410013_Permit Renewal Application 2019_20190410

State of North Carolina
Department of Environmental Quality
Division of Water Resources
Animal Waste Management Systems
Request for Certification of Coverage
Facility Currently covered by an Expiring Sate Non-Discharge General Permit
On September 30, 2019, the North Carolina State Non-Discharge General Permits for Animal Waste Management Systems will
expire. As required by these permits, facilities that have been issued Certificates of Coverage to operate under these State
Non-Discharge General Permits must apply for renewal at least 180 days prior to their expiration date. Therefore, all applications
must be received by the Division of Water Resources by no later than April 3,2019.
Please do not leave any question unanswered Please verify all information and make any necessary corrections below.
Application must be signed and dated by the Peroduee.
1. Farm Number: 41.0013 Certificate Of Coverage Number: AWC410013
2. Facility Name: Whitecedar Dairy 1,'
3. Landowner's Name(same as on the Waste Management Plan): Jefferson T Hopkins Mary Ann N60K*I •s
4. Landowner's Mailing Address: 8255 White Cedar Rd
City: Browns Summit 334-GGy-3311a State: NC Zip: 27214-9544
Telephone Number: 336 456 OOQQ am E-mail: mahPk4(@,aol.com
5. Facility's Physical Address: 8255 White Cedar Rd
City: Browns Summit State: NC Zip: 27214
6. County where Facility is located: Guilford
7. Farm Manager's Name(if different from Landowner):
8. Farm Manager's telephone number(include area code):
9. Integrator's Name(if there is not an Integrator,write"None"): 60-331 V
10. Operator Name(OIC): Jefferson T.Hopkins Phone No.: 336-46-74H OIC 4: 22117
11. Lessee's Name(if there is not a Lessee,write"None"):
12. Indicate animal operation type and number:
Current Permit: Operations Type Allowable Count
Cattle-Milk Cow 149Tf 130
Operation Types: bmry 1464o, 2®
Swine Cattle Dry Poultry Other Types
Wean to Finish Dairy Calf Non Laying Chickens Horses-Horses -- -- --
Wean to Feeder Dairy Heifer Laying Chickens Horses-Other
Farrow to Finish Milk Cow Pullets Sheep-Sheep
Feeder to Finish Dry Cow Turkeys Sheep-Other
Farrow to Wean Beef Stocker Calf Turkey Pullet
Farrow to Feeder Beef Feeder
Boaz/Stud Beef Broad Cow Wet Poultry
Gilts Other Non Laying Pullet
Other Layers

13. Waste Treatment and Storage Lagoons (Verify the following information is accurate and complete. Make all necessary
corrections and provide missing data.)
Design
Estimated Liner Type Estimated Freeboard
Structure Date (Clay,Synthetic, Capacity Surface Area 'Redline"
Name Built Unknown) (Cubic Feet) (Square Feet) (Inches)
LOWER QUID da In��1 �55 34 %45 26.00
UPPER "1 . I Ck ✓1� 27.00
Mail one (1) copy of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP) with this completed and signed application
as required by NC General Statutes 143-215.10C(d)to the address below.
The CAWMP must include the following components:
I. The most recent Waste Utilization Plan(WUP),signed by the owner and a certified technical sneeialist,containing:
a. The method by which waste is applied to the disposal fields(e.g.irrigation,injection,etc.)
b. A map of every field used for land application(for example: irrigation map)
c. The soil series present on every land application field
d. The crops grown on every land application field
e. The Realistic Yield Expectation(RYE)for every crop shown in the WUP
f. The maximum PAN to be applied to every land application field
g. The waste application windows for every crop utilized in the WUP
h. The required NRCS Standard specifications
2. A site map/schematic
3. Emergency Action Plan
4. Insect Control Checklist with chosen best management practices noted
5. Odor Control Checklist with chosen best management practices noted
6. Mortality Control Checklist with selected method noted-Use the enclosed updated Mortality Control Checklist
7. Lagoon/storage pond capacity documentation (design, calculations, etc.) Please be sure the above table is accurate and
complete. Also provide any site evaluations, wetland determinations, or hazard classifications that may be applicable to
your facility.
8. Operation and Maintenance Plan
If your CAWMP includes any components not shown on this list, please include the additional components with your submittal.
(e.g.composting,digesters,waste transfers,etc.)
As a second option to mailing paper copies of the application package, you can scan and email one signed copy of the
application and all the CAWMP items above to: [e-mail]

I attest that this application has been reviewed by me and is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that,
if all required parts of this application are not completed and that if all required supporting information and attachments are not
included,this application package will be returned to me as incomplete.
Note: In accordance with NC General Statutes 143-215.6A and 143-215.613, any person who knowingly makes any false statement,
representation, or certification in any application may be subject to civil penalties up to $25,000 per violation. (18 U.S.C.
Section 1001 provides a punishment by a fine of not more than $10,000 or imprisonment of not more than 5 years, or both for
a similar offense.)
Printed Name of Signing Official (Landowner, or if multiple Landowners all landowners should sign. If Landowner is a
corporation,signature should be by a principal executive officer of the corporation):
Name: Title: ���
Signatur . Date:
Name: A*oq, (iV/[/If/ Title: AMER—"
Signature: Date:
Name: Title:
Signature: Date:
THE COMPLETED APPLICATION SHOULD BE SENT TO THE FOLLOWING ADDRESS:
NCDEQ-DWR
Animal Feeding Operations Program
1636 Mail Service Center
Raleigh,North Carolina 27699-1636
Telephone number:[phone]
E-mail:2019 Perm itRe newa I@ ned en r.gov
FORM: RENENVAI:STATE GENERAL 02/2019

t
ROY COOPER "
Covemor -
MICHAEL S.REGAN » a
L1NDA CULPEPPER NORTH CAROLINA
Director Environmental Quality
February 26,2019
Jefferson T Hopkins
Whitecedar Dairy
8255 White Cedar Rd
Browns Summit,NC 27214-9544
Subject: Application for Renewal of Coverage for Expiring State General Permit
Dear Permittee:
Your facility is currently approved for operation under one of the Animal Waste Operation State Non-Discharge General Permits,
which expire on September 30, 2019. Copies of the new animal waste operation State Non-Discharge General Permits are available
at https:Hde(i nc gov/about/divisions/water-resources/water-quality-regional-operations/afo or by writing or calling:
NCDEQ-DWR
Animal Feeding Operations Program
1636 Mail Service Center
Raleigh,North Carolina 27699-1636
Telephone number:[phone]
In order to assure your continued coverage under the State Non-Discharge General Permits you must submit an application for
permit coverage to the Division. Enclosed You will find a 'Request for Certificate of Covera e Facility Currently Covered by an
Expiring State Non-Discharge General Permit." The application form must be completed, signed and returned by April 3. 2019.
Please note that You must include one (1) copy of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP) with the
completed and signed application form. A list of items included in the CAWMP can be found on Pave 2 of the renewal
application form.
Failure to request renewal of your coverage under a general permit within the time period specified may result in a civil penalty.
Operation of your facility without coverage under a valid general permit would constitute a violation of NCGS 143-215.1 and could
result in assessments of civil penalties of up to$25,000 per day.
If you have any questions about the State Non-Discharge General Permits, the enclosed application, or any related matter please-feel
free to contact the Animal Feeding Operations Branch staff at 919-707-9100.
Sincerely,
/ v
Jon Risgaard,Section Chief
Animal Feeding Operations and Groundwater Section
Enclosures
cc(w/o enclosures): Winston-Salem Regional Office,Water Quality Regional Operations Section
Guilford County Soil and Water Conservation District
AFOG Section Central Files-AWC410013
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality I Didaionof Water Rey ureas
ti..� D Q� 512N.8aI6bury St.I 1636 Mail Sam"Center I Raleigh,North Carolina 2789s,1696
919.707.9DOO

Hopkins Dairy
This plan has been prepared for: This plan has been developed by:
White Cedar Dairy Guilford SWCD
Mary Ann Hopkins Millie Langley
8255 Whitecedar Rd 3309 Burlington Rd
Browns Summit, NC 27214-9544 Greensboro, NC 27405
336- (o(oQ•3 I(p 336-641-2440n
J,
Developer Signature
Type of Plan: Nutrient Management with Manure Only
Owner/Manager/Producer Agreement
I (we) understand and agree to the specifications and operation and maintenance procedures
established in this nutrient management plan which includes an animal waste utilization plan for
the farm named above. I have read and understand the Required Specifications concerning animal
waste management that are included with this plan.
ti
gnature(owner)( Date
iucc t�irriv04
S-a /
'gnat a(manager or producer) Date
This plan meets the minimum standards and specifications of the U.S.Department of Agriculture-
Natural Resources Conservation Service or the standard of practices adopted by the Soil and
Water Conservation Commission.
Plan Approved By: S 2z 901
Tech ' al Specialist Signature Date

White Cedar Dairy
Update 5/20/2019
HOLDING POND INFORMATION:
Upper Holding Pond (Old):
Your facility is designed for 180 days of temporary storage with the contents being removed on
the average of once every 6 MONTHS. In no instance should the volume of waste being stored in
your structure exceed Elevation 87.7 or 2.3' below top of Dam
Lower holding Pond(New):
Your facility is designed for 180 days of temporary storage with the contents being removed on
the average of once every 6 MONTHS. In no instance should the volume of waste being stored in
your structure exceed Elevation 93.8 or 2.2' below Top of Dam .
Call the local Natural Resources Conservation Service or Soil and Water Conservation District office
after you receive the waste analysis report for assistance in determining the amount per acre to apply
and the proper application rate prior to applying the waste.
The operation produces 3,327 ibs of PAN.
Farm Acres ACRES LBS. N
UTILIZED
Owned 244.3 9,807
Leases 101.4 4,070
TOTAL : 345.7 13,877
N PRODUCED 3,327
SURPLUS/(DEFICIT) (10,550)
Available acres:
Using small grain, the crop with the most limiting N requirement,
along with the hay and pasture fields available to the farmer, the
farmer would need a minimum of 83 acres to spread all the waste in
the fall. The farmer has 345.7 acres available, 244.3 acres owned and
101.4 acres leased. See table above.

NARRATIVE OF OPERATION:
Mr. Hopkins uses tank spreaders and custom haulers to spread waste. In the spring the waste goes on
corn silage land and in the fall on small grain and grass fields. The pastures are used infrequently as a
last resort if weather is limiting for getting equipment onto the cropland fields. There is more land
available than required for disposing of waste produced; therefore, every field will not receive waste
every year. Waste is applied at or below agronomic rates. There is some dry waste with bedding in a
barn that is spread with a standard box spreader.
Two holding ponds are used, the original one holds most of the lot runoff, parlor water and scraped lot
manure. The second pond holds runoff and scraped lot manure from the lower end of the lot. These
ponds may have different N levels, therefore, they must both be tested for actual PAN and the
appropriate amount used to compute amount of N per acre. A few of the cows go into in a barn
adjacent to the free stalls. This barn waste is not scraped into the holding pond. These areas are
bedded with and are hauled spread using a box spreader. This manure and bedding can be spread on
any of the fields in Tables 1 & 2.
Alternate Crops:
Sorghum or milo may be planted as an alternate crop, instead of corn. Up to
146 lbs of N may be applied if used as silage, and 101 lbs if harvested for grain.

Sources in Plan
Hopkins Dairy
Nutrients applied in accordance with this plan will be supplied from the
following source(s):
Commercial Fertilizer is included in this plan.
S 6 airy(Heifer)Liquid Manure Slurry waste generated 110,700 gals/year by a 20 Dairy(Heifer)Liquid
Id
anure Slurry operation.This production facility has waste storage capacities of approximately 180
ays..
Estimated Pounds of Plant Available Nitrogen Generated per Year
Injected 1,109
Incorporated-4 wks or less following 1,109
application
Incorporated-5 wks to 3 mos 739
following application
Broadcast 739
Irrigated 739
Max.Available Actual PAN PAN Surplus/ Actual Volume Volume Surplus/Deficit
PAN(Ibs)* Applied(Ibs) Deficit(Ibs) Applied(Gallons) (Gallons)
Year 1 739 7,912 (7,173) 1,185,230 (1,074,530)
Year 739 7,912 (7,173) 1,185,230 (1,074,530)
5/17/2019 1:16:00 PM 1 /2

Sources in Plan
Hopkins Dairy
S 8 Dairy(Milk Cow)Liquid Manure Slurry waste generated 387,450 gals/year by a 50 Dairy(Milk Cow)
Liquid Manure Slurry operation.This production facility has waste storage capacities of approximately
180 days.
Estimated Pounds of Plant Available Nitrogen Generated per Year
Injected 3,881
Incorporated-4 wks or less following 3,881
application
Incorporated-5 wks to 3 mos 2,588
following application
Broadcast 2,588
Irrigated 2,588
Max.Available Actual PAN PAN Surplus/ Actual Volume Volume Surplus/Deficit
PAN(Ibs) Applied(Ibs) Deficit(Ibs) Applied(Gallons) (Gallons)
Year 2,588 84,201 (81,613) 12,605,737 (12,218,287)
Year 2 2,588 16,223 (13,635) 2,428,700 (2,041,250)
5/17/2019 1:16:00 PM 2 12

Sources in Plan
Hopkins Dairy
Nutrients applied in accordance with this plan will be supplied from the
following source(s):
Commercial Fertilizer is included in this plan.
S 6 Dairy(Heifer)Liquid Manure Slurry waste generated 110,700 galstyear by a 20 Dairy(Heifer)Liquid
Manure Slurry operation.This production facility has waste storage capacities of approximately 180
days.
Estimated Pounds of Plant Available Nitrogen Generated per Year
Injected 1,109
Incorporated-4 wks or less following 1,109
application
Incorporated-5 wks to 3 mos 739
following application
Broadcast 739
Irrigated 739
Max.Available Actual PAN PAN Surplus/ Actual Volume Volume Surplus/Deficit
PAN(Ibs) Applied(Ibs) Deficit(Ibs) Applied(Gallons) (Gallons)
Year 1 739 7,912 (7,173) 1,185,230 (1,074,530)
Year 2 739 7,912 (7,173) 1,185,230 (1,074,530)
5/17/2019 4:05:20 PM 1/2

Sources in Plan
Hopkins Dairy
S 8 Dairy(Milk Cow)Liquid Manure Slurry waste generated 387,450 gals/year by a 50 Dairy(Milk Cow)
Liquid Manure Slurry operation.This production facility has waste storage capacities of approximately
180 days.
Estimated Pounds of Plant Available Nitrogen Generated per Year
Injected 3,881
Incorporated-4 wks or less following 3,881
application
Incorporated-5 wks to 3 mos 2,588
following application
Broadcast 2,588
Irrigated 2,588
Max.Available Actual PAN PAN Surplus/ Actual Volume Volume Surplus/Deficit
PAN(Ibs) Applied(Ibs) Deficit(Ibs) Applied(Gallons) (Gallons)
Year 2,588 84,778 (82,190) 12,692,170 (12,304,720)
Year 2,588 16,335 (13,747) 2,445,474 (2,058,024)
5/17/2019 4:05:20 PM 2/2

Waste Utilization Table
Hopkins Dairy
The Waste Utilization table shown below summarizes the waste utilization plan for this operation. This plan provides an estimate of the number of acres of
cropland needed to use the nutrients being produced. The plan requires consideration of the realistic yields of the crops to be grown, their nutrient
requirements, and proper timing of applications to maximize nutrient uptake.
This table provides an estimate of the amount of nitrogen required by the crop being grown and an estimate of the nitrogen amount being supplied by manure
or other by-products, commercial fertilizer and residual from previous crops. An estimate of the quantity of solid and liquid waste that will be applied on each
field in order to supply the indicated quantity of nitrogen from each source is also included. A balance of the total manure produced and the total manure
applied is included in the table to ensure that the plan adequately provides for the utilization of the manure generated by the operation.
Waste Utilization Table Year 1
w.
A
:[a D h leag. .o o o. 00
6473 7 S 8 CeB2 19.70 19.70 Corn,Silage 22.5 Tons 2/15-6/30 245 0 0 Broad. 245 36.66 0 722.24 0
6473 7a S 8 CeB2 9.40 9.40 Corn,Silage 22.5 Tons 2/15-6130 245 0 0 Broad. 245 36.66 0 344.62 0
6473 7 S 8 CeB2 19.70 19.70 Wheat,Grain 59 Bushels 9/1-4/30 118 0 0 Broad. 59 8.83 0 173.93 0
6473 7a S 8 CeB2 9.40 9.40 Wheal,Grain 59 Bushels 9/1-4/30 118 0 0 Broad. 59 8.83 0 82.99 0
6494- 1 S 8 CeB2 16.00 16.00 Corn,Silage 22.5 Tons 2/15-6/30 245 0 0 Broad. 245 36.66 0 586.59 0
6494- 1 S 8 CeB2 16.00 16.00 Wheat,Grain 59 Bushels 9/1-4/30 118 0 0 Broad. 59 8.83 0 141.26 0
6494- 2 S8 CeB2 11.60 11.60 Corn,Silage 22.5 Tons 2/15-6/30 245 0 0Broad. 245 36.66 0 425.28 0
6494- 2 S 8 CeB2 11.60 11.60 Wheat,Grain 59 Bushels 9/1-4/30 118 0 0 Broad. 59 8.83 0 102.41 0
6966 5 S 6 ApC 11.70 11.70 Fescue Pasture 5.1 Tons 8/1-7131 168 0 0 Broad. 168 25.14 0 294.13 0
7035- 4 S 6 EnB 11.50 11.50 Fescue Pasture 4.4 Tons 811-7/31 145 0 0 Broad. 145 21.70 0 249.53 0
7035- 5 S6 En8 2.30 2.30 Fescue Pasture 4.4 Tons 8/1-7/31 145 0 0 Broad. 145 21.70 0 49.91 0
9618 1 1 1 S 8 CaB 6.20 6.20 Corn,Silage 18 Tons 2/15-6/30 1 196 0 0 Broad. 196 29.33 0 181.84 0
5/17/2019 4:03:58 PM 1/7

Waste Utilization Table
Hopkins Dairy
9618 1 S 8 CaB 6.20 6.20 Wheat,Grain 48 Bushels 9/14/30 96 0 0 Broad. 48 7.18 0 44.53 0
9618 2 S 8 CaB 15.60 15.60 Corn,Silage 18 Tons 2/15-6/30 196 0 0 Broad. 196 29.33 0 457.54 0
9618 2 S 8 CaB 15.60 15.60 Wheat,Grain 48 Bushels 9/1-4/30 96 0 0 Broad. 48 7.18 0 112.05 0
9618 3 S 8 CaB 25.40 25.40 Corn,Silage 18 Tons 2/15-6/30 196 0 0 Broad. 196 29.33 0 744.97 0
9618 3 S 8 CaB 25.40 25.40 Wheat,Grain 48 Bushels 9/1-4/30 96 0 0 Broad. 48 7.18 0 182.44 0
9618 4 S 8 CaB 1.40 1.40 Corn,Silage 18 Tons 2/15-6/30 196 0 0 Broad. 196 29.33 0 41.06 0
9618 4 S 8 CaB 1.40 1.40 Wheat,Grain 48 Bushels 9/1-4/30 *96 0 0 Broad. 48 7.18 0 10.06 0
9618 5 S 8 CdB2 22.80 22.80 Corn,Silage 21.9 Tons 2115-6/30 239 0 0 Broad. 239 35.76 0 815.42 0
9618 5 S 8 CdB2 22.80 22.80 Wheat,Grain 57 Bushels 911-4/30 114 0 0 Broad. 57 8.53 0 194.47 0
1000129 1 S 8 CrB 10.20 10.20 Corn,Silage 22.5 Tons 2/15-6/30 245 0 0 Broad. 245 36.66 0 373.95 0
1000129 1 S 8 CrB 10.20 10.20 Wheat,Grain 59 Bushels 9/1-4/30 118 0 0 Broad. 59 8.83 0 90.05 0
1001278 5 S 8 CCB 13.60 13.60 Corn,Silage 22.5 Tons 2115-6/30 245 245 0 Broad. 245 36.66 0 498.60 0
1001278 5 S 8 CcB 13.60 13.60 Wheat,Grain 59 Bushels 911-4/30 118 0 0 Broad. 59 8.83 0 120.07 0
1001418 1 S 8 CeB2 12.90 12.90 Corn,Silage 22.5 Tons 2/15-6/30 245 0 0 Broad. 245 36.66 0 472.94 0
1001418 1 SS CeB2 12.90 12.90 Wheat,Grain 59 Bushels 9/14/30 118 0 0 Broad. 59 8.83 0 113.89 0
1001418 2 S 8 CeB2 13.00 13.00 Corn,Silage 22.5 Tons 2/15-6130 245 0 0 Broad. 245 36.66 0 476.61 0
1001418 2 S 8 CeB2 13.00 13.00 Wheat,Grain 59 Bushels 9/14/30 118 0 0 Broad. 59 8.83 0 114.77 0
1001418 3 S 8 CcB 6.10 6.10 Corn,Silage 22.5 Tons 2/15-6/30 245 0 0 Broad. 245 36.66 0 223.64 0
1001418 3 S 8 CCB 6.10 6.10 Wheat,Grain 59 Bushels 9114130 118 0 0 Broad. 59 8.83 0 53.86 0
1001589 6 S 6 ME 6.10 6.10 Fescue Pasture 2.8 Tons 8/1-7/31 105 0 0 Broad. 105 15.71 0 95.85 0
1001589 7 S 6 EnB 4.80 4.80 Fescue Pasture 4.4 Tons 8/1-7/31 145 0 0 Broad. j .70 0 104.15 0
1001589 1 8 S 6 EnB 4.70 4.70 Fescue Pasture j 4.4 Tons 1 8/1-7/31 145 0 0 Broad. 145 21.70 0 101.98 0
5/17/2019 4:03:58 PM 2/7

Waste Utilization Table
Hopkins Dairy
1001589 9 S 6 CeB2 9.70 9.70 Fescue Pasture 4.9 Tons 811-7/31 162 0 0 Broad. 162 24.24 0 235.15 0
1001589 10 S 6 EnC 1.70 1.70 Fescue Pasture 4.1 Tons 8/1-7/31 135 0 0 Broad. 135 20.20 0 34.34 0
1001589 11 S 6 EnC 1.00 1.00 Fescue Pasture 4.1 Tons 8/1-7/31 135 0 0 Broad. 135 20.20 0 20.20 0
1001613 1 S 8 CfB 3.90 3.90 Corn,Silage 21.9 Tons 2115-6/30 239 0 0 Broad. 239 35.76 0 139.48 0
1001618 1 S 8 CfB 3.90 3.90 Wheat,Grain 57 Bushels 9/1-4/30 114 0 0 Broad. 57 8.53 0 33.27 0
1001618 2 S 8 CgB2 8.50 8.50 Corn,Silage 22.5 Tons 2/15-6/30 245 0 0 Broad. 245 36.66 0 311.63 0
1001618 2 S 8 CgB2 8.50 8.50 Wheat,Grain 59 Bushels 9/1-4/30 118 0 0 Broad. 59 8.83 0 75.05 0
1001618 3 S 8 FrD2 15.80 15.80 Corn,Silage 15.6 Tons 2/15-6/30 170 0 0 Broad. 170 25.44 0 401.94 0
1001618 3 S 8 FrD2 15.80 15.80 Wheat,Grain 40 Bushels 911-4/30 80 0 0 Broad. 40 5.99 0 94.57 0
1001618 4 S 8 CgB2 7.10 7.40 Corn,Silage 22.5 Tons 2115-6/30 245 0 0 Broad. 245 36.66 0 271.30 0
1001618 4 S 8 CgB2 7.10 7.40 Wheat,Grain 59 Bushels 9/1-4/30 118 0 0 Broad. 59 8.83 0 65.33 0
1001618 5 S 8 WcB 9.40 9.40 Corn,Silage 25.5 Tons 2/15-6/30 278 0 0 Broad. 278 41.60 0 391.04 0
1001618 5 S 8 WcB 9.40 9.40 Wheat,Grain 59 Bushels 9/1-4/30 118 0 0 Broad. 59 8.83 0 82.99 0
1001619 1 S 8 CgB2 15.90 15.90 Corn,Silage 22.5 Tons 2/15-6/30 245 0 0 Broad. 245 36.66 0 582.93 0
1001619 1 S 8 CgB2 15.90 15.90 Wheat,Grain 59 Bushels 911-4/30 118 0 0 Broad. 59 8.83 0 140.38 0
1001619 2 S 8 CgB2 15.90 15.90 Corn,Silage 22.5 Tons 2/15-6/30 245 0 0 Broad. 245 36.66 0 582.93 0
1001619 2 S 8 CgB2 15.90 15.90 Wheat,Grain 59 Bushels 9/1-4/30 118 0 0 Broad. 59 8.83 0 140.38 0
1001619 3 S 8 WcB 7.10 7.10 Corn,Silage 25.5 Tons 2115-6/30 278 0 0 Broad. 278 41.60 0 295.36 0
1001619 3 S 8 WcB 7.10 7.10 Wheat,Grain 59 Bushels 9/1-4/30 118 0 0 Broad. 59 8.83 0 62.68 0
1001620 2 S 8 CfB 4.80 4.80 Corn,Silage 21.9 Tons 2/15-6/30 239 0 0 Broad. 239 35.76 0 171.67 0
1001620 2 S 8 CfB 4.80 4.80 Wheat,Grain 57 Bushels 9/1-4/30 114 0 0 Broad. 57 8.53 0 40.94 0
1001620 3 S 8 CfB 8.70 8.70 Corn,Silage 21.9 Tons 2/15-6/30 239 0 0 Broad. 239 35.76 0 311.15 0
1001620 3 S 8 CfB 8.70 8.70 Wheat,Grain 57 Bushels 9/1-4/30 114 0 0 Broad. 57 8.53 0 74.21 0
1001620 5 1 38 CgB2 8.90 8.901 Corn,Silage 22.5 Tons 2115-6130 245 0 0 Broad. 245 36.66 0 326.29 0
5/17/2019 4:03:58 PM 3/7

Waste Utilization Table
Hopkins Dairy
1001620 5 S 8 CgB2 8.90 8.90 Wheal,Grain 59 Bushels 9/1-4/30 118 0 0 Broad. 59 8.83 0 78.58 0
1001620 6 S 8 WcB 2.30 2.30 Corn,Silage 25.5 Tons 2115-6/30 278 0 0 Broad. 278 41.60 0 95.68 0
1001620 6 S 8 WCB 2.30 2.30 Wheat,Grain 59 Bushels 9/1-4/30 118 0 0 Broad. 59 8.83 0 20.31 0
Total Applied,1000 gallons 13,877.40
Total Produced, 1000 gallons 498.15
Balance, 1000 gallons (13,379.25) .. '� ^,
Total Applied,tons n$Ri3 -h 0.00
Total Produced,tons ' a'>�"' 0.00
Balance,tons 0.00
5/17/2019 4:03:58 PM 4/7

Waste Utilization Table
Hopkins Dairy
Waste Utilization Table Year 2
- ID
MINIM
e eRlq, r a ids re e 1e r. P 1pled c, re
ore ,. m re
t od o a 0
6473 7 S8 CeB2 , uses 9/1-4/30 118 0 0 Broad. 59 8.83 0 173.93 0
6473 7a S 8 CeB2 9.40 9.40 Wheat,Grain 59 Bushels 911-4/30 118 0 0 Broad. 59 8.83 0 82.99 0
6494- 1 S 8 CeB2 16.00 16.00 Wheat,Grain 59 Bushels 9/1-4130 118 0 0 Broad. 59 8.83 0 141.26 0
6494- 2 S 8 CeB2 11.60 11.60 Wheat,Grain 59 Bushels 9/1-4/30 118 0 0 Broad. 59 8.83 0 102.41 0
6966 5 S6 ApC 11.70 11.70 Fescue Pasture 5.1 Tons 8/1-7/31 168 0 0 Broad. 168 25.14 0 294.13 0
7035- 4 S6 EnB 11.50 11.50 Fescue Pasture 4.4 Tons 8/1-7/31 145 0 0 Broad. 145 21.70 0 249.53 0
7035- 5 S6 EnB 2.30 2.30 Fescue Pasture 4.4 Tons 8/1-7/31 145 0 0 Broad. 145 21.70 0 49.91 0
9618 1 S 8 CaB 6.20 6.20 Wheat,Grain 48 Bushels 9/1-4/30 96 0 0 Broad. 48 7.18 0 44.53 0
9618 2 S 8 CaB 15.60 15.60 Wheat,Grain 48 Bushels 9/1-4/30 96 0 0 Broad, 48 7.18 0 112.05 0
9618 3 S 8 CaB 25.40 25.40 Wheat,Grain 48 Bushels 9/1-4/30 96 0 0 Broad. 48 7.18 0 182.44 0
9618 4 j S 8 CaB 1.40 1.40 Wheat,Grain 48 Bushels 911-4/30 *96 0 0 Broad. 48 7.18 0 10.06 0
9618 5 S 8 CdB2 22.80 22.80 Wheat,Grain 57 Bushels 9/1-4/30 114 0 0 Broad. 57 8.53 0 194.47 0
1000129 1 S 8 CrB 10.20 10.20 Wheat,Grain 59 Bushels 9/1-4/30 118 0 0 Broad. 59 8.83 0 90.05 0
1001278 5 S 8 CcB 13.60 13.60 Wheat,Grain 59 Bushels 9/1-4/30 118 0 0 Broad. 59 8.83 0 120.07 0
1001418 1 S 8 CeB2 12.90 12.90 Wheat,Grain 59 Bushels 9/1-4/30 118 0 0 Broad. 59 8.83 0 113.89 0
1001418 2 S 8 CeB2 13.00 13.00 Wheat,Grain 59 Bushels 9/1-4/30 118 0 0 Broad. 59 8.83 0 114.77 0
1001418 3 S 8 CcB 6.10 6.10 Wheat,Grain 59 Bushels 9/1-4/30 118 0 0 Broad. 59 8.83 0 53.86 0
1001589 6 S 6 WkE 6.10 6.10 Fescue Pasture 2.8 Tons 8/1-7131 105 0 0 Broad. 105 15.71 0 95.85 0
5/17/2019 4:03:58 PM 5/7

Waste Utilization Table
Hopkins Dairy
1001589 7 S 6 EnB 4.80 4.80 Fescue Pasture 4.4 Tons 8/1-7131 145 0 0 Broad. 145 21.70 0 104.15 0
1001589 8 S 6 EnB 4.70 4.70 Fescue Pasture 4.4 Tons 811-7131 145 0 0 Broad. 145 21.70 0 101.98 0
1001589 9 S 6 CeB2 9.70 9.70 Fescue Pasture 4.9 Tons 8/1-7/31 162 0 0 Broad. 162 24.24 0 235.15 0
1001589 10 S 6 EnC 1.70 1.70 Fescue Pasture 4.1 Tons 8/1-7/31 135 0 0 Broad. 135 20.20 0 34.34 0
1001589 11 S 6 EnC 1.00 1.00 Fescue Pasture 4.1 Tons 8/1-7/31 135 0 0 Broad. 135 20.20 0 20.20 0
1001618 1 S 8 CfB 3.90 3.90 Wheat,Grain 57 Bushels 9/1-4/30 114 0 0 Broad. 57 8.53 0 33.27 0
1001618 2 S 8 CgB2 8.50 8.50 Wheat,Grain 59 Bushels 9/1-4/30 118 0 0 Broad. 59 8.83 0 75.05 0
1001618 3 S 8 FrD2 15.80 15.80 Wheat,Grain 40 Bushels 9/1-4/30 80 0 0 Broad. 40 5.99 0 94.57 0
1001618 4 SS CgB2 7.10 7.40 Wheat,Grain 59 Bushels 9/1-4/30 118 0 0 Broad. 59 8.83 0 65.33 0
1001618 5 S 8 WcB 9.40 9.40 Wheat,Grain 59 Bushels 9/1-4/30 118 0 0 Broad. 59 8.83 0 82.99 0
1001619 1 S 8 CgB2 15.90 15.90 Wheat,Grain 59 Bushels 9/1-4/30 118 0 0 Broad. 59 8.83 0 140.38 0
1001619 2 S 8 CgB2 15.90 15.90 Wheat,Grain 59 Bushels 9/1-4/30 118 0 0 Broad. 59 8.83 0 140.38 0
1001619 3 S 8 WCB 7.10 7.10 Wheat,Grain 59 Bushels 9/1-4/30 118 0 0 Broad. 59 8.83 0 62.68 0
1001620 2 S 8 CfB 4.80 4.80 Wheat,Grain 57 Bushels 911-4130 114 0 0 Broad. 57 8.53 0 40.94 0
1001620 3 S 8 CfB 8.70 8.70 Wheat,Grain 57 Bushels 9/1-4130 114 0 0 Broad. 1 57 8.53 0 74.21 0
1001620 5 S 8 CgB2 8.90 8.90 Wheat,Grain 59 Bushels 9/1-4/30 118 0 0 Broad. 1 59 8.83 0 78.58 0
1001620 6 S 8 WcB 2.30 2.30 Wheat,Grain 59 Bushels 9/1-4/30 1 118 0 0 Broad. 59 8.83 0 20.31 0
Total Applied,1000 gallons 3,630.71
Total Produced,1000 gallons 498.15
Balance, 1000 gallons (3,132.56) 8 � n-A,
Total Applied,tons '�4 "Y-. 0.00
Total Produced,tons k 0.00
Balance,tons 0.00
5/17/2019 4:03:58 PM 6/7

Waste Utilization Table
Hopkins Dairy
Notes: 1. In the tract column,—symbol means leased,otherwise,owned. 1.Symbol'means user entered data.
5/17/2019 4:03:58 PM 7 17

Planned Crops Summary
Hopkins Dairy
The table shown below provides a summary of the crops or rotations included in the plan for each field. Realistic Yield estimates
and Plant Available Nitrogen (PAN) recommendations are also provided for each crop as well as the crop's P2O5 Removal
Rate. The Leaching Index (LI) and the Phosphorous Loss Assessment Tool (PLAT) Rating are also provided for each field,
where available.
If a filed's PLAT Rating is High, any planned manure application is limited to the phosphorous removal rate of the harvested
plant biomass for the crop rotation or multiple years in the crop sequence. Fields with a Very High PLAT Rating should receive
no additional applications of manure. Regardless of the PLAT rating starter fertilizers may be recommended in accordance with
North Carolina State University guidelines or recommendations. The quantity of P2O5 applied to each crop is shown in the
following table if the field's PLAT rating is High or Very High.
Tract Field Total Wettable SMU LI Crop Name RYE Recom- PLAT - P205(lbs/acre)
Acres Acres mended Rating Crop
Tract M Total
PAN Removal Applied
6473 7a '9.4 9.4 CeB2 NA Corn,Silage 22.5 Tons 245 Unknown 77 NA
Wheat,Grain 59 Bushels 118 Unknown 30 NA
6473 7 (9.7 19.7 CeB2 NA
Corn,Silage 22.5 Tons 245 Unknown 77 NA
Wheat,Grain 59 Bushels 118 Unknown 30 NA
6494— 1 16 16 CeB2 NA
Corn,Silage 22.5 Tons 245 Unknown 77 NA
Wheat,Grain 59 Bushels 118 Unknown 30 NA
6494— 2 11.6 11.6 CeB2 NA
Corn,Silage 22.5 Tons 245 Unknown 77 NA
Wheat,Grain 59 Bushels 118 Unknown 30 NA
6966 5 11.7) 11.7 ApC NA
Fescue Pasture 5.1 Tons 168 Unkno n 8 NA
7035— 4 11.5 11.5 EnB NA
Fescue Pasture 4.4 Tons 145 Unknown 7 NA
7035— 5 2.3 2.3 En6 NA
Fescue Pasture 4.4 Tons 145 Unknown 7 NA
9618 1 6.21 6.2 ;; NA
Wheat,Grain 48 Bushels 96 Unknown 24 NA
Corn,Silage 18 Tons 196 Unknown 61 NA
9618 2 15.6� 15.6 CaB NA
Wheat,Grain 48 Bushels 96 Unknown 24 NA
Corn,Silage 18 Tonsl 1961 Unknown 61 NA
Leased. ) 01"i we 5/17/20194:04:31 PM 1 /4
15 (._

Planned Crops Summary
Hopkins Dairy
9618 3 25.4 25.4 CaB NA
Corn,Silage 18Tons 196 Unknown 61 NA
Wheat,Grain 48 Bushels 96 Unknown 24 NA
9618 1 4 1.4 1.4 Ca6 NA
Corn,Silage 18 Tons 196 Unknown 61 NA
Wheat,Grain 48 Bushels 96 Unknown 24 NA
9618 5 22.8 22.8 CcIB2 NA
Corn,Silage 21.9 Tons 239 Unknown 74 NA
Wheat,Grain 57 Bushels 114 Unknown 28 NA
1000129 1 60. 10.2 CrB NA
Corn,Silage 22.5 Tons 245 Unknown 77 NA
Wheat,Grain 59 Bushels 118 Unknown 30 NA
1001278 5 93.6� 13.6 CCB NA
Corn,Silage 22.5 Tons 245 Unknown 77 NA
Wheat,Grain 59 Bushels 118 Unknown 30 NA
1001418
1 12.9 12.9 CeB2 NA
Corn,Silage 22.5 Tons 245 Unknown 77 NA
Wheat,Grain 59 Bushels 118 Unknown 30 NA
1001418
2 13 13 CeB2 NA
Corn,Silage 22.5 Tons 245 Unknown 77 NA
Wheat,Grain 59 Bushels 118 Unknown 30 NA
1001418
3 6.1 6.1 CcB NA
Corn,Silage 22.5 Tons 245 Unknown 77 NA
Wheat,Grain 59 Bushels 118 Unknown 30 NA
1001589
6 6.1 6.1 WkE NA
Fescue Pasture 2.8 Tons 105 Unknown 1 4 NA
1001589
7 4.8 4.8 EnB NA
Fescue Pasture 4.4 Tons 145 Unknown 7 NA
1001589
8 4.7 4.7 EnB NA
Fescue Pasture 4.4 Tons 145 Unknown 7 NA
1001589
9 9.7 9.7 CeB2 NA
Fescue Pasture 4.9 Tons 162 Unknown 8 NA
1001589
10 1.7 1.7 EnC NA
Fescue Pasture 4.1 Tons 135 Unknown 7 NA
5/17/2019 4:04:31 PM 2/4

Planned Crops Summary
Hopkins Dairy
1001589
11 1 1 EnC NA
Fescue Pasture 4.1 Tons 135 Unknown 7 NA
1001618 1 3.9 3.9 Cf8 NA
Corn,Silage 21.9 Tons 239 Unknown 74 NA
Wheat,Grain 57 Bushels 114 Unknown 28 NA
1001618 2 8.5 8.5 CgB2 NA
Corn,Silage 22.5 Tons 245 Unknown 77 NA
Wheat,Grain 1 59 Bushels 118 Unknown 30 NA
1001618 3 5.8 15.8 FrD2 NA
Corn,Silage 15.6 Tons 170 Unknown 53 NA
Wheat,Grain 40 Bushels 80 Unknown 20 NA
1001618 4 .1 7.4 Cg82 NA
Corn,Silage 22.5 Tons 245 Unknown 77 NA
Wheat,Grain 1 59 Bushels 118 Unknown 30 NA
1001618 5 " 9.4 WcB NA
Corn,Silage 25.5 Tons 278 Unknown 87 NA
Wheat,Grain 59 Bushels 118 Unknown 30 NA
1001619 1 159 15.9 CgB2 NA
-- Corn,Silage 22.5 Tons 245 Unknown 77 NA
Wheat,Grain 59 Bushels 118 Unknown 30 NA
1001619 2 16. 15.9 CgB2 NA -
Corn,Silage 22.5 Tons 245 Unknown 77 NA
Wheat,Grain 59 Bushels 118 Unknown 30 NA
1001619 3 73 7.1 Wc6 NA
Corn,Silage 25.5 Tons 278 Unknown 87 NA
Wheal,Grain 59 Bushels 118 Unknown 30 NA
1001620 2 a 4.8 CfB NA
- Corn,Silage 21.9 Tons 239 Unknown 74 NA
Wheat,Grain 57 Bushels 114 Unknown 28 NA
1001620 3 8.7 Ct6 NA
Corn,Silage 21.9 Tons 239 Unknown 74 NA
Wheat,Grain 57 Bushels 114 Unknown 28 NA
1001620 5 8.9 8.9 CgB2 NA
Corn,Silage 22.5 Tons 245 Unknown 77 NA
Wheat,Grain 59 Bushels 118 Unknown 30 NA
1001620 6 1 2. 2.3 WcB NA
5/17/2019 4:04:31 PM 3/4

Planned Crops Summary
Hopkins Dairy
Corn,Silage 25.5 Ton: 278 Unknown 87 NA
Lew . 101, Wheat,Grain 59 Bushels 118 Unknown 30 NA
Totals: 345.70 346.00
Notes:1.In the tract column,-symbol means leased,otherwise,owned.
LI Potential Leaching Technical Guidance
Law potential to contribute to soluble nutrient None
<2 leaching below the root zone.
Moderate potential to contribute to soluble nutrient Nutrient Management(590) should be planned.
> =2 &< = 10 leaching below the root zone.
High potential to contribute to soluble nutrient Nutrient Management(590) should be planned. Other conservation
leaching below the root zone. practices that improve available water holding capacity of soil and
improve nutrient use efficiency should be considered. Examples are
> 10 Cover Crops (340)to scavenge nutrients, Sod-Based Rotations (328),
Long-Term No-Till (778), and edge-of-field practices such as Filter
Strips(393) and Riparian Forest Buffers (391).
P Loss Index Rating P Management Recommendation
0 -25 Low No adjustment needed; N based application
26 - 50 Medium No adjustment needed; N based application
51 - 100 High Application limited to crop P removal
> 100 Very High Starter P application only
5/17/20194:04:31 PM 4/4

Required Specifications For Animal Waste Management
i. Animal waste shall not reach surface waters of the state by runoff, drift,
manmade conveyances, direct application, or direct discharge during
operation or land application. Any discharge of waste that reaches surface
water is prohibited.
z. There must be documentation in the design folder that the producer either
owns or has an agreement for use of adequate land on which to properly
apply the waste. If the producer does not own adequate land to properly
dispose of the waste, he/she shall provide evidence of an agreement with a
landowner, who is within a reasonable proximity, allowing him/her the use of
the land for waste application. It is the responsibility of the owner of the
waste production facility to secure an update of the Nutrient Management
Plan when there is a change in the operation, increase in the number of
animals, method of application, receiving crop type, or available land.
3. Animal waste shall be applied to meet, but not exceed, the nitrogen needs
for realistic crop yields based upon soil type, available moisture, storical data,
climatic conditions, and level of management, unless there are regulations
that restrict the rate of applications for other nutrients.
a. Animal waste shall be applied to land eroding less than 5 tons per acre per
year. Waste may be applied to land eroding at more than 5 tons per acre per
year but less than 10 tons per acre per year provided grass filter strips are
installed where runoff leaves the field (see USDA, NRCS Field Office Technical
Guide Standard 393 - Filter Strips).
5. Odors can be reduced by injecting the waste or by disking after waste
application. Waste should not be applied when there is danger of drift from
the land application field.

6. When animal waste is to be applied on acres subject to flooding, waste will
be soil incorporated on conventionally tilled cropland. When waste is applied
to conservation tilled crops or grassland, the waste may be broadcast
provided the application does not occur during a season prone to flooding
(see "Weather and Climate in North Carolina" for guidance).
7. Liquid waste shall be applied at rates not to exceed the soil infiltration rate
such that runoff does not occur offsite or to surface waters and in a method
which does not cause drift from the site during application. No ponding
should occur in order to control odor and flies.
s. Animal waste shall not be applied to saturated soils, during rainfall events, or
when the soil surface is frozen.
9. Animal waste shall be applied on actively growing crops in such a manner
that the crop is not covered with waste to a depth that would inhibit growth.
The potential for salt damage from animal waste should also be considered.
10. Nutrients from waste shall not be applied in fall or winter for spring planted
crops on soils with a high potential for leaching. Waste/nutrient loading rates
on these soils should be held to a minimum and a suitable winter cover crop
planted to take up released nutrients. Waste shall not be applied more than
30 days prior to planting of the crop or forages breaking dormancy.
11. Any new swine facility sited on or after October 1, 1995 shall comply with the
following: The outer perimeter of the land area onto which waste is applied
from a lagoon that is a component of a swine farm shall be at least 50 feet
from any residential property boundary and canal. Animal waste, other than
swine waste from facilities sited on or after October 1, 1995, shall not be
applied closer than 25 feet to perennial waters.
12. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 100 feet

13. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 200 feet of dwellings other
than those owned by the landowner.
14. Waste shall be applied in a manner not to reach other property and public
right-of-ways.
15. Animal waste shall not be discharged into surface waters, drainage ways, or
wetlands by a discharge or by over-spraying. Animal waste may be applied
to prior converted cropland provided the fields have been approved as a land
application site by a "technical specialist". Animal waste shall not be applied
on grassed waterways that discharge directly into water courses, and on
other grassed waterways, waste shall be applied at agronomic rates in a
manner that causes no runoff or drift from the site.
16. Domestic and industrial waste from wash down facilities, showers, toilets,
sinks, etc., shall not be discharged into the animal waste management
system.
17. A protective cover of appropriate vegetation will be established on all
disturbed areas (lagoon embankments, berms, pipe runs, etc.). Areas shall
be fenced, as necessary, to protect the vegetation. Vegetation such as trees,
shrubs, and other woody species, etc., are limited to areas where considered
appropriate. Lagoon areas should be kept mowed and accessible. Berms
and structures should be inspected regularly for evidence of erosion,
leakage, or discharge.
18. If animal production at the facility is to be suspended or terminated, the
owner is responsible for obtaining and implementing a "closure plan" which
will eliminate the possibility of an illegal discharge, pollution, and erosion.
19. Waste handling structures, piping, pumps, reels, etc., should be inspected on
a regular basis to prevent breakdowns, leaks, and spills. A regular
maintenance checklist should be kept on site.

zo. Animal waste can be used in a rotation that includes vegetables and other
crops for direct human consumption. However, if animal waste is used on
crops for direct human consumption, it should only be applied pre-plant with
no further applications of animal waste during the crop season.
21. Highly visible markers shall be installed to mark the top and bottom
elevations of the temporary storage (pumping volume) of all waste
treatment lagoons. Pumping shall be managed to maintain the liquid level
between the markers. A marker will be required to mark the maximum
storage volume for waste storage ponds.
zz. Waste shall be tested within 60 days of utilization and soil shall be tested at
least annually at crop sites where waste products are applied. Nitrogen shall
be the rate-determining nutrient, unless other restrictions require waste to
be applied based on other nutrients, resulting in a lower application rate
than a nitrogen based rate. Zinc and copper levels in the soils shall be
monitored and alternative crop sites shall be used when these metals
approach excessive levels. pH shall be adjusted and maintained for optimum
crop production. Soil and waste analysis records shall be kept for a minimum
of five years. Poultry dry waste application records shall be maintained for a
minimum of three years. Waste application records for all other waste shall
be maintained for five (5) years.
zs. Dead animals will be disposed of in a manner that meets North Carolina
regulations.

Required Soil Test Values
Hopkins Dairy
The Required Soil Test Values shown in the following table provide a summary of recommended actions that
should be taken based off information provided at time of soil tests. Fields that receive manure must have a soil
analysis conducted at least once every three years. High levels of zinc and copper can adversely affect plant
growth. Alternative crop sites must be used when the concentration of these metals approach excessive levels.
Site life can be estimated by dividing the amount of copper and zinc to be applied in Ibs/acre by 0.036 and 0.071,
respectively and multiplying the result by 0.85. By adding this quantity to the current soil index for copper or zinc,
we can predict life of the site for waste disposal.
In addition to copper and zinc indices, this table also provides a summary of lime recommendations for each
crop based on the first crop listed on the most recent soil sample. Application of lime at recommended rates is
necessary to maintain soil pH in the optimum range for crop production. If the first crop or rotation changes,
these recommendations may need to be reevaluated to ensure optimal ranges ofr crop production are
maintained.
Tract ID Field ID Crop(s) pH Lime Recom. Cu-1 Copper Zn-I Zinc
for Crop(s). Recommendation Recommendation
(tons/acre)
6473 7 6.9 0.0 460 0,0 738 0,0
6473 7a 6.9 0,0 460 0.0 738 0,0
6494 1 5.5 0,0 812 0,0 443 0,0
6494 2 5.6 0,0 825 0,0 408 0.0
6966 5 5.9 0,0 50 0,0 129 0,0
7035 4 4.9 0,0 201 0,0 200 0,0
7035 5 5.8 0.0 155 0,0 134 0,0
9618 1 5.3 0.0 53 0,0 72 0,0
9618 2 5.3 0,0 53 0,0 72 0,0
9618 3 7.6 0,0 150 0,0 328 0,0
9618 4 7.6 0,0 150 0,0 328 0,0
9618 5 7 0,0 219 0,0 348 0.0
1000129 1 7 0.0 219 0,0 348 0,0
1001278 5 6.3 0,0 352 0,0 454 0,0
1001418 1 6.3 0.0 352 0,0 454 0,0
1001418 2 6.1 0,0 623 0,0 250 0,0
1001418 3 4.7 0,0 73 0,0 52 0,0
1001589 6 5.8 0,0 155 0.0 134 0,0
1001589 7 5.6 0,0 825 0.0 408 0,0
1001589 8 6.8 0.0 58 0,0 228 0,0
1001589 9 6.8 0.0 58 0,0 408 0,0
5/17/2019 1:16:20 PM 1/2

Required Soil Test Values
Hopkins Dairy
1001589 10 6.8 0,0 58 0,0 228 0,0
1001589 11 6.7 0.0 90 0,0 228 0,0
1001618 1 6.3 0.0 139 0,0 192 0.0
1001618 2 5.7 0,0 471 0,0 112 0,0
1001618 3 6 0,0 286 0.0 289 0,0
1001618 4 5.8 0,0 255 0,0 126 0,0
1001618 5 6.3 0,0 546 0,0 322 0,0
1001619 1 5.4 0,0 623 0,0 210 0.0
1001619 2 4.8 0,0 244 0.0 64 0,0
1001619 3 5.6 0,0 411 0,0 195 0,0
1001620 2 6.4 0,0 256 0,0 206 0,0
1001620 3 6.2 0,0 219 0,0 159 0.0
1001620 5 6.2 0,0 219 0,0 159 0,0
1001620 6 5.9 0,0 174 0,0 111 0,0
Zinc and Copper Toxicity Levels in Soils
Metal Soil Test Index Recommended Action
Zn 300 Limit application on peanuts.Maintain soil pH>=6.0.
Soo Cease application on peanut land. Maintain soil pH>=6.0.
2000 Caution:seek alternative site(all crops).Maintain soil pH>=6.0.
3000 Cease application(all crops).Maintain soil pH>=6.0.
Cu 2000 Caution:seek alternative site(all crops).Maintain soil pH>=6.0.
3000 Cease application(all crops).Maintain soil pH>=6.0.
5/17/2019 1:16:20 PM 2/2

Cattle Farm Waste Management Odor Control Checklist
Source Cause BMPs to Minimize Odor Site Specific Practices
Farmstead • Dairy production 19 Vegetative or wooded buffers
0 Recommended best management practices
Z Good judgment and common sense
Paved lots or barn . Wet manure-covered IN Scrape or flush daily
alley surfaces surfaces ® Promote drying with proper ventilation
Q9 Routine checks and maintenance on waterers,
hydrants, pipes, stock tanks
Bedded areas • Urine Promote drying with proper ventilation
• Partial microbial ® Replace wet or manure-covered bedding
decomposition
Manure dry stacks • Partial microbial O Provide liquid drainage for stored manure
decomposition
Storage tank or • Partial microbial O Bottom or mid-level loading
basin surface decomposition O Tank covers
• Mixing while filling O Basin surface mats of solids
• Agitation when emptying 0 Minimize lot runoff and liquid additions
O Agitate only prior to manure removal
O Proven biological additives or oxidants
Settling basin . Partial microbial O Liquid drainage from settled solids
surfaces decomposition O Remove solids regularly
• Mixing while filling
• Agitation when emptying
Manure, slurry, or • Agitation when spreading O Soil injection of slurry/sludges
sludge spreader . Volatile gas emissions O Wash residual manure from spreader after use
outlets O Proven biological additives or oxidants
April 18, 2006, page 1

Cattle Farm Waste Management Odor Control Checklist
Source Cause BMPs to Minimize Odor Site Specific Practices
Uncovered manure, • Volatile gas emissions while O Soil injection of slurry/sludges
slurry, or sludge on drying O Soil incorporation within 48 hours
field surfaces 111 Spread in thin uniform layers for rapid drying
0 Proven biological additives or oxidants
Flush tanks • Agitation of recycled lagoon O Flush tank covers
liquid while tanks are filling p Extend fill lines to near bottom of tanks with
anti-siphon vents
Outside drain • Agitation during wastewater O Box covers
collection orjunction conveyance
boxes
Lift stations • Agitation during sump tank O Sump tank covers
filling and drawdown
End of drainpipes at . Agitation during wastewater O Extend discharge point of pipes underneath
lagoon conveyance lagoon liquid level
Lagoon surfaces • Volatile gas emission O Proper lagoon liquid capacity
• Biological mixing O Correct lagoon startup procedures
• Agitation O Minimum surface area-to-volume ratio
O Minimum agitation when pumping
O Mechanical aeration
O Proven biological additives
Irrigation sprinkler • High pressure agitation O Irrigate on dry days with little or no wind
nozzles . Wind drift O Minimum recommended operating procedure
O Pump intake near lagoon liquid surface
O Pump from second-stage lagoon
O Flush residual manure from pipes at end of
slurry/sludge pump ings
April 18, 2006, page 2

Cattle Farm Waste Management Odor Control Checklist
Source Cause BMPs to Minimize Odor Site Specific Practices
Dead animals • Carcass decomposition .9 Proper disposition of carcasses
Standing water . Improper drainage 53 Grade and landscape such that water drains away
around facilities . Microbial decomposition of from facilities
organic matter
Mud tracked onto • Poorly maintained access 0 Farm access road maintenance
public roads from roads
farm access
Additional Information: Available From
Cattle Manure Management; .0200 RuleBMP Packet NCSU, County Extension Center
Dairy Educational Unit Manure Management System—Lake Wheeler Road Field Laboratory;EBAE 209-95 NCSU—BAE
Lagoon Design and Management for Livestock Manure Treatment and Storage; EBAE 103-83 NCSU—BAE
Management of Dairy Wastewater; EBAE 106-83 NCSU—BAE
Calibration of Manure and Wastewater Application Equipment; EBAE Fact Sheet NCSU—BAE
Nuisance Concerns in Animal Manure Management: Odors and Flies; PRO107, 1995 Conference Proceedings Florida Cooperative Extension
April 18, 2006, page 3

Insect Control Checklist for Animal Operations
Source Cause BMPs to Control Insects Site Specific Practices
Liquid Systems
Flush gutters • Accumulation of solids .M Flush system is designed and operated sufficiently
to remove accumulated solids from gutters as
designed
M Remove bridging of accumulated solids at
discharge
Lagoons and pits • Crusted solids M Maintain lagoons, settling basins and pits where
pest breeding is apparent to minimize the crusting
of solids to a depth of no more than 6 to 8 inches
over more than 30 percent of surface
Excessive vegetative • Decaying vegetation X Maintain vegetative control along banks of
growth lagoons and other impoundments to prevent
accumulation of decaying vegetative matter along
water's edge on impoundment's perimeter.
Dry Systems
Feeders Feed spillage 9 Design, operate, and maintain feed systems
(e.g., bunkers and troughs) to minimize the
accumulation of decaying wastage
® Clean up spillage on a routine basis (e.g., 7-to 10-
day interval during summer; 15-to 30-day interval
during winter)
AMIC -November 11, 1996, page 1

Insect Control Checklist for Animal Operations
Source Cause BMPs to Control Insects Site Specific Practices
Feed storage • Accumulations of feed 96 Reduce moisture accumulation within and around
residues immediate perimeter of feed storage areas by
ensuring drainage is away from site and/or providing
adequate containment (e.g., covered bin for
brewer's grain and similar high moisture grain
products)
tV Inspect for and remove or break up accumulated
solids in filter strips around feed storage as needed
Animal holding areas • Accumulations of animal 19 Eliminate low areas that trap moisture along fences
wastes and feed wastage and other locations where waste accumulates and
disturbance by animals is minimal
Z Maintain fence rows and filter strips around animal
holding areas to minimize accumulations of wastes
(i.e., inspect for and remove or break up
accumulated solids as needed)
Dry manure handling • Accumulations of animal 10 Remove spillage on a routine basis (e.g.,
systems wastes 7-to 10-day interval during summer; 15- to 30-day
interval during winter) where manure is loaded for
land application or disposal
O Provide for adequate drainage around manure
stockpiles
O Inspect for and remove or break up accumulated
wastes in filter strips around stockpiles and manure
handling areas as needed
For more information contact:
Cooperative Extension Service, Department of Entomology, Box 7613, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695-7613.
AMIC - November 11, 1996, page 2

EMERGENCY ACTION PLAN
PHONE NUMBERS
DWQ 33&--770-5g00
EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM 33L - 64I — 2X 7
SWCD 330 - (041 - 'gi40
NRCS 33(0 -3"15-5401 x 3
This plan will be implemented in the event that wastes from your operation are leaking,
overflowing, or running off site. You should not wait until wastes reach surface waters or leave
your property to consider that you have a problem. You should make every effort to ensure that
this does not happen. This plan should be posted in an accessible location for all employees at the
facility. The following are some action items you should take.
1. Stop the release of wastes. Depending on the situation, this may or may not be possible.
Suggested responses to some possible problems are listed below.
A. Lagoon overflow-possible solutions are:
a. Add soil to berm to increase elevation of dam.
b. Pump wastes to fields at an acceptable rate.
c. Stop all flows to the lagoon immediately.
d. Call a pumping contractor.
e. Make sure no surface water is entering lagoon.
B: Runoff from waste application field-actions include:
a. Immediately stop waste application.
b. Create a temporary diversion to contain waste.
c. Incorporate waste to reduce runoff.
d. Evaluate and eliminate the reason(s) that caused the runoff.
e. Evaluate the application rates for the fields where runoff occurred.
C: Leakage from the waste pipes and sprinklers-action include:
a. Stop recycle pump.
b. Stop irrigation pump.
c. Close valves to eliminate further discharge.
d. Repair all leaks prior to restarting pumps.
1 December 18, 1996

D: Leakage from flush systems, houses, solid separators-action include:
a. Stop recycle pump.
b. Stop irrigation pump.
c. Make sure no siphon occurs.
d. Stop all flows in the house, flush systems, or solid separators.
e. Repair all leaks prior to restarting pumps.
E: Leakage from base or sidewall of lagoon. Often this is seepage as opposed to flowing
leaks- possible action:
a. Dig a small sump or ditch away from the embankment to catch all seepage, put in a
submersible pump, and pump back to lagoon.
b. If holes are caused by burrowing animals, trap or remove animals and fill holes and
compact with a clay type soil.
c. Have a professional evaluate the condition of the side walls and lagoon bottom as soon
as possible.
2. Assess the extent of the spill and note any obvious damages.
a. Did the waste reach any surface waters?
b. Approximately how much was released and for what duration?
c. Any damage noted, such as employee injury, fish kills, or property damage?
d. Did the spill leave the property?
e. Does the spill have the potential to reach surface waters?
f. Could a future rain event cause the spill to reach surface waters?
g. Are potable water wells in danger (either on or off of the property)?
h. How much reached surface waters?
3: Contact appropriate agencies.
a. During normal business hours, call your DWQ (Division of Water Quality) regional office;
Phone - - . After hours, emergency number: 919-733-3942. Your phone call
should include: your name, facility, telephone number, the details of the incident from item
2 above, the exact location of the facility, the location or direction of movement of the
spill, weather and wind conditions. The corrective measures that have been under taken,
and the seriousness of the situation.
b. If spill leaves property or enters surface waters, call local EMS Phone number - -
c. Instruct EMS to contact local Health Department.
d. Contact CES, phone number - - , local SWCD office phone number - - , and
local NRCS office for advice/technical assistance phone number - - .
2 December 18, 1996

4: If none of the above works call 911 or the Sheriffs Department and explain your problem to
them and ask that person to contact the proper agencies for you.
5: Contact the contractor of your choice to begin repair of problem to minimize off-site damage.
a. Contractors Name: S}CVf Car42r QII{Dl ks 21"ar;�`�I�c1 G� YiIIC
b. Contractors Address: `d901 M lad I{ ncl r .S. 14�1 d c)
c. Contractors Phone: 33U-C�5&- 7-433 (home) 33G'451 "-
6: Contact the technical specialist who certified the lagoon (MRCS, Consulting Engineer, etc.)
a. Name: �"I��Ilt LCMJ&M
b. Phone: 33Ca- U41- 0
7: Implement procedures as advised by DWQ and technical assistance agencies to rectify the
damage, repair the system, and reassess the waste management plan to keep problems with
release of wastes from happening again.
3 December 18, 1996

Version—November 26,2018
Mortality Management Methods
Indicate which method(s) will be implemented.
When selecting multiple methods indicate a primary versus secondary option.
Methods other than those listed must be approved by the State Veterinarian,
Primary Secondary Routine Mortality
❑ Burial three feet beneath the surface of the ground within 24 hours of knowledge of animal
death. The burial must be at least 300 feet from any flowing stream or public body of water
(G.S.106-403). The bottom of the burial pit should be at least one foot above the seasonal
high water table. Attach burial location map and plan.
Landfill at municipal solid waste facility permitted by NC DEQ under GS 15A NCAC
13B .0200.
X I Rendering at a rendering plant licensed under G.S. 106-168.7.
Complete incineration according to 02 NCAC 52C .0102.
A composting system approved and permitted by the NC Department of Agriculture&Con-
sumer Services Veterinary Division (attach copy of permit). If compost is distributed off-farm,
additional requirements must be met and a permit is required from NC DEQ.
In the case of dead poultry only, placing in a disposal pit of a size and design approved by the
NC Department of Agriculture&Consumer Services(G.S. 106-549.70).
a Any method which, in the professional opinion of the State Veterinarian, would make possible
the salvage of part of a dead animal's value without endangering human or animal health.
(Written approval by the State Veterinarian must be attached).
❑ Mass Mortality Plan
Mass mortality plans are required for farms covered by an NPDES permit. These plans are
also recommended for all animal operations. This plan outlines farm-specific mortality man-
agement methods to be used for mass mortality. The NCDA&CS Veterinary Division sup-
ports a variety of emergency mortality disposal options; contact the Division for guidance.
• A catastrophic mortality disposal plan is part of the facility's CAWMP and is activated
when numbers of dead animals exceed normal mortality rates as specified by the State
Veterinarian.
• Burial must be done in accordance with NC General Statutes and NCDA&CS Veterinary
Division regulations and guidance.
• Mass burial sites are subject to additional permit conditions (refer to facility's animal
waste management system permit).
• In the event of imminent threat of a disease emergency, the State Veterinarian may enact
additional temporary procedures or measures for disposal according to G.S. 106-399.4.
a g /anl9
Signature of Farm ner/Manager Date
Signature of Teclopal 4becialist Date

Version—November 26,2018
Mortality Management Methods
Indicate which method(s) will be implemented.
When selecting multiple methods indicate a primary versus secondary option.
Methods other than those listed must be approved by the State Veterinarian.
Primary Secondary Routine Mortality
❑ Burial three feet beneath the surface of the ground within 24 hours of knowledge of animal
death. The burial must be at least 300 feet from any flowing stream or public body of water
(G.S.106-403). The bottom of the burial pit should be at least one foot above the seasonal
high water table.Attach burial location map and plan.
Landfill at municipal solid waste facility permitted by NC DEQ under GS 15A NCAC
13B .0200.
Rendering at a rendering plant licensed under G.S. 106-168.7.
Complete incineration according to 02 NCAC 52C .0102.
A composting system approved and permitted by the NC Department of Agriculture&Con-
sumer Services Veterinary Division (attach copy of permit). If compost is distributed off-farm,
additional requirements must be met and a permit is required from NC DEQ.
❑ Q In the case of dead poultry only, placing in a disposal pit of a size and design approved by the
NC Department of Agriculture &Consumer Services(G.S. 106-549.70).
Any method which, in the professional opinion of the State Veterinarian, would make possible
the salvage of part of a dead animal's value without endangering human or animal health.
(Written approval by the State Veterinarian must be attached).
Mass Mortality Plan
Mass mortality plans are required for farms covered by an NPDES permit. These plans are
also recommended for all animal operations. This plan outlines farm-specific mortality man-
agement methods to be used for mass mortality. The NCDA&CS Veterinary Division sup-
ports a variety of emergency mortality disposal options; contact the Division for guidance.
• A catastrophic mortality disposal plan is part of the facility's CAWMP and is activated
when numbers of dead animals exceed normal mortality rates as specified by the State
Veterinarian.
• Burial must be done in accordance with NC General Statutes and NCDA&CS Veterinary
Division regulations and guidance.
• Mass burial sites are subject to additional permit conditions(refer to facility's animal
waste management system permit).
• In the event of imminent threat of a disease emergency, the State Veterinarian may enact
additional temporary procedures or measures for disposal according to G.S. 106-399.4.
a" 5 L,-2 a l and g
Signature of Farm ner/Manager Date
,�lk,e �, � 5 /aa5 /a l9
Signature Signature ofTeci&al 4ecialist Date

Whitecedar Dairy W.U.P.
N T 6471/co)C
rl x 4
• � r r{(b � C:: r'
9.4
rF 1 i: � • j�1 fi r Jt
T[ f -Y".x SO 4
't xF e 9 r �
ltli
I
A19.7
/
rr rk �,Y � �r�tsl� 'fZ'y4l�f�',�•... r� .�. .
t ^ tE`111 r 1
k ` : •YS CIS„� i`}"1 -S (�'e '?n. r'[• ��w l f*l
� � �� �E � �, f�,C-'.{ .� ��q. rr CCy ^7. -o •.S� e4 t�l r.�:-i
F �� � T,Y� r�$ � '�+ tS7 °�S'� � ��• ��' �''x � i '��•�SFS � a�7��,r��•
a
. f
f +
1 inch = 660 feet Legend
Property Boundary
Field Boundary

Soil Map—Guilford County,North Carolina a
$ (Whitecedar Dairy;T6473)
6194p6 fi19Sro 6196Y1 619R10 fi19all 81%00 620000 6S 00 63NOO fiaYCD BA4W 6XEOp 620600 6= 63= 6T6W fi21pN —
36°14'49-N
Z 36"14'49"ry
02
iz
F
� g
S
R
8
QQ 8
M
p Q
ffi
S
r
8
29
f, S
$ !�
8
8
36°1613'N
36°14']3'N
6194W 61%W 619600 61e]W 61960 619300 fiSIXp 6a11p6 QppJ 62W0o 6261b] 665�] 6a6�11 6MA c= 6Z200 WOOD
3
b 3
5 Map Sok:1:7,920 dPdnted an Aland6L3pe(li"x8.5")shee[ A
N Meters
/V
0 35D 700 1400 21F
Map projeeSon:Web Menator C=ercoordrtlate6:WGSB4 Edge ta:UIM Zone 17N WG584
USDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 12/13/2018
Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 1 of 3

Soil Map—Guilford County,North Carolina Whitecetlar Dairy:TU73
Map Unit Legend
Map Unit Symbol Map Unit Name Acres in AO1 Percent of AOI
CkC I Clifford sandy loam,6 to 10
percent slopes
C162 Clifford!sandy Gay loam,2 t 6 percent
42.4 35]%
percent slopes,moderately
sooded
�CI i Cli0 10 perindy day ent lopes,loam,6 to 27.91 2
noded
CS Codorus loam,0 to 2 percent ].S 6.3%
slopes,frequently flooded
PoplarPbE Forest
sandy
loam,15— _ 27 7 r 23.3%
NaB Nperc percent
slopes
loam 2to6
perce
PpC2 Poplar Forest clay loam,6 to 6.7 5.6
10 percent slopes
moderately eroded 1186
Totals for Area of Interest 100.0%
Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 12/13/2018
Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 3 of 3

. r • r
!
�13� 13gK" �rrt 31 b x r �< N.i V� > V h��"e �T ✓ d4A�a .
'
yy ,r a
1 J
y Q r�•
•
'ia t � • 1 J+�3�,r2 eS�p� Y1 �'+'����a����{�A� t>� r, - ���L �4S �, � � y. - ,.
�j?v"33""tYF K•,� ti ,yg���}r Y y '�'i�}�k�i �f4,�£g�� ����i�'�f`1; yjCH�Y����`� �tl�i�
'((I`���k;� �� � 1f14��'i r +�!}iy�5>t�r�if jh�Yi� '��''� � � l �e �r� • r 3�1
3 �xr'k�` S���,,'. a� r t;'`.,�. -afri'.. 2.'y `.�� t�;r--#'• ✓ �:a ,' � .Ti,9� ���. � � � y�' 4.���
,9p •d�mj� !r
®t�4
iri + 45
: '3p
5��ry1Tfa � �ut i1F'}p p
m=• Y9�j '{fir � b�
,
k e ' - 37 �3�yr♦ p@ Y
e J.:w. �r, fYyt•� R J �
PN YYd
r r�tr i t
0 C• M

kk
6
v
}1 '� ''�`in ��}� i
t^ r 1
5
I
4, {
i
T6494
y}N .
e IT
lop
r
'C
��.� ��3''.S � t ✓� y5 +� S � t i i
• ••t y� Fes..'. p� "f ( Y y .
• :• •-

C'e_62
CeC2
CCB
CeB2CcD
Friendship GIenYDr r
a -� �`•- Cells. �;
m :
.0. 1- � Por rerfield Rd
1 .................
/ y Y{ c
A:

Soil Map—Guilford County,North Carolina
Whitecedar Dairy T6494
Map Unit Legend
Map Unit Symbol Map Unit Name Acres in AO1 Percent of AO1
CCB Cecil sandy loam,2 to 6 9.9 10 6
percent slopes
CCD Cecilsantly l m,lore 15 y 305 32.6%
percent Y o Y III Am
�S2 Cecilsand loam,2tol 284
percent slope.,motlerotel
erodes
eemtledt slopes,moderately _ 93.5 26.4%
CeC2 Cecil sand dayloam,6 to 10 247
Totals for Area oflnterest
utax Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 12/14=18
am" Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 3 of 3

Whitecedar Dairy W.U.P.
N T-6966
{
�115
r. d'
_ LL
1
m
ms d r+ rr
pv �rc,t*pq r r q"a" W •0 �, d'
v
f ) ayy "k�� �- £ � • fi j..G r �tax�i'd Kit \ ��. (_,
C� n) [F - .. L•P
< try
s* ) `•• 11.7 3
'f7
.�+,
r �. rl"
y' t iL .AP
S•
�� -i.4 J ' •'I �3� i
1 inch = 660 feet Legend
Property Boundary
Field Boundary l

3 Soil Map—Guilford County,North Carolina
(Whitecedar Dairy T6966) s
9
R �
819epp 815Pm a=0 6 m BaYOo Em900 sMO ®Y.AO 6ali]a a m RaBOD bal3m 821mp UNHW Q1e1U fi2130p @i9m
36°14'1XN 36°14 N
tl CC
za
3
ppp
o$_
$
K
$
a �
6
g 8
8
36°D'3VN $
36°13'WN
619a10 619300 62]OOo sKmw 6ZUi➢p 6aIIll BN100 62UA0 BkWD 6dTaU S6'B00 eaAOp 621¢n 6211m 62 m W1 6214C0
3 ;
$ Map SmL:1:7,920 irpnnb-d on Alandsmpe(11"x8.S�sheet
Meh s
N 0 100 20D 400 ap
F
0 35D 700 1400 270D
Map pro]ecdon:Web Mend CamermoNinates:WGSS4 Elgetia:UIM Zane 17N WGSS4
USDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 12/14/2018
Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 1 of 3

Soil Map—Guilford County,North Carolina Mitecedar Dairy T6956
Map Unit Legend
ff�Map Unit Symbol Map Unit Name Acres In AOl Percent of AOl
CaB Casville sandy loam,2 to 6 3.41, 8 4°/a
percent slopes
CaC — Casville sandy loam,6 to 10 7.31 18.1%
percent slopes
CnA Codorus loam,0 to 2 percent 2.1 5.3%
slopes,frequently flooded
PO
slopes — 27.0'
NaB Nathalie sandy loam,2 to 6 10.8
NaC Nathalie santl loam,6 to 10 16.51 41.2%
I slo es
Totals for Area oT Interest 40.2I 11
ljsm Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 12/14=18
Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 3 of 3

Whitecedar Dairy W.U.P.
INT 7035
l
F r
5 yyy.
Yat .
de ,
Qk V.�L y.YAt
h
1f 7� � I.
,..r
w,
r
L•�
11.5
2.3 ,l kF TIt
.', jt..
t
1 inch = 660 feet Legend
Property Boundary
Field Boundary

r
s .
x
R,Aq
MhC-2 CIA
ME' r CoAN1aE
r -911/ 4
a ED'-
° 's
P
�u2 Iry - - t• �_
� m
•Ficon&-Rd -.

Soil Map—Guilford County,North Carolina Whilecedar Dairy T 7035
Map Unit Legend
Map Unit Symbol Map Unit Name Acres in A01 Percent of AOI
CeB2 Cecil sandy clay loam,2 to 6 1.0 1.1%
percent slopes,moderately
eroded
CoA Congaree loam,0 to 2 percent 1.1 !! 1.1%
slopes,frequently flooded
EnB !Enon fine sandy loam,2 to 6 37.1 38.5%
percent slopes
EnD Enon fine sandy loam, 10 to 15 41.6 43.1%
percent slopes
MaE Madison sandy loam, 15 to 35 !I 0.0 0.0%
percent slopes
MhC2 Mecklenburg sandy clay loam, 1.1 1.2%
6 to 10 percent slopes,
moderately eroded
WkE Wilkes-Poindexter-Wynott 14.4 14.9%
complex, 15 to 45 percent
slopes
(Totals_for Area of Interest - 96.4
USDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 12/14/2018
Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 3 of 3

r ,
�F p
1 V Y•4P��} • t Y St +�Y {�j�t,
IF
{ t kN' {
0 kr M
is SYs L00,
x 1�e� fi �I r • a . _ '+'4�' i
Y
Y ,
M '
t.
IIdb k
''+V ,'���,' ♦' >, t,' 11 fir`' .s k ��, ,# ,#
3'
p
••— :• •.
- • :• ._

a Soil Map—Rockingham County,North Carolina s
m (Whitecedar Dairy T-9618)
micro samo stem sz4am s24,m s242ao s2a3n szaaoo s24sm szamo
3G°IS'33"N # W 1933'N
j 4
a ,
Y
8
M
A
1
F
n 'St
a
§ s
'valid.a4.11 ,. .
36°14'49'14 °•1..
B23]o0 8't3kD 62.tlm fi290o0 8241m 82d2m B24m0 E24am E245m Q43ll
3
r $
m Map Srale:1:6,670 if Dented on A patrad(8.6"x 11")9heet �
Meters
N o 50 10D 20D Sao
A -Feet
oo
Map projection:Web Meiotor Comeroaordinates:WGS84 Edge G¢:UrM Zone 17N WG584
USDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 12/13/2018
Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 1 of 3

Soil Map—Rockingham County, North Carolina Whitecedar Dairy T-9618
Map Unit Legend
Map Unit Symbol Map Unit Name Acres In AO1 Percent of AOI
CaB Casville sandy loam,2 to 8 45.8 26.4%
percent slopes
CaD Casville sandy loam,8 to 15 12.7 7.3%
percent slopes
derately
CdB2 Cecil sandy clay loam,2 to 8 15.8 9.1%
percent slopes,
CeA _ Chewaclda loam,0 o02 percent 22.4 12.9
slopes,frequently flooded
HaB Halifax sandy loam,2 to 8 11.1 6.4%
percent slopes
HbA Hatboro silt loam,0 to 2 2.4 1.4016'
percent slopes,frequently
flooded,long duration
PCD2 ',Pacolet sandy clay loam,8 to 43.0 24.8%
15 percent slopes,
moderately eroded
VaB Vance sandy loam,2 to 8 171 9.9%
percent slopes Water 1
0tals for Area of Interest _ _ _ -- 173.3
US�DDAA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 12/13/2018
Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 3 of 3

Whitecedar Dairy W.U.P.
N T-1000129
VV
, a
It Ap
WWI
; = t
e? Y,
r
w �
j
10.2
f Aj^N
n Sd S� 1
~4
\O 1 ��
A
er
1 inch = 660 feet Legend
Property Boundary
Field Boundary

3 Soil Map—Guilford County,North Carolina 3
(Whitecedar Dairy T1000129)
� tt
61M00 616330 Mm 61m elm 61MM
36.12'WN $ MO 12'WN
8
p
£p8
d
36°11.51-N tl W 11'51'N
6181M 61= 61m 61= 61m 61M 61M MM
3 3
Map Sole:1:7,920 if pnnbed on A parhad(8.S"x 11")sheet
N McRs $
0 100 200 400 67o k
Feet
0 350 70D 1400 2100
Map projection:Web Ae wr Comercooidinates:WGS84 Edge tics:UR4 Zone 17N WGS84
USDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 1 2/1 312 01 8
Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 1 of 3

Soil Map—Guilford County,North Carolina Whitecedar Dairy T1000129
Map Unit Legend
Map Unit Symbol Map Unit Name Acres In AOI Percent of AOI
CcB Cecil sandy loam,2 to 6 1.9 i 16.6%
percent slopes
CeB2 Cecil sandy clay loam,2 to 6 2.4 21.0%
percent slopes,moderately
eroded
CrB Coronaca clay
Totals for Area of Interest percent slopesam,2 to 6 11.7 100.0
USDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 12/13/2018
Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 3 of 3

Whitecedar Dairy W.U.P.
N T 1001278 ✓ ouA n E
' "
3.6
wi
l,, y
' Tr
}. � •cam � �, 5v cd' ♦�'� +3.i�
des l� �t4 _>� �� �rY�♦�
1 "
. tt,
F
fr.r F SS
♦. ..�rp. T ._A � � �4 ��iriress.. .� 9f tSs� Y
t
i.
{, a
If iY 2
ji,
rat l'
dM' F x 4
�. • Y a. � A ' cic � �s
1 inch =660 feet Legend
Property Boundary
Field Boundary

3 Soil Map—Guilford County,North Carolina 3
(Whitecedar Dairy T 1001278) R
6111m 6178m 61T.1m 81&W 6181W 618Z10 818300 618Cm 61m 616600 fi181W 618800 elm 61m 619103 sim 61m
36°1CWN
36"14g6'11
p §
M pp
S U,
Q
ffi pp
� M
p §
K C
S K
pp �
ffi_ pp
tb
pp �
M_ pp
Y�
R
p �
M_ v
M
C
§
c8,
3 8
29 F
S
36°1410'N
36°1430'N
6171W 6t/800 &tI 61m 618100 61m 6183m 618100 61m 61m 616RO Sim 61m 61m 6191W 619a10 61WW
3 3
Map Scale:1:7,9201f prn Ind on A landscape(IS"xaS)9 e
V Mek s §
R' .NA1 0 100 200 400
a � 700 1400 2100
/V Map Projection:Web Meratc, Comermcd'mate9:WS94 Ed9eda:lnMZone17NWSa4
USDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 12/14/2018
a Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Surrey Page 1 of 3

Soil Map—Guilford County,North Carolina Mitecedar Dairy T 1001278
Map Unit Legend
Map Unit Symbol Map Unit Name Acres in AOl Percent of AOl
CkB Clifford sandy loam,2 to 6 36.0 33.2%
percent slopes
CID s�to 0 Clifford 10 to 15 106
percent
I Clifford sandy clay loam,2 to 6 14.0 12.9%
I percent slopes,moderately
eroded
I
CIC2 Clifford sandy clay loam,6 to 2.9 27%
10 percent slopes, 1
'., moderately eroded
CnA Codopes loam,0 2 percent 3.9 3.6%
slopes,frequently flooded
NaB Nathalie sandy loam,2 to 6 2.6 2.4%
percent slopes
Ra8 Rasalo fine sandy loam,2 to 6 8.1 7.4%
percent slopes
r
RaC Resale fine sandy loam,6 to 6.8: 6.2%
10 percent slopes
psasdlo loam,15 to 45 12811 1.8%
%
ercent
SmE Siloam
SmC Siloam santl loam,4 to 10 7.61 -- 1
es
Totals for Area of Interest _ 108.6'I 100.0%
usm Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 12/14W8
20110 Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 3 of 3

Whitecedar Dairy W.U.P.
T-1001418
N
! Lei
}r.
T1001418
t 12.9 13.0
6.1
Y
. Y
1 inch =660 feet Legend
Property Boundary
Field Boundary

Whitecedar Dairy W.U.P.
T-1001418
N
,�:�;� fit.'• ;'�
T1001418 a.1\
r1C 1� .� — ...� y �q''•k. �tti�A?I�i OVA � �j� (r r ' � E'
a
z �
v t, {
12.914r 1�5 /4ti' 13.0 ' ltrrt
t� Q,.
6.1 1ri' ry � f;
t//��,4 l I.S✓ , ♦ r rV r �� y�l{r�r �f �nW y , kr �{ nr 1 f}= , �f/•� l '^�1 �/r
zA
i fit} 1 r = ! l��a �• 4j Srq f !S �I,kr? T6=
f
.`fir
♦ ri j{� �r ��i Y�%�rt !y kj
.�G' '. � F iTA il�' fir..t' tj•/�' e 'f, l eti 3lt. �'Ftl�,! r�t7 er
��+�`�+rc ti � dr'�'lr��� ��✓� ���'i .`t�"3'F r.t'u��:� '��� �kl3�yry+�`!Z �t'pP ! :0 1{ � �`
�, k ;�� !A` /' f, . l..pr �,f•y�� J "htVr��� , k �"
��l . � '�{ct�,i"s'z + ,�� i• s .. '� `'` t��Y;r' �f '1/� :�') r1` ���.'�� � � I i �`�'. ,
� r r � Aar ,•�� A '' ,�, �' tf•?�r�' ^ I i
,
1 inch = 660 feet Legend
Property Boundary
Field Boundary

Soil Map— uilford County,North Carolina
b (White Cedar Dairy J1OO1418)) R
k k
romo emm &woo sasv WOOD Wrmo emOm Wmo area m1m man an.
A.0 2
a
a
a
la n i y l t I l l l •I I
v roux a mvn
881E WNm B.SW &W[0 BOA] 6.WJ WH➢ Rim] m1m @IAO R1T]
a, 3
$ KV&ae:1:5,130 Pprblm MA4v4mpe(11"x8.5')4 C R
it
it N a So 1W an am k
Aa mo am ew fZla
�Pol�*'I:NPb Nxamtw Cmv+mw4Yafa:WG599 FLaelrs:llM Zac 11NN,6a9
p5pp Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 511 512 01 9
�i Conservation Servlee National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 1 of 3

Soil Map—Guilford County,North Carolina White Cedar Dairy J1001418)
Map Unit Legend
Map Unit Symbol Map Unit Name Acres In AOI Percent of AOI
Ccc Cecil sandy loam,6 to 10 5.7 11.6%
percent slopes
CeB2 Cecil sandy clay loam,2 to 6 34.4 70.7%
percent slopes,moderately
eroded
CeC2 Cecil sandy clay loam,6 to 10 7.2 14.8%
percent slopes,moderately
eroded
McC2 Madison clay loam,6 to 10 1.2 2.5%
percent slopes,moderately
eroded
W Water ._0.2�... 0.4%
Totals for Area of Interest
L48.6 100.0%
USDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 5/15/2019
7• Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 3 of 3

Whitecedar Dairy W.U.P.
T-1001589
N
w 7 e ter, 1
rV,
�'
i�vf
1
h; \
7
.81
e
n�^4�� •.7 �? 6 , a .. I„
K( e, 6.1 ° 4.7
4y / l
4
i ry3,
9.7
CD
q
a 9
Y N i
CL
Z fl.m
1 inch = 660 feet Legend
Property Boundary
Field Boundary

3 Soil Map—Guilford County,North Carolina s
(Whitecedar Dairy T1001589) a
N
@tan @140D @1900 @1eoD 6=0 6=0
36°16'3BWN
36°1O'36'N
!I
g8
F $8
hA
VV
MaF
88
vfcorxe
36°9'47N 36°9'95'N
@1Zn w4@ @ieD @18U BLttO 81T2V em1@
3 3
b b
m MaP Sole:1:7,920fipdnted on Aporbait(8.5"xll")sheet. �
N o 100 20D 40D boo Meters
A 0 350 700 1400 210D
Map projection:Web Melcatw Comeroawdinates:VIGS84 Edge tics:UIM Zone 17N WGS84
USDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 12/14/2018
Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 1 of 3

Soil Map—Guilford County,North Carolina Whitecedar Dairy T1001589
Map Unit Legend
Map Unit Symbol Map Unit Name Acres in AOI Percent of AOI
CeB2 Cecil sandy clay loam,2 to 6 6.5 12.6%
percent slopes,moderately
eroded
CeC2 Cecil sandy clay loam,6 to 10 2.7 5.2%
percent slopes,moderately
eroded
ChA Chewacla loam,0 to 2 percent 1.5 3.0°/
slopes,frequently flooded
EnB Enon fine sandy loam,2 to 6 11.8 22.8%
percent slopes
EnC Enon fine sandy loam,6 to 10 13.2 25.5%
percent slopes
EnD Enon fine sandy loam,10 to 15 4.9 9 4%
percent slopes
MaE Madison sandy loam, 15 to 35 0.0 0.1%
percent slopes
W Water 3.3 6.5%
WkE Wilkes-Poindexter-Wynolt 7.8
complex, 15 to 45 percent
slopes
Totals for Area of Interest 51.6 100.0%
usDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 1 211 412 01 8
a" Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 3 of 3

� r � At� R 'x� u` r+.k e�'c.5 � f �•� a
?`' �" .4,9 F k� � i � xU "# :•j) .�,r�`"t7 fir'. �"�
¢ , ,'may • s T10616k
JF
r
1'f Y
i
Y �
x
1 �v i{yS � � ��� � f s•���
a
T1001619
" T100 618
fir
Vr
a
r
..1

a Soil Map—Rockingham County,North Carolina a
19 (Whitecedar Dairy;T1001618,1001619,1001620)
F
61M 61Ee06 61m 61= 6191(e elm
36°1599"N
36°15'99'N
�i
6
R
n
36°19'S6"N
36°19'S6"N
Sim 61m 61m elm 619 61m film
3 ;
Map Sole:1:7,920 if printed on A portrait(8.5"x 11")sheet
N Mebe0 too 200 400 am rs IC
A 0 350 700 140D 21000
Map pmjecdon:Web Meiotor Gomermordinates:WG584 Edge do:U1M Zone 17N WGS64
USDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 1 211 3/2 01 8
�� Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 1 of 3
—f- I DC) I (n►'I 1-100 I(nI^Il -f- JODIcnaO DWNE-D

Soil Map—Rockingham County,North Carolina Whitecedar Dairy;T1001618,
1001619, 1001620
Map Unit Legend
Map Unit Symbol Map Unit Name Acres In AO1 Percent of AOI
CfB Clifford sandy loam,2 to 8 38.7 24.5%
percent slopes
'',CgB2 Clifford sandy clay loam 2 to 8 42.2 26.8%
percent slopes,moderately
eroded
Fp1) Fairview-Poplar Forest 5.4 3.4%
complex,8 to 15 percent
slopes
FpE Fairview-Poplar Forest 2.9 1.8%
complex,15 to 25 percent
slopes
FrD2 Fairview-Poplar Forest 45.7 29.0%
complex,8 to 15 percent
slopes,moderately eroded
HOA Haw River silty clay loam,0 to 3.1 2.0%
2 percent slopes,frequently
flooded
W Water 3.9 2.5%'
WhB Wickham sandy loam,mesic, 1 15.9 10.1%
to 4 percent slopes,rarely
flooded I
Totals for Area of Interest 157.8 _ 100.0%
USDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 12/13/2018
Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 3 of 3

United States Department of Agriculture
O N RCS Natural Resources
I J Conservation Service
OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE PLAN
"WASTE STORAGE POND"
Landowner/Operator: 1�Wh, Cedaf [_a1 Date: J 2z It
` 1
Address: OaSS Vyh 4,eCedar' J
Legal description of practice location: Farm# i T# �3 F#
OVERVIEW
A properly operated and maintained waste storage pond is an asset to your farm. This waste storage pond
was designed and installed to provide temporary storage of animal waste. The performance life of this
installation can be assured and usually increased by developing and carrying out a good operation and
maintenance program.
This practice will require you to perform periodic operation and maintenance to maintain satisfactory
performance. The following recommendations will help you in performing adequate operation and
maintenance.
GENERAL RECOMMENDATIONS
• Maintain all pumps, agitators,piping, valves and other electrical and mechanical equipment in good
operating condition following the manufacture's recommendations.
• Maintain grounding rods and wiring of all electrical equipment in good working condition.
• Prior to the storage season, empty the pond to provide storage capacity for the accumulation of animal
wastes and precipitation during the storage period.
• Fences and/or warning signs shall be maintained to prevent unauthorized human or livestock entry.
• Immediately repair any vandalism,vehicular or livestock damage to any earthfills, spillway, outlets or
other appurtenances.
• Maintain vigorous growth of desirable vegetative coverings. This includes reseeding, fertilization, and
controlled application of herbicides when necessary. Periodic mowing or grazing may be needed to
control height.
• Immediately remove any foreign debris in or adjacent to the waste storage pond.
• Determine and eliminate causes of settlement or cracks in the earthen sections and repair damage.
• Repair spalls, cracks and weathered areas in concrete surfaces.
0 KS 1/2 AUGUST 2002

• Repair or replace rusted or damaged metal and paint.
• Replace weathered or displaced rock riprap to constructed grade,
• Make sure all structure drains are functional and soil is not being transported through the drainage
system. The screens and/or rodent guards shall also be kept in place.
• Eradicate or otherwise remove all rodents or burrowing animals and repair any damage caused by their
activity.
• Immediately remove any obstructions or blockage of spillways,trash racks, or pipe inlets.
• Apply insecticides for insect control as per the manufacturer's recommendations and precautions, as
needed.
• Operate System in a manner that minimizes odors and air drift.
• Agitating should be completed at the appropriate location(s) in order to maintain the pond liner
material.
SPECIFICR`fECOMMENDATIONS FOR YOUR STRUCTURE
See N/Ofr,-Jk-ve i'n (lrlil tio� ina Rnj �nWVnct h en also
Contact GUILFORD SOIL& WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT for additional assistance: 3309
Burlington Rd, Greensboro NC 27405 Ph: 336-641 2440
Contact your local Natural Resources Conservation Service office(at 336-375-5401 x 3)for any additional technical
assistance you might need for implementation of this operation and maintenance plan for your structure.
0 NRCS 2/2 AUGUST 2002

Sheetl
Dairy Waste Storage Worksheet
Name of Operation Hopkins Dairy- Existing Pond
Number of Cows 172 cows
Days Storage 180 days
% Confinement 75 %
Open Area in sq. ft. 13000 sq. ft.
% Rainfall During Design Period 65 %
Pond Dimensions Length 190 ft.
Width 105 ft.
Depth 11 ft.
Average Inside Slope 2.5 :1
Enter ESW Stage 0.5
Liquid & Solid Manure 45322 cu. ft.
Milkroom & Parlor Waste 20695 cu ft.
Runoff From Open Areas 15974 cu ft.
Rainfall -Evaporation on Pond 16758 cu ft
Total Liquid Volume Required cu ft
549 cu ft./day
25 yr. Storm on Open Areas 0.31 ft.
(Assuming CN 98 and 6.1 in.
rainfall event)
25 Year Storm on Structure 0.5 ft.
Enter ESW Stage 0.5 ft.
Freeboard 1 ft.
Max. Liquid Level 2.31 ft. below top of dam
Number Days Storage Vol. 180 days
Volume at Max. Liquid Level cu. ft.
Gallons at Max. Liquid Level 740294 Gallons
Page 1

Sheets
Dairy Waste Storage Worksheet
Name of Operation _,Hopkins Dairy - Renovated Pond
Number of Cows 428 cows
Days Storage 1801days
% Confinement 75'%
Open Area in sq. ft. 5000 sq. ft.
% Rainfall During Design Period 65 %
Pond Dimensions Length 280 ft.
Width 121.6 ft.
Depth 11 ft.
Average Inside Slope 2.5 :1
Enter ESW Stage 0.5
Liquid & Solid Manure 112779 cu. ft.
Milkroom & Parlor Waste 51497 cu ft.
Runoff From Open Areas 6144 cu ft.
Rainfall - Evaporation on Pond 28600.32 cu ft
Total Liquid Volume Required 199021 cu ft
1106 cu ft./day
25 yr. Storm on Open Areas 0.07 ft.
(Assuming CN 98 and 6.1 in.
rainfall event)
25 Year Storm on Structure 0.5 ft.
Enter ESW Stage 0.5 ft.
Freeboard 1 ft.
Max. Liquid Level 2.07 ft. below top of dam
Number Days Storage Vol. 179 days
Volume at Max. Liquid Level 197855.1 cu. ft.
Gallons at Max. Liquid Level 1479956 Gallons
Page 1

Hopkins Dairy
This plan has been prepared for: This plan has been developed by:
White Cedar Dairy Guilford SWCD
Mary Ann Hopkins Millie Langley
8255 Whitecedar Rd 3309 Burlington Rd
Browns Summit, NC 27214-9544 Greensboro, NC 27405
336- (o(oQ•3 I(p 336-641-2440n
J,
Developer Signature
Type of Plan: Nutrient Management with Manure Only
Owner/Manager/Producer Agreement
I (we) understand and agree to the specifications and operation and maintenance procedures
established in this nutrient management plan which includes an animal waste utilization plan for
the farm named above. I have read and understand the Required Specifications concerning animal
waste management that are included with this plan.
ti
gnature(owner)( Date
iucc t�irriv04
S-a /
'gnat a(manager or producer) Date
This plan meets the minimum standards and specifications of the U.S.Department of Agriculture-
Natural Resources Conservation Service or the standard of practices adopted by the Soil and
Water Conservation Commission.
Plan Approved By: S 2z 901
Tech ' al Specialist Signature Date

White Cedar Dairy
Update 5/20/2019
HOLDING POND INFORMATION:
Upper Holding Pond (Old):
Your facility is designed for 180 days of temporary storage with the contents being removed on
the average of once every 6 MONTHS. In no instance should the volume of waste being stored in
your structure exceed Elevation 87.7 or 2.3' below top of Dam
Lower holding Pond(New):
Your facility is designed for 180 days of temporary storage with the contents being removed on
the average of once every 6 MONTHS. In no instance should the volume of waste being stored in
your structure exceed Elevation 93.8 or 2.2' below Top of Dam .
Call the local Natural Resources Conservation Service or Soil and Water Conservation District office
after you receive the waste analysis report for assistance in determining the amount per acre to apply
and the proper application rate prior to applying the waste.
The operation produces 3,327 ibs of PAN.
Farm Acres ACRES LBS. N
UTILIZED
Owned 244.3 9,807
Leases 101.4 4,070
TOTAL : 345.7 13,877
N PRODUCED 3,327
SURPLUS/(DEFICIT) (10,550)
Available acres:
Using small grain, the crop with the most limiting N requirement,
along with the hay and pasture fields available to the farmer, the
farmer would need a minimum of 83 acres to spread all the waste in
the fall. The farmer has 345.7 acres available, 244.3 acres owned and
101.4 acres leased. See table above.

NARRATIVE OF OPERATION:
Mr. Hopkins uses tank spreaders and custom haulers to spread waste. In the spring the waste goes on
corn silage land and in the fall on small grain and grass fields. The pastures are used infrequently as a
last resort if weather is limiting for getting equipment onto the cropland fields. There is more land
available than required for disposing of waste produced; therefore, every field will not receive waste
every year. Waste is applied at or below agronomic rates. There is some dry waste with bedding in a
barn that is spread with a standard box spreader.
Two holding ponds are used, the original one holds most of the lot runoff, parlor water and scraped lot
manure. The second pond holds runoff and scraped lot manure from the lower end of the lot. These
ponds may have different N levels, therefore, they must both be tested for actual PAN and the
appropriate amount used to compute amount of N per acre. A few of the cows go into in a barn
adjacent to the free stalls. This barn waste is not scraped into the holding pond. These areas are
bedded with and are hauled spread using a box spreader. This manure and bedding can be spread on
any of the fields in Tables 1 & 2.
Alternate Crops:
Sorghum or milo may be planted as an alternate crop, instead of corn. Up to
146 lbs of N may be applied if used as silage, and 101 lbs if harvested for grain.

Sources in Plan
Hopkins Dairy
Nutrients applied in accordance with this plan will be supplied from the
following source(s):
Commercial Fertilizer is included in this plan.
S 6 airy(Heifer)Liquid Manure Slurry waste generated 110,700 gals/year by a 20 Dairy(Heifer)Liquid
Id
anure Slurry operation.This production facility has waste storage capacities of approximately 180
ays..
Estimated Pounds of Plant Available Nitrogen Generated per Year
Injected 1,109
Incorporated-4 wks or less following 1,109
application
Incorporated-5 wks to 3 mos 739
following application
Broadcast 739
Irrigated 739
Max.Available Actual PAN PAN Surplus/ Actual Volume Volume Surplus/Deficit
PAN(Ibs)* Applied(Ibs) Deficit(Ibs) Applied(Gallons) (Gallons)
Year 1 739 7,912 (7,173) 1,185,230 (1,074,530)
Year 739 7,912 (7,173) 1,185,230 (1,074,530)
5/17/2019 1:16:00 PM 1 /2

Sources in Plan
Hopkins Dairy
S 8 Dairy(Milk Cow)Liquid Manure Slurry waste generated 387,450 gals/year by a 50 Dairy(Milk Cow)
Liquid Manure Slurry operation.This production facility has waste storage capacities of approximately
180 days.
Estimated Pounds of Plant Available Nitrogen Generated per Year
Injected 3,881
Incorporated-4 wks or less following 3,881
application
Incorporated-5 wks to 3 mos 2,588
following application
Broadcast 2,588
Irrigated 2,588
Max.Available Actual PAN PAN Surplus/ Actual Volume Volume Surplus/Deficit
PAN(Ibs) Applied(Ibs) Deficit(Ibs) Applied(Gallons) (Gallons)
Year 2,588 84,201 (81,613) 12,605,737 (12,218,287)
Year 2 2,588 16,223 (13,635) 2,428,700 (2,041,250)
5/17/2019 1:16:00 PM 2 12

Sources in Plan
Hopkins Dairy
Nutrients applied in accordance with this plan will be supplied from the
following source(s):
Commercial Fertilizer is included in this plan.
S 6 Dairy(Heifer)Liquid Manure Slurry waste generated 110,700 galstyear by a 20 Dairy(Heifer)Liquid
Manure Slurry operation.This production facility has waste storage capacities of approximately 180
days.
Estimated Pounds of Plant Available Nitrogen Generated per Year
Injected 1,109
Incorporated-4 wks or less following 1,109
application
Incorporated-5 wks to 3 mos 739
following application
Broadcast 739
Irrigated 739
Max.Available Actual PAN PAN Surplus/ Actual Volume Volume Surplus/Deficit
PAN(Ibs) Applied(Ibs) Deficit(Ibs) Applied(Gallons) (Gallons)
Year 1 739 7,912 (7,173) 1,185,230 (1,074,530)
Year 2 739 7,912 (7,173) 1,185,230 (1,074,530)
5/17/2019 4:05:20 PM 1/2

Sources in Plan
Hopkins Dairy
S 8 Dairy(Milk Cow)Liquid Manure Slurry waste generated 387,450 gals/year by a 50 Dairy(Milk Cow)
Liquid Manure Slurry operation.This production facility has waste storage capacities of approximately
180 days.
Estimated Pounds of Plant Available Nitrogen Generated per Year
Injected 3,881
Incorporated-4 wks or less following 3,881
application
Incorporated-5 wks to 3 mos 2,588
following application
Broadcast 2,588
Irrigated 2,588
Max.Available Actual PAN PAN Surplus/ Actual Volume Volume Surplus/Deficit
PAN(Ibs) Applied(Ibs) Deficit(Ibs) Applied(Gallons) (Gallons)
Year 2,588 84,778 (82,190) 12,692,170 (12,304,720)
Year 2,588 16,335 (13,747) 2,445,474 (2,058,024)
5/17/2019 4:05:20 PM 2/2

Waste Utilization Table
Hopkins Dairy
The Waste Utilization table shown below summarizes the waste utilization plan for this operation. This plan provides an estimate of the number of acres of
cropland needed to use the nutrients being produced. The plan requires consideration of the realistic yields of the crops to be grown, their nutrient
requirements, and proper timing of applications to maximize nutrient uptake.
This table provides an estimate of the amount of nitrogen required by the crop being grown and an estimate of the nitrogen amount being supplied by manure
or other by-products, commercial fertilizer and residual from previous crops. An estimate of the quantity of solid and liquid waste that will be applied on each
field in order to supply the indicated quantity of nitrogen from each source is also included. A balance of the total manure produced and the total manure
applied is included in the table to ensure that the plan adequately provides for the utilization of the manure generated by the operation.
Waste Utilization Table Year 1
w.
A
:[a D h leag. .o o o. 00
6473 7 S 8 CeB2 19.70 19.70 Corn,Silage 22.5 Tons 2/15-6/30 245 0 0 Broad. 245 36.66 0 722.24 0
6473 7a S 8 CeB2 9.40 9.40 Corn,Silage 22.5 Tons 2/15-6130 245 0 0 Broad. 245 36.66 0 344.62 0
6473 7 S 8 CeB2 19.70 19.70 Wheat,Grain 59 Bushels 9/1-4/30 118 0 0 Broad. 59 8.83 0 173.93 0
6473 7a S 8 CeB2 9.40 9.40 Wheal,Grain 59 Bushels 9/1-4/30 118 0 0 Broad. 59 8.83 0 82.99 0
6494- 1 S 8 CeB2 16.00 16.00 Corn,Silage 22.5 Tons 2/15-6/30 245 0 0 Broad. 245 36.66 0 586.59 0
6494- 1 S 8 CeB2 16.00 16.00 Wheat,Grain 59 Bushels 9/1-4/30 118 0 0 Broad. 59 8.83 0 141.26 0
6494- 2 S8 CeB2 11.60 11.60 Corn,Silage 22.5 Tons 2/15-6/30 245 0 0Broad. 245 36.66 0 425.28 0
6494- 2 S 8 CeB2 11.60 11.60 Wheat,Grain 59 Bushels 9/1-4/30 118 0 0 Broad. 59 8.83 0 102.41 0
6966 5 S 6 ApC 11.70 11.70 Fescue Pasture 5.1 Tons 8/1-7131 168 0 0 Broad. 168 25.14 0 294.13 0
7035- 4 S 6 EnB 11.50 11.50 Fescue Pasture 4.4 Tons 811-7/31 145 0 0 Broad. 145 21.70 0 249.53 0
7035- 5 S6 En8 2.30 2.30 Fescue Pasture 4.4 Tons 8/1-7/31 145 0 0 Broad. 145 21.70 0 49.91 0
9618 1 1 1 S 8 CaB 6.20 6.20 Corn,Silage 18 Tons 2/15-6/30 1 196 0 0 Broad. 196 29.33 0 181.84 0
5/17/2019 4:03:58 PM 1/7

Waste Utilization Table
Hopkins Dairy
9618 1 S 8 CaB 6.20 6.20 Wheat,Grain 48 Bushels 9/14/30 96 0 0 Broad. 48 7.18 0 44.53 0
9618 2 S 8 CaB 15.60 15.60 Corn,Silage 18 Tons 2/15-6/30 196 0 0 Broad. 196 29.33 0 457.54 0
9618 2 S 8 CaB 15.60 15.60 Wheat,Grain 48 Bushels 9/1-4/30 96 0 0 Broad. 48 7.18 0 112.05 0
9618 3 S 8 CaB 25.40 25.40 Corn,Silage 18 Tons 2/15-6/30 196 0 0 Broad. 196 29.33 0 744.97 0
9618 3 S 8 CaB 25.40 25.40 Wheat,Grain 48 Bushels 9/1-4/30 96 0 0 Broad. 48 7.18 0 182.44 0
9618 4 S 8 CaB 1.40 1.40 Corn,Silage 18 Tons 2/15-6/30 196 0 0 Broad. 196 29.33 0 41.06 0
9618 4 S 8 CaB 1.40 1.40 Wheat,Grain 48 Bushels 9/1-4/30 *96 0 0 Broad. 48 7.18 0 10.06 0
9618 5 S 8 CdB2 22.80 22.80 Corn,Silage 21.9 Tons 2115-6/30 239 0 0 Broad. 239 35.76 0 815.42 0
9618 5 S 8 CdB2 22.80 22.80 Wheat,Grain 57 Bushels 911-4/30 114 0 0 Broad. 57 8.53 0 194.47 0
1000129 1 S 8 CrB 10.20 10.20 Corn,Silage 22.5 Tons 2/15-6/30 245 0 0 Broad. 245 36.66 0 373.95 0
1000129 1 S 8 CrB 10.20 10.20 Wheat,Grain 59 Bushels 9/1-4/30 118 0 0 Broad. 59 8.83 0 90.05 0
1001278 5 S 8 CCB 13.60 13.60 Corn,Silage 22.5 Tons 2115-6/30 245 245 0 Broad. 245 36.66 0 498.60 0
1001278 5 S 8 CcB 13.60 13.60 Wheat,Grain 59 Bushels 911-4/30 118 0 0 Broad. 59 8.83 0 120.07 0
1001418 1 S 8 CeB2 12.90 12.90 Corn,Silage 22.5 Tons 2/15-6/30 245 0 0 Broad. 245 36.66 0 472.94 0
1001418 1 SS CeB2 12.90 12.90 Wheat,Grain 59 Bushels 9/14/30 118 0 0 Broad. 59 8.83 0 113.89 0
1001418 2 S 8 CeB2 13.00 13.00 Corn,Silage 22.5 Tons 2/15-6130 245 0 0 Broad. 245 36.66 0 476.61 0
1001418 2 S 8 CeB2 13.00 13.00 Wheat,Grain 59 Bushels 9/14/30 118 0 0 Broad. 59 8.83 0 114.77 0
1001418 3 S 8 CcB 6.10 6.10 Corn,Silage 22.5 Tons 2/15-6/30 245 0 0 Broad. 245 36.66 0 223.64 0
1001418 3 S 8 CCB 6.10 6.10 Wheat,Grain 59 Bushels 9114130 118 0 0 Broad. 59 8.83 0 53.86 0
1001589 6 S 6 ME 6.10 6.10 Fescue Pasture 2.8 Tons 8/1-7/31 105 0 0 Broad. 105 15.71 0 95.85 0
1001589 7 S 6 EnB 4.80 4.80 Fescue Pasture 4.4 Tons 8/1-7/31 145 0 0 Broad. j .70 0 104.15 0
1001589 1 8 S 6 EnB 4.70 4.70 Fescue Pasture j 4.4 Tons 1 8/1-7/31 145 0 0 Broad. 145 21.70 0 101.98 0
5/17/2019 4:03:58 PM 2/7

Waste Utilization Table
Hopkins Dairy
1001589 9 S 6 CeB2 9.70 9.70 Fescue Pasture 4.9 Tons 811-7/31 162 0 0 Broad. 162 24.24 0 235.15 0
1001589 10 S 6 EnC 1.70 1.70 Fescue Pasture 4.1 Tons 8/1-7/31 135 0 0 Broad. 135 20.20 0 34.34 0
1001589 11 S 6 EnC 1.00 1.00 Fescue Pasture 4.1 Tons 8/1-7/31 135 0 0 Broad. 135 20.20 0 20.20 0
1001613 1 S 8 CfB 3.90 3.90 Corn,Silage 21.9 Tons 2115-6/30 239 0 0 Broad. 239 35.76 0 139.48 0
1001618 1 S 8 CfB 3.90 3.90 Wheat,Grain 57 Bushels 9/1-4/30 114 0 0 Broad. 57 8.53 0 33.27 0
1001618 2 S 8 CgB2 8.50 8.50 Corn,Silage 22.5 Tons 2/15-6/30 245 0 0 Broad. 245 36.66 0 311.63 0
1001618 2 S 8 CgB2 8.50 8.50 Wheat,Grain 59 Bushels 9/1-4/30 118 0 0 Broad. 59 8.83 0 75.05 0
1001618 3 S 8 FrD2 15.80 15.80 Corn,Silage 15.6 Tons 2/15-6/30 170 0 0 Broad. 170 25.44 0 401.94 0
1001618 3 S 8 FrD2 15.80 15.80 Wheat,Grain 40 Bushels 911-4/30 80 0 0 Broad. 40 5.99 0 94.57 0
1001618 4 S 8 CgB2 7.10 7.40 Corn,Silage 22.5 Tons 2115-6/30 245 0 0 Broad. 245 36.66 0 271.30 0
1001618 4 S 8 CgB2 7.10 7.40 Wheat,Grain 59 Bushels 9/1-4/30 118 0 0 Broad. 59 8.83 0 65.33 0
1001618 5 S 8 WcB 9.40 9.40 Corn,Silage 25.5 Tons 2/15-6/30 278 0 0 Broad. 278 41.60 0 391.04 0
1001618 5 S 8 WcB 9.40 9.40 Wheat,Grain 59 Bushels 9/1-4/30 118 0 0 Broad. 59 8.83 0 82.99 0
1001619 1 S 8 CgB2 15.90 15.90 Corn,Silage 22.5 Tons 2/15-6/30 245 0 0 Broad. 245 36.66 0 582.93 0
1001619 1 S 8 CgB2 15.90 15.90 Wheat,Grain 59 Bushels 911-4/30 118 0 0 Broad. 59 8.83 0 140.38 0
1001619 2 S 8 CgB2 15.90 15.90 Corn,Silage 22.5 Tons 2/15-6/30 245 0 0 Broad. 245 36.66 0 582.93 0
1001619 2 S 8 CgB2 15.90 15.90 Wheat,Grain 59 Bushels 9/1-4/30 118 0 0 Broad. 59 8.83 0 140.38 0
1001619 3 S 8 WcB 7.10 7.10 Corn,Silage 25.5 Tons 2115-6/30 278 0 0 Broad. 278 41.60 0 295.36 0
1001619 3 S 8 WcB 7.10 7.10 Wheat,Grain 59 Bushels 9/1-4/30 118 0 0 Broad. 59 8.83 0 62.68 0
1001620 2 S 8 CfB 4.80 4.80 Corn,Silage 21.9 Tons 2/15-6/30 239 0 0 Broad. 239 35.76 0 171.67 0
1001620 2 S 8 CfB 4.80 4.80 Wheat,Grain 57 Bushels 9/1-4/30 114 0 0 Broad. 57 8.53 0 40.94 0
1001620 3 S 8 CfB 8.70 8.70 Corn,Silage 21.9 Tons 2/15-6/30 239 0 0 Broad. 239 35.76 0 311.15 0
1001620 3 S 8 CfB 8.70 8.70 Wheat,Grain 57 Bushels 9/1-4/30 114 0 0 Broad. 57 8.53 0 74.21 0
1001620 5 1 38 CgB2 8.90 8.901 Corn,Silage 22.5 Tons 2115-6130 245 0 0 Broad. 245 36.66 0 326.29 0
5/17/2019 4:03:58 PM 3/7

Waste Utilization Table
Hopkins Dairy
1001620 5 S 8 CgB2 8.90 8.90 Wheal,Grain 59 Bushels 9/1-4/30 118 0 0 Broad. 59 8.83 0 78.58 0
1001620 6 S 8 WcB 2.30 2.30 Corn,Silage 25.5 Tons 2115-6/30 278 0 0 Broad. 278 41.60 0 95.68 0
1001620 6 S 8 WCB 2.30 2.30 Wheat,Grain 59 Bushels 9/1-4/30 118 0 0 Broad. 59 8.83 0 20.31 0
Total Applied,1000 gallons 13,877.40
Total Produced, 1000 gallons 498.15
Balance, 1000 gallons (13,379.25) .. '� ^,
Total Applied,tons n$Ri3 -h 0.00
Total Produced,tons ' a'>�"' 0.00
Balance,tons 0.00
5/17/2019 4:03:58 PM 4/7

Waste Utilization Table
Hopkins Dairy
Waste Utilization Table Year 2
- ID
MINIM
e eRlq, r a ids re e 1e r. P 1pled c, re
ore ,. m re
t od o a 0
6473 7 S8 CeB2 , uses 9/1-4/30 118 0 0 Broad. 59 8.83 0 173.93 0
6473 7a S 8 CeB2 9.40 9.40 Wheat,Grain 59 Bushels 911-4/30 118 0 0 Broad. 59 8.83 0 82.99 0
6494- 1 S 8 CeB2 16.00 16.00 Wheat,Grain 59 Bushels 9/1-4130 118 0 0 Broad. 59 8.83 0 141.26 0
6494- 2 S 8 CeB2 11.60 11.60 Wheat,Grain 59 Bushels 9/1-4/30 118 0 0 Broad. 59 8.83 0 102.41 0
6966 5 S6 ApC 11.70 11.70 Fescue Pasture 5.1 Tons 8/1-7/31 168 0 0 Broad. 168 25.14 0 294.13 0
7035- 4 S6 EnB 11.50 11.50 Fescue Pasture 4.4 Tons 8/1-7/31 145 0 0 Broad. 145 21.70 0 249.53 0
7035- 5 S6 EnB 2.30 2.30 Fescue Pasture 4.4 Tons 8/1-7/31 145 0 0 Broad. 145 21.70 0 49.91 0
9618 1 S 8 CaB 6.20 6.20 Wheat,Grain 48 Bushels 9/1-4/30 96 0 0 Broad. 48 7.18 0 44.53 0
9618 2 S 8 CaB 15.60 15.60 Wheat,Grain 48 Bushels 9/1-4/30 96 0 0 Broad, 48 7.18 0 112.05 0
9618 3 S 8 CaB 25.40 25.40 Wheat,Grain 48 Bushels 9/1-4/30 96 0 0 Broad. 48 7.18 0 182.44 0
9618 4 j S 8 CaB 1.40 1.40 Wheat,Grain 48 Bushels 911-4/30 *96 0 0 Broad. 48 7.18 0 10.06 0
9618 5 S 8 CdB2 22.80 22.80 Wheat,Grain 57 Bushels 9/1-4/30 114 0 0 Broad. 57 8.53 0 194.47 0
1000129 1 S 8 CrB 10.20 10.20 Wheat,Grain 59 Bushels 9/1-4/30 118 0 0 Broad. 59 8.83 0 90.05 0
1001278 5 S 8 CcB 13.60 13.60 Wheat,Grain 59 Bushels 9/1-4/30 118 0 0 Broad. 59 8.83 0 120.07 0
1001418 1 S 8 CeB2 12.90 12.90 Wheat,Grain 59 Bushels 9/1-4/30 118 0 0 Broad. 59 8.83 0 113.89 0
1001418 2 S 8 CeB2 13.00 13.00 Wheat,Grain 59 Bushels 9/1-4/30 118 0 0 Broad. 59 8.83 0 114.77 0
1001418 3 S 8 CcB 6.10 6.10 Wheat,Grain 59 Bushels 9/1-4/30 118 0 0 Broad. 59 8.83 0 53.86 0
1001589 6 S 6 WkE 6.10 6.10 Fescue Pasture 2.8 Tons 8/1-7131 105 0 0 Broad. 105 15.71 0 95.85 0
5/17/2019 4:03:58 PM 5/7

Waste Utilization Table
Hopkins Dairy
1001589 7 S 6 EnB 4.80 4.80 Fescue Pasture 4.4 Tons 8/1-7131 145 0 0 Broad. 145 21.70 0 104.15 0
1001589 8 S 6 EnB 4.70 4.70 Fescue Pasture 4.4 Tons 811-7131 145 0 0 Broad. 145 21.70 0 101.98 0
1001589 9 S 6 CeB2 9.70 9.70 Fescue Pasture 4.9 Tons 8/1-7/31 162 0 0 Broad. 162 24.24 0 235.15 0
1001589 10 S 6 EnC 1.70 1.70 Fescue Pasture 4.1 Tons 8/1-7/31 135 0 0 Broad. 135 20.20 0 34.34 0
1001589 11 S 6 EnC 1.00 1.00 Fescue Pasture 4.1 Tons 8/1-7/31 135 0 0 Broad. 135 20.20 0 20.20 0
1001618 1 S 8 CfB 3.90 3.90 Wheat,Grain 57 Bushels 9/1-4/30 114 0 0 Broad. 57 8.53 0 33.27 0
1001618 2 S 8 CgB2 8.50 8.50 Wheat,Grain 59 Bushels 9/1-4/30 118 0 0 Broad. 59 8.83 0 75.05 0
1001618 3 S 8 FrD2 15.80 15.80 Wheat,Grain 40 Bushels 9/1-4/30 80 0 0 Broad. 40 5.99 0 94.57 0
1001618 4 SS CgB2 7.10 7.40 Wheat,Grain 59 Bushels 9/1-4/30 118 0 0 Broad. 59 8.83 0 65.33 0
1001618 5 S 8 WcB 9.40 9.40 Wheat,Grain 59 Bushels 9/1-4/30 118 0 0 Broad. 59 8.83 0 82.99 0
1001619 1 S 8 CgB2 15.90 15.90 Wheat,Grain 59 Bushels 9/1-4/30 118 0 0 Broad. 59 8.83 0 140.38 0
1001619 2 S 8 CgB2 15.90 15.90 Wheat,Grain 59 Bushels 9/1-4/30 118 0 0 Broad. 59 8.83 0 140.38 0
1001619 3 S 8 WCB 7.10 7.10 Wheat,Grain 59 Bushels 9/1-4/30 118 0 0 Broad. 59 8.83 0 62.68 0
1001620 2 S 8 CfB 4.80 4.80 Wheat,Grain 57 Bushels 911-4130 114 0 0 Broad. 57 8.53 0 40.94 0
1001620 3 S 8 CfB 8.70 8.70 Wheat,Grain 57 Bushels 9/1-4130 114 0 0 Broad. 1 57 8.53 0 74.21 0
1001620 5 S 8 CgB2 8.90 8.90 Wheat,Grain 59 Bushels 9/1-4/30 118 0 0 Broad. 1 59 8.83 0 78.58 0
1001620 6 S 8 WcB 2.30 2.30 Wheat,Grain 59 Bushels 9/1-4/30 1 118 0 0 Broad. 59 8.83 0 20.31 0
Total Applied,1000 gallons 3,630.71
Total Produced,1000 gallons 498.15
Balance, 1000 gallons (3,132.56) 8 � n-A,
Total Applied,tons '�4 "Y-. 0.00
Total Produced,tons k 0.00
Balance,tons 0.00
5/17/2019 4:03:58 PM 6/7

Waste Utilization Table
Hopkins Dairy
Notes: 1. In the tract column,—symbol means leased,otherwise,owned. 1.Symbol'means user entered data.
5/17/2019 4:03:58 PM 7 17

Planned Crops Summary
Hopkins Dairy
The table shown below provides a summary of the crops or rotations included in the plan for each field. Realistic Yield estimates
and Plant Available Nitrogen (PAN) recommendations are also provided for each crop as well as the crop's P2O5 Removal
Rate. The Leaching Index (LI) and the Phosphorous Loss Assessment Tool (PLAT) Rating are also provided for each field,
where available.
If a filed's PLAT Rating is High, any planned manure application is limited to the phosphorous removal rate of the harvested
plant biomass for the crop rotation or multiple years in the crop sequence. Fields with a Very High PLAT Rating should receive
no additional applications of manure. Regardless of the PLAT rating starter fertilizers may be recommended in accordance with
North Carolina State University guidelines or recommendations. The quantity of P2O5 applied to each crop is shown in the
following table if the field's PLAT rating is High or Very High.
Tract Field Total Wettable SMU LI Crop Name RYE Recom- PLAT - P205(lbs/acre)
Acres Acres mended Rating Crop
Tract M Total
PAN Removal Applied
6473 7a '9.4 9.4 CeB2 NA Corn,Silage 22.5 Tons 245 Unknown 77 NA
Wheat,Grain 59 Bushels 118 Unknown 30 NA
6473 7 (9.7 19.7 CeB2 NA
Corn,Silage 22.5 Tons 245 Unknown 77 NA
Wheat,Grain 59 Bushels 118 Unknown 30 NA
6494— 1 16 16 CeB2 NA
Corn,Silage 22.5 Tons 245 Unknown 77 NA
Wheat,Grain 59 Bushels 118 Unknown 30 NA
6494— 2 11.6 11.6 CeB2 NA
Corn,Silage 22.5 Tons 245 Unknown 77 NA
Wheat,Grain 59 Bushels 118 Unknown 30 NA
6966 5 11.7) 11.7 ApC NA
Fescue Pasture 5.1 Tons 168 Unkno n 8 NA
7035— 4 11.5 11.5 EnB NA
Fescue Pasture 4.4 Tons 145 Unknown 7 NA
7035— 5 2.3 2.3 En6 NA
Fescue Pasture 4.4 Tons 145 Unknown 7 NA
9618 1 6.21 6.2 ;; NA
Wheat,Grain 48 Bushels 96 Unknown 24 NA
Corn,Silage 18 Tons 196 Unknown 61 NA
9618 2 15.6� 15.6 CaB NA
Wheat,Grain 48 Bushels 96 Unknown 24 NA
Corn,Silage 18 Tonsl 1961 Unknown 61 NA
Leased. ) 01"i we 5/17/20194:04:31 PM 1 /4
15 (._

Planned Crops Summary
Hopkins Dairy
9618 3 25.4 25.4 CaB NA
Corn,Silage 18Tons 196 Unknown 61 NA
Wheat,Grain 48 Bushels 96 Unknown 24 NA
9618 1 4 1.4 1.4 Ca6 NA
Corn,Silage 18 Tons 196 Unknown 61 NA
Wheat,Grain 48 Bushels 96 Unknown 24 NA
9618 5 22.8 22.8 CcIB2 NA
Corn,Silage 21.9 Tons 239 Unknown 74 NA
Wheat,Grain 57 Bushels 114 Unknown 28 NA
1000129 1 60. 10.2 CrB NA
Corn,Silage 22.5 Tons 245 Unknown 77 NA
Wheat,Grain 59 Bushels 118 Unknown 30 NA
1001278 5 93.6� 13.6 CCB NA
Corn,Silage 22.5 Tons 245 Unknown 77 NA
Wheat,Grain 59 Bushels 118 Unknown 30 NA
1001418
1 12.9 12.9 CeB2 NA
Corn,Silage 22.5 Tons 245 Unknown 77 NA
Wheat,Grain 59 Bushels 118 Unknown 30 NA
1001418
2 13 13 CeB2 NA
Corn,Silage 22.5 Tons 245 Unknown 77 NA
Wheat,Grain 59 Bushels 118 Unknown 30 NA
1001418
3 6.1 6.1 CcB NA
Corn,Silage 22.5 Tons 245 Unknown 77 NA
Wheat,Grain 59 Bushels 118 Unknown 30 NA
1001589
6 6.1 6.1 WkE NA
Fescue Pasture 2.8 Tons 105 Unknown 1 4 NA
1001589
7 4.8 4.8 EnB NA
Fescue Pasture 4.4 Tons 145 Unknown 7 NA
1001589
8 4.7 4.7 EnB NA
Fescue Pasture 4.4 Tons 145 Unknown 7 NA
1001589
9 9.7 9.7 CeB2 NA
Fescue Pasture 4.9 Tons 162 Unknown 8 NA
1001589
10 1.7 1.7 EnC NA
Fescue Pasture 4.1 Tons 135 Unknown 7 NA
5/17/2019 4:04:31 PM 2/4

Planned Crops Summary
Hopkins Dairy
1001589
11 1 1 EnC NA
Fescue Pasture 4.1 Tons 135 Unknown 7 NA
1001618 1 3.9 3.9 Cf8 NA
Corn,Silage 21.9 Tons 239 Unknown 74 NA
Wheat,Grain 57 Bushels 114 Unknown 28 NA
1001618 2 8.5 8.5 CgB2 NA
Corn,Silage 22.5 Tons 245 Unknown 77 NA
Wheat,Grain 1 59 Bushels 118 Unknown 30 NA
1001618 3 5.8 15.8 FrD2 NA
Corn,Silage 15.6 Tons 170 Unknown 53 NA
Wheat,Grain 40 Bushels 80 Unknown 20 NA
1001618 4 .1 7.4 Cg82 NA
Corn,Silage 22.5 Tons 245 Unknown 77 NA
Wheat,Grain 1 59 Bushels 118 Unknown 30 NA
1001618 5 " 9.4 WcB NA
Corn,Silage 25.5 Tons 278 Unknown 87 NA
Wheat,Grain 59 Bushels 118 Unknown 30 NA
1001619 1 159 15.9 CgB2 NA
-- Corn,Silage 22.5 Tons 245 Unknown 77 NA
Wheat,Grain 59 Bushels 118 Unknown 30 NA
1001619 2 16. 15.9 CgB2 NA -
Corn,Silage 22.5 Tons 245 Unknown 77 NA
Wheat,Grain 59 Bushels 118 Unknown 30 NA
1001619 3 73 7.1 Wc6 NA
Corn,Silage 25.5 Tons 278 Unknown 87 NA
Wheal,Grain 59 Bushels 118 Unknown 30 NA
1001620 2 a 4.8 CfB NA
- Corn,Silage 21.9 Tons 239 Unknown 74 NA
Wheat,Grain 57 Bushels 114 Unknown 28 NA
1001620 3 8.7 Ct6 NA
Corn,Silage 21.9 Tons 239 Unknown 74 NA
Wheat,Grain 57 Bushels 114 Unknown 28 NA
1001620 5 8.9 8.9 CgB2 NA
Corn,Silage 22.5 Tons 245 Unknown 77 NA
Wheat,Grain 59 Bushels 118 Unknown 30 NA
1001620 6 1 2. 2.3 WcB NA
5/17/2019 4:04:31 PM 3/4

Planned Crops Summary
Hopkins Dairy
Corn,Silage 25.5 Ton: 278 Unknown 87 NA
Lew . 101, Wheat,Grain 59 Bushels 118 Unknown 30 NA
Totals: 345.70 346.00
Notes:1.In the tract column,-symbol means leased,otherwise,owned.
LI Potential Leaching Technical Guidance
Law potential to contribute to soluble nutrient None
<2 leaching below the root zone.
Moderate potential to contribute to soluble nutrient Nutrient Management(590) should be planned.
> =2 &< = 10 leaching below the root zone.
High potential to contribute to soluble nutrient Nutrient Management(590) should be planned. Other conservation
leaching below the root zone. practices that improve available water holding capacity of soil and
improve nutrient use efficiency should be considered. Examples are
> 10 Cover Crops (340)to scavenge nutrients, Sod-Based Rotations (328),
Long-Term No-Till (778), and edge-of-field practices such as Filter
Strips(393) and Riparian Forest Buffers (391).
P Loss Index Rating P Management Recommendation
0 -25 Low No adjustment needed; N based application
26 - 50 Medium No adjustment needed; N based application
51 - 100 High Application limited to crop P removal
> 100 Very High Starter P application only
5/17/20194:04:31 PM 4/4

Required Specifications For Animal Waste Management
i. Animal waste shall not reach surface waters of the state by runoff, drift,
manmade conveyances, direct application, or direct discharge during
operation or land application. Any discharge of waste that reaches surface
water is prohibited.
z. There must be documentation in the design folder that the producer either
owns or has an agreement for use of adequate land on which to properly
apply the waste. If the producer does not own adequate land to properly
dispose of the waste, he/she shall provide evidence of an agreement with a
landowner, who is within a reasonable proximity, allowing him/her the use of
the land for waste application. It is the responsibility of the owner of the
waste production facility to secure an update of the Nutrient Management
Plan when there is a change in the operation, increase in the number of
animals, method of application, receiving crop type, or available land.
3. Animal waste shall be applied to meet, but not exceed, the nitrogen needs
for realistic crop yields based upon soil type, available moisture, storical data,
climatic conditions, and level of management, unless there are regulations
that restrict the rate of applications for other nutrients.
a. Animal waste shall be applied to land eroding less than 5 tons per acre per
year. Waste may be applied to land eroding at more than 5 tons per acre per
year but less than 10 tons per acre per year provided grass filter strips are
installed where runoff leaves the field (see USDA, NRCS Field Office Technical
Guide Standard 393 - Filter Strips).
5. Odors can be reduced by injecting the waste or by disking after waste
application. Waste should not be applied when there is danger of drift from
the land application field.

6. When animal waste is to be applied on acres subject to flooding, waste will
be soil incorporated on conventionally tilled cropland. When waste is applied
to conservation tilled crops or grassland, the waste may be broadcast
provided the application does not occur during a season prone to flooding
(see "Weather and Climate in North Carolina" for guidance).
7. Liquid waste shall be applied at rates not to exceed the soil infiltration rate
such that runoff does not occur offsite or to surface waters and in a method
which does not cause drift from the site during application. No ponding
should occur in order to control odor and flies.
s. Animal waste shall not be applied to saturated soils, during rainfall events, or
when the soil surface is frozen.
9. Animal waste shall be applied on actively growing crops in such a manner
that the crop is not covered with waste to a depth that would inhibit growth.
The potential for salt damage from animal waste should also be considered.
10. Nutrients from waste shall not be applied in fall or winter for spring planted
crops on soils with a high potential for leaching. Waste/nutrient loading rates
on these soils should be held to a minimum and a suitable winter cover crop
planted to take up released nutrients. Waste shall not be applied more than
30 days prior to planting of the crop or forages breaking dormancy.
11. Any new swine facility sited on or after October 1, 1995 shall comply with the
following: The outer perimeter of the land area onto which waste is applied
from a lagoon that is a component of a swine farm shall be at least 50 feet
from any residential property boundary and canal. Animal waste, other than
swine waste from facilities sited on or after October 1, 1995, shall not be
applied closer than 25 feet to perennial waters.
12. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 100 feet

13. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 200 feet of dwellings other
than those owned by the landowner.
14. Waste shall be applied in a manner not to reach other property and public
right-of-ways.
15. Animal waste shall not be discharged into surface waters, drainage ways, or
wetlands by a discharge or by over-spraying. Animal waste may be applied
to prior converted cropland provided the fields have been approved as a land
application site by a "technical specialist". Animal waste shall not be applied
on grassed waterways that discharge directly into water courses, and on
other grassed waterways, waste shall be applied at agronomic rates in a
manner that causes no runoff or drift from the site.
16. Domestic and industrial waste from wash down facilities, showers, toilets,
sinks, etc., shall not be discharged into the animal waste management
system.
17. A protective cover of appropriate vegetation will be established on all
disturbed areas (lagoon embankments, berms, pipe runs, etc.). Areas shall
be fenced, as necessary, to protect the vegetation. Vegetation such as trees,
shrubs, and other woody species, etc., are limited to areas where considered
appropriate. Lagoon areas should be kept mowed and accessible. Berms
and structures should be inspected regularly for evidence of erosion,
leakage, or discharge.
18. If animal production at the facility is to be suspended or terminated, the
owner is responsible for obtaining and implementing a "closure plan" which
will eliminate the possibility of an illegal discharge, pollution, and erosion.
19. Waste handling structures, piping, pumps, reels, etc., should be inspected on
a regular basis to prevent breakdowns, leaks, and spills. A regular
maintenance checklist should be kept on site.

zo. Animal waste can be used in a rotation that includes vegetables and other
crops for direct human consumption. However, if animal waste is used on
crops for direct human consumption, it should only be applied pre-plant with
no further applications of animal waste during the crop season.
21. Highly visible markers shall be installed to mark the top and bottom
elevations of the temporary storage (pumping volume) of all waste
treatment lagoons. Pumping shall be managed to maintain the liquid level
between the markers. A marker will be required to mark the maximum
storage volume for waste storage ponds.
zz. Waste shall be tested within 60 days of utilization and soil shall be tested at
least annually at crop sites where waste products are applied. Nitrogen shall
be the rate-determining nutrient, unless other restrictions require waste to
be applied based on other nutrients, resulting in a lower application rate
than a nitrogen based rate. Zinc and copper levels in the soils shall be
monitored and alternative crop sites shall be used when these metals
approach excessive levels. pH shall be adjusted and maintained for optimum
crop production. Soil and waste analysis records shall be kept for a minimum
of five years. Poultry dry waste application records shall be maintained for a
minimum of three years. Waste application records for all other waste shall
be maintained for five (5) years.
zs. Dead animals will be disposed of in a manner that meets North Carolina
regulations.

Required Soil Test Values
Hopkins Dairy
The Required Soil Test Values shown in the following table provide a summary of recommended actions that
should be taken based off information provided at time of soil tests. Fields that receive manure must have a soil
analysis conducted at least once every three years. High levels of zinc and copper can adversely affect plant
growth. Alternative crop sites must be used when the concentration of these metals approach excessive levels.
Site life can be estimated by dividing the amount of copper and zinc to be applied in Ibs/acre by 0.036 and 0.071,
respectively and multiplying the result by 0.85. By adding this quantity to the current soil index for copper or zinc,
we can predict life of the site for waste disposal.
In addition to copper and zinc indices, this table also provides a summary of lime recommendations for each
crop based on the first crop listed on the most recent soil sample. Application of lime at recommended rates is
necessary to maintain soil pH in the optimum range for crop production. If the first crop or rotation changes,
these recommendations may need to be reevaluated to ensure optimal ranges ofr crop production are
maintained.
Tract ID Field ID Crop(s) pH Lime Recom. Cu-1 Copper Zn-I Zinc
for Crop(s). Recommendation Recommendation
(tons/acre)
6473 7 6.9 0.0 460 0,0 738 0,0
6473 7a 6.9 0,0 460 0.0 738 0,0
6494 1 5.5 0,0 812 0,0 443 0,0
6494 2 5.6 0,0 825 0,0 408 0.0
6966 5 5.9 0,0 50 0,0 129 0,0
7035 4 4.9 0,0 201 0,0 200 0,0
7035 5 5.8 0.0 155 0,0 134 0,0
9618 1 5.3 0.0 53 0,0 72 0,0
9618 2 5.3 0,0 53 0,0 72 0,0
9618 3 7.6 0,0 150 0,0 328 0,0
9618 4 7.6 0,0 150 0,0 328 0,0
9618 5 7 0,0 219 0,0 348 0.0
1000129 1 7 0.0 219 0,0 348 0,0
1001278 5 6.3 0,0 352 0,0 454 0,0
1001418 1 6.3 0.0 352 0,0 454 0,0
1001418 2 6.1 0,0 623 0,0 250 0,0
1001418 3 4.7 0,0 73 0,0 52 0,0
1001589 6 5.8 0,0 155 0.0 134 0,0
1001589 7 5.6 0,0 825 0.0 408 0,0
1001589 8 6.8 0.0 58 0,0 228 0,0
1001589 9 6.8 0.0 58 0,0 408 0,0
5/17/2019 1:16:20 PM 1/2

Required Soil Test Values
Hopkins Dairy
1001589 10 6.8 0,0 58 0,0 228 0,0
1001589 11 6.7 0.0 90 0,0 228 0,0
1001618 1 6.3 0.0 139 0,0 192 0.0
1001618 2 5.7 0,0 471 0,0 112 0,0
1001618 3 6 0,0 286 0.0 289 0,0
1001618 4 5.8 0,0 255 0,0 126 0,0
1001618 5 6.3 0,0 546 0,0 322 0,0
1001619 1 5.4 0,0 623 0,0 210 0.0
1001619 2 4.8 0,0 244 0.0 64 0,0
1001619 3 5.6 0,0 411 0,0 195 0,0
1001620 2 6.4 0,0 256 0,0 206 0,0
1001620 3 6.2 0,0 219 0,0 159 0.0
1001620 5 6.2 0,0 219 0,0 159 0,0
1001620 6 5.9 0,0 174 0,0 111 0,0
Zinc and Copper Toxicity Levels in Soils
Metal Soil Test Index Recommended Action
Zn 300 Limit application on peanuts.Maintain soil pH>=6.0.
Soo Cease application on peanut land. Maintain soil pH>=6.0.
2000 Caution:seek alternative site(all crops).Maintain soil pH>=6.0.
3000 Cease application(all crops).Maintain soil pH>=6.0.
Cu 2000 Caution:seek alternative site(all crops).Maintain soil pH>=6.0.
3000 Cease application(all crops).Maintain soil pH>=6.0.
5/17/2019 1:16:20 PM 2/2

Cattle Farm Waste Management Odor Control Checklist
Source Cause BMPs to Minimize Odor Site Specific Practices
Farmstead • Dairy production 19 Vegetative or wooded buffers
0 Recommended best management practices
Z Good judgment and common sense
Paved lots or barn . Wet manure-covered IN Scrape or flush daily
alley surfaces surfaces ® Promote drying with proper ventilation
Q9 Routine checks and maintenance on waterers,
hydrants, pipes, stock tanks
Bedded areas • Urine Promote drying with proper ventilation
• Partial microbial ® Replace wet or manure-covered bedding
decomposition
Manure dry stacks • Partial microbial O Provide liquid drainage for stored manure
decomposition
Storage tank or • Partial microbial O Bottom or mid-level loading
basin surface decomposition O Tank covers
• Mixing while filling O Basin surface mats of solids
• Agitation when emptying 0 Minimize lot runoff and liquid additions
O Agitate only prior to manure removal
O Proven biological additives or oxidants
Settling basin . Partial microbial O Liquid drainage from settled solids
surfaces decomposition O Remove solids regularly
• Mixing while filling
• Agitation when emptying
Manure, slurry, or • Agitation when spreading O Soil injection of slurry/sludges
sludge spreader . Volatile gas emissions O Wash residual manure from spreader after use
outlets O Proven biological additives or oxidants
April 18, 2006, page 1

Cattle Farm Waste Management Odor Control Checklist
Source Cause BMPs to Minimize Odor Site Specific Practices
Uncovered manure, • Volatile gas emissions while O Soil injection of slurry/sludges
slurry, or sludge on drying O Soil incorporation within 48 hours
field surfaces 111 Spread in thin uniform layers for rapid drying
0 Proven biological additives or oxidants
Flush tanks • Agitation of recycled lagoon O Flush tank covers
liquid while tanks are filling p Extend fill lines to near bottom of tanks with
anti-siphon vents
Outside drain • Agitation during wastewater O Box covers
collection orjunction conveyance
boxes
Lift stations • Agitation during sump tank O Sump tank covers
filling and drawdown
End of drainpipes at . Agitation during wastewater O Extend discharge point of pipes underneath
lagoon conveyance lagoon liquid level
Lagoon surfaces • Volatile gas emission O Proper lagoon liquid capacity
• Biological mixing O Correct lagoon startup procedures
• Agitation O Minimum surface area-to-volume ratio
O Minimum agitation when pumping
O Mechanical aeration
O Proven biological additives
Irrigation sprinkler • High pressure agitation O Irrigate on dry days with little or no wind
nozzles . Wind drift O Minimum recommended operating procedure
O Pump intake near lagoon liquid surface
O Pump from second-stage lagoon
O Flush residual manure from pipes at end of
slurry/sludge pump ings
April 18, 2006, page 2

Cattle Farm Waste Management Odor Control Checklist
Source Cause BMPs to Minimize Odor Site Specific Practices
Dead animals • Carcass decomposition .9 Proper disposition of carcasses
Standing water . Improper drainage 53 Grade and landscape such that water drains away
around facilities . Microbial decomposition of from facilities
organic matter
Mud tracked onto • Poorly maintained access 0 Farm access road maintenance
public roads from roads
farm access
Additional Information: Available From
Cattle Manure Management; .0200 RuleBMP Packet NCSU, County Extension Center
Dairy Educational Unit Manure Management System—Lake Wheeler Road Field Laboratory;EBAE 209-95 NCSU—BAE
Lagoon Design and Management for Livestock Manure Treatment and Storage; EBAE 103-83 NCSU—BAE
Management of Dairy Wastewater; EBAE 106-83 NCSU—BAE
Calibration of Manure and Wastewater Application Equipment; EBAE Fact Sheet NCSU—BAE
Nuisance Concerns in Animal Manure Management: Odors and Flies; PRO107, 1995 Conference Proceedings Florida Cooperative Extension
April 18, 2006, page 3

Insect Control Checklist for Animal Operations
Source Cause BMPs to Control Insects Site Specific Practices
Liquid Systems
Flush gutters • Accumulation of solids .M Flush system is designed and operated sufficiently
to remove accumulated solids from gutters as
designed
M Remove bridging of accumulated solids at
discharge
Lagoons and pits • Crusted solids M Maintain lagoons, settling basins and pits where
pest breeding is apparent to minimize the crusting
of solids to a depth of no more than 6 to 8 inches
over more than 30 percent of surface
Excessive vegetative • Decaying vegetation X Maintain vegetative control along banks of
growth lagoons and other impoundments to prevent
accumulation of decaying vegetative matter along
water's edge on impoundment's perimeter.
Dry Systems
Feeders Feed spillage 9 Design, operate, and maintain feed systems
(e.g., bunkers and troughs) to minimize the
accumulation of decaying wastage
® Clean up spillage on a routine basis (e.g., 7-to 10-
day interval during summer; 15-to 30-day interval
during winter)
AMIC -November 11, 1996, page 1

Insect Control Checklist for Animal Operations
Source Cause BMPs to Control Insects Site Specific Practices
Feed storage • Accumulations of feed 96 Reduce moisture accumulation within and around
residues immediate perimeter of feed storage areas by
ensuring drainage is away from site and/or providing
adequate containment (e.g., covered bin for
brewer's grain and similar high moisture grain
products)
tV Inspect for and remove or break up accumulated
solids in filter strips around feed storage as needed
Animal holding areas • Accumulations of animal 19 Eliminate low areas that trap moisture along fences
wastes and feed wastage and other locations where waste accumulates and
disturbance by animals is minimal
Z Maintain fence rows and filter strips around animal
holding areas to minimize accumulations of wastes
(i.e., inspect for and remove or break up
accumulated solids as needed)
Dry manure handling • Accumulations of animal 10 Remove spillage on a routine basis (e.g.,
systems wastes 7-to 10-day interval during summer; 15- to 30-day
interval during winter) where manure is loaded for
land application or disposal
O Provide for adequate drainage around manure
stockpiles
O Inspect for and remove or break up accumulated
wastes in filter strips around stockpiles and manure
handling areas as needed
For more information contact:
Cooperative Extension Service, Department of Entomology, Box 7613, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695-7613.
AMIC - November 11, 1996, page 2

EMERGENCY ACTION PLAN
PHONE NUMBERS
DWQ 33&--770-5g00
EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM 33L - 64I — 2X 7
SWCD 330 - (041 - 'gi40
NRCS 33(0 -3"15-5401 x 3
This plan will be implemented in the event that wastes from your operation are leaking,
overflowing, or running off site. You should not wait until wastes reach surface waters or leave
your property to consider that you have a problem. You should make every effort to ensure that
this does not happen. This plan should be posted in an accessible location for all employees at the
facility. The following are some action items you should take.
1. Stop the release of wastes. Depending on the situation, this may or may not be possible.
Suggested responses to some possible problems are listed below.
A. Lagoon overflow-possible solutions are:
a. Add soil to berm to increase elevation of dam.
b. Pump wastes to fields at an acceptable rate.
c. Stop all flows to the lagoon immediately.
d. Call a pumping contractor.
e. Make sure no surface water is entering lagoon.
B: Runoff from waste application field-actions include:
a. Immediately stop waste application.
b. Create a temporary diversion to contain waste.
c. Incorporate waste to reduce runoff.
d. Evaluate and eliminate the reason(s) that caused the runoff.
e. Evaluate the application rates for the fields where runoff occurred.
C: Leakage from the waste pipes and sprinklers-action include:
a. Stop recycle pump.
b. Stop irrigation pump.
c. Close valves to eliminate further discharge.
d. Repair all leaks prior to restarting pumps.
1 December 18, 1996

D: Leakage from flush systems, houses, solid separators-action include:
a. Stop recycle pump.
b. Stop irrigation pump.
c. Make sure no siphon occurs.
d. Stop all flows in the house, flush systems, or solid separators.
e. Repair all leaks prior to restarting pumps.
E: Leakage from base or sidewall of lagoon. Often this is seepage as opposed to flowing
leaks- possible action:
a. Dig a small sump or ditch away from the embankment to catch all seepage, put in a
submersible pump, and pump back to lagoon.
b. If holes are caused by burrowing animals, trap or remove animals and fill holes and
compact with a clay type soil.
c. Have a professional evaluate the condition of the side walls and lagoon bottom as soon
as possible.
2. Assess the extent of the spill and note any obvious damages.
a. Did the waste reach any surface waters?
b. Approximately how much was released and for what duration?
c. Any damage noted, such as employee injury, fish kills, or property damage?
d. Did the spill leave the property?
e. Does the spill have the potential to reach surface waters?
f. Could a future rain event cause the spill to reach surface waters?
g. Are potable water wells in danger (either on or off of the property)?
h. How much reached surface waters?
3: Contact appropriate agencies.
a. During normal business hours, call your DWQ (Division of Water Quality) regional office;
Phone - - . After hours, emergency number: 919-733-3942. Your phone call
should include: your name, facility, telephone number, the details of the incident from item
2 above, the exact location of the facility, the location or direction of movement of the
spill, weather and wind conditions. The corrective measures that have been under taken,
and the seriousness of the situation.
b. If spill leaves property or enters surface waters, call local EMS Phone number - -
c. Instruct EMS to contact local Health Department.
d. Contact CES, phone number - - , local SWCD office phone number - - , and
local NRCS office for advice/technical assistance phone number - - .
2 December 18, 1996

4: If none of the above works call 911 or the Sheriffs Department and explain your problem to
them and ask that person to contact the proper agencies for you.
5: Contact the contractor of your choice to begin repair of problem to minimize off-site damage.
a. Contractors Name: S}CVf Car42r QII{Dl ks 21"ar;�`�I�c1 G� YiIIC
b. Contractors Address: `d901 M lad I{ ncl r .S. 14�1 d c)
c. Contractors Phone: 33U-C�5&- 7-433 (home) 33G'451 "-
6: Contact the technical specialist who certified the lagoon (MRCS, Consulting Engineer, etc.)
a. Name: �"I��Ilt LCMJ&M
b. Phone: 33Ca- U41- 0
7: Implement procedures as advised by DWQ and technical assistance agencies to rectify the
damage, repair the system, and reassess the waste management plan to keep problems with
release of wastes from happening again.
3 December 18, 1996

Version—November 26,2018
Mortality Management Methods
Indicate which method(s) will be implemented.
When selecting multiple methods indicate a primary versus secondary option.
Methods other than those listed must be approved by the State Veterinarian.
Primary Secondary Routine Mortality
❑ Burial three feet beneath the surface of the ground within 24 hours of knowledge of animal
death. The burial must be at least 300 feet from any flowing stream or public body of water
(G.S.106-403). The bottom of the burial pit should be at least one foot above the seasonal
high water table.Attach burial location map and plan.
Landfill at municipal solid waste facility permitted by NC DEQ under GS 15A NCAC
13B .0200.
Rendering at a rendering plant licensed under G.S. 106-168.7.
Complete incineration according to 02 NCAC 52C .0102.
A composting system approved and permitted by the NC Department of Agriculture&Con-
sumer Services Veterinary Division (attach copy of permit). If compost is distributed off-farm,
additional requirements must be met and a permit is required from NC DEQ.
❑ Q In the case of dead poultry only, placing in a disposal pit of a size and design approved by the
NC Department of Agriculture &Consumer Services(G.S. 106-549.70).
Any method which, in the professional opinion of the State Veterinarian, would make possible
the salvage of part of a dead animal's value without endangering human or animal health.
(Written approval by the State Veterinarian must be attached).
Mass Mortality Plan
Mass mortality plans are required for farms covered by an NPDES permit. These plans are
also recommended for all animal operations. This plan outlines farm-specific mortality man-
agement methods to be used for mass mortality. The NCDA&CS Veterinary Division sup-
ports a variety of emergency mortality disposal options; contact the Division for guidance.
• A catastrophic mortality disposal plan is part of the facility's CAWMP and is activated
when numbers of dead animals exceed normal mortality rates as specified by the State
Veterinarian.
• Burial must be done in accordance with NC General Statutes and NCDA&CS Veterinary
Division regulations and guidance.
• Mass burial sites are subject to additional permit conditions(refer to facility's animal
waste management system permit).
• In the event of imminent threat of a disease emergency, the State Veterinarian may enact
additional temporary procedures or measures for disposal according to G.S. 106-399.4.
a" 5 L,-2 a l and g
Signature of Farm ner/Manager Date
,�lk,e �, � 5 /aa5 /a l9
Signature Signature ofTeci&al 4ecialist Date