760003_Permit Renewal Application 2019_20190410

State of North Carolina
Department of Environmental Quality
Division of Water Resources
Animal Waste Management Systems
Request for Certification of Coverage
Facility Currently covered by an Expiring Sate Non -Discharge General Permit
On September 30, 2019, the North Carolina State Non -Discharge General Permits for Animal Waste Management Systems will
expire. As required by these permits, facilities that have been issued Certificates of Coverage to operate under these State
Non -Discharge General Permits must apply for renewal at least 180 days prior to their expiration date. Therefore, all applications
must be received by the Division of Water Resources by no later than April 3, 2019.
Please do not leave any question unanswered Please verify all information and make any necessary corrections belara
Application must be signed and dated by the Perminee.
1.
Farm Number: 76-0003
Certificate Of Coverage Number:
AWS760003
2.
Facility Name: Applefield Farm -Lower & Upper
3.
Landowner's Name (same as on the Waste Management Plan):
Philip Faucette
4.
Landowners Mailing Address: 7-725 Friendshin Rd
City: Browns Summit State:
NC
Zip. 27214
Telephone Number. 336-879-6500 Ext. E-mail:
pridewashr&,,hotmail.com
5.
Facility's Physical Address., 4599 Riverside Dr
City: Ramseur State:
NC
Zip: 27316
6.
County where Facility is located: Randolph
7.
Farm Manager's Name (if different from Landowner):
g,
Farm Manager's telephone number (include area code):
9.
Integrator's Name (if there is not an Integrator, write "None'):
N G Purvis Farnrs Inc
10.
Operator Name (OIC): Phi l j F W. Faucette II
Phone No.: 336-656-7-114
OIC M 20372
11.
Lessee's Name (if tbere is not a Lessee, write "None'):
12.
Indicate animal operation type and number:
Current Permit: Operations Type
AIlowable Count
Swine - Feeder to Finish
12,400
Operation Types
Sine Cattle
Dry Poultry
Other Types
Wean to Finish Dairy Calf
Non Laying Chickens
Horses - Horses
Wean to Feeder Dairy Heifer
Laying Chickens
Horses - Other
Farrow to Finish Milk Comv
Pullets
Sheep- Sheep
Feeder to Finish Dry Cow
Turkeys
Sheep - Other
Farrow to Wean Beef Stocker Calf
Turkey Pullet
Farrow to Feeder Beef Feeder
Boar/Stud Beef Broad Cow
Wei Poultry
Gilts Other
Non Laying Pullet
Other
Layers

1.
Farm Number: 76-0003
2.
Facility Name: Ap lefield Farm -Lower & Unner
Certificate Of Coverage Number: AWS760003
3.
Landowner's Name (same as on the Waste Management Plan
Pltili Faucette
4.
Landowners Mailing Address: 7725 Friendship Rd
��
City: Br(1wn5• Urntrnit
State:
NC
Telephone Number: 336-879-6500 Ext. E-mail:
Zip: 27214
pridewashhotmail.cam
5•
Facility's Physical Address: 4599 Riverside Dr
City: Ramseur State:
NC
6.
County where Facility is located: Randolph
Zip: 27316
7.
Farm Managers Name (if different from Landowner):
8.
Farm Manager's telephone number (include area code):
9.
Integrator's Name (if there is not an integrator, write "None"):
N
_ T Purvis Farms Inc
10.
Operator Name (OIC): Philp W. Faucette II
Phone No.: 336-656-7594
11.
Lessee's Name (if there is not a Lessee, write "None"):
OTC # .- 20372
12. Indicate animal operation type and number:
Current Permit: Operations Type
Allowable Count
Swine - Feeder to Finish - 12,400
Operation Types:
Swine
Wean to Finish
Cattle
Dairy Calf
DrQ u�
Other 1t n�
Wean to Feeder
DairyHeifer
Non Laying Chickens
Horses -Horses
Farrow to Finish
Milk Cow
Laying Chickens
Horses - Other
Feeder to Finish
Dry Cow
Pullets
Sheep- Sheep
Farrow to Wean
Beef Stocker Calf
Turkeys
Sheep - Other
Farrow to Feeder
Beef Feeder
Turkey Pullet
Boar/stud
Gilts
Beef Broad Cow
Wei Pouttr,
'
Other
Other
Non Laying Pullet
Layers

Roy COOPER
Governor
MIC14AEL S. REGAIN
secmrory
LINDA CULPEPPER
Director
NORTH CAROLINA
Environmental quality
February 27, 2019
Philip Faucette
Applefield Farm -Lower & Upper
7725 Friendship Rd
Browns Summit, NC 27214
Subject: Application for Renewal of Coverage for Expiring State General Permit
Dear Permittee:
APR 01 2019
ation State
ischarge
ercd
your facility is currently approved 9for o
peration
of thenewanimal wasone of the te operational teStaaeeiNon-Discharge oGeneral Permit pare available
which expire on September 30, 201 p
at tin s //de . c. v a utl 'visions/water-resources/ ater- in -re nal eration /afo or by writing or calling:
NCDEQ-DWR
Animal Feeding Operations Program
1636 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1636
Telephone number: [phone]
Please Ao= -t
hat o us ine tide ne 1 c v t me """` "` -- - 1)e found on riaae 2 of the ren w
c m leted and maned a Ilcatio o A li t o items included i th CAWMP can
application form -
Failure to request renewal of your coverage under a general permit within the time period specified may result in a civil penalty.
operation of your facility without co ragg to $25 der a valid per day. general peron would constitute a violation of NCGS 143-215.1 and could
result in assessment of civil penalties u p
If you have any questions about the State Non -Discharge General Permit, the. enclosed application, or any related matter please feel
free to contact the Animal Feeding Operations Branch staff at 919-707-9100.
Sincerely,
Jon Risgaard, Section Chief
Animal Feeding Operations and Groundwater Section
Enclosures
cc (w/o enclosures): Win tan- alem Regional Office, Water Quality Regional Operations Section
R_andolnh County Soil and Water Conservation District
AFOG Section Central Files - AWS760 03
N G Pu is arms Inc
I��ah Cara::A=C�parcmertc`_nvsarm�nts �ue;it* � D�v°sa�no{y,+=t=_: Res�u;w_s
Caro7a:� 27599�1ooS
512 N. Sl: bull SL I J-M Na. Serv:ss C� tr � Rem �, North

13. Waste Treatment and Storage Lagoons (Verify the ollowing information is accurate and complete_ Make all necessary
corrections and provide missing data.)
Estimated
Liner Type
Estimated
Date
(Clay, Synthetic,
Capacity
Surface Area
Structure
Built
Unknown}
(Cubic Feet)
(Square Feet)
Name
3/16/1994
67,044.00
LOWER
UPPER
10/13/1994
Design Freeboard j
"Redline"
(Inches)
Mail one (1) copy of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWWj[p) with this completed and signed application
as required by NC General Statutes 143-215.10C(d) to the address below.
The CAWIvIP must include the following components:
1. The most recent Waste Utilization Plan (WUP), signed by the owner and a certified technical s — is -is' containing:
a. The method by which waste is applied to the disposal fields (e.g. irrigation, injection, etc.) ✓
b. A map of every field used for land application (for example: irrigation map),/
c. The soil series present on every land application field✓
d. The crops grown on every land application field
e. The Realistic Yield Expectation (RYE) for every crop shown in the WUR1_1`1
f. The maximum PAN to be applied to every land application field
g. The waste application windows for every crop utilized in the VA P✓
h. The required NRCS Standard specifications,/
2. A site map/schematic.
3. %,Zinergency Action Plan
4. ect Control Checklist with chosen best management practices noted
Odor Control Checklist with chosen best management practices noted
6. Mortality Control Checklist with selected method noted - Use the enclosed updated Mortality Control Checklist
Lagoon/storage pond capacity documentation (design, calculations, etc.) Please be sure the above table is accurate and
complete. Also provide any site evaluations, wetland determinations, or hazard classifications that may be applicable to
/ your facility.
Operation and Maintenance Plan
If your CAR rrMP includes any components not shown on this list, please include the additional components with your submittal.
(e.g. composting, digesters, waste transfers, etc.)
As a second option to mailing paper copies of the application package, you can scan and email one signed copy of the
application and all the CANVMP items above to: [e-mail]

Version —November 26, 2028
r�tatit Tana ement Methods
ID y -
Indicate which method(s) will be implemented.
When selecting multiple methods indicate a primary versus secondary option.
Methods other than those listed must be approved by the State Veterinarian.
primary Secondary Routine Mortality
Burial three feet beneath the surface of the ground within 24 hours of knowledge of animal
death. The burial must be at least 300 feet from any flowing stream or public body of water
(G.S.106403). The bottom of the burial pit should be at least one foot above the seasonal
high water table_ Attach burial location map and plan.
Landfill at municipal solid waste facility permitted by NC DEQ under GS 15A NCAC
13B A200.
X j Rendering at a rendering plant licensed under G.S. 106-158.7.
DComplete incineration according to 02 NCAC 52C .0102.
A composting system approved and permitted by the NC Department of Agriculture & Con-
sumer Services Veterinary Division (attach copy of permit). If compost is distributed off -farm,
additlonal requirements must be met and a permit is required from NC DEQ.
In the case of dead poultry only, placing in a disposal pit of a size and design approved by the
NC Department of Agriculture & Consumer Services (G.S_ 106-549.70).
Any method which, in the professional opiniont-of the State Veterinarian, would make possible
U the salvage of part of a dead animal's value without endangering human or animal health.
(Written approval by the State Veterinarian must be attached).
Mass Mortality Plan
Mass mortality plans are required for farms covered by an NPDES permit. These plans are
also recommended for all animal operations. This plan outlines farm -specific mortality man-
agement methods to be used for mass mortality. The NCDA&CS Veterinary Division sup-
ports a variety of emergency mortality disposal options-, contact the Division for guidance.
p A catastrophic mortality disposal plan is part of the facility's CAWMP and is activated
when numbers of dead animals exceed normal mortality rates as specified by the State
Veterinarian.
6 Burial must be done in accordance with NC General Statutes and NCDA&CS Veterinary
Division regulations and guidance.
® Mass burial sites are subject to additional permit conditions (refe'r to facility's animal
waste management system permit).
In the event of imminent threat of a disease emergency, the State Veterinarian may enact
additional temporary procedures or measures for disposal according to G.S. 106-399.4.
Q Ii n M .• V a--
"J gDate
riatur Farrn �Nvner/Ma ager
Signature ofTechnicaf Specialist Date

Now�a�.v �._`
WIMM
Vn
A
ngM
F t Yh . '„ t o t f gr ' j� c 4�c
�'- -�`-fP��pc>
�s v i f s�s3n$S" O t r
1 d! ,� t ;r'' ; x J+� 5:�4 i^yS�S"`t• �a'��+,r tK.,r h F�,
{� , ar

Conservation Plan Map Date: 3/24/2008
Total Acres Waste Application Fields
Customer(s): PHILIP W FAUCETTE 11 Applefield Farms CNMP
District: RANDOLPH SOIL &WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT Map Use: Nutrient Management
Tract: 5134 1 Fields: 1 - 9 Field Office: ASHEBORO SERVICE CENTER
Total Acres Waste Application Fields: 117.4 ac. State and County: NC, RANDOLPH
Consplan - Roads
Land use Streams
7!71 Crop Lagoons
Forest Parcel
F
Hay
Headquarters
1 inch equals 700 feet
Assisted by:
NRCS 0 350 700
,0,no 19 1!T!T!%iiiiiiiiW Feet
X.
j
2.4 ac
Deep River
N
Ut
N
W+E
S

��,.cSr ����i" �.a�KA� �.�✓'�����5�tt�r�'ti9 s�R ram+,. �'.. f`�. y'":+"a �'fi.�. «:14L.,..a �','
f

Conservation Plan Map Date: 3/2412008
Irrigation Overview w/ Pulls and Wettable Acres
Customer(s): PHILIP W FAUCETTE 11 Applefield Farms CNMP
District: RANDOLPH SOIL & WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT Map Use: Nutrient Management
Tract: 5134 / Fields: 1 - 9 Field Office: ASHEBORO SERVICE CENTER
Wettable Acres Total: 90.5 ac. State and County: NC, RANDOLPH
-N
N)
NV
7
77. 7
Q,
V., :a_
V
3.
A;
_N
Q.
.2 -N
c7-
V1. .4
Z)
-We
N;
%
v.
K". X
At.
3 N.' 1
o
2..-N
P
X1
-o
Roads
Consplan D
-/I- Streams
Land use .......
Crop Lagoons
C
Ut
Parcel
J Forest
Fr
Hay
Irrigation Pulls Deep River
Headquarters
N
1 inch equals 700 feet
Assisted by: W E
NRCS 0 350 700 +
Feet S

Nilk

Conservation Plan Map Date: 3/24/2008
Fields 1 & 2
Customer(s): PHILIP W FAUCETTE 11 Applefield Farms CNMP
District: RANDOLPH SOIL & WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT Map Use: Nutrient Management
Tract: 5134 / Fields: 1 & 2 Field Office: ASHEBORO SERVICE CENTER
Approx. Acres Waste Application Fields: 20.9 ac. & 5.4 ac. State and County: NC, RANDOLPH
3.
J
3
0
6
Y
5nNP
—
'd
V
til
R,17
0
9
C.,
J%
9 4
L
0
rix
tu
4P
0
W.Ar.
.............
C. -
.......
�p
9
v
cons
Roads
plan
0
Land use
Streams
Bt(. Q
Crop
C
Soils
Forest
Parcel
F-7
t&' Hay
Lagoons
Headquarters Irrigation Pulls
P
Assisted by:
NRCS
N
1 Inch equals 300 feet
W
0 150 300 +E
��Feet S

�������������^��� K����� ������ ��:��O00
~~~~^^~~~~^~~~~"~~"" Plan "°^~=�°
Field
oustome,(o):PH|UPVxFAUOETTE|| 8pp|o8o|dFarms CNK4P
District: RANDOLPMSOIL & WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT Map Use: Nutrient Management
Tract: 5134 / Field: 3 Field Office: A3HEBOROSERVICE CENTER
Approx. Acres Waste Application Fields: 12'7ec. State and County: NC, RANDOLPH
Assisted by: I inch equals mmfeet
wRca ,� �~0 ISO 300 w �

Conservation Plan Map Date:3/2412008
Field 4
Customer(s): PHILIP W FAUCETTE 11 Applefield Farms CNMP
District: RANDOLPH SOIL & WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT Map Use: Nutrient Management
Tract: 5134 / Field: 4 Field Office: ASHEBORO SERVICE CENTER
Approx. Acres Waste Application Fields: 15.4 ac. State and County: NC, RANDOLPH
:: _ :�f.- - _ _ Y .� .-,r '• ,i" =1 ,? y ,- 4j` •7 Y .l r:'"- .`:i' •. �.
t
i 4`l"r
9:a-
_ � V
S
} .y
j J
7=
- 4 4
`/,, ^3
l' :'i:::°:
V. -
/ nx.
:154.a
•� w
•R-•
.r.
7
.Y a`
♦ :h
{ 4
7� •fir•::''••: - - -
-'`1r.�.::,:'::-.��:_:::�.`�'•:.�'!r._:is:.}-::`'�::•:•:';:'::'tji�:::..J *' F..;::::';:;:::� ::.:...:.�-.. �'-::.._...__.._. ..4.:...: f�...;7;.;:i:,.';:.t.`i •�
:I
y r.
yy .ry p L•
� .ry
'•S:L :�ci
, .i 7,
}
:a: '.L.(3?1 �:k - Y .fit �•"„• .r-'1" ;; - - (i? '
�i �l
tif.-R'
7`
=1 ^�_ ,
4.
l - -
:f
lY
T.
•i Y
1-:
1 _ �
..� :,�'-• �:• �•._ :�.�' / jet:
1' s:
-
f, _
f
n� f
.Y
Y 'u
.f
-i
_ Y'
:R -9 _
Cons Ian Roads , v _ :�.......
.
-,I' Streams
-
Land use-• _.:. Q :: ��
50115 Y 6" a ' r :•axR:IF:;:'•_}a':
k; Crop i a r F
Ste-)• + " \ ' yy r -
�,�`; Forest Parcel:. 7,
{
:-:
Ha •�J3
L Dons 1
y a -
..I h
RIB .,`_ ,,) .�,, ., � 5 :'::.:�.:�'.. : y;/ •...='.;'1• : J�;:%•:,: . � a
Headquarters Rye Irrigation Pulls aoa} `' _ . ; •r. ., o Q�:
N
AIL 1 inch equals 300 feet
Assisted by: Z IL W E
MRCS 9 o_ eD 3 ❑
Feet S

Ave
qk
I

Conservation Plan Map Date:3/24/2008
Fields 5 & 6
Customer(s): PHILIP W FAUCETTE II Applefield Farms CNMP
District: RANDOLPH SOIL & WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT Map Use: Nutrient Management
Tract: 5134 1 Fields: 5 & 6 Field Office: ASHEBORO SERVICE CENTER
Approx. Acres Waste Application Fields: 14.1 ac. & 3.6 ac. State and County: NC, RANDOLPH
.�
v
-
m
j•. gib:.: � - j ,, 9:�`'::r-'' - :-7:.::.:;:::=•:..:+.a .:.`7.< : ,:.- � .J
:ice '.� y;, .3�. :�� .a,;•�� -. � _ !
`' .� -1: `::.: _.Ji: •: �: j//-, 4� - - - _! �? f�: � � �-a x � s _.'.fit `:>`. �ti
ZI
is � ,� ` ,:• -
� I
s 11
� •'•'+:'•::.::.:':'..��_� .-.'•' i . • '.'.:'.'. ".:.•y a �'..
j:.,i ` :ate•,:;:: 7 _ .ar.• ..'�:� 'ti• 8.?•` i v
_ I •�;' a
i u 1
�, - •'••„_ 1 � -J y Y��a-� , �, `Y y_ f 'µ. -', •.. .•.' .:r l '�::::.: :: :.':� rc y`l _
Consplan
Roads
^n•-- Streams - rY
Land use t..:
Crop t Soils -v',,
i_
Forest Fj
Parcel 1_ ::•. _ //}///
Hay Lagoons Deep River:
Headquarters"®® Irrigation Pulls
y
N
Assisted by: 1 inch equals 300 feet W�E
NRCS y 0 t50 300
"1"76-� Fes! S

Nutrient Management Plan For Animal Waste Utilization
04-09-2008
This plan has been prepared for:
Applefield Farris
Philip W. Faucette H
4599 Riverside Rd.
Ramseur, NC 27316-8259
[phone]
This plan has been developed by.'
Joseph Hudyncica
USDA-NRCS
Asheboro Field ®ice
241 Sunset Avenue
Suite 105, Fed. Bldg.
Asheboro, NC 27203
[phone]
Developer Signature
Type of Plan: Nutrient Manager e nt with Mansura Only
Owner/Manager/Proditcer Agreement
I (ive) understand and agree to the specifications and the operation and maintenance procedures
established in this nutrient management plan which includes an animal waste utilization plan for
the fhr n named above. I liave read and understand the Required Specifications concerning animal
waste management that are included with this plan,
Signature (owner) Date
Sign a (manager or producer) Date
This plan greets the minimum standards and specifications of the U.S. Department of Agriculture
Natural Resources Conservation Service or the standard of practices adopted by the Soil and `dater
Conservation Commission.
Plan Approved By: � � Al- I?����
e nical Spe alist Signs re Date
.........................................................---......-•----------------------...---................----------------------- -----------------•------
676627 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed; 04-09-2008 Cover Page 1

Nutrients applied in accordance with this plan N-v1H he supplied from the following
source(s)
Commercial Fertilizer is not included in this plan,
Ul Applefield Farms User Defined waste generated 4,526,000 gals/year by a 12,400
(animal Swine Finishing Lagoon Liquid operation. This production facility has waste
storage capacities of approximately 180 days.
Estimated Pounds of Plant Available Nitrogen Generated per Year
Broadcast
10576
Incorporated
18162
Innjected
20002
Irrigated
11495
Max. Avail.
PAN (lbs)
Actual PAN
Applied(
PAN Surplus/
Deficit (lbs)
Actual Volume
Applied (Gallons)
Volume Surplus/
Deficit (Gallons)
Year 1
11,495
24169
-12,G74
9,744,038
-5,218,038
Year 2
11,495
29289
'-17,794
11,779,392
-7,253,392
This plan includes a User Defined Source to determine the total pounds of PAN hi lieu
of NRCS Standard values. Refer to North Carolina Cooperative Extension. Service publication AG-439-42
entitled "Soil Facts: Use of On -farm Records for Modifying a Certified Animal Waste Management Plan" for
guidance on using on -farm records to develop a User Defined Source.
- - - .._........... - -•--m-•--eans----user---•---.-defi----ned ---so--urc---•----------------------------
.-------------------------
*---------
Note: In source ID, S means standard source, U e
Max. Available PAN is calculated on the basis of the actual application nnethod(s) identified in the plan for this source.
676627 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 04-09-2008 Source Page Page 1 of h

1,&
Narrative
Applefield Farms, Inc. is a feeder to finish swine operation located approximately 10 miles south of the
village of Ramseur on Riverside Rd. (SR#2873), in southeastern Randolph County, NC (Coleridge
Township). This finishing facility is permitted for 12,400 swine and has been in operation since 1993.
This is a contract operation with N.G. Purvis Farms, Inc, of Robbins, N.C. (Moore County). The farm is
owned by Jerry Apple and Phillip Faucette. Vincent Jessup is the farm manager and on -site
representative. Robin Cox is in charge of record keeping and is also an on -site representative for the
farm.
The N.C. Division of Water Quality (DWQ) facility ID is #760003. The farm property is located within
the Cape Fear River Basin (sub -basin CPF9) and borders the Deep River on the eastern boundary,
Richland Creek on the southern boundary and an un-named tributary of Richland Creek to the east. The
farm has well -established riparian buffers along the streams and river aimed at protecting water quality
and providing wildlife habitat.
The Farm is a single feeder to finish facility that is actually comprised of two farms: the lower farm has
five houses and can handle up to 4,500 swine while the upper farm has nine houses and can handle up to
7,900 swine. Each of the two farms has its own independent liquid waste storage lagoon, referred to as
the "Upper" and "Lower" lagoons. The lagoon system design was conducted by Larry F. Graham, P.E. of
Environmental Engineering Services of Aberdeen, NC. Storage in each of the two lagoons is 180 days.
Waste water from these lagoons is land -applied using a traveling irrigation system: hard hose traveling
gun (Nelson Model F150R w/ 1.18 in. ring) which delivers approximately 205 gallons per minute.
Portions of the (nine) farm fields that cannot be reached by the irrigation system can be covered by
broadcast application with a tank spreader. These broadcast applied areas of each field are designated
with the letter 'B", e.g. 1B, 2B, etc. The size of these broadcast fields was determined by subtracting the
difference between the digitized acres and the wettable acres indicated in the Revised Swine Waste
Utilization and Irrigation Plan for Applefield Farm, Randolph County, N.C. dated September 1998, by .
Environmental Engineering Services. Since traveling irrigation is, by nature, not permanent, the practical
extent of these broadcast areas is left up to the good judgement of the farm manager.
Jerry Apple and Phillip Faucette are in charge of operating the irrigation system on the farm. Casey Cox
also does some of the irrigating.
All waste application fields are ownded by Applefield Farms and are part -of Tract 5134 (there is no
leased land). A summary of waste application fields included in this CNMP is as follows:
Tract5134
Field Irrigation Acres
1-1
1-2
1-3
1-4
1B
2-1
4.44 ,
2.89
5.40
3.72
3.09
Broadcast Acres
4.50
-------------------------- ------------------------------------
676627 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 04-09-2008 Narrative Page Page 1 of 3

Narrative
2B
2.30
3-1
4.55
3-2
2.12
3B
6.00
4-1
5.84
4-2
2.29
4-3
2.62
4B
4.70
5-1
4.55
5-2
4.13 /
5B
5.40
6-1
4.55
7-1
3.33 f
7B
1.60
8-1
4.41 %
8-2
5.56
8-3
5.54
9-1
3.39
9-2
3.55-�
9-3
5.54 !
9-4
5.70
9-5
3.25
9B
7.50
Total Acres:
90.46 ac.
32.00 ac.
The cropping system for the farm fields utilizes two different rotations: either corn (grain) followed by
winter wheat (grain), or fescue (hay) overseeded with pearl millet (hay). Since realistic yield expectation
(RYE) information has not been published for pearl millet overseeded into fescue, this plan considers the
yield of the overseeded millet to be 50% of millet grown alone. This conservative yield estimate is based
on information presented under "Crop Planting and Fertilizing Considerations" in the Revised Swine
Waste Utilization and Irrigation Plan for Applefield Farm, Randolph County, N.C. dated September
1998, by Environmental Engineering Services. The farm is encouraged to keep accurate harvest records
for these crop rotations so that future versions of this plan can be based on actual "on farm" yields,
especially for the pearl millet.
There is a more than sufficient amount of land owned by Applefield Farm to utilize the plant available
nitrogen (PAN) generated by the animal numbers under either crop rotation.
Nutrients should be applied according to the attached Nutrient Management Plan in order to maximize
plant production, properly utilize manure on these fields; and minimize off -site transport of the nutrients
applied. This plan identifies the amount, source, placement, and timing of nutrients to be applied for
these fields. Nitrogen application rates are based on realistic yield expectations for the crop, soil type
and field slope. Application rates for other nutrients and amendments are based on a soil test.
------------------------ ----------------------------------------------- --------
676627 Database Version ')J Date Printed: 04-09-2008 Narrative Page Page 2 of 3

Narrative
Waste applications are to be made in accordance with land application setbacks as set by the state of
North Carolina, as well as applicable federal and local laws. Current setbacks are available at the NC
Division of Soil & Water Conservation 1217 guidance
website,http://www.enr.state.nc.us/DSWC/pages/guidance docs.html
Because animal waste is being applied, all fields in this plan have been evaluated for potential
phosphorous loss using the Phosphorous Loss Assessment Tool (PLAT). (*Phosphorous lost from fields
can become pollution in surface water through surface runoff, erosion of soil or by leaching). The PLAT
rating for each field is listed in the Planned Crops Summary section of this waste plan. A field with a
PLAT rating of 'low' or 'medium' requires no additional measures. A rating of high will require reduced
manure applications, and a rating of 'very high' will require ceasing all waste applications to that field.
All maps included with this plan have been generated specifically for use with Nutrient Management
planning and implementation. Aerial images from the Farm Service Agency's (2007) National
Agriculture Imagery Program (NAIP) were used in generating plan maps with photographs. Road,
stream, soils and parcel information were obtained from Randolph County's GIS database.
Important requirements:
-Soil tests are to be taken annually on all fields that receive animal waste.
-Waste analyses are to be taken within 60 days of applying waste from a source.
-Manure should not be applied more than 30 days prior to planting new crops or to forages breaking
dormancy. Otherwise applications are made to actively growing crops.
-When any commercial fertilizers are used (including starter fertilizer), they need to be included in the
nutrient budget and recorded on the appropriate record -keeping form.
-Liming material should be applied as indicated by the soil test to adjust soil pH to the specific range
required by the crop or crops in the rotation for optimum availability and utilization of nutrients.
-Application equipment (irrigation, honey wagons, manure spreaders, etc.) are to be properly calibrated
to ensure uniform distribution of material at planned rates.
-Accurate harvest records are required, and are essential for future planning and decision making.
676627 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 04-09-2008 Narrative Page Page 3 of 3

The table shown below provides a summary of the crops or rotations included in this plan for each field. Realistic Yield estimates are
also provided for each crop, as well as the crop's P205 Removal Rate. The Leaching Index (LI) and the Phosphorous Loss Assessment
Tool (PLAT) Rating are also provided for each field, where available.
If a field's PLAT Rating is High, any planned manure application is limited to the phosphorous removal rate of the harvested plant
biomass for the crop rotation or multiple years in the crop sequence. Fields with a Very High PLAT Rating should receive no
additional applications of manure. Regardless of the PLAT rating, starter fertilizers may be recommended in accordance with North
Carolina State University guidelines or recommendations. The quantity of P205 applied to each crop is shown in the following table if
the field's PLAT rating is High or Very High.
Planned Crops Summary
Total
Useable
Plat
P20�
Tract
Field Acres
Acres
Ratin S
LI
Sied
oil Series
T Crop Sequence
s
RYE
(Ibs/acre)
(bemoval
alc e)
5134
1-1 4.4d
4.44
Low
N/A
Callison
Corn, Grain
37
N/A
83 bu.
Wheat, Grain
41 bu.
21
N/A
Fescue Hay
4.1 Tons
64
N/A
Pearl Millett, Hay
*].8 Tons
23
N/A
5134
1-2 2.8
2.89
Low
N/A
Callison
Corn, Grain
38
N/A
86 bu.
Wheat, Grain
43 bu.
22
N/A
Fescue Hay
4.3 Tons
68
N/A
Pearl Millett, Hay
*1.8 Ton
24
N/A
5134
1-3 5.40
5.40
Low
N/A
Callison
Corn, Grain
83 bu.
37
N/A
Wheat, Grain
41 bu.
21
N/A
Fescue Hay
4.1 Tons
64
N/A
Pearl Millett, Hay
*1.8 Tons
23
N/A
5134
1-4 3.72
3.7
Low
N/A
Callison
Corn, Grain
38
N/A
86 bu.
Wheat, Grain
43 bu.
22
N/A
Fescue Hay
4.3 Tons
68
N/A
Pearl Millett, Hay
*1.8 Tons
24
N/A
5134
1B 4.50
4.50
Low
N/A
Badin
Corn, Grain
48
NIA
110 bu.
Wheat, Grain
51 bu.
26
N/A
Fescue Hay
3.7 Tons
�8
N/A
Pearl Millett, Hay
*1.6 Tons
21
N/A
5134
2-1 3.0
3.09
Low
N/A
Callison
Corn, Grain
78 bu
34
N/A
Wheat, Grain
39 bu.
20
N/A
Fescue Hay
3.9 Tons
61
N/A
Pearl Millett, Hay
*1.7 Tons
22
N/A
5134
2B 2.30
230
Low
N/A
Badin
Corn, Grain
104 bu.
46
N/A
Wheat, Grain
48 bu.
24
N/A
Fescue Hay
3.5 Tons
»
N/A
676627
Database Version 3.1
Date Printed
4/9,12008
NOTE: Symbol
* means user
entered data.
PCS Page Page 1 of 4

Planned Crops Summary
Total
Useable
Plat
Tract
Field Acres
Acres
Rating
P2O5
LI
Soil Series
Crop Sequence
RYE Removal Applied
(lbs/acre)
(lbs/acre)
5134
3-1 4.55
Pearl Millett, Hay
*1.5 Tons 20
N/A
4.55
Low
N/A
Badin
Corn, Grain
42
96 bu.
N/A
Wheat, Grain
44 bu. 22
N/A
Fescue Hay
3.2 Tons 50
N/A
5134
3-2
Pearl Millett, Hay
* 1.4 Tons 18
N/A
2.1
2.12
Low
N/A
Badin
Corn, Grain
46
] 04 bu.
N/A
Wheat, Grain
48 bu. 24
N/A
Fescue Hay
3.5 Tons 55
N/A
5134
3B
Pearl Millett, Hay
*1.5 Tons 20
N/A
6.00
6.00
Low
N/A
Badin
'Corn, Grain
96 bu. 42
N/A
Wheat, Grain
44 bu. 22
N/A
Fescue Hay
3.2 Tons 50
N/A
5134
4-1
Pearl Millett, Hay
*1.4 Tons 18
N/A
5.84
5.84
Low
N/A
Badin
Corn, Grain
114 bu. 50
N/A
Wheat, Grain
52 bu. 26
N/A
Fescue Hay
3.8 Tons 60
N/A
Pearl Millett, Hay
*1.6 Tons 21
N/A
5134
4-2 2.2
2.29
Low
N/A
Callison
Corn, Grain
37
83 bu.
N/A
Wheat, Grain
41 bu. 21
N/A
Fescue Hay
4.1 Ton 64
N/A
5134
4-3
Pearl Millett, Hay
*1.8 Tons 23
N/A
2.62
2.62
Low
N/A
Badin
Corn, Grain
] 14 bu. 50
N/A
Wheat, Grain
52 bu. 26
N/A
Fescue Hay
3.8 Tons 60
N/A
5134
4B
Pearl Millett, Hay
*1.6 Tons 21
N/A
4.7
4.70
Low
N/A
Badin
Corn, Grain
110 bu. 48
N/A
Wheat, Grain
51 bu 26
NIA
Fescue Hay
3.7 Tons 58
N/A
Pearl Millett, Hay
*1.6 Tons 21
N/A
5134
5-1 4.55
4.55
Low
N/A
Badin
Corn, Grain
48
110 bu.
N/A
Wheat, Grain
51 bu 26
N/A
Fescue Hay
3.7 Tons 58
N/A
Pearl Millett, Hay
*1.6 Tons 41
N/A
5134
5-2 4.13
4.13 Low
N/A
Badin
Corn, Grain
110 bu. 48
1'1/A
Wheat, Grain
51 bu 26
N/A
Fescue Hay
3.7 Tons 58
N/A
676627
Database Version
3.1
Date Printed 4/9/2008
NOTE: Symbol * means user entered data.
PCS Page Pale 2 of 4

Planned Crops Summary
Total
Useable
Plat
P2O5
Tract
Field Acres
Acres
Rating
LI
Soil Series
Crop Sequence
RYE
Removal Applied
(lbs/acre)
(Ibs/acre)
Pearl Millett, Hay
*1.6 Tons
21
N/A
5134
5B 5.4
5.40
Low
NIA
Badin
Corn, Grain
48
N/A
110 bu.
Wheat, Grain
51 bu.
26
N/A
Fescue Hay
3.7 Tons
58
N/A
Pearl Millett, Hay
*1.6 Tons
21
N/A
5134
6-1 4.55
4.55
Low
N/A
Badin
Corn, Grain
50
114 bu.
N/A
Wheat, Grain
52 bu.
26
N/A
Fescue Hay
3.8 Tons
60
N/A
Pearl Millett, Hay
*1.6 Tons
21
NIA
5134
7-1 3.33
3.33
Low
NIA
Badin
Corn, Grain
48
110 bu.
Iv'/A
Wheat, Grain
51.bu.
26
NIA
Fescue Hay
3.7 Tons
58
N/A
Pearl Millett, Hay
*1.6 Tons
21
N/A
5134
7B 1.60
1.60
Low
N/A
Badin
Corn, Grain
48
N/A
110 bu.
Wheat, Grain
51 bu.
26
N/A
Fescue Hay
3.7 Tons
58
N/A
Pearl Millett, Hay
*1.6 Tons
21
N/A
5134
8-1 4.41
4.41
Low
N/A
Callison
Corn, Grain
38
86 bu.
NIA
Wheat, Grain
43 bu.
22
N/A
Fescue Hay
4.3 Tons
68
N/A
Pearl Millett, Hay
*1.8 Tons
24
N/A
5134
8-2 5.56
5.56
Low
N/A
Badin
Corn, Grain
48
N/A
110 bu.
Wheat, Grain
51 bu
26
N/A
Fescue Hay
3.7 Tons
58
N/A
Pearl Millett, Hay
*1.6 Tons
21
N/A
5134
8-3 5.54
5.54
Low
N/A
Badin
Corn, Grain
48
N/A
110 bu.
Wheat, Grain
51 bu.
26
N/A
Fescue Hay
3.7 Tons
58
N/A
Pearl Millett, Hay
*1.6 Tons
21
N/A
5134
9-1 3.39
3.39
Low
N/A
Callison
Corn, Grain
34
N/A
78 bu.
Wheat, Grain
39 bu.
20
N/A
Fescue Hay
3.9 Tons
61
N/A
Pearl Millett, Hay
*1.7 Tons
22
N/A
5134
9-2 3.55
3.55
Low
MIA
Callison
Corn, Grain
34
N/A
78 bu.
Wheat, Grain
39 bu.
20
N/A
Fescue Hay
3.9 Tons 61
N/A
676627
Database Version 3.1
Date Printed
4/9/2008
NOTE: Symbol
* means user entered data.
PCs Page Page 3 of 4

Planned Crops Summary
7FieldAcres
Total
Useable
Plat
P2O?
Tract
Acres
Rating
LT
Soil Series
Crop Sequence
Removal Applied
RYE
(lbs/acre) (lbs/acre)
Pearl Millett, Hay
*1.7 Tons
22 NIA
5134 9-3
5.54
5.54
Low
N/A
Callison
Corn, Grain
78 bu.
34 NIA
Wheat, Grain
39 bu.
20 N/A
�����Pe.�,IuMillett,
e Hay
3.9 Tons
61 NIA
Hay
*1.7 To
22 N/A
5134 9-4
5.7
5.7
Low
NIA
Badin
Corn, Grain
104 bu.
46 N/A
Wheat, Grain
48 bu.
24 N/A
Fescue Hay
3.5 Tons
55 N/A
Pearl Millett, Hay
*1.5 Tons
20 N/A
5134 9-5
3.25
3.25
Low
N/A
Badin
Corn, Grain
104 bu.
46 N/A
Wheat. Grain
48 bu.
24 N/A
Fescue Hay
3.5 Tons
55 N/A
Pearl Millett, Hay
*1.5 Tons
20 N/A
5134 9B
7.50
7.50
Low
N/A
Badin
Corn, Grain
104 bu.
46 N/A
Wheat, Grain
48 bu.
24 N/A
Fescue Hay
3.5 Tons
55 N/A
Peari Millett, Hay
*1.5 Tons
20 N/A
PLAN TOTALS:
122.46
122.46
Technical Guidance
< 2 Low potential to contribute to soluble None
nutrient leaching below the root zone.
>= 2 & Moderate potential to contribute to soluble Nutrient Management (590) should be planned.
<= 10 1 nutrient leaching below the root zone.
High potential to contribute to soluble
nutrient leaching below the root zone.
Nutrient Management (590) should be planned. Other conservation practices that improve the soils
> 10
available water holding capacity and improve nutrient use efficiency should be considered. Examples
are Cover Crops (340) to scavenge nutrients, Sod Rotations
-Based (328), Lon. -Term No -Till (778),
and edge -of -field practices such as Filter Strips (393) and Riparian Forest Buffers (391).
PLAT Index
Rating
P 1lTanagement Recommendation
No adjustment needed; N based application
002054-
5 - 50
4LT
No adjustment needed; N based application
- 100
Application limited to crop P removal
10
Starter P application only
676627 Database Version 3.1
NOTE: Symbol * means user entered data.
Date Printed 4/9/2008
PCs Page Page 4 of 4

The Waste Utilization table shown below summarizes the waste utilization plan for this operation. This plan provides an estimate of the number of acres of cropland needed to us4
the nutrients being produced. The plan requires consideration of the realistic yields of the crops to be grown, their nutrient requirements, and proper tuning of applications to
maximize nutrient uptake.
This table provides an estimate of die amount of nitrogen required by the crop being grown and an estimate of the nitrogen amount being supplied by manure or other by-products
commercial fertilizer and residual from previous crops. An estimate of the quantity of solid and liquid waste that will be applied on each field in order to supply the indicated quantit
of nitrogen from each source is also included. A balance of the total manure produced and the total manure applied is included in the table to ensure that the plan adequately provide:
for the utilization of the manure generated by the operation.
Waste Utilization Table
Vear 1
Tract
Field
Source
ID
Soil Series
Total
Acres
Use.
Acres
Crop
RYE
Applic•
Period
Nitrogen
PA
Nulrienl
Req'd
(Ibs/A)
Comm.
Pert.
Nutrient
Applied
(lbs/A)
Res.
(lbs/A)
Applic.
Method
Manure
PA
NutrientA
pplied
(Ibs/A)
Liquid
ManureA
pplied
(acre)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(acre)
Liquid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
Ions
N
N
N
N
1000
gal/A
'tons
1000 gals
5134
I-1
Ul
Callison
4.44
4.44
Corn, Grain
83 bu.
2/15-6/30
90
0
0
Irrig.
90
35.44
0.00
157.34
0.00
5134
1-1
U1
Callison
4.44
4.44
Wheat, Grain
41 bu.
9/1-4/30
79
0
0
In•ig.
79
31.11
0.00
138.11
0.00
5134
1-2
Ul
Callison
2.89
2.89
Com, Grain
86 No.
2/15-6/30
93
0
0
Irrig.
93
36.62
0.00
105.82
0.00
5134
1-2
Ul
Callison
2.89
2.89
Wheat, Grain
43 bu.
9/1-4/30
83
0
0
Irrig,
83
32.68
0.00
94.44
0.00
5134
1-3
UI
Callison
5.40
5A0
Corn, Grain
83 bu.
2/15-6/30
90
0
0
Irrig.
90
35.44
0.00
191.35
0.00
5134
1-3
Ul
Callison
5.40
5.40
Wheat, Grain
41 bu.
9/1-4/30
79
0
0
Irrig.
79
31.11
0.00
167.97
0.00
5134
1-4
Ul
Callison
3.72
3.72
Corn, Grain
86 bu.
2/15-6/30
93
0
0
Irrig.
93
36.62
0.00
136.22
0.00
5134
1-4
U I
Callison
3.72
3.72
Wheat, Grain
43 bu.
9/1-4/30
83
0
0
Irrig.
83
32.68
0.00
121.57
0.00
5134
1 B
U1
Badin
4.50
4.50
Corn, Grain
110 bu.
2/15-6/30
119
0
0
Broad.
119
50.93
0.00
229.18
0.
5134
1 B
U1
Badin
4.50
4.50
Wheat, Grain
51 bu.
9/1-4/30
98
0
0
Broad.
98
41.94
0.00
188.74
0.00
5134
2-1
U1
Callison
3.09
3.09
Corn, Grain
78 bu.
2/15-6/30
84
0
0
Irrig.
84
33.07
0.00
102.20
0.00
5134 1
2-1
Ul
Callison
3.09
3.09
Wheat, Grain
39bu.
9/1-4/30
75
0
0
Irrig.
75
29.53
0.00
91.25
0.00
5134
2B
Ul
Badin
2.30
2.30
Corn, Grain
104 bu.
2/15-6/30
112
0
0
Broad.
112
47.931
0.00
110.25
0.00
5134
2B
Ul
Badin
2.30
2.30
Wheat, Grain
48 bu.
9/I-4/30
93
0
0
Broad.
93
39.80
0.00
91.54
0.00
5134
3-1
U1
Badin
4.55
4.55
Com, Grain
96bu.
2/15-6/30
t04
0
0
Irrig.
104
40.95
0.00
.186.31
0.00
5134
3-1
UI
Badin
4.55
4.55
Wheat, Grain
44 bu. 1
9/1 4/30
85
0
0
Irrig.
85
33.47
0.00
152.28
0.00
676627 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 4/9/2008 WUT Page Page 1 of 7

Waste Utilization Table Year 1
Tract
Field
Source
ID
Soil Series
Total
Acres
Use.
Acres
Crop
RYE
Applic.
Period
Nitrogen
PA
Nutrient
Req'd
(lbs/A)
Comm.
Fert.
Nutrient
Applied
(Ibs/A)
Res.
(Ibs/A)
Applic.
Method
Manure
PA
NutrientA
pplied
(Ibs/A)
Liquid
ManureA
pplied
(acre)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(acre)
Liquid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
N
N
N
N
1000
gal/A
Tons
1000 gals
tons
5134
3-2
UI
Badin
2.12
2.12
Corn, Grain
104 bu.
2/15-6/30
112
0
0
1 Irrig,
112
44.10
0.00
93.49
0.00
5134
3-2
Ul
Badin
2.12
2.12
Wheat, Grain
48 bu.
9/1-4/30
93
0
0
Irrig.
93
36.62
0.00
77.63
0.00
5134
3B
Ul
Badin
6.00
6.00
Corn, Grain
96 bu.
2/15-6/30
104
0
0
Broad.
104
44.51
0.00
267.05
0.00
5134
3B
Ul
Badin
6.00
6.00
Wheat, Grain
44 bu.
911-4/30
85
0
0
Broad.
85
36.38
0.00
218.26
0.00
5134
4-1
Ul
Badin
5.84
5.84
Corn, Grain
I 114 bu.
1 2/15-6/30
123
0
0
Irrig.
123
48.43
0.00
282.83
0.
5134
4-1
Ul
Badin
5.84
5.84
Wheat, Grain
52 bu.
9/1-4/30
l00
0
0
Irrig.
100
39.37
0.00
229.94
0.00
5134
4-2
UI
Callison
2.29
2.29
Corn, Grain
83 bu.
2/15-6/30
90
0
0
In•ig.
90
35.44
0.00
81.15
0.00
5134
4-2
UI
Callison
2.29
2.29
Wheat, Grain
41 bu.
9/1-4/30
79
0
0
Irrig.
79
31.11
0.00
71.23
0.00
5134
4-3
UI
Badin
2.62
2.62
Corn, Grain
114 bu.
2/15-6/30
123
0
0
Irrig.
1231
48.43
0.00
126.88
0.00
5134
4-3
UI
Badin
2.62
2.62
Wheat, Grain
52 bu.
9/I-4/30
100
0
0
Irrig.
100
39.37
0.00
103.16
0.00
5134
4B
Ul
Badin
4.70
4.70
Corn, Grain
110 bu.
2/15-6/30
119
0
0
Broad.
119
50.93
0.00
239.36
0.00
5134
413
Ul
Badin
4.70
4.70
Wheat, Grain
51 bu.
9/1-4/30
98
0
0
Broad.
98
41.94
0.001
197.12
0.00
5134
5-1
U1 IBadin
4.55
4.55
Conn, Grain
110 bu.
2/15-6/30
119
0
0
Irrig.
119
46.85
0.00
213,191
0.00
5134
5-1
Ul
Badin
4.55
4.55
Wheat, Grain
51 bu.
9/1-4/30
98
0
0
Irrig.
98
38.59
0.00
175.57
0.00
5134
5-2
Ul
Badin
4.13
4.13
Corn, Grain
110 bu.
2/15-6/30
119 1
0
0
1 Irrig.
119
46.85
0.00
193.51
0
5134
5-2
Ul
Badin
4.13
4.13
Wheat, Grain
51 bu.
9/1-4/30
98
0
0
Irrig.
98
38.59
0.00
159.36
0.00
5134
5B
Ul
Badin
5.40
5.40
Corn, Grain
110 bu.
2/15-6/30
119
0
0
Broad.
119
50.93
0.00
275.01
0.00
5134
5B
Ul
Badin
5.40
5.40
Wheat, Grain
51 bu.
9/1-4/30
98
0
0
Broad.
98
41.94
0.00
226.48
0.00
5134
6-1
Ut
Badin
4.55
4.55
Corn, Gain
114 bu.
2/15-6/30
123
0
0
Irrig.
123
48.43
0.00
220.35
0.0
5134
6-1
UI
Badin
4.55
4.55
Wheat, Grain
52 bu.
9/1-4/30
100
0
0
Irrig.
100
39.37
0.00
179.15
0.00
5134-
7-I
UI
Badin
3.33
3.33
Corn, Grain
110 bu.
2/15-6/30
119
0
0
Irrig.
119
46.85
0.00
156.02
0.00
5134
7-1
UI
Badin
3.33
3.33
Wheat, Grain
51 bu.
9/1-4/30
98
0
0
Irrig.
98
38.59
0.00
128.49
0.00
676627 Database Version 3.1
Date Printed: 4/9/2008
WUT Page Page 2 of 7
1

Waste Utilization Table
Year
Source
Total
Use.
Tract
Field
ID
Soil Series
Acres
Acres Crop
5134
7B
Ul
Badin
1.60
1.60 Corn, Grain
5134
7B
Ul
Badin
1.60
1.60 Wheat, Grain
5134
8-1
Ul
Callison
4.41
4,41 Com, Grain
U1
Callison
4.41
4.41 Wheat, Grain
T51348-2
Ul
Badin
5.56
5.56 Corn, Grain
Ul
Badin
5.56
5.56Wheat, Grain
5134
8-3
U1
Badin
5.54
5.54 Corn, Grain
5134
8-3
U1
Badin
5.54
5.54 Wheat, Grain
5134
9-1
Ul
Callison
3,39
3.39 Corn, Grain
5134
9-1
Ul
Callison
3.39
3.39 Wheat, Grain
5134
9-2
Ul
Callison
3.55
3.55 Corn, Grain
5134
9-2
Ul
Callison
3.55
3.55 Wheat, Grain
5134
9-3
Ul
Callison
5.54
5.54 Corn, Grain
5134
9-3
Ul
Callison
5.54
5.54 Wheat, Grain
5134
9-4
Ul
Badin
5,70
5.70 Corn, Grain
5134
9-4
Ul
Badin
5.70
5.70 Wheat, Grain
5134
9-5
Ul
Badin
3.25
3.25 Corn, Grain
5134
9-5
Ul
Badin
3.25
3.25 Wheat, Grain
5134
9B
Ul
Badin
7.50
7.50 Corn, Grain
5134
9B
U l
Badin
7.50
7.50 Wheat, Grain
Nitrogen
Comm.
Res.
Manure
Liquid
Solid
Liquid
Solid
PA
Fert.
(Ibs/A)
PA
ManureA Manure
Manure
Manure
Nutrient Nutrient
NulrientA
pplied
Applied
Applied
Applied
Req'd
Applied
pplied
(acre)
(acre)
(Field)
(Field)
(Ibs/A)
(lbs/A)
(Ibs/A)
Applic.
APPIic.
1000
RYE
Period
N
N
N
Method
N
gal/A
Tons
1000 gals
tons
110 bu.
2/15-6/30
119
0
0
Broad.
119
50.93
0.00
81.49
O.0
51 bu.
9/1-4/30
98
0
0
Broad,
98
41.94
0.00
67.1 t
0.0
86 bu.
2/15-6/30
93
0
0
Irrig,
93
36.62
0.00
I G 1.48
0.0
43 bu.
9/1-4/30
83
0
0
brig.
831
32.68
0.00
144.12
0.0
110 bu.
2/15-6/30
119
0
0
Irrig.
119
46.85
0.00
260.51
0,,
51 bu.
9/1-4/30
98
110 bu.
2/15-6/30
119
51 bu.
9/ 1-4/30
98
78 bu.
2/15-6/30
84
39 bu.
9/1-4/30
75
78 bu.
2/15-6/30
84
39 bu.
9/1-4/30
Q
78 bu.
2/15-6/30
84
39 bu.
9/1-4/30
75
0
0
Irrig.
98
38.59
0.00
214.54
0.00
0
0
Irrig.
119
46.85
0.00
259.57
0.00
0
0
Irrig.
98
38.59
0,00
213.77
0.00
0
0
Irrig.
841
33.07
0,00
112.12
0.00
0
0
0
0
Irrig.
Irrig.
75
84
29.53
33.07
0.00
0.00
100.11
117,41
0,00
0.00
0
0
Irrig.
75
29.53
0.00
t04.83
0.00
0
0
Irrig,
84
33.07
0.00
183,23
O.UO
0
0
Irrig.
75
29.53
0.00
163.60
0.00
104 bu.
2/15-6/30
112
0
0
Irrig.
112
44.10
0.00
251.36
0
48 bu.
9/1-4/30
93
0
0
Irrig.
93
36.62
O.CO
208.72
0.00
L04 bu.
2/15-6/3U
t l2
0
0
Irrig.
112
44.1
0.00
143.32
0.00
48 bu.
9/1-4/30
93
0
0
Irrig.
93
36.62
0.00
119.01
0.00
104 bu.
2/15-6/30
112
0
0
Broad.
112
47.93
0.00
359.49
0.00
48 bu. 1
9/1-4/30
93
0
0
Broad.
93
39.801
0.001
298.51
0_o0
676627 Database Version 3.1
Date Printed: 4/9/2008
WUT Page Page 3 of 7

Waste Utilization Table �, ,
-�• • • -•• •••� •• ��• �......... - ay..,U.,I iucaus icasw, ornermse, ownea. L. Nymbol * means user entered data.
676627 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 4/9/2008 VJUT Page Page 4 of 7

Waste Utilization Table
Year 2
Nitrogen Comm.
PA Fert.
Nutrient Nutrient
Req'd Applied
(Ibs/A) (Ibs/A)
Res.
(lbs/A)
Liquid Solid
ManureA Manure
ENutrientApplied Applied
(acre) (acre)
Liquid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
Solid
Manure '
Applied
(Field)
Tract
Field
Source
1D Soil Series
Total
Acres
Use.
Acres Crop
Ryg
Applic,
Period
N
N
N
Applic.
Method
N
SOUA
Tons
1000 gals
tons
5134
5134
S134
5134
5134
5134
5134
5134
5134
5134
5134
5134UI
5134
5134
5134
5134
1-1
1-1
1-2
1-2
I-3
1-3
1-4
1_4
I B
IB
F
26
3-I
3-1
3-2
UI
Ul
Ul
U1
U1
Ul
Ul
U1
lJ I
Ul
Ul
Ul
U1
UI
Callison
Callison
Callison
Callison
Callison
Callison
Callison
Callison
Badin
Badin
Callison
Callison
Badin
Badin
Badin
Badin
4.44
4.44
2.89
2.89
5.40
5.40
3.72
3.72
4.50
4.50
3.(19
3.09
2.30
2.30
4.55
4.55
2.12
4.44 Fescue Flay
4.44 Pearl Millett, Hay
2.89 Fescue Hay
2.89 Pearl Millett, Hay
5.40 Fescue I -lay
5.40 Pearl Millett, Hay
3.72 Fescue Hay
3.72 Pearl Millett, Ilay
4.50 Fescue llay
4.50 Pearl Millett, Hay
3.09 Fescue Flay
3.09 Pearl Millett, Hay
2.30 Fescue Hay
2.30 Pearl Millett, FIay
4.55 Fescue Hay
4.55 Pearl Millett, Hay
2.12 Fescue liay
4.1 Tons
*1.8 Ton
4.3 Tons
*1.8 Toll
4.1 Tons
*1.8 Ton
4.3 Tons
*1.8 Ton
3.7 Tons
*I.6Ton
3.9'rons
*1.7 Ton
3.5 Tons
*1.5 Ton
3.2 Tans
*1.4 Ton
3.5 Tons
8/1-7/31
4/1-9/15
8/1-7/31
4/1-9/15
8/1-7/31
4/1-9/15
8/1-7/31
4/1-9/15
8/1-7/31
4/1-9/15
8/1-7/31
4/1-9/15
8/1-7/31
4/1-9/15
8/1-7/31
4/1-9/15
8/1-7/31
178
*85
186
*87
178
*85
186
*87
160
*75
169
*80
152
*72
139
*65
152
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
In�ig.
Irrig.
Irrig.
Irrig.
Irrig.
Irrig.
Irrig.
Irrig,
Broad.
Broad,
Irrig.
Irrig.
Broad.
Broad.
Irrig,
Irrig.
Irrig.
178
85
186
87
178
85
186
87
160
75
169
80
152
72
139
65
152
70.08
33.47
73.23
34.26
70.08
33.47
73.23
34.26
68.48
32.10
66.54
31.50
65.05
30.81
54.73
25.59
59.85
0,00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
O.OU
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
311.17
148.59
211,65
99.00
378.46
180.72
272.43
127.43
308,14
144.44
205.61
97.33
149.62
70.87
249.02
116.45
126.88
0.00
0.00
0.00
O.OU
0.
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.05134U1
0.00
0.00
0
0.00
0.00
5134
3-2
TUIBadin
2.12
2.12PearlMillett,Hay
*1.5Ton
4/1-9/15
*72
0
0
]rrig.
72
28.35
0.00
60.LU
O.UU
5134
36
6.00
G,00 Fescue HaY
3.2 Tons
8/1-7/31
139
0
0
Broad.
139
59.49
0.00
356.93
0.00
5134
3B
UI
Badin
6.00
6.00 Pearl Millett, Hay
*1.4Ton
4/1-9/IS
*65
0
0
Broad,
GS
27.82
0.00
166.91
0.00
5134
5134
4-1
4-I
UI
Ul
Badin
Badin
5.84
5.84
5.84 Fescue Hay
5.84 Pearl Millett, HaY
3.8 Tons
*1.6 Tan
8/1-7/31
4/1-9/i5
165
*77 1
0
0
0
0
brig.
Irrig.
165
77
64.97
30.32
0.00
OAe
379.40
177.05
0.00
0.00
676627
Database Version 3.1
Date Printed: 4/9/2008
WUT
Page Page 5 of 7

Waste Utilization Table
Year 2
Tract
Field
Source
ID
5134
4-2
Ul
5134
4-2
U1
5134
4-3
Ul
5134
4-3
Ul
5134
4B
Ul
Soil Series
Total
Acres
IUse.
IAcres
Crop
ison
2.29
2.29
Fescue Hay
ison
2.29
2.29
Pearl Millett, Ilay
in
2.62
2.62
Fescue Hay
in
2.62
2.62
Pearl Millett, Hay
in
1 4.70
4.70
Fescue Hay
Nitrogen
Comm.
Res,
Manure
Liquid
Solid
Liquid
Solid
PA
Fert.
(Ibs/A)
PA
ManureA
Manure
Manure
Manure
Nutrient
Nutrient
NutrientA
pplied
Applied
Applied
Applied
Req'd
Applied
pplied
(acre)
(acre)
(Field)
(Field)
(lbs/A)
(Ibs/A)
(Ibs/A)
Applic.
Applic.
1000
RYE
Period
N
N
N
Method
N
gal/A
Tons
1000 gals
tons
4.1 Tons
8/1-7131
178
0
0
Irrig.
178
70.08
0.00
160.49
0.(
*1.8 Ton
4/1-9/15
*85
0
0
Irrig.
85
33.47
0.00
76.64
0.(
3.8 Tons
8/1-7/31
165
0
0
Irrig.
165
64.97
0.00
170.21
OX
*L6Ton
4/1-9/15
*77
0
0
IlTig,
77
30.32
0.00
79.43
0.(
3.7 Tons
8/1-7/31
160
0
0
Broad.
160
68.48
0.00
321.83
0..
5134
4B
Ul
Badin
4.70
4.70
Pearl Millett, Hay
*1.6 Ton
4/I -9/15
*75
0
0
Broad.
75
32.10
0.00
150.86
0.00
5134
5-1
Ul
Badin
4.55
4.55
Fescue Hay
3.7 Tons
8/1-7/31
160
0
0
Irrig.
160
63.00
0.00
286.64
0.00
5134
5-1
UI
Badin
4.55
4.55
Pearl Millett, I -lay
* 1.6 ]'on
4/1-9/15
*75
0
0
Irrig.
75
29.53
0.00
134.36
0.00
5134
5-2
LI1
Badin
4.13
4.13
Fescue Hay
3.7 Tons
8/1-7/31
160
0
0
Irrig.
1601
63.00
0.00
260.18
0.00
5134
5-2
U1
Badin
4.13
4.13
Pearl Millett, 1-lay
*1.6 Ton
4/1-9/15
*75
0
0
4Tig.
75
29.53
0.00
121.96
0.00
5134
513
UI
13adin
5.40
5.40
Fescue Flay
3.7 Tons
8/1-7/31
160
0
0
Broad.
160
68.48
0.00
369.77
0.00
5134
5B
UI
Badin
5.40
5.40
Pearl Millett, flay
*1.6 Ton
4/1-9/15
*75
0
0
Broad.
75
32.10
0.00
173.33
0.00
5134
6-1
U1
Badin
4.55
4.55
Fescue I-Iay
3.8'rons
8/1-7/31
165
0
0
prig.
165
64.97
0.00
295.59
0.00
5134
6-1
UI
Badin
4.55
4.55
Pearl Millett, Hay
*1.6 Ton
4/1-9/15
*77
0
0
Irrig,
77
30.32
0.00
137.94
0.00
5134
7-I 1
U1
Badin
5134
7-1
Ul
Badin
5134
76
Ul
Badin
5134
7B
UI
Badin
5134
8-1
UI
Callison
5134
8-1
Ul
Callison
5134
8-2
UI
Badin
5134
8-2
Lll
Badin
3.33] 3.331Fescue Hay
3.33
3.33
Pearl Millett, Hay
1.60
1.60
Fescue I -lay
1.60
1.60
Pearl Millett, Hay
4.41
4.41
Fescue Hay
4.41
4.41
Pearl Millett, Hay
5.56
5.56
Fescue Hay
5.56
5.56
Pearl Millett, I -lay
3.7 Tons
8/1-7/31
160
0
0
1 Irrig. 1
160
63.001
0.00
209.78
0
*1.6Ton
4/1-9115
*75
0
0
Irrig.
75
29.53
0.00
98.34
0
3.7 Tons
8/1-7/31
160
0
0
Broad.
160
68.48
0.00
109.56
0
*L6Ton
4/1-9/15
*75
0
0
Broad,
75
32.10
0.00
51.36
0
4.3 Tons
8/1-7/31
186
0
0
Irrig.
186
73.23
0.00
322.96
0
*1.8Ton
4/1-9/15
*87
0
0
Irrig.
87
34.26
0.00
151.06
0
3.7 Tons
8/1-7/31
160
0
0
Irrig.
160
63.00
0.00
350.26
0
*1.6 Ton
4/1-9/15
*75
0
0
Irrig.
75
29.53
0.00
164.19
0
676627 Database Version 3.1
Date Printed: 4/9/2008
WUT Page Page 6 of 7

Waste Utilization Table
Tract
Field
Source
ID
Soil Series
5134
8-3
UI
Badin
5134
8-3
Ul
Badin
5134
9-1
UI
Callison
5134
9-1
Ul
Callison
5134
9-2
Ul
Callison
Year 2
Total
Acres
Use.
Acres
Crop
RYE
APplic.
Period
Nitrogen
. PA
Nutrient
Req'd
(Ibs/A)
Comm.
Fert.
Nutrient
Applied
(lbs/A)
Res.
(Ibs/A)
Applic.
Method
Manure
PA
NuirientA
pplied
(lbs/A)
Liquid
ManureA
pplied
(acre)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(acre)
Liquid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
N
N
N
N
1000
gal/A
Tons
1000 gals
tons
5.54
5.54
Fescue Hay
3.7 Tons
8/1-7/31
160
0
0
In•ig.
160
63.00
0.00
349.00
OX
5.54
5.54
Pearl Millett, Flay
*1.6 Ton
4/1-9/15
*75
0
0
In-ig.
75
29.53
0.00
163.60
OX
3.39
3.39
Fescue flay
3.9 Tons
8/1-7/31
169
0
0
brig.
169
66.54
0.00
225.57
OX
3.39
3.39
Pearl Millett, Hay
*1.7 Ton
4/1-9/15
*80
0
0
Irrig.
801
31.50
0.00
106.78
O.0
3.551
e Hay
3.9 Tons
8/1-7/31
169
0
n
IfTia
1f,9
fF to
n nn
oaf 11)
n
5134
9-2
UI
Callison
3.55
3.55
Pearl Millett, Hay
*1.7 Ton
4/1-9/15
*80
0
0
Irrig.
80
31.50
0.00
111.82
0.00
5134
9-3
UI
Callison
5.54
5.54
Fescue Hay
3.9 Tons
8/1-7/31
169
0
0
Irrig.
169
66.54
0.00
368.64
0.00
5134
9-3
Uf
Callison
5.54
5.54
Pearl Millett, I -lay
*1.7 Ton
4/1-9/15
*80
0
0
Irrig.
80
31.50
0.001
174.50
0.00
5134
9-4
UI
Badin
5.70
5.70
Fescue 1-lay
3.5 Tons
8/1-7/31
152
0
0
Irrig.
152
59.85
0.00
341.13
0.00
5134
9-4
UI
Badin
5.70
- 5.70
Pearl Millett, Hay
*1.5 Ton
4/1-9/15
*72
0
0
Irrig.
72
28.35
0.00
161.59
0.00
5134
9-5
UI
Badin
3.25
3.25
Fescue I -lay
3.5 "Pons
8/1-7/31
152
0
0
Irrig.
152
59.85
0.00
194.50
0.00
5134
9-5
Ul
Badin
3.25
3.25
Pearl Millett, Hay
*1.5 Ton
4/1-9/15
*72
0
0
Irrig.
72
28.35
0.00
92.13
0.00
5134
9B
UI
Badin
7.50
7.50
Fescue Hay
3.5 Tons
8/1-7/31
152
0
0
Broad.
152
65.05
0.00
487.89
0.00
5134
9B
U1
Badin
7.50
7.50
Pearl Millett, Flay
*1.5 Ton
4/I-9/15
*72
0
0
Broad.
72
30.81
0.00
231.1.0
0.00
Total Applied, 1000 gallons 11,779.39
Total Produced, 1000 gallons 4,526.00
Balance, 1000 gallons-7,253.39'
Total Applied, tons 0.00
Total Produced, tons 0.00
Balance, tons 0.00
Notes: 1. In the tract column, - symbol means leased, otherwise, owned. 2. Symbol * means user entered data.
676627 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 4/9/2008 WUT Page Page 7 of 7

The Irrigation Application Factors for each field in this plan are shown in the following table. Infiltration rate varies with soils. If
applying waste nutrients through an irrigation system, you must apply at a rate that will not result in runoff. This table provides the
maximum application rate per hour that may be applied to each -field selected to receive wastewater. It also lists the maximum
application amount that each field may receive in any one application event.
Irrigation Application Factors
Tract Field
Soil Series
Application Rate
(inches/hour)
Application Amount
(inches)
5134
1-1
Callison
0.20
1.0
5134
1-2
Callison
0.20
1.0
5134
1-3
Callison
0.20
1.0
5134
1-4
Callison
0.20
1.0
5134
2-1
Callison
0.20
1.0
5134
3-1
Badin
0.30
1.0
5134
3-2
Badin
0.30
1.0
5134
4-1
Badin
0.30
1.0
5134
4-2
Callison
0.20
1.0
5134
4-3
Badin
0.30
1.0
5134
5-1
Badin
0.30
1.0
5134
5-2
Badin
0.30
1.0
5134
6-1
Badin
0.30
1.0
5134
7-1
Badin
0.30
1.0
5134
8-1
Callison
0.20
1.0
5134
8-2
Badin
0.30
1.0
5134
8-3
Badin
0.30
1.0
5134
9-1
Callison
0.20
1.0
5134
9-2
Callison
0.20
1.0
5134
9-3
Callison
0.20
1.0
5134
9-4
Badin
0.30
1.0
5134
9-5
Badin
0.30
1.0
676627 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed 4/9/2008 IAF Page Page 1 of 1
Mr)TF• * maanc naar anf-" Aata

The Nutrient Management Recommendations table shown below provides an annual summary of the nutrient management plan
developed for this operation. This table provides a nutrient balance for the listed fields and crops for each year of the plan.
Required nutrients are based on the realistic yields of the crops to be grown, their nutrient requirements and soil test results. The
quantity of nutrient supplied by each source is also identified.
The total quantity of nitrogen applied to each crop should not exceed the required amount. However, the quantity of other
nutrients applied may exceed their required amounts. This most commonly occurs when manure or other byproducts are utilized
to meet the nitrogen needs of the crop. Nutrient management plans may require that the application of animal waste be limited so
as to prevent over application of phosphorous when excessive levels of this nutrient are detected in a field. In such situations,
additional nitrogen applications from nonorganic sources may be required to supply the recommended amounts of nitrogen.
Nutrient Management Recommendations Test
YEAR j
N
(lbs/A)
P2O5
(Ibs/A)
K2O
(lbs/A)
Mg
(Ibs/A)
Mn
(Ibs/A)
Zn + Cu
(lbs/A) (lbs/A)
Lime
(tons/A)
Tract
Field
5134
1-1
Req'd Nutrients
90
90
0
0
0
0
0
1
Acres
App. Period
4A44
2/15-6/30
Supplied By:
CROP
Corn, Grain
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
Callison
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RYE Sample
Date
83 bu.
11-30-07
Manure
90
17
216
13
0
1
0
0
P Removal
Rating
37 lbs/ac.
Low
BALANCE
0
-73
216
13
0
1
0
-1
Tract
Field
5134
1-1
Req'd Nutrients
79
90
0
0
0
0
0
0
Acres I
App. Period
4.44
9/1-4/30
Supplied By:
CROP
Wheat, Grain
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
Callison
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RYE Sample
Date
41 bu.
11-30-07
Manure
79
1
189
11
0
1
0
0
P Removal
Rating
21 lbs/ac.
Low
BALANCE
0
-75
189
11
01
1
0
0
Tract
Field
5134
1-2
Req'd Nutrients 1
83
90
0
0
0
0
0
0
Acres
App. Period
2.89
9/1-4/30
Supplied By:
CROP
Wheat, Grain
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
Callison
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RYE Sample
Date
43 bu. 1
11-30-07
Manure
83
15
199
12
0
1
0
0
P Removal
Rating
22 Ibs/ac.
Low
BALANCE
0
-75
199
12
0
1
0
0
Tract
Field
5134
1-2
Req'dNutrients
93
90
0
0
0
0
0
1
Acres I
App. Period
2.89
2/15-6/30
Supplied By:
CROP
Corn, Grain
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
Callison
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RYE I Sample
Date
86 bu. 11-30-07
Manure
93
17
223
13
0
1
01
0
P Removal Rating
38 Ibs/ac. ILow
BALANCE
0
-73
223
13
01
1 1
0
-1
676627 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 4/9/2008 NMR Page Page 1 of 24

Nutrient Management Recommendations Test
YEAR
1
N
(Ibs/A)
P2O5
(Ibs/A)
K2O
(Ibs/A)
Mg
(Ibs/A)
Mn
(Ibs/A)
Zn
(Ibs/A)
Cu
(Ibs/A)
Lime
(tons/A)
Tract
Field
5134 1-3
Req'dNutrients
90
90
0
0
0
0
0
1
Acres App. Period
5.40 2/15-6/30
Supplied By:
CROP
Corn, Grain
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert.
0
0
0
0
0
0
01
0
Soil Series
Callison
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RYE I Sample
Date
83 bu.
11-30-07 1
Manure
90
17
216
13
0
1
0
0
P Removal
Rating
37 lbs/ac.
Low
BALANCE
0
-73
216
131
0
1
0
-1
Tract
Field
5134
1-3
Req'dNutrients
79
90
0
0
0
0
0
0
Acres
App. Period
5.40
9/1-4/30
Supplied By:
CROP
Wheat, Grain
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert.
01
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
Callison
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RYE Sample
Date
41 bu.
11-30-07
Manure
79
15
189
11
0
1
0
0
P Removal i Rating
21 lbs/ac.
Low
BALANCE
0
-75
189
11
0
1
0
0
Tract
I Field
5134
1-4
Req'dNutrients
83
90
0
0
0
0
0
0
Acres
App. Period
3.72
9/1-4/30
Supplied By:
CROP
Wheat, Grain
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
Callison
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RYE I Sample
Date
43 bu.
11-30-07
Manure
83
15
199
12
0
1
0
0
P Removal
Rating
22 Ibs/ac.
Low
BALANCE
0
-75
199
12
0
1
0
0
Tract
Field
5134
1-4
Req'dNutrients
93
90
0
0
0
0
0
1
Acres
App. Period
3.72
2/15-6/30
Supplied By:
CROP
Corn, Grain
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
Callison
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RYE Sample
Date
86 bu.
11-30-07
Manure
931
17
223
13
0
1
01
0
P Removal
I Rating
38 lbs/ac.
Low
BALANCE
0
-731
223
13
0
1
0
-1
Tract
Field
5134
1B
Req'dNutrients
98
90
0
0
0
0
0
0
Acres App. Period
4.50
9/1-4/30
Supplied By:
CROP
Wheat, Grain
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
Badin
Residual
0
0
0
01
0
0
0
0
RYE Sample
Date
51 bu.
11-30-07
Manure
98
20
255
15
0
1
0
0
P Removal
I Rating
26 lbs/ac.
Low
BALANCE
0
-70
255
15
0
1
0
0
676627 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 4/9/2008 NMR Page Page 2 of 24

Nutrient Management Recommendations Test
YEAR
ct Field 5134
j
1B
Req'd Nutrients
N
(lbs/A)
119
P2O5
(lbs/A)
90
K2O
(lbs/A)
00
Mg
(lbs/A)
Mn
(lbs/A)
Zn
(lbs/A)
0
Cu
(lbs/A)
0J:A�cs
Lime
(tons/A)
App. Period 4.50
2/15-6130
Supplied By:
CROP Corn, Grain
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
p
Soil Series Badin
RYE Sample Date 110 bu.
PRemoval Rating 481bs/ac.
11-30-07
[..ow
Commercial Fert.
Residual
Manure
BALANCE
0
0
119
0
0
0
24
-66
0
0
310
310
0
0
18
18
0
0
D
0
0
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
Tract Field 5134
Acres App. Period 3.09
2-1
2/15-6/30
Req'd Nutrients
Supplied By:
84
110
20
0
0
0
0
0
CROP Corn, Grain
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series Callison
RYE Sample bate 78bu.
P Removal 'Rating 341bs/ac.
11-30-07
Low
Commercial Fert.
Residual
Manure
BALANCE
0
0
84
0
0
0
16
-94
0
0
201
181
0
0
12
12
0
0
0
0
n
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
!Tract Field 5134
App. Period 3.09
2-1
9/1-4130
Req'd Nutrients
Supplied By:
75
110
20
0
0
0
0
0
CROP Wheat, Grain
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series Callison
RYE Sample Date 39 bu.
Rating 20 lbs/ac.
I1-30-07
Low
Commercial Fert.
Residual
Manure
BALANCE
0
0
75
0
0
0
14
-96
0
0
180
160
0
0
11
11
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
rPemoval
act Field 5134
es App. Period 2.30
2B
9/1-4/30
Req'd Nutrients
Supplied By:
93
110
20
0
0
0
0
0
CROP Wheat, Grain
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series Badin
RYE Sample Date 48 bu. 11-30-07
P Removal Rating 241bs/ac. Low
Commercial Fert.
Residual
Manure
BALANCE
0
0
93
0
0
0
19
-9
0
0
242
2222
0
0
14
14
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Tract Field 5134
Acres App_Period 2.30
2B
2/15-6/30
Req'd Nutrients
Supplied By:
112
110
20
0
0
0
0
0
CROP Corn, Grain
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series Badin
RYE Sample Date 104 bu. 11-30-07
P Removal Rating 46 lbs/ac. Low
Commercial Fert.
Residual
Manure
BALANCE
0
0
112
0
0
0
23
87
0
0
292
272
0
0
17
17
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
676627 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 4/9/2008 NMR Page Page 3 of 24

Nutrient Management Recommendations Test
YEAR1
N
P205
K20
Mg
Mn
Zn
Cu
Lime
(lbs/A)
(lbs/A)
(lbs/A)
(lbs/A)
(lbs/A)
(lbs/A)
(lbs/A)
(tons/A)
Tract Field 5134
3-1
Req'd Nutrients
104
40
0
0
0
0
0
1
Acres App. Period 4.55
2J15-6/30
Supplied By:
CROP Com, Grain
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
So4Date96
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RYE Sabu.
P Removs/ac.
11-30-07
Low
Manure
BALANCE
104
0
19
-21
249
249
15
15
0
0
1
1
0
0
0
-1
Tract34
3-1
Req'd Nutrients
85
40
0
0
0
0
0
0
Acres A.55
9/1-4/30
Supplied By:
CROP Wheat, Grain
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series Badin
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
0'-0-0
RYE Sample Date 44 bu.
PRemoval Rating 22lbs/ac.
11-30-07
Low
Manure
BALANCE
85
0
16
-24
204
204
12
12
0
p
1
1
0
0
0
p
Tract Field 5134
3-2
Req'd Nutrients
93
40
0
0
0
0
0
0
Acres App. Period 2.12
9/1-4/30
Supplied By:
CROP Wheat, Grain
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series Badin
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RYE Sample Date 48 bu.
P Removal Rating 24 lbs/ac.
111-30-07
Low
Manure
BALANCE
93
0
171
-23
223
223
13
13
0
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
Tract Field 5134
3-2
Req'd Nutrients
112
40
0
0
0
0
0
1
Acres App. Period 2.12
2/15-6/30
Supplied By:
CROP Corn, Grain
Starterl
0
0
0
0
0
0
01
0
Commercial Fert.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series Badin
Residual
0
0
-'0
0
0
0
0
0
RYE Sample Date 104 bu.
11-30-07
Manure
112
21
268
16
0
1
0
D
P Removal Rating 46 lbs/ac.
Low
BALANCE 1
0
-19
268
16
0
1 1
0
-1
Tract Field. 5134
3B
Req'd Nutrients
104
401
0
0
0
0
1
Acres App. Period 6.00
2/15-6/30
Supplied By:
CROP Corn, Grain
Starter
0
0
0
0Et
0
0
0
Commercial Fert.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series Badin
Residual
0
0
0
0
01
0
0
0
RYE Sample Date 96 bu.
�11-30-07
Manure
104
21
271
16
0
1
0
0
P Removal Rating 42 lbs/ac.
BALANCE
0
-19
271
16
0
1
0
-1
676627 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 4/9/2008 NMR Page Page 4 of 24

Nutrient Management Recommendations Test
YEAR 1
Tract Field 5134 3B
Acres App. Period 6.00 9/1-4/30
Req'd Nutrients
Supplied By:
N
(lbs/A)
85
P205
(lbs/A)
40
K20
(lbs/A)
0
Mg
(lbs/A)
0
Mn
(lbs/A)
—0
Zn
(lbs/A)
—0
Cu
(lbs/A
0
Lime
(tons/A)
0
CROP Wheat, Grain
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series Badin
RYE Sample Date 44 bu. 11-30-07
P Removal Rating 22 lbs/ac. Low
Commercial Fert.
Residual
Manure
BALANCE
0
0
85
0
0
0
17
-23
0
0
221
221
0
0
13
13
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Tract Field 5134 4-1
Acres App. Period 5.84 9/1-4130
Req'd Nutrients
Supplied By:
100
50
0
0
0
0
0.
0
CROP Wheat, Grain
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series Badin
RYE Sample Date 52 bu. 11-30-07
P Removal i Rating 26 lbs/ac. Low
Commercial Fert.
Residual
Manure
BALANCE
0
0-0-0
100
0
0
19
-31
0
240
240
0
0
14
14
0
0
0
0
00
0
I
I
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Tract Field 5134 4-1
Acres App. Period 5.84 2115-6130
Req'd Nutrients
Supplied By:
123
50
0
0
0
0
0
1
CROP Corn, Grain
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series Badin
RYE Sample Date 114 bu. 11-30-07
PRemoval Rating 50lbs/ac. Low
Commercial Fert.
Residual
Manure
BALANCE
0
0
123
0
0
0
23
-27
0
0
295
295
0
0
18
18
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
-1
Tract Field 5134 4-2
Acres App_ Period 2.29 2/15-6/30
Req'd Nutrients
Supplied By:
90
50
0
0
0
0
0
1
CROP Corn, Grain
Starter
0
0-0-0-0
0
0
p
Soil Series Callison
RYE Sample Date 83 bu. 11-30-07
P Removal Rating 371bs/ac. Low
Commercial Fert.
Residual
Manure
BALANCE
0
0
90
0
0
0
17
-33
0
0
216
216
0
0
13
I3
0
0
0
0
0
0
li
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
-1
5134 4-2
Req'd Nutrients
79
50
0
0
0
0
0
0
2.29 9/1-4/30
!21
Supplied By:
eat, Grain
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
ison
RYE I Sample Date 41 bu. 11-30-07
P Removal I Rating 21 lbs/ac. Low
Commercial Fert.
Residual
Manure
BALANCE
0
0
79
0
0
0
15
-35
0
0
189
189
0
0
11
11
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
676627 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 4/9/2008 NMR Page Page 5 of 24

Nutrient Management Recommendations Test
YEAR
Tract Field
Acres App. Period
CROP
1
5134 4-3
2.62 911-4/30
Wheat, Grain
Req'd Nutrients
Supplied By:
Starter
N
(lbs/A)
100
0
P205
(lbs/A)
50
0
K20
(lbs/A)
0
0
Mg
(lbs/A)
0
0
Mn
(lbs/A)
0
0
Zn
(lbs/A)
0
0
Cu
(lbs/A)
0
0
Lime
(tons/A)
0
0
Commercial Fert.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
RYE Sample Date
P Removal Rating
Tract Field
Acres App. Period
Badin
52 bu.
26 lbs/ac.
5134
2.62
11-30-07
Low
4-3
2/15-6/30
Residual
Manure
BALANCE
Req'd Nutrients
Supplied By:
0
100
0
123
0
19
-311
50
0
240
240
0
0
14
14
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
CROP
Corn, Grain
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
Badin
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RYE Sample
Date
114bu.
11-30-07
Manure
123
23
295
18
0
1
0
0
P Removal
I Rating
50 lbs/ac.
Low
BALANCE
0
-27
295
181
0
1
0
-1
Tract
Field
5134
4B
Req'd Nutrients
119
50
0
0
0
0
0
1
Acres I App. Period
4.70
2/15-6/30
Supplied By:
CROP
Corn, Grain
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
Badin
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RYE Sample
Date
110 bu.
11-30-07
Manure
119
24
310
18
0
1
0
0
P Removal
Rating
48 lbs/ac.
Low
BALANCE
0
-26
310
18
0
1
0
-1
Tract
Field
5134
4B
Req'd Nutrients
98
50
0
0
0
0
0
0
Acres
App. Period
4.70
9/1-4/30
Supplied By:
CROP
Wheat, Grain
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
Badin
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RYE Sample Date
51 bu.
11-30-07
Manure
98
20
255
15
0
1
0
0
P Removal
Rating
26 lbs/ac.
Low
BALANCE
0
-30
255
151
0
1
0
0
Tract
Field
5134
5-1
Req'd Nutrients
119
120
0
D
0
0
0
0
Acres
App. Period
4.55
2/15-6/30
Supplied By:
CROP
Corn, Grain
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
Badin
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Q
RYE Sample
Date
110 bu.
11-30-07
Manure
119
221
285
17
0
1
0
0
P Removal
Rating
481bs/ac.
Low I
BALANCE
0
-98
285
17
0
1
0
0
676627 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 4/9/2008 NMR Page Page 6 of 24

Nutrient Management Recommendations Test
YEAR 1
Tract Field 5134 5-1
Acres App. Period 4.55 9/1-4/30
Req'd Nutrients
Supplied By:
N
(lbs/A)
98
P2O5
(lbs/A)
120
K2O
(lbs/A)
0
Mg
(lbs/A)
0
Mn
(lbs/A)
0
Zn
(lbs/A)
0
Cu
(lbs/A)
0
Lime
(tons/A)
p
CROP Wheat, Grain
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series Badin
RYE Sample Date 51 bu. 11-30-07
26 lbs/ac. Low
Commercial Fert.
Residual
Manure
BALANCE
0
0
98
0
0
0
18
-102
0
0
235
235
0
0
14
14
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
0
0
0 '
0
p
0
0
0
5134 5-2
nApp. 4A3 2/15-6/30
Req'd Nutrients
Supplied By:Corn,
119
120
0
0
0
0
0
0
Grain
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
00
Badin
RYE Sample Date 110 bu. PII-3�0-07
P Removal Rating 48 lbs/ac.
Commercial Fert.
Residual
Manure
BALANCE
0
0
119
0
0
0
22
-98
0
0
285
285
0
0
17
17
00
0
0
0
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
0oeres
p
0
0
Tract Field 5134 5-2
Acres App. Period 4.13 9i1-4/30
Req'd Nutrients
Supplied By:
98
120
0
0
0
0
0
0
CROP Wheat, Grain
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series Badin
RYE Sample Date 51 bu. 11-30-07
P Removal Rating 26 lbs/ac. Low
Commercial Fert.
Residual
Manure
BALANCE
0
0
98
0
0
0
18
-102
0
0
235
235
0
0
14
14
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Tract Field 5134 5B
Acres App. Period 5.40 9/1 4/30
Req'd Nutrients
Supplied By:
98
120
0
0
0
0
0
0
CROP Wheat, Grain
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
p
Soil Series Badin
RYE Sample Date 51 bu. 11-30-07
PRemoval Rating 26lbs/ac. Low
Commercial Fert.
Residual
Manure
BALANCE
0
0
98
0
0
0
20
-100
0
0
255
255
0
0
15
15
0
0
0
0
0
01
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
p
Tract Field 5134 5B
Acres App. Period 5.40 2/15-6/30
Req'd Nutrients
Supplied By:
119
120
0
0
0
0
0
0
CROP Com, Grain
Starter
0
0
0
0-0-0-0
0
Soil Series Badin
RYE Sample Date I10bu. 11-30-07
P Removal Rating 48 lbs/ac. Low
Commercial Fert.
Residual
Manure
BALANCE
0
0
119
0
0
0
24
-96
0
01
310
310
0
0
18
18
0
0
0
0
0
0
I
1
p
0
0
0
p
0
0
0
676627 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 4/9/2008 NMR Page Page 7 of 24

Nutrient Management Recommendations Test
YEAR
Tract
Field 5134
6-1
Acres
App. Period 4.55
2/15-6/30
CROP Corn, Grain
Soil Series Badin
RYE Sample
Date 114 bu.
11-30-07
P Removal
I Rating 50 lbs/ac.
Low
Tract
Field 5134
6-1
Acres I
App. Period 4.55
9/1-4/30
CROP lWheat, Grain
Soil Series Badin
Rmple Date
52 bu. 1 11-30-07
P Removal Rating
26 lbs/ac. ILow
Tract Field
5134 7-1
Acres I App. Period
3.33 9/1-4/30
CROP I Wheat, Grain
Soil Series Badin
RYE Sample Date 51 bu. 11-30-07
P Removal Rating 26 lbs/ac. Low
Tract Field 5134 7-1
Acres App. Period 3.33 2/15-6/30
CROP Corn, Grain
Soil Series lBadin
RYE I Sample Date 110 bu. 11-30-07
P Removal Rating 48 Ibs/ac. Low
Tract Field 5134 7B
Acres App. Period 1.60 9/1-4/30
CROP JWheat, Grain
Soil Series 113adin
RYE Sample Date 51 bu. 11-30-07
P Removal Rating 26 lbs/ac. ILow
676627 Database Version 3.1
N
P205
K20
Mg
Mn
Zn
Cu
Lime
(lbs/A)
(Ibs/A)
(Ibs/A)
(Ibs/A)
(Ibs/A)
(lbs/A)
(lbs/A)
(tons/A)
Req'd Nutrients
123
50
50
0
0
0
0
0
Supplied By:
Starter
01
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert.
0
0
0
01
0
0
0
0
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Manure
123
23
295
18
0
11
0
01
BALANCE
0
27
245
18
0
1
0
0
Req'd Nutrients
100
50
50
D
0
0
0
0
Supplied By:
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Manure
100
19
240
14
0
1
0
0
BALANCE
0
-311
190
14
0
1
01
0
Req'd Nutrients
98
40
0
0
0
0
0
0
Supplied By:
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Manure
98
18
235
14
0
1
0
0
BALANCE
0
-22
235
141
0
1
0
0
Req'd Nutrients
119
40
0
0
0
0
0
0
Supplied By:
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Manure
119
22
285
17
0
1
0
0
BALANCE
0
-181
2851
17
0
1
01
0
Req'd Nutrients
98
40
ol
0
0
0
0
0
Supplied By:
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Manure
98
20
255
15
0
1
0
0
BALANCE
0
-20
255
15
0
11
0 10
Date Printed: 4/9/2008
NMR Page Page 8 of 24

Nutrient Management Recommendations Test
YEAR
Tract IField
Acres I App. Period
j
5134 7B
1.60 2/15-6/30
Req'd Nutrients
Supplied By:
N
(lbs/A)
119
P205
(lbs/A)
401
I
K20
(lbs/A)
0
Mg
(lbs/A)
0
Mn
(Ibs/A)
0
Zn
(Ibs/A)
0
Cu
(lbs/A)
0
Lime
(tons/A)
0
CROP
Soil Series
Corn, Grain
Badin
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert.
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RYE Sample
Date
110 bu.
11-30-07
Manure
119
24
310
18
0
1
0
0
P Removal
I Rating
48 lbs/ac.
Low
BALANCE
0
-16
310
18
0
1
0
0
Tract
Field
5134
8-1
Req'd Nutrients
93
70
0
0
0
0
0
0
Acres I
App. Period
4.41
2/15-6/30
Supplied By:
CROP
Corn, Grain
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
Callison
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RYE Sample Date
86 bu.
11-30-07
Manure
93
17
223
13
0
1
0
0
P Removal
I Rating
38 Ibs/ac.
Low
BALANCE
0
-53
223
13
0
1
0
0
Tract Field
5134
8-1
Req'd Nutrients
83
70
0
0
0
0
0
0
Acres App. Period
4.41
9/1-4/30
Supplied By:
CROP
Wheat, Grain
Starter
0
0
0
.0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
Callison
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RYE Sample
Date
43bu.
11-30-07
Manure
83
15
199
12
0
1
0
0
P Removal
Rating
221bs/ac.
Low
BALANCE
-55
199
12
0
1
0
0
Tract
Field
5134
8-2
Req'd Nutrients710
70
0
0
0
0
0
0
Acres
App. Period
5.56
9/1-4/30
Supplied By:
CROP
Wheat, Grain
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
Badin
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RYE Sample
Date
51 bu. 1
11-30-07
Manure
98
18
235
14
0
1
0
0
P Removal
I Rating
26 lbs/ae.
Low
BALANCE
0
-52
235
14
0
1
0
0
Tract Field
5134
8-2
Req'd Nutrients
119
70
0
0
0
0
0
0
Acres App. Period
5.56
2/15-6/30
Supplied By:
CROP
Corn, Grain
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fen
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
Badin
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
00
0
RYE Sample
Date
110 bu.
11-30-07
Manure
119
22
285
17
0
1
0
0
P Removal
Rating
48 lbs/ac. ILow
BALANCE
0
-48
285
17
0
1
0
0
676627 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 4!9/2008 NMR Paee Page 9 of 24

Nutrient Management Recommendations Test
YEAR 1 1
Tract IField 5134 8-3
Acres App. Period 5.54 2/15-6130
CROP Corn, Grain
Soil Series Badin
RYE I Sample Date 110 bu. 1 11-30-07
P Removal Rating 48 lbs/ac. Low
Tract Field 5134 8-3
Acres I App. Period 5.54 9/14/30
CROP JWheat, Grain
Soil Series Badin
RYE' Sample Date 51 bu. 11-30-07
P Removal Rating 26 lbs/ac. iLow
Tract Field 5134 9-1
Acres App. Period 3.39 9/1-4/30
CROP Wheat, Grain
Soil Series Callison
RYEJ Sample Date 39 bu. 11-30-07
P Removal Rating 20 lbs/ac. ILow
Tract Field 5134 9-1
Acres App. Period 3.39 2/15-6/30
CROP JCorn, Grain
Soil Series Callison
RYE Sample Date 78 bu. 11-30-07
P Removal Rating 34 lbs/ac. Low
Tract Field 5134 9-2
Acres App. Period 3.55 9/I-4/30
CROP Wheat, Grain
Soil Series Callison
RYE Sample Date 39 bu. 11-30-07
P Removal I Rating 1 20 lbs/ac. Low
676627 Database Version 3.1
N
P2O5 K2O
Mg
Mn
Zn
Cu
Lime
(lbs/A)
(lbs/A) (lbs/A)
(lbs/A)
(lbs/A)
(lbs/A)
(lbs/A)
(tons/A)
Req'd Nutrients 119
70 0
0
0
0
0
0
Supplied By:
Starter 0
0 0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert. 0
0 0
0
0
0
0
0
Residual 0
0 0
0
0
0
0
0
Manure 119
22 285
17
0
1
0
0
BALANCE 0
-48 285
17
0
1
0
0
Req'd Nutrients 98
70 0
0
0
0
01
0
Supplied By:
Starter 0
0 0
0
0
D
0
0
Commercial Fert. 0
0 0
0
0
0
0
0
Residual 0
0 0
0
0
0
0
0
Manure 98
18 2351
14
0
1
0
0
BALANCE 0
-52 235
14
0
1
0
0
Req'd Nutrients 75
100 0
0
0
0
0
0
Supplied By:
Starter 0
0 0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert. 0
0 0
0
0
0
0
0
Residual 0
0 0
0
0
0
0
0
Manure 75
14 180
11
0
1
0
0
BALANCE 0
-86 180
11
0
1
0
0
Req'd Nutrients 84
100 0
0
0
0
0
1
Supplied By:
Starter 0
0 0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert. 0
0 0
0
0
0
0
0
Residual p
0 0
0
0
0
0
0
Manure 84
16 201
12
0
1
0
0
BALANCE 0
-84 201
12
0
1
0
-1
Req'd Nutrients 75
100 0
01
0
0
0
0
Supplied By:
Starter 0
0 0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert. 0
0 0
0
0
0
0
0
Residual 0
0 0
0
0
0
0
0
Manure 75
14 180
11
0
1
0
0
BALANCE 0
86 180
11
01
1
0
0
Date Printed: 4/9/2008
NMR Page Page 10 of 24

Nutrient Management Recommendations Test
YEAR
j
N
(]bs/A)
P205
(]bs/A)
K20
(]bs/A)
Mg
(Ibs/A)
Mn
(]bs/A)
Zn
(lbs/A)
Cu Lime
Obs/A) I (tons/A)
Tract
Field
5134
9-2
Req'd Nutrients
84
100
0
0
0
0
01 1
Acres
App. Period
3.55
2/15-6/30
Supplied By:
CROP
Corn, Grain
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
Callison
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RYE Sample
Date
78bu.
11-30-07
Manure
84
16
201
12
0
1
0
0
P Removal
Rating
34 Ibs/ac.
Low
BALANCE
0
-84
201
121
0
1
0
-1
Tract
Field
5134
9-3
Req'd Nutrients
75
100
0
0
0
0
0
0
Acres
App. Period
5.54
9/1-4/30
Supplied By:
CROP
Wheat, Grain
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
Callison
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RYE! Sample Date
39 bu.
11-30-07
Manure
75
14
180
11
0
1
01
0
P Removal
I Rating
201bs/ac.
Low
BALANCE
0
-86
180
11
0
1
0
0
Tract
Field
5134
9-3
Req'd Nutrients
84
100
0
0
0
0
0
1
Acres I App. Period
5.54
2/15-6/30
Supplied By:
CROP
Corn, Grain
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
Callisan
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RYE Sample
Date
78 bu.
1 11-30-07
Manure
84
16
201
12
0
1
0
0
P Removal
Rating
34 Ibs/ac.
Low
BALANCE
0
-84
201
12
0
1
0
-1
Tract
Field
5134
9-4
Req'd Nutrients
112
100
0
0
0
0
0
1
Acres I
App. Period
5.70
2/15-6/30
Supplied By:
CROP
Corn, Grain
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
Badin
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RYE Sample
Date
104bu.
11-30-07
Manure
112
21
268
16
0
1
0
0
P Removal
Rating
461bs/ac.
Low
BALANCE
0
-79
268
16
0
1
0
-1
Tract Field
5134
9-4
Req'd Nutrients
93
100
0
0
0
0
0
0
Acres
App. Period
5.70
9/1-4/30
Supplied By:
CROP
Wheat, Grain
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
Badin
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RYE Sample
Date
48 bu. 11-30-07
Manure
93
17
223
13
0
1
0
0
P Removal Rating
24 lbslac. jLow
BALANCE
0
-83
223
13
0
1
0
0
676627 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 4/9/2008 NMR Page Page l l of 24

Nutrient Management Recommendations Test
YEAR
1
N
P205
K20
Mg
Mn
Zn
Cu
Lime
(Ibs/A)
(lbs/A)
(Ibs/A)
(Ibs/A)
(Ibs/A)
(Ibs/A)
(Ibs/A)
(tons/A)
�AT�,-3.25Supplied
-5
E9119=4/30
Req'd Nutrients
93
100
0
0
0
0
0
0
By:
CROP Wheat, Grain
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
011
0
0
Soil Series Badin
Commercial Fert.
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RYE Sample Date 48 bu.
P Removal Rating 24 lbs/ac.
11-30-07
Low
Manure
BALANCE
93
0
17
-83
223
223
13
13
0
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
Tract Field 5134
9-5
Req'd Nutrients
112
100
0
0
0
0
0
1
Acres App. Period 3.25
2/15 6/30
Supplied By:
CROP Corn, Grain
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert.
0
0
0
0
0
p
n
0
Soil Series Badin
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RYE Sample Date 104bu.
P Removal Rating 46 lbs/ac.
11-30-07
Low
Manure
BALANCE
112
0
21
79
268
268
16
16
0
0
1
—1
—0
—0
—0
-1
Tract Field 5134
9B
Req'd Nutrients
112
] 00
0
0
0
0
0
1
Acres App. Period 7.50
2/15-6/30
Supplied By:
CROP Corn, Grain
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
p
0
0
Commercial Fert.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series Badin
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RYE Sample Date 104bu.
1 11-30-07
Manure
112
23
292
17
0
1
0
0
P Removal j Rating 46 lbs/ac.
ILow
BALANCE
0
-77
292
17
0
1
0
-1
Tract Field 5134
9B
Req'd Nutrients
93
100
0
0
0
0
0
0
Acres I App. Period 7.50
9/1-4/30
Supplied By:
CROP Wheat, Grain
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series Badin
Residuall
01
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RYE Sample Date 48. bu.
11-30-07
Manure
93
19
242
14
0
1
0
0
P Removal I Rating 24 lbs/ac.
Low
BALANCE
0
-81
242
14
0
l
ol
0
NOTE: Symbol * means user entered data.
676627 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 4/9/2008 NMR Page Page 12 of 24

Nutrient Management Recommendations Test
YEAR
2
N
(lbs/A)
P205
(ibs/A)
K20
(lbs/A)
Mg
(lbs/A)
Mn
(Ibs/A)
Zn
(lbs/A)
Cu
(lbs/A)
Lime
(tons/A)
Tract
Field
5134 1-1
Req'dNutrients
178
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Acres I
App. Period
4.44 8/1-7131
Supplied By:
CROP
Fescue Hay
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert.
0
0
0
ol
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
Callison
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RYE Sample
Date
4.1 Tons
11-30-07
Manure
178
33
426
25
0
1
1
0
P Removal
I Rating
64 lbs/ao.
Low
BALANCE
0
33
426
25
0
1
1
0
Tract Field
5134
1-1
Req'dNutrients
*85
100
0
0
0
0
0
0
Acres App. Period
4.44
4/1-9/15
Supplied By:
CROP
Pearl Millett, Hay
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fen.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
Callison
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
mple Date
*1.8 Tons
11-30-07
Manure
85
16
204
12
0
1
0
0
l Rating
R
23 Ibs/ac.
Low
BALANCE
0
-84
204
12
0
1
0
0
Field
5134
1-2
Req'dNutrients
186
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
pp. Period
2.89
1 8/1-7/31
Supplied By:
CROP
Fescue Hay
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
Callison
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
ample Date
4.3 Tons
I1-30-07
Manure
186
35
446
27
0
1
1
0
val
E
Rating
68 lbs/ac.
Low
BALANCE
0
35
446
27
0
1
1
0
Field
5134
1-2
Req'd Nutrients
*87
100
0
0
0
0
0
0
App. Period
2.89
4/1-9/15
Supplied By:
CROP
Pearl Millett, Hay
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
Callison
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RYE Sample
Date
*1.8 Tons
11-30-07
Manure
87
16
208I
12
0
1
0
0
P Removal
I Rating
24 lbs/ac.
Low
BALANCE
0
-84
208
12
0
1
0
0
Tract
Field
5134
1-3
Req'd Nutrients
*85
100
0
0
0
0
0
0
Acres
App. Period
5.40
4/1-9/15
Supplied By:
CROP
Pearl Millett, Hay
Starter
0
0
0
01
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
Callison
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RYE Sample Date
*1.8 Tons
11-30-07
Manure
85
16
204
12
0
1
0
0
P Removal
I Rating 1
23 lbs/ac. ILow
I
BALANCE
0
-84
204
121
0
1
0
0
676627 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 4/9/2008 NMR Page Page 13 of 24

Nutrient Management Recommendations Test
YEAR 1 2
Tract Field 5134 1-3
Acres App. Period 5.40 8/1-7/31
CROP Fescue Hay
Soil Series Callison
RYE Sample Date 4.1 Tons 11-30-07
P Removal Rating 64 lbs/ac. Low
Tract Field 5134 1-4
Acres App. Period 3.72 4/1-9/15
CROP Pearl Millett, Hay
Soil Series Callison
RYE Sample Date *1.8Tons 1 11-30-07
P Removal Rating 24 lbs/ac. ILow
Tract Field 5134 14
Acres App. Period 3.72 8/1-7/31
CROP FFescue Hay
Soil Series ICallison
RYE Sample Date 4.3 Tons 11-30-07
P Removal Rating 68 lbs/ac. Low
Tract Field 5134 1B
Acres App. Period 4.50 411-9/15
CROP IPearl Millett, Hay
Soil Series Badin
RYE Sample Date *1.6 Tons 11-30-07
P Removal Rating 21 lbs/ac. Low
Tract I Field 5134 ' 1B
Acres App. Period 4.50 8/1-7/31
CROP IFescue Hay
Soil Series Badin
RYE Sample Date 3.7Tons 11-30-07
PRemoval Rating 58lbs/ac. Low
676627 Database Version 3.1
N
P205
K20
Mg
Mn
Zn
Lime
(lbs/A)
(ibs/A)
(lbs/A)
(lbs/A)
(lbs/A)
(lbs/A)
F(Ibs/A)
(tons/A)
Req'd Nutrients
178
0
0
0
0
0
0
Supplied By:
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Manure
178
33
426
25
0
1
1
0
BALANCE
0
33
426
25
0
1
1
0
Req'd Nutrients
*87
100
0
0
0
0
0
0
Supplied By:
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Manure
871
16
208
12
0
1
0
0
BALANCE
0
-84
208
12
01
1
0
0
Req'd Nutrients
186
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Supplied By:
Starter
0
01
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Manure
186
35
446
27
0
1
1
0
BALANCE
0
35
446
27
0
1
1
0
Req'd Nutrients
*751
100
0
0
0
0
0
0
Supplied By:
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Manure
75
15
195
12
0
1
0
0
BALANCE
0
-85
195
12
0
1
0
0
Req'd Nutrients
160
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Supplied By:
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Manure
160
32
417
25
0
1
1
0
BALANCE
0
32
417
25
0
1 1
1
0
Date Printed: 4/9/2008
NMR Page Page 14 of 24

Nutrient Management
Recommendations Test
YEAR
i
2
N
(lbs/A)
P205
(lbs/A)
K20
(lbs/A)
Mg
(lbs/A)
Mn
(lbs1A)
Zn
(lbs/A)
Cu
(lbs/A)
Lime
(tons/A)
Tract Field
5134 3-1
Req'd Nutrients
*65
50
0
0
0
0
0
0
Acres App. Period
4.55 4/1-9/15
Supplied By:
CROP
Pearl Millett, Hay
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
Badin
Residual
0
01
0
0
0
0
0
0
RYE I Sample Date
*1.4Tons 1 11-30-07
Manure
65
12
156
9
0
0
0
0
P Removal Rating
18 lbs/ac. P-ow
BALANCE
0
-38
156
9
0
0
0
0
Tract Field
5134 3-2
Req'd Nutrients
*72
50
0
0
0
0
0
0
Acres I App. Period
2.12 1 4/1-9/15
Supplied By:
CROP
Pearl Millett, Hay
Starter
0
0
0
01
0
0
01
0
Commercial Fert.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
Liadin
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RYE Sample Date
* 1.5 Tons 1 11-30-07
Manure
72
13
172
10
0
0
0
0
P Removal Rating
20 lbs/ac. Low
BALANCE
0
-37
172
10
0
0
0
0
Tract Field
5134 3-2
Req'd Nutrients
152
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Acres I App. Period
2.12 811-7/31
Supplied By:
CROP
Fescue Hay
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
Badin
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RYE
Sample Date
3.5 Tons 11-30-07
Manure
152
28
364
22
0
1
0
0
P Removal Rating
55 lbs/ac. Low
BALANCE
0
28
364
22
0
1
0
0
Tract Field
5134 3B
Req'd Nutrients
139
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Acres App. Period
6.00 8/1-7/31
Supplied By:
CROP
Fescue Hay
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
Badin
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RYE Sample Date
3.2Tons
11-30-07
Manure
139
28
362
22
0
I
0
0
P Removal Rating
50 lbs/ac.
Low
BALANCE
0
28
362
221
0
1
D
0
Tract Field
5134
313
Req'd Nutrients
*65
50
0
0
0
0
0
0
Acres App. Period
6.00
411-9/15
Supplied By:
CROP
Pearl Millett, Hay
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Series
Badin
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
bSoil
Sample Date
*1.4 Tons 11-30-07
Manure
65
13
169
10
0
0
0
0
ova]
Rating
18 lbs/ac. Low
BALANCE
0
-37
169
10
0
0
0
0
676627 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 4/9/2008 NMR Page Page 16 of 24

Nutrient Management Recommendations Test
YEAR
Tract Field
Acres App. Period
CROP
2
5134 2-1
3.09 4/1-9/15
Pearl Millett, Hay
Req'd Nutrients
Supplied By:
Starter
N
(lbs/A)
*80
0
P2O5
(lbs/A)
110
0
K2O
(lbs/A)
50
0
Mg
(lbs/A)
0
0
Mn
(lbs/A)
0
0
Zn
(lbs/A)
0
0
Cu
(Ibs/A)
0
01
Lime
(tons/A)
0
0
Commercial Fert.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
Callison
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RYE Sample
Date
*1.7Tons
11-30-07
Manure
80
15
192
11
0
1
0
0
P Removal
Rating
22 lbs/ac.
Low
BALANCE
0
-95
142
11
0
1
0
0
Tract
Field
5134
2-1
Req'd Nutrients
169
0
20
0
0
0
0
0
Acres
App. Period
3.09
8/1-7131
Supplied By:
CROP
Fescue Hay
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
Calhsor.
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RYE', Sample Date
3.9 Tons
11-30-07
Manure
169
31
405
24
0
1
0
0
P Removal
Rating
61 lbs/ac.
Low
BALANCE
0
31
385
24
0
1
0
0
Tract
Field
5134
2B
Req'd Nutrients
*72
110
50
0
0
0
0
0
Acres
App. Period
2.30
4/1-9/15
Supplied By:
CROP
Pearl Millett, Hay
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
Badin
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RYE I Sample
Date
*1.5Tons
1 11-30-07
Manure
72
15
187
11
0
1
0
0
P Removal
Rating
20 lbs/ac.
Low
BALANCE
1 0
-95
137
11
0
1
0
0
Tract
Field
5134
2B
Req'd Nutrients
152
0
20
0
0
0
0
0
Acres I
App. Period
2.30
8/1-7/31
Supplied By:
CROP
Fescue Hay
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
Badin
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RYE Sample Date
3.5 Tons
l 1-30-07
Manure
152
31
396
24
0
1
0
0
P Removal
Rating
55 lbs/ac.
Low
BALANCE
0
31
376
24
0
1
0
0
Tract
Field
5134
3-1
Req'd Nutrients
139
0
0
0
0
0
01
0
Acres I
App, Period
4.55
8/1-7/31
Supplied By:
CROP
Fescue Hay
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
Badin
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RYE Sample
Date
3.2 Tons
11-30-07
Manure
139
26
333
20
0
1
0
0
P Removal
Rating
50 lbs/ac.
Low
BALANCE
0
26
3331
20
0
1
0
0
676627 Database Version 3.1 Dat_ Printed: 4/9/2008 NMR Page Page 15 of 24

Nutrient Management Recommendations Test
YEAR
2
N
(lbs/A)
P205
(lbs/A)
K20
(lbs/A)
Mg
(lbs/A)
Mn
(lbs/A)
Zn
Obs/A)
Cu
(lbs/A)
Lime
(tons/A)
Tract
Field
5134
4-1
Req'd Nutrients
165
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Acres I App.
Period
5.84
8/1-7/31
Supplied By:
CROP
Fescue Hay
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
Badin
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RYE Sample
Date
3.8 Tons
11-30-07
Manure
165
31
395
24
01
1
0
0
P Removal
I Rating
601bs/ac.
Low
BALANCE
0
31
395
24
0
1
0
0
Tract
Field
5134
4-1
Req'd Nutrients
*77
60
0
0
0
0
0
0
Acres I App. Period
5.84
4/1-9/15
Supplied By:
CROP
Pearl Millett, Hay
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
Badin
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
AYE Sample
Date
*1.6Tons
11-30-07
Manure
77
14
184
11
0
1
0
0
P Removal
Rating
21 lbs/ac.
Low
BALANCE
0
-461
184
ill
0
1
0
0
Tract
Field
5134
4-2
Req'd Nutrients
*85
60
0
0
0
0
0
0
Acres I
App. Period
2.29
4/1-9/15
Supplied By:
CROP
Pearl Millett, Hay
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
Callison
Residual
0
0
0
01
0
0
01
0
RYE Sample
Date
*1.8Tons
11-30-07
Manure
85
16
204
12
0
1
0
0
P Removal
I Rating
23 lbs/ac.
Low
BALANCE
0
-44
204
12
0
1
0
0
Tract
Field
5134
4-2
Req'd Nutrients
178
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Acres
App. Period
2.29
8/1-7/31
Supplied By:
CROP
Fescue Hay
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
Callison
Residual
0
0
0
01
0
0
0
0
RYE Sample Date
4.1 Tons
11-30-07
Manure
178
33
426
25
0
1
1
0
P Removal
Rating
64 lbs/ac.
Low
BALANCE
0
33
426
25
0
1
1
0
Tract I Field
5134
4-3
Req'd Nutrients
165
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Acres I
App. Period
2.62
8/1-713I
Supplied By:
CROP
Fescue Hay
Starter
0
0
0
01
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
Badin
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RYE Sample
Date
3.8 Tons
1 11-30-07
Manure
165
31
395
24
0
1
1 0
0
P Removal
Rating
60 lbs/ac.
Low
BALANCE
0
31
395
24
0
1
0
0
676627 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 4/9/2008 NMR Page Page 17 of 24

Nutrient Management Recommendations Test
YEAR
2
N
(lbs/A)
P205
(lbs/A)
K20
(]bs/A)
Mg
(lbs/A)
Mn
(lbs/A)
Zn
(lbs/A)
Cu
(lbs/A)
Lime
(tons/A)
Tract Field
5134
4-3
Req'd Nutrients
*77
60
0
0
0
0
0
0
Acres I App.
Period
2.62
4/1-9115
Supplied By:
CROP
Pearl Millett, Hay
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
Badin
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RYE Sample Date
*1.6 Tons
11-30-07
Manure
77
14
184
11
0
1
0
0
P Removal
I Rating
21 lbs/ac.
Low
BALANCE
0
-46
184
11
0
1
0
0
Tract
Field
5134
4B
Req'd Nutrients
160
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Acres App.
Period
4.70
811-7/31
Supplied By:
CROP
Fescue Hay
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert.
0
0
0
0
0
0
01
0
Soil Series
i3adin
Residual
0
0
0
D
0
0
0
0
RYE Sample
Date
3.7 Tons
11-30-07
Manure
160
32
417
25
0
1
1
0
P Removal
Rating
58 lbs/ac.
Low
BALANCE
0
32
417
25
0
1
1
0
Tract
Field
5134
4B
Req'd Nutrients
*75
60
0
0
0
0
0
0
Acres
App. Period
1 4.70
411-9/15
Supplied By:
CROP
Pearl Millett, Hay
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
Badin
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RYE Sample
Date
*1.6 Tons
11-30-07
Manure
75
15
195
12
0
1
0
0
P Removal
Rating
21 lbs/ac.
Low
BALANCE
0
45
195
12
0
1
0
0
Tract
Field
5134
5-1
Req'd Nutrients
*75
120
0
0
0
0
0
0
Acres
App. Period
4.55
4/1-9/15
Supplied By:
CROP
Pearl Millett, Hay
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
Badin
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RYE Sample
Date
*1.6 Tons
11-30-07
Manure
75
14
180
11
0
1
0
0
P Removal
Rating
21 lbs/ac.
Low
BALANCE
0
-106
180
11
0
1
0
0
Tract Field
5134
5-1
Req'd Nutrients
160
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Acres
App. Period
4.55
8/1-7/31
Supplied By:
CROP
Fescue Hay
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
Badin
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RYE Sample
Date
3.7 Tons
1 11-30-07
Manure
160
30
383
23
0
1
0
0
P Removal
Rating
58 lbs/ac.
ILow
BALANCE
0
30
383
23
0
1
0
0
676627 Database Version 3.1 Date 1 rinted: 4/9/2008 NMR Page Page 18 of 24

Nutrient Management Recommendations Test
YEAR
2
N
(lbs/A)
P205
(lbs/A)
K20
(lbs/A)
Mg
(lbs/A)
Mn
(lbs/A)
Zn
(lbs/A)
Cu
(lbs/A)
Lime
(tons/A)
Tract
IField
5134 5-2
Req'd Nutrients
1601
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Acres I
App. Period
4.13 8/1-7/31
Supplied By:
CROP
Fescue Hay
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
Badin
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RYE I Sample
Date
3.7 Tons
11-30-07
Manure
160
30
383
23
0
1
0
0
P Removal Rating
58 lbs/ac.
Low
BALANCE
0
30
383
231
0
1
01
0
Tract
Field
5134
5-2
Req'd Nutrients
*75
120
0
0
0
0
0
0
Acres I
App. Period
4.13
4/1-9/15
Supplied By:
CROP
Pearl Millett, Hay
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
13adin
Residual
0
01
0
01
0
0
01
0
RYE Sample
Date
*1.6 Tons
11-30-07
Manure
75
14
180
11
0
1
0
0
P Removal
11Rating
21 lbs/ac.
Low
BALANCE
0
-106
180
11
0
1
0
0
Tract
I Field
5134
5B
Req'd Nutrients
*75
120
0
0
0
0
0
0
Acres App. Period
5A0
4/1-9/15
Supplied By:
CROP
Pearl Millett, Hay
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
Badin
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RYE I Sample
Date
* 1.6 Tons
11-30-07
Manure
75
15
195
12
0
1
0
0
P Removal
Rating
21 lbs/ac.
Low
BALANCE
0
-105
195
12
0
1
0
0
Tract
Field
5134
5B
Req'd Nutrients
160
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Acres I
App. Period
5.40
8/1-7/31
Supplied By:
CROP
Fescue Hay
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert.1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
Badin
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RYE Sample
Date
3.7 Tons
11-30-07
Manure
160
32
417
25
0
1
1
0
P Removal
I Rating
58 lbs/ac.
Low
BALANCE
0
32
417
25
0
1
1
0
Tract Field
5134
6-1
Req'd Nutrients
165
0
50
0
0
0
0
0
Acres
App. Period
4.55
8/1-7/31
Supplied By:
CROP
Fescue Hay
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
Badin
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RYE Sample
Date
3.8 Tons
11-30-07
Manure
165
31
395
24
0
1
0
0
P Removal
I Rating
1 60 lbs/ac.
Low
BALANCE
0
31
345
24
0
1
0
0
676627 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 4/9/2008 NMR Page Page 19 of 24

Nutrient Management Recommendations Test
YEAR 2
N
(lbs/A)
P205
(lbs/A)
K20
(lbs/A)
Mg
(lbs/A)
Mn
(lbs/A)
Zn
(Ibs/A)
Cu
(lbs/A)
Lime
(tons/A)
Tract I Field 5134
6-1
Req'd Nutrients
*77
70
90
0
0
0
0
0
Acres App.
Period 4.55
4/1-9/15
Supplied By:
CROP Pearl Millett, Hay
Starter
Commercial Fert.
0
0
0
0
0
0
01
01
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series Badin
Residual
0
01
0
01
0
0
0 10
RYE Sample Date *1.6 Tons
11-30-07
Manure
77
14
184
11
0
1
0
0
P Removal
I Rating 21 lbs/ac.
Low
BALANCE
0
-56
94
11
0
1
0
0
Tract
Field 5134
7-1
Req'd Nutrients
160
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Acres App.
Period 3.33
8/1-7/31
Supplied By:
CROP Fescue Hay
Starter
Commercial Fert.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series Badin
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RYE Sample
Date 3.7 Tons
11-30-07
Manure
160
30
383
23
0
1 1
0
0
PRemoval
Rating 58lbs/ac.
Low
BALANCE
0
30
383
23
0
1 1
0
0
Tract
Field 5134
7-1
Req'd Nutrients
*75
5.0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Acres I
App. Period 3.33
4/1-9/15
Supplied By:
CROP Pearl Millett, Hay
Starter
Commercial Fert.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series Badin
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RYE sample
Date *1.6 Tons
11-30-07
Manure
75
14
180
11
0
1
0
0
P Removal
I Rating 21 lbs/ac.
Low
BALANCE
0
-361
180
11
0
1
0
0
Tract
Field 5134
7B
Req'd Nutrients
160
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Acres
App. Period 1.60
8/1-7/31
Supplied By:
CROP Fescue Hay
Starter
Commercial Fert.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
01
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series Badin
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RYE Sample Date 3.7 Tons
11-30-07
Manure
160
32
417
25
0
1
1
0
P Removal Rating 58 lbs/ac.
Low
BALANCE
0
32
417
25
0
1
1
0
Tract
Field 5134
7B
Req'd Nutrients
*75
501
0
0
0
01
0
0
Acres I
App. Period 1.60
4/1-9115
Supplied By:
CROP Pearl Millett, Hay
Starter
Commercial Fert.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series Badin
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RYE Sample
Date *1.6 Tons
11-30-07
Manure
75
15
195
12
0
1
0
0
P Removal
Rating 21 lbs/ac.
Low
BALANCE
0
-35
195
12
0
1
0
0
676627 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 4/9/2008 NMR Page Page 20 of 24

Nutrient Management Recommendations Test
YEAR 2
N
(lbs/A)
P205
(lbs/A)
K20
(lbs/A)
Mg
(lbs/A)
Mn
(lbs/A)
Zn
(lbs/A)
Cu
(lbs/A)
Lime
(tons/A)
Tract Field
5134
8-3
Req'd Nutrients
*75
80
0
0
0
0
0
0
Acres
App. Period
5.54
4/1-9/15
Supplied By:
CROP
Pearl Millett, Hay
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series i
Badin
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RYE
Sample Date
* 1.6 Tons
11-30-07
Manure
75
141
180
11
0
1
0
0
P Removal
Rating
21 lbs/ac.
Low
BALANCE
0
-66
180
11
0
1
0
0
Tract I Field
5134
9-1
Req'dNutrients
169
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Acres
I App. Period
3.39
8/1-7/31
Supplied By:
CROP
Fescue Hay
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
Callison
Residual
0
0
0
01
0
0
0
0
RYE
Sample Date
3.9 Tons
11-30-07
Manure
169
31
405
24
0
1
0
0
PRemoval
I Rating
61lbs/ac.
Low
BALANCE
0
31
405
24
0
11
0
0
Tract Field
5134
9-1
Req'dNutrients
*80
110
0
0
0
0
0
0
Acres App. Period
3.39
411-9/15
Supplied By:
CROP
Pearl Millett, Hay
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert.
0
0
0
01
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
Callison
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RYE I Sample Date
*1.7 Tons
11-30-07
Manure
80
15
192
11
0
1
0
0
P Removal
Rating
22 lbs/ac.
Low
BALANCE
0
-95
192
11
0
1
0
0
Tract
Field
5134
9-2
Req'd Nutrients
*80
110
0
0
0
0
0
0
Acres App. Period
3.55
4/1-9/15
Supplied By:
CROP
Pearl Millett, Hay
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
Callison
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RYE
Sample Date
*1.7 Tons
11-30-07
Manure
80
15
192
11
0
1
0
0
P Removal Rating
22 lbs/ac.
Low
BALANCE
0
-95
192
11
0
I
0
0
Tract
Field
5134
9-2
Req'dNutrients
169
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Acres I App. Period
3.55
8/1-7/31
Supplied By:
CROP
Fescue Hay
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert.
0
0
0
0
0
0
01
0
Soil Series
Callison
Residual
0
0
0
01
01
0
0
0
RYE
Sample Date
3.9 Tons
11-30-07
Manure
169
31
405
24
0
1
0
0
P Removal Rating
61 lbs/ac.
Low
BALANCE
0
31
405
24
0
1
0
0
676627 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 4/9/2008 NMR Page Page 22 of 24

Nutrient Management Recommendations Test
YEAR
2
N
(lbs/A)
P205
(lbs/A)
K20
(lbs/A)
Mg
(lbs/A)
Mn
(lbs/A)
Zn
(lbs/A)
Cu
(lbs/A)
Lime
(tons/A)
Tract
IField
5134
8-1
Req'd Nutrients
186
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Acres I
App. Period
4.41
8/1-7/31
Supplied By:
CROP
Fescue Hay
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
Callison
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RYE Sample
Date
4.3 Tons
11-30-07
Manure
186
35
446
27
0
1
1
0
P Removal
I Rating
68 Ibs/ac.
Low
BALANCE
0
35
446
271
0
1
1
0
Tract
Field
5134
8-1
Req'd Nutrients
*87
80
0
0
0
0
0
0
Acres App. Period
4.41
4/1-9/15
Supplied By:
CROP
Pearl Millett, Hay
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
C'allison
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RYEII Sample
Date
* 1.8 Tons
11-30-07
Manure
87
16
208
12
0
1
0
0
P Removal
Rating
24 lbs/ac.
Low
BALANCE
0
-64
208
12
0
1
0
0
Tract
Field
5134
8-2
Req'd Nutrients
160
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Acres
App. Period
5.56
811-7/31
Supplied By:
CROP
Fescue Hay
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
Badin
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RYE Sample
Date
3.7Tons 11-30-07
Manure
160
30
383
23
0
1
0
0
P Removal
I Rating
58 lbs/ac. ILow
BALANCE
0
30
383
23
0
11
0
0
Tract
Field
5134 ` 8-2
Req'd Nutrients
*75
80
0
0
0
0
0
0
Acres I
App. Period
5.56 4/1-9/15
Supplied By:
CROP
Pearl Millett, Hay
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
Badin
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
0
01
0
RYE Sample
Date
*1.6 Tons
11-30-07
Manure
75
14
180
11
0
1
0
0
P Removal
Rating
21 Ibs/ae.
ILow
BALANCE
0
-66
180
11
0
1
0
0
Tract Field
5134
8-3
Req'd Nutrients
160
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Acres I App. Period
5.54
8/1-7131
Supplied By:
CROP
Fescue Hay
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
Badin
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RYE I Sample
Date
3.7Tons
11-30-07
Manure
160
30
383
23
0
1
0
0
P Removal
Rating
58 lbs/ac.
Low I
BALANCE 1
0
30
383
23
0
1
1 01
D
676627 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 4/9/2008 NMR Page Page 21 of 24

Nutrient Management Recommendations Test
YEAR
2
N P205
(lbs/A) (lbs/A) '
K20 Mg
(lbs/A) (lbs/A)
Mn
(lbs/A)
Zn
(lbs/A)
Cu
(lbs/A)
Lime
(tons/A)
Tract
Field
5134
9-5
Rod. Nutrients
*72
110 `
0
0
0
0
0
0
Acres App. Period
3.25
4/1-9/15
Supplied By:
CROP
Pearl Millett, Hay
Starter
0
01
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
IBadin
Residual
0
0
0
01
0
0
0
0
RYE Sample
Date
*1.5 Tons
11-30-07
Manure
72
13
172
10
0
0
0
0
P Removal
Rating
20 lbs/ac.
Low
BALANCE
0
-97
172
10
0
0
0
0
Tract
Field
5134
9B
Req'd Nutrients
152
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Acres
App. Period
7.50
8/1-7/31
Supplied By:
CROP
Fescue Hay
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
Badin
Residual
01
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RIB Sample
Date
3.5 Tons
11-30-07
Manure
152
31
396
241
0
1
0
0
P Removal
I Rating
55 lbs/ac.
Low
BALANCE
0
31
396
24
0
1
0
0
Tract
Field
5134
9B
Req'dNutrients
*72
110
0
0
0
0
0
0
Acres I
App. Period
7.50
4/1-9/15
Supplied By:
CROP
Pearl Millett, Hay
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Series
Badin
Residual
0
0
0
01
0
0
0
0
RYEi Sample Date
rPSoil
*1.5 Tons
11-30-07
Manure72
15
187
11
0
1
0
0
Removal
Rating
201bs/ac.
Lott/
BALANCE
I 0
-95
187
1Y
0
1
0
0
NOTE: Symbol * means user entered data.
676627 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 4/9/2008 NMR Page Page 24 of 24

Nutrient Management Recommendations Test
YEAR
2
N
(lbs/A)
P205
(lbs/A)
K20
(lbs/A)
Mg
(lbs/A)
Mn
(lbs/A)
Zn
(lbs/A)
Cu
(lbs/A)
Lime
(tons/A)
ract
LA
Field
5134
9-3
Req'd Nutrients
*80
110
0
0
0
0
0
0
res I
App. Period
5.54
4/1-9/15
Supplied By:
CROP
Pearl Millett, Hay
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
Callison
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RYE Sample Date
*1.7 Tons
11-30-07
Manure
80
15
192
11
0
1
0
0
P Removal
Rating
22 lbs/ac.
Low
BALANCE
0
-95
192
• 111
0
11
0
0
Tract
Field
5134
9-3
Req'd Nutrients
169
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Acres
App. Period
5.54
8/1-7/31
Supplied By:
CROP
Fescue Hay
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
(_ aliisnn
Residual
D
0
0
01
0
0
0
0
RYE Sample Date
3.9 Tons
11-30-07
Manure
169
311
405
24j
0
1
0
0
P Removal
Rating
61 lbs/ac.
Low
BALANCE
0
31
405
24
0
1
0
0
act
K
Field
5134
9-4
Req'd Nutrients
*72
110
0
0
0
0
0
0
es
App. Period
5.70
4/1-9/15
Supplied By:
CROP
Pearl Millett, Hay
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
Badin
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RYE Sample
Date
*1.5 Tons
11-30-07
Manure
72
13
172
10
0
0
0
0
P Removal
Rating
20 lbs/ac.
Low
BALANCE
0
-97
172
101
0
0
0
0
Tract
Field
5134
94
Req'd Nutrients
152
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Acres
App. Period
5.70
8/1-7/31
Supplied By:
CROP
Fescue Hay
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
Badin
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
0
01
0
RYE Sample
Date
3.5 Tons
11-30-07
Manure
152
28
364
22
0
1
0
0
P Removal Rating
55 lbs/ac.
Low
BALANCE
01
28
364
22
0
1
0
0
Tract Field
5134
9-5
Req'd Nutrients
152
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Acres I
App. Period
3.25
8/1-7/31
Supplied By:
CROP
Fescue Hay
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
Badin
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RYE Sample
Date
3.5Tons
11-30-07
Manure
152
28
364
22
0
1
0
0
P Removal I Rating
55 lbs/ac.
Low
BALANCE 1
01
28
364
22
0
1
0
0
676627 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 4/9/2008 NMR Page Page 23 of 24

The Required Soil Test Values shown in the following table.provide a summary of recommended actions that should be taken if soil tests indicate excessive levels of
copper or zinc. Fields that receive manure must have an annual soil analysis for these elements. High levels of zinc and copper can adversely affect plant growth.
Alternative crop sites must be used when the concentration of these metals approach excessive levels. Site life can be estimated by dividing the amount of copper and
zinc to be applied in lbs/acre by 0.036 and 0.071, respectively and multiplying the result by 0.85. By adding this quantity to the current soil index for copper or zinc, we
can predict life of the site for waste disposal.
In addition to copper and zinc indices, this table also provides a stunmary of lime recommendations for each crop based on the most recent soil sample. Application of
lime at recommended rates is necessary to maintain soil pH in the optimum range for crop production -
Retluired Soil Test Values
Tract
Field
Crop
pH
Lime Recom.
(tons/acre)
Cu-1
Copper Recommendation
Zn-I
Zinc Recommendation
5134
1-1
Corn, Gain
5.3
0.8
95
None
42
None
5134
1-1
Wheat, Gain
5.3
0.0
95
None
42
None
5134
t-i
Fescue Ilay
5.3
0.0
95
None
42
None
5134
1-1
Pearl Millett, Ilay
5.3
0.0
95
None
42
None
5134
1-2
Corn, Grain
5.3
0.8
95
None
42
None
5134
1-2
Wheat, Grain
5.3
0.0
95
None
42
None
5134
1-2
-Fescue Flay
5.3
0.0
95
None
42
None
5134
1-2
Pearl Millett, flay
5.3
0.0
95
None
42
None
5134
1-3
Com, Grain
5.3
0.8
95
None
42
None
5134
1-3
Wheal, Grain
5.3
0.0
95
None
42
None
5134
1-3
Fescue play
5.3
0.0
95
None
42
None
5134
1-3
Pearl Millctt, I -lay
5.3
0.0
95
None
42
None
5134
1-4
Corn, Grain
5.3
0.8
95
None
42
None
5134
1-4
Wheat, Grain
5.3
0.0
95
None
42
None
5134
1-4
Fescue Hay
5.3
0.0
95
None
42
None
5134
1-4
jPearl Millett, Hay
5.3
0.0
95
None
42
None
5134
1 B
Corn, Grain
5.3
0.8
95
None
42
None
5134
1B
Wheat, Grain
5.3
0.0
95
None
42
None
5134
1 B
Fescue .Hay
5.3
0.0
95
None
42
None
5134
1B
Pearl Millett, Hay
5.3
0.0
95
None
42
None
5134
2-1
Corn, Grain
6.2
0.0
84
None
44
None
5134
2-1
1 Wheat, Grain
6.2
0.0
84
None
44
None
5134
2-1.
Fescue Hay
6.2
0.0
84
None
44
None
676627 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 04-09-2008 STV Page Page 1 of 5

Reti
aired Soil
Test Values
Lime Recom.
Tract
Field
Crop
pH
(ton%lacre)
Cu-1
Copper Recommendation
Zn-I
Zinc Recommendation
5134
2-1
Pearl Millett, flay
6.2
0.0
84
None
44
None
5134
213
Conn, Grain
6.2
0.0
84
None
44
None
5134
2B
Wheat, Grain
6.2
0.0
84
None
44
None
5134
2B
Fescue Hay
6.2
0.0
84
None
44
None
5134
2B
Pearl Millett, Hay
Com, Grain
Wheat, Grain
6.2
5.5
5.5
0.0
0.6
0.0
84
230
230
None
None
None
44
133
133
None
None
None
5134
3-1
3-1
5134
5134
3-1
Fescue Hay
5.5
0.0
230
None
133
None
5134
3-1
3-2 lCorn,
Pearl Millett, I•lay
Grain
5.5
5.5
0.0
0.6
230
230
None
None
133
133
None
None
5 334
5134
3-2
Wheat, Grain
5.5
0.0
230
None
133
None
5134
3-2
Fescue l-lay
Pearl Millett, Flay
Corn, Grain
Wheat, Grain
Fescue Hay
5.5
5.5
5.5
5.5
5,5
0.0
0.0
0.6
0.0
0.0
230
230
230
230
230
None
None
None
None
None
133
133
133
133
133
None
None
None
None
None
5134
3-2
3B
5134
5134
313
513t4
3B
5134
313
Pearl Millett, Hay
5.5
0.0
230
None
133
None
5134
4-1
Corn, Grain
5.2
1.1
211
None
1.27
None
5134
4-1
Wheat, Grain
5.2
0.0
211
None
127
None
5134
4-1
Fescue Hay
5.2
0.0
211
None
127
None
5134
4-1
4-2
Pearl Millett, Hay
Corn, Grain
Wheat, Grain
Fescue I -lay
Pearl Millett, Hay
Corn, Grain
Wheat, Grain
5.2
5.2
5.2
1 5.2
5.2
5.2
5.2
0.0
1.1
0.0
0.0
0.0
1.1
0.0
211
211
211
211
211
211
211
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
127
127
127
127
127
127
127
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
5134
5134
4-2
5134
4-2
5134
4-2
5134
4-3
5134
4-3
5134
4-3
Fescue Hay
Pearl Millett, Hay
Corn, Grain
5.2
5.2
5.2
0.0
0.0
1.1
211
211
21 l
None
1 None
None
127
127
127
None
None
None
5134
4-3
5134
4B
---------------------------- -
676627 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 04-09-2008 STV Page Page 2 o

Ret
uired Soil
Test Values
Lime Recom.
Tract
Field
Crop
pH
(tonstacre)
Ca-1
Copper Recommendation
Zn-I
Zinc Recommendation
5134
4B
Wheat, Grain
5.2
0.0
211
None
127.
None
5134
4B
rescue I -lay
5.2
0.0
211
None
127
None
1134
4B
Pearl Millett, Hay
5.2
0.0
211
None
127
None
5134
5-1 lCom,
Grain
5.9
0.0
218
None
90
None
5134
5-1
Wheat, Grain
5.9
0.0
218
None
90
None
5134
5-1
Fescue 1-lay
5.9
0.0
218
None
90
None
5134
5-1
Pearl Millett, Hay
5.9
0.0
218
None
90
None
5134
5-2
Corn, Grain
5.9
0.0
218
None
90
None
5134
5-2
Wheat, Gain
5.9
0.0
218
None
90
None
5134
5-2
Fescue Hay
5.9
0.0
218
None
90
None
5134
5-2
Pearl Millett, I -lay
5.9
0.0
218
None
90
None
51.34
5B
Corn, Grain
5.9
0.0
218
None
g0
None
5134
5B
Wheat, Grain
5.9
0-0
218
None
90
None
5134
5B
Fescue Hay
5.9
0.0
218
None
90
None
5134
5B
Pearl Millett, Hay
5.9
0.0
218
None
90
None
5134
6-I
Corn, Grain
6.7
0.0
162
None
219
None
5134
6-1
Wheat, Grain
6.7
0.0
162
None
219
None
5134
6-1
Fescue Hay
6.7
0.0
162
None
219
None
5134
6-1
Pearl Millett, Hay
6.7
0.0
162
None
219
None
5134
7-1
Corn, Grain
6.0
0.0
143
None
67
None
5134
7-1
Wheat, Grain
6.0
0.0
143
None
67
INone
5134
7-1
IFescue Hay
6.0
0.0
143
None
67
None
5134
7-1
1 Pearl Millett, I -lay
6.0
0.0
143
None
67
None
5134
7B
Corn, Grain
6.0
0.0
143
None
67
None
5134
7B
Wheat, Grain
6.0
0.0
143
None
67
None
5134
7B
Fescue May
6.0
0.0
143
None
67
None
5134
7B
Pearl Millett, Flay
6.0
0.0
143
None
67
None
51.34
8-1
Com, Grain
6.1
0.0
117
None
120
None
5134
8-1
Wheat, Grain
6.1
0.0
1.17
None
120
None
5134
8-1
Fescue Flay
6.1
0.01
117
None
l20
None
- - --
676627 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 04-09-2008 STV Page Page 3 of 5

Required Soil Test Values
Tract
Field
Crop
pH
Lime Recom.
(tons/acre)
Cu-t
Copper Recommendation
Zn-1
Zinc Recommendation
5134
8-1
Pearl Millett, Hay
6.1
0.0
117
None
120
None
5134
8-2
Corn, Grain
6.1
0.0
117
None
120
None
5134
8-2
Wheat, Grain
6.1
0.0
117
None
120
None
5134
8-2
Fescue Flay
6.1
0.0
117
None
120
None
5134
8-2
Pearl Millett, Hay
6.1
0.0
117
None
120
None
5134
8-3
Corn, Grain
6.1
0.0
117
None
120
None
5134
8-3
Wheat, Grain
6.1
0.0
117
None
120
None
5134
8-3
Fescue I -lay
6.1
0.0
117
None
120
None
5134
8-3
Pearl Millett, Flay
6.1
0.0
117
None
120
None
5134
9-1
Com, Grain
5.6
0.6
116
None
11 l
None
5134
9-1
Wheat, Grain
5.0
0.0
116
None
111
None
5134
9-1
Fescue Hay
5.6
0.0
116
None
1 I l
None
5134
9-1
Pearl Millett, Hay
5.6
0.0
116
None
1l1
None
5134
9-2
Corn, Grain
5.6
0.6
116
None
111
None
5134
9-2
Wheat, Grain
5.6
0.0
116
None
1 l l
None
5134
9-2
Fescue I lay
5.6
0.0
116
None
1 l t
None
5134
9-2
Pearl Millett, I -lay
5.6
0.0
116
None
111
None
5134
9-3
Com, Grain
5.6
0.6
116
None
ll l
None
5134
9-3
Wheat, Grain
5.6
0.0
116
None
l l I
None
5134
9-3
lFeSCLIe Hay
5.6
0.0
H6
None
111
None
5134
9-3
Pearl Millett, I -lay
5.6
0.0
116
None
l l l
None
5134
9-4
Corn, Grain
5.6
0.6
116
None
111
None
5134
9-4
Wheat, Grain
5.6
0.0
116
None
111
None
5134
9-4
Fescue Hay
5.6
0.0
116
None
l 11
None
5134
9-4
1 Pearl Millett, Hay
5.6
0.0
116
None
111
None
5134
9-5
Com, Grain
5.6
0.6
116
None
111
None
5134
9-5
Wheat, Grain
5.6
0.0
116
None
l l l
None
5134
9-5
Fescue Hay
5.6
0.0
116
None
111
None
5134
9-5
Pearl Millett, Hay
5.6
0.0
116
None
111
None
5134 1
9D
Corn, Grain
5.6
0.6
116
None
ill
None
....------------------- - ----------------
676627 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 04-09-2008 STV Page Page 4 of 5

Rarfiiirari Cnil Tect VAIIIE'R
'Pratt
Field
Crop
pH
Lime Recom.
(tons/acre)
Cu-I
Copper Recommendation
Zn-I
Zinc Recommendation
5134
9B
Wheat, Grain
5.6
0.0
116
None
] ] ]
None
5134
9B
Fescue Hay
5.6
0.0
116
None
] ] 1
None
5134
9B
Pearl Millett, Hay
1 5.6
1 0.0
1 116
lNone
111
None
676627 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 04-09-2008 STV Page Page 5 of 5

The Available Waste Storage Capacity table provides an estimate of the number of days of storage capacity available
at the end of each month of the plan. Available storage capacity is calculated as the design storage capacity in days
minus the number of days of net storage volume accumulated. The start date is a value entered by the user and is
defined as the date prior to applying nutrients to the first crop in the plan at which storage volume in the lagoon or
holding pond is equal to zero.
Available storage capacity should be greater than or equal to zero and less than or equal to the design storage
capacity of the facility. If the available storage capacity is greater than the design storage capacity, this indicates that
the plan calls for the application of nutrients that have not yet accumulated. If available storage capacity is negative,
the estimated volume of accumulated waste exceeds the design storage volume of the structure. Either of these
situations indicates that the planned application interval in the waste utilization plan is inconsistent with the
structure's temporary storage capacity.
Available Waste Stora:_e Ca;-,acii,,
Source Name
Applefield Farms User Defined
Design Storage Capacity (Days)
Start Date
9/1 1
180
Plan Year
Month
Available Storage Capacity (Days)
1
1
28
1
2
72
1
3
180
1
4
180
1
5
180
1
6
180
1
7
149
1
8
118
1
9
160
1
10
180
1
11
180
1
12
149
2
1
118
2
2
155
2
3
180
2
4
180
2
5
180
2
6
180
2
7
180
2
8
180
2
9
180
2
10
180
2
11
180
2
12
180
* Available Storage Capacity is calculated as of the end of each month.
------------- --- -------------- -------- --------------------------------- -----------
676627 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 04-09-2008 Capacity Page Page 1 of 1

Crop Notes
The following crop note applies to field(s): 1-1, 1-2, 1-3, 1-4, 2-1, 4-2, 8-1, 9-1, 9-2, 9-3
Corn Piedmont
In the Piedmont, corn is normally planted when soil temperatures reach 52 to 55 degrees fahrenheit.
Review the Official Variety "green book" and information from private companies to select a high
yielding variety with the characteristics needed for your area and conditions. Plant 1-2" deep. Plant
populations should be determined by the hybrid being planted. Increase the seeding rate by 10% when
planting no -till. Phosphorus and potassium recommended by a soil test can be broadcast or banded at
planting. When planting early in cool, wet soil, banded phosphorus will be more available to the young
plants. An accepted practice is to apply 20-30 lbs/acre N and 20-30 lbs/acre phosphorus banded as a
starter and the remaining N behind the planter. The total amount of N is dependent on soil type. When
including a starter in the fertilizer program, the recommended potassium and any additional phosphorus
is normally broadcast at planting. Plant samples can be analyzed during the growing season to monitor
the overall nutrient status of the corn. Timely management of weeds and insects are essential for corn
production.
The following crop note applies to field(s): 1B, 2B, 3-1, 3-2, 313, 4-1, 4-3, 4B, 5-1, 5-2, 5B, 6-1, 7-1, 7B,
8-2, 8-3, 9-4, 9-5, 9B
Corn Piedmont
In the Piedmont, corn is normally planted when soil temperatures reach 52 to 55 degrees fahrenheit.
Review the Official Variety "green book" and information from private companies to select a high
yielding variety with the characteristics needed for your area and conditions. Plant 1-2" deep. Plant
populations should be determined by the hybrid being planted. Increase the seeding rate by 10% when
planting no -till. Phosphorus and potassium recommended by a soil test can be broadcast or banded at
planting. When planting early in cool, wet soil, banded phosphorus will be more available to the young
plants. An accepted practice is to apply 20-301bs/acre N and 20-30 lbs/acre phosphorus banded as a
starter and the remaining N behind the planter. The total amount of N is dependent on soil type. When
including a starter in the fertilizer program, the recommended potassium and any additional phosphorus
is normally broadcast at planting. Plant samples can be analyzed during the growing season to monitor
the overall nutrient status of the corn. Timely management of weeds and insects are essential for corn
production.
--------------------------------------------------- - -- ---------- ---------------- -----------------------------------------
676627 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 04-09-2008 Crop Note Page Page 1 of 3

The following crop note applies to field(s): 1-1, 1-2, 1-3, 1-4, 2-1, 4-2, 8-1, 9-1, 9-2, 9-3
Wheat: Piedmont
In the Piedmont, wheat should be planted from October 10-November 3. Plant 22 seed/drill row foot at
1-1 1/2" deep and increase the seeding rate by 5% for each week seeding is delayed beyond the optimum
time. See the seeding rates table for applicable seeding rate modifications in the current NCSU "Small
Grain Production Guide". Also, increase the initial seeding rate by at least 10% when planting no -till.
Adequate depth control when planting the wheat is essential. Review the NCSU Official Variety "green
book" and information from private companies to select a high yielding variety with the characteristics
needed for your area and conditions. Apply no more than 30 lbs/acre N at planting. Increase the N at
planting to 40 lbs/acre in no -till wheat. Apply phosphorus and potash according to soil test
recommendations at this time. The remaining N should be applied during the months of February -March.
The total N is dependent on the soil type. Plant samples can be analyzed during the growing season to
monitor the nutrient status of the wheat. Timely management of diseases, insects and weeds are essential
for profitable wheat production.
The following crop note applies to field(s): 1B, 2B, 3-1, 3-2, 3B, 4-1, 4-3, 4B, 5-1, 5-2, 5B, 6-1, 7-1, 7B,
8-2, 8-3, 9-4, 9-5, 9B
Wheat: Piedmont
In the Piedmont, wheat should be planted from October 10-November 3. Plant 22 seed/drill row foot at
1-1 1/2" deep and increase the seeding rate by 5% for each week seeding is delayed beyond the optimum
time. See the seeding rates table for applicable seeding rate modifications in the current NCSU "Small
Grain Production Guide". Also, increase the initial seeding rate by at least 10% when planting no -till.
Adequate depth control when planting the wheat is essential. Review the NCSU Official Variety "green
book" and information from private companies to select a high yielding variety with the characteristics
needed for your area and conditions. Apply no more than 301bs/acre N at planting. Increase the N at
planting to 40 lbs/acre in no -till wheat. Apply phosphorus and potash according to soil test
recommendations at this time. The remaining N should be applied during the months of February -March.
The total N is dependent on the soil type. Plant samples can be analyzed during the growing season to
monitor the nutrient status of the wheat. Timely management of diseases, insects and weeds are essential
for profitable wheat production.
------------------------------------------------------
676627 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 04-09-2008 Crop Note Page Page 2 of 3

The following crop note applies to field(s): 1-1, 1=2, 1-3, 1-4, 2-1, 4-2, 8-1, 9-1, 9-2, 9-3
Fescue: Piedmont
Adaptation: Well -adapted.
In the Piedmont, tall fescue can be planted Aug. 20 to Oct. 10 (best) and Feb. 15 to Mar. 20. For
pure -stand broadcast seedings use 20 to 30 lb/ac., for drilled use 15 to 20 lb/ac. seed. Use certified seed
to avoid introducing weeds or annual ryegrass. Plant seed 0.25" to 0.5" deep for pure stands, 0.25" in
mixture with clovers. Soil test for preplant and maintenance lime, phosphorus, and potassium
recommendations. Apply 40 to 60 lb/ac nitrogen at planting for pure stands only. Do not apply N for
mixtures with clovers but use proper legume inoculation techniques. Apply 150 to 2001b/ac. N to
pure -stand fescue for hay production; reduce N rates by 25% to 50% for grazing. Apply N Feb. 1 to Mar.
20 and Aug. 20 to Sept. 30, with equal amounts in each window. Refer to NCSU Technical Bulletin 305
Production and Utilization of Pastures and Forages in North Carolina for additional information or
consult your regional agronomist or extension agent for assistance.
The following crop note applies to field(s): IB, 2B, 3-1, 3-2, 3B, 4-1, 4-3, 4B, 5-1, 5-2, 5B, 6-1, 7-1, 7B,
8-2, 8-3, 9-4, 9-5, 9B
Fescue: Piedmont
Adaptation: Well -adapted.
In the Piedmont, tall fescue can be planted Aug. 20 to Oct. 10 (best) and Feb. 15 to Mar. 20. For
pure -stand broadcast seedings use 20 to 30 lb/ac., for drilled use 15 to 20 lb/ac. seed. Use certified seed
to avoid introducing weeds or annual ryegrass. Plant seed 0.25" to 0.5" deep for pure stands, 0.25" in
mixture with clovers. Soil test for preplant and maintenance lime, phosphorus, and potassium
recommendations. Apply 40 to 60 lb/ac nitrogen at planting for pure stands only. Do not apply N for
mixtures with clovers but use proper legume inoculation techniques. Apply 150 to 2001b/ac. N to
pure -stand fescue for hay production; reduce N rates by 25% to 50% for grazing. Apply N Feb. 1 to Mar.
20 and Aug. 20 to Sept. 30, with equal amounts in each window. Refer to NCSU Technical Bulletin 305
Production and Utilization of Pastures and Forages in North Carolina for additional information or
consult your regional agronomist or extension agent for assistance.
The following crop note applies to field(s): 1-1, 1-2, 1-3, 1-4, 2-1, 4-2, 8-1, 9-1, 9-2, 9-3
Pearl Millett: No Comment
The following crop note applies to field(s): 1B, 2B, 3-1, 3-2, 3B, 4-1, 4-3, 4B, 5-1, 5-2, 5B, 6-1, 7-1, 7B,
8-2, 8-3, 9-4, 9-5, 9B
Pearl Millett: No Comment
--------------------------------------- -- - - - --------------------- ----- ----
676627 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 04-09-2008 Crop Note Page Page 3 of 3

Agricultural Disposal of Wastewater by Irrigation and Overland Fes-
Randolph County, North Carolina
APR 012019
[The information in this table indicates the dominant soil condition but does not eliminate the need for onsite
investigation. The numbers in the value columns range from 0.01 to 1.00. The larger the value, the greater the
limitations]ptlimitation. The table shows only the top five limitations for any given soil. The soil may have ad(iliopnpl
Map symbol
and soil name
BaB:
Badin
Tarrus
BtB2:
Badin, moderately eroded
Tarrus, moderately eroded
BtC2:
Badin, moderately eroded
Pct.
Disposal of wastewater by Overland flow of wastewater
of
irrigation
map
unit
Rating class and
limiting features
Value
Rating class and
limiting features
Value
50
Very limited
Very limited
Too acid
0.99
Seepage
1.00
Too steep for surface
0.32
Depth to bedrock
1.00
application
Too acid
0.99
Depth to bedrock
0.29
Low adsorption
0.17
Low adsorption
0.17
Droughty
0.04
40
Very limited
Very limited
Too acid
0.99
Seepage
1.00
Low adsorption
0.51
Too acid
0.99
Too steep for surface
0.32
Depth to bedrock
0.88
application
Low adsorption
0.51
45
Very limited
Very limited
Too acid
0.99
Seepage
1.00
Low adsorption
0.50
Depth to bedrock
1.00
Too steep for surface
0.32
Too acid
0.99
application
Low adsorption
0.50
Depth to bedrock
0.03
40
Very limited
Very limited
Too acid
0.99
Seepage
1.00
Low adsorption
0.59
Too acid
0.99
Too steep for surface
0.32
Depth to bedrock
0.71
application
Low adsorption
0.59
60
Very limited
Very limited
Too steep for surface
1.00
Seepage
1.00
application
Depth to bedrock
1.00
Too acid
0.99
Too steep for surface
1.00
Too steep for
0.78
application
sprinkler application
Too acid
0.99
Low adsorption
0.50
Low adsorption
0.50
Depth to bedrock
0.03
USDANatural Resources This report shows only the major soils in each map unit. Others may exist
Tabular Data Version: 9
Conservation Service Tabular Data Version Date: 01/07/2008 Page 1 of 2

Agricultural Disposal of Wastewater by Irrigation and Overland Flow
Randolph County, North Carolina
Pct.
Disposal of wastewater by
Overland flow of wastewater
Map symbol
of
irrigation
and soil name
map
-
unit
Rating class and
Value
Rating class and
Value
limiting features
limiting features
BtC2:
Tarrus, moderately eroded
35
Very limited
Very limited
Too steep for surface
1.00
Seepage
1.00
application
Too steep for surface
1.00
Too acid
0.99
application
Too steep for
0.78
Too acid
0.99
sprinkler application
Depth to bedrock
0.71
Low adsorption
0.59
Low adsorption
0.59
CaB:
Callison
62
Very limited
Very limited
Depth to saturated
0.99
Seepage
1.00
zone
Depth to bedrock
1.00
Too acid
0.67
Depth to saturated
0.99
Slow water
0.22
zone
movement
Too acid
0.67
Too steep for surface
0.08
application
Depth to bedrock
0.03
Lignum
30
Very limited
Very limited
Slow water
1.00
Seepage
1.00
movement
Too acid
0.99
Too acid
0.99
Depth to saturated
0.99
Depth to saturated
0.99
zone
zone
Depth to bedrock
0.05
Too steep for surface
0.08
application
USDANatural Resources This report shows only the major soils in each map unit. Others may exist
Tabular Data Version: 9
COri5erVatlOri Service Tabular Data Version Date: 01/07/2008 Page 2 of 2

Nonirrigated Yields by Map Unit Component
Randolph County, North Carolina
Map symbol
and soil name
Land capability
Wheat
Corn
Tall fescue
Grain sorghum
Bu
Bu
Tons
Bu
BaB:
Badin
2e
53
115
3.80
53
Tarrus
2e
53
115
4.30
53
BtB2:
Badin, moderately eroded
2e
47
103
3.90
47
Tarrus, moderately eroded
2e
47
103
3.90
47
BtC2:
Badin, moderately eroded
3e
43
93
3.10
43
Tarrus, moderately eroded
3e
43
93
3.50
43
CaB:
Callison
2e
46
103
4.40
47
Lignum
2e
48
120
4.30
57
i
USDANatural Resources This report shows only the major soils in each map unit. Others may exist.
Tabular Data Version: 9
Conservation Service Tabular Data Version Date: 01/07/2008 Page 1 of 1

Soil Features
Randolph County, North Carolina
Restrictive layer
Subsidence
Risk of corrosion
Map symbol
Potential
for frost
and soil name
Kind
De to
Thickness
Hardness
Initial Total
action
Uncoated
Concrete
topop
steel
In In
In In
BaB:
Badin
Paralithic bedrock
20-40 --
Weakly cemented
0 —
None
High
High
Tarrus
Paralithic bedrock
40-60 —
Weakly cemented
0 --
None
High
High
BtB2:
Badin, moderately eroded
Paralithic bedrock
20-40 —
Weakly cemented
0 --
None
High
High
Tarrus, moderately eroded
Paralithic bedrock
40-60 —
Weakly cemented
0 --
None
High
High
BtC2:
Badin, moderately eroded
Paralithic bedrock
20-40 --
Weakly cemented
0 --
None
High
High
Tarrus, moderately eroded
Paralithic bedrock
40-60 ---
Weakly cemented
0 --
None
High
High
CaB:
Callison
Paralithic bedrock
20-40 ---
Weakly cemented
0 --
None
Moderate
High
Lithic bedrock
40-80 —
Very strongly
cemented
Lignum
Paralithic bedrock
40-60 --
Weakly cemented
0 --
None
High
High
USDA Natural Resources
rConservation Service
Tabular Data Version: 9
Tabular Data Version Date: 01/07/2008
This report shows only the major soils In each map unit. Others may exist.
Page 1 of 1

Map Unit Description (Brief, Generated)
Randolph County, North Carolina
[Minor map unit components are excluded from this report]
Map unit: BaB - Badin-Tarrus complex, 2 to 8 percent slopes
Component: Badin (50%)
The Badin component makes up 50 percent of the map unit. Slopes are 2 to 8 percent. This component is on interfluves, uplands. The
parent material consists of residuum weathered from metavolcanics and/or argillite. Depth to a root restrictive layer, bedrock, paralithic,
is 20 to 40 inches. The natural drainage class is well drained. Water movement in the most restrictive layer is moderately high. Available
water to a depth of 60 inches is low. Shrink -swell potential is moderate. This soil is not flooded. It is not ponded. There is no zone of
water saturation within a depth of 72 inches. Organic matter content in the surface horizon is about 2 percent. Nonirrigated land
capability classification is 2e. This soil does not meet hydric criteria.
Component: Tarrus (40%)
The Tarrus component makes up 40 percent of the map unit. Slopes are 2 to 8 percent This component is on interfluves, uplands. The
parent material consists of residuum weathered from metavolcanics and/or argillite. Depth to a root restrictive layer, bedrock, paralithic,
is 40 to 60 inches. The natural drainage class is well drained. Water movement in the most restrictive layer is moderately high.
Available water to a depth of 60 inches is moderate. Shrink -swell potential is low. This soil is not flooded. It is not ponded. There is no
zone of water saturation within a depth of 72 inches. Organic matter content in the surface horizon is about 1 percent. Nonirrigated land
capability classification is 2e. This soil does not meet hydric criteria.
Map unit: 131:132 - Badin-Tarrus complex, 2 to 8 percent slopes, moderately eroded
Component: Badin, moderately eroded (45%)
The Badin, moderately eroded component makes up 45 percent of the map unit. Slopes are 2 to 8 percent. This component is on
interfluves, uplands. The parent material consists of residuum weathered from metavolcanics and/or argillite. Depth to a root restrictive
layer, bedrock, paralithic, is 20 to 40 inches. The natural drainage class is well drained. Water movement in the most restrictive layer is
moderately high. Available water to a depth of 60 inches is moderate. Shrink -swell potential is moderate. This soil is not flooded. It is
not ponded. There is no zone of water saturation within a depth of 72 inches. Organic matter content in the surface horizon is about 1
percent. Nonirrigated land capability classification is 2e. This soil does not meet hydric criteria.
Component: Tarrus, moderately eroded (40%)
The Tarrus, moderately eroded component makes up 40 percent of the map unit. Slopes are 2 to 8 percent. This component is on
interfluves, uplands. The parent material consists of residuum weathered from metavolcanics and/or argillite. Depth to a root restrictive
layer, bedrock, paralithic, is 40 to 60 inches. The natural drainage class is well drained. Water movement in the most restrictive layer is
moderately high. Available water to a depth of 60 inches is moderate. Shrink -swell potential is low. This soil is not flooded. It is not
ponded. There is no zone of water saturation within a depth of 72 inches. Organic matter content in the surface horizon is about 1
percent. Nonirrigated land capability classification is 2e. This soil does not meet hydric criteria.
Map unit: BtC2 - Badin-Tarrus complex, 8 to 15 percent slopes, moderately eroded
Component: Badin, moderately eroded (60%)
The Badin, moderately eroded component makes up 60 percent of the map unit. Slopes are 8 to 15 percent. This component is on
ridges, uplands. The parent material consists of residuum weathered from metavolcanics and/or argillite. Depth to a root restrictive layer,
bedrock, paralithic, is 20 to 40 inches. The natural drainage class is well drained. Water movement in the most restrictive layer is
moderately high. Available water to a depth of 60 inches is moderate. Shrink -swell potential is moderate. This soil is not flooded. it is
not ponded. There is no zone of water saturation within a depth of 72 inches. Organic matter content in the surface horizon is about 1
percent. Nonirrigated land capability classification is 3e. This soil does not meet hydric criteria.
�jS L �' Natural Resources Tabular Data version: 9
Conservation Service Tabular Data Version Date: 01/07/2008
Page 1 of 2

Map Unit Description (Brief, Generated)
Randolph County, North Carolina
Map unit: BtC2 - Badin-Tarrus complex, 8 to 15 percent slopes, moderately eroded
Component: Tarrus, moderately eroded (35%)
The Tarrus, moderately eroded component makes up 35 percent of the map unit. Slopes are 8 to 15 percent. This component is on
ridges, uplands. The parent material consists of residuum weathered from metavo/canics and/or argillite. Depth to a root restrictive layer,
bedrock, paralithic, is 40 to 60 inches. The natural drainage class is well drained. Water movement in the most restrictive layer is
moderately high. Available water to a depth of 60 inches is moderate. Shrink -swell potential is low. This soil is not flooded. It is not
ponded. There is no zone of water saturation within a depth of 72 inches. Organic matter content in the surface horizon is about 1
percent. Nonirrigated land capability classification is 3e. This soil does not meet hydric criteria.
Map unit: CaB - Callison-Lignum complex, 2 to 6 percent slopes
Component: Callison (62%)
The Callison component makes up 62 percent of the map unit. Slopes are 2 to 6 percent. This component is on interf/uves, uplands. The
parent material consists of residuum weathered from metavo/canics and/or argillite. Depth to a root restrictive layer, bedrock, lithic, is 40
to 80 inches. The natural drainage class is moderately well drained. Water movement in the most restrictive layer is moderately high.
Available water to a depth of 60 inches is low. Shrink -swell potential is low. This soil is not flooded. It is not ponded. A seasonal zone of
water saturation is at 24 inches during January, February, March, April, November, December. Organic matter content in the surface
horizon is about 1 percent. Nonialgated land capability classification is 2e. This soil does not meet hydric criteria.
Component: Lignum (30%)
The Lignum component makes up 30 percent of the map unit. Slopes are 2 to 6 percent. This component is on interf/uves, uplands. The
parent material consists of residuum weathered from metavolcanics and/or argillite. Depth to a root restrictive layer, bedrock, paratithic,
is 40 to 60 inches. The natural drainage class is moderately well drained. Water movement in the most restrictive layer is low. Available
water to a depth of 60 inches is moderate. Shrink -swell potential is moderate. This soil is not flooded. It is not ponded. A seasonal zone
of water saturation is at 24 inches during January, February, March, December. Organic matter content in the surface horizon is about 2
percent. Nonirrigated land capability classification is 2e. This soil does not meet hydric criteria.
U S DA Natural Resources
Tabular Data Version: 9
Conservation Service Tabular Data Version Date: 01/07/2008
Page 2 of 2

Required Specifications For Animal Waste Management
1. Animal waste shall not reach surface waters of the state by runoff, drift,
manmade conveyances, direct application, or direct discharge during operation
or land application. Any discharge of waste that reaches surface water is
prohibited.
2. There must be documentation in the design folder that the producer either owns
or has an agreement for use of adequate land on which to properly apply the
waste. If the producer does not own adequate land to properly dispose of the
waste, he/she shall provide evidence of an agreement with a landowner, who is
within a reasonable proximity, allowing him/her the use of the land for waste
application. It is the responsibility of the owner of the waste production facility to
secure an update of the Nutrient Management Plan when there is a change in the
operation, increase in the number of animals, method of application, receiving
crop type, or available land.
3. Animal waste shall be applied to meet, but not exceed, the nitrogen needs for
realistic crop yields based upon soil type, available moisture, historical data,
climatic conditions, and level of management, unless there are regulations that
restrict the rate of applications for other nutrients.
4. Animal waste shall be applied to land eroding less than 5 tons per acre per year.
Waste may be applied to land eroding at more than 5 tons per acre per year but
less than 10 tons per acre per year provided grass filter strips are installed where
runoff leaves the field (see USDA, NRCS Field Office Technical Guide Standard
393 - Filter Strips).
5. Odors can be reduced by injecting the waste or by disking after waste application.
Waste should not be applied when there is danger of drift from the land
application field.
6. When animal waste is to be applied on acres subject to flooding, waste will be soil
incorporated on conventionally tilled cropland. When waste is applied to
conservation tilled crops or grassland, the waste may be broadcast provided the
application does not occur during a season prone to flooding (see "Weather and
Climate in North Carolina" for guidance).
7. Liquid waste shall be applied at rates not to exceed the soil infiltration rate such
that runoff does not occur offsite or to surface waters and in a method which does
not cause drift from the site during application. No ponding should occur in order
to control odor and flies.
-
------------------- -------------------------------

8. Animal waste shall not be applied to saturated soils, during rainfall events, or
when the soil surface is frozen.
9. Animal waste shall be applied on actively growing crops in such a manner that
the crop is not covered with waste to a depth that would inhibit growth. The
potential for salt damage from animal waste should also be considered.
10. Nutrients from waste shall not be applied in fall or winter for spring planted
crops on soils with a high potential for leaching. Waste/nutrient loading rates on
these soils should be held to a minimum and a suitable winter cover crop planted
to take up released nutrients. Waste shall not be applied more than 30 days prior
to planting of the crop or forages breaking dormancy.
11. Any new swine facility sited on or after October 1, 1995 shall comply with the
following: The outer perimeter of the land area onto which waste is applied from
a lagoon that is a component of a swine farm shall be at least 50 feet from any
residential property boundary and canal. Animal waste, other than swine waste
from facilities sited on or after October 1,1995, shall not be applied closer that 25
feet to perennial waters.
12. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 100 feet to wells.
13. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 200 feet of dwellings other than
those owned by the landowner.
14. Waste shall be applied in a manner not to reach other property and public
right-of-ways.
15. Animal waste shall not be discharged into surface waters, drainageways, or
wetlands by a discharge or by over -spraying. Animal waste may be applied to
prior converted cropland provided the fields have been approved as a land
application site by a "technical specialist". Animal waste shall not be applied on
grassed waterways that discharge directly into water courses, and on other
grassed waterways, waste shall be applied at agronomic rates in a manner that
causes no runoff or drift from the site.
16. Domestic and industrial waste from washdown facilities, showers, toilets, sinks,
etc., shall not be discharged into the animal waste management system.
-------------------------------------------------------------.------- --------------- ---------------------
676627 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 4/9/2008 Specification Page 2

17. A protective cover of appropriate vegetation will be established on all disturbed
areas (lagoon embankments, berms, pipe runs, etc.). Areas shall be fenced, as
necessary, to protect the vegetation. Vegetation such as trees, shrubs, and other
woody species, etc., are limited to areas where considered appropriate. Lagoon
areas should be kept mowed and accessible. Berms and structures should be
inspected regularly for evidence of erosion, leakage, or discharge.
18. If animal production at the facility is to be suspended or terminated, the owner is
responsible for obtaining and implementing a "closure plan" which will eliminate
the possibility of an illegal discharge, pollution, and erosion.
19. Waste handling structures, piping, pumps, reels, etc., should be inspected on a
regular basis to prevent breakdowns, leaks, and spills. A regular maintenance
checklist should be kept on site.
20. Animal waste can be used in a rotation that includes vegetables and other crops
for direct human consumption. However, if animal waste is used on crops for
direct human consumption, it should only be applied pre -plant with no further
applications of animal waste during the crop season.
21. Highly visible markers shall be installed to mark the top and bottom elevations of
the temporary storage (pumping volume) of all waste treatment lagoons.
Pumping shall be managed to maintain the liquid level between the markers. A
marker will be required to mark the maximum storage volume for waste storage
ponds.
22. Waste shall be tested within 60 days of utilization and soil shall be tested at least
annually at crop sites where waste products are applied. Nitrogen shall be the
rate -determining nutrient, unless other restrictions require waste to be applied
based on other nutrients, resulting in a lower application rate than a nitrogen
based rate. Zinc and copper levels in the soils shall be monitored and alternative
crop sites shall be used when these metals approach excessive levels. pH shall be
adjusted and maintained for optimum crop production. Soil and waste analysis
records shall be kept for a minimum of five years. Poultry dry waste application
records shall be maintained for a minimum of three years.
Waste application records for all other waste shall be maintained for five (5)
years.
23. Dead animals will be disposed of in a manner that meets North Carolina
regulations.
------------------------ --- -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
676627 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 4/9/2008 Specification Page 3

EMERGENCY ACTION PLAN
PHONE NUMBERS
DWQ L-1:3
EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM ` 7
SWCD _y ; 9 --6 o
NRCS3�
� f
This plan will be implemented in the event that wastes from your operation are leaking,
overflowing, or rumring off site. You should not wait until wastes reach surface waters or leave
your property to consider that you have a problem. You should make every effort to ensure that
this does not happen. This plan should be posted in an accessible location for all employees at
the facility. The following are some action items you should take.
Stop the release of wastes. Depending on the situation, this may or may not be possible.
Suggested responses to some possible problems are listed below.
A. Lagoon overflow -possible solutions are:
a. Add soil to berm to increase elevation of dam.
b. Pump wastes to fields at an acceptable rate.
c. Stop all flows to the lagoon immediately.
d. Call a pumping contractor.
e. Make sure no surface water is entering lagoon.
B. Runoff from waste application field -actions include:
a. Immediately stop waste application.
b. Create a temporary diversion to contain waste.
c. Incorporate waste to reduce runoff.
d. Evaluate and eliminate the reason(s) that caused the runoff.
e. Evaluate the application rates for the fields where runoff occurred.
C. Leakage from the waste pipes and sprinklers -action include:
a. Stop recycle pump.
b. Stop irrigation pump.
c. Close valves to eliminate further discharge.
d. Repair all leaks prior to restarting pumps.
D. Leakage from flush systems, houses, solid separators -action include:
December 18, 1996

a. Stop recycle pump.
b. Stop irrigation pump.
c. Make sure no siphon occurs.
d. Stop all flows in the house, flush systems, or solid separators.
e. Repair all leaks prior to restarting pumps.
E. Leakage from base or sidewall of lagoon. Often this is seepage as opposed to
a. Dig a small sump or ditch away from the embankment to catch all seepage, put
in a submersible pump, and pump back to the lagoon.
b. If holes are caused by burrowing animals, trap or remove animals and fill holes
and compact with a clay type soil.
c. Have a professional evaluate the condition of the side walls and lagoon bottom
as soon as possible.
2. Assess the extent of the spill and note any obvious damages.
a. Did the waste reach any surface waters?
b. Approximately how much was released and for what duration?
c. Any damage noted, such as employee injury, fish kills, or property damage?
d. Did the spill leave the property?
e. Does the spill have the potential to reach surface waters?
f. Could a future rain event cause the spill to reach surface waters?
g. Are potable water wells in danger (either on or off of the property)?
h. How much reached surface waters?
3. Contact appropriate agencies.
a. During normal business hours, call your DWQ (Division of Water Quality) regional office;
Phone AL- After hours, emergency mm-nber: 919-733-3942. Your phone call should
include: your name, facility, telephone number, the details of the incident from item 2 above,
the exact location of the facility, the location or direction of movement of the spill, weather
and wind conditions. The corrective measures that have been under taken, and the
seriousness of the situation.
b. If spill leaves property or enters surface eaters, call local EMS phone numbers5�Jt<<'jl
c. Instruct EMS to contact local Health Department.
d. Contact CES, phone ;' local SWCD office phone number5and
local NRCS office for advice/technical assistance phone number:-3'v6&24,#%-
4. If none of the above works call 911 or the Sheriffs Department and explain your problem to
them and ask that person to contact the proper agencies for you.
Contact the contractor of your choice to begin repair of problem to minimize off -site
2 December 18, 1996

damage.
a. Contractors Name:1"1"�i
b. Contractors Address: -�2031 e(-Hi�� S.
c. Contractors Phone: l3 L) �" -m
6. Contact the technical specialist who certified the lagoon (MRCS, Consulting Engineer, etc.
a. Name: ka rr y G C-J) r.1 n '. C
b. Phone: �t�)5y�-L' 1Y-1�
7. Implement procedures as advised by DWQ and technical assistance agencies to rectify the
damage, repair the system, and reassess the waste management plan to keep problems
with release of wastes fiom happening again.
December 18, 1996

Source
Insect Control Checklist for Animal Operations
Cause
BMPs to Minimize .Insects Site Specific Practices
Liquid Systems
Flush Gutters * Accumulation of Solids O Flush system is designed and operated sufficiently to
remove accumulated solids from gutters as designed; 111-4.
Lagoons and Pits • Crusted Solids
El Remove bridging of accumulated solids at d
La' Maintain lagoons, settling basins and pits where pest
breeding is apparent to minimize the crusting of
solids to a depth of no more than 6 - 8 inches over
more than 30% of surface.
Excessive Vegetative • Decaying vegetation 9� Maintain vegetative control along banks of lagoons
Growth and other impoundments to prevent accumulation of
decaying vegetative matter along water's edge on
impoundment's perimeter.
Dry S"fems
Feeders ■ Feed Spillage Design, operate and maintain feed systems (e.g.,
bunkers and troughs) to minimize the accumulation
1 of decaying wastage.
u1 Clean up spillage on a routine basis (e.g., 7 - 10 day
interval during summer; 15-30 day interval during
winter).
Feed Storage a Accumulation of feed residues
Animal .Holding Areas * Accumulations of animal wastes
and feed wastage
AM IC - November 11, 1996, Page 1
i1 Reduce moisture accumulation within and around
immediate perimeter of feed storage areas by
insuring drainage away from site and/or providing
adequate containment (e.g., covered bin for brewer's
grain and similar high moisture grain products).
O Inspect for and remove or break up accumulated
solids in filter strips around feed storage as needed.
O Eliminate low areas that trap moisture along fences
and other locations where waste accumulates and
disturbance by animals is minimal.
O Maintain fence rows and filter strips around animal
holding areas to minimize accumulations of wastes
(i.e. inspect for and remove or break up
accumulated solids as needed.
N. 4.

Source Cause BMPs to Minimize Insects Site Specific Practices
Dry Manure Handling i Accumulations of animal wastes O Remove spillage on a routine basis (e.g., 7-10 day
Systems interval during sunnner; 15-30 day interval during
winter) where manure is loaded for land application �y
or disposal. Af -
O Provide fo adequate drainage around manure
stockpiles.
0 Inspect for an remove or break up accumulated
wastes in filter strips around stockpiles and manure
handling areas as needed.
For more information contact the Cooperative Extension Service, Department of Entomology, Box 7613, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC
27695-7613
AMIC - November 11, 1996, Page 2

Swine Farm Waste Management Odor Control Checklist
Source -Cause BMPs to Minimize Odor Site Specific Practices
Farmstead 0 Swine ProductionVegetative or wooded buffers;
13/ Recommended best management practices;
Good judgement and common sense
Animal body surfaces ■ Dirty manure -covered animals O Dry floors 'A� 4
Floor surfaces • Wet manure -covered floors p� Slotted floors; ( f ,••t L,
d Waterers located over slotted floors;
Cl Feeders at high end of solid floors;
O Scrape manure buildup from floors;
O Underfloor ventilation for drying
Manure collection pits 4, Urine; Frequent manure removal by flush, pit recharge, or
0 Partial microbial decomposition scrape;
O Underfloor ventilation
Ventilation exhaust fans Volatile gases; Of Fan maintenance;
Dust O Efficient air movement
Indoor surfaces 4b Dust d Washdown between groups of animals;
O Feed additives;
11 Feed covers;
O Feed delivery downspout extenders to feeder covers
Flush tanks 9 Agitation of recycled lagoon liquid O Flush tank covers;
while tanks are filling p Extend fill to near bottom of tanks with anti -siphon
vents
Flush alleys Agitation during wastewater 0 Underfloor flush with underfloor ventilation
conveyance
Pit recharge points 0- Agitation of recycled lagoon liquid O Extend recharge lines to near bottom of pits with
while pits are filling anti -siphon vents
Lift stations r Agitation during sump tank filling O Sump tank covers
and drawdown
Outside drain collection or 0 Agitation during wastewater O Box covers
junction boxes conveyance
AMOC -November If, 1996, Page 3

Source
Cause
BMPs to Minimize Odor
Site Specific Practices
End of drainpipes at lagoon b
Agitation during wastewater
O
Extend discharge point of pipes underneath
conveyance
lagoon liquid level
Lagoon surfaces
Volatile gas emission;
/
®
W
Proper lagoon liquid capacity;
•
Biological mixing;
Correct lagoon startup procedures;
•
Agitation
�m
Minimum surface area -to -volume ratio;
VMinimu
agitation when pumping; -Xr_te.:�
Mechanical aeration;
O
Proven biological additives
Irrigation sprinkler nozzles ►
High pressure agitation;
®`
Irrigate on dry days with little or no wind;
Wind drift
Q
Minimum recommended operating pressure;
Pump intake near lagoon liquid surface; .
O
Pump from second stage lagoon
Storage tank or basin 0 Partial microbial decomposition; O Bottom or midlevel loading; '
surface • Mixing while filling; O Tank covers;
• Agitation when emptying O Basin surface mats of solids,
_ [I Proven biological additives or oxidants
Settling basin surface 0 Partial microbial decomposition; O Extend drainpipe outlets underneath liquid level;
Mixing while filling;
Agitation when emptying Q Remove settled solids regularly
Manure, slurry or sludge 0 Agitation when spreading; O/ Soil injection of slung/sludges;
spreader outlets 0 Volatile gas emissionsW Wash residual manure from spreader after use;
O Proven biological additives or oxidants
Uncovered manure, slurry a Volatile gas emissions while drying O Soil injection of slurry/sludges;
or sludge on field surfaces D Soil incorporation within 48 hrs.;
WSpread in thin uniform layers for rapid drying;
O Proven biolo Aical additives or oxidants
Dead animals Carcass decomposition Proper disposition of carcasses
Dead animal disposal pits
Incinerators
6 Carcass decomposition O Complete covering of carcasses in burial pits; A/ill .
AMOC - November 11, 1996, Page
O Proper location/construction of disposal pits
Incomplete combustion O Secondary stack burners /V A

Source Cause BMPs to Minimize Odor Site Specific Practices
Standing water around • Improper drainage; 51 Grade and landscape such that water drains away
facilities 0 Microbial decomposition of organic from facilities
matter
Mud tracked onto public • Poorly maintained access roads Farm access road maintenance
roads from farm access
Additional Information: Available From:
Swine Manure Management; .0200 Rule/BMP Packet
Swine Production Farm Potential Odor Sources and Remedies; EBAE Fact Sheet
Swine Production Facility Manure Management: Pit Recharge - Lagoon Treatment; EBAE 128-88
Swine Production Facility Manure Management: Underfloor Flush - Lagoon Treatment; EBAE 129-88
Lagoon Design and Management for Livestock Manure Treatment and Storage; EBAE 103-88
Calibration of Manure and Wastewater Application Equipment; EBAE Fact Sheet
Controlling Odors from Swine Buildings; PIH-33
Environmental Assurance Program: NP13C Manual
Options for Managing Odor; a report fi•om the Swine Odor Task Force
Nuisance Concerns in Animal Manure Management: Odors and Flies; PRO107, 1995 Conference Proceedings
AMOC - November 11, 1996, Page
NCSU, County Extension Center
NCSU-BAE
NCSU - BAE
NCSU-BAE
NCSU-BAE
NCSU - BAE
NCSU - Swine Extension
NC Pork Producers Assoc.
NCSU - Agri Communications
Florida Cooperative Extension

Mortality Management Methods
(check which method(s) are being implemented)
❑ Burial three feet beneath the surface of the ground within 24 hours after knowledge of
the death. The burial must be at least 300 feet from any flowing stream or public body
of water.
Z. Rendering at a rendering plant licensed under G.S. 106-168.7.
❑ Complete incineration
❑ In the case of dead poultry only, placing in a disposal pit of a size and design approved
by the Department of Agriculture.
❑ Any method which in the professional opinion of the State Veterinarian would make
possible the salvage of part of a dead animal's value without endangering human or
animal health. (Written approval of the State Veterinarian inust be attached)
December 18, 1996

A008 Daily Rainfall, Weekly Freeboard, Monthly Stocking, and I" Rainfall Check Form
January
I!
SUN
MON
t
SAT
SUN
MON
TUES
WEDS
THUR
FRI
SAT
-TUES
2WED
3THUR�
1
12
I
6
17
9
10
11
12
5
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
10
11
12
13
14
15
6
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
7
18
—17—
20
21
22
23
27
28
29
30
31
24
25
2 6
27
28
25
lviarch
April
SUN
MON
TUES
WED
THUR
FRI
SAT
SUN
MON
TUES
WED
THUR
FRI
SAT
I
1
2
3
4
5
3
4
5
n
7
8
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
10
11
12
13
14
15
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
-16
17
18
19
20Ti—
22
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
23
24
'5
z
M—i
28
29
27
28
29
30
30
31
May
June
SUN
MON
TUES
WED
THUR
FRI
SAT
SUN
MON
TUES
WED
THUR
FRI
SAT
1
2
3
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
8
9
10
11
12
3
14
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
5
16
17
1
9
2p
18
19
20
Ti—
22
23
24
2
23
24
25
728
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
2 9
30
T
I
I

ENVIRONMENTAL
ENGINEERING SERVICES
2145 Foxfire Road
`j
Jackson Springs, NC 27281
fiz
[phone]
Fax [phone]
170
AS —BUILT SWINE EFFLUENT TREATMENT
AND ANAEROBIC LAGOON DESIGN FOR
APPLEFIELD FARM — UPPER FARM
LOCATION IN RAYIDOLPP -CO . , N.C.

ENVIRONMENTAL. ENGINEERING SERVI-CES
Water • Wastewater -Sludge • Agricultural • Industrial -Civil
October 10, 1994
NCDEHNR = Division of Land Resources
Land Quality Section
P.O. Box 27687
Raleigh, N.C. 27611-7687
Attn: James K. Leumas, P.E.
Re: Earthen dike
notification
Farm - upper
Randolph Co.
Dear Mr. Leumas,
completion
at Applefield
farm location,
Please find enclosed two copies of the "As Built" plans for
the above referenced site. Please note that we were able to
obtain sufficient volume within a single containment structure,
which kept us from building a second structure as originally
placed. I believe this liquid containment: facility has been
constructed in accordance with sound and proven methods foL-
earthen dike construction. Clay liners are also in place as
prescribed.
The enclosed documents should contain sufficient information,
for the owners of Applefield Farm to operate the lagoons. Please
note my letter to Mr. Barton Roberson which outlines the items
remaining to be completed (e.g. landscaping). If you leave
questions please feel free to call my office.
cc: Philip Faucette
Barton Roberson
enclosures
Best R Irds,
Larry Crah- P.E.
Env' nmental Engineering Services
5647 N.C. HIGHWAY 211, WEST END, N.C. 27376-9001 - [phone]

AN=K; L WASTE 2iANAGEHENT PLAIN CBRTIPICATION FOR NEW OR =PlaMED FEEDLOTS
Plaaaa retu= the cos:spleted form to the Division of Eaviranmaatal Hanagament at
the addraaa on -the reverse side of thus form.
Name of farm (Please print): APPLEFIELD FARM - UPPER FARM LOCATION
Address:_ .722S ErjandsbiP Boarl
grncun Ciimmi� �j,r' 27714 Phone No. s..(21.Q) 696-7594
County: u a ftrn l l n
Farm locations Latitude and Longitude:_U _U 15 /-79 35 55 (required) . Also,
please attach a copy of a county road. -map with location identified.
Type of operation (swine, layer, dairy, etc.) : Swi m. - Tnppj ng Floors
Design capacity -(number of animals).:
Average size of operation (12 month population avg.) s 1220 /Mg.
Average acreage needed for land application of waste (acres)184 (two farm total-)
aaaasasu�raasaa�saaawa�saaaaaaaaasassasasaasaaas�aaasasaaaaaasaaaaaaasaasaaaasaaasoa .
technical specialist Certification
As a technical specialist designated by the North Carolina Soil and Water
Conservation Commission pursuant to 15A NCAC 6F .0005, I certify that the new,or
expanded animal waste management system as installed for the farm named above
has an animal waste management plan that meets the design, construction,
operation and maintenance standards and .specifications of the Division of
Environmental Management and the USDA -Soil Conservation Service and/or the North
Carolina Soil and Water Conservation Commission pursuant to 15A NCAC 2H.0217•and
15A NCAC 6F .0001-.0005. The following, elements and their corresponding minimum
criteria-ha;re_beer-�verified by me or other -designated technical specialists and
are included in the plan as applicable: minimum separations (buffers); liners or
equivalent for lagoons or waste storage ponds; waste storage capacity; adequate
quantity and amount of land for waste -utilization (or use of third party); access
or ownership of proper waste application equipment; schedule for -timing of
applications; application rates; loading ratesi and the control of the discharge
of pollutants from stormwater runoff events less severe than the 25-year, 24-hour
storm.
Name of Technical Specillist (Please Print) s Larry F . Graham P.E.
Affiliation: Consultant
Address (Agency .Phone No. ( Al 0)-. 673_0487
27376-9001 `
ZL
Signatur °a4 Date
': 442-4Z
sa,asssas:eases sasauaa nears■ saasesssaasasaasasaseaasaaraaasasasa Sena
Owner/�Sa11sQ� aemaa .
I (we) understand the operation and maintenance procedures established in the
approved animal waste management plan for the farm named above and will implement
these procedures. I (we) know• that any additional expansion to the existing
design capacity of the waste treatment and -storage system or construction of new
facilities.- will require a nevi Qertification to be submitted to the Division of
Environmental Management before the new animals are stocked. I (we) also
understand that there must be no discharge,of_animal waste from this system to
surface waters of the state either "'through a man-made conveyance or through
runoff from a. storm event less severe. than the 25-year, 24-hour storm. ' Tho
approved plan will be filed at the farm and at the office of the local Soil. and
-Water. Conservation District.
Name'.of r• (Please Print):, Philip W. Fa
Signatures
Date: /6 / �—
Name of Tian (gi-aV4 different from owner (Please print):
Signattare: I W Date:
,Nate::A:.ch a in and ownership requires notification or a new certification
(if the approved plan %is changed) to be submitted to the Division of
Environmental Management within 60 days of a title transfer.
DEH USE ONLY:ACNEW#

ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING SERVICES
Water -Wastewater -Sludge -Agricultural *Industrial • Civil
ll October 14, 1994
APPLEFIELD FARM
c/o Philip Faucette Lopy
7725 Friendship Rd.
Brown Summit, N.C. 27214
[phone] RE: Final Waste Management Plans and
certifications for the Lagoon at
the Applefield Farm - Upper Farm
Location in Randolph Co.
Dear Mr. Faucette,
Please find attached a copy of the Lagoon Design and
Specifications and the certification forms for the above:
referenced property. I believe this report is complete within
the scope of the work ordered.
Please keep in mind that these general guidelines are
typical of those used by the Soil Conversation Service for lagoon
designs. It is important to follow these criteria as close as
possible to afford you the safety needed for such an operation.
The lagoon volume and design volumes are especially important.
It is required that you keep a copy of these documents at
.the farm at all times. Re -read them occasionally to keep certain
-guidelines fresh in your mind. I would also suggest you farm
manager keep good maintenance records.
Theseplansonly give a few pointers and comments about the
long term maintenance and operation of anaerobic lagoons.
Regular and careful planning on irrigation events as well as
close observations on lagoon conditions will go a long way in
preventing odors from becoming a problem. I have enclosed a
letter to Barton Roberson that lists a few items yet to be
completed.
It has been my pleasure to be of service in this matter.
Should you have questions about this report please feel free -to
contact my office. Thank -you for this opportunity.
Best Regards,
I`
Larry Graham .E.
Environmental Engineering Services
enclosures
5647 N.C. HIGHWAY 211, WEST END, N.C. 27376-9001 - [phone]

ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING SERVICES
Water *Wastewater - Sludge - Agricultural - Industrial - Civil
�GOPY
October 14, 1994
NCDEHNR - Division of Environmental Management
Water Quality Section, Planning Branch
P. 0. Box 29535
Raleigh, N.C. 27626-0535
[phone]
RE: Lagoon Design, Discussions and
Certifications for the New Swine
Effluent Lagoons at -the Applefie ld
Farm, Upper Farm Location in
Randolph Co.
To Whom It May Concern,
Please find attached the following:
1) The original copy of the signed certification form foi
Livestock Waste Management plans, signed by myself and PI-iili_p
Faucette. Attached to the form is a vicinity map.
2) The original copy of the signed Livestock Waste Utilization
plans, signed by yourself and Philip Faucette.
I trust this information fulfills Applefield Parin's
requirements for certification pursuant to requirements listnless
Title 15A NCAC 2H .0217 (Animal Waste Management).
otherwise requested, this will be the only correspondence to
your office on the matter.
If there are questions or items I have not addressed please
let me know. Thank -you for your time in this matter.
cc: Philip Faucette
enclosures
Best
Lar rh/"' . 'GraWalm P.E.
Env ronmental Engineering Services
5647 N.C. HIGHWAY 211, WEST END, N.C. 27376-9001 - [phone]

10
ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING SERVICES
f' Water Wastewater • Sludge *Agricultural *Industrial • Civil
- D
OU
"
Barton Roberson, Randolph County D.C. October 14, 1994
U.S. Soil Conservation Service
241 Sunset Ave.
Asheboro, N.C. 27203
[phone]
RE: Lagoon Design, Discussions and
Certifications for the New Swine
Effluent Lagoons at the Applefielcl
Farm, Upper Farm Location in
Randolph Co.
Dear Barton,
Please find attached the following:
1) A copy of the signed certification form for Livestock Waste
Management plans, signed by myself and Philip Faucette.
2) A copy of the signed Livestock Waste Utilization plans,
signed by yourself and Philip Faucette.
3) Plans and specifications for the anaerobic swine effluent
treatment lagoon and earthen embankment.
In my opinion the package is complete with the required
information. Work at the farm is progressing.and Mr. Faucette
plans to get animals on the farm sometime this week or next.
Please understand that the following items remain to be
completed:
A. Final grading, seeding, and soil stabilization needs to
take place around the lagoons, hog houses, and over the dam.
Several bare areas need to be stabilized ASAP.
B. A few erosion scars need to be filled before grass is
planted. This is true around the lagoons and along the earthen
embankments. Mr. Faucette may choose to use some large diameter
pipe to convey storm -water away from the dam instead of the rock
dams.
C. The earthen emergency overflow invert has not been
leveled. However it will be 8 to 12 months or longer before the
lagoon will be near its design volume. There is no rush to get
this overflow leveled but I have suggested it be done within the
next -few months.
5647 N.C. HIGHWAY 211, WEST END, N.C. 27376-9001 • [phone]

D. One section of the storm water diversion ditch above the
primary treatment lagoon has been removed so rain water can be
filling the lagoon. This was approved by myself. This section
must be replaced once sufficient water is in the lagoon as a pre -
charge.
E. Applefield needs to charge the lagoon with fresh water
as soon as possible. I believe they are doing so as of t1lis
letter per my phone conversations with Mr. Faucette.
F. I do not think that the land application areas (to
receive effluent) are finished. However I was told they will be
completed and cover crops established before land application
begins.
I trust this information fulfills Applefield Farm's
requirements for certification pursuant to requirements listed i.n
Title 15A NCAC 2H .0217 (Animal Waste Management). Unless:
otherwise requested, this will be the only correspondence Lo
your office on the matter.
I am sending James K. Leumas a complete package for his
files and a complete copy to Philip Faucette for him to keep on
the farm. You are receiving 1 complete copy.
In addition I am sending the original certification forms to
DEM - Raleigh for their files. However I am not sending them the
complete package.
If there are questions or items I have not addressed please
let me know. Thank -you for your time in this matter.
Best Regar
Lar' F. Gra am P.E.
Environmental_ Engineering Services
cc: Philip Faucette
James K. Leumas
OEM - Raleigh
enclosures

AS BUILT SWINE EFFLUENT TREATMENT AND ANAEROBIC -LAGOON DESIGN
FOR
APPLEFIELD FARM - UPPER FARM LOCATION
IN RANDOLPH COUNTY, N. C.
Plans Prepared for
APPLEFIELD FARM
c/o Philip Faucette
7725 Friendship Rd.
Brown Summit, N.C. 27214
[phone]
Plans Prepared by:
Larry F. Graham, P.E.
Environmental Engineering Services
5647 N. C. Highway 211
West End, N. C. 27376-9001
Soils and
[phone]
Design Review:
Barton Roberson, Randolph County D.C.
U. S. Soil Conservation Service
241 Sunset Ave.
Asheboro, N.C. 27203
�
[phone]
Earthen Dike Plan Review: James K. Leumas, P.E.
NCDEHNR - Division of Land Resources91
Land Quality Section a�
P. 0. BOX 27687
Raleigh, N.C. 27611-7687
[phone]
As -Built Plans
Submitted to: Applefield Farms with copies to Barton
Roberson, and James K. Leumas, P.E.
Submittal Date: PHASE II - October 14, 1994
Specificatio�v lo�tp t d �ani�tion By:
-� - �. _ �- = = �-fix• - _ ,
a ry F Graham, P. E. ------ ,�eeeO�� ..:aR�(�0A
N. C. P _ essiona Registration Number 11602�.Q�aFESS�a�,y,�s
f 9s
Date of Review: w
SE L
O 116011 •
2 p6
.•Y J `a`� NC
sss'�'ye
C:

APPLEFIELD FARM, UPPER FARM LOCATION
ANAEROBIC SWINE EFFLUENT LAGOON SPECIFICATIONS
RANDOLPH COUNTY
SINGLE STAGE TREATMENT LAGOON SYSTEM
* NOTE TO THE READER REPORT CONTENTS
PHASE II. AS -BUILT SPECIFICATIONS
I• LAGOON DESIGN PARAMETERS AND DETAILS (AS -BUILT)
A. INTRODUCTION
B. REVIEW OF GENERAL FARM PARAMETERS
C. LAGOON SHAPE
D•'LAGOON VOLUMES
E. SIX MONTH WASTEWATER AND RAINFALL STORAGE
F. SEVERE STORM STORAGE
G. FREEBOARD
H. EMERGENCY SPILLWAYS AND OVERFLOW PROTECTION
I. EARTHEN DIKE (DAM) CONSTRUCTION
J. LAGOON DESIGN SUMMARY
K. SEDIMENT AND EROSION CONTROL
L. LAGOON MAINTENANCE SUGGESTIONS
M. CONCLUSIONS AND NOTICES
EXHIBIT LIST
EXHIBIT 1 - County map (vicinity map),
EXHIBIT 2 - USGS Topographic map of the lagoon location.
EXHIBIT 3 - Boundary Survey of entire property.
EXHIBIT 4 - Localized topographic map of the existing lagoon
area including certain observation pit locations
and proposed lagoon construction. (See original
Plans, Exhibit 4 not in this package.)
EXHIBIT 5 - Topographic map of As -Built lagoon and dam
construction.
EXHIBIT 6 - No Exhibit 6 in this package.
EXHIBIT 7 - SCS soils investigation data (Form SCS-ENG-538).
EXHIBIT 8 - U.S. SCS Swine waste utilization plan.
EXHIBIT 9 - Temporary grass seeding recommendations.
EXHIBIT 10 - Permanent grass seeding recommendations.
EXHIBIT ll - Permanent grass seeding recommendations.
EXHIBIT 12 - Permanent grass seeding recommendations.
1

A FEW NOTES ABOUT THIS PROJECT:
This report only contains information about the "as -built"
status of the anaerobic swine effluent treatment lagoon system at
Applefield Farms, upper farm location. The original set of
specifications developed for this project indicated a two stage
lagoon system. A two stage lagoon system was first chosen because
of anticipated hard rock conditions that would prevent deep
lagoon excavations.
On -site excavations encountered a softer rock than was
originally anticipated. This allowed excavations to be deeper in
the first lagoon which allowed sufficient volume to meet the
typical design standards.
Therefore, the specifications and discussions contained
within this document refer to a single stage lagoon with only one
earthen embankment or dike. The reader should refer to the
original set of specifications submitted on 3-21-94 to obtain
project background and geographical information. References to
background information in this document will be minimal.
The below information will serve to notify all concerned
parties of the existing lagoon construction as of the submittal
date on the cover page.
PHASE II. AS -BUILT SPECIFICATIONS
I. LAGOON DESIGN PARAMETERS AND DETAILS (AS -BUILT)
A. INTRODUCTION --
The Applefield Farm, upper location (hereafter called the
upper farm) swine effluent treatment facilities have been mostly
completed and are listed within this package for documentation of
the As -Built sizes, volumes, etc. The reader must refer to the
original plans to see original design specifications and
guidelines. The below information document describes a single
stage lagoon only.
B. REVIEW.OF GENERAL FARM PARAMETERS --
1. Type of facility : Finishing operation.
2. Number of hogs: 7,920 head.
3. Average animal weight assumed: 135 pounds.
4. Housing: 9 Units @ 880 head each.
5. Type of Treatment: Anaerobic lagoons.
6. Lagoon Numbers: 1. Primary Treatment Lagoon.
2

C. LAGOON SHAPE (See Exhibit 5 for topographic details).
1. Primary Treatment Lagoon: General rectangular surface and
bottom, with uneven side lengths. Bottom elevation is relatively
flat, sloping gradually from the south corner to the north cor-
ner.
D. LAGOON VOLUMES --
All As -Built lagoon volumes calculated for the upper farm
used on -site topographic measurements which compares empty
lagoons with full lagoons. The computer technique used for these
comparisons is called L.I. CONTOUR V+, Version 4.0, developed by
A.B. Consulting Co. Inc., Lincoln NE. Great -care was used in
developing the contour maps for comparisons, however any such
measurements and calculations have some margin for error. The
engineer has verified the L.I. CONTOUR V+ program with known
field data and believes it to be a very accurate approximation
technique for pond volumes. Detailed design volume calculations
can be seen in the original plans.
Calculated Minimum Design Volume: 7,997,616 gallons
Min. Design Volume Needed per Engineer's opinion = 7,200,000 gal.
E. SIX MONTH WASTEWATER AND RAINFALL STORAGE --
Wastewater will normally be pulled off of the top of the
primary treatment lagoon and recycled to the confinement
buildings for re -use. A six month excess water storage had been
used for this design. This does not include rainfall run-off
water from outside the lagoon since that will be diverted by
earthen embankments and grass water ways. Detailed design calcu-
lations can be seen in the original plans.
Total Six Month Storage Volume Needed: 3,998,808 gallons
F. SEVERE STORM STORAGE --
At any time in North Carolina there can occur a severe rain
producing storm which can deposit considerable amounts of water
quickly.. This fact should be considered when designing a lagoon
and allowances made to accommodate this extra water. The
standard storm surge allowed in lagoon design is the 25 year - 24
hour rainfall. event. For conservative reasons the engineer
chose to use 6.41 inches as a design number.

The design engineer is only considering the rainfall falling
within the interior of the lagoon. THERE SHOULD BE NO SURFACE
RUN-OFF FROM SURROUNDING AREAS ALLOWED TO ENTER THE LAGOON. ALL
RUN-OFF SHALL BE DIVERTED AROUND THE LAGOON VIA EARTHEN
EMBANKMENTS, GRASS WATER WAYS, OR SIMILAR WATER DIVERSION
TECHNIQUES. A small safety factor has been added to the storm
storage to account for a small amount of lagoon rim "run-in".
The 25 year - 24 hour storm volume for the Upper Farm is
calculated to be approximately:
Primar•,- La,:ioon Storm Stora,e:
Total lagoon acreage = 2.53 acres.
6.41 inches x 2.53 acres = 16.22 ac-in or 1.35 ac-ft
1.35 ac-ft x 43,560 cu.ft./ac-ft = 58,806 cu.ft.
or
58,806 cu.ft. x 7.48 gal/cu.ft. = 439,869 gallons
G. FREEBOARD --
Freeboard is the extra depth added to a lagoon for safety
against an embankment overflow or dam washout. This extra depth
is a safety measure and prevents water from spilling over the
dam, resulting in dam erosion and complete or partial failure.
Primary Lagoon Freeboard: 1 foot (minimum design).
Actual Anticipated Freeboard: 1.3 feet.
H. EMERGENCY SPILLWAYS AND OVERFLOW PROTECTION --
The discharge or overflow of swine effluent to the surface
waters of N.C. is Prohibited. However, in the unlikely event the
water level inside a lagoon should exceed the maximum high water
level design it should have a predetermined path of overflow in
order to safeguard the dam. This emergency spillway should be
located on undisturbed, firm soil not easily eroded or on a very
solid surface like concrete, away from the lagoon dam if
possible. Overflow pipes or earthen overflows may be used.
The amount of water to be safely passed by an emergency
overflow will depend on several factors and the degree of safety
the designer requires. The emergency spillway should pass the
overflow water without over -topping the embankments or dam.
4

According to SCS guidelines (Table 4 - Minimum Spillway
Design Storm ) the Upper Farm lagoon spillway should be designed
for a 10 year - 24 hour storm. The engineer feels that a shorter
duration more intense storm would be a more conservative design,
therefore the engineer decided to use a 25 year - 1 hour storm
for emergency spillway design. Weather data for Greensboro, N. C.
suggests rainfall during this storm event at:
25 year - 1 hour storm = 2.74 inches
Average flow calculates to be:
From Primary Treatment Lagoon:
2.74 in./hr. x 2.53 acres x 3,631 cu.ft/ac.-in.= 25,171 cu.ft/hr.
25,171 cu.ft./hour / 3,600 seconds/hour = 6.99 cu.ft./sec. (cfs)
Based on information obtained in the manual titled "EROSION
AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PLANNING AND DESIGN MANUAL", published by
the North Carolina Department of Environment, Health, and Natural
Resources, Land Quality Section, and the information calculated
above, the engineer has decided to use an earthen overflow. The
emergency overflow entrance for the lagoon overflow shall be a
minimum of 1 foot below the lowest point of any earthen
embankments around the lagoon perimeter.
The emergency overflow elevation shall be verified with a
transit after construction and final settling. The expected path
of. overflow from an emergency spillway should direct the water
away from any embankment or dam structures. Vegetation on
emergency overflows and along the anticipated paths of flow
should be well maintained at all times. See Exhibit 5 for more
details about the earthen overflow.
I. EARTHEN DIKE (DAM) CONSTRUCTION --
1. Primary Treatment Lagoon Dike:
The primary lagoon dike was constructed with a good soil
material with a high clay content. The good clay soil was taken
from a nearby hill -side and imported for construction. Its
placement was observed by the engineer as construction was taking
place. Recommendations found in the dam construction permit
package can be viewed to see construction considerations.
r_

AS BUILT DIKE CONSTRUCTION SUMMARY AS OF 10-13-94:
1. Maximum Height, Top of Dike to Outside Toe: 22.9 feet
2. Top of Dam Contour: 117.8 feet.
3. Inside Dam Slope: 2.5 to 1 (average).
4. Outside Dam Slope: 3 to 1 (average).
5. Dam and Dam Core Compaction: Sheeps-foot Roller,
Vibrating Roller, and Loaded Pan.
6. Anticipated Dam Settling: 0-2 percent.
7. Top Width of Dam: 15 to 30 feet.
8. Dam Core Width: 12 feet.
9. Dam Core Depth: 0 to 5 feet.
10. Dam Core Taken to Rock: No.
11. Dam and Core Material: Red/Brown Clay - Good Quality
Material.
J. LAGOON DESIGN SUMMARY
AS BUILT CONSTRUCTION OF FINAL LAGOON AS OF 10-13-94:
1. Number of hogs = .7920
2. Type of facility = Finishing operation
3. Type of lagoon = Single stage anaerobic.
4. 25 year 24 hr. storm intensity = 6.41 in.
5. Estimated run-off from surrounding land into the lagoon = 0%
6. Waste storage period = 6 months
7. Design criteria = Anaerobic treatment with adequate odor
control.
8. Est. maximum dam height of Lagoon = 22.9
feet (without settling).
9. Inside side slopes = varies from 2:1 to 3:1 (clay soil)
10. Rock Outcroppings covered?: Yes, 2 to 7 feet of clay.
11. Sludge accumulation criteria = Irrigate Solids, no long term
solids accumulation.
12. Average animal weight = 135 lbs.
13. Final Volumes:
* 5 year sludge accumulation (calculated) ............ 0 gal.
* Design treatment volume 7,997,616 gal.
* Design treatment volume (min. per engineer).. 7,200,000 gal.
* 6 month storage (plus excess rain) ..........
* 25 year 24 hr. storm ................... 3,,8gal.
•••.. 43939,$69 gal.
TOTAL DESIGN CALCULATED VOLUME (less freeboard) 12,436,293 gal.
TOTAL MINIMUM VOLUME (per engineers opinion).... 11,7-.60,000 gal.
TOTAL VOLUME OF LAGOON (as built) ............... 12,023,848
PERCENT OF LAGOON VOLUME vs. MIN. DESIGN gal.
•••••••• 103 %
I

14. Details:
* Top dimensions (approx.) .........................
* Bottom dimensions (approx.) ......................
* Max. liquid depth (to overflow approx.) ..........
* Minimum liquid depth to maintain .................
* Emergency spillway contour at invert .............
* Dam top elevation from bench mark ................
* Dam front and back slope ratio .................
Actual Freeboard .................................
* Calculated volume to overflow during storm .......
* Rainfall for overflow calculations ...............
* Deepest Floor Contour ............................
* Type of Overflow Channel ..........
................
* Bottom Width of Overflow Channel .................
* Begin irrigation (depth of water) ... Between 14.9
250 x 510
125 x 400
20.67 ft.
14.9 ft-
116.5 ft.
117.8 ft.
> 5:1
1.3 ft.
c f s .
2. 74: in/ .
-94.5 ft.
Earthen
9 ft.
and 20.1 +
+ In no case draw water below 10 feet deep unless performing
maintenance on the lagoon.interior.
K. SEDIMENT AND EROSION CONTROL --
General Sediment and Erosion Control Suggestions (Certain
paragraphs below are reprinted from original plans):
A] The purpose of sediment and erosion control measures is to
confine sediment transport to the construction area. This means
the contractor should construct physical barriers, obstacles, or
structures to insure sediment and soil is retained on the
construction site. This task includes repairs of disturbed
soils, erosion scars, and damaged erosion control devices. Grass
planting and maintenance are also part of standard erosion
control measures. Suggestions and seeding recommendations below
were taken in part from the "EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL
PLANNING AND DESIGN MANUAL", published by the North Carolina
Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources, Land
Quality Section.
B] Water drainage from the confinement housing construction area
and from immediately up slope from the lagoon will be diverted in
several directions. Diverting water away from the lagoon area is
recommended. However it is not possible to divert all water away
from the lagoon area. The total disturbed area for the houses and
just up slope from the lagoon is being approximated at 3 acres.
Water from the housing construction site will likely drain in at
least two directions. For estimation purposes we will assume
that .50 percent of this total run-off water will migrate toward
the lagoon. It is this water conveyance that is of concern from
the lagoon construction and will be addressed here. These are
estimates only and are being supplied to offer some ideas to the
owner on grass channel construction. Water will flow around the
lagoon in two directions so the flow values can be divided in
half for calculations purposes.
7

1• Water conveyance mechanism = Grass lined channel.
ii. Area contributing to flow = 3 acres.
Storm considered = 10 year - 1 hour.
iv. Calculated flow = 6.3 cubic feet
pe
V. Channel shape = Shallow trapezoidalr second (cfs).
vi. Channel side slopes = 5:1 (H:V) and 2:1 (H:V).
vii. Channel bottom width = 5 feet.
viii. Channel depth = 1 foot (minimum).
ix, Channel top width = 7.5 feet.
X. Grass type = Fescue or Bermudagrass
xi. Estimated water run-off velocity
xii. Erosion potential: Bare soil before2coveret per second.
high
Bare soil with mulch
Well established grass coverm/hlow�/medium
xiii• Slope: On contour not to exceed 3:1.
C] The grass lined channel should have a rock dam or earthen dam
installed just as the water gets around the earthen embankment on
either side. Large diameter
pi 31r1g also
the water down slope if available. Ifaused, willconvey
sediment 'and allow run-off water to escape into natural
areas at a reduced velocity
d with
The "horse -shoe" dam shall withsediment
grassy
class trans erosion
ot
control stone. A sketch of this device placement can be seen on
Exhibit 5.
D] Sediment removed from sediment control devices shall be
stored in stable areas not subject to re-enter the sediment
control devices or escape off of site. This apes tostored or any temporary soil storage areas. Silt if encingopshosoil
uld
be installed on the down slope side of stock piled or stored
soils and along the base of earthen embankments.
E] Gullies, ditches, moved stone, torn fence, or similar areas
of erosion shall be given immediate attention and corrective
action taken. Control devices that do not seem to be adequately
preventing sediment transport shall be improved to stop soil
transport.
F] Seeding Suggestions:
i. There is no more important
p function for stabilizing a
construction site than to
soil disturbance has ended. Sample vegeand ltestoon soils forsliming and
fertilizer suggestions. Send soil samples to the N.C. Department
of Agriculture, Agronomic Division, Soil Testin
Blue Ridge Road, Raleigh, N.C. 27611. Sample containers Section,
can be
obtained at the Randolph County Cooperative Extension Service in
Asheboro.
0

ii. Disturbed areas which are to waiting final grading should be
seeded with temporary vegetation if they will be left idle for
more than 30 days, or if they are subject to severe erosion. The
contractor may wish to seed or re -seed disturbed or undisturbed
land with Rye grass since construction will be taking place in
cool weather (See Exhibit 9). Do not destroy existing grass if
at all possible.
Temporary Seeding Suggestion:
Rye (grain) ........... Applied @ 120 lbs/acre
iii. When final grading is complete, Permanent Seeding will be
required. The contractor shall use best judgment as to the
variety of grass to be planted at the site. A few recommended
grass types are shown as Exhibits 10, 11 and 12.
Permanent Seeding Suggestions:
Grass lined channels (Exhibit 10):
... Tall Fescue @ 200 lb./acre (4-5 lb./sq.ft.)
Steep slopes (Exhibit 11):
... Tall Fescue @ 100 lb./acre, plus
+ Sericea Lespedeza @ 30 lbs./acre, plus
Kobe Lespedeza @ 10 lbs./acre
+ = SERICEA LESPEDEZA SHOULD NOT BE PLANTED ON EARTHEN DAMS!
Less steep slopes (Exhibit 12):
... Blend of Tall Fescue (90 %) plus
improved Kentucky Bluegrass (10%)
(200 - 250 lbs./acre)
iv. Seeded areas shall be re -seeded if necessary to insure good
stands of vegetation are developed and maintained. Fertilization
and mulch shall be installed as necessary.
V. Apply seed with a broadcast method, such as a cyclone seeder,
drop spreader, drill (in some cases), etc. Hydro -seeding may be
used but is not being specified.
vi. Rake over all sites to assure seed has been covered and
lightly pack in place. Lightly water if water is available (only
enough to moisten soil).
G] Mulch Suggestions:
i. On steep slopes ( greater than 3:1) apply approximately 100
pounds of straw per 1000 square feet of surface. Cover straw
with a netting or jute cover or use some other suitable adhesive
material to hold straw in place. If asphalt is used apply at
roughly a rate of 11 gallons per 1000 square feet of surface.
a

ii. On less steep slopes (less than 3:1) apply approximately g0
Pounds of straw per 1000 square feet of surface. Cover straw
with a netting or jute cover or use some other suitable adhesive
material to hold straw in place. Mulch may not be needed on
relatively flat surfaces.
iii. Grass lined channels are sometimes difficult to get
stabilized because of the velocity of flowing water. Often water
velocities exceeding 2 feet per second on bare soil channels will
cause erosion scars. In many cases, the previous recommendation
is sufficient to get a cover established, however if not, use an
excelsior mat (like Curlex Blanket) to line the channel and
secure according to manufacturers recommendations. Seed all
exposed areas and mulch as necessary. Make slopes of grass lined
channels as gentle as possible. Use drop boxes if necessary to
lessen steep slopes.
H] Silt fencing should be used on the down slope .sides of
disturbed areas, such as at the toe of the dam, earthen
embankments, and at piles of stored soils. Silt fencing should
not be used as the only sediment control for large areas of soil
disturbance. Hang silt fencing on wooden or metal posts well
anchored into the soil. Do not allow sediment to flow under
loose fitting silt fencing. Anchor the bottoms of slit fences in
the soil and clean out small sumps or pools just in front of the
fences to allow for sediment build-up. Liquid heads over 1.5
feet high will likely damage silt fencing.
I] Maintain 15 feet vegetative buffers between disturbed areas
and property boundaries.
J] The contractor shall use good judgment and common sense to
install sediment and erosion control measures where needed. Keep
wind -row brush piles in place to catch sediment.
K] After final grading and permanent vegetation is well
established, maintain good covers with mowing and fertilizing.
Annually collect soil samples for analysis and crop fertilizer
and lime recommendations. Fertilize and lime native grasses
around the site and keep existing ground cover in tact as much as
possible. Maintain natural water ways and ditches. Plant new
cover grasses as necessary.
L] Mow grass as desired and in accordance with accepted
practices, especially around the lagoon area. Keep weeds and
floating weed mats off of the lagoon.
M] Repair mulch and seed beds as necessary if areas of dead
grass develop or erosion scars occur.
N] Use pesticides and herbicides only as a last resort to keep
grass stands healthy. Use housekeeping techniques to control
insects along with or instead of pesticides.
10

L. LAGOON MAINTENANCE SUGGESTIONS --
11 No shrubs or bushes are planned at this time. New shrubs and
trees should not be planted closer than 30 feet to the new lagoon
and not on the lagoon dam.
21 Once the lagoon is constructed and ready for filling, it is
very important to first add water to the lagoon prior to adding
swine manure. The owner should be careful to add water to the
lagoon until at least one third of the lagoon volume is achieved
before adding swine manure. This means the operator should
always strive to maintain a liquid depth of about 10 feet.
Initial water addition to the lagoon shall be from water wells on
the farm, but if storm water run-off can be easily added to the
lagoon it may be added in place of well water.
31 Research literature suggests a pH of 7.0 to 8.0 be maintained
in an anaerobic swine lagoon to obtain optimum treatment
conditions and minimize odors. During lagoon start-up the acid
forming bacteria will tend to populate faster then the methane
forming bacteria and can lower the overall pH of the lagoon
water. If this occurs, the owner/operator should add hydrated
lime to the lagoon at a rate of 1 pound per 1000 cubic feet of
water. The lime can be applied to the surface of the lagoon and
mixed into the surface waters until a proper pH is obtained.
Start adjusting the pH if the lagoon waters drop to or below a pH
of 6.7.
41 It is desirable to add manure daily in regular doses. This
is preferred to slug loading the lagoon at irregular intervals or
starving the microorganisms.
51 The lagoon sludge and/or wastewater can and should be tested
to determine its nutrient content prior to land applications.
Send effluent and sludge samples to the N. C. Department of
Agriculture, Agronomic Division, Plant Analysis Laboratory,
Raleigh, N.C. 27611. Plant or crop tissue samples can also be
sent for regular analysis.
61 Keep grasses and vegetation out of the lagoon. Floating mats
(not weed mats) are not likely to occur on swine lagoons. Such
mats will not interfere with performance and can be left in
place if present.
71 Take extreme care to select optimum conditions for spray
.irrigation of wastewater and sludge removal events. Careful
planing will help minimize odors. Irrigate wastewater in dry
warm weather if possible, preferably before 12 noon.
81 Water levels should be lowered before the on set of wet
weather seasons and in accordance with on -farm crop needs.
1 I

91 Regularly inspect the lagoon dam and earthen embankments for
settling or bulges, side slope stability, rodent damage, holds or
Pock marks, erosion scars, wave action damage, weeping, etc.
Weeds should be mown at least one time per year and two times per
year in heavy growth years.
101 Do not drive vehicles across emergency spillways. Keep the
spillway clear of limbs, tall plant growth, logs, floating
debris, sedimentation, etc. Watch for erosion and settling.
Keep outlet channel in good vegetative cover and free from
erosion.
Ill Grazing on dams and embankments can cause problems and is
not recommended.
121 Inspect all dams, earthen embankments, and emergency
spillway at least two times per year or after every significant
storm event.
131 Lagoons with floors below the seasonably high water table
should maintain the water levels in the lagoon above the
seasonably high level.
141 Irrigation pump intakes should be a minimum of 18 inches
below the lagoon liquid surfaces. The operator will occasionally
agitate the sludge on the lagoon floor while irrigating in order
to minimize sludge build-up.
151 Always maintain at least 1 foot of freeboard in lagoons with
Pump systems. Lagoons without dedicated pump systems should
maintain at least a 2 feet freeboard.
161 The volume of the lagoon designated for the 25 year - 24
hour storm should be kept void except in emergency situations.
This is not art of the six month_storace volume.
171 Emergency spillways should be kept clear
debris. A good grass of trash and
cover should be maintained at and down
slope of emergency earthen spillways.
181 occasional upsets to an anaerobic lagoon can be expected,
but the duration of such events should be very short. Rapid or
sudden temperature changes may cause some temporary changes in
lagoon performance. Long term cold snaps can also cause upsets.
The owner should strive to maintain a steady state condition in
the lagoon at all times. Avoid the use of harsh or chlorinated
chemicals in the confinement housing or in the lagoon.
191 New products are being developed to help minimize odors from
swine operations. The owner/operator may utilize such products
but these should only be utilized according to manufacture's
recommendations and with caution. Rapid additions of enzymes or
chemicals could cause microbial upsets. Use new products
carefully!
1?

M. CONCLUSIONS AND NOTICES
1. The lagoon system at the upper farm location is mostly
complete as of this PHASE II report. The contents of this report
are included herein to describe the lagoon and then compare these
numbers to the design parameters. For brevity reasons certain
portions of this report list average values or rounded numbers
when exact values are not appropriate or are of only small
percentages. The engineer feels as though the lagoon structure
as -built will function properly as an anaerobic treatment
structure for the swine effluent as long as the system is
maintained and the farmer agitates and irrigates the effluent on
a regular basis, controls erosion, etc. NO AMOUNT OF DESIGN CAN
TARE THE PLACE OF REGULAR AND PROPER MAINTENANCE!
2. The potential for bare soils to erode at this farm is medium
to high. This will require the farmer to repair erosion scars
during the course of filling the lagoon. It is important to re-
cover exposed rock within the lagoon prior to the interior being
covered with water. Likewise it is very important to repair any
erosion on the dam as soon as it is observed. GRASS SHOULD BE
PLANTED IMMEDIATELY ON ALL DISTURBED SOILS!
3. The engineer wishes to point out that certain construction
items are yet to be completed or are almost complete, e.g. grass
planting. These items must be done to have a satisfactory lagoon
system. Sediment and erosion control structures and practices
must be maintained as long as there is the potential for erosion.
This includes the planting and maintaining of grass. The farmer
will be continually responsible for maintaining all parts of this
system and completing the work as promised to the engineer.
4. The owner of this lagoon system shall be obligated to install
and operate the system according to the above specifications.
However the engineer realizes the on -site conditions may cause
some variations in as already mentioned. As long as the changes
are minor and improve the system and do not change the flow or
intent of the design, the changes can be made by the owner.
Brand name items mentioned in this document are given for example
only and may be changed as long as the function and quality are
not compromised.
5. The engineer takes no responsibility .for changes made to the
system before, during, or after construction without his
knowledge. Nor does the engineer take any responsibility for
human losses or property damages which should occur due to poor
workmanship, improper use of machinery, unknown conditions above
or below ground level, legal problems with boundary lines or
easements, acts of Nature, or "short-cuts" the owner may take in
system construction or operation.
1

6. The engineer has made a concerted effort to observe the lagoon
being constructed at different stages. However, as with most
existing systems there are components of the system that are not
visible and were not observed under construction. Therefore it
is necessary to assume certain things that are reasonable for
such systems. or take the information given by owners,
contractors, etc. Information given to the engineer by others
and used in these specifications shall be taken as truth if it
can notbe verified otherwise.
7. The owner must prevent the lagoon effluent from overtopping
the dam. The liquid level should never be allowed to rise to
within 1 foot to the overflow if at all possible.
8. While excavating the site, some soft rock was encountered in
addition to a few boulders. All free standing boulders were
removed from the lagoon interior. Any exposed boulders or rock
outcroppings were covered with a minimum of 2 feet of clay. In
most places the clay cover exists 3 to 7 feet deep.
********** END OF SPECIFICATIONS AND COMMENTS *********
The preceding specifications and comments have been reviewed
by the undersigned professional engineer and are believed to be
complete within the context of the scope of this project. The
lagoon(s) are ready for use, however the engineer acknowledges
more work is scheduled as documented herein and in correspondence
to the owner.
Preceding pages reviewed by Engineer: 1 thr
Professional Engineers Signature:/��
North Carolina P.E. Registration Number! 11602
Date of Signature and Seal:
�9
14
h 14.
am , P.E
�"0,Isiuurrjat4
�e CAR �Ai
e
SEAL
11602 .•ice :
'�' F a• •'�Ci' ,o
�FRp NCI
1#401ru11111%

I \ 1Sa1/Ait.( t LLLa
Yf a
�� s �qt
XG �7NtTX`��' ' SAP;,. c'; APPLFYF Z''LD ',FAIW. u17 , � 1 . r� Whil" l icc; E}�Fi��`P 1 � '0 r
RAND r CQMXa 'It
2lu y�j r 1111 1ilJS 1
Iil! • Y y a t+y mu n 2lLI' I.
13l1 •
2L7
1� v.
..m 1w �T 21L1 r*
J ' Wra1 t rl.0 ma,•� 21lJ • L ,•T 77 ; 211E 7!!1 Lt a;:
al In
nL Jul 1
ft F ti , ♦7 � T >yi r ]� I 1lZS � � ^ I
' Y •� 712.E `S
IL'1 5r 7Cadar
�.- •fff�faQl /
:221 'G t� tt ,� ► 1 JUL 10
23iL •• 1 t . w� 1 kt
011
:i � /�`•7 t17 � ).tlL �.7 ~ 'r ^ lLlt �� 2lit •^ '�
u r4S E�V R i v %:T . � M ♦. LLLt
/]+►Q � 2121 1
u 7 2LLt 7iJd • ]LJ1
_ lee, I uu
r7 q t' � fl•aram p •. � 71fy
•w.zr 4 2w 11J1 �e •i;i Rldy I
I7S! . n M 1 A 72 Gou oodl 1.1 3329 � �
a .P uu .7
u9! 1 uu i rN1 1
� i v
im
an I121
mu
e. •• rW 2l91 INS ILU
,s .7 LIMIs
�7 gyres 1
711Euu
UU
IiU
/ .r .� 1� ♦ "? Holly Sprinp l •7 3171 �y' 1
au Y 111E R.wwr 1CO2 tii a ILIA .'T Lul I
■ h 59L9,20Vin , 1134 '+ (r a ram i�j 16il, v i
t
7 L u1
� � � � � .,• is ♦` T Ot �,td• y 1111 a` �, t
ltll 4 . 1LU 11ZI t 7 7 ♦ 1t!!
` I31 �/rA/ob 4 r
7211.•r 7 -•� a 211E Graatrill• >�L7 y e / L1.t
• � i••�• , 7171
V u;Gcn "� ./ 11t! 7117 ff/I
ZLU• 2II1 �' , 4 1 � SL! 724! %y � Cd•rldp• i
L Il11 7 N.C. llr.• 3LiL lP9l .!
IOOLOOICAI IH7.
$ ►ARK LILi k • I
ro 2RN 27 I • > °.
IL212t11 r 71m1 1
1,0
. 7.7 �; - t4 • it • r:'St. 2141
IJ22 1 " S
''2 t ty,. LiL1 Lffi1 U� u u u 37 I
;�• • _r^.f •'1 � 31i1 1 � . t •7 _ r> 111! {• d � L!1
t • nd. ei n A Ill? 1
LS •s
L ! • 2 4 SLlL uu J
1131 L7
2W ILiL L1LL 2Li2 } t .�. 7L27 ♦
2m t
Ii 7
,NL8+ .•.r , 'b
11
1111 T• . tb :• 1t4L T ILtIII!+u4 , � J iii
•� i Z 2 1 �R Y)Irf. �1 ` J QI•llU �7 2
T� J 1
. 12� t• �°
f li1L LUL
r
H w JdldlWd 2> 21bL 121E •S+ 17r7
wr I1119 �' tl v 22!d ° , t 211p '♦ LLL7 11L1
h '• - am 2172 ;La to 11S1 `7 mu .7 1111 G r
'y - � 2l3I 4j1
Z •� !lu v 1A01 �{� 6M i 4 '.
. I=
1 �• 1llr 1➢A,L � 31
117E � 7,� 7LL2 ar �� LLl1 .r 72 10
LUI
USum
rk 31L9 3 I ��?
u p 1Ll1 k° �� tJ
wi
i
1 Sa.1•••. Lt LRO 1171 1RF2
10 yF�b7af 'i� 3 12 2!!! r LSr2 11I2
,T I
OROVt t IM y ! ILLS
a WAyrat y 31L2 11L2 213E 7 ty llai
` 9 111i . •• I J III! I { 1L17
..}•. .9 r77 ! ri �7L1! r 11ZL
lllt�1t • �,
)VS
M 0 0 R E C O U N T Y
1 '19

EXHIBIT 2
r r'•.f � . 4411
r
P •j t � • •ice _ � �a
' - `� • =� �'` • ��''' USGS TOPOGRAPHIC MA
f ;,� „� �, .t{:s, �'"•""°' P OF APPLEFIELD .
i : ►. c;, r.;.. �� RANDOLPH
.• U'F .: �j,���.l,..•�..,. .� COUNTY ,
rPI ... ► 'isq !t;'sl�:r.• ,.' '/:. .t'-1 0 �•:; l.l�� .rf'✓•
-,��� it � u1 •i. , •�'1��. - CF'.. •• ,••i•{,:. w:. :, ,, C,t '�,•-
Y �„ ra ; , ,:�s•:_� 'tit{ , r
r J j;1.:., cr ;� .p. ;a.•.`.-r `-1: :sta+,1 .iv1f``<
:� G►•f r •Y,�q :1 1.,;� •-':':, 1. •�, _ ','-;Yy�. •. -`tr:.;r::t�� �•A y Yy
•� "- :'yi[ �,��'��, ''!�%. •'{• r:.' :,:rid �`C:, rt''r44 �'
V74
•'1'' •! lY�•r•i'. .. r t..r �`' .r' :rrr. iil' .1L�: y,y� � Vr:. ••,'
}( rJx.'K �"� �)},, .'r��i. ,r :•.�•:;. Sri, ::y: �• r•'
t
•. .,�+ _�,• ,.': •t :'. x:'• :;j•� � ." ``'` .;::• DPM FARM
��� � rt :.; '•`= :��•'•� :' •.r LAGOON SITE
�1 yy ),IL/:l (:;{ii �. •• �. .':•17 _ '_P.
T.
719
HMO
ri
►', ,��.. N
LA ARM OON Slso
rj,
�{ 1!�',''�'111iii.�r, :� jIi�V;-•' . :•: r1 -' :. �.r`'�'� �.,` .
.1•t • �4Yt� 1• � i t �' �.: •I'9iP 1:, �•:;. `4
r'1 - r•• ,;,
lmllrl . a :
► ., `,.'d :i
:1t� ;r��`*u,'.•:�,,{ice ��::�t:.:�• 1w�
ti'i••.
-�;,P; •r• 1 r{� �Skt"', �� •••� :vrr. ''� .l•,�i'''r' 4t ..,.
��t. e '�`Fi%tiy1: •!' /• � �'/� r�' Vol: ',.�.'1 ':"% �'�'•' • . tr�•�'.�4 • •� •
tit'/a6 K ,}0 ON
ms` ,.. •} ~ ' , •,. `• ,• • �'rr •'t , , ,,'.,,..'.
• � fY�a
00
Ki I.... .r.l :� r , •.�ti,�e ,'- .�y„9V��- �•''•1.�� �
so
�, .j(rS��P .S V -� r^%r • 1 •a�5,'`,:'. "�yj, '!� ''•''-_,''r is �!{, �T ► t'{ ; °r, T.
AN
yy •rti / J.11 .r.
•( ,fir sfi`.•��:�'• ':(.i. �. 1 :�, .: �'Y• r •r
.,.. •�(.t4. ft 'f1 •r' r i:rr:. Y..F' fir
'F ' �1 ''2\t 'i 'tr r+�Srl �•y. '• �1 i A YS 1!1: � �
vi
LZ' 2 Jl - ;• �.,y .r's:�.., w ": f, 1e eft, h • _1aF�{'t• .,�•�S �:r. �.'rf. t {i! 1• :'. ./J, -'1-x �p`�`,',
BENNETT QUADRANGLE
_ice .��- `' ••:,., �, ,w�w•>
'NORTH CAROLIN
.5 MINUTE '' •;�'�. 'I ':'� .; ...
SERIES (TOPOGRAPHIC ,. `' ' •�'• ``r `r i �y`""'••'

41.
"V�!

.• µ/{�'=4;. 11 w`ee7l-Y MdCNir V
NI I F,
7 FRANCES P. SIMMONS
x
NI 1 6 ' q za v^ [ty COLER10GE TOWNSHIP RANOOLPH COUNTY NCM2TH CAROLINA
_ JVNE 21, 1993 SCALE: r.3oo,
SURVEY BY: BLMRW SLAVE S.
..^�'••ts ^L a.wy o..... �'��{+� b l 1 4483 FORK PREEN MLLL fl0 INC.
SEAGAOVF NC 27341
l��7-♦; 4 j.j' - ?L• at:
` GEr.ERgL LCcAln 0, UPPER
' •1' .�:. cF, str: i>w�E8o01C-"1. G NHS, �.�
n .w r•4.a • .si.e wn 4 i ,aJp„ $Ea Y _ - L
'�' ^'• -e•+r •5•••• wo_aa1L: f �L.2197 ,'13 _ APPLE FtEL•O PART'\
252.997 Ac•
c
Yy�
w 4r+a i.�"�•�••r. 4a wa
• � .. I,a•w-��Ir13�wa�.r.
a GENERAL LOCATION OF EXNlBlT4
u LOWER FARM ANNERO61C LAGOON
vl _ rraLOJ F\ /f �
102\506 �% ��nl• 1 loa aa.•ar. 'r fr
el
a'
Ilf f(1111:1 I� ['11; INf 1'1111l1) �~^—�-"a� •' ,• ✓/J VitinilY Mn

EXHIBIT 7
SOILS INVESTIGATION
RICKY COX
RANDOLPH COUNTY
Mr. Cox is planning the construction of a 11,000 feeder to
finish, swine operation. A waste treatment lagoon will be
constructed to hold and treat the effluent prior to land
application.
On August 19, 1993, a backhoe was used to excavate test pits
to determine site suitability for the construction of the
lagoon. The area for lagoon #1 has saprolite overlain with
CL, ML/CL or SC material as designated in the Unified
Classification System. This area should be satisfactory for
construction of an -animal waste treatment lagoon. The
structure will meet the criteria of the NC Dam Safety Law.
The cutoff trench under the embankment will be critical as
the foundation is shallow to weathered rock. This lagoon
would be for 9 to 10 swine houses. The area for lagoon #2
has weathered rock overlain by CL or SC material varying in
depth from 2 to 6 feet. .The pit designated as #5 was ten
feet deep with no weathered rock exposed. Lagoon #2 would
be for 4 or 5 swine houses.
The bottom of these lagoon will probably require lining with
a'12 inch layer of clayey -material. Borrow material is
available nearby that should be -adequate for the liner.
With stockpiling and selective placement, the site should
yield -enough clayey material*to.construct the e#ankments
and line the bottoms. Yardage calculations should show the
quantity of clayey material available and needed for the
embankments. The weathered rock and saprolite should be
used for construction of the building pad.
CONCLUSION
These sites are suitable for construction of waste treatment
lagoons. The clayey material -will need to be managed and
selectively placed.

United States Soil
Department of 530 W. Innes St.
Conservation riSalisbury, N.C. culture Serv'ce
2$144
Subject: ENG - Soils Investigation DATE: August 30, 1993
Ricky Cox
File Code: 210
To:
District Conservationist
Asheboro, NC
Attached is the soils report for the investigation of the
two lagoons for Mr. Ricky Cox. This report should be given
to Mr. Cox or his designer for use in -preparing the designs
for these lagoons. The quantity of clayey material will
need to be determined and may require some management and
selective placement.
Lagoon #1 will meet the criteria of the NC Dam Safety Law.
A permit to construct may not be needed as Mr. Cox owns all
the land between the lagoon and Deep River. He should check
with Mr. G. Douglas Miller, Regional Dam Safety Engineer in
Winston-Salem, NC, for a determination as to the need of a
permit to construct. In any case, recommend you send him
the first letter in dealing with a dam safety structure.
Example letter is in Part 506 of the National Engineering
Manual.
ka'e'
Vernon Jo
C.i.vi'1 Engineer
Attachment
c : T.H. Wetmore, Jr..
H.. J. Pate

0
SCS-ENG-538
Rev 5-10 U. S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
SOIL CONSERVATION SERVICE
SOIL INVESTIGATION TO DETERMINE SUITABILITY OF PROPOSED POND SITE
DFARATE
SME9 9L DISTRICT A,,rio
COUNTY-
S. C. S. PHOTO SHEET NO. WORK UNIT
WATERSHED AREA MEASUREMENTS
CROPLAND ACRES PASTURE ACHES
WOODLAND ACRES TOTAL ACRES POND CLASS WORK UNIT CONSERVATIONIST
SKETCH OF PROPOSED POND SHOWING WHERE BORINGS WERE MADE (Approa. scale 1'1 = feet)
Locate reference point in center line o/ dam and Identity on sketch.
ILE
j
ti
Ei
I I '
I i
IT
i
I � �• R� 1,IF, e f tr<I�
SHOW BORINGAUMBER AND PROFILE
DEPTH "(ake and list darn -site and soillwav borings firs! then Ponded area and borrow pit borings • separate wilh verrlcal red Ilne.
SCALE
lConrinued on back whery necessary! Show w ter table elevations on dam•sile borings.
z -s
'
i�1�l�t.■
I
■I■!■ice
©�■■■I
II
■I■MIN
■I■I■■I■I■!■®I■i■IL
■1■!■i■I■I■I■I■■1■I■IF
■■I■1■!■1■!■i■■1■Iwin
■I■I■■I■
I■i■�■I■I■f�
■I■!■i■1■I
i■1■!I■I■lam
�I■I■■1■1
■I■��l�f■llii
�■
�Is■■�■1■■1[■
�■I■E■�■■i�l■1
BORWGS• MADE BY
a-V
I■I■lE>�■�■I��
■I■!■I■�■
I■1■11�I■I■ii'il■i
I■I■I■
�■1■
■!■IL�I■i■iW,�l■I
■I■i■!■1■ICI■i■I■■i■
■I■1■1■1■1■I■f■I■1■1■
■f■i�■1■I■■1■1■!■I■
■!■[�lil■1■i■1■I■I■i■[
SIGNATURE & TITLE Ct

End Of Exhibit 7
TYPES OF MATERIAL ENCOUNTERED IN BORINGS
(Use one of systems below)
UNIFIED CLASSIFICATION
USDA CLASSIFICATION
GW - Well graded gravels; gravel, sand mix
g- gravel
GP -Poorly graded gravels
s - sand
GM -Silty gravels; gravel -sand -silt mix
vfs -very fine sand
GC -Clayey gravels; gravel -sand -clay mix
sl-sandy loam
SW -Well graded sands; sand -gravel mix
fsl-fine sandy loam
SP -Poorly graded sands
I - loam
SM -Silty sand
gl -gravelly loam
SC -Clayey sands; sand -clay mixtures
si - silt
ML - Silts; silty, v.. fine sands; sandy or clayey silt
sil - silt loam
CL - Clays. of low to medium plasticity
, cl -clay loam
CH - Inorganic clays of high plasticity
sicl -silty clay loam
MH -Elastic silts
i scl -sandy clay loam
OL -Organic silts and silty clays, low plasticity
sic -silty clay
OH -Organic clays, medium to high plasticity
c -clay
1. Suitable material for embankment is available M Yea a No (!nd(ca/e wAere (oca(ea on tht sketch on
rw+erse ilde)
REMARKS: afoor+ 'iz W,'/�!�-`
_ /0 1j a c✓s�S
2. EXPlain hazards requiring special attention in desig
n (Seepage. SArina.•rack ecJ
i2�=/err �'/ 'O� c".
41
A� � /,' /J • • �` G v , •r .? •tom .� =-t/ i � ` �•.�o /% ,+� r• �; ;
coo ,�/ � % ` � C / ^�--'• / � /
GENE MARKS: —

EXHIBIT 8
SWINE WASTE
UTILIZATION PLAN
Randolph County
Producer: AE�Ieiield Farm
Address: 7725 Frientfshig_Church_Rd�s_Brown S
Telephone' Number: (910) 6RAW _ ummi tti_NC__27214
Kind of Operation: — _<_sh��)
F er-at i on: Q2A2r=to;Fi n i sh Type of Waste Facility: Swine
Water- and air- qua I i ty protection require
waste from agr- i c u I tur-a I c�perat i ons . Recycling p`,�-per management +�f organic
by' I and application forforPlant uptake andcr-o f agricultural waste rnater i a l s
proven waste utilization technique. Properly done, crecyc I tion i ng byal an Bona I and
application and crop uptake is an environmentally sound method of waste
management.
Your animal waste management facility has been designed for a given
storage capacity. When the waste reaches the designed level it roust be land
applied at a specified rate to prevent pollution -of surface and/or- ground
water. The plant nutrients in the animal waste should banalbere
application cycle and annual sOiI tests are encouraged so thatyaIII pliant each
nutrients can be balanced for realistic yields for the crop to be grown.
SPECIFICATIONS GUIDE
Several factors are important in implementing
order- to coax i rn i ze the fert i I i zer- value of the wastewand etout
ensure 'that on I it is
applied in an environmentally safe manner-.
1. The Asheboro Fi e I d Office roust have documentation in the design folder
that You either- own or have long term access to adequate land on which to
properlye
Y apply the waste. If
au do
apply lye waste y not own adequate land on which to properly
you shall provide SCS with a copy of a written agreement with
a landowner(s) who is/are within reasonable pro:;
imtyuse the
land for waste application for the life expectancyiof�theIproductiontfacility.
(This document signed at the bottom by landowners will be sufficient). If an
agreement is dissolved you are responsible for obtainin
cant i nue�yo apply your waste in an env i ronrnenta I Iy� safe g si
mannnene . i ent land to
r.
Waste shoal I be applied to meet the n i tr-ogen bayed crrr sail needs for realistic yields
type, available moisture, historical data, cfimate conditions,
and level pf management, unless there are regulations that restrict the rate of
application of ether nutrients.
An_i rna I waste sha I I not be applied F +
I i ed to I and . erc+ding at greater- than
tons per`-- acre per year. F
4.-Waste shall be incorporated immediately after- spreading on areas
sub,jett .to flooding. Waste is not to be applied on areas subject to flooding
unless incorporation is used.

• Liquid waste shall be
appledinfiltration rate such that r-un off i doestn ott�ccu _�t to exceed the so i 1
not cause drift from the site dur- i rr a GY and in a method which d
g p�licatian.
r• Waste shall not be applied to saturated soils or on land when the
surface is frozen.
`� 7. Apply waste to growingcrop 1
s i n Such a manner that no more than 20
Percent of the leaf area is covee red.
L • Waste nutrients shall not be . Planted crops on soils with a l-r i 3 h p��ential for leaching unless special
applied i n fa 1 1 or winter for spring
precautions are taken to minimize leaching and erasion
te
rates on these soils should be held to a rn i n i mum and w i nter stover tc rats p 1 a,
i ens I oa
to take up released nutrients.
9. Waste shall not be applied closer than Z5 feet to surface water.
Tt
distance maybe reduced provided adequate vegetative filter strips
in. Waste sha 1 I not be a � G are prase
closer than IUCr feet from water wells fo
human consumption. Flied cl
11. Waste sha1I_not be applied closer than 200 feet
than those awned by the Ianduser. of dwellings Other
er
12. Waste shall be applied in a manner not to reach other property and
public right-of-ways.
G
The acres needed to apply the animal waste are based car, WOW content for this type of faciIit
y.based an the waste analysis report from
requirementsYay b nutrient
ag may be more o. less
Your waste management facility.
The_design_of_Maur_wastg_management_facilitY_is_based_gn the fa
Amount of waste produced per year:
1Z2
2
2
animals X 927 gals. of waste/anirnall ear
waste produced. Y = 114Q21QG_total gallons of
Amount of Nitrogen Produced Per Year:
12Q00 animals. .r 243 I bs. Nitrogen/an irna I /year 2g5rQ I bs. of
total Nitrogen.
Applying the above amount of waste is a bi
appropriate equipment to apply g job - You should plan time and hav
designed for 1$Q days of stFragehe Thewastefor-reaitiwiel I needly
least ever Your facility is
Y 6 months. t,, be emptied at

+------------------------------------------------------------------------------
!the following acreage for waste application will be -needed based on the crop
!to be grown and surface application:
+-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
FIELD
I SOIL 1 CROP
1 REALISTIC 1-LBS.
N.1 ACRES 1 LBS.'N. ''-MONTH(s)
I TYPE 1
1 YIELD 1
/ACRE 1 1 UTILIZED 1 APPLIED
-
'--;--------1}----
'-
a--
--- —k
---=�----�p+-
- 3--
---' ---
-'-----------1---
---1---�-�J--- i �-- � fir=°
----' ----- --
_______ ___
—
--
'--------- '
-- --- _ L3.— —� ---- l ----
--
-—
-
- -
-
- -
- - -- -
— �! ---'
------'------'
-----------'
-- ---- ----
--------' ---3 --' — 3ZZO ---- —
TOTAL '
a
AMOUNT OF N PRODUCED ,ggo
NARRATIVE OF OPERATION:
+----------------•---------------------------------------------------------------
1 Ueper_anti_Lawer-aperations.
------------------------------ --------------------------------------------------
Ca.11 the Randolph Soil and Water- Conservation District Office after you receive
waste analysis report to obtain the amount per acre .to apply pr- i or to app Ly i ng
the waste. The p per i 0 27-439.
Prepared by:
B. Barton Ro er-son
lv
Concurred by: (�/S:5�
0�� j7q
A iplef eld Farro
Other- Landowners
(if applicable)
(3/10/94)

U -S. Department of Agriculture
Soil 1 Conservation � Pale 1
Soil onser - an Service Oct
--------------------------------------------------ober 14,-19-4---
Applefield Farm
FIELD SOILS LISTING
Field
-----------------------
Number(s)
- 1 10
11 2 4 •.5 .,a 6 6a 7 S 9 ga
Field
Soil
Map
--- -----
Map Unit
-------------------------------
-----------
Number
Survey
Symbol
------`-------------------------------
Acres
Soil Map Unit Name
1
151
45C2
2.6
BADIN-TATUM COMPLEX,
S TO,15 PERCENT -_`-
2
15I
45C23.5
SLOPES, ERODED
BADIN-TATUM-COMPLEX,
S TO 15 PERCENT
151
SLOPES, ERODED
41L�
4.9
CID-LIGNUM-COMPLEX, 2 TO 6 PERCENT
4
151
41B
2.2
SLOPES
CID-LIGNUM COMPLEX, 2 TO 6 PERCENT
4
151
45C:2
2.2
SLOPES
BADIN-TATUM COMPLEX,
8 TO 15 PERCENT
5a
151
41B
1.0
SLOPES, ERODED
CID-LIGNUM'COMPLEX, 2
TO 6 PERCENT
5
151
45CZ
1.9
SLOPES
BADIN-TATUM COMPLEX,
S TO 15-PERCENT
5
151
41B
4.0
SLOPES, ERODED
CID-LIGNUM COMPLEX, 2
TO 6 PERCENT
6a
151
41B
5.0
SLOPES
CID-LIGNUM COMPLEX, 2
TO G PERCENT
6
151
45B
8.6
SLOPES
BADIN-TATUM COMPLEX, 2 TO S-PERCENT
7
151
45C2
0.9
SLOPES
BADIN-TATUM COMPLEX; 8 TO'15 PERCENT
7
151
41B
1.0
SLOPES, ERODED.
CID-LIGNUM COMPLEX, 2
TO 6 PERCENT
S
151
41D
2.3
SLOPES
CID-LIGNUM COMPLEX, 2
TO-6 PERCENT
9a
151
45BZ
5.0
SLOPES
%ADIN-TATUM COMPLEX, 2
I
TO 8 PERCENT
SLOPES, ERODED
151
41B
5.4
CID-LIGNUM COMPLEX, 2
TO 6 PERCENT
151
45C2
5.4
SLOPES
BADIN-TATUM COMPLEX, S
TO 15 PERCENT
9
151
SLOPES, ERODED
45BZ
13.0
BADIN-TATUM COMPLEX, 2
TO 3 PERCENT
10
151
45132
5.8
SLOPES, ERODED
BADIN-TATUM COMPLEX, 2
TO S PERCENT
11
151
SLOPES, ERODED
45C2
9.3
8ADIN-TATUM COMPLEX, S
TO 15 PERCENT
SLOPES, ERODED

U.S. Department of Agriculture
,S6 i I ConservationService
Page - 1
10/14/94
Applefield Farrn
NONTECHNICAL SOILS DF-SCRIPTION REPORT � '
FOR DESCRIPTION CATEGORY - SOI
Field Number(s) - 1 10 11 2 3 4 5 5a 6 6a 7 S 9 9a
-------------------------------------------------------
Map
Syrnbo I Description
--------------------------------------------------
413 CID-LIGNUM COMPLEX, Z TO 6 PERCENT SLOPES This map unit
consists of 50 to 60 percent Cid soils and 40 to 50
percent Lignum soils. C:id soils are deep and
moderately well drained soil and on uplands. It has
formed in residuum from sericite schist or phyllite.
The surface layer is to -&my. A significant -amount of
gravel is mixed in the surface layer is common. The
subsoil is clayey and loamy with a fairly high silt
content. Permeability Is very slow. Available water
capacity is moderate to high. Shrink -swell potential i5
moderate. The seasonal high water table is within a
depth of 1 to 2.5 feet. Lignum soils are very deep and
moderately well drained soil and are on uplands. It has
formed in residuum from sericite schist or.phyllite.
The surface layer is loamy. The subsoil is clayey and
loamy with a fairly high silt content. Permeability is
very slow. Available water -capacity is -moderate to
high. Shrink -swell potential is moder-ate. The seasonal
high water,table is within'a depth of 1 to 2.5 feet.
453 SADIN-TATUM COMPLEX, Z TO S .PERCENT SLOPES This map
unit consists of 50 to 60 percent Badin•soils and 30 to
40 percent Tatum soils. Badin soils ar.e moderately
.deep and well drained and are on uplands. Ua�dIn soils
have formed in residuum from Carolina slates. The
surface layer is loamy with 15 to 35 percent ch.anners
mired in. The subsoil is clayey.and loamy with some
channers mixed in. Permeability is moderate. Available
water capacity is moderate to low. Shrink -swell
potential is moderate. Bedrock is within a depth of ZO
to 40 inches. The seasonal high water- table is below 6
feet. Tatum soils are deep and well drained and are on
uplands. Tatum soils have formed in -residuum from
Carolina slates. They have a loamy surface layer and a
loamy and clayey subsoil. Permeability is moderate and
available -water capacity is moderate to high.
Shrink -swell potential is moderate. The seasonal high
water- table is below 6 feet.
45BZ CADIN-TATUM COMPLEX, 2 TO S PERCENT SLOPES, ERODEd This
map unit consists of 50 to 60 percent Badin soils and
'o to 40 percent Tatum soils. Badin soils are
moderately deep and well drained and are on uplands.
Badin soils have formed in residuum from Carolina
slates. The surface layer is loamy with 15 to 35

U.-S. Department of Agriculture Page - 2
Soil Conservation Service 10/14/74
--------------------------------------------------------- ----------------
Applefield Farm -
NONTECHNICAL SOILS DESCRIPTION REPORT
FOR DESCRIPTION CATEGORY - SGI
Field Number(s) - 1 10 11 2 3 4 5 5a 6 6a 7 S 9 9a
--- ----------------------------------------------------------------------
Map
Symbol Description
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
percent channers mixed in. The .subsoil -is clayey and
loamy with some channers mixed in. Permeability is
moderate. Available water capacity is -moderate -to -low.
Shrink -swell potential hs moderate. Bedrock is within a
depth of 20 to 40 inches. The seasonal high water table
is below 6 feet. Tatum soils are deep and well drained
and are on uplands. Tatum soils have formed in residuum
from Carolina slates. -They have a loamy surface layer
and a loamy and clayey subsoil. Permeability is
moderate and available water capacity is moderate to
high. Shrink -swell potential is moderate. The seasonal
high water- table is below 6 feet.
45CZ BADIN-TATUM COMPLEX, 2 TO 15 PERCENT SLOPES, ERODED
This map unit consists of 50 to 60 percent Badin soils
and 30 to 40 percent Tatum soils. Badin soils are
moderately deep and well drained and are on uplands.
Badin soils have formed in residuum from Carolina
slates. The surface layer is loamy with 15 to 35
percent channers mixed in.'The subsoil is clayey and
loamy with some channers mixed in. Permeability is
moderate. Available water- capacity is moderate to low.
Shrink -swell potential is moderate. Bedrock is within a
depth of 20 to 40 inches. The seasonal high water table
is below 6 feet. Tatum soils are deep and well drained
and are on uplands. Tatum soils have formed in residuum
from Carolina slates. They have a loamy surface layer
and a loamy and clayey subsoil. Permeability is
moderate and available water- capacity is moderate to
high. Shrink -swell potential is moderate. The seasonal
high water- table is below 6 feet.

• �' L ti f Y'rJ 6 'Y tr r• . j if ylji,
iii - { � r+^k - �� �r " � rk �` {� .r^ ♦ ? � � �rT S � tit
?jZ,vi
!. _ i � }Jt h f" �� '-t� /4 � � .., I _ - � •� �yu i ."Yt tf �d`,
w 4`
Y <ii
'.7 t _Tt' i ��..,;C ? �� S rt .. ;A,}- � ?tv` + `.....+� �� -: C� t •, �. :-� � � .f.� .c �' +J..
�, .,i`, .�. � :^t v •yam �< i- '�- , �. y
t
i.{ r �� k k ♦ �ppgy��E,' f _ ,,
I 4trF f`` t ••� ''x { fit. a _y �,+i,�
e � � T �i � 1 �' �z _ 4 F.� Y `w� b,• � � . ; � �� -'� dr ` y
Owl
oz
J- M -s' Jt i law
�i'�µ i :r Fi' T'� • t r- �' r t � 4�, �{� � � t i r tv �ti � � �I � } � e'
�...4u a✓d +kl ' �. '�' - ` �' i.. wr1,t~ .` h h4 'S, k-`�.y_��. -; �' 4' ,._
t R
� ' \r ♦-+ySry ♦., Sy, 2ti �' I �V.0 .y � .. k�a i` �� -� � k K4 J�H�
._Airv-:4 ..�r-�:1 �...`�k4r ��ti•a==ti .�"�'�.>;" ,.: �_'.

Toole 6.100
TemporarySeeding Seeding lbixture
Racommendallons for Fall 8prob/ • Hilo (Ib/acre)
Rye �g ow 120
Seeding delea.'..
Mountains- .4g,16 • Dog, 16
Coastal Plain and Plodmonl-Aug, tb. Dec.30
Soil amendments
Follow solf lasts c(Opply 2,000 IWacre ground agricultural limestone and
1.000Iblaore 1W10.10 1rdUaer.
Mulch
Apply 4,000IWaoro straw. Anchor straw by lacking wlth asphalt, nening,
or a mulch anchoring tool, A disk with blades sat nearly straight can be
us od as a mulch anchoring tool,
Maintenance
Repair and rolertlUzo damsppod areas Immodlateiy, Topdresa with 60
lb/acre of nlvogen.ln Marchr•U It Is necessary to extend temporary cover
beyond Jupe 16, ovoresed with 60 lo/aom Kobe (Pladmoni and Coastal
Plain) or Korean (Mountains) lespedoza ki tale February or @Lily March.
Table 6,10a
Temporary seeding
$coding mixture
Recommendations for Late
species Rate (Iblacre)
Winter and Early Spring
Rye (grain) 120
Annual lespodoza (Kobe In
Piedmont and Coastal Plain,
Korean In Mounlalni) 60
Omll annual lespedaza when durailon of temporary cover is not to extend
beyond June,
Seoding,dales
Movnlalns—Above 2600 it: Feb. 16 • May 15
. Below 2600 it; Feb.1 : May 1
Piedmont—Jan,1 • May 1
Ceastsl Plain—Ovo, 1 • Apr, lb
Sell amendments '
Follow recommendations of soil tests or apply 2,o001Wave grovnd agricul-
tural limestone and 760 iWacre I g-10.10 fertilizer,
Mulch
Apply 4,000 (Wows straw. Anchor straw by tacking with asphalt, Waning,
or a mulch anailodag loot A disk with blades $al newly zvalghi can be
usad as a mulch anchoring tool. •
Maintenance
RefertUlza pgroWlh is nolfuity adequate. Rcaeed, refenlllze and mulch im•1
medlalely foUowlrig erosion orother damage,
Pracllce Standards and$pec�flcarians
Table 6.1O1;
Temporary Seeding
seeding mixture
Recommendations for
Species Rate (lb/scre)
Summer
G$(manmillet 40
In the Pladmont and Mountains, a small•stommsd Sudangrass may be
subathuted at a rate of 50lb/acre,
Seeding dates
Mountaln"ay 15 • Aug. IS
Piedmont-�y 1 • Aug. 16
coastal Plain --Apt. 16 • Avg. 16
Soli amendments
a
Follow r000mmandagons of sell tests or apply2,0001dlacre ground agricul-
turn! limesone and 760 kslaora 10.10.10 fartUizer.
Mulch
Apply 4,000 b/acra straw. Anchor straw by taoking with asphalt, nutting,
or a mulch anchoring tool. A disk with blades set nearly straight can be
used as a mulch anchoring tool.
Maintenarloe
Relonlllts9growth I& not fully adequate, Raseed,relertUlzeand mulch lm•
t mWi ately loalowing erosion or other damage,
I
EXHIBIT 9

EXHIBIT 10
Practice Slandards and Specifications
Table 6.11 o
Seeding No, 5P for:
,Grass lined Channels
Seeding mixture
Spoclest Rate (Ib/acre)
Tall loscuo 200 (4.5 Ib/1,000 ft2}
Nurso plants
Betwoon May 1 and Aug.15 add 15 lb/acre Sudangrass or 10 lb/acre Ger-
man millet. Before May 1, or After Aug, 15, add-40 lb/acre rye (grain).
Seeding dales
Besl: Aug. 25 -Oct,
Possiblo: Fob. - Apr. 15
Avoid seeding Irom Nov, to Jan. If seeding must be done at this time, add
40 Ib/acro ryo grain and use a channel llning that offers maximum protec-
tion.
Soil amendments
Apply limo and fertilizer according to soil tosts, or apply 4,000 Ib/acre
ground agrlculiuralllmoslono and 1,0001b/acro 10-10-10 fertilizer. Operate
tillage equipment across the waterway.
Mulch
Use Juto, excelsior matting, pr other effective channel lining material to
cover the bottom of channels and ditches, and staple securely. The lining
should extend above ilia highest calculated depth of flow. On channel side
slopes above this height, and In drainages not requiring temporary linings,
apply 4,000 lb/acre grain straw and anchor straw by stapling netting over
Iho top.
Mulch and anchoring materials must not bo allowed to wash down slopes
whore they can clog drainage devices.
Maintenance
Inspect andiepair mulch frequently. Refortilize In lalbkwinter of tho follow.
Ing yoar; use soil tosts or apply 150 lb/acre 10.10.10, Mow regularly to a
height of 2-4 Inchos.
'Refer to Appondrx 8.02for botanical names.
6,11.23

rracuce Standards and Specifj
Table 6,11k
Saedlrig No. 1P for; Sleep
Slopes or Poor S011s; Lo4v
Maintenance
Seeding mixture
species,Rate (lb/acre)
Tall fescue.
100
Soricoa lospedoza 30
Kobe lospedoza
10
Seeding notes .
1. In Eastern Piedmont add 25 Iblacre Pensacola Bahiagrass or 1 o ibiacre
common Bermudagrass, Use common Bermudagrass only where it is un-
likoly to becomo a pesi.
2. After Aug. 15 use unscarifled sericoa seed.
3. Whore a noat appoaranoe Is desired, omit sericoa and substitute 40
lb/acre Bahlagrass or 15 Ib/acre Bermudagrass.
4, To extend spring seeding dales Into June, add 15 Ib/acre hulled Bor.
mudagrass. However, it Is preferable to seed temporary cover and seed
foscue in Sept. -
Nurse plants
Botvroon May 1 and Aug. 15, add 10 lb/acre German millet or 15 lb/acre
Sudangras3, Prior to May 1 or after Aug. 15, add 40 Iblacre rye (grain),
Seeding dates
Bost Possiblo
Fall: Aug. 25 - Sept.15 Aug, 20 - Oct. 25
Late Sri►mor: Fob. 15 - Mar. 21
Fob. 1 -Apr, 15
Fall is best for tall fescue and late winter for lospedezas. Overseeding of
Kobo lospedoza overfall-soeded tall fescue Is very effective. Bermudagrass seed In fall. Use unhuiled
S011 amendments
Apply lime and fertilizer according 10 soil tests, or apply 4,000 lb/acre
ground agricultural limestone and 1,000 lb/acre 10-10.10 fertilizer.
Mulch
Apply 4,000.5000 Ib/acro grain straw, or equivalent ¢qvof another
sultablo mulching material, Anchor mulch by tacking with es7halt, roving,
or netting. Notting is the preferred anchoring method on steep slopes.
Maintenance
Refortilizo 10 the second year unless growth is fully adequate. May be
mowed once or twice a year, but mowing is not necessary. Reseed, fertil-
ize, and mulch damaged areas Immediately.
'Refer to Appendix 8.02 for botanical names.
NOTE: DO NOT USE SERICE A LESPEDEZA SEEDING ON DAM!
(
f
6,11,19

ractice Stt.Aards. arcd SpecifecadortS
-------------
'fable 5.11m
Seeding No. 3P for; Geritio
Slopes, Solis with Average or
Setter Moisture Retention,
Cooler Sites; Higli
Maintenance
Seeding mlxtu Io
Spoclos
Blend of two turf -typo tall
tescuos.(90%) and two or
moro Improved tKontucky
bidograss variolios (10%)
Rate (ib/acro)
200.250
seeding dates Boatpossible
Fall: Aug. 25 - Sept. 15 Aug. 20.Oct, 25
Vlintor: — Feb.1 - Mar. 31
For quality turf avoid spring sooding. Where grading is completed during
lato winter or spring; an alternative is to seed 30 Wave Kobe lespedeza,
troop moviod, preparo soodbed, and seed a permanent mixture In early
tali.
Soil amendments 4,000 lb/acre
Apply lime and terlilizor according to soli tests, or apply
ground agricultural limestone and 1,o00 lb/acre 10-10.10 fertilizer,
Mulch
equivalent cover of
Apply 4,000 Ib/acro small grain straw or .another
suitable mulch, Anchor straw by tacking with asphalt, netting, or roving of
by crimping with a mulch anchoring tool, A disk with blades set nearly
straight can bo used as a mulch anchoring tool.
Maintenance 40 lb/acre nitrogen in Jan. or Feb.,
Fortilizo according to soil tests or apply
40 lb in Sopl., and 40 Ib in Nov„ from a 12.4•8, 16.4-8 , or similar turf fer-
tllizer. Avoid tortilizor applications during warm weather, as this Increases
stand
osoodlosses
lortllltzo�and mul hMow
damag d areas immediately.
Imm d atInches as needed.
R
'Rolor to Appondlx s.o2 for botanical names,

64-600fV
3116 9
2) Exhibit 1 shows a sketch of the final lagoon and some
construction details. This exhibit is provided to help
illustrate certain construction parameters which are difficult to
verbally explain.
3) All estimations made within this package are as close as
reasonable for this type of operation. The engineer can not take
responsibility for future management of the lagoon, ].however the
owners have made a serious commitment to manage all wastes
closely.
1.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
19.
20.
21.
22.
23.
24.
25.
26.
27.
. 5kqAn1a<'j
J
*&'3
"AS -BUILT"
LAGOON CONSTRUCTION SUMMARY
Number of hogs = 4,500 (4,400 average).
Type of facility = Finishing operation.
Type of lagoon = Single stage anaerobic.
25 year 24 hr. storm intensity = 6.41 in.
Estimated run-off from surrounding land into
Waste storage period = 6 months
Desi n c 't 4
the lagoon = 0
adequate
g r eria = adequate odor control, irrigate sludge.
Settled dam height = 69.08 feet contour.
Inside lagoon side slopes = 2 to 1 and 3 to 1.
Sludge accumulation criteria = 0 (irrigate sludge).
Minimum treatment volume = 1 cu. ft./lb.
Six month storage plus excess rainfall = 0.5 cu. f t./lb.
Average animal weight = 135 lbs.
Built in free board = 1 ft.
Sludge accumulation ... 0 gal.
..............
Design treatment volume .4,544,100 gal.
6 month storage (plus excess rain) ......... 2,272,050 gal.
25 year 24 hr. storm ....................... 348,093 gal.
TOTAL VOLUME (less freeboard) 7,164,243 gal.
Top dimensions °°°.°.°°" `°°'°'° Irregular
Bottom dimensions
Approx. rain catch°surf ace area................°°° Irregular
Max. liquid depth. 2 acres.
Approx. pumping intervals (start/stop). °'°° " ' 13.5 ft.
Minimum liquid depth -to maintain p .. '°°°°°° 13 ft ft.
Depth of emergency overflow (depth • from .floor)...„ 6 3.77 ft.
7 7 ft.
Lagoon floor contour from bench mark (avg.)......... 54.31 ft.
Estimated volume overdesign (for safety) ............. 2.5 %
i
ra m
av\
(lac
\� sic �a 5` �j r -``�

ROY COOPER
cofted6r
MICHAEL & REGAN
Seer rary
LINDA CULPEi PPER
binlaor
o? SrA�
ca
NORTH CAROUNA
ErtAronmental Qaaltry
February 27, 2019
Philip 1=aucette
Applefield Farm -Lower & Upper
7725 Friendship Rd
Browns Summit, NC 27214
Subject: Application for Renewal of Coverage for Expiring State General .Permit
Dear Permittee:
�WS -760003
Your facility is currently approved for operation 'under one of the Animal Waste Operation State Non -Discharge Geuetal Permits,
which expire on September 30, 2019. Copies of the new animal waste operation State Non -Discharge General Permits are available
at httt)s:lldeq.nc.Eov/abouUdivisions/water-resources/water-civalih-zMgional-operations/afo or by writing or calling.
NCDEQ-DWR
Animal Feeding Operations Program
1636 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1636
Telephone number: [phone]
In order to assure your continued coverage under the State Non-Dischargc General Permits you must submit an application for
omit coverage to the Division. Enclosed you will find a "Reouest for Certificate of Covera a Facili Curren iv Covered by an
Emirinp- State Non -Discharge General Permit." The application form must be complete&L sieved and returned by April: 3. 2019.
Please note that you must include one 1 co v of the Certified Animal Waste Management Platt CAZVMP with the
completed_and_ signed application form. A list of items included in the CAWMP can be found on oaae 2 of the renewal
application fern.
Failure to request renewal of your coverage under a general permit within the time period specified may result in a civil penalty.
Operation of your facility without coverage under a valid general permit would constitute a violation of NCGS 143-215.1 and could
result in assessments of civil penalties of up to $25,000 per day.
If you have any questions about the State Non -Discharge General Permits, the, enclosed application, or any related matter please feel
free to contact the Animal Feeding Operations Branch staff at 919-707-9100.
Sincerely,
Jon Risgaard, Section Chief
Animal Feeding Operations and Groundwater Section
Enclosures
cc (w/o enclosures): Winston-Salem Regional Office, Water Quality Regional Operations Section
Randolph County Soil and Water Conservation District
AFOG Section Central Files - AWS760003
N G Purvis Farms Inc
�� N.+z!}:isaar:v7?�zrxn=_atofirtvraa;r=_r:a;�kus:#}j Jar=s<rr�5i1'sier��arr.-r�=
F.7o Pt. Sa€stun• St. 1 163& 61.9:.Serv:ze Cect_r I fie =rah. Nora; waro:-im 2?S90-1686

13, Waste Treatment and Storage Lagoons (Verify the following information is accurate and complete, Make all necessary
corrections and provide missing data.)
Structure
Name
Estimated
Date
Built
Liner Type
(Clay, Synthetic,
Unknown)
Capacity
(Cubic Feet)
Estimated
Surface Area
(Square Feet)
Design Freeboard
"Redline"
(Inches)
LOWER
3/16/1994
67,044.00
UPPER
10/1311994
Mail one (1) copy of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP) with this completed and signed application
as required by NC General Statutes 143-215;1OC(d) to the address below -
The CAWMP must include the following components:
1. nlp most recent Waste Utilization Plan (WUP), signed by the owner and a certified technical specialist, containing
a. The method by which waste is applied to.lie disposal -fields (e.g: inigaton, injection, etc.)-
b. A map of every field used for land application (for example. irrigation map)
c. The soil series present on every land application field
d. The crops grown on every land application field
e. The Realistic Yield Expectation (RYE) for every crop shown in the WUP
£ The maximum PAN to be applied to every land application field
g. The waste application windows for every crop utilized in the'% -'UP
h. The required NRCS Standard specifications
2. A site map!schetnatic
3. Emergency Action Plan
4. Insect Control Checklist with chosen best management practices noted
5. Odor Control Checklist with chosen best management practices noted
6. Mortality Control Checklist with selected method noted - Use the enclosed updated Mortality Control Checklist
7. Lagoon/storage pond capacity documentation (design, calculations, etc.) Please be sure the above table is accurate and
complete. Also provide any site evaluations, wetland determinations, or hazard classifications that may be applicable to
your facility.
8. Operation and Maintenance Plan
If your CANilMP includes any components not shown on this list, please include the additional components with your submittal.
(e.g. composting, digesters, waste transfers; etc.)
As a second option to mailing paper copies of the application package, you can scan and email one signed copy of the
application and alt the CAWAIP items above to: 2019PermitRenewal@?nedenr.gov

I attest that this application has been reviewed by me and is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that,
if all required parts of this application are not completed and that if all required supporting information and attachments are not
included, this application package will be returned to me as incomplete.
Note: In accordance with NC General Statutes 143-215.6A and 143-215.6B, any person who knowingly makes any false statement,
representation, or certification in any application may be subject to civil penalties up to $25,000 per violation. (18 U_S.C.
Section 1001 provides a punishment by a tine of not more than $10,000 or imprisonment of not more than 5 years; or both for
a similar offense.)
Printed Name of Signing Official (Landowner, or if multiple Landowners all landowners should sign. If Landowner is a
corporation, signature should be by a principal executive officer of the corporation):
Name: r )
_ 'e Title:
Signotu5v _- _ Date: — ^ ,
.I"
Name: _ 1 , 14 Title: _ Q V` liR" l-
Signature: Date:
Name:
Signature:
Title:
Date:
THE COMPLETED APPLICATION' SHOULD BE SENT TO THE FOLLOWING ADDRESS:
NCDEQ-DWR -
Animal Feeding Operations Program
1636Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1636
Telephone number: [phone]
F-mail: 2019PermitReneivalCn;ucdenr gov
FORM: RENEWAL STATE GENERAL 02/2019

ENVIRONMENTAL
ENGINEERING SERVICE
2145 Foxfire Road
Jackson Springs, NC 27281
[phone]
Fax [phone]
TO
AS -BUILT SWINE EFFLUENT TREATMENT
AND ANAEROBIC LAGOON DESIGN FOR
APPLEFIELD FARM -
LOCATION IN RAViDOLPH' r-O . v N.C.

\ ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING SER
VICES
i
Water • Wastewater • Sludge • Agricultural • Industriai • Civil
P
0:
October 10, 1994
NCDEHNR ; Division of Land Resources ,%
Land Quality Section
P.O. Box 27687
Raleigh, N.C. 27611-7687
Attn: James K. Leumas, P.E.
Re: Earthen dike completion
notification at Applefield
Farm - upper farm location,
Randolph Co.
Dear Mr. Leumas,
Please find enclosed two copies of the "As Built" plans for
the above referenced site. Please note that we were able to
obtain sufficient volume within a single containment structure,
which kept us from building a second structure as origi.na),Iy
placed. I believe this liquid containment: facility has been
constructed in accordance with sound and proven methods for
earthen dike construction. Clay liners are also in place is
prescribed.
The enclosed documents should contain sufficient information
for the owners of Applefield Farm to operate the lagoons. Please
note my letter to Mr. Barton Roberson which outlines the items
remaining to be completed (e.g. landscaping). If you have
questions please feel free to call my office.
cc: Philip Faucette
Barton Roberson
enclosures
Best Re "rds,
4V
I,arr Grah , P.E.
Env' nmental Engineering Services
5647 N.C. HIGHWAY 211, WEST END, N.C. 27376-9001 • [phone]

CUP .
ANIHAL WASTS HANAGENE'NT PLAN CZRTIPICATION FOR inM OR =PAMED FHF,DLOTS
P1�&ame, rstu= the, cazaylatad loan to the Division of Bnvir0n:n4atal 2Sa a9&:aont at
the address on the reverse side of thiA fors.
Name of farm (Please print): APPLEFIELD FARM - UPPER FARM LOCATION
Address:_
Phone No.:�,g1❑1 Fi�,Fi_7594
Countys
Farm locationz_ L—
atitude and Longitudes.3L _U 15 /,29 3b 55 (required) . Also,
please attach a copy of a county, road, map with location identified.
Type of operation (swine, layer, dairy, etc.): qwi ne- - Tnpp; ng Floors -
Design capacity (number of animals).:
Average size of operation (12 month population avg.): 2920/mo
Average acreage needed for land application of waste (acres) s 84 (t-wo farm tntal•)
erewasftomown
sa�as�r�ssswsarras::xr:searrase sassi�wnsssssffioacssssa�asss�srsssassws �
technical SpQcialist eertificatiosx
As a technical 'specialist designated by the North Carolina Soil and Water
Conservation Commission pursuant to 1SA NCAC 6F -000S, I certify that the new.or
expanded animal waste management system as installed for the farm named above
has an animal waste management plan that meets the design, construction,
operation and maintenance standards and .specifications of the Division of
Environmental Management and the USDA -Sail Conservation Service and/or the North
Carolina Soil and Water Conservation Commission pursuant to 1SA NCAC 2H.0217•and
15A NCAC 6F .0001-.000S. The following -elements and their corresponding minimum
criteria-havo beeaverified by me or other designated technical specialists and
are included in the plan as applicable: minimum separations (buffers); liners or
equivalent for lagoons or waste storage ponds; waste storage capacity; adequate
quantity and amount of land for waste utilization (or use of third party) ; access
or ownership of proper waste application equipment; schedule for timing of
applications; application rates; loading rates) and the control of the discharge
of pollutants from stormwater runoff events less severe than the 2S-year, 24-hour
storm. '
Nazdc of Technical SpecialiAt (Please Print): Larr F. Graham P.E.
Affiliation: Consm1tanj
Address (Agency] .Phone No.,(41 Q) (;T2-04A7
27376-9001 "
Signatur I- . ' Date: -
saa,sssssssss�s sasses :sass: ssssass:w:saws:s:sss:sss:s:ssssss ��rc�
Owar/Manager ■emaa
I (we) understand the operation and maintenance procedures established in the
approved animal waste management plan, for the farm named above and will implement
these procedures. I (we) know that any additional expansion to the existing
design capacity of the waste treatment and storage system or construction of now
facilities. -will require a new certification to be submitted to the Division of
Environmental Management before the new animals are stocked. .I (we) also
understand that there must be no discharge of animal waste from•this system to
surface waters of the state either -'through a man-made conveyance or through
runoff -from a. storm event less severe. than the 2S-year, 24-hour storm. 'The
approved plan will be filed at the farm and at the office of the local Soil and
'Water Conservation District.
gaze of r (Please Print): Philip W. Faucette
Signature: Dates
Name. of Han gem different from owner (Please print):
t .._ f
Signature: Dater
j9tL .' A-:.c:� ge in and ownership requires notification or a new certification
(if the approved plan J s changed) to be submitted to the Division of
Environmental Management within 60 days of a title transfer.
DE24 USE ONLY:ACNEW#

ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING SERVICES
WWater - Wastewater - Sludge - Agricultural - Industrial - Civil
APPLEFIELD FARM -11 October 14, 1994
c/o Philip Faucette Lu LCI P Y
7725 Friendship Rd.
Brown Summit, N.C. 27214
[phone] RE: Final Waste Management Plans and
certifications for the Lagoon aL
the Applefield Farm - Upper Farm
Dear Mr. Faucette, Location in Randolph Co.
Please find attached a copy of the Lagoon Design and
Specifications and the certification forms for the above
referenced property. I believe this report is complete within
the scope -of the work ordered.
Please keep in mind that these general guidelines are
typical of those used by the Soil Conversation Service for lagoon
designs. It is important to follow these criteria as close as
possible to afford you the safety needed for such an operation.
The lagoon volume and design volumes are especially important.
It is required that you keep a copy of these documents at
.the farm at all times. -Re-read them occasionally to keep certain
-guidelines' fresh in your mind. I would also suggest you farm
manager keep good maintenance records.
These .plans only give a few pointers and comments about the
1long term. maintenance and operation of anaerobic lagoons.
Regular and careful planning on irrigation events as well as
close observations on lagoon conditions will go a long way in
preventing odors from becoming a problem. I have enclosed a
letter to Barton Roberson that lists a few items yet to be
completed.
It has been my pleasure to be of service in this matter.
Should you have questions about this report please feel free 'to
contact my office. Thank -you for this opportunity.
Best Regards;
Larry Graham .E.
Environmental Engineering Services
enclosures
5647 N.C. HIGHWAY 211, WEST END, N.C. 27376-9001 - [phone]

ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING SERVICES
Water • Wastewater • Sludge •Agricultural & Industrial • Civil
COPY
October 14, 1994
NCDEHNR - Division of Environmental Management
Water Quality Section, Planning Branch
P. 0. Box 29535
Raleigh, N.C. 27626-0535
[phone]
RE: Lagoon Design, Discussions and
Certifications for the New Swine
Effluent Lagoons at -the Applefield
Farm, Upper Farm Location in
Randolph Co.
To Whom It May Concern,
Please find attached the following:
1) The original copy of the signed certification form for
Livestock Waste Management plans, signed by myself and Phil:ii_)
Faucette. Attached to the form is a vicinity map.
2) The original copy of the signed Livestock Waste Utilization
plans, signed by yourself and Philip Faucette.
I trust this information fulfills Applefield Farm'
requirements for certification pursuant to requirements listed :in
Title 15A NCAC 2H .0217 (Animal Waste Management). Unless
otherwise requested, this will be the only correspondence to
your office on the matter.
If there are questions or items I have not addressed please
let me know. Thank -you for your time in this matter.
cc: Philip Faucette
enclosures
Best K
LarrP.E.
Env onmental Engineering Services
5647 N.C. HIGHWAY 211, WEST END, N.C. 27376-9001 9 [phone]

S'
a
ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING SERVICES
Water • Wastewater - Sludge - Agricultural - Industrial a Civil
-
Barton Roberson, Randolph County D.C. October 14, 1994 COUPY
U.S. Soil Conservation Service
241 Sunset Ave.
Asheboro, N.C. 27203
[phone]
RE: Lagoon Design, Discussions and
Certifications for the New Swine
Effluent Lagoons at the Applefield
Farm, Upper Farm Location in
Randolph Co.
Dear Barton,
Please find attached the following:
1) A copy of the signed certification form for Livestock Waste
Management plans, signed by myself and Philip Faucette.
2) A copy of the signed Livestock Waste Utilization plans,
signed by yourself and Philip Faucette.
3) Plans and specifications for the anaerobic swine effluent
treatment lagoon and earthen embankment.
In my opinion the package is complete with the required
information. 'Work at the farm is progressing and Mr. Faucette
plans to get animals on the farm sometime this week or next.
Please understand that the following items remain to be
completed:
A. Final grading, seeding, and soil stabilization needs to
take place around the lagoons, hog houses, and over the dam.
Several bare areas need to be stabilized ASAP.
B. A few erosion scars need to be filled before grass is
planted. This is true around the lagoons and along the earthen
embankments. Mr. Faucette may choose to use some large diameter:
pipe to convey storm -water away from the dam instead of the rock
dams.
C. The earthen emergency overflow invert has not beer-,
leveled. However it will be 8 to 12 months or longer before the
lagoon will be near its design volume. There is no rush to get
this overflow leveled but I have suggested it be done within the
next. few months.
5647 N.C. HIGHWAY 211, WEST END, N.C. 27376-9001 • [phone]

D. one section of the storm water diversion ditch above the
primary treatment lagoon has been removed so rain water can be
filling the lagoon. This was approved by myself. This section
must be replaced once sufficient water is in the lagoon as a pre -
charge.
E. Applefield needs to charge the lagoon with fresh water
as soon as possible. I believe they are doing so as of L1ii.s
letter per my phone conversations with Mr. Faucette.
F. I do not think that the land application areas (to
receive effluent) are finished. However I was told they will be
completed and cover crops established before land application
begins.
I trust this information fulfills Applefield Farm's
requirements for certification pursuant to requirements listed i.r,
Title 15A NCAC 2H .0217 (Animal Waste Management). Unles-
otherwise requested, this will be the only correspondence Lo
your office on the matter.
I am sending James K. Leumas a complete package for his
files and a complete copy to Philip Faucette for him to keep on
the farm. You are receiving 1 complete copy.
In addition I am sending the original certification forms to
DEM - Raleigh for their files. However I am not sending them the
complete package.
If there are questions or items I have not addressed please
let me know. Thank -you for your time in this matter.
Best Regar ,
Lar44. Gra am P.E.
Environmental, Engineering Services
cc: Philip Faucette
James K. Leumas
DEM - Raleigh
enclosures

AS BUILT SWINE EFFLUENT TREATMENT AND ANAEROBIC LAGOON DESIGN
FOR
APPLEFIELD FARM - UPPER FARM LOCATION
IN RANDOLPH COUNTY, N. C.
Plans Prepared for
APPLEFIELD FARM
c/o Philip Faucette
7725 Friendship Rd.
Brown Summit, N.C. 27214
[phone]
Plans Prepared by:
Larry F. Graham, P.E.
Environmental Engineering Services
5647 N. C. Highway 211
West End, N. C. 27376-9001
[phone]
Soils and
Design Review:
Barton Roberson, Randolph County D.C.
U. S. Soil Conservation Service
241 Sunset Ave.
Asheboro, N.C. 27203
[phone]�
un
Earthen Dike Plan Review: James K. Leumas, P.E.
NCDEHNR - Division of Land Resources F
Land Quality Sections
P. O. Box 27687
Raleigh, N.C. 27611-7687
[phone]
As -Built Plans
Submitted to: Applefield Farms with copies to Barton
Roberson, and James K. Leumas, P.E.
Submittal Date: PHASE II - October 14, 1994
Specificatia velo)na t�d Wjanizption By:
a r ry F Graham, P P. E E.
-------- \���•4-0 �CARp�,,����
N. C. P essiona Registration Number 11602ES�j?,�!
a o r•;
Date of Review: SEAL
- = 11602

APPLEFIELD FARM, UPPER FARM LOCATION
ANAEROBIC SWINE EFFLUENT LAGOON SPECIFICATIONS
RANDOLPH COUNTY
SINGLE STAGE TREATMENT LAGOON SYSTEM
EPORT CONTENTS
* NOTE TO THE READER
PHASE II. AS -BUILT SPECIFICATIONS
I. LAGOON DESIGN PARAMETERS AND DETAILS (AS -BUILT)
A. INTRODUCTION
B. REVIEW OF GENERAL FARM PARAMETERS
C. LAGOON SHAPE
D. LAGOON VOLUMES
E. SIX MONTH WASTEWATER AND RAINFALL STORAGE
F. SEVERE STORM STORAGE
G. FREEBOARD
H. EMERGENCY SPILLWAYS AND OVERFLOW PROTECTION
I. EARTHEN DIKE (DAM) CONSTRUCTION
J. LAGOON DESIGN SUMMARY
K. SEDIMENT AND EROSION CONTROL
L. LAGOON MAINTENANCE SUGGESTIONS
M. CONCLUSIONS AND NOTICES
EXHIBIT LIST
EXHIBIT 1 - County map (vicinity map).
EXHIBIT 2 - USGS Topographic map of the lagoon location.
EXHIBIT 3 - Boundary Survey of entire property.
EXHIBIT 4 - Localized topographic map of the existing lagoon
area including certain observation pit locations
and proposed lagoon construction. (See original
plans, Exhibit 4 not in this package.)
EXHIBIT
5 -
Topographic map
of As -Built lagoon and dam
construction.
EXHIBIT
6 -
No Exhibit 6 in
this package.
EXHIBIT
7 -
SCS soils investigation data (Form SCS-ENG-538).
EXHIBIT
8 -
U.S. SCS Swine waste utilization plan.
EXHIBIT
9 -
Temporary grass
seeding recommendations.
EXHIBIT
10
- Permanent grass
seeding recommendations.
EXHIBIT
11
- Permanent grass
seeding recommendations.
EXHIBIT
12
- Permanent grass
seeding recommendations.
1

A FEW NOTES ABOUT THIS PROJECT:
This report only contains information about the "as -built"
status of the anaerobic swine effluent treatment lagoon system at
Applefield Farms, upper farm location. The original set of
specifications developed for this project indicated a two stage
lagoon system. A two stage lagoon system was first chosen because
of anticipated hard rock conditions that would prevent deep
lagoon excavations.
On -site excavations encountered a softer rock than was
originally anticipated. This allowed excavations to be deeper in
the first lagoon which allowed sufficient volume to meet the
typical design standards.
Therefore, the specifications and discussions contained
within this document refer to a single stage lagoon with only one
earthen embankment or dike. The reader should refer to the
original set of specifications submitted on 3-21-94 to obtain
project background and geographical information. References to
background information in this document will be minimal.
The below information will serve to notify all concerned
parties of the existing lagoon construction as of the submittal
date on the cover page.
PHASE IT. AS -BUILT SPECIFICATIONS
I. LAGOON DESIGN PARAMETERS AND DETAILS (AS -BUILT)
A. INTRODUCTION
The Applefield Farm, upper location (hereafter called the
upper farm) swine effluent treatment facilities have been mostly
completed and are listed within this package for documentation of
the As -Built sizes, volumes, etc. The reader must refer to the
original plans to see original design specifications and
guidelines. The below information document describes a single
stage lagoon only.
B. REVIEW -OF GENERAL FARM PARAMETERS --
1. Type of facility Finishing operation.
2. Number of hogs: 7,920 head.
3. Average animal weight assumed: 135 pounds.
4. Housing: 9 Units @ 880 head each.
5. Type of Treatment: Anaerobic lagoons.
6. Lagoon Numbers: I. Primary Treatment Lagoon.
2

C. LAGOON SHAPE (See Exhibit 5 for topographic details). --
1. Primary Treatment Lagoon: General rectangular surface and
bottom, with uneven side lengths. Bottom elevation is -relatively
flat, sloping gradually from the south corner to the north cor-
ner.
D. LAGOON VOLUMES --
All As -Built lagoon volumes calculated for the upper farm
used on -site topographic measurements which compares empty
lagoons with full lagoons. The computer technique used for these
comparisons is called L.I. CONTOUR V+, Version 4.0, developed by
A.B. Consulting Co. Inc., Lincoln NE. Great care was used in
developing the contour maps for comparisons, however any such
measurements and calculations have some margin for error. The
engineer has verified the L.I. CONTOUR V+ program with known
field data and believes it to be a very accurate approximation
technique for pond volumes. Detailed design volume calculations
can be seen in the original plans.
Calculated Minimum Design Volume: 7,997,616 gallons
Min. Design Volume Needed per Engineer's opinion = 7,200,000 gal.
E. SIX MONTH WASTEWATER AND RAINFALL STORAGE --
Wastewater will normally be pulled off of the top of the
primary treatment lagoon and recycled to the confinement
buildings for re -use. A six month excess water storage had been
used for this design. This does not include rainfall run-off
water from outside the lagoon since that will be diverted by
earthen embankments and grass water ways. Detailed design calcu-
lations can be seen in the original plans.
Total Six Month Storage Volume Needed: 3,998,808 gallons
F. SEVERE STORM STORAGE --
At any time in North Carolina there can occur a severe rain
producing storm which can deposit considerable amounts of water
quickly. This fact should be considered when designing a lagoon
and allowances made to accommodate this extra water. The
standard storm surge allowed in lagoon design is the 25 year - 24
hour rainfall event. For conservative reasons the engineer
chose to use 6.41 inches as a design number.
3

The design engineer is only considering the rainfall falling
within the interior of the lagoon. THERE SHOULD BE NO SURFACE
RUN-OFF FROM SURROUNDING AREAS ALLOWED TO ENTER THE LAGOON. ALL
RUN-OFF SHALL BE DIVERTED AROUND THE LAGOON VIA EARTHEN
EMBANKMENTS, GRASS WATER WAYS, OR SIMILAR WATER DIVERSION
TECHNIQUES. A small safety factor has been added to the storm
storage to account for a small amount of lagoon rim "run-in".
The 25 year - 24 hour storm volume for the Upper Farm is
calculated to be approximately:
Primary Lagoon Storm Storage_
Total lagoon acreage = 2.53 acres.
6.41 inches x 2.53 acres = 16.22 ac-in or 1.35 ac-ft
1.35 ac-ft x 43,560 cu.ft./ac-ft = 58,806 cu.ft.
or
58,806 cu.ft. x 7.48 gal/cu.ft. = 439,869 gallons
G. FREEBOARD --
Freeboard is the extra depth added to a lagoon for safety
against an embankment overflow or dam washout. This extra depth
is a safety measure and prevents water from spilling over the
dam, resulting in dam erosion and complete or partial failure.
Primary Lagoon Freeboard: 1 foot (minimum design).
Actual Anticipated Freeboard: 1.3 feet.
H. EMERGENCY SPILLWAYS AND OVERFLOW PROTECTION --
The discharce or overflow of swine effluent to the surface
waters o£ N.C. is prohibited. However, in the unlikely event the
water level inside a lagoon should exceed the maximum high water
level design it should have a predetermined path of overflow in
order to safeguard the dam. This emergency spillway should be
located on undisturbed, firm soil not easily eroded or on a very
solid surface like concrete, away from the lagoon dam if
possible. Overflow pipes or earthen overflows may be used.
The amount of water to be safely passed by an emergency
overflow will depend on several factors and the degree of safety
the designer requires. The emergency spillway should pass the
overflow water without over -topping the embankments or dam.
4

According to SCS guidelines (Table 4 - Minimum Spillway
Design Storm ) the Upper Farm lagoon spillway should be designed
for a 10 year - 24 hour storm. The engineer feels that a shorter
duration more intense storm would be a more conservative design,
therefore the engineer decided to use a 25 year - 1 hour storm
for emergency spillway design. Weather data for Greensboro, N. C.
suggests rainfall during this storm event at:
25 year - 1 hour storm = 2.74 inches
Average flow calculates to be:
From Primary Treatment Lagoon:
2.74 in./hr. x 2.53 acres x 3,631 cu.ft/ac.-in.= 25,171 cu.ft/hr.
25,171 cu.ft./hour / 3,600 seconds/hour = 6.99 cu.ft./sec. (cfs)
Based on information obtained in the manual titled "EROSION
AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PLANNING AND DESIGN MANUAL", published by
the North Carolina Department of Environment, Health, and Natural
Resources, Land Quality Section, and the information calculated
above, the engineer has decided to use an earthen overflow. The
emergency overflow entrance for the lagoon overflow shall be a
minimum of 1 foot below the lowest point of any earthen
embankments around the lagoon perimeter.
The emergency overflow elevation shall be verified with a
transit after construction and final settling. The expected path
of overflow from an emergency spillway should direct the water
away from any embankment or dam structures. Vegetation on
emergency overflows and along the anticipated paths of flow
should be well maintained at all times. See Exhibit 5 for more
details about the earthen overflow.
I. EARTHEN DIKE (DAM) CONSTRUCTION --
1. Primary Treatment Lagoon Dike:
The primary lagoon dike was constructed with a good soil
material with a high clay content. The good clay soil was taken
from a nearby hill -side and imported for construction. Its
placement was observed by the engineer as construction was taking
place. Recommendations found in the dam construction permit
package can be viewed to see construction considerations.
5

AS BUILT DIKE CONSTRUCTION SUMMARY AS OF 10-13-94:
1. Maximum Height, Top of Dike to Outside Toe: 22.9 feet
2. Top of Dam Contour: 117.8 feet.
3. Inside Dam Slope: 2.5 to 1 (average).
4. Outside Dam Slope: 3 to 1 (average).
5. Dam and Dam Core Compaction: Sheeps-foot Roller,
Vibrating Roller, and Loaded Pan.
6. Anticipated Dam Settling: 0-2 percent.
7. Top Width of Dam: 15 to 30 feet.
8. Dam Core Width: 12 feet.
9. Dam Core Depth: 0 to 5 feet.
10. Dam Core Taken to Rock: No.
11. Dam.and Core Material: Red/Brown Clay - Good Quality
Material.
J. LAGOON DESIGN SUMMARY
AS BUILT CONSTRUCTION OF FINAL LAGOON AS OF 10-13-94:
1. Number of hogs = 7920
2. Type of facility = Finishing operation
3. Type of lagoon = Single stage anaerobic.
4. 25 year 24 hr. storm intensity = 6.41 in.
5. Estimated run-off from surrounding land into the lagoon = 0%
6. Waste storage period = 6 months
7. Design criteria = Anaerobic treatment with adequate odor
control.
8. Est. maximum dam height of Lagoon = 22.9
feet (without settling).
9. Inside side slopes = varies from 2:1 to 3:1 (.clay soil)
10. Rock Outcroppings covered?: Yes, 2 to 7 feet of clay.
11. Sludge accumulation criteria = Irrigate Solids, no long term
solids accumulation.
12. Average animal weight = 135 lbs.
13. Final Volumes:
* 5 year sludge accumulation (calculated) ............ 0 gal.
* Design treatment volume ..................... 7,997,616 gal.
* Design treatment volume (min. per engineer).. 7,200,000 gal.
* 6 month storage (plus excess rain) .......... 3,998,808 gal.
* 25 year 24 hr. storm ........................ 439,869 gal.
TOTAL DESIGN CALCULATED VOLUME (less freeboard) 12,4,36,293 gal.
TOTAL MINIMUM VOLUME (per engineers opinion).... 11,7,00,000 gal.
TOTAL VOLUME OF LAGOON (as built) ............... 12,023,848 gal.
PERCENT OF LAGOON VOLUME vs. MIN. DESIGN ........ 103
r.

14. Details:
* Top dimensions (approx.) 250 x 510
* Bottom dimensions (approx.) ...................... 125 x 400
* Max. liquid depth (to overflow approx.) 20.67 ft.
* Minimum liquid depth to maintain ................. 14.9 ft
* Emergency spillway contour at invert ............. 116.5 ft.
* Dam top elevation from bench mark ................ 117.8 ft.
* Dam front and back slope ratio ................. > 5:1
* Actual Freeboard ................... 1.3 ft.
* Calculated volume to overflow during storm ....... 6__99 cfs.
* Rainfall for overflow calculations ...............'2,74.,>in/hr
* Deepest Floor Contour 94•5 ft.
* Type of Overflow Channel ........... Earthen
* Bottom Width of Overflow Channel ................. 9 ft.
* Begin irrigation -(depth of water) ... Between 14.9 and 20.1 +
+ In no case draw water below 10 feet deep unless performing
maintenance on the lagoon interior.
K. SEDIMENT AND EROSION CONTROL
General Sediment and Erosion Control Suggestions (Certain
paragraphs below are reprinted from original plans):
A] The purpose of sediment and erosion control measures is to
confine sediment transport to the construction area. This means
the contractor should construct physical barriers, obstacles, or
structures to insure sediment and soil is retained on the
construction site. This task includes repairs of disturbed
soils, erosion scars, and damaged erosion control devices. Grass
planting and maintenance are also part of standard erosion
control measures. Suggestions and seeding recommendations below
were taken in part from the "EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL
PLANNING AND DESIGN MANUAL", published by the North Carolina
Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources, Land
Quality Section.
Bl Water drainage from the confinement housing construction area
and from immediately up slope from the lagoon will be diverted in
several directions. Diverting water away from the lagoon area is
recommended. However it is not possible to divert all water away
from the lagoon area. The total disturbed area for the houses and
just up slope from the lagoon is being approximated at 3 acres.
Water from the housing construction site will likely drain in at
least two directions. For estimation purposes we will assume
that 50 percent of this total run-off water will migrate toward
the lagoon. It is this water conveyance that is of concern from
the lagoon construction and will be addressed here. These are
estimates only and are being supplied to offer some ideas to the
owner on grass channel construction. Water will flow around the
lagoon in two directions so the flow values can be divided in
half for calculations purposes.
7

i. Water conveyance mechanism = Grass lined channel.
ii. Area contributing to flow = 3 acres.
Storm considered = 10 year - 1 hour.
iv. Calculated flow = 6.3 cubic feet per second (cfs).
V. Channel shape = Shallow trapezoidal.
vi. Channel side slopes = 5:1 (H:V) and 2:1 M V).
vii. Channel bottom width = 5 feet.
viii. Channel depth = 1 foot (minimum).
ix. Channel top width = 7.5 feet.
X. Grass type = Fescue or Bermudagrass
xi. Estimated water run-off velocity = 2.5 feet per second.
xii. Erosion potential: Bare soil before cover = high -
Bare soil with mulch = medium/high
Well established grass cover = low/medium
xiii. Slope: on contour not to exceed 3:1.
C] The grass lined channel should have a rock dam or earthen dam
installed just as the water gets around the earthen embankment on
either side. Large diameter piping may also be used to convey
the water down slope if available. If used, a rock dam will trap
sediment and allow run-off water to escape into natural grassy
areas at a reduced velocity and with less sediment transport.
The "horse -shoe" dam shall be constructed with class A erosion
control stone. A sketch of this device placement can be seen on
Exhibit 5.
D] Sediment removed from sediment control devices shall be
stored in stable areas not subject to re-enter the sediment
control devices or escape off of site. This applies to top soil
stored or.any temporary soil storage areas. Silt fencing should
be installed on the down slope side of stock piled or stored
soils and along the base of earthen embankments.
E7 Gullies, ditches, moved stone, torn fence, or similar areas
of erosion shall be given immediate attention and corrective
actionaction taken. Control devices that do not seem to be adequately
preventing sediment transport shall be improved to stop soil
transport.
Fl Seeding Suggestions:
i. There is no more important function for stabilizing a
construction site than to plant vegetation soon as possible after
soil disturbance has ended. Sample and test soils for liming and
fertilizer suggestions. Send soil samples to the N.C. Department
of Agriculture, Agronomic Division, Soil Testing Section,
Blue Ridge Road, Raleigh, N.C. 27611. Sample containers can be
obtained at the Randolph County Cooperative Extension Service in
Asheboro.

ii. Disturbed areas which are to waiting final grading should be
seeded with temporary vegetation if they will be left idle for
more than 30 days, or if they are subject to severe erosion. The
contractor may wish to seed or re -seed disturbed or undisturbed
land with Rye grass since construction will be taking place in
cool weather (See Exhibit 9). Do not destroy existing grass if
at all possible.
Temporary Seeding Suggestion:
Rye (grain) ........... Applied @ 120 lbs/acre
iii. When final grading is complete, Permanent Seeding will be
required. The contractor shall use best judgment as to the
variety of grass to be planted at the site. A few recommended
grass types are shown as Exhibits 10, 11 and 12.
Permanent Seeding Suggestions:
Grass lined channels (Exhibit 10):
... Tall Fescue @ 200 lb./acre (4-5 lb./sq.ft.)
Steep slopes (Exhibit 11):
... Tall Fescue @ 100 lb./acre, plus
+ Sericea Lespedeza @ 30 lbs./acre, plus
Kobe Lespedeza @ 10 lbs./acre
+ = SERICEA LESPEDEZA SHOULD NOT BE PLANTED ON EARTHEN DAMS!
Less steep slopes (Exhibit 12):
... Blend of Tall Fescue (90 0) plus
improved Kentucky Bluegrass (100)
(200 - 250 lbs./acre)
iv. Seeded areas shall be re -seeded if necessary to insure good
stands of vegetation are developed and maintained. Fertilization
and mulch shall be installed as necessary.
V. Apply seed with a broadcast method, such as a cyclone seeder,
drop spreader, drill (in some cases), etc. Hydro -seeding may be
used but is not being specified.
vi. Rake over all sites to assure seed has been covered and
lightly pack in place. Lightly water if water is available (only
enough to moisten soil).
G] Mulch Suggestions:
i. On steep slopes ( greater than 3:1) apply approximately 100
pounds of straw per 1000 square feet of surface. Cover straw
with a netting or jute cover or use some other suitable adhesive
material to hold straw in place. if asphalt is used apply at
roughly a rate of 11 gallons per 1000 square feet of surface.
9

ii. on less steep slopes (less than 3:1) apply approximately 90
pounds of straw per 1000 square feet of surface. Cover straw
with a netting,or jute cover or use some other suitable adhesive
material to hold straw in place. Mulch may not be needed on
relatively flat surfaces.
iii. Grass lined channels are sometimes difficult to get
stabilized because of the velocity of flowing water. often water
velocities exceeding 2 feet per second on bare soil channels will
cause erosion 'cars. In many cases, the previous recommendation
is sufficient to get a cover established, however if not, use an
excelsior mat (like Curlex Blanket) to line the channel and
secure according to manufacturers recommendations. Seed all
exposed areas and mulch as necessary. Make slopes of grass lined
channels as gentle as possible. Use drop boxes if necessary to
lessen steep slopes.
H] Silt fencing should be used on the down slope .sides of
disturbed areas, such as at the toe of the dam, earthen
embankments, and at piles of stored soils. Silt fencing should
not be used as�the only sediment control for large areas of soil
disturbance. ;Hang silt fencing on wooden or metal posts well
anchored into; the soil. Do not allow sediment to flow under
loose fitting silt fencing. Anchor the bottoms of slit fences in
the soil and clean out small sumps or pools just in front of the
fences to allow for sediment build-up. Liquid heads over 1.5
feet high will likely damage silt fencing.
Il Maintain 15 feet vegetative buffers between disturbed areas
and property boundaries.
Jl The contractor shall use good judgment and common sense to
install sediment and erosion control measures where needed. Keep
wind -row brushpiles in place to catch sediment.
Kl After final grading and permanent vegetation is well
established, maintain good covers with mowing and fertilizing.
Annually collect soil samples for analysis and crop fertilizer
and lime recommendations. Fertilize and lime native grasses
around the site and keep existing ground cover in tact as much as
possible. Maintain natural water ways and ditches. Plant new
cover grasses as necessary.
LI Mow grass as desired and in accordance with accepted
practices, especially around the lagoon area. Keep weeds and
floating weed mats off of the lagoon.
M] Repair mulch and seed beds as necessary if areas of dead
grass develop or erosion scars occur.
N] Use pesticides and herbicides only as a last resort to keep
grass stands healthy. Use housekeeping techniques to control
insects along With or instead of pesticides.
10

L. LAGOON MAINTENANCE SUGGESTIONS
11 No shrubs or bushes are planned at this time. New shrubs and
trees should not be planted closer than 30 feet to the new lagoon
and not on the lagoon dam.
21 Once the lagoon is constructed and ready for filling, it is
very important to first add water to the lagoon prior to adding
swine manure. The owner should be careful to add water to the
lagoon until at least one third of the lagoon volume is achieved
before adding swine manure. This means the operator should
always_ strive to maintain a liquid depth of about 10 feet.
Initial water addition to the lagoon shall be from water wells on
the farm, but if storm water run-off can be easily added to the
lagoon it may be added in place of well water.
31 Research literature suggests a pH of 7.0 to 8.0 be maintained
in an anaerobic swine lagoon to obtain optimum treatment
conditions and minimize odors. During lagoon start-up the acid
forming bacteria will tend to populate faster then the methane
forming bacteria and can lower the overall pH of the lagoon
water. If this occurs, the owner/operator should add hydrated
lime to the lagoon at a rate of 1 pound per 1000 cubic feet of
water. The lime can be applied to the surface of the lagoon and
mixed into the surface waters until a proper pH is obtained.
Start adjusting the pH if the lagoon waters drop to or below a pH
of 6.7.
41 It is desirable to add manure daily in regular doses. This
is preferred to slug loading the lagoon at irregular intervals or
starving the microorganisms.
51 The lagoon sludge and/or wastewater can and should be tested
to determine its nutrient content prior to land applications.
Send effluent and sludge samples to the N. C. Department of
Agriculture, Agronomic Division, Plant Analysis Laboratory,
Raleigh, N.C. 27611. Plant or crop tissue samples can also be
sent for regular analysis.
61 Keep grasses and vegetation out of the lagoon. Floating mats
(not weed mats) are not likely to occur on swine lagoons. Such
mats will not interfere with performance and can be left in
place if present.
71 Take extreme care to select optimum conditions for spray
irrigation of wastewater and sludge removal events. Careful
planing will help minimize odors. Irrigate wastewater in dry
warm weather if possible, preferably before 12 noon.
81 Water levels should be lowered before the on set of wet
weather seasons and in accordance with on -farm crop needs.
11

91 Regularly inspect the lagoon dam and earthen embankments for
settling or bulges, side slope stability, rodent damage, holds or
pock marks, erosion scars, wave action damage, weeping, etc.
Weeds should be mown at least one time per year and two times per
year in heavy growth years.
101 Do not drive vehicles across emergency spillways. Keep the
spillway clear of limbs, tall plant growth, logs, floating
debris, sedimentation, etc. Watch for erosion and settling.
Keep outlet channel in good vegetative cover and free from
erosion.
11) Grazing on dams and embankments can cause problems and is
not recommended.
121 Inspect all dams, earthen embankments, and emergency
spillway at least two times per year or after every significant
storm event.
131 Lagoons with floors below the seasonably high water table
should maintain the water levels in the lagoon above the
seasonably high level.
141 Irrigation pump intakes should be a minimum of 18 inches
below the lagoon liquid surfaces. The operator will occasionally
agitate the sludge on the lagoon floor while irrigating in order
to minimize sludge build-up.
151 Always maintain at least 1 foot_of freeboard in lagoons with
pump systems. Lagoons without dedicated pump systems should
maintain at least a 2 feet freeboard.
161 The volume of the lagoon designated for the 25 year - 24
hour storm should be kept void except in emergency situations.
This is not part of the six month storaqe volume.
171 Emergency spillways should be kept clear of trash and
debris. A good grass cover should be maintained at and down
slope of emergency earthen spillways.
181 Occasional upsets to an anaerobic lagoon can be expectedr
but the duration of such events should be very short. Rapid or
sudden temperature changes may cause some temporary changes in
lagoon performance. Long term cold snaps can also cause upsets.
The owner should strive to maintain a steady state condition in
the lagoon at all times. Avoid the use of harsh or chlorinated
chemicals in the confinement housing or in the lagoon.
191 New products - are being developed to help minimize odors from
swine operations. The owner/operator may utilize such products
but these should only be utilized according to manufacture's
recommendations and with caution. Rapid additions of enzymes or
chemicals could cause microbial upsets. Use new products
carefully!
1.2

M. CONCLUSIONS AND NOTICES
1. The lagoon system at the upper farm location is mostly
complete as of this PHASE II report. The contents of this report
are included herein to describe the lagoon and then compare these
numbers to the design parameters. For brevity reasons certain
portions of this report list average values or rounded numbers
when exact values are not appropriate or are of only small
percentages. The engineer feels as though the lagoon structure
as -built will function properly as an anaerobic treatment
structure for the swine effluent as long as the system is
maintained and the farmer agitates and irrigates the effluent on
a regular basis, controls erosion, etc. NO AMOUNT OF DESIGN CAN
TAKE THE PLACE OF REGULAR AND PROPER MAINTENANCE!
2. The potential for bare soils to erode at this farm is medium
to high. This will require the farmer to repair erosion scars
during the course of filling the lagoon. It is important to re-
cover exposed rock within the lagoon prior to the interior being
covered with water. Likewise it is very important to repair any
erosion on the dam as soon as it is observed. GRASS SHOULD BE
PLANTED IMMEDIATELY ON ALL DISTURBED SOILS!
3. The engineer wishes to point out that certain construction
items are yet to be completed or are almost complete, e.g. grass
planting. These items must be done to have a satisfactory lagoon
system. Sediment and erosion control structures and practices
must be maintained as long as there is the potential for erosion.
This includes the planting and maintaining of grass. The farmer
will be continually responsible for maintaining all parts of this
system and completing the work as promised to the engineer.
4. The owner of this lagoon system shall be obligated to install
and operate the system according to the above specifications.
However the engineer realizes the on -site conditions may cause
some variations in as already mentioned. As long as the changes
are minor and improve the system and do not change the flow or
intent of the design, the changes can be made by the owner.
Brand name items mentioned in this document are given for example
only and may be changed as long as the function and quality are
not compromised.
5. The engineer takes no responsibility for changes made to the
system before, during, or after construction without his
knowledge. Nor does the engineer take any responsibility for
human losses or property damages which should occur due to poor
workmanship, improper use of machinery, unknown conditions above
or below ground level, legal problems with boundary lines or
easements, acts of Nature, or "short-cuts" the owner may take in
system construction or operation.
13

6. The engineer has made a concerted effort to observe the lagoon
being constructed at different stages. However, as with most
existing systems there are components of the system that are not
visible and were not observed under construction. Therefore it
is necessary to assume certain things that are reasonable for
such systemsor take the information given by owners,
contractors, etc. Information given to the engineer by others
and used in these specifications shall be taken as truth if it
can not be verified otherwise.
7. The owner must prevent the lagoon effluent from overtopping
the dam. The liquid level should never be allowed to rise to
within 1 foot to the overflow if at all possible.
8. While excavating the site, some soft rock was encountered in
addition to a few boulders. All free standing boulders were
removed from the lagoon interior. Any exposed boulders or rock
outcroppings were covered with a minimum of 2 feet of clay. In
most places the clay cover exists 3 to 7 feet deep.
********** END OF SPECIFICATIONS AND COMMENTS *********
The preceding specifications and comments have been reviewed
by the undersigned professional engineer and are believed to be
complete within the context of the scope of this project. The
lagoon(s) are ready for use, however the engineer acknowledges
more work is scheduled as documented herein and in correspondence
to the owner.
Preceding pages reviewed by Engineer: 1 through 14.
Professional Engineers Signature:
North Carolina P.E. Registration Number 'r 11602
Date of Signature and Seal: r�
am , P.E
���e•� CA "Ni
SEAL
ri 11602 i�
*�iR NC=S��;;.��y�
14

0 U N i Y
b'Th
c,,
Po
S�
119

0 P y
"AS -BUILT" SWINE EFFLUENT LAGOON DETAILS AND CONCLUSIONS
FOR
APPLEFIELD FARMS
AT
THE LOWER FARM LOCATION, RANDOLPH COUNTY, N. C.
Prepared for Ricky Cox
APPLEFIELD FARMS
2132 Highway 22 South
Ramseur, N. C. 27316
[phone]
Details Prepared by: Larry F. Graham, P.E.
Environmental Engineering Services
5647 N. C. Highway 211
West End, N. C. 27376-9001
[phone]
Original Soils and
Design Review:
Submitted to:
Barton Roberson and Vernon Jones
U. S. SOIL CONSERVATION SERVICE
Asheboro, N. C. 27203
[phone]
Ricky Cox
Submittal Date: March 16, 1994
bt�ttYtiCARO
yEBOIi�, '
p
S FAL
° ° m
Certifi )o. f Fins ection By:
- - - - - - - - -� - - - - - - - - - -
arry F. raham, P. E.
N. C. Pro essional Registration Number 11602
Date of Certification: Z, /,. /gy_

"AS -BUILT" DETAILS AND CONCLUSIONS FOR THE
APPLEFIELD FARM ANAEROBIC SWINE EFFLUENT LAGOON
IN THE CO'LERIDGE COMMUNITY, RANDOLPH COUNTY
LOWER FARM LAGOON
REPORT CONTENTS
* NOTE TO THE READER
A. PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND OVERVIEW
B. LAGOON LOCATION
C. SURFACE DRAINAGE
D. CONSTRUCTION SITE SOILS
E. GROUNDWATER AND SURFACE WATERS
F. LAGOON SHAPE
G. SLUDGE HOLDING CAPACITY
H. DESIGN TREATMENT VOLUME
I. SIX MONTH WASTEWATER AND RAINFALL STORAGE
J. SEVERE STORM STORAGE
K. FREEBOARD
L. DAM CONSIDERATIONS
M. CALCULATION OF LAGOON VOLUME
N. EMERGENCY OVERFLOW
O. SEDIMENT CONTROL STRUCTURES
P. LAGOON FILLING PREPARATIONS
Q. OTHER CONSIDERATIONS
* LAGOON CONSTRUCTION SUMMARY PAGE
EXHIBIT LIST
EXHIBIT 1.- General site sketch of the "as -built" lagoon.
EXHIBIT 2 - Lagoon floor elevations.
1

A FEW NOTES ABOUT THIS REPORT:
The following report is a brief summary of the swine lagoon
construction and "as -built" details related to Appllefield Farm's
lower anaerobic lagoon. This report does not include much of the
introduction material used in the original report for brevity
reasons. Before reading this report the reader should familiarize
himself/herself with the original set of specifications. The
reader should keep this and other related documents in their
files for reference.
Certain portions of the original report will be reprinted
herein if necessary for clarity or emphasis. When possible, this
document follows the U. S. Soil Conversation Service (SCS) design
guidelines and is not meant to contradict standard SCS guidelines
or the design criteria of other organizations.
In case the reader is not familiar with the design and
construction of anaerobic lagoons for waste treatment, he or she
must realize that many factors go into the construction of a
swine waste management lagoon, including the type of managemc:;rit
the operator wishes to use with waste utilization. Cer.t.ai.n
specifications and assumptions herein are explained in deta:i] to
give the reader a clearer picture of just how end results mat-.ch
the needed volumes, sizes, etc. All assumptions related to
decision details made herein are not being presented in full
explanation for brevity reasons.
A. PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND OVERVIEW --
1) The physical location of the farm is in -the south eastern
corner of Randolph County near the intersection of: Highway 42 and
State Road 2873. State Road 2873 (Riverside Road) borders the
property on one side. The farm is approximately 2.5 road miles
from the town of Coleridge. The farm is also bordered by the
Deep River and Richland Creek. Maps and other introduction
details for this site can be seen in the original set of.
specifications. The total farm acreage is roughly 252 acres.
2) The lower farm swine effluent lagoon at Applefield Farm has
been constructed. Some of the final parameters of the work have
been modified from the original specifications due to on -site
physical characteristics, a likelihood proposed numerous times in
the original specifications. The final "as built" details are in
this report.
3.) The lower farm will contain a maximum, of 4,500 head of hogs
in. confinement housing. In practice the number of head will be
more like 4,400 thus allowing for some safety in the
engineer's volume calculations. Under slat plug/drain waste
removal has been installed in each house and the lines installed
from each house to the lagoon. Swine effluent will be stored in
this lagoon and recycled into the houses to recharge the. under
slat pits. On occasion lagoon effluent will be pumped from the
lagoon and land applied via a spray irrigation system.
OA

4) Specifications contained in this report only deal with the
design and construction of the anaerobic lagoon on the lower
farm. Details on the land application of the treated wastewater,
hydraulic loadings and nutrient balances are not part of this
report.
B. LAGOON LOCATION --
1) The lagoon was constructed in the same location proposed in
the original set of specifications (south west of the swine
facilities).
C. SURFACE DRAINAGE --
1) All surface drainage has been routed around or away from the
lagoon as specified. Only rainfall directly into the lagoon
should affect final lagoon volume.
D. CONSTRUCTION SITE SOILS --
1) Observation pits were installed at several places around the
site by the U. S. Soil Conservation Service (SCS) prior to the
lagoon construction. A log of these observation tits and SCS
comments can be seen in the original specifications. Final
construction proved the soils to be similar to that shown by
these holes. In general the soil was better in the south western
end of the lagoon (dam end) than in the north eastern end.
2) Rock interfaces were found to restrict lagoon depth at the
north eastern end of the lagoon. In order to maximize
groundwater protection the engineer decided not to deeply
penetrate the rock interfaces. This was in accordance with the
intent of the original specifications which stated:
" As one last point, the soils at this particular site vary
across the site in terms of consistency and depth, making an
exact prediction on quantity and uniformity impossible.
Construction work will help reveal underlying soil types and
conditions and adjustments can be made at that time so that
groundwater protection is maximized. "
3) A considerable amount of good, rock free red clay soil was
found during lagoon excavation. This red clay existed over much
of the lagoon's interior, saving the need to apply it as a liner.
Some rock was encountered as mentioned above and excavation was
limited in these areas. All significant rock outcroppings were
covered with a minimum of 12 inches of clay.
E. GROUNDWATER AND SURFACE WATERS --
1) At no time during construction was groundwater encountered.
A1.1 surface waters were routed around the lagoon.
3

F. LAGOON SHAPE
1) There is no one special shape required for the design of
anaerobic lagoons. However due to construction ease many lagoons
are rectangular in overall shape with a trapezoidal cross
section. Due to rock interfaces, it was not possible to make the
lower lagoon conform perfectly to the suggested trapezoidal shape
with a flat bottom. From an aerial view the lagoon looks
somewhat like a "frying pan". The attached Exhibit 1 shows the
as -built shape and various as -built details.
2) The interior sides of this lagoon vary to some degree in
slope, from 2-:1 to 3:1. Most outside slopes of earthen berms or
dams are 3:1.or less steep. The outside slope of the dam varies
from 3:1 to 6:1, which is acceptable.
3) Volume calculations will be presented later.
G. SLUDGE HOLDING CAPACITY
1) Rock out-croppings encountered while constructing the lagoon
prevented it from being built to the original desired capacity
without building the dam higher than originally specified.
Conversations with SCS representatives revealed that in many
cases the SCS has not found any significant sludge accumulation
in older swine lagoons which have wasted sludge at the time of
irrigation events. This has resulted in the SCS typically
eliminating the sludge storage volume in most of their more
recent designs. When sludge is added to the irrigation
wastewater on a routine basis there has been virtually zero
sludge accumulation.
2) The original design package allowed for Applefield Farm to
store sludge for 15 years prior to a sludge disposal event. This
sludge volume calculated to be 358,425 cubic feet (2,681,019
gallons) for a depth of sludge on the lagoon floor of 4.83 feet.
Because of the rock encountered the north eastern end of the
lagoon, the original or planned total depth could not be achieved
over the entire lagoon bottom.
3) To solve this problem, and without going over the already
specified dam height, a management decision was made to waste
sludge during irrigation events. This was agreed upon by the
owners of Applefield Farm and discussed with SCS personnel. By
doing this as a routine occurrence the Applefield Farm lower
lagoon would have zero accumulate sludge. It should be mentioned
here that by routinely wasting sludge no significant difference
inn objectionable odors should be realized from the site.
Irrigating swine effluent with a small amount of sludge is one of
those management options mentioned in the original report.
4

H. DESIGN TREATMENT VOLUME
1) The design treatment volume (sometimes called Minimum Design
Volume) is the volume of wastewater needed to maintain optimum
conditions for bacterial growth. This volume is a suggested
volume and will require several months to obtain once operations
begin.
2) From the original specifications package, the minimum design
volume has not changed, and is:
Design Treatment Volume = 1 cu.ft./lb. animal wt.
1 cu.ft./lb.. x 135 lbs./animal x 4,500 animals = 607,500 cu.ft.
or
607,500 cu.ft. x 7.48 gal./cu.ft. = 4,544,100 gallons
3) Researchers at N.C.S.U. have conducted field work on
hundreds of lagoons and seen many types of operations. The
general consensus is that lagoon management makes more difference
than size in minimizing lagoon odors, provided that the lagoon is
not grossly under -sized.
4) Given the somewhat irregular shape of the lagoon only an
approximate depth for the minimum design volume can be given.
This estimated depth is 10 feet. See Exhibit 1 for additional
details.
I. SIX MONTH WASTEWATER AND RAINFALL STORAGE
1) To provide that extra margin of safety, six months of water
storage was used in the Applefield Farm lagoon design. The six
month storage volume includes excess wastes produced by the
animals, spillage or wasted water, clean-up water, and excess
rainfall (less evaporation) directly into the lagoon. This does
not include rainfall run-off water from outside the lagoon since
that water has been diverted by earthen embankments and grass
water ways.
2) Six month storage values that were used in the original
design were not changed and were figured based on 0.5 cu.ft./lb.
animal ,wt.
0.5 cu.ft./lb. x 135 lbs./animal x 4,500 animals = 303,750 cu.ft.
or
303,750 cu.ft. x 7.48 gal./cu.ft. = 2,272,050 gallons
31 Given the somewhat irregular shape of the lagoon only an
approximate depth for this volume can be given. This estimated
extra. depth is 3 feet over the minimum design volume. See
Exhibit 1 for additional details.
5

4) Referring to the calculated numbers, and the irregular shape
of the lagoon, the six month storage volume will allow the water
level to vary between 10 feet 13 feet (total depth less storm
storage). The farmer should now realize that any irrigation
events should begin at or before the 13 feet depth and stop
around the 10 feet depth. Pumping below 6 feet should be
avoided.
J. SEVERE STORM STORAGE --
1) The standard storm allowed for in lagoon design is the 25
year - 24 hour event. The 25 year - 24 hour storm rate used for
this design. was 6.41.inches. This design parameter has not
changed. However the irregular shape of the lagoon will cause
some slight variation in expected volume. The new estimated
amount is:
6.41 inches x 2.00 acres = 12.82 ac-in or 1.068 ac-ft
1.068 ac-ft x 43,560 cu.ft./ac-ft = 46,537 cu.ft.
or
46,537 cu.ft. x 7.48 gallons/cu.ft. = 348,093 gallons
2) Given the somewhat irregular shape of the lagoon only an
approximate depth for this volume can be given. This estimated
depth is 0.5 feet in addition to the minimum design volume and
the six month storage. This now puts the total liquid depth at
13.5 feet. See Exhibit 1 for additional details.
K. FREEBOARD --
1) Freeboard is the extra depth added to a lagoon for safety
against an embankment overflow or dam washout. This extra depth
is a safety measure and prevents water from spilling over the
dam, resulting in dam erosion and complete or partial failure. A
1 foot freeboard has been allowed.
2) Given the selected shape, side slopes, etc. mentioned above,
the maximum high water level in the lagoon is estimated to be
13.5 feet. The total depth of the lagoon, including freeboard
must be a minimum of 14.5 feet.
L: DAM CONSIDERATIONS --
1)._-There is disagreement among designers as to how much earthen
dams will settle after construction. Settling depends on factors
such as soil type, compaction techniques, moisture, etc. General
opinion is that clay dams that are compacted while being built
will settle between 0 and 5 %.
0

2) Given the good clay soils in this dam and the construction
compaction which occurred, the engineer feels a 2 o settlement
should be sufficient. The maximum amount of fill on this dam was
roughly 11 feet (not to be confused with maximum height from out
side toe)-. Two percent of 11 feet is 0.22 feet for settling. The
measured top of the dam was on the 69.3 feet contour, settling to
69.08 feet. Maximum settled height of the dam measured on the
outside toe will be 14.8 feet.
3) The lagoon dam was constructed with good red clay. The dam
core was made roughly 6 feet deep and 12 feet wide and tapered
less deep at the ends of the dam. The dam and dam core was
compacted with a rubber tired pan and bulldozer while being
constructed. The dam core depth was not taken to bedrock but
finished in a good clay soil.
4) The dam top width varies from 15 to 20 feet.
5) Dam construction was regularly observed by the engineer and
SCS personnel. An effort was made to use uniform clay soil
though out the core and fill. Compaction occurred at each phase
of dam development with the dam filled in small lifts of 8 inches
or less.
6) The combination slopes of the inner face of the dam and the
outer face exceeds a 5:1 ratio.
7) Measurements were taken throughout the lagoon site and cross -
sections of the lagoon were observed. In general the large
portion of the lagoon (somewhat trapezoidal in shape) had a flat
or level floor. The inside floor elevation averaged on the 54.31
feet contour or 14.77 feet below the top of the settled dam which
was on the 69.08 feet contour.
M. CALCULATION OF LAGOON VOLUME ---
1) Lagoon volume calculations were made using a technique known
as "sum -of -the -end -areas". This approach works fairly well when
considering irregular shaped lagoons. For these calculations
various cross sections of the lagoon were measured and plotted
for cross -sectional area, then combined and summed for estimating
volume:
2) After settling the top of the dam is approximately 14.77 feet
above the lagoon floor. The maximum water depth is estimated to
b-e.' 13.5 feet as shown above. Adding 1 foot of freeboard would
put -the needed dam height at 14.5 feet. Since we have shown the
dsm height to be 14.77 feet above the lagoon floor the dam is
sufficiently high to allow for our volumes plus freeboard.
7

3) At a water level of 13.5 feet, the volume of water in the
lagoon is estimated at 7,124,000 million gallons. This compares
closely to the design value of 7,164,243 gallons. The reader
should also consider that the needed volumes were based on
inflated hog population values and as well some rather high
rainfall values, etc. The dimensions stated should well cover
design guidelines and offer maximum odor control with proper
management.
N. EMERGENCY OVERFLOW --
1) The discharge of swine effluent to surface waters is
prohibited. However, in the unlikely event the water level
inside the lagoon should exceed the maximum high water level
(13.5 feet) it should have a predetermined path of overflow in
order to safeguard the dam. It is recommended the bottom of the
emergency overflow bottom be 1 foot below the crest of the dam.
This would place the bottom of the emergency overflow at 13.77
feet off of the lagoon floor and 0.27 feet above the design high
water maximum. This emergency spillway was installed as shown in
Exhibit 1.
0. SEDIMENT CONTROL STRUCTURES --
1) The owner should maintain sediment and erosion control
measures to confine sediment transport to the construction area.
Any sediment and erosion control structures can be taken down
when the soil is stabilized, however until that time any useful
structures should be left in place.
2) There is no more important function for stabilizing a
construction site than to plant vegetation soon as possible after
soil disturbance has ended. This should be done ASAP. Sample and
test soils for liming and fertilizer suggestions. Send soil
samples to the N.C. Department of Agriculture, Agronomic
Division, Soil Testing Section, Blue Ridge Road, Raleigh, N.C.
27611. Sample containers can be obtained at the Randolph County
Cooperative Extension Service in Asheboro.
P. LAGOON FILLING PREPARATIONS:
1. Approximately 2.5 feet of water was in the lagoon on the last
day of inspection. More water was scheduled to be added to the
lagoon to achieve a liquid depth of from 4 to 6 feet prior to
adding effluent. Conversations with the owner confirms this has
been done as of this report.
Q. OTHER CONSIDERATIONS:
1).:--'The owner should re -read the original specifications and
comply.with all safety suggestions and other items. Items within
the original document will be helpful with waste management.
8

EXHIBIT 2
ELEVATION CALCULATIONS FROM FIELD DATA
* WHAT IS THIS JOB NAME? APPLEFIELD FARMS, LOWER FARM LAGOON
* WHAT COUNTY IS THIS? RANDOLPH
* WHAT IS TODAYS DATE? MARCH 10, 1994
* WHEN WAS DATA COLLECTED AND BY WHOM? TOP OF DAM BY SCS ON 3-4-94
EES MEASURED BOTTOM 3-10-94
* LIST BELOW THE READINGS OF THE ELEVATIONS
FROM THE TRANSIT ROD AND THE HEIGHT OF
EACH POINT WILL AUTOMATICALLY BE CALUCLATED
BASED ON THE GROUND UNDER THE TRANSIT BEING
AT 69.3 FEET ELEVATION. (THIS IS AN SCS MEASURED NUMBER).
* WHAT IS THE LOCATION I.D. OF THE TRANSIT
* WHAT IS THE TRANSIT HEIGHT?
* THE CONTOUR ELEVATION OF GRADE AT TH1 IS =
MEASURING
POINT
*******
C (TOP OF WATER)
D
E (DEPTH OF WATER)
F "
G "
H "
I
J "
K
L "
M "
N "
O "
P "
Q
R "
S "
T "
U "
V "
W
X "
Y "
Z "
AA "
AB "
ELEVATION ACTUAL ELEVS.
READINGS FROM THE TOP
(IN FEET) OF DAM
********* ************
17.4 -12.68
17.4 -12.68
2.3 -14.98
2.2 -14.88
2.65 -15.53
2.55 -15.23
2.8 -15.48
2.4 -15.08
2.4 -15.08
2.05 -14.73
2 -14.68
2.1 -14.78
1.9 -14.58
2.22 -14.90
2.7 -15.38
2.1 -14.78
2.3 -14.98
2.5 -15.18
1.9 -14.58
2.6 -15.28
2.45 -15.13
2.5 -15.18
2.5 -15.18
2.32 -15.00
1.98-1-4.66
1.74 -14.42
AVERAGE DEPTH OF THE LAGOON *****
FLOOR IS = -14.99
TH1, ON TOP OF DAM
56.64 INCHES
69.3 FEET (NOT SETTLED)
CONTOUR LEVELS
(IN FEET)
************
56.62
56.62
54.32
54.42
53.77
54.07
53.82
54.22
54.22
54.57
54.62
54.52
54.72
54.40
53.92
54.52
54.32
54.12
54.72
54.02
54.17
54.12
54.12
54.30
54.64
54.88
*****
54.31

VEGETATION: IV. GENERAL MAINTENANCE
1.. After final grading and permanent vegetation is well
established, maintain good covers with mowing and fertilizing.
Annually collect soil samples for analysis and crop fertilizer
and lime recommendations. Fertilize and lime native grasses
around the site and keep existing ground cover in tact as much as
possible. Maintain natural water ways and ditches. Plant new
cover grasses as necessary.
2.:•• Mow grass as desired and in accordance with accepted
Practices, especially around the lagoon area. Keep weeds and
floating weed mats off of the lagoon.
24

3. Repair mulch and seed beds as necessary if areas of dead
grass develop or erosion scars occur.
4. Use pesticides and herbicides only as a last resort to keep
grass stands healthy. Use housekeeping techniques to control
insects along with or instead of pesticides.
5. Use common sense and close observations to prevent
lagoon upsets.
6. No shrubs or bushes are planned at this time. New shrubs and
trees should not be planted closer than 30 feet to the new lagoon
and not on the lagoon dam.
V. LAGOON MANAGEMENT AND DAM INSPECTIONS
1. Once the lagoon is constructed and ready for filling, it is
very important to first add water to the lagoon prior to adding
swine manure. The owner should be careful to add water to the
lagoon until at least one third of the lagoon volume is achieved
before adding swine manure. The operator should always strive to
maintain a liquid depth of about 6 feet. Initial water addition
to the lagoon shall be from water wells on the farm, but if storm
water run-off can be easily added to the lagoon it may be added
in place of well water.
2. Research literature suggests a pH of 7.0 to 8.0 be maintained
in an anaerobic swine lagoon to obtain optimum treatment
conditions and minimize odors. During lagoon start-up the acid
forming bacteria will tend to populate faster then the methane
forming bacteria and can lower the overall pH of the lagoon
water. If this occurs, the owner/operator should add hydrated
lime to the lagoon at a rate of 1 pound per 1000 cubic feet of
water. The lime can be applied to the surface of the lagoon and
mixed into the surface waters until a proper pH is obtained.
Start adjusting the pH if the lagoon waters drop to or below a pH
of 6.7.
3. It is desirable to add manure daily in regular doses. This
is preferred to slug loading the lagoon at irregular intervals or
starving the microorganisms.
4. The only way to accurately estimate the volume of sludge in
an anaerobic lagoon is to take measurements. This can be done by
using a "sludge judge" or a variety of other measuring devices.
Measure sludge accumulation at least one time per year. Plan
sludge removal events as desired by the farmer in accordance with
the waste utilization plan, weather conditions, etc.
5. The lagoon sludge and/or wastewater can and should be tested
to determine its nutrient content prior to land applications.
Send effluent and sludge samples to the N. C. Department of
Agriculture, Agronomic Division, Plant Analysis Laboratory,
Raleigh, N.C. 27611. Plant or crop tissue samples can also be
sent for regular analysis.
25

6. Keep grasses and vegetation out of the lagoon. Floating mats
(not weed mats) are not likely to occur on swine lagoons. Such
mats will not interfere with performance and can be left in
place if present.
7. Take extreme care to select optimum conditions for spray
irrigation of wastewater and sludge removal events. Careful
planing will help minimize odors. Irrigate wastewater in dry
warm weather if possible, preferably before 12 noon.
8. Water levels should be lowered before the on set of wet
weather seasons and in accordance with on -farm crop needs.
9. Avoid unnecessary agitation of the lagoon. When possible
allow water to flow into the lagoon in a gentle fashion instead
of splashing or cascading. Inlet piping can be placed below
water surface.
10. Effluent piping from the confinement housing should be a
minimum of 6 inches in diameter, however 8 inch piping may be
used. Gravity flow piping should be sloped a minimum of 1
percent. It should be PVC piping with glue joints. The terminal
end of the piping should extend at or just under the water
surface at the Design Treatment Volume level. If the pipe
outlets are under water the pipes should be equipped with vapor
traps and vents to prevent gasses from moving back toward the
confinement houses. Clean out ports should also be provided for
each set of pipes.
11. Lagoon start-ups are best done in warm weather, particularly
in the northern climates. This is less important in southern
states. Careful consideration to pH and gradual start-up
loadings can help off -set cool weather start-ups.
12. Regularly inspect the lagoon dam and earthen embankments for
settling or bulges, side slope stability, rodent damage, holds or
pock marks, erosion scars, wave action damage, weeping, etc.
Weeds should be mown at least one time per year and two times per
year in heavy growth years.
13. Do not drive vehicles across emergency spillways. Keep the
spillway clear of limbs, tall plant growth, logs, floating
debris, sedimentation, etc. Watch for erosion and settling.
Keep outlet channel in good vegetative cover and free from
erosion.
14..- Grazing on dams and embankments can cause problems and is
not recommended.
15. Inspect all dams, earthen embankments, and emergency spill-
way.at least two times per year or after every significant storm
event.
?A

16. Lagoons with floors below the seasonably high water table
should maintain the water levels in the lagoon above the seasona-
bly high level.
17. Irrigation pump intakes should be a minimum of 18 inches
below the lagoon liquid surfaces. The operator plans to
occasionally agitate the sludge on the lagoon floor while
irrigating in order to minimize sludge build-up. Any irrigation
pump and irrigation nozzles should be designed to pump solids.
18. Always maintain at least 1 foot of freeboard in lagoons with
Pump systems. Lagoons without dedicated pump systems should
maintain at least a 2 feet freeboard.
19. The volume of the lagoon designated for the 25 year - 24
hour storm should be kept void except in emergency situations.
This is not part of the six month storage volume. Only use the
six month storage volume if necessary.
20. Emergency spillways should be kept clear of trash and
debris. A good grass cover should be maintained at and down
slope of emergency spillways.
21. Occasional upsets to an anaerobic lagoon can be expected,
but the duration of such events should be very short. Rapid or
sudden temperature changes may cause some temporary changes in
lagoon performance. Long term cold snaps can also cause upsets.
The owner should strive to maintain a steady state condition in
the lagoon at all times. Avoid the use of harsh or chlorinated
chemicals in the confinement housing or in the lagoon.
22. New products are being developed to help minimize odors from
swine operations. The owner/operator may utilize such products
but these should only be utilized according to manufacture's
recommendations and with caution. Many of these products do not
reduce odors and are a waste of money. Rapid additions of
enzymes or chemicals could cause microbial upsets.
VI. SAFETY CONSIDERATIONS
1. Fencing around the lagoon is not being recommended since the
entrance to the farm is controlled, however fencing should be
used if needed. If the public or children will have access to
the lagoon area the lagoon should have a stock tight fence
installed around its perimeter. Clear warning signs should be
installed around the lagoon and visible from all sides of the
lagoon. Unauthorized persons should be kept away from the lagoon
area.
17

Ammonia-(NH4):
* Not extremely toxic in lower concentrations. Irritating to
the eyes and respiratory system. Can be released in large
quantities especially during manure agitation. Can be
corrosive to exposed metal parts.
* Colorless with very distinct odor.
* Lighter than air, accumulates near the ceiling.
* Recommended maximum safe gas concentrations for an 8 hour
exposure to humans: 25 parts per million
* Recommended control of gas: Adequate ventilation.
* Not readily explosive.
4. Workers should never go under floor slats unless accompanied
by a helper and only if adequate ventilation is in place. Drain
and clean under slat pits at least 8 hours prior to entering in
addition to providing good ventilation. Workers entering
confined spaces should follow OSHA guidelines for such
activities.
5. The owner/operator may wish to purchase a portable hand held
gas meter for questionable environmental situations.
6. Beware of spiders and snakes around swine facilities.
7. Workers should attend to cuts and wounds immediately with the
proper first aid.
** end of report **
REFERENCES
1) American National Standards Institute (ANSI)/ASAE No. EP403.2
August 93. DESIGN OF ANAEROBIC LAGOONS FOR ANIMAL WASTE
MANAGEMENT.
2) American Society of Agricultural Engineering, Engineering
Practice No. ASAE EP379.1. CONTROL OF MANURE ODORS.
3) American Society of Agricultural Engineering, Data No. ASAE
D384.1. MANURE PRODUCTION AND CHARACTERISTICS.
4) American Society of Agricultural Engineering, Engineering
Practice No. ASAE EP470. MANURE STORAGE SAFETY.
5). American Society of Agricultural Engineering, Engineering
Practice No. ASAE EP393.2. MANURE STORAGES.
6) Barker, James C., PH.D., P.E. Professor in the Biological and
Agricultural Engineering Department, N.C. State University,
Raleigh, N.C., LAGOON DESIGN AND MANAGEMENT FOR LIVESTOCK WASTE
TREATMENT. AND STORAGE. Extension Publication Number 103-83,
Revised 1990.
29