HomeMy WebLinkAbout20151080 Ver 1_Application_20151019� �r����.
�� ����: � ��
"�i '�.a�g�
�� m...
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
PAT MCCRORY
GOVERNOR
Wilmington Regulatory Field Office
US Army Corps of Engineers
69 Darlington Ave.
Wilmington, NC 28403
I:�M�i
Dear Sir:
Ms. Liz Hair
NCDOT Coordinator
October 15, 2015
NICHOLAS7.TENNYSON
SECRETARY
Subject: Application for a Section 404 Nationwide Permit No. 23, and Section
401 Water Quality Certification for the proposed replacement of Bridge
No. 144, SR 1429 (Old Pine Log Road) over Soules Swamp, Columbus
County. TIP No. B-4948; Federal Aid Project No. BRSTP-1429(7); WBS
No. 40104.1.1
The North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) proposes to replace Bridge
No.144 with approximately 80-foot bridge on the existing alignment. This bridge will be
replaced on the existing alignment while trafiic will be shifted to an off-site detour.
Permanent impacts to riparian wetlands include 0.07 acre of fill.
Please see enclosed copies of the Pre-Construction Notification (PCN), permit drawings,
stormwater management plan, and design plans for the above referenced project. The
Programmatic Categorical EXClusion (PCE) was completed in August 2014 and
distributed shortly thereafter.
This project calls for a letting date of April 19, 2016 and a review date of March l, 2016.
The project schedule may be advanced if funding becomes available.
Regulatory Approvals
Section 404 Permit: All aspects of this project are being processed by the Federal
Highway Administration as a"Categorical Exclusion" in accordance with 23 CFR
771.115(b). The NCDOT requests that the project be authorized by NW 23 for bridge
construction.
MAILING ADDRESS: Te�ePHONE: 919-707-6000 LOCATION:
NC DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION FAX: 919-250-4224 CENTURY CENTER, BUILDING A
PROJECT DEVELOPMENT AND ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS WEBSITE: 'I OOO BIRCH RIDGE DRIVE
1548 MAIL SERVICE CENTER HTTPS://CONNECT.NCDOT.GOV/RESOURCES/ENVIRON RALEIGH NC 2761 O
Rn�ei�H NC 27699-1548 MENTALIPAGES�DEFAULLASPX
Section 401 Permit: We anticipate 401 General Certiiication number 3891 will apply to
this project. NCDOT will adhere to all general conditions of this Water Quality
Certificaton.
A copy of this permit application will be posted on the NCDOT Website at
https•//connect ncdot.�ov/resources/Environmental/Pa�es/default.aspx, under Quick Links >
Permit Applications. A copy of the PCE is also available at the above website address under
Quick Links > Environmental Documents. Thank you for your assistance with this project. If
you have any questions or need additional information, please contact John Merritt at
jsmerritt@ncdot.gov ar (919) 707-6140.
Sincerely,
1.�
-_� y
..�r- Richard W. Hancock, P.E., Manager
Project Development and Environmental Analysis Unit
cc: NCDOT Permit Application Standard Distribution List
��oF w a r�9Q�
� �
5 �
P Y
Office Use Only:
Corps action ID no.
DWQ project no.
Form Version 1.3 Dec 10 2008
Pre-Construction Notification (PCN) Form
A. Applicant Information
1. Processing
1 a. Type(s) of approval sought from the
Corps: � Section 404 Permit ❑ Section 10 Permit
1 b. Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: 23 or General Permit (GP) number:
1c. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps? ❑ Yes � No
1d. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply):
❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Regular ❑ Non-404 Jurisdictional General Permit
❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Express ❑ Riparian Buffer Authorization
1 e. Is this notification solely for the record For the record only for DWQ 401 For the record only for Corps Permit:
because written approval is not required? Certification:
� Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes � No
1f. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in-lieu fee program proposed for mitigation � Yes ❑ No
of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank or in-lieu
fee program.
1g. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1 h ❑ Yes � No
below.
1 h. Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)? ❑ Yes � No
2. Project Information
2a. Name of project: proposed replacement of Bridge No. 144
2b. County: Columbus
2c. Nearest municipality / town: Chadbourn
2d. Subdivision name: not applicable
2e. NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state g_4948
project no:
3. Owner Information
3a. Name(s) on Recorded Deed: North Carolina Department of Transportation
3b. Deed Book and Page No. not applicable
3c. Responsible Party (for LLC if not applicable
applicable):
3d. Street address: 1598 Mail Service Center
3e. City, state, zip: Raleigh, NC 27699-1598
3f. Telephone no.: (919) 707-6140
3g. Fax no.: (919) 250-4224
3h. Email address: jsmerritt@ncdot.gov
4. Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a. Applicant is: ❑ Agent ❑ Other, specify:
4b. Name: not applicable
4c. Business name
(if applicable):
4d. Street address:
4e. City, state, zip:
4f. Telephone no.:
4g. Fax no.:
4h. Email address:
5. Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable)
5a. Name: not applicable
5b. Business name
(if applicable):
5c. Street address:
5d. City, state, zip:
5e. Telephone no.:
5f. Fax no.:
5g. Email address:
B. Project Information and Prior Project History
1. Property Identification
1a. Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID): not applicable
1 b. Site coordinates (in decimal degrees): Latitude: 34.310387 Longitude: - 78.776212
(DD.DDDDDD) (-DD.DDDDDD)
1 c. Property size: 20 acres
2. Surface Waters
2a. Name of nearest body of water (stream, river, etc.) to genson Mill Pond
proposed project:
2b. Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water: C;Sw
2c. River basin: Lumbar
3. Project Description
3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application: Existing conditions at the site include maintained/disturbed roadside shoulder and forested areas. Land use
in the project vicinity is predominantly mixed residential and agricultrual.
3b. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property: 4.33
3c. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property: 200
3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project: To replace bridge 144
3e. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
The project involves replacing bridge 144 on the existing alignment. Traffic will follow an offsite detour during
construction. Standard road building equipment, such as trucks, dozers, and cranes will be used.
4. Jurisdictional Determinations
4a. Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property /
project (including all prior phases) in the past? ❑ Yes � No ❑ Unknown
Comments:
4b. If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type
of determination was made? ❑ Preliminary ❑ Final
4c. If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas? Agency/Consultant Company:
Name (if known): Veronica Barnes Other:
4d. If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation.
5. Project History
5a. Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for � Yes � No ❑ Unknown
this project (including all prior phases) in the past?
5b. If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions.
6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project? ❑ Yes � No
6b. If yes, explain.
C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1a. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply):
� Wetlands ❑ Streams - tributaries Buffers
� Open Waters ❑ Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted.
2a. 2b. 2c. 2d. 2e. 2f.
Wetland impact Type of jurisdiction
number — Type of impact Type of wetland Forested (Corps - 404, 10 Area of impact
Permanent (P) or (if known) DWQ — non-404, other) (acres)
Tem orar T
Site 1� P � T Roadway fill Riverine � Yes � Corps 0.07
❑ No ❑ DWQ
Site 1❑ P❑ T ❑ Yes ❑ Corps
❑ No ❑ DWQ
2g. Total wetland impacts 0.07 Permanent
0.00 Temporary
2h. Comments: - There will also be 0.10 acre of hand clearing. Additionally, there will be 0.02 acre of temporary fill in wetlands
in the hand clearing areas for the installation of erosion control measures, including temporary silt fence and/or special
sediment control fence.
3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted.
3a. 3b. 3c. 3d. 3e. 3f. 3g.
Stream impact Type of impact Stream name Perennial Type of Average Impact length
number - (PER) or jurisdiction stream (linear feet)
Permanent (P) or intermittent (Corps - 404, 10 width
Temporary (T) (INT)? DWQ — non-404, (feet)
other)
Site 1❑ P � T ❑ PER ❑ Corps
❑ INT ❑ DWQ
Site 2❑ P � T ❑ PER ❑ Corps
❑ INT ❑ DWQ
Site 3❑ P � T ❑ PER ❑ Corps
❑ INT ❑ DWQ
Site 4❑ P❑ T ❑ PER ❑ Corps
❑ INT ❑ DWQ
3h. Total stream and tributary impacts
3i. Comments:
4. Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U.S. then individuall list all o en water im acts below.
4a. 4b. 4c. 4d. 4e.
Open water Name of
impact number— waterbody Type of impact Waterbody type Area of impact (acres)
Permanent (P) or (if applicable)
Temporary T
01 ❑ P � T Soules Swamp Fill Stream 0.02
01 ❑POT
02 ❑P�T
03 ❑P�T
4f. Total open water impacts 0.02
X Temporary
4g. Comments:
5. Pond or Lake Construction
If pond or lake construction roposed, then complete the chart below.
5a. 5b. 5c. 5d. 5e.
Wetland Impacts (acres) Stream Impacts (feet) Upland
Pond ID Proposed use or (acres)
number purpose of pond Excavat
Flooded Filled ed Flooded Filled Excavated Flooded
P1
P2
5f. Total
5g. Comments:
5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required?
❑ Yes ❑ No If yes, permit ID no:
5i. Expected pond surface area (acres):
5j. Size of pond watershed (acres):
5k. Method of construction:
6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer
impacts below. If any impacts require mitigation, then you MUST fill out Section D of this form.
6a.
❑ Neuse ❑ Tar-Pamlico ❑ Other:
Project is in which protected basin? ❑ Catawba ❑ Randleman
6b. 6c. 6d. 6e. 6f. 6g.
Buffer impact
number — Reason for impact Buffer Zone 1 impact Zone 2 impact
Permanent (P) or Stream name mitigation (square feet) (square feet)
Temporar T re uired?
B1* ❑ P � T Phone line Neuse ❑ Yes
❑ No
6h. Total buffer impacts
6i. Comments: *Utility impacts
D. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
1 a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project.
The proposed bridge No. 144 is approximately 24 feet longer than the existing bridge. The existing causeway is utilized to
minimize jurisdictional impacts. All proposed mechanized clearing was changed to hand clearing.
1 b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques.
Construction will be top-down. Best Management Practices for the Protection of Surface Waters, as well as, Best
Management Practices for Construction and Maintenance Activities will be implemented.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for ❑ Yes � No
impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State? If no, ex lain: No miti ation ro osed due to minimal im acts
2b. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply): ❑ DWQ ❑ Corps
❑ Mitigation bank
2c. If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this
project? ❑ Payment to in-lieu fee program
❑ Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a. Name of Mitigation Bank:
3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter) Type Quantity
3c. Comments:
4. Complete if Making a Payment to In-lieu Fee Program
4a. Approval letter from in-lieu fee program is attached. ❑ Yes
4b. Stream mitigation requested: linear feet
4c. If using stream mitigation, stream temperature: ❑ warm ❑ cool ❑cold
4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only): square feet
4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested:
4f. Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested: acres
4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested: acres
4h. Comments: The Crescent Road Mitigation Site will be debited.
5. Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a. If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan.
6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) — required by DWQ
6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires ❑ Yes � No
buffer mitigation?
6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the
amount of mitigation required.
6c. 6d. 6e.
Zone Reason for impact Total impact Multiplier Required mitigation
(square feet) (square feet)
Zone 1 3(2 for Catawba)
Zone 2 1.5
6f. Total buffer mitigation required:
6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank,
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in-lieu fee fund).
6h. Comments:
E. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1. Diffuse Flow Plan
1 a. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified ❑ Yes � No
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
1 b. If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If not, explain why.
� Yes ❑ No
Comments:
2. Stormwater Mana ement Plan
2a. What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project? N/A
2b. Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan? � Yes ❑ No
2c. If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why:
2d. If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative description of the plan:
See attached permit drawings and stormwater management plan.
❑ Certified Local Government
2e. Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan? ❑ DWQ Stormwater Program
� DWQ 401 Unit
3. Certified Local Government Stormwater Review
3a. In which local government's jurisdiction is this project? not applicable
❑ Phase II
3b. Which of the following locally-implemented stormwater management programs ❑ NSW
apply (check all that apply): ❑ USMP
❑ Water Supply Watershed
❑ Other:
3c. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been ❑ Yes ❑ No
attached?
4. DWQ Stormwater Program Review
❑ Coastal counties
4a. Which of the following state-implemented stormwater management programs apply ❑ HQW
(check all that apply): ❑ ORW
❑ Session Law 2006-246
❑ Other:
4b. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
attached? ❑ Yes ❑ No N/A
5. DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
5a. Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements? � Yes ❑ No N/A
5b. Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met? � Yes ❑ No N/A
F. Supplementary Information
1. Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
1 a. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the � Yes ❑ No
use of public (federal/state) land?
1 b. If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State � Yes ❑ No
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
1 c. If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
letter.) � Yes ❑ No
Comments:
2. Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a. Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards, ❑ Yes � No
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)?
2b. Is this an after-the-fact permit application? ❑ Yes � No
2c. If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s):
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a. Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in ❑ Yes
additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality? � No
3b. If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
Due to the minimal transportation impact resulting from this bridge replacement, this project will neither influence nearby
land uses nor stimulate growth. Therefore, a detailed indirect or cumulative effects study will not be necessary.
4. Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a. Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
not applicable
10
5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or
habitat?
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act
impacts?
5c. If yes, ind icate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted.
� Yes ❑ No
� Yes ❑ No
� Raleigh
❑ Asheville
5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat?
NCNHP, USFWS website, field surveys
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat? �❑ Yes
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
NMFS County Index
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation
status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or_properties_significan_t_in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
❑ Yes
/1 .
// .
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
NEPA Documentation
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA-designated 100-year floodplain? � Yes ❑ No
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements: NCDOT Hydraulics Unit coordination with FEMA
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination? FEMA Maps
� �� �"� � "` ��
� Richard W. Hancock, P.E. "`��'�'�--'--. �
Applicant/Agent's Printed Name Applicant/AgenYs Signature Date
(AgenYs signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant
is orovided.l
11
k li�;l lr� <14' North Carolina Department of Transportation
S L[?l"l l itYcltPf �
Highway Stormwater Program �.
STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PLAN
(Version 2.01; Released December 2014) FOR NCDOT PROJECTS
WBS Element: 40104.1.1 TIP No.: B-4948 County(ies): Columbus Page 1 of 3
General Project Information
WBS Element: 40104.1.1 TIP Number: B-4948 Project Type: Bridge Replacement Date: 4/13/2015
NCDOT Contact: Bill Zerman, PE Contractor I Designer: HDR � ICA Engineering / Trent Cormier
Address: 1000 Birch Ridge Dr. Address: 5121 Kingdom Way, Suite 100
Raleigh, NC 27610 Raleigh, NC 27607
Phone: 919-703-6301 Phone: 919-900-1608
Email: rpatel ncdot. ov Email: tcormier icaen .com
Cit ITown: Chadbourn Count ies): Columbus
River Basin s: Lumber CAMA Count ? No
Wetlands within Project Limits? Yes
Pro'ect Description
Pro'ect Len th lin. miles or feet : 0.15 Surrounding Land Use: Forest and agriculture
Proposed Pro'ect Existin Site
Pro'ect Built-U on Area ac. 0.5 ac. 0.4 ac.
Typical Cross Section Description: 2 lanes @ 11' with 6' shoulders 2 lanes @ 10'
Annual Avg Daily Traffic (veh/hr/day): Desi n/Future: 4570 Year: 2036 Existin : 3154 Year: 2016
General Project Narrative: The project consists of construction of a new 82'-4.5" (2 @ 41' -2 1/4") 21" PCCS bridge to replace the existing 55 feet 8 inch long bridge #144 on SR 1429 over Soules
(Description of Minimization of Water Swamp. The total project length is 0.147 miles. The project is located in the Lumber River Basin. The project drainage system consists of grass shoulders, grated inlets with
Quality Impacts) associated pipes, and rip rap pad at the pipe outfall.
Jurisdictional Streams: Soules Swamp
The BMP measures used on this project to reduce stormwater impacts are listed below
Sheet flow on grass shoulders along the roadway: This will promote infiltration and filtration of pavement runoff by directing sheet flow over grassed shoulder slopes.
Outlet protection with rip rap: Rip rap outlet protection is provided at 17+71 LT to dissipate energy from the bridge storm water to provide a non-erosive sheet flow
(approximately 60 feet) for infiltration and filtration before entering the stream with Q10=0.30 cfs and V10=0.70 fps.
No deck drains: This will avoid direct discharge of storm water from the bridge deck into the receiving water.
Bank stabilization: Bank stabilization with class II rip rap is provided at both sides of the stream at 18+02 & 18+67 to provide long-term bank stability to prevent erosion. This will
provide a stable stream and the stream will not degrade in the evolution process.
Waterbody Information
Surface Water Body (1): Soules Swamp NCDWR Stream Index No.: 15-4-8
NCDWR Surface Water Classification for Water Body Primary Classification: Class C
Supplemental Classification: Swamp Waters (Sw)
Other Stream Classification: None
Impairments: None
ThreatenedlEndangered Species? Yes Comments: Wood Stork is May Affect Not Likely to Adversely Affect: All others are No Affect
NRTR Stream ID: Soules Swamp Buffer Rules in Effect: N/A
Project Includes Bridge Spanning Water Body? Yes Deck Drains Discharge Over Buffer? No Dissipator Pads Provided in Buffer? Yes
Deck Drains Discharge Over Water Body? No (If yes, provide justification in the General Project Narrative) (If yes, describe in the General Project Narrative; if no, justify in the
(If yes, provide justification in the General Project Narrative) General Project Narrative)
1 31�;31�t'�lw° North Carolina Department of Transportation
�'���.117��"���� Highway Stormwater Program
'�':)
STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PLAN
(Version 2.01; Released December 2014) FOR NCDOT PROJECTS
WBS Element: 40104.1.1 TIP No.: B-4948 Count ies : Columbus Pa e 3 of 3
Preformed Scour Holes and Energy Dissipators
Drainage Pipe/Structure BMP
Sheet Station (Road Projects) or Surface Energy Dissipator Area Conveyance Dimensions Q10 V10 Associated w/
No. Coordinates (Non-Road Projects) Water Bod Type Riprap T pe ac Structure (in) (cfs) (fps) Buffer Rules?
4 17+70 (1)Soules Riprap Apron / Pad Class'B' 0.1 Pipe 15 0.3 1.4 No
Swamp
4 18+g0 (1)Soules Riprap Apron / Pad Class'B' 0.0 Pipe 15 0.3 1.1 No
Swamp
Additional Comments
' Refer to the NCDOT Best Management Practices Toolbox (2014), NCDOT Standards, the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) Hydraulic Engineering Circular No. 14 (HEC-14), Third Edition, Hydraulic Design of Energy Dissipators for
Culverts and Channels (July 2006), as applicable, for design guidance and criteria.
V�
Zt
(7 :
Z'
Z_
�n (7 ',
oZ
��VQ�
d U c
..
.
�
.�
.,
�
V
W
O
�
�
�
�
•�
�
V
�
�
O
V
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DIVISION OF HIGHW�IYS
COL UMB US CO U1�lTY
LOCATI0IV: BRIDGE NO.144 OVER SOULES SWAMP
011t SR 1429 (OLD PI11tE LOGGIIIIG ROAD)
TYPE OF WORK GRADIIVG, DRAINAGE, PA VI11lG AND STR UCTURE
WETLAND AND SURFACE WATER IMPACTS PERMIT
NOTES:
CLEARING ON THIS PROJECT SHALL BE PERFORMED TO THE LIMITS ESTABLISHED BY METHOD —.
THIS PROJECT IS NOT WITHIN ANY MUNICIPAL BOUNDARIES.
THERE IS NO CONTROL OF ACCESS ON THIS PROJECT.
�
�o
a0 N
0 N
Z Z
][I���1�1[1P1LlG�C1C+ 1[�IL.�I`7�
Dm N✓JT L?SE FOR RAW ACQUISITIO[�'
lE�l[�lE1L,d1Mi d�.�lEbSY 1E��.A�l�,y�
DO NOT USE FQJR CONSTRUCTION
�
<
�Z
n ??
a
�, z
oW
"s'
WETLAND AND SURFACE WATER IMPACTS PERMIT
�
0
0
N
N
�
H
�'T
�
�
Q
Z
50 0
25 50
SCALEe I"= 50' HORIZe
ENLARGED
PLAN VI EW
SITE 1 LEGEND
TOTAL PROJECT LENGTH: 0.152 MILES
PROPOSED BRIDGE: TWO SPAN: 2@ 41'-2%2" (21" PCCS WITH
2 VERTICAL ABUTMENTS)
EXISTING BRIDGE: 3 SPAN BRIDGE: 1@18'8", 1@18'3", 1@18'9"
--'M�e--- WETLAND BOUNDARY
� DENOTES FILL IN
WETLAND
� DENOTES HAND
CLEARING
�DENOTES PERMANENT
IMPACTS IN SURFACE WATER
�
<
�Z
n ??
a
�, z
oW
"s'
WETLAND AND SURFACE WATER IMPACTS PERMIT
�
0
0
N
N
�
H
�'T
�
�
Q
Z
50 0
25 50
SCALEe I"= 50' HORIZe
ENLARGED
PLAN VI EW
SITE 1 LEGEND
TOTAL PROJECT LENGTH: 0.152 MILES
PROPOSED BRIDGE: TWO SPAN: 2@ 41'-2%2" (21" PCCS WITH
2 VERTICAL ABUTMENTS)
EXISTING BRIDGE: 3 SPAN BRIDGE: 1@18'8", 1@18'3", 1@18'9"
--'M�e--- WETLAND BOUNDARY
� DENOTES FILL IN
WETLAND
� DENOTES HAND
CLEARING
�DENOTES PERMANENT
IMPACTS IN SURFACE WATER
Z
�
z
��
oZ
�V
� PROJECT REFERENCE NO. SHEET NO.
' WETLAND AND SURFACE WATER IMPACTS PERMIT 8-4948 5
�� ROADWAY DESIGN HYDRAULICS
ENGINEER ENGINEER
� ������d� ��' ��.1���
DO NOT USE PO CONSTRUCTION
�b �'` �Ei� OF /1'R1�3�T�OA�A�PION
DIVI�Oi�i OF HI�H�PAY�
BM#1 �OLU�u� �O�'Y
-L- STA. 10+74.10, 25.33' LT p�,*�i�y�„��j
RR SPIKE IN BASE 18" HARDWOOD E 3•TA14( OVER, �OiII.F.�
ELEV. = 72.86' BR/DGE HYDRAUIJC DATA
w.� orr � i�?f
ves�siy ascHiV� - �on cFS �r.,n �� ��f� Ro.�
aES�r F ou�ycr - � rRs
v,�s�cN��vAr�r - �ao Fr �r oF
BASE ARi�E � 1580 CFS PERMIT DRAWING
��� � � � � SHEET b OF 8
av Piiys ascw,4r�- �on cFS GLI
�Pi ro �,4r� n� rY-r�
DA7'E � SUAVEY � 3/l3/EDl4
��DATE�� SUAI�EY � 61.4 F/'
-- STA. 17 + 93.81 -L- STA. 18 + 6.19
0 0
0 0
w p o P� = 15+25.00 PI = 18+15 0 BRI GE � 5T 18 35 -L- PI = 20+65.0 � P
�+ � EL = 70J2' E= 73J0 2 41'-2�/4 (21' CS�) EL = 71.97' w+ r
� �^ VC 250' V = 260' SK V90TICAL A UTMENTS VC 220' � cv �
80 F �i K= 189 K= 151 GP E.= 73.16 K= 138 � F �i 80
W J J Z J W
LO � W W I W
(+ 1.0259% (-)0. 00% + 0.900 %
7�
+ . +1.32% (r) .50%
° 2. 3% � � �
ELEV. = 65.6 �� "�=lo_ oi _-_' ' -'—' �+li v�� ----° + o.—soi
ELEy. = 65 I
6O Z; CL�pES 'll' RIP RAP TYPJ� ' ASS 'll RIP RAP � � 6O
n' � i �
e �
r
- 50 � � � . � . 50
n CLAS 'II' RIP RAP � � �
; (2 FT THICK) � g
n� KEY-I TO SLOPE 4
EL y. = 65.3 � � m �o � �
(3/13/2014) F (p F THICK)
J KEY N TO SLOPE
ELEV. ° 4.9 �
3 r
�
E y �
FI
� SITE 1
_
F�R —L— PLQN V�EW
SEE SNEET �
11+00 12+00 13+00 14+00 15+00 16+00 17+00 18+00 19+00 20+00 21+00 22+00 23+00 24+00
WETLANDS
8o CLEARING �
75
7�
- - - - - - - - - - - - -
65 -------
60
WETLAND AND SURFACE WATER IMPACTS PERMIT
FILL IN
�ETLAND
�0.020 �0.010
3;1 /� ----------------_. __—
� � � � � � � � � � � � � �
75 70 65 60 55 50 45 40 35 3� 25 20 /5 /0
n
� � �
5 0 5
SITE I
X-SECTION
STA 17+50 -L-
ao
75
------------- 70
65
60
� � � � � � � � � � � � � �
l0 /5 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 7Q 75
LEGE D
�DENOTES FILL IN
WETLAND
I�T�O�IPLETE PLA�T�
DO NOT U9E POR N/W ACQU191TtON
PRELI�fI�T.�RY I�LA�T�
DO NOT USE FOA CONSTRI%CTIOIV
WETLAND PERMIT IMPACT SUMMARY
WETLAND IMPACTS SURFACE WATER IMPACTS
Hand Existing Existing
Permanent Temp. Excavation Mechanized Clearing Permanent Temp. Channel Channel Natural
Site Station Structure Fillln Fillln in Clearing in SW SW Impacts Impacts Stream
No. (From/To) Size / Type Wetlands Wetlands Wetlands in Wetlands Wetlands impacts impacts Permanent Temp. Design
(ac) (ac) (ac) (ac) (ac) (ac) (ac) (ft) (ft) (ft)
1 14+43 TO 20+08 ROADWAY FILL 0.07 0.10
18+10 and 18+60 0.02
TOTALS*: 0.07 0.10 0.02
*Rounded totals are sum of actual impacts
NOTES:
0.02 acres of temporary fill in Wetlands in the hand clearing areas for erosion control measures
TN Revised 3/12/13
o�
�
�
�
T
�
�i
�
�
m�
�
N�o
ee, �
o��w
o��
>,a
� oz
0 3�
,ow
� o�
� ���
Q��
�
��ffr
.
.
�
��
.�
�
V
W
O
�
�
�
�
•�
�
V
�
�
O
V
See Sheet lA For Index of Sheets
See Sheet 1B for Conventional Symbols
�����' �� ����� �����e���
������� � �� ����������
COL UMB US CO U1�lTY
LOCATION: BRIDGE N0.144 OVER SOULES SWAMP
011t SR 1429 (OLD PI11tE LOG ROAD)
TYPE OF WORK GRADI11tG, DRAI11tAGE, PAVING A111D STRUCTURE
�
TO CHADBOURN
NC 410
+
SR 1429
END TIP PROJECT B-4948
—L— POC STA. 22 + 00.00
�� i
,\,\ /, �
`�� /
�RIDGE
_�_ O. 144� ��p pINE LOG
I a '
� 3 '
N /
IW,
,�
I°� F
+
BEGI1� TIP PROJECT B-4948
—L— POT STA.14 + 00.00
NOTES:
CLEARING ON THIS PROJECT SHALL BE PERFORMED TO THE LIMITS ESTABLISHED BY METHOD II.
THIS PROJECT IS NOT WITHIN ANY MUNICIPAL BOUNDARIES.
THERE IS NO CONTROL OF ACCESS ON THIS PROJECT.
,
, ,
, ,
i �
i j�S\�O,LLE
U
�
c� O
CO N
� N
a�
zz
PIdELIMINARY FL.�N3
DO NOT [1SE FOR CONSTRUCTION
Prepared In /he 0/flce of: �'DRAULICS ENGINEER
GRAPHIC SCALES DESIGN DATA PROJECT LENGTH
ADT 2016 = 3154 DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
50� 2$' 0 $�� ���� /000 Birch Ridge Dr., Ra[eigh NC, 27610 r�O�P�
{rr�, I� ADT 2036 = 4570 �° c
K ° �% % 2072 STANDARD SP6C/FlCATIONS �9�� ��p'
PLANS D= 60 % LENGTH ROADWAY TIP PROJECT B-4948 = 0.136 MILES f,E � �
50' 25' 0 50' 100' = a * — RIGHT OF WAY DATE: REKHA PATEL, PE sicxazuaE: � �
T 3 /o LENGTH STRUCTURE TIP PROJECT B-4948 — 0.016 MILES � �
V= 60 MPH APRIL 14, 2015 PRO�FCT ENC�NFEn ROADWAY DESIGN
�
PROFILE (HORIZONTAL) * TTST =1% DUAL = 2% TOTAL LENGTH TIP PROJECT B-4948 = 0.152 MILES ENGINEER ��.�� �����
FUNC CLASS = LOCAL LETTING DATE: BRIAN P. ROBINSON �� g����
10' 5' 0 10' 20'
APRIL 19, 2016 PROJECT DESIGN ENGINEER
PROFILE (VERTICAL) SUB—REGIONAL TIER PE
SIGNATURE:
�
�
N
Note: Not to Scale
*S. U.E. = Subsurface Utility Engineering
BOUNDARIES AND PROPERTY.•
State Line
County Line
Township Line
City Line
Reservation Line
Property Line
Existing Iron Pin
Property Corner
Property Monument
Parcel/Sequence Number
Existing Fence Line
Proposed Woven Wire Fence
Proposed Chain Link Fence
Proposed Barbed Wire Fence
Existing Wetland Boundary
Proposed Wetland Boundary
Existing Endangered Animal Boundary
Existing Endangered Plant Boundary
0
EiP
�
O
E[M
i23
—x x x-
e
e
�
— — — — w L B — — — —
wLB
EeB
Known $oil Contamination: Area or $ite �
Potential Soil Contamination: Area or Site — �
BUILDINGS AND OTHER CULTURE.•
�
,�r
.�.
Gas Pump Vent or U�G Tank Cap O
Sign �
WB�� �w
Small Mine 'SZ�
Foundation �
Area Outline 0
Cemetery 0
Building �
School �
Church �
Dam
HYDROLOGY.•
Stream or Body of Water
Hydro, Pool or Reservoir
Jurisdictional Stream
Buffer Zone 1
BufFer Zone 2
Flow Arrow
Disappearing Stream
Spring
Wetland
Proposed Lateral, Tail, Head Ditch
False Sump
�----J
�s
— BZ 1
BZ 2
5�'�°]�]C �iF�° 1�C��°]�i�[ �C��$�]Ie�1��
�����1[�� �]F �[��iE�I����
CONVENTIONAL PLAN SHEET SYMBOLS
RAILROADS.•
Standard Gauge
RR Signal Milepost
Switch
RR Abandoned
RR Dismantled
RIGHT OF Wf1Y.•
Baseline Control Point
Existing Right of Way Marker
Existing Right of Way Line
Proposed Right of Way Line
Proposed Right of Way Line with
Iron Pin and Cap Marker
Proposed Right of Way Line with
Concrete or Granite WW Marker
Proposed Control of Access Line with
Concrete C1A Marker
Existing Control of Access
Proposed Control of Access
Existing Easement Line
Proposed Temporary Construction Easement -
Proposed Temporary Drainage Easement
Proposed Permanent Drainage Easement
Proposed Permanent Drainage / Utility Easement
Proposed Permanent Utility Easement
Proposed Temporary Utility Easement
Proposed Aerial Utility Easement
�
CSX TRANSPoRTATION
MILEPo T 35
�0
�
�
ia
v✓
ia
L�✓
��a
��./
/A\ ��
�J
��
_..
TDE
PDE
DUE
PUE
TUE
AUE
Proposed Permanent Easement with O
Iron Pin and Cap Marker �
ROADS AND RELATED FEATURES.•
Existing Edge of Pavement
Existing Curb -----
Proposed Slope Stakes Cut --- �---
Proposed $lope Stakes Fill - - - F - - -
Proposed Curb Ramp CR
Existing Metal Guardrail
Proposed Guardrail T T T r
Existing Cable Guiderail n n �
P d C bl G'd 'I n n n n
ropose a e ui erai
E Equality $ymbol
� Pavement Removal
°� �" ^ i�EGET�ITION.•
� Single Tree
�� Single Shrub
� Hedge '�"
���������
�#
Woods Line �""'-'
Orchard
Vineyard
EXISTING STRUCTURES.•
MAJOR:
Bridge, Tunnel or Box Culvert
Bridge Wing Wall, Head Wall and End Wall
MINOR:
Head and End Wall
Pipe Culvert
Footbridge
Drainage Box: Catch Basin, DI or JB
Paved Ditch Gutter
Storm Sewer Manhole
$torm $ewer
UTILITIES.•
POWER:
Existing Power Pole
Proposed Power Pole
Existing Joint Use Pole
Proposed Joint Use Pole
Power Manhole
Power Line Tower
Power Transformer
WG Power Cable Hand Hole
H-Frame Pole
Recorded WG Power Line
Designated U/G Power Line (S.U.E.*)
TELEPHONE:
WATER:
Water Manhole OO
Water Meter o
Water Valve �
�? Q f? Q
Water Hydrant �
vtnerora
Recorded l!/G Water Line •
Designated WG Water Line (S.U.E.*� - - - -•- - - -
Above Ground Water Line A�c wa,a�
CONC
- J CONC WW I
�
CONC HW
>---------�
�CB
OO
s
•
•
O
//
r
��
�
Existing Telephone Pole �
Proposed Telephone Pole �
Telephone Manhole OO
Telephone Booth ❑'
Telephone Pedestal ❑T
Telephone Cell Tower �
U/G Telephone Cable Hand Hole HH
Recorded U/G Telephone Cable �
Designated U/G Telephone Cable (S.U.E.*) - - - - -'- - - -
Recorded WG Telephone Conduit '�
Designated U/G Telephone Conduit (S.U.E.*� - - - -T�- - - -
Recorded U/G Fiber Optics Cable T��
Designated U/G Fiber Optics Cable (S.U.E.*� - - - -T °°- - -
rv:
N Satellite Dish CC
TV Pedestal ❑O
TV Tower �
WG N Cable Hand Hole HH
Recorded U/G N Cable �°
Designated U/G N Cable (S.U.E.*) - - - -*�- - - -
Recorded U/G Fiber Optic Cable �° F�
Designated U/G Fiber Optic Cable (S.U.E.*� ----T� F�- --
GAS:
Gas Valve �
Gas Meter �
Recorded U/G Gas Line �
Designated U/G Gas Line (S.U.E.*) - - - -°- - - -
Above Ground Gas Line A�c co�
SANITARY SEWER:
Sanitary Sewer Manhole OO
Sanitary Sewer Cleanout 0+
U/G Sanitary Sewer Line s�
Above Ground Sanitary Sewer A�c sa�,+o�Y Sewer
Recorded SS Forced Main Line Fss
Designated SS Forced Main Line (S.U.E.*) — - - - -F�s- - - -
MISCELLANEOUS:
Utility Pole
Utility Pole with Base
Utility Located Object
Utility Traffic $ignal Box
Utility Unknown U/G Line
U/G Tank; Water, Gas, Oil
Underground Storage Tank, Approx. Loc. —
A/G Tank; Water, Gas, Oil
Geoenvironmental Boring
U�G Test Hole (S.U.E.*)
Abandoned According to Utility Records
End of Information
•
O
O
❑s
��.�
�
0
�
AATUR
E.O.I.
�
s
ti
m
�
�
�
Q
-�
�
�
�
m
�
N o.
���
02:
o ��
FINAL PA VEMENT S CHED ULE
C1 PROP. APPROX. 1�/q" ASPHALT CONCRETE SURFACE COURSE, TYPE SF9.5A,
AT AN AVERAGE RATE OF 137.5 LBS. PER SQ. YD.
PROP. APPROX. 2%2" ASPHALT CONCRETE SURFACE COURSE, TYPE SF9.5A,
L"z AT AN AVERAGE RATE OF 137.5 LBS. PER SQ. YD. IN EACH OF TWO
LAYERS.
PROP. VAR. DEPTH ASPHALT CONCRETE SURFACE COURSE, TYPE SF9.5A, AT
C'3 AN AVERAGE RATE OF 110 LBS. PER SQ. YD. PER 1" DEPTH. TO BE PLACED
IN LAYERS NOT LESS THAN 1" IN DEPTH OR GREATER THAN 1�/p" IN DEPTH.
E1 PROP. APPROX. 5" ASPHALT CONCRETE BASE COURSE, TYPE 625.0B,
AT AN AVERAGE RATE OF 570 LBS. PER SQ. YD.
PROP. VAR. DEPTH ASPHALT CONCRETE BASE COURSE, TYPE B25.OB, AT AN
E 2 AVERAGE RATE OF 114 LBS. PER S�. YD. PER 1" DEPTH. TO BE P�ACED
IN LAYERS NOT LESS THAN 3° IN DEPTH OR GREATER THAN 5�/p" IN DEPTH.
R1 CONCRETE SHOULDER BERM GUTTER.
T EARTH MATERIAL.
�J EXISTING PAVEMENT.
W VARIABLE DEPTH ASPHALT PAVEMENT. (SEE WEDGING DETAIL)
NOTE: PAVEMENT EDGE SLOPES ARE 1:1 UNLESS OTHERWISE SHOWN
7� \/ADIAQI C
DETAIL SHOWING SHOULDER BERM GUTTER
-L- STA. 17+66.00 TO -L- STA. 17+81.81 (LT.) (BEGIN APPROACH SLAB)
-L- STA. 18+88.19 (END APPROACH SLAB) TO -L- STA. 19+07.00 (LT)
C� —L—
�
30'-10"
4'-5" 11' 11' 4'-5"
2a�� @ C� BRG.
GRADE
C3 POINT
0.02_ 0.02_
O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O
PROPOSED CORED SLABS
r 33'
TYPICAL SECTION ON STRUCTURE
(SEE STRUCTURE PLANS)
-L- STA. 17+93.81 (BEGIN BRIDGE) TO -L- STA. 18+76.19 (END BRIDGE)
24„ @ C{ BRG.
C� —L—
Detail Showing Method of Wedging
C� —L—
I
b� 22'
vV/GR
A� ll� I 71'
EXIST. PAVEMENT EXIST. PAVEMENT
CZ Cl GRADE CZ
POINT
�.�$ / 0.�2 �.OZ \ �.�8�
<�
, o�l ��-_-__- ____�-
3' 5���\ T U W T
ls��'� E� �.5" � �.s„ El
GRADE TO THIS LINE
TYPICAL SECTION NO. 1
-L- STA. 14 + 00.00 TO -L- STA. 17 + 50.00
-L- STA. 19 + 00.00 TO -L- STA. 21 + 75.00
NOTE: RESURFACE SR 1435 FROM SR 1436 TO NC 13Q/US 74-76 BUS WITH Cl
3.� S�G�\��\
���
\S
C� —L—
b' 22 � b'
9' W/GR 9' W/GR
� 4' 11' I 11' 4' �
� POINT
� 0.02 ,�( o.oz �
� � 7.5" �
GRADE TO THIS LINE
TYPICAL SECTION NO. 2
-L- STA. 17+50.00 TO -L- STA. 17+93.81 (BEGIN BRIDGE)
-L- STA. 18+76.19 (END BRIDGE) TO -L- STA. 19+00.00
PROJECT REFERENCE NO. SHEET NO.
B-4948 2A-1
ROADWAY DESIGN PAVEMENT DESIGN
ENGINEER ENGINEER
PRELIMINARY PLANS
DO NOT USE FOR CONSTRUCTION
/SFF `���
x SF
cT�o�J
/SFF 3��
X
SFC,T��NJ
�