760031_Permit Renewal Application 2019_20190410

State of North Carolina
Department of Environmental Quality
Division of Water Resources
Animal Waste Management Systems
Request for Certification of Coverage
Facility Currently covered by an Expiring Sate Non-Discharge General Permit
On September 30, 2019, the North Carolina State Non-Discharge General Permits for Animal Waste Management Systems will
expire. As required by these permits, facilities that have been issued Certificates of Coverage to operate under these State
Non-Discharge General Permits must apply for renewal at least 180 days prior to their expiration date. Therefore, all applications
must be received by the Division of Water Resources by no later than April 3,2019.
Please do not leave any question unanswered. Please verify all information and make any necessary corrections below.
Application must be signed and dated by the Permittee.
1. Farm Number: 76-0031 Certificate Of Coverage Number: AWC760031
2. Facility Name: McCain Dairy
3. Landowner's Name(same as on the Waste Management Plan): William Crai•1 Frazier
4. Landowner's Mailing Address: 1904 Lake Lucas Rd
City: Sophia State: NC Zip: 27350
Telephone Number: 336-629-3 12 Ext. E-mail:
5. Facility's Physical Address: 1904 Lake Lucas Rd
City: Sophia State: NC Zip: 27350
6. County where Facility is located: Randolph
7. Farm Manager's Name(if different from Landowner):
8. Farm Manager's telephone number(include area code):
9. Integrator's Name(if there is not an Integrator,write"None"):
10. Operator Name(OIC): William C.Frazier Phone No.: 336-629-3512 OIC#: 20947
11. Lessee's Name(if there is not a Lessee,write'None"):
12. Indicate animal operation type and number:
Current Permit: Operations Type Allowable Count
Cattle-Dairy Heifer 280
Cattle-Dairy Calf 322
Cattle-Milk Cow 699
Operation Types:
Swine Cattle Dry Poultry Other
Wean to Finish Dairy Calf Non Laying Chickens Horses-Horses
Wean to Feeder Dairy Heifer Laying Chickens Horses-Other
Farrow to Finish Milk Cow Pullets Sheep-Sheep
Feeder to Finish Dry Cow Turkeys Sheep-Other
Farrow to Wean Beef Stocker Calf Turkey Pullet
Farrow to Feeder Beef Feeder
Boar/Stud Beef Broad Cow Wet Poultr%
Gilts Other Non Laying Pullet
Other Layers

13. Waste Treatment and Storage Lagoons (Verify the following information is accurate and complete. Make all necessary
corrections and provide missing data.)
Design
Estimated Liner Type Estimated Freeboard
Structure Date (Clay,Synthetic, Capacity Surface Area "Redline"
Name Built Unknown) (Cubic Feet) (Square Feet) (Inches)
WASTE POND 9 Lr a 215,830.00 1 yQZ
WET STACK Coy yete
42,225.00 q go 0 R2
Mail one (1) copy of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP) with this completed and signed application
as required by NC General Statutes 143-215.10C(d)to the address below.
The CAWMP must include the following components:
1. The most recent Waste Utilization Plan(WUP),signed b% the owner and a certified technical specialist,containing:
a. The method by which waste is applied to the disposal fields(e.g.irrigation,injection,etc.)
b. A map of every field used for land application(for example:irrigation map)
c. The soil series present on every land application field
d. The crops grown on every land application field
e. The Realistic Yield Expectation(RYE)for every crop shown in the WUP
f. The maximum PAN to be applied to every land application field
g. The waste application windows for every crop utilized in the WUP
h. The required NRCS Standard specifications
2. A site map/schematic
3. Emergency Action Plan
4. Insect Control Checklist with chosen best management practices noted
5. Odor Control Checklist with chosen best management practices noted
6. Mortality Control Checklist with selected method noted-Use the enclosed updated Mortality Control Checklist
7. Lagoon/storage pond capacity documentation (design, calculations, etc.) Please be sure the above table is accurate and
complete. Also provide any site evaluations, wetland determinations, or hazard classifications that may be applicable to
your facility.
8. Operation and Maintenance Plan
If your CAWMP includes any components not shown on this list, please include the additional components with your submittal.
(e.g.composting,digesters,waste transfers,etc.)
As a second option to mailing paper copies of the application package, you can scan and email one signed copy of the
application and all the CAWMP items above to: [e-mail]
APR 0 2 201�

I attest that this application has been reviewed by me and is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that,
if all required parts of this application are not completed and that if all required supporting information and attachments are not
included,this application package will be returned to me as incomplete.
Note: In accordance with NC General Statutes 143-215.6A and 143-215.6B, any person who knowingly makes any false statement,
representation, or certification in any application may. be subject.to civil,penalties up to $25,000 per violation. (18 U.S.C.
Section 1001 provides a punishment by a fine of not more than $10,000 or imprisonment of not more than 5 years, or both for
a similar offense.)
Printed Name of Signing Official (Landowner,. or if multiple,_Landowners all landowners should sign. If Landowner is a
corporation,signatures should be by aprprincipal executive officer of the corporation):
Name:
Signature: Date: -
Name: Title:
Signature: Date:
Name: Title:
Signature: _ Date:
THE COMPLETED APPLICATION SHOULD BE SENT TO THE FOLLOWING ADDRESS:
NCDEQ-DWR
Animal Feeding Operations Program
1636 Mail Service Center
Raleigh,North Carolina 27699-1636
Telephone number:[phone]
E-mail:2019Pe rm [e-mail]
FORM: RENEWAL-STATE GENERAL 02/2019

ROY COOPER �+
Governor f` APR
MICHAEL S.REGANI ; � ri 022019
secretary
LINDA CULPEPPER NORTH CAROLINA
Aireetor FnvirunmenratQuaUty
Jr r�`1i.i1
February 26,2019
William Craig Frazier
McCain Dairy
1904 Lake Lucas Rd
Sophia,NC 27350
Subject: Application for Renewal of Coverage for Expiring State General Permit
Dear Permittee:
Your facility is currently approved for operation under one of the Animal Waste Operation State Non-Discharge General Permits,
which expire on September 30, 2019. Copies of the new animal waste operation State Non-Discharge General Permits are available
at hilps://deg.nc.gov/abouVdivisions/water-resources/watgr-qualii%-re iog nal-operations/afo or by writing or calling:
NCDEQ-DWR
Animal Feeding Operations Program
1636 Mail Service Center
Raleigh,North Carolina 27699-1636
Telephone number:[phone]
In order to assure .our continued covemge under the State Non-Discharge General Permits. You must submit an application for
Permit coverage to the Division. Enclosed yQu will find a "Request for Certificate of Coverage Facilit Currently Covered by an
Expiring State Non-Discharge General Permit." The application form must be completed. signed and returned by April
Please note that jou must includt one Ill copy of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP) with the
completed and signed aiinlication form. A list of items included in the CAWMP can be found on page 2 of the renewal
application form.
Failure to request renewal of your coverage under a general permit within the time period specified may result in a civil penalty.
Operation of your facility without coverage under a valid general permit would constitute a violation of NCGS 143-215.1 and could
result in assessments of civil penalties of up to$25,000 per day.
If you have any questions about the State Non-Discharge General Permits, the enclosed application, or any related matter please feel
free to contact the Animal Feeding Operations Branch staff at 919-707-9100.
Sincerely,
Jon Risgaard,Section Chief
Animal Feeding Operations and Groundwater Section
Enclosures
cc(w/o enclosures): Winston-Salem Regional Office,Water Quality Regional Operations Section
Randolph County Soil and Water Conservation District
AFOG Section Central Files-AWC76M
North Ca ra't rta Qepar•.rnernt of Eaev raarr ertte'Q�ca".;"} 10ays�os of Ikater Re_g0U( es
512 N.SaTssbury St.1 1636 Ma; Sevae Cenur I Ra:alt,north Cero;rs 2765E-16aS
ft9.7C7 6WO

Waste 'Utilization Map Ov .-. view
Customer: McCain Dairy
Assisted By: Kelly Whitaker
Randolph SWCD Date:April 15, 2009
I
` I E
\.ELD-DRr� 'I r� 0 2 74
(00 O/ 1
Tract
et`� 5P
ps t 2274 RO
r 9O� OJ� �• Trae 2 4
G
n� �p Tract 11862 • r53'"
0 56 1%,a 5 4 c Tra 22 3 279-
Mij 2
RACE TRACK RD f <POND�pR tylr ra;;;t 2,,..71
Tra 92 71 9 10 '
O�
Tract 227PTract 2270
Q`S 15 .' 04 -
QQ' _
iiact 2270
JR., Tract 227 0 ,,, 2 Tr 2
O 17 1 Tr�ct70 f'a`� 1
O \i
T TO,Q
�LF,p_ ti
19 TORY UV
lip
U0 ract
O" �
9�
Tract 9956~� r t 10 68T 0168 �n
1 8 5 C'
SIL.ZRSPRINGS-RD- Tra 57 J ract35
0, 16
Tra 6 r 9958 4�
Tract 9 S 34 �c
32 }' Tra
5940
Tra 9
I.
Tract Tract 996 TCactc9� f
961
Ct
I 01
RANDOLPH "
THIS MAP WAS PREPARED BY COUNTY,
COUNTY,NC FOR THE ES MAKE
SO WATER
INTERNAL USE, RANDOLPH COUNTY,ITS AGENTS AND EMPLOYEES MAKE yy E
NO WARRANTY AS TO THE CORRECTNESS ORACCURACY OF THE INFORMATION
SET FORTH ON THIS MAP,WHETHER EXPRESSED)OR IMPLIED,IN FACT OR
IN LAW, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION THE IMPLIED WARRANITES OF
MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. — S
MAP IS BASED ON STATE PLANE COORDINATE SYSTEM IN 1983 DATUM.
*0 hilmma I Em 91 P11 I rim 1 inch equals 1,538.34 feet

+' ;� {'�:�•3;:t• �'�;tips!: K'ik=.
Co
N go
NT
Ir
r ia�i{re 1 �,yA{ xw�1�'y� �G
ve
k,4
kkk
r
m
' p' �• .fir. l - Y:•;l.• ..L
•x . ••r w M1 t�:.ir sue;.A' i.�" - � l .��7
if
71
'KY3;- G ''•Ai; y � Sys!� xy ��i.
� L� �.0 "•'-� ••c••i'• •r -' r;� '.j•r+.� �,yti..�- }.,�•`�ti�•, [:.may.
ry _ ry �•' iJ 1.:J.11 '-f r-�"y s ..,": ky'. r i� _ i/�.U�3ti.'
r ..� _. a -]l. '•4'� �v�--..-`� 1 y ��.'': `�.1 Cys -�'r/w yR•r..S° 1, Yam.
Ir
.F, .�'F' , �. .fix -•'s_ s e r.,:ri:i'•,.�r��•�a, ,.�.;'>.x�c,� ,� r
�a rX �icy. ` �yR � Fy4_ �:;.:• ��+.:�• 1 a -
..a'.,_'�: =:,r'�r" •�, tom: :'a• .y,{, _ _ .
i � •
CONSERVATION DISTRICT -• - Me

Waste Utilization Map ,& _if 2
Customer: McCain Dairy
Assisted By: Kelly Whitaker
Randolph SWCD Date:April 13, 2009
*16
: 1 FY3. tT FoxF1��Q,
4
rNm
a.
u
r
>; r
•rr
� ( i
3 s
I�
E A
I
I
RANDOLPH N
THIS MAP WAS PREPARED BY LINTY ITS COUNTY,NC FOR THE ES MWE INr�►TE
INTERNAL USE. RANDOLPH COUNTY, ITS AGENTS AND EMPLOYEES MAKE W�- E
NO WARRANTY AS TO THE CORRECTNESS OR ACCURACY OF THE INFORMATION SOIL &SET FORTH ON THIS MAP,WHETHER EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED,IN FACT OR
IN LAW, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION THE IMPLIED WARRANITES OF b,
MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.
MAP IS BASED ON STATE PLANE COORDINATE SYSTEM IN 1983 DATUM. • ` ` 1 inch equals 800 feet

Customer: McCain Dairy Soils Map 1 of 2
Assisted By: Kelly Whitaker
Randolph SWCD Date: April 15, 2009
g BtB2 B;B2
� BtC2
(Q (TL
tD j BtC2 0
CU9 51
p 39 ac GeB2
o BaD
52 GeB2
10.17 ac. BaB
2
tB 2.52 c.Bt 55m GoE BtB2
56 v1
21.99 ac. jp
55 13
37 ac. G F32 12
5.68 a
11
.28 a 10 GbC w
9 3.78 ac. BM
1.51 ac BtC2
BtB2
BaC
15 14 DoB Do
5.61 ac. .54 ac.
BaC
GeB2 21
.62 ac.
oC 1.41 ac 2. ac 22
hA4.9
20
RvA 19 6.64 ac.
BtC2 ac:
B2 BaD
GoC
BM W BaE
BaD BaC ChA
BaD
GeB BtB2
as BaC
GoE
BaE 3.
BtB2
BaD
RANDoLPH
THIS MAP WAS PREPARED BY COUNTY.
IT COUNTY,NC FOR THE COUNTY'S $� WATER
R W E
INTERNAL USE. TO THE O RECTNESSO AGENTS AND EMPLOYEES MAKE
NO WARRANTY AS TO THE CORRECTNESS ORACCURACY OF THE INFORMATION
SET FORTH ON THIS MAP,WHETHER EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED.IN FACT OR
IN LAW, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION THE IMPLIED WARRANITES OF S
MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.
MAP IS BASED ON STATE PLANE COORDINATE SYSTEM IN 1983 DATUM. • + . 1 inch equals 800 feet

Soils Map 2 of 2
Customer: McCain Dairy
Assisted By: Kelly Whitaker
Randolph SWCD Date:April 15, 2009
BaC
GoE BaE BaC
' BaC
RVA '�--FOXFIELO
Ro-----_o BaC
.55 ac-
BtB2
w
s_r CnA
BaD
37
5.89 ac
5
35a 36
8 4 ac. 43 ac.
BaD 22.46 ac.
BtB2
7 JU
.66 ac
tB2
33 BtB
BtC2 BtC2 0.4 34 ac.
C. 3
0.08 fc*N Bt 2
32 41 2 1
1 9 ae 13.78 ac. - 14.15 ac.
40
GoC 45 a G Bt
BtB2 BaD
BtC2 3s
E
6 75 ac. BaE
s 1 cis. BtB
3 �4
BaCBt 4 6.43 ac. BtC2
24.25 ac.
5 Y pR E.7Fi-
.96 ac.
ik �LP
k'9V SYL-VANW'P�l
6 � Bab
5.28 ac.
z
J
�F GdE
BaD m Ado
m
r
GbC
tC2 BaB 1;ta'o
RANDOLPH IN
THIS MAP WAS PREPARED BY RANDOLPH COUNTY,NC FOR THE COUNTY'S yti/� ,,r���R W )41
yy� E
INTERNAL USE. RANDOLPH COUNTY,ITS AGENTS AND EMPLOYEES MAKE `\/(�/� WATER
NO WARRANTYAS TO THE CORRECTNESS ORACCURACY OF THE INFORMATION
SET FORTH ON THIS MAP,WHETHER EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED,IN FACT OR
IN LAW. INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION THE IMPLIED WARRANITES OF $
MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. -
MAP IS BASED ON STATE PLANE COORDINATE SYSTEM IN 1983 DATUM. , fMd
1 inch equals 800 feet

Customer: McCain Dairy Location dap
Assisted By: Kaitlyn Johnson Date: 2/12/2016 - ncacsp-map_102 - swkcj
Randolph SWCD
??-- ..- k _ }.• rr��
/� I• ; i Y'r-_ f•
+ 'h - McCain Dairy r-
z
L :
�4 �G
r�
2
flQ O. _ •�
c C
� r -
"
THIS MAP WAS PREPARED BY RANDOLPH COUNTY,NC FOR THE COUNTY'S RAN DOLPH
INTERNAL USE. RANDOL O RCOUNTY. ITSECTNESSO AGENTS CCUR AND EMPLOYEES MAKE SOIL & WATER
NO WARRANTY AS TO THE CORRECTNESS OR ACCURACY OF THE INFORMATION
SET FORTH ON THIS MAP,WHETHER EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED, IN FACT OR
IN LAW, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION THE IMPLIED WARRANITES OF $
MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.
MAP IS BASED ON STATE PLANE COORDINATE SYSTEM IN 1963 DATUM.
1 in =400ft

Nutrient Management Plan For Animal Waste .utilization
03-25-2019
This plan has been prepared for: This plan has been developed by:
McCain Dairy Kaitlyn Johnson
Craig Frazier Randolph SWCD
1904 Lake Lucas Road 2222 A S. Fayetteville Street
Sophia, NC 27350 Asheboro, NC 27205
[phone] (3361318-6490
Developer Sigt nture
Type of Plan: Nutrient Management with Both Manure and Fertilizer
Owner/Manager/Producer Agreement
I(we)understand and,agree to the specifications and the operation and maintenance
procedures established in this nutrient management plan which includes an animal
waste utilization plan for the farm named above. I have read and understand the
Required Specifications concerning animal waste management that are included with
this plan.
Signature(owner) Date
Signature(manager or producer) Date
This plan meets the minimum standards and specifications of the U.S.Department of
Agriculture-Natural Resources Conservation Service or the standard of practices
adopted by the Soil and Water Conservation Commission.
Plan Approved By: 3125 f S
TecF 'cal Speci ist Si ature Date
----------------------------------- ---- -- --- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
500173 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 03-25-2019 Cover Page 1

Nutrients applied in accordance with this plan will be supplied from the
following source(s):
Commercial Fertilizer is included in this plan.
U7 McCain Dairy Liquids waste generated 6,519,573 gals/year by a 699 animal Dairy
(Milk Cow)Lagoon Liquid operation.This production facility has waste storage
capacities of approximately 180 days.
Estimated Pounds of Plant Available Nitrogen Generated per Year
Broadcast 4705
Incorporated 7308
Injected 7908
Irrigated 5005
Max. Avail. Actual PAN PAN Surplus/ Actual Volume Volume Surplus/
PAN(lbs)* Applied (lbs) Deficit(lbs) Applied(Gallons) Deficit(Gallons)
Year 1 4,705 7462 -2,757 12,150,003 -5,630,430
Year 2 4,705 1 6797 -2,092 11,066,791 -4,547,218
Year 3 4,705 5307 -602 8,640,104 -2,1205531
U8 McCain Dairy Solids waste generated 8,527.80 tons/year by a 699 animal Dairy(Milk
Cow) Solid operation.
Estimated Pounds of Plant Available Nitrogen Generated per Year
Broadcast 26683
Incorporated 35370
Inj ected N/A
Irrigated N/A
Max. Avail. Actual PAN PAN Surplus/ Actual Quantity Surplus/Deficit
PAN(lbs)* Applied (lbs) Deficit(lbs) Applied(Tons) (Tons)
Year 1 26,683 46825 -20,142 16,087.60 -7,559.80
Year 2 26,683 40576 -13,893 13,940.89 -5,413.09
Year 3 26,683 33251 -6,568 11,424.07 -2,896.27
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Note: In source ID,S means standard source,U means user defined source.
*Max. Available PAN is calculated on the basis of the actual application method(s)identified in the plan for this source.
500173 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 03-25-2019 Source Page 1 of 2

Ul l Calves-57.5%confinement waste generated 759.92 tons/year by a 322 animal Dairy
I(Calf) Solid operation.
Estimated Pounds of Plant Available Nitrogen Generated per Year
Broadcast 3660
Incorporated 4851
Inj ected N/A
Irrigated N/A
Max. Avail. Actual PAN PAN Surplus/ Actual Quantity Surplus/Deficit
PAN(lbs)* Applied (lbs) Deficit(lbs) Applied(Tons) (Tons)
Year 1 3,660 7200 -3,540 1,607.02 -847.10
Year 2 3,660 6908 -3,248 1,541.84 -781.92
Year 3 3,660 4972 -1,312 1,109.87 -349.95
U12 Heifers- 15%confinement waste generated 504.00 tons/year by a 280 animal Dairy
(Heifer) Solid operation.
Estimated Pounds of Plant Available Nitrogen Generated per Year
Broadcast 2427
Incorporated 3218
Injected N/A
Irrigated N/A
Max. Avail. Actual PAN PAN Surplus/ Actual Quantity Surplus/Deficit
PAN(lbs)* Applied obs) Deficit(lbs) Applied(Tons) (Tons)
Year 1 2,427 5567 -3,140 1,242.55 -738.55
Year 2 2,427 5444 -3,017 1,215.23 -711.23
Year 3 2,427 4557 -2,130 1,017.15 -513.15
This plan includes a User Defined Source to determine the total pounds of PAN in lieu
of NRCS Standard values. Refer to North Carolina Cooperative Extension Service publication AG-439-42
entitled"Soil Facts: Use of On-Farm Records for Modifying a Certified Animal Waste Management Plan" for
guidance on using on-farm records to develop a User Defined Source.
------- - - - --------------------------- --- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Note: In source ID, S means standard source,U means user defined source.
*Max.Available PAN is calculated on the basis of the actual application method(s)identified in the plan for this source.
500173 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 03-25-2019 Source Page 2 of 2

Narrative
12/27/2018--Due to significant rain events not allowing for hauling of manure irrigation values were
provided for Tract a9958 Fields 1 and 2 to allow for removal of liquids. (KCJ)
a9958-Field 1-
Corn, Silage-RYE 1 9.1-Applic Period-2/15-6/30-Nitrogen Requirement 204 (lbs/A)-Irrigated-Manure
PA Nutrient Applied(lbs/A)23-Liquid Manure Applied(acre)29.96 (1000 gal/A)Liquid Manure
Applied(Field)422.41 (1000 gals)
Small Graiin, Silage-RYE 8.7-Applic Period-9/1-3/31-Nitrogen Requirement 94(lbs/A)-Irrigated-
Manure PA Nurtient Applied(lbs/A) 14-Liquid Manure Applied(acre) 18.24 (1000 gal/A)Liquid
Manure Applied(Field)257.12 (1000 gals)
Sorghum-Sudan Hay-RYE 3.3 -Applic Period-3/15-8/31-Nitrogen Requirement 159 (lbs/A)-Irrigated-
Manure PA Nutrient Applied(lbs/A) 18-Liquid Manure Applied(acre)23.45 (1000/A)Liquid Manure
Applied(Field)330.58 (1000 gals)
a9958-Field 2-
Corn, Silage-RYE 20.9-Applic Period-2/15-6/30-Nitrogen Requirement 224(lbs/A)-Irrigated-Manure
PA Nutrient Applied(lbs/A) 25-Liquid Manure Applied(acre)32.56 (1000 gal/A)Liquid Manure
Applied(Field)449.37(1000 gals)
Small Graiin, Silage-RYE 9.5-Applic Period-9/1-3/31-Nitrogen Requirement 103 (lbs/A)-Irrigated-
Manure PA Nurtient Applied(lbs/A) 15-Liquid Manure Applied(acre) 19.54(1000 gal/A)Liquid
Manure Applied(Field)269.62 (1000 gals)
Sorghum-Sudan Hay-RYE 3.6-Applic Period-3/15-8/31-Nitrogen Requirement 174 (lbs/A)-Irrigated-
Manure PA Nutrient Applied(lbs/A)20-Liquid Manure Applied(acre)26.05 (1000/A)Liquid Manure
Applied(Field)359.50 (1000 gals)
09/05/2014
This revision of the Animal Waste Management Plan for McCain Dairy is to support a request for
expansion.
New animal numbers for McCain Dairy expansion request: 699 milk cows (includes both milking and
dry cows). 322 calves (partial confinement), 280 heifers(partial confinement).
Milk cows: are 100%confined during 305 day lactation and dry cows are 10%confined during 60 day
dry period. The 699 total milk cow cow number(complete confinement)to include both milking and dry
COWS.
Calves: average 46 calves/100 cows. 699 cows x 46 calves/100 cows=321.5=322 calves.
Calves are 100%confined from 0 -6 months, and 15%confined from 6- 12 months. Weighted Average
calf confinement for planning purposes=57.5%.
Heifers: average 40 heifers/100 cows. 699 cows x 40 heifers/100 cows=279.6=280 heifers.
Heifers are 15%confined during entire 12-24 month period.
------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------------------- -
Preview Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 03-27-2019 Narrative Page 1 of 4

Narrative
Field 15 was re-measured at 6.79 acres using GIS mapping and is reflected in Plan.
Field 7 is currently being used for fescue hay while a waterway is being stablized. Once stablized,the
field will be planted in the corn rotation shown in the plan.
As built Waste Storage Pond volume=215,830 cubic feet. 1 cubic foot=7.48052 gallons. 215,830
cubic feet x 7.48052= 1,614,521 gallons.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FROM THIS POINT FORWARD IS THE ORIGINAL NARRATIVE WITH OUT DATED
INFORMATION. IT REMAINS AS REFERENCE ONLY!
**This plan has been revised to show nutrient utilization of an animal number of 699 head.
This is a dairy operation that has a total of 381 animals currently in confinement (300 milking cows,46
dry cows, and 35 calves).
The operation is located on land that borders Lake Lucas, one of the City of Asheboro's drinking water
supply reservoirs. The waste management system on this farm will primarily consist of all solid waste
being transported to nearby fields and applied to land by spreader(dry waste). Only a small portion of
liquid(including rain runoff)will be collected and applied to fields in waste plan.
The crop rotation used in this plan utilize the planting of corn and soybeans in a drilled(7.5" widths)
mix, sodplanted into small grain stubble. Small grain is planted in the fall before by drilling in 7.5"
widths.Both crops are removed as silage. This plan describes a system that uses only corn silage(no
soybeans mixed) Numbers are not currently available for PAN needs by this mixture of crops. This
waste plan will be revised and begin using this rotation when those numbers become available.
The nutrient uptake by the mixture of crops described above is currently undocumented. Assistance from
the NCDA,thru field samplings of soils and plant tissue is currently underway. Initial indications are
that based on yields of the corn and beans,and the amount of Nitrogen uptake by the plants that is being
seen in the tissue analysis, it is possible that the mixture could require up to 300 pounds of plant
available nitrogen be applied to provide optimum growth. Samples of the soybeans that have been
pulled, show that nodulation is occuring,but the nodules that appear are very small. In a normal soybean
crop,the nodules present would not be able to provide the necessary nitrogen needed to grow the beans.
The application of nitrogen to the crops appears to be "shutting the plant down" in terms of allowing it to
produce nitrogen. The plant will need the nitrogen to be replaced. Due the the tissue analysis indications
and the lack of nodules,this plan is using the Nitrogen requirement for corn. This should allow for
sufficient Nitrogen to sustain the crops as well as eliminate the possibility of there being any excess
nitrogen. Additional tests are being conducted to compare the yield data and tissue analysis. The corn
and soybeans are planted in a mixture together. The two crops are uniformily planted together. They are
havested for silage.
In some cases soybeans are harvested for hay. Since this process is a total removal of the crop,PAN
rates for soybean silage is used.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Preview Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 03-27-2019 Narrative Page 2 of 4

Narrative
Field 8 is located on 2 tracts,but operated as one field. This WUP shows the field as field 8 on tract
9956. Field 56 is also located on multiple tracts. This WUP designates Field 56 on tract 11862
Fields 41, 42,and 43 were added to the CLAMP so that they can receive the low nutrient content waste
from the dairy slurry to help keep the fescue cover alive during summer drought conditions. Grass cover
is critical to maintaining soil integrity for field 41 (surrounding waste storage pond)and fields 42 and 43
(forming roadside cover and grassed drainage areas). Liquid waste will be applied with a honeywagon.
300 cows x 1.96 cu. ft/cow/day x 60 days of storage x 100%confinement=35,280 cu..ft. of storage
needed for waste generated from milk cows for the time they are on the lot.
16 heifers x 1.40 cu. ft/heifer/day x 60 days x 100%confinement=1344cu. ft.of storage needed for
waste generated from heifers for the time they are on the lot.
30 heifers x 1.40 cu. ft/heifer/day x 60 days x 0.083%confinement=209.16 cu. ft. of storage needed for
waste generated from heifers for the time they are on the lot.
35 calves x 0.49 cu. ft./calves/day x 60 days x 100%confinement= 1029 cu. ft. of storage needed for
waste generated from calves for the time they are on the lot.
59 dry cows x 1.4 cu. ft./dry cow/day x 60 days x 0.083%confinement=411 cu. ft. of storage needed for
waste generated from dry cows for the time they are on the lot.
TOTAL STORAGE VOLUME NEEDED: 38,273.16 cu. ft. for 60 days of storage of all waste generated
for all animals.
SOLIDS:
300 cows--35,280 cu. ft(total waste produced for time on the lot for 60 days). x 1.5 cu. ft./cow/day
(solids)/ 1.96 cu. ft./cow/day(total)=27,80 cu. ft. (solids for 60 days)
16 heifers--1344 cu. ft. (total waste produced for time on the lot for 60 days). x 1.08 cu. ft./heifers/day
(solids)/ 1.4 cu. ft./heifer/day(total)= 1,036.8 cu. ft. (solids for 60 days)
30 heifers--209.16 cu. ft. (total waste produced for time on the lot for 60 days). x 1.08 cu. ft./heifers/day
(solids)/ 1.4 cu. ft./heifer/day(total)= 161.35 cu. ft. (solids for 60 days)
35 calves—1029 cu.ft.(total waste produced for time on the lot for 60 days). x0.38 cu. ft./calves/day
(solids)/0.49 cu. ft./calves/day(total)=22.5 cu. ft. (solids for 60 days)
59 dry cows--411 cu. ft. (total waste produced for time on the lot for 60 days). x 1.08 cu. ft./dry cow/day
(solids)/ 1.4 cu. ft./dry cow/day(total)=317 cu. ft. (solids for 60 days)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Preview Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 03-27-2019 Narrative Page 3 of 4

Narrative
{27,180 cu.ft. (cows)+ 1198.15 cu. ft. (heifers)+22.5 cu. ft. (calves)+317 cu. ft. (dry cows)x 6 (no. of
60 day periods in a year= 172,305.9 cu. ft./yr
172,305.9 cu. ft./yr x 62.4 lbs/cu. ft. =10,751,888 lbs./yr
10,751,888 lbs./yr./2000 lbs./ton=5375.9 tons/yr.
5375.9 tons/yr. /440 head= 12.2 tons/head/yr. of solids
LIQUIDS:
COWS: 35,280 cu. ft. (total waste produced for time on lot for 60 days). x 0.46 cu. ft./cow/day(liquid)/
1.96 cu. ft./cow/day(total=5,933 cu. ft. (liquids for 60 days)
HEIFERS: 1,344 cu. ft. (total waste produced for time on lot for 60 days). x 0.33 cu. ft./heifer/day
(liquids)/ 1.4 cu. ft./heifer/day(total) =317 cu. ft. (liquids for 60 days)
HEIFERS: 209 cu. ft. (total waste produced for time on lot for 60 days).x 0.33 cu. ft./heifer/day
(liquids)/ 1.4 cu.ft./heifer/day(total)=49 cu. ft. (liquids for 60 days)
CALVES: 1029 cu. ft. (total waste produced for time on lot for 60 days).x 0.46 cu. ft./calf/day(liquid)/
1.96 cu. ft./calf/day(total=242 cu. ft. (liquids for 60 days)
DRY COWS: 411 cu. ft. (total waste produced for time on lot for 60 days). x 0.33 cu. ft./dry cow/day
(liquids)/ 1.4 cu. ft./dry cow/day(total)=97 cu. ft. (liquids for 60 days)
{5,933 cu. ft. (cows) +366 cu. ft. (heifers)+242 cu. ft. (calves)+97 cu ft(dry cows)} x 6 (no. of 60 day
periods in a year)=39,828 cu. ft./yr.
39,828 cu. ft./yr.x 7.48 gals./cu.ft.=297,913 gals./yr.
Revised 6/18/12: Soybeans-double cropped manured was added as a crop option for all crop fields.
The soybeans will be used for grain or forage however,there are no numbers available for these options.
Therefore,the Division of Soil&Water recommended using the numbers for SB double cropped
manured.
----------- ------------------------------------ -- ------------------------ -----------------------
Preview Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 03-27-2019 Narrative Page 4 of 4

The table shown below provides a summary of the crops or rotations included in this plan for each field. Realistic Yield e
are also provided for each crop,as well as the crop's P205 Removal Rate. The Leaching Index(LI)and the Phosphorous l
Assessment Tool(PLAT)Rating are also provided for each field,where available.
If a field's PLAT Rating is High,any planned manure application is limited to the phosphorous removal rate of the harvest
biomass for the crop rotation or multiple years in the crop sequence. Fields with a Very High PLAT Rating should receiv
additional applications of manure. Regardless of the PLAT rating,starter fertilizers maybe recommended in accordance A
Carolina State University guidelines or recommendations. The quantity of P205 applied to each crop is shown in the foll(
table if the field's PLAT rating is High or Very High.
Planned Crops Summary
Total Useable Plat P205
Removal Applied
Tract Field Acres Acres Rating LI Soil Series Crop Sequence RYE (lbs/acre) (lbs/acre)
a9958 01 14.1C 14.10 Medium 15.0 Badin Corn,Silage 19.1 Tons 65 N/A
Small Grain,Silage 8.7 Tons 47 N/A
Sorghum-Sudan Hay 3.3 Tons 46 N/A
Small Grain,Silage 8.7 Tons 47 N/A
Soybeans,Manured,Double Crop 33 bu. 26 N/A
Small Grain,Silage 8.7 Tons 47 N/A
a9958 02 13.80 13.80 Medium 15.0 Badin Corn,Silage 20.9 Tons 71 N/A
Small Grain,Silage 9.5 Tonsl 51 N/A
Sorghum-Sudan Hay 3.6 Tons 50 N/A
Small Grain,Silage 9.5 Tons 51 N/A
Soybeans,Manured,Double Crop 36 bu. 29 N/A
Small Grain,Silage 9.5 Tonj 51 N/A
a9958 34 1.50 1.50 Low 15.0 Badin Fescue Hay 3.8 Tons 60 N/A
a9958 42 0.40 0.40 Low 15.0 Badin Fescue Hay 3.2 Tons 50 N/A
a9958 43 0.10 0.10 Low 15.0 Badin Fescue Hay 3.2 Tons 50 N/A
b9959 41 1.70 1.70 Low 15.0 Badin Fescue Hay 3.8 Tons 60 N/A
c9961 03 6.40 6.40 Medium 15.0 Badin Corn,Silage 19.1 Tons 65 N/A
Small Grain,Silage 8.7 Tons 47 N/A
Sorghum-Sudan Hay 3.3 Tons 46 N/A
Small Grain,Silage 8.7 Tons 47 N/A
Soybeans,Manured,Double Crop 33 bu. 26 N/A
Small Grain,Silage 8.7 Tons 47 N/A
c9961 04 24.2q 24.20 Medium 15.0 Badin Com,Silage 19.1 Tons 65 N/A
Small Grain,Silage 8.7 Tons 47 N/A
Sorghum-Sudan Hay 3.3 Tons 46 N/A
Small Grain,Silage 8.7 To 47 N/A
Soybeans,Manured,Double Crop 33 bu. 26 N/A
500173 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed 3/25/2019
PCs Page 1 of 6
NOTE: Symbol*means user entered data.

Planned Crops Summary
Total Useable Plat P2O5
Tract Field Acres Acres Rating LI Soil Series Cro Se Sequence RYE Removal Applied
P q Obs/acre) pbs/acre)
Small Grain,Silage 8.7 Tons 47 N/A
c9961 05 10.00 10.00 Medium 15.0 Badin Com,Silage 19.1 Tons 65 N/A
Small Grain,Silage 8.7 Tons 47 N/A
Sorghum-Sudan Hay 3.3 Tons 46 N/A
Small Grain,Silage 8.7 Tons 47 N/A
Soybeans,Manured,Double Crop 33 bu. 26 N/A
Small Grain,Silage 8.7 Tons 47 N/A
c9961 06 5.30 5.30 Medium 15.0 Badin Com,Silage 19.1 Tons 65 N/A
Small Grain,Silage 8.7 Tons 47 N/A
Sorghum-Sudan Hay 3.3 Tons 46 j N/A
Small Grain,Silage 8.7 Tons 47 N/A
Soybeans,Manured,Double Crop 33 bu. 26 N/A
Small Grain,Silage 8.7 Tons 47 N/A
c9961 31 2.0 2.00 Low 15.0 Badin Fescue Hay 3.5 Tons 55 N/A
c9961 32 1.4 1.40 Low 15.0 Badin Fescue Hay 3.8 Tons 60 N/A
c9961 33 0.4 0.40 Low 15.0 Badin Fescue Hay 3.8 Tons 60 N/A
d9957 07 2.66 2.66 Medium 15.0 Badin Corn,Silage 19.1 Tons 65 N/A
Small Grain,Silage 8.7 Tons 47 N/A
Sorghum-Sudan Hay 3.3 Tons 46 N/A
Small Grain,Silage 8.7 Tons 47 N/A
Soybeans,Manured,Double Crop 33 bu. 26 N/A
Small Grain,Silage 8.7 Ton 47 N/A
c9956 08 22.46 22.46 Medium 15.0 Badin Corn,Silage 19.1 Tons 65 N/A
Small Grain,Silage 8.7 Tons 47 N/A
Sorghum-Sudan Hay 3.3 Tons 46 N/A
Small Grain,Silage 8.7 Tons 47 N/A
Soybeans,Manured,Double Crop 33 bu. 26 N/A
Small Grain,Silage 8.7 Tons 47 N/A
f2271 09 1 4.5 4.501 Medium 15.0 Badin Com,Silage 20.9 Ton 71 N/A
Small Grain,Silage 9.5 Tons 51 N/A
Sorghum-Sudan Hay 3.6 To 50 N/A
Small Grain,Silage 9.5 Tons 51 N/A
Soybeans,Manured,Double Crop 36 bu. 29 N/A
Small Grain,Silage 9.5 Tons 51 N/A
f2271 10 1 3.8 3.80 Medium 1 15.0 1 Badin 1 Corn,Silage 20.9 Tons 71 N/A
Small Grain,Silage 9.5 Ton 51 N/A
500173 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed 3/25/2019
PCs Page 2 of 6
NOTE: Symbol*means user entered data.

Planned Crops Summary P2O5
Total Useable Plat Removal Applied
Tract Field Acres Acres Rating LI Soil Series Crop Sequence RYE (lbs/acre) (lbs/acre)
Sorghum-Sudan Hay
2.5 Tons 35 N/A
Small Grain,Silage
5.7 Ton 31 N/A
Soybeans,Manured,Double Crop
22 bu. 18 N/A
Small Grain,Silage
5.7 Ton 31 N/A
17.6 Ton 60 N/A
RW
15.0 Badin Corn,Silage 43 N/A
Small Grain,Silage 8.0 Tons
Sorghum-Sudan Hay
3.0 Ton 42 N/A
Small Grain,Silage
8.0 To 43 N/A
24 N/A
Soybeans,Manured,Double Crop
30 bu.
Small Grain,Silage
8.0 To 43 NIA
20.9 Ton 71 N/A
2270 19 2.6 2.60 Low 15.0 Badin Corn,Silage 51 N/A
Small Grain,Silage 9.5 Ton
Sorghum-Sudan Hay
3.6 Tons 50 N/A
Small Grain,Silage
9.5 Ton 51 N/A
Soybeans,Manured,Double Crop
36 bu. 29 N/A
Small Grain,Silage
9.5 Ton 51 N/A
23.8 Ton 81 NIA
g2270 20 6.6 6.60 Medium 9.0 Dogue-P Corn,Silage 54 N/A
Small Grain,Silage 10.0 To
Sorghum-Sudan Hay
5.4 Ton 75 N/A
Small Grain,Silage
10.0 Ton 54 N/A
0 bu. 32 N/A
Soybeans,Manured,Double Crop
4
Small Grain,Silage
10.0 Tons 54 N/A
23.8 To 81 N/A
270 21 4.5 4.5 Medium 9.0 Dogue-P Corn,Silage 54 N/A
Small Grain,Silage 10.0 Ton
Sorghum-Sudan Hay
5.4 To 75 N/A
Small Grain,Silage
10.0 Ton 54 N/A
Soybeans,Manured,Double Crop
40 bu. 32 NIA
Small Grain,Silage
10.0 Ton 54 N/A
'22.5 Tons 77 NIA
g2270 22 4.9 4.90 Medium 9.0 Chewacla-P Corn,Silage 49 N/A
Small Grain,Silage *9.0 Tons
Sorghum-Sudan Hay
4.3 Tons 60 N/A
Small Grain,Silage
*9.0 Tons 49 N/A
Soybeans,Manured,Double Crop
46 bu. 37 N/A
Small Grain,Silage
*9.0 To 49 N/A
3.8 Ton 6 N/A
h10168 35 1.8 1.85 Low 15.0 Badin Fescue Pasture 6 NIA
h10168 35a 4.0 4.0d Low 15.0 Badin Fescue Pasture
3.5 Tons
500173 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed 3/25/2019 PCs Page 4 of 6
NOTE: Symbol*means user entered data.

Planned Crops Summary
Total Useable Plat A
Removalval Applied
Tract Field Acres Acres Rating LI Soil Series Crop Sequence RYE (lbs/acre) pbs/acre)
h10168 36 2.4o 2.40 Low 15.0 Badin Fescue Pasture 3.8 Tons 6 N/A
h10168 37 5.90 5.901 Low 15.01 Badin Fescue Pasture 3.8 Tons 6 N/A
i2308 38 6.50 6.50 Low 15.0 Badin Fescue Pasture 3.2 Tons 5 N/A
j9959 39 6.75 6.75 Low 15.0 Badin Fescue Hay 3.2 Tons 50 N/A
j9959 40 3.80 3.80 Low 15.0 Badin Fescue Pasture 3.5 Tons 6 N/A
U 1276 44 3.44 3.441 Low 15.0 Georgeville Fescue Hay 4.8 Tons 75 N/A
12274 51 4.40 4.4 Low 15.0 Georgeville Corn,Silage 21.9 Tons 74 N/A
Small Grain,Silage 10.4 Tons 56 N/A
Sorghum-Sudan Hay 4.6 Tons 64 N/A
Small Grain,Silage 10.4 Tons 56 N/A
Soybeans,Manured,Double Crop 40 bu. 32 N/A
Small Grain,Silage 10.4 Tons 56 N/A
12274 52 10.20 10.2C Medium 15.0 Georgeville Corn,Silage 21.9 Tons 74 N/A
Small Grain,Silage 10.4 Tons 56 N/A
Sorghum-Sudan Hay 4.6 Tons 64 N/A
Small Grain,Silage 10.4 Tons 56 N/A
Soybeans,Manured,Double Crop 40 bu. 32 N/A
Small Grain,Silage 10.4 Tons 56 N/A
12274 53 2.50 2.50 Low 15.0 Badin Fescue Hay 3.5 Tons 55 N/A
12274 54 1.55 1.55 Low 15.0 Badin Fescue Hay 3.7 Tons 58 N/A
12274 55 3.4q 3.40 Medium 15.0 Badin Fescue Hay 3.8 Tons 60 N/A
ml 1862 56 22.0) 22.00 Medium 15.0 Badin Corn,Silage 20.9 Tons 71 N/A
Small Grain,Silage 9.5 Tons 51 N/A
Sorghum-Sudan Hay 3.6 Tons 50 N/A
Small Grain,Silage 9.5 Tons 51 N/A
Soybeans,Manured,Double Crop 36 bu. 29 N/A
Small Grain,Silage 9.5 Tons 51 N/A
PLAN TOTALS: 240.20 240.20
500173 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed 3/25/2019
PCS Page 5 of 6
NOTE: Symbol*means user entered data.

LI Potential Leaching Technical Guidance
Low potential to contribute to soluble None
<2 nutrient leaching below the root zone.
>=2& Moderate potential to contribute to Nutrient Management(590)should be planned.
<=10 soluble nutrient leaching below the
root zone.
13 igh potential to contribute to soluble Nutrient Management(590)should be planned. Other conservation practices that improve
Iutrient leaching below the root zone. the soils available water holding capacity and improve nutrient use efficiency should be
>10 considered. Examples are Cover Crops(340)to scavenge nutrients,Sod-Based Rotations
(328),Long-Term No-Till(778),and edge-of-field practices such as Filter Strips(393)and
Riparian Forest Buffers(391).
PLAT Index Rating P Management Recommendation
0-25 Low No adjustment needed;N based application
25-50 Medium No adjustment needed;N based application
51 - 100 High Application limited to crop P removal
> 100 Very High Starter P application only
500173 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed 3/25/2019
PCS Page 6 of 6
NOTE: Symbol*means user entered data.

The Waste Utilization table shown below summarizes the waste utilization plan for this operation. This plan provides an estimate of the number of acres of
cropland needed to use the nutrients being produced. The plan requires consideration of the realistic yields of the crops to be grown,their nutrient requirements,
and proper timing of applications to maximize nutrient uptake.
This table provides an estimate of the amount of nitrogen required by the crop being grown and an estimate of the nitrogen amount being supplied by manure or
other by-products,commercial fertilizer and residual from previous crops. An estimate of the quantity of solid and liquid waste that will be applied on each field in
order to supply the indicated quantity of nitrogen from each source is also included. A balance of the total manure produced and the total manure applied is
included in the table to ensure that the plan adequately provides for the utilization of the manure generated by the operation.
Waste Utilization Table Year 1
Nitrogen Comm Res. Manure I Liquid Solid Liquid Solid Manu
PA Fert. (lbs/A) PA Manure• Manure Manure Applied
Nutrient Nutrient Nutrient,) pplied Applied Applied (Field)
Req'd Applied pplied (acre) (acre) (Field)
(lbs/A) (lbs/A) Obs/A)
Source Total Use. Applic. Applic. 1000
Tract Field ID Soil Series Acres Acres Crop RYE Period N N N Method N gal/A Tons 1000 gals tons
a9958 Ol U8 Badin 14.10 14.10 Com,Silage 19.1 2/15-6/30 204 0 0 Broad. 204 0.00 70.09 0.00 988.25
a9958 01 U8 Badin 14.10 14.10 Small Grain,Silage 8.7 Tons 9/1-3/31 94 0 0 Broad. 94 0.00 32.30 0.00 455.37
a9958 02 U8 Badin 13.80 13.80 Corn,Silage 20.9 2/15-6/30 224 0 0 Broad. 224 0.00 76.96 0.00 1,062.05
a9958 02 U8 Badin 13.80 13.80 Small Grain,Silage 9.5 Tons 9/1-3/31 103 0 0 Broad. 103 0.00 35.39 0.00 488.35
a9958 34 U12 Badin 1.50 1.50 Fescue Hay 3.8 Tons 8/1-7/31 165 0 0 Broad. 165 0.00 36.83 0.00 55.24
a9958 42 U7 Badin 0.40 0.40 Fescue Hay 3.2 Tons 8/1-7131 139 0 0 Broad. 139 226.31 0.00 90.53 0.00
a9958 43 U7 Badin 0.10 0.10 Fescue Hay 3.2 Tons 8/1-7/31 139 0 0 Broad. 139 226.31 0.00 22.63 0.00
b9959 41 U7 Badin 1.70 1.70 Fescue Hay 3.8 Tons 8/1-7/31 165 0 0 Broad. 165 268.65 0.00 456.70 0.00
c9961 03 U8 Badin 6.40 6.40 Com,Silage 19.1 2/15-6/30 204 0 0 Broad. 204 0.00 70.09 0.00 448.57
c9961 03 U8 Badin 6.40 6.40 Small Grain,Silage 8.7 Tons 9/1-3/31 94 0 0 Broad. 94 0.00 32.30 0.00 206.69
c9961 04 U8 Badin 24.20 24.20 Corn,Silage 19.1 2/15-6/30 204 0 0 Broad. 204 0.00 70.09 0.00 1,696.15
c9961 04 U8 Badin 24.20 24.20 Small Grain,Silage 8.7 Tons 9/1-3/31 94 0 0 Broad. 94 0.00 32.30 0.00 781.56
c9961 05 U8 Badin 10.00 10.00 Com,Silage 19.1 2115-6/30 204 0 0 Broad. 204 0.00 70.09 0.00 700.89
c9961 05 U8 Badin 10.00 10.00 Small Grain,Silage 8.7 Tons 9/1-3/31 94 0 0 Broad. 94 0.00 32.30 0.00 322.96
c9961 06 U8 Badin 5.30 5.30 Corn,Silage 19.1 2/15�194
0 0 Broad. 204 0.00 70.09 0.00 371.47
c9961 06 U8 Badin 5.30 5.30 Small Grain,Silage 8.7 Tons 9/1- 0 0 Broad. 94 0.00 32.30 0.00 171.17
500173 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 3/25/2019 WUT Page 1 of 12

Waste Utilization Table Year 1
Nitrogen Cantu Res. Manure Liquid Solid Liquid Solid Manur
PA Fort. (lbs/A) PA Manure. Manure Manure Applied
Nutrient Nutrient Nutrient pplied Applied Applied (Field)
Req'd Applied pplied (acre) (acre) (Field)
pbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A)
Source Total Use. Applic. Applic. 1000
Tract Field ID Soil Series Acres I Acres Crop RYE Period N N N Method N gal/A Tons 1000 gals tons
c9961 31 U12 Badin 2.00 2.00 Fescue Hay 3.5 Tons 8/1-7/31 152 0 0 Broad. 152 0.00 33.93 0.00 67.86
c9961 32 U12 Badin 1.40 1.40 Fescue Hay 3.8 Tons 8/1-7/31 165 0 0 Broad. 165 0.00 36.83 0.00 51.56
c9961 33 U12 Badin 0.40 0.40 Fescue Hay 3.8 Tons 8/1-7/31 165 0 0 Broad. 165 0.00 36.83 0.00 14.73
d9957 07 U8 Badin 2.66 2.66 Corn,Silage 19.1 2/15-6/30 204 0 0 Broad. 204 0.00 70.09 0.00 186.44
d9957 07 U8 Badin 2.66 2.66 Small Grain,Silage 8.7 Tons 9/1-3/31 1 94 0 0 Broad. 94 0.00 32.30 0.00 85.91
e9956 08 U8 Badin 22.46 22.46 Com,Silage 19.1 2/15-6/30 1 204 0 0 Broad. 204 0.00 70.09 0.00 1,574.19
e9956 08 1 U8 Badin 22.46 22.46 Small Grain,Silage 8.7 Tons 9/1-3/31 94 0 0 Broad. 94 0.00 32.30 0.00 725.36
f2271 09 U8 Badin 4.50 4.50 Com,Silage 20.9 2/15-6/30 224 0 0 Broad. 224 0.00 76.96 0.00 346.32
f2271 09 U8 Badin 4.50 4.50 Small Grain,Silage 9.5 Tons 9/1-3/31 103 0 0 Broad. 103 0.00 35.39 0.00 159.25
f2271 10 U8 Badin 3.80 3.80 Corn,Silage 20.9 2/15-6/30 224 1 0 0 Broad. 224 0.00 76.96 0.00 292.45
f2271 10 U8 Badin 3.80 3.80 Small Grain,Silage 9.5 Tons 9/1-3/31 103 0 0 Broad. 103 0.00 35.39 0.00 134.47
f2271 11 U8 Badin 3.20 3.20 Com,Silage 20.9 2/15-6/30 224 0 0 Broad. 224 0.00 76.96 0.00 246.27
f2271 11 U8 Badin 3.20 3.20 Small Grain,Silage 9.5 Tons 9/1-3/31 103 0 0 Broad. 103 0.00 35.39 0.00 113.24
f2271 12 U7 Georgeville 5.70 5.70 Com,Silage 20.0 2/15-6/30 214 0 0 Broad. 214 348.43 0.00 1,986.03 0.00
t2271 12 U7 Georgeville 5.70 5.70 Small Grain,Silage 9.6 Tons 9/1-3/31 104 0 0 Broad. 104 169.33 0.00 965.17 0.00
f2271 13 U7 Georgeville 3.10 3.10 Corn,Silage 20.0 2/15-6/30 214 0 0 Broad. 214 348.43 0.00 1,080.12 0.00
f2271 13 U7 Georgeville 3.10 3.10 Small Grain,Silage 9.6 Tons 9/1-3/31 104 0 0 Broad. 104 169.33 0.00 524.92 0.00
g2270 1 14 U7 Badin 5.60 5.60 Com,Silage 20.9 2/15-6/30 224 0 0 Broad. 224 364.71 0.00 2,042.36 0.00
g2270 1 14 U7 Badin 5.60 5.60 Small Grain,Silage 9.5 Tons 9/1-3/31 103 0 0 Broad. 103 167.70 0.00 939.12 0.00
g2270 15 U7 Badin 6.79 6.79 Com,Silage 20.9 2/15-6/30 224 0 0 Broad. 224 364.71 0.00 2,476.36 0.00
g2270 15 U7 Badin 6.79 6.79 Small Grain,Silage 9.5 Tons 9/i-3/31 103HOOO
Broad. 103 167.70 0.00 1,138.68 0.00
g2270 17 U7 Goldston 1.50 1.50 Corn,Silage 8.7 Tons 2/15-6/30 104 Broad. 104 169.33 0.00 253.99 0.00
500173 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 3/25/2019 WUT Page 2 of 12

Waste Utilization Table Year 1
Nitrogen Comm. Res. Manure Liquid Solid Liquid Solid Manur
PA Fert. (lbs/A) PA Manure: Manure Manure Applied
Nutrient Nutrient Nutrien;.- pphed Applied Applied (Field)
Req'd Applied pplied (acre) (acre) (Field)
(lbs/A) (lbs/A) pbs/A)
Source Total Use. Applic. Applic. 1000
Tract Field ID Soil Series Acres Acres Crop RYE Period N N N MethDd N gal/A Tons 1000 gals tons
g2270 17 U7 Goldston 1.50 1.50 Small Grain,Silage 5.7 Tons 9/1-3/31 71 0 0 Broad. 71 115.60 0.00 173.40 0.00
g2270 18 Ul l Badin 2.30 2.30 Corn,Silage 17.6 2115-6/30 188 0 0 Broad. 188 0.00 41.96 0.00 96.52
g2270 18 Ul l Badin 2.30 2.30 Small Grain,Silage 8.0 Tons 9/1-3/31 86 0 0 Broad. 86 0.00 19.20 0.00 44.15
g2270 19 Ul1 jBadin 2.60 2.60 Corn,Silage 20.9 2/15-6/30 224 0 0 Broad. 224 0.00 50.00 0.00 130.00
g2270 19 Ul l Badin 2.60 2.60 Small Grain,Silage 9.5 Tons 9/1-3/31 103 0 0 Broad. 103 0.00 22.99 0.00 59.78
g2270 20 Ul l Dogue-P 6.60 6.60 Corn,Silage 23.8 2/15-6/30 259 0 0 Broad. 259 0.00 57.81 0.00 381.56
g2270 20 Ul l Dogue-P 6.60 6.60 Small Grain,Silage 10.0 9/1-3/31 111 0 0 Broad. 111 0.00 24.78 0.00 163.53
g2270 21 Ul1 Dogue-P 4.50 4.50 Corn,Silage 23.8 2/15-6/30 259 0 1 0 Broad. 259 0.00 57.81 0.00 260.15
g2270 21 Ul l Dogue-P 4.50 4.50 Small Grain,Silage 10.0 9/1-3/31 111 0 1 0 Broad. 111 0.00 24.78 0.001 111.49
g2270 22 Ul l Chewacla-P 4.90 4.90 Corn,Silage *22.5 2/15-6/30 *234 0 0 Broad. 234 0.00 52.23 0.00 255.93
g2270 22 Ul l Chewacla-P 4.90 4.90 Small Grain,Silage *9.0 9/1-3/31 *95 0 0 Broad. 95 0.00 21.21 0.00 103.91
h10168 35 U8 jBadin 1.85 1.85 Fescue Pasture 3.8 Tons 8/1-7/31 124 0 0 Broad. 124 0.00 42.60 0.00 78.82
h10168 35a U8 Badin 4.00 4.00 Fescue Pasture 3.5 Tons 8/1-7/31 114 0 0 Broad. 114 0.00 39.17 0.00 156.67
h101681 36 U8 Badin 2.40 2.40 Fescue Pasture 13.8 Tons 8/1-7/31 124 1 0 Broad. 123 0.00 42.26 0.00 101.42
h10168 37 U8 Badin 5.90 5.90 Fescue Pasture 3.8 Tons 8/1-7/31 124 1 0 Broad. 123 0.00 42.261 0.00 249.33
i2308 38 U8 lBadin 6.50 6.50 Fescue Pasture 3.2 Tons 8/1-7/31 104 0 0 Broad. 104 0.00 35.73 0.00 232.25
j9959 39 U8 Badin 6.75 6.75 Fescue Hay 3.2 Tons 8/1-7/31 1 139 0 0 Broad. 139 0.00 47.76 0.00 322.36
j9959 40 U8 Badin 3.80 3.80 Fescue Pasture 3.5 Tons 8/1-7/31 114 0 0 Broad. 114 0.00 39.17 0.00 148.84
k11276 44 U8 Georgeville 3.44 3.44 Fescue Hay 4.8 Tons 8/1-7/31 208 0 0 Broad. 208 0.00 71.46 0.00 245.83
12274 51 U8 Georgeville 4.40 4.40 Corn,Silage 21.9 2/15-6/30 234 0 0 Broad. 234 0.00 80.40 0.00 353.74
12274 51 U8 Georgeville 4.40 4.40 Small Grain,Silage 10.4 9/1-3/31 112 0 0 Broad. 112 0.00 38.48 0.00 169.31
12274 52 U12 Georgeville 10.20 10.20 Corn,Silage 21.9 2/15-6/30 234 0 0 Broad. 234 0.00 52.23 0.00 532.76
500173 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 3/25/2019 V=Page 3 of 12

Waste Utilization Table Year 1
LReq�d
Caron Res. Manure Liquid Solid Liquid Solid Manur
Fert. (lbs/A) PA Manure Manure Manure Applied
Nutrient Nutrient+ pplied Applied Applied (Field)
Applied pplied (acre) (acre) (Field)
(lbs/A) (Ibs/A)
Total Use. Applic. Applic. 1000
Source Crop RYE period N N N Method N gal/A Tons 1000 gals tons
Tract Field 1D Soil Series Acres Acres
k2274 52 U12 Georgeville 10.20 10.20 Small Grain,Silage 10.4 9/1-3/31 112 0 0 Broad. 112 0.00 25.00 0.00 255.00
53 U12 Badin 2.50 2.50 Fescue Hay 3.5 Tons 8/1-7/31 152 0 0 Broad. 152 0.00 33.93 0.00 84.82
54 U12 Badin ].55 1.55 Fescue Hay 3.7Tons 8/1-7/31 160 0 0 Broad. 160 0.00 35.71 0.00 55.36
12274 55 U12 Badin 3.40 3.40 Fescue Hay 3.8 Tons 8/1-7/31 165 0 0 Broad. 165 0.00 36.83 0.00 125.22
tn11862 56 U8 Badin 22.00 22.00 Corn,Silage 20.9 2/15-6/30 224 0 0 Broad. 224 0.00 76.96 0.00 1,693.12
m11862 56 U8 jBadin 22.00 22.00 Small Grain,Silage 9.5 Tons 9/1-3/31 103 0 0 Broad. 103 0.00 35.39 0.00 778.53
Total Applied,1000 gallons 12,150.00
Total Produced,1000 gallons 6,519.57
Balance,1000 gallons -5,630.43
Total Applied,tons 1.8,937.17
Total Produced,tons 9,791.72
Balance,tons -9,145.45
Notes: 1. In the tract column,-symbol means leased,otherwise,owned. 2. Symbol*means user entered data.
500173 Database Version 3.1
Date Printed: 3/25/2019 WUT Page 4 of 12

Waste Utilization Table Year 2
Nitrogen Comm Res. Manure Liquid Solid Liquid Solid Manus
PA Fert. (lbs/A) PA Manure= Manure Manure Applied
Nutrient Nutrient Nutriew:1 pplied Applied Applied (Field)
Req'd Applied pplied (acre) (acre) (Field)
(lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A)
Source Total Use. Applic. Applic. 1000
Tract Field ID Soil Series Acres Acres Crop RYE Period N N N Method N gal/A Tons 1000 gals tons
a9958 01 U8 Badin 14.10 14.1oSorghum-Sudan Hay 3.3 Tons 1 3/15-8/31 159 0 0 Broad. 159 0.00 54.63 0.00 770.25
a9958 01 U8 Badin 14.10 14.10 Small Grain,Silage 8.7 Tons 9/1-3/31 94 0 0 Broad. 94 0.00 32.30 0.00 455.37
a9958 02 U8 Badin 13.80 13.80 Sorghum-Sudan Hay 3.6 Tons 3/15-8/31 174 0 0 Broad. 174 0.00 59.78 0.00 824.99
a9958 02 U8 Badin 13.80 13.80 Small Grain,Silage 9.5 Tons 9/1-3/31 103 0 0 Broad. 103 0.00 35.39 0.00 488.35
a9958 34 U12 Badin 1.50 1.50 Fescue Hay 3.8 Tons 8/1-7/31 165 0 0 Broad. 165 0.00 36.83 0.00 55.24
a9958 42 U7 Badin 0.40 0.40 Fescue Hay 3.2 Tons 8/1-7/31 139 0 0 Broad. 139 226.31 0.001 90.53 0.00
a9958 1 43 U7 Badin 0.10 0.10 Fescue Hay 3.2 Tons 8/1-7/31 139 0 0 Broad. 139 226.31 0.00 22.63 0.00
b9959 41 U7 Badin 1.70 1.70 Fescue Hay 3.8 Tons 8/1-7/31 165 0 0 Broad. 165 268.65 0.00 456.70 0.00
c9961 03 U8 Badin 6.40 6.40 Sorghum-Sudan Hay 3.3 Tons 3/15-8/31 159 0 0 Broad. 159 0.00 54.63 0.00 349.62
c9961 03 U8 Badin 6.40 6.40 Small Grain,Silage 8.7 Tons 9/1-3/31 94 0 0 Broad. 94 0.00 32.30 0.00 206.69
c9961 04 U8 Badin 24.20 24.20 Sorghum-Sudan Hay 3.3 Tons 3/15-8/31 159 0 0 Broad. 159 0.00 54.63 0.00 1,322.00
c9961 04 U8 Badin 24.20 24.20 Small Grain,Silage 8.7 Tons 9/1-3/31 94 0 0 Broad. 94 0.00 32.30 0.00 781.56
c9961 05 U8 Badin 10.00 10.00 Sorghum-Sudan Hay 3.3 Tons 3/15-8/31 159 0 0 Broad. 159 0.00 54.63 0.00 546.28
c9961 05 U8 Badin 10.00 10.00 Small Grain,Silage 8.7 Tons 9/1-3/31 94 0 0 Broad. 94 0.00 32.30 0.00 322.96
c9961 06 U8 Badin 5.30 5.30 Sorghum-Sudan Hay 3.3 Tons 3/15-8/31 159 0 0 Broad. 159 0.00 54.63 0.00 289.53
c9961 06 U8 Badin 5.30 5.30 Small Grain,Silage 8.7 Tons 9/1-3/31 94 1 0 0 Broad. 94 0.00 32.30 0.00 171.17
c9961 31 U12 Badin 2.00 2.00 Fescue Hay 3.5 Tons 8/1-7/31 152 0 0 Broad. 152 0.00 33.93 0.00 67.86
c9961 32 U12 Badin 1.40 1.40 Fescue Hay 3.8 Tons 8/1-7/31 165 0 0 Broad.1 165 0.00 36.83 0.00 51.56
c9961 33 U12 Badin 1 0.40 0.40 Fescue Hay 3.8 Tons 8/1-7/31 165 0 0 Broad. 165 0.00 36.83 0.00 14.73
d9957 07 U8 Badin 2.66 2.66 Sorghum-Sudan Hay 3.3 Tons 3/15-8/31 159 1 0 0 Broad. 159 0.00 54.63 0.00 145.31
d9957 07 U8 Badin 2.66 2.66 Small Grain,Silage 8.7 Tons 9/1-3/31 94 0 1 0 1 Broad. 94 0.00 32.30 0.00 85.91
e9956 1 08 U8 Badin 22.46 22.46 Sorghum-Sudan Hay 3.3 Tons 3/15-8/31 159 0 0 Broad. 159 0.00 54.63 0.00 1,226.94
500173 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 3/25/2019 WUT Page 5 of 12

Waste Utilization Table Year 2
Nitrogen Comm Res. Manure Liquid Solid Liquid SolidManur
PA Fert. pbs/A) PA Marturt-I Manure Manure Applied
Nutrient Nutrient Nutrien[ pplied Applied Applied (Field)
Req'd Applied pplied (acre) (acre) (Field)
(Ibs/A) (Ibs/A) Obs/A)
Source Total Use. Applic. Applic. 1000
Tract Field m Soil Series Acres Acres Crop RYE Period N N N Method N gal/A Tons 1000 gals tons
e9956 08 U8 Badin 22.46 22.46 Small Grain,Silage 8.7 Tons 9/1-3/31 94 0 0 Broad. 94 0.00 32.30 0.00 725.36
f2271 09 U8 Badin 4.50 4.50 Sorghum-Sudan Hay 3.6 Tons 3/15-8/31 174 0 0 Broad. 174 0.00 59.78 0.00 269.02
f2271 09 U8 Badin 4.50 4.50 Small Grain,Silage 9.5 Tons 9/1-3/31 103 0 0 Broad. 103 0.00 35.39 0.00 159.25
f2271 10 U8 Badin 3.80 3.80 Sorghum-Sudan Hay 3.6 Tons 3/15-8/31 174 0 0 Broad. 174 0.00 59.78 0.00 227.17
f2271 10 U8 Badin 3.80 3.80 Small Grain,Silage 9.5 Tons 9/1-3/31 103 0 0 Broad. 103 0.00 35.39 0.00 134.47
f2271 11 U8 Badin 3.20 3.20 Sorghum-Sudan Hay 3.6 Tons 3/15-8/31 174 0 0 Broad. 174 0.00 59.78 0.00 191.30
f2271 11 U8 Badin 3.201 3.20 Small Grain,Silage 9.5 Tons 9/1-3/31 103 0 0 Broad. 103 0.00 35.39 0.00 113.24
f2271 12 U7 Georgeville 5.70 5.70 Sorghum-Sudan Hay 4.2 Tons 3/15-8/31 203 0 0 Broad. 203 330.52 0.00 1,883.94 0.00
f2271 12 U7 Georgeville 5.70 5.70 Small Grain,Silage 9.6 Tons 9/1-3/31 104 0 0 Broad. 104 169.33 0.00 965.17 0.00
f2271 13 U7 Georgeville 3.10 3.10 Sorghum-Sudan Hay 4.2 Tons 3/15-8/31 203 1 0 0 Broad. 203 330.52 0.00 1,024.60 0.00
f2271 13 U7 eorgeville 3.10 3.10 Small Grain,Silage 9.6 Tons 9/1-3/31 104 0 0 Broad. 104 169.33 0.00 524.92 0.00
g2270 14 U7 Badin 5.60 5.60 Sorghum-Sudan Hay 3.6 Tons 3/15-8/31 174 0 0 Broad. 174 283.30 0.00 1,586.48 0.00
g2270 14 U7 Badin 5.60 5.60 Small Grain,Silage 9.5 Tons 9/1-3/31 103 0 0 Broad. 103 167.70 0.00 939.12 0.00
g2270 15 U7 Badin 6.79 6.79 Sorghum-Sudan Hay 3.6 Tons 3/15-8/31 174 0 0 Broad. 174 283.30 0.00 1,923.60 0.00
g2270 15 U7 Badin 6.79 6.79 Small Grain,Silage 9.5 Tons 9/1-3/31 103 0 0 Broad. 103 167.70 0.00 1,138.68 0.00
g2270 17 U7 Goldston 1.50 1.50 Sorghum-Sudan Hay 2.5 Tons 3/15-8/31 138 0 0 Broad. 138 224.69 0.00 337.03 0.00
g2270 17 U7 Goldston 1.50 1.50 Small Grain,Silage 5.7 Tons 9/1-3/31 71 0 0 Broad. 71 115.60 0.00 173.40 0.00
g2270 18 Ul l Badin 2.30 2.30 Sorghum-Sudan Hay 3.0 Tons 3/15-8/31 145 0 0 Broad. 145 0.00 32.37 0.00 74.44
g2270 18 Ul l Badin 2.30 2.30 Small Grain,Silage 8.0 Tons 9/1-3/31 86 0 0 Broad. 86 0.00 19.20 0.00 44.15
g2270 19 U l l Badin 2.60 2.60 Sorghum-Sudan Hay 3.6 Tons 3/15-8/31 174 1 0 0 1 Broad. 174 0.00 38.84 0.00 100.98
g2270 19 Ul l Badin 2.60 2.60 Small Grain,Silage 9.5 Tons 9/1-3/31 103 1 0 0 Broad. 103 0.00 22.99 0.00 59.78
g2270 20 Ul 1 Dogue-P 6.60 6.60 Sorghum-Sudan Hay 5.4 Tons 3/15-8/31 267 0 0 Broad. 267 0.00 59.60 0.00 393.34
500173 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 3/25/2019 WUT Page 6 of 12

Waste Utilization Table Year 2
Nitrogen Comm. Res. Manure Liquid Solid Liquid Solid Manua
PA Fert. (lbs/A) PA Manure. Manure Manure Applied
Nutrient Nutrient Nutrients pplied Applied Applied (Field)
Req'd Applied ppbed (acre) (acre) (Field)
(lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A)
Source Total Use. Applic. Applic. 1000
Tract Field 1D I Soil Series Acres Acres Crop RYE I Period N N N Method N I gal/A. Tons I 1000 gals tons
g2270 20 Ul l Dogue-P 6.60 6.60 Small Grain,Silage 10.0 9/1-3/31 111 0 0 Broad. 111 0.00 24.78 0.00 163.53
g2270 21 Ul l Dogue-P 4.50 4.50 Sorghum-Sudan Hay 5.4 Tons 3/15-8/31 267 1 0 0 Broad. 267 0.00 59.60 0.00 268.19
g2270 21 Ull Pogue-P 4.50 4.50Small Grain,Silage 10.0 9/1-3/31 ill 0 0 Broad. ill 0.00 24.78 0.00 111.49
g2270 22 Ul l Chewacla-P 4.90 4.90 Sorghum-Sudan Hay 4.3 Tons 3/15-8/31 203 0 0 Broad. 203 0.00 45.31 0.00 222.03
g2270 22 Ul1 Chewacla-P 4.90 4.90 Small Grain,Silage *9.0 9/1-3/31 *95 0 0 Broad. 95 0.00 21.21 0.00 103.91
hl0168 35 U8 Badin 1.85 1.85 Fescue Pasture 3.8 Tons 8/1-7/31 124 0 0 Broad. 124 0.00 42.60 0.00 78.82
h10168 35a U8 Badin 4.00:::4AlFescueasture 3.5 Tons 8/1-7/31 114 0 0 Broad. 114 0.00 39.17 0.00 156.67
h10168 36 U8 Badin 2.40 2.40 Fescue Pasture 3.8 Tons 8/1-7/31 124 1 0 Broad. 123 0.00 42.26 0.00 101.42
h10168 37 U8 Badin 5.90 5.90 Fescue Pasture 3.8 Tons 8/1-7/31 124 1 0 Broad. 123 0.00 42.26 0.001 249.33
i2308 38 U8 Badin 6.50 6.50 Fescue Pasture 3.2 Tons 8/1-7/31 104 0 0 Broad. 104 0.00 35.73 0.00 232.25
j9959 39 �U78 �Badffi6.75 6.75 Fescue Hay 3.2 Tons 8/1-7/31 139 1 0 0 Broad. 139 0.00 47.76 0.00 322.36
j9959 40 U8 Badin 3.80 3.80 Fescue Pasture 3.5Tons 8/1-7/31 114 0 0 Broad. 114 0.00 39.17 0.00 148.84
k11276 44 U8 Georgeville 3.44 3.44 Fescue Hay 4.8 Tons 8/1-7/31 208 0 1 0 Broad. 208 0.00 71.46 0.00 245.83
12274 51 U8 Georgeville 4.40 4.40 Sorghum-Sudan Hay 4.6 Tons 3/15-8/31 1 222 0 0 Broad.1 222 0.00 76.27 0.00 335.60
12274 51 U8 Georgeville 4.40 4.40 Small Grain,Silage 10.4 9/1-3/31 112 0 0 Broad. 112 0.00 38.48 0.00 169.31
12274 52 U12 Georgeville 10.20 10.20 Sorghum-Sudan Hay 4.6 Tons 3/15-8/31 222 0 0 Broad. 222 0.00 49.55 0.00 505.44
12274 52 U12 Georgeville 10.20 10.20 Small Grain,Silage 10.4 9/1-3/31 112 0 0 Broad. 112 0.00 25.00 0.00 255.00
12274 53 U12 Badin 2.50 2.50 Fescue Hay 3.5 Tons 8/1-7/31 152 0 0 Broad. 152 0.00 33.93 0.00 84.82
12274 54 U12 Badin 1.55 1.55 Fescue Hay 3.7 Tons 8/1-7/31 160 0 0 Broad. 160 0.00 35.71 0.00 55.36
t2274 55 U12 Badin 3.40 3.40 Fescue Hay 3.8 Tons 811-7/31 165 0 0 Broad. 165 0.00 36.83 0.00 125.22
rot 1862 56 U8 Badin 22.00 22.00 Sorghum-Sudan Hay 3.6 Tons 3/15-8/31 174 0 0 Broad. 174 0.00 59.78 0.00 1,315.19
[ml1862 56 U8 Badin 22.00 22.00 Small Grain,Silage 9.5 Tons 9/1-3/31 103 0 0 Broad. 103 0.00 35.39 0.00 778.53
500173 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 3/25/2019 WUT Page 7 of 12

Waste Utilization Table Year 2
Nitrogen Comm Res. Manure Liquid Solid Liquid SolidManu<
PA Fert. (lbs/A) PA ManureA Manure Manure Applied
Nutrient Nutrient NutrienV pplied Applied Applied (Field)
Req'd Applied pplied (acre) (acre) (Field)
(lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A)
Source Total Use. Applic. Applic. 1000
Tract Field 1D Soil Series Acres Acres Crop RYE Period N N N Method N gal/A Tons 1000 gals tons
Total Applied,1000 gallons 11,066.79
Total Produced,1000 gallons 6,519.57
Balance,1000 gallons 4,547.22
Total Applied,tons 16,697.96
Total Produced,tons 9,791.72
Balance,tons -6,906.24
Notes: 1. In the tract column,—symbol means leased,otherwise,owned. 2. Symbol*means user entered data.
500173 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed:3/25/2019 WUT Page 8 of 12

Waste Utilization Table Year 3
Nitrogen Comm Res. Manure Liquid Solid Liquid Solid Manus
PA Fert. (lbs/A) PA Manur:- Manure Manure Applied
Nutrient Nutrient Nutrieni-A pplied Applied Applied (Field)
Req'd Applied pplied (acre) (acre) (Field)
Obs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A)
Source Total Use. Applic. Applic. 1000
Tract Field ID Soil Series Acres Acres Crop RYE Period N N N Method N gal/A Tons 1000 gals tons
a9958 01 U8 Badin 14.10 14.10 Soybeans,Manured,Double Crop 33 bu. 4/1-9/15 128 0 0 Broad. 128 .0.00 43.98 0.00 620.08
a9958 01 U8 Badin 14.10 14.10 Small Grain,Silage 8.7 Tons 9/1-3/31 94 0 20 Broad. 74 0.00 25.42 0.00 358.48
a9958 02 U8 Badin 13.80 13.80 Soybeans,Manured,Double Crop 36 bu. 4/1-9/15 139 0 0 Broad. 139 0.00 47.76 0.00 659.04
a9958 02 U8 Badin 13.80 13.80 Small Grain,Silage 9.5 Tons 9/1-3/31 103 0 20 1 Broad. 83 0.00 28.52 0.00 393.53
a9958 34 U12 Badin 1.50 1.50 Fescue Hay 3.8 Tons 8/1-7/31 165 0 0 Broad. 165 0.00 36.83 0.00 55.24
a9958 42 U7 Badin 0.40 0.40 Fescue Hay 3.2 Tons 8/1-7/31 139 0 0 Broad. 139 226.31 0.00 90.53 0.00
a9958 43 U7 Badin 0.101 0.10 Fescue Hay 3.2 Tons 8/1-7/31 139 0 0 Broad. 139 226.31 0.00 22.63 0.00
b9959 41 U7 Badin 1.70 1.70 1 Fescue Hay 3.8 Tons 8/1-7/31 165 0 0 Broad. 165 268.65 0.00 456.701 0.00
c9961 03 U8 Badin 6.40 6.40 Soybeans,Manured,Double Crop 33 bu. 4/1-9/15 128 0 0 Broad. 128 0.00 43.98 0.00 281.45
c9961 03 U8 Badin 6.40 6.40 Small Grain,Silage 8.7 Tons 9/1-3/31 94 0 20 Broad. 74 0.00 25.42 0.00 162.72
c9961 04 U8 Badin 24.20 24.20 Soybeans,Manured,Double Crop 33 bu. 4/1-9/15 128 0 0 Broad. 128 0.00 43.98 0.00 1,064.25
c9961 04 U8 Badin 24.20 24.20 Small Grain,Silage 8.7 Tons 9/1-3/31 94 0 20 Broad. 74 0.00 25.42 0.00 615.27
c9961 05 U8 Badin 10.00 10.00 Soybeans,Manured,Double Crop 33 bu. 4/1-9/15 128 0 0 Broad. 128 0.00 43.98 0.00 439.77
c9961 05 U8 Badin 10.00 10.00 Small Grain,Silage 8.7 Tons 9/1-3/31 94 0 20 Broad. 74 0.00 25.42 0.00 254.24
c9961 06 U8 Badin 5.30 5.30 Soybeans,Manured,Double Crop 33 bu. 4/1-9/15 128 0 0 1 Broad. 128 0.00 43.98 0.00 233.08
c9961 06 U8 Badin 5.30 5.30 Small Grain,Silage 8.7 Tons 9/1-3/31 94 0 20 1 Broad. 74 0.00 25.42 0.00 134.75
c9961 31 U12 Badin 2.00 2.00 Fescue Hay 3.5 Tons 811-7/31 152 0 0 1 Broad. 152 0.00 33.93 0.00 67.86
c9961 32 U12 Badin 1.40 1.40 Fescue Hay 3.8 Tons 8/1-7/31 165 0 0 Broad. 165 0.00 36.83 0.00 51.56
c9961 33 U12 Badin 0.40 0.40 Fescue Hay 3.8 Tons 8/1-7/31 165 0 0 Broad. 165 0.00 36.83 0.00 14.73
d9957 07 U8 Badin 2.66 2.66 Soybeans,Manured,Double Crop 33 bu. 4/1-9/15 128 0 0 Broad. 128 0.001 43.98 0.00 116.98
d9957 07 U8 Badin 2.66 2.66 Small Grain,Silage 8.7 Tons 9/1-3/31 94 0 20 Broad.1 74 0.00 25.42 0.00 67.63
c9956 08 1 U8 Badin 22.46 22.46 Soybeans,Manured,Double Crop 33 bu. 4/1-9/15 128 0 0 Broad. 128 0.00 43.98 0.00 987.73
500173 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 3/25/2019 WUT Page 9 of 12

Waste Utilization Table Year 3
Nitrogen Comm Res. Manure Liquid Solid Liquid Solid Manu<
PA Fert. (lbs/A) PA Manure Manure Manure Applied
Nutrient Nutrient NutrienO pplied Applied Applied (Field)
Req'd Applied pplied (acre) (acre) (Field)
(lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A)
Source Total Use. Appbc• Applic. 1000
Tons
Tract Field ID Soil Series Acres Acres Crop RYE Period N N N Method N gal/A 1000 gals tons
e9956 08 U8 Badin 22.46 22.46 Small Grain,Silage 8.7 Tons 9/1-3/31 94 0 20 Broad. 74 0.00 25.42 0.00 571.03
f2271 09 U8 Badin 4.50 4.50 Soybeans,Manured,Double Crop 36 bu. 4/1-9/15 139 0 0 Broad. 139 0.00 47.76 0.00 214.90
f2271 09 U8 Badin 4.50 4.50 Small Grain,Silage 9.5 Tons 9/1-3/31 103 0 20 Broad. 83 0.00 28.52 0.00 128.32
f2271 10 U8 Badin 3.80 3.80 Soybeans,Manured,Double Crop 36 bu. 4/1-9/15 139 0 0 Broad. 139 0.00 47.76 0.00 181.47
f2271 10 U8 Badin 3.80 3.80 Small Grain,Silage 9.5 Tons 9/1-3/31 103 0 20 Broad. 83 0.00 28.52 0.00 108.36
f2271 11 U8 Badin 3.201 3.20 Soybeans,Manured,Double Crop 36 bu. 4/1-9/15 139 0 0 Broad. 139 0.00 47.76 0.00 152.82
f1271 11 U8 Badin 3.20 3.20 Small Grain,Silage 9.5 Tons 9/1-3/31 103 0 20 Broad. 83 0.00 28.52 0.00 91.25
f2271 12 U7 Georgeville 5.70 5.70 Soybeans,Manured,Double Crop 37 bu. 4/1-9/15 143 0 0 Broad. 143 232.83 0.00 1,327.11 0.00
12271 12 U7 Georgeville 5.70 5.70 Small Grain,Silage 9.6 Tons 9/1-3/31 104 0 20 Broad. 84 136.77 0.00 779.56 0.00
f2271 13 U7 Georgevillc 3.10 3.10 Soybeans,Manured,Double Crop 37 bu. 4/1-9/15 143 0 0 Broad. 143 232.83 0.00 721.76 0.00
f2271 13 U7 Georgeville 3.10 3.10 Small Grain,Silage 9.6 Tons 9/1-3/31 104 0 20 Broad. 84 136.77 0.00 423.97 0.00
g2270 14 U7 Badin 5.60 5.60 Soybeans,Manured,Double Crop 36 bu. 4/1-9/15 139 0 0 Broad. 139 226.31 0.00 1,267.36 0.00
g2270 14 U7 Badin 5.60 5.60 Small Grain,Silage 9.5 Tons 9/1-3/31 103 0 20 Broad. 83 135.14 0.00 756.77 0.00
g2270 15 U7 Badin 6.79 6.79 Soybeans,Manured,Double Crop 36 bu. 4/1-9/15 139 0 0 Broad. 139 226.31 0.00 1,536.67 0.00
g2270 15 U7 Badin 6.79 6.79 Small Grain,Silage 9.5 Tons 9/1-3/31 103 0 20 Broad. 83 135.14 0.00 917.58 0.00
g2270 17 FU7Goldston 1.50 1.50 Soybeans,Manured,Double Crop 22 bu. 4/1-9/15 88 0 0 Broad. 88 143.28 0.00 214.92 0.00
g2270 17 Goldston 1.50 1.50 Small Grain,Silage 5.7 Tons 9/1-3/31 71 0 20 Broad. 51 83.04 0.00 124.55 0.00
g2270 18 Badin 2.30 2.30 Soybeans,Manured,Double Crop 30 bu. 4/1-9/15 116 0 0 Broad. 116 0.00 25.89 0.00 59.55
g2270 18 Ul l Badin 2.30 2.30 Small Grain,Silage 8.0 Tons 9/1-3/31 86 0 20 Broad. 66 0.00 14.73 0.00 33.88
g2270 19 Ul l Badin 2.601 2.60 Soybeans,Manured,Double Crop 36 bu. 4/1-9/15 139 0 0 Broad. 1391 0.00 31.03 0.00 80.67
g2270 19 UI I Badin 2.60 2.60 Small Grain,Silage 9.5 Tons 9/1-3/31 ]03 0 20 Broad. 83 0.00E34
0.00 48.17
g2270 20 Ul1 Dogue-P 6.60 6.60 Soybeans,Manured,Double Crop 40 bu. 4/1-9/15 156 0 0 Broad. 156 0.00 0.00 229.82
500173 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 3/25/2019 WUT Page 10 of 12

Waste Utilization Table Year 3
Nih•ogen Cantu Res. Manure Liquid Solid Liquid Solid Manu<
PA Fert. pbs/A) PA Manua, Manure Manure Applied
Nutrient Nutrient Nutrien' pplied Applied Applied (Field)
Req'd Applied pplied (acre) (acre) (Field)
(lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A)
Source Total Use. Applic. Applic. 1000
Crop RYE Period N N N Method N gal/A Tons 1000 gals tons
Tract Field ID Soil Series Acres Acres
g2270 20 Ul l Dogue-P 6.60 6.60 Small Grain,Silage 10.0 9/1-3/31 111 0 20 Broad. 91 0.00 20.31 0.00 134.06
g2270 21 Ul l Dogue-P 4.50 4.50 Soybeans,Manured,Double Crop 40 bu. 4/1-9/15 156 0 0 Broad. 156 0.00 34.82 0.00 156.69
92270 21 Ul l Dogue-P 4.50 4.50 Small Grain,Silage 10.0 9/1-3131 111 0 20 Broad. 91 0.00 20.31 0.00 91.41
g2270 22 U l l Chewacla-P 4.90 4.90 Soybeans,Manured,Double Crop 46 bu. 4/1-9/15 177 0 0 Broad. 177 0.00 39.51 0.00 193.59
92270 22 Ul1 I Chewacla-P 4.90 4.90 Small Grain,Silage *9.0 9/1-3/31 *95 0 20 Broad. 751 0.00 16.74 0.00 82.03
h10168 35 U8 Badin 1.85 1.85 Fescue Pasture 3.8 Tons 8/1-7/31 124 0 0 Broad. 124 0.00 42.60 0.00 78.82
h10168 35a U8 Badin 4.00 4.00 Fescue Pasture 3.5 Tons 8/1-7/31 114 0 0 Broad. 114 0.00 39.17 0.00 156.67
h10168 36 U8 Badin 2.40 2.40 Fescue Pasture 3.8 Tons 8/1-7/31 124 1 0 Broad. 123 0.00 42.26 0.00 101.42
h10168 37 U8 Badin 5.90 5.90 Fescue Pasture 3.8 Tons 8/1-7/31 124 1 0 Broad. 123 0.00, 42.26 0.00 249.33
i2308 38 U8 Badin 6.50 6.50 Fescue Pasture 3.2 Tons 8/1-7/31 104 0 0 1 Broad. 1041 0.00 35.73 0.00 232.25
j9959 39 U8 Badin 6.75 6.75 Fescue Hay 3.2 Tons 8/1-7/31 139 0 0 Broad. 0.00 322.36
ad. 139 0.00 47.76
j9959 40 U8 Badin 3.80 3.80 Fescue Pasture 3.5 Tons 8/1-7/31 114 0 0 Broad. 114 0.00 39.17 0.00 148.84
k11276 44 U8 Georgeville 3.44 3.44 Fescue Hay 4.8 Tons 8/1-7/31 208 0 0 Broad. 208 0.00 71.46 0.00 245.83
12274 51 U8 Georgeville 4.40 4.40 Soybeans,Manured,Double Crop 40 bu. 4/1-9/15 155 0 0 Broad. 155 0.00 53.25 0.00 234.32
12274 51 U8 Georgeville 4.40 4.40 Small Grain,Silage 10.4 9/1-3/31 112 0 20 Broad. 92 0.00 31.61 0.00 139.08
12274 52 U12 Georgeville 10.20 10.20 Soybeans,Manured,Double Crop 40 bu. 4/1-9/15 155 0 0 Broad. 155 0.00 34.60 0.00 352.90
12274 1 52 U12 Georgeville 10.20 10.20 Small Grain,Silage 10.4 9/1-3/31 112 0 20 Broad. 92 f 0.00 20.54 0.00 209.46
12274 53 U12 Badin 2.50 2.50 Fescue Hay 3.5 Tons 8/1-7/31 152 0 0 Broad. 152 0.00 33.93 0.00 84.82
12274 54 U12 Badin 1.55 1.55 Fescue Hay qTons
-7/31 160 0 0 Broad. 160 0.00 35.71 0.00 55.36
12274 55 U12 Badin 3.40 3.40 Fescue Hay -7/31 165 0 0 Broad. 165 0.00 36.83 0.00 125.22
m11862 56 U8 Badin 22.00 22.00 Soybeans Manured,Double Crop 1-9/15 139 0 0 Broad. 139 0.00 47.76 0.00 1,050.64
ml1862 56 1 U8 Badin 22.00 22.00 Small Grain,Silage 9.5 Tons 1 9/1-3/31 L103 L 0 20 Broad. 831 0.00 28.52 0.00 627.36
WUT Page 11 of 12
500173 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 3/25/2019

Waste Utilization Table Year 3 Nitrogen Cotnm Res. Manure Liquid Solid Liquid SolidManiu
PA Fert. (lbs/A) PA Manure= Manure Manure Applied
Nutrient Nutrient Nutrienu pplied Applied Applied (Field)
Req'd Applied pplied (acre) (acre) (Field)
(lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A)
Applic. Applic. 1000
Source Total Use. RYE Period N N N Method N gal/A Tons 1000 gals tons
Crop
Tract Field 1D Soil Series Acres Acres Total Applied,1000 gallons 8,640.10
Total Produced,1000 gallons 6,519.57
Balance,1000 gallons -2,120.53
Total Applied,tons 13,551.09
Total Produced,tons 9,791.72
LLLBalance,tons -3,759.37
Notes: 1. In the tract column,—symbol means leased,otherwise,owned. 2. Symbol*means user entered data.
WUT Page 12 of 12
500173 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 3/25/2019

The Nutrient Management Recommendations table shown below provides an annual summary of the nutrient
management plan developed for this operation. This table provides a nutrient balance for the listed fields and crops
for each year of the plan. Required nutrients are based on the realistic yields of the crops to be grown,their nutrient
requirements and soil test results. The quantity of nutrient supplied by each source is also identified.
The total quantity of nitrogen applied to each crop should not exceed the required amount. However, the quantity
of other nutrients applied may exceed their required amounts. This most commonly occurs when manure or other
byproducts are utilized to meet the nitrogen needs of the crop. Nutrient management plans may require that the
application of animal waste be limited so as to prevent over application of phosphorous when excessive levels of
this nutrient are detected in a field. In such situations,additional nitrogen applications from nonorganic sources
may be required to supply the recommended amounts of nitrogen.
Nutrient Management Recommendations Test
YEAR 1 N P2O5 K2O Mg Mn Zn Cu Lime
(lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (tons/A)
Tract Field a9958 01 Req'd Nutrients 204 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Acres I App.Period 14.10 2/15-6/30 Supplied By:
CROP Corn,Silage Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Commercial Fert, 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Soil Series Badin Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
RYE I Sample Date 19.1 Tons 08-11-08 Manure 204 269 337 931 3 2 1 0
P Removal I Rating 65 Ibs/ac. Medium BALANCE 0 269 337 93 3 2 1 0
Tract Field a9958 01 Req'd Nutrients 94 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Acres I App.Period 14.10 9/1-3/31 Supplied By:
CROP Small Grain,Silage Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Soil Series Badin Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
RYE I Sample Date 8.7 Tons 08-11-08 Manure 94 124 156 43 1 1 0 0
P Removal Rating 47 lbs/ac. Medium BALANCE 0 124 156 43 1 1 0 0
Tract Field a9958 02 Req'd Nutrients 103 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Acres I App.Period 13.80 9/1-3/31 Supplied By:
CROP Small Grain,Silage Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Soil Series Badin Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
RYE I Sample Date 9.5 Tons 06-02-14 Manure 103 136 170 47 1 1 0 0
P Removal I Rating 51 lbs/ac. Medium BALANCE 0 136 170 47 1 1 0 0
Tract Field a9958 02 Req'd Nutrients 224 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Acres j App.Period 13.80 2/15-6/30 Supplied By:
CROP Corn,Silage Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Soil Series Badin Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
RYE Sample Date 20.9 Tons 06-02-14 Manure 224 295 371 102 3 2 1 0
P Removal I Rating 71 lbs/ac. Medium I BALANCE 0 2951 371 102 3 2 1 0
500173 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 3/25/2019 NMR Page 1 of 34

Nutrient Management Recommendations Test
YEAR 1 N P2O5 K2O Mg Mn Zn Cu Lime
(lbs/A) (Ibs/A) (Ibs/A) (Ibs/A) (Ibs/A) (Ibs/A) (lbs/A) (tons/A)
Tract Field a9958 34 Req'd Nutrients 165 0 50 0 0 0 0 0
Acres I App.Period 1.50 8/1-7/31 Supplied By:
CROP Fescue Hay Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Soil Series Badin Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
RYE I Sample Date 3.8 Tons 06-02-14 Manure 165 258 361 81 3 3 1 0
P Removal Rating 60 Ibs/ac. Low BALANCE 0 258 311 811 3 3 1 0
Tract Field a9958 42 Req'd Nutrients 139 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Acres I App.Period 0.40 8/1-7/31 Supplied By:
CROP Fescue Hay Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Soil Series Badin Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
RYE I Sample Date 3.2 Tons 06-02-14 Manure 139 238 1521 198 1 2 1 0
P Removal Rating 501bs/ac. Low BALANCE 01 238 1521 1981 1 2 1 0
Tract Field a9958 43 Req'd Nutrients 139 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Acres App.Period 0.10 8/1-7/31 Supplied By:
CROP Fescue Hay Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Soil Series Badin Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 01 0
RYE I Sample Date 3.2 Tons 1 06-02-14 Manure 139 238 1521 198 1 2 1 0
P Removal IRating 50 Ibs/ac. L.ow BALANCE 0 238 1521 198 1 2 1 0
Tract I Field b9959 41 Req'd Nutrients 165 0 10 0 0 0 0 0
Acres App.Period 1.70 8/1-7/31 Supplied By:
CROP Fescue Hay Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Soil Series Badin Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
RYE I Sample Date 3.8 Tons 07-11-12 Manure 165 283 1805 2351 1 2 1 0
P Removal IRating 601bs/ac. Low BALANCE 0 283 1795 235 1 2 1 0
Tract Field c9961 03 Req'd Nutrients 94 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Acres I App.Period 6.40 9/1-3/31 Supplied By:
CROP Small Grain,Silage Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Soil Series Badin Residual 0 0 0 0 01 01 0 0
RYE I Sample Date 8.7 Tons 1 06-02-14 Manure 94 124 156 43 1 1 0 0
P Removal IRating 47 lbs/ac. Medium BALANCE 0 124 156 43 1 1 1 1 0 0
500173 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 3/25/2019 NMR Page 2 of 34

Nutrient Management Recommendations Test
YEAR 1 N P2O5 K2O Mg Mn Zn Cu Lime
(lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (tons/A)
Tract Field c9961 03 Req'd Nutrients 204 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Acres I App.Period 6.40 2/15-6/30 Supplied By:
CROP Corn,Silage Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Soil Series Badin Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
RYE I Sample Date 19.1 Tons 06-02-14 Manure 204 269 337 93 3 2 1 0
P Removal Rating 65 lbs/ac. Medium BALANCE 0 269 337 93 3 21 1 0
Tract Field c9961 04 Req'd Nutrients 94 0 20 0 0 0 0 0
Acres I App.Period 24.20 9/1-3/31 Supplied By:
CROP Small Grain,Silage Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 01 0
Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Soil Series Badin Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
RYE Sample Date 8.7 Tons 06-02-14 Manure 94 124 156 43 1 1 0 0
P Removal n Rating 471bs/ac. Medium BALANCE 0 124 136 43 1 1 0 0
Tract Field c9961 04 Req'd Nutrients 204 20 60 0 0 0 0 0
Acres I App.Period 24.20 2/15-6/30 Supplied By:
CROP Corn,Silage Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Soil Series Badin Residual 0 0 0 01 0 0 0 0
RYE I Sample Date 19.1 Tons 06-02-14 Manure 204 269 337 93 3 21 1 0
P Removal I Rating 65 lbs/ac. Medium BALANCE 0 249 277 93 3 2 1 0
Tract Field c9961 05 Req'd Nutrients 204 0 20 0 0 0 0 0
Acres App.Period 10.00 2/15-6/30 Supplied By:
CROP Com,Silage Starter 0 0 0 01 0 0 01 0
Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Soil Series Badin Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
RYE I Sample Date 19.1 Tons 06-02-14 Manure 204 2691 337 93 3 2 1 0
P Removal I Rating 65 lbs/ac. Medium BALANCE 0 269 317 93 3 2 1 0
Tract Field c9961 05 Req'd Nutrients 94 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Acres I App.Period 10.00 9/1-3/31 Supplied By:
CROP Small Grain,Silage Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Soil Series Badin Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
RYE I Sample Date 8.7 Tons 1 06-02-14 Manure 94 124 156 431 1 11 01 0
P Removal Rating 471bs/ac. Medium BALANCE 0 124 156 431 1 1 0 0
500173 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 3/25/2019 NMR Page 3 of 34

Nutrient Management Recommendations Test
YEAR 1 N P2O5 K2O Mg Mn Zn Cu Lime
(Ibs/A) (Ibs/A) (Ibs/A) (Ibs/A) (Ibs/A) (lbs/A) (Ibs/A) (tons/A)
Tract Field c9961 06 Req'd Nutrients 204 0 60 0 0 0 0 0
Acres I App.Period 5.30 2/15-6/30 Supplied By:
CROP Corn,Silage Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Soil Series Badin Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
RYE I Sample Date 19.1 Tons 1 06-02-14 Manure 204 269 337 93 3 2 1 0
P Removal I Rating 65 lbs/ac. Medium BALANCE 0 269 277 93 3 2 1 0
Tract Field c9961 06 Req'd Nutrients 94 0 20 0 0 0 0 0
Acres I App.Period 5.30 9/1-3/31 Supplied By:
CROP Small Grain,Silage Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Soil Series Badin Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
RYE Sample Date 8.7 Tons 06-02-14 Manure 94 124 156 43 1 1 0 0
P Removal I Rating 47 lbs/ac. Medium BALANCE 0 124 136 43 1 1 0 0
Tract Field c9961 31 Req'd Nutrients 1'12 0 90 0 0 0 0 1
Acres App.Period 2.00 8/1-7/31 Supplied By:
CROP Fescue Hay Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
Soil Series Badin Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
RYE I Sample Date 3.5 Tons 07-11-12 Manure 152 238 333 75 3 2 1 0
P Removal Rating 55 ibs/ac. Low BALANCE 0 238 243 75 3 2 1 0
Tract Field c9961 32 Req'd Nutrients 165 0 60 0 0 0 0 0
Acres App.Period 1.40 8/1-7/31 Supplied By:
CROP Fescue Hay Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Soil Series Badin Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
RYE I Sample Date 3.8 Tons 07-11-12 Manure 165 258 361 81 3 3 1 0
P Removal Rating 601bs/ac. Low BALANCE 0 258 301 81 3 31 1 0
Tract Field c9961 33 Req'd Nutrients 165 0 50 0 0 0 0 1
Acres I App.Period 0.40 8/1-7/31 Supplied By:
CROP Fescue Hay Starterl 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 01 0 0 0 1
Soil Series Badin -Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
RYE j Sample Date 3.8 Tons 06-02-14 Manure 165 258 361 81 3 3 1 0
P Removal Rating 60 lbs/ac. Low BALANCE 0 258 311 81 3 3 1 0
500173 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 3/25/2019 NMR Page 4 of 34

Nutrient Management Recommendations Test
YEAR 1 N P205 K20 Mg Mn Zn Cu Lime
(lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (tons/A)
Tract Field d9957 07 Req'd Nutrients 204 0 50 0 0 0 0 0
Acres I App.Period 2.66 2/15-6/30 Supplied By:
CROP Corn,Silage Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Soil Series Badin Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
RYE I Sample Date 19.1 Tons 07-11-12 Manure 204 269 337 93 3 2 1 0
P Removal Rating 65 lbs/ac. Medium BALANCE 0 269 287 931 3 2 1 0
Tract Field d9957 07 Req'd Nutrients 94 0 10 0 0 0 0 0
Acres App.Period 2.66 9/1-3/31 Supplied By:
CROP Small Grain,Silage Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Soil Series Badin Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
RYE I Sample Date 8.7 Tons 07-11-12 Manure 94 1241 156 43 1 1 0 0
P Removal Rating 47 lbs/ac. Medium BALANCE 0 124 146 43 1 1 0 0
Tract Field e9956 08 Req'd Nutrients 204 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Acres I App.Period 22.46 1 2/15-6/30 Supplied By:
CROP Corn,Silage Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Soil Series Badin Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
RYE I Sample Date 19.1 Tons 07-11-12 Manure 204 269 337 93 3 2 1 0
P Removal Rating 65 lbs/ac. Medium BALANCE 0 269 337 93 3 2 1 0
Tract Field e9956 08 Req'd Nutrients 94 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Acres I App.Period 22.46 9/1-3/31 Supplied By:
CROP Small Grain,Silage Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Soil Series Badin Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
RYE I Sample Date 8.7 Tons 07-11-12 Manure 94 124 156 43 1 1 0 0
P Removal I Rating 47 lbs/ac. Medium BALANCE 0 124 156 43 1 1 0 0
Tract Field f2271 09 Req'd Nutrients 224 0 20 0 0 0 0 0
Acres I App.Period 4.50 2/15-6/30 Supplied By:
CROP Corn,Silage Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Soil Series Badin Residual 0 0 0 0 0 01 0 0
RYE I Sample Date 20.9 Tons 1 07-11-12 Manure 224 295 371 102 3 2 1 0
P Removal Rating 1 71 lbs/ac. IMedium I BALANCE 0 295 351 102 31 21 1 0
500173 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 3/25/2019 NMR Page 5 of 34

Nutrient Management Recommendations Test
YEAR 1 N P2O5 K2O Mg Mn Zn Cu Lime
(lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (tms/A)
Tract Field f2271 09 Req'd Nutrients 103 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Acres App.Period 4.50 9/1-3/31 Supplied By:
CROP Small Grain,Silage Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Soil Series Badin Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
RYE I Sample Date 9.5 Tons 07-11-12 Manure 103 136 170 47 1 1 0 0
P Removal Rating 51 Ibs/ac. Medium BALANCE 0 136 170 47 1 1 0 0
Tract I Field f2271 10 Req'd Nutrients 224 30 110 0 0 0 0 0
Acres I App.Period 3.80 2/15-6/30 Supplied By:
CROP Corn,Silage Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Soil Series Badin Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
RYE I Sample Date 20.9 Tons 07-11-12 Manure 2241 295 371 102 3 2 1 0
P Removal I Rating 71 lbs/ac. -Medium BALANCE 0 265 261 102 3 2 1 0
Tract Field f2271 10 Req'd Nutrients 103 10 50 0 0 0 0 0
Acres I App.Period 3.80 9/1-3/31 Supplied By:
CROP Small Grain,Silage Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Soil Series Badin Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
RYE I Sample Date 9.5 Tons 07-11-12 Manure 103 136 170 47 1 1 0 0
P Removal Rating 51 lbs/ac. Medium BALANCE 0 126 120 47 1 1 0 0
Tract Field f2271 1 I Req'd Nutrients 224 10 130 0 0 0 0 0
Acres I App.Period 3.20 2/15-6/30 Supplied By:
CROP Corn,Silage Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Soil Series Badin Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
RYE I Sample Date 20.9 Tons 07-11-12 Manure 224 295 371 102 3 2 1 0
P Removal Rating 71 Ibs/ac. Medium BALANCE 01 285 241 102 3 2 1 0
Tract I Field f2271 11 Req'd Nutrients 103 0 70 0 0 0 0 0
Acres I App.Period 3.20 9/1-3/31 Supplied By:
CROP Small Grain,Silage Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Soil Series Badin Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
RYE I Sample Date 9.5 Tons 07-11-12 Manure 103 136 170 47 1 1 0 P Removal Rating 51 lbs/ac. Medium BALANCE 0 136 100 47 1 1 0Ej
500173 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 3/25/2019 NMR Page 6 of 34

Nutrient Management Recommendations Test
YEAR 1 N P205 K20 Mg Mn Zn Cu Lime
(lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (tons/A)
Tract Field f2271 12 Req'd Nutrients 104 0 40 0 0 0 0 0
Acres App.Period 5.70 9/1-3/31 Supplied By:
CROP Small Grain,Silage Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Soil Series Georgeville Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
RYE I Sample Date 9.6 Tons 07-11-12 Manure 104 178 1138 148 1 1 1 0
P Removal Rating 521bs/ac. Medium BALANCE 0 178 1098 148 1 1 1 0
Tract Field @271 12 Req'd Nutrients 214 0 90 0 0 0 0 0
Acres App.Period 5.70 2/15-6/30 Supplied By:
CROP Corn,Silage Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 n n 0 0
Soil Series Georgeville Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
RYE 1 Sample Date 20.0 Tons 07-11-12 Manure 214 367 2341 305 2 3 1 0
P Removal Rating 68 lbs/ac. Medium BALANCE 0 367 2251 305 2 3 1 0
Tract Field 12271 13 Req'd Nutrients 104 0 40 0 0 0 0 0
Acres I App.Period 3.10 9/1-3/31 Supplied By:
CROP Small Grain,Silage Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Soil Series Georgeville Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
RYE I Sample Date 9.6 Tons 07-11-12 Manure 104 178 1138 148 1 1 1 0
P Removal Rating 52 lbs/ac. Low BALANCE 0 178 1098 148 1 1 1 0
Tract Field f2271 13 Req'd Nutrients 214 10 100 0 0 0 0 0
Acres App.Period 3.10 2/15-6/30 Supplied By:
CROP Corn,Silage Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Soil Series Georgeville Residual 0 0 0 01 0 0 0 0
RYE I Sample Date 20.0 Tons 07-11-12 Manure 214 367 2341 305 2 3 1 0
P Removal Rating 68 lbs/ac. Low BALANCE 0 357 2241 305 2 3 1 0
Tract Field g2270 14 Req'd Nutrients 224 40 40 0 0 0 0 0
Acres I App.Period 5.60 2/15-6/30 Supplied By: .
CROP Corn,Silage Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Soil Series Badin Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
RYE I Sample Date 20.9 Tons 1 07-11-12 Manure 224 384 2451 320 2 3 1 0
P Removal Rating 71 lbs/ac. Low I BALANCE 0 3441 24111 3201 2 3 1 0
500173 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 3/25/2019 NMR Page 7 of 34

Nutrient Management Recommendations Test
YEAR 1 N P2O5 K2O Mg Mn Zn Cu Lime
(lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (tons/A)
Tract Field g2270 14 Req'd Nutrients 103 30 0 0 0 0 0 0
Acres App.Period 5.60 9/1-3/31 Supplied By:
CROP Small Grain,Silage Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Soil Series Badin Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
RYE I Sample Date 9.5 Tons 07-11-12 Manure 103 177 1127 147 1 1 1 0
P Removal Rating 51 lbs/ac. Low BALANCE 0 147 1127 1471 1 1 1 0
Tract Field g2270 15 Req'd Nutrients 103 30 0 0 0 01 0 0
Acres I App.Period 6.79 9/1-3/31 Supplied By:
CROP Small Grain,Silage Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Soil Series Badin Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 01 0
RYE 1 Sample Date 9.5 Tons 07-11-12 Manure 103 177 1127 147 1 1 1 0
P Removal I Rating 51 lbs/ac. Medium BALANCE 0 147 1127 147 1 1 1 0
Tract Field g2270 15 Req'd Nutrients 224 40 40 0 0 0 0 0
Acres I App.Period 6.79 2115-6/30 Supplied By:
CROP Corn,Silage Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Soil Series Badin Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
RYE I Sample Date 20.9 Tons 07-11-12 Manure 224 384 2451 3201 2 3 1 0
P Removal Rating 71 lbs/ac. Medium BALANCE 0 344 2411 320 2 31 1 0
[ Tract Field g2270 17 Req'd Nutrients 71 90 30 0 0 0 0 0
Acres App.Period 1.50 9/1-3/31 Supplied By:
CROP Small Grain,Silage Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Soil Series Goldston Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
RYE I Sample Date 5.7 Tons 07-11-12 Manure 71 122 777 101 1 1 0 0
P Removal Rating 31 lbs/ac. Low BALANCE 0 32 747 101 1 1 0 0
Tract I Field g2270 17 Req'd Nutrients 104 100 80 0 0 0 0 0
Acres I App.Period 1.50 2/15-6/30 Supplied By:
CROP Corn,Silage Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Soil Series Goldston Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
RYE I Sample Date 8.7 Tons 07-11-12 Manure 104 178 1138 148 1 1 1 0
P Removal I Rating 301bs/ac. Low BALANCE 0 78 1058 148 1 1 1 1 0
500173 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 3/25/2019 NMR Page 8 of 34

Nutrient Management Recommendations Test
YEAR 1 N P205 K20 Mg Mn Zn Cu Lime
(lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (tons/A)
Tract F Field g2270 18 Req'd Nutrients 86 70 90 0 0 0 0 0
Acres I App.Period 2.30 9/1-3/31 Supplied By:
CROP Small Grain,Silage Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Soil Series Badin Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
RYE I Sample Date 8.0 Tons 07-11-12 Manure 86 1341 188 42 2 1 01 0
P Removal IRating 43 lbs/ac. Low BALANCE 0 64 98 421 2 1 0 0
Tract I Field g2270 18 Req'd Nutrients 188 80 160 0 0 0 0 0
Acres App.Period 2.30 2/15-6/30 Supplied By:
CROP Corn,Silage Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Soil Series Badin Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
RYE I Sample Date 17.6 Tons 07-11-12 Manure 188 294 411 92 4 3 1 0
P Removal I Rating 60 lbs/ac. Low BALANCE 0 214 251 92 4 3 1 0
Tract Field g2270 19 Req'd Nutrients 103 60 90 0 0 0 0 0
Acres I App.Period 2.60 9/1-3/31 Supplied By:
CROP Small Grain,Silage Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Soil Series Badin Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
RYE I Sample Date 9.5 Tons 1 07-11-12 Manure 103 161 225 51 2 2 0 0
P Removal I Rating 51 lbs/ac. Low BALANCE 0 101 135 51 2 2 0 0
Tract Field g2270 19 Req'd Nutrients 224 70 150 0 0 0 0 0
Acres App.Period 2.60 2/15-6/30 Supplied By:
CROP Corn,Silage Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Soil Series Badin Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
RYE I Sample Date 20.9 Tons 07-11-12 Manure 224 350 490 1101 4 4 1 0
P Removal Rating 71 lbs/ac. Low BALANCE 01 280 340 110 4 4 1 0
Tract I Field g2270 20 Req'd Nutrients 111 60 90 0 0 0 0 0
Acres I App.Period 6.60 9/1-3/31 Supplied By:
CROP Small Grain,Silage Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Soil Series Dogue-P Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
RYE Sample Date 10.0 Tons 1 07-11-12 Manure 1111 173 243 55 2 21 01 0
P Removal I Rating 54 lbs/ac. Medium BALANCE 01 113 153 55 2 2 0 0
500173 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 3/25/2019 NMR Page 9 of 34

Nutrient Management Recommendations Test
YEAR 1 N P2O5 K2O Mg Mn Zn Cu Lime
(lbs/A) (Ibs/A) (Ibs/A) (Ibs/A) (Ibs/A) (Ibs/A) (Ibs/A) (tons/A)
Tract Field g2270 20 Req'd Nutrients 259 80 150 0 0 0 0 0
Acres I App.Period 6.60 2/15-6/30 Supplied By:
CROP Com,Silage Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Soil Series Dogue-P Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
RYE I Sample Date 23.8 Tons 07-11-12 Manure 259 405 567 127 5 4 1 0
P Removal Rating 81 Ibs/ac. Medium BALANCE 0 325 4171 127 5 4 1 0
Tract Field g2270 21 Req'd Nutrients ill 20 80 0 0 0 0 0
Acres App.Period 4.50 9/1-3/31 Supplied By:
CROP Small Grain,Silage Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Soil Series Dogue-P Residual 0 0 0 0 0 01 0 0
RYE Sample Date 10.0 Tons 07-11-12 Manure ill 173 243 55 2 2 0 0
P Removal Rating 54 lbs/ac. Medium BALANCE 0 153 163 55 2 2 0 0
Tract Field g2270 21 Req'd Nutrients 259 40 150 0 0 0 0. 0
Acres I App.Period 4.50 2/15-6/30 Supplied By:
CROP Corn,Silage Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Soil Series Dogue-P Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
RYE I Sample Date 23.8 Tons 07-11-12 Manure 259 405 567 127 5 4 11 0
P Removal IRating 81 Ibs/ac. Medium BALANCE 0 365 417 127 5 4 1 0
Tract Field g2270 22 Req'd Nutrients *95 40 90 0 0 0 0 0
Acres App.Period 4.90 9/1-3/31 Supplied By:
CROP Small Grain,Silage Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Soil Series Chewacla-P Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
RYE j Sample Date *9.0 Tons 07-11-12 Manure 95 148 208 47 2 1 0 0
P Removal I Rating 49 lbs/ac. Medium BALANCE 0 108 118 471 2 1 0 0
Tract Field g2270 22 Req'd Nutrients *234 60 160 0 0 0 0 0
Acres I App.Period 4.90 2/15-6/30 Supplied By:
CROP Com,Silage Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Soil Series Chewacla-P Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
RYE I Sample Date *22.5 Tons 07-11-12 Manure 234 366 512 115 4 41 1 0
P Removal Rating 77 lbs/ac. IMedium BALANCE 1 01 306 352 1151 4 41 1 0
500173 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 3/25/2019 NMR Page 10 of 34

Nutrient Management Recommendations Test
YEAR 1 N P205 K20 Mg Mn Zn Cu Lime
(lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (tons/A)
Tract Field h10168 35 Req'd Nutrients *124 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Acres I App.Period 1.85 8/1-7/31 Supplied By:
CROP Fescue Pasture Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Soil Series Badin Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
RYE I Sample Date 3.8 Tons 08-11-08 Manure 124 164 205 57 2 1 0 0
P Removal I Rating 6 lbs/ac. Low BALANCE 0 1641 205 571 2 1 0 0
Tract Field h10168 35a Req'd Nutrients 114 40 60 0 0 0 0 1
Acres App.Period 4.00 8/1-7/31 Supplied By:
CROP Fescue Pasture Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
Soil Series Badin Residual 0 0 0 01 0 0 0 0
RYE I Sample Date 3.5 Tons 04-14-06 Manure 114 150 189 52 2 1 1 0 0
P Removal-'.Rating 6 lbs/ac. Low BALANCE 0 110 129 52 2 1 0 0
Tract Field h10168 36 Req'd Nutrients *124 0 90 0 0 0 0 1
Acres I App.Period 2.40 8/1-7/31 Supplied By:
CROP Fescue Pasture Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Commercial Fert. 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
Soil Series Badin Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
RYE I Sample Date 3.8 Tons 04-14-06 Manure 123 162 203 56 2 1 0 0
P Removal I Rating 6lbs/ac. Low BALANCE 0 162 113 56 2 1 0 0
Tract Field h10168 37 Req'd Nutrients *124 0 90 0 0 0 0 1
Acres I App.Period 5.90 8/1-7/31 Supplied By:
CROP Fescue Pasture Starter 01 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Commercial Fert. 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
Soil Series Badin Residual 0 0 0 01 0 0 0 0
RYE I Sample Date 3.8 Tons 04-14-06 Manure 123 162 203 56 2 1 0 0
P Removal I Rating 6 lbs/ac. Low BALANCE 0 162 113 56 2 1 0 0
Tract Field i2308 38 Req'd Nutrients 104 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Acres I App.Period 6.50 8/1-7/31 Supplied By:
CROP Fescue Pasture Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Soil Series Badin Residual 0 0 0 01 0 0 0 0
RYE I Sample Date 3.2 Tons 1 07-11-12 Manure 104 137 172 48 1 1 0 0
P Removal Rating 5 lbs/ac. ILow BALANCE j 01 137 1721 481 1 1 0 0
�r-
500173 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 3/25/2019 APR 0 2 2019 NMR Page 11 of 34

Nutrient Management Recommendations Test
YEAR 1 N P2O5 K2O Mg Mn Zn Cu Lime
(lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (tons/A)
Tract Field j9959 39 Req'd Nutrients 139 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Acres App.Period 6.75 1 8/1-7/3 1 Supplied By:
CROP Fescue Hay Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Soil Series Badin Residual 0 0 0 01 0 0 0 0
RYE I Sample Date 3.2 Tons 07-11-12 Manure 139 183 230 64 2 1 1 0
P Removal Rating 50 lbs/ac. Low BALANCE 0 183 230 64 2 1 1 0
Tract Field j9959 40 Req'd Nutrients 114 90 10 0 0 0 0 0
Acres I App.Period 3.80 8/1-7/31 Supplied By:
CROP Fescue Pasture Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Soil Series Badin Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
RYE I Sample Date 3.5 Tons 07-11-12 Manure 114 150 189 52 2 1 0 0
P Removal Rating 61bs/ac. Low BALANCE 0 60 179 521 2 1 0 0
Tract Field k11276 44 Req'd Nutrients 20S' 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Acres I App.Period 3.44 8/1-7/31 Supplied By:
CROP Fescue Hay Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Soil Series Georgeville Residual 0 0 0 0 0 01 0 0
RYE I Sample Date 4.8 Tons 06-02-14 Manure 208 274 344 951 3 2 1 0
P Removal IRating 75 lbs/ac. Low BALANCE 0 274 344 95 3 2 1 0
Tract Field 12274 51 Req'd Nutrients 112 90 70 0 0 0 0 0
Acres I App.Period 4.40 9/1-3/31 Supplied By:
CROP Small Grain,Silage Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Soil Series Georgeville Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
RYE I Sample Date 10.4 Tons 07-11-12 Manure 112 148 185 51 2 1 0 0
P Removal I Rating 56 lbs/ac. Low BALANCE 0 58 115 51 2 1 0 0
Tract Field 12274 51 Req'd Nutrients 234 100 130 0 0 0 0 0
Acres App.Period 4.40 2/15-6/30 Supplied By:
CROP Corn,Silage Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Soil Series Georgeville Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
RYE Sample Date 21.9 Tons 1 07-11-12 Manure 234 309 387 107 3 2 1 0
P Removal I Rating 74 lbs/ac. ILow BALANCE 01 209 257 107 3 2 1 0
500173 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 3/25/2019 NMR Page 12 of 34

Nutrient Management Recommendations Test
YEAR 1 N P2O5 K2O Mg Mn Zn Cu Lime
(lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (tons/A)
Tract Field 12274 52 Req'd Nutrients 234 100 140 0 0 0 0 0
Acres I App.Period 10.20 2/15-6/30 Supplied By:
CROP Corn,Silage Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Soil Series Gcorgeville Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
RYE I Sample Date 21.9 Tons 07-11-12 Manure 234 3661 512 115 4 4 1 0
P Removal I Rating 74 lbs/ac. Medium BALANCE 01 2661 372 115 4 4 1 0
Tract Field 12274 52 Req'd Nutrients 112 90 80 0 0 0 0 0
Acres I App.Period 10.20 9/1-3/31 Supplied By:
CROP Small Grain, Silage Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Soil Series Georgeville Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
RYE 1 Sample Date 10.4 Tons 07-11-12 Manure 112 175 245 55 2 2 0 0
P Removal IRating 561bs/ac. Medium BALANCE 0 85 165 55 2 2 0 0
Tract I Field 12274 53 Req'd Nutrients 152 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Acres I App.Period 2.50 8/1-7/31 Supplied By:
CROP Fescue Hay Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Soil Series Badin Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
RYE I Sample Date 3.5 Tons 06-02-14 Manure 152 238 333 75 3 2 1 0
P Removal Rating 55 lbs/ac. Low BALANCE 0 238 333 75 3 2 1 0
Tract Field 12274 54 Req'd Nutrients 160 0 80 0 0 0 0 0
Acres I App.Period 1.55 8/1-7/31 Supplied By:
CROP Fescue Hay Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Soil Series Badin Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
RYE Sample Date 3.7 Tons 07-11-12 Manure 160 250 350 79 3 3 1 0
P Removal Rating 58 lbs/ac. Low BALANCE 01 250 2701 79 3 3 1 0
Tract Field 12274 55 Req'd Nutrients 165 0 80 0 0 0 0 0
Acres I App.Period 3.40 8/1-7/31 Supplied By:
CROP Fescue Hay Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Soil Series Badin Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
RYE I Sample Date 3.8 Tons 07-11-12 Manure 165 258 361 81 3 3 1 0
P Removal I Rating 60 lbs/ac. Medium BALANCE 0 258 2811 81 31 31 1 0
500173 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 3/25/2019 NMR Page 13 of 34

Nutrient Management Recommendations Test
YEAR 1 N P2O5 K2O Mg Mn Zn Cu Lime
(lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (tonss/A)
Tract Field ml 1862 56 Req'd Nutrients 224 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Acres I App.Period 22.00 2/15-6/30 Supplied By:
CROP Corn,Silage Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Soil Series Badin Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
RYE Sample Date 20.9 Tons 06-02-14 Manure 224 295 371 102 3 2 1 0
P Removal IRating 71 lbs/ac. Medium BALANCE 01 295 371 1021 3 2 1 0
Tract Field ml 1862 56 Req'd Nutrients 103 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Acres I App.Period 22.00 9/1-3/31 Supplied By:
CROP Small Grain,Silage Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Soil Series Badin Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
RYE Sample Date 9.5 Tons 06-02-14 Manure 103 136 170 47 1 1 0 0
P Removal iRating 51 lbs/ac. Medium I BALANCE 0 136 170 471 1 1 0 0
NOTE: Symbol*means user entered data.
500173 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 3/25/2019 NMR Page 14 of 34

Nutrient Management Recommendations Test
YEAR 2 N P2O5 K2O Mg Mn Zn Cu Lime
(lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (tons/A)
Tract Field a9958 01 Req'd Nutrients 159 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Acres I App.Period 14.10 3/15-8/31 Supplied By:
CROP Sorghum-Sudan Hay Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Soil Series Badin Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
RYE I Sample Date 3.3 Tons 08-11-08 Manure 159 210 263 73 2 2 1 0
P Removal IRating 461bs/ac. Medium BALANCE 0 210 263 73 2 21 1 0
Tract Field a9958 01 Req'd Nutrients 94 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Acres I App.Period 14.10 9/1-3/31 Supplied By:
CROP Small Grain,Silage Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Soil Series Badin Residual 0 0 0 0 0 01 0 0
RYE I Sample Date 8.7 Tons 08-11-08 Manure 94 124 156 43 1 1 0 0
F Removal iRating 47lbs/ac. Medium BALANCE 0 124 156 43 1 1 0 0
Tract Field a9958 02 Req'd Nutrients 103 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Acres I App.Period 13.80 9/1-3/31 Supplied By:
CROP Small Grain,Silage Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Soil Series Badin Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
RYE I Sample Date 9.5 Tons 06-02-14 Manure 103 136 170 47 1 1 0 0
P Removal IRating 51 lbs/ac. Medium BALANCE 0 136 170 471 1 1 0 0
mmmmonq
Tract Field a9958 02 Req'd Nutrients 174 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Acres I App.Period 13.80 3/15-8/31 Supplied By:
CROP Sorghum-Sudan Hay Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Soil Series Badin Residual 0 0 0 01 0 0 0 0
RYE I Sample Date 3.6 Tons 06-02-14 Manure 174 229 288 80 2 21 1 0
P Removal I Rating 50 lbs/ac. Medium BALANCE 0 229 288 80 2 2 1 0
Tract Field c9961 03 Req'd Nutrients 159 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Acres I App.Period 6.40 3/15-8/31 Supplied By:
CROP Sorghum-Sudan Hay Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Esso.'-'P"
Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
RYEle Date 3.3 Tons 06-02-14 Manure 159 210 263 73 2 2 1 0
P Removal Rating 1 46 lbs/ac. Medium I BALANCE 0 2101 263 73 2 2 1 0
500173 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 3/25/2019 NMR Page 15 of 34

Nutrient Management Recommendations Test
YEAR 2 N P2O5 K2O Mg Mn Zn Cu Lime
(lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (tons/A)
Tract Field c9961 03 Req'd Nutrients 94 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Acres jApp.Period 6.40 1 9/1-3/31 Supplied By:
CROP Small Grain,Silage Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Soil Series Badin Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
RYE I Sample Date 8.7 Tons 06-02-14 Manure 94 124 156 43 1 1 0 0
P Removal Rating 47 lbs/ac. Medium BALANCE 0 124 156 43 1 11 0 0
Tract Field c9961 04 Req'd Nutrients 159 0 60 0 0 0 0 0
Acres I App.Period 24.20 3/15-8/31 Supplied By:
CROP Sorghum-Sudan Hay Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Soil Series Badin Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
RYE 1 Sample Date 3.3 Tons 06-02-14 Manure 159 210 263 731 2 2 1 0
P Removal I Rating 46 lbs/ac. Medium BALANCE 0 210 203 73 2 2 1 0
Tract Field c9961 04 Req'd Nutrients 94 0 20 0 0 0 0 0
Acres I App.Period ,24.20 9/1-3/31 Supplied By:
CROP Small Grain,Silage Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Soil Series Badin Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
RYE I Sample Date 8.7 Tons 06-02-14 Manure 94 124 156 43 1 1 0 0
P Removal I Rating 471bs/ac. Medium BALANCE 0 124 136 43 1 1 0 0
Tract Field c9961 05 Req'd Nutrients 159 0 20 0 0 0 0 0
Acres I App.Period 10.00 3/15-8/31 Supplied By:
CROP Sorghum-Sudan Hay Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Soil Series Badin Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
RYE I Sample Date 3.3 Tons 06-02-14 Manure 159 210 263 73 2 21 1 0
P Removal Rating 46 lbs/ac. Medium BALANCE 0 210 243 731 2 2 1 0
Tract Field c9961 05 Req'd Nutrients 941 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Acres App.Period 10.00 9/1-3/31 Supplied By:
CROP Small Grain,Silage Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Soil Series Badin Residual 0 0 01 0 0 0 0 0
RYE I Sample Date 8.7 Tons 06-02-14 Manure 94 124 156 43 1 1 0 0
P Removal I Rating 47 lbs/ac. Medium BALANCE 1 0 124 156 43 1 1 01 0
500173 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 3/25/2019 NMR Page 16 of 34

Nutrient Management Recommendations Test
YEAR 2 N P205 K20 Mg Mn Zn Cu Lime
(lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (tons/A)
Tract Field c9961 06 Req'd Nutrients 94 0 20 0 0 0 0 0
Acres I App.Period 5.30 9/1-3/31 Supplied By:
CROP Small Grain,Silage Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Soil Series Badin Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
RYE Sample Date 8.7 Tons 06-02-14 Manure 94 124 156 43 1 1 0 0
P Removal I Rating 47 lbs/ac. Medium BALANCE 0 124 136 43 1 1 1 0 0
Tract Field c9961 06 Req'd Nutrients 159 0 60 0 0 0 0 0
Acres App.Period 5.30 3/15-8/31 Supplied By:
CROP Sorghum-Sudan Hay Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Soil Series Badin Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
RYE Sample Date 3.3 Tons 06-02-14 Manure 159 210 263 73 2 2 1 0
P Removal Rating 46 lbs/ac. !ledium BALANCE 0 210 203 73 2 2 1 0
Tract Field d9957 07 Req'd Nutrients 94 0 10 0 0 0 0 0
Acres I App.Period 2.66 9/1-3/31 Supplied By:
CROP Small Grain,Silage Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Soil Series Badin Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
RYE I Sample Date 8.7 Tons 07-11-12 Manure 941 124 156 431 1 1 0 0
P Removal Rating 47 lbs/ac. Medium BALANCE 0 124 146 43 1 1 0 0
Tract Field d9957 07 Req'd Nutrients 159 0 50 0 0 0 0 0
Acres I App.Period 2.66 3/15-8/31 Supplied By:
CROP Sorghum-Sudan Hay Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Soil Series Badin Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
RYE I Sample Date 3.3 Tons 07-11-12 Manure 159 210 263 73 2 2 1 0
P Removal Rating 46 lbs/ac. Medium BALANCE 0 210 213 73 2 2 1 0
Tract Field e9956 08 Req'd Nutrients 159 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Acres I App.Period 22.46 3/15-8131 Supplied By:
CROP Sorghum-Sudan Hay Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Soil Series Badin Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
RYE Sample Date 3.3 Tons 07-11-12 Manure 159 210 263 73 2 2 1 0
P Removal I Rating 46 lbs/ac. IMediurn BALANCE 01 210 2631 731 2 2 1 0
500173 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 3/25/2019 NMR Page 17 of 34

Nutrient Management Recommendations Test
YEAR 2 N P2O5 K2O Mg Mn Zn Cu Lime
(lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (Ibs/A) (tons/A)
Tract Field e9956 08 Req'd Nutrients 94 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Acres App.Period 22.46 1 9/1-3/31 Supplied By:
CROP Small Grain,Silage Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Soil Series Badin Residual 0 0 0 01 0 0 0 0
RYE Sample Date 8.7 Tons 07-11-12 Manure 94 124 156 43 1 1 0 0
P Removal Rating 47 lbs/ac. Medium BALANCE 0 124 156 43 1 1 0 0
Tract Field f2271 09 Req'd Nutrients 103 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Acres I App.Period 4.50 9/1-3/31 Supplied By:
CROP Small Grain,Silage Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Soil Series Badin Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
RYE j Sample Date 9.5 Tons 07-11-12 Manure 1031 136 170 47 1 1 0 0
P Removal IRating 51 lbs/ac. Medium BALANCE 0 136 170 471 1 1 01 0
Tract Field f2271 09 Req'd Nutrients 174 0 20 0 0 0 0 0
Acres I App.Period 4.50 3/15-8/31 Supplied By:
CROP Sorghum-Sudan Hay Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Soil Series Badin Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
RYE I Sample Date 3.6 Tons 07-11-12 Manure 174 229 288 80 2 2 1 0
P Removal Rating 501bs/ac. Medium BALANCE 0 229 268 80 2 2 1 0
Tract Field f2271 10 Req'd Nutrients 174 10 110 0 0 0 0 0
Acres I App.Period 3.80 3/15-8/31 Supplied By:
CROP Sorghum-Sudan Hay Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Soil Series Badin Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
RYE I Sample Date 3.6 Tons 07-11-12 Manure 174 229 288 80 2 2 1 0
P Removal Rating 50 lbs/ac. Medium BALANCE 0 219 178 80 2 2 1 0
Tract Field f2271 10 Req'd Nutrients 103 10 50 0 0 0 0 0
Acres I App.Period 3.80 9/1-3/31 Supplied By:
CROP Small Grain,Silage Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Soil Series Badin Residual 0 01 01 01 0j 0 0 0
RYE Sample Date 9.5 Tons 07-11-12 Manure 103 136 170 47 1 1 0 0
P Removal IRating 51 lbs/ac. IMedium BALANCE 01 1261 1201 471 11 1 0 0
500173 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 3/25/2019 NMR Page 18 of 34

Nutrient Management Recommendations Test
YEAR 2 N P2O5 K2O Mg Mn Zn Cu Lime
(Ibs/A) (Ibs/A) (Ibs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (Ibs/A) (Ibs/A) (tons/A)
M.Period
Field f2271 11 Req'd Nutrients 174 0 130 0 0 0 0 0 3.20 3/15-8/31 Supplied By:
CROP Sorghum-Sudan Hay Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Soil Series Badin Residual 01 0 0 01 0 0 0 0
RYE Sample Date 3.6 Tons 07-11-12 Manure 174 229 288 80 2 2 1 0
P Removal I Rating 50 lbs/ac. Medium BALANCE 0 229 158 80 2 2 1 0
Tract Field f2271 11 Req'd Nutrients 103 0 70 0 0 0 0 0
Acres I App.Period 3.20 9/1-3/31 Supplied By:
CROP Small Grain,Silage Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Soil Series Badin Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
RYE Sample Date 9.5 Tons 07-11-12 Manure 103 136 170 47 1 1 0 0
P Removal I Rating 51 lbs/ac. Medium BALANCE 0 136 100 47 1 1 0 0
Tract Field f2271 12 Req'd Nutrients 203 0 90 01 0 0 0 0
Acres I App.Period 5.70 3/15-8/31 Supplied By:
CROP Sorghum-Sudan Hay Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 01 0 0
Soil Series Georgeville Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
RYE I Sample Date 4.2 Tons 07-11-12 Manure 203 348 22211 290 2 3 1 0
P Removal I Rating 58 Ibs/ac. Medium BALANCE 0 348 2131 290 2 3 1 0
Tract I Field t2271 12 Req'd Nutrients 104 0 40 0 0 0 0 0
Acres I App.Period 5.70 9/1-3/31 Supplied By:
CROP Small Grain,Silage Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Soil Series Georgeville Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
RYE I Sample Date 9.6 Tons 07-11-12 Manure 104 178 1138 148 1 1 1 0
P Removal I Rating 52 lbs/ac. Medium BALANCE 0 178 1098 1481 1 1 1 0
Tract Field f2271 13 Req'd Nutrients 203 0 100 0 0 0 0 0
Acres I App.Period 3.10 3/15-8/31 Supplied By:
CROP Sorghum-Sudan Hay Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Soil Series Georgeville Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
RYE I Sample Date 4.2 Tons 1 07-11-12 Manure 203 348 22211 290 2 3 1 0
P Removal I Rating 58 Ibs/ac. Low BALANCE 1 0 348 21211 2901 2 3 1 0
500173 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 3/25/2019 NMR Page 19 of 34

Nutrient Management Recommendations Test
YEAR 2 N P205 K20 Mg Mn Zn Cu Lime
(Ibs/A) (Ibs/A) (Ibs/A) (Ibs/A) (lbs/A) (Ibs/A) (Ibs/A) (tonsvA)
PmTField 12271 13 Req'd Nutrients 104 0 40 0 0 0 0 0
respp.Period 3.10 9/1-3/31 Supplied By:
CROP Small Grain,Silage Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Soil Series Georgeville Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
RYE I Sample Date 9.6 Tons 07-11-12 Manure 104 178 1138 1481 1 1 1 0
P Removal Rating 52 Ibs/ac. Low BALANCE 0 178 1098 148 1 1 1 0
Tract Field g2270 14 Req'd Nutrients 174 30 40 0 0 0 0 0
Acres I App.Period 5.60 3/15-8/31 Supplied By:
CROP Sorghum-Sudan Hay Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Soil Series Badin Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
RYE I Sample Date 3.6 Tons 07-11-12 Manure 174 298 1904 248 1 2 1 0
P Removal Rating 50 Ibs/ac. Low BALANCE 0 268 1864 248 1 21 1 0
Tract I Field g2270 14 Req'd Nutrients 103 30 0 0 0 0 0 0
Acres I App.Period 5.60 9/1-3/31 Supplied By:
CROP Small Grain,Silage Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
CommercialFert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Soil Series Badin Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
RYE I Sample Date 9.5 Tons 07-11-12 Manure 103 177 1127 1471 1 1 1 0
P Removal IRating 51 lbs/ac. Low BALANCE 0 147 1127 147 1 1 1 0
Tract Field g2270 15 Req'd Nutrients 103 30 0 0 0 0 0 0
Acres I App.Period 6.79 9/1-3/31 Supplied By:
CROP Small Grain,Silage Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Soil Series Badin Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
RYE I Sample Date 9.5 Tons 07-11-12 Manure 103 177 1127 147 1 1 1 0
P Removal Rating 51 lbs/ac. Medium BALANCE 0 147 1127 147 1 1 1 0
Tract Field g2270 15 Req'd Nutrients 174 30 40 0 0 0 0 0
Acres I App.Period 6.79 3/15-8/31 Supplied By:
CROP Sorghum-Sudan Hay Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Soil Series Badin Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
RYE I Sample Date 3.6 Tons 1 07-11-12 1 Manure 174 298 1904 248 1 2 1 0
P Removal Rating 50 lbs/ac. Medium BALANCE 0 268 1864 248 1 2 1 0
500173 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 3/25/2019 NMR Page 20 of 34

Nutrient Management Recommendations Test
YEAR 2 N P2O5 K2O Mg Mn Zn Cu Lime
(lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (tons/A)
W
Field g2270 17 Req'd Nutrients 71 90 30 0 0 0 0 0
pp.Period 1.50 9/1-3/31 Supplied By:
CROP Small Grain,Silage Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Soil Series Goldston Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
RYE I Sample Date 5.7 Tons 07-11-12 Manure 71 122 777 101 1 1 0 0
P Removal Rating 31 lbs/ac. Low BALANCE 0 32 747 101 1 1 0 0
Tract Field g2270 17 Req'd Nutrients 138 90 80 0 0 0 0 0
Acres I App.Period 1.50 3/15-8/31 Supplied By:
CROP Sorghum-Sudan Hay Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Soil Series Goldston Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
RYE!Sample Date 2.5 Tons 07-11-12 Manure 138 237 1510 197 1 2 1 0
P Removal Rating 35 lbs/ac. Low BALANCE 0 147 1430 197 1 2 1 0
Tract Field g2270 18 Req'd Nutrients 145 70 160 0 0 0 0 0
Acres I App.Period 2.30 3/15-8/31 Supplied By:
CROP Sorghum-Sudan Hay Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Soil Series Badin Residual 0 0 0 01 0 0 0 0
RYE I Sample Date 3.0 Tons 07-11-12 Manure 145 227 317 71 3 2 1 0
P Removal I Rating 42 lbs/ac. Low BALANCE 0 157 157 71 3 2 1 0
Tract Field g2270 18 Req'd Nutrients 86 70 90 0 0 0 0 0
Acres I App.Period 2.30 9/l-3/31 Supplied By:
CROP Small Grain,Silage Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Soil Series Badin Residual 0 0 0 01 0 0 01 0
RYE I Sample Date 8.0 Tons 07-11-12 Manure 86 134 188 42 2 1 0 0
P Removal I Rating 43 lbs/ac. Low BALANCE 01 64 98 42 2 1 0 0
Tract Field g2270 19 Req'd Nutrients 103 60 90 0 0 0 0 0
Acres I App.Period 2.60 9/1-3/31 Supplied By:
CROP Small Grain,Silage Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 01 0
Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Soil Series Badin Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
RYE I Sample Date 9.5 Tons 07-11-12 Manure 103 161 225 51 2 2 0 0
P Removal I Rating 51 lbs/ac. Low BALANCE 0 101 135 51 2 21 0 0
500173 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 3/25/2019 NMR Page 21 of 34

Nutrient Management Recommendations Test
YEAR 2 N P205 K20 Mg Mn Zn Cu Lime
(lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (Ibs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (tons/A)
Tract Field g2270 19 Req'd Nutrients 174 60 150 0 0 0 0 0
Acres App.Period 2.60 3/15-8/31 Supplied By:
CROP Sorghum-Sudan Hay Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Soil Series Badin Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
RYE I Sample Date 3.6 Tons 07-11-12 Manure 174 272 381 85 3 3 1 0
P Removal Rating 50 lbs/ac. Low BALANCE 0 212 231 85 3 3j 1 0
Tract Field g2270 20 Req'd Nutrients 111 60 90 0 0 0 0 0
Acres I App.Period 6.60 9/1-3/31 Supplied By:
CROP Small Grain,Silage Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 01 0
CommercialFert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Soil Series Dogue-P Residual 0 0 0 01 0 0 0 0
RYE Sample Date 10.0 Tons 07-11-12 Manure 111 173 243 55 2 2 0 0
P Removal I Rating 54 lbs/ac. Medium BALANCE 0 113 153 55 2 2 0 0
Tract Field g2270 20 Req'd Nutrients 267 60 150 0 0 0 0 0
Acres I App.Period 6.60 3/15-8/31 Supplied By:
CROP Sorghum-Sudan Hay Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Soil Series Dogue-P Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
RYE I Sample Date 5.4 Tons 07-11-12 Manure 267 417 584 131 5 4 1 0
P Removal I Rating 75 lbs/ac. Medium BALANCE 0 357 434 1311 5 4 1 0
Tract Field g2270 21 Req'd Nutrients 267 20 150 0 0 0 0 0
Acres I App.Period 4.50 3/15-8/31 Supplied By: .
CROP Sorghum-Sudan Hay Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Soil Series Dogue-P Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
RYE I Sample Date 5.4 Tons 07-11-12 Manure 267 417 584 131 5 4 1 0
P Removal IRating 75 lbs/ac. Medium BALANCE 0 397 434 131 5 41 1 0
MEMEW
Tract Field g2270 21 Req'd Nutrients Ill 20 80 0 0 0 0 0
Acres I App.Period 4.50 9/1-3/31 Supplied By:
CROP Small Grain,Silage Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Soil Series Dogue-P Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
RYE I Sample Date 10.0 Tons 1 07-11-12 Manure 111 173 243 551 2 2 0 0
P Removal Rating 54 lbs/ac. IMedium. BALANCE 0 153 163 551 2 2 0 0
500173 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 3/25/2019 NMR Page 22 of 34

Nutrient Management Recommendations Test
YEAR 2 N P2O5 K2O Mg Mn Zn Cu Lime
(lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (Ibs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (tons�A)
Tract Field g2270 22 Req'd Nutrients 203 40 160 0 0 0 0 0
Acres I App.Period 4.90 3/15-8/31 Supplied By:
CROP Sorghum-Sudan Hay Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Soil Series Chewacla-P Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
RYE I Sample Date 4.3 Tons 07-11-12 Manure 203 317 444 100 4 3 1 0
P Removal I Rating 60 lbs/ac. Medium BALANCE 0 277 284 100 4 3 1 0
Tract Field g2270 22 Req'd Nutrients *95 40 90 0 0 0 0 0
Acres I App.Period 4.90 9/1-3/31 Supplied By:
CROP Small Grain,Silage Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 00
Soil Series Chewacla-P Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
RYE 1 Sample Date *9.0 Tons 07-11-12 Manure 95 148 208 47 2 1 0 0
P Removal I Rating 49 lbs/ac. Medium BALANCE 0 108 118 47 2 1 0 0
Tract Field 12274 51 Req'd Nutrients 222 90 130 0 0 0 0 0
Acres I App.Period 4.40 3/15-8/31 Supplied By:
CROP Sorghum-Sudan Hay Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Soil Series Georgeville . Residual 01 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
RYE I Sample Date 4.6 Tons 07-11-12 Manure 222 293 367 102 3 2 1 0
P Removal I Rating 641bs/ac. Low BALANCE 0 203 237 102 3 2 1 0
Tract Field 12274 51 Req'd Nutrients 112 90 70 0 0 0 0 0
Acres I App.Period 4.40 9/1-3/31 Supplied By:
CROP Small Grain,Silage Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Soil Series Georgeville Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
RYE I Sample Date 10.4 Tons 07-11-12 Manure 112 148 185 51 2 1 0 0
P Removal I Rating 56 lbs/ac. Low BALANCE 0 58 115 51 2 1 0 0
Tract I Field 12274 52 Req'd Nutrients 222 90 140 0 0 0 0 0
Acres I App.Period 10.20 3/15-8/31 Supplied By:
CROP Sorghum-Sudan Hay Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 01 0
Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Soil Series Georgeville Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
RYE I Sample Date 4.6 Tons 07-11-12 Manure 222 347 486 109 41 3 1 0
P Removal Rating 64 lbs/ac. Medium BALANCE 0 257 346 109 4 3 1 0
500173 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 3/25/2019 NMR Page 23 of 34

Nutrient Management Recommendations Test
YEAR 2 N P205 K20 Mg Mn Zn Cu Lime
(lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (tons/A)
Tract Field 12274 52 Req'd Nutrients 112 90 80 0 0 0 0 0
Acres I App.Period 10.20 9/1-3/31 Supplied By:
CROP Small Grain,Silage Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Soil Series Georgeville Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
RYE I Sample Date 10.4 Tons 07-11-12 Manure 112 175 245 55 2 2 0 0
P Removal I Rating 561bs/ac. Medium BALANCE 0 85 165 55 2 2 0 0
17ract
Field m11862 56 Req'd Nutrients 174 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Acres App.Period 22.00 3/15-8/31 Supplied By:
CROP Sorghum-Sudan Hay Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 01 0
Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Soil Series Badin Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
RYE I Sample Date 3.6 Tons 06-02-14 Manure 174 229 288 80 2 2 1 0
P Removal.Rating 50 lbs/ac. Medium BALANCE 0 229 288 80 2 2 1 0
Tract Field m11862 56 Req'd Nutrients 103 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Acres I App.Period 22.00 9/1-3131 Supplied By:
CROP Small Grain,Silage Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Soil Series Badin Residual 0 0 01 0 0 0 0 0
RYE I Sample Date 9.5 Tons 1 06-02-14 Manure 1031 136 170 47 1 1 0 0
P Removal Rating 51 lbs/ac. Medium BALANCE 1 01 136 1701 47 1 1 0 0
NOTE: Symbol*means user entered data.
500173 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 3/25/2019 NMR Page 24 of 34

Nutrient Management Recommendations Test
YEAR 3 N P2O5 K2O Mg Mn a Cu Lime
(lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (tons(A)
Tract Field a9958 01 Req'd Nutrients 94 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Acres App.Period 14.10 9/1-3/31 Supplied By:
CROP Small Grain,Silage Starter 0 0 0. 0 0 0 0 0
Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Soil Series Badin Residual 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
RYE I Sample Date 8.7 Tons 08-11-08 Manure 74 981 122 34 1 1 0 0
P Removal I Rating 47 lbs/ac. Medium BALANCE 0 98 122 34 1 1 0 0
Tract Field a9958 01 Req'd Nutrients 128 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Acres I App.Period 14.10 4/1-9/15 Supplied By:
CROP Soybeans,Manured, Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Double Crop Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Soil Series Badin Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
RYE Sample Date 33 bu. 08-11-08 Manure 128 169 212 59 2 1 0 0
P Removal Rating 26 lbs/ac. Medium BALANCE 0 169 212 59 2 1 0 0
Tract I Field a9958 02 Req'd Nutrients 103 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Acres I App.Period 13.80 9/1-3/31 Supplied By:
CROP Small Grain,Silage Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Soil Series Badin Residual 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
RYE I Sample Date 9.5 Tons 06-02-14 Manure 83 109 137 381 1 1 01 0
P Removal Rating 51 lbs/ac. Medium BALANCE 0 109 137 38 1 1 0 0
Tract Field a9958 02 Req'd Nutrients 139 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Acres I App.Period 13.80 4/1-9/15 Supplied By:
CROP Soybeans,Manured, Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Double Crop Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Soil Series Badin Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
RYE I Sample Date 36 bu. 06-02-14 Manure 139 183 230 64 2 1 1 0
P Removal Rating 29 lbs/ac. Medium BALANCE 0 183 1 230 64 2 1 1 0
Tract Field c9961 03 Req'd Nutrients 128 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Acres I App.Period 6.40 4/1-9/15 Supplied By:
CROP Soybeans,Manured, Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Double Crop Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Soil Series Badin Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
RYE I Sample Date 33 bu. 1 06-02-14 Manure 128 169 212 591 2 1 01 0
P Removal Rating 26 lbs/ac. Medium BALANCE 0 169 212 59 2 1 1 0 0
500173 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 3/25/2019 NMR Page 25 of 34

Nutrient Management Recommendations Test
YEAR 3 N P2O5 K2O Mg Mn Zn Cu Lime
(lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (tons/A)
Tract Field c9961 03 Req'd Nutrients 94 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Acres Lpp.Period 6.40 1 9/1-3/31 Supplied By:
CROP Small Grain,Silage Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Soil Series Badin Residual 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
RYE I Sample Date 8.7 Tons 06-02-14 Manure 74 98 122 34 1 1 0 0
P Removal Rating 47 lbs/ac. Medium BALANCE 0 98 122 34 1 1 0 0
Tract Field c9961 04 Req'd Nutrients 128 0 20 0 0 0 0 0
Acres I App.Period 24.20 4/1-9/15 Supplied By:
CROP Soybeans,Manured, Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Double Crop Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Soil Series Badin Residual 01 0 0 0 0 01 0 0
RYE I Sample Date 33 bu. 06-02-14 Manure 128 169 212 59 2 1 0 0
P Removal Rating 26 lbs/ac. Medium BALANCE 0 169 192 59 2 1 0 0
Tract Field c9961 04 Req'd Nutrients 94 0 20 0 0 0 0 0
Acres I App.Period 24.20 9/1-3/31 Supplied By:
CROP Small Grain,Silage StarterA20
0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Soil Series Badin Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
RYE Sample Date 8.7 Tons 06-02-14 Manure 98 122 34 1 1 0 0
P Removal Rating 47 lbs/ac. Medium BALANCE 0 98 102 34 1 1 0 0
Tract Field c9961 05 Req'd Nutrients 128 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Acres I App.Period 10.00 4/1-9/15 Supplied By:
CROP Soybeans,Manured, Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Double Crop Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Soil Series Badin Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 01 0
RYE I Sample Date 33 bu. 06-02-14 Manure 128 169 212 591 2 1 0 0
P Removal Rating 26 lbs/ac. Medium BALANCE 0 169 212 59 2 1 0 0
Tract Field c9961 05 Req'd Nutrients 94 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Acres I App.Period 10.00 9/1-3/31 Supplied By:
CROP Small Grain,Silage Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Soil Series Badin Residual 20 6 0 0 0 0 0 0
RYE I Sample Date 8.7 Tons 06-02-14 Manure 74 98 122 34 1 1 0 0
P Removal I Rating 471bs/ac. Medium BALANCE 0 98 122 34 1 1 0 0
500173 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 3/25/2019 NMR Page 26 of 34

Nutrient Management Recommendations Test
YEAR 3 N P205 K2O Mg Mn Zn Cu Lime
(lbs/A) (Ibs/A) (Ibs/A) (Ibs/A) (Ibs/A) (Ibs/A) (Ibs/A) (tor'SW
Tract I Field c9961 06 Req'd Nutrients 128 0 20 0 0 0 0 0
Acres I App.Period 5.30 4/1-9/15 Supplied By:
CROP Soybeans,Manured, Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Double Crop Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Soil Series Badin Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
RYE I Sample Date 33 bu. 06-02-14 Manure 128 169 212 59 2 1 0 0
P Removal Rating 26 lbs/ac. Medium BALANCE 0 169 1921 59 2 1 0 0
Tract Field c9961 06 Req'd Nutrients 94 0 20 0 0 0 0 0
Acres I App.Period 5.30 9/1-3/31 Supplied By:
CROP Small Grain,Silage Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Soil Series Badin Residual 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
RYE 1 Sample Date 8.7 Tons 06-02-14 Manure 74 98 122 34 1 1 0 0
P Removal j Rating 471bs/ac. ?.Tedium BALANCE 0 98 102 34 1 1 0 0
Tract Field d9957 07 Req'd Nutrients 94 0 10 0 0 0 0 0
Acres I App.Period 2.66 9/1-3/31 Supplied By:
CROP Small Grain,Silage Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Soil Series Badin Residual 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
RYE I Sample Date 8.7 Tons 07-11-12 Manure 74 98 122 34 1 1 0 0
P Removal I Rating 47 Ibs/ac. IMedium BALANCE 0 98 112 34 1 1 0 0
Tract Field d9957 07 Req'd Nutrients 128 0 10 0 0 0 0 0
Acres I App.Period 2.66 4/1-9/15 Supplied By:
CROP Soybeans,Manured, Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Double Crop Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Soil Series Badin Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
RYE I Sample Date 33 bu. 07-11-12 Manure 128 169 2121 59 2 1 0 0
P Removal Rating 261bs/ac. Medium BALANCE 0 169 202 59 2 1 0 0
Tract Field e9956 08 Req'd Nutrients 128 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Acres I App.Period 22.46 4/1-9/15 Supplied By:
CROP Soybeans,Manured, Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Double Crop Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Soil Series Badin Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
RYE I Sample Date 33 bu. 07-11-12 Manure 128 169 212 59 2 1 0 0
P Removal Rating 26 Ibs/ac. Medium BALANCE 0 169 212 59 2 1 1 01 0
500173 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 3/25/2019 NMR Page 27 of 34

Nutrient Management Recommendations Test
YEAR 3 N P2O5 K2O Mg Mn Zn Cu Lime
(Ibs/A) (lbs/A) (Ibs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (Ibs/A) (Ibs/A) (tons/A)
Tract Field e9956 08 Req'd Nutrients 94 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Acres App.Period 22.46 1 9/1-3/31 Supplied By:
CROP Small Grain,Silage Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Commercial Fert. 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 0
Soil Series Badin Residual 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
RYE I Sample Date 8.7 Tons 07-11-12 Manure 74 98 122 34 1 1 0 0
P Removal I Rating 471bs/ac. Medium BALANCE 01 98 122 34 1 1 0 0
Tract Field f2271 09 Req'd Nutrients 103 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Acres I App.Period 4.50 9/1-3/31 Supplied By:
CROP Small Grain,Silage Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Soil Series Badin Residual 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
RYE I Sample Date 9.5 Tons 07-11-12 Manure 83 109 137 38 1 1 0 0
P Removal Rating 51 Ibs/ac. M-,dium BALANCE 0 109 137 38 1 1 0 0
Tract Field f2271 09 Req'd Nutrients 139 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Acres I App.Period 4.50 4/1-9/15 Supplied By:
CROP Soybeans,Manured, Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Double Crop Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 01 0
Soil Series Badin Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
RYE I Sample Date 36 bu. 07-11-12 Manure 139 183 230 641 2 1 1 0
P Removal Rating 29 lbs/ac. Medium BALANCE 0 183 230 64 2 1 1 0
Tract Field f2271 10 Req'd Nutrients 139 10 50 0 0 0 0 0
Acres I App.Period 3.80 4/1-9/15 Supplied By:
CROP Soybeans,Manured, Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Double Crop Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Soil Series Badin Residual 0 0 0 01 0 01 0 0
RYE I Sample Date 36 bu. 07-11-12 Manure 139 183 230 64 2 1 1 0
P Removal I Rating 29 lbs/ac. Medium BALANCE 01 173 180 64 2 1 1 0
Tract Field f2271 10 Req'd Nutrients 103 10 50 0 0 0 0 0
Acres I App.Period 3.80 9/1-3/31 Supplied By:
CROP Small Grain,Silage Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Soil Series Badin I Residual 201 01 0 0 01 0 0 0
RYE I Sample Date 9.5 Tons 1 07-11-12 1 Manure 83 109 137 38 1 1 0 0
P Removal IRating 51 lbs/ac. Medium I BALANCE 01 99 87 38 1 1 0 0
500173 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 3/25/2019 NMR Page 28 of 34

Nutrient Management Recommendations Test
YEAR 3 N P2O5 K2O Mg Mn Zn Cu Lime
(lbs/A) (Ibs/A) (Ibs/A) (Ibs/A) (Ibs/A) (Ibs/A) (Ibs/A) (tons(A)
Tract Field f2271 11 Req'd Nutrients 139 0 70 0 0 0 0 0
Acres I App.Period 3.20 4/1-9/15 Supplied By:
CROP Soybeans,Manured, Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Double Crop Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Soil Series Badin Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
RYE I Sample Date 36 bu. 07-11-12 Manure 139 183 230 64 2 1 1 0
P Removal Rating 29 lbs/ac. Medium BALANCE 0 183 160 64 2 1 1 0
Tract Field f2271 11 Req'd Nutrients 103 0 70 0 0 0 0 0
Acres I App.Period 3.20 9/1-3/31 Supplied By:
CROP Small Grain,Silage Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 v" "u 0
Soil Series Badin Residual 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
RYE I Sample Date 9.5 Tons 07-11-12 Manure 83 109 137 38 1 1 0 0
P Removal IRating 51 lbs/ac. Medium BALANCE 0 109 67 38 1 1 0 0
Tract Field f2271 12 Req'd Nutrients 104 0 40 0 0 0 0 0
Acres I App.Period 5.70 9/1-3/31 Supplied By:
CROP Small Grain,Silage Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Soil Series Georgeville Residual 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
RYE I Sample Date 9.6 Tons 07-11-12 Manure 841 144 919 1201 1 1 01 0
P Removal Rating 52 Ibs/ac. Medium BALANCE 0 144 879 120 1 1 0 0
Tract Field f2271 12 Req'd Nutrients 143 0 40 0 0 0 0 0
Acres App.Period 5.70 4/1-9/15 Supplied By:
CROP Soybeans,Manured, Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Double Crop Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Soil Series Georgeville Residual 01 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
RYE I Sample Date 37 bu. 07-11-12 Manure 143 2451 1564 204 1 2 1 0
P Removal Rating 30 lbs/ac. Medium BALANCE 0 245 1524 204 1 21 1 0
Tract Field f2271 13 Req'd Nutrients 143 0 40 0 0 0 0 0
Acres I App.Period 3.10 4/1-9/15 Supplied By:
CROP Soybeans,Manured, Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Double Crop Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Soil Series Georgeville Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
RYE I Sample Date 37 bu. 1 07-11-12 Manure 143 245 15641 204 1 21 1 0
P Removal Rating 30 Ibs/ac. L.ow BALANCE 0 245 15241 2041 1 2 1 0
500173 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 3/25/2019 NMR Page 29 of 34

Nutrient Management Recommendations Test
YEAR 3 N P205 K20 Mg Mn Zn Cu Lime
(lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (tons/A)
Tract Field f227= 13 Req'd Nutrients 104 0 40 0 0 0 0 0
Acres App.Period 3.10 9/1-3/31 Supplied By:
CROP Small Grain,Silage Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Soil Series Georgeville Residual 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
RYE I Sample Date 9.6 Tons 07-11-12 Manure 84 144 919 120 1 1 0 0
P Removal I Rating 52 lbs/ac. Low BALANCE 0 144 879 120 1 1 0 0
Tract Field g2270 14 Req'd Nutrients 103 30 0 0 0 0 0 0
Acres I App.Period 5.60 9/1-3/31 Supplied By:
CROP Small Grain,Silage Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Soil Series Badin Residual 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
RYE I Sample Date 9.5 Tons 07-11-12 Manure 83 142 908 118 1 1 0 0
P Removal I Rating 51 lbs/ac. Low 13ALANCE 0 112 908 118 1 1 0 0
Tract ' Field g2270 14 Req'd Nutrients 139 30 0 0 0 ii 0 0
Acres I App.Period 5.60 4/1-9/15 Supplied By:
CROP Soybeans,Manured, Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Double Crop Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Soil Series Badin Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
RYE I Sample Date 36 bu. 07-11-12 Manure 139 238 1521 198 1 2 1 0
P Removal I Rating 291bs/ac. Law BALANCE 0 208 1521 198 1 2 1 0
Tract Field g2270 15 Req'd Nutrients 139 30 0 0 0 0 0 0
Acres I App.Period 6.79 4/1-9/15 Supplied By:
CROP Soybeans,Manured, Starter 0 0 0 01 0 0 0 0
Double Crop Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Soil Series Badin Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
RYE I Sample Date 36 bu. 07-11-12 Manure 139 238 1521 198 1 2 1 0
P Removal I Rating 291bs/ac. Medium BALANCE 0 208 1521 198 1 2 1 0
Tract I Field g2270 15 Req'd Nutrients 103 30 0 0 0 0 0 0
Acres I App.Period 6.79 9/1-3/31 Supplied By:
CROP Small Grain,Silage Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Soil Series Badin Residual 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
RYE I Sample Date 9.5 Tons 1 07-11-12 Manure 83 142 908 118 1 1 0 0
P Removal Rating 51 lbs/ac. IMedium BALANCE 01 1121 908 1181 1 1 0 0
500173 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 3/25/2019 NMR Page 30 of 34

Nutrient Management Recommendations Test
YEAR 3 N P2O5 K2O Mg Mn Zn Cu Lime
(lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (tons/A)
Tract Field g2270 17 Req'd Nutrients 88 901 30 0 0 0 0 0
Acres I App.Period 1.50 4/1-9/15 Supplied By:
CROP Soybeans,Manured, Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Double Crop Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Soil Series Goldston Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
RYE I Sample Date 22 bu. 07-11-12 Manure 88 151 963 126 1 1 0 0
P Removal I Rating 18 lbs/ac. Low BALANCE 0 61 933 126 1 1 01 0
Tract Field g2270 17 Req'd Nutrients 71 90 30 0 0 0 0 0
Acres I App.Period 1.50 9/1-3/31 Supplied By:
CROP Small Grain,Silage Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Commercial Fert. 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0
Soil Series Goldston Residual 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
RYE I Sample Date 5.7 Tons 07-11-12 Manure 51 87 558 73 0 1 0 0
P Removal Rating 31 lbs/ac. Low BALANCE 0 0 528 73 0 1 0 0
Tract Field g2270 18 Req'd Nutrients 116 70 90 0 0 0 0 0
Acres I App.Period 2.30 4/1-9/15 Supplied By:
CROP Soybeans,Manured, Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Double Crop Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Soil Series Badin Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
RYE I Sample Date 30 bu. 07-11-12 Manure 116 181 254 57 2 2 01 0
P Removal IRating 241bs/ac. Low BALANCE 0 111 164 57 2 2 0 0
Tract Field g2270 18 Req'd Nutrients 86 70 90 0 0 0 0 0
Acres I App.Period 2.30 9/1-3/31 Supplied By:
CROP Small Grain,Silage Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Soil Series Badin Residual 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
RYE I Sample Date 8.0 Tons 07-11-12 Manure 66 103 144 32 1 1 0 0
P Removal I Rating 43 lbs/ac. Low BALANCE 0 33 54 32 1 1 0 0
Tract Field g2270 19 Req'd Nutrients 103 60 90 0 0 0 0 0
Acres I App.Period 2.60 9/1-3/31 Supplied By:
CROP Small Grain,Silage Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Soil Series Badin Residual 20 0 11 0 0 0 0 0
RYE Sample Date 9.5 Tons 07-11-12 Manure 83 130 1821 41 2 1 0 0
P Removal I Rating 51 lbs/ac. ILOW BALANCE 1 0 701 921 411 21 1 0 0
500173 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 3/25/2019 NMR Page 31 of 34

Nutrient Management Recommendations Test
YEAR 3 N P205 K20 Mg Mn Zn Cu Lime
(lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) Obs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (tons/A)
Tract Field g2270 19 Req'd Nutrients 139 60 90 0 0 0 0 0
Acres App.Period 2.60 1 4/1-9/15 Supplied By:
CROP Soybeans,Manured, Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Double Crop Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Soil Series Badin Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
RYE I Sample Date 36 bu. 07-11-12 Manure 139 217 304 68 3 2 11 0
P Removal Rating 29 lbs/ac. Low BALANCE 0 157 214 681 3 2 1 0
Tract Field g2270 20 Req'd Nutrients 111 60 90 0 0 0 0 0
Acres I App.Period 6.60 9/1-3/31 Supplied By:
CROP Small Grain,Silage Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Soil Series Dogue-P Residual 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
RYE Sample Date 10.0 Tons 07-11-12 Manure 91 142 199 45 2 1 0 0
P Removal 1 Rating 54 lbs/ac. :Medium BALANCE 0 82 109 45 2 1 0 0
Tract Field g2270 20 Req'd Nutrients €56 60 90 0 0 0 0 0
Acres I App.Period 6.60 4/1-9/15 Supplied By:
CROP Soybeans,Manured, Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Double Crop Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Soil Series Dogue-P Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
RYE I Sample Date 40 bu. 07-11-12 Manure 156 244 341 771 3 2 1 0
P Removal I Rating 32 lbs/ac. Medium BALANCE 0 184 251 77 3 2 11 0
Tract Field g2270 21 Req'd Nutrients 111 20 80 0 0 0 0 0
Acres I App.Period 4.50 9/1-3/31 Supplied By:
CROP Small Grain,Silage Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Soil Series Dogue-P Residual 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
RYE I Sample Date 10.0 Tons 07-11-12 Manure 91 142 199 45 2 1 0 0
P Removal IRating 54 lbs/ac. Medium BALANCE 0 122 119 45 2 1 0 0
Tract Field g2270 21 Req'd Nutrients 156 20 80 0 0 0 0 0
Acres I App.Period 4.50 4/1-9/15 Supplied By:
CROP Soybeans,Manured, Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Double Crop Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Soil Series Dogue-P Residual 0 0 01 01 01 0 0 0
RYE I Sample Date 40 bu. 1 07-11-12 Manure 156 244 341 77 3 2 1 0
P Removal Rating 321bs/ac. IMedium. BALANCE 0 224 2611 771 3 21 1 0
500173 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 3/25/2019 NMR Page 32 of 34

Nutrient Management Recommendations Test
YEAR 3 N P2O5 K20 Mg Mn Zn Cu Lime
(lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (tons/A)
Tract Field g2270 22 Req'd Nutrients *95 40 90 0 0 0 0 0
Acres I App.Period 4.90 9/1-3/31 Supplied By:
CROP Small Grain,Silage Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Soil Series Chewacla-P Residual 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
RYE I Sample Date *9.0 Tons 07-11-12 Manure 75 117 164 37 1 1 0 0
P Removal IRating 49 lbs/ac. Medium BALANCE 0 77 74 371 1 1 0 0
Tract Field g2270 22 Req'd Nutrients 177 40 90 0 0 0 0 0
Acres App.Period 4.90 4/1-9/15 Supplied By:
CROP Soybeans,Manured, Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Double Crop Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Soil Series Chewacla-P Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 D 0
RYE I Sample Date 46 bu. 07-11-12 Manure 177 277 387 87 3 3 1 0
P Removals Rating 37 lbs/ac. Medium BALANCE 0 237 297 87 3 3 1 0
Tract Field 12274 51 Req'd Nutrients '155 90 70 0 0 0 0 0
Acres j App.Period 4.40 4/1-9/15 Supplied By:
CROP Soybeans,Manured, Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Double Crop Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Soil Series Georgeville Residual 01 0 0 01 0 0 0 0
RYE I Sample Date 40 bu. 07-11-12 Manure 155 204 256 71 2 2 1 0
P Removal I Rating 32 lbs/ac. Low BALANCE 0 114 186 71 2 2 1 0
Tract I Field 12274 51 Req'd Nutrients 112 90 70 0 0 0 0 0
Acres I App.Period 4.40 9/1-3/31 Supplied By:
CROP Small Grain,Silage Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Soil Series Georgeville Residual 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
RYE I Sample Date 10.4 Tons 07-11-12 Manure 92 121 152 42 1 1 0 0
P Removal I Rating 561bs/ac. Low BALANCE 0 31 82 42 1 1 0 0
Tract Field 12274 52 Req'd Nutrients 112 90 80 0 0 0 0 0
Acres I App.Period 10.20 9/1-3/31 Supplied By:
CROP Small Grain,Silage Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Soil SerieS Georgeville Residual 20 0 0 0 0 0 01 0
RYE I Sample Date 10.4 Tons 1 07-11-12 Manure 92 144 201 45. 2 1 0 0
P Removal Rating 56 lbs/ac. Medium I BALANCE 01 54 121 45 2 1 0 0
500173 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 3/25/2019 NMR Page 33 of 34

Nutrient Management Recommendations Test
YEAR 3 N P2O5 K2O Mg Mn Z11 Cu Lime
(lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (tons/A)
Tract Field 12274 52 Req'd Nutrients 155 90 80 0 0 0 0 0
Acres App.Period 10.20 4/1-9/15 Supplied By:
CROP Soybeans,Manured, Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Double Crop Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Soil Series Georgeville Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
RYE I Sample Date 40 bu. 07-11-12 Manure 155 242 339 76 3 2 1 0
P Removal Rating 32 lbs/ac. Medium BALANCE 0 152 259 76 3 2 1 0
Tract Field ml 1862 56 Req'd Nutrients 139 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Acres I App.Period 22.00 4/1-9/15 Supplied By:
CROP Soybeans,Manured, Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Double Crop Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Soil Series Badin Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
RYE'Sample Date 36 bu. 06-02-14 Manure 139 183 230 64 2 1 1 0
P Removal Rating 29 lbs/ac. Medium BALANCE 0 183 230 64 2 1 1 0
Tract Field ml 1862 56 Req'd Nutrients 103 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Acres I App.Period 22.00 9/1-3/31 Supplied By:
CROP Small Grain,Silage Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Commercial Fert. 01 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Soil Series Badin Residual 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
RYE Sample Date 9.5 Tons 06-02-14 Manure 83 109 137 38 1 1 0 0
P Removal I Rating 51 lbs/ac. IMedium BALANCE 0 109 137 38 11 1 1 0 0
NOTE: Symbol*means user entered data.
500173 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 3/25/2019 NMR Page 34 of 34

The Required Soil Test Values shown in the following table provide a summary of recommended actions that should be taken if soil tests indicate
excessive levels of copper or zinc. Fields that receive manure must have an annual soil analysis for these elements. High levels of zinc and copper
can adversely affect plant growth. Alternative crop sites must be used when the concentration of these metals approach excessive levels. Site life can
be estimated by dividing the amount of copper and zinc to be applied in Ibs/acre by 0.036 and 0.071,respectively and multiplying the result by 0.85.
By adding this quantity to the current soil index for copper or zinc, we can predict life of the site for waste disposal.
In addition to copper and zinc indices,this table also provides a summary of lime recommendations for each crop based on the most recent soil sample.
Application of lime at recommended rates is necessary to maintain soil pH in the optimum range for crop production .
Reuuired Soil Test Value
Lime Recom.
Tract Field Crop pH (tons/acre) Cu-1 Copper Recommendation Zn-1 Zinc Recommendation
a9958 01 Corn,Silage 6.3 0.0 175 None 340 None
a9958 01 Small Grain,Silage 6.3 1 0.0 175 None 340 None
a9958 01 Sorghum-Sudan Hay 6.3 0.0 175 None 340 None
a9958 01 Small Grain,Silage 6.3 0.0 175 None 340 None
a9958 01 Soybeans,Manured,Double Crop 6.3 0.0 175 None 340 None
a9958 01 Small Grain,Silage 6.3 0.0 175 None 340 None
a9958 02 Corn,Silage 6.0 0.0 202 None 367 None
a9958 02 Small Grain,Silage 6.0 0.0 202 None 367 None
a9958 02 Sorghurn-Sudan Hay 6.0 0.0 202 None 367 None
a9958 02 Small Grain,Silage 6.0 0.0 202 None 367 None
a9958 02 Soybeans,Manured,Double Crop 6.0 0.0 202 None 367 None
a9958 02 Small Grain,Silage 1 6.0 0.0 202 None 367 None
a9958 34 Fescue Hay 6.0 0.0 193 None 368 None
a9958 42 Fescue Hay 6.0 0.0 133 None 95 None
a9958 43 Fescue Hay 6.0 0.0 133 None 95 None
b9959 41 Fescue Hay 5.9 0.0 116 None 78 None
c9961 03 Corn,Silage 6.0 0.0 231 None 328 None
c9961 03 Small Grain,Silage 6.0 0.0 231 None 328 None
c9961 03 Sorghum-Sudan Hay 6.0 0.0 231 None 328 None
L99 03 Small Grain,Silage 6.0 0.0 231 None 328 None
03 Soybeans,Manured,Double Crop 6.0 0.0 231 None 328 None
03 Small Grain,Silage 6.0 0.0 i 231 None 328 None
----------------------------------- ------------------------------------- -------------------- - --------------------- ------------------------------- -
500173 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 03-25-2019 STV Page 1 of 6

Recluired Soil Test Values
Lime Recom.
Tract Field Crop pH (tons/acre) Cu-I Copper Recommendation Zn-1 Zinc Recommendation
c9961 04 Corn,Silage 6.3 0.0 183 None 217 None
c9961 04 Small Grain,Silage 6.3 0.0 183 None 217 None
c9961 04 Sorghum-Sudan Hay 6.3 0.0 183 None 217 None
c9961 04 Small Grain,Silage 6.3 0.0 183 None 217 None
c9961 04 Soybeans,Manured,Double Crop 6.3 0.0 183 None 217 None
c9961 04 Small Grain,Silage 6.3 0.0 183 None 217 None
c9961 05 Corn,Silage 6.2 0.01 189 None 287 None
c9961 05 Small Grain,Silage 6.2 0.0 189 None 287 None
c9961 05 Sorghum-Sudan Hay 6.2 0.0 189 None 287 None
c9961 05 Small Grain,Silage 6.2 0.0 189 None 287 None
c9961 05 Soybeans,Manured,Double Crop 6.2- 0.0 189 None 287 None
c9961 05 Small Grain,Silage 6.2 0.0 189 None 287 None
c9961 06 Corn,Silage 6.0 0.0 188 None 272 None
c9961 06 Small Giain,Silage 6.0 0.0 188 None 272 None
c9961 06 Sorghum-Sudan Hay 6.0 0.0 188 None 272 None
c9961 06 Small Grain,Silage 6.0 0.0 188 None 272 None
c9961 06 Soybeans,Manured,Double Crop 6.0 0.0 188 None 272 None
c9961 06 Small Grain,Silage 6.0 0.0 188 None 272 None
c9961 31 Fescue Hay 4.9 1.3 154 None 96 None
c9961 32 Fescue Hay 6.1 0.0 189 None 324 None
c9961 33 Fescue Hay 5.4 1.0 130 None 121 None
d9957 07 Com,Silage 5.9 0.0 177 None 234 None
d9957 07 Small Grain,Silage 5.9 0.0 177 None 234 None
d9957 07 Sorghum-Sudan Hay 5.9 0.0 177 None 234 None
d9957 07 Small Grain,Silage 5.9 0.0 177 None 234 None
d9957 07 Soybeans,Manured,Double Crop 5.9 0.0 177 None 234 None
d9957 07 1 Small Grain,Silage 5.9 0.0 177 None 234 None
e9956 08 Com,Silage 6.2 0.0 247 None 411 None
e9956 08 Small Grain,Silage 6.2 0.0 247 None 411 None
e9956 08 Sorghum-Sudan Hay 6.2 0.0 247 None 411 None
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ -
500173 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 03-25-2019 STV Page 2 of 6

Reuuired SoilTest-Vatues
Lime Recom.
Tract Field Crop pH (tons/acre) Cu-1 Copper Recommendation Zn-I Zinc Recommendation
e9956 08 Small Grain,Silage 6.2 0.0 247 None 411 None
e9956 08 Soybeans,Manured,Double Crop 6.2 0.0 247 None 411 None
e9956 08 Small Grain,Silage 6.2 0.0 247 None 411 None
12271 09 Corn,Silage 6.3 0.0 173 None 222 None
12271 09 Small Grain,Silage 6.3 0.0 173 None 222 None
f2271 09 Sorghum-Sudan Hay 6.3 0.0 173 None 222 None
f2271 09 Small Grain,Silage 6.3 0.0 173 None 222 None
f2271 09 Soybeans,Manured,Double Crop 6.3 0.0 173 None 222 None
f2271 09 Small Grain,Silage 6.3 0.0 173 None 222 None
f2271 10 Corn,Silage 5.8 0.3 121 None 174 None
f2271 10 Small Grain,Silage 5.8 0.0 121 None 174 None
f2271 1 10 Sorghum-Sudan Hay 5.8 0.0 121 None 174 None
f2271 10 Small Grain,Silage 5.8 0.0 121 None 174 None
f2271 10 Soybeans,Manured,Double Crop 5.8 0.0 121 None 174 None
f2271 10 Small Grain,Silage 5.8 0.0 121 None 174 None
f2271 11 Corn,Silage 6.0 0.0 160 None 212 None
f2271 11 Small Grain,Silage 6.0 0.0 160 None 212 None
f2271 11 Sorghum-Sudan Hay 6.0 0.0 160 None 212 None
f2271 11 Small Grain,Silage 6.0 0.0 160 None 212 None
f2271 11 Soybeans,Manured,Double Crop 6.0 0.0 160 None 212 None
12271 11 Small Grain,Silage 6.0 0.0 160 None 212 None
f2271 12 Corn,Silage 6.1 0.0 178 None 317 None
f2271 12 Small Grain,Silage 6.1 0.0 178 None 317 None
12271 12 Sorghum-Sudan Hay 6.1 0.0 178 None 317 None
12271 12 Small Grain,Silage 6.1 0.0 178 None 317 None
f2271 12 Soybeans,Manured,Double Crop 6.1 0.0 178 None 317 None
f2271 12 Small Grain,Silage 6.1 0.0 178 None 317 None
f2271 13 Corn,Silage 6.2 0.0 154 None 198 None
f2271 13 Small Grain,Silage 6.2 0.0 154 None 198 None
f2271 13 Sorghum-Sudan Hay 6.2 0.0 154 None 198 None
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
500173 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 03-25-2019 STV Page 3 of 6

Re uired Soil Test Values
Lime Recom.
Tract Field Crop pH (tons/acre) Cu-1 Copper Recommendation Zn-I Zinc Recommendation
f2271 13 Small Grain,Silage 6.2 0.0 154 None 198 None
f2271 13 Soybeans,Manured,Double Crop 6.2 0.0 154 None 198 None
f2271 13 Small Grain,Silage 6.2 0.0 154 None 198 None
g2270 14 Corn,Silage 6.7 0.0 148 None 248 None
g2270 14 Small Grain,Silage 6.7 0.0 148 None 248 None
g2270 14 Sorglmm-Sudan Hay 6.7 0.0 148 None 248 None
g2270 14 Small Grain,Silage 6.7 0.0 148 None 248 None
g2270 14 Soybeans,Manured,Double Crop 6.7 0.0 148 None 248 None
g2270 14 Small Grain,Silage 6.7 0.0 148 None 248 None
g2270 15 Corn,Silage 6.4 0.0 127 None 142 None
g2270 15 Small Grain,Silage 6.4 0.0 127 None 142 None
g2270 15 Sorghum-Sudan Hay 6.4 0.0 127 None 142 None
g2270 15 Small Grain,Silage 6.4 0.0 127 None 142 None
g2270 15 Soybeans,Manured,Double Crop 6.4 0.0 127 1 None 142 None
g2270 15 Small Grain,Silage 6.4 0.0 127 None 142 None
g2270 17 Corn,Silage 6.0 0.0 183 None 194 None
g2270 17 Small Grain,Silage 6.0 0.0 183 None 194 None
g2270 17 Sorglimn-Sudan Hay 6.0 0.0 183 None 194 None
g2270 17 Small Grain,Silage 6.0 0.0 183 None 194 None
g2270 17 Soybeans,Manured,Double Crop 6.0 0.0 183 None 194 None
g2270 17 Small Grain,Silage 6.0 0.0 183 None 194 None
g2270 18 Corn,Silage 6.1 0.0 180 None 179 None
g2270 18 Small Grain,Silage 6.1 0.0 180 None 179 None
g2270 18 Sorghum-Sudan Hay 6.1 0.0 180 None 179 None
g2270 18 Small Grain,Silage 6.1 0.0 180 None 179 None
g2270 18 Soybeans,Manured,Double Crop 6.1 0.0 180 None 179 None
g2270 18 Small Grain,Silage 6.1 0.0 180 None 179 None
g2270 19 Corn,Silage 6.2 0.0 208 None 209 None
g2270 19 Small Grain,Silage 6.2 0.0 208 None 209 None
g2270 19 Sorghum-Sudan Hay 6.2 0.0 208 None 209 1 None
.................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................-
500173 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 03-25-2019 STV Page 4 of 6

Ret uired Soil Test Values
Lime Recom.
Tract Field Crop pH (tons/acre) Cu-1 Copper Recommendation Zn-I Zinc Recommendation
g2270 19 Small Grain,Silage 6.2 0.0 208 None 209 None
g2270 19 Soybeans,Manured,Double Crop 6.2 0.0 208 None 209 None
g2270 19 Small Grain,Silage 6.2 0.0 208 None 209 None
g2270 20 Corn,Silage 6.3 0.0 148 None 185 None
g2270 20 Small Grain,Silage 6.3 0.0 148 None 185 None
g2270 20 Sorghum-Sudan Hay 6.3 0.0 148 None 185 None
g2270 20 Small Grain,Silage 6.3 0.0 148 None 185 None
g2270 20 Soybeans,Manured,Double Crop 6.3 0.0 148 None 185 None
g2270 20 Small Grain,Silage 6.3 0.0 148. None 185 None
g2270 21 Corn,Silage 6.1 0.0 141 None 168 None
g2270 21 Small Grain,Silage 6.1 0.0 141 None 168 None
g2270 21 Sorghum-Sudan Hay 6.1 0.0 141 None 168 None
g2270 21 Small Grain,Silage 6.1 0.0 141 None 168 None
g2270 21 Soybeans,Manured,Double Crop 6.1 0.0 141 None 168 None
g2270 21 Small Grain,Silage 6.1 0.0 141 None 168 None
g2270 22 Com,Silage 5.8 0.3 ! 155 None 150 None
g2270 22 Small Grain,Silage 5.8 0.0 155 None 150 None
g2270 22 Sorghum-Sudan Hay 5.8 0.0 155 None 150 None
g2270 22 Small Grain,Silage 5.8 0.0 155 None 150 None
g2270 22 Soybeans,Manured,Double Crop 5.8 0.0 155 None 150 None
g2270 22 Small Grain,Silage 5.8 0.0 155 None 150 None
b10168 35 Fescue Pasture 6.8 0.0 281 1 None 665 None
M0168 35a Fescue Pasture 5.1 1.4 81 None 78 None
h10168 36 Fescue Pasture 5.4 1.1 33 None 160 None
h10168 37 Fescue Pasture 5.4 1.1 33 None 160 None
i2308 38 Fescue Pasture 6.3 0.0 175 None 245 None
j9959 39 Fescue Hay 6.3 0.0 175 None 245 None
j9959 40 Fescue Pasture 5.9 0.0 116 None 78 None
kl 1276 44 1 Fescue Hay 1 6.6 0.0 220 None 390 None
12274 51 Corn,Silage 6.5 0.01 121 None 477 None
------------------------------------------- --------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- -----------------------------
500173 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 03-25-2019 STV Page 5 of 6

it Values
Lime Recom.
Tract Field Crop pH (tons/acre) Cu-I Copper Recommendation Zn-1 Zinc Recommendation
12274 51 Small Grain,Silage 6.5 0.0 121 None 477 None
12274 51 Sorghum-Sudan Hay 6.5 0.0 121 None 477 None
12274 51 Small Grain,Silage 6.5 0.0 121 None 477 None
12274 51 Soybeans,Manured,Double Crop 6.5 0.0 121 None 477 None
12274 51 Small Grain,Silage 6.5 0.0 121 None 477 None
12274 52 Corn,Silage 5.8 0.3 125 None 198 None
12274 52 Small Grain,Silage 5.8 0.0 125 None 198 None
12274 52 Sorghum-Sudan Hay 5.8 0.0 125 None 198 None
12274 52 Small Grain,Silage 5.8 0.0 125 None 198 None
12274 52 Soybeans,Manured,Double Crop 5.8 0.0 125 None 198 None
12274 52 Small Grain,Silage 5.8 0.0 125 None 198 None
12274 53 Fescue Hay 6.3 0.0 132 None 468 None
12274 54 Fescue Hay 6.1 0.0 126 None 144 None
12274 55 Fescue Hay 6.1 0.0 126 None 144 None
ml 1862 56 Corn,Silage 6.5 0.0 130 None 200 None
ml 1862 56 Small Grain,Silage 6.5 0.0 130 None 200 None
ml 1862 56 Sorghum-Sudan Hay 6.5 0.0 130 None 200 None
m11862 56 Small Grain,Silage 6.5 0.0 130 None 200 None
ml 1862 56 Soybeans,Manured,Double Crop 6.5 0.0 130 None 200 None
m11862 56 Small Grain,Silage 6.5 0.0 130 1 None 200 None
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------------- ---
500173 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 03-25-2019 STV Page 6 of 6

The Available Waste Storage Capacity table provides an estimate of the number of days of storage
capacity available at the end of each month of the plan. Available storage capacity is calculated as the
design storage capacity in days`minus the number of days of net storage volume accumulated. The start
date is a value entered by the user and is defined as the date prior to applying nutrients to the first crop in
the plan at which storage volume in the lagoon or holding pond is equal to zero.
Available storage capacity should be greater than or equal to zero and less than or equal to the design
storage capacity of the facility. If the available storage capacity is greater than the design storage
capacity,this indicates that the plan calls for the application of nutrients that have not yet accumulated.
If available storage capacity is negative, the estimated volume of accumulated waste exceeds the design
storage volume of the structure. Either of these situations indicates that the planned application interval
in the waste utilization plan is inconsistent with the structure's temporary storage capacity.
Available Waste Storage Ca_l ci �
Source Name I McCain Dairy Liquids Design Stora-,e Capacity(Days)
Start Date 9/1 180
Plan Year Month Available Storage Capacity(Days)
1 1 41
1 2 58
1 3 180
1 4 180
1 5 180
1 6 153
1 7 125
1 8 97
1 9 133
1 10 168
1 11 141
1 12 110
2 1 79
2 2 96
2 3 148
2 4 180
2 5 180
2 6 180
2 7 152
2 8 124
2 9 160
2 10 180
2 11 153
2 12 122
3 1 91
3 2 100
-------------------- -------------------------------------------------------- ----------
500173 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 03-25-2019 Capacity Page 1 of 2

Available Waste Stora e Capacity
Source Name I McCain Dairy Liquids Design Storage Capacity(Days)
Start Date 9/1 180
Plan Year Month Available Storage Capacity(Days)
3 3 106
3 4 180
3 5 180
3 6 153
3 7 125
3 8 97
3 9 121
3 10 144
3 11 117
3 12 86
*Available Storage Capacity is calculated as of the end of each month.
--------------------------- I------------------------------------------------------------
500173 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 03-25-2019 Capacity Page 2 of 2

Required Specifications For Animal Waste Management
1. Animal waste shall not reach surface waters of the state by runoff, drift,
manmade conveyances, direct application, or direct discharge during
operation or land application. Any discharge of waste that reaches surface
water is prohibited.
2. There must be documentation in the design folder that the producer
either owns or has an agreement for use of adequate land on which to
properly apply the waste. If the producer does not own adequate land to
properly dispose of the waste, he/she shall provide evidence of an
agreement with a landowner, who is within a reasonable proximity,
allowing him/her the use of the land for waste application. It is the
responsibility of the owner of the waste production facility to secure an
update of the Nutrient Management Plan when there is a change in the
operation, increase in the number of animals, method of application,
receiving crop type, or available land.
3. Animal waste shall be applied to meet, but not exceed, the nitrogen needs
for realistic crop yields based upon soil type, available moisture, historical
data, climatic conditions, and level of management, unless there are
regulations that restrict the rate of applications for other nutrients.
4. Animal waste shall be applied to land eroding less than 5 tons per acre
per year. Waste may be applied to land eroding at more than 5 tons per
acre per year but less than 10 tons per acre per year provided grass filter
strips are installed where runoff leaves the field (see USDA, MRCS Field
Office Technical Guide Standard 393 -Filter Strips).
5. Odors can be reduced by injecting the waste or by disking after waste
application. Waste should not be applied when there is danger of drift
from the land application field.
6. When animal waste is to be applied on acres subject to flooding, waste
will be soil incorporated on conventionally tilled cropland. When waste is
applied to conservation tilled crops,or grassland, the waste may be
broadcast provided the application does not occur during a season prone
to flooding (see "Weather and Climate in North Carolina" for guidance).
500173 Database Version 3 1 Date Printed: 3/25/2019 Specification Page 1

7. Liquid waste shall be applied at rates not to exceed the soil infiltration
rate such that runoff does not occur offsite or to surface waters and in a
method which does not cause drift from the site during application. No
ponding should occur in order to control odor and flies.
8. Animal waste shall not be applied to saturated soils, during rainfall
events, or when the soil surface is frozen.
9. Animal waste shall be applied on actively growing crops in such a manner
that the crop is not covered with waste to a depth that would inhibit
growth. The potential for salt damage from animal waste should also be
considered.
10. Nutrients from waste shall not be applied in fall or winter for spring
planted crops on soils with a high potential for leaching. Waste/nutrient
loading rates on these soils should be held to a minimum and a suitable
winter cover crop planted to take up released nutrients. Waste shall not
be applied more than 30 days prior to planting of the crop or forages
breaking dormancy.
11. Any new swine facility sited on or after October 1, 1995 shall comply with
the following: The outer perimeter of the land area onto which waste is
applied from a lagoon that is a component of a swine farm shall be at least
50 feet from any residential property boundary and canal. Animal waste,
other than swine waste from facilities sited on or after October 1, 1995,
shall not be applied closer that 25 feet to perennial waters.
12. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 100 feet to wells.
13. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 200 feet of dwellings other
than those owned by the landowner.
14. Waste shall be applied in a manner not to reach other property and
public right-of-ways.
-------------------------------------------------
500173 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 3/25/2019 Specification Page 2

15. Animal waste shall not be discharged into surface waters, drainageways,
or wetlands by a discharge or by over-spraying. Animal waste may be
applied to prior converted cropland provided the fields have been
approved as a land application site by a "technical specialist". Animal
waste shall not be applied on grassed waterways that discharge directly
into water courses, and on other grassed waterways, waste shall be
applied at agronomic rates in a manner that causes no runoff or drift
from the site.
16. Domestic and industrial waste from washdown facilities, showers,toilets,
sinks, etc., shall not be discharged into the animal waste management
system.
17. A protective cover of appropriate vegetation will be established on all
disturbed areas (lagoon embankments, berms, pipe runs, etc.). Areas
shall be fenced, as necessary, to protect the vegetation. Vegetation such as
trees, shrubs, and other woody species, etc., are limited to areas where
considered appropriate. Lagoon areas should be kept mowed and
accessible. Berms and structures should be inspected regularly for
evidence of erosion, leakage, or discharge.
18. If animal production at the facility is to be suspended or terminated, the
owner is responsible for obtaining and implementing a "closure plan"
which will eliminate the possibility of an illegal discharge, pollution, and
erosion.
19. Waste handling structures, piping, pumps, reels, etc., should be inspected
on a regular basis to prevent breakdowns, leaks, and spills. A regular
maintenance checklist should be kept on site.
20. Animal waste can be used in a rotation that includes vegetables and other
crops for direct human consumption. However, if animal waste is used on
crops for direct human consumption, it should only be applied pre-plant
with no further applications of animal waste during the crop season.
21. Highly visible markers shall be installed to mark the top and bottom
elevations of the temporary storage (pumping volume) of all waste
treatment lagoons. Pumping shall be managed to maintain the liquid level
between the markers. A marker will be required to mark the maximum
storage volume for waste storage ponds.
---------------------------------------------------- ----------------------------------------
500173 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 3/25/2019 Specification Page 3

22. Waste shall be tested within 60 days of utilization and soil shall be tested
at least annually at crop sites where waste products are applied. Nitrogen
shall be the rate-determining nutrient, unless other restrictions require
waste to be applied based on other nutrients, resulting in a lower
application rate than a nitrogen based rate. Zinc and copper levels in the
soils shall be monitored and alternative crop sites shall be used when
these metals approach excessive levels. pH shall be adjusted and
maintained for optimum crop production. Soil and waste analysis
records shall be kept for a minimum of five years. Poultry dry waste
application records shall be maintained for a minimum of three years.
Waste application records for all other waste shall be maintained for five
(5)years.
23. Dead animals will be disposed of in a manner that meets North Carolina
regulations.
----------------------------------------------------------------
500173 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 3/25/2019 Specification Page 4

NUTRIENT MANAGEMENT and
WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION
N.C. Practice Job Sheet: NC-590-633
Prepared for—
Farm: Tract: Dater
-• To utilize agricultural wastes for
WHAT IS NUTRIENT MANAGEMENT? livestock feed or as an energy source.
The conservation practice, Nutrient
Management, is managing the amount, CONTENTS OF THE NUTRIENT
source, placement, form and timing of the MANAGEMENT/WASTE UTILIZATION
application of nutrients and soil amendments PLAN
to achieve realistic production goals, while The information provided in this Job
minimizing nutrient movement to surface or Sheet and the attachments meet the
ground waters. The practice, Waste minimum requirements for a Nutrient
Utilization, is using agricultural waste such as Management Plan for USDA-NRCS
manure or wastewater in an environmentally
sound manner. These practices are jointly purposes. This Nutrient Management
accomplished through the development of a Plan includes:
Nutrient Management/Waste Utilization Plan, 1 A plan map and soils map for the area
which is normally part of a broader
Conservation Plan that addresses multiple planned (these may be part of the
overall Conservation Plan).
natural resource concerns on the land.
2. Location of designated sensitive areas
PURPOSE OF NUTRIENT MANAGEMENT or resources (streams, wells,
and WASTE UTILIZATION PRACTICES sinkholes, etc.) and any associated
nutrient application setbacks, etc.
Your nutrient management/waste utilization 3. Your planned crop rotation.
plan is intended to accomplish one or more of
the following objectives: 4. Results of soil, plant, water tests.
• To budget nutrients for plant production. 6. Results from Phosphorus Loss
• To properly utilize manure or organic by- Assessment Tool (PLAT) or Leaching
products as a plant nutrient source. Index (LI) as required.
• To minimize the delivery of agricultural 6. Realistic yield expectations for the
nutrients to surface and ground water crops in the rotation, and their source
resources. if other than default values approved
• To maintain or improve the physical, for N.C.
chemical, and biological condition of the 7 Recommended nutrient application
soil. rates for nitrogen, phosphorus, and
potassium, as well as timing, form,
NC Practice Job Sheet: NC-590(August,2003) Page 1

and method of application and REQUIREMENTS FOR NUTRIENT
incorporation, if applicable. MANAGEMENT")
8. This Job Sheet (or comparable You are required to acquire and comply
information), that provides the following: with all federal, state, or local permit
• General requirements of this practice, requirements related to the handling and
as well as additional requirements to application of manure or organic
meet the natural resource protection materials.
purposes listed above.
• Additional considerations specific to The nutrient management/waste
this plan. utilization plan must address all organic
waste generated at or brought to the
• Operation and maintenance facility. A Waste Utilization Third Party
information associated with this Agreement must exist to address all
practice. organic waste not handled by the nutrient
Because this Nutrient Management Plan management/waste utilization plan.
includes agricultural organic sources, Manure or organic wastes will not be
additional items are required in the plan to applied to the following areas:
ensure proper waste utilization: . surface waters,
• Waste Utilization Agreement (if . wetlands, unless constructed as a
applicable) component in a waste treatment
• Waste Utilization Third Party system,
Agreement (if applicable) • soils subject to frequent flooding
• Additional engineering design and during the period when flooding is
operating information for waste storage expected,
structures, transport, and application frozen, snow-covered, or saturated
system, as applicable. These designs, soils,
and the instructions for operating these . within 200 feet of a dwelling other
structures, is an integral component of than those owned by the producer,
your overall Nutrient Management/ . Within 100 feet of a well,
Waste Utilization Plan.
• Emergency Action Plan to prevent • within 25 feet of surface waters, or
overtopping or other discharges from 0within any other setbacks as identified
storage structures or facilities, as by federal, state, or local laws or
applicable. regulations (e.g. NC General Statute
prevents swine lagoon effluent from
This plan was developed based on the current being applied within 75 feet of a
NRCS 590 and 633 standards and Federal, residential property boundary or
state, or local regulations or policies. perennial stream or river if the facility
Changes in laws or regulations may was sited on or after October 1995.)
necessitate a revision of the plan.
Manure or organic wastes will be applied
BASIC REQUIREMENTS FOR WASTE in a manner not to reach surface waters,
UTILIZATION wetlands (unless constructed as a
component in a waste treatment system),
General property owned by others, or public right-
of-way.
All manure and organic residues must be
applied according to a nutrient management Sludge that accumulates in waste storage
plan (see the following section, "BASIC structures must be analyzed prior to land
NC Practice Job Sheet: NC-590(August,2003) Page 2

application. Adequate provisions (available The realistic yield expectations (RYES) in
land and/or third party manure agreements) this plan are based on one or more of the
must exist to ensure sludge is applied in following:
adherence to all nutrient application Default values approved by the N.C.
requirements. All federal and state guidance Interagency Nutrient Management
regarding the proper testing, handling, Committee that incorporate soil
planning, and application of sludge must be productivity information, yield data,
followed for regulated operations. and research with North Carolina
soils, and cropping systems.
Since compliance with all applicable North Additional information on the default
Carolina laws is the responsibility of the values may be found at:
producer, you should consult the most current
version of the Guidance Memo for www.soil.ricsu.edu/nm /ncnmw /index.htm
Implementing the Environmental Management
Commission's Regulations for Animal Waste Documented actual yield data from
Management for questions. the site, determined by the average of
the highest three yields of the last five
ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS FOR consecutive specific crop harvests.
PROVIDING LIVESTOCK FEED (For forage crops, determine the
average of the highest three years of
If applicable, all agricultural wastes or other the last five years.)
organic residues used for feedstock must be 4 A fertilization rate recommended by
handled in a manner to minimize North Carolina State University may
contamination and preserve its feed value. be used in cases where no yield data
Chicken litter stored for this purpose must be or approved RYE values exist for a
covered. A qualified animal nutritionist shall crop.
develop rations that utilize animal wastes. An RYE inferred from a similar crop
on a soil with similar physical and
ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS FOR chemical features may be used for
PROVIDING A SOURCE OF ENERGY new crops or in the absence of other
RYE data. This inferred RYE may
If your facility is to be used for energy ONLY be specified by a certified
production, all energy producing components Nutrient Management planner.
of the system are included in the Nutrient
Management/Waste Utilization Plan and Erosion, runoff, and water management
provisions for the utilization of residues of controls have been planned, as needed,
energy production identified. Your Nutrient on fields that receive nutrients.
Management Plan includes the use of these
residues, if applicable. Soil Testing
BASIC REQUIREMENTS FOR NUTRIENT This nutrient management plan has been
MANAGEMENT developed based on current soil test
results (no older than three years).
General
Soil samples must be collected and
Application of nutrients must comply with all prepared in accordance with North
applicable Federal, state, and local laws and Carolina State University or the North
regulations. Carolina Department of Agriculture and
Consumer Services (NCDA&CS)
Agronomic Division standards or
recommendations.
NC Practice Job Sheet: NC-590(August,2003) Page 3

Soil test analyses can be performed by any NCDA&CS Agronomic Division, or others
laboratory or program that is certified by the certified by the NCDENR.
North Carolina Department of Environment
and Natural Resources (NCDENR), Division of Field Risk Assessment
Water Quality, Laboratory Section.
A field-specific assessment of the
NCDA&CS Agronomic Division uses the potential for phosphorus transport from
Mehlich-3 extractant process for soil testing. each field (or groups of similar fields)
Growers who utilize other laboratories must have been conducted, using the North
request the use of the Mehlich-3 methodology Carolina Phosphorus Loss Assessment
to ensure the test results are compatible with Tool (PLAT)
North Carolina's nutrient management
planning and assessment tools. For statewide PLAT assesses the potential for
consistency, all laboratories used must phosphorus (P) to be transported from the
provide fertilization recommendations using site to surface water through each of the
guidelines and methodologies as referenced four primary loss pathways:
at the NCDA&CS website: . sediment-bound P transported
through erosion,
www.ncagr.com/agronomi/obook.htm . soluble P transported through
surface runoff,
Growers are encouraged to use a laboratory . soluble P leached through the soil
that is supported by field research within the g
state. profile, and
• non-incorporated source F�
Soil testing shall include analysis for all transported through surface
nutrients for which specific information is runoff.
needed to develop the nutrient plan.
Based on the assessment of each loss
Plant Tissue Testing pathway, PLAT produces a single rating
for each field. As shown below, this
Tissue sampling and testing, when used, shall rating will identify whether nitrogen or
be done in accordance with North Carolina phosphorus shall be the rate-determining
State University or NCDA&CS standards or element in developing the planned
recommendations. application rate for manure.
Manure Testing PLAT Rating I Nutrient Application Criteria
LOW Nitrogen-based manure
Nutrient values of manure and organic by- application.
products shall be established for planning MEDIUM Nitrogen-based manure
purposes based on laboratory analysis, application.
acceptable default values, or historic records HIGH Manure application limited to
for the operation. phosphorus removal from site
in harvested Ulant biomass.
When determining actual application rates, a VERY HIGH No additional manure
laboratory analysis is required. State application i be specified in
s
plan for the site.
regulations require that waste be tested within
60 days of utilization for some operations. In On all sites, regardless of the PLAT
the case of daily spreading, the waste must be rating, starter fertilizers may be
sampled and analyzed at least once a year. recommended in accordance with NCSU
Acceptable laboratories include the guidelines or recommendations.
NC Practice Job Sheet: NC-590(August,2003) Page 4

In some cases, specific conservation practices nutrients that exceeds the soil test
that reduce the potential for phosphorus recommendation.
transport have been incorporated into PLAT.
Examples include buffers or filter strips, . When the plan is being implemented
ponds, water table management, and residue on a phosphorus standard (a PLAT
management and conservation tillage. rating of High or Very High), manure
Similarly, soil erosion rates, either existing or or other organic by-products shall be
planned, have been incorporated into your applied at rates consistent with the
PLAT analysis. This information is shown on phosphorus application guidance
the PLAT results enclosed. Because the below. In such situations, an
management of the site actually affects the additional nitrogen application from
PLAT rating, all practices identified on the non-organic sources may be required
PLAT analysis (including any required to to supply nitrogen at the rate
achieve the specified erosion rate) must be recommended by the RYE.
either already installed or included in a
Conservation Plan for the Nutrient . Within the limits allowed by PLAT,
Management Plan to be approved. manure or other organic by-products
may be applied on soybeans at rates
Nutrient Application Rates equal to the estimated removal of
nitrogen in harvested plant biomass.
Recommended nutrient application rates are
based on North Carolina State University or All nitrogen rates for hay production
NCDA&CS recommendations that consider are for pure grass stands. Due to the
current soil test results, RYEs, and nutrient recycling by grazing animals,
management. the planned nitrogen rate per unit
yield for hay crops shall be reduced
Liming material shall be applied as needed to by 25% for the portion of the expected
adjust soil pH to the specific range required by yield that is removed through grazing.
the crop or crops in the rotation for optimum
availability and utilization of nutrients. Phosphorus Application —When
manure or other organic by-products
The application amount and rate (in/hr) for are used, the planned rates of
liquid wastes (e.g. applied through irrigation) phosphorus application shall be based
shall not result in runoff from the site. The on the PLAT rating for the site, as
application shall not exceed the field capacity follows:
of the soil.
Low or Medium_ Rating —The
The planned rates of nutrient application are planned manure or organic by-
shown on the attached sheets. These rates product application rate is based
have been computed as follows: on the nitrogen needs of the crop.
• Nitrogen Application - When the plan is High Rating —The planned
nitrogen-based (a PLAT rating of Low or manure or organic by-product
Medium), the application rate of manure or application rate is limited to the
organic by-products shall be based on the phosphorus removal rate of the
recommended nitrogen rate using the RYE harvested plant biomass.
for the site (or a rate recommended by
NCSU or NCDA in the ease of crops Very High Rating — No additional
without established RYEs). This may manure or organic by-product
result in an application rate for other application is specified in the plan.
NC Practice Job Sheet: NC-590(August,2003) Page 5

On all sites, regardless of the PLAT rating, plant nutrient uptake characteristics, while
starter fertilizers containing nitrogen, considering cropping system limitations,
phosphorus, and potassium may be weather and climatic conditions, and field
recommended in accordance with North accessibility. Nutrients shall not be
Carolina State University guidelines or applied to frozen, snow-covered, or
recommendations. saturated soil.
A single application of phosphorus applied Manure or organic by-products shall not
as manure or organic by-product may be be applied more than 30 days prior to
made at a rate equal to the recommended planting of the crop or forages breaking
phosphorus application or estimated dormancy.
phosphorus removal in harvested plant
biomass for the crop rotation or multiple For nutrients applied through irrigation
years in the crop sequence. systems, application equipment should be
properly calibrated to ensure uniform
• When such single applications are distribution of material at planned rates.
made, the rate shall:
♦ not exceed the recommended Plan Review and Revision Period
nitrogen application rate during the
year of application, or A thorough review and revision (if
needed) of the nutrient management plan
♦ not exceed the estimated nitrogen shall be conducted on a regular cycle, not
removal in harvested plant bio- to exceed five years.
mass during the year of application
when there is no recommended Heavy Metals Monitoring
nitrogen application, or
♦ not be made on sites with a Very For animal waste, including sludge, zinc
High PLAT risk rating. and copper concentrations shall be
• Potassium Application — Planned monitored and alternative crop sites for
potassium application rates should application shall be sought when these
match the soil test recommended rates metals approach excessive
as closely as possible. (This is concentrations. The following criteria and
particularly critical in situations where a actions are provided:
potentially harmful nutrient imbalance
in crops or forages may occur, such as
grass-tetany). When using manure or ZINC
other organic sources, the addition of Mehlich-3 Index Action
potassium from non-organic sources fZfl:U
be required. 300(21 Ibs/ac) Peanuts are very sensitive to
may q zinc,and application on peanuts
• Other Plant Nutrients -The planned should be limited. Seek
rates of application of other nutrients if alternative sites when possible.
applicable are consistent with North The risk of zinc toxicity is
Carolina State Universityor the greater with low soil pH and has
been seen at Zn-I as low as
NCDA&CS guidelines or 300.*
recommendations. 500(35 Ibs/ac) Critical toxic level for peanuts.
Cease application on peanuts.'
Nutrient Application Timing 2,000(142 Caution:Seek alternative sites
Ibs/ac) when possible for all crops.
3,000(213 Critical toxic level for all crops.
Timing of nutrient application shall Ibs/ac).�, Cease application for all crops.
correspond as closely as possible with
NC Practice Job Sheet: NC-590(August,2003) Page 6

likely source. The Leaching Index (LI)
COPPER is included in this plan.
Mehlich-3Index Action
cu-I While the results of the LI does not affect
2,000 (72 Ibs/ac) Caution:Seek alternative sites
when possible for all crops.* your planned nutrient application rates,
3,000(108 Critical toxic level for all crops. some additional conservation practices
Ibs/ac) Cease application on all crops.• may be specified in the plan to reduce the
* Maintain pH at 6.0 on these risk of nutrient movement from the field, if
sites. applicable.
When sewage sludge is applied, the IMPORTANCE OF MANAGING
accumulation of potential pollutants (including NUTRIENTS
arsenic, cadmium, copper, lead, selenium,
and zinc) in the soil shall be monitored in Nitrogen and phosphorus are water
accordance with the US Code, Reference 40 soluble elements and either or both may
CFR, Parts 403 and 503, and applicable state be components of organic and inorganic
and local laws or regulations. Additional fertilizers. In soluble forms, both can
information on heavy metal criteria for sewage move with water as leachate down
sludge may be found in Land Application of through the soil, or over the soil surface
Sewage Sludge, EPA/831-B-93-002b as runoff after rainfall. While nitrogen and
publication number at: phosphorus exist in different forms and
http://www.epa.govinpdes/pubs/sludge.pdf may move through different transport
processes on the same site, they both
ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS FOR can have detrimental effects on both
MINIMIZING DELIVERY OF NUTRIENTS TO surface and shallow ground water quality.
SURFACE AND GROUND WATER As an example, excess nutrients can
result in accelerated eutrophication with
In areas that have been identified as impaired severe algal blooms and fish kills.
with agricultural nutrients being a likely
source, an assessment shall be completed of Because of the topography, hydrology,
the potential for nitrogen or phosphorus and other factors in the state, the
transport from the site. (The streams/water environmental problems from excess
bodies in this category are listed in the USDA- nutrients reaching surface water may not
NRCS Field Office Technical Guide, Section be exhibited near the contributing source,
I } but rather create water quality problems
far downstream. Consequently, the
Neuse River Basin, Tar-Pamlico Basin,
❑ NO the Chowan River, the watershed of the
This nutrient management plan IS NOT in B. Everett Jordan Reservoir, and the
an area where surface waters are watershed of the New River in Onslow
impaired, with agricultural nutrients County are listed as Nutrient Sensitive
identified as a likely source. The Leaching waters in North Carolina.
Index (LI) is not required.
Nitrogen: Nitrogen applied as fertilizer or
organic material is transformed into
❑ YES nitrate and can move with the water
moving downward into the shallow ground
This nutrient management plan IS in an water and eventually to surface waters.
area where surface waters are impaired, (Relatively small amounts of nitrogen
with agricultural nutrients identified as a reach our surface waters through rainfall
runoff. ) The Leaching Index (LI) is a
NC Practice Job Sheet: NC-590(August,2003) Page 7

required part of the nutrient management plan are needed. (The S.B. 1217
in some areas of the state with surface water interagency group guidelines
impairments. The LI uses soils information accepted by the N.C. Division of
and local climate data to assess the potential Water Quality for .0200 operations
hazard from leaching of nutrients. The results specify a plan revision when there are
of the LI analysis and recommended actions changes in crops or cropping patterns
are included in your nutrient management that utilize more than 25 percent of
plan, if applicable. the nitrogen generated by the
operation.) As a minimum, nutrient
Phosphorus: Research in recent decades management plans shall be
indicates that-,with high soil phosphorus thoroughly reviewed every five years
levels, phosphorus has more potential to be and revised if necessary. The next
transported off-site than recognized in the review will be performed in
past. Phosphorus can be transported in
several ways: (1) attached to soil particles
leaving the field through erosion, (2) in soluble 2. Protect fertilizer and organic by-
form leaving the field in surface runoff, and (3) product storage facilities from weather
in soluble form leaching downward through and accidental leakage or spillage.
the soil profile, and eventually into surface
water. Unlike nitrogen, the most likely 3. Ensure proper calibration of
transport pathway for phosphorus varies by application equipment to ensure
site, and depends upon such factors as soil uniform distribution of material at
erosion rate, soil phosphorus levels, texture of planned rates.
sails, existence of buffers, and other factors.
In N.C., PLAT is the tool used to assess 4. Inspect and maintain the equipment
potential excessive phosphorus losses. The and facilities used to implement the
results of the PLAT analysis and Nutrient Management/Waste
recommended actions are included in your Utilization Plan regularly. Any needed
nutrient management plan, if applicable. repairs should be made in a timely
manner.
If a site receives a PLAT rating of Low or
Medium, then applying manure at rates based 5. Review the Emergency Action Plan, if
on the nitrogen needs of the crop is allowed. applicable, annually.
It is important to realize that this may result in
phosphorus being applied at rates that 6. Records should be maintained for five
significantly exceed the crop's phosphorus years, or for a period as required by
removal rate. In these cases, the planned other Federal, state, or local
nutrient application rate is not sustainable, ordinances, or program or contract
and eventually a PLAT rating of High may be requirements. To ensure adequate
reached. information exists to support sound
nutrient management, NRCS
OPERATION & MAINTENANCE recommends the following records be
included:
You are responsible for safe operation and • Soil test results and
maintenance of this practice, including all recommendations for nutrientapplication,
equipment. The following Operation & Quantities, analyses and sources
Maintenance should be conducted: of nutrients applied (When the
1 Review the plan annually to determine if actual rates used exceed the
adjustments or modifications to the plan recommended and planned rates
on inorganic fertilizer plans,
NC Practice Job Sheet: NC-590(August,2003) Page 8

records should indicate the reasons for
the differences, e.g. inability to acquire
custom blended fertilizer.)
• Dates and method of nutrient
applications,
• Crops planted, planting and harvest
dates, yields, and crop residues
removed,
• Results of water, plant, and organic by-
product analyses, and
• Dates of review and person performing
the review, and recommendations that
resulted from the review.
NOTE: State laws or regulations may
define record-keeping requirements for
some operations.
7. Ensure that workers are protected from
and avoid unnecessary contact with
inorganic fertilizers and organic by-
products. Protection should include the
use of protective clothing when working
with plant nutrients. Extra caution must be
taken when handling ammonia sources of
nutrients, or when dealing with organic
wastes stored in poorly ventilated
enclosures.
8. Properly dispose of material generated by
the cleaning of nutrient application
equipment. Excess material should be
collected and stored or field applied in an
appropriate manner. Excess material
should not be applied on areas of high
potential risk for runoff or leaching.
9. Properly dispose of or recycle nutrient
containers according to state and local
guidelines or regulations.
NC Practice Job Sheet: NC-590(August,2003) Page 9

Crop Notes
The following crop note applies to field(s): 35, 35a,36, 37, 38,40
Fescue: Piedmont
Adaptation: Well-adapted.
In the Piedmont,tall fescue can be planted Aug. 20 to Oct. 10 (best)and Feb. 15 to Mar. 20.For
pure-stand broadcast seedings use 20 to 30 lb/ac., for drilled use 15 to 20 lb/ac. seed.Use certified seed
to avoid introducing weeds or annual ryegrass. Plant seed 0.25"to 0.5"deep for pure stands, 0.25"in
mixture with clovers. Soil test for preplant and maintenance lime,phosphorus, and potassium
recommendations.Apply 40 to 60 lb/ac nitrogen at planting for pure stands only.Do not apply N for
mixtures with clovers but use proper legume inoculation techniques.Apply 150 to 200 lb/ac.N to
pure-stand fescue for hay production; reduce N rates by 25%for grazing. Apply N Feb. 1 to Mar.20 and
Aug. 20 to Sept. 30,with equal amounts in each window.Refer to NCSU Technical Bulletin 305
Production and Utilization of Pastures and Forages in North Carolina for additional information or
consult your regional agronomist or extension agent for assistance.
The following crop note applies to field(s): 22
Corn Silage: Piedmont and Mountains
In the Piedmont, corn should be planted when soil temperature reaches 52 to 55 degrees fahrenheit. Plant
1-2" deep. Adequate depth control is essential. Review the NCSU Official Variety"green book"and
information from private companies to select a high yielding variety with the characteristics needed for
your area and conditions. Apply 10 to 12 lbs. nitrogen per-ton of expected yield. All nitrogen can be
applied at planting.Also acceptable is to apply 2/3 to 3/4 of the nitrogen at planting and the rest when
corn is in the 7 to 9 leaf stage. Tropical corn for silage needs about 6-8 lbs nitrogen per ton of expected
yield applying no more than 100 to 120 lbs total nitrogen. Research has shown that nitrogen can be
reduced by approximately 15 percent when soil injected. The total N is dependent on the soil type and
expected yield. Apply phosphorus and potassium according to a soil test before planting. Phosphorus
is best utilized when banded with the planter as a starter. Plant samples can be analyzed during the
growing season to monitor the nutrient status of the corn.Timely management of weeds and insects is
essential in profitable corn silage production.Plant a cover crop after harvest.
------------- ------------------------------------
500173 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 03-25-2019 Crop Note Page 1 of 7

The following crop note applies to field(s): 20, 21
Corn Silage: Piedmont and Mountains
In the Piedmont, corn should be planted when soil temperature reaches 52 to 55 degrees fahrenheit. Plant
1-2" deep. Adequate depth control is essential. Review the NCSU Official Variety"green book"and
information from private companies to select a high yielding variety with the characteristics needed for
your area and conditions. Apply 10 to 12 lbs. nitrogen per ton of expected yield. All nitrogen can be
applied at planting. Also acceptable is to apply 2/3 to 3/4 of the nitrogen at planting and the rest when
corn is in the 7 to 9 leaf stage. Tropical corn for silage needs about 6-8 lbs nitrogen per ton of expected
yield applying no more than 100 to 1201bs total nitrogen. Research has shown that nitrogen can be
reduced by approximately 15 percent when soil injected. The total N is dependent on the soil type and
expected yield. Apply phosphorus and potassium according to a soil test before planting. Phosphorus
is best utilized when banded with the planter as a starter. Plant samples can be analyzed during the
growing season to monitor the nutrient status of the corn. Timely management of weeds and insects is
essential in profitable corn silage production. Plant a cover crop after harvest.
The following crop note applies to field(s): 01, 02, 03,04, 05, 06, 07,08, 09, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 18,
19, 51, 52, 56
Corn Silage: Piedmont and Mountains
In the Piedmont, corn should be planted when soil temperature reaches 52 to 55 degrees fahrenheit. Plant
1-2"deep. Adequate depth control is essential. Review the NCSU Official Variety"green book" and
information from private companies to select a high yielding variety with the characteristics needed for
your area and conditions. Apply 10 to 12 lbs. nitrogen per ton of expected yield. All nitrogen can be
applied at planting. Also acceptable is to apply 2/3 to 3/4 of the nitrogen at planting and the rest when
corn is in the 7 to 9 leaf stage. Tropical com for silage needs about 6-8 lbs nitrogen per ton of expected
yield applying no more than 100 to 1201bs total nitrogen. Research has shown that nitrogen can be
reduced by approximately 15 percent when soil injected. The total N is dependent on the soil type and
expected yield. Apply phosphorus and potassium according to a soil test before planting. Phosphorus
is best utilized when banded with the planter as a starter. Plant samples can be analyzed during the
growing season to monitor the nutrient status of the corn. Timely management of weeds and insects is
essential in profitable corn silage production. Plant a cover crop after harvest.
- ----------------------
500173 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 03-25-2019 Crop Note Page 2 of 7

The following crop note applies to field(s): 17
Corn Silage: Piedmont and Mountains
In the Piedmont, corn should be planted when soil temperature reaches 52 to 55 degrees fahrenheit. Plant
1-2" deep. Adequate depth control is essential. Review the NCSU Official Variety"green book"and
information from private companies to select a high yielding variety with the characteristics needed for
your area and conditions. Apply 10 to 12 lbs.nitrogen per ton of expected yield. All nitrogen can be
applied at planting. Also acceptable is to apply 2/3 to 3/4 of the nitrogen at planting and the rest when
corn is in the 7 to 9 leaf stage. Tropical corn for silage needs about 6-8 lbs nitrogen per ton of expected
yield applying no more than 100 to 120 lbs total nitrogen. Research has shown that nitrogen can be
reduced by approximately 15 percent when soil injected. The total Nis dependent on the soil type and
expected yield. Apply phosphorus and potassium according to a soil test before planting. Phosphorus
is best utilized when banded with the planter as a starter. Plant samples can be analyzed during the
growing season to monitor the nutrient status of the corn.Timely management of weeds and insects is
essential in profitable corn silage production.Plant a cover crop after harvest.
The following crop note applies to field(s): 31, 32, 33, 34, 39,41,42,43, 44, 53, 54,55
Fescue: Piedmont
Adaptation: Well-adapted.
In the Piedmont, tall fescue can be planted Aug.20 to Oct. 10 (best) and Feb. 15 to Mar. 20.For
pure-stand broadcast seedings use 20 to 30 lb/ac., for drilled use 15 to 20 lb/ac. seed.Use certified seed
to avoid introducing weeds or annual ryegrass.Plant seed 0.25"to 0.5"deep for pure stands, 0.25"in
mixture with clovers. Soil test for preplant and maintenance lime,phosphorus, and potassium
recommendations. Apply 40 to 60 lb/ac nitrogen at planting for pure stands only.Do not apply N for
mixtures with clovers but use proper legume inoculation techniques.Apply 150 to 200 lb/ac.N to
pure-stand fescue for hay production; reduce N rates by 25%to 50%for grazing.Apply N Feb. 1 to Mar.
20 and Aug. 20 to Sept. 30,with equal amounts in each window.Refer to NCSU Technical Bulletin 305
Production and Utilization of Pastures and Forages in North Carolina for additional information or
consult your regional agronomist or extension agent for assistance.
The following crop note applies to field(s): 22
Double-Crop Soybeans, Piedmont
Double-crop soybeans should be planted as early in June as possible with planting completed by July 4th.
When no-tilling soybeans in small grain straw, it is essential to manage the straw to achieve adequate
plant populations.Review the NCSU Official Variety"green book" and information from private
companies to select a high yielding variety with the characteristics needed for your area and conditions.
Plant 4-6 seed/row foot for 7-8" drills and 6-8 seed/row foot for 15"rows. Seeding depth should be 1-1
1/2" and adequate depth control is essential. Phosphorus and potash recommended for the soybeans can
be applied to the wheat in the Fall. Soybeans produce their own nitrogen and are normally grown without
additions of nitrogen. However, applications of 20-30 lbs/acre N are sometimes made at planting to
promote early growth and vigor.Tissue samples can be analyzed during the growing season to monitor
the overall nutrient status of the soybeans.Timely management of weeds and insects is essential for
profitable double crop soybean production.
---------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------
500173 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 03-25-2019 Crop Note Page 3 of 7

The following crop note applies to field(s): 20,21
Double-Crop Soybeans,Piedmont
Double-crop soybeans should be planted as early in June as possible with planting completed by July 4th.
When no-tilling soybeans in small grain straw, it is essential to manage the straw to achieve adequate
plant populations. Review the NCSU Official Variety"green book" and information from private
companies to select a high yielding variety with the characteristics needed for your area and conditions.
Plant 4-6 seed/row foot for 7-8" drills and 6-8 seed/row foot for 15" rows. Seeding depth should be 1-1
1/2" and adequate depth control is essential. Phosphorus and potash recommended for the soybeans can
be applied to the wheat in the Fall. Soybeans produce their own nitrogen and are normally grown without
additions of nitrogen.However, applications of 20-30 lbs/acre N are sometimes made at planting to
promote early growth and vigor. Tissue samples can be analyzed during the growing season to monitor
the overall nutrient status of the soybeans. Timely management of weeds and insects is essential for
profitable double crop soybean production.
The following crop note applies to field(s): 01,02,03,04,05, 06, 07, 08,09, 10. 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 18,
19, 51, 52, 56
Double-Crop Soybeans,Piedmont
Double-crop soybeans should be planted as early in June as possible with planting completed by July 4th.
When no-tilling soybeans in small grain straw, it is essential to manage the straw to achieve adequate
plant populations.Review the NCSU Official Variety"green book" and information from private
companies to select a high yielding variety with the characteristics needed for your area and conditions.
Plant 4-6 seed/row foot for 7-8" drills and 6-8 seed/row foot for 15" rows. Seeding depth should be 1-1
1/2" and adequate depth control is essential. Phosphorus and potash recommended for the soybeans can
be applied to the wheat in the Fall. Soybeans produce their own nitrogen and are normally grown without
additions of nitrogen.However, applications of 20-30 lbs/acre N are sometimes made at planting to
promote early growth and vigor. Tissue samples can be analyzed during the growing season to monitor
the overall nutrient status of the soybeans.Timely management of weeds and insects is essential for
profitable double crop soybean production.
The following crop note applies to field(s): 17
Double-Crop Soybeans, Piedmont
Double-crop soybeans should be planted as early in June as possible with planting completed by July 4th.
When no-tilling soybeans in small grain straw, it is essential to manage the straw to achieve adequate
plant populations.Review the NCSU Official Variety"green book" and information from private
companies to select a high yielding variety with the characteristics needed for your area and conditions.
Plant 4-6 seed/row foot for 7-8" drills and 6-8 seed/row foot for 15" rows. Seeding depth should be 1-1
1/2" and adequate depth control is essential. Phosphorus and potash recommended for the soybeans can
be applied to the wheat in the Fall. Soybeans produce their own nitrogen and are normally grown without
additions of nitrogen.However, applications of 20-30 lbs/acre N are sometimes made at planting to
promote early growth and vigor.Tissue samples can be analyzed during the growing season to monitor
the overall nutrient status of the soybeans.Timely management of weeds and insects is essential for
profitable double crop soybean production.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- -----------------
500173 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 03-25-2019 CropNote Page 4 of 7

The following crop note applies to field(s): 22
Small Grain Silage,Piedmont and Mountains
In the Piedmont, small grain silage should be planted from October 10 to November 3. In the Mountains,
small grain silage should be planted from September 15 to October 31. Plant 18 to 22 seed/drill row foot
at 1-1 1/2" deep and increase the seeding rate by 5%for each week seeding is delayed beyond the
optimum time frame. See the seeding rates table for applicable seeding rate modifications in the current
NCSU"Small Grain Production Guide".Also,increase the initial seeding rate by at least 10%when
planting no-till. Adequate depth control when planting the small grain is essential. Review the NCSU
Official Variety"green book" and information from private companies to select a high yielding variety
with the characteristics needed for your area and conditions. Apply approximately 30 lbs N at planting.
Increase N at planting by 20%for no-till. Phosphorus and potassium should be applied according to a
soil test at this time. The remaining N should be applied during February-March. Apply 10 to 12 lbs.N
per ton of expected yield. The total N is dependent on soil type and expected yield. Plant samples can be
analyzed during the growing season to monitor the nutrient status of the small grain.Timely management
of diseases,weeds and insects are essential for profitable small grain silage production. Plant a cover
crop after harvest.
The following crop note applies to field(s): 20, 21
Small Grain Silage,Piedmont and Mountains
In the Piedmont, small grain silage should be planted from October 10 to November 3. In the Mountains,
small grain silage should be planted from September 15 to October 31. Plant 18 to 22 seed/drill row foot
at 1-1 1/2" deep and increase the seeding rate by 5%for each week seeding is delayed beyond the
optimum time frame. See the seeding rates table for applicable seeding rate modifications in the current
NCSU"Small Grain Production Guide".Also, increase the initial seeding rate by at least 10% when
planting no-till. Adequate depth control when planting the small grain is essential. Review the NCSU
Official Variety"green book" and information from private companies to select a high yielding variety
with the characteristics needed for your area and conditions. Apply approximately 30 lbs N at planting.
Increase N at planting by 20% for no-till. Phosphorus and potassium should be applied according to a
soil test at this time. The remaining N should be applied during February-March. Apply 10 to 12 lbs.N
per ton of expected yield. The total N is dependent on soil type and expected yield. Plant samples can be
analyzed during the growing season to monitor the nutrient status of the small grain.Timely management
of diseases,weeds and insects are essential for profitable small grain silage production. Plant a cover
crop after harvest.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
50ot73 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 03-25-2019 Crop Note Page 5 of 7

The following crop note applies to field(s): 01, 02, 03, 04, 05, 06, 07,08, 09, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 18,
19, 51, 52, 56
Small Grain Silage,Piedmont and Mountains
In the Piedmont, small grain silage should be planted from October 10 to November 3. In the Mountains,
small grain silage should be planted from September 15 to October 31. Plant 18 to 22 seed/drill row foot
at 1-1 1/2" deep and increase the seeding rate by 5%for each week seeding is delayed beyond the
optimum time frame. See the seeding rates table for applicable seeding rate modifications in the current
NCSU"Small Grain Production Guide".Also,increase the initial seeding rate by at least 10%when
planting no-till. Adequate depth control when planting the small grain is essential. Review the NCSU
Official Variety"green book" and information from private companies to select a high yielding variety
with the characteristics needed for your area and conditions. Apply approximately 30 lbs N at planting.
Increase N at planting by 20% for no-till. Phosphorus and potassium should be applied according to a
soil test at this time. The remaining N should be applied during February-March. Apply 10 to 12 lbs.N
per ton of expected yield. The total N is dependent on soil type and expected yield. Plant samples can be
analyzed during the growing season to monitor the nutrient status of the small grain.Timely management
of diseases,weeds and insects are essential for profitable small grain silage production. Plant a cover
crop after harvest.
The following crop note applies to field(s): 17
Small Grain Silage,Piedmont and Mountains
In the Piedmont, small grain silage should be planted from October 10 to November 3. In the Mountains,
small grain silage should be planted from September 15 to October 31. Plant 18 to 22 seed/drill.row foot
at 1-1 1/2" deep and increase the seeding rate by 5% for each week seeding is delayed beyond the
optimum time frame. See the seeding rates table for applicable seeding rate modifications in the current
NCSU"Small Grain Production Guide".Also,increase the initial seeding rate by at least 10%when
planting no-till. Adequate depth control when planting the small grain is essential. Review the NCSU
Official Variety"green book" and information from private companies to select a high yielding variety
with the characteristics needed for your area and conditions. Apply approximately 301bs N at planting.
Increase N at planting by 20%for no-till. Phosphorus and potassium should be applied according to a
soil test at this time. The remaining N should be applied during February-March. Apply 10 to 12 lbs.N
per ton of expected yield. The total N is dependent on soil type and expected yield. Plant samples can be
analyzed during the growing season to monitor the nutrient status of the small grain.Timely management
of diseases,weeds and insects are essential for profitable small grain silage production. Plant a cover
crop after harvest.
The following crop note applies to field(s): 22
Sorghum-Sudan: No Comment
The following crop note applies to field(s): 20,21
Sorghum-Sudan: No Comment
-------- --------------------------------------------------------- ------
-------------------------------------------------------------------
500173 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 03-25-2019 Crop Note Page 6 of 7

The following crop note applies to field(s): 01, 02,03,04,05,06,07, 08, 09, 10, 11, 12, 1 , 4,,,52, 56
Sorghum-Sudan: No Comment
The following crop note applies to field(s): 17
Sorghum-Sudan: No Comment
______ - ------------------------------- ------------------------------------------- ------
500173 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 03-25-2019 Crop Note Page 7 of 7

Search Maps Tools More... s_:
Randolph
County GIS Quick search Identify Community Info
Hide
Map Themes Print
Locate
Me
3 f . .
Zoom .
In -
17424922
[ YY
zoom ,.
Out : 492196
Full ',
Extent .�
Prey
Extent
s.
iti t
https`//gis.randoIphcountync.gov/randolphjs/ 112

EMERGENCY ACTION PLAN
PHONE NUMBERS
DWQ 33(R--) -R7os
EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM .%P- 315?- (oc \4
S WCD 33(a-UR- (o4ga
NRCS 336- ("aa -144LI9
This plan will be implemented in the event that wastes from your operation are leaking,
overflowing, or running off site. You should not wait until wastes reach surface waters or leave
your property to consider that you have a problem. You should make every effort to ensure that
this does not happen. This plan should be posted in an accessible location for all employees at the
facility. The following are some action items you should take.
1. Stop the release of wastes. Depending on the situation, this may or may not be possible.
Suggested responses to some possible problems are listed below.
A. Lagoon overflow-possible solutions are:
a. Add soil to berm to increase elevation of dam.
b. Pump wastes to fields at an acceptable rate.
c. Stop all flows to the lagoon immediately.
d. Call a pumping contractor.
e. Make sure no surface water is entering lagoon.
B: Runoff from waste application field-actions include:
a. Immediately stop waste application.
b. Create a temporary diversion to contain waste.
c. Incorporate waste to reduce runoff.
d. Evaluate and eliminate the reason(s) that caused the runoff.
e. Evaluate the application rates for the fields where runoff occurred.
C: Leakage from the waste pipes and sprinklers-action include:
a. Stop recycle pump.
b. Stop irrigation pump.
c. Close valves to eliminate further discharge.
d. Repair all leaks prior to restarting pumps.
1 December 18, 1996

D: Leakage from flush systems, houses, solid separators-action include:
a. Stop recycle pump.
b. Stop irrigation pump.
c. Make sure no siphon occurs.
d. Stop all flows in the house, flush systems, or solid separators.
e. Repair all leaks prior to restarting pumps.
E: Leakage from base or sidewall of lagoon. Often this is seepage as opposed to flowing
leaks-possible action:
a. Dig a small sump or ditch away from the embankment to catch all seepage, put in a
submersible pump, and pump back to lagoon.
b. If holes are caused by burrowing animals, trap or remove animals and fill holes and
compact with a clay type soil.
c. Have a professional evaluate the condition of the side walls and lagoon bottom as soon
as possible.
2. Assess the extent of the spill and note any obvious damages.
a. Did the waste reach any surface waters?
b. Approximately how much was released and for what duration?
c. Any damage noted, such as employee injury, fish kills, or property damage?
d. Did the spill leave the property?
e. Does the spill have the potential to reach surface waters?
f. Could a future rain event cause the spill to reach surface waters?
g. Are potable water wells in danger(either on or off of the property)?
h. How much reached surface waters?
3: Contact appropriate agencies.
a. During normal business hours, call your DWQ (Division of Water Quality) regional office;
Phone - - . After hours, emergency number: 919-733-3942. Your phone call
should include: your name, facility, telephone number, the details of the incident from item
2 above, the exact location of the facility, the location or direction of movement of the
spill, weather and wind conditions. The corrective measures that have been under taken,
and the seriousness of the situation.
b. If spill leaves property or enters surface waters, call local EMS Phone number - -
c. Instruct EMS to contact local Health Department.
d. Contact CES, phone number - - , local SWCD office phone number - - , and
local NRCS office for advice/technical assistance phone number - - .
2 December 18, 1996

4: If none of the above works call 911 or the Sheriffs Department and explain your problem to
them and ask that person to contact the proper agencies for you.
5: Contact the contractor of your choice to begin repair of problem to minimize off-site damage.
a. Contractors Name:
b. Contractors Address: �2,o S' lie
c. Contractors Phone: �7'7 4 p-718`- S Y 6
6: Contact the technical specialist who certified the lagoon(MRCS, Consulting Engineer, etc.)N a. Name: 1�GS
b. Phone: 3_3 E - -4 22—�
7: Implement procedures as advised by DWQ and technical assistance agencies to rectify the
damage, repair the system, and reassess the waste management plan to keep problems with
release of wastes from happening again.
3 December 18, 1996

Insect Control Checklist for Animal Operations
Source Cause BMPs to Control Insects Site Specific Practices
Lip uid Se stems
Flush gutters • Accumulation of solids lush system is designed and operated sufficiently
to remove accumulated solids from gutters as
designed
0 Remove bridging of accumulated solids at
discharge
Lagoons and pits • Crusted solids 54 Maintain lagoons, settling basins and pits where
pest breeding is apparent to minimize the crusting
of solids to a depth of no more than 6 to 8 inches
over more than 30 percent of surface
Excessive vegetative • Decaying vegetation IX Maintain vegetative control along banks of
growth lagoons and other impoundments to prevent
accumulation of decaying vegetative matter along
water's edge on impoundment's perimeter.
Dry Systems
Feeders • Feed spillage Design, operate, and maintain feed systems
(e.g., bunkers and troughs)to minimize the
accumulation of decaying wastage
91/'Clean up spillage on a routine basis (e.g., 7-to 10-
day interval during summer; 15-to 30-day interval
during winter)
AMIC -November 11, 1996,page 1

Insect Control Checklist for Animal Operations
Source Cause BMPs to Control Insects Site Specific Practices
Feed storage • Accumulations of feed 74 Reduce moisture accumulation within and around
residues immediate perimeter of feed storage areas by
ensuring drainage is away from site and/or providing
adequate containment (e.g., covered bin for
brewer's grain and similar high moisture grain
products)
EY Inspect for and remove or break up accumulated
solids in filter stri-�s around feed stora,e as needed _
Animal holding areas • Accumulations of animal Eliminate low areas that trap moisture along fences
wastes and feed wastage and other locations where waste accumulates and
disturbance by animals is minimal
RAJJ Maintain fence rows and filter strips around animal
holding areas to minimize accumulations of wastes
(i.e., inspect for and remove or break up
accumulated solids as needed)
Dry manure handling • Accumulations of animal M Remove spillage on a routine basis (e.g.,
systems wastes 7-to 10-day interval during summer; 15-to 30-day
interval during winter)where manure is loaded for
/land application or disposal
5 Provide for adequate drainage around manure
stockpiles
Inspect for and remove or break up accumulated
wastes in filter strips around stockpiles and manure
handling areas as needed
For more information contact:
Cooperative Extension Service, Department of Entomology, Box 7613,North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695-7613.
AMIC -November 11, 1996, page 2

Cattle Farm Waste Management Odor Control Checklist
Source Cause BMPs to Minimize Odor Site Specific Practices
Farmstead • Dairy production Vegetative or wooded buffers
WRecommended best management practices
0 Good judgment and common sense
Paved lots or barn • Wet manure-covered M W"Promote
Scrape or flush daily
alley surfaces surfaces drying with proper ventilation
C9 Routine checks and maintenance on waterers,
hydrants,pipes, stock tanks
Bedded areas • Urine Promote drying with proper ventilation
• Partial microbial Replace wet or manure-covered bedding
decomposition
Manure dry stacks • Partial microbial Provide liquid drainage for stored manure
decomposition
Storage tank or • Partial microbial Bottom or mid-level loading
basin surface decomposition Tank covers
• Mixing while filling O Basin surface mats of solids
• Agitation when emptying 0 Minimize lot runoff and liquid additions
L rAgitate only prior to manure removal
O Proven biological additives or oxidants
Settling basin • Partial microbial IJ Liquid drainage from settled solids
surfaces decomposition ZRemove solids regularly
• Mixing while filling
• Agitation when emptying
Manure, slurry, or • Agitation when spreading 0 Soil injection of slurry/sludges
sludge spreader . Volatile gas emissions 0 Wash residual manure from spreader after use
outlets 0 Proven biological additives or oxidants
April 18, 2006, page 1

Cattle Farm Waste Management Odor Control Checklist
Source Cause BMPs to Minimize Odor - Site Specific Practices
Uncovered manure, • Volatile gas emissions while 0 Soil injection of slurry/sludges
slurry, or sludge on drying Vspread
oil incorporation within 48 hours
field surfaces in thin uniform layers for rapid drying
0 Proven biological additives or oxidants
Flush tanks • Agitation of recycled lagoon O Flush tank covers
liquid while tanks are filling � 0 Extend fill lines to near bottom of tanks with
anti-siphon vents
Outside drain • Agitation during wastewat r O Box covers
collection or junction conveyance 1' /�
boxes
Lift stations • Agitation during sump tank 0 Sump tank covers
filling and drawdown
End of drainpipes at • Agitation during wastewater Extend discharge point of pipes underneath
lagoon conveyance lagoon liquid level
Lagoon surfaces • Volatile gas emission O Proper lagoon liquid capacity
• Biological mixing O Correct lagoon startup procedures
• Agitation O Minimum surface area-to-volume ratio
0 Minimum agitation when pumping
O Mechanical aeration
O Proven biological additives
Irrigation sprinkler • High pressure agitation 0 Irrigate on dry days with little or no wind
nozzles . Wind drift O Minimum recommended operating procedure
O Pump intake near lagoon liquid surface
O Pump from second-stage lagoon
0 Flush residual manure from pipes at end of
slurry/sludge pumpings
April 18, 2006, page 2

Cattle Farm Waste Management Odor Control Checklist
Source Cause BMPs to Minimize Odor Site Specific Practices
Dead animals • Carcass decomposition Proper disposition of carcasses
Standing water • Improper drainage Grade and landscape such that water drains away
around facilities . Microbial decomposition of from facilities
organic matter
Mud tracked onto • Poorly maintained access O Farm access road maintenance
public roads from roads
farm access
Additional Information: Available From :
Cattle Manure Management; .0200 RuleBMP Packet NCSU, County Extension Center
Dairy Educational Unit Manure Management System--Lake Wheeler Road Field Laboratory;EBAE 209-95 NCSU—BAE
Lagoon Design and Management for Livestock Manure Treatment and Storage;EBAE 103-83 NCSU—BAE
Management of Dairy Wastewater;EBAE 106-83 NCSU—BAE
Calibration of Manure and Wastewater Application Equipment; EBAE Fact Sheet NCSU—BAE
Nuisance Concerns in Animal Manure Management: Odors and Flies; PRO107, 1995 Conference Proceedings Florida Cooperative Extension
April 18,2006,page 3

Version—November 26,2018
Mortality Management Methods
Indicate which method(s) will be implemented.
When selecting multiple methods indicate a primary versus secondary option.
Methods other than those listed must be approved by the State Veterinarian.
Primary Secondary Routine Mortality
Burial three feet beneath the surface of the ground-within 24 hours of knowledge of animal
death. The burial must be at least 300 feet from any flowing stream or public body of water
(G.S.106-403). The bottom of the burial pit should beat least one foot above the seasonal
high water table.Attach burial location map and plan.
Landfill at municipal solid waste facility permitted by NC DEQ under GS 15A NCAC
13B .0200.
nRendering at a rendering plant licensed under G.S. 106-168.7.
Complete incineration according to 02 NCAC 52C .0102.
A composting system approved and permitted by'the NC Department of Agriculture&Con-
sumer Services Veterinary Division (attach copy of permit). If compost is distributed off-farm,
additional requirements must be met and a permit is required from NC DEQ.
® In the case of dead poultry only, placing in a disposal pit of a size and design approved by the
NC Department of Agriculture&Consumer Services (G.S. 106-549.70).
a Q Any method which, in the professional opinioniof the State Veterinarian, would make possible
the salvage of part of a dead animal's value without endangering human or animal health.
(Written approval by the State Veterinarian must be attached).
QMass Mortality Plan
Mass mortality plans are required for farms covered by an NPDES permit. These plans are
also recommended for all animal operations. This plan outlines farm-specific mortality man-
agement methods to be used for mass mortality. The NCDA&CS Veterinary Division sup-
ports a variety of emergency mortality disposal options;contact the Division for guidance.
• A catastrophic mortality disposal plan is part of the facility's CAWMP and is activated
when numbers of dead animals exceed normal mortality rates as specified by the State
Veterinarian.
• Burial must be.,done in accordance with NC General Statutes and NCDA&CS Veterinary
Division regulations and guidance.
• Mass burial sites are subject to additional permit conditions(refer to facility's animal
waste management system permit).
• In the event of imminent threat of a disease emergency,the State Veterinarian may enact
additional temporary procedures or measures for disposal according to G.S. 106-399.4.
Signature of Farm Owner/Manager Date
nat a f Technical Specialist Date