7
DR iF
C rr 4P
R ,c
1
v \ yA ACD > Z
!!AR AI � RD
JIPR/T(/(K DYP ` i - i') 01 �I G�y�b , ' ( ga
r ` D
RAMBLEWOOD PR~ ( 1J II•\� \ �, -_I ` S pLBA�
�° ° _ `(,;SO:� . i� i ;•,._�', - Greenwood
r t Farms
�� 4 1 \.,i1�e{�FII@ 11` C°MPUTfq i f (`
ce. O C 1'
W u W Featureilliamshoro A h
Big Branch
`� ��� ' o Sao .•c i l - •' �� '" � ;'J , i ! r `
Park
• J y, 1�� '•\,2 w DRt:'N _Drewl-y ;_ ,i•C- `' -p�,Aq _
Hills
RD
DR
/,
1 %�j3� ", / %�IIIIIOI�" % � � J .,�� .�J ��H�!' `1 �`, l.- .•. \" �-�' `. ` J 'illy. - -�
i
-_ • rH£ rig `. Ili �. `, � �
Map Location
GRANVILLE
FRANKLIN
DURHAM
WAKE
;HAT AM
JOHNSTON
+`� CDR �Norrthsai �e
luius,sr , M/LLS St.•� w I
USGS Map
Figure 1
Townes at Cheswick
Wake County
N
EN 14.029.00
USGS Topography, 2013
SLPI
Raleigh West Quadrangle
Raleigh le
9 g
EN INEERING N
August 14, 2014
G
C O N S T R U C T I O N
1 inch = 2,333 feet

OP
Feature A
Big Branch
-W
r �09
;Feature B
ik
4"N -T-4W7,
!� �� .Q►� j. ��. �. ,mss � ��', 1 '�, ^� �f��4 �%� /
Map Location Soils Map Figure 2
GRANVILLE Townes at Cheswick
FRANKLIN Wake County N
DURHAM EN 14.029.00
Wake County Soil Survey, 1970 SEPI
WAKE E N G I N E E R I N G &
Soil Sheets 39 & 4• C 0 N S T R U C T 1 0 N
'HAT AM August 14, 2014
ZJOHNSTON 1 inch = 1,322 feet

TOWNji ` 1-' SWICK
VERTICAL DATUM - NAVD88 N E U S E RIVER BASIN COVER
HORIZONTAL DATUM - NADW WETLAND AND BUFFER IMPACT EXHIBITS SHEET I OF 4
RALEIGH,
PROJECT STATISTICS
PROPERTY OWNER ASHTON RALEIGH RESIDENTIAL, LLG
5111 SIX FORKS ROAD, SUITE 300
RALEIGH, NG 21609
WAKE GouNTY PIN(5)
1115-06-4029 4 1,715-06 -619a
ZONING
CUD 041 -2 (9A9 AG), R-4 (3.44 AG), WITH SHOD 1 4 2 OVERLAY
TOTAL AREA
12.53 AC
PREVIOUS CASE ID(5):
Z- 13-96, 5 -48-14
PRIVATE OPEN SPACE
1.21 AG
AREA IN TOWNHOUSE LOTS
3.03 AG
AREA IN R16HT -OF -WAY
229 AG
TOTAL NUMBER OF UNITS
89
DENSITY (NO BUILDINGS LOCATED
ON R-4 DISTRICT) 1.1 UWAG
IMPERVI0U5 CALCULATIONS
AREA IN EXISTING IMPERVIOUS SURFAGES
OA AG
AREA IN PROPOSED IMPERVIOUS SURFAGES
5b5 AG
IMPERVIOUS PERCENTAGE (5b5 AG / 1253 AC)
45.1%
OPEN SPACE CALCULATI0N5
IMPACT # NO.
TOTAL TRACT 51ZE
1253 AG
OPEN SPACE REQUIRED (10%) (1253X0.10)
125 AG
OPEN SPACE PROVIDED (INCLUDES ALL AREA 0UT51DE OF T0VMH0U5E LOTS)
121 AG
PERCENTAGE OF OPEN SPACE PROVIDED (7.21/1253)
575%
NORTH CAROLINA
W
C0N5ULTANT:
PRIEST,CRAVEN & ASSOCIATES, INC.
PLANNERS / LANDSCAPE DESIGNERS / SURVEYORS / ENGINEERS
3803 - B COMPUTER DRIVE, SUITE 104, RALEIGH, N.C. 27609
PHONE 919 / 781 -0300 FAX 919 / 782 -1288 1 OF 3
EMAIL PCA @PRIESTCRAVEN.COM FIRM#: C -0488 2 OF 3
3OF3
MPAGT5
I MPAGT TA13LE
PERMANENT
IMPACT
WETLAND
5HEET
IMPACT
IMPACT # NO.
PERM.
I
(5.F)
Z 1 2
-
2 2
-
w TOTALS:
-
3 I 3
z 4 3 8 4
GRAND TOTAL
VICINITY MAP
SHEET INDEX
COVER 5HEET
100' SCALE OVERALL LAYOUT
40' 0FF5ITE BYPASS OUTLET
CH = CHANNEL, JW = JUR15DIGTI0NAL WETLAND, IN = 150LATED WETLAND,
NB = NEUSE BUFFER, ZI = ZONE I, Z2 = ZONE 2
GENERAL N0TE5:
I. BOUNDARY INFORMATION 15 TAKEN FROM A FIELD SURVEY PREPARED BY TH15 OFFICE.
2. SITE TOPOGRAPHIG INFORMATION 15 TAKEN FROM 615 DATA AVAILABLE ONLINE WITH WAKE COUNTY.
3. PLANEMETRIG INFORMATION FOR AREAS OUTSIDE OF TH15 51TE ARE TAKEN FROM WAKE COUNTY 615
INFORMATION.
4. ALL MATERIALS AND G0N5TRUGTI0N SHALL BE IN STRIGT ACCORDANCE WITH THE CITY OF RALEIGH,
NGDOT, AND NGDENR STANDARDS AND SPECIFICATIONS.
5. FEMA DESIGNATED FLOOD ZONES ARE LOCATED ON TH15 PROPERTY PER FLOOD PANELS 1105 d 1115.
6. NO NEW BUFFER IMPACTS SHALL OGGUR PRIOR TO APPROVAL FROM NGDENR.
OWNER AND APPLICANT:
Ashton Raleigh Residential, LLC
5711 Six Forks Rd. #300, Raleigh, NC 27609
Phone[phone]
TEMP.
I MPAGT TA13LE
IMPORTANT
IMPACT
IMPACT TYPE
PURP05E
NUMBER
LOCATION
I
5HEET 2 OF 3 ZI AND Z2
STORM PIPE
2
5HEET 2 OF 3 ZI, Z2, GH, 4 IN
SEWER PIPE
3
5HEET 3 OF 3 ZI AND Z2
5T0RM PIPE
CH = CHANNEL, JW = JUR15DIGTI0NAL WETLAND, IN = 150LATED WETLAND,
NB = NEUSE BUFFER, ZI = ZONE I, Z2 = ZONE 2
GENERAL N0TE5:
I. BOUNDARY INFORMATION 15 TAKEN FROM A FIELD SURVEY PREPARED BY TH15 OFFICE.
2. SITE TOPOGRAPHIG INFORMATION 15 TAKEN FROM 615 DATA AVAILABLE ONLINE WITH WAKE COUNTY.
3. PLANEMETRIG INFORMATION FOR AREAS OUTSIDE OF TH15 51TE ARE TAKEN FROM WAKE COUNTY 615
INFORMATION.
4. ALL MATERIALS AND G0N5TRUGTI0N SHALL BE IN STRIGT ACCORDANCE WITH THE CITY OF RALEIGH,
NGDOT, AND NGDENR STANDARDS AND SPECIFICATIONS.
5. FEMA DESIGNATED FLOOD ZONES ARE LOCATED ON TH15 PROPERTY PER FLOOD PANELS 1105 d 1115.
6. NO NEW BUFFER IMPACTS SHALL OGGUR PRIOR TO APPROVAL FROM NGDENR.
OWNER AND APPLICANT:
Ashton Raleigh Residential, LLC
5711 Six Forks Rd. #300, Raleigh, NC 27609
Phone[phone]
TEMP.
IMPORTANT
IMPORTANT
UN- IMPORTANT UN- IMPORTANT IMPORTANT IMPORTANT UN- IMPORTANT UN- IMPORTANT
WETLAND
CHANNEL
CHANNEL
CHANNEL
CHANNEL
CHANNEL
CHANNEL
CHANNEL
CHANNEL
BUFFER
BUFFER
WETLAND IMPACT WETLAND IMPACT
BUFFER
IMPACT
IMPACT
IMPACT
IMPACT
IMPACT
IMPACT
IMPACT
IMPACT
IMPACT
IMPACT
IMPACT
WITHIN WITHIN
IMPACT
REASON FOR
PERM.
PERM.
TEMP.
PERM.
TEMP.
PERM.
TEMP.
PERM.
TEMP.
ZONE I
ZONE 2
ZONE I ZONE 2
TOTAL
IMPACT
(S.F)
(5.F)
(S.F.)
(S.FJ
(S.F)
(L.F)
(L.F)
(L -FJ
(L.FJ
(S.F)
(S.FJ
(S.FJ (S.F)
(5.F)
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
650
420
- -
1070
STORM POND OUTLET
615
-
70
-
-
-
20
-
-
1345
905
- -
2250
SEWER PIPE
615
-
70
-
-
-
20
-
-
1995
1325
- -
3320
615
70
F. \LAND PROJECTS \XOTHER5\2014 - 007.001 ASHTON HOODS - WAKE TOWE5\D64S\1-ETLAND IPPNCT\ 1 MPACT MAP - 10-12 -2015. DW6 , 0-t 21, 2015 - 4 51 AM , BEN
20
1955 2100
20 300
3970 3725
4055 POND OUTLET 4 BYPASS PIPE
320 HEAD GUT REPAIR
7695
ORIGINAL DATE: JUNE, 4, 2015

APPROVED
IMPACT-I
ZONE I 650 5F
ZONE 2 — 420 5F
1 APPROVED
I MPAGT -2
ZONE 1 — 1545 5F
ZONE 2 — qO5 5F
JW -6155F
CH — 20 LF, -70 5F
NEUSE
RIVER /
RI PAR NN,� "Ji
30, 00544AY
EASAHENT
\ \
ZONE I
OVERALL LAYOUT
SHEET 2 OF 3
�. � , %�� /i' ��� _ 1 � !1�= ►.11 � ,111 � � �' - `i,�,�
. ,moo C?..� -�� � _ ►�� , �1. �
may ,�. ��.�- ��, - ► _ .
,,'/ ' • • i /�_ - ■ X71 '� .,.,
ONi
' __ � � ►� �� _ �_ _ � � � IC In �
� p� 11 3 �.. ■�■ -� �., t x-11 � _. .� 1 • 1 t� ' ;:w � i
2�•� ■ ■�■■ � � ~i fly •
♦ 1 1 J ■- ■ ■— i�'. ■ ■■■ ■,• - III ■ � \\
.�.... �.
WETLAND
ZONE 1 1MPAGT I
ZONE 2 - 650 SF
1 / 1
1 �\
EX
MH ll
IFl, If4 1
Iow ■._
■cc�
.1
•.
6RAPHIG 5GALE
I II = 100'
y r1
i`
AgM
,'S
1
G
MH iG
#I
•
11 ` GI
10
WC�
(5EE 5HEET 5) r a
NEW IMPACT-5 U W E
z-
. ZONE I — M55 5F Q
ZONE 2 — 2100 5F
(AND) A 4
IMPACT-4 z
ZO — 20 5F z j
ZO 2 — 00 5F a z
z=
= ZONE I IMPACTS = CHANNEL IMPACTS H Z
= ZONE 2 IMPACTS F-1 =J14 IMPACTS
as z
- IMPAGT
-2
ZONE I - 1345 5F
ZOW 2 - 405 SF
-H - 615 SF
G41 - 20 LF, 10 5F
IFl, If4 1
Iow ■._
■cc�
.1
•.
6RAPHIG 5GALE
I II = 100'
y r1
i`
AgM
,'S
1
G
MH iG
#I
•
11 ` GI
10
WC�
(5EE 5HEET 5) r a
NEW IMPACT-5 U W E
z-
. ZONE I — M55 5F Q
ZONE 2 — 2100 5F
(AND) A 4
IMPACT-4 z
ZO — 20 5F z j
ZO 2 — 00 5F a z
z=
= ZONE I IMPACTS = CHANNEL IMPACTS H Z
= ZONE 2 IMPACTS F-1 =J14 IMPACTS
as z

J
F5 '7
Al
NEN
IMPACT -4\
zorE i - 20 sF
ZONE 2 -300 SF
ELLIOTT
FEMA FLOODWAY 1115 -05 -3238
FRINGE
\\ ELLIOTT
1115 -05 -3403 FEMA FLOODWAY�
NO EXCAVATION TO OCCUR
BELOW ORDINARY WATERMARK i`' z� i '
��. �
\ + —+ 2
Of
i
NEE RI'..`
IZI FIAA RI AN 5TORM PIPE, GRADING
FBI II= I=I=I? AND 10 LF OF RIRPAPi
- 1
•
o
_gym
o�m
/�- <
�o
V
F-
l�II- �XQ
Jl,1IJJ to
�o
X2=1 SLOPES
i w Lu
OWW
Q
z
80 40
OVERALL LAYOUT
5HEET 5 OF 5
NEH— E
I MPAGT -5 �3 z
ZONE I - M55 5F w
ZONE 2 - 2100 5F zj
a z
V Gg
0 40 Igo = ZONE I IMPACTS = CHANNEL IMPACTS H z
6RAPHIG SCALE = ZONE 2 IMPACTS = JH IMPACTS Z

NO �J
ELLIOTT
1-715-05-5405
(PROp�R� LANE)
ELLIOTT I
FEMA 100 YEAR
FLOODPLAIN /
BOUNDARY LINE
20,5
AREA OF REPAIR
GRADING, FILL � RIPF
ZONE 1 = 20 SF
ZONE 2 = 300 SF
50' NEUSE RIVER
RIPARIAN BUFFER
204
GRA55 I I
203—'41Z51— _.,- --
ld�� / MIN CLA55 B
�j RIRPAP
202 /511?„ / PROTECTION
201 �� \ EXISTING
200
COMPACTED
_
199 FILL
Iqb
141
19b 5GALE: 1" = 3'
0+00
GEOTEXTILE FILTER
FABRIC LINER
••
EXCAVATE
+/- I'
0 +10
0 +15
EXISTING
GROUND
ZO
0 +20
U
204
20-2 ZONE I
202•
Ow
z
201
w 20C
v
i I99
/
/ 19b
/ 21
197 I
0 +25196
DRIVENAY
BELVIN DRIVE
UNIMPROVED RM
FEMA
FLOODWAY
NO EXCAVATION
OR FILL TO OGGUR
BELOW ORDINARY
\ \ TERMARK
200
B 16 BRANCH
GREEK_
7 10 5 O 10 30
ORAPH1< 5GALE
1" =10'
uj
w
o�m
Q�
J
,%)
�Ta
Quo
�o
o0
i i ty r
N (�
77
W�
�°
v
Q O
A
U z�
y
z
ray 1' P
L/ 31 i
U�
ozD
�a
�a
J S
u q
Z°
<a
Wz
z �
z
i.
U
z�
ag
J n