20100099 Ver 3_Year 3 Monitoring Report_20151006

ANNUAL MONITORING REPORT
YEAR 3 (2015)
Pancho Bank Parcel
Pursuant to:
Restoration Systems' Umbrella Mitigation Banking Instrument for
Riparian Buffer and Nutrient Offset Mitigation Credits - Neuse River Basin
PREPARED BY:
RESTORATION SYSTEMS, LLC
1101 HAYNES STREET, SUITE 211
RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27604
and
AXIOM ENVIRONMENTAL, INC..
218 SNOW AVENUE
RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27603
October 2015

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Restoration Systems (Sponsor) is pleased to provide the North Carolina Division of Water
Resources ( NCDWR) this Year 3 (2015) Annual Monitoring Report for the Pancho Bank Parcel
(Parcel) pursuant to the Restoration Systems' Neuse River Basin Riparian Buffer & Nutrient
Umbrella Mitigation Banking Instrument (Banking Instrument) signed March 17, 2008 between
the Sponsor and the NCDWR.
The Pancho Bank Parcel is located approximately 13 miles west of Goldsboro in western Wayne
County; north of U.S. Highway 13 near the intersection of State Road 1008 (Stevens Mill Road)
and State Road 1105 (Dobbersville Road) (Figure 1, Appendix A). Encompassing 65.62 acres of
land, the Parcel is within the Neuse River Basin 14 -digit United States Geological Survey
(USGS) Cataloging Unit 03020201150050 of the South Atlantic /Gulf Region (North Carolina
Division of Water Quality [ NCDWQ] Subbasin Number 03- 04 -04).
The Parcel was designed and constructed to provide mitigation credits for unavoidable impacts
due to development within the Neuse River Basin. Neuse River riparian buffer mitigation credits
provided by this Parcel are available over the entire Neuse River Basin, United States Geological
Survey (USGS) 6 -digit Hydrologic Unit Code (HUC) 030202, per 15A NCAC 02B .0242 (Meuse
River Basin: Nutrient Sensitive Waters Management Strategy: Mitigation Program for Protection
and Maintenance of Existing Riparian Buffers). Mitigation credits for Nutrient Offset are made
available within the Neuse River Basin USGS 8 -digit HUC 03020201 excluding the Falls Lake
Drainage Basin.
Prior to construction activities, Parcel land use was agricultural based and utilized for livestock
grazing and row crop production with degraded forest pockets. Pasture areas were accessible to
livestock and were routinely cleared for hay production, resulting in local disturbances to stream
banks and wetland soil surfaces. Additional land use practices included the maintenance and
removal of riparian vegetation; ditching of adjacent riparian wetlands; and relocation, dredging,
and channelization of onsite streams resulting in degraded water quality and excessive
sedimentation resulting from unstable banks (stream entrenchment, erosion, and bank collapse).
Adjacent land use is currently characterized by pasture land for hay production and livestock
grazing. Prior to construction, adjacent landowners installed and will be responsible for the
maintenance of fencing to protect from livestock trespass and damage to Parcel assets.
Parcel construction activities were concluded in early April 2013. An onsite determination for
applicability to the Neuse River Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0233) was conducted in
June 2013 and NCDWR approved the Pancho Bank Parcel Development Package on October 4,
2013. The Sponsor currently owns the property in fee simple, a perpetual Conservation Easement
was placed over the Parcel on April 18, 2012. This Parcel was designed and implemented in
concurrence with the Pancho Stream & Wetland Mitigation Bank (Corps Action ID # SAW -
2010- 00142).
Restoration of riparian corridors was accomplished in conjuncture with the objectives and
methods outlined by the Pancho Stream & Wetland Mitigation Bank. Primary objectives of the
riparian restoration focused on improving water quality, enhancing flood attenuation, and
Year 3 (2015) Monitoring Report Executive Summary i
Pancho Stream and Wetland Mitigation Bank

restoring wildlife habitat by planting a forested riparian buffer adjacent to stream channels,
Primary objectives were accomplished by the following.
1. Removing nonpoint sources of pollution associated with agricultural production
including a) removing livestock and b) ceasing the broadcast application of fertilizer,
pesticides, and other agricultural materials into and adjacent to Parcel streams through
treatment of runoff within the forested buffer.
2. Reducing sedimentation within onsite and downstream receiving waters by a) reducing
bank erosion, vegetation maintenance, plowing, and hoof shear adjacent to Parcel
streams, and b) removing livestock from the Parcel.
3. Promoting floodwater attenuation by increasing frictional resistance on floodwaters
crossing Parcel floodplains.
4. Improving aquatic habitat by enhancing stream bed shading and natural detritus input.
5. Providing a terrestrial wildlife corridor and refuge in an area extensively developed for
agricultural production.
6. Restoring and reestablishing natural community structure, habitat diversity, and
functional continuity.
7. Protecting the Parcel's full potential of stream and riparian buffer functions and values in
perpetuity.
The primary objectives were achieved by implementing a two phase restoration plan, which
consisted of the following.
1. Re- establishment of riparian buffer forest up to 200 linear feet from channel margins.
2. Permanent protection of the Parcel in a conservation easement.
Year 3 (2015) vegetation sampling occurred October 2, 2015. Stem density across the Parcel
was above the required average density with 645 planted tree stems per acre (excluding
livestakes) surviving in year 3 (2015). In addition, all individual plots exceeded success criteria
with the exception of Plot 2; however, when including naturally recruited stems of appropriate
species such as green ash (Fraxinus pennsylvanica) and river birch (Betula nigra) this plot is
well above success criteria. The area surrounding Plots 8 and 9 is characterized by compacted
soils from previous agricultural land -use; therefore, planted stem survival in this area was low.
This area was planted with 200 -1 gallon northern red oak (Quercus rubra) and white oak
(Quercus alba) tree stems in the winter of 2014/2015. Overall, newly planted stems appear
vigorous, and stem counts have risen well above success criteria in this area.
Additionally, a small area (soil borrow area from Site construction) between the main tributary
and Kennedy Mill Branch was observed to have bare, eroded, nutrient poor soil and low planted
stem survival during year 2 (2014) monitoring. Planted stems in this area appeared slightly
stunted, but present and viable during year 3 (2015) monitoring. If needed, a remedial action
plan for this area will be developed and may include fertilization, installation of erosion control
matting, and replanting. Further correspondence with the DWR will occur prior to any action.
Overall, Parcel conditions remained stable during Year 3 (2015). No signs of herbivory,
easement encroachment, mowing, pruning, or mulching were observed. The fences protecting
Year 3 (2015) Monitoring Report Executive Summary ii
Pancho Stream and Wetland Mitigation Bank

the easement from livestock intrusion are intact and effective. Additionally, minimal invasive
species were observed on the Parcel, continual monitoring and treatment of invasive species will
be conducted by Carolina Silvics, a NCDA & CS Licensed Pesticide Applicator.
Year 3 (2015) Monitoring Report Executive Summary iii
Pancho Stream and Wetland Mitigation Bank

TABLE OF CONTENTS
EXECUTIVESUMMARY .............................................................................. ............................... i
1.0 MONITORING AND SUCCESS CRITERIA ..................................... ............................... 1
2.0 MITIGATION POTENTIAL ................................................................ ............................... 1
3.0 MAINTENANCE AND CONTINGENCY .......................................... ............................... 1
4.0 REFERENCES ..................................................................................... ............................... 2
APPENDICES
APPENDIX A.
SITE LOCATION MAP AND BACKGROUND TABLES
Figure 1.
Site Location
Table 1.
Project Components and Mitigation Units
Table 2.
Project Activity and Reporting History
Table 3.
Project Contacts Table
Table 4.
Project Baseline Information and Attributes
Table 5.
Reference Forest Ecosystem
Table 6.
Planted Tree Species
APPENDIX B.
VISUAL ASSESSMENT DATA
Figure 2.
Current Conditions Plan View
Figure 3.
Mitigation Components and Assets
Marsh Treatment Area Photos
Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos
APPENDIX C.
VEGETATION PLOT DATA
Table 7.
Total and Planted Stems by Plot and Species
Year 3 (2015) Monitoring Report Table of Contents
Pancho Bank Parcel

1.0 MONITORING AND SUCCESS CRITERIA
Restoration monitoring procedures for vegetation will include periodic visual inspection and
annual plant survival and species diversity survey reports. Quantitative sampling of vegetation
will be performed as outlined in the CVS Level 1 -2 Protocol for Recording Vegetation, Version 4.2
(Lee et al. 2008). Detailed qualitative and quantitative monitoring is proposed for vegetated
riparian areas. Marsh treatment areas will be visually inspected periodically and reported
qualitatively within the annual monitoring report, which will include photographic record of the
Parcel's assets.
Monitoring of the restoration efforts will be performed for five years or until success criteria are
fulfilled. Restoration Systems shall submit annual monitoring reports to NCDWR no later than
December 31St of each year. Quantitative monitoring will occur at seventeen (17) 10 -meter x10 -
meter vegetation plots (Figure 2, Appendix B). Vegetation sampling will be performed as
outlined in the CVS Level 1 -2 Protocol for Recording Vegetation, Version 4.2 (Lee et al. 2008) in
September or October for the remainder of the monitoring period or until vegetation success
criteria are achieved.
During the first year, vegetation will receive a cursory, visual evaluation on a periodic basis to
ascertain the degree of overtopping of planted elements by nuisance species. Success criteria
within the riparian buffer and nutrient offset restoration areas will be based on the survival of
planted species at a density of 320 stems per acre after five years of monitoring. Natural recruits
will not count towards annual success criteria, but may be taken into account during review by the
NCDWR.
2.0 MITIGATION POTENTIAL
Riparian areas suitable to generate mitigation credit were calculated by measuring 50 linear feet
horizontally from the top of bank on all subject streams for Neuse riparian buffer credit and 200
linear feet from the top of bank on all hydrologically connected conveyances for nutrient offset
mitigation. Riparian buffer credits were measured by the hundredth of an acre and converted into
square feet.
The Parcel will generate 16.35 acres of restored riparian area; of that 11.33 acres will be used
specifically for nutrient offset credit, generating 25,753.31 pounds of nitrogen offset credit (the
NCDWR determined that restored riparian areas at the Parcel would abate 2273.02 pounds per
acre of nitrogen), and the remaining 5.02 acres (218,671.2 sq. ft.) will be used for Neuse riparian
buffer credits. The mitigation provided in the Neuse riparian buffer can be used for either Neuse
riparian buffer credits or nutrient offset credits, but not both. The Sponsor will request and receive
approval of the transfer of any mitigation credits from NCDWR. All mitigation credit assets shall
be shown on the credit ledgers. Figure 3 (Appendix B) and Table 1 (Appendix A) summarize the
Parcel's components and mitigation credits.
3.0 MAINTENANCE AND CONTINGENCY
A remedial action plan will be developed and implemented with the approval of NCDWR in the
event that the Parcel or a specific component of the Parcel fails to achieve success criteria as
outlined above. Other vegetation maintenance and repair activities may include pruning,
mulching, and fertilizing. In the event that exotic invasive plant species require treatment, such
species will be controlled by mechanical (physical removal with the use of a chainsaw) and/or
Year 3 (2015) Monitoring Report Page 1
Pancho Bank Parcel

chemical methods (aquatic approved herbicide) in accordance with North Carolina Department of
Agriculture (NCDA) rules and regulations.
4.0 REFERENCES
Griffith, G.E., J.M. Omernik, J.A. Comstock, M.P. Schafale, W.H. McNab, D.R. Lenat, T.F.
MacPherson, J.B. Glover, and V.B. Shelboume. 2002. Ecoregions of North Carolina and
South Carolina. U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia.
Lee, M.T., R.K. Peet, S.D. Roberts, and T.R. Wentworth. 2008. CVS -EEP Protocol for
Recording Vegetation. Version 4.2. North Carolina Department of Environment and
Natural Resources, Ecosystem Enhancement Program. Raleigh, North Carolina.
Neuse River Nutrient Sensitive Waters Management Strategy 15A NCAC 2B .023 3,
15A NCAC 02B .024 1, and 15A NCAC 02B .0242
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources, Ecosystem Enhancement
Program. Guidelines for Riparian Buffer Restoration. October 2004
Schafale, M.P. and A.S. Weakley. 1990. Classification of the Natural Communities of North
Carolina: Third Approximation. North Carolina Natural Heritage Program, Division of Parks
and Recreation, N.C. Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources. Raleigh,
North Carolina.
Year 3 (2015) Monitoring Report Page 2
Pancho Bank Parcel

APPENDIX A.
SITE LOCATION MAP
AND BACKGROUND TABLES
Figure 1. Site Location
Table 1. Project Components and Mitigation Units
Table 2. Project Activity and Reporting History
Table 3. Project Contacts Table
Table 4. Project Baseline Information and Attributes
Table 5. Reference Forest Ecosystem
Table 6. Planted Tree Species
Year 3 (2015) Monitoring Report Appendices
Pancho Bank Parcel

.c,
.7 JOHNSTON REEN
U
r V
WAYNE
.Y 91
ENOI^
SAMPSON --- 9° l
IDUPLIN w
y
r 1
�. f, ,Goldsboro
Cj
wAll
,ems
,. F
s-'V
. Roa 1 C , K
even a
_
Bank
Parcels
{ Directions to the Site from Raleigh, NC-
- '`Q�r,,, °' { -> Travel east on U.S. Highway 70
Travel - 37 miles on U.S. Highway 70 to the intersection
— - with Martin Livestock Road
c� �k _> Turn right at Martin Livestock Road (0.7 mile)
-> Turn right at Progressive Church Road (4 miles)
Turn left at Brogden Road (0.5 mile)
-> Turn right at Richardson Bridge Road (5.3 miles)
-> Turn left at T- intersection onto Harper House Road,
0 0.5 1 2 3 4 which becomes Stevens Mill Road (1.3 miles)
Mlles II -> The Bank is located where Kennedy Mill Branch crosses
T Stevens Mill Road
Scale 1:120,000 `-' -> Latitude: 35.333755° N, Longitude: 78.192699° W
Axiom Environmental, Inc.
218 Snow Avenue
Raleigh, NC 27603
919- 215 -1693
MI.. EroA r 0Ins„
SITE LOCATION
PANCHO BANK PARCEL
Wayne County, North Carolina
Dwn. By:
FIGURE
CLF /KRJ
Date:
Jan 2014
Project:
13 -010

Table 1. Project Components and Mitigation Credits
Pancho Bank Parcel, Wayne County, NC
Mitigation Credits
Nutrient Offset (Nitrogen only)
Restoration
Restoration Equivalent
11.33
--
Projects Components
Restoration
Existing
Restoration Mitigation /
/
Acreage
Acreage Acre
Comment
Mit. Ratio
Restoration
2273.02 lbs. /
Cessation of current land use practices,
11.33 (1:1)
11.33 acre
removing invasive species, and planting
with native forest vegetation.
Component Summation
Restoration Level
Nutrient Offset Credits (lbs.)
Restoration
11.33 acres = 25,753.31 lbs.
Totals
11.33 acres = 25,753.31 lbs.
Neuse Riparian Buffer
Restoration
Restoration Equivalent
5.02
--
Projects Components
Restoration
Existing
Restoration Mitigation /
/
Acreage
Acreage Acre
Comment
Mit. Ratio
Restoration
43,560 sq. ft. /
Cessation of current land use practices,
5.02 (1:1)
5.02 acre
removing invasive species, and planting
with native forest vegetation.
Component Summation
Restoration Level
Neuse Riparian Buffer Credits (sq. ft.)
Restoration
5.02 acres
= 218,671.2 sq. ft.
Totals
5.02 acres
= 218,671.2 sq. ft.
Table 2. Project Activity and Reporting History
Pancho Bank Parcel, Wayne County, NC
Activity or Report
Restoration Systems Neuse UMBI
BPDP
Conservation Easement
Construction
Bare Root Planting
As -Built & Baseline Monitoring Document
Year 1 (2013) Annual Monitoring
Year 2 (2014) Annual Monitoring
Year 3 (2015) Annual Monitoring
Data Collection Completion or Delivery
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
July 2013
October 2013
November 2014
October 2015
March 2008
September 2013
April 2012
April 2013
March 2013
January 2014
January 2014
January 2015
October 2015
Year 3 (2015) Monitoring Report Appendices
Pancho Bank Parcel

Table 3. Project Contacts Table
Pancho Mitigation Bank
Mitigation Provider
Designer
Construction and Seeding Contractor
Planting Contractor
Nursery Stock Suppliers
As -built Surveyor
Baseline Data Collection &
Annual Monitoring
Restoration Systems
1101 Haynes Street, Suite 211
Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
George Howard and John Preyer 919- 755 -9490
Axiom Environmental, Inc.
218 Snow Avenue
Raleigh, NC 27603
Grant Lewis 919 - 215 -1693
Land Mechanic Designs
780 Landmark Road
Willow Spring, NC 27592
Lloyd Glover 919 - 639 -6132
Carolina Silvics
908 Indian Trail Road
Edenton, NC 27932
Mary Margaret McKinney 252- 482 -8491
ArborGen 888 - 888 -7158
K2 Design Group
5688 US Highway 70 East
Goldsboro, NC 27534
John Rudolph 919- 751 -0075
Axiom Environmental, Inc.
218 Snow Avenue
Raleigh, NC 27603
Grant Lewis 919 - 215 -1693
Table 4. Project Baseline Information & Attributes Table
Pancho Bank Parcel, Wayne County, NC
Project information
Project Name Pancho
County Wayne
Project Area (acres) 65.62
Project Coordinates (latitude and 35.333755° N, - 78.192699° W (NAD 83 /WGS 84)
longitude)
Project Watershed Summary Information
Physiographic Province Southeastern Floodplains and Low Terraces &
Rolling Coastal Plain
River Basin Neuse
USGS Hydrologic Unit 8 -digit 1 03020201
DWQ Sub -basin
Project Drainage Area, Total Outfall (miles)
Project Drainage Area Impervious Area
CGIA Land Use Classification
Year 3 (2015) Monitoring Report
Pancho Bank Parcel
USGS Hydrologic Unit 03020201150050
14 -digit
03 -04 -06
+/-3.3
< 5%
Cropland and Pasture
Appendices

Table 5. Reference Forest Ecosystem
Pancho Bank Parcel, Wayne County, NC
Onsite Observations + Mesic Mixed Hardwood Forest & Coastal Plain Bottomland Hardwoods
Canopy Species
Red maple (Acer rubrum)
River birch (Betula nigra)
Pecan (Carya illinoinensis)
American beech (Fagus grandifolia)
American holly (Ilex opaca)
Sweetgum (Liquidambar styraciflua)
Tulip poplar (Liriodendrum tulipifera)
Black gum (Nyssa biflora)
Water oak (Quercus nigra)
Swamp chestnut oak (Quercus michauxii)
Cherrybark oak (Quercus pagoda)
Willow oak (Quercus phellos)
Winged elm (Ulmus alata)
American elm (Ulmus americana)
Year 3 (2015) Monitoring Report
Pancho Bank Parcel
Understory Species
Red maple (Acer rubrum)
River birch (Betula nigra)
Ironwood (Carpinus caroliniana)
Coastal sweetpepperbush (Clethra alnifolia)
Dogwood (Cornus florida)
Sourwood (Diospyros virginiana)
American holly (Ilex opaca)
Virginia sweetspire (Itea virginica)
Sweetgum (Liquidambar styraciflua)
Tulip poplar (Liriodendrum tulipifera)
Common sweetleaf (Symplocos tinctoria)
Winged elm (Ulmus alata)
Highbush blueberry (Vaccinium corymbosum)
Appendices

Table 6. Planted Tree Species
Pancho Bank Parcel, Wayne County, NC
Vegetation Association: Mesic Mixed Hardwood Forest & Coastal Plain Bottomland Hardwoods
Total
Area (Acres) Total= 48.9 acres
3.6
17.5
27.8
Streamside
Mesic Mixed
Coastal Plain
Vegetation Association:
Assemblage
Hardwood
Forest
Bottomland
Hardwoods
Species
Number % of
Number
% of
Number
% of
Planted Total
Planted
Total
Planted
Total
River birch (Betula nigra)
1,100 47.8
1,000
3.02
2,100
American elderberry (Sambucus canadensis)
2,300 52.2
2,300
American Beech (Fagus grandifolia)
1,850
5.59
1,850
Northern red oak (Quercus rubra)
5,800
17.53
5,800
White oak (Quercus alba)
5,850
17.69
5,850
Black cherry (Prunus serotina)
5,000
15.12
5,000
Persimmon (Diospyros virginiana)
5,300
16.02
5,300
Flowering dogwood (Cornus florida)
2,000
6.05
2,000
American tulip tree (Liriodendron tulipifera)
1,000
3.02
1,000
6.91
2,000
Southern red oak (Quercus falcata var. pagodifolia)
2,800
8.47
2,800
Florida maple (Acer saccharumsubsp. floridanum)
2,475
7.49
2,475
Black tupelo (Nyssa sylvatica)
2,800
19.34
2,800
Swamp chestnut aak (Quercus michauxii)
2,800
19.34
2,800
Willow oak (Quercus phellos)
2,800
19.34
2,800
Green Ash (Fraxinus pennsylvanica)
1,850
12.78
1,850
Bald cypress (Taxodium distichum)
2,000
13.82
2,000
Bitternut Hickory (Carya cordiformis)
975
6.74
975
Shagbark hickory (Carya ovate)
250
1.73
250
Total
3,400 100%
33,075
100%
14,475
100%
50,950
Year 3 (2015) Monitoring Report Appendices
Pancho Bank Parcel

APPENDIX B.
VISUAL ASSESSMENT DATA
Figure 2. Current Conditions Plan View
Figure 3. Mitigation Components and Assets
Marsh Treatment Area Photos
Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos
Year 3 (2015) Monitoring Report Appendices
Pancho Bank Parcel

5
I
4f
6'
t
�
`31
t_
Legend
Easement Boundary
As -Built Streams
Marsh Treatment
C Vegetation Plots
C3 Nutreint Offset Credit Area - 11.33 acres
M High Value Forest
C:3 Riparian Buffer Credit Area - 5.02
Winter 2014/2015 Supplemental Planting
Soil Borrow Area - Poor /Stunted Growth
Prepared by:
Axiom Environmental, Inc.
Prepared for:
r "1
i
7 `16
15 14
M&11� 3
�
QMJ
fe
11
3
12
Background Imagery Source: Esri, DigitalGlobe,
GeoEye, i- cubed, USDA, USGS, AEX,
Getmapping, Aerogrid, IGN, IGP, swisstopo,
and the GIS User Community
0 250 500 1,000 1,500
Feet
s
Drawn by:
KRJ Project: Title:
Date: PANCHO FIGURE
October 2015 CURRENT
BANK CONDITIONS
Scale: PARCEL
1:4200 PLAN VIEW 2
Project No.: Wayne County, NC
13 -010

Table 1. Project Components and Mitigation Credits
' i
Mitigation Credits
Nutrient Offset (Nitrogen only)
Restoration Restoration Equivalent
11.33 --
Projects Components
Existing Restoration/ Restoration Mitigation / Comment
Acreage Mit. Ratio Acreage Acre
--- i v y i }i-i
i i i
r Si
Y i y i i Ni i
MComponent Summation
G' Restoration Level Nutrient Offset Credits (lbs.)
i y i ii ii v y i }
Totals y i ii ii v y i y
Neuse Riparian Buffer
c►
Restoration
Restoration Equivalent
tea,'
5.02
•
Projects Components
'
Existing Restoration/
Restoration Mitigation /
Comment
Acreage Mit. Ratio
Acreage Acre
1
v i
i
y i
r Si
y i
i
i
Component Summation
Restoration Level
Neuse Riparian Buffer Credits (sq. ft.)
i
y i
ii ii v y ii F }i
Totals
y i
ii ii v y ii y y
` s
„ o
4^ r�
a
Y
Legend
Easement Boundary
Fencing
- As -Built Streams
Marsh Treatment
Nutreint Offset Credit Area - 11.33 acres
High Value Forest
3 Riparian Buffer Credit Area - 5.02
Wetland Mitigation Credit Area
Prepared by:
Axiom Environmental, Inc.
Prepared for:
M.-V
°r
i
v
i
Background Imagery Source: Esri, DigitalGlobe,
GeoEye, i- cubed, USDA, USGS, AEX,
Getmapping, Aerogrid, IGN, IGP, swisstopo,
and the GIS User Community
0 250 500 1,000 1,500
Feet
Drawn by:
KRJ Project:
Date: PANCHO
January 2014 BANK
Scale: PARCEL
1:4200
Project No.: Wayne County, NC
13 -010
Title:
MITIGATION
COMPONENTS
AND ASSETS
FIGURE
3
11

Pancho Bank Parcel
Marsh Treatment Area
Fixed Station Photographs
Taken October, 2015
Year 3 (2015) Monitoring Report Appendices
Pancho Bank Parcel

Pancho Bank Parcel
Vegetation Monitoring Photographs
Taken October 2, 2015
Year 3 (2015) Monitoring Report Appendices
Pancho Bank Parcel

Pancho Bank Parcel
Vegetation Monitoring Photographs
Taken October 2, 2015 (continued)
Plot 7
Plot 9
'.:
pint
Year 3 (2015) Monitoring Report Appendices
Pancho Bank Parcel

Pancho Bank Parcel
Vegetation Monitoring Photographs
Taken October 2, 2015 (continued)
Plot 15
Plot 14
Year 3 (2015) Monitoring Report Appendices
Pancho Bank Parcel

APPENDIX C.
VEGETATION PLOT DATA
Table 7. Total and Planted Stems by Plot and Species
Year 3 (2015) Monitoring Report Appendices
Pancho Bank Parcel

Table 7. Total and Planted Stems by Plot and Species
Pancho Bank Parcel
Fails to meet requirements by more than 109/,
Current Plot Data (MY3 2015)
001 -01 -0001 001 -01 -0002
001 -01 -0003
001 -01 -0004
001 -01 -0005
001 -01 -0006
001 -01 -0007
001 -01 -0008
001 -01 -0009
001 -01 -0010
001 -01 -0011
Scientific Name
Common Name
I Species Type
Pnol-S P -all T PnoLS P -all T
Pnol-S P -all T
Pnol-S
P -all T
PnoLS
P -all T
Pnol-S
P -all T
PnoLS
P -all T
Pnol-S
P -all T
PnoLS P -all T
Pnol-S
P -all T
PnoLS
P -all T
Acer floridanum
Southern Sugar Maple, Tree
8
8
8
1
1
1
2 2
2
1
1
1
Acer rubrum
red maple
Tree
60
Betula nigra
river birch
Tree
6
1
1
1
61
33
7
7
7
8
8
8
Carpinus caroliniana
American hornbeam
Tree
1
1
1
Carya
hickory
Tree
Carya cordiformis
bitternut hickory
Tree
4
4
4
Carya ovata
shagbark hickory
Tree
Cornus
dogwood
Shrub or Tree
1
1
1
Cornus amomum
silky dogwood
Shrub
3
3
3
Cornus florida
flowering dogwood
Tree
2
2
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
Diospyros virginiana
common persimmon
Tree
1
1
1
2
2
2
Fagus grandifolia
American beech
Tree
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
green ash
Tree
4 4
10
1 1
1
3
3
3
4
4
4
Ilex opaca
American holly
Tree
Juglans nigra
black walnut
Tree
Liquidambar styraciflua
sweetgum
Tree
27
70
40
3
7
Liriodendron tulipifera
tuliptree
Tree
4
4
4
2
1 1
1
1
1
1
Nyssa
tupelo
Tree
Nyssa sylvatica
blackgum
Tree
3 3
3
30
3
3
3
Pinus taeda
loblolly pine
Tree
10
Prunus
plum
Shrub or Tree
5
Prunus serotina
black cherry
Tree
3 3 3
3
3
3
2
2
2
1
1
1
3
3
12
1
1
1
Quercus
oak
Tree
3 3
3
Quercus alba
white oak
Tree
2 2 2
2 2
2
1
1
1
2
2
2
2 2
2
7
7
7
Quercus michauxii
swamp chestnut oak
Tree
7 7 7 2 2
2
8 8
8
5
5
5
2
2
2
Quercus nigra
water oak
Tree
1
3
3
3
Quercus pagoda
cherrybark oak
Tree
1
1
1
1
1
1
Quercus phellos
willow oak
Tree
1 1
1
2
2
2
5
5
5
1
1
1
Quercus rubra
northern red oak
Tree
1 1 1
3
3
3
4
4
4
3
3
3
1
1
1
Salix
willow
Shrub or Tree
2
Salix nigra
black willow
Tree
Taxodium distichum
bald cypress
Tree
9
9
9
Ulmus alata
winged elm
Tree
Ulmus americana
American elm
Tree
Vaccinium corymbosum
highbush blueberry
Shrub
4
4
4
1 1
1
Stem count
13 13 13 7 7
48
14 14
145
16
16
156
17
17
59
21
21
21
18
18
20
10
10
17
9 9
9
13
13
22
26
26
26
size (ares)
1 1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
size (ACRES)
0.02 0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
Species count
4I
4
4 3I
31
6
4I
4
7
5
5�
8
5I
S
9
7
7I
7
4I
4
5
6
6I
7
5I
5
5
6
6I
6
9I
9
9
Stems per ACRE
526.1
526.1
526.1 283.3
283.3
1942
566.6
566.6
5868
647.5
647.5
6313
688
688
2388
849.8
849.8
849.8
728.4
728.4
809.4
404.7
404.7
688
364.2
364.2
364.2
526.1
526.1
890.3
1052
1052
1052
Color for Density
Pnol-S = Planting excluding livestakes
Exceeds requirements by 10%
P -all = Planting including livestakes
Exceeds requirements, but
by less than 10%
T = All planted and natural recruits including
livestakes
Fails to meet requirements,
by less than 109/c
T includes natural recruits
Fails to meet requirements by more than 109/,

Table 7. Total and Planted Stems by Plot and Species (continued)
Pancho Bank Parcel
Fails to meet requirements by more than 109/,
Current Plot Data (MY3 2015)
Annual Means
001 -01 -0012
001 -01 -0013
001
-01 -0014
001 -01 -0015
001 -01 -0016
001 -01 -0017
MY3 (2015)
MY2 (2014)
MY1 (2013)
MYO (2013)
Scientific Name
Common Name
I Species Type
Pnol-S P -all T
PnoLS P -all T
Pnol-S
P -all T
Pnol-S P -all T
PnoLS P -all T
Pnol-S
P -all T
PnoLS
P -all T
Pnol-S
P -all T
PnoLS
P -all T
Pnol-S
P -all T
Acer floridanum
Southern Sugar Maple, Tree
1 1 1
3 3
3
6
6
6
6 6 6
28
28
28
27
27
27
28
28
28
31
31
31
Acer rubrum
red maple
Tree
60
16
15
27
Betula nigra
river birch
Tree
2 2 2
2 2
2
5
20
20
125
21
21
95
19
19
19
19
19
19
Carpinus caroliniana
American hornbeam
Tree
1
1
1
2
2
2
2
2
2
1
1
1
Carya
hickory
Tree
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
Carya cordiformis
bitternut hickory
Tree
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
Carya ovata
shagbark hickory
Tree
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
Cornus
dogwood
Shrub or Tree
1
1
1
Cornus amomum
silky dogwood
Shrub
3
3
3
3
3
3
4
4
4
4
4
4
Cornus florida
flowering dogwood
Tree
3 3
3
1
1
1
8
8
8
8
8
8
10
10
10
9
9
9
Diospyros virginiana
common persimmon
Tree
5 5 5
6 6
6
1
1
1
4 4
4
19
19
19
22
22
22
21
21
21
22
22
22
Fagus grandifolia
American beech
Tree
1 1 1
1
1
1
2
2
2
4
4
4
3
3
3
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
green ash
Tree
2 2
2
14
14
20
15
15
23
16
16
16
15
15
15
Ilex opaca
American holly
Tree
3
Juglans nigra
black walnut
Tree
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
Liquidambar styraciflua
sweetgum
Tree
2
14
163
177
72
61
Liriodendron tulipifera
tuliptree
Tree
6 6 6
3
3
3
5 5 5
20
20
22
21
21
21
21
21
21
21
21
21
Nyssa
tupelo
Tree
1
Nyssa sylvatica
blackgum
Tree
6
6
36
6
6
6
7
7
7
7
7
7
Pinus taeda
loblolly pine
Tree
10
4
Prunus
plum
Shrub or Tree
5
Prunus serotina
black cherry
Tree
1 1 1
3 3
3
2
2
2
1
1
1
20
20
29
23
23
23
21
21
21
23
23
23
Quercus
oak
Tree
3
3
3
1
1
1
Quercus alba
white oak
Tree
4 4 4
2
2
2
4
4
4
26
26
26
26
26
26
22
22
22
22
22
22
Quercus michauxii
swamp chestnut oak
Tree
24
24
24
27
27
27
24
24
24
24
24
24
Quercus nigra
water oak
Tree
1 1
1
2
2
2
6
6
7
6
6
6
Quercus pagoda
cherrybark oak
Tree
3
3
3
5
5
5
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
Quercus phellos
willow oak
Tree
2 2
2
2
2
2
1 1
1
6
6
6
20
20
20
20
20
20
17
17
17
17
17
17
Quercus rubra
northern red oak
Tree
3 3 3
1 1
1
2
2
2
5 5
5 1 1 1
1
1
1
25
25
25
21
21
21
21
21
21
21
21
21
Salix
willow
Shrub or Tree
10
12
Salix nigra
black willow
Tree
11
Taxodium distichum
bald cypress
Tree
9
9
9
9
9
9
10
10
10
10
10
10
Ulmus alata
winged elm
Tree
2
Ulmus americana
American elm
Tree
1
Vaccinium corymbosum
highbush blueberry
Shrub
5
5
5
6
6
6
9
9
9
9
9
9
Stem count
23 23 25
21 21
21
24
24
24
12 12
22 12 12 12
15
15
34
271
271
674
277
277
574
263
263
350
267
267
355
size (ares)
1
1
1
1
1
1
17
17
16
16
size (ACRES)
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.42
0.42
0.40
0.40
Species count
81
8 8
9
81
8
111
11
11
4
41
S 31
3
3
6
61
8
241
24
29
24
241
32
191
19
21
20
201
22
Stems per ACRE
930.8
930.8
1012
849.8
849.8
849.8
971.2
971.2
971.2
485.6
485.6
890.3
485.6
485.6
485.6
607
607
1376
645.1
645.1
1604
659.4
659.4
1366
665.2
665.2
885.2
675.3
675.3
897.9
Color for Density
Pnol-S = Planting excluding livestakes
Exceeds requirements by 10%
P -all = Planting including
livestakes
Exceeds requirements, but
by less than 10%
T = All planted and natural
recruits including
livestakes
Fails to meet requirements,
by less than 109/c
T includes natural recruits
Fails to meet requirements by more than 109/,