760051_Permit Renewal Application 2019_20190410

State of North Carolina
Department of Environmental Quality
Division of Water Resources
Animal Waste Management Systems
Request for Certification of Coverage
Facility Currently covered by an Expiring Sate Non-Discharge General Permit
On September 30, 2019, the North Carolina State Non-Discharge General Permits for Animal Waste Management Systems will
expire. As required by these permits, facilities that have been issued Certificates of Coverage to operate under these State
Non-Discharge General Permits must apply for renewal at least 180 days prior to their expiration date. Therefore, all applications
must be received by the Division of Water Resources by no later than April 3,2019.
Please do not leave any question unanswered. Please verify all information and make any necessary corrections below.
Application must be signed and dated by the Permittee.
1. Farm Number: 76-0051 Certificate Of Coverage Number: AWC760051
2. Facility Name: Wri lit Farm
3. Landowner's Name(same as on the Waste Management Plan): David R Wright
4. Landowner's Mailing Address: 3540 Wright Farm Ln
City: Franklinville State: NC Zip: 27248-8669
Telephone Number: E-mail: wri,-htfarin-a emban mail.com
5. Facility's Physical Address: 1228 Grantville Ln
City: Franklinville State: NC Zip: 27248
6. County where Facility is located: Randolph
7. Farm Manager's Name(if different from Landowner): Darrell G Wright
8. Farm Manager's telephone number(include area code): 336-824-4218 Ext.
9. Integrator's Name(if there is not an Integrator,write"None"):
10. Operator Name(OIC): Darrell G.Wright Phone No.: 336-824-4218 O1C#: 21332
11. Lessee's Name(if there is not a Lessee,write'None"):
12. Indicate animal operation type and number:
Current Permit: Operations Type Allowable Count
Cattle-Milk Cow 175
Operation Tvpes•
Swine Cattle Dry Poultry Other Types
Wean to Finish Dairy Calf Non Laying Chickens Horses-Horses
Wean to Feeder Dairy Heifer Laying Chickens Horses-Other
Farrow to Finish Milk Cow Pullets Sheep-Sheep
Feeder to Finish Dry Cow Turkeys Sheep-Other
Farrow to Wean Beef Stocker Calf Turkey Pullet
Farrow to Feeder Beef Feeder
Boar/Stud Beef Broad Cow Wet Poultr%
Gilts Other Non Laying Pullet
Other Layers

13. Waste Treatment and Storage Lagoons (Verify the following information is accurate and complete. Make all necessary
corrections and provide missing data.)
Design
Estimated Liner Type Estimated Freeboard
Structure Date (Clay,Synthetic, Capacity Surface Area 'Redline"
Name Built Unknown) (Cubic Feet) (Square Feet) (Inches)
WASTE POND
Mail one (1) copy of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP) with this completed and signed application
as required by NC General Statutes 143-215.10C(d)to the address below.
The CAWMP must include the following components:
1. The most recent Waste Utilization Plan(WUP),signed b� the owner and a certified technical specialist.containing:
a. The method by which waste is applied to the disposal fields(e.g.irrigation,injection,etc.)
b. A map of every field used for land application(for example:irrigation map)
c. The soil series present on every land application field
d. The crops grown on every land application field
e. The Realistic Yield Expectation(RYE)for every crop shown in the WUP
f. The maximum PAN to be applied to every land application field
g. The waste application windows for every crop utilized in the WUP
h. The required NRCS Standard specifications
2. A site map/schematic
3. Emergency Action Plan
4. Insect Control Checklist with chosen best management practices noted
5. Odor Control Checklist with chosen best management practices noted
6. Mortality Control Checklist with selected method noted-Use the enclosed updated Mortality Control Checklist
7. Lagoon/storage pond capacity documentation (design, calculations, etc.) Please be sure the above table is accurate and
complete. Also provide any site evaluations, wetland determinations, or hazard classifications that may be applicable to
your facility.
8. Operation and Maintenance Plan
If your CAWMP includes any components not shown on this list, please include the additional components with your submittal.
(e.g.composting,digesters,waste transfers,etc.)
As a second option to mailing paper copies of the application package, you can scan and email one signed copy of the
application and all the CAWMP items above to: [e-mail]

I attest that this application has been reviewed by me and is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that,
if all required parts of this application are not completed and that if all required supporting information and attachments are not
included,this application package will be returned to me as incomplete.
Note: In accordance with NC General Statutes 143-215.6A and 143-215.6B, any person who knowingly makes any false statement,
representation, or certification in any application may be subject to civil penalties up to $25,000 per violation. (18 U.S.C.
Section 1001 provides a punishment by a fine of not more than $10,000 or imprisonment of not more than 5 years, or both for
a similar offense.)
Printed Name of Signing Official (Landowner, or if multiple Landowners all landowners should sign. If Landowner is a
corporation,signature should be by a principal executive officer of the corporation):
Name: V-e- I i Title: _F(i Y Mr s n
Signature: Date: 3 P� ( Q q
Name: Title:
Signature: Date:
Name: Title:
Signature: Date:
THE COMPLETED APPLICATION SHOULD BE SENT TO THE FOLLOWING ADDRESS:
NCDEQ-DWR
Animal Feeding Operations Program
1636 Mail Service Center
Raleigh,North Carolina 27699-1636
Telephone number:[phone]
E-mail:[e-mail]
FORM: RENEWAL-STATE GENERAL 02/2019

; SCAA-Y, AH 01 Z019
F
y ,
ROY COOPER
�orernor �� f Jy
MICHAEL S.REGAN G• '.w niiV gyp•
Secretary
LINDA CULPEPPER NORTH CAROLINA
Rirrtrar Environmental Quality
February 26,2019
David R Wright „ /
Wright Farm V G/
3540 Wright Farm Ln
Franklinville,NC 27248-8669
Subject: Application for Renewal of Coverage for Expiring State General Permit
Dear Permittee:
Your facility is currently approved for operation under one of the Animal Waste Operation State Non-Discharge General Permits,
which expire on September 30, 2019. Copies of the new animal waste operation State Non-Discharge General Permits are available
at https,Hdeq.nc.eov/about/divisiQns/water-resources/water-ct ality-ram eLional-regional o or by writing or calling:
NCDEQ-DWR
Animal Feeding Operations Program
1636 Mail Service Center
Raleigh,North Carolina 27699-1636
Telephone number:[phone]
In order to assure your continued coverue under the State Non-Discharge General Permits, You must submit an application for
permit overage to the Division. Enclosed You will find a "Request for Certificate of Coverage Facility Currently Covered by an
Exnirine State Non-Discharge General Permit." The application form must be completed, signed and —Aumed bv_ April 3. 2019.
Please note that you must include one (1) cony of the ertified Animal Waste Management Plan �CAWMP}_within
completed and signed application form. A list of items included in the CAWMP can be found on page 2 of the renewal
application form.
Failure to request renewal of your coverage under a general permit within the time period specified may result in a civil penalty.
Operation of your facility without coverage under a valid general permit would constitute a violation of NCGS 143-215.1 and could
result in assessments of civil penalties of up to$25,000 per day.
If you have any questions about the State Non-Discharge General Permits, the enclosed application, or any related matter please feel
free to contact the Animal Feeding Operations Branch staff at 919-707-9100.
Sincerely,
Jon Risgaard,Section Chief
Animal Feeding Operations and Groundwater Section
Enclosures
cc(w/o enclosures): Winston-Salem Regional Office,Water Quality Regional Operations Section
Randolph County Soil and Water Conservation District
AFOG Section Central Files-AWC760051
Norte*Ms to.r,a Depe r:mant of Erv-ront mer_ta Q4e IV I D Ys or Df WSW F.e50L'rOes
512 N.Sa sbu,y St.1163E Na 1 Sery x Carter I Ra a gh,,North Caro:ra 27693-1586
319.?�?aD�rJ

tX11111_..a1 YY QJI.G 1 kill % %,A L►►aa.LLLavaa
(Please tv a or ri-_nt all information that does not r ui-re a sienature)
.
shn :... '6circe:t� ie
-- _
Gener formation: _
Name of Farm: 4Facility No:-j
Owner(s) Name: Phone No: 'A D a'sy q�
Mailing Address: cp r c)
Farm Location: _ County Farm is located in: -
Latitude and Longitude: �b tfL 63 I o ZS Integrator:_ yn �P -
Please attach a copy of a county road map with location identified and describe below (Be specific: road
names, directions, milepost, etc.): F__P'sl szr e%wx r � tl' nNk
Operation Description_:
Type of Swine No. of Animals Type of Poultry No. of Animals Type of Cattle No. o Ani als
❑Wean to Feeder _ ❑Layer Q-hairy -
❑Feeder to Finish ❑Pullets ❑Beef
❑Farrow to Wean
❑Farrow to Feeder
❑Farrow to Finish Other Type of Livestock:_ Number of Animals:
❑Gilts
❑Boars
EYRgin ::Qperafor iLQni3<
Actililio..nal:. �s�erzea#� ..:Prevro ?esi ii a ... ,. Totitl DttsiY X.,t-i/t�.,
Acreage Available for Application: 1`-I3 Required Acreage: _ 0 J
Number of Lagoons/Storage Ponds: 1�Total Capacity:12-3. •11 __ Cubic Feet(ft3)
Are subsurface drains present on the farm: YES or GD (please circle one)
If YES:are subsurface drains present in the area of the LAGOON or SPRAY FIELD (please circle one)
Owner/Manager Agreement
I (we) verify that all the above information is correct and will be updated upon changing. I (we) understand the operation
and maintenance procedures established in the approved animal waste management plan for the farm named above and will
implement these procedures. I (we) know that any expansion to the existing design capacity of the waste treatment and
storage system or construction of new facilities will require a new certification to be submitted to the Division of
Environmental Management before the new animals are stocked. I (we) understand that there must be no discharge of
animal waste from the storage or application system to surface waters of the state either directly through a man-made
conveyance or from a storm event less severe than the 25-year, 24-hour storm and there must not be run-off from the
application of animal waste. I (we) understand that run-off of pollutants from lounging and heavy use areas must be
minimized using technical standards developed by the Natural Resources Conservation Service. The approved plan will be
filed at the farm and at the office of the local Soil and Water Conservation District. I (we) know that any modification
must be approved by a technical specialist and submitted to the Soil and Water Conservation District prior to
implementation. A change in land ownership requires written notification to DEM or a new certification (if the approved
plan is changed)within 60 days of a title transfer. II
✓ Name of Lan Owner D i�j rl h
r
Signature• �-'1 Date:
Name of Manager(if different from own r):
Signature: Date:
AWC -- August 1, 1997 1 a
...7M " _ ..nvv,";`,_'^;;-+"q.,-'F:3. !:;'ice.c:c «.s•T--2.m-n,.,,e—q.w s_ •..�ew^S+' -r a;v+«. '?r:,;•:i--

'l'edinical Npecianst t;ertincauon
L As a technical specialist-designated by the North Carolina Soil and Water Conservation Commissiow-pursuant to 15A
NCAC 6F .0005, I. certify that the animal waste management system for the farm named above has=an animal waste
management plan that meets or exceeds standards and specifications of the Division of Environmental Management
(DEW as specified in 15A NCAC 2H.0217 and the USDA-Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) and/or the
North Carolina Soil and Water Conservation Commission pursuant to 15A NCAC 2H.0217 and 15A NCAC 6F .0001-
'.0005.The following elements are included in the plan as applicable. While each category designates a technical specialist
who may sign each certification(SD, SI,WUP,RC, I), the technical specialist should only certify parts for which they are
technically competent.
II. Certification of Design
A) Collection. Storage. Treatment Svstem
Check the appropriate box
Existing facility without retrofit (SD or WUP)
Storage volume is adequate for operation capacity; storage capability consistent with waste utilization
requirements.
❑ New. ex�,anded or retrofitted facility (SD)
Animal waste storage and treatment structures, such as but not limited to collection systems, lagoons and ponds,
have been designed to meet or exceed the minimum standards and specifications.
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print): so'L, a�����^'�-
Affiliation LL SOA -N Qt S Date Work Completed:— _
Address (Agen s - A,.,c : 33 b 31S IAA d -
Signature: Date: Z 3 7
B) Land Application Site (WUP)
The plan provides for minimum separations(buffers);adequate amount of land for waste utilization; chosen crop is
suitable for waste management;hydraulic and nutrient loading rates.
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print):
Affiliation t lS A - t1 Q.c S Date Work Completed:
Address (Agen ): Z�1 S�wt.� Arm f+s �+ � Ali-- Z 2 10 S Phone No.:A36 318 -(-`f'50_
Signature: L - Date: 7
C) Runoff Controls from Exterior Lots
Check the appropriate box
❑ Facilit� without exterior lots (SD or WUP or RC)
is facility does not contain any exterior lots.
Facility. with exterior lots (RC) z
Methods to minimize the run off of pollutants from lounging and heavy use areas have been designed in
accordance with technical standards developed by NRCS.
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print): R, a1'��+ Ro e.-3 V"'
Affiliation Date Work Completed:
Address (Agen ): Phone No.:
Signature: Date: I Z 3 L 7
AWC -- August 1, 1997 2 ,
S,_-.z;:_-,.�:-�•,•;.d•..,..•-_.,�..-'.•, ;fir 4•"-"Ri^ir^r-r:-1.: :^�: !:^r,,.,-Y_�ft-:;•n-•"'Ct:. a ;+��f+3:+c;p--rejv;+f'-'f

D). Application and Handlx.-: Equipment
Chec the appropriate box
Existing x in facility with existing waste li n eguipmen (WUP or 1)
Animal waste application equipment specified in the plan has been either field calibrated or evaluated in
accordance with existing design charts and tables and is able to apply waste as necessary to accommodate the
waste management plan: (existing application equipment can cover the area required by the plan at rates not to
exceed either the specified hydraulic or nutrient loading rates, a schedule for timing of applications has been
established;required buffers can be maintained and calibration and adjustment guidance are contained as part of
the plan).
❑ New, expanded or existing facility without existing waste application equipment for spray irrigation, (I)
Animal waste application equipment specified in the plan has been designed to apply waste as necessary to
accommodate the waste management plan; (proposed application equipment can cover the area required by the
plan at rates not to exceed either the specified hydraulic or nutrient loading rates; a schedule for timing of
applications has been established; required buffers can be maintained; calibration and adjustment guidance are
contained as part of the plan).
* New expanded or existing facility without existing waste application equipment for land spreading not using
spray irrigation. (WUP or I)
Animal waste application equipment specified in the plan has been selected to apply waste as necessary to
accommodate the waste management plan; (proposed application equipment can cover the area required by the
plan at rates not to exceed either the specified hydraulic or nutrient loading rates; a schedule for timing of
applications has been established; required buffers can be maintained; calibration and adjustment guidance are
contained as part of the plan).
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print): . 4--40-v- R6�tesc-�
Affiliation -A/ __.Date Work Completed:._ -
Address (Ag c ): n f" c s �a�e{� l`�L Z7Z43 Phone No.: 336 319 -AVYiD
Signature: Date: Z
E) Odor Control, Insect Control. Mortality Management and Emergency Action Plan ;-SD.
SI. WUP. RC or 1)
The waste management plan for this facility includes a Waste Management Odor Control Checklist, an Insect
Control Checklist, a Mortality Management Checklist and an Emergency Action Plan. Sources of both odors and
insects have been evaluated with respect to this site and Best Management Practices to Minimize Odors and Best
Management Practices to Control Insects have been selected and included in the waste management plan. Both the
Mortality Management Plan and the Emergency Action Plan are complete and can be implemented by this facility.
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print):— 4K 40,
Affiliatio Date Work Completed:
Address (Age y)-. _Phone No.: 33 6 319 -606
Signature: Date: t 5
F) Written Notice of New or Expanding Swine Farm
The following signature block is only to be used for new or expanding swine farms that begin construction after June
21, 1996. If the facility was built before June 21, 1996, when was it constructed or last
expanded _
I(we)certify that I(we)have attempted to contact by certified mail all adjoining property owners and all property owners
who own property located across a public road,street,or highway from this new or expanding swine farm. The notice was
in compliance with the requirements of NCGS 106-805. A copy of the notice and a list of the property owners notified is
attached.
Name of Land Owner:
Signature: Date:
Name of Manager (if different from own ):
Signature: Date:
AWC -- August 1, 1997 _ 3 -

III. Certification of Installation
A) Collection. Stora e. Treatment Installation -
New, expanded or retrofitted facility (SI)
Animal waste storage and treatment structures, such as but not limited to lagoons and ponds, have been installed
in accordance with the approved plan to meet or exceed the minimum standards and specifications.
For existing facilities without retrofits, no certification is necessary.
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print):
Affiliation Date Work Completed:
Address (Agency): Phone No.:
Signature: Date:
B) Land Application Site (WUP)
Check the appropriate box
ZThe cropping system is in place on all land as specified in the animal waste management plan.
Conditional Approval: all required land as specified in the plan is cleared for planting; the cropping system
as specified in the waste utilization plan has not been established and the owner has committed to establish the
vegetation as specified in the plan by (month/day/year); the proposed cover crop is
appropriate for compliance with the wasteutilization plan.
❑ Also check this box if appropriate
if the cropping system as specified in the plan can not be established on newly cleared land within 30 days
of this certification, the owner has committed to establish an interim crop for erosion control;
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print): �A�4n (o bets
Affiliation (AS A— t {GCS Date Work Completed:
Address (A L,,,s ''�- �� k1L 1.7 Phone No.: IS& 3 8 41
Signature:-M�� Date: L 3
17-7
This following signature block is only to be used when the box for conditional approval in III. B
above has been checked.
I (we)certify that I(we)have committed to establish the cropping system as specified in my(our)waste utilization plan,
and if appropriate to establish the interim crop for erosion control,and will submit to DEM a verification of completion
from a Technical Specialist within 15 calendar days following the date specified in the conditional certification. I(we)
realize that failure to submit this verification is a violation of the waste management plan and will subject me(us)to an
enforcement action from DEM.
. z
Name of Land Owner:
Signature: Date:
Name of Manager(if different from owner):
Signature: Date:
AWC -- August 1, 1997 — 4
-- •—_ •- "= - -"":a:�=' _ - .mot ,:—g --4:.:rT,r;..;.y -r--a. - -- -•.*-•r-.. =._n-�»"3, 7 ^*^^".—•r

Please return the completed form to the Division of Water Quality at the following address:
Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources
Division Of Water Quality
Non-Discharge Branch, Compliance Unit
P.O. Box 29535
Raleigh, NC 27626-0535
Please also remember to submit a copy of this form along with the complete Animal Waste
Management Plan to the local Soil and Water Conservation District Office and to keep a copy
in your files with your Animal Waste Management Plan.
AWC -- August 1, 1997 6

Nutrient Management Plan For Animal Waste Utilization
08-16-2004
r
1
This plan has been prepared for: This plan;has been developed by:
Wright Farm B. Barton Roberson
Darrell Wright USDA-NRCS .
3540 Wright Farm Lane 241 Sunset Avenue
Suite 105, Fed. Bldg.
Franklinville, NC 27248-8669 Asheboro, NC 27203
336-824-4218 [phone], Ext.
Developer Sign re
Type of Plan: Nitrogen Only with Manure Only
Owner/Manager/Producer Agreement
I(we)understand and agree to the specifications and the operation and maintenance procedures
established in this nutrient management plan which includes an animal waste utilization plan for
the farm named above.I have read and understand the Required Specifications concerning anima]
waste management that are included with this plan.
Signature(owner) Date
0
Signature(manager or producer) Date
This plan meets the minimum standards and specifications of the U.S.Department of Agriculture-
Natural Resources Conservation Service or the standard of practices adopted by the Soil and Water
Conservation Commission,
Plan Approved _ ` . �'� Iw, f to-(
Technical Specialist Signature Date
--------- --------------------------------:----------- ------------------------------------------------------------ --------------------------
820260 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 08-16-2004 Cover Page 1

Nutrients applied in accordance with this plan will be supplied from the following
source(s):
Commercial Fertilizer is not included in this plan.
S1 Dairy(Milk Cow) Solid waste generated 2,975.00 tons/year by a 175 animal Dairy
(Milk Cow) Solid operation.
Estimated Pounds of Plant Available Nitrogen Generated per Year
Broadcast 12793
Incorporated 16958
Injected N/A
Irrigated N/A
Max.Avail. Actual PAN PAN Surplus/ Actual Quantity Surplus/Deficit
PAN(lbs) * Applied(lbs) Deficit(lbs) Applied(Tons) (Tons)
Year 1 12,793 46578 -33,785 10,831.86 -7,856.86
Year 2 12,793 34407 -21,614 8,001.62 -5,026.62
Year 3 12,793 41929 -29,136 9,750.82 -6,775.82
Year 4 12,793 31612 -18,819 7,351.54 1 -4,376.54
------------- -- - ----- - - -
- -
Note: I-n so--u--rce- ID,S means s-tandaz- d- _ ________________________________source,U means user defined source. -----------
*Max.Available PAN is calculated on the basis of the actual application method(s)identified in the plan for this source.
820260 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 08-16-2004 Source Page Page 1 of 1

Narrative
This plan has been revised to add additional acreage. This operation is still milking 175 cows. Waste
will be broadcast on all fields provided in the waste plan. The Wright Farm has two waste storage ponds.
The storage capacity for the two ponds in for 270 days. no instance should the volume of waste being
stored in your upper storage pond exceed Elevation 104.5 and in the lower pond at Elevations 1.3. Fields
have err-giv�tr amt c—d ton�nsea�pro�ucer, acres �� acres. Three crop rotation
examples are as follows: T3942 F1 =Corn silage planted in spring, followed by small grain and fescue
mixed as over-seed/winter crop; corn silage will be planted as fescue dies out over course of 3-5 years.
T3991 DWI =field contains components for all three grass types and therefore all three are represented.
Other fields in the WUP have these three crop rotation sequences.
Prior printing did not provide copies of subsequent years. Printing this copy and updating developer for
the purpose of capturing the missing fields.
BBR 8/176/04
------ --------------------
--- - - ----- - -------------
820160 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 08-16-2004 Narrative Page Page 1 of 1

The table shown below provides a summary of the crops or rotations included in this plan for each field. Realistic Yield estimates
are also provided for each crop in the plan. In addition,the Leaching Index for each field is shown,where available.
Planned Crops Summary
Total Useable Leaching
Tract Field Acres Acres Index(LI) Soil Series Crop Sequence RYE
3942 Fl 24.90 24.90 15.0 Georgeville Small Grain,Silage 9.4 Tons
Fescue Hay 4.2 Tons
Corn,Silage 19.5 Tons
3942 F2 2.87 2.87 15.0 Georgeville Small Grain,Silage 8.5 Tons
Fescue Hay 3.8 Tons
Corn,Silage 17.7 Tons
3942 F3 2.92 2.92 15.0 Georgeville Small Grain,Silage 8.5 Tons
Fescue Hay 3.8 Tons
Corn,Silage 17.7 Tons
3991 DWI 5.24 5.24 15.0 Georgeville Corn,Silage 18.4 Tons
Small Grain,Silage 8.8 Tons
Fescue Hay 4.0 Tons
Orchardgrass Hay 3.2 Tons
Common Bermudagrass Hay 3.0 Tons
3991 DW2 15.00 15.00 15.0 1 Georgeville Small Grain Overseed 1.0 Tons
Corn,Silage 17.7 Tons
3991 DW3 15.82 15.82 15.0 Georgeville Corn,Silage 21.2 Tons
Small Grain,Silage 10.1 Tons
Fescue Hay 4.6 Tons
Orchardgrass Hay 3.7 Tons
Common Bermudagrass Hay 3.5 Tons
3991 DW4 12.63 12.63 15.0 1 Georgeville Fescue Hay 3.8 Tons
Orchardgrass Hay 3.1 Tons
Common Bermudagrass Hay 2.9 Tons
3991 DW5 8.79 8.79 15.0 Georgeville Fescue Hay 3.8 Tons
Orchardgrass Hay 3.1 Tons
3991 DW6 12.071 12.07 15.0 Georgeville Com,Silage 18.4 Tons
Small Grain,Silage 8.8 Tons
Fescue Hay 4.0 Tons
Orchardgrass Hay 3.2 Tons
Common Bermudagrass Hay 3.0 Tons
820260 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed 8/16/2004
PCS Page Page 1 of 2
NOTE: Symbol*means user entered data.

Planned Crops Summary
Total Useable Leaching
Tract Field Acres Acres Index(LI) Soil Series Crop Sequence RYE
3991 DW7 4.59 4.59 15.0 Georgeville Small Grain Overseed 1.0 Tons
Com,Silage 17.7 Tons
3991 DW8 4.51 4.51 15.0 Georgeville Fescue Hay 4.2 Tons
Orchardgrass Hay 3.4 Tons
Common Bermudagrass Hay 3.2 Tons
3991 DW9 12.681 12.68 15.0 Georgeville Fescue Hay 3.8 Tons
Orchardgrass Hay 3.1 Tons
4018 MB 1 24.95 24.95 15.0 Georgeville Small Grain,Silage 9.4 Tons
Fescue Hay 4.2 Tons
Corn,Silage 19.5 Tons
4018 M132 6.94 6.94 10.0 Wynatt Small Grain,Silage 6.2 Tons
Fescuc Hay 3.6 Tons
Corn,Silage 10.7 Tons
4018 MB3 20.22 20.22 15.0 Georgeville Small Grain,Silage 9.4 Tons
Fescue Hay 4.2 Tons
Com,Silage 19.5 Tons
PLAN TOTALS: 174.13 174.13.
I.1 Fatmlial4e.aelzing Technical Guidance
<2 Low potential to contribute to soluble None
nutrient leaching below the root zone.
>=2& Moderate potential to contribute to Nutrient Management(590)should be planned.
<=10 soluble nutrient leaching below the root
zone.
High potential to contribute to soluble Nutrient Management(590)should be planned. Other conservation practices that improve
nutrient leaching below the root zone. the soils available water holding capacity and improve nutrient use efficiency should be
> 10 considered. Examples are Cover Crops(340)to scavenge nutrients,Sod-Based Rotations
(328),Long-Term No-Till(778),and edge-of-field practices such as Filter Strips(393)and
Riparian Forest Buffers(391).
820260 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed 8/16/2004
PCs Page Page 2 of 2
NOTE: Symbol*means user entered data.

The Waste Utilization table shown below summarizes the waste utilization plan for this operation. This plan provides an estimate of the number of acres of cropland needed to u
the nutrients being produced. The plan requires consideration of the realistic yields of the crops to be grown,their nutrient requirements,and proper timing of applications to
maximize nutrient uptake.
This table provides an estimate of the amount of nitrogen required by the crop being grown and an estimate of the nitrogen amount being supplied by manure or other by-produc,
commercial fertilizer and residual from previous crops. An estimate of the quantity of solid and liquid waste that will be applied on each field in order to supply the indicated quant
of nitrogen from each source is also included. A balance of the total manure produced and the total manure applied is included in the table to ensure that the plan adequately provid
for the utilization of the manure generated by the operation.
Waste Utilization Table
Year 1
Nitrogen I Co-mrn I Res. Manure Liquid I Solid Liquid Solid
PA Fert. (lbs/A) PA ManureA Manure Manure Manure
Nutrient Nutrient NutrientA pplied Applied Applied Applied
Req'd Applied lied pp
(Ibs/A) (lbs/A) p(lbs/A) (acre) (acre) (Field) (Field)
Source Total Use. Applic. Applic. 1000
Tract Field ID Soil Series Acres Acres Crop RYE Period N N N Method N gal/A Tons 1000 gals tons
3942 Fl S1 Georgeville 24.90 24.90 Small Grain,Silage 9.4 Tons 9/1-3/31 102 0 0 !Broad.
. 0
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
3942 Fl S1 Georgeville 24.90 24.90 Fescue Hay 4.2 Tons 8/1-7/31 182 0
0 55 0.00 12.70 0.00 316.17
3942 Fl S1 Georgeville 24 990 24.90 Com,Silage 19.5 Ton 2/15-6/30 209 0 0 209 0.00 48.60 0.00 1,210.24
3942 F2 "'b-91 Georgeville 2.87 2.87 Small Grain,Silage 8.5 Tons 9/1-3/31 92 0 0 Broad. 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 f
0.00
3942 F2 S1 Georgeville 2.87 2.87 Fescue Hay 3.8 Tons 8/1-7/31 165 0 0 Broad. 50 0.00 11.51 0.00 33.04
3942 F2 Sl Georgeville 2.87 2.87 Corn,Silage 17.7 Ton 2/15-6/30 189 0 0 Broad. 189 0.00 43.95 0.00 126.14
3942 F3 S1 Georgeville 2.92 2.92 Small Grain,Silage 3942 F3 Sl Georgeville 2.92 2.92 Fescue Hay 8.5 Tons 9/1-3/31 92 0 0 Broad. 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
3.8 Tons 8/1-7/31 165 0 0 Broad. 50 0.00 11.51 0.00 33.61
3942 F3 Sl Georgeville 2.92 2.92 Com,Silage 17.7 Ton 2/15-6/30 189 0
0 Broad. 189 0.00 43.95 0.00 128.34
3991 DWI S1 Georgeville 5.24 5.24 Com,Silage 18.4 Ton 2/15-6/30 197 0 0 Broad. 197 0.00 45.81 0.00 240.06
3991 DW2 S1 Georgeville 15.00 15.00 Small Grain Overseed 1.0 Tons 10/1-3/31 50 0
0 Broad. 50 0.00 11.63 0.00 174.42
3991 DW2 S1 Georgeville 15.00 15.00 Com,Silage 17.7 Ton 2/15-6/30 189 0 0 Broad. 189 0.00 43.95 0.00 659.29
3991 DW3 S1 Georgeville 15.82 15.82 Com,Silage
21.2 Ton 2/15-6/30 227 0 0 Broad. 227 0.00 52.79 0.00 835.14
3991 DW4 S1 Georgeville 12.63 12.63 Fescue Hay 3.8 Tons 8/1-7/31 165 0 0 Broad. 165 0.00 38.37 0.00 484.63
3991 DW4 SI Georgeville 12.63 12.63 Orchardgrass Hay 3.1 Tons 8/1-7/31 134 0
0 Broad. 134 0.00 31.16 0.00 393.58
3991 DW4 S1 eorgeville 12.63 12.63 Common Bermudagrass Hay 2.9 Tons 3/15-9/IS 126 0 0 Broad. 126 0.00 29.30 0.00 370.08
820260 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 8/16/2004
WUT Page Page 1 of,9

WasteUtiliza.,_.,x Table
i(ear 1
Nitrogen Comm. Res. Manure Liquid Solid Liquid Solid
PA Fert. (lbs/A) PA ManureA Manure Manure Manure
Nutrient Nutrient NutrientA pplied Applied Applied Applied
Req'd Applied pplied (acre) (acre) (Field) (Field)
(lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) u
Source Total Use. APplic. APplic. ]000
Tract Field ID Soil Series Acres Acres Crop RYE Period N N N Method N gal/A Tons 1000 gals tons
3991 DW5 S1 Georgeville 8.79 8.79 Fescue Hay 3.8 Tons 8/1-7/31 165 0 0 Broad. 165 0.00 38.37 0.00 337.29
3991 DW5 S1 Georgeville 8.79 8.79 Orchardgrass Hay 3.1 Tons 8/1-7/31 134 0 0 Broad. 134 0.00 31.16 0.00 273.92
3991 DW6 S1 Georgeville 12.07 12.07 Com,Silage 18.4 Ton 2/15-6/30 197 0 0 Broad. 197 0.00 45.81 0.00 552.97
3991 DW7 S1 Georgeville 4.59 4.59 Small Grain Overseed 1.0 Tons 10/1-3/31 50 0 0 Broad. J,..000, 11.63 0.00 53.37
3991 DW7 S1 Georgeville 4.59 4.59 Com,Silage 17.7 Ton 2/15-6/30 189 0 0 Broad. 43.95 0.00 201.74
3991 DW8 SI Georgeville 4.51 4.51 Fescue Hay 4.2 Tons 8/1-7/31 182 0 0 Broad. 42.32 0.00 190.89
3991 DW8 SI Georgeville 4.51 4.51 Orchardgrass Hay 3.4 Tons 8/1-7/31 147 0 0 Broad. 147 0.00 34.19 0.00 154.18
3991 DW8 S1 Georgeville 4.51 4.51 Common Bermudagrass Hay 3.2 Tons 3/15-9/15 139 0 0 Broad. 139 0.00 32.33 0.00 145.79
3991 DW9 S1 Georgeville 12.68 12.68 Fescue Hay 3.8 Tons 8/1-7131 165 0 0 Broad. 165 0.00 38.37 0.00 486.55
3991 DW9 S1 Georgeville 12.68 12.68 Orchardgrass Hay 3.1 Tons 8/1-7/31 134 0
0 Broad. 134 0.00 31.16 0.001 395.14
4018 MBl S1 Georgeville 24.95 24.95 Small Grain,Silage 9.4 Tons 9/1-3/31 102 0 0 Broad. 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
4018 MB1 SI Georgeville 24.95 24.95 Fescue Hay 4.2 Tons 8/1-7/31 182 0 0 Broad. 55 0.00 12.70 0.00 316.80
4018 MB1 S1 Georgeville 24.95 24.95 Corn,Silage 19.5 Ton 2/15-6/30 209 0 0 Broad. 209 0.00 48.60 0.00 1,212.67
4018 MB2 S1 Wynott 6.94 6.94 Small Grain,Silage 6.2 Tons 9/1-3/31 69 0 0 Broad. 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 - 0.00
4018 MB2 S1 Wynott 6.94 6.94 Fescue Hay 3.6 Tons 8/1-7/31 160 0 0 Broad. 48tOO48.6
0.00
77.47
4018 MB2 S1 Wynott 6.94 6.94 Com,Silage 10.7 Ton 2/15-6/30 117 0 0 Broad. 117 0.00 188.83
4018 MB3 S1 Georgeville 20.22 20.22 Small Grain,Silage 9.4 Tons 9/1-3/31 102 0 0 Broad. 0 0.00 0.00
• 4018 MB3 S1 Georgeville 20.22 20.22 Fescue Hay 4.2 Tons 8/1-7/31 182 0 0 Broad. 55 0.00 256.74
[�=MB3 S1 Georgeville 20.22 20.22 Com,Silage 19.5 Ton 2/15-6/30 209 0 0 Broad. 209 0.00 9$2.77
820260 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed; 8/16/2004
WILT Page Page 2 of 9

Waste t .,Ation Table Year 1
Nitrogen Comm. Res. Manure Liquid Solid Liquid Solid
PA Fert. (lbs/A) PA ManureA Manure Manure Manure
Nutrient Nutrient NutrientA pplied Applied Applied Applied
Req'd Applied pplied (acre) (acre) (Field) (Field)
(lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A)
4,
Source Total Use. Applic. Applic. 1000
Tract Field ID Soil Series Acres Acres Crop RYE Period N N N Method N gal/A Tons 1000 gals tons
Total Applied,1000 gallons 0.00
Total Produced,1000 gallons 0.00
Balance,1000 gallons 0.00
Total Applied,tons 10,831.86
Total Produced,tons 2,975.00
Balance,tons -7,856.86
Notes: 1. In the tract column,—symbol means leased,otherwise,owned. 2. Symbol*means user entered data.
f
820260 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 8/16/2004 WUT Page Page 3 of 9

Waste U:_-- ation Table Year 2
Nitrogen Comm. Res. Manure Liquid Solid Liquid Solid
PA Fert. (lbs/A) PA ManureA Manure Manure Manure
Nutrient Nutrient NutrientA pplied Applied Applied Applied
Req'd Applied pplied (acre) (acre) (Field) (Field)
(lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A)
r
Source Total Use. Applic. Applic. 1000
Tract Field ID Soil Series Acres Acres Crop RYE Period N N N Method N gal/A Tons 1000 gals tons
3942 Fl S1 Georgeville 24.90 24.90 Small Grain,Silage 9.4 Tons 9/1-3/31 102 0 0 Broad. 102 0.00 23.72 0.00 590.64
3942 F2 S1 Georgeville 2.87 2.87 Small Grain,Silage 8.5 Tons 9/1-3/31 92 0 0 Broad. 92 0.00 21.40 0.00 61.40
3942 F3 SI Georgeville 2.92 2.92 Small Grain,Silage 8.5 Tons 9/1-3/31 92 0 0 Broad. 92 0.00 21.40 0.00 62.47
3991 DWI S1 Georgeville 5.24 5.24 Small Grain,Silage 8.8 Tons 9/1-3/31 95 0 0 Broad. 95 0.00 22.09 0.00 115.77
3991 DWI S1 Georgeville 5.24 5.24 Fescue Hay 4.0 Tons 8/1-7/31 173 0 0 Broad. 121 0.00 28.16 0.00 147.57
3991 DW2 S1 Georgeville 15.00 15.00 Small Grain Overseed 1.0 Tons 10/1-3/31 50 0 0 Broad. 50 0.00 11.63 0.00 174.42
3991 DW2 S1 Georgeville 15.00 15.00 Com,Silage 17.7 Ton 2/15-6/30 189 0 0 Broad.1 189 0.00 43.95 0.00 659.29
3991 DW3 S1 Georgeville 15.82 15.82 Small Grain,Silage 10.1 Ton 9/1-3/31 109 0 0 Broad. 109 0.00 25.35 0.00 401.01
3991 DW3 S1 Georgeville 15.82 15.82 Fescue Hay 4.6 Tons 8/1-7/31 199 0 0 Broad. 139 0.00 32.40 0.00 512.48
3991 DW4 S1 Georgeville 12.63 12.63 Fescue Hay 3.8 Tons 8/1-7/31 165 0 0 Broad. 165 0.00 38.371 0.00 r 484.63
3991 DW4 S1 Georgeville 12.63 12.63 Orchardgrass Hay 3.1 Tons 8/1-7/31 134 0 0 Broad. 134 0.00 31.16 0.00 393.58
3991 DW4 S1 Georgeville 12.63 12.63 Common Bermudagrass Hay 2.9 Tons 3115-9/15 126 0 0 Broad. 126 0.00 29.30 0.00 370.08
3991 DW5 SI Georgeville 8.79 8.79 Fescue Hay 3.8 Tons 8/1-7/31 165 0 0 Broad. 165 0.00 38.37 0.00 337.29
3991 DW5 S1 Georgeville 8.79 8.79 Orchardgrass Hay 3.1 Tons 8/1-7/31 134 0 0 Broad. 134 0.00 31.16 0.00 273.92
3991 DW6 S1 Georgeville 12.07 12.07 Small Grain,Silage 8.8 Tons 9/1-3/31 95 0 0 Broad. 95 0.00 22.09 0.00 266.66
3991 DW6 SI Georgeville 12.07 12.07 Fescue Hay 4.0 Tons 8/1-7131 173 0 0 Broad. 121 0.00 28.16 0.00 339.92
3991 DW7 S1 Georgeville 4.59 4.59 Small Grain Overseed 1.0 Tons 10/1-3/31 50 0 0 Broad. 501 0.00 11.63 0.00 53.37
3991 DW7 SI Georgeville 4.59 4.59 Com,Silage 17.7 Ton 2/15-6/30 189 0 0 Broad. 189 0.00 43.95 0.00 201.74
3991 DW8 SI Georgeville 4.51 4.51 Fescue Hay 4.2 Tons 8/1-7/31 182 0 0 Broad. 182 0.00 42.32 0.00 190.89
3991 DW8 S1 Georgeville 4.51 4.51 Orchardgrass Hay 3.4 Tons 8/1-7/31 147 0 0 Broad. 147 0.00 34.19 0.00 154.18
3991 DW8 SI Georgeville 4.51 4.51 Common Bermudagrass Hay 3.2 Tons 3/15-9/15 139 0 0 Broad. 139 0.00 32.33 0.00 145.79
3991 1 DW9 S1 IGeorgeville 12.68 12.68 Fescue Hay 3.8 Tons 8/1-7/31 1 165 0 0 Broad. 165 0.00 38.37 0.00 486.55
820260 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 8/16/2004 WUT Page Page 4 of 9

Waste Wx'nation Table `` Year 2
Nitrogen Comm. Res. Manure Liquid Solid. Liquid Solid
PA Feat. (lbs/A) PA ManureA Manure Manure Manure
Nutrient Nutrient NutrientA pplied Applied Applied Applied
(1bs/A) (]bs/A)
Req'd Applied pplied (acre) (acre) (Field) (Field)
9;
Source Total Use. Applic. Applies (Ibs/A) 1000
Tract Field ID Soil Series Acres Acres Crop RYE Period N N N Method N gal/A Tons 1000 gals tons
3991 DW9 S1 Georgeville 12.68 12.68 Orchardgrass Hay 3.1 Tons 8/1-7/31 134 0 0 Broad. 134 0.00 31.16 0.00 395.14
4018 MBl S1 Georgeville 24.95 24.95 Small Grain,Silage 9.4 Tons 9/1-3/31 102 0 0 Broad. 102 0.00 23.72 0.00 591.83
4018 MB2 S1 Wynott 6.94 6.94 Small Grain,Silage 6.2 Tons 9/1-3/31 69 0 0 Broad. 69 0.00 16.05 0.00 111.36
4018 MB3 S1 Georgeville 20.22 20.22 Small Grain,Silage 9.4 Tons 9/1-3/31 102 0 0 Broad. 102 0.001 23.72 0.00 479.63
Total Applied,1000 gallons 0.00
Total Produced,1000 gallons 0.00
Balance,1000 gallons 0.00
Total Applied,tons 8,001.62
Total Produced,tons 2,975.00
Balance,tons -5,026.62
Notes: 1. In the tract column,-symbol means leased,otherwise,owned. 2. Symbol*means user entered data.
f
820260 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 8/16/2004 WUT Page Page 5 of 9

Waste Di.=.2ation Table Year 3
Nitrogen Comm. Res. Manure Liquid Solid Liquid Solid
PA Fert. (lbs/A) PA ManureA Manure Manure Manure
Nutrient Nutrient NutrientA pplied Applied Applied Applied
Req'd Applied pplied (acre) (acre) (Field) (Field)
(lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) u
Source Total Use. Applic. Applic. 1000
Tract Field ID Soil Series Acres Acres Crop RYE Period N N N Method N gal/A Tons 1000 gals tons
3942 1 Fl S1 Georgeville 24.90 24.90 Small Grain,Silage 9.4 Tons 9/1-3/31 102 0 Y3 Broad. 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
3942 1 FI' S1 Georgeville 24.90 24.90 Fescue Hay 4.2 Tons 8/1-7/31 182 0 1 Broad. 55 0.00 12.70 0.00 316.17
3942 FI S1 GeoTgcville 24.90 24.90 Corn,Silage 19.5 Ton 2/15-6/30 209 - 0 Broad. 209 0.00 48.60 0.00 1,210.24
3942 F2 Sl Georgeville 2.87 2.87 Small Grain,Silage 8.5 Tons 9/1-3/31 92 0 0 Broad. 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
3942 F2 S1 Georgeville 2.87 2.87 1 Fescue Hay 3.8 Tons 8/1-7/31 165 0 0 Broad. 50 0.00 11.51 0.00 33.04
3942 F2 S1 Georgeville 2.87 2.87 Com,Silage 17.7 Ton 2/15-6/30 189 0 0 Broad. 189 0.00 43.95 0.00 126.14
3942 F3 S1 Georgeville 2.92 2.92 Small Grain,Silage 8.5 Tons 9/1-3/31 92 0 0 Broad. 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
3942 F3 S1 Georgeville 2.92 2.92 Fescue Hay 3.8 Tons 8/1-7/31 165 0 0 Broad. 50 0.00 11.51 0.00 33.61
3942 F3 SI Georgeville 2.92 2.92 Com,Silage 17.7 Ton 2/15-6/30 189 0 0 Broad. 189 0.00 43.95 0.00 128.34
3991 DWI Sl Georgeville 5.24 5.24 Fescue Hay 4.0 Tons 8/1-7/31 173 0 0 Broad. 52 0.00 12.07 0.00 t 63.25
3991 DWI Sl Georgeville 5.24 5.24 Orchardgrass Hay 3.2 Tons 8/1-7/31 139 0 0 Broad. 97 0.00 22.63 0.00 118.57
3991 DW2 S1 Georgeville 15.00 15.00 Small Grain Overseed 1.0 Tons 10/1-3/31 50 0 0 Broad. 50 0.00 11.63 0.00 174.42
3991 DW2 S1 Georgeville 15.00 15.00 Corn,Silage 17.7 Ton 2/15-6/30 189 0 0 Broad. 189 0.00 43.95 0.00 659.29
3991 DW3 S1 Georgeville 15.82 15.82 Fescue Hay 4.6 Tons 8/1-7/31 199 0 0 Broad. 60 0.00 13.88 0.00 219.64
3991 DW3 S1 Georgeville 15.82 15.82 Orchardgrass Hay 3.7 Tons 8/1-7/31 160 0 0 Broad. 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
3991 DW4 S1 Georgeville 12.63 12.63 Fescue Hay 3.8 Tons 8/1-7/31 165 0 0 Broad. 165 0.00 38.37 0.00 484.63
3991 DW4 S1 Georgeville 12,63 12.63 Orchardgrass Hay 3.1 Tons 8/1-7/31 134 0 0 Broad. 134 0.00 31.161 0.00 393.58
3991 DW4 S1 Georgeville 12.63 12.63 Common Bermudagrass Hay 2.9 Tons 3/15-9/15 126 0 0 Broad. 126 0.00 29.30 0.00 370.08
3991 DW5 S1 Georgeville 8.79 8.79 Fescue Hay 3.8 Tons 8/1-7/31 165 0 0 Broad. 165 0.00 38.37 0.00 337.29
3991 DW5 SI Georgeville 8.79 8.79 Orchardgrass Hay 3.1 Tons 8/1-7/31 134 0 0 Broad. 134 0.00 31.16 0.00 f 273.92
3991 DW6 S1 Georgeville 12.07 12.07 Fescue Hay 4.0 Tons 8/1-7/31 173 0 0 Broad. 52 0.00 12.07 0.00 145.68
1
3991 DW6 S1 Georgeville 12.07 12.07 Orchazdgrass Hay 3.2 Tons 8/1-7/31 139 0 0 Broad. 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
820260 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 8/16/2004 WUT Page Page 6 of 9

Waste Ui=gation Table Year 3
Nitrogen Comm. Res. Manure Liquid Solid Liquid Solid
PA Fert. (lbs/A) PA ManureA Manure Manure Manure
Nutrient Nutrient NutrientA pplied Applied Applied Applied
Req'd Applied pplied (acre) (acre) (Field) (Field)
(lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A)
4,
Source Total Use. Applic. Applic. 1000
Tract Field ID Soil Series Acres Acres Crop RYE Period N N N Method N gal/A Tons 1000 gals tons
3991 DW7 S1 Georgeville 4.59 4.59 Small Grain Oversced 1.0 Tons 10/1-3/31 50 0 0 Broad. 50 0.00 11.63 0.00 53.37
3991 DW7 S1 Georgeville 4.59 4.59 Com,Silage 17.7 Ton 2/15-6/30 189 0 0 Broad. 189 0.00 43.95 0.00 201.74
3991 DW8 S1 Georgeville 4.51 4.51 Fescue Hay 4.2 Tons 8/1-7/31 182 0 0 Broad. 182 0.00 42.32 0.00 190.89
3991 DW8 S1 Georgeville 4.51 4.51 Orchardgrass Hay 3.4 Tons 8/1-7/31 147 0 0 Broad. 147 0.00 34.19 0.00 154.18
3991 DW8 S1 Georgeville 4.51 4.51 Common Bermudagrass Hay 3.2 Tons 3/15-9/15 139 0 0 Broad. 139 0.00 32.33 0.00 145.79
3991 DW9 S1 Georgeville 12.68 12.68 Fescue Hay 3.8 Tons 8/1-7/31 165 0 0 Broad. 165 0.00 38.37 0.00 486.55
3991 DW9 SI Georgeville 12.68 12.68 Orchardgrass Hay 3.1 Tons 8/1-7/31 134 0 0 Broad. 134 0.00 31.16 0.00 395.14
4018 MB1 S1 Georgeville 24.95 24.95 Small Grain,Silage 9.4 Tons 9/1-3/31 102 0 0 Broad. 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
4018 MB1 SI Georgeville 24.95 24.95 Fescue Hay 4.2 Tons 8/1-7/31 182 0 0 Broad. 55 0.00 12.70 0.00 316.80
4018 MB1 S1 Georgeville 24.95 24.95 1 Com,Silage 19.5 Ton 2/15-6/30 209 0 0 Broad. 209 0.00 48.601 0.00 1,212.67
4018 MB2 S1 Wynott 6.94 6.94 Small Grain,Silage 6.2 Tons 9/1-3/31 69 0 0 Broad. 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
4018 MB2 Sl Wynott 6.94 6.94 Fescue Hay 3.6 Tons 8/1-7/31 160 0 0 Broad. 48 0.00 11.16 0.00 77.47
4018 MB2 S1 Wynott 6.94 6.94 Com,Silage 10.7 Ton 2/15-6/30 117 0 0 Broad. 117 0.00 27.21 0.00 188.83
4018 MB3 S1 Georgeville 20.22 20.22 Small Grain,Silage 9.4 Tons 9/1-3/31 102 0 0 Broad. 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
4018 MB3 S1 Georgeville 20.22 20.22 Fescue Hay 4.2 Tons 8/1-7/31 182 0 0 Broad. 55 0.00 12.70 0.00 256.74
4018 MB3 S1 Georgeville 20.22 20.22 Forn,Silage 19.5 Ton 2/15-6/30 209 0 0 Broad. 209 0.001 48.60 0.00 982.77
Total Applied,1000 gallons 0.00,
Total Produced,1000 gallons 0.00,
Balance,1000 gallons 0.00
Total Applied,tons 9,750.85
Total Produced,tons ? 2,975.00
Balance,tons -6,775.82
Notes: 1. In the tract column,-symbol means leased,otherwise,owned. 2. Symbol*means user entered data.
820260 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 8/16/2004 WUT Page Page 7 of 9

Waste i),-ation Table Year 4
Nitrogen Comm. Res. Manure Liquid Solid Liquid Solid
PA Fert. (lbs/A) PA ManureA Manure I Manure Manure
Nutrient Nutrient NutrientA pplied Applied I Applied Applied
Req'd Applied pplied (acre) (acre) (Field) (Field)
(lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) o
Source Total Use. Applic. Applic. 1000
Tract Field ID Soil Series Acres Acres Crop RYE Period N N N Method N gal/A Tons 1000 gals tons
3942 Fl Sl Georgeville 24.90 24.90 Small Grain,Silage 9.4 Tons 9/1-3131 102 0 0 Broad. 102 0.00 23.72 0.00 590.64
3942 F2 Sl Georgeville 2.87 2.87 Small Grain,Silage 8.5 Tons 9/1-3/31 92 0 0 Broad. 92 0.00 21.40 0.00 61.40
3942 F3 Si Georgeville 2.92 2.92 Small Grain,Silage 8.5 Tons 9/1-3/31 92 0 0 Broad. 92 0.00 21.40 0.00 62.47
3991 DWI. Sl Georgeville 5.24 5.24 10rchardgrass Hay 3.2 Tons 8/1-7/31 139 0 0 Broad. 42 0.00 9.70 0.00 50.81
3991 DWI Sl Georgeville 5.24 5.24 1 Common Bermudagrass Hay 3.0 Tons 3/15-9/15 130 0 0 Broad. 130 0.00 30.23 0.00 158.42
3991 DW2 Sl Georgeville 15.00 15.00 Small Grain Overseed 1.0 Tons 10/1-3/31 50 0 0 Broad. 50 0.00 11.63 0.00 174.42
3991 DW2 Sl Georgeville 15.00 15.00 Com,Silage 17.7 Ton 2/15-6/30 189 0 0 Broad, 189 0.00 43.95 0.00 659.29
3991 DW3 S1 Georgeville 15.82 15.82 Orchardgrass Hay 3.7 Tons 8/1-7/31 160 0 0 Broad. 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
3991 DW3 S1 Georgeville 15.82 15.82 Common Bermudagrass Hay 3.5 Tons 3/15-9/15 152 0 0 Broad. 152 0.00 35.35 0.00 559.21
3991 DW4 Sl Georgeville 12.63 12.63 Fescue Hay 3.8 Tons 8/1-7/31 165 0 0 Broad. 165 0.00 38.37 0.00 I 484.63
3991 DW4 S1 Georgeville 12.63 12.63 Orchardgrass Hay 3.1 Tons 8/1-7/31 134 0 0 Broad. 1341 0.00 31.16 0.00 393.58
3991 DW4 S1 Georgeville 12.63 12.63 Common Bermudagrass Hay 2.9 Tons 3/15-9/15 126 0 0 Broad. 126 0.00 29.30 0.00 370.08
3991 DWS S1 Georgeville 8.79 8.79 Fescue Hay 3.8 Tons 8/1-7/31 165 0 0 Broad. 165 0.00 38.371 0.00 ' 337.29
3991 DW5 S1 Georgeville 8.79 8.79 Orchardgrass Hay 3.1 Tons 8/1-7/31 134 0 0 Broad. 134 0.00 31.16 0.00 273.92
3991 DW6 Sl Georgeville 12.07 12.07 Orchardgrass Hay 3.2 Tons 8/1-7/31 139 0 0 Broad. 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
3991 DW6 S1 Georgeville 12.07 12.07 Common Bermudagrass Hay 3.0 Tons 3/15-9/15 130 0 10 Broad. 130 0.00 30.23 0.00 364.90
3991 DW7 S1 Georgeville 4.59 4.59 Small Grain Overseed 1.0 Tons 10/1-3/31 50 0 0 Broad. 50 0.00 11.63 0.00 53.37
3991 DW7 S1 Georgeville 4.59 4.59 Com,Silage 17.7 Ton 2/15-6/30 189 0 0 Broad. 189 0.00 43.95 0.00 201.74
3991 DW8 S1 Georgeville 4.51 4.51 Fescue Hay 4.2 Tons 8/1-7/31 182 0 0 Broad. 182 0.00 42.32 0.00 190.89
i
3991 DW8 S1 Georgeville 4.51 4.51 Orchardgrass Hay 3.4 Tons 8/1-7/31 147 0 0 Broad. 147 0.00 34.19 0.00 154.18
3991 DW8 S1 Georgeville 4.51 4.51 Common Bermudagrass Hay 3.2 Tons 3/15-9/15 139 0 0 Broad. 139 0.00 32.33 0.00 145.79
3991 DW9 S1 Georgeville 12.68 12.68 Fescue Hay 3.8 Tons 8/1-7/31 165FO 0 Broad. 165 0.00 38.37 0.00 486.55
820260 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 8/16/2004 WUT Page Page 8 of 9

Waste Utilization Table `'`Year 4
Nitrogen Comm. Res. Manure Liquid Solid Liquid Solid
PA Fert. (lbs/A) PA ManureA Manure Manure Manure
Nutrient Nutrient NutrientA pplied Applied Applied Applied
Req'd Applied pplied (acre) (acre) (Field) (Field)
(lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A)
V'
Source Total Use. Applic. Applic. 1000
Tract Field ID Soil Series Acres Acres Crop RYE Period N N N Method N gal/A Tons 1000 gals tons
3991 DW9 S1 Georgeville 12.68 12.68 Orchardgrass Hay 3.1 Tons 8/1-7/31 134 0 0 Broad. 134 0.00 31.16 0.00 395.14
4018 MB1 S1 Georgeville 24.95 24.95 Small Grain,Silage 9.4 Tons 9/1-3/31 102 0 0 Broad. 102 0.00 23.72 0.00 591.83
4018 MB2 S1 Wynott 6.94 6.94 Small Grain,Silage 6.2 Tons 9/1-3/31 69 0 0 Broad. 69 0.00 16.05 0.00 111.36
4018 MB3 S1 Georgeville 20.221 20.22 Small Grain,Silage 9.4 Tons 9/1-3/31 102 0 0 Broad. 102 0.00 23.72 0.00 479.63
Total Applied,1000 gallons 0.00
Total Produced,1000 gallons 0.00"
Balance,1000 gallons 0.00
Total Applied,tons 7,351.54
Total Produced,tons 2,975.00
Balance,tons 4,376.54
Notes: 1. In the tract column,-symbol means leased,otherwise,owned. 2. Symbol*means user entered data.
820260 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 8/16/2004 WUT Page Page 9 of 9

Required Specifications For Animal Waste Management
1. Animal waste shall not reach surface waters of the state by runoff, drift,
manmade conveyances, direct application, or direct discharge during operation
or land application.Any discharge of waste that reaches surface water is
prohibited.
2. There must be documentation in the design folder that the producer either owns
or has an agreement for use of adequate land on which to properly apply the
waste. If the producer does not own adequate land to properly dispose of the
waste, he/she shall provide evidence of an agreement with a landowner, who is
within a reasonable proximity, allowing him/her the use of the land for waste
application. It is the responsibility of the owner of the waste production facility to
secure an update of the Nutrient Management Plan when there is a change in the
operation, increase in the number of animals, method of application, receiving
crop type, or available land.
3. Animal waste shall be applied to meet, but not exceed, the nitrogen needs for
realistic crop yields based upon soil type, available moisture, historical data,
climatic conditions, and level of management, unless there are regulations that
restrict the rate of applications for other nutrients.
4. Animal waste shall be applied to land eroding less than 5 tons per acre per year.
Waste may be applied to land eroding at more than 5 tons per acre per year but
less than 10 tons per acre per.year provided grass filter strips are installed where
runoff leaves the field (see USDA, NRCS Field Office Technical Guide Standard
393 -Filter Strips).
5. Odors can be reduced by injecting the waste or by disking after waste application.
Waste should not be applied when there is danger of drift from the land
application field.
6. When animal waste is to be applied on acres subject to flooding,waste will be soil
incorporated on conventionally tilled cropland. When waste is applied to
conservation tilled crops or grassland, the waste may be broadcast provided the
application does not occur during a season prone to flooding (see "Weather and
Climate in North Carolina" for guidance).
7. Liquid waste shall be applied at rates not to exceed the soil infiltration rate such
that runoff does not occur offsite or to surface waters and in a method which does
not cause drift from the site during application. No ponding should occur in order
to control odor and flies.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- I------ ------------------------------------------------
820260 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 8/16/2004 Specification Page 1

8. Animal waste shall not be applied to saturated soils, during rainfall events, or
when the soil surface is frozen.
9. Animal waste shall be applied on actively growing crops in such a manner that
the crop is not covered with waste to a depth that would inhibit growth. The
potential for salt damage from animal waste should also be considered.
10. Nutrients from waste shall not be applied in fall or winter for spring planted
crops on soils with a high potential for leaching..Waste/nutrient loading rates on
these soils should be held to a minimum and a suitable winter cover crop planted
to take up released nutrients. Waste shall not be applied more than 30 days prior
to planting of the crop or forages breaking dormancy.
11. Any new swine facility sited on or after October 1, 1995 shall comply with the
following: The outer perimeter of the land area onto which waste is applied from
a lagoon that is a component of a swine farm shall be at least 50 feet from any
residential property boundary and canal.Animal waste, other than swine waste
from facilities sited on or after October 1, 1995, shall not be applied closer that 25
feet to perennial waters.
12. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 100 feet to wells.
13. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 200 feet of dwellings other than
those owned by the landowner.
14. Waste shall be applied in a manner not to reach other property and public
right-of-ways.
15. Animal waste shall not be discharged into surface waters, drainageways, or
wetlands by a discharge or by over-spraying. Animal waste may be applied to
prior converted cropland provided the fields have been approved as a land
application site by a "technical specialist". Animal waste shall not be applied on
grassed waterways that discharge directly into water courses, and on other
grassed waterways, waste shall be applied at agronomic rates in a manner that
causes no runoff or drift from the site.
16. Domestic and industrial waste from washdown facilities, showers, toilets, sinks,
etc., shall not be discharged into the animal waste management system.
------------------ ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- -- -------------
820260 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 8/16/2004 Specification Page 2

17. A protective cover of appropriate vegetation will be established on all disturbed
areas (lagoon embankments, berms, pipe runs, etc.). Areas shall be fenced, as
necessary, to protect the vegetation. Vegetation such as trees, shrubs, and other
woody species, etc., are limited to areas where considered appropriate. Lagoon
areas should be kept mowed and accessible. Berms and structures should be
inspected regularly for evidence of erosion, leakage, or discharge.
18. If animal production at the facility is to be suspended or terminated, the owner is
responsible for obtaining and implementing a "closure plan" which will eliminate
the possibility of an illegal discharge, pollution, and erosion.
19. Waste handling structures,piping, pumps, reels, etc., should be inspected on a
regular basis to prevent breakdowns, leaks, and spills. A regular maintenance
checklist should be kept on site.
20. Animal waste can be used in a rotation that includes vegetables and other crops
for direct human consumption. However, if animal waste is used on crops for
direct human consumption, it should only be applied pre-plant with no further
applications of animal waste during the crop season.
21. Highly visible markers shall be installed to mark the top and bottom elevations of
the temporary storage (pumping volume) of all waste treatment lagoons.
Pumping shall be managed to maintain the liquid level between the markers. A
marker will be required to mark the maximum storage volume for waste storage
ponds.
22. Waste shall be tested within 60 days of utilization and soil shall be tested at least
annually at crop sites where waste products are applied. Nitrogen shall be the
rate-determining nutrient, unless other restrictions require waste to be applied
based on other nutrients, resulting in a lower application rate than a nitrogen
based rate. Zinc and copper levels in the soils shall be monitored and alternative
crop sites shall be used when these metals approach excessive levels. pH shall be
adjusted and maintained for optimum crop production. Soil and waste analysis
records shall be kept for a minimum of five years. Poultry dry waste application
records shall be maintained for a minimum of three years.
Waste application records for all other waste shall be maintained for five (5)
years.
23. Dead animals will be disposed of in a manner that meets North Carolina
regulations.
---------------- - ----------- ------------------------------ -------------------------------------------------------- ---- ---- --- ---------------------
820260 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 8/16/2004 Specification Page 3

Crop Notes
The following crop note applies to field(s): DW2,DW7
Small Grain: Piedmont
In the Piedmont,oats and barley should be planted from October 1-October 25; and rye from October
15-November 10.For barley,plant 22 seed/drill row foot and increase the seeding rate by 5% for each
week seeding is delayed beyond the optimum time. See the seeding rates table for applicable seeding rate
modifications in the current NCSU"Small Grain Production Guide". Also,increase the initial seeding
rate by at least 10%when planting no-till. Oats should be planted at 2 bushels/acre and rye at 1-1 1/2
bushels/acre. Plant all these small grains at 1-1 1/2 deep.Adequate depth control is essential.Review the
NCSU Official Variety "green book" and information from private companies to select a high yielding
variety with the characteristics needed for your area and conditions.Apply no more than 30 lbs/acre N at
planting.Phosphorus and potash recommended by a soil test can also be applied at this time. The
remaining N should be applied during the months of February-March.
The following crop note applies to field(s): MB2
Corn Silage: Piedmont and Mountains
In the Piedmont, corn should be planted when soil temperature reaches 52 to 55 degrees fahrenheit. Plant
1-2" deep. Adequate depth control is essential. Review the NCSU Official Variety"green book" and
information from private companies to select a high yielding variety with the characteristics needed for
your area and conditions. Apply 10 to 121bs.nitrogen per ton of expected yield. All nitrogen can be
applied at planting. Also acceptable is to apply 2/3 to 3/4 of the nitrogen at planting and the rest when
corn is in the 7 to 9 leaf stage.Tropical corn for silage needs about 6-81bs nitrogen per ton of expected
yield applying no more than 100 to 1201bs total nitrogen. Research has shown that nitrogen can be
reduced by approximately 15 percent when soil injected. The total N is dependent on the soil type and
expected yield. Apply phosphorus and potassium according to a soil test before planting. Phosphorus
is best utilized when banded with the planter as a starter. Plant samples can be analyzed during the
growing season to monitor the nutrient status of the corn. Timely management of weeds and insects is
essential in profitable corn silage production.Plant a cover crop after harvest.
-------------------------- --------------------------- ----------------------------------------------------------------------
820260 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 08-16-2004 Crop Note Page Page 1 of 3

The following crop note applies to field(s): DWI,DW2,DW3, DW6,DW7,F1,F2,F3,MB1,MB3
Corn Silage: Piedmont and Mountains
In the Piedmont,corn should be planted when soil temperature reaches 52 to 55 degrees fahrenheit. Plant
1-2" deep. Adequate depth control is essential. Review the NCSU Official Variety"green book" and
information from private companies to select a high yielding variety with the characteristics needed for
your area and conditions. Apply 10 to 12 lbs.nitrogen per ton of expected yield. All nitrogen can be
applied at planting.Also acceptable is to apply 2/3 to 3/4 of the nitrogen at planting and the rest when
corn is in the 7 to 9 leaf stage. Tropical corn for silage needs about 6-8 lbs nitrogen per ton of expected
yield applying no more than 100 to 120 lbs total nitrogen. Research has shown that nitrogen can be
reduced by approximately 15 percent when soil injected. The total N is dependent on the soil type and
expected yield. Apply phosphorus and potassium according to a soil test before planting. Phosphorus
is best utilized when banded with the planter as a starter. Plant samples can be analyzed during the
growing season to monitor the nutrient status of the corn. Timely management of weeds and insects is
essential in profitable corn silage production.Plant a cover crop after harvest.
The following crop note applies to field(s):MB2
Fescue: Piedmont
Adaptation: Well-adapted.
In the Piedmont,tall fescue can be planted Aug. 20 to Oct. 10(best)and Feb. 15 to Mar. 20.For
pure-stand broadcast seedings use 20 to 30 lb/ac., for drilled use 15 to 20 lb/ac. seed.Use certified seed
to avoid introducing weeds or annual ryegrass.Plant seed 0.25"to 0.5"deep for pure stands, 0.25"in
mixture with clovers. Soil test for preplant and maintenance lime,phosphorus, and potassium
recommendations. Apply 40 to 60 lb/ac nitrogen at planting for pure stands only.Do not apply N for
mixtures with clovers but use proper legume inoculation techniques.Apply 150 to 2001b/ac.N to
pure-stand fescue for hay production; reduce N rates by 25%to 50% for grazing. Apply N Feb. 1 to Mar.
20 and Aug.20 to Sept. 30,with equal amounts in each window.Refer to NCSU Technical Bulletin 305
Production and Utilization of Pastures and Forages in North Carolina for additional information or
consult your regional agronomist or extension agent for assistance.
The following crop note applies to field(s):DWI,DW3,DW4,DW5, DW6,DW8,DW9,F1,F2,F3,
MB1,MB3
Fescue:Piedmont
Adaptation: Well-adapted.
In the Piedmont, tall fescue can be planted Aug. 20 to Oct. 10 (best)and Feb. 15 to Mar.20.For
pure-stand broadcast seedings use 20 to 30 lb/ac., for drilled use 15 to 20 lb/ac. seed. Use certified seed
to avoid introducing weeds or annual ryegrass.Plant seed 0.25"to 0.5"deep for pure stands, 0.25"in
mixture with clovers. Soil test for preplant and maintenance lime,phosphorus, and potassium
recommendations. Apply 40 to 60 lb/ac nitrogen at planting for pure stands only. Do not apply N for
mixtures with clovers but use proper legume inoculation techniques.Apply 150 to 200 lb/ac.N to
pure-stand fescue for hay production;reduce N rates by 25%to 50%for grazing. Apply N Feb. 1 to Mar.
20 and Aug.20 to Sept. 30,with equal amounts in each window.Refer to NCSU Technical Bulletin 305
Production and Utilization of Pastures and Forages in North Carolina for additional information or
consult your regional agronomist or extension agent for assistance.
------------------------------------------------------------ ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
820260 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 08-16-2004 Crop Note Page Page 2 of 3

The following crop note applies to field(s):MB2
Small Grain Silage,Piedmont and Mountains
In the Piedmont, small grain silage should be planted from October 10 to November 3. In the Mountains,
small grain silage should be planted from September 15 to October 31. Plant 18 to 22 seed/drill row foot
at 1-1 1/2" deep and increase the seeding rate by 5% for each week seeding is delayed beyond the
optimum time frame. See the seeding rates table for applicable seeding rate modifications in the current
NCSU"Small Grain Production Guide".Also, increase the initial seeding rate by at least 10%when
planting no-till. Adequate depth control when planting the small grain is essential. Review the NCSU
Official Variety"green book" and information from private companies to select a high yielding variety
with the characteristics needed for your area and conditions. Apply approximately 301bs N at planting.
Increase N at planting by 20%for no-till. Phosphorus and potassium should be applied according to a
soil test at this time. The remaining N should be applied during February-March. Apply 10 to 121bs.N
per ton of expected yield. The total N is dependent on soil type and expected yield. Plant samples can be
analyzed during the growing season to monitor the nutrient status of the small grain. Timely management
of diseases, weeds and insects are essential for profitable small grain silage production. Plant a cover
crop after harvest.
The following crop note applies to field(s):DWI,DW3,DW6, F1,F2,F3,MB1,MB3
Small Grain Silage,Piedmont and Mountains
In the Piedmont, small grain silage should be planted from October 10 to November 3. In the Mountains,
small grain silage should be planted from September 15 to October 31. Plant 18 to 22 seed/drill row foot
at 1-1 1/2" deep and increase the seeding rate by 5% for each week seeding is delayed beyond the
optimum time frame. See the seeding rates table for applicable seeding rate modifications in the current
NCSU"Small Grain Production Guide".Also,increase the initial seeding rate by at least 10%when
planting no-till. Adequate depth control when planting the small grain is essential. Review the NCSU
Official Variety"green book" and information from private companies to select a high yielding variety
with the characteristics needed for your area and conditions. Apply approximately 301bs N at planting.
Increase N at planting by 20%for no-till. Phosphorus and potassium should be applied according to a
soil test at this time. The remaining N should be applied during February-March. Apply 10 to 121bs.N
per ton of expected yield. The total N is dependent on soil type and expected yield. Plant samples can be
analyzed during the growing season to monitor the nutrient status of the small grain. Timely management
of diseases,weeds and insects are essential for profitable small grain silage production. Plant a cover
crop after harvest.
The following crop note applies to field(s): DWI,DW3,DW4,DW5,DW6,DW8,DW9
Orchardgrass: No Comment
The following crop note applies to field(s): DWI,DW3,DW4,DW6,DW8
Common Bermudagrass: No Comment
------- ------ --------------------------------------------------------------------------
820260 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 08-16-2004 Crop Note Page Page 3 of 3

)
- LIVESTOCK OPERATION FOR
INDEX DISTRICT COPY
SECTION I . FORMS & CORRESPONDENCE
A. Step-by-Step Process for . 0200 Certification (Checklist )
B . Waste Management Plan (Review for Certification Checklist )
C. Certification Form for Existing Feedlot
D. Registration Form for Animal Feedlot Operations
E. Correspondence with Operator
SECTION II . WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
A. waste Utilization Plan
B . Waste Utilization Plan Agreement
C. waste 'Utilization Plan Requirements
C . waste utilization Information by Tract and Field
D. Maps of Tracts with Fields for Waste Application
E . Soil Maps & Legend
SECTION III . DESIGN INFORMATION
A. Drawing of Existing Facility (Enhancements shown in "RED" )
B . Drawing of Water Movement on Open Areas
C . Dairy waste Storage Structure Worksheet
D. Volume Calculations of Existing Structure(s ) _ ( ) ,�-tONTHS STORAGE
E . Animal waste Survey
F. Supporting Data
SECTION IV . TECHNICAL DRAY!INGS AND INFORMATION
A . Technical Drawings and Information of Proposed Enhancements
(Note these Items are shown in "RED" in Section III )
SECTION V . EXISTING STRUCTURE DATA
A. _-As-Built Drawings
B. Drawings and Plans
SECTION VI . OTHER SUPPORTING DATA
A. Plan Maps Showing Location of Facility
B. Conservation Plan (Copy)
C . Assistance Notes

SEEDING SPECIFICATIONS
A. Site Preparation
1. Smooth land to fill rills and washes so runoff will not be concentrated and to
provide uniform slopes.
2. Perform all land preparation and seeding on the general contour.
B. Seedbed Preparation
1. Prepare a seedbed 3 to 5 inches deep or as determined by NRCS or District
personnel on site. Scarify the surface with suitable equipment such as a chain
harrow, grader with chisels attached or with hand tools. Ripping chisels or tools
must be spaced not more than 12" apart.
C. Seeding
1. Use a cyclone seeder, brillion-type seeder, or other appropriate seeding apparatus
to achieve a 1/2 inch seeding depth. Where a cyclone seeder is used, cross seed by
seeding one half of the seed in one direction and the other half at right angles.
When the seed are broadcast, cover them to a 1/2 inch depth and cultipack the
entire area immediately following seeding. All operations using a brillion-type
seeder or cultipacker should be done across the slope.
2. Hydraulic seeding-Mix the fertilizer, seed and wood cellulose fiber mulch with
water and apply the slurry uniformly over the area being treated. The slurry must
be applied within one hour after mixing the seed with the fertilizer.
3. Mulching -Mulch all areas immediately after seeding. Mulch must cover 75% of
the surface area.
D Temporary Seeding
1. Provide temporary seeding during the late winter and summer months (see list
below). Permanent seeding should be established as soon as possible based on
appropriate seeding dates.
E. Lime, Fertilizer, and Seed
Estimated Area of Dam,ESW, and Borrow Areas= acres*
Seeding Dates Amount
60 lbs. of fescue (KY-3 1) per acre Aug. 15 - Oct 31 = lbs.
(permanent) Feb. 15 - April 15
50 lbs. of rye-grain per acre(temporary) Nov. 1 -Feb. 14 = _lbs.
401bs. of browntop millet per acre April 15 - Aug 15
(temporary)
250 lbs. of 46%phosphate per acre = lbs.
1000 lbs. of 10-10-10 fertilizer per acre = lbs.
6000 lbs. of lime per acre = lbs.
100 bales of straw per acre = bales
*Measure area(s)to be seeded prior to seeding and adjust acreage and quantities of
seeding materials accordingly

North -S
Ca . ina ^Agrictcltttral Exte . ' On Ser� ic e
.A
1 .
ste Management
North Carolina SWE University
Biological and Agricultural Engineering
LTVEsTOCK WASTE SAMPLING, ANLYSIS AND CAL=LA-TION
OF LAND APPLICATION BATES
James C. Barker*
I. SA'dPL COLLECTION
A. Semi-Solid Lot Manure
i. Scraped directly from lot into spreader
a. From loaded spreader, collect about 2 lbs of manure from
different locations using nonmetallic collectors.
ii. From storage '
a. Collect about 2 lbs of Manure from under the surface crust
avoiding bedding materials and using nonmetallic collectors.
B. Liquid ;fanurs Slsr_-f
i. Under-slotted-floor pit
a. Extend a 1/21, nonmetallic conduit open on both ends into
manure to pit floor-
b. Seal upper end of conduit (e.g. , by placing a thumb over end
of conduit) trapping =allure that has entered lower and, remove
and empty slurry into plastic bucket or nonmetallic container.
c. Take su:osamples from 5 or Mora locations or at least 1 quart.
d. Mix and add about 3/4 pint to nonmetallic sample container.
ii. Exterior storage basin or tank
a. Make sure manure has been well mixed with a liquid manure
chopper-agitator pump or propeller agitator.
b. Take subsamples from about
pic place inalp asticobucketator pump
or from manure spreaderP
* Professor and Extension Specialist, Biological and Agricui-taral Engineering
rth Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC.
Department, No

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION AGREEMENT
(Needed only if additional land has to be leased, etc. )
G�I� hereby give
permission to apply animal waste from his Waste Utilization System
on =, acres of my land for the duration of time shown below.
The field(s) on which waste can be applied are shown on the
attached map.
I understand that this waste contains nitrogen, phosphorous,
potassium, and other trace elements and G7hen prooeri., ' ; C-1
should not harm my land or crops. I also understand that the use
of -waste will reduce my need for commercial fertilizer.
Adjacent Landowner: _ Date:
Waste Producer:_ _ _ Date:
Technical Representative : Date:
SWCD Representative: _ — Date:
Term of Agreement : 19 to _
(Minimum of Ten Years on Cost Shared Items)
(See Required Specification No. 2. )
Page: 13

Dairy Farm Waste Management Odor Control Checklist
- - - -- - ll(\ll's lu 1lliniulire Udur —� site Silecilic 1'r:tclices —
Source Cause —
Ir:►rluslcatl Daily ploducliull i >' Vegetative or Wooded butlers
(� I1 Ccomtnellded best utannbenlent practices
®' Good judgment alld common sellse — —
Poved lull or barn alley 4Vct ulnnure coveted surl'uccs _ Scr:y>c or Ilusll daily
smIaces ❑ I'ronlolc(hying with proper venlilnlion
_ Kaoline checks null limintemlllce on tvnlevers,
tl, hydrants, pipes,stuck lanks
llcdded areas Urine G Prolnole drying tvilll proper ventilulioll -
1'ortiul microbial deconlposilioll Replace wet or manure-covered bedding _
MLllitfre dry slacks I'allial microbial decomposition Provide liquid drainage for stored Manure
Sloragc lank or basin I ntiaubial ciccolnpo! lull ; IwIllllll or nlid-level loading
surlitce Mixing while filling; ❑ Tank covers
• Agitation whorl enlplyillg ❑ Basin surface nulls ofsolids;
VAlillil,lize lot runoff and liquid addiliuns
gilatc only prior to mnnurc removal
❑ Proven biological addilivcs or oxid;ntls
Settling basin surfaces • Partial nlicrubial cleconlpusiliull ❑ Liquid drainage front settled solids
• Mixing while filling . ❑ Remove solids regularly
• Agitatiuu when emptying - --
lvlauure,starry or sludge Agitation when spreading ❑ Boil injection of slurry/sludges
sprendcr outlets Volatile gas emissions p1/ Wash residual mnnurc fromspreacicr after use
O Proven biological additives or oxidnills
Uncovered maum m
e, Volatile gas eissions while ❑ Soil injection of slurry/sludges
slurry ar sludge on field drying ❑ ,Soil incorpornlion within'18 In-s
surfaces C" Spread in thin uuifol'm Inycrs for rapid drying
❑ Proven biologicai nddilives or oxidants
slush tanks Agitation of recycled lagoon ❑ Flush lank covers;
liquid while lacks are filling ❑ t;xlcllcl fill lines to near botlom of hulks with
anti-siphon vcnls - - - - -- — --
Oulslde drain collection Agitation during wastewater ❑ Box covers
or jtlttction boxes conveyance
AMOC-Novcu►ber 11, 1996, Page I /• �. :. 1

--"��— — - Site Specific Prnelices
to Minimize Odor —
` Source C.nlsc
Lift slaliuns Agitation during sump lank Cl Sump tank cuvcrs .
filling and drawdown —
I:nd of drainpipes at 0 Agitation during WasteNvaler C7 I"wend discharge point of pipes MILICnleillh ,
lagoon conveyance lagoon liquid level —
Lagoon surCllccs Volatile gas ciissiou; l'rupct lagoon liquid capacity;
• Biological (nixing., C7 Currecl lagoon startup procedures;
• Agitation El Minimum surface area-lo-volume ratio;
O Minimum ngitnlion Wllcll pumping;
I� r 0 rViecliallical neratioll;
O Proven biulogicnl additives
Irrig,dion sprinkler •, I ligh pressure agitation; O Irrignic on dry days with little or no wind; DV
nozzles Wind drill i O Mininnuu rcconuneilcd operating procedure;
O pump iu(ake near Ingoon liquid surface;
i Cl 1'lnnh front second-stage lagoon;
O Flush residual nlnnure from pipes al end of
slurry/sludge pumpings — — -- �.
Dead animals a Carcass decomposition ('roper disposiliou of carcasses —
Standing water around • Improper drainage; Grade and landscape such llrll water drains
acilities sllaay from facilities
f Microbial decomposition ul'
orgculic inner —
Mud tracked onto public • Poorly maintained access roads O Dann access road maintenance —
roads from farm access -
-�._ Available From : _
Additional Information : _ -- .- — — - — - — NCSU,County Extension Center
,Gattlo Maitre Manngelltent ; 0200 Rule/BMI'Puket NCSU- BAE
Dairy Gducntiollal Unit Manure Mnnagenlent System -Lakc Wheeler(load Field Labornlory ; EBAE- 209-95 NCSU -BAE
La uure !rcmand Storage ; EBAE 103-83
goonDesignand Management for Livestock M a NCSU - BAE
Management of Dairy Wastewater; EBAE IUG-83 NCSU-BAE
Calibratiun of Manure mud Wastewater Application Equipment ; EBAE Fact.Sllcel
Nuisance Concerns in Animal Manure Management: Odors and Flies ;' PRO 107, 1995 Conference Proceedings Florida Cooperative Extension
� l III
I I. li r la
AN4OC-November It, 1996, Page 2

Insect Control Checklist for Animal Operations
Ctluse 115,11's to Con r
Control Insects Site Specific 1' acllces
Source -
- Liquid Systems
j lush Gullcrs Aecuululaliou of solidsO I;luslt system is designed and operated
I
! suflicienlly to remove accumulated solids from
gutters as designed.
I O Itclnove bridging of acclmlulated solids nl
-- t '
� discharge
Lagoons:u►d I'Ils Ousted Solids Mai, t lagoons,settling ha51115 a11L1 ells SVIICI'C :_
pest breeding is apparent to minimize the
crusting orsolids to n depth of no more than G -
8 inches over more than 30%of surface.
Exccssivc Vegelalive Decaying vegettttiun t� Ivlainlain vegetative control along banks of
Growth lagoons and other impoundments to prevcut
accumulation of decaying vegetative ntnller
r,l — along walcr's edge on impoundment's perintcler.— - —
Dry Systems
Feeders heed Spillage I)csign,operate and maintain feed systems(e.g.,
hunkers and [roughs)to minimize the
,ccunndation of decaying wastage.
61 Clean up spillage on n routine basis(e.g.,7 - 10'
day interval during summer; 15-30 day interval
during winter). -- — - --_ —
I heed Storage Accunnllalious Of feed residues 1 Reduce moisture accuuudalion tvilhin and
around inurtediale perimeter of feed storage
areas by insuring drainage away from site
;Ind/or providing adequate containment(e.g.,
i covered bin for brewer's grain and similar high
I
moisture grain prod,ucls).
Cl Inspect for and reinove or break up accumulated
solids in tiller strips-ground feed storage ns
� needed.
AMIC-November 11, 1996, Page I

uurcc Clause -)1's to Miuiulizc Odor- - 5itc 511ccltic rrslcu�cs
Lill s►iiiolls • Agitation during sump lank El Sump lal—�uvcrs
filling and dralwdown•
lied ofdrainpipes at Agilalion during %vaslcwale" I:xlcnd discharge point of pipes underneath
lagoon Conveyance lagoon liquid level
Lago(m surfaces Volatile gas emissions; ❑ Proper Iagooll liquid Capacity;
• Biological mixing; ❑ Correct lagoon startup procedures;
1
• Agilalion ❑ Mininmun surface area-to-vollinlc ratio;
❑ Mimimmil agitation while pumping; I ,l
Cl Mechanical aeration;
1` Cl I'MMI biological addillvcs
Irrigation spl'lllkler •-—1 ligh pic5sure agitation; ❑ Irrigate Oil dry days will) little or no wind;
nozzles 0 Wind drill ❑ Ivtinimnnn recommended operating procedure;
Cl Pump intake near lagoon liquid surface;
❑ 1'unlp from second-stage lagoon
Dead birds a Carcass decompusiliuml ❑ Propel•disposition of carcasses -- _
Dead bird disposal pits • Carcass decomposition Cl Complete Covering of carcasses Ill burial pits; - -—
❑ Proper locatloll/C011structioil of disposal Ails;
❑ Disposal pil Covers light filling v
Standing water around • Improper drainage; - - ❑ Uradc and Ii111dsCilpe s(ICII 111(It\Vi11CI'(11a1115 - -
facilities 0 NIicrohim dccompositiun of away from facilities
organic matter
Mud tracked onto public • Poorly ulainlalined access ruads ❑ I'arn1 access Mild maintenance
roads li-onl farm access -- ---
y - - - --- -
Additional Inform natio Available from
!'oulhy lvlaluue A7auagcment ; 0200 Rule/BrAl' Packet- - NCSU,County L'xlension Cculcr
Poultry Layer Production Facility Manure Managculcnt: I ligll Itise, Deep Pit ; LIlAE 131-qg NCSU-13AE (y
IY
I
i•: Poultry Layer 1'roducfiun I acilily Manure Management; Undercage Flush- Lngoom•I•rea(ment ; EDAE 130-88 NCSU- L3AI's n
-I3AE
1119OOI1 Design and Managcmlcnt fur Livestock Manure Trealnlcill and Storage ; El3Als 103-83 NCSU
' Iibration of lvtanure and Wastewater ADplicalion Equipment; EDA1i Fact Sheet NCSU-[3AL'
ry ; I'S&T Guide No. 19 NCSU-Poultry Science
Proper Disposal of Dead Poult
Nuisance Concerns in Animal Manure Management:Odors and Flies ; PRO 107, 1995 Conference Proceedings Florida Cooperative Extension
AN10C-November I I, 1996, Page 7
( ',J

Suitt-cc Cause Ilii•il's to Control Insects site Sl►ecitie Practices
Animal I lolding Areas Accun►ulatiuns of mnimal xvastcs liliminntc low areas lint U•ap moislRu-e mlong
and feed wastage fences and other locations where waste
accunnilales and disturbance by animals is .
/ n►iuiuml.
® Maiuts►in fence rows and filler strips around
animal 1101din6 IS to n►inimize
accumulations orwastcs ox., inspect for and
remove or break up mccun►tilated solids as
needed).
Dry Manure I landling Accumulations of animal wastes ❑ Iten►ove spillage on a routine basis(e.g.,7 - 10
ly Systemsday interval during Slimmer; 15-30 day interval
during winter)where manure is loaded for land J
applicatimt ur disposal.
❑ Provide for adcqualc drainage around manure
stockpiles.
❑ Inspect Im and remove or break up accumulated
wastes in tiller scrips around stockpiles mud
mauiure handling areas as needed.
or move it►lurmalion Contact the Coolie-;It i ve iixlcnsion Scrvice, Deparlmenl ul*Entomology, Box 76 13,Notth Carulinm Stale University,
Itt►Icigh, NC,27 69 5-7 6 13.
` rt.uNy� , �•�.
' AA•11C-November I I, 1996, I'mgc 2

C) Runoff Controls from Exterior Lots (RC)
Facility with exterior lots
Methods to minimi e-the run off of pollutants from lounging and heavy use areas have been installed as specified
in the plan. -
For facilities without exterior lots, no certification is necessary.
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print):..
Affiliation 4 D/� -AI D S Date Work Completed:
Address (Ag 5 A++e__ 2,7103 Phone No.: 331. 316� 3D
Signature: - - Date:_ �i -
D) Application and Handling Equipment Installation (WUP or 1)
Check the aXropnate block
VI Animal waste application and handling equipment specified in the plan is on site and ready for use;
calibration and adjustment materials have been provided to the owners and are contained as part of the plan.
❑ Animal waste application and handling equipment specified in the plan has not been installed but the owner
has proposed leasing or third party application and has provided a signed contract; equipment specified in
the contract agrees with the requirements of the plan; required buffers can be maintained; calibration and
adjustment guidance have been provided to the owners and are contained as part of the plan:
❑ Conditional approval: Animal waste application and handling equipment specified in the plan has
been purchased and will be on site and installed by __ (month/day/year); there is adequate
storage to hold the waste until the equipment is installed and until the waste can be land applied in
accordance with the cropping system contained in the plan; and calibration and adjustment guidance have
been provided to the owners and are contained as part of the plan.
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print): fa1 -V-s 0—
Affiliation _ N QCS Date Work Completed:—
Address (A y : 2 5ti,. 4-E- t ! s�aau,v (._ 1,7 ZL' Phone No.: !3 31 6�90
Signature: Date:�_Z�3�s7
The following signature block is only to be used when the box for conditional approval in III D
above has been checked.
I (we) certify that I (we) have committed to purchase the animal waste application and handling equipment as
specified in my (our) waste management plan and will submit to DEM a verification of delivery and installation
from a Technical Specialist within 15 calendar days following the date specified in the conditional certification. I
(we)realize that failure to submit this verification is a violation of the waste management plan and will subject me
(us)to an enforcement action from DEM.
Name of Land Owner:
Signature: Date:
Name of Manager (if different from owner):
Signature: Date:
E) Odor Control, Insect Control and Mortality Management (SD. SI, VVUR RC or Fi
Methods to control odors and insects as specified in the Plan have been installed and are operational. The
mortality management system as specified in the Plan has so installed and is operational.
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print):R .
Affiliatio S Date Work-Completed:
Address (Agency)• Ait. (— 2,?2o"S Phone No.: 33y l -G1AJ�
Signature: Date: /� 7/9 Y
AWC -- August 1, 1997
-- �--rc--:-r,-,�r;?Fr?ks;s^,':'�.Rc-..�.w r.+.-:.e.,-A.o-..F,.- ��u.+� ...-r;Cs-.:. x-..�,TC-�...-+-. .;e-...,.r�»r:Ps-^^TM-t�..+r�c.",.'e:>—�m-s-.r-;•'-..-r

,,_�_ �I �.T.
..
...
i
�� _
- _ - �/�-_s_-- 6- �'- - - ---
- - �----- ------�c �2a d .�
�Asa � ------_--
---=- ,---�� --a.�3-S,Ss------ -- - -
,� _
--- --r - - - --
i
� - - --- -
_ - -
I

I
w - '�T
re MB2
''
'� Fe MB3 = aC

.1
' r
r: w
i
-���..�'• 1 .. - :��-Sty{ � e'er � •� �. ! ��

r
Waste Utilization Plan Maps
For: Darrell Wright IN
W E
Map 2 of 2
5
I
roads
hi
660 330 0 660 Feet soils
�. GeB2 tsa _ CDC
bract: 394Zr-�
Tracts:,3991Q
Fe DW6 7
Acres 12.07
1 r Fe F1 •, rr
0 Acres 24.9
FeDW9 —
T4} b�At Acres 12,66 y
•
r IF DW5
L Acres 8.79 qj
Fe F2 • ;`: �`
• � Acres 2.87 •, i
` I�f Fe DW3
Acres 15.82 �=
Fe F3 �
Acres 2.92 •
Z Fe DW4
r� Acres 12.63 f
� r
Ilk
Fe DW7
Acres 4.59 Fe DW2
Acres 15 �e
Fe DWS s
Acres 4.51
L
t •_
Fe DWI
Acres 5.24
i

Waste Utilization Plan Maps
N
For: Darrell Wright
W - 4�E
Map 2of2 !
s
roads
'
660 330 0 660 Feet l soils
wt6 GeC2 YO v
GeC2
BaB
P
I 2�v
Q�
f Me s
Cnr� wtC GaC 1�
t o
W w .� ract: 40tG Ir
III s FeMB2 =
Acres 9.94
WtC w U
z.
GeB2
Fe MB3
I'I GeC2 - -;e
Fe MB7 Acres 20.22
r3t(: ... Acres'24.95 �•n�
I r�
y
WtC
g.4y BaC Cas WtB '
GrsC � O,� GeC2
r
a� BtB2 ��r

SMALL• ,' 0 3a•^ °_ \ s` .y/ HAYEN
d A: f eo c 4� DR. •D ty lYgCR WILLARD ar c
�o+z 9.0� p RD.
£rap• x xuM r
ale z! z GH KAM
E FOX o LL c l v Fc^ J jp a I �IFAUS `'yfp��9 r; i tl•'��
FT J c ti
Rh� I IR E Q• ��,FG QO O D RO. GR EIFJI. � KLE�' - �.$'• a r��=.�, �(I��'l 9 �'A.\�I ALEY.�i
CH.�� D. FRA y �� -_.S•.':�.y. �O _ �P Q
N r a'A GR 5 a
TOW SHIP '
nay 5C pR I Tn •r.-A,:-. "1^ m
r..�Cgo:N,, y ��• '_.ly cy a-a rs 3L� Q z BRUCE p�- - p .•.el;..•. t^� -� _
7 r.t 7ya . •[b g ¢ PUGI{ Gray's'- INGS pZ �, g°• y..
1D- I •�sT �_.. N W
Chapely
A�.-I4lr N po 0 0 �o'" yapo o r�TJ R
2I3f7' o
Tx-
• N
rlard�em�
IL 'i CrI i ROUTH COX OR MARCLIF Ra_ M+4 �y6p5A D p
TO NSH p'°9�Fgl P 4PgG5 �10� ¢ D. I SHADY gapOK rUUtow
AN pPE W $RO ryr
Ort ville Milib ro o aEL ar FIRE J N. Rp cH I� r
�•'n_ Ispaa CLplA_X- DR IS 6, jOR �- r
COLUMBIA
c c < <w I �` DENNY o I` Oe` -m 4RO/ VI 8R s JEWS RD. GOLD a°
4D°Lf .s zil I m°• F- I z �' NELC/s l Pelgyi IEL al
VS i 'o �ofl"".°'2 ON o I RDA, r
Jr . m 1- D�iw c trO�E£ CEDAR FOR fslRID RD ,LjpK
REEKWD RD. 5. 9?
RE GLo 0 R♦IrOLEAfi 'Ap 9� '. i v F4jRrH6Qz WILLIAN PENN4R �° DR 0 yC9 Q° -
- a R fjylLL>ej o� V KEROGE
° O
13
CRp551 CF W NrND 04K 3i• P '4i S°Y �9 EASTERN
R ` K
• K la. BHOQ$ �l 9Q i ELp( , fQ-� OHr RANI o CN. A• 5-
.� _ ��.� 1 �.¢'sr•� �G�3 0 F a 22 y f}t F¢ L c�`'J� `` � w cam'' '� .°'Z 1 c
- RO o - W •' J .� ? 49 RofH i-FO E r I •2`
EON p •D W C DR f � ?
I LypaY. -Oy; LR�"t RIVfR ? m u r' 1724E
a T __Cl dar Fa :`P RaTRD oI-ALLS 4�, D I o°°
° z - '`
9qL y GILESc �� T"E R1CN 1 p ra klintiill R }i°Ks��E'V TOWN ID
DIST, R 1 H 27230 0 o S{0 ; z + c+Qc� T
RD_ �1�'1., �_ 1 •- f N r °a;�
` /J t Easrslarl LTT TRc g• F dap.., ' T/316
r o s o•.�• 22 t^ra
_/II Ns�l�'CRO .. .0�° x R°- eur
"• l S f/ v 3 w E?-'` LDI.�.,i na,' ( .. -�;; SHEE
FOU
RA °P� -i_ o J na'W k DR LENi.iy"_f�y b'4 S6 J,� y7 F Z e�RGE33 FARY
DR b 5 Emt:' Y
..RRE( o$�o' Ida ° ERNESTjo¢� R.
4" R0. COU t 49 NTP <
h' --j A EB RO c�.— 6a Es
w zLNEADOW ISI',,�z• 1=e o-_� W
2.TANGLEW%D CRIS7Y IN D]ANIy,S,PG. ''Oy OT aR TH°RS
I I �GO°�b-ti i 35,'LYAN DR. L�.L" Clfl 9 �CI,I CL
.�.i_ ICJ If a11•T' ole LSwME RIDG[ eGRRe A ppµ DFIEL RIGHtp fL�• - .A� 4
1 _
RD FAµ 9S,q Q2�i_ iLN. .A1 eya POD
r �TyADORIDG PINEW I CO SR4 ON
� '= -Wa°w°oD TDP¢¢ RD pLEY FAR ryr y 1 •u
5 _ I
I arks YYT
9.NEOFIELD W ' �� YDR s :rA
SALISBURY I IpNORWOOff r-^ rpE DTsr y' - 'cro sroadsa
r
27203 r ? 1 0= A dE�NirJ w]O41E"r_ +LrE� 1 1 0
40EASTSIDER FRA IN (NLIIWML FOXR Dn OSrW YDUKG D f z3 I � ~ ��4E, 22
E W I 49
GRA
64 o •P :.�Ne J i-:.
aW $ 1P-w y�E n C AO I, ti Q �
TON HIP`r iv RDCX 4 _ ` 4t
42 tat ""TR. 6vF� cW WIN FORD ?g qq
I I 3 uH i w ql RD.ER °D r
i LIB tip a g�a FALL pNo�RO�o. cYEe�o U-
R ��` D S? I
RCC I .� E °•l� LEE POONS - �Np'•`�' D? hl .�
aA o 011y
ring �a
_
THEL +"` T
R
Llrn E WR4"NTR g /f S RD, S a C1R
p R0.
L
r-1 LOlp � uMg L VI '�'d EL`-Ep u
LO 4TN4M D sACRE55T ACRE-0 BR
BUS ag O ]'PA /C.N4RaVELC J ILE ACRES Grantville QP ? S,D 1 LL W }
'y ? 'PAt OLO `� y�,Pq'O T. / W 'p)',y FIELDS COX RD.
"a4 42 ° �s MpCON Coleri
• °Um TN t4
IAN Ulah
a J 3H Cr<• AO ..y-" Y.�.r:�y_ -• ?= CK. A D w 9 y Z oy,�i� W L SDUTX R p Ra
iD. °' GT. �.•=�y�F -�ti•*s'_% n w � Tn f 9= RD.
. � ��SD' XE Pr. ...=�c•rZ'a-r,2T�•,r ,.? RILT - e o I L� p DOC COLERI
DOETAL N.C:Zoological Park; �, Ig P a C.I O I{AYWORTM p�f-N
I Tc PINED'o r•9! oT"� ,.SPUR 7dM' ^�sli`j::: 9
5L „�� }'- tiFTOWNSHI
RD. a h�o NC.Z00>. •`: a 8 C4 N
NNA Sby ° ti°m 159 EXTRANC LL 'y/Lt Q •�H KEITN DR -
RD-
.s F � ` >� ��`-;Y'a5t�'-.`.' �r z pi t� �a 42 HERRINGTOa�°•
T13A T s�.•• �., o,V Z'
a1RpR+0°'o I,Y00O,,,,,,�pR S - :- 'E" fL7y G• DUENTIN T,I CDUNTRY
R a t'C RplTc�S 0 f �5 I .� •p0 tA' DR. M.
y �� UBpOREs t AF, Q Ol OLD 3 ¢ S 4
I cP� Y 59 9D rgyo Z — III NaCR r
oo
LN DER.. J RD. `yN�o
•. ''Sd42 POWEaPV r1 1 i 9 PC'�y. •� f0 'Al
RD. 1
u
tal '=SSEAGRO4LylELO,p p� gAGyEL o LN L JOEL
P Cx ¢ D.
•� ..�. C15 r3AOT W ,&OFF -r A :.
W ? R0. RD. ti
Y' r;
O"�_ 'MJf,L1LCed 7 W AC CA17COE

- w '
_sue ��.'�: � M:;• r '.w:••
.R
AW11ilh 0 Tschrwlogy k7C. � r• r Afr
. SWk_Fa tltilke t!.SrElr 29n ,1•s• ': "•a"' �' ..rr.... -
RaMlyry
wv.w�yelrrrataxarn �� �"r`
Wright Farm " ; • �'-'_ '' -
south
Flnld wid 5etbadit Map "" * ,LiC 11451
' '
'{ni t:".t•..Pre: r - - .. 4 '.' 3.5 ac.
2.4 at.
i.lilf-FgA;�IO�i'Jlil L' -- _
A.
pi
•s!w -� � .�we {...
PAS
- •' :Lx' _ is .. .• - �.
MPMFI
Pond
Surface W ' ; � � �wT •.: r-i`,
e�iD�' � ��Yi,:y,�r•��i+10
Kra'-wZ:�` •yet s, �..
Residience
Setback
'Ur#ace Water 75' _ ; ,:..i•'� : :,'-.:r - . '. r :e�-• L. - : "
- w{G„�'z'�7e+yx"•:>�.� ••,Ff• ;syy�;lL '`.1;..''• s5 r.:'. - •.r.`. 'M
�'�-'`}: :may'�•;.{Y•';� •'i�,�, 1»
i f..,, �Q�•� •S' Tom' :-F= F `r.c �;�•�iF
f•,•. -�. �.e!fl�` �'tri,',:Z•r. ♦ r��{lr!'�-:' � w -F^'i� y4
-Y�-.f �•....:.--.j ~-•1�. .r ..�_.3 f Lam!.�...:� -

74 _
IRN
P•5" V •,�.li.'s9.¢68$
OL
N51
South 3.5 n.
FieIJ and Setback Map 2.4"0 e
r..
i:.aml Poit w.na:Jrn a -
BOBS
r,- 2.9 x, - c
WIZNe
a tiff y r
r
EiC36T
f _
;r
Soli lype5:
. Eliti°,�814A15
� dit��Tatrus FI���lex �� �►. ,.�
9tB atliI-Tarrue OOmpFex
akin
- 2^�d1Fr�rtrrs C4rlle3t '
.�FlAUBF>r8r p }°
I t&41'r 6 WL-n ldkee SaNs
r �
Leyand Gn&-tam Si f Lmrm yr
C7 iB7d Gac-Gotg owuo Silt L6mm
= C�E1.RG+�g�rw rip t
:Sni Y76g 6 sift
loam RJ
Lmm
.`� _ — � !'hsF374+10ck1antxrrg Frey Laarn
LU=J4ci9r
� . s�"� N7ifJ.lyyrglr-E-Is:,n C.�i�,�nx

Attachment 2: RUSLE and P-Index Documentation

02/14/2011 16:06 9192331970 AGRI—VJASTE TECHHOLOG PAGE 02/02
Phosphorus Loss .Assessment Toot completlon
Name of Facility: i �` — Facility Number: qk
Owner(s)Name: 1"t _ i?hvn.e No: 3
� - 1$
Mailing Address: 41
74
Check the appropriate box helow,and sign at the bottom:
9"No fields received a high.or very high rating.
O Yes,the fields listed below received a High or very high rating:
Field Number ^_ Size(Acres;,— Ra.tin it 1.1 .g ,of Ver HigL
Please use as many additional attachment forms(PLAT-A-I 15-05)as needed,for additional fields.
By completing the above section and any additionai attachments and by signing this form, the facility
owner and Technical Specialist ac,kn.owledge all application, fields were evaluated using the. Phosphorus
Loss Assessment Tool. All necessary calculations were completed to conduct the Assessment. .A copy wi li
he kept on site witlt the Certif.led Animal Waste Mana.gcnaent Plan, Any fixture modifications must he
approved by a technical specialist and filod with the Soil and NVater Conservation District prior to
implementa.tiun. Waste plans with fields having a. high or very high rating will have to be modified to
address phosphonis loss by the next permit cycle beginning July, 2007.
Owner Name: r�c:�
PiG:� Owner Signature:
hate:
Technical ;pecia.list Name:
Technical.Specialist Signature: ---- _Date: - ,_- I 1
AfFilia.tion.: �j. Ph[�ne No: �.. ���,��•
Submit this form to:
NC Di-vision of Water Quality
Aquifer Protection section �
Animal Feeding Operations Unit — SEA
1636 Mail Service Center �
R.ateiglr,NC 27699-1(M
PLAN'-I2-15-05
.Q ] f

Wright Farms P-Index
Field Crop P-Level Soil Type Est Slope A*'Mal r i Kf T HSG L El Sub P P
C' adtoi' A
PH1 Fes 45 Badin 1 230 0.37 0.3 2 B 0.14 0.027 110 0.62 0.62 0.16
BH3 Fes 301 Georgeville 3 230 0.49 0.4 4 B 0.38 0.027 110 0.5 0.5 0.47
SH4 Fes 275 Georgeville 3 230 0.49 0.4 4 B 0.38 0.027 110 0.5 0.5 0.47
Bob1 Corn 329 Badin 5 230 0.37 0.3 2 B 0.65 0.109 110 0.41 0.595 2.91
Bob2 Corn 353 Georgeville 3 230 0.49 0.4 4 B
eville 3 0.39 0.109 110 0.47 0.705 2.76
Bob3 Corn 346 Geor
9 230 0.49 0.4 4 B 0.39 0.109 110 0.47 0.705 2.76
NS1 Corn 50 Georgeville 3 230 0.49 0.4 4 B 0.39 0.109 110 0.47 0.705 2.76
NS2 Corn 41 Georgeville 3 230 0.49 0.4 4 8
NI-1 Fes 53 Georgeville 3 0.38 0.027 110 0.5 0.705 2.76
g 230 0.49 0.4 4 B 0.38 0.027 110 0.5 0.5 0.47
NI-2 Fes 54 Georgeville 3 230 0.49 0.4 4 B 0.38 0.027 110 0.5 0.5 0.47
RH1 Fes 51 Georgeville 3 230 0.49 0.4 4 B 0.38 0.027 110 0.5 0.5 0.47
HR1 Fes 249 Badin 3 230 0.37 0.3 2 B 0.38 0.027 110 0.5 0.5 0.35
HR3 Fes 189 Badin 3 230 0.37 0.3 2 B 0.38 0.027 110 0.5 0.5 0.35
WH1 Corn 179 Badin 1 230 0.37 0.3 2 B 0.14 0,109 110 0.73 0.855 0.90
WH2 Corn 112 Georgeville 3 230 0.49 0.4 4 B 0.39 0.109 110 0.47 0.705 2.76
WH3 Corn 176 Georgeville 3 230 0.49 0.4 4 B 0.39 0.109 110 0.47 0.705 2.76
DGW1 Fes 345 Georgeville 3 230 0.49 0.4 4 B 0.38 0.027 110 0.5 0.5 0.47
DGW2 Fes 338 Callison/Georgeville 2 230 0.49 0.4 4 B 0.26 0.027 110 0.5 0.5 0.32
DGW3 Fes 445 Georgeville 3 230 0.49 0.4 4 B 0.38 0.027 110 0.5 0.5 0.47
DGW4 Fes 238 Georgeville 5 230 0.49 0.4 4 B 0.62 0.027 110 0.5 0.5 0.77
DGW5 Fes 336 Georgeville 5 230 0.49 0.4 4 B 0.62 0.027 110 0.5 0.5 0.77
DGW6 Fes 210 Georgeville 3 230 0.49 0.4 4 B 0.38 0.027 110 0.5 0.5 0.47
AM Fes 88 Mechlenburg 3 230 0.28 0.22 2 C 0.38 0.027 110 0.5 0.5 0.26
BM Fes 295 Carbonton/Georgeville 5 230 0.49 0.4 4 B 0.62 0.027 110 0.5 0.5
BH2 Fes 355 Georgeville 3 0.77
9 230 0.49 0.4 4 B 0.38 0.027 110 0.5 0.5 0.47
HR4 Fes 274 Georgeville 5 230 0.49 0.4 4 B 0.62 0.027 110 0.5 0.5 0.77
MW1 Fes 46 Georgeville 3 230 0.49 0.4 4 B 0.38 0.027 110 0.5 0.5 0.47
MW2 Fes 45 Georgeville 5 230 0.49 0.4 4 B 0.62 0.027 110 0.5 0.5 0.77
MW3 Fes 47 Georgeville 5 230 0.49 0.4 4 B 0.62 0.027 110 0.5 0.5 0.77
Bi Corn 588 Georgeville 3 230 0.49 0.4 4 B
0.39 0.109 110 0.47 0.705 2.76

't
'ANAT Version: 2.02
" .AT Results For: Randolph 12/9/2010 2:56:01 PM
�- INPUTS
,a� _.,dar Year: 2010
aunty: Randolph
?reducer Identifier:
rTact Number:
Field Number: WH1
3o.il Series : BaB: Badin-Tarrus complex, 2 to 8 percent slopes
'rop: Corn (Silage) : Conventional Tillage
Fertilizers: Dairy-Lagoon liquid
Yearly Applied Amount: 1 aC in
Lb P205: 77.58 lb
Application Method: Incorporated-5 wks to 3 mos
Eollowing application
3aI Loss: .9 t/ac/yr
leceiving Slope Distance 50-99 ft
3o'Ll Test 0" - 8" 179
WV_Factor (DATABASE) 1. 1
;ydrologic Condition: GOOD
OUTPUTS
PARTICULATE P = 7
30 LUBLE P = 7
:.E� :ATE P = 0
;0URCE P = 3
­TAL P RATING = 17 (LOW)

'•C:ANAl' Version: z.ul
-LAT Results For: Randolph 12/9/2010 2 :56:40 PM
INPUTS
.,dar Year: 2010
�ounty: Randolph
Producer Identifier:
tract Number:
Field Number: WH2
Soil Series: GaB: Georgeville silt loam, 2 to 8 percent slopes
�'_^op: Corn (Silage) : Conventional Tillage
?rtilizers: Dairy-Lagoon liquid
Yearly Applied Amount: 1 ac in
Lb P205: 77.58 lb
following application Application Method: Incorporated-5 wks to 3 mos
Soil Loss: 2 . 76 t/ac/yr
Receiving Slope Distance 50-99 ft
Soil Test 0" - 8" 112
WV Factor (DATABASE) 1. 1
lydrologic Condition: GOOD
OUTPUTS
"ARTICULATE P = 12
3 LUBLE P = 5
:ATE P = 0
SOURCE P = 3
POTAL P RATING = 20 (LOW)

i.AT Results For: Randolph 12/9/2010 2:57: 11 PM
INPUTS
:a,, far Year: 2010
:01unty: Randolph
Producer Identifier:
tract Number:
Field Number: WH3
3o:il Series : GaB: Georgeville silt loam, 2 to 8 percent slopes
Corn (Silage) : Conventional Tillage
?e:rtilizers : Dairy-Lagoon liquid
Yearly Applied Amount: 1 ac in
Lb P205: 77.58 lb
Application Method: Incorporated-5 wks to 3 mos
.U-Llowing application
Soil Loss : 2.76 t/ac/yr
teceiving Slope Distance 50-99 ft
Soil Test 0" - 8" 176
WV Factor (DATABASE) 1. 1
ydrologic Condition: GOOD
OUTPUTS
'%RTICULATE P = 18
>OLUBLE P = 7
Ef. '?ATE P = 0
ioURCE P = 3
'OTAL P RATING = 28 (MEDIUM)

'._kT Results For: Randolph 12/9/2010 2:23:36 PM
INPUTS
"a dar Year: 2010
'ounty: Randolph
?reducer Identifier:
react Number:
.ield Number: NLl
ao:il Series: GaB: Georgeville silt loam, 2 to 8 percent slopes
;rop: Fescue (Pasture) :
'ertilizers: Dairy-Lagoon liquid
Yearly Applied Amount: 1 ac in
Lb P205: 77.58 lb
Application Method: Incorporated-5 wks to 3 mos
-a Llowing application
3eil Loss : . 47 t/ac/yr
�ec:eiving Slope Distance 50-99 ft
30 1L1 Test 0" - 4" 53
WV Factor (DATABASE) 1. 1
iydrologic Condition: GOOD
OUTPUTS
?ARTICULATE P = 1
1UBLE P = 1
-ATE P = 0
f
'OURCE P = 1
70TAL P RATING = 3 (LOW)

.-_AT Results For: Randolph 12/9/2010 2:24:00 PM
INPUTS
ak far Year: 2010
lounty: Randolph
Producer Identifier:
Cract Number:
Field Number: NL2
coil Series: GaB: Georgeville silt loam, 2 to 8 percent slopes
Irop: Fescue (Pasture) :
Fertilizers: Dairy-Lagoon liquid
Yearly Applied Amount: 1 ac in
Lb P2O5: 77.58 lb
Application Method: Incorporated-5 wks to 3 mos
following application
Toil Loss : .47 t/ac/yr
deceiving Slope Distance 50-99 ft
3o.il Test 0" - 4" 54
WV—Factor (DATABASE) 1.1
hydrologic Condition: GOOD
OUTPUTS
.z-UITICULATE P = 1
,nLUBLE P = 1
,E" '.ATE P = 0
SOURCE P = l
'OTAL P RATING = 3 (LOW)

AT Results For: Randolph 12/9/2010 3.18 •53 PM
INPUTS APR 0-12019
=a 3ar Year: 2010 v:O•-:L-!a '
�oui�cy: Randolph
Producer Identifier:
tract Number:
Field Number: MW1
3.oil Series: GaB: Georgeville silt loam, 2 to 8 percent slopes
"rop: Fescue (Pasture) :
Fertilizers: Dairy-Lagoon liquid
Yearly Applied Amount: 1 ac in
Lb P205: 77.58 lb
Application Method: Incorporated-5 wks to 3 mos
`ollowing application
3o:il Loss: .47 t/ac/yr
7ec,eiving Slope Distance 50-99 ft
Soil Test 0" - 4" 46
WV Factor (DATABASE) 1. 1
lydrologic Condition: GOOD
OUTPUTS
'ARTICULATE P = 1
n71UBLE P = 0
,� 'ATE P = 0
:_/;_DACE P = 1
OTAL P RATING = 2 (LOW)

:-AT Results For: Randolph 12/9/2010 3:19: 14 PM
INPUTS
Sad Jdar Year: 2010
-aunty: Randolph
Producer Identifier:
Fract Number:
Field Number: MW2
Soil Series: GaB: Georgeville silt loam, 2 to 8 percent slopes
Irop: Fescue (Pasture) :
Fertilizers: Dairy-Lagoon liquid
Yearly Applied Amount: 1 ac in
Lb P2O5: 77.58 lb
Application Method: Incorporated-5 wks to 3 mos
following application
Soil Loss: .77 t/ac/yr
deceiving Slope Distance 50-99 ft
nail Test 0" - 4" 45
WV_Factor (DATABASE) 1.1
iydrologic Condition: GOOD
OUTPUTS
,ARTICULATE P = 1
SOLUBLE P = 0
GE' 'ATE P = 0
DOURCE P = 1
rDTAL P RATING = 2 (LOW)

- ' AT Results For: Randolph 12/9/2010 3:19:34 PM
INPUTS
f�
Idar Year: 2010
r,u icy: Randolph
Producer Identifier:
Pract Number:
Field Number: MW3
ao.Ll Series: GaB: Georgeville silt loam, 2 to 8 percent slopes
:rop: Fescue (Pasture) .
Fertilizers : Dairy-Lagoon liquid
Yearly Applied Amount: 1 ac in
Lb P205: 77.58 lb
Application Method: Incorporated-5 wks to 3 mos
Eollowing application
Soil Loss : .77 t/ac/yr
2eceiving Slope Distance 50-99 ft
io:Ll Test 0" - 4" 47
WV—Factor (DATABASE) 1. 1
lydrologic Condition: GOOD
OUTPUTS
'ARTICULATE P = 1
;OLUBLE P = 0
,E.T -ATE P = 0
;OURCE P = 1
'OTAL P RATING = 2 (LOW)

:--.:. T Results For: Randolph 12/9/2010 3:20:37 PM
INPUTS
lad 3ar Year: 2010
1O uil-cy: Randolph
Producer Identifier:
Tract Number:
yield Number: B1
3o=il Series: GaB: Georgeville silt loam, 2 to 8 percent slopes
;rop: Corn (Silage) : Conventional Tillage
?e_rtilizers: Dairy-Lagoon liquid
Yearly Applied Amount: 1 ac in
Lb P2O5: 77.58 lb
Application Method: Incorporated-5 wks to 3 mos
ollowing application
Soil Loss : 2.76 t/ac/yr
keceiving Slope Distance 50-99 ft
Sail Test 0" - 8" 588
WV Factor (DATABASE) 1. 1
1-111drologic Condition: GOOD
OUTPUTS
'ARTICULATE P = 54
;OLUBLE P = 25
,E' - ,?ATE P = 0
;CURCE P = 3
'OTPAL P RATING = 82 (HIGH)

PLAT Results For: Randolph 12/9/2010 2:57:59 PM
INPUTS
Ca,; Lr Year: 2010
,tufty: Randolph
Producer Identifier:
Tract Number:
Field Number: DGWl
Soil Series: GaB: Georgeville silt loam, 2 to 8 percent sloPes
:�rop: Fescue (Pasture) :
Fertilizers: Dairy-Lagoon liquid
Yearly Applied Amount: 1 ac in
Lb P2O5: 77.58 lb
Application Method: Incorporated-5 wks to 3 mos
Eollowing application
Soil Loss : .47 t/ac/yr
leceiving Slope Distance 50-99 ft.
7o.il Test 0" - 4" 345
WV Factor (DATABASE) 1.1
zydrologic Condition: GOOD
OUTPUTS
PARTICULATE P = 6
3,0LUBLE P = 3
'jzTE P = 0
SOURCE P = 1
OCTAL P RATING = 10 (LOW)

-:.'kT Results For: Randolph 12/9/2010 2:58:35 PM
INPUTS
�a', dar Year: 2010
t
'ounty: Randolph
producer Identifier:
Pract Number:
Fifald Number: DGW2
3o:il Series: GaB: Georgeville silt loam, 2 to 8 percent slopes
,rop: Fescue (Pasture)
?ertilizers: Dairy-Lagoon liquid
Yearly Applied Amount: 1 ac in
Lb P205: 77.58 lb
Application Method: Incorporated-5 wks to 3 mos
'o-Llowing application
�o-L1 Loss : .32 t/ac/yr
teceiving Slope Distance 50-99 ft
30i'_1 Test 0" - 4" 338
WV—Factor (DATABASE) 1. 1
Iydrologic Condition: GOOD
OUTPUTS
tTICULATE P = 4
OLUBLE P = 3
,T., ATE P = 0
OURCE P = 1
'07"AL P RATING = 8 (LOW)

_-AT Results For: Randolph 12/9/2010 2:59:35 PM
INPUTS
:afar Year: 2010
�a unty: Randolph
?roducer Identifier:
Cr'act Number:
Field Number: DGW4
7o:il Series: GaB: Georgeville silt loam, 2 to 8 percent slopes
-rop: Fescue (Pasture)
Fertilizers: Dairy-Lagoon liquid
Yearly Applied Amount: 1 ac in
Lb P205: 77.58 lb
Application Method: Incorporated-5 wks to 3 mos
Eollowing application
Soil Loss : .77 t/ac/yr
keceiving Slope Distance 50-99 ft
)oil Test 0" - 4" 238
WV Factor (DATABASE) 1. 1
iydrologic Condition: GOOD
OUTPUTS
'ARTICULATE P = 7
%J'USLE P = 2
jF 'ATE P = 0
30URCE P = 1
=AL P RATING = -10 (LOW)

=...AT Results For: Randolph 12/9/2010 3:13:34 PM
INPUTS
far Year: 2010
�ounty: Randolph
Producer Identifier:
Tract Number:
Field Number: DGW5
30.il Series: GaB: Georgeville silt loam, 2 to 8 percent slopes
'rop: Fescue (Pasture)
?e:rtilizers: Dairy-Lagoon liquid
Yearly Applied Amount: 1 ac in
Lb P205: 77.58 lb
Application Method: Incorporated-5 wks to 3 mos
°o'1 lowing application
io-L1 Loss : .77 t/ac/yr
deceiving Slope Distance 50-99 ft
Soil Test 0" - 4" 336
WV—Factor (DATABASE) 1. 1
;_-irclogic Condition: GOOD
OUTPUTS
'ARTICULATE P = 10
;OLUBLE P = 3
,E . ATE P = 0
OURCE P = 1
'OTAL P RATING = 14 (LOW)

' .:AT Results For: Randolph 12/9/2010 3:14:07 PM
INPUTS
ae
�a,IAar Year: 2010
oulity: Randolph
Producer Identifier:
tract Number:
Field Number: DGW6
Soil Series: GaB: Georgeville silt loam, 2 to 8 percent slopes
Irop: Fescue (Pasture) :
Fertilizers: Dairy-Lagoon liquid
Yearly Applied Amount: 1 ac in
Lb P2O5: 77.58 lb
Application Method: Incorporated-5 wks to 3 mos.
Eo.11owing application
3o.i1 Loss: .47 t/ac/yr
Receiving Slope Distance 50-99 ft
3o.il Test 0" - 4" 210
WV Factor (DATABASE) 1.1
3ydrologic Condition: GOOD
OUTPUTS
'?ARTICULATE P = 4
30RUBLE P = 2
E ATE P = 0
3oOP CE P = 1
6rAL P RATING = 7 (LOW)

-°T.,kT Results For: Randolph 12/9/2010 2:24:56 PM
INPUTS
:a: far Year: 2010
�ouisty: Randolph
Producer Identifier:
tract Number:
Pi=.old Number: HR1
Toil Series: GaB: Georgeville silt loam, 2 to 8 percent slopes
'rop: Fescue (Pasture)
?e:rtilizers: Dairy-Lagoon liquid
Yearly Applied Amount: 1 ac in
Lb P205: 77.58 lb
Application Method: Incorporated-5 wks to 3 mos
Following application
3oi1 Loss: . 35 t/ac/yr
ieceiving Slope Distance 50-99 ft
foil Test 0" - 4" 249
WV Factor (DATABASE) 1.1
iydrologic Condition: GOOD
OUTPUTS
'ARTICULATE P = 3
SOLUBLE P = 2
ATE P = 0
')OURCE P = 1
'OTAL P RATING = 6 (LOW)

;.,AT Results For: Randolph 12/9/2010 2:25: 31 PM
INPUTS
ar Year: 2010
�o u_.cy: Randolph
?roducer Identifier:
Pract Number:
field Number: HR3
3o:il Series: BaB: Badin-Tarrus complex, 2 to 8 percent slopes
�r=gyp: Fescue (Pasture) .
Fertilizers: Dairy-Lagoon liquid
Yearly Applied Amount: 1 ac in
Lb P2O5: 77.58 lb
Application Method: Incorporated-5 wks to 3 mos
Following application
3o:L1 Loss : .35 t/ac/yr
teceiving Slope Distance 50-99 ft
3oi1 Test 0" - 4" 189
WV_Factor (DATABASE) 1. 1
Pyrdrologic Condition: GOOD
OUTPUTS
)ARTICULATE P = 3
OLUBLE P = 2
,E- `?ATE P = 0
4
0 0RCE P = 1
."TAL P RATING = 6 (LOW)

:IAT Results For: Randolph 12/9/2010 3: 18: 17 PM
INPUTS
rafdar Year: 2010
�orluty: Randolph
?roducer Identifier:
tract Number:
{ield Number: HR4
3cil Series: GaB: Georgeville silt loam, 2 to 8 percent slopes
:rop: Fescue (Pasture)
-7ertilizers: Dairy-Lagoon liquid
Yearly Applied Amount: 1 ac in
Lb P2O5: 77.58 lb
Application Method: Incorporated-5 wks to 3 mos
Llowing application
,oil Loss : . 77 t/ac/yr
�ec:eiving Slope Distance 50-99 ft
,oil Test 0" - 4" 274
WV Factor (DATABASE) 1. 1
fydrologic Condition: GOOD
OUTPUTS
'ARTICULATE P = 8
: LUBLE P = 3
,E- -- ATE P = 0
OURCE P = 1
'OTAL P RATING = 12 (LOW)

- ',AT Results For: Randolph 12/9/2010 3:15:44 PM
INPUTS
,aj` �ar Year: 2010
:aunty: Randolph
?xoducer Identifier:
bract Number:
Field Number: BHI
3o:il Series: Ga.B: Georgeville silt loam, 2 to 8 percent slopes
'rop: Fescue (Pasture)
Fertilizers: Dairy-Lagoon liquid
Yearly Applied Amount: 1 ac in
Lb P205: 77.58 lb
Application Method: Incorporated-5 wks to 3 mos
Eo-llowing application
io-il Loss : .77 t/ac/yr
keceiving Slope Distance 50-99 ft
ia:il Test 0" - 4" 295
WV-Factor (DATABASE) 1. 1
' -drologic Condition: GOOD
OUTPUTS
31IRTICULATE P = 8
SOLUBLE P = 3
;E' ATE P = 0
3U-URCE P = 1
COTAL P RATING = 12 (LOW)

- 'AT Results For: Randolph 12/9/2010 3:17:44 PM
INPUTS
:as dar Year: 2010
20iiaty: Randolph
Producer Identifier:
Tract Number:
Field Number: BH2
32oil Series: GaB: Georgeville silt loam, 2 to 8 percent slopes
'rop: Fescue (Pasture) :
Fertilizers: Dairy-Lagoon liquid
Yearly Applied Amount: 1 ac in
Lb P2O5: 77.58 lb
Application Method: Incorporated-5 wks to 3 mos
following application
3o:il Loss: . 47 t/ac/yr
deceiving Slope Distance 50-99 ft
3o:il Test 0" - 4" 355
WV—Factor (DATABASE) 1. 1
hydrologic Condition: GOOD
OUTPUTS
j6.RTICULATE P = 6
3OLUBLE P = 4
.i' ?ATE P = 0
iOCJRCE P = 1
'OTAL P RATING = 11 (LOW)

'--AAT Results For: Randolph 12/9/2010 3:15:04 PM
INPUTS
dar Year: 2010
'ciunty: Randolph
?xoducer Identifier:
tract Number:
Field Number: AH1
fail Series: MaC: Mecklenburg loam, 8 to 15 percent slopes
'rop: Fescue (Pasture)
Fertilizers: Dairy-Lagoon liquid
Yearly Applied Amount: 1 ac in
Lb P205: 77.58 lb
Application Method: Incorporated-5 wks to 3 mos
Eollowing application
coil Loss : .26 t/ac/yr
Receiving Slope Distance 50-99 ft
3o.il Test 0" - 4" 88
WV Factor (DATABASE) 1.2
zrtificial Drainage System: NO
iydrologic Condition: GOOD
OUTPUTS
?ARTICULATE P = 1
;OLUBLE P = 2
=74 ATE P = 0
30URCE P = 2
(VOTAL P RATING = 5 (LOW)

- .kT Results For: Randolph 12/9/2010 2:24:24 PM
INPUTS
ati dar Year: 2010
'01111ty: Randolph
Producer Identifier:
L'ract Number:
Field Number: RH1
Soil Series: GaB: Georgeville silt loam, 2 to 8 percent slopes
:rop: Fescue (Pasture)
?ertilizers: Dairy-Lagoon liquid
Yearly Applied Amount: 1 ac in
Lb P2O5: 77.58 lb
Application Method: Incorporated-5 wks to 3 mos
.ollowing application
3flil Loss: .47 t/ac/yr
teceiving Slope Distance 50-99 ft
coil Test 0" - 4" 51
WV_Factor (DATABASE) 1. 1
iydrologic Condition: GOOD
OUTPUTS
,ARTICULATE P = 1
'07 UBLE P = 1
E ATE P = 0
DACE P = 1
'�,,"'AL P RATING = 3 (LOW)

PLAT Results For: Randolph 12/9/2010 2:22:55 PM
INPUTS
vai dar Year: 2010
70u: �,y: Randolph
Producer Identifier:
Tract Number:
Field Number: NS2
Soil Series : GaB: Georgeville silt loam, 2 to 8 percent slopes
�rop: Corn (Silage) : Conservation Tillage - high residue
Fertilizers: Dairy-Lagoon liquid
Yearly Applied Amount: 1 ac in
Lb P205: 77.58 lb
Application Method: Incorporated-5 wks to 3 mos
Eollowing application
3o:il Loss: 2. 76 t/ac/yr
tec,eiving Slope Distance 50-99 ft
3a-L 1Test 0" - 4" 41
WV_Factor (DATABASE) 1. 1
ivdrologic Condition: GOOD
OUTPUTS
'ARTICULATE P 4
;rjj UBLE P = 1
,FT FATE P = 0
RC,E P = 1
.n-TAL P RATING = 6 (LOW)

-TAT Results For: Randolph 12/9/2010 2:22:28 PM
INPUTS
Cam;, dar Year: 2010
:�ointy: Randolph
Producer Identifier:
Tract Number:
Field Number: NS1
Soil Series: GaB: Georgeville silt loam, 2 to 8 percent slopes
:�rop: Corn (Silage) : Conservation Tillage - high residue
Fertilizers: Dairy-Lagoon liquid
Yearly Applied Amount: 1 ac in
Lb P205: 77.58 lb
Application Method: Incorporated-5 wks to 3 mos
following application
Soil Loss : 2.76 t/ac/yr
Deceiving Slope Distance 50-99 ft
Soil Test 0" - 4" 50
WV_Factor (DATABASE) 1. 1
3Ydrologic Condition: GOOD
OUTPUTS
?ARTICULATE P = 5
i,,LUBLE P = 1
ATE P = 0
>uTJRCE P = 1
'OTAL P RATING = 7 (LOW)

-.AT Results For: Randolph 12/9/2010 2:21: 58 PM
INPUTS
vat ar Year: 2010
lod.ur_y: Randolph OR '12019
Producer Identifier:
Tract Number:
Field Number: BOB3 v,.�:.��.�PC'3w!'7^7'�``�`��
Soil Series: GaB: Georgeville silt loam, 2 to 81percent slopes
�rop: Corn (Silage) : Conservation Tillage - high residue
- _> rtilizers: Dairy-Lagoon liquid
Yearly Applied Amount: 1 ac in
Lb P205: 77.58 lb
Application Method: Incorporated-5 wks to 3 mos
following application
io:il Loss : 2.76 t/ac/yr
3eceiving Slope Distance 50-99 ft
3o-il Test 0" - 4" 346
WV Factor (DATABASE) 1.1
iydrologic Condition: GOOD
OUTPUTS
-ARTICULATE, P = 36
;6LUBLE P = 5
,i' - -ATE P = 0
,0,7RCE P = 1
70`927 L P RATING = 42 (MEDIUM)

""..AT Results For: Randolph 12/9/2010 2:21:25 PM
INPUTS
�e -N
=. Uar Year: 2010
Randolph
Producer Identifier:
Fract Number:
Field Number: BOB2
3o.il Series: GaB: Georgeville silt loam, 2 to 8 percent slopes
'rop: Corn (Silage) : Conservation Tillage - high residue
ie-rtilizers: Dairy-Lagoon liquid
Yearly Applied Amount: 1 ac in
Lb P205: 77.58 lb
Application Method: Incorporated-5 wks to 3 mos
-ollowing application
Soil Loss : 2. 76 t/ac/yr
tec:eiving Slope Distance 50-99 ft
3J;L1 Test 0" - 4" 353
WV Factor (DATABASE) 1.1
- lrologic Condition: GOOD
OUTPUTS
.=CULATE P = 36
;OLUBLE P = 5
Z -ATE P = 0
!n-URCE P = 1
OTAL P RATING = 42 (MEDIUM)

AT Results For: Randolph 12/9/2010 2:20:30 PM
INPUTS
C dar Year: 2010
CoWity: Randolph
Producer Identifier:
Tract Number:
Field Number: BOB1
Soil Series: BaB: Badin-Tarrus complex, 2 to 8 percent slopes
:rop: Corn (Silage) : Conservation Tillage - high residue
Fertilizers: Dairy-Lagoon liquid
Yearly Applied Amount: 1 ac in
Lb P2O5: 77.58 lb
Application Method: Incorporated-5 wks to 3 mos
following application
Soil Loss : 2. 91 t/ac/yr
Receiving Slope Distance 50-99 ft
3o.il Test 0" - 4" 329
WV-Factor (DATABASE) 1. 1
iydrologic Condition: GOOD
OUTPUTS
ARTICULATE P = 42
30LUBLE P = 5
'F.- - ATE P = 0
'OURCE P = 1
- AL P RATING = 48 (MEDIUM)

-AT Results For: Randolph 12/9/2010 2:19:30 PM
INPUTS
:a �dar Year: 2010
vA_cy: Randolph
Producer Identifier:
Tract Number:
Field Number: BH4
Soil Series: GaB: Georgeville silt loam, 2 to 8 percent slopes
�rop: Fescue (Hay) :
Fertilizers: Dairy-Lagoon liquid
Yearly Applied Amount: 1 ac in
Lb P2O5: 77 .58 lb
Application Method: Incorporated-5 wks to 3 mos
[allowing application
3ai1 Loss: .47 t/ac/yr
deceiving Slope Distance 50-99 ft
Soil Test 0" - 4" 275
WV Factor (DATABASE) 1.1
1177drologic Condition: GOOD
OUTPUTS
PARTICULATE P = 5
�VJLUBLE P = 2
rn- '-ATE P = 0
f
:_URCE P = 1
-7TAL P RATING = 8 (LOW)

''.AT Results For: Randolph 12/9/2010 2:18 :47 PM
INPUTS
'a;, dar Year: 2010
�ora.L.Lty: Randolph
?reducer Identifier:
Cract Number:
?field Number: BH3
,oil Series: GaB: Georgeville silt loam, 2 to 8 percent slopes
'rop: Fescue (Hay) .
?e;rtilizers: Dairy-Lagoon liquid
Yearly Applied Amount: 1 ac in
Lb P2O5: 77.58 lb
Application Method: Incorporated-5 wks to 3 mos
o:Llowing application
Soil Loss : .47 t/ac/yr
teceiving Slope Distance 50-99 ft
3o:Ll Test 0" - 4" 301
WV-Factor (DATABASE) 1. 1
iydrologic Condition: GOOD
OUTPUTS
'r,RTICULATE P = 5
'^LUBLE P = 3
-ATE P = 0
I0I7RCE P = 1
'oTAL P RATING = 9 (LOW)

=' .AT Results For: Randolph 12/9/2010 2: 17:53 PM
INPUTS
2a;E dar Year: 2010
�nunty: Randolph
Producer Identifier:
Pract Number:
Field Number: PH1
Soil Series: BaB: Badin-Tarrus complex, 2 to 8 percent slopes
:rop: Fescue (Hay) .
Fertilizers: Dairy-Lagoon liquid
Yearly Applied Amount: 1 ac in
Lb P2O5: 77.58 lb
Application Method: Incorporated-5 wks to 3 mos
Following application
Soil Loss : .16 t/ac/yr
keceiving Slope Distance 50-99 ft
soil Test 0" - 4" 45
WV Factor (DATABASE) 1. 1
-:-drologic Condition: GOOD
OUTPUTS
-HRTICULATE P = 0
30 LUBLE P = 0
;E ATE P = 0
310URCE P = 1
COTAL P RATING = 1 (LOW)

".:-1T Results For: Randolph 12/9/2010 2:59:01 PM
INPUTS
;a; tiar Year: 2010
.ours cy: Randolph
?reducer Identifier:
Cract Number:
ield Number: DGW3
foil Series: GaB: Georgeville silt loam, 2 to 8 percent slopes
kop: Fescue (Pasture) .
ertilizers: Dairy-Lagoon liquid
Yearly Applied Amount: 1 ac in
Lb P205: 77.58 lb
Application Method: Incorporated-5 wks to 3 mos
!allowing application
Vi_l Loss: .47 t/ac/yr
Zec:eiving Slope Distance 50-99 ft
3ni_1 Test 0" - 4" 445
WV Factor (DATABASE) 1. 1
odrologic Condition: GOOD
OUTPUTS
'ARTICULATE P = 8
:vLUBLE P = 4
,E- - -ATE P = 0
,cXM CE P = 1
'OTAL P RATING = 13 (LOW)

Attachment 2: Sample Analysis

NCDA&C' comic Division Phone:[phone] Web site:www.ncagr.gov/agrop Report::WO3215
Grower., Wright,Darrell/David Copies to:
3540 Wright Farm Ln.*
l Franldinville,NC 27248
5, F
Waste Analysis Report Fann:
Received: 10/21/2010 Completed: 10/27/2010 Links to Helpful Information Randolph County
Sample Information Laboratory Results(parts per million unless otherwise noted)
Sample ID: N P K Ca Mg S Fe Mrr, Zn Ca B MO Cl C
DW310 Total 327 121 308 371 154 56.3 39.3 4.42 3.99 1.01 0.79
INN
Waste code: ,NH4
LSD NO3 Na Ni Cd Pb Al Se Li pH SS C.N DM% CCE% ALE(K
Description: OR-N 112 7.53
Daisy Llq.Slum Urea
R end•i on : Nutrients Available for First Crop MOM allons Other Elements lbs/1000 gallons
Application Method N P205 K20 Ca Mg S Fe Ma Zn Cu B Mo Cl Na Ni Cd Pb Al Se M
Broadcast 1.2 1.6 2.5 2.2 0.90 0.33 0.23 0.03 0.03 0.01 T 0.93
Completed: 10/25/2010
Sample Information Laboratory Results(parts per million unless otherwise:noted)
Sample ID: N P K Ca Mg S Fe Mr: Z71 Cu B MD Cl C
JDW110 Total 37038 11817 27023 17162 6358 6270 562 502 471 314 47.9
IN-N
Waste Code: -NH4
HLB -NO3 Na Ni Cd Pb Al Se Li pH SS ON DM% CGB% ALE(tons)
Description: OR-N 8346 82.84
Broiler House Urea
Recommendations: _ _ _ _ Nutrients Available for First Crop lbs/ton wet basis Other Elements lbs ton wet basis
Application Method N P205 K20 Ca Mg S Fe Mn Zn Cu B MO Cl Na Ni Cd Pb Al Se M
Broadcast 27.6 26.9 43.0 17.1 6.3 6.2 0.56 0.50 0.62 0.42 0.05 13.8
North th Carolina
Reprogramming of the laboratory-information-management system that makes this report possible is being funded
through a grant from the North Carolina Tobacco Trust Fund Commission.
Thank you for using agronomic services to manage nutrients and safeguard environmental quality.
lobaccu I rust F uncl(:usrtm6ssiun -Steve Troxler,Commissioner ofAgriculture
i
I

NCDA&(, unomle Division Phone:[phone] Web site:www.ncagir.gov/agror Report No: 11944
,.�,H,. Grower.• Wright,Darrell/David Copies To:
r 3540 Wright Farm Ln.*
.T Franklinville,NC 27248
` rgl Aq
p
A oil Test Report
SERVING N.C.RESIDENTS FOR OVER 60 YEARS Farm:
Received: 10/22/2010 Completed: 11/03/2010 Links to H.el:iful_Infor_mation Randolph County
Agronomist Comments
Field Information Applied`Lime Recommendations _ I
Sample No. Last Crop Mo Yr T/A Crop or Year Lime N P205 K20 Mg S Cu Zu B Mn See Note 1
DW2 3 2010 1.0 1st Crop: Corn,Silage .7T 180-220 0 0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 i
2nd Crop: Small Grains 0 80-100 0 0 0 0 0 0 .0 0
Test Results
Soil Class HM% W/V CEC BS% Ac pH P-I K I Ca% Mg% Mn-I Mn-AI(1) Mn-AI(2) Zn-I Zn-AI Cud S-I SS-I NO3 N 1VH4-N Na
MIN 0,41 0.92 8.8 77.0 2.0 5.2 238 213 47.0 18.0 582 366 359 427 427 544 60 0.1
Field Information Applied Lime Recommendations
Sample No. Last Crop Mo Yr T/A Crop or Year Lime N P205 K20 Mg S Cu Zn B Mn See Note
DW3 3 2010 1.0 ist Crop: Corn,Silage 0 180-220 0 0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 1
2nd Crop: Small Grains 0 80-100 0 0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 1
Test Results
Soil Class HM% W/V GEC BS% Ac pH P-I If I Ca% Mg% Mn-1 Mn-AI(I) Mn-AI(2) Zn-I Zn-AI Ca-1 S-I SS-1 NO3-N NH4-N Na
MIN 0.32 1.10 7.5 79.0 1.6 5.6 196 178 47.0 20.0 906 567 560 361 361 423 43 0.1
Field•Information Applied Lime Recommendations
Sample No. Last Crop Mo Yr T/A Crop or Year Lime N PZ05 K20 Mg S GU Zn B Mn See Note
DW4 3 2010 1.0 1st Crop: Corn,Silage .6T 180-220 0 0 0 0 0 0 ,0 0
2nd Crop: Small Grains 0 80-100 0 0 0 0 0 0 .0 0
Test Results
Soil Class HM% W/V CEC BS% Ac pH P-I K-I Ca% Mg% Mn-1 Mn-AI(1) Mn-AI(2) Zn-I Zn-AI Cu-1 S-1 SS-1 NO3-N AW4-N Na
MIN 0.51 0.92 9.2 78.0 2.0 5.4 193 138 52.0 19.0 463 295 288 323 323 _423 47 0.1
Field Information Applied lime Recommendations
Sample No. Last Crop Mo Yr T/A I Crop or Year Lime N P205 K20 Mg S Cu Zu B Mn See Note
DW5 3 2010 1.01 1st Crop: Corn,Silage .6T 180-220 0 0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 1
i
2nd Crop: Small Grains 0 80-100 0 0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 i
Test Results
Soil Class HM% W/V CEC BS% Ac pH P-I K-I Ca% Mg% Mn-1 Mn-AI(1) Mn-AI(2) Zn-I Zn-AI Cu-I S-I SS-1 NO3-N NH4-N Na
MIN 0.51 0.94 9.5 79.0 2.0 5.4 197 140 52.0 19.0 501 318 311 333 333 438 49 0.1
1

NOW" ►nomic:Division Phone:[phone] Web site;www.ncagrr.gov/agw � Grower: Wright,DarreWDavid Report No: 11944 Pg 2
Fieldlnfofmation Applied Lime. Recommendations `
Sample No. Last Crop Mo Yr T/A Crop or Year Lime N P205 K20 Mg S Cn Zn B Mn See Note
DW6 3 2010 1.0 lsl Crop: Corn,Silage .6T 180-220 0 0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 y
2nd Crop: Small Grains 0 80-100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 i
Test Results
Soil Class HM% W/V CEC BS96 Ac pH P-I K-I Ca% Mg% Mn-1 Mn-AI(l) Mn-AI(2) Zu-I Zn-AI Cu-1 S-I SS-1 NO3-N NH4-N Na
MIN 0.56 0.92 9.5 79.0 2.0 5.4 197 142 52.0 19.0 463 295 288 330 330 450 50 0.1
Field Information Applied Lime Recommendations
Sample No. Last Crop Mo Yr T/A Crop or Year Lime N P205 K20 Mg S Cu Zn B Mn See Note
DW7 3 2010 1.0 1st Crop: Corn,Silage 1T 180-220 0 0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 i
2nd Crop: Small Grains 0 80-100 0 0 0 0 0 0 .0 0
Test Results
Soil Class HM% W/V CEC BS% Ac pH P-I K I Ca% Mg% Mn-I Mn-AI(T) Mn-AI(2) Zn-I Zn-AI Cu-I S-I SS-1 NO3-N NH4-N Na
MIN 0.60 0.95 10.1 76.0 2.4 5.1 228 134 51.0 18.0 593 373 366 545 545 494 51 0.2
Field Information Applied-Lime Recommendations _
Sample No. Last Crop Mo Yr T/A Crop or Year Lime N P205 K20 Mg S Cu Zn B Mn See Note
DW8 3 2010 1.0 1st Crop: Corn,Silage 1T 180-220 0 0-20 0 0 0 0 .0 0 ,ii
2nd Crop: Small Grains 0 80-100 0 0 0 0 0 0 .0 0
Test Results
Soil Class HM% W/V CEC BS% Ac pH P-I K I Ca% Mg% Mn-1 Mn-AI(1) Mn-AI(2) Zn-I Zn-AI Cu-I S-I SS-1 NO3-N NH4-N Na
MIN 0.56 0.86 8.9 74.0 2.3 5.0 191 112 49.0 19.0 771 480 473 451 451 545 48 0.1
Field Information Applied Lime Recommendations
Sample No. Last Crop Mo Yr T/A Crop or Year Lime N P205 K20 Mg S Cu Zn B Mn See Note
DW9 3 2010 1.0 1st Crop: Corn,Silage 0 180-220 0 0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 yi
2nd Crop: Small Grains 0 80.100 0 0 0 0 0 0 .0 0
Test Results
Soil Class HM96 W/V CEC BS% Ac pH P-I K-I Ca% Mg% Mn-1 Mn-AI(i) Mn-AI(2) Zu-I Zn-Ai Cn-I S-I SS-1 NO3-N NH4-N Na
MIN 0.32 1.07 7.7 79.0 1.6 5.6 190 181 47.0 20.0 877 549 542__ 352 352 423 42 0.1
Field Information Applied Lime Recommendations
Sample No. Last Crop Mo Yr T/A Crop or Year Lime N P205 K20 Mg S Cu Zu B Mn See Note
SHOE 4 2010 1.0 1st Crop: Corn,Silage 0 180-220 0 60-80 0 0 0 0 .0 pH$
2nd Crop: Small Grains 0 80-100 0 20-40 0 0 0 0 .0 pH$
Test Results
Soil Class HM% W/V CEC BS% Ac pH P-I K-I Ca% Mg% Mn-1 Mn-AI(1) Mn-AI(2) Zn-I Zn-AI CO-1 S-I SS-1 'NO3-N NH4-N Na
MIN 0.32 0.96 10.4 90.0 1.0 6.6 14o 61 61.0 26.0 176 113 106 351 351 259 32 0.0

NCDA& gnomic Division Phone:[phone] Web site:warw.ncagr.gov/agrot Grower: Wright,Darrell/David Report No: 11944 Pg 3
Field'In&rination Applied Lime 'Recommendations
Sample No. Last Crop ' Mo Yr T/A Crop or Year Lime N P205 K20 Mg S Cu Zn B Mn See Note
PHI 3 2010 1.0 1st Crop: Fes/OG/Pim,E LIT 50-70 40-60 0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 12
2nd Crop: Fes/OG/rim,M 0 120-200 20-40 0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 12
Test Results
Soil Class HM% W/V CEC BS% Ac pH P-I K-I Ca% Mg% Mn-I Mn-AI(1) Mn-AI(2) Zn-I Zn-AI Cu-I S-I SS-1 NO3-N NH4-N Na
MIN 0.22 0.90 9.0 82.0 1.6 5.2 45 136 54.0 21.0 161 106 1o6 329 329 354 225 0.1
Field Information Applied Lime Recommendations
Sample No. Last Crop Mo Yr T/A Crop or Year Lime N P205 K20 Mg S Cu Zu B Mn See Note
BH3 4 2010 1.0 1st Crop: Fes/OG/rim,E 1.3T 50-70 0 0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 J2
2nd Crop: Fes/OG/TIm,M 0 120-200 0 0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 12
Test Results
Soil Class HM% W/V CEC BS% Ac pH P-I K I Ca% Mg% Mn-I Mu-AI(1) Mn-AI(2) Zn-I Zn-Al CO-1 S-I SS-1 NO3-N NH4 N Na
MIN 0.46 0.85 10.6 82.0 1.9 5.5 301 116 58.0 18.0 209 135 135 550 550 560 39 0.1
_Field Information Applied Lime Recommendations
Sample No. Last Crop Mo Yr T/A Crop or Year Lime N P205 K20 Mg S Cu Zn B Mn See Note
BH4 4 2010 1.0 1st Crop: Fes/OG/rim,E .7T 50-70 0 30-50 0 0 0 0 .0 0 12
2nd Crop: Fes/OG/Tim,M 0 120-200 0 60.8o 0 0 0 0 .0 0 i2
Test Results
Soil Class HM% W/V CEC BS% Ac pH P-I K-I Ca% Mg% Mn-I Mn-AI(2) Mn-AI(2) Zn-I Zn-AI Cu-1 S-I SS-1 NO3-N NH4-N Na
MIN 0.51 0.91 11.0 88.0 1.3 5.9 275 32 66.0 2i.o 193 125 125 731 731 497 31 0.1
Field Information Applied Lime Recommendations_
Sample No. Last Crop Mo Yr T/A Crop or Year Lime N P205 K20 Mg S Cu Zn B Mn See Note
BOBI 3 2010 1.0 1st Crop: Corn,Silage 0 180-220 0 0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 1
2nd Crop: Small Grains 0 80-100 0 0 0 0 0 0 .0 0
Test Results
Soil Class HM% W/V CEC BS% Ac pH P-I K-I Ca% Mg% Mn-I Mn-AI(1) Mn-AI(2) Zn-I Zn-AI CO-I S-I SS-1 NO3-N NH4-N Na
MIN 0.46 0.95 11.4 89.0 1.2 5.9 329 157 64.0 19.0 227 155 148 419 419 265 67 0.2
Field information Applied Lime Recommendations _
Sample No. Last Crop Mo Yr T/A Crop or Year f Lime N P205 K20 Mg S Cu Zn B Mn See Note
BOB2 3 2010 1.0 1st Crop: Corn,Silage 0 180-220 0 0-20 0 0 0 0 .0 0 i
2nd Crop: Small Grains 0 80-100 0 0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 1
Test Results
Soil Class HM% W/V CEC BS% Ac pH P-I K-I Ca% Mg% Mn-I Mn-AI(1) Mn-AI(2) Zn-1 Zn-Al Cral S-I SS-1 NO3-N NH4-N Na
MIN 0.51 1.00 10.0 86,0 1.4 5.7 353 128 63.0 17.0 383 251 244 325 325 144 72 0.2

NCDA&C' inomic.Division Phone:(919)733=2655 Web site:www.ncagr.gov/agroi. Grower: Wright,Darrelt(Dayid Report No: 11944 Pg 4
Field Information Applied Lime. Recommendations.
Sample No. Last Crop Mo Yr T/A Crop or Year Lime N P205 K20• Mg S Cu Zn B Mn See Note
BOB3 3 2010 1.0 1st Crop: Corn,Silage 0 180-220 0 0 0 0 0 0 .0 0
2nd Crop: Small Grains 0 80-100 0 0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 Y
Test Results
Soil Class HM% W/V CBC BS% Ac pH P-1 K-1 Ca% Mg% Mn-1 Mn-AI(1) Mn-AI(2) Zn-I Zn-Al Cu-1 8-1 SS-1 NO3 N NH4-N Aa
MIN . 0.51 0.96 11.5 88.0 1.4 5.7 346 131 66.0 17.0 243 167 160 490 490 430 57 0.1
Field Information Applied Lime, Recommendations
Sample No. Last Crop Mo Yr T/A Crop or Year Lime N P205 K20 Mg S Cu Zn B Mn See Note
NS1 3 2010 1.0 1st Crop: Corn,Silage .5T 180-220 30-50 0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 1
2nd Crop; Small Grains 0 80-100 20-40 0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 i
Test Results
Soil Class HM% W/V CBC BS% Ac pH P-1 K-I Ca% Mg% Mn-i Mn-AI(1) Mn-AI(2) Zn-1 Zn-AI Cu-I S-1 SS-1 NO3-N NH4-N Na
MIN 0.32 0.94 9.2 83.0 1.6 5.2 50 139 54.0 21.G 168 118 ill 352 352 370 237 0.1
Field Information Applied Lime Recommendations
Sample No. Last Crop Mo Yr T/A Crop or Year Lime N P205 K20 Mg S Cu Zu B Mn See Note
NS2 3 2010 1.0 1st Crop: Corn,Silage .6T 180-220 50-70 0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 1
2nd Crop; Small Grains 0 80-100 30-50 0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 i
Test Results
-i
Soil Class HM% W/V CBC BS% Ac pH P-I K-1 Ca% Mg% Mn-1 Mn-AI(1) Mn-AI(2) Zn-1 Zn-AI Cu-I S-1 SS-1 NO3-N N714-N Na
MIN 0.32 o.94 9.3 81.0 1.8 5.2 41 141 52.0 21.0 156 ill 104 316 316 338 252 0.1
' Field.anformation. Applied Lime Recommendations
Sample No. Last Crop Mo Yr T/A Crop or Year Lime N P205 K20 Mg S Cu Zn B Mn See Note
NU 4 2010 1.0 1st Crop: Fes/OG/fim,E 1.2T 50-70 30-50 0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 12
2nd Crop: Fes/OG/Tim,M 0 120-200 10-30 0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 12
Test Results
Soil Class HM% W/V CBC BS% Ac PH P-I K-1 Ca% Mg% Mn-1 Mn-AI(1) Mn-AI(2) Zn-1 Zn-AI Cu-1 S-I SS-1 NO3 N NH4-N Na
MIN 0.32 0.90 9.1 81.0 1.7 5.2 53 139 53.0 21.0 175 114 114 353 353 416 233 0.1
Field information Applied Lime. Recommendations
Sample No. Last Crop Mo Yr T/A Crop or Year Lime N P205 K20 Mg S Cu Zn B Mn See Note
NI.2 4 2010 1.0 1st Crop: Fes/OG/Tim,E LIT 50-70 30-50 0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 12
2nd Crop: Fes/OG/Tim,M 0 120-200 10-30 0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 t?
Test Results
Soil Class HM% W/V CEC BS% Ac pH P-I K-1 Ca% Mg% Mn-1 Mn-AI(T) Mn-AI(2) Zn-1 Zn-Al Cu-1 S-1 SS-1 NO3-N NH4-N Na
MIN 0.22 0.90 9.1 82.0 1.6 5.1 54 139 54.0 21.0 179 117 117 368 368 420 221 0.1

NCDUVld 1A, .tation Applied Lime Recommendations comic Division Phone:.[phone] Web site:www.ncagr.gov/agroyd Grower: Wright,.Darrell/David Report'Nor.11944 pg 7
Fie "
Sample No. Last Crop Mo Yr T/A Crop or Year Lime N P205 K20 Mg S Cu Zn B Mn See Note
DGW5 3 2010 1.0 lst Crop: Fes/OG/rim,E .9T 50-70 0 0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 12
2nd Crop: Fes/OG/TIm,M 0 120-200 0 0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 12
Test Results --
Soil Class HM% W/V CEC BS% Ac pH P-I K I CA Mg% Mn-1 Mn-AI(1) Mn-AI(2) Zn-1 Zn-AI Cti-1 S-I SS-1 NO3-N NH4-N Na
MIN 0.41 0.90 12.5 88.0 1.5 5.8 336 136 63.0 20.0 259 165 165 974 974 770 46 0.1
Field information Applied Lime Recommendations
Sample No. Last Crop Mo Yr T/A Crop or Year Lime N P205 K20 Mg S Cu Zu B Mn See Note
DGW6 3 2010 1.0 1st Crop: Fes/OG/rim,E 1T 50-70 0 0 0 0 0 0 ,0 0 1'2
2nd Crop: Fes/OG/Tim,M 0 120-200 0 0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 12
Test Results
Soil Class HM% W/V CEC BS% Ac pH P-I K-I Ca% Mg% Mn-1 Mn-AI(Y) Mn-AI(2) Zn-1 Zn-AI Cu-1 S-1 SS-1 NO3-N NH4-N Na
MIN 0,51 0.99 8.4 81.0 1.6 5.7 210 138 57.0 16.0 354 222 222 382 382 317 35 0.1
Field Information Applied Lime, Recommendations
Sample No. Last Crop Mo Yr T/A Crop or Year Lime N P205 K20 Mg S Cu Zn B Mn See Note
AHl 1 4 2010 1.0 1st Crop: Fes/OG/rim,E 1AT 50-70 0 10-30 0 0 0 0 .0 0 12
2nd Crop: Fes/OG/TIm,M 0 120-200 0 50-70 0 0 0 0 .0 0- 12
Test Results -
Soil Class HM% W/V CEC BS% Ac pH P-I K-1 Ca% Mg% Mn-1 Mn-AI(1) Mn-AI(2) Zn-I Zn-AI Cu-1 S-1 SS-1 NO3-N NN4-N Na
MIN o.41 0.90 8.3 76.0 2.0 5.4 88 38 54.0 20.0 319 201 201 262 262 392 29 0.1
Field Information Applied Lime Recommendations
Sample No. Last Crop Mo Yr T/A Crop or Year Lime N P205 K20 Mg S Cu Zu B Mn See Note
BHi 4 2010 1.0 1st Crop: Fes/OG/rim,E 1.2T 50-70 0 0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 12
2nd Crop: Fes/OG/rim,M 0 120-200 0 0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 12
Test Results
Soil Class HM% W/V CEC BS% Ac pH P-1 K4 Ca% Mg% Mn-1 Mn-AI(1) Mn-AI(2) Zn-I Zn-AI Cu-I S-I SS-1 NO3-N NH4-N Na
MIN o.46 0.93 12.0 85.0 1.8 5.8 295 119 61.o 19.0 496 307 307 6o6 606 474 41 _ 0.1
Field Information Applied Lime Recommendations
Sample No. Last Crop No Yr T/A Crop or Year Lime N P205 K20 Mg S Cu Zn B Mn See Note
BH2 4 2010 1.0 1st Crop: Fes/OG/rim,E 1.7T 50-70 0 0 0 0 0 0 ,0 0 12
2nd Crop: Fes/OG/rim,M 0 120-200 0 0 0 0 0 0 ,0 0 12
Test Results f
Soil Class HM% W/V CEC BS% Ac pH P-I K I Ca% Mg% Mn-I Mn-AI(T) Mn-AI(2) Zn-I Zn-AI Cu-1 S-I SS-1 NO3-N 1VH4-N Na
MIN 0.51 0.82 11.5 80.0 2.3 5.3 355 198 56.0 16.0 239 153 153 810 810 493 47 0.1

NCDA&C' - momic Division Phone:[phone] Web site:www.ncagr.gov/agrot Grower: Wright,Darrell/David ReporCNo: 11944 Pg s
Field lnf6r,nation AppliedLime Recommendations
Sample No. Last Crop Mo Yr T/A Crop or Year Lime N P205 K20 Mg S Cu Zn B Mn See Note
HR4 3 2010 1.0 1st Crop: Fes/OG/rim,E IAT 50-70 0 0 0 0 0 0 ,0 0 12
2nd Crop: Fes/OG/rim,M 0 120-200 0 0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 12
Test Results
Soil Class HM% W/V CEC BS•.6 Ac pH P-1 K I Ca% Mg% Mn-I Mn-AI(1) Ma-AI(2) Zn-I Zn-AI Cu-1 S-I SS-1 NO3-N NH4-N Na
MIN 0.41 0.93 11.5 83.0 2.0 5.3 274 141 58.0 19.0 230 147 147 657 657 628 110 0.1
Field Information Applied Lime Recommendations
Sample No. Last Crop Mo Yr T/A Crop or Year Lime N P205 K20 Mg S Cu Zn B Mn See Note
MWl 4 2010 1.0 1st Crop: Fes/OG/rim,E .5T 50-70 40-60 0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 12
2nd Crop: Fes/OG/Tim,M 0 120-200 20-40 0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 12
Test Results
Soil Class HM% W/V CEC BS% Ac pH P-1 KI Ca% Mg% Mn-I Mn-AI(1) Mn-AI(2) Zn-1 Zn-Al Cu-I S-1 SS-1 NO3-N NH4-N Na
MIN 0.18 0.90 9.3 86.0 1.3 6.3 46 155 55.0 23.0 156 103 103 550 350 371 270 0.1
Field'Information Applied Lime Recommendations
Sample No. Last Crop Mo Yr T/A Crop or Year Lime N P205 K20 Mg S Cu Zn B Ma See Note
MW2 4 2010 1.0 1st Crop: Fes/OG/rim,E 1.3T 50-70 40-60 0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 12
2nd Crop: Fes/OG/rim,M 0 120-200 20-40 0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 12
Test Results
Soil Class HM% W/V CEC BS% Ac pH P-I K-1 Ca% Mg% Mu-1 Mn-01) Mn-02) Zn-I Zn-A! Cud S-I SS-1 NO3 N NH4-N Na
MIN 0.22 0.90 9.2 80.0 1.8 5.3 45 142 51.0 21.0 148 98 98 313 313 338 280 0.1
Field Information. Applied Lime Recommendations
Sample No. Last Crop Mo Yr T/A Crop or Year Lime N P205 K20 Mg S Cu Zn B Mn See Note
MW3 4 2010 1.0 1st Crop: Fes/OG/rim,E 1.4T 50-70 40-60 0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 12
2nd Crop: Fes/OG/irn,M 0 120-200 20-40 0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 12
Test Results
Soil Class HM% W/V GEC BS% Ac pH P-1 K-1 Ca% Mg% Mn-1 Mn-AI(1) Mn-AI(2) Zn-1 Zn-AI Cu-1 S-I SS-I NO3 N NH4-N Na
MIN 0.18 0.94 9.7 79.0 2.0 5.3 47 159 50.0 21.0 161 106 106 331 331 362 275 0.1
Field Information Applied Lime Recommendations
Sample No. Last Crop Mo Yr T/A Crop or Year Lime N P205 K20 Mg S Cu Zn B Mn See Note
Bl 4 2010 1.0 1st Crop: Corn,Silage 0 180-220 0 0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 1
2nd Crop: Small Grains 0 80-100 0 0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 i
Test Results
Soil Class HM% W/V CEC BS% Ac pH P-I K-1 Ca% Mg% Mu-1 Mn-AI(I) Mn-AI(2) Zn-1 Zn-AI Cu-1 S-1 SS-1 NO3-N NH4-N Na
MIN 0.46 0.85 14.3 89.0 1.6 6.1 588 134 62.0 22.0 296 193 186 1280 1280 768 80 0.2

pNGD ` momicDivision Phone:[phone]W Web site:www.acagr.gov/agror Grower Wright,Darrell/David Report No: 11944 Pg9
ld Inte_-..,ation Applied Lime Recommendations
Sample No. Last Crop Mo Yr T/A Crop or Year Lime N P20s K20 Mg S Cu Zn B Mn See Note
Fl 3 2010 1.0 Is[Crop: Corn,Silage 0 180-220 0 0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 i
2nd Crop: Small Grains 0 80-100 0 0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 1
Test Results
Soil Class HK% W/V CEC BS% Ac pH P-I K-I Ca% Mg% Mn-1 Mn-AI(1) Mn-02) Zn-1 Zn-AI Cu-1 S-1 SS-1 NO3-N 1VH4-N Na
MIN 0.27 1.00 8.5 79.0 1.8 5.7 139 134 47.0 24.0 1498 920 913 271 271 354 66 0.1
Field Information Applied Lime Recommendations
Sample No. Last Crop Mo. Yr T/A Crop or Year Lime N P205 K20 Mg S Cu Zn B Mn See Note
F2 3 2010 1.0 1slCrop: Corn,silage 0 180-220 0 0-20 0 0 0 0 0 0
2nd Crop: Small Grains 0 80-100 0 0 0 0 0 0 .0 0
Test Results
Soil Class HM96 W/V CEC BS% Ac pH P-1 K-1 Ca% Mg% Mx-1 Mn-AI(1) Mn-02) Zn-I Zn-AI Cu-1 S-I SS-1 NO3-N NH4-N Na
MIN 0.22 1.00 7.7 90.0 0.8 6.4 257 109 57.0 27.0 494 307 300 315 315 277 55 0.1
Field Information Applied Lime Recommendations
Sample No. Last Crop Mo Yr T/A Crop or Year Lime N P205 K20 Mg S Cu Zn B Mn See Note
F3 3 2010 1.0 1st Crop: Corn,Silage 0 180-220 0 0 0 0 0 0 .0 pH$
2nd Crop: Small Grains 0 80-100 0 0 0 0 0 0 .0 pH$
Test Results
Soil Class HM96 W/V CEC BS% Ac pH P-1 K 1 Ca% Mg% Mn-1 Mn-AI(1) Mn-02) Zu-1 Zn-AI Ca-1 S-I SS-1 NO3-N N114 N Na
MIN 0.27 0.95 11.4 95.0 0.6 6.8 188 203 59.0 27.o 417 255 248 321 321 450 55 _ 0.1
Field Information Applied Lime: Recommendations
Sample No. Last Crop Mo Yr T/A Crop or Year Lime N P205 K20 Mg S Cu Zn B Mn See Note
MB1 4 2010 1.0 Ist Crop: Com,Silage 0 180-220 0 40-60 0 0 0 0 .0 pH$
2nd Grop: Small Grains 0 80-100 0 0-20 0 0 0 0 .0 pH$
Test Results
Soil Class HM96 W/V CEC BS% Ac pH P-I K-1 Ca% Mg% Mn-1 Mn-AI(1) Mn-AI(2) Zn-1 Zn-AI Cu-1 S-1 SS-I NO3-N NH4-N Na
MIN 0.27 1.02 10.3 98.0 0.2 7.0 213 76 67.0 27.0 335 203 196 386 386 243 51 0.1
Field Information Applied Lime Recommendations
Sample No. Last Crop Mo Yr T/A Crop or Year Lime N P205 K20 Mg S Cu Zn B Mn See Note
MB2 4 2010 1.0 1st Crop: Corn,Silage 0 180-220 0 20-40 0 0 0 0 .0 pH$ y
2nd Crop: Small Grains 0 80-100 0 0 0 0 0 0 .0 pH$ .
Test Results
Soil Class HM% W/V CEC BS% Ac pH P-I K-1 Ca% Mg% Mn-1 Mn-AI(1) Mn-AI(2) Zn-1 Zn-AI Cu-1 S-I SS-1 NO3-N NH4-N Na
MIN 0.32 1.00 10.8 100.0 0.0 7.2 184 go 69.0 27.0 251 149 142 451 451 199 49 0.1

NOAH" rnomie Division Phone:[phone] Web site:www.!gW.gov/agror Grower: Wright,Darrell/David Report_No: 11944 Pg 10
Field infi►". ation Applied Lime . Recommendations
Sample No. Last Crop Mo Yr T/A Crop or Year Lime N PzOs X20 Mg S Cu Zn B Mn See Note
MB3 4 2010 1.0 1st Crop: Com,Silage 0 180-220 0 40-60 0 0 0 0 .0 pH$
2nd Crop: Small Grains 0 80-100 0 0-20 0 0 0 0 .0 pH$ i
Test Results _
Soil Class HM% W/V CEC BSS6 Ac pH P-I K-I CAMg% Mn-I Mn-AI(1) Mn-AI(2) Zn-I Zn-AI Cu-1 S-I SS-1 No -N NH4-N Na
MIN 0.27 1.01 10.3 98.0 0.2 7.0 216 78 67.0 27:0 333 202 195 385 385 232 49 0.1
Field information Applied Lime Recommendations
Sample No. Last Crop Mo Yr T/A Crop or Year Lime N P205 K20 Mg S Cu Zn B Mn See Note
DWl 3 2010 1.0 1st Crop: Corn,Sitage 0 180-220 0 0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 i
2nd Crop: Small Grains 0 80-100 0 _ 0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 1
Test Results
Soil Class HM% W/V CEC BS106 Ac pH P-I K I Ca% Mg% Mn-I Mn-AI(1) Mn-AI(2) Zn-I Zn-AI Cu-I S-1 SS-I NO3-N NH4-N Na
MIN 0.36 0.98 13.5 91.0 1.2 6.3 335 273 58.0 24.0 239 156 149 564 564 642 66 0.2
L North-Carolina Reprogramming of the laboratory-information-management system that makes this report possible is being funded
through a grant from the North Carolina Tobacco Trust Fund Commission.
...:,
Z�.�' �•;r;,*, � Thank you far using agronomic services to manage nutrients and safeguard environmental quality.
-Steve Troxler,Commissioner of Agriculture
Tobacco Trust Fund Conumsslnn

Version—November 26,2018
Mortality Management Methods
Indicate which method(s) will be implemented.
When selecting multiple methods indicate a primary versus secondary option.
Methods other than those listed must be approved by the State Veterinarian.
Primary Secondary Routine Mortality
a Burial three feet beneath the surface of the ground within 24 hours of knowledge of animal
death. The burial must be at least 300 feet from any flowing stream or public body of water
(G.S.106-403). The bottom of the burial pit should be at least one foot above the seasonal
high water table.Attach burial location map and plan.
a Landfill at municipal solid waste facility permitted by NC DEQ under GS 15A NCAC
13B .0200.
VV Rendering at a rendering plant licensed under G.S. 106-168.7-
Complete incineration according to 02 NCAC 52C .0102.
a A composting system approved and permitted by the NC Department of Agriculture&Con-
sumer Services Veterinary Division (attach copy of permit). If compost is distributed off-farm,
additional requirements must be met and a permit is required from NC DEQ.
In the case of dead poultry only, placing in a disposal pit of a size and design approved by the
NC Department of Agriculture&Consumer Services(G.S. 106-549.70).
Any method which, in the professional opinion of the State Veterinarian, would make possible
the salvage of part of a dead animal's value without endangering human or animal health.
(Written approval by the State Veterinarian must be attached).
Mass Mortality Plan
Mass mortality plans are required for farms covered by an NPDES permit. These plans are
also recommended for all animal operations. This plan outlines farm-specific mortality man-
agement methods to be used for mass mortality. The NCDA&CS Veterinary Division sup-
ports a variety of emergency mortality disposal options; contact the Division for guidance.
• A catastrophic mortality disposal plan is part of the facility's CAWMP and is activated
when numbers of dead animals exceed normal mortality rates as specified by the State
Veterinarian.
• Burial must be done in accordance with NC General Statutes and NCDA&CS Veterinary
Division regulations and guidance.
• Mass burial sites are subject to additional permit conditions (refer to facility's animal
waste management system permit).
• In the event of imminent threat of a disease emergency, the State Veterinarian may enact
additional temporary procedures or measures for disposal according to G.S. 106-399.4.
-_ - 2- 7-/ -
G Si nature of Farm 011p4r .s anager Date
Signature of Technical Specialist Date

Version—November 26,2018
Mortality Management Methods
Indicate which method(s) will be implemented.
When selecting multiple methods indicate a primary versus secondary option.
Methods other than those listed must be approved by the State Veterinarian.
Primary Secondary Routine Mortality
Burial three feet beneath the surface of the ground within 24 hours of knowledge of animal
death. The burial must be at least 300 feet from any flowing stream or public body of water
(G.S.106-403). The bottom of the burial pit should be at least one foot above the seasonal
high water table.Attach burial location map and plan.
Landfill at municipal solid waste facility permitted by NC DEQ under GS 15A NCAC
" r 136 .0200.
Rendering at a rendering plant licensed under G.S. 106-168.7
Complete incineration according to 02 NCAC 52C .0102.
a A composting system approved and permitted by the NC Department of Agriculture&Con-
sumer Services Veterinary Division (attach copy of permit). If compost is distributed off-farm,
additional requirements must be met and a permit is required from NC DEQ.
El D In the case of dead poultry only, placing in a disposal pit of a size and design approved by the
NC Department of Agriculture&Consumer Services(G.S. 106-549.70).
Any method which, in the professional opinioniof the State Veterinarian, would make possible
the salvage of part of a dead animal's value without endangering human or animal health.
(Written approval by the State Veterinarian must be attached).
Mass Mortality Plan
Mass mortality plans are required for farms covered by an NPDES permit. These plans are
also recommended for all animal operations. This plan outlines farm-specific mortality man-
agement methods to be used for mass mortality. The NCDA&CS Veterinary Division sup-
ports a variety of emergency mortality disposal options; contact the Division for guidance.
• A catastrophic mortality disposal plan is part of the facility's CAWMP and is activated
when numbers of dead animals exceed normal mortality rates as specified by the State
Veterinarian.
• Burial must be:done in accordance with NC General Statutes and NCDA&CS Veterinary
Division regulations and guidance.
• Mass burial sites are subject to additional permit conditions(refer to facility's animal
waste management system permit).
• In the event of imminent threat of a disease emergency,the State Veterinarian may enact
additional temporary procedures or measures for disposal according to G.S. 106-399.4.
JAAA_&
Signature of Farm 0 ner/Mpnager Date
Signature of Technical Specialist Date

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
NATURAL RESOURCES CONSERVATION SERVICE
I[- OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE PLAN
PROJECT/FARK
DATE:
• A 4" X 4"treated post,painted white or a 4" diameter schedule 40 PVC pipe with cap
shall be placed at the maximum liquid level at elevation At no time should the
effluent level rise above the maximum liquid level, which is feet level below
the settled top of dam.
• A visual inspection of the waste storage pond will be performed at least twice a year.
The inspector should check the condition of the dam and the emergency spillway. The
inspector will need to look for signs of slope failure and seepage on the back slope and
at the toe of the dam. Also, a very close look will need to be made to check for signs
of damage due to varmint (ground hogs, muskrats, etc.)burrows. A visual inspection
should also be made after heavy rainfall events to ensure that the structure is not
experiencing erosion rills or gullies. Any problems found should be brought to the
attention of the technical specialist for repair recommendations.
• The waste storage pond will need to be mowed twice a year. All eroded areas shall be
repaired and stabilized. Areas that do not have an adequate ground cover shall be
reseeded to provide a vegetative cover sufficient restrain erosion. The dam and all
constructed slopes will need to be fertilized annually with 500 pounds of 10-10-10 per
acre or its equivalent.
• Maintain all waste handling equipment—pumping, loading, hauling, spreading, etc.--
in accordance with the manufacturers specifications.
• All waste application shall be completed in accordance with the waste utilization plan.
The waste storage pond will be emptied at the end of each design storage period
_._, days or months) or as needed due to excess rainfall.
See the attached NC Agricultural Extension.Service Agri-Waste Management
Publication by Dr. James C. Barker for information on sampling and testing of the
effluent.

Mortality Management Methods
(check which method(s) are beinC7 implemented)
Burial three feet beneath the surface of the ground within 24 hours after
knowledge of the death. The burial must be at least 300 feet from any flowing
stream or public bodv of water.
en%eying at a rendering plant licensed under G.S. 106-168.
. y
i-1 Complete incineration
In the case of dead poultry only, placing in a disposal pit of a size and design
approved by the Department of Agriculture
Any method which in the professional opinion animal's ofthe State
alue Veterinarian
Brian eould _
make possible the salvage of part of a dead
human or animal health. (Written approval of the State Veterinarian must be
attached)
J
December 13. 1996
t