Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout20151080 Ver 1_Application_20151019� �r����. �� ����: � �� "�i '�.a�g� �� m... STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION PAT MCCRORY GOVERNOR Wilmington Regulatory Field Office US Army Corps of Engineers 69 Darlington Ave. Wilmington, NC 28403 I:�M�i Dear Sir: Ms. Liz Hair NCDOT Coordinator October 15, 2015 NICHOLAS7.TENNYSON SECRETARY Subject: Application for a Section 404 Nationwide Permit No. 23, and Section 401 Water Quality Certification for the proposed replacement of Bridge No. 144, SR 1429 (Old Pine Log Road) over Soules Swamp, Columbus County. TIP No. B-4948; Federal Aid Project No. BRSTP-1429(7); WBS No. 40104.1.1 The North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) proposes to replace Bridge No.144 with approximately 80-foot bridge on the existing alignment. This bridge will be replaced on the existing alignment while trafiic will be shifted to an off-site detour. Permanent impacts to riparian wetlands include 0.07 acre of fill. Please see enclosed copies of the Pre-Construction Notification (PCN), permit drawings, stormwater management plan, and design plans for the above referenced project. The Programmatic Categorical EXClusion (PCE) was completed in August 2014 and distributed shortly thereafter. This project calls for a letting date of April 19, 2016 and a review date of March l, 2016. The project schedule may be advanced if funding becomes available. Regulatory Approvals Section 404 Permit: All aspects of this project are being processed by the Federal Highway Administration as a"Categorical Exclusion" in accordance with 23 CFR 771.115(b). The NCDOT requests that the project be authorized by NW 23 for bridge construction. MAILING ADDRESS: Te�ePHONE: 919-707-6000 LOCATION: NC DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION FAX: 919-250-4224 CENTURY CENTER, BUILDING A PROJECT DEVELOPMENT AND ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS WEBSITE: 'I OOO BIRCH RIDGE DRIVE 1548 MAIL SERVICE CENTER HTTPS://CONNECT.NCDOT.GOV/RESOURCES/ENVIRON RALEIGH NC 2761 O Rn�ei�H NC 27699-1548 MENTALIPAGES�DEFAULLASPX Section 401 Permit: We anticipate 401 General Certiiication number 3891 will apply to this project. NCDOT will adhere to all general conditions of this Water Quality Certificaton. A copy of this permit application will be posted on the NCDOT Website at https•//connect ncdot.�ov/resources/Environmental/Pa�es/default.aspx, under Quick Links > Permit Applications. A copy of the PCE is also available at the above website address under Quick Links > Environmental Documents. Thank you for your assistance with this project. If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact John Merritt at jsmerritt@ncdot.gov ar (919) 707-6140. Sincerely, 1.� -_� y ..�r- Richard W. Hancock, P.E., Manager Project Development and Environmental Analysis Unit cc: NCDOT Permit Application Standard Distribution List ��oF w a r�9Q� � � 5 � P Y Office Use Only: Corps action ID no. DWQ project no. Form Version 1.3 Dec 10 2008 Pre-Construction Notification (PCN) Form A. Applicant Information 1. Processing 1 a. Type(s) of approval sought from the Corps: � Section 404 Permit ❑ Section 10 Permit 1 b. Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: 23 or General Permit (GP) number: 1c. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps? ❑ Yes � No 1d. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply): ❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Regular ❑ Non-404 Jurisdictional General Permit ❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Express ❑ Riparian Buffer Authorization 1 e. Is this notification solely for the record For the record only for DWQ 401 For the record only for Corps Permit: because written approval is not required? Certification: � Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes � No 1f. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in-lieu fee program proposed for mitigation � Yes ❑ No of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank or in-lieu fee program. 1g. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1 h ❑ Yes � No below. 1 h. Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)? ❑ Yes � No 2. Project Information 2a. Name of project: proposed replacement of Bridge No. 144 2b. County: Columbus 2c. Nearest municipality / town: Chadbourn 2d. Subdivision name: not applicable 2e. NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state g_4948 project no: 3. Owner Information 3a. Name(s) on Recorded Deed: North Carolina Department of Transportation 3b. Deed Book and Page No. not applicable 3c. Responsible Party (for LLC if not applicable applicable): 3d. Street address: 1598 Mail Service Center 3e. City, state, zip: Raleigh, NC 27699-1598 3f. Telephone no.: (919) 707-6140 3g. Fax no.: (919) 250-4224 3h. Email address: jsmerritt@ncdot.gov 4. Applicant Information (if different from owner) 4a. Applicant is: ❑ Agent ❑ Other, specify: 4b. Name: not applicable 4c. Business name (if applicable): 4d. Street address: 4e. City, state, zip: 4f. Telephone no.: 4g. Fax no.: 4h. Email address: 5. Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable) 5a. Name: not applicable 5b. Business name (if applicable): 5c. Street address: 5d. City, state, zip: 5e. Telephone no.: 5f. Fax no.: 5g. Email address: B. Project Information and Prior Project History 1. Property Identification 1a. Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID): not applicable 1 b. Site coordinates (in decimal degrees): Latitude: 34.310387 Longitude: - 78.776212 (DD.DDDDDD) (-DD.DDDDDD) 1 c. Property size: 20 acres 2. Surface Waters 2a. Name of nearest body of water (stream, river, etc.) to genson Mill Pond proposed project: 2b. Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water: C;Sw 2c. River basin: Lumbar 3. Project Description 3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this application: Existing conditions at the site include maintained/disturbed roadside shoulder and forested areas. Land use in the project vicinity is predominantly mixed residential and agricultrual. 3b. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property: 4.33 3c. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property: 200 3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project: To replace bridge 144 3e. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used: The project involves replacing bridge 144 on the existing alignment. Traffic will follow an offsite detour during construction. Standard road building equipment, such as trucks, dozers, and cranes will be used. 4. Jurisdictional Determinations 4a. Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property / project (including all prior phases) in the past? ❑ Yes � No ❑ Unknown Comments: 4b. If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type of determination was made? ❑ Preliminary ❑ Final 4c. If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas? Agency/Consultant Company: Name (if known): Veronica Barnes Other: 4d. If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation. 5. Project History 5a. Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for � Yes � No ❑ Unknown this project (including all prior phases) in the past? 5b. If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions. 6. Future Project Plans 6a. Is this a phased project? ❑ Yes � No 6b. If yes, explain. C. Proposed Impacts Inventory 1. Impacts Summary 1a. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply): � Wetlands ❑ Streams - tributaries Buffers � Open Waters ❑ Pond Construction 2. Wetland Impacts If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted. 2a. 2b. 2c. 2d. 2e. 2f. Wetland impact Type of jurisdiction number — Type of impact Type of wetland Forested (Corps - 404, 10 Area of impact Permanent (P) or (if known) DWQ — non-404, other) (acres) Tem orar T Site 1� P � T Roadway fill Riverine � Yes � Corps 0.07 ❑ No ❑ DWQ Site 1❑ P❑ T ❑ Yes ❑ Corps ❑ No ❑ DWQ 2g. Total wetland impacts 0.07 Permanent 0.00 Temporary 2h. Comments: - There will also be 0.10 acre of hand clearing. Additionally, there will be 0.02 acre of temporary fill in wetlands in the hand clearing areas for the installation of erosion control measures, including temporary silt fence and/or special sediment control fence. 3. Stream Impacts If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this question for all stream sites impacted. 3a. 3b. 3c. 3d. 3e. 3f. 3g. Stream impact Type of impact Stream name Perennial Type of Average Impact length number - (PER) or jurisdiction stream (linear feet) Permanent (P) or intermittent (Corps - 404, 10 width Temporary (T) (INT)? DWQ — non-404, (feet) other) Site 1❑ P � T ❑ PER ❑ Corps ❑ INT ❑ DWQ Site 2❑ P � T ❑ PER ❑ Corps ❑ INT ❑ DWQ Site 3❑ P � T ❑ PER ❑ Corps ❑ INT ❑ DWQ Site 4❑ P❑ T ❑ PER ❑ Corps ❑ INT ❑ DWQ 3h. Total stream and tributary impacts 3i. Comments: 4. Open Water Impacts If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of the U.S. then individuall list all o en water im acts below. 4a. 4b. 4c. 4d. 4e. Open water Name of impact number— waterbody Type of impact Waterbody type Area of impact (acres) Permanent (P) or (if applicable) Temporary T 01 ❑ P � T Soules Swamp Fill Stream 0.02 01 ❑POT 02 ❑P�T 03 ❑P�T 4f. Total open water impacts 0.02 X Temporary 4g. Comments: 5. Pond or Lake Construction If pond or lake construction roposed, then complete the chart below. 5a. 5b. 5c. 5d. 5e. Wetland Impacts (acres) Stream Impacts (feet) Upland Pond ID Proposed use or (acres) number purpose of pond Excavat Flooded Filled ed Flooded Filled Excavated Flooded P1 P2 5f. Total 5g. Comments: 5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required? ❑ Yes ❑ No If yes, permit ID no: 5i. Expected pond surface area (acres): 5j. Size of pond watershed (acres): 5k. Method of construction: 6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ) If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts below. If any impacts require mitigation, then you MUST fill out Section D of this form. 6a. ❑ Neuse ❑ Tar-Pamlico ❑ Other: Project is in which protected basin? ❑ Catawba ❑ Randleman 6b. 6c. 6d. 6e. 6f. 6g. Buffer impact number — Reason for impact Buffer Zone 1 impact Zone 2 impact Permanent (P) or Stream name mitigation (square feet) (square feet) Temporar T re uired? B1* ❑ P � T Phone line Neuse ❑ Yes ❑ No 6h. Total buffer impacts 6i. Comments: *Utility impacts D. Impact Justification and Mitigation 1. Avoidance and Minimization 1 a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project. The proposed bridge No. 144 is approximately 24 feet longer than the existing bridge. The existing causeway is utilized to minimize jurisdictional impacts. All proposed mechanized clearing was changed to hand clearing. 1 b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques. Construction will be top-down. Best Management Practices for the Protection of Surface Waters, as well as, Best Management Practices for Construction and Maintenance Activities will be implemented. 2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State 2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for ❑ Yes � No impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State? If no, ex lain: No miti ation ro osed due to minimal im acts 2b. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply): ❑ DWQ ❑ Corps ❑ Mitigation bank 2c. If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this project? ❑ Payment to in-lieu fee program ❑ Permittee Responsible Mitigation 3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank 3a. Name of Mitigation Bank: 3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter) Type Quantity 3c. Comments: 4. Complete if Making a Payment to In-lieu Fee Program 4a. Approval letter from in-lieu fee program is attached. ❑ Yes 4b. Stream mitigation requested: linear feet 4c. If using stream mitigation, stream temperature: ❑ warm ❑ cool ❑cold 4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only): square feet 4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested: 4f. Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested: acres 4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested: acres 4h. Comments: The Crescent Road Mitigation Site will be debited. 5. Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan 5a. If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan. 6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) — required by DWQ 6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires ❑ Yes � No buffer mitigation? 6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the amount of mitigation required. 6c. 6d. 6e. Zone Reason for impact Total impact Multiplier Required mitigation (square feet) (square feet) Zone 1 3(2 for Catawba) Zone 2 1.5 6f. Total buffer mitigation required: 6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank, permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in-lieu fee fund). 6h. Comments: E. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ) 1. Diffuse Flow Plan 1 a. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified ❑ Yes � No within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules? 1 b. If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If not, explain why. � Yes ❑ No Comments: 2. Stormwater Mana ement Plan 2a. What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project? N/A 2b. Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan? � Yes ❑ No 2c. If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why: 2d. If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative description of the plan: See attached permit drawings and stormwater management plan. ❑ Certified Local Government 2e. Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan? ❑ DWQ Stormwater Program � DWQ 401 Unit 3. Certified Local Government Stormwater Review 3a. In which local government's jurisdiction is this project? not applicable ❑ Phase II 3b. Which of the following locally-implemented stormwater management programs ❑ NSW apply (check all that apply): ❑ USMP ❑ Water Supply Watershed ❑ Other: 3c. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been ❑ Yes ❑ No attached? 4. DWQ Stormwater Program Review ❑ Coastal counties 4a. Which of the following state-implemented stormwater management programs apply ❑ HQW (check all that apply): ❑ ORW ❑ Session Law 2006-246 ❑ Other: 4b. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been attached? ❑ Yes ❑ No N/A 5. DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review 5a. Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements? � Yes ❑ No N/A 5b. Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met? � Yes ❑ No N/A F. Supplementary Information 1. Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement) 1 a. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the � Yes ❑ No use of public (federal/state) land? 1 b. If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State � Yes ❑ No (North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)? 1 c. If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter.) � Yes ❑ No Comments: 2. Violations (DWQ Requirement) 2a. Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards, ❑ Yes � No or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)? 2b. Is this an after-the-fact permit application? ❑ Yes � No 2c. If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s): 3. Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement) 3a. Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in ❑ Yes additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality? � No 3b. If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description. Due to the minimal transportation impact resulting from this bridge replacement, this project will neither influence nearby land uses nor stimulate growth. Therefore, a detailed indirect or cumulative effects study will not be necessary. 4. Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement) 4a. Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility. not applicable 10 5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement) 5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or habitat? 5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act impacts? 5c. If yes, ind icate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted. � Yes ❑ No � Yes ❑ No � Raleigh ❑ Asheville 5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical Habitat? NCNHP, USFWS website, field surveys 6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement) 6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat? �❑ Yes 6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat? NMFS County Index 7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement) 7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or_properties_significan_t_in North Carolina history and archaeology)? ❑ Yes /1 . // . 7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources? NEPA Documentation 8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement) 8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA-designated 100-year floodplain? � Yes ❑ No 8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements: NCDOT Hydraulics Unit coordination with FEMA 8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination? FEMA Maps � �� �"� � "` �� � Richard W. Hancock, P.E. "`��'�'�--'--. � Applicant/Agent's Printed Name Applicant/AgenYs Signature Date (AgenYs signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant is orovided.l 11 k li�;l lr� <14' North Carolina Department of Transportation S L[?l"l l itYcltPf � Highway Stormwater Program �. STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PLAN (Version 2.01; Released December 2014) FOR NCDOT PROJECTS WBS Element: 40104.1.1 TIP No.: B-4948 County(ies): Columbus Page 1 of 3 General Project Information WBS Element: 40104.1.1 TIP Number: B-4948 Project Type: Bridge Replacement Date: 4/13/2015 NCDOT Contact: Bill Zerman, PE Contractor I Designer: HDR � ICA Engineering / Trent Cormier Address: 1000 Birch Ridge Dr. Address: 5121 Kingdom Way, Suite 100 Raleigh, NC 27610 Raleigh, NC 27607 Phone: 919-703-6301 Phone: 919-900-1608 Email: rpatel ncdot. ov Email: tcormier icaen .com Cit ITown: Chadbourn Count ies): Columbus River Basin s: Lumber CAMA Count ? No Wetlands within Project Limits? Yes Pro'ect Description Pro'ect Len th lin. miles or feet : 0.15 Surrounding Land Use: Forest and agriculture Proposed Pro'ect Existin Site Pro'ect Built-U on Area ac. 0.5 ac. 0.4 ac. Typical Cross Section Description: 2 lanes @ 11' with 6' shoulders 2 lanes @ 10' Annual Avg Daily Traffic (veh/hr/day): Desi n/Future: 4570 Year: 2036 Existin : 3154 Year: 2016 General Project Narrative: The project consists of construction of a new 82'-4.5" (2 @ 41' -2 1/4") 21" PCCS bridge to replace the existing 55 feet 8 inch long bridge #144 on SR 1429 over Soules (Description of Minimization of Water Swamp. The total project length is 0.147 miles. The project is located in the Lumber River Basin. The project drainage system consists of grass shoulders, grated inlets with Quality Impacts) associated pipes, and rip rap pad at the pipe outfall. Jurisdictional Streams: Soules Swamp The BMP measures used on this project to reduce stormwater impacts are listed below Sheet flow on grass shoulders along the roadway: This will promote infiltration and filtration of pavement runoff by directing sheet flow over grassed shoulder slopes. Outlet protection with rip rap: Rip rap outlet protection is provided at 17+71 LT to dissipate energy from the bridge storm water to provide a non-erosive sheet flow (approximately 60 feet) for infiltration and filtration before entering the stream with Q10=0.30 cfs and V10=0.70 fps. No deck drains: This will avoid direct discharge of storm water from the bridge deck into the receiving water. Bank stabilization: Bank stabilization with class II rip rap is provided at both sides of the stream at 18+02 & 18+67 to provide long-term bank stability to prevent erosion. This will provide a stable stream and the stream will not degrade in the evolution process. Waterbody Information Surface Water Body (1): Soules Swamp NCDWR Stream Index No.: 15-4-8 NCDWR Surface Water Classification for Water Body Primary Classification: Class C Supplemental Classification: Swamp Waters (Sw) Other Stream Classification: None Impairments: None ThreatenedlEndangered Species? Yes Comments: Wood Stork is May Affect Not Likely to Adversely Affect: All others are No Affect NRTR Stream ID: Soules Swamp Buffer Rules in Effect: N/A Project Includes Bridge Spanning Water Body? Yes Deck Drains Discharge Over Buffer? No Dissipator Pads Provided in Buffer? Yes Deck Drains Discharge Over Water Body? No (If yes, provide justification in the General Project Narrative) (If yes, describe in the General Project Narrative; if no, justify in the (If yes, provide justification in the General Project Narrative) General Project Narrative) 1 31�;31�t'�lw° North Carolina Department of Transportation �'���.117��"���� Highway Stormwater Program '�':) STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PLAN (Version 2.01; Released December 2014) FOR NCDOT PROJECTS WBS Element: 40104.1.1 TIP No.: B-4948 Count ies : Columbus Pa e 3 of 3 Preformed Scour Holes and Energy Dissipators Drainage Pipe/Structure BMP Sheet Station (Road Projects) or Surface Energy Dissipator Area Conveyance Dimensions Q10 V10 Associated w/ No. Coordinates (Non-Road Projects) Water Bod Type Riprap T pe ac Structure (in) (cfs) (fps) Buffer Rules? 4 17+70 (1)Soules Riprap Apron / Pad Class'B' 0.1 Pipe 15 0.3 1.4 No Swamp 4 18+g0 (1)Soules Riprap Apron / Pad Class'B' 0.0 Pipe 15 0.3 1.1 No Swamp Additional Comments ' Refer to the NCDOT Best Management Practices Toolbox (2014), NCDOT Standards, the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) Hydraulic Engineering Circular No. 14 (HEC-14), Third Edition, Hydraulic Design of Energy Dissipators for Culverts and Channels (July 2006), as applicable, for design guidance and criteria. V� Zt (7 : Z' Z_ �n (7 ', oZ ��VQ� d U c .. . � .� ., � V W O � � � � •� � V � � O V STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA DIVISION OF HIGHW�IYS COL UMB US CO U1�lTY LOCATI0IV: BRIDGE NO.144 OVER SOULES SWAMP 011t SR 1429 (OLD PI11tE LOGGIIIIG ROAD) TYPE OF WORK GRADIIVG, DRAINAGE, PA VI11lG AND STR UCTURE WETLAND AND SURFACE WATER IMPACTS PERMIT NOTES: CLEARING ON THIS PROJECT SHALL BE PERFORMED TO THE LIMITS ESTABLISHED BY METHOD —. THIS PROJECT IS NOT WITHIN ANY MUNICIPAL BOUNDARIES. THERE IS NO CONTROL OF ACCESS ON THIS PROJECT. � �o a0 N 0 N Z Z ][I���1�1[1P1LlG�C1C+ 1[�IL.�I`7� Dm N✓JT L?SE FOR RAW ACQUISITIO[�' lE�l[�lE1L,d1Mi d�.�lEbSY 1E��.A�l�,y� DO NOT USE FQJR CONSTRUCTION � < �Z n ?? a �, z oW "s' WETLAND AND SURFACE WATER IMPACTS PERMIT � 0 0 N N � H �'T � � Q Z 50 0 25 50 SCALEe I"= 50' HORIZe ENLARGED PLAN VI EW SITE 1 LEGEND TOTAL PROJECT LENGTH: 0.152 MILES PROPOSED BRIDGE: TWO SPAN: 2@ 41'-2%2" (21" PCCS WITH 2 VERTICAL ABUTMENTS) EXISTING BRIDGE: 3 SPAN BRIDGE: 1@18'8", 1@18'3", 1@18'9" --'M�e--- WETLAND BOUNDARY � DENOTES FILL IN WETLAND � DENOTES HAND CLEARING �DENOTES PERMANENT IMPACTS IN SURFACE WATER � < �Z n ?? a �, z oW "s' WETLAND AND SURFACE WATER IMPACTS PERMIT � 0 0 N N � H �'T � � Q Z 50 0 25 50 SCALEe I"= 50' HORIZe ENLARGED PLAN VI EW SITE 1 LEGEND TOTAL PROJECT LENGTH: 0.152 MILES PROPOSED BRIDGE: TWO SPAN: 2@ 41'-2%2" (21" PCCS WITH 2 VERTICAL ABUTMENTS) EXISTING BRIDGE: 3 SPAN BRIDGE: 1@18'8", 1@18'3", 1@18'9" --'M�e--- WETLAND BOUNDARY � DENOTES FILL IN WETLAND � DENOTES HAND CLEARING �DENOTES PERMANENT IMPACTS IN SURFACE WATER Z � z �� oZ �V � PROJECT REFERENCE NO. SHEET NO. ' WETLAND AND SURFACE WATER IMPACTS PERMIT 8-4948 5 �� ROADWAY DESIGN HYDRAULICS ENGINEER ENGINEER � ������d� ��' ��.1��� DO NOT USE PO CONSTRUCTION �b �'` �Ei� OF /1'R1�3�T�OA�A�PION DIVI�Oi�i OF HI�H�PAY� BM#1 �OLU�u� �O�'Y -L- STA. 10+74.10, 25.33' LT p�,*�i�y�„��j RR SPIKE IN BASE 18" HARDWOOD E 3•TA14( OVER, �OiII.F.� ELEV. = 72.86' BR/DGE HYDRAUIJC DATA w.� orr � i�?f ves�siy ascHiV� - �on cFS �r.,n �� ��f� Ro.� aES�r F ou�ycr - � rRs v,�s�cN��vAr�r - �ao Fr �r oF BASE ARi�E � 1580 CFS PERMIT DRAWING ��� � � � � SHEET b OF 8 av Piiys ascw,4r�- �on cFS GLI �Pi ro �,4r� n� rY-r� DA7'E � SUAVEY � 3/l3/EDl4 ��DATE�� SUAI�EY � 61.4 F/' -- STA. 17 + 93.81 -L- STA. 18 + 6.19 0 0 0 0 w p o P� = 15+25.00 PI = 18+15 0 BRI GE � 5T 18 35 -L- PI = 20+65.0 � P �+ � EL = 70J2' E= 73J0 2 41'-2�/4 (21' CS�) EL = 71.97' w+ r � �^ VC 250' V = 260' SK V90TICAL A UTMENTS VC 220' � cv � 80 F �i K= 189 K= 151 GP E.= 73.16 K= 138 � F �i 80 W J J Z J W LO � W W I W (+ 1.0259% (-)0. 00% + 0.900 % 7� + . +1.32% (r) .50% ° 2. 3% � � � ELEV. = 65.6 �� "�=lo_ oi _-_' ' -'—' �+li v�� ----° + o.—soi ELEy. = 65 I 6O Z; CL�pES 'll' RIP RAP TYPJ� ' ASS 'll RIP RAP � � 6O n' � i � e � r - 50 � � � . � . 50 n CLAS 'II' RIP RAP � � � ; (2 FT THICK) � g n� KEY-I TO SLOPE 4 EL y. = 65.3 � � m �o � � (3/13/2014) F (p F THICK) J KEY N TO SLOPE ELEV. ° 4.9 � 3 r � E y � FI � SITE 1 _ F�R —L— PLQN V�EW SEE SNEET � 11+00 12+00 13+00 14+00 15+00 16+00 17+00 18+00 19+00 20+00 21+00 22+00 23+00 24+00 WETLANDS 8o CLEARING � 75 7� - - - - - - - - - - - - - 65 ------- 60 WETLAND AND SURFACE WATER IMPACTS PERMIT FILL IN �ETLAND �0.020 �0.010 3;1 /� ----------------_. __— � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 75 70 65 60 55 50 45 40 35 3� 25 20 /5 /0 n � � � 5 0 5 SITE I X-SECTION STA 17+50 -L- ao 75 ------------- 70 65 60 � � � � � � � � � � � � � � l0 /5 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 7Q 75 LEGE D �DENOTES FILL IN WETLAND I�T�O�IPLETE PLA�T� DO NOT U9E POR N/W ACQU191TtON PRELI�fI�T.�RY I�LA�T� DO NOT USE FOA CONSTRI%CTIOIV WETLAND PERMIT IMPACT SUMMARY WETLAND IMPACTS SURFACE WATER IMPACTS Hand Existing Existing Permanent Temp. Excavation Mechanized Clearing Permanent Temp. Channel Channel Natural Site Station Structure Fillln Fillln in Clearing in SW SW Impacts Impacts Stream No. (From/To) Size / Type Wetlands Wetlands Wetlands in Wetlands Wetlands impacts impacts Permanent Temp. Design (ac) (ac) (ac) (ac) (ac) (ac) (ac) (ft) (ft) (ft) 1 14+43 TO 20+08 ROADWAY FILL 0.07 0.10 18+10 and 18+60 0.02 TOTALS*: 0.07 0.10 0.02 *Rounded totals are sum of actual impacts NOTES: 0.02 acres of temporary fill in Wetlands in the hand clearing areas for erosion control measures TN Revised 3/12/13 o� � � � T � �i � � m� � N�o ee, � o��w o�� >,a � oz 0 3� ,ow � o� � ��� Q�� � ��ffr . . � �� .� � V W O � � � � •� � V � � O V See Sheet lA For Index of Sheets See Sheet 1B for Conventional Symbols �����' �� ����� �����e��� ������� � �� ���������� COL UMB US CO U1�lTY LOCATION: BRIDGE N0.144 OVER SOULES SWAMP 011t SR 1429 (OLD PI11tE LOG ROAD) TYPE OF WORK GRADI11tG, DRAI11tAGE, PAVING A111D STRUCTURE � TO CHADBOURN NC 410 + SR 1429 END TIP PROJECT B-4948 —L— POC STA. 22 + 00.00 �� i ,\,\ /, � `�� / �RIDGE _�_ O. 144� ��p pINE LOG I a ' � 3 ' N / IW, ,� I°� F + BEGI1� TIP PROJECT B-4948 —L— POT STA.14 + 00.00 NOTES: CLEARING ON THIS PROJECT SHALL BE PERFORMED TO THE LIMITS ESTABLISHED BY METHOD II. THIS PROJECT IS NOT WITHIN ANY MUNICIPAL BOUNDARIES. THERE IS NO CONTROL OF ACCESS ON THIS PROJECT. , , , , , i � i j�S\�O,LLE U � c� O CO N � N a� zz PIdELIMINARY FL.�N3 DO NOT [1SE FOR CONSTRUCTION Prepared In /he 0/flce of: �'DRAULICS ENGINEER GRAPHIC SCALES DESIGN DATA PROJECT LENGTH ADT 2016 = 3154 DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS 50� 2$' 0 $�� ���� /000 Birch Ridge Dr., Ra[eigh NC, 27610 r�O�P� {rr�, I� ADT 2036 = 4570 �° c K ° �% % 2072 STANDARD SP6C/FlCATIONS �9�� ��p' PLANS D= 60 % LENGTH ROADWAY TIP PROJECT B-4948 = 0.136 MILES f,E � � 50' 25' 0 50' 100' = a * — RIGHT OF WAY DATE: REKHA PATEL, PE sicxazuaE: � � T 3 /o LENGTH STRUCTURE TIP PROJECT B-4948 — 0.016 MILES � � V= 60 MPH APRIL 14, 2015 PRO�FCT ENC�NFEn ROADWAY DESIGN � PROFILE (HORIZONTAL) * TTST =1% DUAL = 2% TOTAL LENGTH TIP PROJECT B-4948 = 0.152 MILES ENGINEER ��.�� ����� FUNC CLASS = LOCAL LETTING DATE: BRIAN P. ROBINSON �� g���� 10' 5' 0 10' 20' APRIL 19, 2016 PROJECT DESIGN ENGINEER PROFILE (VERTICAL) SUB—REGIONAL TIER PE SIGNATURE: � � N Note: Not to Scale *S. U.E. = Subsurface Utility Engineering BOUNDARIES AND PROPERTY.• State Line County Line Township Line City Line Reservation Line Property Line Existing Iron Pin Property Corner Property Monument Parcel/Sequence Number Existing Fence Line Proposed Woven Wire Fence Proposed Chain Link Fence Proposed Barbed Wire Fence Existing Wetland Boundary Proposed Wetland Boundary Existing Endangered Animal Boundary Existing Endangered Plant Boundary 0 EiP � O E[M i23 —x x x- e e � — — — — w L B — — — — wLB EeB Known $oil Contamination: Area or $ite � Potential Soil Contamination: Area or Site — � BUILDINGS AND OTHER CULTURE.• � ,�r .�. Gas Pump Vent or U�G Tank Cap O Sign � WB�� �w Small Mine 'SZ� Foundation � Area Outline 0 Cemetery 0 Building � School � Church � Dam HYDROLOGY.• Stream or Body of Water Hydro, Pool or Reservoir Jurisdictional Stream Buffer Zone 1 BufFer Zone 2 Flow Arrow Disappearing Stream Spring Wetland Proposed Lateral, Tail, Head Ditch False Sump �----J �s — BZ 1 BZ 2 5�'�°]�]C �iF�° 1�C��°]�i�[ �C��$�]Ie�1�� �����1[�� �]F �[��iE�I���� CONVENTIONAL PLAN SHEET SYMBOLS RAILROADS.• Standard Gauge RR Signal Milepost Switch RR Abandoned RR Dismantled RIGHT OF Wf1Y.• Baseline Control Point Existing Right of Way Marker Existing Right of Way Line Proposed Right of Way Line Proposed Right of Way Line with Iron Pin and Cap Marker Proposed Right of Way Line with Concrete or Granite WW Marker Proposed Control of Access Line with Concrete C1A Marker Existing Control of Access Proposed Control of Access Existing Easement Line Proposed Temporary Construction Easement - Proposed Temporary Drainage Easement Proposed Permanent Drainage Easement Proposed Permanent Drainage / Utility Easement Proposed Permanent Utility Easement Proposed Temporary Utility Easement Proposed Aerial Utility Easement � CSX TRANSPoRTATION MILEPo T 35 �0 � � ia v✓ ia L�✓ ��a ��./ /A\ �� �J �� _.. TDE PDE DUE PUE TUE AUE Proposed Permanent Easement with O Iron Pin and Cap Marker � ROADS AND RELATED FEATURES.• Existing Edge of Pavement Existing Curb ----- Proposed Slope Stakes Cut --- �--- Proposed $lope Stakes Fill - - - F - - - Proposed Curb Ramp CR Existing Metal Guardrail Proposed Guardrail T T T r Existing Cable Guiderail n n � P d C bl G'd 'I n n n n ropose a e ui erai E Equality $ymbol � Pavement Removal °� �" ^ i�EGET�ITION.• � Single Tree �� Single Shrub � Hedge '�" ��������� �# Woods Line �""'-' Orchard Vineyard EXISTING STRUCTURES.• MAJOR: Bridge, Tunnel or Box Culvert Bridge Wing Wall, Head Wall and End Wall MINOR: Head and End Wall Pipe Culvert Footbridge Drainage Box: Catch Basin, DI or JB Paved Ditch Gutter Storm Sewer Manhole $torm $ewer UTILITIES.• POWER: Existing Power Pole Proposed Power Pole Existing Joint Use Pole Proposed Joint Use Pole Power Manhole Power Line Tower Power Transformer WG Power Cable Hand Hole H-Frame Pole Recorded WG Power Line Designated U/G Power Line (S.U.E.*) TELEPHONE: WATER: Water Manhole OO Water Meter o Water Valve � �? Q f? Q Water Hydrant � vtnerora Recorded l!/G Water Line • Designated WG Water Line (S.U.E.*� - - - -•- - - - Above Ground Water Line A�c wa,a� CONC - J CONC WW I � CONC HW >---------� �CB OO s • • O // r �� � Existing Telephone Pole � Proposed Telephone Pole � Telephone Manhole OO Telephone Booth ❑' Telephone Pedestal ❑T Telephone Cell Tower � U/G Telephone Cable Hand Hole HH Recorded U/G Telephone Cable � Designated U/G Telephone Cable (S.U.E.*) - - - - -'- - - - Recorded WG Telephone Conduit '� Designated U/G Telephone Conduit (S.U.E.*� - - - -T�- - - - Recorded U/G Fiber Optics Cable T�� Designated U/G Fiber Optics Cable (S.U.E.*� - - - -T °°- - - rv: N Satellite Dish CC TV Pedestal ❑O TV Tower � WG N Cable Hand Hole HH Recorded U/G N Cable �° Designated U/G N Cable (S.U.E.*) - - - -*�- - - - Recorded U/G Fiber Optic Cable �° F� Designated U/G Fiber Optic Cable (S.U.E.*� ----T� F�- -- GAS: Gas Valve � Gas Meter � Recorded U/G Gas Line � Designated U/G Gas Line (S.U.E.*) - - - -°- - - - Above Ground Gas Line A�c co� SANITARY SEWER: Sanitary Sewer Manhole OO Sanitary Sewer Cleanout 0+ U/G Sanitary Sewer Line s� Above Ground Sanitary Sewer A�c sa�,+o�Y Sewer Recorded SS Forced Main Line Fss Designated SS Forced Main Line (S.U.E.*) — - - - -F�s- - - - MISCELLANEOUS: Utility Pole Utility Pole with Base Utility Located Object Utility Traffic $ignal Box Utility Unknown U/G Line U/G Tank; Water, Gas, Oil Underground Storage Tank, Approx. Loc. — A/G Tank; Water, Gas, Oil Geoenvironmental Boring U�G Test Hole (S.U.E.*) Abandoned According to Utility Records End of Information • O O ❑s ��.� � 0 � AATUR E.O.I. � s ti m � � � Q -� � � � m � N o. ��� 02: o �� FINAL PA VEMENT S CHED ULE C1 PROP. APPROX. 1�/q" ASPHALT CONCRETE SURFACE COURSE, TYPE SF9.5A, AT AN AVERAGE RATE OF 137.5 LBS. PER SQ. YD. PROP. APPROX. 2%2" ASPHALT CONCRETE SURFACE COURSE, TYPE SF9.5A, L"z AT AN AVERAGE RATE OF 137.5 LBS. PER SQ. YD. IN EACH OF TWO LAYERS. PROP. VAR. DEPTH ASPHALT CONCRETE SURFACE COURSE, TYPE SF9.5A, AT C'3 AN AVERAGE RATE OF 110 LBS. PER SQ. YD. PER 1" DEPTH. TO BE PLACED IN LAYERS NOT LESS THAN 1" IN DEPTH OR GREATER THAN 1�/p" IN DEPTH. E1 PROP. APPROX. 5" ASPHALT CONCRETE BASE COURSE, TYPE 625.0B, AT AN AVERAGE RATE OF 570 LBS. PER SQ. YD. PROP. VAR. DEPTH ASPHALT CONCRETE BASE COURSE, TYPE B25.OB, AT AN E 2 AVERAGE RATE OF 114 LBS. PER S�. YD. PER 1" DEPTH. TO BE P�ACED IN LAYERS NOT LESS THAN 3° IN DEPTH OR GREATER THAN 5�/p" IN DEPTH. R1 CONCRETE SHOULDER BERM GUTTER. T EARTH MATERIAL. �J EXISTING PAVEMENT. W VARIABLE DEPTH ASPHALT PAVEMENT. (SEE WEDGING DETAIL) NOTE: PAVEMENT EDGE SLOPES ARE 1:1 UNLESS OTHERWISE SHOWN 7� \/ADIAQI C DETAIL SHOWING SHOULDER BERM GUTTER -L- STA. 17+66.00 TO -L- STA. 17+81.81 (LT.) (BEGIN APPROACH SLAB) -L- STA. 18+88.19 (END APPROACH SLAB) TO -L- STA. 19+07.00 (LT) C� —L— � 30'-10" 4'-5" 11' 11' 4'-5" 2a�� @ C� BRG. GRADE C3 POINT 0.02_ 0.02_ O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O PROPOSED CORED SLABS r 33' TYPICAL SECTION ON STRUCTURE (SEE STRUCTURE PLANS) -L- STA. 17+93.81 (BEGIN BRIDGE) TO -L- STA. 18+76.19 (END BRIDGE) 24„ @ C{ BRG. C� —L— Detail Showing Method of Wedging C� —L— I b� 22' vV/GR A� ll� I 71' EXIST. PAVEMENT EXIST. PAVEMENT CZ Cl GRADE CZ POINT �.�$ / 0.�2 �.OZ \ �.�8� <� , o�l ��-_-__- ____�- 3' 5���\ T U W T ls��'� E� �.5" � �.s„ El GRADE TO THIS LINE TYPICAL SECTION NO. 1 -L- STA. 14 + 00.00 TO -L- STA. 17 + 50.00 -L- STA. 19 + 00.00 TO -L- STA. 21 + 75.00 NOTE: RESURFACE SR 1435 FROM SR 1436 TO NC 13Q/US 74-76 BUS WITH Cl 3.� S�G�\��\ ��� \S C� —L— b' 22 � b' 9' W/GR 9' W/GR � 4' 11' I 11' 4' � � POINT � 0.02 ,�( o.oz � � � 7.5" � GRADE TO THIS LINE TYPICAL SECTION NO. 2 -L- STA. 17+50.00 TO -L- STA. 17+93.81 (BEGIN BRIDGE) -L- STA. 18+76.19 (END BRIDGE) TO -L- STA. 19+00.00 PROJECT REFERENCE NO. SHEET NO. B-4948 2A-1 ROADWAY DESIGN PAVEMENT DESIGN ENGINEER ENGINEER PRELIMINARY PLANS DO NOT USE FOR CONSTRUCTION /SFF `��� x SF cT�o�J /SFF 3�� X SFC,T��NJ �