The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About010036_Permit Renewal Application 2019_20190410 01 ,3 State of North Carolina :WR Department of Environmental Quality Division of Water Resources APR 15 2019 Animal Waste Management Systems WaterQuaiity Request for Certification of Coverage Regbm10P8rgtjpag$BC" Facility Currently covered by an Expiring Sate Non-Discharge General Permit On September 30, 2019, the North Carolina State Non-Discharge- General Permits for Animal Waste Management Systems will expire. As required by these permits, facilities that have been issued Certificates of Coverage to operate under these State Non-Discharge General Permits must apply for renewal at least 180 days prior to their expiration date.' Therefore, all applications must be received by the Division of Water Resources by no later than April 3,2019. Please do not leave any question unanswered. Please verify all information and make any necessary corrections below. Application must be signed and dated by the Permittee. 1. Farm Number: 01-0036 Certificate Of Coverage Number: AWC010036 2. Facility Name: Fogleman Dairy 3. Landowner's Name(same as on the Waste Management Plan): Joseph Johnson 4. Landowner's Mailing Address: 9558 Pleasant Hill CH Rd City: Liberty State: NC Zip: 27298 Telephone Number: 336-376-3970 Ext. E-mail: .5. Facility's Physical Address: 9144 S%]van Rd City: Liberty State: NC Zip: 27298 6. County where Facility is located: Alamance 7. Farm Manager's Name(if different from Landowner): 8. Farm Manager's telephone number(include area code): 9. Integrator's Name(if there is not an Integrator,write'None"): 10. Operator Name(OIC): Joseph Michael Johnson Phone No.: 336-376-3970 OIC#: 990540 11. Lessee's Name(if there is not a Lessee,write'None"): 12. Indicate animal operation type and number: Current Permit: Operations Type Allowable Count Cattle-Milk Cow 330 Operation Types: Swine Cattle Dry Poultry Other Types Wean to Finish Dairy Calf Non Laying Chickens Horses-Horses Wean to Feeder Dairy Heifer Laying Chickens Horses-Other Farrow to Finish Milk Cow Pullets Sheep-Sheep Feeder to Finish Dry Cow Turkeys Sheep-Other Farrow to Wean Beef Stocker Calf Turkey Pullet Farrow to Feeder Beef Feeder Boar/Stud Beef Broad Cow Wet POpltry Gilts Other Non Laying Pullet Other Layers 13. Waste Treatment and Storage Lagoons (Verify the following information is accurate and complete. Make all necessary corrections and provide missing data.) Design Estimated Liner Type Estimated Freeboard Structure Date (Clay,Synthetic, Capacity Surface Area "Redline" Name Built Unknown) (Cubic Feet) (Square Feet) (Inches) 01 40,320.00 NEW(LOWER) 5/8/2018 Full,clay 140,272.00 24,830.00 12.00 Mail one (1) copy of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP) with this completed and signed application as required by NC General Statutes 143-215.1OC(d)to the address below. The CAWMP must include the following components: 1. The most recent Waste Utilization Plan(WUP),signed by the owner and a certified technical specialist.containing: a. The method by which waste is applied to the disposal fields(e.g.irrigation,injection,etc.) b. A map of every field used for land application(for example:irrigation map) c. The soil series present on every land application field d. The crops grown on every land application field e. The Realistic Yield Expectation(RYE)for every crop shown in the WUP f. The maximum PAN to be applied to every land application field g. The waste application windows for every crop utilized in the WUP h. The required NRCS Standard specifications 2. A site map/schematic 3. Emergency Action Plan 4. Insect Control Checklist with chosen best management practices noted 5. Odor Control Checklist with chosen best management practices noted 6. Mortality Control Checklist with selected method noted-Use the enclosed updated Mortality Control Checklist 7. Lagoon/storage pond capacity documentation (design, calculations, etc.) Please be sure the above table is accurate and complete. Also provide any site evaluations, wetland determinations, or hazard classifications that may be applicable to your facility. 8. Operation and Maintenance Plan If your CAWMP includes any components not shown on this list, please include the additional components with your submittal. (e.g.composting,digesters,waste transfers,etc.) As a second option to mailing paper copies of the application package, you can scan and email one signed copy of the application and all the CAWMP items above to: 2019PermitRenewal@ncdenr.gov I attest that this application has been reviewed by me and is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that, if all required parts of this application are not completed and that if all required supporting information and attachments are not included,this application package will be returned to me as incomplete. Note: In accordance with NC General Statutes 143-215.6A and 143-21-5.613, any person who knowingly makes any false statement, representation, or certification in any application may be subject to civil penalties up to $25,000 per violation. (18 U.S.C. Section 1001 provides a punishment by a fine of not more than $10,000 or imprisonment of not more than 5 years, or both for a similar offense.) Printed Name of Signing Official (Landowner, or if multiple Landowners all-_landowners'.should sign. If Landowner is a corporation,signature should be by a principal executive officer of the�cyoiporation): Name: -� ��' Title: CJlil�� Signature: ate: 9 r 4 I Name: Title: Signature: Date: Name: Title: Signature: Date: THE COMPLETED APPLICATION SHOULD BE SENT TO THE FOLLOWING ADDRESS: NCDEQ-DWR Animal Feeding Operations Program 1636 Mail Service Center Raleigh,North Carolina 27699-1636 Telephone number:(919)707-9100 E-mail:2019Perm itRenewal@ncdenr.gov FORM: RENEWAL-STATE GENERAL 02/2019 1 Ka• ROY COOPER � Cwerrror � l MICHAEL S.REGAN w "r• 5€rrrtury LINDA CULPEPPER NORTH CAROLINA D;rcrt" Environmental Quality February 26,2019 Joseph Johnson Fogleman Dairy 9558 Pleasant Hill CH Rd Liberty,NC 27298 Subject: Application for Renewal of Coverage for Expiring State General Permit Dear Permittee: Your facility is currently approved for operation under one of the Animal Waste Operation State Non-Discharge General Permits, which expire on September 30, 2019. Copies of the new animal waste operation State Non-Discharge General Permits are available at hn.s:H .nc..ov/about/divisions/water-resources/water-c ualitl-re ional-o rations/aft or by writing or calling: NCDEQ-DWR Animal Feeding Operations Program 1636 Mail Service Center Raleigh,North Carolina 27699-1636 Telephone number:(919)707-9100 In order to assure your continued coverage under the State Non-Discharee General Permits. You must submit an Vplication for permit coverage to the Division. Enclosed ou will find a "Re guest for Certificate of Coverage Facility Currently Covered by an Expiring State Non Discharge General Permit." The application form must be completed. signed and returnees April 3, 2019. Please note that you must include one (1) copv of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP) with the completed and signed application form. A list of items included in the CAWMP can be found on page 2 of the renewal application form. Failure to request renewal of your coverage under a general permit within the time period specified may result in a civil penalty. Operation of your facility without coverage under a valid general permit would constitute a violation of NCGS 143-215.1 and could result in assessments of civil penalties of up to$25,000 per day. If you have any questions about the State Non-Discharge General Permits, the enclosed application, or any related matter please feel free to contact the Animal Feeding Operations Branch staff at 919-707-9100. Sincerely, A g�_� Jon Risgaard,Section Chief Animal Feeding Operations and Groundwater Section Enclosures cc(w/o enclosures): Winston-Salem Regional Office,Water Quality Regional Operations Section Alamance County Soil and Water Conservation District AFOG Section Central Files-AWC010036 Nortth:aro caDepannmeitaf Env romrne*tal raty DvsarrofWaterResources 512 N.Sa sbim St.1 1636!Vs Servoe:e^tar I R'a:r-g,North Care rta 27693-1S38 -� g1?.707.9= Animal Waste Management Plan Certification (Please t e or print all information that does not require a signature) lExisting or New or Expanded Lease circle one C General Information: Permit No: � jP,t/,6106 3 6 Name of Farm: tt r"Y' Facility No- Oa-S Owner(s)Name: a ji t� 'hone No:33&-Sa--1$.�3 Mailing Address: ah l `/ C'!'1 r f` L 27P99 Farm Location: County Farm is located in; �27�/? Gam' � t Latitude and Longitude: rj7 / ' 0 Integrator:__ Please attach a copy of a county road map with location identified and describe below (Be specific: road names, directions,milepost, etc.):_ � .L�� f �z l7 �3`) fib; h-- el; -'r' �2 3 7/ Operation Description: Type of Swine No. ofAnimals Type of Poultry No. ofAnimals Type ofDaity No. ofAnimals o Wean to Feeder o Layer _ o Milking -7aa o Feeder to Finish o Non-Layer a a�� ^_ o Dry o Farrow to Wean Type of Beef No. ofAnimals o Heifers o Farrow to Feeder o Brood _ o Calves o Farrow to Finish o Feeders o Gilts o Stockers o Boars Other Type ofLivestock:i Number ofAnimals:- Expanding Operation Only Previous Design Capacity:_ 20 Additional Design Ca aci�dj�6-2 7 Total Design Capacity:l�'" Acreage Available for Application: 7eD Required Acreage: Number of waste structures: q Total Capacity: 1,f'd OVd Cubic Feet(ft3) Are subsurface drains present on the farm: YES or 9 O (please circle one) If YES: are subsurface drains present in the area of the waste structures(please circle one or both as applicable) Owner/Manager Agreement I (we)verify that all the above information is correct and will be updated upon changing. I(we)understand the operation and maintenance procedures established in the approved animal waste management plan for the farm named above and will implement these procedures. I(we)know that any expansion to the existing design capacity of the waste treatment and storage system or construction of new facilities will require a permit application and a new certification to be submitted to the Division of Water Resources (DWR) and permit approval received before the new animals are stocked. I (we) understand that there must be no discharge of animal waste from the storage system to surface waters of the state unless specifically allowed under a permit from DWR and there must not be run-off from the application of animal waste. I (we) understand that run-off of pollutants from lounging and heavy use areas must be minimized using technical standards developed by the USDA-Natural Resources Conservation Service(MRCS). The approved plan will be filed at the farm and at the DWR Regional Office and the office of the local Soil and Water Conservation District(SWCD). I (we) know that any modification must be approved by a technical specialist and submitted to the DWR Regional Office and local SWCD and required approvals received from DWR prior to implementation. A change in farm ownership requires a permit application to be sent to DWR along with a new certification(if the approved plan is changed). Name of L/�nd Ow er: jc)5ra mac,��S o; Signature' � ` L Date: -lei Name of�anager(if different fro owner): r, 5fc0{K�W Signature: Date: AWC-September 18,2006 1 Technical Specialist Certification L As a technical specialist designated by the North Carolina Soil and Water Conservation Commission pursuant to 15A NCAC 6H .0104, I certify that the animal waste management system for the farm named above has an animal waste management plan that meets or exceeds standards and specifications of the Division of Water Resources as specified in 15A NCAC 2T .1300 (formerly 2H .0217)and the USDA-Natural Resources Conservation Service and/or the North Carolina Soil and Water Conservation Commission pursuant to 15A NCAC 2T .1300(formerly 2H .0217)and 15A NCAC 6F.0101-.0105. The following elements are included in the plan as applicable. While each category designates a technical specialist who may sign each certification (SD, SI,WUP,RC, I), the technical specialist should only certify parts for which they are technically competent. IL Certification of Design A) Collection, Storage, Treatment System Check the appropriate box o Existinp- facility without retrofit (SD or WUP) Storage volume is adequate for operation capacity;storage capability consistent with waste utilization requirements. New, expanded or retrofitted facility (SD) Animal waste storage and treatment structures, such as but not limited to collection systems, lagoons and ponds, have been designed to meet or exceed the minimum standards and specifications. Name of Technical Specialist(Please Print): 1, " Affiliation � �1� -I' Date Work Completed: �l Address (Agency): 2 u `—T 9 Phone No.: r Signature: ' f'�' Date: B) Land Application Site (WUP) The plan provides for minimum separations(buffers);adequate amount of land for waste utilization;chosen crop is suitable for waste management;and the hydraulic and nutrient loading rates are appropriate for the site and receiving crop. Name of Technical Specialist(Please Print): l it Affiliation'41ea/Yu nee 5GV cj' Date Work Completed: `� !5'- /2 Address (Agency): 0 I' � ��;�cc►i �< � ,� �?c�s(t` .�1 Phone No.: 3 Z 94'- /7 0:9,1� Signature: r Ive 27 ZF Date: �7' la -l2 C) Runoff Con rols from Exterior Lots Check the appropriate box Facility without exterior lots (SD or WUP or RC) This facility does not contain any exterior lots. o Facility with exterior lots (RC) Methods to minimize the run off of pollutants from lounging and heavy use areas have been designed in accordance with technical standards developed by NRCS. Name of Technical Specialist(Please Print): Affiliation Date Work Completed: Address (Agency): Phone No.: Signature:_ Date: AWC-September 18,2006 2 D).Application and Handling E ui ment Check the appropriate box o Existing or expandiLig facility with existing waste application equipment ()ArUP or I) Animal waste application equipment specified in the plan has been either field calibrated or evaluated in accordance with existing design charts and tables and is able to apply waste as necessary to accommodate the waste management plan: (existing application equipment can cover the area required by the plan at rates not to exceed either the specified hydraulic or nutrient loading rates, a schedule for timing of applications has been established; required buffers can be maintained and calibration and adjustment guidance are contained as part of the plan). o New,expanded, or existing facility without existing waste application equipment for spray irrigation. (I) Animal waste application equipment specified in the plan has been designed to apply waste as necessary to accommodate the waste management plan;(proposed application equipment can cover the area required by the plan at rates not to exceed either the specified hydraulic or nutrient loading rates; a schedule for timing of applications has been established;required buffers can be maintained; calibration and adjustment guidance are contained as part of the plan). o New. expanded, or existing facility without existing waste application equipment for land spreading not using spray irrigation, (WUP or I) Animal waste application equipment specified in the plan has been selected to apply waste as necessary to accommodate the waste management plan; (proposed application equipment can cover the area required by the plan at rates not to exceed either the specified hydraulic or nutrient loading rates; a schedule for timing of applications has been established;required buffers can be maintained;calibration and adjustment guidance are contained as part of the plan). Name of Technical Specialist(Please Print): ( 'P� Affiliations L _ 4J C/Q Date Work Completed: ek Address (Agency): t Phone No.:. 5��?�-/75`s' Signature: Date: 1-e- 6 E) Odor Control, Insect Control. Mortality Mana;;ement and Emergency Action Plan (SD, SI, WUP, RC or I) The waste management plan for this facility includes a Waste Management Odor Control Checklist,an Insect Control Checklist,a Mortality Management Checklist and an Emergency Action Plan. Sources of both odors and insects have been evaluated with respect to this site and Best Management Practices to Minimize Odors and Best Management Practices to Control Insects have been selected and included in the waste management plan. Both the Mortality Management Plan and the Emergency Action Plan are complete and can be implemented by this facility. Name of Technical Specialist(Please Print): &"er Affiliation la rr��: swco Date Work Completed: Address(Ag741elei' cy): 0� / .z, �atv/f, Cx��1 7Phone No.: Signature: ftii` Date: F) Written Notice of New or Expanding Swine Farm The following signature block is only to be used for new or expanding swine farms that begin construction after June 21, 1996. If the facility was built before June 21, 1996,when was it constructed or last expanded I(we)certify that I(we)have attempted to contact by certified mail all adjoining property owners and all property owners who own property located across a public road,street,or highway from this new or expanding swine farm. The notice was in compliance with the requirements of NCGS 106-805. A copy of the notice and a list of the property owners notified are attached. Name of Land Owner: Signature: Date: Name of Manager(if different from owner): Signature: Date: AWC-September 18,2006 3 III. Certification of Installation A) Collection, Storage, Treatment Installation New, expanded or retrofitted faciliiy (SI) Animal waste storage and treatment structures, such as but not limited to lagoons and ponds,have been installed in accordance with the approved plan to meet or exceed the minimum standards and specifications. For existing facilities without retrofits, no certification is necessary. Name of Technical Specialist( lease Print): � It &J S Affiliation ��-,� Z `7 l- z— Date Work Completed: Address (Agency): 2 - /-� AGTf� Phone No.: Signature: L2vfc 1/ � Date: / r B)Land Application Site (WUP) The cropping system is in place on all land as specified in the animal waste management plan. Name of Technical Specialist(Please Print): 1111al—Al li` Affiliations ll&y C '9'!t-XO Date Work Completed: Address (Age c ): QMah lit) Phone No.:3,A ,2�2 `-/7S 3 X-F Signature: E Date: fJ Ali C) Runoff Co rols from Exterior Lots (RC) Facility with exterior lots Methods to minimize the run off of pollutants from lounging and heavy use areas have been installed as specified in the plan. For facilities without exterior lots, no certification is necessary. Name of Technical Specialist(Please Print): Affiliation Date Work Completed: Address (Agency): Phone No.: Signature: Date: D)Application and Handling Equipment Installation (WUP or I) ® Animal waste application and handling equipment specified in the plan is on site and ready for use; calibration and adjustment materials have been provided to the owners and are contained as part of the plan. o Animal waste application and handling equipment specified in the plan has not been installed but the owner has proposed leasing or third party application and has provided a signed contract; equipment specified in the contract agrees with the requirements of the plan; required buffers can be maintained; calibration and adjustment guidance have been provided to the owners and are contained as part of the plan. Name of Technical Specialist(Please Print): L",IA'1161It Al Affiliation ,d AMA'Ice Date Work Completed:_ Address (Agency - is jof 10. ` ,A ' t- 2-1-21� Phone No.: Signature: Date: z-1-/d AWC-September 18,2006 4 E) Odor Control, Insect Control and Mortality Management SD, SI. WUP RC or I Methods to control odors and insects as specified in the Plan have been installed and are operational. The mortality management system as specified in the Plan has also been installed and is operational. Name of Technical Specialist(Please Print): 111,44 rl A Affiliationf2SL�IC.!(� _Date Work Completed: Address(Agency): �4 a,► - I hone No.: IAK-17 53 Y 3 Signature: Date: Zf—16 -/V Please return the completed form to the Division of Water Resources at the following address: Department of Environment and Natural Resources Division of Water Resources Animal Feeding Operations Unit 1636 Mail Service Center Raleigh,NC 27699-1636 Please also remember to submit a copy of this form along with the complete Animal Waste Management Plan to the DWR Regional Office and the local Soil and Water Conservation District Office and to keep a copy in your files with your Animal Waste Management Plan. AWC-September 18,2006 5 State of North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality Division of Water Resources Animal Feeding Operations Permit Application Form (THIS FORM MAYBE PHOTOCOPIED FOR USE AS AN ORIGINAL) State General Permit — New or Expanding Animal Waste Operations 1. GENERAL INFORMATION: 1.1 Facility name:Fogleman Dairy 1.2 Print Land Owner's name: Joseph M.Johnson 1.3 Mailing address: 9558 Pleasant Hill Church Rd. City, State:Liberty NC Zip:27298 Telephone number(include area code): (336) 588 - 1853 1.4 Physical address: 9144 Sylvan Rd. City,State:Liberty NC Zip: 27298 Telephone number(include area code): (336) 588 - 1853 1.5 County where facility is located:Alamance 1.6 Facility location(directions from nearest major highway,using SR numbers for state roads):HWY 49 left on SR2375.Rijzht on SR 2371.Left on SR 2370.Right on SR 2372,Right on SR 2369 1.7 Farm Manager's name(if different from Land Owner):Brian Stafford 1.8 Lessee's/Integrator's name(if applicable; circle which type is listed): 1.9 Facility's original start-up date: 2007 Date(s)of facility expansion(s)(if applicable):Fall if approved 2. OPERATION INFORMATION: 2.1 Facility number: 010036 2.2 Operation Description: Please enter the Design Capacity of the system. The"No. of Animals" should be the maximum number for which the waste management structures were designed. Type of Swine No. of Animals Type of Poultry No. of Animals Type of Cattle No. of Animals ❑Wean to Feeder ❑Layer ❑Beef Brood Cow ❑Feeder to Finish ❑Non-Layer ❑Beef Feeder ❑Farrow to Wean(#sow) ❑Turkey ❑Beef Stocker Calf ❑Farrow to Feeder(#sow) ❑Turkey Poults ❑Dairy Calf ❑Farrow to Finish(#sow) ❑Dairy Heifer ❑Wean to Finish(#sow) ❑Dry Cow ❑Gilts ❑Milk Cow 700 ❑Boar/Stud FORM: AWO-STATE-G-N/E 1/10/06 Page 1 of 5 State of North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality Division of Water Resources Animal Feeding Operations Permit Application Form (THIS FORMMAY BE PHOTOCOPIED FOR USE AS AN ORIGINAL) State General Permit — New or Expanding Animal Waste Operations I. GENERAL INFORMATION: 1.1 Facility name:Fogleman Dairy d' '191 VR 1.2 Print Land Owner's name:Joseph Johnson 1.3 Mailing address: 9558 Pleasant Hill Church Rd 00 k A 1Q 19 City,State:Liberty,NC Zip:27298 auty Telephone number(include area code):(336)376- 3970 myivnal apsfM846 Seer► 1.4 Physical address: 9144 Sylvan Rd. City, State:Liberty,NC Zip:27298 Telephone number(include area code): 336 588- 1853 1.5 County where facility is located:Alamance 1.6 Facility location(directions from nearest major highway,using SR numbers for state roads):H 49 left on SR 2375 Right on SR 2371 Lefton SR 2370 Right on SR 2372.Right on SR 2369 1.7 Farm Manager's name(if different from Land Owner):&j&Brims s 1.8 Lessee's/Integrator's name(if applicable;circle which type is listed): 1.9 Facility's original start-up date: .c v u 7 Date(s)of facility expansion(s)(if applicable): 2. OPERATION INFORMATION: 2.1 Facility number:010036 2.2 Operation Description: Please enter the Design Capacity of the system. The "No.of Animals"should be the maximum number for which the waste management structures were designed. Type of Swine No.of Animals Tyne of Poultry No.of Animals Tyke of Cattle No.of Animals ❑Wean to Feeder ❑Layer ❑Beef Brood Cow ❑Feeder to Finish ❑Non-Layer 80000 ❑Beef Feeder ❑Farrow to Wean(#sow) ❑Turkey ❑Beef Stocker Calf _ ❑Farrow to Feeder(#sow) ❑Turkey Poults ❑Dairy Calf ❑Farrow to Finish(#sow) ❑Dairy Heifer ❑Wean to Finish(#sow) ❑ ❑ Gilts Dry Cow ❑Milk Cow 700 ❑Boar/Stud FORM: AWO-STATE-G-N/E 1/10/06 Page 1 of 5 2.3 Acreage cleared and available for application(excluding all required buffers and areas not covered by the application system): 700 Required Acreage(as listed in the CAWMP): 2.4 Number of lagoons: Total Capacity(cubic feet): Required Capacity(cubic feet): Number of Storage Ponds:2 Total Capacity(cubic feet): 110,248 Required Capacity q p ty(cubic feet): 2.5 Are subsurface drains present within 100'of any of the application fields? YES or O (circle one) 2.6 Are subsurface drains present in the vicinity or under the waste management system? E or N4T (circle one) 2.7 Does this facility meet all applicable siting requirements? r NO (circle one) YES 3. REQUIRED ITEMS CHECKLIST: Please indicate that you have included the following required items by signing your initials in the space provided next to each item. 3.1 One completed and signed original and two copies of the application for State General Permit- Applicants Initials Animal Waste Operations; 3.2 Three copies of a general location map indicating the location of the animal waste facilities and field locations where animal waste is land applied and a county road map with the location of the facility indicated; 3.3 Three copies of the entire Certified Animal Waste Management Plan(CAWMP). If the facility does not have a CAWMP,it must be completed prior to submittal of a permit application for animal waste operations. The CAWMP must include the following components. Some ofthese components may not have been required at the time the facility was certified but should be added to the CAWMP for permitting purposes: 3.3.1 NRCS Site Evaluation Form NC-CPA-17 or equivalent 3.3.2 A hazard classification of the proposed lagoons,if required 3.3.3 Documentation that proposed swine facilities meet the Swine Farm Siting Act,including a site map prepared by a Registered Land Surveyor. The scale of this map shall not exceed 1 inch=400 feet. At a minimum,the site map shall show the distance from the proposed houses and lagoons to occupied residences within 1500 feet, schools,hospitals,churches,outdoor recreational facilities,national parks,state parks,historic properties,or child care centers within 2500 feet,property boundaries within 500 feet,water supply wells within 500 feet. The map shall also show the location of any property boundaries and perennial streams or rivers located within 75 feet of waste application areas. 3.3.4 Documentation showing that all adjoining property owners,all property owners who own property located across a public road, street,or highway from the facility,the local health department,and the county manager or chair of the county board of commissioners if there is no county manager,have been notified by certified mail of your intent to construct or expand a swine farm at this location. 3.3.5 A wetlands determination 3.3.6 The lagoon/storage facility design 3.3.7 Proposed runoff control measures,if required 3.3.8 Irrigation or other land application method design 3.3.9 The Waste Utilization Plan(WUP)must include the amount of Plant Available Nitrogen(PAN)produced and utilized by the facility 3.3.10 The soil series present on every waste disposal field 3.3.11 The crops grown on every waste disposal field 3.3.12 The Realistic Yield Expectation(RYE)for every crop shown in the WUP 3.3.13 The PAN applied to every waste disposal field 3.3.14 The waste application windows for every crop utilized in the WUP 3.3.15 The required NRCS Standard specifications FORM: AWO-STATE-G-N/E 1/10/06 Page 3 of 5 3.3.16 Emergency Action Plan 3.3.17 Insect Control Checklist with options noted 3.3.18 Odor Control Checklist with options noted 3.3.19 Mortality Control Checklist with options noted 3.3.20 Documentation proving this facility is exempt from the Moritoria on Construction or Expansion of Swine Farms,if the application is for a swine facility 3.3.21 A map showing the topography of the proposed facility location showing features that affect facility design,the dimensions and elevations of any existing facilities, the fields used for waste application,and areas where surface runoff is to be controlled If your CAWMP includes any components not shown on this list,please include the additional components with your submittal.(Composting,waste transfers,etc.) 4. APPLICANT'S CERTIFICATION: I, �Ds� �p—g 9 (Land Owner's name listed in question 1.2),attest that this application for I' (Facility name listed in question 1.1) has been reviewed by me a. d is accurate and com fete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that if all required parts of this application are not completed and that if all required supporting information and attachments are not included,this application package will be returned to me as incomplete. Signature Date 5. MANAGER'S CERTI ICATION: (complete only if different from the Land Owner) I' P (Manager's name listed in question 1.6),attest that this application for �D j r (Facility name listed in question 1.1) has been reviewed b me and is accurate a complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that if all required parts of this application are not completed and that if all required supporting information and attachments are not included,this application package will be returned as incomplete. Signature &;4 Date THE COMPLETED APPLICATION PACKAGE,INCLUDING ALL SUPPORTING INFORMATION AND MATERIALS, SHOULD BE SENT TO THE FOLLOWING ADDRESS: NORTH CAROLINA DIVISION OF WATER RESOURCES WATER QUALITY REGIONAL OPERATIONS SECTION ANIMAL FEEDING OPERATIONS PROGRAM 1636 MAIL SERVICE CENTER RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27699-1636 TELEPHONE NUMBER: (919)807-6464 FAX NUMBER: (919) 807-6496 FORM: AWO-STATE-G-N/E 1/10/06 Page 4 of 5 6. SURFACE WATER CLASSIFICATION: This form must be completed by the appropriate DWR regional office and included as a part of the project submittal information. INSTRUCTIONS TO NC PROFESSIONALS: The classification of the downslope surface waters(the surface waters that any overflow from the facility would flow toward)in which this animal waste management system will be operated must be determined by the appropriate DWR regional office. Therefore,you are required,prior to submittal of the application package,to submit this form,with items 1 through 6 completed,to the appropriate Division of Water Resources Regional Aquifer Protection Supervisor(see page 6 of 10). At a minimum,you must include an 8.5"by I I"copy of the portion of a 7.5 minute USGS Topographic Map which shows the location of this animal waste application system and the downslope surface waters in which they will be located. Identify the closest downslope surface waters on the attached map copy. Once the regional office has completed the classification, reincorporate this completed page and the topographic map into the complete application form and submit the application package. 6.1 Farm Name: 6.2 Name&complete address of engineering firm: Telephone number: ( ) _ 6.3 Name of closest downslope surface waters: 6.4 County(ies)where the animal waste management system and surface waters are located 6.5 Map name and date: 6.6 NC Professional's Seal(If appropriate), Signature,and Date: TO:REGIONAL WQROS SUPERVISOR Please provide me with the classification of the watershed where this animal waste management facility will be or has been constructed or field located,as identified on the attached map segment(s): Name of surface waters: Classification(as established by the Environmental Management Commission): Proposed classification,if applicable: Signature of regional office personnel: Date: _ (All attachments must be signed) FORM: AWO-STATE-G-N/E 1/10/06 Page 4 of 5 Version—November 26,2018 Mortality Management Methods Indicate which method(s)will be implemented. When selecting multiple methods indicate a primary versus secondary option. Methods other than those listed must be approved by the State Veterinarian. Primary Secondary Routine Mortality ❑ rm Burial three feet beneath the surface of the ground within 24 hours of knowledge of animal death. The burial must be at least 300 feet from any flowing stream or public body of water (G.S.106-403). The bottom of the burial pit should beat least one foot above the seasonal high water table.Attach burial location map and plan. �at r" F] � Landfill at municipal solid waste facility permitted by NC DEQ under GS 15A NCAC 1 13B .0200, JRendering at a rendering plant licensed under G.S. 106-168.7. Complete incineration according to 02 NCAC 52C .0102. A composting system approved and permitted by the NC Department of Agriculture&Con- sumer Services Veterinary Division (attach copy of permit). If compost is distributed off-farm, additional requirements must be met and a permit is required from NC DEQ. In the case of dead poultry only, placing in a disposal pit of a size and design approved by the �J NC Department of Agriculture&Consumer Services(G.S. 106-549.70). (� Any method which, in the professional opinion of the State Veterinarian,would make possible L 1 the salvage of part of a dead animal's value without endangering human or animal health. (Written approval by the State Veterinarian must be attached). Mass Mortality Plan Mass mortality plans are required for farms covered by an NPDES permit. These plans are also recommended for all animal operations. This plan outlines farm-specific mortality man- agement methods to be used for mass mortality. The NCDA&CS Veterinary Division sup- ports a variety of emergency mortality disposal options; contact the Division for guidance. WR . A catastrophic mortality disposal plan is part of the facility's CAWMP and is activated when numbers of dead animals exceed normal mortality rates as specified by the State NIS Veterinarian. • Burial must be done in accordance with NC General Statutes and NCDA&CS Veterinaryr2�terQua1'" Division regulations and guidance. �s5rtiatOPOSOOO Mass burial sites are subject to additional permit conditions(refer to facility's animal waste management system permit). • In the event of imminent threat of a disease emergency,the State Veterinarian may enact additional temporary procedures or measures for disposal according to G.S. 106-399.4. Si nature of Farms wner/Manager Dat Signature of Technical Specialist Date EMERGENCY ACTION PLAN PHONE NUMBERS DWQ ( 77�-' -6QO EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM SWCDC,3'��4 2 as l.7�3 NRCS Sa.r—C as f]10ave- This plan will be implemented in the event that wastes from your operation are leaking, overflowing, or running off site. You should not wait until wastes reach surface waters or leave your property to consider that you have a problem. You should make every effort to ensure that this does not happen. This plan should be posted in an accessible location for all employees at the facility. The following are some action items you should take. 1. Stop the release of wastes. Depending on the situation, this may or may not be possible. Suggested responses to some possible problems are listed below. A. Lagoon overflow-possible solutions are: a. Add soil to berm to increase elevation of dam. b. Pu np wastes to fields at an acceptable rate. c. Stop all flows to the lagoon immediately. d. Call a pumping contractor. e. Make sure no surface water is entering lagoon. B. Runoff from waste application field-actions include: a. Immediately stop waste application. b. Create a temporary diversion to contain waste. c. hicorporate waste to reduce runoff. d. Evaluate and eliminate the reason(s)that caused the runoff. e. Evaluate the application rates for the fields where runoff occurred. C. Leakage from the waste pipes and sprinklers-action include: a. Stop recycle pump. b. Stop irrigation pump. c. Close valves to eliminate further discharge. d. Repair all leaks prior to restarting pumps. D. Leakage from flush systems, houses, solid separators-action include: 1 December 18, 1996 a. Stop recycle pump. b. Stop irrigation pump. c. Make sure no siphon occurs. d. Stop all flows in the house, flush systems, or solid separators. e. Repair all leaks prior to restarting pumps. E. Leakage from base or sidewall of lagoon. Often this is seepage as opposed to a. Dig a small sump or ditch away from the embankment to catch all seepage, put in a submersible pump, and pump back to the lagoon. b. If holes are caused by burrowing animals, trap or remove animals and fill holes and compact with a clay type soil. c. Have a professional evaluate the condition of the side walls and lagoon bottom as soon as possible. 2. Assess the extent of the spill and note any obvious damages. a. Did the waste reach any surface waters? b. Approximately how much was released and for what duration'? c. Any damage noted, such as employee injury, fish kills, or property damage'? d. Did the spill leave the property? e. Does the spill have the potential to reach surface waters? f. Could a future rain event cause the spill to reach surface waters'? g. Are potable water wells in danger(either on or off of the property)? h. How much reached surface waters? 3. Contact appropriate agencies. a. During normal business hours, call your DWQ (Division of Water Quality)regional office; Phone - - . After hours, emergency number: 919-733-3942. Your phone call should include: your name, facility,telephone number,the details of the incident from item 2 above, the exact location of the facility,the location or direction of movement of the spill, weather and wind conditions. The corrective measures that have been under taken, and the seriousness of the situation. b. If spill leaves property or enters surface waters, call local EMS phone number - �- c. Instruct EMS to contact local Health Department. d. Contact CES, phone number - - , local SWCD office phone number - - and local NRCS office for advice/technical assistance phone number - - _ 4. If none of the above works call 911 or the Sheriffs Department and explain your problem to them and ask that person to contact the proper agencies for you. 5. Contact the contractor of your choice to begin repair of problem to minimize off-site 2 December 18, 1996 damage. a. Contractors Name: e- f&u e,c b. Contractors Address: c. Contractors Phone: 6. Contact the technical specialist who certified the lagoon (NRCS, Consulting Engineer, etc. a. Name: j31-// 411019 5 b. Phone: 3 3 &,� �?- 2-6 — /753 EX ff • 3 7. Implement procedures as advised by DWQ and technical assistance agencies to rectify the damage, repair the system, and reassess the waste management plan to keep problems with release of wastes from happening again. g1NR RfcC' Nn 15 2019 N,'atetQua144y Rs9io�m�Ope�°as 3 December 18, 1996 Dairy Farm Waste Management Odor Control Checklist Source Cause BMPs to Minimize Odor Site Specific Practices Farmstead • Dairy Production ❑ Vegetative or wooded buffers; ❑ Recommended best management practices; ❑ Good judgement and common sense Paved lots or barn alley • Wet manure-covered surfaces ❑ Scrape or flush daily; surfaces ❑ Promote drying with proper ventilation; ❑ Routine checks and maintenance on waterers, hydrants,pipes,stock tanks Bedded areas • Urine; ❑ Promote drying with proper ventilation; • Partial microbial decomposition ❑ Replace wet or manure-covered bedding Manure dry stacks • Partial microbial decomposition ❑ Provide liquid drainage for stored manure Storage tank or basin • Partial microbial decomposition; ❑ Bottom or mid-level loading; surface ■ Mixing while filling; ❑ Tank covers; • Agitation while emptying ❑ Basin surface mats of solids; ❑ Minimize lot runoff and liquid additions; ❑ Agitate only prior to manure removal; ❑ Proven biological additives or oxidants Settling basin surfaces • Partial rtuerollial decomposition; O Liquid drainage from settled solids; • Mixing while filling; ❑ Remove solids regularly •_ Agitation while empiyinb Manure,slurry,or sludge • Agitation when spreading; ❑ Soil injection of slurry/sludges; spreader outlets • Volatile gas emissions ❑ Wash residual manure from spreader after use; ❑ Proven biological additives or oxidants Uncovered manure,slurry • Volatile gas emissions while drying ❑ Soil injection of slurry/sludges; or sludge on field surfaces ❑ Soil incorporation within 48 hrs; ❑ Spread in thin uniform layers for rapid drying; ❑ Proven biological additives or oxidants Flush tanks • Agitation of recycled lagoon liquid ❑ Flush tank covers; while tanks are filling ❑ Extend lilt lines to near bottom of tanks with anti-siphon vents Outside drain collection or • Agitation during wastewater ❑ Box covers junction boxes conveyance AMOC-N °•ether 11. 1996, Page I Source Cause BMPs to Minimize Odor Site Specific Practices Lift stations ■ Agitation during sump tank filling ❑ Sump tank covers and drawdown End of drainpipes at lagoon • Agitation during wastewater ❑ Extend discharge point of pipes underneath conveyance lagoon liquid level Lagoon surfaces • Volitile gas emission; O Proper lagoon liquid capacity; r Biological mixing; Correct lagoon startup procedures; * Agitation ❑ Minimum surface area-to-volume ratio; ❑ Minimum agitation when pumping; ❑ Mechanical aeration; ❑ Proven biological additives Irrigation sprinkler nozzles * High pressure agitation; ❑ Irrigate on dry days with little or no wind; * Wind drift ❑ Minimum recommended operating pressure; ❑ Pump intake near lagoon liquid surface; ❑ Pump from second stage lagoon; ❑ Flush residual manure from pipes at end of slung/sludge pumpings Dead animals ■ Carcass decomposition ❑ Proper disposition of carcasses Standing water around • Improper drainage; ❑ Grade and landscape such that water drains away facilities ■ Microbial decomposition of organic from facilities matter Mud tracked onto public • Poorly maintained access roads ❑ Farm access road maintenance roads from farm access Additional Information: Available From: Cattle Manure Management; .0200 Rule/BMP Packet NCSU,County Extension Center Dairy Educational Unit Manure Management System-Lake Wheeler Road Filed Labatory;EBAE 209-95 NCSU-BAE Lagoon Design and Management for Livestock Manure Treatment and Storage;EBAE 103-83 NCSU-BAE Management of Dairy Wastewater;EBAE 106-83 NCSU-BAE Calibration of Manure and Wastewater Application Equipment; EBAE Fact Sheet NCSU-BAE Nuisance Concerns in Animal Manure Management:Odors and Flies; PRO107, 1995 Conference Proceedings Florida Cooperative Extension • AMOC-N- -tuber 11, 1996,Page Poultry Layer Farm Waste Management Odor Control Checklist Source Cause BMPs to Minimize Odor Site Specific Practices Farmstead • Poultry Production O Vegetative or wooded buffers; O Recominended best management practices; O Good judgement and common sense Floor surfaces(walk aisles) • Wet dirty surfaces O Scrape manure,dust,feathers into collection alleys; O Splash boards along upper ends of collection alleys; O Proper ventilation Cage manure dropping • Manure-covered surface O Scrape manure into collection alleys boards Manure collection alleys • Partial microbial decomposition O Frequent manure removal by flush or scrape; O Frequent checks and maintenance on waterers and water pipes Ventilation exhaust fans ■ Volatile gases; O Fan maintenance; ■ Dust O Efficient air movement Indoor surfaces ■ Dust O Vacuum or waslidown between flocks; Manure conveyors • Partial microbial decomposition O Keep mechanical equipment in good repair; O Remove manure accumulations promptly Storage tank or basin • Partial microbial decomposition; O Bottom or midlevel loading; surface O Tank covers; O Basin surface mats of solids; O Proven biological additives or oxidants Manure slurry or sludge • Agitation when spreading; O Soil injection of slurry/sludges; spreader outlets • Volatile gas emissions O Wash residual manure from spreader after use; O Proven biological additives or oxidants Uncovered manure slurry • Volatile gas emissions while drying O Soil injection of slurry/sludges; or sludge on field surfaces O Soil incorporation within 48 hrs. Outside drain collection or • Agitation during wastewater O Box covers junction boxes conveyance AMOC-November 11. 1996. Page 6 Source Cause BMPs to Minimize Odor Site Specific Practices Lift stations • Agitation during sump tank filling ❑ Sump tank covers and drawdown End of drainpipes at lagoon 0 Agitation during wastewater ❑ Extend discharge point of pipes underneath conveyance lagoon liquid level Lagoon surfaces • Volitile gas emission; ❑ Proper lagoon liquid capacity; i Biological mixing; ❑ Correct lagoon startup procedures; 40 Agitation ❑ Minimum surface area-to-volume ratio; ❑ Minimum agitation while pumping; ❑ Mechanical aeration; ❑ Proven biological additives Irrigation sprinkler nozzles ■ High pressure agitation; O Irrigate on dry days with little or no wind; 0 Wind drift ❑ Minimum recommended operating procedure; ❑ Pump intake near lagoon liquid surface; ❑ Pump from second-stage lagoon Dead birds ■ Carcass decomposition ❑ Proper disposition of carcasses Dead bird disposal pits ■ Carcass decomposition ❑ Complete covering of carcasses in burial pits; ❑ Proper location/construction of disposal pits; ❑ Disposal pit covers tight fitting Standing water around 0 Improper drainage ❑ Grade and landscape such that water drains away facilities Microbial decomposition of organic from facilities matter Mud tracked onto public ■ Poorly maintained access roads ❑ Farm access road maintenance roads from farm access Additional Information: Available From: AMOC-November 11, 1996,Page 7 Source Cause BMPs to Minimize Odor Site Specific Practices Poultry Manure Management; .0200 Rule/BMP Packet NCSU,County Extension Center Poultry Layer Production Facility Manure Management:High Rise,Deep Pit;EBAE 131-88 NCSU-BAE Poultry Layer Production Facility Manure Management:Undercage Flush-Lagoon Treatment;EBAE 130-88 NCSU-BAE Lagoon Design and Management for Livestock Manure Treatment and Storage;EBAE 103-83 NCSU-BAE Calibration of Manure and Wastewater Application Equipment;EBAE Fact Sheet NCSU-BAE Proper Disposal of Dead Poultry;PS&T Guide No. 19 NCSU-Poultry Science Nuisance Concerns in Animal Manure Management:Odors and Flies;PRO107, 1995 Conference Proceedings Florida Cooperative Extension L � m a a � AMOC'- Nip%eniber 1 I 1996. Page 8 Insect Control Checklist for Animal Operations Source Cause BMPs to Minimize Insects Site Specific Practices Liquid Systems Flush Gutters • Accumulation of Solids O Flush system is designed and operated sufficiently to remove accumulated solids from gutters as designed; O Remove bridging of accumulated solids at discharge Lagoons and Pits • Crusted Solids O Maintain lagoons,settling basins and pits where pest breeding is apparent to minimize the crusting of solids to a depth of no more than 6-8 inches over more than 30%of surface. Excessive Vegetative • Decaying vegetation O Maintain vegetative control along banks of lagoons Growth and other impoundments to prevent accumulation of decaying vegetative matter along waters edge on impoundment's perimeter. Dry Syslrms Feeders • Feed Spillage O Design,operate and maintain feed systems(e.g., bunkers and troughs)to minimize the accumulation of decaying wastage. O Clean up spillage on a routine basis(e.g.,7- 10 day interval during summer; 15-30 day interval during winter). Feed Storage • Accumulation of feed residues O Reduce moisture accumulation within and around immediate perimeter of feed storage areas by insuring drainage away from site and/or providing adequate containment(e.g.,covered bin for brewer's grain and similar high moisture grain products). Cl Inspect for and remove or break up accumulated solids in filter strips around feed storage as needed. Animal Holding Areas • Accumulations of animal wastes O Eliminate low areas that trap moisture along fences and feed wastage and other locations where waste accumulates and disturbance by animals is minimal. O Maintain fence rows and filter strips around animal holding areas to minimize accumulations of wastes (i.e. inspect for and remove or break up accumulated solids as needed. AMIC- November 11, 1996,Page I Source Cause BMPs to Minimize Insects Site Specific Practices Dry Manure Handling 0 Accumulations of animal wastes O Remove spillage on a routine basis(e.g.,7-10 day Systems interval during summer; 15-30 day interval during winter)where manure is loaded for land application or disposal. O Provide fo adequate drainage around manure stockpiles. O Inspect for an remove or break up accumulated wastes in filter strips around stockpiles and manure handling areas as needed. For more information contact the Cooperative Extension Service,Department of Entomology,Box 7613,North Carolina State University,Raleigh,NC 27695-7613 AMW- November 1 1 1996. Page 2 Nutrient Management Plan For Animal Waste Utilization 02-15-2019 This plan has been prepared for: This plan has been developed by: Joseph Johnson Dairy/Poultry Farm Wally Walker Joseph Johnson Alamance SWCD 9558 Pleasant Hill Church 209 North Graham-Hopedale Rd Road Liberty, NC 27298 Burlington, NC 27217 (336)376-6412 336-228-1753 Developer Signature Type of Plan: Nutrient Management with Both Manure and Fertilizer Owner/Manager/Producer Agreement I (we) understand and agree to the specifications and the operation and maintenance procedures established in this nutrient management plan which includes an animal waste utilization plan for the farm named above. I have read and understand the Required Specifications concerning animal waste management that are included with this plan. //Y Signature(owner) Date Signature(manager or producer) Date This plan meets the minimum standards and specifications of the U.S. Department of Agriculture-Natural Resources Conservation Service or the standard of practices adopted by the Soil and Water Conservation Commission. Plan Approved By: &- Oe' zo Technical 4ecialist Signature Date ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ------------ ----------------- Preview Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: Cover Page 1 Nutrients applied in accordance with this plan will be supplied from the following source(s): Commercial Fertilizer is included in this plan. S 1 Dairy(Milk Cow) Solid waste generated 8,160.00 tons/year by a 480 animal Dairy (Milk Cow) Solid operation. Estimated Pounds of Plant Available Nitrogen Generated per Year Broadcast 35089 Incorporated 46513 Inj ected N/A Irrigated N/A Max. Avail. Actual PAN PAN Surplus/ Actual Quantity Surplus/Deficit PAN(lbs)* Applied (lbs) Deficit(lbs) Applied(Tons) (Tons) Year 1 35,089 53934 -18,845 12,622.07 -4,462.07 Year 2 35,089 46644 -11,555 10,900.30 -2,740.30 S2 Dairy(Milk Cow)Liquid Manure Slurry waste generated 1,704,780 gals/year by a 220 animal Dairy(Milk Cow)Liquid Manure Slurry operation. This production facility has waste storage capacities of approximately 100 days. Estimated Pounds of Plant Available Nitrogen Generated per Year Broadcast 16876 Incorporated 23013 Inj ected 26081 Irrigated 15342 Max. Avail. Actual PAN PAN Surplus/ Actual Volume Volume Surplus/ PAN(lbs)* Applied (lbs) Deficit(lbs) Applied(Gallons) Deficit (Gallons) Year 1 19,449 42133 -22,684 3,999,301 -2,294,521 Year 2 19,449 39483 -20,034 3,732,564 -2,027,784 Note: In source ID, S means standard source,U means user defined source. *Max.Available PAN is calculated on the basis of the actual application method(s)identified in the plan for this source. Preview Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 02-26-2019 Source Page 1 of 2 S22 Broiler House Stockpiled Litter waste generated 464.00 tons/year by a 80,000 animal Broiler House Stockpiled Litter operation. Estimated Pounds of Plant Available Nitrogen Generated per Year Broadcast 7517 Incorporated 9688 Injected N/A Irrigated N/A Max. Avail. Actual PAN PAN Surplus/ Actual Quantity Surplus/Deficit PAN(lbs)* Applied (lbs) Deficit(lbs) Applied(Tons) (Tons) Year 1 7,517 50643 -43,126 3,137.94 -2,673.94 Year 2 7,517 47909 -40,392 2,969.16 -2,505.16 Note: In source ID,S means standard source,U means user defined source. *Max.Available PAN is calculated on the basis of the actual application method(s)identified in the plan for this source. Preview Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 02-01-2019 Source Page 2 of 2 d_ Steve Trcwter Norui Carolina Department of Agriculture Dr, Colleen Hassle-wise Commissioner and Col1samer ServlceS Director Ag.ronurnic Div ion MEM-0 To., Noel ssa'-kosebrock,Environments Senior Specialist, NCDEQ Rebecca liar�.cr,Environmental Speci 1,s,of DEQ From; Bra don Doole,Regional Agronomist,NCDA&CS CC. J'Oseph Johnson, Owner of Fogieman Dairy Wa-ly Walker, Distrct l echnici6.n,Aiamanee Saa.and Water Conservation Michelle Mcvi»ris, Field Services Section Chief,NCDA&CS Davie:tlaray, Sol_'Testing-'ab Sectior Chief,NCDA&CS Date. February 11,2019 RE; Summary of 201 S Agronomic --esting for ?ogteman Dairy Background I was approached by Joseph rohnson,owner of Fogleman Dairy,and Wally Walker,Districy Technician of tiiamance Sok and Water Conservation,in early lvlarch of 2018 to discuss nitrogen(N)management of dsiry waste to his corn silage/rye cover crop system..loseph naa the idea to apply most of the N needed for corn silage To cover crops thinking that the fat_planted rover crop would-utilize and Store N in the pla-at 4fter the cover crop was terininated spy;oll:ng prior to planting the corn,the cover crop v u:a begin to break down. n;:trie-n_t mineralization wound occur,and N wouk:be avalable to the cor:..Josepi) Plan was to apply approximately 65 percent"90#PATT)of t ital desired PAN for the corn(150#PAN)to the cover crop. He would then apply the remaining N(50#PAN)neeaea for trie corn si lage at the time of planting. kpplications of dairy waste for 2017/2018 were applied as follows: F&:12017-5N-RAN to cover crop,March 2018—40# i'-A N to cover crop,Aprii/May 20 i 3-6W PAN applied at planting of corn silage. Data Collection Due to current regulations,application greater Than 01;of_'AN to a cover crop that is not harvested�s not allowed unless proven io be agronomically sound. The Depa-ftment of EnvironmeTitai Quality expresses concern of not harvesting the cover crop titer receiving rnore tiara the 30,E PANT a_lotment,as ielated to -Ile anpredictable nature of N release from the cover crop a,id oncetn of late season N release thZL is not utilized ay a crop. kt a meeting on May 22,2018, Joseph Jctansoi,;Melissa:tosebroc`x,Environmentai Senior Specialist of NCDEQ,Rebecca Chandler. Environmen:at Specia.is_of DEQ, Wally 'Walker and agreed.o conduct a smah aemonstration project t(,monitor N as foulomrs. • Evaluate two fields with different soil types tsandy soi.anti clay soil). 040 Arian Service Center,Rateigh,North unroiina 27699.1040 '919)733-2W • Fax(919)733-2337 nn Eq;;al Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer • C_011-ct soil samples 4.0-6 inches and b-12 inches.:or analysis of nitrate-N at foru times: torn silage piariting, :assel grown stage,&-imediatciy after harvest,and after cover crop establishment. • Collect corn silage pant tissue samples at V6 and tassel o,o wdi stages to evacuate nutrient s,:�f�ciens�=1e�t.�s Res-..-ts Soil r_i+.rate-!' results are. iIli,..,.ded in Table i hi bob soil types.nitrate-N concentrations were-ower at the deeper b to i.2-inch soil depth than tyre ,nipper U to b-inch depth at ,]I sampling events. As iuseph Jonnson practices no-salt tarmiug;practices,root densities are.&ighest in the shallowest wept::.The predominance of the crop root mass in this zone allows for N sequestratior. and.;nits N movement to iower soil depths. This sequcstraton mnay explain why :he 5 to 12-inch depth ha-6 consis,,mtly lower nitrate:,Doter►trations. The ru;trate-N concemijr.-tions for both,,oil types at both samnpme dept?is were generally similar between planting and Lasseling which would inarcate nitrate was being at�rized by the actively growing coma Not; a cover crop Womass from-pre-existing co rer crop prior to this corn silage wa-present cturing the growing season =n_erestingiy,the nitrate-N concentrations iucreased between tasseiina an6 harvest. This may be explai-ieu.by visual observations of high eveis of earthworm acti=,ity and degradation-if biomass as well, as uecreased nutrient mptake of the maturing corn. 'vitiate decreased after the estawistmnzent of the cover crop indicating its acts e nutriemr aptaxe Plant tissue N results are inc.wded in Table 2. AL both sampling crates,N concentrations in corn silage plant tissa-.were within sufficiency ranges which suggests adequate bu3 not excessive N being supplied to the corn adage. Table 1. Soil nitrate-N Concentrations at two depths on two fields with different soil types in a co!MJje cover crop rotation. Nitrate-Nitrogen Concentration Sample G--— -- — (rig/,.or ppm) _r Sa;; 1 ype Depth Af Corn I Tassel After At Cover Crop Planting , Stage Harvest ;stabIJsn,nent 16/06/2018j (8/13/2018) (10123/2018) 111/28/20� 18) Sand 0-6 inches_1 4 - 3 1 7 Y 6-32 inches ` 2 2 6 Clay inches s 5 ---�- -- �- `12 --1 6-12 inches , 6 3 S 6 Fi are 2. Plant N concentrations at two fields with different soil types in a Cornicover crop rotation. geld Tota:Nitrogen Percentage r— J61 Tasse;2 �--- 7/12/2018 8/i 3/2018 Sandy ---r-- 3 N 8 2.9 _ 2.9 Safficiencv range at V6 's 3.0-4.0 pp►r. 2 Sutffciency-a-ge ut tassel is 2.8-4.0 ppm Soil Nitrate-R Results: Sandy.vacation: Soil nitrate-N it the 0-6-inch sample depth froir.planting anti com maturity was similar at approximately 3 to 1 pptA(Table l) From ma€urify,to after corn silage harvest, soi nitrate-N at this sampling aepth increasea to -_ ppni.After establishing the covet crop immediately after corn stage harvest, soil nitrate-N declined to I pprn, Soil nitratr.-N in the 6-12-inen sample depth remained at 2 ppm Irom planting until corn silage maturity.At harvest at this sampling depth, soil nitrate-N was measured ac 6 ppni an(: Coen meas-red at 4 ppiii about 6 weeks,later_ after cover crop establishment. Clay L.ocat-:on: Soil nitrate-N in the a-S-anuh sample depth remainea at 5 ppm from planting untL corr.maharity.From iaturity so harvest, soil nitrate-R at this sampling depth increases to 20 ppm. Soil nitrate-N declined to l2 ppin after 5 6 weeks of establishing the cover crop. In rate 6--2-inch sample depth,nitrate-N was at 3 ana 6 prim. Plant Tissue Analysis: Samples were collectea at v 6 ana tasseling to evaluate :he:,orn nutrient status. iL both iocations atl plant nutrients were found tc be sufficient for both=mpling dates. Observations from this year: Based on.he data and F.._ield observations,it appears fhai sigrmica;i:N re.eased from the cover crop wag assimilated by %lie corn silage.Nitrogen re_ewed fol'.owing corn silage maturity is Nicely being utilized by the fail-estab"shed cover crop. A crop growing on the fields at all times of tree year greatly reduces th;, Chance if moveniert of nitrogen from the field. Suggestions moving forward: 1 realize that this jemonstratiun is oily basea onniie year's data without statistica.rigor and experimental design,but I think these suggestions are agronomically sounu unti:further woric can be accomplisher- From.what`learned Mth diis systQm,T suggest a total of 60 pounds PAN applied to the co-vcr crop, which would then be rwduced from the tots_N allowed for the corn silage. The suggested timing of'his Iota' PAN rate is 30 Pounds at planting and an addition&:30 pounds applied between GS 25 arvC GS 30. At planting of:lie corn silage, the remaining N snouia be applied. This approach wilt allow app:1od IN'to be utilized oy an activeiv growing cover crop and allow bib-mass for weed suppression.Tne reniaining N applied at planting of the corn will supply N �o the corn crop that v ,_ bP supplemented by N re eased horn,he cover crop.This recommendation is only valid if the cover erop-corn crop-cover crop scenario is maintainer. Soil and Plant Tissue Report Numbers FY:8-SL036834 -collected 6/06/2018 6N'9-SLv02373—coilected 8/13/20LE FV19-ST 009086—collected 10/23/2018 FY i 9-SL014739—collected L v2°r2C L 8 Y_9-Puu0:37—cn'lectect 71-2/2018 FYI9-P000474 -collected 8/13/2018 At'-ached sample form sample iDIs: Soil testing HGA—Clay 0-6-inch d,rp*d HGB--Clay 6-12-inch depth SGA—Sandy soil U-6-inch depth SGB—Sandy boil 6-i2-inch depth 'lane tissue testing SG—Sandy soil HG—Clay sci, NCQAt3CS Agronomic Division Phnne: (919)733-2655 Website: www.ncagr-gov/agronomic r Report No. FY18-SL036834 Sys °"t;vpr,� Client: J^sepn Johnsor Advisor: Branda,Goole -- u Diagnostic Q558 Pleasant Hill Ch Rd 4310 Pitman Hall Apt 201 T .bevy,NC 27298 Raleigh,ANC 27612 #1 Soil Reg)or Mehlich-3 Extraction Sampled County.Alamance R aim to Helpful tnformstlon Client ID: 405220 Advisor ID: 453661 Sampiea: 06/06/2018 Re-Vad 06/08/2018 compiewd: 06/14/2018 Farm; Agronomist's Comarmenw: _ These sampie:c were suomined for ni�rate analysis.In trip oraer as w aed on me report,the nitrate-N levels in ppm are:4,2. 16,8.5.and F.Please let me knmy if therq are ouesilons.Brandon Poo►e wol be in contact xmth au.Davis tt.Hardu_.AQronomist.,rune 14,2018 Sample IA: SGA Recommendations: Lime — _ Nutn_ents(lb/acre) _ _ More Cron (tonsatcre) -N tr20C. K20 Me 5 in in Cu F3 Information Lime History: 1-Cam,grain 0.0 120-160 a 30 0 20 pH$ 0 0 0 i Nme;a No e,; 2- Test Results[units•,WN in glc.A.CEC ana Na in inegrm00 cnA NO3-N in mgldrd]: Spit Class: Mine;ai HM% WN CEC BSeh Ac pH Na K4 • Ca% NJg% 3.1 Mn4 Mn-All Mn-Ai2 Zn4 zn�Al CU4 No EIRP RS4 NO3-N 0.22 1.20 0 88 0.7 _6.7 209 67 59 25 16 110 73 482 48t 152 0.1 2 1ti San:olo Ili: S(3, � � ..r � acr Recommendations: Lima - _,Nutrients(lb/acre) �`�" � Yulate Crop (tonslacre) N P2O5 K20 - Mg ;a luln Zn Cu information Lirre History: t-Com,grain 0.0 120 160 0 30 0 25 0 0 0 0 I Nlr"ar 3 j2- Test Results fun s-WIV in g/cO:!CEC and Na in meg1100 crrt3:NO3-N in mg1difft Roil Clans: Mineral HM WIV CEC BS% Ac pH M P4 K-1 Ca% MO% S4 n4 Mn-Al1 Mn-Al2 Zix-i Zn-AI Cu-I Na FSP SS4 NO3-N 0.22 1.31 1.9 76 0.0, 6.2 259 61 do 18 18 89 67 219 219 136 0.2 5 16 Sample 10: GLA, Recommendations: Lime _ _ Nutrients(Ibiacre) _ —Cu— r More Crap (tonslacre) N PaOs K2O — S Mn Zn B Information Linte History: 1-Corn,grain 0.0 120-160 0 0 0 0 r:H$ 0 0 0 3 N4¢A 2- Test Results[units-WIV In glcO:CEG and Na in matirl00 c0,NO3-N In mg/drr>i): Soil Claps• Mineral — HM% WIV CEC BS% Ac off P-1 K-1 Ca% Mg% 34 Mn-1 Mn-Ali Mn4U2 Zn-i Zn-Ai Cu4 Na IFSP S$4 NO3-N O.z2 0.83 13.0 98 _0.3 _ l.�s _ '113 146 64 28 34 201 117 _ 968 958 212 _ 0.2 2 27 North Carolina Reprogramming of the Lciborstory-information-management syetem that mpt cs this repor+possible is being funded through a grant from tt+4 North Carollra TebaccoTrust Fund Commission. *r Thank you for using agronomic services to manage nutrient;and safeguard environmental quality. Steve Troxier.Commissioner of Agriculture 7ctbooc+t 1rn+tt fund Cc�aaisaron NCDA&GS Agronomic Division Phone: (919)733.2655 V16lisite: Www.ncagr.+gov/agronomi/ Report No. FY19-SL002373 Client: Branoon Poole A is riv or. i a Diagnostic 4310 Or; rman Wall Ant 201 x! Raleign,NG 2M12 Soil Report Mehli,ch-3 Extraction Sampled County:Aiamance Sampled: 08113/201£i rtscenrad: 08/141201$ completed. 08/1 t12418 Farm Client ID; n5366'1 Advisor ID: Agronomist's Ceenments: Com srA nitrate test.Note the recommendat'ons.Jaclalni Kamalakanthan 8/1712018 Sample ID: HGA Lin Nutr)ar°'s(lblacre) Crop (tons/acre) N P205 K20 Mg S Mn Zn Cu _ B Information Lime History: 1-Com.grain 0.0 120-16n n 0 0 !) pW$ 0 0 0 Nato:3 I te.A. _ 2-_ � _ � 0.0 'rest Results[units-Wtv in glcnr'i;CPC and Na in rneg1100 cam;NOa-N la rn,&n3j: Soli CI€iss: MrFierai I HM% W/V GE-C as% Ac pH pd K4 Ca% Mp% S4 Mn-I Mn-All Mn Al2 Zrm Zn-Al Cu-I Na ESP SS-1 NO3-N 0.36 0.94 13.2 93 0.9 7.0 86 7_A7 AR 28 41 1183 7,2 410 410 d3o 0.4 3 19 Sample HGB RerOnirnandatio�s Lime _ _ __Nutrients itoiaare)__ 1' `''more Crop (tons/Acre) N —P205 K20 _ Mg a Mn 7_n cu B infminaitian 1-inle History: 1 -Corn,grain 0.0 12C-160 90 0 0 pH$ 0 0 0 Test Results[units-W/V in g/Colt;CEC and,Na in meq/100 co,NO3-N in mg/do]: Si)il Class: Mineral - 1w% Wfv GEC BS% AC pH P4 K4 Ca% Mg% S-1 Mn4 Mn All Mn.AI2 ZMA Zn AI Cu-i Na ESP SS-1 NO3-N 0.27 1.05 10.6 92 0.9 6.9 92 71 60 29 27 1595 961 174 174 160 0.4 4 10 ^wino Ile D :GA Raccrrim ndations: Lime _ _ _Nutrients(Ib,acre) MMV Crop ltons/acre) _ N P205 K20 Mg S Mn in, Cu B Informatioa Lime History: 1 -Com.grain 0.0 120.'iN:i 0 0 0 0 pH$ 0 0 Teiit Results[units-W1V in 91=0;CEC anei Na in m9g1100 crrP;NO3-N In mglddl: Soil Class., Mineral — HM'!a WN CEC 8S% Ac pH P4 K4 Ca9b Mg% S-I W4 Mn-All Mn-Al2 Znal ZriAl Cud Na ESP SS-t NO3-N 0.18 1.27 7.7 92 0.6 6.8 321 88 — 61 25 V 202 126 804 $01 244 J.2 3 14 Noah Carolina reprogramming of the taboratory-information-inanagemeni syste n:hal maKes this reoort nosMbin is being flipried through a c-nint from the Norm Carolina Tobacco Thist Fund Cornmi—inn. shank you for using agronomic services to manage nutrients and safeguard environmental quality. Steve Truxler COmmiss-'Oner,)f Acricullure ipparru Ttu+i fund Cc>r»ahwn NCDA&CS Agronrtnic Division - Phone, (919)733-2655 `Website: www.ncaqr.gov1&qr000mI/ Report No. FO'19 SL0090ff6 * +. Client: Joseph Johnso., Advisor. Brandon Poolei } Diagnostic 9558 Pleasant Hill Oh Rd 4310 Farman Hall apt 201 _ i ib-ty,NC 27298 Raleigh,NC 27612 Soil Report Mehlich-:3 Extraction "F Sampled County.Pandoiph ''rx o�xu5�' Liwk�s H�� Client in: 405220 Advisor ID: Q��66 i Sampiaa; 1 0/2 314 1 8 "em'ved: 10/23/2018 compwed 11f01/2018 Faan; Auronomist's ct mments: -- Nitrates were requested on these samolp,3.Nitrefe-N levefs in ppm for time s-wples listed in the order as they occur on the rauort are:23,5,11,anti 6 pprn Brandon Poole will ne in contact with you,David H.Hardy.N,vomber l.2018 Sample ID: HGA lies ommc ndatlons:Line - r — '"� —Nutri—ents�Ibla cre) - _ _ More , f Crop (tons/Acre) N P2O5 IC20 _ Mg S Mint Zn Cu S Information Lime History. 1-Can.gr;Ir 0 4 120-160 0 0 0 0 DW 0 0 0 q 2- _0.0 Test"esults[units-W/V in g/crn3;CEC and Na in magll t 0 crnP;NO3-N In mg/dnrl]: _ Seim Ciass Mineral HM% W1V' CEC BSA, Ac pH P-1 K4 Ca% Mg% 54 Mn-I Mn-All Mn-Al2 Zn4 Zn-Al r u-i Na ESP SS-I NO3-N 0.27 U.84 13.6 97 0.4 7.2 11y 214 59 31 42 814 488 392 392 272 0.3 2 29 Sample ID: HGB Rer_nmmendetior Lime — —_ —___� . _ _Nutrients tib/acre) More Crop (tonslacre) N P205 K^,0 Mg S Mn 7-11 Cu B Information Lime History: 1-Com_grain 0.0 120 160 0 20 0 0 0 0 rest Results[units..WlV in g/CO;CEC and Na in meq/100 crrr3;NO3-N in mgldrrrl.]:- — - — Solt Class Mineral - - - - HM% W/V CEC SS% Ac pH P-i K4 Ca% Mg.% S4 Mn4 Mn Alt Mn AI2 Z11-1 Zn-AI Cue Na ESP SS-i NO3-W 0.27 1.;3 4.8 87 0.6 6.2 322 64 59 2" 29 152 105 366 1266 220 0.1 2 10 S:im01e ID: SGA i� or+n_merrI13tions: Lima - � _ _ Nutrients(lb/acre) _ 1More. Crop (ta�.slacrr;) N !'30s Ka0 Mg S Mn �n Cu R Information tame History: f 1.Cnrn,grain U:U 120-160 0 10 0 0 DH$ 0 n 0 2 _ 0.0 Test Results[units-W/V in g/cO;CEC and Na in m", 100 cnT3;NO3-N in ingldirr;]: _ — Gnil Class: Mineral HM% WN CEC BS% Ae pH P4 Ka Ca% Mg% 5-1 Mn-F mn-All Mn-Al2 Zn4 Zn-Al Cu-i Na ESP SS4 NO3-N G.22 1.10- -3.0 93 - O.a_ 6.6 335 74 63 _ 25 - 32 215 _ 139 — - 8550 � 850 290 0.1- -a 17 - North Carolina Peprogramming of the iaboratnry-information-manage-e9,it system that makes this report possible is being funded through a grant from the Nrxth Carnlim Toba.co Trust Fund Commission. 11'ank you for usinq agronomic services to manage nutrients and safeguard envirorryiental quality. 1#uc<u flu+!F and[ r... 5 tee Troxier. Corrimissiorer of Aaricutture e NCDA&CS Agronomic Division Phone; 919 733-2655 Wet: - s - _ Report No. FY19-SL014T;39 ( ) ite: w�nrw.ncagr.gav/agrona:�itl 1 UN f " Client. Joseph Johnson Advkor 13ransnn P-1a Diagnostic 9558 r'Ieasai,t Hill Ch Ri1 43101:1irnan Nell Apt 201 Soil Report Mehlich-3 Extraction Liberty,NC 2i298 Raleigh,Nc,27612 6 _ Sampled Cou.nry:Alamance f•'r'4LkYLl"�.'. ,t.l'lj'u�O'.b°'%^tD(�ySYiJ}'_.t'S:%ram sampwd!1112812018w R_-ived: 11/28/2018 Compteeon_12/06/201.8 Farm Client ID: 405220 Advisor ID. 453661 Agronomist's Comments: Tl ose samples were suomittea for nitrate testing.For the order that samples appear on this report,nitrate-N in ppm(rnglkg)are as follows:12.0,6,0;1.0,:and 4.0. Brandon Poole will be in contact with you.David H.Hardy,A ronrmist,December 6 2018 Sample ID: "GA Recornmendaticas„ Lime _ _ Nutrients(lb/acre) _ ' �" More Crop (tonslacre.l - N Rz05 K26 MP S Mn Zn CIA B Information Lime History: 1 -Sma!'Grain (Sly) 0.0 80-100 0 0 0 0 pH$ 0 0 0 ' e:3 2 3__ 0.0! rest Results[units-WIN in g/cn.,CEC and Na in raeq/100 crrr:NOs-N in+ngidd]: Soil Class: Minr9rat - - - Hai% W/V CEC BS% Ac. pH P4 K4 Ca%o Mg% S-t rAn4 Mn-Ali Mn-Al2 Zn4 ZnAI Cu4 Na ESP SS-I NOS-N 0.13 0.81 12.4 95 0.6 1.1 till 214 55 32 28 901 534 298 298 230 0.2 2 15 Sample 13: HGEi itsconstnendatIons., Lime _ N,1tnents(lb/acre) — �~� _ More " Crop (tans/acre) N P205 K20 Mg S Mn Zn Cu f3 information Lime History; 1 -Small Grain(SO) 0.0 80-100 90 0 0 20 pH$ 0 0 0 to Vat 2- — — 0.0 i est Results[units-WN in 91Cm3;CEC and Na Ira meaP100 a0;NO3.-N in mg/rirprl]; - - - - — Sail Class• Mineral — HM1°fa WN CEr; BS% Ac pH P,d K4 C8% Wig% Sa Mn4 Mn-All Mn Al2 Zn4 Zn4U CAW Na ESP SSa NO3-H 0.13 102 11.4 95 0.5 1.1 21 86 60 32 25 1227 729 132 132 171 0,2 2 11 5ampte lD: SGA Recommendations: Llr _ _ _ _ Nutrie.ii;(Ib/acre) moreCrop (tonslacre) N P20F K20 Mg S Mn z CIA B Information Lime History: _ 1-Small Gain(SG) - 0.0 80-100 tt an — t) - r)— PH$ _ 0 0 0 Rota:3 2 0,0 Test Resu is funits-rMN in gfcntl:CEC and Na in meNW100 cn,';NO-i-N in mgt/dnri]: Soil Class: Mineral HM%o WtV GEC ft% Ac .1H A-I K4 r,a%p Mgr g4 Mn-I Mn-Ali Mn-AJ2 Zn-1 Zn-AI Cu4 Na ESP SS4 NO3-N 3.18 1.03 0 91 O.b - 6.7 280. 58 - 63 � 24 - �6 203_ 121 - _ 702 --102 231 0.1 1 11 North !Carolina Reprogramming of the laboratory-information-manegomnnt System that mazes this report passible is being funded I through a grant from the Nortn Qarrlina.Tobacco Trust Fund Commission A,• Thank you for using agronomic,services to manage nutrients and saNguard eeivironmental quality. Ti>bcYre Trust f unii C Steve 7roxler CommiRsionf,r ofAwiculture NCDP,B CS Agroromir,Division Rhone: (919)733.2655 Website: www.neagr.gov/agronomic Report No.FYI 9•P000137 llT. Internal Client; Brandon Poole Advisor. , 4310 Furman Nall Apt 201 {� ¢` Flint T issue Report 1?aleigh,NC27612 Sampled County'.AlamailCe ' Sam ilea: 07/12/2018 Kecehrew 07h 3/201 b Farm:Not P-ovidod Completed: 07/13/2018 PALS M 453r61 PALS M :gym to#nf�trrrs+tia�; !Nutrient Measui errtents are given in units of parts Dar millior (ppn.or mg/L)unless otherwise specified. ID:SG N(%) P(%) K(%) Ca/,%) 1'49(%) 5(ok) Fe Will Zn CU 13 Mo Noe-N Crop: COO 3.76 t1.36 4.20 0.26 0.17 0.25 85.5 23.0 60.4 10.8 9.64 Gru*wth Stage: B Interpretation Indexes N p K Ca Mg S Fe M11 Zn Cu B Mo Week 0 89-S bi-S 105-E SO-S51-5 60 .56-G 51- 69-5 57-.S 5e-S Plant part. E carer Results Nutrient Ratios � Plant Po%itium- 0 Na(%) 41(%) C:(%) OW ig) At N:S id:K Fe:Mn 0.00 - 6,16 15.2:1 0.90:`l 3.74:1 Agronomist's Comments: hunter U.Lanais 7t1312018 4:04 PM �mr.L 9nfarer�atian Nutrient Measurements are given in units of parts per million(ppm or mg/L)unless otherwise specified. ID:NG N(%) P(°/a) K(%) Ca(%) Mg(%) S(-A) Fe Mr Zr Cu R Me NO3-N Crop: Com 2.91 0.40 2.76 0.26 0.22 0.20 8',:3 26.9 39.0 9.14 4.69 - Growth Stage- B InterpretaCon Indexes N P K Ca Mg S Fe Mn Zn Cu d Mo Week. 0 52-S 65-5 69-5 51-S 54-S 55-S 56-S 62-S 59-S 55-5 45••1- Plant Part: F. Other Results Nutrient Ratios Plant Position: 0 Na(° ) Cl/%) G MDW(g) Al N-� NX Fe:Mn 0.00 - - - 5.49 i4 R 1 Ds 1.02 1 North Carolina Reprogramming of to iaboratorv-information-manaaemerit system that makes this report possible is being hinded -.� througn a grant trom the North Carolina Tobacco Tnist Fund(,-lr lmiccir n A, r~ { Thank you for using agronomic services to manage nutrients and safez"ard environn;entat TnbaCrn TnKt Fund CommlWnn qualm NCDAt4C5 Agronomic Division Phone: (919)733-2655- - Wehsite: wwwn ncagr.gov/agronomi! Report No.FY19 P000474 Internal Client: Brandon Poole - As1►+isor: 4310 FurmanHall Apt 201 Plant Tissue Report i R,40;gh,NC 7.7612 Sampled County:Aiamance LIAM teMr0nth+1° r u'.°,a� Sampled: 03113/2018 Received: 08/14/2018 Farm:Not Provided Completed: 08/15/2018 PALS M 453661 P®i S#: ,t I Samkis infrrmatfoil Nutrient Measurerrlertts are given in units of parts per million(pprn or mall-)unless otherwise snecifiM - iD:Hr N(11/1) P(%) K(°k) Ca(°10; Mg(°/n1 S(%) Fe Mn Zn Cu ti IOU NO3--N Crop: Corr 2.91 0.26 1.86 046 0,16 01.13 126 37 6 21.7 10.3 3.80 - Growth Stage: F Interpretation Indexes N P K Ca Mg S FR Mn Zn Cur S Mo Weak n 52-S 52_S 51-S 60-S 51-S 43-1- 60-S 54-S 51-S 56-S 39-' . ' Plant P-irt: G Other results Nutrient Ratios Plant Position: 0 Na(%) Ci(%) C(%) DW tci) AI N:S N:K FeWn 0.00 35.2 22.a:1 1.57: 1 :i.36:1 d Atyrononttut's Comments: Kristin A.Hicks 8/15120/8 1:43 FM T - - - — i Sarriuie in formaLl0q Nutrient Measrirernenrs are giver�n nits of parts per mi"ion(ppm or mg1L)unless otherwise specified. ID:SU N(WI P(-/.i Ii(%) Ca(%,) Mg(%) S(%) Fe Mn Zn Cu Q Mo NO3-N Crop: C^rn 3.16 0.47 1_83 0.27 0.16 015 85.3 Ai,? 36.6 12.2 5.37 Growth Sukae: F interpretation Indexes N R K Ca Mg S Fe Mn Zn C4 8 Mc Week: O 57-5 /1-S 51-S 511-S 61-S 51-S 56-el 53-S 58-S 59-S bo-S Plant Flirt: r= Other Results Nutrient Ratios Plant Position: 0 M) C DW(9) Al N:S N:K Fai.Mn o n0 - - 19.2 i 21.3 1 1,73:1 274 t North Carolina Reprogramming of the laboratorv-iritorma;iori-management systern that makes this report F;,,.aible is being funded trirough a grant from :he North Carolina Teharco Tnmt Fund Corn mi—lon. A Thank;you fiar im rg-agronomic se"icvs to manaze nutrients are,?xgfeguard environerienial. Thbarrp Trim Fluid Con adsslw quality. "'he table shown below provides a summary of the crops or rotations included in this plan for each field. Realistic Yield e _re also provided for each crop,as well as the crop's P205 Removal Rate. The Leaching Index(LI)and the Phosphorous l Assessment Tool(PLAT)Rating are also provided for each field,where available. If a field's PLAT Rating is High,any planned manure application is limited to the phosphorous removal rate of the harvest biomass for the crop rotation or multiple years in the crop sequence. Fields with a Very High PLAT Rating should receiv, additional applications of manure. Regardless of the PLAT rating, starter fertilizers may be recommended in accordance N Carolina State University guidelines or recommendations. The quantity of P205 applied to each crop is shown in the folk table if the field's PLAT rating is High or Very High. Planned Crops Summary Total Useable Plat Removal A Tract Field Acres Acres Rating LI Soil Series Crop Sequence RYE Removal Applied (lbs/acre) (lbs/acre) 10309 1 7.60 7.60 Unknown N/A Herndon Corn,Silage 21.9 Tons 74 N/A Small Grain,Silage 10.4 Tons 56 N/A Soybeans,Manured,Full Season 48 bu. 38 N/A 10309 2 9.5C 9.50 Unknown 15.0 Herndon Corn,Silage 21.9 Tons 74 N/A Small Grain,Silage 10.4 Tons 56 N/A Soybeans,Manured,Full Season 48 bu. 38 N/A 10309 3 7.9C 7.90 Unknown 15.0 Herndon Corn,Silage 22.5 Tons 77 N/A Small Grain,Silage 10.8 Tons 58 N/A Soybeans,Manured,Full Season 49 bu. 39 N/A 10309 4 9.20 9.20 Unknown 15.0 Alamance Corn,Silage 22.5 Tons 77 N/A Small Grain,Silage 9.8 Tons 53 N/A Soybeans,Manured,Full Season 44 bu. 35 N/A 10385 2 8.10 8.10 Unknown 15.0 Georgeville Fescue Pasture 5.0 Tons 8 N/A 10385 3 5.20 5.20J Unknown 15.0 Georgeville Fescue Pasture 4.8 Tons 8 N/A 10386 6 5.90 5.90 Unknown 15.0 Tarrus Corn,Silage 21.6 Tons 73 N/A Small Grain,Silage 9.8 Tons 53 N/A Soybeans,Manured,Full Season 44 bu. 35 N/A 10386 7 9.5q 9.50 Unknown 15.0 Tarrus Corn,Silage 22.0 Tons 75 N/A Small Grain,Silage 10.0 Tons 54 N/A Soybeans,Manured,Full Season 45 bu. 36 N/A 10386 8 13.10 13.10 Unknown 15.0 Tarrus Corn,Silage 22.0 Tons 75 N/A Small Grain,Silage 10.0 Tons 54 N/A Soybeans,Manured,Full Season 45 bu. 36 N/A 10497 7 1 1.80 1.80 Unknown 15.0 Appling Corn,Silage 24.5 Tons 83 N/A Small Grain,Silage 11.3 Tons 61 N/A Soybeans,Manured,Full Season 54 bu. 43 N/A 10497 8 3.30 3.30 Unknown 15.0 Appling Com,Silage 24.5 Tons 83 N/A Small Grain,Silage 11.3 Tons 61 N/A Preview Database Version 3.1 Date Printed 2/1/2019 PCs Page 1 of 7 NOTE: Symbol*means user entered data. Tanned Crops Summary Total Useable Plat P2O5 Removal Applied Tract Field Acres Acres Rating LI Soil Series Crop Sequence RYE (tbs/acre) (Ibs/acre) Soybeans,Manured,Full Season 54 bu. 43 N/A 10497 9 1 5.10 5.101 Unknown 15.0 Appling Corn,Silage 24.5 Tons 83 N/A Small Grain,Silage 11.3 Tons 61 N/A Soybeans,Manured,Full Season 54 bu. 43 N/A 10499 5 9.10 7.00 Unknown 15.0 Appling Com,Silage 23.8 Tons 81 N/A Small Grain,Silage 10.9 Tons 59 N/A Soybeans,Manured,Full Season 52 bu. 42 N/A 10499 6 2.70 2.70 Unknown 15.0 Appling Com,Silage 23.8 Tons 81 N/A Small Grain,Silage 10.9 Tons 59 N/A Soybeans,Manured,Full Season 52 bu. 42 N/A 10499 8 3.70 3.70 Unknown 15.0 Appling Com,Silage 23.8 Tons 81 N/A Small Grain,Silage 10.9 Tons 59 N/A Soybeans,Manured,Full Season 52 bu. 42 N/A 10514 5 11.00 11.00 Unknown N/A Herndon Fescue Pasture 4.9 Tons 8 N/A 10514 6 7.50 7.50 Unknown N/A Georgeville Corn,Silage 22.5 Tons 77 N/A Small Grain,Silage 10.8 Tons 58 N/A Soybeans,Manured,Full Season 49 bu. 39 N/A 10514 8 14.00 14.00 Unknown N/A Georgeville Com,Silage 21.9 Tons 74 N/A Small Grain,Silage 10.4 Tons 56 N/A Soybeans,Manured,Full Season 48 bu. 38 N/A 10514 9 7.00 7.001 Unknown N/A Hemdon Fescue Pasture 4.9 Tons 8 N/A 10569 1 3.00 3.00 Unknown N/A Georgeville Com,Silage 22.5 Tons 77 N/A Small Grain,Silage 10.8 Tons 58 N/A Soybeans,Manured,Full Season 49 bu. 39 N/A 1074 1 30.00 30.00 Unknown N/A Georgeville Fescue Pasture 4.8 Tons 8 N/A 1074 2 2.00 2.00 Unknown N/A Georgeville Fescue Pasture 4.8 Tons 8 N/A 1074 3 9.00 9.00 Unknown N/A Appling Fescue Pasture 5.4 Tons 9 N/A 1074 5 15.00 15.00 Unknown N/A Appling Corn,Silage 24.5 Tons 83 N/A Small Grain,Silage 11.3 Tons 61 N/A Soybeans,Manured,Full Season 54 bu. 43 N/A 1074 6 6.00 6.00 Unknown N/A Appling Com,Silage 23.8 Tons 81 N/A Small Grain,Silage 10.9 Tons 59 N/A Soybeans,Manured,Full Season 52 bu. 42 N/A 2383 3 3.50 3,001 Low 15.0 Appling Com,Silage 23.8 Tons 81 N/A Small Grain,Silage 10.9 Tons 59 N/A Soybeans,Manured,Full Season 52 bu. 42 N/A Preview Database Version 3.1 Date Printed 2/1/2019 PCs Page 2 of 7 NOTE: Symbol*means user entered data. lanned Crops Summary Total Useable Plat P2O5 Removal Applied Tract Field Acres Acres Rating LI Soil Series Crop Sequence RYE pbs/acre) (lbs/acre) 2383 3A 3.00 3.00 Low 15.0 Durham Fescue Pasture 4.3 Tons 7 NIA 2383 1 5 4.801 4.00 Low 15.0 Durham Fescue Pasture 4.3 Tons 7 N/A 2384 6 6.50 6.50 Unknown 15.0 Georgeville Com,Silage 22.5 Tons 77 N/A Small Grain,Silage 10.8 Tons 58 N/A Soybeans,Manured,Full Season 49 bu. 39 N/A 2392 1 19.20 19.00 Medium 15.0 Tatum Corn,Silage 20.9 Tons 71 N/A Small Grain,Silage 9.5 Tons 51 N/A Soybeans,Manured,Full Season 43 bu. 34 N/A 2392 2 3.10 3.00 Medium 15.0 Tatum Corn,Silage 20.9 Tons 71 N/A Small Grain,Silage 9.5 Tons 51 N/A Soybeans,Manured,Full Season 43 bu. 34 N/A 2392 3 1 6.30 6.00 Medium 15.0 Hemdon Corn,Silage 21.9 Tons 74 N/A Small Grain,Silage 10.4 Tons 56 N/A Soybeans,Manured,Full Season 48 bu. 38 N/A 2392 4 1.60 1.60, Medium 15.0 Tatum Corn,Silage 20.9 Tons 71 N/A Small Grain,Silage 9.5 Tons 51 N/A Soybeans,Manured,Full Season 43 bu. 34 N/A 2392 5 2.30 2.00 Medium 15.0 Georgeville Corn,Silage 21.9 Tons 74 N/A Small Grain,Silage 10.4 Tons 56 N/A Soybeans,Manured,Full Season 48 bu. 38 N/A 2392 6 6.40 6.00 Medium 15.0 Georgeville Corn,Silage 22.5 Tons 77 N/A Small Grain,Silage 10.8 Tons 58 N/A Soybeans,Manured,Full Season 49 bu. 39 N/A 2392 7 5.70 5.70 Medium 15.0 Callison Com,Silage 11.4 Tons 39 N/A Small Grain,Silage 7.1 Tons 38 N/A Soybeans,Manured,Full Season 28 bu. 22 N/A 2415 1 19.30 19.001 Medium 15.0 Appling Com,Silage 23.8 Tons 81 N/A Small Grain,Silage 10.9 Tons 59 N/A Soybeans,Manured,Full Season 52 bu. 42 N/A 2415 3 10.00 10.00 Medium 15.0 Herndon Com,Silage 21.2 Tons 72 N/A Small Grain,Silage 10.1 Tons 55 N/A Soybeans,Manured,Full Season 46 bu. 37 N/A 2415 3a 4.00 4.00 Unknown N/A Herndon Fescue Pasture 4.9 Tons 8 N/A 2415 ; 6.30 6.00 Very High 8.0 Orange Fescue Pasture 1.3 Tons 4 II 2415 6 6.00 6.00 Medium 15.0 Callison Fescue Pasture 4.3 Tons 7 N/A 2415 6A 6.00 6.00 Medium 15.0 Callison Fescue Pasture 4.3 Tons 7 N/A 2415 7 24.70 24.70 Medium 15.0 Appling Co.,Silage 124.5 Tonsl 83 N/A Preview Database Version 3.1 Date Printed 2/1/2019 PCs Page 3 of 7 NOTE: Symbol*means user entered data. Tanned Crops Summary Total Useable Plat P2O5 Removal Applied Tract Field Acres Acres Rating LI Soil Series Crop Sequence RYE (Ibs/acre) (lbs/acre) Small Grain,Silage 11.3 Tons 61 N/A Soybeans,Manured,Full Season 54 bu. 43 N/A 30369 1 6.00 6.00 Unknown N/A Georgeville Com,Silage 22.5 Tons 77 N/A Small Grain,Silage 10.8 Tons 58 N/A Soybeans,Manured,Full Season 49 bu. 39 N/A 30369 2 5.00 5.00 Unknown N/A Georgeville Corn,Silage 22.5 Tons 77 N/A Small Grain,Silage 10.8 Tons 58 N/A Soybeans,Manured,Full Season 49 bu. 39 N/A 30369 3 7.00 7.00 Unknown N/A Georgeville Corn,Silage 22.5 Tons 77 N/A Small Grain,Silage 10.8 Tons 58 N/A Sovbeans.Manured,Full Season 49 bu. 39 N/A 30370 1 1.00 1.00 Unknown N/A Georgeville Corn,Silage 22.5 Tons 77 N/A Small Grain,Silage 10.8 Tons 58 N/A Soybeans,Manured,Full Season 49 bu. 39 N/A 30370 2 1 1.50 1.501 Unknown N/A Georgeville Corn,Silage 22.5 Tons 77 N/A Small Grain,Silage 10.8 Tons 58 N/A Soybeans,Manured,Full Season 49 bu. 39 N/A 30370 3 4.00 4.00 Unknown N/A Georgeville Corn,Silage 22.5 Tons 77 N/A Small Grain,Silage 10.8 Tons 58 N/A Soybeans,Manured,Full Season 49 bu. 39 N/A 30370 5 3.50 3.50 Unknown N/A Georgeville Corn,Silage 22.5 Tons 77 N/A Small Grain,Silage 10.8 Tons 58 N/A Soybeans,Manured,Full Season 49 bu. 39 N/A 30370 6 2.70 2.70 Unknown N/A Georgeville Corn,Silage 22.5 Tons 77 N/A Small Grain,Silage 10.8 Tons 58 N/A Soybeans,Manured,Full Season 49 bu. 39 N/A 53 1 1 25.00 25.00 Unknown 15.0 Appling Corn,Silage 24.5 Tons 83 N/A Small Grain,Silage 11.3 Tons 61 N/A Soybeans,Manured,Full Season 54 bu. 43 N/A 53 2 2.00 2.00 Unknown 15.0 Appling Corn,Silage 25.0 Tons 85 N/A Small Grain,Silage 11.5 Tons 62 N/A Soybeans,Manured,Full Season 55 bu. 44 N/A 53 3 1.50 1.50 Unknown 15.0 Durham Corn,Silage 12.0 Tons 41 N/A Small Grain,Silage 7.0 Tons 38 N/A Soybeans,Manured,Full Season 35 bu. 28 N/A 53 4 2AJ 2.40 Unknown 15.0 Appling Corn,Silage i25.0 Tonsl 85 N/A Preview Database Version 3.1 Date Printed 2/1/2019 PCs Page 4 of 7 NOTE: Symbol*means user entered data. lanned Crops Summary Total Useable Plat P205 Removal applied Tract Field Acres Acres Rating LI Soil Series Crop Sequence RYE (lbs/acre) (lbshacre) Small Grain,Silage 11.5 Tons 62 N/A Soybeans,Manured,Full Season 55 bu. 44 NIA 53 6 3.00 3.00 Unknown 15.0 Appling Corn,Silage 25.0 Tons 85 N/A Small Grain,Silage 11.5 Tons 62 N/A Soybeans,Manured,Full Season 55 bu. 44 N/A 53 7 0.5q 0.50 Unknown 15.0 Appling Corn,Silage 25.0 Tons 85 N/A Small Grain,Silage 11.5 Tons 62 N/A Soybeans,Manured,Full Season 55 bu. 44 N/A 53 9 0.50 0.5q Unknown 15.0 Appling Corn,Silage 25.0 Tons 85 N/A Small Grain,Silage 11.5 Tons 62 N/A Soybeans,Manured,Full Season 55 bu. 44 N/A 534 1 6.14 6.10 Unknown 15.0 Appling Corn,Silage 24.5 Tons 83 NIA Small Grain,Silage 11.3 Tons 61 N/A Soybeans,Manured,Full Season 54 bu. 43 N/A 534 2 9.10 9.10 Unknown 15.0 Appling Corn,Silage 24.5 Tons, 83 N/A Small Grain,Silage 11.3 Tons 61 N/A Soybeans,Manured,Full Season 54 bu. 43 N/A 534 3 3.80 3.80 Unknown 15.0 Appling Corn,Silage 24.5 Tons 83 N/A Small Grain,Silage 11.3 Tons 61 N/A Soybeans,Manured,Full Season 54 bu. 43 N/A 540 1 7.40 7.40 Medium 15.0 Georgeville Corn,Silage 21.9 Tons 74 N/A Small Grain,Silage 10.4 Tons 56 N/A Soybeans,Manured,Full Season 48 bu. 38 N/A 540 2 15.59 15.59 Low 15.0 Georgeville Corn,Silage 21.9 Tons 74 N/A Small Grain,Silage 10.4 Tons 56 N/A Soybeans,Manured,Full Season 48 bu. 38 N/A 540 3 15.60 15.60 Medium 8.0 Orange Fescue Pasture 2.4 Tons 4 N/A 540 4 2.70 2.70 Medium 15.0 Georgeville Com,Silage 21.9 Tons 74 N/A Small Grain,Silage 10.4 Tons 56 N/A Soybeans,Manured,Full Season 48 bu. 38 N/A 540 5 8.80 8.80 Medium 15.0 Georgeville Corn,Silage 21.9 Tons 74 N/A Small Grain,Silage 10.4 Tons 56 N/A Soybeans,Manured,Full Season 48 bu. 38 N/A 540 6 0.80 0.80 Unknown 15.0 Georgeville Fescue Pasture 4.9 Tons 8 N/A 540 7 1.61 1.601 Low 15.0 Appling Fescue Pasture 4.3 Tons 7 N/A 540 8 L 6.2 6.2 Medium 15.01 Appling Corn,Silage 24.5 Tons 83 N/A Preview Database Version 3.1 Date Printed 2/1/2019 PCs Page 5 of 7 NOTE: Symbol*means user entered data. Planned Crops Summary Total Useable Plat P2O5 Removal Applied Tract Field Acres Acres Rating LI Soil Series Crop Sequence RYE (lbshacre) (lbs/acre) Small Grain,Silage 11.3 Tons 61 N/A Soybeans,Manured,Full Season 54 bu. 43 N/A 540 9 5.30 5.30 Medium 15.0 Appling Com,Silage 24.5 Tons 83 N/A Small Grain,Silage 11.3 Tons 61 N/A Soybeans,Manured,Full Season 54 bu. 43 N/A 551 1 7.30 7.30 Unknown 15.0 Appling Corn,Silage 24.5 Tons 83 N/A Small Grain,Silage 11.3 Tons 61 N/A Soybeans,Manured,Full Season 54 bu. 43 N/A 551 2 6.60 6.601 Unknown 15.0 Appling Corn,Silage 24.5 Tons 83 N/A Small Grain,Silage 11.3 Tons 61 N/A Soybeans,Manured,Full Season 54 bu. 43 N/A 551 3 3.40 3.40 Unknown 15.0 Appling Com,Silage 24.5 Ton• 83 N/A Small Grain,Silage 11.3 Tons 61 N/A Soybeans,Manured,Full Season 54 bu. 43 N/A 551 4 4.00 4.00 Unknown 15.0 Georgeville Com,Silage 22.5 Tons 77 N/A Small Grain,Silage 10.8 Tons 58 N/A Soybeans,Manured,Full Season 49 bu. 39 N/A 551 6 9.50 9.50 Unknown 15.0 Georgeville Com,Silage 22.5 Tons 77 N/A Small Grain,Silage 10.8 Tons 58 N/A Soybeans,Manured,Full Season 49 bu. 39 N/A 551 7 2.60 2.60 Unknown 15.0 Herndon Com,Silage 22.5 Tonsl 77 N/A Small Grain,Silage 10.8 Tons 58 N/A Soybeans,Manured,Full Season 49 bu. 39 N/A 568 1 13.50 13.50 Unknown 15.0 Herndon Corn,Silage 22.5 Tons 77 N/A Small Grain,Silage 10.8 Tons 58 N/A Soybeans,Manured,Full Season 49 bu. 39 N/A 569 1 4.60 4.60 Unknown 15.0 Nanford Corn,Silage 20.9 Tons 71 N/A Small Grain,Silage 8.6 Tons 46 N/A Soybeans,Manured,Full Season 43 bu. 34 N/A 569 10 7.20 7.20 Unknown 15.0 Georgeville Corn,Silage 21.9 Tons 74 N/A Small Grain,Silage 10.4 Tons 56 N/A Soybeans,Manured,Full Season 48 bu. 38 N/A 569 11 51.90 51.90 Unknown 15.0 Georgeville Corn,Silage 21.9 Tons 74 N/A Small Grain,Silage 10.4 Tonsl 56 N/A Soybeans,Manured,Full Season 48 bu. 38 N/A 569 1 5 1 2.90 2.90 Unknown 15.0 Georgeville Corn,Silage 21.9 Tons! 74 N/A Preview Database Version 3.1 Date Printed 2/1/2019 PCs Page 6 of 7 NOTE: Symbol*means user entered data. Tanned Crops Summary Total Useable Plat Removal A Tract Field Acres Acres Rating LI Soil Series Crop Sequence RYE Removal Applied (lbs/acre) (lbs/acre) Small Grain,Silage 10.4 Tons 56 N/A Soybeans,Manured,Full Season 48 bu. 38 N/A 575 1 71.00 71.00 Unknown N/A Nanford Fescue Pasture 4.4 Tons 7 N/A 580 3 3.00 3.00 Unknown 15.0 Georgeville Fescue Pasture 4.9 Tons 8 N/A 580 4 10.00 10.00 Unknown 15.0 Georgeville Fescue Pasture 4.9 Tons 8 N/A 618 1 2.00 2.001 Unknown N/A Nanford Fescue Pasture 4.4 Tons 7 N/A 618 2 5.50 5.50 Unknown N/A Nanford Fescue Pasture 4.4 Tons 7 N/A 618 3 2.00 2.00 Unknown N/A Nanford Fescue Pasture 4.4 Tons 7 N/A 618 4 1.00 1.00 Unknown N/A Nanford Fescue Pasture 4.4 Tons 7 N/A 618 5 5.00 5.00 Unknown N/A Nanford Fescue Pasture 4.4 Tons 7 N/A 618 6 4.00 4.00 Unknown N/A Nanford Fescue Pasture 4.4 Tons 7 N/A 618 7 1.50 1.50 Unknown N/A Nanford Fescue Pasture 4.4 Tons 7 N/A 618 8 4.5 4.50 Unknown N/A Nanford Fescue Pasture 4.4 Tons 7 N/A PLAN TOTALS: 716.49 711.19 LI Potential Leaching Technical Guidance <2 Low potential to contribute to soluble None nutrient leaching below the root zone. >=2& Moderate potential to contribute to Nutrient Management(590)should be planned. <=10 soluble nutrient leaching below the root zone. High potential to contribute to soluble Nutrient Management(590)should be planned. Other conservation practices that improve nutrient leaching below the root zone. the soils available water holding capacity and improve nutrient use efficiency should be > 10 considered. Examples are Cover Crops(340)to scavenge nutrients,Sod-Based Rotations (328),Long-Term No-Till(778),and edge-of-field practices such as Filter Strips(393)and Riparian Forest Buffers(391). PLAT Index Rating P Management Recommendation 0-25 Low No adjustment needed;N based application 25 -50 Medium No adjustment needed;N based application 51 - 100 High Application limited to crop P removal > 100 Very High Starter P application only Preview Database Version 3.1 Date Printed 2/1/2019 PCs Page 7 of 7 NOTE: Symbol*means user entered data. The Waste Utilization table shown below summarizes the waste utilization plan for this operation. This plan provides an estimate of the number of acres of cropland needed to use the nutrients being produced. The plan requires consideration of the realistic yields of the crops to be grown,their nutrient requirements, and proper timing of applications to maximize nutrient uptake. This table provides an estimate of the amount of nitrogen required by the crop being grown and an estimate of the nitrogen amount being supplied by manure or other by-products,commercial fertilizer and residual from previous crops. An estimate of the quantity of solid and liquid waste that will be applied on each field in order to supply the indicated quantity of nitrogen from each source is also included. A balance of the total manure produced and the total manure applied is included in the table to ensure that the plan adequately provides for the utilization of the manure generated by the operation. Waste Utilization Table Year 1 nitrogen Comm Res. Manure Liquid Solid Liquid Solid Manur PA Fert. (Ibs/A) PA ManurcA Manure Manure Applied Nutrient Nutrient NutrienO pplied Applied Applied (Field) Req'd Applied pplied (acre) (acre) (Field) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (Ibs/A) Source Total Use. Applic. Applic. 1000 Tract Field ID Soil Series Acres Acres Crop RYE Period N N N Method N gal/A Tons 1000 gals tons 10309 1 S1 Hemdon 7.60 7.60 Corn,Silage 21.9 2/15-6/30 234 1 20 Broad. 72 0.00 16.74 0.00 127.25 10309 1 S22 Hemdon 7.60 7.60 Corn,Silage 21.9 2/15-6/30 234 1 20 Broad. 70 0.00 4.32 0.00 32.84 10309 1 S2 Hemdon 7.60 7.60 Corn,Silage 21.9 2/15-6/30 234 1 20 Broad. 71 7.17 0.00 54.51 0.00 10309 1 S1 Herndon 7.60 7.60 Small Grain,Silage 10.4 9/1-3/31 112 0 0 Broad. 31 0.00 7.12 0.00 54.08 10309 1 S22 Herndon 7.60 7.60 Small Grain,Silage 10.4 9/1-3/31 112 0 0 Broad. 14 0.00 0.87 0.00 6.57 10309 1 S2 Hemdon 7.60 7.60 Small Grain,Silage 10.4 9/1-3/31 112 0 0 Injec. 17 1.081 0.00 8.20 0.00 10309 2 S1 Hemdon 9.50 9.50 Corn,Silage 21.9 2/15-6/30 234 1 20 Broad. 72 0.00 16.74 0.00 159.07 10309 2 S22 Hemdon 9.50 9.50 Corn,Silage 21.9 2/15-6/30 234 1 20 Broad. 70 0.00 4.32 0.00 41.05 10309 2 S2 Herndon 9.50 9.50 Corn,Silage 21.9 2/15-6/30 234 1 20 Broad. 71 7.17 0.00 68.14 0.00 10309 2 S1 Hemdon 9.50 9.50 Small Grain,Silage 10.4 9/1-3/31 112 0 0 Broad. 31 0.00 7.12 0.00 157.60 10309 2 S22 Hemdon 9.50 9.50 Small Grain,Silage 10.4 9/1-3/31 112 0 0 Broad. 14 0.00 0.87 0.00 8.21 10309 2 S2 Herndon 9.50 9.50 Small Grain,Silage 10.4 9/1-3/31 112 0 0 Injec. 17 1.08 0.00 10.25 0.00 10309 3 S1 Herndon 7.90 7.90 Corn,Silage 22.5 2/15-6/30 241 2 20 Broad. 74 0.00 17.21 0.00 135.95 10309 3 S22 Herndon 7.90 7.90 Corn,Silage 22.5 2/15-6/30 241 2 20 Broad. 72 0.00 4.44 0.00 35.11 10309 3 S2 Herndon 7.90 7.90 Corn,Silage 22.5 2/15-6/30 241 2 20 Broad. 73 7.37 0.00 58.26 0.00 10309 1 3 Si Herndon 7.90 7.90 Small Grain,Silage ==10.8 9/1-3/31 117 1 0 Broad. 32 0.00 7.4q 0.00 58.42 Preview Database Version 3.1 Date Printed:2/1/2019 WUT Page 1 of 44 Waste Utilia:._ -on Table .ear 1 Nitrogen Comm Res. Manure Liquid Solid EAgLfld Solid Mama PA Fert. (lbs/A) PA Manure Manure Manure Applied Nutrient Nutrient Nutrien: pplied Applied Applied (Field) Req'd Applied pPued (acre) (acre) (Field) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) Source Total Use. Applic. Applic. lom Tract Field ID Soil Series Acres Acres Crop RYE Period N N N Method N gal/A Tons 1000 gals tons 10309 3 S22 Herndon 7.90 7.90 Small Grain,Silage 10.8 9/1-3/31 117 l 0 Broad. 15 0.00 0.89 0.00 7.07 10309 3 S2 Herndon 7.90 7.90 Small Grain,Silage 10.8 9/1-3/31 117 1 0 hijec. 17 1.11 0.00 8.78 0.00 10309 4 S1 Alamance 9.20 9.20 Corn,Silage 22.5 2/15-6/30 241 0 20 Broad. 74 0.00 17.21 0.00 158.32 10309 4 S22 Alamance 9.20 9.20 Corn,Silage 22.5 2/15-6/30 241 0 20 Broad. 72 0.00 4.44 0.00 40.89 10309 4 S2 Alarnance 9.20 9.20 Corn,Silage 22.5 2/15-6/30 241 0 20 Broad. 75 7.58 0.00 69.70 0.00 10309 4 S1 Alamance 9.20 9.20 Small Grain,Silage 9.8 Tons 9/1-3/31 1106 0 0 Broad. 29 0.00 6.70 0.00 61.62 10309 4 S22 Alarnance 9.20 9.20 Small Grain,Silage 9.8 Tons 9/1-3/31 106 0 0 Broad. 14 0.00 0.83 0.00 7.66 10309 4 S2 Alamance 9.20 9.20 Small Grain,Silage 9.8 Tons 9/1-3/31 106 0 0 Injec. 16 1.01 0.00 9.32 0.00 10385 2 S1 Georgeville 8.10 8.10 Fescue Pasture 5.0 Tons *1/1-12/31 162 0 0 Broad. 57 0.00 13.26 0.00 107.37 10385 2 S22 Georgeville 8.10 8.10 Fescue Pasture 5.0 Tons *1/1-12/31 162 0 0 Broad. 49 0.00 3.02 0.00 24.50 10385 2 S2 Georgeville 8.10 8.10 Fescue Pasture 5.0 Tons *1/1-12/31 162 0 0 Broad. 56 5.66 0.00 45.82 0.00 10385 3 Sl Georgeville 5.201 5.20 Fescue Pasture 4.8 Tons *1/1-12/31 156 0 0 Broad. 55 0.00 12.79 0.00 66.51 10385 3 S22 Georgeville 5.20 5.20 Fescue Pasture 4.8 Tons *1/1-12/31 156 0 0 Broad. 47 0.00 2.90 0.00 15.09 10385 3 S2 Georgeville 5.20 5.20 Fescue Pasture 4.8 Tons *1/1-12/31 156 0 0 Broad. 54 5.46 0.00 28.37 0.00 10386 6 S1 Tarrus 5.90 5.90 Com,Silage 21.6 2/15-6/30 231 0 1 20 Broad. 72 0.00 16.74 0.00 98.79 10386 6 S22 Tarrus 5.90 5.90 Com,Silage 21.6 2/1.5-6/30 231 0 20 Broad. 70 0.00 4.32 0.00 25.49 10386 6 S2 Tarrus 5.90 5.90 Com,Silage 21.6 2/15-6/30 231 0 20 Broad. 69 6.97 0.00 41.13 0.00 10386 6 S1 Tarrus 5.90 5.90 Small Grain,Silage 9.8 Tons 9/1-3/31 106 0 0 Broad. 29 0.00 6.70 0.00 39.52 10386 6 S22 Tarrus 5.90 5.90 Small Grain,Silage 9.8 Tons 9/1-3/31 106 0 0 Broad. 14 0.00 0.87 0.00 5.10 10386 6 S2 Tan us 5.90 5.901 Small Grain,Silage 9.8 Tons 9/1-3/31 106 0 0 Injec. 15 0.98 0.00 5.79 0.00 10386 7 S1 Tarrus 9.50 9.50 Corn,Silage 22.0 2/15-6/30 235 1 20 Broad. 73 0.00 16.98 0.00 161.28 --[10386 7 S22 Tarrus 9.50 9.50 Corn,Silage 22.0 2/15-6/30 235 1 20 Broad. 71 0.00 4.38 0.00 41.64 Preview Database Version 3.1 Date Printed:2/18/2019 WUT Page 2 of 44 Waste Utiliza,__a Table -ear 1 Nitrogen Comm Res. Manure Liquid Solid Liquid SolidMana PA Fert. (lbs/A) PA ManureA Manure Manure Applied Nutrient Nutrient NutrienO pplied Applied Applied (Field) Req'd Applied pplied (acre) (acre) (Field) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) Source Total Use. Applic. Applic. 1000 Tract Field ID Soil Series Acres Acres Crop RYE Period N N N Method N gal/A Tons 1000 gals tons 10309 3 S22 Herndon 7.90 7.90 Small Grain,Silage 10.8 9/1-3/31 117 1 0 Broad. 15 0.00 0.89 0.00 7.07 10309 3 S2 Hemdon 790 7.90 Small Grain,Silage 10.8 9/1-3/31 117 1 0 Injec. 17 1.11 0.00 8.78 0.00 10309 4 S1 Alamance 9.20 9.20 Corn,Silage 22.5 2/15-6/30 241 0 20 Broad. 74 0.00 17.21 0.001 158.32 10309 4 S22 Alamance 9-20 9.20 Corn,Silage 22.5 2/15-6/30 241 0 20 Broad. 72 0.00 4.44 0.00 40.89 10309 4 S2 Alamance 9.20 9.20 Corn,Silage 22.5 2/15-6/30 241 0 20 Broad. 75 7.58 0.00 69.70 0.00 10309 4 S1 Alamance 9 20 9.20 Small Grain,Silage 9.8 Tons 9/1-3/31 106 0 0 Broad. 29 0.00 6.70 0.00 61.62 10309 4 S22 Alamance 4 20 9.20 Small Grain,Silage 9.8 Tons 9/1-3/31 106 0 0 Broad. 14 0.00 0.83 0.00 7.66 10309 4 S2 Alamance 920 9.20 Small Grain,Silage 9.8 Tons 9/1-3/31 106 0 0 Injec. 16 1.01 0.00 9.32 0.00 10385 2 S1 Georgeville 8.10 8.10 Fescue Pasture 5.0 Tons*2/15-10/31 162 0 0 Broad. 57 0.00 13.26 0.00 107.37 10385 2 S22 Georgeville 8.10 8.10 Fescue Pasture 5.0 Tons*2/15-10/31 162 0 0 Broad. 49 0.00 3.02 0.00 24.50 10385 2 S2 Georgeville 8.10 8.10:Fescue Pasture 5.0 Tons*2/15-10/31 162 0 0 Broad. 56 5.66 0.00 45.82 0.00 10385 3 S1 Georgeville 5.20 5.20 Fescue Pasture 4.8 Tons*2/15-10/31 156 0 0 Broad. 55 0.00 12.79 0.00 66.51 10385 3 S22 Georgeville 5,20 5.20 Fescue Pasture 4.8 Tons*2/15-10/31 156 0 0 Broad. 47 0.00 2.90 0.00 15.09 10385 3 S2 Georgeville 5.20 5.23 Fescue Pasture 4.8 Tons*2/15-10/31 156 0 0 Broad. 54 5.46 0.00 28.37 0.00 10386 6 S1 Tarrus 5.90 5.90 Corn,Silage 21.6 2/15-6/30 231 0 20 Broad. 72 0.00 16.74 0.00 98.79 10386 6 S22 Tarrus 5.90 5.90 Corn,Silage 21.6 2/15-6/30 231 0 20 Broad. 70 0.00 4.32 0.00 25.49 10386 6 S2 Tarrus 5.90 5.90 Corn,Silage 21.6 2/15-6/30 231 0 20 Broad. 69 6.97 0.00 41.13 0.00 10386 6 S1 Tarrus �,90 5.90 Small Grain,Silage 9.8 Tons 9/1-3/31 106 0 0 Broad. 29 0.00 6.70 0.00 39.52 10386 6 S22 Tarrus 5.90 5.90 Small Grain,Silage 9.8 Tons 911-3/31 106 0 0 Broad. 14 0.00 0.87 0.00 5.10 10386 6 S2 Tarrus 5.90 5.90 Small Grain,Silage 9.8 Tons 9/1-3/31 106 0 0 Injec. 15 0.98 0.00 5.79 0.00 10386 7 S1 Tarrus 9.50 9.50 Corn,Silage 22.0 2/15-6/30 235 1 20 Broad. 73 0.00 16.98 0.00 161.28 10386 7 S22 Tarrus 11.50 9.50 Corn,Silage 22.0 2/15-6/30 235 1 20 Broad. 71 0.00 4.38 0.00 41.64 Preview Database Version 3.1 Date Printed:2/1/2019 WUT Page 2 of 44 Waste Utilizah-i Table ..;ar 1 \irogen Comm Res. Manure Liquid Solid Liquid SolidManur PA Fert. (lbs/Ai PA Manure. Manure Manure Applied Nutrient Nutrient Nutrient pphed Applied Applied (Field) Req'd Applied pplied (acre) (acre) (Field) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) Source Total Use. Applic. Applic, 1000 Tract Field ID Soil Series Acres Acres Crop RYE Period N N N Method N gal/A Tons 1000 gals tons 10386 7 S2 Tarrus 9.50 9.50 Corn,Silage 22.0 2/15-6/30 235 1 20 Broad. 70 7.07 0.00 67.18 0.00 10386 7 S1 Tarrus 9.50 9.50 Small Grain,Silage 10.0 9/1-3/31 108 0 0 Broad. 29 0.00 6.84 0.00 64.95 10386 7 S22 Tarrus 9.50 9.5 01 Small Grain,Silage 10.0 9/1-3/31 108 0 0 Broad. 15 0.00 0.891 0.00 8.51 10386 7 S2 Tarrus 9.50 9.50 Small Grain,Silage 10.0 9/1-3/31 108 0 0 Injec. 15 1.01 0.00 9.63 0.00 10386 8 S1 Tarrus 13.10 13.10 Corn,Silage 22.0 2/15-6/30 235 1 20 Broad. 73 0.00 16.98 0.00 222.39 10386 8 S22 Tarrus 13.10 13.10 Corn,Silage 22.0 2/15-6/30 235 1 20 Broad. 71 0.00 4.38 0.00 57.41 10386 8 S2 Tarrus 13.10 13.10 Corn,Silage 22.0 2/15-6/30 235 1 20 Broad. 70 7.07 0.00 92.63 0.00 10386 8 S1 Tarrus 13.10 13.10 Small Grain,Silage 10.0 9/1-3/31 108 0 0 Broad. 29 0.00 6.84 0.00 89.57 10386 8 S22 Tarrus 13.10 13.10 Small Grain,Silage 10.0 9/1-3/31 108 0 0 Broad. 15 0.00 0.89 0.00 11.73 10386 8 S2 Tarrus 13.10 13.10 Small Grain,Silage 10.0 9/1-3/31 108 0 0 Injec. 15 0.98 0.00 12.84 0.00 10497 7 S1 Appling 1.80 1.80 Corn,Silage 24.5 2/15-6/30 267 139 20 Broad. 37 0.00 8.60 0.00 15.49 10497 7 S22 jAppling 1.80 1.80 Corn,Silage 24.5 2/15-6/30 267 139 20 Broad. 36 0.00 2.22 0.00 4.00 10497 7 S2 Appling 1.80 1.80 Corn,Silage 24.5 2/15-6/30 267 139 20 Broad. 35 3.54 0.00 6.36 0.00 10497 7 S1 Appling 1.80 1.80 Small Grain,Silage 11.3 9/1-3/31 125 48 0 Broad. 21 0.00 4.88 0.00 8.79 10497 7 S22 Appling 1.80 1.80 Small Grain,Silage 11.3 9/1-3/31 125 48 0 Broad. 10 0.00 0.62 0.00 1.11 10497 7 S2 Appling 1.80 1.80 Small Grain,Silage 11.3 9/1-3/31 125 48 0 Injec. 11 0.72 0.00 1.29 0.00 10497 8 S1 Appling 3.30 3.30 Com,Silage 24.5 2/15-6/30 267 139 20 Broad. 37 0.00 8.60 0.00 28.39 10497 8 S22 Appling 3.30 3.30 Corn,Silage 24.5 2/15-6/30 267 139 20 Broad. 36 0.00 2.22 0.00 7.33 10497 8 S2 Appling 3.30 3.30 Corn,Silage 24.5 2/15-6130 267 139 20 Broad. 35 3.54 0.00 11.67 0.00 10497 8 S1 Appling 3.30 3.30 Small Grain,Silage 11.3 9/1-3/31 125 48 0 Broad. 21 0.00 4.88 0.00 16.12 10497 8 S22 Appling 3.30 3.30 Small Grain,Silage 11.3 9/1-3/31 125 48 0 Broad. 10 0.00 0.62 0.00 7210410497 8 S2 Appling 3.30 3.30Small Grain,Silage 11.3 9/1-3/31 125 48 0 Injec. 11 0.72 0.002.37 Preview Database Version 3.1 Date Printed:2/1/2019 WUT Page 3 of 44 Waste Utiliza`, ..Table -ar 1 Nitrogen Comm Res. Manure Liquid Solid Liquid SolidMamx PA Fert. (lbs/A) PA Manure: Manure Manure Applied Nutrient Nutrient NutrienO pplied Applied Applied (Field) Req'd Applied pplied (acre) (acre) (Field) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) Source Total Use. Applic. Applic. 1000 Tract Field ID Soil Series Acres Acres Crop RYE Period N N N Method N gal/A Tons 1000 gals tons 10497 9 S1 Appling 5.10 5.11.E Corn,Silage 24.5 2/15-6/30 267 139 20 Broad. 37 0.00 8.60 0.00 43.88 10497 9 S22 Appling 5.10 5.10 Corn,Silage 24.5 2/15-6/30 267 139 20 Broad. 36 0.00 2.22 0.00 11.33 10497 9 S2 Appling 5.10 5.10 Corn,Silage 24.5 2/15-6/30 267 139 20 Broad. 35 3.54 0.00 18.03 0.00 10497 9 S1 Appling 5.10 5.10 Small Grain,Silage 11.3 9/1-3/31 125 48 0 Broad. 21 0.00 4.88 0.00 24.91 10497 9 S22 Appling 5.10 5.10 Small Grain,Silage 11.3 9/1-3/31 125 48 0 Broad. 10 0.00 0.62 0.00 3.15 10497 9 S2 Appling 5.10 5.1rf Small Grain,Silage 11.3 9/1-3/31 125 48 0 Injec. 11 0.72 0.00 3.67 0.00 10499 5 S1 Appling 9.10 7.00 Corn,Silage 23.8 2115-6/30 *267 8 20 Broad. 82 0.00 19.07 0.00 133.48 10499 5 S22 Appling 9.10 7.00 Corn,Silage 23.8 2/15-6/30 *267 8 20 Broad. 80 0.00 4.94 0.00 34.57 10499 5 S2 Appling 9.10 7.00 Corn,Silage 23.8 2/15-6/30 *267 8 20 Broad. 77 7.88 0.00 55.16 0.00 10499 5 S1 Appling 9.10 7.01,Small Grain,Silage 10.9 9/1-3/31 121 0 0 Broad. 32 0.00 7.54 0.00 52.74 10499 5 S22 Appling 1 9.10 7.00 Small Grain,Silage 10.9 9/1-3/31 121 0 0 Broad. 16 0.00 0.95 0.00 6.70 10499 5 S2 Appling 9.10 7.00 Small Grain,Silage 10.9 9/1-3/31 121 0 0 Injec. 18 1.18 0.00 8.24 0.00 10499 6 S1 Appling 2.70 2.711 Corn,Silage 23.8 2/15-6/30 *267 8 20 Broad. 82 0.00 19.07 0.00 51.49 10499 6 S22 Appling 2.70 2.70 Corn,Silage 23.8 2/15-6/30 *267 8 20 Broad. 80 0.00 4.94 0.00 13.33 10499 6 S2 Appling 2.70 2.70 Corn,Silage 23.8 2/15-6/30 *267 8 20 Broad. 77 7.78 0.00 21.00 0.00 10499 6 S1 Appling 2.70 2.70 Small Grain,Silage 10.9 9/1-3/31 121 0 0 Broad. 32 0.00 7.54 0.00 20.35 10499 6 S22 Appling 2.70 2.70 Small Grain,Silage 10.9 9/1-3/31 121 0 0 Broad. 16 0.00 0.95 0.00 2.59 10499 6 S2 Appling 2.70 2.70 Small Grain,Silage 10.9 9/1-3/31 121 0 0 Injec. 18 1.18 0.00 3.181 0.00 10499 8 S1 Appling 3.70 3.70 Corn,Silage 23.8 2/15-6/30 259 0 20 Broad. 82 0.00 19.07 0.00 70.56 10499 8 S22 Appling 3.70 3.70 Corn,Silage 23.8 2/15-6/30 259 0 20 Broad. 80 0.00 4.94 0.00 18.27 10499 8 S2 Appling 3.70 3.70 Corn,Silage 23.8 2/15-6/30 259 0 20 Broad. 77 7.78 0.00 28.78 0.00 10499 8 S1 Appling 3.70 3.70 Small Grain,Silage 10.9 9/1-3/31 121 0 0 Broad. 321 0.001 7.54 0.00 27.88 Preview Database Version 3.1 Date Printed:2/1/2019 WUT Page 4 of 44 Waste Utilizat: f able x,ar 1 Nnngen Comm Res. Manure Liquid Solid Liquid SolidM:anry PA Fert. (lbs/A) PA Manureel Manure Manure Applied Nutrient Nutrient NutrieW pplied Applied Applied (Field) Req'd Applied pplied (acre) (acre) (Field) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) Source Total Use. Applic. Applic. 1000 Tract Field 1D Soil Series Acres Acres Crop RYE Period N N N Method N gal/A Tons 1000 gals tons 10499 8 S22 Appling 3.70 3.70 Small Grain,Silage 10.9 9/1-3/31 121 0 0 Broad. 16 0.00 0.95 0.00 3.54 10499 8 S2 Appling 3.70 3.70 Small Grain,Silage 10.9 9/1-3/31 121 0 0 Injec. 18 1.18 0.00 4.35 0.00 10514 5 SI Hemdon 11.00 11.00FescuePasture 4.9 Tons *1/1-12/31 159 1 0 Broad. 52 0.00 12.09 0.00 133.02 10514 5 S22 Herndon 11.00 11.00 Fescue Pasture 4.9 Tons *1/1-12/31 159 1 0 Broad. 52 0.00 3.21 0.00 35.31 10514 j 5 S22 Herndon 11.00 11.00 Fescue Pasture 4.9 Tons *1/1-12/31 159 1 0 Broad. 54 0.00 3.33 0.00 36.67 10514 6 S1 Georgeville 7.50 7.50 Corn,Silage 22.5 2/15-6/30 241 1 20 Broad. 76 0.00 17.67 0.00 132.56 10514 6 S22 Georgeville 7.50 7.50 Corn,Silage 22.5 2/15-6/30 241 1 20 Broad. 74 0.00 4.57 0.00 34.26 10514 6 S2 Georgeville 7.50 7.50 Corn,Silage 22.5 2/15-6/30 241 I 20 Broad. 70 7.07 0.00 53.04 0.00 10514 6 S1 Georgeville 7.50 7.50 Small Grain,Silage 10.8 9/1-3/31 117 0 0 Broad. 31 0.00 7.25 0.00 54.42 10514 6 S22 Georgeville 7.50 7.50 Small Grain,Silage 10.8 9/1-3/31 117 0 0 Broad. 15 0.00 0.93 0.00 6.95 10514 6 S2 Georgeville 7.50 7.50 Small Grain,Silage 10.8 9/1-3/31 117 0 0 Injec. 18 1.14 0.00 8.58 0.00 10514 8 S1 Georgeville 14.00 14.00 Corn,Silage 21.9 2/15-6/30 234 0 20 Broad. 72 0.00 16.74 0.00 234.41 10514 8 S22 Georgeville 14.00 14.00 Corn,Silage 21.9 2/15-6/30 234 0 20 Broad. 71 0.00 4.38 0.00 61.36 10514 8 S2 Georgeville 14.00 14.00 Corn,Silage 21.9 2/15-6/30 234 0 20 Broad. 71 7.17 0.00 100.41 0.00 10514 8 St Georgeville 14.00 14.00 Small Grain,Silage 10.4 9/1-3/31 112 0 0 Broad. 31 0.00 7.12 0.00 99.62 10514 8 S22 Georgeville 14.00 14.00 Srnall Grain,Silage 10.4 9/1-3/31 112 0 0 Broad. 14 0.00 0.87 0.00 12.10 10514 8 S2 Georgeville 14.00 14.00 Small Grain,Silage 10.4 9/1-3/31 112 0 0 Injec. 17 1.08 0.00 15.10 0.00 10514 9 Sl Herndon 7.00 7.00 Fescue Pasture 4.9 Tons *1/1-12/31 159 1 0 Broad. 52 0.00 12.09 0.00 84.65 10514 9 S22 Herndon 7.00 7.00 Fescue Pasture 4.9 Tons *1/1-12/31 159 1 0 Broad. 52 0.00 3.21 0.00 22.47 10514 9 S22 Herndon 7.00 7.00 Fescue Pasture 4.9 Tons *1/1-12/31 159 1 0 Broad. 54 0.00 3.33 0.00 23.33 10569 1 S1 Georgeville 3.00 3.00 Corn,Silage 22.5 2/15-6/30 241 1 20 Broad. 74 0.00 17.21 0.00 51.63 10569 1 S22 Georgeville 3.00 3.00 Corn,Silage 22.5 2/15-6/30 241 1 20 Broad. 73 0.00 4.51 0.00 13.52 Preview Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 2/18/2019 WUT Page 5 of 44 Waste Utilb., on Table :ear 1 Nitrogen Comm Res. Manure Liquid Solid Liquid Solid Manur PA Fert. (lbs/A) PA Manureil Manure Manure Applied Nutrient Nutrient Nutrien pplied Applied Applied (Field) Req'd Applied pplied (acre) (acre) (Field) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) Source Total Use. Applic. Applic. 1000 Tract Field ID Soil Series Acres Acres Crop RYE Period N N N Method N gal/A Tons 1000 gals tons 10569 I S2 Georgeville 3.00 3.00 Corn,Silage 22.5 2/15-6/30 241 1 20 Broad. 73 7.37 0.00 22.12 0.00 10569 1 S1 Georgeville 3.00 3.00 Small Grain,Silage 10.8 9/1-3/31 117 1 0 Broad. 32 0.00 7.40 0.00 22.19 10569 1 S22 Georgeville 3.00 3.00 Small Grain,Silage 10.8 9/1-3/31 117 1 0 Broad. 15 0.00 0.89 0.00 2.68 10569 1 S2 IGeorgeville 3.00 3.00 Small Grain,Silage 10.8 9/1-3/31 117 1 0 Injec. 17 1.11 0.00 3.33 0.00 1074 1 S1 Georgeville 30.00 30.00 Fescue Pasture 4.8 Tons *1/1-12/31 156 0 0 Broad. 55 0.00 12.79 0.00 383.71 1074 1 S22 Georgeville 30.00 30.00 Fescue Pasture 4.8 Tons *1/1-12/31 156 0 0 Broad. 47 0.00 2.90 0.00 87.04 1074 1 S2 Georgeville 30.00 30.00 Fescue Pasture 4.8 Tons *1/1-12/31 156 0 0 Broad. 54 5.46 0.00 163.65 0.00 1074 2 S1 Georgeville 2.00 2.00 Fescue Pasture 4.8 Tons *1/1-12/31 156 0 0 Broad. 55 0.00 1179 O.fu} 25.58 1074 2 S22 Georgeville 2.00 2.00 Fescue Pasture 4.8 Tons *1/1-12/31 156 0 0 Broad. 47 0.00 2.90 0001 5.80 1074 2 S2 Georgeville 2.00 2.00 Fescue Pasture 4.8 Tons *1/1-12/31 156 0 0 Broad. 54 5.46 0.00 10.91 0.0 1074 3 S1 Appling 9.00 9.00 Fescue Pasture 5.4 Tons *1/1-12/31 180 0 0 Broad. 63 0.00 14.65 0.00 131.86 1074 3 S22 Appling 9.00 9.00 Fescue Pasture 5.4 Tons *1/1-12/31 180 0 0 Broad. 55 0.00 3.40 [1.00 30.56 1074 3 S2 Appling 9.00 9.00 Fescue Pasture 5.4 Tons *1/1-12/311 180 0 0 Broad. 62 6.26 0.00 56.37 0.00 1074 5 S1 Appling 15.00 15.00 Com,Silage 24.5 2/15-6/30 267 0 20 Broad. 85 0.00 19.77 0.00 296.51 1074 5 S22 Appling 15.00 15.00 Corn,Silage 24.5 2/15-6/30 267 0 20 Broad. 83 0.00 5.12 0.001 76.85 1074 5 S2 Appling 15.00 15.00 Com,Silage 24.5 2/15-6/30 267 0 20 Broad. 79 7.98 0.00 119.71 0.00 1074 5 S1 Appling 15.00 15.00 Small Grain,Silage 11.3 9/1-3/31 125 0 0 Broad. 34 0.00 7.81 0.00 117.21 1074 5 S22 Appling 15.00 15.00 Small Grain,Silage 11.3 9/1-3/31 125 0 0 Broad. 16 0.00 0.99 0.00 14.81 1074 5 S2 Appling 15.00 15.00 Small Grain,Silage 11.3 9/1-3/31 125 0 0 Injec. 19 1.21 0.00 18.14 0.00 1074 6 St Appling 6.00 6.00 Corn,Silage 23.8 2/15-6/30 259 1 20 Broad. 82 0.00 19.07 0.00 114.42 1074 6 S22 Appling 6.00 6.00 Corn,Silage 23.8 2/15-6/30 259 1 20 Broad. 80 0.001 4.94 0.00 29.63 ]074 6 S2 Appling 6.00 6.00 Com,Silage 23.8 2/15-6/30 259 1 20 Broad. 76 7.68 0.00 46.06 0.00 Preview Database Version 3.1 Date Printed:2/18/2019 WUT Page 6 of 44 Waste Utiliz. i Table ear 1 Nitrogen Comm Res. Manure Liquid Solid Liquid Solid Manur PA Fert. (lbs/A PA Manure. Manure Manure Applied Nutrient Nutrient NutrienO pplied Applied Applied (Field) Req'd Applied pplied (acre) (acre) (Field) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) Source Total Use. Applic. Applic. 1000 Tract Field ID Soil Series Acres Acres Crop RYE Period N N N Method N gal/A Tons 1000 gals tons 1074 6 S1 Appling 6.00 6.00 Small Grain,Silage 10.9 9/1-3/31 t21 0 0 Broad. 32 0.00 7.54 0.00 45.21 1074 6 S22 Appling 6.00 6.00 Small Grain,Silage 10.9 9/1-3/31 121 0 0 Broad. 16 0.00 0.95 0.00 5.74 1074 6 S2 Appling 6.00 6.00 Small Grain,Silage 10.9 9/1-3/31 121 0 0 Injec. 1 18 1.18 0.00 7.06 0.00 2383 3 S1 Appling 3.50 3.00 Corn,Silage 23.8 2/15-6/30 *267 144 20 Broad. 35 0.00 8.14 0.00 24.42 2383 3 S22 Appling 3.50 3.00 Corn,Silage 23.8 2/15-6/30 *267 144 20 Broad. 34 0.00 2.10 0.00 6.30 2383 3 S2 Appling 3.50 3.00 Corn,Silage 23.8 2/15-6/30 *267 144 20 Broad. 34 3.44 0.00 10.30 0.00 2383 3 S1 Appling 3.50 3.00 Small Grain,Silage 10.9 9/1-3/31 121 47 0 Broad. 20 0.00 4.75 0.00 14.23 2383 3 S22 Appling 3.50 3.00 Small Grain,Silage 10.9 9/1-3/31 121 47 0 Broad. 10 0.00 0.58 0.00 1.76 2383 j 3 S2 jAppling 3.50 3.00 Small Grain,Silage 10.9 9/1-3131 121 47 0 Injec. 11 0.69 0.00 2.061 0.00 2383 3A S1 Durham 3.00 3.00 Fescue Pasture 4.3 Tons *1/1-12/31 143 0 0 Broad. 50 0.00 11.63 0.00 34.88 2383 3A S22 Durham 3.00 3.00 Fescue Pasture 4.3 Tons *1/1-12/31 143 0 0 Broad. 43 0.00 2.65 0.00 7.96 2383 3A S2 Durham 3.00 3.00 Fescue Pasture 4.3 Tons *1/1-12/31 143 0 0 Broad. 50 5.05 0.00 15.15 0.00 2383 5 S1 Durham 4.80 4.00 Fescue Pasture 4.3 Tons *1/1-12/31 143 0 0 Broad. 50 0.00 11.63 0.00 46.51 2383 5 S22 Durham 4.80 4.00 Fescue Pasture 4.3 Tons *1/1-12/31 143 0 0 Broad. 43 0.00 2.65 0.00 10.62 2383 5 S2 Durham 4.80 4.00 Fescue Pasture 4.3 Tons *1/1-12/31 143 0 0 Broad. 50 5.05 0.00 20.20 0.00 2384 6 S1 Georgeville 6.50 6.50 Corn,Silage 22.5 2/15-6/30 241 1 20 Broad. 74 0.00 17.21 0.00 111.86 2384 6 S22 I Georgeville 6.50 6.50 Corn,Silage 22.5 2/15-6/30 241 1 20 Broad. 73 0.00 4.51 0.001 29.29 2384 6 S2 Georgeville 6.50 6.50 Corn,Silage 22.5 2/15-6/30 241 1 20 Broad. 73 7.37 0.00 47.93 0.00 2384 6 S1 lGeorgeville 6.50 6.50 Small Grain,Silage 10.8 9/1-3/31 117 1 0 Broad. 32 0.00 7.40 0.00 48.07 2384 6 S22 Georgeville 6.50 6.50 Small Grain,Silage 10.8 9/1-3/31 117 1 0 Broad. 15 0.00 0.89 0.00 5.82 2384 6 S2 Georgeville 6.50 6.50 Small Grain,Silage 10.8 9/1-3/31 117 1 0 Injec. 17 1.111 !].lfi! 7.22 0.00 2392 1 S1 Tatum 19.20 19.00 Corn,Silage 20.9 2/IS-6/30 224 0 20 Broad. 66 0.00 15.35 0.00 291.62 Preview Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 2/18/2019 WUT Page 7 of 44 Waste Utili&t..,n Table -ear 1 Nitogcn Comm Res. Manure Liquid Solid Liquid Solid Manur PA Fert. (lbs/A PA Manure, Manure Manure Applied Nutrient Nutrient NutrienO pplied Applied Applied (Field) Req'd Applied pplied (acre) (acre) (Field) (lbs/A) (ibs/A) (lbs/A) Source Total Use. Applic. Applic. 1000 Tract Field ID Soil Series Acres Acres Crop RYE Period N N N Method N gal/A Tons 1000 gals tons 2392 1 S22 Tatum 19.20 1900,. Corn,Silage 20.9 2/15-6/30 224 0 20 Broad. 55 0.00 3.40 0.00 64.51 2392 1 S2 Tatum 19.20 19.00 Corn,Silage 20.9 2/15-6/30 224 0 20 Broad. 83 8.39 0.00 159.31 0.00 2392 1 S1 Tatum 19.20 19.0o Small Grain,Silage 9.5 Tons 9/1-3/31 103 0 0 Broad. 24 0.00 5.58 0.00 106.04 2392 1 S22 Tatum 19.20 19.00 Small Grain,Silage 9.5 Tons 9/1-3/31 103 0 0 Broad. 15 0.00 0.93 0.00 17.59 2392 1 S2 Tatum 19.20 19.00 Small Grain,Silage 9.5 Tons 9/1-3/31 103 0 0 Injec. 17 1.08 0.00 20.49 0.00 2392 2 S1 Tatum 3.10 3.001 Corn,Silage 20.9 2/15-6/30 224 0 20 Broad. 66 0.00 15.35 0.00 46.05 2392 2 S22 Tatum 3.10 3.00 Corn,Silage 20.9 2/15-6/30 224 0 20 Broad. 55 0.00 3.40 0.00 10.19 2392 1 2 S2 ITatum 3.10 3.00 Corn,Silage 20.9 2/15-6/30 224 0 20 Broad. 83 8.39 0.00 25.15 0.00 2392 2 S1 Tatum 3.10 3.00 Small Grain,Silage 9.5 Tons 9/1-3/31 103 0 0 Broad. 24 0.00 5.58 0.00 16.75 2392 2 S22 Tatum 3.10 3.00 Small Grain,Silage 9.5 Tons 9/1-3/31 103 0 0 Broad. 15 0.00 0.93 0.00 2.78 2392 2 S2 Tatum 3.10 3.00 Small Grain,Silage 9.5 Tons 9/1-3/31 103 0 0 Injec. 17 1.08 0.00 3.24 0.00 2392 3 S1 Herndon 6.30 6.00 Corn,Silage 21.9 2/15-6/30 234 1 20 Broad. 72 0.00 16.74 0.00 100.4 2392 3 S22 Herndon 6.30 6.00 Corn,Silage 21.9 2/15-6/30 234 1 20 Broad. 70 0.00 4.32 0.00 25.93 2392 3 S2 Herndon 6.301 6.00 Corn,Silage 21.9 2/15-6/30 234 1 20 Broad. 71 7.17 0.00 43.03 0.0 2392 3 S1 Herndon 6.30 6.00 Small Grain,Silage 10.4 9/1-3/31 112 0 0 Broad. 31 0.00 7.12 0.00 42.7 2392 3 S22 Herndon 6.30 6.00 Small Grain,Silage 10.4 9/1-3/31 112 0 0 Broad. 14 0.00 0.87 0.00 5.18 2392 3 S2 Herndon 6.30 6.00 Small Grain,Silage 10.4 9/1-3/31 112 0 0 Injec. 17 1.08 0.00 6.47 0.00 2392 4 S1 Tatum 1.60 1.60 Corn,Silage 20.9 2/15-6/30 224 0 20 Broad. 66 0.00 15.35 0.00 24.56 2392 4 S22 Tatum 1.60 1.60 Corn,Silage 20.9 2/15-6/30 224 0 20 Broad. 55 0.00 3.40 0.00 5.43 2392 4 S2 Tatum 1.60 1.60 Corn,Silage 20.9 2/15-6/30 224 0 20 Broad. 83 8.39 0.06 13.42 0.00 2392 4 S1 Tatum 1.60 1.60 Small Grain,Silage 9.5 Tons 9/1-3/31 103 0 0 Broad. 24 0.00 5.58 0.00 8.93 2392 r 4 S22 Tatum 1.60 1.60 Small Grain,Silage 9.5 Tons 9/1-3/31 103 0 1 0 1 Broad. 15 0.00 0.93 0.001 1.48 Preview Database Version 3.1 Date Printed:2/1/2019 WUT Page 8 of 44 Waste Utiliza;, Table dr 1 Nitrogen Comm Res. Manure Liquid Solid Liquid Solid Manur PA Fert. (lbs/A) PA ManureA Manure Manure Applied Nutrient Nutrient NutrienY pplied Applied Applied (Field) Req'd Applied pplied (acre) (acre) (Field) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) Source Total Use. Applic. Applic. 1000 Tract Field ID Soil Series Acres Acres Crop RYE Penod N N N Method N gal/A Tons 1000 gals tons 2392 4 S2 Tatum 1.60 1.60 Small Grain,Silage 9.5 Tons 9/1-3/31 103 0 0 Injec. 17 1.08 0.00 1.73 0.00 2392 1 5 S1 Georgeville 2.30 2.00 Com,Silage 21.9 2/15-6/30 234 0 20 Broad. 72 0.00 16.74 0.00 33.49 2392 5 S22 Georgeville 2.30 2.00 Com,Silage 21.9 2/15-6/30 234 0 20 Broad. 71 0.00 4.38 0.00 8.77 2392 5 S2 Georgeville 2.30 2.00 Com,Silage 21.9 2/15-6/30 234 0 20 Broad. 71 7.17 0.00 14.35 0.00 2392 5 St Georgeville 2.30 2.00 Small Grain,Silage 10.4 9/1-3/31 112 0 0 Broad. 31 0.00 7.12 0.00 14.23 2392 5 S22 Georgeville 2.30 2.00 Small Grain,Silage 10.4 9/1-3/31 112 0 0 Broad. 14 0.00 0.87 0.00 1.73 2392 5 S2 Georgeville 2.30 2.00 Small Grain,Silage 10.4 9/1-3/31 112 0 1 0 Injec. 17 1.08 0.00 2.16 0.00 2392 6 S1 Georgeville 6.40 6.00 Com,Silage 22.5 2/15-6/30 241 1 20 Broad. 74 0.00 17.21 0.00 103.25 2392 6 S22 Georgeville 6.40 6.00 Corn,Silage 22.5 2/15-6/30 241 1 20 Broad. 73 0.00 4.51 0.00 27.04 2392 6 1 S2 Georgeville 6.40 6.00 Corn,Silage 22.5 2/15-6/30 241 1 20 Broad. 73 7.37 0.00 44.25 0.00 2392 6 Sl Georgeville 6.40 6.00 Small Grain,Silage 10.8 9/1-3/31 117 1 0 Broad. 32 0.00 7.40 0.00 44.37 2392 6 S22 Georgeville 6.40 6.00 Small Grain,Silage 10.8 9/1-3/31 117 1 0 Broad. 15 0.00 0.89 0.00 5.37 2392 6 S2 Georgeville 6.40 6.00 Small Grain,Silage 10.8 9/1-3/31 117 1 0 Injec. 17 1.11 0.00 6.67 0.00 2392 7 S1 Georgeville 5.70 5.70 Cam,Silage 21.9 2/15-6/30 234 112 20 Broad. 40 0.00 9.30 0.00 53.02 2392 7 S22 Georgeville 5.70 5.70 Corn,Silage 21.9 2/15-6/30 234 112 20 Broad. 30 0.00 1.85 0.00 10.56 2392 7 S2 Georgeville 5.70 5.70 Corn,Silage 21.9 2/15-6/30 234 112 20 Broad. 32 3.23 0.00 18.43 0.00 2392 7 S1 Georgeville 5.70 5.70 Small Grain,Silage 10.4 9/1-3/31 112 35 0 Broad. 18 0.00 4.19 0.00 23.86 2392 7 S22 Georgeville 5.70 5.70 Small Grain,Silage 10.4 9/1-3/31 1 l2 35 0 Broad. 10 0.00 0.62 0.00 3.52 2392 7 S2 Georgeville 5.70 5.70 Small Grain,Silage 10.4 9/l-3/31 112 35 0 Injec. 14 0.88 0.00 5.03 0.00 2415 1 S1 Appling 19.30 19.00 Corn,Silage 23.8 2/15-6/30 *267 145 20 Broad. 40 0.00 9.30 0.00 176.74 2415 1 S22 Appling 19.30 19.00 Com,Silage 23.8 2/15-6/30 *267 145 20 Broad. 30 0.00 1.85 0.00 35.19 2415 I 1 S2 Appling 19.30 19.00 Corn,Silage 23.8 2/15-6/30 *267 145 20 Broad. 32 3.23 0.01 61.42 0.00 Preview Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 2/18/2019 WUT Page 9 of 44 Waste Utiliza, Table ;ar 1 Nitrogen Comm Res. Manure Liquid Solid Liquid Solid Manur PA Fert. (lbs/Ai PA Manure Manure Manure Applied Nutrient Nutrient NatrienL pplied Applied Applied (Field) Req'd Applied pplied (acre) (acre) (Field) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) Source Total Use. Applic. Applic. 1000 Tract Field ID Soil Series Acres Acres Crop RYE Period N N N Method N gal/A Tons 1000 gals tons 2415 I SI Appling 19.30 19.00 Small Grain,Silage 10.9 9/1-3/31 *125 98 0 Broad. 0 0.00 4.19 0.00 79.54 2415 1 S22 Appling 19.30 1 100 Small Grain,Silage 10.9 9/1-3/31 *125 98 0 Broad. 0 0.00 0.62 0.00 t 1.73 2415 1 S2 Appling 19.30 19.00 Small Grain,Silage 10.9 9/1-3/31 *125 98 0 Injec. t4 0.88 0.00 16.77 0.00 2415 3 SI Herndon 10.00 10.00 Corn,Silage 21.2 2/15-6/30 227 0 20 Broad. 70 0.00 16.28 0.00 162.79 2415 3 S22 Hemdon t0.00 10.00 Corn,Silage 21.2 2/15-6/30 227 0 20 Broad. 68 0.00 4.20 0.00 41.98 2415 3 S2 Herndon 10.00 10.00 Corn,Silage 21.2 2/15-6/30 227 0 20 Broad. 69 6.97 t1.00 69.70 0.00 2415 3 S1 Herndon 10.00 10.00 Small Grain,Silage 10.1 9/1-3/31 109 0 0 Broad. 30 0.00 6.98 0.00 69.77 2415 3 S22 Herndon 10.00 10.00 Small Grain,Silage 10.1 9/1-3/31 109 0 0 Broad. 14 0.00 0.83 0.00 8.34 2415 3 S2 Herndon 10.00 10.00 Small Grain,Silage 10.1 9/1-3/31 109 0 0 Injec. 16 1.05 0.00 10.461 0.00 2415 3a S1 Herndon 4.00 4.00 Fescue Pasture 4.9 Tons *1/1-12/31 159 0 0 1 Broad. 56 0.00 13.02 0.00 52.0 2415 3a S22 Herndon 4.00 4.00 Fescue Pasture 4.9 Tons *1/1-12/31 159 0 0 Broad. 48 0.00 2.96 0.00 11.85 2415 3a S2 Hemdon 4.00 4.00]Fescue Pasture 4.9 Tons *1/1-12/31 159 0 0 Broad. 55 5.56 0.110 22.22 0.0 2415 5 N/A Herndon 6,30 6.00 Fescue Pasture 4.6 Tons *1,1-12/3 t t 50 150 0 N fA 0 0.00 0.00 Ono 0.00 2415 6 SI Callison 6.00 6.00]Fescue Pasture 4.3 Tons *1/1-12/3t t40 0 0 Broad. 50 0.00 11.63 +Lail 69.77 2415 6 S22 Callison 6.00 6.00]Fescue Pasture 4.3 Tons *1/1-12/31 140 0 0 Broad. 40 0.00 2.47 0.00 14.81 2415 6 S2 Callison 6.00 6.00 Fescue Pasture 4.3 Tons *1/1-12/31 140 0 0 Broad. 50 5.05 0.00 30.31 0.00 2415 6A St Callison 6.00 6.00 Fescue Pasture 4.3 Tons *1/1-12/31 140 0 0 Broad. 49 0.00 11.40 0.00 68.37 2415 6A S22 Callison 6.00 6.00 Fescue Pasture 4.3 Tons *1/1-12/31 140 0 0 Broad. 42 0.00 2.59 0.00 15.56 2415 6A S2 Callison 6.00 6.00 Fescue Pasture 4.3 Tons *1/1-12/31 140 0 0 Broad. 49 4.95 0.00 29.70 0.00 2415 7 Sl Appling 24.70 24.70 Corn,Silage 24.5 2/15-6/30 267 141 20 Broad. 42 0.00 9.77 0.00 241.25 2415 7 S22 Appling 24.701 24.70 Com,Silage 24.5 2/15-6/30 267 141 20 Broad. 31 0.00 1.91 0.00 47.27 2415 7 S2 I Appling 24.70 24.70 Corn,Silage 24.5 2/15-6/30 267 141 20 Broad. 33 3.33 0.00 82.34 0.00 Preview Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 2/18/2019 WUT Page 10 of 44 Waste Uti&at.-.t Table -car 1 Nitrogen Comm. Res. Manure Liquid Solid Liquid Solid Manu< PA Fert. (Ibs/A PA ManwE :, Manure Manure Applied Nutrient Nutrient NutrientA pplied Applied Applied (Field) Req'd Applied pplied (acre) (acre) (Field) (lbs/A) Obs/A) Obs/A) Source Total Use. Applic. Applic. 1000 Tract Field ID Soil Series Acres Acres Crop RYE Period N N N Method N gal/A Tons 1000 gals tons 2415 7 S1 Appling 24.70 24.70 Small Grain,Silage 11.3 9/1-3/31 125 46 0 Broad. 19 0.00 4.33 0.00 106.84 2415 7 S22 Appling 24.70 24.70 Small Grain,Silage 11.3 9/1-3/31 125 46 0 Broad. 11 0.00 0.65 0.00 16.01 2415 7 S2 Appling 24.70 24.70 Small Grain,Silage 11.3 9/1-3/31 125 46 0 Injec. 14 0.92 0111) 22.601 0.00 30369 1 SI Georgeville 6.00 6.00 Corn,Silage 22.5 2/15-6/30 241 1 20 Broad. 76 0.00 17.67 0.00 106.04 30369 1 S22 Georgeville 6.00 6.00 Com,Silage 22.5 2/15-6/30 241 1 20 Broad. 74 0.00 4.57 0.00 27.41 30369 1 S2 Georgeville 6.00 6.00 Corn,Silage 22.5 2/15-6/30 241 1 20 Broad. 70 7.07 0.00 42.43 0.00 30369 1 S1 Georgeville 6.00 6.00 Small Grain,Silage 10.8 9/1-3/31 117 0 0 Broad. 31 0.00 7.25 0.00 43.54 30369 1 S22 Georgeville 6.00 6.00 Small Grain,Silage 10.8 9/1-3/31 117 0 0 Broad. 15 0.00 0.93 0.00 5.55 30369 1 S2 Georgeville 6.00 A 00 Small Grain,Silage 10.8 9/1-3/31 117 0 0 Injec. 18 1.14 0.00 6.86 0.00 30369 2 S1 Georgeville 5.00 5.00 Corn,Silage 22.5 2/15-6/30 241 1 20 Broad. 76 0.00 17.67 0.00 88.37 30369 2 S22 Georgeville 5.00 5.00 Corn,Silage 22.5 2/15-6/30 241 1 20 Broad. 74 0.00 4.57 0.00 22.84 30369 2 S2 Georgeville 5.00 5.00 Corn,Silage 22.5 2/15-6/30 241 1 20 Broad. 70 7.07 0.00 35.36 0.00 30369 2 S1 Georgeville 5.00 5.00 Small Grain,Silage 10.8 9/1-3/31 117 0 0 Broad. 31 0.00 7.25 0.00 36.28 30369 2 S22 Georgeville 5.00 5.00 Small Grain,Silage 10.8 9/1-3/31 117 0 0 Broad. 15 0.00 0.93 0.00 4.63 30369 2 S2 Georgeville 5.00 5.00 Small Grain,Silage 10.8 9/1-3/31 117 0 0 Injec. 18 1.14 0.00 5.72 0.00 30369 3 S1 Georgeville 7.00 7.00 Corn,Silage 22.5 2/15-6/30 241 1 20 Broad. 76 0.00 17.67 0.00 123.72 30369 3 S22 Georgeville 7.00 7.00 Corn,Silage 22.5 2/15-6/30 241 1 20 Broad. 74 0.00 4.57 0.00 31.98 30369 3 S2 Georgeville 7.00 7.00 Corn,Silage 22.5 12/15-6/30 241 1 20 Broad. 70 7.07 0.00 49.50 0.00 30369 3 S1 Georgeville 7.00 7.00 Small Grain,Silage 10.8 9/1-3/31 117 0 0 Broad. 31 0.00 7.25 0.00 50.79 30369 3 S22 Georgeville 7.00 7.00 Small Grain,Silage 10.8 9/1-3/31 117 0 0 Broad. 15 0.00 0.93 0.00 6.48 30369 3 S2 Georgeville 7.0 0 7.00 Small Grain,Silage 10.8 9/1-3/31 117 0 0 Inject 18 1.14 1)N] 8.01 0.00 F0370 1 S1 Georgeville 1.00 1.01)Corn,Silage 22.5 2/15-6/30 241 1 20 Broad. 76 0.00 17.67 0.00F 17.67 Preview Database Version 3.1 Date Printed:2/1/2019 WUT Page 11 of 44 bb 3o Zi 00ud.l OAl 610Z/I/Z:Pa;ulld QW(l I £uolslan asLClEii?Q d-,JiA3Jd bZ'E 00'0 £60 00'0 SI PUOjs 0 0 LII I£/E-1/6 8'01 Aum`ulujJ news OS'£ OS'£ 011!na8aoaD ZZS S OLEOE 6£'SZ 00'0 SZ'L 00'0 IE 'PuojE[ 0 0 LII I£/E-1/6 8'0I a3ul!S`ulujJ halos OS'E OS'E 311!n33100f) IS S OLEOE 00'0 SL'bZ 00'0 LO'L OL 'PuOJ9 OZ i !bZ OE/9-51/Z S'ZZ aftms`-03 OS'£ OS'E all!n38aoa[) ZS S OLEO£ 66'9I 00'0 LS'b 00'0 bL 'PuOjg OZ i ibZ OE/9-SI/Z S'ZZ 03ul!S`-Oj OS'E OS'E alpna3joaD ZZS S OLEOE 98'I9 00'0 L9'LI 00'0 9L 'PuOjH OZ I ibZ OE/9-51/Z S'ZZ aftm`U303 OS'E OS'E all!n381oa9 IS S OLEOE 00'0 85'b 00'0 171'1 81 'aaful 0 0 Lii !E/E-1/6 8'01 a3un`ulujo pu-S 00'b 00'17 all!nA1030 ZS £ OLEO£ OL'£ 00'0 E6'0 00'0 Si PEOJEI 0 0 LII I£/E-1/6 8'01 a3ul!s`ulujo 11—S 00'b 00'b 011!na8aoaD ZZS E OLEO£ ZO'6Z 00'0 SZ'L 00'0 I£ 'PuOjg 0 0 Lii IE/E-1/6 8'01 aBuP.S`ulujJ IIumS 00'17 00'b 311!na8aoaD is E OLEOS 00'0 6Z'8Z 00"0 LO'L OL 'PuOjg OZ I IbZ OE/9-9I/Z S'ZZ a L'I!S`-03 00'17 00'17 all!n331009 ZS E OLEOS LZ'81 00'0 LS'b 00'0 bL 720ja OZ I IbZ OE/9-SI/Z S'ZZ 3321!S`UJOD 00'b 0017 all!n331030 ZZS E OLEOE OCOL 00'0 L9'LI 00'0 9L W1041 OZ i ibZ 0£/9-5I/Z S'ZZ 03u1!S`-03 00'b 00'b 0lpea3joaD IS E OLEO£ 00'0 ZL'! 00'0 b!'i 81 'oafuI 0 0 Lii IE/£-I/6 8'01 a3ul!S`lllujo11EUISOS'i OS'I 011!n33aoaD ZS Z OLEO£ 6£'I 00'0 E6'0 00'0 Si PuojEl 0 0 LII IE/£-I/6 TO a3uP.S`uluj'J11uU1SOS'1 OS'I alI!na3ao00 ZZS Z OLEOS 88'01 00'0 SZ'L 00'0 I£ 'PuojE[ 0 0 Lli I£/£-I/6 8'01 03uP.S`ulujfJllmSOS,1 OS'I all!n331030 IS Z OLEO£ 00'0 I9'0I 00'0 LO'L OL 'Puois OZ I ibZ OE/9-91/Z S'ZZ a vl!S`WOD OS,! OS'I aII!n33joaD ZS Z OLEOE 98'9 00'0 LS'b 00'0 bL 'PuOjH OZ I ItiZ OE/9-SI/Z S'ZZ a381!S`-OD OS'i OS'! all!n931000 ZZS Z OLEOE I5'9Z 00'0 L9'LI 00'0 9L 'PuOJB OZ I IbZ 0£/9-S!/Z S'ZZ 33e1!S`WOD OS'i 09'1 0p!na3joaD IS Z OLEO£ 00'0 bi'I 00'0 bI'l 81 'oafuI 0 0 LII IE/£-I/6 8'01 03u1►S`U'8191[u-S 00'1 00'I all!n031009 ZS I OL£OE E6'0 00'0 E6'0 00'0 Si 'PuojE[ 0 0 LIi iE/E-1/6 8'01 03u1!S`ulujLJ lluwS 00'1 00'1 all!n03100D ZZS I OLEOE SZ'L 00'0 SZ'L 00'0 iE 'Puoje 0 0 LII I£/E-I/6 8'01 03un`Um"D[Iu-S 00'1 001 011!na3joao IS I OLEOS 00'0 LO'L 00'0 LO'L OL 'Pu041 OZ I 117Z OE/9-SI/Z S'ZZ a3ullS`-OD 00'1 00'1 011!n33100D ZS I OLEOS LS'b 00'0 LS'ti 00'0 bL 'PuOJH OZ I IbZ OE/9-SI/Z S'ZZ 32Rl!s`-OD 00'1 00'I a[I!n93jo0D ZZS i OLEOE suol slu3 0001 suns V/P'3 P011laW NI K NI Pouad RANI doiD sajaV sajoV sauaS[!OS QI Mold loujy 0001 ogddv ogddV "a 11401 aomoS (V/sgl) (V/sgl) (V/sgo (Plo!.) (wou) (alau) pogdd pogddV p,bag (Pla!,D pagddV pogddV pagdd ivapinN luapinN luaulnH PagddV ajnuew amuew alnueYl Vd (V/sqo ua3 t+d VOW I p!nbrl P!IoS P!nblZ wnuuW sad iuuaD ug%-41N t JUDA alggs,uoi;l,zl[pn al"'M Waste Utiliza. Table -ar 1 Mingen Comm Res. Manure Liquid Solid Liquid Solid Manur PA Fert. (lbs/Al PA Manure Manure Manure Applied Nutrient Nutrient NutrienLLI pplied Applied Applied (Field) Req'd Applied pplied (acre) (acre) (Field) (Ibs/A) (Ibs/A) (ibs/A) Source Total Use. Applic. Applic. 1000 Tract Field m Soil Series Acres Acres Crop RYE Period N N N Method N I gal/A Tons 1000 gals tons 30370 5 S2 Georgeville 3.50 3.50 Small Grain,Silage 10.8 9/1-3/31 117 0 0 Injec. 18 1.14 0.00 4.00 0.00 30370 6 Sl Georgeville 2.70 2.70 Com,Silage 22.5 2/15-6/30 241 1 20 Broad. 76 0.00 17.67 0.00 47.72 30370 6 S22 Georgeville 2.70 2.70 Com,Silage 22.5 2/15-6/30 241 1 20 Broad. 7 0.00 4.57 0.00 12.33 30370 6 S2 Georgeville 2.70 2.70 Com,Silage 22.5 2/15-6/30 241 1 20 Broad. 70 7.07 0.0 19.09 0.00 30370 6 Sl Georgeville 2.70 2.70 Small Grain,Silage 10.8 9/1-3/31 117 0 0 Broad. 31 0.00 7.25 0.00 19.59 30370 6 S22 Georgeville 2.70 2.70 Small Grain,Silage 10.8 9/1-3/31 117 0 0 1 Broad. 15 0.00 0.93 0.00 2.50 30370 6 S2 Georgeville 2.70 2.70 Small Grain,Silage 10.8 9/1-3/31 117 0 0 Injec. 18 1.14 0.00 3.09 0.00 53 1 S1 Appling 25.00 25.00 Corn,Silage 24.5 2/15-6/30 267 138 20 Broad. 37 0.00 8.60 0.00 215.11 53 1 S22 Appling 25.00 25.00 Corn,Silage 24.5 2/15-6/30 267 138 20 Broad. 36 0.00 2.22 0.00 55.56 11 53 1 S2 Appling 25.00 25.00 Corn,Silage 24.5 2/15-6/30 267 138 20 Broad. 36 3.64 0.00 90.92 0.00 53 1 S1 Appling 25.00 25.00 Small Grain,Silage 11.3 9/1-3/31 125 48 0 Broad. 21 0.00 4.88 0.00 122.09 53 1 S22 Appling 25.00 25.00 Small Grain,Silage 11.3 9/1-3/31 125 48 0 Broad. 10 0.00 0.62 0.00 15.43 53 1 S2 Appling 25.00 25.00 Small Grain,Silage 11.3 9/1-3/31 125 48 0 Injec. 11 0.72 0.00 17.98 0.00 53 2 SI Appling 2.00 2.00 Com,Silage 25.0 2/15-6/30 272 141 20 Broad. 38 0.00 8.84 0.00 17.67 53 2 S22 Appling 2.00 2.00 Com,Silage 25.0 2/15-6/30 272 141 20 Broad. 37 0.00 2.28 0.00 4.57 53 2 S2 Appling 2.00 2.00 Corn,Silage 25.0 2/15-6/30 272 141 20 Broad. 36 3.74 0.00 7.48 0.00 53 2 S1 Appling 2.00 2.00 Small Grain,Silage 11.5 9/1-3/31 128 51 0 Broad. 21 0.00 4.88 0.00 9.77 53 2 S22 Appling 2.00 2.00 Small Grain,Silage 11.5 9/1-3/31 128 51 0 Broad. 10 0.00 0.62 0.00 1.24 53 2 S2 Appling 2.00 2.00 Small Grain,Silage 11.5 9/1-3/31 128 51 0 Injec. 11 0.72 0.00 1.44 0.00 53 3 S1 Appling 1.50 1.50 Corn,Silage 25.0 2/15-6/30 272 141 20 Broad. 38 0.00 8.84 0.00 13.26 53 3 S22 Appling 1.50 1.50 Corn,Silage 25.0 2/15-6/30 272 141 20 Broad. 37 0.00 2.28 0.00 3.43 53 3 S2 I Appling 1.50 1.50 Corn,Silage 25.0 2/15-6/30 272 141 20 Broad. 36 3.64 0.00 5.46 0.00 Preview Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 2/18/2019 WUT Page 13 of 44 Waste Utilization Table Year 1 Nitrogen Comm Res. Manure Liquid Solid Liquid Solid Manur PA Fert. (lbs/Ai PA Manure Manure Manure Applied Nutrient Nutrient Nutrient. pplied Applied Applied (Field) Req'd Applied pplied (acre) (acre) (Field) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) Source Total Use. Applic. Applic. 1000 Tract Field ID Soil Series Acres Acres Crop RYE Period N N N Method N gal/A Tons 1000 gals tons 53 3 S1 Appling 1.50 1.50 Small Grain,Silage 11.5 9/1-3/31 128 51 0 Broad. 21 0.00 4.88 0.00 7.33 53 3 S22 Appling 1.50 1.50 Small Gain,Silage 11.5 9/1-3/31 128 51 0 Broad. 10 0.00 0.62 0.00 0.93 53 3 S2 Appling 1.50 1.50 Small Grain,Silage 11.5 9/1-3/31 128 51 0 Injec. 11 0.72 0.00 1.08 0.00 53 4 S1 Appling 2.40 2.40 Com,Silage 25.0 2/15-6/30 272 141 20 Broad. 38 0.00 8.84 0.00 21.21 53 4 S22 Appling 2.40 2.40 Com,Silage 25.0 2/15-6/30 272 141 20 Broad. 37 0.00 2.28 0.00 5.48 53 4 S2 Appling 2.40 2.40 Com,Silage 25.0 2/15-6/30 272 141 20 Broad. 36 3.64 0.00 8.73 0.00 53 4 S1 Appling 2.40 2.40 Small Grain,Silage 11.5 9/1-3/31 128 51 0 Broad. 21 0.00 4.88 0.00 11.72 53 4 S22 Appling 2.40 2.40 Small Grain,Silage I l.5 9/1-3/31 128 51 0 Broad. 10 0.00 0.62 0.00 1.48 53 4 S2 Appling 2.40 2.40 Small Grain,Silage 11.5 9/1-3/31 128 51 0 Injec. 11 0.72 0.00 1.73 0.00 53 6 S1 Appling 3.00 3.00 Com,Silage 25.0 2/15-6/30 272 141 20 Broad. 38 0.00 8.84 0.00 26.51 53 6 S22 Appling 3.00 3.00 Com,Silage 25.0 2/15-6/30 272 141 20 Broad. 37 0.00 2.28 0.00 6.85 53 6 S2 Appling 3.00 3.00 Corn,Silage 25.0 2/15-6/30 272 141 20 Broad. 36 3.64 0.00 10.91 0.00 53 6 S1 Appling 3.00 3.00 Small Grain,Silage 11.5 9/1-3/31 128 51 0 Broad. 21 0.00 4.88 0.00 14.65 53 6 S22 Appling 3.00 3.00 Small Grain,Silage 11.5 9/1-3/31 128 51 0 Broad. 10 0.00 0.62 0.00 1.85 53 6 S2 Appling 3.00 3.00 Small Grain,Silage 11.5 9/1-3/31 128 51 0 Injec. 11 0.72 0.00 2.16 0.00 53 7 St Appling 0.50 0.50 Com,Silage 25.0 2/15-6/30 272 141 20 Broad. 38 0.00 8.84 0.00 4.42 53 7 S22 Appling 0.50 0.50 Corn,Silage 25.0 2/15-6/30 272 141 20 Broad. 37 0.00 2.28 0.00 1.14 53 7 S2 Appling 0.50 0.50 Com,Silage 25.0 2/15-6/30 272 141 20 Broad. 36 3.64 0.00 1.82 0.00 53 7 Sl Appling 0.50 0.50 Small Grain,Silage 11.5 9/1-3/31 128 51 0 Broad. 21 0.00 4.88 0.00 2.44 53 7 S22 Appling 0.50 0.50 Small Grain,Silage 11.5 9/1-3/31 128 51 0 Broad. 10 0.00 0.62 0.00 0.31 53 7 S2 Appling 0.50 0.50 Small Grain,Silage 11.5 9/1-3/31 128 51 0 Injec. 11 0.72 0.00 0.36 0.00 53 9 S1 Appling 0.50 0.50 Corn,Silage 25.0 2/15-6/30 272 141 20 Broad. 38 0.00 8.84 0.00 4.42 Pr '-:w Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 2/18'" '9 WUT Pag- `4 of 44 Waste Utilization Table Year 1 Nitrogen Comm. Res. Manure Liquid Solid Liquid Solid Manur PA Fert. (lbs/Ai PA Manur<. Manure Manure Applied Nutrient Nutrient Nutrieno pplied Applied Applied (Field) Req'd Applied pplied (acre) (acre) (Field) (lbs/A) (Ibs/A) (lbs/A) Source Total Use. Applic. Applic. 10o0 Tract Field ID Soil Series Acres I Acres Crop RYE Period N N N Method N gal/A Tons 1000 gals tons 53 9 S22 Appling 0.50 0.50 Corn,Silage 25.0 2/15-6/30 272 141 20 Broad. 37 0.00 2.28 0.00 1.14 53 9 S2 Appling 0.50 0.50 Corn,Silage 25.0 2/15-6/30 272 141 20 Broad. 36 3.64 0.00 1.82 0.00 53 9 S1 Appling 0.50 0.50 Small Grain,Silage 11.5 9/1-3/31 128 51 0 Broad. 21 0.00 4.88 0.00 2.44 53 9 S22 Appling 0.50 0.50 Small Grain,Silage 11.5 9/1-3/31 128 51 0 Broad. 10 0.001 0.62 0.00 0.31 53 9 S2 Appling 0.50 0.50 Small Grain,Silage 11.5 9/1-3/31 128 51 0 Injec. 11 0.72 0.001 0.36 0.00 534 1 S1 Appling 6.10 6.10 Corn,Silage 24.5 2/15-6/30 267 138 20 Broad. 37 0.00 8.60 0.00 52.49 534 1 S22 Appling 6.10 6.10 Com,Silage 24.5 2/15-6/30 267 138 20 Broad. 36 0.00 2.22 0.00 13.56 534 1 S2 Appling 6.10 6.10 Com,Silage 24.5 2/15-6/30 267 138 20 Broad. 36 3.64 0.00 22.18 0.00 534 1 S1 Appling 6.10 6.10 Small Grain,Silage 11.3 9/1-3/31 125 48 0 Broad. 21 0.00 4.88 0.00 29.79 534 1 S22 Appling 6.10 6.10 Small Grain,Silage 11.3 9/1-3/31 125 48 0 Broad. 10 0.00 0.62 0.00 3.77 534 1 S2 Appling 6.10 6.10 Small Grain,Silage 11.3 9/1-3/31 125 48 0 Injec. 11 0.72 0.00 4.39 0.00 534 2 S1 Appling 9.10 9.10 Corn,Silage 24.5 2/15-6/30 267 138 20 Broad. 37 0.00 8.60 0.00 78.30 534 2 S22 Appling 9.10 9.10 Corn,Silage 24.5 2/15-6/30 267 138 20 Broad. 36 0.00 2.22 0.00 20.22 534 2 S2 Appling 9.10 9.10 Corn,Silage 24.5 2/15-6/30 267 138 20 Broad. 36 3.64 0.00 33.09 0.00 534 2 S1 Appling 9.10 9.10 Small Grain,Silage 11.3 9/1-3/31 125 48 0 Broad. 21 0.00 4.88 0.00 44.44 534 2 S22 k2pling 9.10 9.10 Small Grain,Silage 11.3 9/1-3/31 125 48 0 Broad. 10 0.00 0.62 0.00 5.61 534 2 S2 Appling 9.10 9.10 Small Grain,Silage 11.3 9/1-3/31 125 48 0 Injec. 11 0.00 8.60 0.00 2.70 534 3 S1 Appling 3.80 3.80 Corn,Silage 24.5 2/15-6/30 267 138 20 Broad. 37 0.00 8.60 0.00 32.70 534 3 S22 Appling 3.80 3.80 Com,Silage 24.5 2/15-6/30 267 138 20 Broad. 36 0.00 2.22 0.00 8.44 534 3 S2 Appling 3.80 3.80 Corn,Silage 24.5 2/15-6/30 267 138 20 Broad. 36 3.64 0.00 13.82 0.00 534 3 S1 Appling 3.80 3.80 Small Grain,Silage 11.3 9/1-3/31 125 48 0 Broad. 21 0.00 4.88 0.00 18.56 534 3 S22 Appling 3.80 3.80 Small Grain,Silage 11.3 9/1-3/31 125 48 0 Broad. 10 0.00 0.62 0.00 2.35 Previ-, Database Version 3.1 Date Printed:2/1/2019 WUT Page 15 of 44 Waste Utilization Table Year 1 Nitrogen Comm Res. Manure Liquid Solid Liquid Solid Mane PA Fen. (lbs/A PA Manure.1 Manure Manure Applied Nutrient Nutrient Nutrientil pplied Applied Applied (Field) Req'd Applied pplied (acre) (acre) (Field) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) Source Total Use. Applic. Applic. 1000 Tract Field ID Soil Series Acres Acres Crop RYE Period N N N Method N gal/A Tons 1000 gals tons 534 3 S2 Appling 3.80 3.80 Small Grain,Silage 11.3 9/1-3/31 125 48 0 Injec. 1 l 0.72 0.00 2.73 0.00 540 1 S1 Georgeville 7.40 7.40 Com,Silage 21.9 2/15-6/30 234 0 20 Broad. 72 0.00 16.74 0.00 123.91 540 1 S22 Georgeville 7.40 7.40 Com,Silage 21.9 2/15-6/30 234 0 20 Broad. 71 0.001 4.38 0.00 32.43 540 1 S2 Georgeville 7.40 7.40 Corn,Silage 21.9 2/15-6/30 234 0 20 Broad. 71 7.17 0.00 53.08 0.00 540 1 S 1 Georgeville 7.40 7.40 Small Grain,Silage 10.4 9/1-3/31 112 0 0 Broad. 31 0.00 7.12 0.00 52.66 540 1 S22 Georgeville 7.40 7.40 Small Grain,Silage 10.4 9/1-3/31 112 0 0 Broad. 14 0.00 0.87 0.00 6.39 540 1 S2 Georgeville 7.40 7.40 Small Grain,Silage 10.4 9/1-3/31 112 0 0 hijec. 17 1.08 0.00 7.98 0.00 540 2 S1 Georgeville 15.59 15.59 Corn,Silage 21.9 2/15-6/30 234 0 20 Broad. 72 0.00 16.74 0.00 261.03 540 2 S22 Georgeville 15.59 15.59 Com,Silage 21.9 2/15-6/30 234 0 20 Broad. 71 0.00 4.38 0.00 68.32 540 2 S2 Georgeville 15.59 15.59 Corn,Silage 21.9 2/15-6/30 234 0 20 Broad. 71 7.17 0.00 111.82 0.00 540 2 S1 Georgeville 15.59 15.59 Small Grain,Silage 10.4 9/1-3/31 112 0 0 Broad. 31 0.00 7.12 0.00 110.94 540 2 S22 Georgeville 15.59 15.59 Small Grain,Silage 10.4 9/1-3/31 112 0 0 Broad. 14 0.00 0.87 0.00 13.47 540 2 S2 Georgeville 15.59 15.59 Small Grain,Silage 10.4 9/1-3/31 112 0 0 Injec, 17 1.08 0.00 16.81 0.00 540 3 S1 Georgeville 15.60 15.60 Fescue Pasture 4.8 Tons *I/1-12/31 156 36 0 Broad. 40 0.00 9.30 0.00 145.11 540 3 S22 Georgeville 15.60 15.60 Fescue Pasture 4.8 Tons *1/1-12/31 156 36 0 Broad. 40 0.00 2.47 0.00 38.52 540 3 S2 Georgeville 15.60 15.60 Fescue Pasture 4.8 Tons *I/1-12/31 156 36 0 Broad. 40 4.04 0.00 63.04 0.00 540 4 S1 Georgeville 2.70 2.70 Com,Silage 21.9 2/15-6/30 234 0 1 20 Broad. 72 0.00 16.74 0.00 45.21 540 4 S22 Georgeville 2.70 2.70 Corn,Silage 21.9 2/15-6/30 234 0 20 Broad. 71 0.00 4.38 0.00 11.83 540 4 S2 Georgeville 2.70 2.70 Com,Silage 21.9 2/15-6/30 234 0 20 Broad. 71 7.17 0.00 19.37 0.00 540 4 S1 Georgeville 2.70 2.70 Small Grain,Silage 10.4 9/1-3/31 112 0 0 Broad. 31 0.00 7.12 0.00 19.21 540 4 S22 Georgeville 2.70 2.70 Small Grain,Silage 10.4 9/1-3/31 112 0 0 Broad. 14 0.00 0.87 0.00 2.34 540 4 S2 Georgeville 2.70 2.70 Small Grain,Silage 10.4 9/I-3/31 112 0 0 Injec. 17 1.08 0.00 2.91 0.00 Pre= ' -v Database Version 3.1 Date Printed:2/18/7" 11 WUT Page of 44 Waste Utilization Table Year 1 Nitrogen Comm Res. Manure Liquid Solid Liquid Solid Mana PA Fert. (lbs/A i PA ManurO Manure Manure Applied Nutrient Nutrient Nutriem pplied Applied Applied (Field) Req'd Applied pplied (acre) (acre) (Field) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) Source Total Use. Applic. Applic. 1000 Tract Field ID Soil Series Acres Acres Crop RYE Period N N N Method N gal/A Tons 1000 gals tons 540 5 S1 Georgeville 8.80 8.80 Corn,Silage 21.9 2/15-6/30 234 1 0 20 Broad. 72 0.00 16.74 0.00 147.35 540 5 S22 Georgeville 8.80 8.80 Corn,Silage 21.9 2/15-6/30 234 0 20 Broad. 71 0.00 4.38 0.00 38.57 540 5 S2 Georgeville 8.80 8.80 Corn,Silage 21.9 2/15-6/30 234 0 20 Broad. 71 7.17 0.00 63.12 0.00 540 5 S1 Georgeville 8.80 8.80 Small Grain,Silage 10.4 9/1-3/31 112 0 0 Broad. 31 0.001 7.12 0.00 62.62 540 5 S22 Georgeville 8.80 8.80 Small Grain,Silage 10.4 9/1-3/31 112 0 0 Broad. 14 0.00 0.87 0.00 7.61 540 5 S2 Georgeville 8.80 8.80 Small Grain,Silage 10.4 9/1-3/31 112 0 0 Injec. 17 1.08 0.00 9.49 0.00 540 6 S1 Georgeville 0.80 0.80 Fescue Pasture 4.9 Tons 2/15-10/31 159 0 0 Broad. 56 0.00 13.02 0.00 10.42 540 6 S22 Georgeville 0.80 0.80 Fescue Pasture 4.9 Tons*2/15-10/31 159 0 0 Broad. 48 0.00 2.96 0.00 2.37 540 6 S2 Georgeville 0.801 0.80 Fescue Pasture 4.9 Tons*2/15-10/31 159 0 0 Broad. 55 5.66 0.00 4.53 0.00 540 7 S1 Appling 1.60 1.60 Fescue Pasture 4.3 Tons*2/15-10/31 143 0 0 Broad. 50 0.00 11.63 0.00 18.60 540 7 S22 Appling 1.60 1.60 Fescue Pasture 4.3 Tons*2/15-10/31 143 0 0 Broad. 43 0.00 2.65 0.00 4.25 540 7 S2 Appling 1.60 1.60 Fescue Pasture 4.3 Tons*2/15-10/31 143 0 0 Broad. 50 5.05 0.00 8.08 0.00 540 8 S1 Appling 6.20 6.20 Corn,Silage 24.5 2/15-6/30 267 138 20 Broad. 37 0.00 8.60 0.00 53.35 540 8 S22 Appling 6.20 6.20 Corn,Silage 24.5 2/15-6/30 267 138 20 Broad. 36 0.00 2.22 0.00 13.78 540 8 S2 IAppling 6.20 6.20 Corn,Silage 24.5 2/15-6/30 267 138 20 Broad. 36 3.64 0.00 22.55 0.00 540 8 S1 Appling 6.20 6.20 Small Grain,Silage 11.3 9/1-3/31 125 48 0 Broad. 21 0.00 4.88 0.00 30.28 540 8 S22 Appling 6.20 6.20 Small Grain,Silage 11.3 9/1-3/31 125 48 0 Broad. 10 0.00 0.62 0.00 3.83 540 8 S2 Appling 6.20 6.20 Small Grain,Silage 11.3 9/1-3/31 125 48 0 Injec. 11 0.72 0.00 4.46 0.00 540 9 S1 Appling 5.30 5.30 Corn,Silage 24.5 2/15-6/30 267 138 20 Broad. 37 0.00 8.60 0.00 45.60 540 9 S22 Appling 5.30 5.30 Corn,Silage 24.5 2/15-6/30 267 138 20 Broad. 36 0.00 2.22 0.00 11.78 540 9 S2 Appling 5.30 5.30 Corn,Silage 24.5 2/15-6/30 267 138 20 Broad. 36 3.64 0.00 19.27 0.00 540 9 S1 Appling 5.301 5.30 Small Grain,Silage 11.3 9/1-3/31 125 48 0 Broad. 21 0.00 4.88 0.00 25.88 Previe- Database Version 3.1 Date Printed:2/1/2019 WUT Page 17 of 44 Waste Utilization Table Year 1 Nitrogen Comm Res. Manure Liquid I Solid Liquid SolidMann[ PA Fert. Obs/Ai PA Manure. Manure Manure Applied Nutrient Nutrient NutrientA pplied Applied Applied (Field) Req'd Applied pplied (acre) (acre) (Field) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) Source Total Use. Applic. Applic. 1000 l racl Field ID Soil Series Acres Acres Crop RYE Period N N N Method N gal/A Tons 1000 gals tons 540 9 S22 Appling 5.30 5.30 Small Grain,Silage 11.3 9/1-3/31 125 48 0 Broad. 10 0.00 0.62 0.00 3.27 540 9 S2 Appling 5.30 5.30 Small Grain,Silage 11.3 9/1-3/31 125 48 0 Injec. 11 0.72 0.00 3.81 0.00 551 1 S1 Appling 7.30 7.30 Corn,Silage 24.5 2/15-6/30 267 138 20 Broad. 37 0.00 8.60 0.00 62.81 551 1 S22 Appling 7.30 7.30 Com,Silage 24.5 2/15-6/30 267 138 20 Broad. 36 0.00 2.22 0.00 16.22 551 1 S2 Appling 7.30 7.30 Com,Silage 24.5 2/15-6/30 267 138 20 Broad. 36 3.64 0.00 26.55 0.00 551 1 S1 Appling 7.30 7.30 Small Grain,Silage 11.3 9/1-3/31 125 48 0 Broad. 21 0.00 4.88 0.00 35.65 551 1 S22 Appling 7.30 7.30 Small Grain,Silage 11.3 9/1-3/31 125 48 0 Broad. 10 0.00 0.62 0.00 4.51 551 1 S2 Appling 7.30 7.30 Small Grain,Silage 11.3 9/1-3/31 125 48 0 Injec. 11 0.72 0.00 5.25 0.00 551 2 S1 Appling 6.60 6.60 Corn,Silage 24.5 2/15-6/30 267 138 20 Broad. 37 0.00 8.60 0.00 56.79 551 2 S22 Appling 6.60 6.60 Com,Silage 24.5 2/15-6/30 267 138 20 Broad. 36 0.00 2.22 0.00 14.67 551 2 S2 Appling 6.60 6.60 Com,Silage 24.5 2/15-6/30 267 138 20 Broad. 36 3.64 0.00 24.00 0.00 551 2 S1 Appling 6.60 6.60 Small Grain,Silage 11.3 9/1-3/31 125 48 0 Broad. 21 0.00 4.88 0.00 32.23 551 2 S22 Appling 6.60 6.60 Small Grain,Silage 11.3 9/1-3/31 125 48 0 Broad. 10 0.00 0.62 0.00 4.07 551 2 S2 Appling 6.60 6.60 Small Grain,Silage 11.3 9/1-3/31 125 48 0 Injec. 11 0.72 0.00 4.75 0.00 551 3 S1 Appling 3.40 3.40 Com,Silage 24.5 2/15-6/30 267 138 20 Broad. 37 0.00 8.60 0.00 29.26 551 3 S22 Appling 3.40 3.40 Corn,Silage 24.5 2/15-6/30 267 138 20 Broad. 36 0.00 2.22 0.00 7.56 551 3 S2 Appling 3.40 3.40 Corn,Silage 24.5 2/15-6/30 267 138 20 Broad. 36 3.64 0.00 12.37 0.00 551 3 S1 Appling 3.40 3.40 Small Grain,Silage 11.3 9/1-3/31 125 48 0 Broad. 21 0.00 4.88 0.00 16.60 551 3 S22 Appling 3.40 3.40 Small Grain,Silage 11.3 9/1-3/31 125 48 0 Broad. 101 0.00 0.621 0.00 2.10 551 3 S2 Appling 3.40 3.40 Small Grain,Silage 11.3 9/1-3/31 125 48 0 Injec. 11 0.72 0.00 2.44 0.00 551 4 S1 Georgeville 4.00 4.00 Com,Silage 22.5 2/15-6/30 *267 27 20 Broad. 74 0.00 17.21 0.00 68.84 551 4 S22 Georgeville 4.00 4.00 Com,Silage 22.5 2/15-6/30 *267 27 20 Broad. 73 0.00 4.51 0.00 18.02 Previe- Database Version 3.1 Date Printed:2/1/2019 WUT Page 18 of 44 Waste Utilization Table Year 1 Nitrogen Cantu Res. Manure Liquid Solid Liquid SolidManrrc PA Fert. (lbs/Al PA Man U FCA Manure Manure Applied Nutrient Nutrient Nutrient pplied Applied Applied (Field) Req'd Applied pplied (acre) (acre) (Field) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) Obs/A) Source Total Use. Applic. Applic. 1000 Tract Field ID Soil Series Acres Acres Crop RYE Period N N N Method N gal/A Tons 1000 gals tons 551 4 S2 Georgeville 4.00 4.00 Corn,Silage 22.5 2/15-6/30 *267 27 20 Broad. 73 7.37 0.00 29.50 0.00 551 4 S1 Georgeville 4.00 4.00 Small Grain,Silage 10.8 9/1-3/31 *125 9 0 Broad. 32 0.00 7.40 0.00 29.58 551 4 S22 Georgeville 4.00 4.00 Small Grain,Silage 10.8 9/1-3/31 *125 9 0 Broad. 15 0.00 0.89 0.00 3.58 551 4 S2 Georgeville 4.00 4.00 Small Grain,Silage 10.8 9/1-3/31 *125 9 0 Injec. 17 1.11 0.00 4.45 0.00 551 6 S1 Georgeville 9.50 9.50 Corn,Silage 22.5 2/15-6/30 *267 27 20 Broad. 74 0.00 17.21 0.00 163.49 551 6 S22 Georgeville 9.501 9.50 Corn,Silage 22.5 2/15-6/30 *267 27 20 Broad, 73 0.00 4.51 0.00 42.81 551 6 S2 Georgeville 9.50 9.50 Corn,Silage 22.5 2/15-6/30 *267 27 20 Broad. 73 7.37 0.00 70.06 0.00 551 6 S1 Georgeville 9.50 9.50 Small Grain,Silage 10.8 9/1-3/31 *125 9 0 Broad. 32 0.00 7.40 0.00 70.25 551 6 S22 Georgeville 9.50 9.50 Small Grain,Silage 10.8 9/1-3/31 *125 9 0 Broad. 15 0.00 0.89 0.00 8.51 551 6 S2 Georgeville 9.50 9.50 Small Grain,Silage 10.8 9/1-3/31 *125 9 0 Injec. 17 1.111 0.00 10.56 0.00 551 7 S1 Herndon 2.60 2.60 Corn,Silage 22.5 2/15-6/30 241 2 20 Broad. 74 0.00 17.21 0.00 44.74 551 7 S22 Herndon 2.60 2.60 Corn,Silage 22.5 2/15-6/30 241 2 20 Broad. 72 0.00 4.44 0.00 11.56 551 7 S2 Herndon 2.60 2.60 Corn,Silage 22.5 2/15-6/30 241 2 20 Broad. 73 7.37 0.00 19.17 0.00 551 7 S1 Herndon 2.60 2.60 Small Grain,Silage 10.8 9/1-3/31 117 1 0 Broad. 32 0.00 7.40 0.00 19.23 551 7 S22 Herndon 2.60 2.60 Small Grain,Silage 10.8 9/1-3/31 117 1 0 Broad. 15 0.00 0.89 0.00 2.33 551 7 S2 Herndon 2.60 2.60 Small Grain,Silage 10.8 9/1-3/31 117 1 0 Injec. 17 1.11 0.00 2.89 0.00 568 1 S1 Herndon 13.50 13.50 Corn,Silage 22.5 2/15-6/30 241 2 20 Broad. 74 0.00 17.21 0.00 232.32 568 1 S22 Herndon 13.50 13.50 Com,Silage 22.5 2/15-6/30 241 2 20 Broad. 72 0.00 4.44 0.00 60.00 568 1 S2 Herndon 13.50 13.50 Corn,Silage 22.5 2115-6/30 241 2 20 Broad. 73 7.37 0.00 99.55 0.00 568 1 S1 Herndon 13.50 13.50 Small Grain,Silage 10.8 9/1-3/31 117 1 0 Broad. 32 0.00 7.40 0.00 99.83 568 1 S22 Herndon 13.50 13.50 Small Grain,Silage 10.8 9/1-3/31 117 1 0 Broad. 15 0.00 0.89 0.00 12.09 568 1 S2 Herndon 13.50 13.50 Small Grain,Silage 10.8 9/1-3/31 117 1 0 Injec. 17 1.11 0.00 15.00 0.00 Previp- - Database Version 3.1 Date Printed:2/1/2019 WUT Page 19 of 44 11 a I Utilization Table Year 1 Nitrogen Comm Res. Manure Liquid Solid Liquid Solid Manui PA Fert. (lbs/Al PA Manure:) Manure Manure Applied Nutrient Nutrient NutrienO pplied Applied Applied (Field) Req'd Applied pplied (acre) (acre) (Field) (Ibs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) Source Total Use. Applic. Applic. 1000 I I a" Field ID Soil Series Acres Acres Crop RYE Period N N N Method N gal/A Tons 1000 gals tons 569 1 N/A Nanford 4.60 4.60 Corn,Silage 20.9 2/15-6/30 224 224 0 N/A 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 569 1 N/A Nanford 4.60 4.60 Small Grain,Silage 8.6 Tons 911-3/31 *112 112 0 N/A 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 569 10 S1 Georgeville 7.20 7.20 Com,Silage 21.9 2/15-6/30 234 0 20 Broad. 72 0.00 16.74 0.00 120.56 569 10 S22 Georgeville 7.20 7.20 Corn,Silage 21.9 2/15-6/30 234 0 20 Broad. 71 0.00 4.38 0.00 31.56 569 10 S2 Georgeville 7.20 7.20 Corn,Silage 21.9 2/15-6/30 234 0 20 Broad. 71 7.17 0.00 51.64 0.00 569 1 10 S1 Georgeville 7.20 7.20 Small Grain,Silage 10.4 9/1-3/31 112 0 0 Broad. 31 0.00 7.12 0.00 51.23 569 10 S22 I Georgeville 7.20 7.20 Small Grain,Silage 10.4 9/1-3/31 112 0 0 Broad. 14 O.00J 0.87 0.00 6.22 569 10 S2 Georgeville 7.20 7.20 Small Grain,Silage 10.4 9/1-3/31 112 0 0 Injec. 17 1.08 0.00 7.77 0.00 569 11 S1 Georgeville 51.901 51.90 Com,Silage 21.9 2/15-6/30 234 0 20 Broad. 72 0.00 16.74 0.00 869.01 569 11 S22 Georgeville 51.90 51.90 Corn,Silage 21.9 2/15-6/30 234 0 20 Broad. 71 0.00 4.38 0.00 227.47 569 11 S2 Georgeville 51.90 51.90 Corn,Silage 21.9 2/15-6/30 234 0 20 Broad. 71 7.17 0.00 372.24 0.00 569 11 S1 Georgeville 51.90 51.90 Small Grain,Silage 10.4 9/1-3/31 112 0 0 Broad. 31 0.00 7.12 0.00 369.33 569 11 S22 Georgeville 51.90 51.901 Small Grain,Silage 10.4 9/1-3/31 112 0 0 Broad. 14 0.00 0.87 0.00 44.85 569 11 S2 Georgeville 51.90 51.90 Small Grain,Silage 10.4 9/1-3/31 112 0 0 Injec. 17 1.08 0.00 55.98 0.00 569 5 S1 Georgeville 2.90 2.90 Com,Silage 21.9 2/15-6/30 234 0 20 Broad. 72 0.00 16.74 0.00 48.56 569 5 S22 Georgeville 2.90 2.90 Com,Silage 21.9 2/15-6/30 234 0 20 Broad. 71 0.00 4.38 0.00 12.71 569 5 S2 Georgeville 2.90 2.90 Corn,Silage 21.9 2/15-6/30 234 0 20 Broad. 71 7.17 0.00 20.80 0.00 569 5 SI Georgeville 2.90 2.90 Small Grain,Silage 10.4 9/1-3/31 112 0 0 Broad. 31 0.00 7.12 0.001 20.63 569 5 janford eorgeville 2.90 2.90 Small Grain,Silage 10.4 9/1-3/31 112 0 0 Broad. 14 0.00 0.87 0.00 2.51 569 5 eorgeville 2.90 2.90 Small Grain,Silage 10.4 9/1-3/31 112 0 0 Injec. 17 1.08 0.00 3.13 0.00 575 1 anford 71.00 71.00 Fescue Pasture 4.4 Tons*2/15-10/31 143 0 0 Broad. 47 0.00 10.93 0.00 776.03 575 1 71.00 71.00 Fescue Pasture 4.4 Tons*2/15-10/31 143 0 0 Broad. 47 0.00 2.90 0.00 205.99 Previ- Database Version 3.1 Date Printed:2/1/2019 WUT Page 20 of 44 Waste Utilization Table Year 1 Nitrogen Cantu Res. Manure Liquid Solid Liquid Solid Manur PA Fert. (lbs/Ai PA Manure Manure Manure Applied Nutrient Nutrient Nutrient: pplied Applied Applied (Field) Req'd Applied pplied (acre) (acre) (Field) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) Source Total Use. Applic. Applic. 1000 Tract Field ID Soil Series Acres Acres Crop RYE Period N N N Method N gal/A Tons 1000 gals tons 575 1 S22 Nanford 71.00 71.00 Fescue Pasture 4ATons *1/1-12/31 143 0 0 Broad. 49 0.00 3.02 0.00 214.76 580 3 S1 Georgeville 3.00 3.00 Fescue Pasture 4.9 Tons *1/1-12/31 159 0 0 Broad. 56 0.00 13.02 0.00 39.07 580 3 S22 Georgeville 3.00 3.00 Fescue Pasture 4.9 Tons *1/1-12/31 159 0 0 Broad. 48 0.00 2.96 0.00 8.89 580 3 S2 Georgeville 3.00 3.00 Fescue Pasture 4.9 Tons *1/1-12/31 159 0 0 Broad. 55 5.66 0.00 16.97 0.00 580 4 S1 Georgeville 10.00 10.00 Fescue Pasture 4.9 Tons *1/1-12/31 159 0 0 Broad. 56 0.00 13.02 0.00 130.23 580 4 S22 Georgeville 10.00 10.00 Fescue Pasture 4.9 Tons *1/1-12/31 159 0 0 Broad. 48 0.00 2.96 0.00 29.63 580 4 S2 Georgeville 10.00 10.00 Fescue Pasture 4.9 Tons *1/1-12/31 159 0 0 Broad. 55 5.56 0.00 55.56 0.00 618 1 S1 Nanford 2.00 2.00 Fescue Pasture 4.4 Tons *1/1-12/31 143 0 0 Broad. 47 0.00 10.93 0.00 21.86 618 1 S22 Nanford 2.00 2.00 Fescue Pasture 4.4 Tons *1/1-12/31 143 0 0 Broad. 471 0.00 2.90 0.00 5.80 618 1 S22 Nanford 2.00 2.00 Fescue Pasture 4.4 Tons *1/1-12/31 143 0 0 Broad, 49 0.00 3.02 0.00 6.05 618 2 S1 Nanford 5.50 5.50 Fescue Pasture 4.4 Tons *1/1-12/31 143 0 0 Broad. 47 0.00 10.93 0.00 60.12 6l8 2 S22 Nanford 5.50 5.50 Fescue Pasture 4.4 Tons *1/1-12/31 143 0 0 Broad. 47 0.001 2.90 0.00 15.96 618 2 S22 Nanford 5.50 5.50 Fescue Pasture 4A Tons *1/1-12/31 143 0 0 Broad. 49 0.00 3.02 0.00 16.64 618 3 S1 Nanford 2.00 2.00 Fescue Pasture 4.4 Tons *1/1-12/31 143 0 0 Broad. 47 0.00 10.93 0.00 21.86 618 3 S22 Nanford 2.00 2.00 Fescue Pasture 4.4 Tons *1/1-12/31 143 0 0 Broad. 47 0.00 2.90 0.00 5.80 618 3 S22 Nanford 2.00 2.00 Fescue Pasture 4.4 Tons *1/1-12/31 143 0 0 Broad. 49 0.001 3.02 0.00 6.05 618 4 S1 Nanford 1.00 1.00 Fescue Pasture 4.4 Tons *1/1-12/31 143 0 0 Broad. 47 0.00 10.93 0.00 10.93 618 4 S22 Nanford 1.00 1.00 Fescue Pasture 4.4 Tons *1/1-12/31 143 0 0 Broad. 47 0.00 2.90 0.00 2.90 618 4 S22 Nanford 1.00 1.00 Fescue Pasture 4.4 Tons *1/1-12/31 143 0 0 Broad. 49 0.00 3.02 0.00 3.02 618 5 S1 Nanford 5.00 5.00 Fescue Pasture 4.4 Tons *1/1-12/31 143 1 0 0 Broad. 47 0.001 10.93 0.00 54.65 618 5 S22 Nanford 5.00 5.00 Fescue Pasture 4.4 Tons *1/I-12/31 143 0 0 Broad. 47 0.00 2.90 0.00 14.51 618 5 S22 Nanford 5.00 5.00 Fescue Pasture 4.4 Tons *1/1-12/31 143 0 0 Broad. 49 0.00 3.02 0.00 15.12 Prev' • Database Version 3.1 Date Printed:2/18/21' WUT Page ' 'if 44 Waste Utilization Table Year 1 Nitrogen Comm Res. Manure Liquid Solid Liquid Solid Manur PA Fert. (lbs/Ai PA. Manure: Manure Manure Applied Nutrient Nutrient NutrienL pplied Applied Applied (Field) Req'd Applied pplied (acre) (acre) (Field) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) Source Total Use. Applic. Applic. 1000 Tract Field ID Soil Series Acres Acres Crop RYE Period N N N Method N gal/A Tons 1000 gals tons 618 6 S1 Nanford 4.00 4.00 Fescue Pasture 4.4 Tons *1/1-12/31 143 0 0 Broad. 47 0.00 10.93 0.00 43.72 618 6 S22 Nanford 4.00 4.00 Fescue Pasture 4.4 Tons *1/1-12/31 143 0 0 Broad. 47 0.00 2.90 0.00 11.61 618 6 S22 Nanford 4.00 4.00 Fescue Pasture 4.4 Tons *1/1-12/31 143 0 0 Broad. 49 0.00 3.02 0.00 12.10 618 7 SI Nanford 1.50 1.50 Fescue Pasture 4.4 Tons *1/1-12/31 143 0 0 Broad. 47 0.00 10.93 0.00 16.40 618 7 S22 Nanford 1.50 1.50 Fescue Pasture 4.4 Tons *1/1-12/31 143 0 0 Broad, 47 0.00 2.90 0.00 4.35 618 7 S22 Nanford 1.50 1.50 Fescue Pasture 4.4 Tons *1/1-12/31 143 0 0 Broad. 49 0.00 3.02 0.00 4.54 618 8 S1 Nanford 4.50 4.50 Fescue Pasture 4.4 Tons *1/1-12/31 143 0 0 Broad. 47 0.00 10.93 0.00 49.19 618 8 S22 Nanford 4.50 4.50 Fescue Pasture 4.4 Tons *1/1-12/31 143 0 0 Broad. 47 0.00 2.90 0.00 13.06 618 8 S22 Nanford 4.50 4.50 Fescue Pasture 4.4 Tons *1/1-12/31 143 0 0 Broad.1 49 0.00 3.02 0.00 13.61 Total Applied,1000 gallons 3,999.30 rr Total Produced,1000 gallons 767.15 r i Balance,1000 gallons -3,232.15 Total Applied,tons 15,777.34 Total Produced,tons 10,664.00 Balance,tons -5,113.34 Notes: 1. In the tract column,-symbol means leased,otherwise,owned. 2. Symbol*means user entered data. Prev,-' Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 2/18/2V-- WUT Page ' !)f 44 Waste UtilizaL cable �-ar 2 Nitrogen Comm. Res. Manure Liquid Solid Liquid Solid Manur PA Fert. (lbs/A) PA ManureA Manure Manure Applied Nutrient Nutrient NutrienLI pplied Applied Applied (Field) Req'd Applied pplied (acre) (acre) (Field) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) Source Total Use. App ic. Applic. 1000 Tract Field ID Soil Series Acres Acres Crop RYE Period N N N Method N gal/A Tons 1000 gals tor(3" 10309 l SI Hemdon 7.60 7.60 Small Grain,Silage 10.4 9/1-3/31 112 0 0 Broad. 20 0.00 4.74 0.00 36.06 10309 1 S22 Hemdon 7.60 7.60 Small Grain,Silage t0.4 9/1-3/31 112 0 0 Broad. 14 0.00 0.87 0.00 6.57 t0309 l S2 Herndon 7.60 7.60 Small Grain,Silage 10.4 9/1-3/31 112 0 0 Injec. 17 1.08 0.00 8.20 0.00 10309 1 S1 Herndon 7.60 7.60 Soybeans,Manured,Full Season 48 bu. 4/1-9/15 186 0 0 Broad. 63 0.00 14.65 0.00 111.35 10309 l S22 Herndon 7.60 7.60 Soybeans,Manured,Full Season 48 bu. 4/1-9/15 186 0 0 Broad. 61 0.00 3.77 0.00 28.62 10309 1 S2 Herndon 7.60 7.60 Soybeans,Manured,Full Season 48 bu. 4/1-9/15 186 0 0 Broad. 62 6.36 0.00 48.37 0.00 10309 2 S1 Hemdon 9.50 9.50 Small Grain,Silage 10.4 9/1-3/31 1 t2 0 0 Broad. 20 0.00 4.74 0.00 45.07 10309 2 S22 Hemdon 9.50 9.50 Small Grain,Silage 10.4 9/t-3/31 I t2 0 0 Broad. 14 0.00 0.87 0.00 8.21 10309 2 S2 Hemdon 9,50 9.50 Small Grain,Silage 10.4 9/1-3/31 1 112 0 0 Injec. 17 1.08 0.00 10.25 0.00 10309 2 S1 Herndon 9.50 9.50 Soybeans,Manured,Full Season 48 bu. 4/1-9115 186 0 0 Broad. 63 0.00 14.65 0.00 139.18 10309 2 S22 Hemdon 9.50 9.50 Soybeans,Manured,Full Season 48 bu. 4/1-9/15 186 0 0 Broad. 61 0.00 3.77 0.00 35.77 10309 2 S2 Herndon 9.50 9.50 Soybeans,Manured,Full Season 48 bu. 4/1-9/t5 186 0 0 Broad. 62 6.26 0.00 59.50 J4,00 0 10309 3 Sl Hemdon 7.90 7.90 Small Grain,Silage 10.8 9/1-3/31 117 0 0 Broad. 21 0.00 4.93 0.00 q.95 10309 3 S22 Hemdon 7.90 7.90 Small Grain,Silage 10.8 9/1-3/31 117 0 0 Broad. 15 0.00 0.89 0.00 J,07. 10309 3 S2 Herndon 7.90 7.90 Small Grain,Silage t0.8 9/1-3/31 117 0 0 Injec. 17 1.11 0.001 8.78 100 10309 3 S1 Herndon 7.90 7.90 Soybeans,Manured,Full Season 49 bu. 4/1-9115 190 1 0 Broad. 64 0.00 14.88 0.00 11''j.58 10309 3 S22 Hemdon 7.90 7.90 Soybeans,Manured,Full Season 49 bu. 4/1-9/15 190 l 0 Broad. 62 0.00 3.83 0.00 35.23 y t0309 3 S2 Hemdon 7.90 7.90 Soybeans,Manured,Full Season 49 bu. 4/1-9/15 190 1 0 Broad. 63 6.36 0.00 50.28 400 10309 4 S1 Alamance 9.20 9 20 Small Grain,Silage 9.8 Tons 9/1-3/31 106 0 0 Broad. 19 0.00 4.46 0.00 .08 10309 4 S22 Alamance 9.20 9.20 Small Grain,Silage 9.8 Tons 9/1-3/31 106 0 0 Broad. 14 0.00 0.83 0.00 -#66 10309 4 S2 Alamance 9.20 9.20 Small Grain,Silage 9.8 Tons 9/1-3/31 106 0 0 Injec. 1 1.01 0.00 9.32 99.00 10309 4 S1 Alamance 9.20 9.20 Soybeans,Manured,Full Season 44 bu. 4/1-9/15 170 0 0 Broad, 57 0.00 13.26 0.00 1?T.95 Preview Database Version 3.1 Date Printed:2/18/2019 WUT Page 23 of 44 Waste Uti&at, fable ,-ar 2 Nitrogen Conm Res. Manure Liquid Solid Liquid Solid Man PA Fort. (lbs/A) PA Manure Manure Manure Applied Nutrient Nutrient Nutriem-1 pplied Applied Applied (Field) Req'd Applied pplied (acre) (acre) (Field) (Ibs/A) (lbs/A) (Ibs/A) N Source Total Use. Applic. Applic. 1000 Tract Field 1D Soil Series Acres Acres Crop RYE Period N N N Method N gal/A Tons 1000 gals torsi§+ 10309 4 S22 Alamance 9.20 9.20 Soybeans,Manured,Full Season 44 bu. 4/1-9/15 170 0 0 Broad. 55 0.00 3.40 0.00 31.23 10309 4 S2 Alamance 9.20 9.20 Soybeans,Manured,Full Season 44 bu. 4/1-9/15 170 0 0 Broad. 58 5.86 0.00 53.90 0.00 10385 2 S1 Georgeville 8.10 8.10 Fescue Pasture 5.0Tons *1/1-12/31 162 0 0 Broad. 57 0.00 13.26 0.00 107.37 10385 2 S22 Georgeville 8.10 8.10 Fescue Pasture 5.0Tons *1/1-12/31 162 0 0 Broad. 49 0.00 3.02 0.00 24.50 10385 j 2 S2 Georgeville 8.10 8.10 Fescue Pasture 5.0 Tons *1/1-12/31 162 0 0 Broad. 56 5.66 0.00 45.82 0.00 10385 3 S1 Georgeville 5.20 5.20 Fescue Pasture 4.8 Tons *1/1-12/31 156 0 0 Broad. 55 0.00 12.79 0.00 66.51 10385 3 S22 Georgeville 5.20 5.20 Fescue Pasture 4.8 Tons *1/1-12/31 156 0 0 Broad. 47 0.00 2.90 0.00 15.09 10385 3 S2 Georgeville 5.20 5.20 Fescue Pasture 4.8 Tons *1/1-12/31 156 0 0 Broad. 54 5.46 0.00 28.37 0.00 10386 6 S1 Tarrus 5.90 5.90 Small Grain,Silage 9.8 Tons 9/1-3/31 106 0 0 Broad. t9 0.00 4.46 0.00 26.34 10386 6 S22 Tarrus 5.90 5.90 Small Grain,Silage 9.8 Tons 9/t-3/31 106 0 0 Broad. 14 0.00 0.87 0.00 5.10 10386 6 S2 Tanus 5.90 5.90 Small Grain,Silage 9.8 Tons 9/1-3/31 106 0 0 Injec. 15 0.98 0.00 5.79 0.00 10386 6 S1 Tarrus 5.90 5.90 Soybeans,Manured,Full Season 44 bu. 4/1-9/15 170 0 0 Broad. 57 0.00 13.26 0.00 34.21 10386 6 S22 Tan-us 5.90 5.90 Soybeans,Manured,Full Season 44 bu. 4/1-9/15 170 0 0 Broad. 57 0.00 3.52 0.00 A.76 10386 6 S2 Tarrus 5.90 5.90 Soybeans,Manured,Full Season 44 bu. 4/1-9/15 170 0 0 Broad. 56 5.66 0.00 33.38 '.00 10386 7 S1 Tarrus 9.50 9.50 Small Grain,Silage 10.0 9/1-3/31 108 0 0 Broad. 20 0.00 4.56 0.00 6.30 rn 10386 7 S22 Tarrus 9.50 9.50 Small Grain,Silage 10.0 9/1-3/31 108 0 0 Broad. 15 0.00 0.89 0.001 1.51 10386 7 S2 Tarrus 9.50 9.50 Small Grain,Silage 10.0 9/1-3/31 108 0 0 Injec. 15 1.01 0.00 9.63 '-0.00 0 10386 7 S1 Tarrus 9.50 9.50 Soybeans,Manured,Full Season 45 bu. 4/1-9/15 174 1 0 Broad. 58 0.00 13.49 0.00 1A.14 10386 7 S22 Tan-us 9.50 r q) Soybeans,Manured,Full Season 45 bu. 4/1-9/15 174 1 0 Broad. 58 0.00 3.58 0.00 .01 10386 7 S2 Tarrus 9.50 9.50 Soybeans,Manured,Full Season 45 bu. 4/1-9/15 174 1 0 Broad. 57 5.76 0.00 54.70 •`6.00 10386 8 S1 Tarrus 13.10 13.10 Small Grain,Silage 10.0 9/1-3/31 108 0 0 Broad. 201 0.00 4.56 0.00 99.71 10386 8 S22 Fs 13.10 13.10 Small Grain,Silage 10.0 9/1-3/3l 108 0 0 Broad. 15 0.00 0.89 0.00 673 Preview Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 2/18/2019 WUT Page 24 of 44 Waste Utilim, Table _ .;ar 2 Nurogen Comm. Res. Manure Liquid Solid Liquid Solid Manur PA Fert. (lbs/A) PA Manureel Manure Manure Applied Nutrient Nutrient Nutrient pplied Applied Applied (Field) Req'd Applied pplied (acre) (acre) (Field) (]bs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) Source Total Use. Applic. Applic. 1000 Tract Field ID Soil Series Acres Acres Crop RYE Period N N N Method N gal/A Tons 1000 gals tons 10386 8 S2 Tarrus 13.10 13.10 Small Grain,Silage 10.0 9/1-3/31 108 0 0 Injec. 15 0.98 0.00 12.84 0.00 10386 8 St Tarrus 1 13.10 13.10 Soybeans,Manured,Full Season 45 bu. 4/1-9/15 174 1 0 Broad. 58 0.00 13.49 0.00 176.69 10386 8 S22 Taints 13.10 13.10 Soybeans,Manured,Full Season 45 bu. 4/1-9/15 174 1 0 Broad. 58 0.00 3.58 0.00 46.90 10386 8 S2 Tarrus 13.10 13.10 Soybeans,Manured,Full Season 45 bu. 4/1-9/15 174 1 0 Broad. 57 5.76 0.00 75.43 0.00 10497 7 Sl Appling 1.80 1.80 Small Grain,Silage 11.3 9/1-3/31 125 0 0 Broad. 14 0.00 3.26 0.001 5.86 10497 7 S22 Appling 1.80 1.80 Small Grain,Silage 11.3 9/1-3/31 125 0 0 Broad. 10 0.00 0.62 0.00 1.11 10497 7 S2 Appling 1.80 1.80 Small Grain,Silage 11.3 9/1-3/31 125 0 0 Injec. 11 0.72 0.00 1.29 0.00 10497 7 SI Appling 1.80 1.80 Soybeans,Manured,Full Season 54 bu. 4/1-9/15 210 79 0 Broad. 44 0.00 10.23 0.00 118.42 10497 7 S22 Appling 1.80 1.80 Soybeans,Manured,Full Season 54 bu. 4/1-9/15 210 79 0 Broad. 44 0.00 2.72 0.00 4.89 10497 7 S2 Appling 1.80 1.80 Soybeans,Manured,Full Season 54 bu. 4/1-9/15 210 79 0 Broad. 43 4.34 0.00 7.82 0.00 10497 8 SI Appling 3.30 3.30 Small Grain,Silage 11.3 9/1-3/31 125 0 0 Broad. 14 0.00 3.261 0.00 10.74 10497 8 S22 Appling 3.30 3.30 Small Grain,Silage 11.3 9/1-3/31 125 0 0 Broad. 10 0.00 0.62 0.00 2.04 10497 8 S2 Appling 3.301 3.30 Small Grain,Silage 11.3 9/1-3/31 125 0 0 Injec. 11 0.72 0.00 2.37 0.00 10497 8 Si Appling 3.30 3.30 Soybeans,Manured,Full Season 54 bu. 4/1-9/15 210 79 0 Broad. 44 0.00 10.23 0.00 33.77 10497 8 S22 Appling 3.30 3.30 Soybeans,Manured,Full Season 54 bu. 4/1-9/15 210 79 0 Broad. 44 0.00 2.72 0.00 8.96 10497 8 S2 Appling 3.30 3.30 Soybeans,Manured,Full Season 54 bu. 4/1-9/15 210 79 0 Broad. 43 4.34 0.00 14.34 0.00 10497 9 SI Appling 5.10 5.10 Small Grain,Silage 11.3 9/1-3/31 125 0 0 Broad. 14 0.00 3.26 0.00 16.60 10497 9 S22 Appling 5.10 5.10 Small Grain,Silage 11.3 9/1-3/31 125 0 0 Broad. 10 0.00 0.62 0.00 3.15 10497 9 S2 Appling 5.10 5.10 Small Grain,Silage 11.3 9/1-3/31 125 0 0 Injec. 11 0.72 0,00 3.67 0.00 10497 9 S1 Appling 5.10 5.10 Soybeans,Manured,Full Season 54 bu. 4/1-9/15 210 79 0 Broad. 44 0.00 10.23 0.00 52.19 10497 9 S22 Appling 5.10 5.10 Soybeans,Manured,Full Season 54 bu. 4/1-9/15 210 79 0 Broad. 44 0.00 2.72 0.00 13.85 10497 9 S2 Appling 5.10 5.10 Soybeans,Manured,Full Season 54 bu. 4/1-9/15 210 79 0 Broad. 43 4.34 0.00 22.15 0.00 Preview Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 2/18/2019 WUT Page 25 of 44 Waste Utilizat. cable .�ar 2 Nitrogen Comm Res. Manure Liquid Solid Liquid Solid Mianur PA Fert. (1bs/A) PA ManureA Manure Manure Applied Nutrient Nutrient Nutrienul pplied Applied Applied (Field) Req'd Applied ppGed (acre) (acre) (Field) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) Source Total Use. Applic. Applic. 1000 Tract Field ID Soil Series Acres Acres Crop RYE Period N N N Method N gal/A Tons 1000 gals tons 10499 5 SI Appling 9.10 7.00 Small Grain,Silage 10.9 9/1-3/31 121 0 0 Broad. 22 0.00 5.02 0.00 35.16 10499 5 S22 Appling 9.10 7.00 Small Grain,Silage 10.9 9/1-3/31 121 0 0 Broad. 16 0.00 0.95 0.00 6.70 10499 5 S2 Appling 9.10 7.00 Small Grain,Silage 10.9 9/1-3/31 121 0 0 Injec. 18 1.18 0.00 8.24 0.00 10499 5 St Appling 9.10 7.00 Soybeans,Manured,Full Season 52 bu. 4/1-9/15 202 0 0 Broad. 67 0.00 15.58 0.00 109.07 10499 5 S22 Appling 9.10 7.00 Soybeans,Manured,Full Season 52 bu. 4/1-9/15 202 0 0 Broad. 67 0.00 4.14 0.00 28.95 10499 5 S2 Appling 9.10 7.00 Soybeans,Manured,Full Season 52 bu. 4/1-9/15 202 0 0 Broad. 68 6.87. 0.00 48.09 0.00 10499 6 S1 Appling 2.70 2.70 Small Grain,Silage 10.9 9/1-3/31 121 0 0 Broad. 22 0.00 5.02 0.00 13.56 10499 6 S22 jAppling 2.70 2.70 Stnall Grain,Silage 10.9 911-3/31 121 0 0 Broad. 16 0.00 0.95 0.00 2.59 10499 6 S2 Appling 2.70 2.70 Small Grain,Silage 10.9 9/1-3/31 121 0 0 Injec. 18 1.18 0.00 3.18 0.00 10499 6 S1 Appling 2.70 2.70 Soybeans,Manured,Full Season 52 bu. 4/1-9/15 202 0 0 Broad. 67 0.00 15.58 0.00 42.07 10499 6 S22 Appling 2.70 2.70 Soybeans,Manured,Full Season 52 bu. 4/1-9/15 202 0 0 Broad. 67 0.00 4.14 0.00 11.17 10499 6 S2 Appling 2.70 2.70 Soybeans,Manured,Full Season 52 bu. 4/1-9/15 202 0 0 Broad. 68 6.87 0.00 18.55 0.00 10499 8 S1 Appling 3.70 3.70 Small Grain,Silage 10.9 9/1-3/31 121 0 0 Broad. 22 0.00 5.02 0.00 18.58 10499 8 S22 Appling 3.70 3.70 Small Grain,Silage 10.9 9/1-3/31 121 0 0 Broad. 16 0.00 0.95 0.00 3.54 10499 8 S2 Appling 3.70 3.70 Small Grain,Silage 10.9 9/1-3/31 121 0 0 Injec. 18 1.18 0.00 4.35 0.00 10499 8 S1 Appling 3.70 3.70 Soybeans,Manured,Full Season 52 bu. 4/1-9/15 202 0 0 Broad, 67 0.00 15.58 0.00 57.65 10499 8 S22 Appling 3.70 3.70 Soybeans,Manured,Full Season 52 bu. 4/1-9/15 202 0 0 Broad. 67 0.00 4.14 0.00 15.30 10499 8 S2 Appling 3.70 3.70 Soybeans,Manured,Full Season 52 bu. 4/1-9/15 202 0 0 Broad. 68 6.87 0.00 25.42 0.00 10514 5 Sl Herndon 11.00 11.00 Fescue Pasture 4.9 Tons *1/1-12/31 159 l 0 Broad. 52 0.00 12.09 0.00 133.02 10514 5 S22 Hemdon 11.00 11.00 Fescue Pasture 4.9 Tons *1/1-12/31 159 1 0 Broad. 52 0.00 3.21 0.00 35.31 10514 5 S22 Hemdon 11.00 11.00 Fescue Pasture 4.9 Tons *1/1-12/31 159 1 0 Broad. 54 0.00 3.33 0.00 36.67 10514 1 6 1 S1 Georgeville 7.50 7.50 Small Grain,Silage 10.8 9/1-3/31 117 0 0 Broad. 21 0.00 4.84 0.00 36.28 Preview Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 2/18/2019 WUT Page 26 of 44 Waste Utilizati fable _ar 2 Nitrogen Canm Res. Manure Liquid Solid Liquid Solid Manur PA Fert. (lbs/A PA Manurerl Manure Manure Applied Nutrient Nutrient NutrienV pplied Applied Applied (Field) Req'd Applied pplied (acre) (acre) (Field) (Ibs/A) (Ibs/A) (lbs/A) Source Total Use. Applic. Applic. 1000 Tract Field ID Soil Series Acres Acres Crop RYE Period N N N Method N gal/A Tons 1000 gals tons 10514 6 S22 Georgeville 7.50 7.50 Small Grain,Silage 10.8 9/1-3/31 117 0 0 Broad.1 15 0.00 0.93 0.00 6.95 105M 6 S2 Georgeville 7.50 7.50 Small Grain,Silage 10.8 9/1-3/31 117 0 0 Injec. 18 1.14 0.00 8.58 0.00 10514 6 St Georgeville 7.50 7.50 Soybeans,Manured,Full Season 49 bu. 4/1-9/15 190 1 0 Broad. 63 0.00 14.65 0.00 109.88 10514 6 S22 Georgeville 7.50 7.50 Soybeans,Manured,Full Season 49 bu. 4/1-9/15 190 1 0 Broad. 63 0.00 3.89 0.00 29.17 10514 6 S2 Georgeville 7.50 7.50 Soybeans,Manured,Full Season 49 bu. 4/1-9/15 190 1 0 Broad. 63 6.36 0.00 47.73 0.00 10514 8 S1 Georgeville 14.00 14.00 Small Grain,Silage 10.4 9/1-3/31 112 0 0 Broad, 20 0.00 4.74 0.00 66.42 10514 8 S22 Georgeville 14.00 14.00 Small Grain,Silage 10.4 9/1-3/31 112 0 0 Broad. 14 0.00 0.87 0.00 12.L0 10514 8 S2 Georgeville 14.00 14.00 Small Grain,Silage 10.4 9/1-3/31 112 0 0 Injec. 17 L08 0.00 15.10 0.00 10514 1 8 S1 Georgeville 14.00 14.00 Soybeans,Manured,Full Season 48 bu. 4/1-9/15 186 0 0 Broad. 63 0.00 14.65 0.00 205.11 10514 8 S22 Georgeville 14.00 14.00 Soybeans,Manured,Full Season 48 bu. 4/1-9/15 186 0 0 Broad. 61 0.00 3.77 0.00 52.72 10514 8 S2 Georgeville 14.00 14.00 Soybeans,Manured,Full Season 48 bu. 4/1-9/15 186 0 0 Broad. 62 6.26 0.00 87.68 0.00 10514 9 SI Herndon 7.00 7.00 Fescue Pasture 4.9 Tons *1/1-12/31 159 1 0 Broad. 52 0.00 12.09 0.00 84.65 10514 9 S22 Herndon 7.00 7.00 Fescue Pasture 4.9 Tons *1/1-12/31 159 l 0 Broad. 52 0.00 3.21 0.00 22.47 10514 9 S22 Hemdon 7.00 7.00 Fescue Pasture 4.9 Tons *1/1-12/31 159 1 0 Broad. 54 0.00 3.33 0.00 23.33 10569 1 1 S l Georgeville 3.00 3.00 Small Grain,Silage 10.8 9/1-3/31 117 0 0 Broad. 2l 0.00 4.93 0.00 14.79 10569 1. S22 Georgeville 3.00 3.00 Small Grain,Silage 10.8 9/1-3/31 117 0 0 Broad. 15 0.00 0.89 0.00 2.68 10569 1 S2 Georgeville 3.00 3.00 Small Grain,Silage 10.8 9/1-3/31 117 0 0 Injec. 17 1.11 0.00 3.33 0.00 10569 1 S1 Georgeville 3.00 3.00 Soybeans,Manured,Full Season 49 bu. 4/1-9/15 190 1 0 Broad 64 0.00 14.88 0.00 44.65 10569 1 S22 Georgeville 3.00 3.00 Soybeans,Manured,Full Season 49 bu. 4/1-9/15 190 1 0 Broad. 62 0.00 3.83 0.00 11.48 1074 1 S1 Georgeville 30.00 30.00 Fescue Pasture 4.8 Tons *1/1-12/3l 156 1 0 0 Broad. 55 0.00 12.79 0.00 383.71 1074 1 S22 Georgeville 30.00 30.00 Fescue Pasture 4.8 Tons *1/1-12/31 156 0 0 Broad. 47 0.00 2.90 0.00 8d04 1074 1 S2 Georgeville 30.0030.00 Fescue Pasture 4.8 Tons *1/1-12/31 156 0 0 Broad. 54 5.46 0.00 163.65 0 Preview Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 2/18/2019 WUT Page 27 of 44 Waste Utilizat. Table dr 2 Na gen Comm Res. Manure Liquid Solid Liquid Solid Manur PA Fert. (lbs/A) PA Manure Manure Manure Applied Nutrient Nutrient NutrienO pplied Applied Applied (Field) Req'd Applied pplied (acre) (acre) (Field) (Ibs/A) (1bs/A) (lbs/A) Source Total Use. Applic. Applic. 1000 Tract Field ID Soil Series Acres Acres Crop RYE Period N N N Method N gal/A Tons 1000 gals tons 1074 2 SI Georgeville 2.00 2.00 Fescue Pasture 4.8 Tons *1/1-12/31 156 0 0 Broad. 55 0.00 12.79 0.00 25.58 1074 2 S22 Georgeville 2.00 2.00 Fescue Pasture 4.8 Tons *111-12/31 156 0 0 Broad. 47 0.00 2.90 0.00 5.8 1074 2 S2 Georgeville 2.00 2.00 Fescue Pasture 4.8 Tons *1/1-12/31 156 0 0 Broad. 54 5.46 0.00 10.91 0.0 1074 3 S1 Appling 9.00 9.00 Fescue Pasture 5.4 Tons *1/1-12/31 180 0 0 Broad. 63 0.00 14.65 0.00 131.86 1074 3 S22 Appling 9.00 9.00 Fescue Pasture 5.4 Tons *l/1-12/31 180 0 0 Broad. 55 0.00 3.40 0.00 30.56 1074 3 S2 Appling 9.00 9.00 Fescue Pasture 5.4 Tons *1/1-12/31 180 0 0 Broad. 62 6.26 0.00 56.37 0.00 1074 5 S1 Appling 15.00 15.00 Small Grain,Silage 11.3 9/1-3/31 125 0 0 Broad. 22 0.00 5.21 0.00 78.14 107.4 5 S22 Appling 15.00 15.00 Small Grain,Silage I L3 9/1-3/31 125 0 0 Broad. 16 0.00 0.99 0.00 14.81 1074 5 S2 Appling 15.00 15.00 Small Grain,Silage 11.3 9/1-3/31 125 0 0 Injec. 19 1.21 0.00 18.14 0.00 1074 5 S1 jAppling 15.00 15.00 Soybeans,Manured,Full Season 54 bu. 4/1-9/15 210 0 0 Broad, 70 0.00 16.28 0.00 244.18 1074 5 S22 Appling 15.00 15.00 Soybeans,Manured,Full Season 54 bu. 4/1-9/15 210 0 0 Broad. 70 0.00 4.32 0.00 64.82 1074 5 S2 Appling 15.00 15.00 Soybeans,Manured,Full Season 54 bu. 4/1-9/15 210 0 0 Broad. 70 7.07 0.00 106.07 0.00 1074 6 S1 Appling 6.00 6.00 Small Grain,Silage 10.9 9/1-3/31 121 0 0 Broad. 22 0.00 5.02 0.00 30.14 1074 6 S22 Appling 6.00 6.00 Small Grain,Silage 10.9 9/1-3/31 121 0 0 Broad. 16 0.00 0.95 0.00 5.74 1074 6 S2 Appling 6.00 6.00 Small Grain,Silage 10.9 9/1-3/31 121 0 0 Injec. 18 1.18 0.00 7.06 0.00 1074 6 S1 Appling 6.00 6.00 Soybeans,Manured,Full Season 1 52 bu 4/1-9/15 202 1 0 1 Broad. 67 0.00 15.58 0.00 93.49 1074 6 S22 Appling 6.00 6.00 Soybeans,Manured,Full Season 52 bu. 4/1-9/15 202 1 0 Broad. 67 0.00 4.14 0.00 24.82 1074 6 S2 Appling 6.00 6.00 Soybeans,Manured,Full Season 52 bu. 4/1-9/15 202 1 0 Broad. 67 6.77 0.00 40.61 0.00 2383 13Appling Appling 3.50 3.00 Small Grain,Silage 10.9 9/1-3/31 121 0 0 Broad. 14 0.00 3.16 0.00 9.49 2383 Appling 3.50 3.00 Small Grain,Silage 10.9 9/1-3/31 121 0 0 Broad. 10 0.00 0.58 0.00 1.76 2383 Appling 3.50 3.00 Small Grain,Silage 10.9 9/1-3/31 121 0 0 Injec. 11 0.69 0.00 2.06 0.00 2383 3.50 3.00 Soybeans,Manured,Full Season 52 bu. 4/1-9/15 202 74 0 Broad. 43 0.00 10.00 0.00 30.00 Preview Database Version 3.1 Date Printed:2/18/2019 WUT Page 28 of 44 Waste Utilizat_ Table _-ar 2 Niv4gen Canm Res. Manure Liquid Solid Liquid Solid Manur PA Fert. (lbs/Aj PA Manure, Manure Manure Applied Nutrient Nutrient Nutrienl)l pplied Applied Applied (Field) Req'd Applied pplied (acre) (acre) (Field) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) Source Total Use. Applic. Applic. 1000 Tract Field ID Soil Series Acres Acres Crop RYE Period N N N Method N gal/A Tons 1000 gals tons 2383 3 S22 Appling 3.50 3.00 Soybeans,Manured,Full Season 52 bu. 4/1-9/I5 202 74 0 Broad. 43 0.00 2.65 0.00 7.96 2383 3 S2 Appling 3.50 3.00 Soybeans,Manured,Full Season 52 bu. 4/1-9/15 202 74 0 Broad. 42 4.34 0.00 13.03 0.00 2383 3A S1 Durham 3.00 3.00 Fescue Pasture 4.3 Tons *1/1-12/31 143 0 0 Broad. 50 0.00 11.63 0.00 34.88 2383 3A S22 Durham 3.00 3.00 Fescue Pasture 4.3 Tons *1/1-12/31 143 0 0 Broad. 43 0.00 2.65 0.00 7.96 2383 3A S2 Durham 3.00 3.00 Fescue Pasture 4.3 Tons *1/1-12/31 143 0 0 Broad. 50 5.05 0.00 15.15 0.00 2383 5 SI Durham 4.80 4.00 Fescue Pasture 4.3 Tons *1/1-12/31 143 0 0 Broad. 50 0.00 11.63 0.00 46.51 2383 5 S22 Durham 4.80 4.00 Fescue Pasture 4.3 Tons *1/1-12/31 143 0 0 Broad. 43 0.00 2.65 0.00 10.62 2383 5 S2 Durham 4.80 4.00 Fescue Pasture 4.3 Tons *1/1-12/31 143 0 0 Broad. 50 5.05 0.00 20.201 0.00 2384 6 SI Georgeville 6.50 6.50 Small Grain,Silage 10.8 9/1-3/31 117 0 0 Broad. 21 0.00 4.93 0.00 32.05 2384 6 S22 Georgeville 6.50 6.50 Small Grain,Silage 10.8 9/1-3/31 117 0 0 Broad. 15 0.00 0.89 0.00 5.82 2384 6 S2 Georgeville 6.50 6.50 Small Grain,Silage 10.8 9/1-3/31 117 0 0 Injec. 17 1.11 0.00 7.22 0.00 2384 6 S1 Georgeville 6.50 6.50 Soybeans,Manured,Full Season 49 bu. 4/1-9/15 190 1 0 Broad. 64 0.00 14.88 0.00 96.74 2384 6 S22 Georgeville 6.50 6.50 Soybeans,Manured,Full Season 49 bu. 4/1-9/15 190 1 0 Broad. 62 0.00 3.83 u.00 24.88 2384 6 S2 Georgeville 6.50 6.50 Soybeans,Manured,Full Season 49 bu. 4/1-9/15 190 1 0 Broad. 63 6.36 0.00 41.37 0.00 2392 1 S1 Tatum 19.20 19.00 Small Grain,Silage 9.5 Tons 9/1-3/31 103 0 0 Broad. 16 0.00 3.72 0.00 70.70 2392 1 S22 Tatum 19.20 19.00 Small Grain,Silage 9.5 Tons 9/1-3/31 103 0 0 Broad. 15 0.00 0.93 0.00 17.59 2392 1 S2 Tatum 19.20 19.00 Small Grain,Silage 9.5 Tons 9/1-3/31 103 0 0 Injec. 17 1.08 0.00 20.49 0.00 2392 1 S1 Tatum 19.20 19.00 Soybeans,Manured,Full Season 43 bu. 4/1-9/15 166 0 0 Broad. 55 0.00 12.79 0.00 243.02 2392 1 S22 Tatum 19.20 19.00 Soybeans,Manured,Full Season 43 bu. 4/1-9/15 166 0 0 Broad. 50 0.00 3.09 0.00 58.64 2392 1 S2 Tatum 19.20 19.00 Soybeans,Manured,Full Season 43 bu. 4/1-9/15 166 0 0 Broad. 61 6.16 0.00 117.08 0.00 2392 1 2 S1 Tatum 3.10 3.00 Small Grain,Silage 9.5 Tons 9/1-3/31 103 0 0 Broad. 16 0.001 3.72 0.00 11.16 2392 2 S22 Tatum 3.10 3.00 Small Grain,Silage 9.5 Tons 9/1-3/31 103 0 0 Broad. 15 0.00 0.93 0.00 2.78 Preview Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 2/18/2019 WUT Page 29 of 44 Waste Utilizat- ,Table _ear 2 Nitrogen Canm Res. Manure Liquid Solid Liquid Solid Manur PA Fert. (lbs/A) PA Manure. Manure Manure Applied Nutrient Nutrient Nutrient pplied Applied Applied (Field) Req'd Applied ppGed (acre) (acre) (Field) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) Source Total Use. Applic. Applic. 1000 Tract Field ID Soil Series Acres Acres Crop RYE Period N N N Method N gal/A Tons 1000 gals tons 2392 2 S2 Tatum 3.10 3.00 Small Grain,Silage 9.5 Tons 9/1-3/31 103 0 0 Injec. 17 1.08 0.00 3.24 0.00 2392 2 S1 Tatum 3.10 3.00 Soybeans,Manured,Full Season 43 bu. 4/1-9/15 166 0 0 Broad. 55 0.00 12.79 0.00 38.37 2392 2 S22 Tatum 3.10 3.00 Soybeans,Manured,Full Season 43 bu. 4/1-9/15 166 0 0 Broad. 50 0.00 3.09 0.00 9.26 2392 2 S2 ITatum 3.10 3.00 Soybeans,Manured,Full Season 43 bu. 4/1-9/15 166 0 0 Broad. 61 6.16 0.00 18.49 0.00 2392 3 S1 Herndon 6.30 6.00 Small Grain,Silage 10.4 9/1-3/31 112 0 0 Broad. 20 0.00 4.741 0.00 28.46 2392 3 S22 Herndon 6.30 6.00 Small Grain,Silage 10.4 9/1-3/31 112 0 0 Broad. 14 0.00 0.87 0.00 5.18 2392 3 S2 Hemdon 6.30 6.00 Small Grain,Silage 10.4 9/1-3/31 112 0 0 Injec. 17 1.08 0.00 6.471 0.00 2392 3 S1 Herndon 6.30 6.00 Soybeans,Manured,Full Season 48 bu. 4/1-9/15 186 0 0 Broad. 63 0.00 14.65 0.00 87.91 2392 3 S22 Herndon 6.30 6.00 Soybeans,Manured,Full Season 48 bu. 4/1-9/15 186 0 0 Broad. 61 0.00 3.77 0.00 22.59 2392 3 S2 Hemdon 6.30 6.00 Soybeans,Manured,Full Season 48 bu. 4/1-9/15 186 0 0 Broad. 62 6.36 0.00 38.19 0.00 2392 4 S1 Tatum 1.60 1.60 Small Grain,Silage 9.5 Tons 9/1-3/31 103 0 0 Broad. 16 0.00 3.72 0.00 5.95 2392 4 S22 Tatum 1.60 1.60 Small Grain,Silage 9.5 Tons 9/1-3/31 103 0 0 Broad. 15 0.00 0.93 0.00 1.48 2392 4 S2 Tatum 1.60 1.60 Small Grain,Silage 9.5 Tons 9/1-3/31 103 0 0 Injec. 17 1.08 0.00 1.73 0.00 2392 4 St Tatum 1.60 1.60 Soybeans,Manured,Full Season 43 bu. 4/1-9/15 166 0 0 Broad. 55 0.00 12.79 0.00 20.46 2392 4 S22 Tatum 1.60 1.60 Soybeans,Manured,Full Season 43 bu. 4/1-9/15 166 0 0 Broad. 50 0.00 3.09 0.00 4.94 2392 4 S2 Tatum 1.60 L60 Soybeans,Manured,Full Season 43 bu. 4/1-9/15 166 0 0 Broad. 61 6.16 0.00 9.86 0.00 2392 1 5 SI Georgeville 2.30 2.00 Small Grain,Silage 10.4 9/1-3/31 112 0 0 Broad. 20 0,001 4.74 0.00 9.49 2392 5 S22 Georgeville 2.30 2.00 Small Grain,Silage 10.4 9/1-3/31 112 0 0 Broad. 14 0.00 0.87 0.00 1.73 2392 5 S2 Georgeville 2.30 2.00 Small Grain,Silage 10.4 9/1-3/31 112 0 0 Injec. 17 1.08 0.00 2.16 0.00 2392 5 S1 Georgeville 2.30 2.00 Soybeans,Manured,Full Season 48 bu. 4/1-9/15 186 0 0 Broad. 63 0.00 14.65 0.00 29.30 2392 5 S22 Georgeville 2.30 2.00 Soybeans,Manured,Full Season 48 bu. 4/1-9/15 186 0 0 Broad. 61 0.00 3.77 0.00 7.53 2392 5 S2 Georgeville 2.30 2.00 Soybeans,Manured,Full Season 48 bu. 4/1-9/15 186 0 0 Broad. 62 6.36 0.00 12.73 0.00 Preview Database Version 3.1 Date Printed:2/18/2019 WUT Page 30 of 44 Waste Utiliza. ..Table ear 2 Nitrogen Comm Res. Manure Liquid Solid Liquid Solid Manur PA Fert. (Ibs/A) PA Manure.I Manure Manure Applied Nutrient Nutrient Nutrienr.I pplied Applied Applied (Field) Req'd Applied POW (acre) (acre) (Field) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) Source Total Use. Applic. Applic. 1000 Tract Field ID Soil Series Acres Acres Crop RYE Period N N N Method N gal/A Tons 1000 gals tons 2392 6 Sl Georgeville 6.40 6.00 Small Grain,Silage 10.8 9/1-3/31 117 0 0 Broad. 21 0.00 4.93 0.00 29.58 2392 6 S22 Georgeville 6.40 6.00 Small Grain,Silage 10.8 9/1-3/31 117 0 0 Broad. 15 0.00 0.89 0.00 5.37 2392 6 S2 Georgeville 6.40 6.00 Small Grain,Silage 10.8 9/1-3/31 117 0 0 Injec. J62 1.11 0.00 6.67 0.00 2392 6 S1 Georgeville 6.40 6.00 Soybeans,Manured,Full Season 49 bu. 4/1-9/15 190 1 0 Broad. 0.00 14.88 0.00 89.30 2392 6 S22 Georgeville 6.40 6.00 Soybeans,Manured,Full Season 49 bu. 4/1-9/15 190 1 0 Broad. 0,00 3.83 0.001 22.96 2392 6 S2 Georgeville 6.40 6.00 Soybeans,Manured,Full Season 49 bu. 4/1-9/15 190 1 0 Broad.J 631 6.36 0.00 38.19 0.00 2392 7 Sl Georgeville 5.70 5.70 Small Grain,Silage 10.4 9/1-3/31 112 0 0 Broad. 12 0.00 2.79 0.00 15.91 2392 7 S22 Georgeville 5.70 5.70 Small Grain,Silage 10.4 9/1-3/31 112 0 0 Broad. 10 0.00 0.62 0.00 3.52 2392 7 S2 Georgeville 5.70 5.70 Small Grain,Silage 10.4 9/1-3/31 112 0 0 Injec. 14 0.88 0.00 5.03 0.00 2392 7 S1 Georgeville 5.70 5.70 Soybeans,Manured,Full Season 48 bu. 4/1-9/15 186 78 0 Broad. 40 0.00 9.30 0.00 53.02 2392 7 S22 Georgeville 5.70 5.70 Soybeans,Manured,Full Season 48 bu. 4/l-9/15 186 78 0 Broad. 30 0.00 L85 0.00 10.56 2392 7 S2 Georgeville 5.70 5.70 Soybeans,Manured,Full Season 48 bu. 4/1-9/15 186 78 0 Broad. 38 3.84 0.00 21.88 0.00 2415 1 Sl Appling 19.30 19.00 Small Grain,Silage 10.9 9/1-3/31 *125 0 0 Broad. 0 0.00 2.79 0.00 53.02 2415 1 S22 Appling 19.30 1')11iI )mall Grain,Silage 10.9 9/1-3/31 *125 L 0 0 Broad. 0 0.00 0.62 0.00 11.73 2415 1 S2 Appling 19.30 19.00 Small Grain,Silage 10.9 9/1-3/31 *125 0 0 Injec. 14 0.88 0.00 t6.77 0.00 2415 1 S1 Appling 19.30 19.00 Soybeans,Manured,Full Season 52 bu. 4/1-9/15 *112 4 0 Broad. 40 0.00 9.3 0.00 176.74 2415 1 S22 Appling 19.30 19.00 Soybeans,Manured,Full Season 52 bu. 4/1-9/15 *112 4 0 Broad. 30 0.00 1 85 0.00 35.19 2415 1 S2 Appling 19.30 19.00 Soybeans,Manured,Full Season 52 bu. 4/1-9/15 *112 4 0 Broad. 38 3.84 0.00 72.94 0.00 2415 3 S1 Herndon t0.00 10.00 Small Grain,Silage 10.1 9/1-3/31 109 0 0 Broad. 20 0.00 4.65 0.00 46.51 2415 3 S22 Hemdon 10.00 10,00 Small Grain,Silage 10.1 9/1-3/31 109 0 0 Broad. 14 0.00 0.83 0.00 8.34 2415 3 S2 Herndon 10.00 10.00 Small Grain,Silage 10.1 9/1-3/31 109 0 0 Injec. 16 1.05 0.00 10.46 0.0 2415 3 S1 Herndon 10.00 10.00 Soybeans,Manured,Full Season 46 bu. 4/1-9/15 1 178 0 0 Broad. 60 0.00 13.95 0.00 139.53 Preview Database Version 3.1 Date Printed:2/18/2019 WUT Page 31 of 44 Waste Utilizat,-i Table _ear 2 Nitrogen Cornet Res. Manure Liquid Solid Liquid SolidManur PA Fert. (lbs/A) PA Manure' Manure Manure Applied Nutrient Nutrient NutrienO pplied Applied Applied (Field) Req'd Applied pplied (acre) (acre) (Field) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) Source Total Use. Applic. Applic. 1000 Tract Field ID Soil Series Acres Acres Crop RYE Period N N N Method N gal/A Tons 1000 gals tons 2415 3 S22 Hemdon 10.00 10.00 Soybeans,Manured,Full Season 46 bu. 4/1-9/15 178 0 0 Broad. 58 0.00 3.58 0.00 35.80 2415 3 S2 Hemdon 10.00 10.00 Soybeans,Manured,Full Season 46 bu. 4/1-9/15 178 0 0 Broad. 60 6.06 0.00 60.61 0.00 2415 3a SI Hemdon 4.00 4.00 Fescue Pasture 4.9Tons *1/1-12/31 159 0 1 0 Broad.1 56 0.00 13.02 0.00 52.09 2415 3a S22 Hemdon 4.00 4.00 Fescue Pasture 4.9 Tons *1/1-12/31 159 0 0 Broad. 48 0.00 2.96 0.00 11.85 2415 3a S2 Herndon 4.00 4.00 Fescue Pasture 4.9 Tons *1/1-12/31 159 0 0 Broad. 55 5.56 0.00 22.22 0.00 2415 5 N,A Hemdon 6.30 6.00 Fescue Pasture 4.6Tons *I-I-12.31 150 150 0 NA 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2415 6 S1 Callison 6.00 6.00 Fescue Pasture 4.3 Tons *1/1-12/31 140 0 0 Broad. 50 0.00 11.63 0.00 69.77 2415 6 S22 Callison 6.00 6.00 Fescue Pasture 4.3 Tons *1/1-12/31 140 0 0 Broad. 40 0.00 2.47 0.00 14.81 2415 6 S2 Callison 6.00 6.00 Fescue Pasture 4.3 Tons *1/1-12/31 140 0 0 Broad. 50 5.05 0.00 30.31 0.00 2415 6A S1 Callison 6.00 6.00 Fescue Pasture 4.3 Tons *1/1-12/31 140 0 0 Broad. 49 0.00 11.40 0.00 68.37 2415 6A S22 Callison 6.00 6.00 Fescue Pasture 4.3 Tons *1/1-12131 140 0 0 Broad. 42 0.00 2.59 0.00 15.56 2415 6A S2 Callison 6.00 6.00 Fescue Pasture 4.3 Tons *1/1-12/31 140 0 0 Broad. 49 4.95 0.00 29.70 0.00 2415 7 S1 Appling 24.70 24.70 Small Grain,Silage 11.3 9/1-3/31 125 0 0 Broad. 12 0.00 2.88 0.00 71.23 2415 7 S22 Appling 24.70 24.70 Small Grain,Silage 11.3 9/1-3/31 125 0 0 Broad. 11 0.00 0.65 0.00 16.01 2415 7 S2 Appling 24.70 24.70 Small Grain,Silage 11.3 911-3/31 125 0 0 Injec. 14 0.92 0.00 22.60 0.00 2415 7 S1 Appling 24.70 24.70 Soybeans,Manured,Full Season 54 bu. 4/1-9/15 *140 29 0 Broad. 41 0.00 9.53 0.00 235.51 2415 7 S22 Appling 24.70 24.70 Soybeans,Manured,Full Season 54 bu. 4/1-9/15 *140 29 0 Broad. 31 0.00 1.91 0.00 47.27 2415 7 S2 Appling 24.70 24.70 Soybeans,Manured,Full Season 54 bu. 4/1-9/15 *140 29 0 Broad. 39 3.94 0.00 97.31 0.00 30369 1 S1 Georgeville 6.00 6.00 Small Grain,Silage 10.8 9/1-3/31 117 0 0 Broad. 21 0.00 4.84 0.00 29.02 30369 1 S22 Georgeville 6.00 6.00 Small Grain,Silage 10.8 9/1-3/31 117 0 0 Broad. 15 0.00 0.93 0.00 5.55 30369 1 S2 Georgeville 6.00 6.00 Small Grain,Silage 10.8 9/1-3/31 117 0 0 Injec. 18 1.14 0.00 6.86 0.0 30369 1 St Georgeville 6.00 6.00 Soybeans,Manured,Full Season 49 bu. 4/1-9/15 190 1 0 Broad. 63 0.00 14.65 0.00 87.91 Preview Database Version 3.1 Date Printed:2/18/2019 WUT Page 32 of 44 Waste Utilizat►_. Table _"r 2 Nilrcgen Cantn. Res. Manure Liquid Solid Liquid Solid Manor PA Fert. (lbs/Al PA Manure Manure Manure Applied Nutrient Nutrient Nutrient pplied Applied Applied (Field) Req'd Applied pplied (acre) (acre) (Field) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) Source Total Use. Applic. Applic. 1000 Tract Field ID Soil Series Acres Acres Crop RYE Period N N N Method N gal/A Tons 1000 gals tons 30369 1 S22 Georgeville 6.00 6.00 Soybeans,Manured,Full Season 49 bu. 4/1-9/15 190 1 0 Broad. 63 0.00 3.89 0.00 23.33 30369 1 S2 Georgeville 6.00 6.00 Soybeans,Manured,Full Season 49 bu. 4/1-9/15 190 1 0 Broad. 63 6.36 0.00 38.19 0.00 30369 2 S1 Georgeville 5.00 5.00 Small Grain,Silage 10.8 9/1-3/31 117 0 0 Broad. 21 0.00 4.84 0.00 24.18 30369 2 S22 Georgeville 5.00 5 f10 Small Grain,Silage 10.8 9/1-3/31 117 0 0 Broad. 15 0.00 0.93 0.00 4.63 30369 2 S2 Georgeville 5.00 5.00 Small Grain,Silage 10.8 9/1-3/31 117 0 0 Injec. 18 1.14 0.00 5.72 0.00 30369 2 S1 Georgeville 5.00 5.00 Soybeans,Manured,Full Season 49 bu. 4/1-9/15 190 1 0 Broad. 63 0.00 14.65 0.00 73.25 30369 2 S22 Georgeville 5.00 5.00 Soybeans,Manured,Full Season 49 bu. 4/1-9/15 190 1 0 Broad. 63 0.00 3.89 0.00 19.44 30369 2 S2 Georgeville 5.00 5.00 Soybeans,Manured,Full Season 49 bu. 4/1-9/15 190 1 0 Broad. 63 6.36 0.00 31.82 0.00 30369 3 S1 I Georgeville 7.00 7.00 Small Grain,Silage 10.8 9/1-3/31 117 0 0 Broad. 21 0.00 4.84 0.00 33.86 30369 3 S22 Georgeville 7.00 7.00 Small Grain,Silage 10.8 9/1-3/31 117 0 0 Broad. 15 0.00 0.93 0.00 6.48 30369 3 S2 Georgeville 7.00 7.00 Small Grain,Silage 10.8 9/1-3/31 117 0 0 Injec. 18 1.14 0.00 8.01 0.00 30369 3 S1 Georgeville 7.00 7.00 Soybeans,Manured,Full Season 49 bu. 4/1-9/15 190 1 0 Broad. 63 0.00 14.65 0.00 102.56 30369 3 S22 Georgeville 7.00 7.00 Soybeans,Manured,Full Season 49 bu. 4/1-9/15 190 1 0 Broad. 63 0.00 3.89 0.00 27.22 30369 3 S2 Georgeville 7.00 7.00 Soybeans,Manured,Full Season 49 bu. 4/1-9/15 190 1 0 Broad. 63 6.36 0.00 44.55 0.00 30370 1 S1 Georgeville I Luj 1.00 Small Grain,Silage 10.8 9/1-3/31 117 0 0 Broad. 21 0.00 4.841 0.00 4.84 30370 1 S22 Georgeville 1.00 1.00 Small Grain,Silage 10.8 9/1-3/31 117 0 0 Broad. 15 0.00 0.93 (M9) 0.93 30370 1 S2 Georgeville 1.00 1.00 Small Grain,Silage 10.8 9/1-3/31 117 0 0 Injec. 18 1.14 0.00 1.14 0.00 30370 1 S1 Georgeville 1.00 L00 Soybeans,Manured,Full Season 49 bu. 4/1-9/15 190 1 0 Broad. 63 0.00 14.65 0.00 14.65 30370 1 S22 Georgeville 1.00 1.00 Soybeans,Manured,Full Season 49 bu. 4/1-9/15 190 1 0 Broad. 63 0.00 3.89 0.00 3.89 30370 1 S2 Georgeville 1.00 1.00 Soybeans,Manured,Full Season 49 bu. 4/1-9/15 190 1 0 Broad. 63 6.36 0.00 6.36 0.00 30370 2 S1 Georgeville 1.50 1.50 Small Grain,Silage 10.8 9/1-3/31 117 0 0 Broad, 21 0.00 4.84 0.00 7.26 30370 2 S22 Georgeville 1.50 1.50 Small Grain,Silage 10.8 9/1-3/31 117 0 0 Broad. 15 0.00 0.93 0.00 1.39 Preview Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 2/18/2019 WUT Page 33 of 44 Waste Utiliza.. ..Table -car 2 Nitrogen Canm Res. Manure Liquid Solid Liquid Solid Manur PA Fort. (lbs/A) PA Manure Manure Manure Applied Nutrient Nutrient NutrienO pplied Applied Applied (Field) Req'd Applied pplied (acre) (acre) (Field) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) Source Total Use. Applic. Applic. 1000 Tract Field ID Soil Series Acres Acres Crop RYE Period N N N Method N gal/A Tons 1000 gals tons 30370 2 S2 Georgeville 1.50 1.50 Small Grain,Silage 10.8 9/1-3/31 117 0 0 Injec. 18 1.14 0.00 1.72 0.00 30370 2 S1 Georgeville 1.50 1.50 Soybeans,Manured,Full Season 49 bu. 4/1-9/15 190 1 0 Broad. 63 0.00 14.65 0.00 21.98 30370 2 S22 Georgeville 1.50 1.50 Soybeans,Manured,Full Season 49 bu. 4/1-9/15 190 1 0 Broad. 63 0.00 3.89 0.00 5.83 30370 2 S2 Georgeville 1.50 1.50 Soybeans,Manured,Full Season 49 bu. 4/1-9/15 190 1 0 Broad. 63 6.36 0.00 9.55 0.00 30370 3 Sl Georgeville 4.00 4.00 Small Grain,Silage 10.8 9/1-3/31 117 0 0 Broad. 21 0.00 4.84 0.00 19.35 30370 3 S22 Georgeville 4.00 4.00 Small Grain,Silage 10.8 9/1-3/31 117 0 0 Broad. 15 0.00 0.93 0.00 3.70 30370 3 S2 Georgeville 4.00 4.00 Small Grain,Silage 10.8 9/1-3/31 117 0 0 Injec. 18 1.14 0.00 4.58 0.00 30370 3 SI Georgeville 4.00 4.00 Soybeans,Manured,Full Season 49 bu. 4/1-9/15 190 1 0 Broad. 63 0.00 14.65 0.00 58.60 30370 3 S22 Georgeville 4.00 4.00 Soybeans,Manured,Full Season 49 bu. 4/1-9/15 190 1 0 Broad. 63 0.00 3.89 0.00 1.5.56 30370 3 S2 Georgeville 4.00 4.00 Soybeans,Manured,Full Season 49 bu. 4/1-9/15 190 1 0 Broad. 63 6.36 0.00 25.46 0.00 30370 5 S1 Georgeville 3.50 3.50 Small Grain,Silage 10.8 9/1-3/31 117 0 0 Broad. 21 0.001 4.84 0.00 16.93 30370 5 S22 Georgeville 3.50 3.50 Small Grain,Silage 10.8 9/1-3/31 117 0 0 Broad. 15 0.00 0.93 0.00 3.24 30370 5 S2 Georgeville 3.50 3.50 Small Grain,Silage 10.8 9/1-3/31 117 0 0 Injec. 18 1.14 0.00 4.00 0.00 30370 5 S1 Georgeville 3.50 3.50 Soybeans,Manured,Full Season 49 bu. 4/I-9/15 190 1 0 Broad. 63 0.00 14.65 0.00 51.28 30370 5 S22 Georgeville 3.50 3.50 Soybeans,Manured,Full Season 49 bu. 4/1-9/15 190 1 0 Broad. 63 0.00 3.89 0.00 13.61 30370 5 S2 Georgeville 3.50 3.50 Soybeans,Manured,Full Season 49 bu. 4/1-9/15 190 1 0 Broad. 63 6.36 0.00 22.28 0.00 30370 6 Sl Georgeville 2.70 2.70 Small Grain,Silage 10.8 9/1-3/31 117 0 0 Broad. 21 0.001 4.84 0.001 13.06 30370 6 S22 Georgeville 2.70 2.70 Small Grain,Silage 10.8 9/1-3/31 117 0 0 Broad. 15 0.00 0.93 0.00 2.50 30370 6 S2 Georgeville 2.70 2.70 Small Grain,Silage 10.8 9/1-3/31 117 0 0 Injec, 18 1.14 0.00 3.09 0.00 30370 6 SI Georgeville 2.70 2.70 Soybeans,Manured,Full Season 49 bu. 4/1-9/15 190 1 0 Broad. 63 0.00 14.65 0.00 39.56 30370 6 S22 Georgeville 2.70 2.70 Soybeans,Manured,Full Season 49 bu. 4/1-9/15 190 1 0 Broad. 63 0.00 3.89 0.00 10.50 30370 6 S2 Georgeville 2.70 2.70 Soybeans,Manured,Full Season 49 bu. 4/1-9/15 190 1 0 Broad. 63 6.36 0.00 17.18 0.00 Preview Database Version 3.1 Date Printed:2/18/2019 WUT Page 34 of 44 Waste Utilizat, Table __ar 2 Nitrogen Comm. Res. Manure Liquid Solid Liquid Solid Manur PA Fert. (lbs/Al PA ManuTO Manure Manure Applied Nutrient Nutrient NutrienO pplied Applied Applied (Field) Req'd Applied ppfied (acre) (acre) (Field) (lbs/A) (lbslA) (1bs/A) Source Total Use. Applic. Applic. 1000 Tract Field ID Soil Series Acres Acres Crop RYE Period N N N Method N gal/A Tans 1000 gals tons 53 1 SI Appling 25.00 25.00 Small Grain,Silage 11.3 9/1-3/31 125 0 0 Broad. 14 0.00 3.26 0.00 81.40 53 1 S22 Appling 25.00 25.00 Small Grain,Silage 11.3 9/1-3/31 125 0 0 Broad. 10 0.00 0.621 0.00 15.43 53 1 S2 Appling 25.00 25.00 Small Grain,Silage 11.3 9/1-3/31 125 0 1 0 Injec. 11 0.72 0.00 17.98 0.00 53 1 Sl Appling 25.00 25.00 Soybeans,Manured,Full Season 54 bu. 4/1-9/15 210 79 0 Broad, 44 0,00 10.23 0.00 255.81 53 1 S22 Appling 25.00 25.00 Soybeans,Manured,Full Season 54 bu. 4/1-9/15 210 79 0 Broad. 44 0.00 2.72 0.00 67.90 53 1 S2 Appling 25.00 25.00 Soybeans,Manured,Full Season 54 bu. 4/1-9/15 210 79 0 Broad. 43 4.34 0.00 108.601 0.00 53 2 Sl Appling 2.00 2.00 Small Grain,Silage 11.5 9/1-3/31 128 0 0 Broad. 14 0.00 3.26 0.00 6.51 53 2 S22 Appling 2.00 2.00 Small Grain,Silage 11.5 9/1-3/31 128 0 0 Broad. 10 0.00 0.62 0.00 1.24 53 2 S2 Appling 2.00 2.00 Small Grain,Silage 11.5 9/1-3/31 128 0 0 Injec. 11 0.72 0.00 1.44 0.00 53 2 Sl Appling 2.00 2.00 Soybeans,Manured,Full Season 55 bu. 4/1-9/15 214 80 0 Broad. 45 0.00 10.46 0.00 20.93 53 2 S22 Appling 2.00 2.00 Soybeans,Manured,Full Season 55 bu. 4/1-9/15 214 80 0 Broad. 45 0.00 2.78 0.00 5.56 53 2 S2 Appling 2.00 2.00 Soybeans,Manured,Full Season 55 bu. 4/1-9/15 214 80 0 Broad. 44 4.45 0.00 8.89 0.00 53 3 S1 Appling 1.50 1.50 Small Grain,Silage 11.5 9/1-3/31 128 0 0 Broad. 14 0.00 3.26 0.00 4.88 53 3 S22 Appling 1.50 1.50 Small Grain,Silage 11.5 9/1-3131 128 0 0 Broad. 10 0.00 0.62 0.00 0.93 53 3 S2 Appling 1.50 1.50 Small Grain,Silage 11.5 9/1-3/31 128 0 0 Injec. 11 0.72 0.00 1.08 0.00 53 3 S1 Appling 1.50 1.50 Soybeans,Manured,Full Season 55 bu. 4/1-9/15 214 80 0 Broad. 45 0.00 10.46 0.00 15.70 53 3 S22 Appling 1.50 1.50 Soybeans,Manured,Full Season 55 bu. 4/1-9/15 214 80 0 Broad. 45 0.00 2.78 0.00 4.17 53 3 S2 Appling 1.50 1.50 Soybeans,Manured,Full Season 55 bu. 4/1-9/15 214 80 0 Broad. 44 4.45 0.00 6.67 0.00 53 4 S1 Appling 2.40 2.40 Small Grain,Silage 11.5 9/1-3/31 128 0 0 Broad. 14 0.00 3.26 0.00 7.81 53 4 S22 Appling 2.40 2.40 Small Grain,Silage 11.5 9/1-3/31 128 0 0 Broad. 10 0.00 0.62 0.00 1.48 53 4 S2 Appling 2.40 2.40 Small Grain,Silage 11.5 9/1-3/31 128 0 0 Injec. 11 0.72 0.00 1.73 0.00 53 4 S1 Appling 2.40 2.40 Soybeans,Manured,Full Season 55 bu. 4/1-9/15 214 80 0 Broad. 45 0.00 10.46 0.00 25,12 Preview Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 2/18/2019 WUT Page 35 of 44 Waste Utiliz:. ,n Table ear 2 Nitrogen Comm Res. Manure Liquid Solid Liquid SolidManur PA Fert. (Ibs/A) PA Manuru Manure Manure Applied Nutrient Nutrient NutrienO pplied Applied Applied (Field) Req'd Applied pplied (acre) (acre) (Field) (Ibs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) Source Total Use. Applic. Applic. 1000 Tract Field ID Soil Series Acres Acres Crop RYE Period N N N Method N gal/A 11 Tons 1000 gals tons 53 4 S22 Appling 2.40 2.40 Soybeans,Manured,Full Season 55 bu. 4/1-9/15 214 80 0 Broad. 45 0.00 2.78 0.00 6.67 53 4 S2 Appling 2.40 2.40 Soybeans,Manured,Full Season 55 bu. 4/1-9/15 214 80 0 Broad. 44 4.45 0.00 10.67 0.00 53 6 S1 Appling 3.00 3.00 Small Grain,Silage 11.5 9/1-3/31 128 0 0 Broad. 14 0.00 3.26 0.00 9.77 53 6 S22 Appling 3.00 3.00 Small Grain,Silage 11.5 9/1-3/31 128 0 0 Broad. 10 0.00 0.62 0.00 1.85 53 6 S2 Appling 3.00 3.00 Small Grain,Silage 11.5 9/1-3/31 128 0 0 Injec. 11 0.72 0.00 2.16 0.00 53 6 Sl Appling 3.00 3.00 Soybeans,Manured,Full Season 55 bu. 4/1-9/15 214 80 0 Broad. 45 0.00 10.46 0,00 31.39 53 6 S22 Appling 3.00 3.00 Soybeans,Manured,Full Season 55 bu. 4/1-9/15 214 80 0 Broad. 45 0.00 2.78 0.00 8.33 53 6 S2 Appling 3.00 3.00 Soybeans,Manured,Full Season 55 bu. 4/1-9/15 214 80 0 Broad. 44 4.45 0.00 13.33 0.00 53 7 S1 Appling 0.50 0.50 Small Grain,Silage 11.5 9/1-3/31 128 0 0 Broad. 14 0.00 3.2+) 0.00 1.63 53 7 S22 Appling 0.50 0.50 Small Grain,Silage 11.5 9/1-3/31 128 0 0 Broad. 10 0.00 0.62 0.00 0.31 53 7 S2 Appling 0.50 0.50 Small Grain,Silage 11.5 9/1-3/31 128 0 0 Injec. 11 0.72 0.00 0.36 0.0 53 7 S1 Appling 0.50 0.50 Soybeans,Manured,Full Season 55 bu. 4/1-9/15 214 80 0 Broad. 45 0.00 16 46 Ojg) 5.23 53 7 S22 Appling 0.50 0.50 Soybeans,Manured,Full Season 55 bu. 4/1-9/15 214 80 0 Broad. 45 0.00 2.78 0.�){1 1.39 53 7 S2 Appling 0.50 0.50 Soybeans,Manured,Full Season 55 bu. 4/1-9/15 214 80 0 Broad. 44 4.45 0.00 2.22 0.00 53 9 SI I Appling 0.50 0.50 Small Grain,Silage 11.5 9/1-3/31 128 0 0 Broad. 14 0.00 3.26 0.00 1.63 53 9 S22 Appling 0.50 0.50 Small Grain,Silage 11.5 9/1-3/31 128 0 0 Broad. 10 0.00 0.62 0.00 0.31 53 9 S2 Appling 0.50 0.50 Small Grain,Silage 11.5 9/1-3/31 128 0 0 Injec. 11 0.72 0.00 0.36 0.00 53 9 S1 Appling 0.50 0.50 Soybeans,Manured,Full Season 55 bu. 4/1-9/15 214 80 0 Broad. 45 0.00 10.46 0.00 5.23 53 9 S22 Appling 0.50 0.50 Soybeans,Manured,Full Season 55 bu. 4/1-9/15 214 80 0 Broad. 45 0.00 2.78 0.00 1.39 53 9 S2 Appling 0.50 0.50 Soybeans,Manured,Full Season 55 bu. 4/1-9/15 214 80 0 Broad. 44 4.45 0.00 2.22 0.00 534 l Sl Appling 6,10 ±OSmall allGrain,Silage 11.3 9/1-3/31 125 0 0 Broad. 14 0.00 3.26 0.00 19.534 1 S22 Appling 6.10 Grain,Silage 11.3 9/1-3/31 125 0 0 Broad. 10 0.00 0.62 0.00 3.77 Preview Database Version 3.1 Date Printed:2/18/2019 WUT Page 36 of 44 Waste Utiliza ..Table -car 2 Nitrogen Comm Res. Manure Liquid Solid Liquid Solid Manor PA Fert. (Ibs/Ai PA Manure Manure Manure Applied Nutrient Nutrient Nutrient pplied Applied Applied (Field) Req'd Applied pplied (acre) (acre) (Field) (Ibs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) Source Total Use. Applic, Applic. 1000 Tract Field ID Soil Series Acres Acres Crop RYE Period N N N Method N gal/A Tons 1000 gals tons 534 1 S2 Appling 6.10 6.10 Small Grain,Silage 11.3 9/1-3/31 125 0 0 Injec. 11 0.72 0.00 4.39 0.00 534 1 S1 Appling 6.10 6.10 Soybeans,Manured,Full Season 54 bu. 4/1-9/15 210 79 0 Broad. 44 0.00 10.23 0.00 62.42 534 1 S22 Appling 6.10 6.10 Soybeans,Manured,Full Season 54 bu. 4/1-9/15 210 79 0 Broad. 44 0.00 2.72 0.00 16.57 534 1 S2 Appling 6.10 6.10 Soybeans,Manured,Full Season 54 bu. 4/1-9/15 210 79 0 Broad. 43 4.34 0.00 26.50 0.00 534 2 S1 Appling 9.10 9.10 Small Grain,Silage 11.3 9/1-3/31 125 0 0 Broad. 14 0.00 3.26 0.00 29.63 534 2 S22 Appling 9.10 9.10 Small Grain,Silage 11.3 9/1-3/31 125 0 0 Broad. 10 0.00 0.62 0.00 5.61 534 2 S2 Appling 9.10 9.10 Small Grain,Silage 11.3 9/1-3/31 125 0 0 Injec. 111 0.72 0.00 6.54 0.00 534 2 St Appling 9.10 9.10 Soybeans,Manured,Full Season 54 bu. 4/1-9/15 210 79 0 Broad. 44 0.00 10.23 0.00 93.11 534 2 S22 Appling 9.10 9.10 Soybeans,Manured,Full Season 54 bu. 4/1-9/15 210 79 0 Broad. 44 0.00 2.72 0.00 24.72 534 2 S2 Appling 9.10 9.10 Soybeans,Manured,Full Season 54 but. 4/1-9/15 210 79 0 Broad. 43 4.34 0.00 39.53 0.00 534 3 S1 Appling 3.80 3.80 Small Grain,Silage 11.3 9/1-3/31 125 0 0 Broad. 14 0.00 3.26 0.00 12.37 534 3 S22 Appling 3.80 3.80 Small Grain,Silage 11.3 9/1-3/31 125 0 0 Broad. 10 0.00 0.62 0.00 2.35 534 3 S2 Appling 3.80 3.80 Small Grain,Silage 11.3 9/1-3/31 125 0 0 Injec. 11 0.72 0.00 2.73 0.00 534 3 SL Appling 3.80 3.80 Soybeans,Manured,Full Season 54 bu. 4/1-9/15 210 79 0 Broad. 44 0.00 10.23 0.00 38.88 534 3 S22 Appling 3.80 3.80 Soybeans,Manured,Full Season 54 bu. 4/1-9/15 210 79 0 Broad. 44 0.00 2.72 0.00 10.32 534 3 S2 Appling 3.80 3.80 Soybeans,Manured,Full Season 54 bu. 4/1-9/15 210 79 0 Broad. 43 4.34 0.00 16.51 0.00 540 1 S1 Georgeville 7.40 7.40 Small Grain,Silage 10.4 9/1-3/31 112 0 0 Broad. 20 0.00 4.74 0.00 35.11 540 1 S22 Georgeville 7.40 7.40 Small Grain,Silage 10.4 9/1-3/31 112 0 0 Broad. 14 0.00 0.87 0.00 6.39 540 1 S2 Georgeville 7.40 7.40 Small Grain,Silage 10.4 9/1-3/31 112 0 0 Injec. 17 1.08 0.00 7.98 0.00 540 1 S1 Georgeville 7.40 7.40 Soybeans,Manured,Full Season 48 bu. 4/1-9/15 186 0 0 Broad. 63 0.00 14.65 0.00 108.42 540 1 S22 Georgeville 7.40 7.40 Soybeans,Manured,Full Season 48 bu. 4/1-9/15 186 0 0 Broad. 61 0.00 3.77 0.00 27.86 540 1 S2 Georgeville 7.40 7.40 Soybeans,Manured,Full Season 48 bu. 4/1-9/15 186 0 0 Broad. 621 6.26 0.00 46.35 0.00 Preview Database Version 3.1 Date Printed:2/18/2019 WUT Page 37 of 44 Waste Utiliza. t Table -ear 2 tiirogen Conm Res. Manure Liquid Solid Liquid SolidManur PA Fert. (Ibs/A) PA Manure. Manure Manure Applied Nutrient Nutrient Nutrienul pplied Applied Applied (Field) Req'd Applied POW (acre) (acme) (Field) (lbs/A) OWN (lbs/A) Source Total Use. AppGc. Applic. 1000 Tract Field ID Soil Series Acres Acres Crop RYE Period N N N Method N gal/A Tons 1000 gals tons 540 2 S1 Georgeville 15.59 15.59 Small Grain,Silage 10.4 9/1-3/31 112 0 0 Broad. 20 0.00 4.74 0.00 73.96 540 2 S22 Georgeville 15.59 15.59 Small Grain,Silage 10.4 9/1-3/31 112 0 0 Broad. 14 0.00 0.87 0.00 13.47 540 2 S2 Georgeville 15.59 15.59 Small Grain,Silage 10.4 9/1-3/31 112 0 0 Injec. 17 1.08 0.00 16.81 0.00 540 2 S1 Georgeville 15.59 15.59 Soybeans,Manured,Full Season 48 bu. 4/1-9/15 186 0 0 Broad. 63 0.00 14.65 0.00 228.41 540 2 S22 Georgeville 15.59 15.59 Soybeans,Manured,Full Season 48 bu. 4/1-9/15 186 0 0 Broad. 61 0.00 3.77 0.00 58.71 540 2 S2 Georgeville 15.59 15.59 Soybeans,Manured,Full Season 48 bu. 4/1-9/15 186 0 0 Broad. 62 6.26 0.00 97.64 0.00 540 3 S1 Georgeville 15.60 15.60 Fescue Pasture 4.8 Tons *1/1-12/31 156 36 0 Broad, 40 0.00 P?I] 0.00 145.11 540 3 S22 Georgeville 15.60 15.60 Fescue Pasture 4.8 Tons *1/1-12/31 156 36 0 Broad. 40 0.00 2.47 t1.Ot1 38.52 540 3 1 S2 Georgeville 15.60 IS.60 Fescue Pasture 4.8 Tons *1/1-12/31 156 36 0 Broad. 40 4.04 0.00 63.04 0.00 540 4 S1 Georgeville 2.70 2.70 Small Grain,Silage 10.4 9/1-3/31 112 0 0 Broad. 20 0.00 4.74 0.00 12.81 540 4 S22 Georgeville 2.70 2.70 Small Grain,Silage 10.4 9/1-3/31 112 0 0 Broad. 14 0.00 0.87 0.00 2.34 540 4 S2 Georgeville 2.70 2.70 Small Grain,Silage 10.4 9/1-3/31 112 0 0 Injec. 17 1.08 0.00 2.91 0.00 540 4 Sl Georgeville 2.70 2.70 Soybeans,Manured,Full Season 48 bu. 4/1-9/15 186 0 0 Broad. 63 0.00 14.65 0.00 39.56 540 4 S22 Georgeville 2.70 2.70 Soybeans,Manured,Full Season 48 bu. 4/1-9/15 186 0 0 Broad. 61 0.00 3.77 0.00 10.17 540 4 S2 Georgeville 2.70 2.70 Soybeans,Manured,Full Season 48 bu. 4/1-9/15 186 0 0 Broad. 62 6.26 0.00 16.91 0.00 540 5 Sl Georgeville 8.80 8.80 Small Grain,Silage 10.4 9/1-3/31 112 0 0 Broad. 20 0.00 4.74 0.00 41.75 540 5 S22 Georgeville 8.80 8.80 Small Grain,Silage 10.4 9/1-3/31 112 0 0 Broad. 14 0.00 0.87 0.001 7.61 540 5 S2 Georgeville 8.80 8.80 Small Grain,Silage 10.4 9/1-3/31 112 0 0 Injec. 17 1.08 0.00 9.49 0.00 540 5 St Georgeville 8.80 8.80 Soybeans,Manured,Full Season 48 bu. 4/1-9/15 186 0 0 Broad. 63 0.00 14.65 0.00 128.93 540 5 S22 Georgeville 8.80 8.80 Soybeans,Manured,Full Season 48 bu. 4/1-9/15 186 0 0 Broad. 61 0.00 3.77 0.00 33.14 540 5 S2 Georgeville 8.80 8.80 Soybeans,Manured,Full Season 48 bu. 4/1-9/15 186 0 0 Broad. 62 6.26 0.00 55.12 0.00 540 6 S1 Georgeville 0.80 0.80 Fescue Pasture 4.9 Tons *1/1-12/31 159 0 0 Broad. 56 0.00 13.02 0.00 10.42 Preview Database Version 3.1 Date Printed:2/18/2019 WUT Page 38 of 44 Waste Utiliza. .Table ear 2 Nitrogen Comm. Res. Manure Liquid Solid Liquid Solid Manur PA Fert. (lbs/A) PA Manurer Manure Manure Apply Nutrient Nutrient NutrienL6 pplied Applied Applied (Field) Req'd Applied pPlied (acre) (acre) (Field) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) Source Total Use. Applic. Applic. 1000 Tract Field ID Soil Series Acres Acres Crop RYE Period N N N Method N gal/A Tons 1000 gals tons 540 6 S22 Georgeville 0.80 0.80 Fescue Pasture 4.9 Tons *1/1-12/31 159 0 0 Broad. 48 0.00 2.96 0.00 2.37 540 6 S2 Georgeville 0.80 0.80 Fescue Pasture 4.9 Tons *1/1-12/31 159 0 0 Broad. 55 5.66 0.00 4.53 0.00 540 7 S1 Appling 1.60 1.60 Fescue Pasture 4.3 Tons *1/1-12/31 143 0 0 Broad. 50 0.00 11.63 0.00 18.60 540 7 S22 Appling 1.60 1.60 Fescue Pasture 4.3 Tons *1/1-12/31 143 0 0 Broad. 43 0.00 2.65 0.00 4.25 540 7 S2 Appling 1.60 1.60 Fescue Pasture 4.3 Tons *1/1-12/31 143 0 0 Broad. 50 5.05 0.00 8.08 0.00 540 8 S1 Appling 6.20 6.20 Small Grain,Silage 11.3 9/1-3/31 125 0 0 Broad. 14 0.00 3.26 0.00 20.18 540 8 S22 Appling 6.20 6.20 Small Grain,Silage 11.3 9/1-3/31 125 0 0 Broad. 10 0.00 0.62 0.00 3.83 540 8 S2 Appling 6.20 6.20 Small Grain,Silage 11.3 9/1-3/31 125 0 0 Injec. 11 0.72 0.00 4.46 0.00 540 8 St Appling 6.20 6.20 Soybeans,Manured,Full Season 54 bu. 4/1-9/15 210 78 0 Broad. 44 0.00 10.23 0.00 63.44 540 8 S22 Appling 6.20 6.20 Soybeans,Manured,Full Season 54 bu. 4/1-9/15 210 78 0 Broad. 44 0.00 2.72 0.00 16.84 540 8 S2 Appling 6.20 6.20 Soybeans,Manured,Full Season 54 bu. 4/1-9/15 210 78 0 Broad. 44 4.45 0.00 27.56 0.00 540 9 S1 Appling 5.30 5.30 Small Grain,Silage 11.3 9/1-3/31 125 0 0 Broad. 14 0.00 3.26 0.00 17.26 540 9 S22 Appling 5.30 5.30 Small Grain,Silage 11.3 9/1-3/31 125 0 0 Broad. 10 0.00 0.62 0.00 3.27 540 9 S2 Appling 5.30 5.30 Small Grain,Silage 11.3 9/1-3/31 125 0 0 Injec. 11 0.72 0.00 3.81 0.00 540 9 S1 Appling 5.30 5.30 Soybeans,Manured,Full Season 54 bu. 4/1-9/15 210 78 0 Broad. 44 0.00 10.231 0.00 54.23 540 9 S22 Appling 5.30 5.30 Soybeans,Manured,Full Season 54 bu. 4/1-9/15 210 78 0 Broad. 44 0.00 2.72 0.00 14.40 540 9 S2 Appling 5.30 5.30 Soybeans,Manured,Full Season 54 bu. 4/1-9/15 210 78 0 Broad. 44 4.45 0.00 23.56 0.00 551 1 SI Appling 7.30 7.30 Small Grain,Silage 11.3 9/1-3/31 125 0 0 Broad. 14 0.00 3.26 0.00 23.77 551 I S22 Appling 7.30 7.30 Small Grain,Silage 11.3 9/1-3/31 125 0 0 Broad. 10 0.00 0.62 0.00 4.51 551 1 S2 Appling 7.30 7.30 Small Grain,Silage 11.3 9/1-3/31 125 0 0 Injec. 11 0.72 0.00 5.25 0.00 551 t S1 Appling 7.30 7.30 Soybeans,Manured,Full Season 54 bu. 4/1-9/15 210 79 0 Broad. 44 0.00 10. 33 0.00 74.7 551 1 S22 Appling 7.30 7.30 Soybeans,Manured,Full Season 54 bu. 4/1-9/15 210 79 0 Broad. 44 0.00 2.72 0.00 19.83 Preview Database Version 3.1 Date Printed:2/18/2019 WUT Page 39 of 44 Waste Utiliz& Table -ar 2 ''rtrcgen Comm Res. Manure Liquid Solid Liquid Solid Manur PA Fert. (lbs/Al PA Manure Manure Manure Applied Nutrient Nutrient NutrienV pplied Applied Applied (Field) Req'd Applied pplied (acre) (acre) (Field) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) Source Total Use. Applic. Applic. 1000 Tract Field ID Soil Series Acres Acres Crop RYE Period N N N Method N gal/A Tons 1000 gals tons 551 1 S2 Appling 7.30 7.30 Soybeans,Manured,Full Season 54 bu. 4/1-9/15 210 79 0 Broad. 43 4.34 0.00 31.71 0.00 551 2 SI Appling 6.60 6.60 Small Grain,Silage 11.3 9/I-3/31 125 0 0 Broad. 14 0.00 3.26 0.00 21.49 551 2 S22 Appling 6.60 6.60 Small Grain,Silage 11.3 9/1-3/31 125 0 0 Broad. 10 0.00 0.62 0.00 4.07 551 2 S2 Appling 6.60 6.60 Small Grain,Silage 11.3 9/1-3/31 125 0 0 Injec. I l 0.72 0.00 4.75 0.00 551 2 S1 Appling 6.60 6.60 Soybeans,Manured,Full Season 54 bu. 4/1-9/15 210 79 0 Broad. 44 0.00 10.23 0.00 67.53 551 2 S22 Appling 6.60 6.60 Soybeans,Manured,Full Season 54 bu. 4/1-9/15 210 79 0 Broad. 44 0.00 2.72 0.00 17.93 551 2 S2 Appling 6.60 6.60 Soybeans,Manured,Full Season 54 bu. 4/1-9/15 210 79 0 Broad. 43 4.34 0.00 28.67 0.00 551 3 S 1 Appling 3.40 3.40 Small Grain,Silage 11.3 9/1-3/31 125 0 0 Broad. 14 0.00 3.26 0.00 11.07 551 3 S22 Appling 3.40 3.40 Small Grain,Silage 11.3 9/1-3/31 125 0 0 Broad. 10 0.00 0.62 0.00 2.10 551 3 S2 Appling 3.40 3.40 Small Grain,Silage 11.3 9/1-3/31 125 0 0 Injec. 11 0.72 0.00 2.44 0.00 551 3 S1 Appling 3.40 3.40 Soybeans,Manured,Full Season 54 bu. 4/1-9/15 210 79 0 Broad. 44 0.00 10.23 0.00 34.79 551 3 S22 Appling 3.40 3.40 Soybeans,Manured,Full Season 54 bu. 4/1-9/15 210 79 0 Broad. 44 0.00 2.72 0.00 9.23 551 3 S2 Appling 3.40 3.40 Soybeans,Manured,Full Season 54 bu. 4/1-9/15 210 79 0 Broad. 43 4.34 0.00 14.77 0.00 551 4 Sl Georgeville 4.00 4.00 Small Grain,Silage 10.8 9/1-3/31 *125 0 0 Broad. 21 0.00 4.931 0.00 19.72 551 4 S22 Georgeville 4.00 4.00 Small Grain,Silage 10.8 9/1-3/31 *125 0 0 Broad. 15 0.00 0.89 000 3.58 551 4 S2 Georgeville 4.00 4.00 Small Grain,Silage 10.8 9/1-3/31 *125 0 0 Injec. 17 1.11 0.00 4.45 0.00 551 4 Sl Georgeville 4.00 4.00 Soybeans,Manured,Full Season 49 bu. 4/1-9/15 190 1 0 Broad. 64 0.00 14.88 0.001 59.53 551 4 S22 Georgeville 4.00 4.00 Soybeans,Manured,Full Season 49 bu. 4/1-9/15 190 1 0 Broad. 62 0.00 3.83 0.00 15.31 551 4 S2 Georgeville 4.00 4.00 Soybeans,Manured,Full Season 49 bu. 4/1-9/15 190 1 0 Broad. 63 6.36 0.00 25.46 0.00 551 6 S1 Georgeville 9.50 9.50 Small Grain,Silage 10.8 9/1-3/31 *125 0 0 Broad. 21 0.00 4.93 0.00 46.84 551 6 S22 Georgeville 9.50 9.50 Sinai]Grain,Silage 10.8 9/1-3/31 *125 0 0 Broad. 15 0.00 0.89 0.00 8.51 551 6 S2 Georgeville 9.50 9.50 Small Grain,Silage 10.8 9/1-3/31 *125 0 0 Injec. 17 1.1 l 0.00 10.56 0.00 Preview Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 2/18/2019 WUT Page 40 of 44 Waste Utiliza. .Table -,ear 2 Nitrogen Cotnm Res. Manure Liquid Solid Liquid SolidManur PA Fert. (lbs/Al PA Manure Manure Manure Applied Nutrient Nutrient Nutrient: pplied Applied Applied (Field) Req'd Applied ppGed (acre) (acre) (Field) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) Source Total Use. Applic. Applic. 1000 Tract Field ID Soil Series Acres Acres Crop RYE Period N N N Method N gal/A Tons 1000 gals tons 551 6 St Georgeville 9.50 9.50 Soybeans,Manured,Full Season 49 bu. 4/1-9/15 190 1 0 Broad. 64 0.00 14.88 0.00 141.39 551 6 S22 Georgeville 9.50 9.50 Soybeans,Manured,Full Season 49 bu. 4/1-9/15 190 1 0 Broad. 62 0.00 3.83 0.00 36.36 551 6 S2 Georgeville 9.50 9.50 Soybeans,Manured,Full Season 49 bu. 4/1-9/15 190 1 0 Broad. 63 6.36 0.00 60.46 0.00 551 7 SI Hemdon 2.60 2.60 Small Grain,Silage 10.8 9/I-3/31 117 0 0 Broad. 21 0.00 4.93 0.00 12.82 551 7 S22 Hemdon 2.60 2.60 Small Grain,Silage 10.8 9/1-3/31 117 0 0 Broad. 15 0.00 0.89 0.00 2.33 551 7 S2 Hemdon 2.60 2.60 Small Grain,Silage 10.8 9/1-3/31 117 0 0 Injec. 17 1.11 0.00 2.84 0.00 551 7 S1 Herndon 2.60 2.60 Soybeans,Manured,Full Season 49 bu. 4/1-9/15 190 1 0 Broad. 64 0.00 14.88 0.00 38.70 551 7 S22 Hemdon 2.60 2.60 Soybeans,Manured,Full Season 49 bu. 4/1-9/15 190 1 0 Broad. 62 0.00 3.83 0.00 9.95 551 7 S2 Herndon 2.60 2.60 Soybeans,Manured,Full Season 49 bu. 4/1-9/15 190 1 0 Broad. 63 6.36 0.00 16.55 0.00 568 1 S1 Herndon 13.50 13.50 Small Grain,Silage 10.8 9/1-3/31 117 0 0 Broad. 21 0.001 4.93 0.00 66.56 568 l S22 Hemdon 13.50 13.50 Small Grain,Silage 10.8 9/1-3/31 117 0 0 Broad. 15 0.00 0.89 0.00 12.09 568 1 S2 Herndon 13.50 13.50 Small Grain,Silage 10.8 9/1-3/3I 117 0 0 Injec. 17 1.11 0.00 15.00 0.00 568 l Sl Herndon 13.50 13.50 Soybeans,Manured,Full Season 49 bu. 4/1-9/15 190 1 0 Broad. 64 0.00 14.88 0.00 200.93 568 1 S22 Herndon 13.50 13.50 Soybeans,Manured,Full Season 49 bu. 4/1-9/15 190 1 0 Broad. 62 0.00 3.83 0.00 51.67 568 1 S2 Hemdon 13.50 13.50 Soybeans,Manured,Full Season 49 bu. 4/1-9/15 190 1 0 Broad. 63 6.36 0.00 85.92 0.00 569 1 N/A Nanford 4.60 4.60 Soybeans,Manured,Full Season 43 bu. 4/1-9/15 166 166 0 N/A 01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 569 10 S1 Georgeville 7.201 7.20 Small Grain,Silage 10.4 9/1-3/31 112 0 0 Broad. 20 0.00 4.74 0.00 34.16 569 10 S22 Georgeville 7.20 7.20 Small Grain,Silage 10.4 9/1-3/31 112 0 0 Broad. 14 0.00 0.87 0.00 6.22 569 10 S2 Georgeville 7.20 7.20 Small Grain,Silage 10.4 9/1-3/31 112 0 0 Injec. 17 1.08 0.00 7.77 0.00 569 10 SI Georgeville 7.20 7.20 Soybeans,Manured,Full Season 48 bu. 4/1-9/15 186 0 0 Broad. 63 0.00 14.65 0.00 105.49 569 10 S22 Georgeville 7.20 7.20 Soybeans,Manured,Full Season 48 bu. 4/1-9/15 186 0 0 Broad. 61 0.00 3.77 0.00 27.11 569 1 10 S2 Georgeville 7.20 7.20 Soybeans,Manured,Full Season 48 bu. 4/1-9/15 186 0 0 Broad. 62 6.26 0.00 45.10 0.00 Preview Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 2/18/2019 WUT Page 41 of 44 Waste Utiliza, Table _.:ar 2 4ivogen Comm Res. Manure Liquid Solid Liquid SolidManur PA Fert. (lbs/Al PA Manu Manure Manure Applied Nutrient Nutrient NutrienY pplied Applied Applied (Field) Req'd Applied pplied (acre) (acre) (Field) (Ibs/A) (lbs/A) (Ibs/A) Source Total Use. Applic. Applic. 1000 Tract Field ID Soil Series Acres Acres Crop RYE Period N N N Method N gal/A Tons 1000 gals tons 569 11 SI Georgeville 51.90 51.90 Small Grain,Silage 10.4 9/1-3/31 112 0 0 Broad. 20 0.00 4.74 0.00 246.22 569 11 S22 Georgeville 51.90 51.90 Small Grain,Silage 10.4 9/1-3/31 112 0 0 Broad. 14 0.00 0.87 0.00 44.85 569 1 t S2 Georgeville 51.90 51.90 Small Grain,Silage 10.4 9/1-3/31 112 0 1 0 lnjec. 17 1.08 0.00 55.9X 0.00 569 11 St Georgeville 51.90 51.90 Soybeans,Manured,Full Season 48 bu. 4/1-9/15 186 0 0 Broad. 63 0.00 14.65 0.00 760.38 569 11 S22 Georgeville 1 51.90 51.90 Soybeans,Manured,Full Season 48 bu. 4/1-9/15 186 0 0 Broad. 61 0.00 3.771 0.00 195.43 569 11 S2 Georgeville 51.90 5L90 Soybeans,Manured,Full Season 48 bu. 4/1-9/15 186 0 0 Broad. 62 6.26 0.00 325.06 0.00 569 5 S1 Georgeville 2.90 2.90 Small Grain,Silage 10.4 9/1-3/31 112 0 0 Broad. 20 0.00 4.74 0.00 13.76 569 5 S22 Georgeville 2.90 2.90 Small Grain,Silage 10.4 9/1-3/31 112 0 0 Broad. 14 0.00 0.87 0.00 2.51 569 5 S2 Georgeville 2.90 2.90 Small Grain,Silage 10.4 9/1-3/31 112 0 0 Injec. 17 1.08 0.00 3.13 0.00 569 5 SI Georgeville 2.90 2.90 Soybeans,Manured,Full Season 48 bu. 4/1-9/15 186 0 0 Broad. 63 0.00 14.65 0.00 42.49 569 5 S22 Georgeville 2.90 2.90 Soybeans,Manured,Full Season 48 bu. 4/1-9/15 186 0 0 Broad. 61 0.00 3.77 0.00 10.92 569 5 S2 Georgeville 2.90 2.90 Soybeans,Manured,Full Season 48 bu. 4/1-9/15 186 0 0 Broad. 62 6.26 0.00 18.16 0.00 575 1 Sl Nanford 71.00 7 1.00 Fescue Pasture 4.4 Tons *1/1-12/31 143 0 0 Broad. 47 0.00 10.93 0.00 776.03 575 1 S22 Nanford 71.00 71.00 Fescue Pasture 4.4 Tons *1/1-12/31 143 0 0 Broad. 47 0.00 2.90 0.00 205.99 575 1 S22 Nanford 71.00 7 1.00 Fescue Pasture 4.4 Tons *1/1-12/31 143 0 0 Broad. 49 0.00 3.02 0.00 214.76 580 3 SI Georgeville 3.00 3.00 Fescue Pasture 4.9 Tans *1/1-12/31 159 0 0 Broad. 56 0.00 13.02 0.00 39.07 580 3 S22 Georgeville 3.00 3.00 Fescue Pasture 4.9 Tons *1/1-12/31 159 0 0 Broad. 48 0.00 2.96 0.00 8.89 580 3 S2 Georgeville 3.00 3.00 Fescue Pasture 4.9 Tons *1/1-12/31 159 0 0 Broad. 55 5.66 0.00 16.97 0.00 580 4 S1 Georgeville 10.00 1000 Fescue Pasture 4.9 Tons *1/1-12/31 159 0 0 Broad. 56 0.00 13.02 0.00 130.23 580 4 S22 Georgeville 10.00 10.00 Fescue Pasture 4.9 Tons *1/1-12/31 159 0 0 Broad. 48 0.00 2.96 0.00 29.63 580 4 S2 Georgeville 10.00 10.00 Fescue Pasture 4.9 Tons *1/1-12/31 159 0 0 Broad. 55 5.56 0.00 55.56 0.00 618 1 St Nanford T-2.00 2.00 Fescue Pasture 4.4 Tons *1/1-12/31 143 0 0 Broad. 47 0.00 10.93 0.00 21.86 Preview Database Version 3.1 Date Printed:2/18/2019 WUT Page 42 of 44 Waste Utitizat,_ _ Table ,-ar 2 \cUr�!en Comm Res. Manure Liquid Solid Liquid SolidManur PA Fert. (lbs/Ai PA Manure Manure Manure Applied Nutrient Nutrient Nutrient pplied Applied Applied (Field) Req'd Applied whed (acre) (acre) (Field) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) Source Total Use. Applic. Applies 1000 Tract Field ID Soil Series Acres Acres Crop RYE Period N N N Method N gal/A Tons 1000 gals tons 618 1 S22 Nanford 2.00 2.00 Fescue Pasture 4.4 Tons *1/1-12/31 143 0 0 Broad. 47 0.00 2.90 0.00 5.80 618 1 S22 Nanford 2.00 2.00 Fescue Pasture 4.4 Tons *1/1-12/31 143 0 0 Broad. 49 0.00 3.02 0.00 6.05 618 2 S1 Nanford 5.50 5.50 Fescue Pasture 4.4 Tons *1/1-12/31 143 0 0 Broad. 47 0.00 10.93 0.00 60.12 618 2 S22 Nanford 5.50 5.50 Fescue Pasture 4.4 Tons *1/1-12/31 143 0 0 Broad. 47 0.00 2.90 0.00 15.96 618 2 S22 Nanford 5.50 5.50 Fescue Pasture 4.4 Tons *1/1-12/31 143 0 0 Broad. 49 0.00 3.02 0.00 16.64 618 3 S1 Nanford 2.00 2.00 Fescue Pasture 4.4 Tons *1/1-12/31 143 0 0 Broad. 47 0.00 10.93 0.00 21.86 618 3 S22 Nanford 2.00 2.00 Fescue Pasture 4ATons *1/1-12/31 143 0 0 Broad. 47 0.00 2.90 0.00 5.80 618 3 S22 Nanford 2.00 2.00 Fescue Pasture 4ATons *1/1-12/31 143 0 0 Broad. 49 0.00 3.02 0.00 6.05 618 4 S1 Nanford 1.00 1.00 Fescue Pasture 4.4 Tons *1/1-12/31 143 0 0 Broad. 47 0.00 10.93 0.00 10.93 618 4 S22 Nanford 1.00 1.00 Fescue Pasture 4.4 Tons *1/1-12/31 143 0 0 Broad. 47 0.00 2.90 0.00 2.90 618 4 S22 Nanford 1.00 1.00 Fescue Pasture 4.4 Tons *1/1-12/31 143 0 0 Broad.1 49 0.00 3.02 0.00 3.02 618 5 S1 Nanford 5.00 5.00FescuePasture 4.4Tons *1/1-12/31 143 0 0 Broad. 47 0.00 10.93 0.001 54.65 618 5 S22 Nanford 5.00 5.00 Fescue Pasture 4.4 Tons *l/1-12/31 143 0 0 Broad. 47 0.00 2.90 0.00 14.51 618 5 S22 Nanford 5.00 5.00 Fescue Pasture 4.4 Tons *1/1-12/31 143 0 0 Broad. 49 0.00 3.02 0.00 15.12 618 1 6 SI Nanford 4.00 4.00 Fescue Pasture 4.4 Tons *1/1-12/31 143 0 0 Broad. 47 0.00 10.93 0.00 43.72 618 6 S22 Nanford 4.00 4.00 Fescue Pasture 4.4 Tons *1/1-12/31 143 0 0 Broad. 47 0.00 2.90 0.00 11.61 618 6 S22 Nanford 4.00 4.00 Fescue Pasture 4ATons *1/1-12/31 143 0 0 Broad. 49 0.00 3.02 0.110 12.10 618 7 Sl Nanford 1.50 1.50 Fescue Pasture 4.4 Tons *1/1-12/31 143 0 0 Broad. 47 0.00 10.93 0.00 16.40 618 7 S22 Nanford 1.50 1.50 Fescue Pasture 4.4 Tons *1/I-12/31 143 0 0 Broad. 47 0.00 2.90 0.00 4.35 618 7 S22 Nanford 1.50 1.50 Fescue Pasture 4ATons *1/1-12/31 143 0 0 Broad. 49 0.00 3.02 0.00 4.54 618 8 S1 Nanford 4.50 4.50 Fescue Pasture 4.4 Tons *1/1-12/31 143 0 0 Broad. 47 0.00 10.93 0.00 49.19 618 8 S22 Nanford 4.50 4.50 Fescue Pasture 4.4 Tons *l/1-12/31 143 0 0 Broad. 47 0.00 2.90 0.00 13.06 Preview Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 2/18/2019 WUT Page 43 of 44 Waste Utilizath....fable _ar 2 Nitrogen Canm Res Manure Liquid Solid Liquid Solid Manur PA Fert. (lbs/A) PA Manure. Manure Manure Applied Nutrient Nutrient NutrienO pplied Applied Applied (Field) Req'd Applied pplied (acre) (acre) (Field) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) Source Total Use. Applic. Applic. 1000 Tract Field ID Soil Series Acres Acres Crop RYE Period N N N Method N gal/.A Tons 1000 gals tons 618 8 S22 Nanford 1 4.50 4.50 Fescue Pasture 4.4Tons *l/1-12/31 143 0 0 Broad. 749 0.00 3.02 0.00 13.61 Total Applied,1000 gallons 3,732.56 Total Produced,1000 gallons 767.15 Balance,1000 gallons -2,965.41 Total Applied,tons 13,886.711 Total Produced,tons 10,664.00 Balance,tons -3,222.79 Notes: 1. In the tract column,—symbol means leased,otherwise,owned. 2. Symbol*means user entered data. Preview Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 2/18/2019 WUT Page 44 of 44 The Nutrient Management Recommendations table shown below provides an annual summary of the nutrient management plan developed for this operation. This table provides a nutrient balance for the listed fields and crops for each year of the plan. Required nutrients are based on the realistic yields of the crops to be grown, their nutrient requirements and soil test results. The quantity of nutrient supplied by each source is also identified. The total quantity of nitrogen applied to each crop should not exceed the required amount. However, the quantity of other nutrients applied may exceed their required amounts. This most commonly occurs when manure or other byproducts are utilized to meet the nitrogen needs of the crop. Nutrient management plans may require that the application of animal waste be limited so as to prevent over application of phosphorous when excessive levels of this nutrient are detected in a field. In such situations,additional nitrogen applications from nonorganic sources may be required to supply the recommended amounts of nitrogen. Nutrient Management Recommendations Test YEAR 1 N P205 K20 Mg Mn Zn Cu Lime (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (tons/A) Tract Field 10309 1 Req'd Nutrients 112 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Acres I App.Period 7.60 9/1-3/31 Supplied By: 11 CROP Small Grain,Silage Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Soil Series Herndon Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RYE I Sample Date 10.4 Tons 11-28-13 Manure 112 172 149 50 2 2 0 0 P Removal Rating 561bs/ac. I nnlmown BALANCE 0 172 149 50 2 2 0 0 Tract Field 10309 1 Req'd Nutrients 234 0 20 0 0 0 0 0 Acres App.Period 7.60 2/15-6/30 Supplied By: CROP Corn,Silage Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Commercial Fert. 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Soil Series Hemdon Residual 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RYE I Sample Date 21.9 Tons 11-28-13 Manure 213 385 311 106 5 5 1 0 P Removal Rating 74 lbs/ac. Unknown BALANCE 01 385 291 106 5 5 1 0 7App. Field 10309 2 Req'd Nutrients 112 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Period 9.50 9/1-3/31 Supplied By: CROP Small Grain,Silage Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Soil Series Herndon Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RYE Sample Date 10.4 Tons 11-28-13 Manure 112 172 149 50 2 2 0 0 P Removal Rating 561bs/ac. Unknown BALANCE 0 172 149 50 2 2 0 0 FA .s Field 10309 2 Req'd Nutrients 234 0 20 0 0 0 0 0 App.Period 9.50 2/15-6/30 Supplied By: CROP Corn,Silage Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Commercial Fert. 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Soil Series Herndon Residual 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RYE Sample Date 21.9 Tons 11-28-13 Manure 213 385 311 106 5 5 1 0 P Removal Rating 74 lbs/ac. t!nknown BALANCE 0 385 291 106 5 5 1 0 _,view Database version 3.1 Date Printed: 2/13/2019 NMR Page 1 of 45 1 Nutrient Management Recommendations Test YEAR j N P2O5 K2O Mg Mn Zn Cu Lime (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (tons/A) Tract Field 10309 3 Req'd Nutrients 117 0 0 0-0-0 0 0 Acres I App.Period 7.90 9/1-3/31 Supplied By: CROP Small Grain,Silage Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Commercial Fert. 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Soil Series Herndon Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RYE I Sample Date 10.8 Tons 1 11-28-13 Manure 116 179 156 52 2 2 0 0 P Removal I Rating 58 lbs/ac. t j-known BALANCE 0 179 156 52 2 2 0 0 Tract Field 10309 3 Req'd Nutrients 241 0 20 0 0 0 0 0 Acres App.Period 7.90 2/15-6/30 Supplied By: CROP Corn,Silage Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Commercial Fert. 2 0 0 0 01 0 0 0 Soil Series Herndon Residual 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RYE I Sample Date 22.5 Tons 11-28-13 Manure 219 396 320 108 5 5 1 0 P Removal Rating 77 lbs/ac. I'nknown BALANCE 0 396 300 1081 5 5 1 0 Tract Field 10309 4 Req'd Nutrients 241 0 20 0 0 0 0 0 Acres App.Period 9.20 2/15-6/30 Supplied By: CROP Corn,Silage Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 01 0 0 0 0 Soil Series Alamance Residual 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RYE I Sample Date 22.5 Tons 11-28-13 Manure 221 398 323 109 5 5 1 0 P Removal Rating 77 lbs/ac. Unknown BALANCE 0 398 303 109 5 5 1 0 Tract Field 10309 4 Req'd Nutrients 106 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Acres App.Period 9.20 9/1-3/31 Supplied By: CROP Small Grain,Silage Starter, 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Soil Series Alamance Residual 0 0 01 0 0 0 0 0 RYE I Sample Date 9.8 Tons 11-28-13 Manure 106 165 142 48 2 2-0-0 P Removal Rating 53 lbs/ac. Unknown BALANCE 0 165 142 48 21 2 0 0 Tract Field 10385 2 Req'd Nutrients *162 20 10 0 0 0 0 0 Acres App.Period 8.10 *2/15-10/31 (Supplied By: CROP Fescue Pasture Starter 0 0 0 01 0 0 0 0 Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Soil Series Georgeville Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RYE I Sample Date 5.0 Tons 11-28-13 Manure 162 282 237 80 4 4 1 0 P Removal Rating 8 Ibs/ac. ILInknown BALANCE 0 262 227 80 4 4 1 0 .6view Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 2/13/2019 NMR Page 2 of 45 Nutrient Management Recommendations Test YEAR 1 N P205 K20 Mg Mn Zn Cu Lime (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (tons/A) Tract Field 10385 3 Req'd Nutrients 156 20 10 0 0 0 0 0 Acres App.Period 5.20 -2/15-10/31 Supplied By: CROP Fescue Pasture Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Soil Series Georgeville Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RYE I Sample Date 4.8 Tons 11-28-1-3 Manure 156 271 228 77 4 4 1 0 P Removal Rating 8 lbs/ac. Unknown BALANCE 0 251 218 77 4 4 1 0 Tract I Field 10386 6 Req'd Nutrients 106 60 0 0 0 0 0 0 Acres App.Period 5.90 9/1-3/31 Supplied By: . CROP Small Grain,Silage Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Soil Series Tarrus Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RYE I Sample Date 9.8 Tons 11-28-13 Manure 106 167 142 48 2 2 0 0 P Removal Rating 53 lbs/ac. Unknown BALANCE 0 la7 142 48 2 2 0 0 17 Tract Field 10386 6 Req'd Nutrients 231 70 0 0 0 0 0 0 Acres App.Period 5.90 2/15-6/30 Supplied By: CROP Corn,Silage Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Soil Series Tarrus Residual 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RYE I Sample Date 21.6 Tons 11-28-13 Manure 211 383 308 105 5 4 1 0 P Removal Rating 73 lbs/ac. Unknown BALANCE 0 313 308 105 5 4 1 0 Tract Field 10386 7 Req'd Nutrients 235 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Acres App.Period 9.50 2/15-6/30 Supplied By: CROP Corn,Silage Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Commercial Fert. 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Soil Series Tarrus Residual 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RYE I Sample Date 22.0 Tons 11-28-13 Manure 214 388 311 106 5 4 1 0 PRemoval Rating 751 s/ac. isnknown BALANCE 0 388 311 106 5 4 1 0 Tract Field 10386 7 Req'd Nutrients 108 0 j 0 0 0 0 0 0 Acres App.Period 9.50 9/1-3/31 Supplied By: CROP Small Grain,Silage Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Soil Series Tarrus Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RYE Sample Date 10.0 Tons 11-28-13 Manure 108 172 146 49 2 21 01 0 P Removal Rating 54 lbs/ac. Unknown BALANCE 0 172 146 49 2 2 0 0 Yfeview Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 2/13/2019 NMR Page 3 of 45 Nutrient Management Recommendations Test YEAR j N P2O5 K2O Mg Mn Zn Cu Lime (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (tons/A) E FApp ld 10386 8 Req'd Nutrients 235 80 10 0 0 0 0 0 riod 13.10 2/15-6/30 Supplied By: CROP Corn,Silage Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Commercial Fert. 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Soil Series Ta—s Residual 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RYE I Sample Date 22.0 Tons 07-14-10 Manure 214 388 311 106 5 4 1 0 P Removal Rating 75 lbs/ac. Unknown BALANCE 0 308 301 106 5 4 1 0 Tract Field 10386 8 Req'd Nutrients 108 70 0 0 0 0 0 0 Acres App.Period 13.10 9/1-3/31 Supplied By: CROP Small Grain,Silage Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Soil Series Ta—s Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RYE I Sample Date 10.0 Tons 07- 44-10 Manure 108 171 145 48 2 2 0 0 P Removal Rating 54 lbs/ac. l nknown BALANCE 0 101 145 48 2 2 0 0 Tract 1 Field 10497 7 Req'd Nutrients 267 0 100 0 0 0 0 0 Acres App.Period 1.80 2/15-6/30 Supplied By: CROP Corn, Silage Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Commercial Fert. 139 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Soil Series Appling Residual 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RYE I Sample Date 24.5 Tons 11-28-13 Manure 108 196 157 54 3 3 1 0 P Removal Rating 83 lbs/ac. Unknown BALANCE 0 196 57 54 3 3 1 0 Tract Field 10497 7 Req'd Nutrients 125 0 50 0 0 0 0 0 Acres App.Period 1.80 9/1-3/31 Supplied By: CROP Small Grain,Silage Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Commercial Fert. 48 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Soil Series Appling Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RYE I Sample Date 11.3 Tons 1 11-28-13 Manure 77 120 103 35 2 2 0 0 P Removal Rating 61 lbs/ac. Unknown BALANCE 0 120 53 35 2 2 0 0 Tract I Field 10497 8 Req'd Nutrients 267 0 30 0 0 0 0 0 Acres I App.Period 3.30 2/15-6/30 Supplied By: CROP Corn,Silage Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Commercial Fert. 1391 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Soil Series Appling Residual 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RYE I Sample Date 24.5 Tons 11-28-13 Manure 108 196 157 54 3 3 1 0 P Removal I Rating 83 lbs/ac. Unknown BALANCE 0 196 127 541 3 3 1 0 rfeview Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 2/13/2019 NMR Page 4 of 45 Nutrient Management Recommendations Test YEAR 1 N P2O5 K2O Mg Mn Zn Cu Lime (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (tons/A) Tract Field 10497 8 Req'd Nutrients 125 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Acres App.Period 3.30 9/1-3/31 Supplied By: CROP Small Grain,Silage Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Commercial Fert. 48 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Soil Series Appling Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RYE I Sample Date 11.3 Tons 11-28-13 Manure 77 120 103 35 2 2 0 0 P Removal Rating 61 lbs/ac. Unknown BALANCE 0 120 103 35 2 2 0 0 Tract 1 Field 10497 9 Req'd Nutrients 267 0 90 0 0 0 0 0 Acres I App.Period 5.10 2/15-6/30 Supplied By: CROP Com,Silage Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Commercial Fert. 139 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Soil Series Appling Residual 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RYE I Sample Date 24.5 Tons 11-28-13 Manure 108 196 157 54 3 3 1 0 P Removal Rating 83 lbs/ac. jUnknown BALANCE 01 196 67 54 3 3 1 0 Tract Field 10497 9 Req'd Nutrients [2f 0 40 0 0 0 0 0 Acres I App.Period 5.10 9/1-3/31 Supplied By: CROP Small Grain,Silage Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Commercial Fert. 48 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Soil Series Appling Residual 0 0 0 0 0 01 0 0 RYE I Sample Date 11.3 Tons 11-28-13 Manure 77 120 103 35 2 2 0 0 P Removal Rating 61 lbs/ac. l'nknown BALANCE 0 120 63 35 2 2 0 0 Tract I Field 10499 5 Req'd Nutrients 121 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Acres App.Period 7.00 1 9/1-3/31 Supplied By: CROP Small Grain,Silage Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Soil Series Appling Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RYE I Sample Date 10.9 Tons 11-28-13 Manure 121 188 161 541 2 2 1 0 P Removal Rating 591bs/ac. Unknown BALANCE 0 188 161 54 2 2 1 0 Tract I Field 10499 5 Req'd Nutrients *267 0 40 0 0 0 0 0 Acres App.Period 7.00 2/15-6/30 Supplied By: CROP Corn,Silage Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Commercial Fert. 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Soil Series Appling Residual 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RYE Sample Date 23.8 Tons 11-28-13 Manure 239 437 350 118 61 61 1 0 P Removal Rating 81 lbs/ac. l[Inknown BALANCE 01 437 310 1181 6 6 1 0 rreview Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 2/13/2019 NMR Page 5 of 45 Nutrient Management Recommendations Test YEAR j N P205 K20 Mg Mn Zn Cu Lime (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (tons/A) Tract Field 10499 6 Req'd Nutrients *267 0 70 0 0 0 0 0 Acres App.Period 2.70 2/15-6/30 Supplied By: CROP Corn,Silage Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Commercial Fert. 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Soil Series Appling Residual 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RYE I Sample Date 23.8Tons 11-28-13 Manure 239 436 349 118 6 6 1 0 P Removal Rating 81 lbs/ac. Unknown BALANCE 0 436 279 118 6 6 1 0 Tract Field 10499 6 Req'd Nutrients 121 0 30 0 0 0 0 0 Acres App.Period 2.70 9/1-3/31 Supplied By: CROP Small Grain,Silage Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Soil Series Appling Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RYE I Sample Date 10.9 Tons 11-28-13 Manure 121 188 161 54 2 2 1 0 P Removal Rating 59 lbs/ac. Unknown BALANCE 0 188 131 54 2 2 1 0 Tract I Field 10499 8 Req'd Nutrients 121 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Acres I App.Period 3.70 9/1-3/31 Supplied By: CROP Small Grain,Silage Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 01 0 0 0 0 Soil Series Appling Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RYE I Sample Date 10.9 Tons 1 11-28-13 Manure 121 188 161 54 2 2 1 0 P Removal Rating 59 lbs/ac. lL nknown BALANCE 0 188 161 54 2 2 1 0 Tract Field 10499 8 Req'd Nutrients 259 0 30 0 .0 0 0 0 Acres I App.Period 3.70 2/15-6/30 Supplied By: CROP Corn,Silage Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Soil Series Appling Residual 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RYE I Sample Date 23.8 Tons 11-28-13 Manure 239 436 349 118 6 6 1 0 P Removal Rating 81 lbs/ac. Unknown BALANCE 0 436 319 118 6 6 1 0 Tract Field 10514 5 Req'd Nutrients 159 0 0 0 0 0 01 1 Acres App.Period 11.00 *2/15-10/31 (Supplied By: CROP Fescue Pasture Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Commercial Fert. 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 Soil Series Herndon Residual 0 0 0 0 01 0 0 0 RYE I Sample Date 4.9 Tons 11-04-14 Manure 158 418 229 80 5 5 2 0 P Removal Rating 8 lbs/ac. Unknown BALANCE 0 418 229 80 5 5 2 0 "Preview Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 2/13/2019 NMR Page 6 of 45 Nutrient Management Recommendations Test YEAR j N P2O5 K2O Mg Mn Zn CU Lime (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (tons/A) Tract FFild 10514 1 6 Req'd Nutrients 117 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 Acres App.Period 7.50 j 9/1-3/31 Supplied By: CROP Small Grain,Silage Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Soil Series Georgeville Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RYE I Sample Date 10.8 Tons 11-28-13 Manure 117 182 157 53 2 2 0 0 P Removal Rating 58 lbs/ac. I:nknown BALANCE 0 182 147 53 2 2 0 0 Tract Field 10514 6 Req'd Nutrients 241 0 50 0 0 0 0 0 Acres App.Period 7.50 2/15-6/30 Supplied By: CROP Corn,Silage Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Commercial Fert. 1 01 0 0 0 0 0 0 Soil Series Georgeville Residual 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RYE I Sample Date 22.5 Tons 1 11-28-13 Manure 220 402 321 110 6 5 1 0 P Removal Rating 77 lbs/ac. it Inknown BALANCE 0 402 271 110 61 5 1 0 Tract Field 10514 8 Req'd Nutrients 112 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 Acres App.Period 14.00 9/1-3/31 Supplied By: CROP Small Grain,Silage Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Soil Series Georgeville Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RYE I Sample Date 10.4 Tons 11-28-13 Manure 112 172 149 50 2 21 0 0 P Removal Rating 561bs/ac. Unknown BALANCE 0 172 139 50 2 2 0 0 Tract I Field 10514 8 Req'd Nutrients 234 0 50 0 0 0 0 0 Acres App.Period 14.00 2/15-6/30 Supplied By: CROP Corn,Silage Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Soil Series Georgeville Residual 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RYE I Sample Date 21.9 Tons 11-28-13 Manure 214 388 312 106 5 5 1 0 P Removal Rating 74 lbs/ac. Unknown BALANCE 0 388 262 106 5 5 1 0 7ppField 10514 9 Req'd Nutrients 159 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 .Period 7.00 *2/15-10/31 Supplied By: CROP Fescue Pasture Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Commercial Fert. 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 Soil Series Ilirnhiun Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RYE I Sample Date 4.9 Tons 1 11-04-14 Manure 158 418 229 80 5 5 2 0 P Removal Rating 1 8 lbs/ac. Unknown BALANCE 0 418 229 80 5 51 2 0 Preview Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 2/13/2019 NMR Page 7 of 45 Nutrient Management Recommendations Test YEAR j N P2O5 K2O Mg Mn Zn CU Lime (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (tons/A) LyApp. Field 10569 1Req'd Nutrients 241 0 20 0 0 0 0 0 Period 3.00 2/15-6/30 Supplied By: CROP Corn,Silage Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Commercial Fert. 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Soil Series Georgeville Residual 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RYE I Sample Date 22.5 Tons 1 11-28-13 Manure 220 400 321 109 5 5 1 0 P Removal Rating 771bs/ac. Unknown BALANCE 0 400 301 109 5 5 1 0 Tract Field 10569 1 Req'd Nutrients 117 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Acres App.Period 3.00 9/1-3/31 Supplied By: CROP Small Grain,Silage Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Commercial Fert. 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Soil Series Georgeville Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RYE I Sample Date 10.8 Tons 1 11-28-13 Manure 116 179 156 52 2 2 0 0 P Removal Rating 58 lbs/ac. 1!nknown BALANCE 0 179 156 52 2 2 0 0 Field 1074 1 Req'd Nutrients 156 110 0 0 0 0 0 0 [A7cresjApp.Period 30.00 *2/15-10/31 Supplied By: CROP Fescue Pasture Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Soil Series Georgeville Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RYE I Sample Date 4.8 Tons 11-28-13 Manure 156 271 228 77 4 4 1 0 P Removal Rating 8 lbs/ac. [ nknown BALANCE 0 161 228 77 4 4 1 0 7Acres Field 1074 2 Req'd Nutrients 156 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .Period 2.00 *2/15-10/31 Supplied By: CROP Fescue Pasture Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Soil Series Georgeville Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RYE I Sample Date 4.8 Tons 11-28-13 Manure 156 271 228 77 4 4 1 0 P Removal I Rating 8 lbs/ac. Unknown BALANCE 0 271 228 77 4 4 1 0 FA.res ct Field 1074 3 Req'd Nutrients 180 100 60 0 0 0 0 0 App.Period 9.00 *2/15-10/31 Supplied By: CROP Fescue Pasture Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 [ Soil Series jAppling Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RYE Sample Date 5.4 Tons 11-28-13 Manure 180 315 263 89 4 4 1 0 Removal Rating 9 lbs/ac l nknown BALANCE 0 215 2031 891 4 4 1 0 Preview Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 2/13/2019 NMR Page 8 of 45 Nutrient Management Recommendations Test YEAR 1 N P205 K20 Mg Mn Zn Cu Lime (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (tons/A) Tract Field 1074 5 Req'd Nutrients 125 80 0 0 0 0 0 0 Acres App.Period 15.00 9/1-3/31 Supplied By: CROP Small Grain,Silage Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Soil Series Appling ResiduaI7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RYE I Sample Date 11.3 Tons 11-28-13 Manure 125 195 167 57 21 3 1 0 P Removal Rating 61 lbs/ac. Unknown BALANCE 0 115 167 57 2 3 1 0 Tract Field 1074 5 Req'd Nutrients 267 90 10 0 0 0 0 0 Acres App.Period 15.00 2/15-6/30 Supplied By: CROP Corn,Silage Starter 0 j 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Soil Series Appling Residual 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RYE I Sample Date 24.5 Tons 11-28-13 Manure 247 451 360 122 6 6 1 0 P Removal Rating 83 lbs/ac. Unknown BALANCE 0 361 350 122 6 6 1 0 Tract Field 1074 6 Req'd Nutrients 259 70 20 0 0 0 0 1 Acres App.Period 6.00 2/15-6/30 Supplied By: CROP Corn,Silage Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Commercial Fert. 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 Soil Series Appling Residual 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RYE I Sample Date 23.8 Tons 11-28-13 Manure 238 435 347 118 6 6 1 0 P Removal Rating 81 lbs/ac. Unknown BALANCE 0 365 3271 1181 6 6 1 0 Tract I Field 1074 6 Req'd Nutrients 121 60 0 0 0 0 0 0 Acres App.Period 6.00 9/1-3/31 Supplied By: CROP Small Grain,Silage Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Soil Series Appling Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RYE I Sample Date 10.9 Tons 11-28-13 Manure 121 188 161 54 2 2 1 0 P Removal Rating 5916s/ac. Unknown BALANCE 0 128 161 54 2 2 1 0 FAc7resjApp. Field 2383 3 Req'd Nutrients 121 0 0 0 0 0 0 Period 3.00 9/1-3/31 Supplied By: CROP Small Grain,Silage Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Commercial Fert. 47 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Soil Series Appling Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RYE Sample Date 10.9 Tons 11-28-13 Manure 74 115 99 33 2 2 0 0 P Removal Rating 59 lbs/ac. w BALANCE 0 115 99 33 2 2 0 0 Preview Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 2/13/2019 NMR Page 9 of 45 Nutrient Management Recommendations Test YEAR j N P205 K20 Mg Mn Zn Cu Lime (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (tons/A) Tract Field 2383 3 Req'd Nutrients *267 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 Acres App.Period 3.00 2/15-6/30 Supplied By: CROP Corn,Silage Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Commercial Fert. 144 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Soil Series Appling Residual 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RYE I Sample Date 23.8 Tons 11-28-13 Manure 103 187 151 51 3 3 1 0 P Removal Rating 81 lbs/ac. Low BALANCE 0 187 141 51 3 3 1 0 Tract Field 2383 3A Req'd Nutrients 143 60 20 0 0 0 0 1 Acres App.Period 3.00 *2/15-10/31 Supplied By: CROP Fescue Pasture Starter 0 01 0 0 0 0 0 0 Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 Soil Series Durham Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RYE I Sample Date 4.3 Tons 11-28-13 Manure 143 247 209 71 4 3 1 0 P Removal Rating 7 lbs/ac. Low BALANCE 0 187 189 71 4 3 1 0 TApp. Field 2383 5 Req'd Nutrients 143 10 10 0 0 0 0 0 Period 4.00 *2/15-10/31 Supplied By: CROP Fescue Pasture Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Soil Series Durham Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RYE I Sample Date 4.3 Tons 11-28-13 Manure 143 247 209 71 4 3 1 1 0 P Removal Rating 79bs/ac. Low BALANCE 0 237 199 71 4 3 1 0 Tract Field 2384 6 Req'd Nutrients 117 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Acres App.Period 6.50 9/1-3/31 Supplied By: CROP Small Grain,Silage Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Commercial Fert. 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Soil Series Georgeville Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RYE I Sample Date 10.8 Tons 11-28-13 Manure 116 179 156 52 2 2 0 0 P Removal I Rating 58 lbs/ac. Unknown BALANCE 0 j 179 156 52 2 2 0 0 7=7 Field 2384 6 Req'd Nutrients 241 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .Period 6.50 2/15-6/30 Supplied By: CROP Corn,Silage Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Commercial Fert. 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Soil Series {leorgeville Residual 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RYE I Sample Date 22.5 Tons 11-28 13 Manure 220 400 321 109 5 5 1 0 P Removal Rating 77 lbs/ac. Unknown BALANCE 0 400 321 109 5 5 1 0 -Preview Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 2/13/2019 NMR Page 10 of 45 Nutrient Management Recommendations Test YEAR j N P205 K20 Mg Mn Zn Cu. Lime (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (tons/A) Tract Field 2392 1 Req'd Nutrients 103 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Acres App.Period 19.00 9/1-3/31 Supplied By: CROP Small Grain,Silage Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Soil Series Tatum Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RYE I Sample Date 9.5 Tons 11-28-13 Manure 103 168 137 45 2 2 0 0 PRemoval Rating 51lbs/ac. %Iedium BALANCE 0 168 137 45 2 2 0 0 Tract Field 2392 1 Req'd Nutrients 224 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 Acres App.Period 19.00 2/15-6/30 Supplied By: CROP Corn,Silage Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Soil Series Tatum Residual 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RYE I Sample Date 20.9 Tons 11-28-13 Manure 204 339 298 101 4 5 1 0 P Removal Rating 71 ibs/ac. Medium BALANCE 0 329 298 101 4 5 1 0 Tract I Field 2392 2 Req'd Nutrients 103 20 10 0 0 0 0 0 Acres App.Period 3.00 9/1-3/31 Supplied By: CROP Small Grain,Silage Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Soil Series Tatum Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RYE I Sample Date 9.5 Tons 1 11-28-13 Manure 103 168 137 45 2 2 0 0 P Removal Rating 1 51 lbs/ac. Medium BALANCE 0 148 127 45 2 2 0 0 Tract Field 2392 2 Req'd Nutrients 224 40 50 0 0 0 0 0 Acres App.Period 3.00 2/15-6/30 Supplied By: CROP Corn,Silage Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Soil Series Tatum Residual 201 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RYE I Sample Date 20.9 Tons 11-28-13 Manure 204 339 298 101 4 5 1 0 P Removal Rating 71 lbs/ac. Medium BALANCE 0 299 248 101 4 5 1 0 Tract Field 2392 3 Req'd Nutrients 234 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Acres jApp.Period 6.00 2/15-6/30 Supplied By: CROP Corn,Silage Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Commercial Fert. 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Soil Series Hemdon Residual 20 0 0 ol 0 0 0 0 RYE I Sample Date 21.9 Tons 1 11-28-13 Manure 213 385 311 106 5 5 1 0 P Removal Rating 74lbs/ac. %tedium BALANCE 0 385 311 106 5 5 1 0 review Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 2/13/2019 NMR Page 11 of 45 Nutrient Management Recommendations Test YEAR j N P2O5 K2O Mg Mn Zn Cu Lime (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (tons/A) Tract Field 2392 3 Req'd Nutrients 112 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Acres App.Period 6.00 9/1-3/31 Supplied By: CROP Small Grain,Silage Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Soil Series Herndon Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RYE I Sample Date 10.4 Tons 11-28-13 Manure 112 172 149 50 2 2 0 0 P Removal Rating 56 lbs/ac. %tedium BALANCE 0 172 149 50 2 2 0 0 Tract I Field 1 2392 4 Req'd Nutrients 103 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Acres I App.Period 1.60 9/1-3/31 Supplied By: CROP Small Grain,Silage Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Soil Series Tatum Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RYE I Sample Date 9.5 Tons 11-28-13 Manure 103 168 137 45 2 2 0 0 PRemoval Rating 511bs/ac. Iedium BALANCE 0 168 137 45 2 2 0 0 Tract I Field 2392 4 Req'd Nutrients 224 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Acres App.Period 1.60 2/15-6/30 Supplied By: CROP Corn,Silage Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 01 0 0 0 0 Soil Series Tatum Residual 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RYE I Sample Date 20.9 Tons 11-28-13 Manure 204 339 298 101 4 5 1 0 P Removal Rating 71 lbs/ac. N9 edium BALANCE 0 339 298 101 4 5 1 0 Tract I Field 2392 5 Req'd Nutrients 112 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Acres App.Period 2.00 9/1-3/31 Supplied By: CROP Small Grain,Silage Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Soil Series Georgeville Residual 0 01 0 0 0 0 0 0 RYE I Sample Date 10.4 Tons 11-28-13 Manure 112 172 149 50 2 2 0 0 P Removal Rating 56 lbs/ac. %1 edium BALANCE 0 172 149 50 2 2 0 0 Tract Field 2392 5 Req'd Nutrients 234 20 40 0 0 0 0 0 Acres I App.Period 2.00 2/15-6/30 Supplied By: CROP Corn,Silage Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Soil Series Gr,,rgeville Residual 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RYE I Sample Date 21.9 Tons 11-28-13 Manure 214 388 312 106 5 51 1 0 P Removal IRating 74 lbs/ac. Medium BALANCE 0 368 272 106 5 51 1 0 Preview Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 2/13/2019 NMR Page 12 of 45 Nutrient Management Recommendations Test YEAR 1 N P2O5 K2O Mg Mn Zn Cu Lime (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (tons(A) Tract Field 2392 6 Req'd Nutrients 117 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Acres App.Period 6.00 9/1-3/31 Supplied By: CROP Small Grain,Silage Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Commercial Fert. 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Soil Series Georgeville Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RYE I Sample Date 10.8 Tons 11-28-13 Manure 116 179 156 52 2 2 0 0 P Removal Rating 58 lbs/ac. Medium BALANCE 0 179 156 52 21 2 0 0 Tract Field 2392 6 Req'd Nutrients 241 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Acres App.Period 6.00 2/15-6/30 Supplied By: CROP Corn,Silage Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Commercial Fert. 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Soil Series Georgeville Residual 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RYE I Sample Date 22.5 Tons 11-28-13 Manure 220 400 321 109 5 5 1 0 P Removal Rating 77 lbs/ac. Medium BALANCE 0 400 321 109, 5 5 1 0 Tract Field 2392 7 Req'd Nutrients *192 20 10 0 0 0 0 0 Acres App.Period 5.70 2/15-6/30 Supplied By: -MqW CROP Corn,Silage Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Commercial Fert. 70 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Soil Series Callison Residual 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RYE I Sample Date 11.4 Tons 11-28-13 Manure 102 176 149 501 3 3 0 0 P Removal Rating 39lbs/ac. Medium BALANCE 0 156 139 50 3 3 0 0 Tract Field 2392 7 Req'd Nutrients *87 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Acres App.Period 5.70 9/1-3/31 Supplied By: CROP Small Grain,Silage Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Commercial Fert. 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Soil Series Callison Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RYE I Sample Date 7.1 Tons 11-28-13 Manure 77 1191 102 331 2 1 0 0 P Removal I Rating 38 lbs/ac. Medium BALANCE 0 119 102 33 2 1 0 0 Tract Field 2415 1 Req'd Nutrients *267 0 80 0 0 0 0 0 Acres App.Period 19.00 2/15-6/30 Supplied By: CROP Corn,Silage Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Commercial Fert. 145 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Soil Series APPling Residual 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RYE I Sample Date 23.8 Tons 1 11-28-13 Manure 102 176 149 50 3 3 0 0 P Removal Rating 81 lbs/ac. Medium I BALANCE 1 0 176 69 50 3 3 0 0 Preview Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 2/13/2019 NMR Page 13 of 45 Nutrient Management Recommendations Test YEAR 1 N P205 K20 Mg Mn Zn Cu Lime (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (tons/A) Tract Field 2415 3 Req'd Nutrients 109 0 0 0 01 0 0 0 Acres App.Period 10.00 9/1-3/31 Supplied By: CROP Small Grain,Silage Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Soil Series Herndon Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RYE I Sample Date 10.1 Tons 1 11-28-13 Manure 109 167 146 49 2 2 0 0 P Removal Rating 55 lbs/ac. tiledium BALANCE 0 167 146 49 2 2 0 0 Tract Field 2415 1 3 Req'd Nutrients 227 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 Acres App.Period 10.00 1 2/15-6/30 Supplied By: CROP Com,Silage Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Soil Series Herndon Residual 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RYE I Sample Date 21.2 Tons 11-28-13 Manure 207 374 302 103 4 4 1 0 P Removal Rating 721bs/ac. 1Sedium BALANCE 0 374 292 103 4 4 1 0 Tract I Field 2415 3a Req'd Nutrients 159 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Acres App.Period 4.00 *2/15-10/31 Supplied By: CROP Fescue Pasture Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 01 0 0 0 0 Soil Series Herndon Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RYE I Sample Date 4.9 Tons 11-28-13 Manure 159 277 231 79 4 4 1 0 P Removal Rating 8 lbs/ac. Unknown BALANCE 0 277 231 79 4 4 1 0 Tract Field 2415 5 Req'd Nutrients 71 0 80 0 0 0 0 0 Acres App.Period 6.00 *2/15-10/31 Supplied By: CROP Fescue Pasture Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Commercial Fert. 71 0 80 0 0 0 0 0 Soil Series Orange Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RYE I Sample Date 2.3 Tons 07-14-10 Manure 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 P Removal Rating 4 lbs/ac. V ery High BALANCE 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 F�TApp. Field 2415 6 Req'd Nutrients 140 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Period 6.00 *2/15-10/31 Supplied By: CROP Fescue Pasture Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Commercial Fert. 01 0 0 01 0 0 0 0 Soil Series Callison Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RYE I Sample Date 4.3 Tons 11-28-13 Manure 140 237 205 70 3 3 1 0 P Removal Rating 71bs/ac. liedium BALANCE 0 237 205 70 3 3 1 0 .-:,view Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 2/13/2019 NMR Page 14 of 45 Nutrient Management Recommendations Test YEAR 1 N P205 K20 Mg Mn Zn Cu Lime (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (tons/A) Tract Field 2415 6A Req'd Nutrients 140 0 30 0 0 0 0 0 Acres App.Period 6.00 -2/15-10/31 Supplied By: CROP Fescue Pasture Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Soil Series Callison Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Tract RYE Sample Date 4.3 Tons 11-28-13 Manure 140 242 204 70 4 3 1 0 P Removal Rating 7 lbs/ac. M edium BALANCE 0 242 174 70 4 3 1 0 Field 2415 7 Req'd Nutrients 267 0 80 0 0 0 0 0 Acres App.Period 24.70 2/15-6/30 Supplied By: CROP Corn,Silage Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Commercial Fert. 141 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Soil Series Appling Residual 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RYE I Sample Date 24.5 Tons 1 11-28-13 Manure 106 182 153 521 3 3 1 0 P Removal Rating 83 lbs/ac. Medium BALANCE 0 182 73 52 3 3 1 0 Tract Field 2415 7 Req'd Nutrients 1 '; 0 30 0 0 0 0 0 Acres App.Period 24.70 9/1-3/31 Supplied By: CROP Small Grain,Silage Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Commercial Fert. 46 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Soil Series Appling Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RYE Sample Date 11.3 Tons 11-28-13 Manure 79 124 106 35 2 2 0 0 P Removal Rating 61 lbs/ac. 'Medium BALANCE 0 124 76 35 2 2 0 0 Tract Field 30369 1 Req'd Nutrients 117 0 50 0 0 0 0 0 Acres App.Period 6.00 9/1-3/31 Supplied By: CROP Small Grain,Silage Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Soil Series Georgeville Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RYE I Sample Date 10.8Tons 11-04-14 Manure 117 182 157 53 2 2 0 0 P Removal IRating 58 lbs/ac. Unknown BALANCE 0 182 107 53 2 2 0 0 Tract Field 30369 1 Req'd Nutrients 241 10 100 0 0 0 0 0 Acres App.Period 6.00 2/15-6/30 Supplied By: CROP Corn,Silage Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Commercial Fert. 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Soil Series Georgeville Residual 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RYE I Sample Date 22.5 Tons 11-04-14 Manure 220 !39]2 321 110 6 5 1 0 P Removal Rating 77 lbs/ac. t'nknown BALANCE 0 221 110 6 5 1 0 .-review Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 2/13/2019 NMR Page 15 of 45 Nutrient Management Recommendations Test YEAR 1 N P205 K20 Mg Mn Zn Cu Lime (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (tons/A) Tract Field 30369 2 Req'd Nutrients 241 20 110 0 0 0 0 0 Acres App.Period 5.00 2/15-6/30 Supplied By: CROP Corn,Silage Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Commercial Fert. 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Soil Series Georgeville Residual 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RYE j Sample Date 22.5 Tons 11-04-14 Manure 220 402 321 110 6 5 1 0 P Removal Rating 77 lbs/ac. L.inknown BALANCE 0 382 211 110 6 5 1 0 Tract Field 30369 1 2 Req'd Nutrients 117 0 50 0 0 0 0 0 Acres App.Period 5.00 1 9/1-3/31 Supplied By: CROP Small Grain,Silage Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Soil Series Georgeville Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RYE I Sample Date 10.8 Tons 11-04-14 Manure 117 182 157 53 2 2 0 0 PRemoval Rating 581bs/ac. ['nknown BALANCE 0 182 107 531 2 2 0 0 Tract I Field 30369 3 Req'd Nutrients 117 0 70 0 0 0 0 0 Acres App.Period 7.00 9/1-3/31 Supplied By: CROP Small Grain,Silage Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Soil Series Georgeville Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RYE I Sample Date 10.8 Tons 11-04-14 Manure 117 182 157 531 2 2 0 0 P Removal Rating 58 lbs/ac. l inknown BALANCE 0 182 87 53 2 2 0 0 Tract Field 30369 3 Req'd Nutrients 241 0 130 0 0 0 0 2 Acres I App.Period 7.00 2/15-6/30 Supplied By: CROP Corn,Silage Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Commercial Fert. 1 0 0 01 0 0 0 2 Soil Series Georgeville Residual 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RYE I Sample Date 22.5 Tons 11-04-14 Manure 220 402 321 110 6 5 1 0 P Removal Rating 77 lbs/ac. Unknown BALANCE 0 402 191 110 6 5 1 0 Tract Field 30370 1 Req'd Nutrients 117 0 50 0 0 0 0 0 Acres App.Period 1.00 9/1-3/31 Supplied By: CROP Small Grain,Silage Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 [ Soil Series Gcoigevifle Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RYE Sample Date 10.8 Tons 11-04-14 Manure 117 182 157 53 2 2 0 0 Removal Rating 58 lbs/ac. Unknown BALANCE 0 182 107 53 2 21 0 0 _review Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 2/13/2019 NMR Page 16 of 45 Nutrient Management Recommendations Test YEAR 1 N P2O5 K2O Mg Mn Zn Cu Lime (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (tons/A) FTract Field 30370 1 Req'd Nutrients 241 10 100 0 0 0 0 0 Acres App.Period 1.00 2/15-6/30 Supplied By: CROP Corn,Silage Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Commercial Fert. 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Soil Series Georgeville Residual 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RYE I Sample Date 22.5 Tons 11-04-14 Manure 220 402 321 110 6 5 1 0 P Removal Rating 77 lbs/ac. L nknown BALANCE 0 392 221 110 6 5 1 0 Tract I Field 30370 2 Req'd Nutrients 241 10 100 0 0 0 0 j 0 Acres App.Period 1.50 2/15-6/30 Supplied By: CROP Corn,Silage Starter 01 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Commercial Fert. 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Soil Series Georgeville Residual 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RYE I Sample Date 22.5 Tons 11-04-14 Manure 220 402 321 110 6 5 1 0 P Removal I Rating 77 lbs/ac, l lnknown BALANCE 0 392 221 110 6 5 1 0 Tract 1 Field 30370 2 Req'd Nutrients 117 0 50 0 0 0 0 0 Acres App.Period 1.50 9/1-3/31 Supplied By: CROP Small Grain,Silage Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Soil Series Georgeville Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RYE I Sample Date 10.8 Tons 1 11-04-14 Manure 117 182 157 53 2 2 0 0 P Removal Rating 58 lbs/ac. it inknown BALANCE 0 182 107 53 2 2 0 0 Tract I Field 30370 3 Req'd Nutrients 241 0 130 0 0 0 0 1 Acres I App.Period 4.00 2/15-6/30 Supplied By: CROP Com,Silage Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Commercial Fert. 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 Soil Series Georgeville Residual 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RYE I Sample Date 22.5 Tons 11-04-14 Manure 220 402 321 110 6 51 1 0 P Removal Rating 77 lbs/ac. E.:nknown BALANCE 0 402 191 110 6 5 1 0 FTA7pPe7fiod 30370 3 Req'd Nutrients 117 0 70 0 0 0 0 0 4.00 9/1-3/31 Supplied By: CROP Small Grain,Silage Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Soil Series Georgeville Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RYE I Sample Date 10.8 Tons 11-04-14 Manure 117 182 157 53 2 2 0 0 P Removal Rating 58 lbs/ac. L"nknown BALANCE 0 182 87 53 2 2 0 0 -rreview Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 2/13/2019 NMR Page 17 of 45 Nutrient Management Recommendations Test YEAR 1 N P205 K20 Mg Mn Zn Cu Lime (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (tons/A) Tract Field 30370 5 Req'd Nutrients 117 70 90 0 0 0 0 0 Acres App.Period 3.50 9/1-3/31 Supplied By: CROP Small Grain,Silage Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Soil Series Georgeville Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RYE I Sample Date 10.8 Tons 11-04-14 Manure 117 182 157 53 2 2 0 0 P Removal Rating 58 lbs/ac. Unknown BALANCE 0 112 67 53 2 2 0 0 Tract Field 30370 5 Req'd Nutrients 241 80 150 0 0 0 0 0 Acres I App.Period 3.50 2/15-6/30 Supplied By: CROP Corn,Silage Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Commercial Fert. 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Soil Series Georgeville Residual 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RYE I Sample Date 22.5 Tons 11-04-14 Manure 220 402 321 110 6 5 1 0 P Removal Rating 771bs/ac. Unknown BALANCE 0 322 171 110 6 5 1 0 F�A7pp. Field 30370 6 Req'd Nutrients 117 50 80 0 0 0 0 0 Period 2.70 9/1-3/31 Supplied By: CROP Small Grain,Silage Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Soil Series Georgeville Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RYE I Sample Date 10.8 Tons 11-04-14 Manure 117 182 157 53 2 2 0 0 P Removal Rating 58 lbs/ac. Unknown BALANCE 0 132 77 53 2 2 0 0 Tract Field 30370 6 Req'd Nutrients 241 70 140 0 0 0 0 0 Acres App.Period 2.70 2/15-6/30 Supplied By: CROP Corn,Silage Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Commercial Fert. 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Soil Series Georgeville Residual 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RYE I Sample Date 22.5 Tons I 1-04-14 Manure 220 402 321 110 6 5 1 0 P Removal Rating 77 lbs/ac. Unknown BALANCE 0 332 181 110 6 5 1 0 FA, ct Field 53 1 Req'd Nutrients 267 0 80 0 0 0 0 0 s App.Period 25.00 2/15-6/30 Supplied By: CROP Corn,Silage Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Commercial Fert. 138 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 U il Series Appling Residual 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 mple Date 24.5 Tons 11-28-13 Manure 109 197 159 54 3 3 1 0 al Rating 83 lbs/ac. Unknown BALANCE 0 197 79 54 3 3 1 0 -rfeview Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 2/13/2019 NMR Page 18 of 45 Nutrient Management Recommendations Test YEAR 1 N P2O5 K2O Mg Mn Zn C11 Lime (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (tons/A) Tract Field 53 1 Req'd Nutrients 125 0 30 0 0 0 0 0 Acres App.Period 25.00 9/1-3/31 Supplied By: J. CROP Small Grain,Silage Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 }0 Commercial Fert. 48 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Soil Series Appling Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RYE I Sample Date 11.3 Tons 11-28-13 Manure 77 120 103 35 2 2 0 0 P Removal Rating 61 lbs/ac. Unknown BALANCE 0 120 73 35 2 2 0 0 Tract Field 53 2 Req'd Nutrients 128 0 20 0 0 0 0 0 Acres I App.Period 2.00 9/1-3/31 Supplied By: CROP Small Grain,Silage Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 01 0 Commercial Fert. 51 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Soil Series Appling Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RYE I Sample Date 11.5 Tons 1 11-28-13 Manure 77 120 103 35 2 2 0 0 P Removal Rating 62 lbs/ac. Unknown BALANCE 0 120 83 35 2 2 0 0 Tract Field 53 2 Req'd Nutrients 272 0 70 0 0 0 0 0 Acres App.Period 2.00 2/15-6/30 Supplied By: CROP Corn,Silage Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Commercial Fert. 141 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Soil Series Appling Residual 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RYE I Sample Date 25.0 Tons 11-28-13 Manure 111 203 163 55 3 3 1 0 P Removal Rating 85 lbs/ac. l'nknown BALANCE 0 203 93 55 3 3 1 0 Tract Field 53 3 Req'd Nutrients *87 0 40 0 0 Of 0 0 Acres App.Period 1.50 9/1-3/31 Supplied By: CROP Small Grain,Silage Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Commercial Fert. 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Soil Series Durham Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RYE Sample Date 7.0 Tons 11-28-13 Manure 77 120 103 35 2 2 0 0 P Removal Rating 38 tbs/ac. Unknown BALANCE 0 120 63 35 2 2 0 0 Tract Field 53 3 Req'd Nutrients *192 0 90 0 0 0 0 0 Acres App.Period 1.50 1 2/15-6/30 Supplied By: l� CROP Corn,Silage Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Commercial Fert. 61 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 U l Series Durham Residual 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 mple Date 12.0 Tons 11-28-13 Manure 111 202 162 54 3 3 1 0 l Rating 41 lbs/ac. Unknown BALANCE 0 202 72 54 3 3 1 0 -.review Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 2/13/2019 NMR Page 19 of 45 Nutrient Management Recommendations Test YEAR 1 N P2O5 K2O Mg Mn Zn Cu Lime (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (tons/A) Tract Field 53 4 Req'd Nutrients 128 0 40 0 0 0 0 0 Acres App.Period 2.40 9/1-3/31 Supplied By: I _ CROP Small Grain,Silage Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Commercial Fert. 51 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Soil Series Appling Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RYE I Sample Date 11.5 Tons 11-28-13 Manure 77 120 103 35 2 2 0 0 P Removal Rating 62 Ibs/ac. 1!nknown BALANCE 0 120 63 35 2 2 0 0 Tract Field 53 1 4 Req'd Nutrients 272 0 90 0 0 0 0 0 Acres App.Period 2.40 2/15-6/30 Supplied By: CROP Corn,Silage Starter 0 0 0 01 0 0 0 0 Commercial Fert. 141 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Soil Series Appling Residual 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RYE Sample Date 25.0 Tons 11-28-13 Manure 111 202 162 54 3 3 1 0 P Removal 'Rating 85 lbs/ac. Unknown BALANCE 0 202 72 54 3 3 1 0 Tract I Field 53 =6 Req'd Nutrients 272 0 100 0 0 0 0 0 Acres App.Period 3.00 1 2/15-6/30 Supplied By: CROP Corn,Silage Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Commercial Fert. 141 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Soil Series Appling Residual 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RYE I Sample Date 25.0 Tons 11-28-13 Manure 111 202 162 54 3 3 j 1 0 P Removal Rating 85 lbs/ac. 17nknown BALANCE 0 202 62 54 3 3 1 0 Tract Field 53 6 Req'd Nutrients 128 0 40 0 0 0 0 0 Acres I App.Period 3.00 9/1-3/31 Supplied By: CROP Small Grain,Silage Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Commercial Fert. 51 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Soil Series Appling Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RYE I Sample Date 11.5 Tons 11-28-13 Manure 77 120 103 35 2 2 0 0 P Removal Rating 62 lbs/ac. Unknown BALANCE 0 120 63 35 2 2 0 0 Tract Field 53 Req'd Nutrients 128 0 40 0 0 0 0 0 Acres App.Period 0.50 9/1-3/31 Supplied By: CROP Small Grain,Silage Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Commercial Fert. 51 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Soil Series Appling Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RYE Sample Date 11.5 Tons 11-28-13 Manure 77 120 103 35 21 2 0 0 P Removal Rating 1 621bs/ac. 1-1nknown BALANCE 0 120 63 35 2 2 0 0 rieview Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 2/13/2019 NMR Page 20 of 45 Nutrient Management Recommendations Test YEAR j N P2O5 K2O Mg Mn Zn Cu Lime (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (tons/A) Tract Field 53 7 Req'd Nutrients 272 0 100 0 0 0 0 0 Acres I App.Period 0.50 2/15-6/30 Supplied By: CROP Corn,Silage Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Commercial Fert. 141 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Soil Series Appling Residual 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RYE I Sample Date 25.0 Tons 11-28-13 Manure 111 202 162 54 3 3 1 0 P Removal Rating 85 lbs/ac. Unknown BALANCE 0 202 62 54 3 3 1 0 Tract Field 53 9 Req'd Nutrients 272 0 100 0 0 0 0 0 Acres App.Period 0.50 2/15-6/30 Supplied By: � CROP Corn,Silage Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Commercial Fert. 141 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Soil Series Appling Residual 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RYE I Sample Date 25.0 Tans 1 11-28-13 Manure 111 202 162 54 3 3 1 0 P Removal Rating 85 lbs/ac. l Inknown BALANCE 0 202 62 54 3 3 1 0 Tract Field 53 9 Req'd Nutrients 128 0 40 0 0 0 0 0 Acres App.Period 0.50 1 9/1-3/31 Supplied By: CROP Small Grain,Silage Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Commercial Fert. 51 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Soil Series Appling Residual 01 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RYE I Sample Date 11.5 Tons 11-28-13 Manure 77 120 103 35 2 2 0 0 P Removal Rating 62 lbs/ac. Unknown BALANCE 0 120 63 35 2 2 0 0 Tract Field 534 1 Req'd Nutrients 267 0 60 0 0 0 0 0 A.reT App.Period 6.10 2/15-6/30 Supplied By: CROP Corn,Silage Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Commercial Fert. 138 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Soil Series Appling Residual 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RYE Sample Date 24.5 Tons 11-28-13 Manure 109 197 15 541 3 3 1 0 P Removal Rating 83 lbs/ac. Unknown BALANCE 0 197 99 54 3 3 1 0 Tract Field 534 1 Req'd Nutrients 125 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 Acres I App.Period 6.10 9/1-3/31 Supplied By: CROP Small Grain,Silage Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Commercial Fert. 48 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Soil Series Appling Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RYE I Sample Date 11.3 Tons 11-28-13 Manure 77 120 103 35 2 2 0 0 P Removal Rating 61 lbs/ac. Unknown I BALANCE 0 120 93 35 2 2 0 0 Preview Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 2/13/2019 NMR Page 21 of 45 Nutrient Management Recommendations Test YEAR j N P205 K20 Mg Mn Zn Cu Lime (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (tons/A) Tract F Field 534 2 Req'd Nutrients 125 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 Acres App.Period 9.10 9/1-3/31 Supplied By: CROP Small Grain,Silage Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Commercial Fert. 48 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Soil Series Appling Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RYE I Sample Date 11.3 Tons 11-28-13 Manure 77 120 103 35 2 2 0 0 P Removal Rating 61 lbs/ac. Unknown BALANCE 0 120 93 35 2 2 0 0 Tract Field 534 2 Req'd Nutrients 267 0 60 0 0 0 0 0 Acres App.Period 9.10 2/15-6/30 Supplied By: CROP Corn,Silage Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Commercial Fert. 138 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Soil Series Appling Residual 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RYE I Sample Date 24.5 Tons 11-28-13 Manure 109 197 159 54 3 3 1 0 P Removal Rating 83 lbs/ac. Unknown BALANCE 0 197 99 54 3 3 1 0 F Tract Field 534 3 Req'd Nutrients 125 0 30 0 0 0 0 0 cres App.Period 3.80 9/1-3/31 Supplied By: CROP Small Grain,Silage Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Commercial Fert. 48 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Soil Series Appling Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RYE I Sample Date 11.3 Tons I1-28-13 Manure 77 120 103 35 2 2 0 0 P Removal Rating 61 lbs/ac. Unknown BALANCE 0 120 73 35 2 2 0 0 Tract Field 534 3 Req'd Nutrients 267 0 801 0 0 0 0 0 Acres App.Period 3.80 2/15-6/30 Supplied By: W IN _1 CROP Com,Silage Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Commercial Fert. 138 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Soil Series Appling Residual 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RYE I Sample Date 24.5 Tons 11-28-13 Manure 1091 197 159 54 3 3 1 0 P Removal Rating 83 ibs/ac. Unknown BALANCE 0 197 79 54 3 3 1 0 Tract Field 540 1 Req'd Nutrients 234 0 20 0 0 0 0 0 Acres App.Period 7.40 2/15-6/30 Supplied By: CROP Corn,Silage Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Commercial Fert.---0- 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Soil Series GeOrgeville Residual 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RYE I Sample Date 21.9 Tons 11-28-13 Manure 214 388 312 106 5 5 1 0 P Removal Rating 74 lbs/ac. %ledium BALANCE 0 388 2921 106 5 5 1 0 -I-'review Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 2/13/2019 NMR Page 22 of 45 Nutrient Management Recommendations Test YEAR j N P205 K20 Mg Mn Zn Cu Lime (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (tons/A) Tract Field 540 1 Req'd Nutrients 112 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Acres App.Period 7.40 9/1-3/31 Supplied By: 1 i CROP Small Grain,Silage Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Soil Series Georgeville Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RYE I Sample Date 10.4 Tons 11-28-13 Manure 112 172 149 50 2 2 0 0 P Removal Rating 56 lbs/ac. Medium BALANCE 0 172 149 50 2 2 0 0 Tract Field 540 2 Req'd Nutrients 234 20 60 0 0 0 0 0 Acres App.Period 15.59 2/15-6/30 Supplied By: CROP Corn,Silage Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Soil Series Georgeville Residual 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RYE I Sample Date 21.9 Tons 11-28-13 Manure 214 388 312 106 5 5 1 0 P Removal Rating 74 lbs/ac. Low BALANCE 0 368 252 106 5 5 1 0 Tract Field 540 2 Req'd Nutrients 112 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 Acres App.Period 15.59 9/1-3/31 Supplied By: CROP Small Grain,Silage Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Soil Series Georgeville Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RYE I Sample Date 10.4 Tons 1 11-28-13 Manure 112 172 149 50 2 2 0 0 P Removal Rating 561bs/ac. Low BALANCE 0 172 139 50 2 2 0 0 Tract Field 540 3 Req'd Nutrients 74 10 70 0 0 0 0 1 Acres App.Period 15.60 1 -2/15-10/31 Supplied By: CROP Fescue Pasture Starter, 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Commercial Fert. 01 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 Soil Series Orange Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RYE I Sample Date 2.4 Tons I 1-28-13 Manure 74 128 108 36 2 2 0 0 P Removal Rating 4 lbs/ac. 4ledium BALANCE 0 118 38 36 2 2 0 0 Tract Field 540 4 Req'd Nutrients 112 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Acres App.Period 2.70 9/1-3/31 Supplied By: CROP Small Grain,Silage Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Soil Series Georgcville Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RYE I Sample Date 00.4 Tons 11-28-13 Manure 112 172 149 50 2 2 0 0 P Removal I Rating 56 lbs/ac. edium BALANCE 0 172 149 50 2 2 0 0 Preview Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 2/13/2019 NMR Page 23 of 45 Nutrient Management Recommendations Test YEAR 1 N P2O5 K2O Mg Mn Zn Cu Lime (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (tons/A) Tract I Field 540 4 Req'd Nutrients 234 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Acres I App.Period 2.70 2/15-6/30 Supplied By: CROP Corn, Silage Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Soil Series Georgeville Residual 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RYE I Sample Date 21.9 Tons 11-28-13 Manure 214 388 312 106 5 5 1 0 P Removal Rating 74lbs/ac. Medium BALANCE 0 388 312 106 5 5 1 0 Tract Field 540 5 Req'd Nutrients 234 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 Acres I App.Period 8.80 2/15-6/30 Supplied By: CROP Corn, Silage Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 Soil Series Georgeville Residual 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RYE Sample Date 21.9 Tons 11-28-13 Manure 214 388 312 106 5 5 1 0 P Removal Rating 74lbs/ac. viedium BALANCE 0 388 312 106 5 5 1 0 Tract Field 540 5 Req'd Nutrients 112 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Acres App.Period 8.80 9/1-3/31 Supplied By: CROP Small Grain,Silage Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Soil Series Georgeville Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RYE I Sample Date 10.4 Tons 1 11-28-13 Manure 112 172 149 50 2 2 0 0 P Removal Rating 561bs/ac. Medium BALANCE 0 172 149 50 2 2 0 0 Tract Field 540 6 Req'd Nutrients 159 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Acres App.Period 0.80 -2/15-10/31 Supplied By: CROP Fescue Pasture Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 01 0 0 0 0 Soil Series Georgeville Residual 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 RYE I Sample Date 4.9 Tons 1 07-14-10 Manure 159 278 233 80 4 4 1 0 P Removal Rating 8 lbs/ac. jUnknown BALANCE 0 278 233 80 4 4 1 0 Tract Field 540 7 Req'd Nutrients 143 0 30 0 0 0 0 0 Acres I App.Period 1.60 -2/15-10/31 Supplied By: CROP Fescue Pasture Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Soil Series APpling Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RYE I Sample Date 4.3 Tons 11-28-13 Manure 143 247 209 71 4 3 1 0 P Removal Rating 7 lbs/ac. Low BALANCE 0 247 179 71 4 3 1 0 Preview Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 2/13/2019 NMR Page 24 of 45 Nutrient Management Recommendations Test YEAR j N P2O5 K2O Mg Mn Zn Cu Lime (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (tons/A) Tract I Field 54= 8 Req'd Nutrients 125 0 40 0 0 0 0 0 Acres App.Period 6.20 9/1-3/31 Supplied By: CROP Small Grain,Silage Starter 0 0 0 0 01 0 0 0 Commercial Fert. 48 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Soil Series Appling Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RYE I Sample Date 11.3 Tons 1 11-28-13 Manure 77 120 103 35 2 2 0 0 PRemoval Rating 61lbs/ac. Kledium BALANCE 0 120 63 35 2 2 0 0 Tract Field 540 1 8 Req'd Nutrients 267 0 90 0 0 0 0 0 Acres I App.Period 6.20 2/15-6/30 Supplied By: CROP Corn,Silage Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Commercial Fert. 138 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Soil Series Appling Residual 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RYE I Sample Date 24.5 Tons 11-28-13 Manure 109 197 159 54 3 3 1 0 PRemoval I Rating 83lbs/ac. INIedium BALANCE 0 197 69 54 3 3 1 0 Tract Field 540 9 Req'd Nutrients 125 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Acres App.Period 5.30 9/1-3/31 Supplied By: CROP Small Grain,Silage Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Commercial Fert. 48 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Soil Series Appling Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RYE I Sample Date 11.3 Tons 1 11-28-13 Manure 77 120 103 35 2 2 0 0 P Removal Rating 61 lbs/ac. -Medium BALANCE 0 120 103 35 2 2 0 0 Tract Field 540 9 Req'd Nutrients 267 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Acres App.Period 5.30 2/15-6/30 Supplied By: CROP Corn,Silage Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Commercial Fert. 138 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Soil Series Appling Residual 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RYE I Sample Date 24.5 Tons 11-28-13 Manure 109 197 159 54 3 3 1 0 P Removal Rating 83 lbs/ac. Medium BALANCE 0 197 1591 54 3 3 1 0 7A.�. Field551 1 Req'd Nutrients 125 0 40 0 0 0 0 0 pp.Period 7.30 9/1-3/31 Supplied By: CROP Small Grain,Silage Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Commercial Fert. 48 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Soil Series Appling Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RYE I Sample Date 11.3 Tons 1 11-28-13 Manure 77 120 103 35 2 2 0 0 P Removal Rating 61 lbs/ac. Unknown BALANCE 0 120 63 35 2 2 0 0 Preview Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 2/13/2019 NMR Page 25 of 45 Nutrient Management Recommendations Test YEAR j N P205 K20 Mg Mn Zn Cu Lime (lbs/A) (Ibs/A) (Ibs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (Ibs/A) (Ibs/A) (tons/A) Tract Field 551 1 Req'd Nutrients 267 0 100 0 0 0 0 0 Acres App.Period 7.30 2/15-6/30 Supplied By: CROP Corn,Silage Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Commercial Fert. 138 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Soil Series APpling Residual 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RYE I Sample Date 24.5 Tons 11-28-13 Manure 109 197 159 54 3 3 1 0 P Removal Rating 83 Ibs/ac. Unknown BALANCE 0 197 59 54 3 3 1 0 Tract Field 551 2 Req'd Nutrients 125 0 30 0 0 0 0 0 Acres I App.Period 6.60 9/1-3/31 Supplied By: CROP Small Grain,Silage Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Commercial Fert. 48 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Soil Series APpling Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RYE I Sample Date 11.3 Tons 1 11-28-13 Manure 77 120 103 35 2 2 0 0 P Removal Rating 61 ibs/ac. Unknown BALANCE 0 120 73 35 2 2 0 0 Tract Field 551 2 Req'd Nutrients 267 0 80 0 0 0 0 0 Acres App.Period 6.60 2/15-6/30 Supplied By: CROP Corn,Silage Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Commercial Fert. 138 0 0 01 0 0 0 0 Soil Series APpling Residual 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RYE I Sample Date 24.5 Tons 11-28-13 Manure 109 197 159 54 3 3 1 0 P Removal Rating 83 Ibs/ac. 1'nknown BALANCE 0 197 79 54 3 3 1 0 Tract Field 551 3 Req'd Nutrients 125 0 40 0 0 0 0 0 Acres App.Period 3.40 9/1-3/31 Supplied By: CROP Small Grain,Silage Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Commercial Fert. 48 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Soil Series APpling Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RYE I Sample Date 11.3 Tons 11-28-13 Manure 77 120 103 35 2 2 0 0 P Removal Rating 61 lbs/ac. Unknown BALANCE 0 120 63 35 2 2 0 0 Tract Field 551 3 Req'd Nutrients 267 0 100 0 0 0 0 0 Acres App.Period 3.40 2/15-6/30 Supplied By: CROP Corn,Silage Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Commercial Fert. 138 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Soil Series APpling Residual 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RYE Sample Date 24.5 Tons 11-28-13 Manure 109 197 159 54 3 3 1 0 P Removal Rating 83 ibs/ac. LInknown BALANCE 0 197 59 54 3 3 1 1 0 rreview Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 2/13/2019 NMR Page 26 of 45 Nutrient Management Recommendations Test YEAR j N P2O5 K2O Mg Mn Zn Cu Lime (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (tons/A) Tract Field 551 4 Req'd Nutrients *125 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Acres I App.Period 4.00 9/1-3/31 Supplied By: CROP Small Grain,Silage Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Commercial Fert. 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Soil Series Georgeville Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RYE I Sample Date 10.8 Tons 11-28-13 Manure 116 179 156 52 2 2 0 0 PRemoval Rating 581bs/ac. I'nknown BALANCE 0 179 156 52 2 2 0 0 Tract I Field 551 4 Req'd Nutrients *267 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Acres App.Period 4.00 2/15-6/30 Supplied By: CROP Com,Silage Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Commercial Fert. 27 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Soil Series Georgeville Residual 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RYE I Sample Date 22.5 Tons 11-28-13 Manure 22 4400 321 109 5 5 1 0 P Removal Rating 771bs/ac. I nknown BALANCE 0 400 321 109 5 5 1 0 Tract Field 551 6 Req'd Nutrients 1'? 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Acres App.Period 9.50 9/1-3/31 Supplied By: CROP Small Grain,Silage Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Commercial Fert. 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Soil Series Georgeville Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RYE I Sample Date 10.8 Tons 11-28-13 Manure 116 179 156 52 2 2 0 0 P Removal Rating 58 ibs/ac. Unknown BALANCE 0 179 156 52 2 2 0 0 Tract Field 551 6 Req'd Nutrients *267 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Acres App.Period 9.50 2/15-6/30 Supplied By: CROP Corn,Silage Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Commercial Fert. 27 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Soil Series Georgeville Residual 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RYE I Sample Date 22.5 Tons 11-28-13 Manure 220 400 321 109 5 5 1 0 P Removal Rating 77 lbs/ac. e_'nknown BALANCE 0 400 321 1091 5 5 1 0 [ Tract Field 551 7 Req'd Nutrients 117 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Acres I App.Period 2.60 9/1-3/31 Supplied By: CROP Small Grain,Silage Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Commercial Fert. 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Soil Series Herndon Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RYE I Sample Date 10.8 Tons 11-28-13 Manure 116 179 156 52 2 2 0 0 P Removal Rating 58 lbs/ac. l'nknown I BALANCE 0 179 156 52 2 2 0 0 -preview Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 2/13/2019 NMR Page 27 of 45 Nutrient Management Recommendations Test YEAR j N P205 K20 Mg Mn Zn Cu Lime (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (tons/A) Tract F Field 551 7 Req'd Nutrients 241 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Acres I App.Period 2.60 2/15-6/30 Supplied By: } �I CROP Corn,Silage Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Commercial Fert. 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Soil Series Herndon Residual 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RYE I Sample Date 22.5 Tons 1 11-28-13 Manure 219 396 320 108 5 5 1 0 P Removal Rating 77 lbs/ac. jUnknown BALANCE 0 396 320 108 5 5 1 0 Tract Field 568 1 Req'd Nutrients 117 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Acres App.Period 13.50 1 9/1-3/31 Supplied By: CROP Small Grain,Silage Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Commercial Fert. 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Soil Series Herndon Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RYE I Sample Date 10.8 Tons 11-28-13 Manure 116 179 156 52 2 2 0 0 P Removal Rating 58 lbs/ac. L nknown BALANCE 0 179 156 52 2 2 0 0 Tract Field 568 1 Req'd Nutrients 241 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Acres App.Period 13.50 2/15-6/30 Supplied By: _ CROP Corn,Silage Starter 0 0 0 01 0 0 0 0 Commercial Fert. 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Soil Series Herndon Residual 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RYE I Sample Date 22.5 Tons 11-28-13 Manure 219 396 320 108 5 5 1 0 P Removal Rating 77 lbs/ac. Unlmown BALANCE 0 396 3201 108 5 5 1 0 Tract Field 569 1 Req'd Nutrients 224 60 0 0 0 0 0 0 Acres App.Period 4.60 2/15-6/30 Supplied By: CROP Corn,Silage Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Commercial Fert. 224 60 0 0 0 0 0 0 Soil Series '�'anford Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RYE I Sample Date 20.9 Tons 1 11-28-13 Manure 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 P Removal Rating 71 lbs/ac. I nknown BALANCE 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Tract Field 569 1 Req'd Nutrients *112 50 0 0 0 0 0 0 Acres App.Period 4.60 9/1-3/31 Supplied By: CROP Small Grain,Silage Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Commercial Fert. 112 50 0 0 0 0 0 0 Soil Series Nanford Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RYE I Sample Date 8.6 Tons 11-28-13 Manure 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 P Removal I Rating 1 46 lbs/ac. l.inknown BALANCE 1 01 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 -ereview Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 2/13/2019 NMR Page 28 of 45 Nutrient Management Recommendations Test YEAR 1 N P205 K20 Mg Mn Zn Cu Lime (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (tons/A) Tract Field 569 10 Req'd Nutrients 234 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Acres App.Period 7.20 2/15-6/30 Supplied By: 1W .1 CROP Com,Silage Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Soil Series Georgeville Residual 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RYE j Sample Date 21.9 Tons 11-28-13 Manure 214 388 312 106 5 5 1 0 P Removal Rating 74 lbs/ac. Unknown BALANCE 0 388 312 106 5 5 1 0 Tract Field 569 10 Req'd Nutrients 112 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Acres App.Period 7.20 9/1-3/31 Supplied By: CROP Small Grain,Silage Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 01 0 0 Soil Series Georgeville Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RYE I Sample Date 10.4 Tons 11-28-13 Manure 112 172 149 50 2 2 0 0 P Removal Rating 56 lbs/ac. l Inknown BALANCE 0 172 149 50 2 2 0 0 Tract Field 569 11 Req'd Nutrients 112 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Acres App.Period 51.90 9/1-3/31 Supplied By: CROP Small Grain,Silage Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Soil Series Georgeville Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RYE I Sample Date 10.4 Tons 11-28-13 Manure 112 172 149 50 2 2 0 0 P Removal Rating 56 lbs/ac. i nknown BALANCE 0 172 149 50 2 2 0 0 7Acres Field 569 11 Req'd Nutrients 234 0 00 0 0 0 0 p.Period 51.90 2/15-6/30 Supplied By: CROP Corn,Silage Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Soil Series Georgeville Residual 20 0 0 0 0 01 0 0 RYE I Sample Date 21.9 Tons 11-28-13 Manure 214 388 312 106 5 5 1 0 P Removal I Rating 74 lbs/ac. Unknown BALANCE 0 388 312 106 5 5 1 0 Tract Field 569 5 Req'd Nutrients 112 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Acres App.Period 2.90 9/1-3/31 Supplied By: CROP Small Grain,Silage Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Soil Series Georgeville Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RYE Sample Date 10.4 Tons 11-28-13 Manure 112 172 149 50 2 2 0 0 P Removal Rating 561bs/ac. ['nknown BALANCE 0 172 149 50 2 2 0 0 Preview Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 2/13/2019 NMR Page 29 of 45 Nutrient Management Recommendations Test YEAR 1 N P205 K20 Mg Mn Zn Cu Lime (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (tons/A) Tract Field 569 5 Req'd Nutrients 234 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 Acres App.Period 2.90 2/15-6/30 Supplied By: CROP Com,Silage Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Soil Series Georgeville Residual 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RYE I Sample Date 21.9 Tons 11-28-13 Manure 214 388 312 106 5 5 1 0 P Removal Rating 74 lbs/ac. Unknown BALANCE 0 378 312 106 5 5 1 0 Tract Field 575 1 Req'd Nutrients 143 60 0 0 0 0 0 1 Acres App.Period 71.00 *2/15-10/31 Supplied By: CROP Fescue Pasture Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 Soil Series Nanford Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RYE I Sample Date 4.4 Tons 11-04-14 Manure 143 378 208 71 5 5 2 0 P Removal Rating 7lbs/ac. Unknown BALANCE 0 318 208 71 5 5 2 0 Tract Field 580 3 Req'd Nutrients 159 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Acres App.Period 3.00 1 *2/15-10/31 Supplied By: CROP Fescue Pasture Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Soil Series Georgeville Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RYE I Sample Date 4.9 Tons 1 11-28-13 Manure 159 278 233 80 4 4 1 0 P Removal Rating 8 lbs/ac. i.tknown BALANCE 0 278 233 80 4 4 1 0 Tract Field 580 4 Req'd Nutrients 159 10 20 0 0 0 0 0 Acres App.Period 10.00 j *2/15-10/31 Supplied By: CROP Fescue Pasture Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Commercial Fert. 0 0 01 0 0 0 0 0 Soil Series Georgeville Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RYE I Sample Date 4.9 Tons 11-28-13 Manure 159 277 231 79 4 4 1 0 P Removal Rating 8 lbs/ac. Unknown BALANCE 0 267 211 79 4 4 1 0 Tract Field 618 1 Req'd Nutrients 143 110 60 0 0 0 0 1 Acres App.Period 2.00 *2/15-10/31 Supplied By: CROP Fescue Pasture Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 01 0 0 0 1 Sail Series Vanford Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 FPRemoval E Sample Date 4.4 Tons 11-04-14 Manure 143 378 208 71 5 5 2 0 Rating 7 lbs/ac. Unknown BALANCE 0 268 148 71 5 5 2 0 r'review Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 2/13/2019 NMR Page 30 of 45 Nutrient Management Recommendations Test YEAR j N P2O5 K2O Mg Mn Zn Cu Lime (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (tons/A) Tract Field 618 2 Req'd Nutrients 143 120 70 0 0 01 0 1 Acres I App.Period 5.50 *2/15-10/31 Supplied By: CROP Fescue Pasture Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 Soil Series Nanford Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RYE I Sample Date 4.4 Tons 11-04-14 Manure 143 378 208 71 5 5 2 0 P Removal I Rating 7 lbs/ac. 1'nknown BALANCE 0 258 138 71 5 5 2 0 Tract Field 618 3 Req'd Nutrients 143 70 0 0 0 0 0 2 Acres App.Period 2.00 *2/15-10/31 Supplied By: ` I CROP Fescue Pasture Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 Soil Series tianford Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RYE I Sample Date 4.4 Tons 11-04-14 Manure 143 378 208 71 5 5 2 0 P Removal Rating 7 lbs/ac. 1InknOWn BALANCE 0 308 208 71 5 5 2 0 Tract Field 618 4 Req'd Nutrients 143 110 20 0 0 0 0 0 Acres App.Period 1.00 *2/15-10/31 Supplied By: 1 CROP Fescue Pasture Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Soil Series Nanford Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RYE I Sample Date 4.4 Tons 1 11-04-14 Manure 143 378 208 71 5 5 2 0 P Removal Rating 7 lbs/ac. Unknown BALANCE 0 268 188 71 51 5 2 0 Tract Field 618 5 Req'd Nutrients 143 60 10 0 0 0 0 0 Acres App.Period 5.00 *2/15-10/31 Supplied By: CROP Fescue Pasture Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Soil Series Nanford Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RYE I Sample Date 4.4 Tons 1 11-04-14 Manure 143 378 208 71 5 5 2 0 P Removal Rating 7 lbs/ac. Unknown BALANCE 0 318 198 71 5 5 2 0 Tract Field 618 6 Req'd Nutrients 143 110 20 0 0 0 0 0 Acres App.Period 4.00 *2/15-10/31 Supplied By: CROP Fescue Pasture Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Soil Series Nanford Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RYE I Sample Date 4.4 Tons 11-04-14 Manure 143 378 208 71 5 5 2 0 P Removal Rating 7 lbs/ac. Unknown BALANCE 0 268 188 71 5 5 2 0 Preview Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 2/13/2019 NMR Page 31 of 45 Nutrient Management Recommendations Test YEAR 1 N P205 K20 Mg Mn Zn Cu Lime (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (tons/A) Tract FFicld 618 7 Req'd Nutrients 143 130 110 0 0 0 0 0 Acres App.Period 1.50 -2/15-10/31 Supplied By: CROP Fescue Pasture Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Soil Series Nanford Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RYE I Sample Date 4.4 Tons 11-04-14 Manure 143 378 208 71 5 5 2 0 PRemoval Rating 71bs/ac. tInknown BALANCE 0 248 98 71 5 5 2 0 Tract Field 618 8 Req'd Nutrients 143 110 100 0 0 0 0 0 Acres App.Period 4.50 -2/15-10/31 Supplied By: CROP Fescue Pasture Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Commercial Fert. 0 01 0 0 0 0 0 0 Soil Series Nanford Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RYE I Sample Date 4.4 Tons 11-04-14 Manure 143 378 208 71 5 5 2 0 P Removal Rating 7 lbs/ac. SJnknown BALANCE 0 268 108 71 5 5 2 0 NOTE: Symbol*means user entered data. Areview Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 2/13/2019 NMR Page 32 of 45 Nutrient Management Recommendations Test YEAR 2 N P2O5 K2O Mg Mn Zn Cu Lime (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (tons/A) Tract Ffleld 10309 1 Req'd Nutrients 186 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Acres App.Period 7.60 4/1-9/15 Supplied By: CROP Soybeans,Manured,Full Starter 0 0 01 0 0 01 0 0 Season Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Soil Series Herndon Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RYE I Sample Date 48 bu. 11-28-13 Manure 186 337 273 92 4 4 1 0 P Removal Rating 38 lbs/ac. 1-'nknown BALANCE 0 337 273 92 4 4 1 0 Tract Field 10309 2 Req'd Nutrients 186 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Acres App.Period 9.50 4/1-9/15 Supplied By: CROP Soybeans,Manured,Full Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Season Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Soil Series Herndon Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RYE I Sample Date 48 bu. 11-28-13 Manure 186 336 272 92 4 4 1 1 0 P Removal Rating 38 lbs/ac. Unknown BALANCE 0 336 272 92 4 4 1 0 Tract Field 10309 3 Req'd Nutrients 190 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Acres I App.Period 7.90 4/1-9/15 Supplied By: CROP Soybeans,Manured,Full Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Season Commercial Fert. 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Soil Series Herndon Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RYE I Sample Date 49 bu. 1 11-28-13 Manure 189 341 276 94 4 4 1 0 P Removal Rating 391bslac. l Inknown BALANCE 0 341 276 94 4 4 1 0 Tract Field 10309 4 Req'd Nutrients t70 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Acres AI,p.Period 9.20 4/1-9/15 Supplied By: CROP Soybeans,Manured,Full Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Season Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Soil Series Alamance Residual 0 0 0f— 0 0 0 0 0 RYE I Sample Date 44 bu. 11-28-13 Manure 170 305 249 84 4 4 1 0 PRemoval Rating 35lbs/ac. i;nknown BALANCE 0 305 249 84 4 4 1 0 Tract I Field 10386 6 Req'd Nutrients 170 60 0 0 0 0 0 0 Acres App.Period 5.90 4/1-9/15 Supplied By: CROP Soybeans,Manured,Full Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Season Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Soil Seri Tarsus Series Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RYE I Sample Date 44 bu. 1 11-28-13 Manure 170 310 249 84 4 4 1 0 P Removal I Rating 35 lbs/ac. Unknown BALANCE 01 250 249 84 4 4 I 0 Preview Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 2/13/2019 NMR Page 33 of 45 Nutrient Management Recommendations Test YEAR 2 N P205 K20 Mg Mn Zn CU. Lime (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (tons/A) Field 10386 7 Req'd Nutrients 174 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 J:A!,�. App.Period 9.50 4/1-9/15 Supplied By: CROP Soybeans,Manured,Full Starter 0 0 0 01 0 0 0 0 Season Commercial Fert. 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Soil Series Ta—s Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RYE I Sample Date 45 bu. 11-28-13 Manure 173 315 252 86 4 4 1 0 P Removal Rating 36 lbs/ac. l;nknown BALANCE 0 315 252 86 4 4 1 0 Tract Field 10386 8 Req'd Nutrients 174 70 0 0 0 0 0 0 Acres App.Period 13.10 4/1-9/15 Supplied By: CROP Soybeans,Manured,Full Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Season Commercial Fert. 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Soil Series Tarsus Residual 0 0 0 01 0 0 0 0 RYE I Sample Date 45 bu. 1 07-14-10 Manure 173 315 252 86 4 4 1 0 tRemoval Rating 361bs/ac. Unknown BALANCE 0 245 252 86 4 4 1 0 Field 10497 7 Req'd Nutrients 210 0 50 0 0 0 0 0 pp.Period 1.80 4/1-9/15 Supplied By: CROP Soybeans,Manured,Full Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Season Commercial Fert. 79 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Soil Series Appling Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RYE I Sample Date 54 bu. 11-28-13 Manure 131 238 191 66 4 3 1 0 P Removal Rating 43 lbs/ac. Unknown BALANCE 0 238 141 66 4 3 1 0 Tract Field 10497 8 Req'd Nutrients 210 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Acres I App.Period 3.30 4/1-9/15 Supplied By: CROP Soybeans,Manured,Full Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Season Commercial Fert. 79 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Soil Series Appling Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RYE I Sample Date 54 bu. 11-28-13 Manure 131 238 191 66 4 3 1 0 P Removal Rating 43 lbs/ac. Unknown BALANCE 0 2381 191 66 4 3 1 0 [ Tract Field 10497 9 Req'd Nutrients 210 0 40 0 0 0 0 0 Acres I App.Period 5.10 4/1-9/15 Supplied By: CROP Soybeans,Manured,Full Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Season Commercial Fert. 79 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 LRYEI Series Appling Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ple Date 54 bu 11-28-13 Manure 131 238 191 66 4 3 1 0 Rating 43 lbs/ac. t nknown BALANCE 0 238 151 66 4 3 1 0 Preview Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 2/13/2019 NMR Page 34 of 45 Nutrient Management Recommendations Test YEAR 2 N P2O5 K2O Mg Mn Zn Cu Lime (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (tons/A) Tract Field 10499 5 Req'd Nutrients 202 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Acres App.Period 7.00 4/1-9/15 Supplied By: CROP Soybeans,Manured,Full Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Season Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Soil Series Appling Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RYE I Sample Date 52 bu. 11-28-13 Manure 202 367 295 100 4 4 1 0 P Removal Rating 42 lbs/ac. lJnknown BALANCE 0 367 295 100 4 4 1 0 Tract Field 10499 6 Req'd Nutrients 202 0 30 0 0 0 0 0 Acres I App.Period 2.70 1 4/1-9/15 Supplied By: CROP Soybeans,Manured,Full Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Season Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Soil Series Appling Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RYE I Sample Date 52 bu. 11-28-13 Manure 202 367 295 100 4 4 1 0 P Removal Rating 42 lbs/ac. !'nknown BALANCE 0 367 265 100 4 4 1 0 Tract Field 10499 8 Req'd Nutrients 202 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Acres App.Period 3.70 4/1-9/15 Supplied By: CROP Soybeans,Manured,Full Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Season Commercial Fett. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Soil Series Appling Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RYE I Sample Date 52 bu. 11-28-13 Manure 202 367 295 100 4 4 1 0 P Removal Rating 42 lbs/ac. Unknown BALANCE 0 367 295 100 4 4 1 0 FTApp. Field 10514 6 Req'd Nutrients 190 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 Period 7.50 4/1-9/15 Supplied By: CROP Soybeans,Manured,Full Starter, 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Season Commercial Fert. 1 0 0 0 0 0 01 0 Soil Series Georgeville Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RYE I Sample Date 49 bu. 11-28-13 Manure 189 344 276 93 4 4 1 0 P Removal Rating 39 lbs/ac. Unknown BALANCE 0 344 266 93 4 4 1 0 Tract Field 10514 8 Req'd Nutrients 186 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 Acres App.Period 14.00 4/1-9/15 Supplied By: CROP Soybeans,Manured,Full Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Season Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 �00 0 0 0 URYE il Series 'Georgeville Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 mple Date 48 bu. 11-28-13 Manure 186 336 272 92 4 4 1 0 al Rating 38 lbs/ac. t Inknown BALANCE 0 336 262 92 4 4 1 0 Preview Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 2/13/2019 NMR Page 35 of 45 Nutrient Management Recommendations Test YEAR 2 N P205 K20 Mg Mn Zn Cu Lime (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (tons/A) Tract Fheld 105= 1 Req'd Nutrients 190 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Acres App.Period 3.00 4/1-9/15 Supplied By: CROP Soybeans,Manured,Full Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Season Commercial Fert. 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Soil Series Georgeville Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RYE I Sample Date 49 bu. 11-28-13 Manure 189 341 276 94 4 4 1 0 P Removal Rating 39 lbs/ac. Unknown BALANCE 0 341 276 94 4 4 1 0 Tract Field 1074 5 Req'd Nutrients 210 80 0 0 0 0 0 0 Acres I App.Period 15.00 4/1-9/15 Supplied By: CROP Soybeans,Manured,Full Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Season Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Soil Series Appling Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RYE I Sample Date 54 bu. 11-28-13 Manure 210 382 306 105 5 4 1 0 P Removal I Rating 43 lbs/ac. Unknown BALANCE 0 302 306 105 5 4 1 0 Tract Field 1074 6 Req'd Nutrients 202 60 0 01 0 0 0 0 Acres App.Period 6.00 4/1-9/15 Supplied By: CROP Soybeans,Manured,Full Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Season Commercial Fert. 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Soil Series Appling Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RYE I Sample Date 52 bu. 11-28-13 Manure 201 366 294 99 4 4 1 0 P Removal Rating 421bs/ac. Unknown BALANCE 01 306 294 99 4 4 1 0 F ract Field 2383 3 Req'd Nutrients 202 0 0 0 0 00 0 res App.Period 3.00 4/1-9/15 Supplied By: CROP Soybeans,Manured,Full Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Season Commercial Fert. 74 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Soil Series Appling Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RYE I Sample Date 52 bu. 11-28-13 Manure 128 233 188 64 4 3 1 0 P Removal Rating 421bs/ac. Low BALANCE 0 233 188 64 4 3 1 0 Tract Field 2384 6 Req'd Nutrients 190 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Acres App.Period 6.50 4/1-9/15 Supplied By: CROP Soybeans,Manured,Full Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Season Commercial Fert. 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Soil Series Georgeville Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RYE I Sample Date 49 bu. 11-28-13 Manure 189 341 276 94 4 4 1 0 P Removal Rating 39 lbs/ac. l;nknown BALANCE 0 341 2761 941 4 4 1 0 -Preview Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 2/13/2019 NMR Page 36 of 45 Nutrient Management Recommendations Test YEAR 2 N P205 K20 Mg Mn Zn Cu Lime (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (tons/A) FApp. Field 2392 1 Req'd Nutrients 166 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Acre Period 19.00 4/1-9/15 Supplied By: CROP Soybeans,Manured,Full Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Season Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Soil Series Tatum Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RYE I Sample Date 43 bu. 1 11-28-13 Manure 166 289 243 82 4 4 1 0 P Removal Rating 34 lbs/ac. %,tedium BALANCE 0 289 243 82 4 4 1 0 Tract Field 2392 2 Req'd Nutrients 166 20 10 0 0 0 0 0 Acres App.Period 3.00 4/1-9/15 Supplied By: CROP Soybeans,Manured,Full Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Season Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Soil Series Tatum Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RYE I Sample Date 43 bu. 11-28-13 Manure 166 289 243 82 4 4 1 0 P Removal Rating 34 lbs/ac. Iv1 edium BALANCE 0 269 233 82 4 4 1 0 Tract Field 2392 3 Req'd Nutrients 186 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Acres App.Period 6.00 4/1-9/15 Supplied By: CROP Soybeans,Manured,Full Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Season Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Soil Series Herndon Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RYE I Sample Date 48bu. 11-28-13 Manure 186 337 273 92 4 4 1 0 P Removal Rating 38 lbs/ac. %Tedium BALANCE 0 337 273 92 4 4 1 0 Tract Field 2392 4 Req'd Nutrients 166 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Acres I App.Period 1.60 4/1-9/15 Supplied By: CROP Soybeans,Manured,Full Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Season Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Soil Series Tam Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RYE j Sample Date 43 bu. 11-28-13 Manure 166 289 243 82 4 4 1 0 P Removal Rating 34 lbs/ac. Medium BALANCE 0 289 243 82 4 4 1 0 Tract Field 2392 5 Req'd Nutrients 186 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Acres App.Period 2.00 4/1-9/15 Supplied By: CROP Soybeans,Manured,Full Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Season Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Soil Series Georgeville Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RYE I Sample Date 48 bu. 11-28-13 Manure 186 337 273 92 4 4 1 0 P Removal IRating 38 lbs/ac. Tedium BALANCE 0 337 273 92 4 4 1 0 Preview Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 2/13/2019 NMR Page 37 of 45 Nutrient Management Recommendations Test YEAR 2 N P205 K20 Mg Mn Zn Cu Lime (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (tons/A) Tract Field 2392 1 6 Req'd Nutrients 190 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Acres App.Period 6.00 4/1-9/15 Supplied By: CROP Soybeans,Manured,Full Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Season Commercial Fert. 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Soil Series Georgeville Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RYE I Sample Date 49 bu. 11-28-13 Manure 189 341 276 94 4 4 1 0 P Removal Rating 39 lbs/ac. Ntedium BALANCE 0 341 276 94 4 4 1 0 Tract Field 2392 7 Req'd Nutrients 108 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Acres I App.Period 5.70 4/1-9/15 ISupplied By: - CROP Soybeans,Manured,Full Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Season Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Soil Series Callison Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RYE I Sample Date 28 bu. 11-28-13 Manure 108 181 158 53 3 3 0 0 P Removal Rating 22 lbs/ac. \1edium BALANCE 0 181 158 53 3 3 0 0 Tract IField 2415 3 Req'd Nutrients 178 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Acres App.Period 10.00 4/1-9/15 Supplied By: CROP Soybeans,Manured,Full Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Season Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Soil Series Herndon Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RYE I Sample Date 46 bu. 11-28-13 Manure 178 320 260 89 4 4 1 0 P Removal Rating 371bs/ac. Medium BALANCE 0 320 2601 89 4 4 1 0 Tract Field 2415 7 Req'd Nutrients *140 0 30 0 0 0 0 0 Acres App.Period 24.70 4/1-9/15 Supplied By: CROP Soybeans,Manured,Full Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Season Commercial Fert. 29 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Soil Series Appling Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RYE I Sample Date 54 bu. 11-28-13 Manure 111 186 161 55 3 3 1 0 P Removal Rating 43 lbs/ac. Medium BALANCE 0 186 131 55 3 3 1 0 Tract Field 30369 1 Req'd Nutrients 190 0 50 0 0 0 0 0 Acres App.Period 6.00 4/1-9/15 Supplied By: CROP Soybeans,Manured,Full Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Season Commercial Fert. 1 0 0 0 0 p 0 0 Soil Series Cltk]fgt�'F3IC Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 01 0 RYE Sample Date 49 bu. 11-04-14 Manure 189 344 276 93 4 4 1 0 P Removal Rating 3916s/ac. Unknown BALANCE 0 344 226 93 4 4 1 0 rreview Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 2/13/2019 NMR Page 38 of 45 Nutrient Management Recommendations Test YEAR 2 N P2O5 K2O Mg Mn Zn Cu Lime (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (tons/A) Tract Field 30369 2 Req'd Nutrients 190 0 50 0 0 0 0 0 Acres App.Period 5.00 4/1-9/15 Supplied By: CROP Soybeans,Manured,Full Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Season Commercial Fert. 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Soil Series Georgeville Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RYE I Sample Date 49 bu. 11-04-14 Manure 189 344 276 93 4 4 1 0 P Removal I Rating 39 lbs/ac. Unknown BALANCE 01 344 226 93 4 4 1 0 Tract Field 30369 3 Req'd Nutrients 190 0 70 0 0 0 0 0 Acres I App.Period 7.00 4/1-9/15 Supplied By: CROP Soybeans,Manured,Full Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Season Commercial Fert. 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Soil Series Georgeville Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RYE I Sample Date 49 bu. 11-04-14 Manure 189 344 276 93 4 4 1 0 P Removal I Rating 39 lbs/ac. Unknown BALANCE 0 344 206 931 41 4 1 0 Tract Field 30370 1 Req'd Nutrients 190 0 50 0 0 0 0 0 Acres I App.Period 1.00 4/1-9/15 Supplied By: _ i CROP Soybeans,Manured,Full Starter 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Season Commercial Fert. 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Soil Series Georgeville Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RYE I Sample Date 49 bu. 1 11-04-14 Manure 189 344 276 93 4 4 1 0 P Removal Rating 391bs/ac. t Inknown BALANCE 0 344 226 93 4 4 1 0 Tract Field 30370 2 Req'd Nutrients 190 0 50 0 0 0 0 0 Acres App.Period 1.50 4/1-9/15 Supplied By: CROP Soybeans,Manured,Full Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Season Commercial Fert. 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Soil Series Georgeville Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RYE I Sample Date 49 bu. 1 11-04-14 Manure 189 344 276 93 4 4 1 0 P Removal Rating 39 lbs/ac. ItInknown BALANCE 0 344 226 93 4 4 1 0 Tract Field 30370 3 Req'd Nutrients 190 0 70 0 0 0 0 0 Acres App.Period 4.00 4/1-9/15 Supplied By: - - -Y =R CROP Soybeans,Manured,Full Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Season Commercial Fert. 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 [ Soil Series 'Georgeville Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RYE Sample Date 49 bu. 11-04-14 Manure 189 344 276 93 4 4 1 0 Removal I Rating 1 39 lbs/ac. Unknown BALANCE 1 0 344 206 93 4 41 1 0 rreview Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 2/13/2019 NMR Page 39 of 45 Nutrient Management Recommendations Test YEAR 2 N P2O5 K2O Mg Mn Zn Cu Lime (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (tons/A) ITract Field 30370 5 Req'd Nutrients 190 70 90 0 0 0 0 0 .Acres App.Period 3.50 4/1-9/15 Supplied By: CROP Soybeans,Manured,Full Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Season Commercial Fert. 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Soil Series Georgeville Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RYE I Sample Date 49 bu. 11-04-14 Manure 189 344 276 93 4 4 1 0 P Removal Rating 39 lbs/ac. LInknown BALANCE 0 274 186 93 4 4 1 1 0 Tract Field 30370 6 Req'd Nutrients 190 50 80 0 0 0 0 0 Acres App.Period 2.70 4/1-9/15 Supplied By: CROP Soybeans,Manured,Full Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Season Commercial Fert. 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Soil Series Georgeville Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RYE I Sample Date 49 bu. 1 11-04-14 Manure 189 344 276 93 4 4 1 0 P Removal Rating 39 lbs/ac. 1'nknown BALANCE 0 294 196 93 4 4 1 0 Tract Field 53 1 Req'd Nutrients 210 0 30 0 0 0 0 0 Acres App.Period 25.00 4/1-9/15 Supplied By: CROP Soybeans,Manured,Full Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Season Commercial Fert. 79 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Soil Series Appling Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RYE I Sample Date 54 bu. 11-28-13 Manure 131 238 191 661 4 3 1 0 P Removal Rating 43 lbs/ac. jUnknown BALANCE 0 238 161 66 4 3 1 0 Tract Field 53 2 Req'd Nutrients 214 0 20 0 0 0 0 0 Acres App.Period 2.00 4/1-9/15 Supplied By: CROP Soybeans,Manured,Full Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Season Commercial Fert. 80 0 0 0 0, 0 0 0 Soil Series Appling Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RYE I Sample Date 55 bu. 11-28-13 Manure 134 244 196 66 4 4 1 0 P Removal Rating 44 lbs/ac. Unknown BALANCE 0 244 176 66 4 4 1 0 FTField 53 3 Req'd Nutrients 136 0 40 0 0 0 0 0 ATpp.Period 1.50 4/1-9/15 Supplied By: CROP Soybeans,Manured,Full Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Season Commercial Fert. 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Soil Series Durham Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RYE i Sample Date 35 bu. 1 11-28-13 Manure 134 244 196 66 4 4 1 0 P Removal Rating 28 lbs/ac. unknown I BALANCE 0 244 156 661 41 4 1 0 rreview Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 2/13/2019 NMR Page 40 of 45 Nutrient Management Recommendations Test YEAR 2 N P2O5 K2O Mg Mn Zn Cu Lime (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (tons/A) Tract Field 53 4 Req'd Nutrients 214 0 40 0 0 0 0 0 Acres App.Period 2.40 4/1-9/15 Supplied By: CROP Soybeans,Manured,Full Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Season Commercial Fert. 80 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Soil Series Appling Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RYE i Sample Date 55 bu. 11-28-13 Manure 134 244 196 66 4 4 1 0 PRemoval Rating 44lbs/ac. tinknown BALANCE 0 244 156 66 4 4 1 0 Tract Field 53 6 Req'd Nutrients 214 0 40 0 0 0 0 0 Acres App.Period 3.00 4/1-9/15 Supplied By: WkL CROP Soybeans,Manured,Full Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Season Commercial Fert. 80 0 0 0 0 0 01 0 Soil Series Appling Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RYE 'Sample Date 55 bu. 11-28-13 Manure 134 244 196 66 4 4 1 0 P Removal Rating 44 lbs/ac. [.'nknown BALANCE 0 244 156 66 41 4 1 0 Tract Field 53 7 Req'd Nutrients 214 0 40 0 0 0 0 0 Acres App.Period 0.50 4/1-9/15 Supplied By: CROP Soybeans,Manured,Full Starter 0 0 0 01 0 0 0 0 Season Commercial Fert. 80 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Soil Series Appling Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RYE I Sample Date 55 bu. 1 11-28-13 Manure 134 244 196 66 4 4 1 0 P Removal Rating 441bs/ac. Unknown BALANCE 0 244 156 66 4 4 1 0 Tract Field 53 9 Req'd Nutrients 214 0 40 0 0 0 0 0 Acres App.Period 0.50 4/1-9/15 Supplied By: CROP Soybeans,Manured,Full Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Season Commercial Fert. 80 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Soil Series Appling Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RYE I Sample Date 55 bu. 1 11-28-13 Manure 134 244 196 66 4 4 1 0 P Removal Rating 44 lbs/ac. E:nknown BALANCE 0 244 156 66 4 4 1 0 Tract Field 534 1 Req'd Nutrients 210 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 Acres App.Period 6.10 4/1-9/15 Supplied By: CROP Soybeans,Manured,Full Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Season Commercial Fert. 791 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Soil Series Appling Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RYE I Sample Date 54 bu. 11-2843 Manure 131 238 191 66 4 3 1 0 P Removal Rating 43 lbs/ac. Unknown BALANCE 0 238 181 661 4 3 1 0 Preview Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 2/13/2019 NMR Page 41 of 45 Nutrient Management Recommendations Test YEAR 2 N P2O5 K2O Mg Mn Zn Cu Lime (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (tons/A) Tract Field 534 2 Req'd Nutrients 210 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 Acres App.Period 9.10 4/1-9/15 Supplied By: CROP Soybeans,Manured,Full Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Season Commercial Fert. 79 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Soil Series Appling Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RYE I Sample Date 54 bu. 11-28-13 Manure 131 238 191 66 4 3 1 0 P Removal Rating 43 lbs/ac. f nknown BALANCE 01 238 181 661 4 3 1 0 Tract Field 534 3 Req'd Nutrients 210 0 30 0 0 0 0 0 Acres I App.Period 3.80 4/1-9/15 Supplied By: CROP Soybeans,Manured,Full Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Season Commercial Fert. 79 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Soil Series Appling Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RYE I Sample Date 54 bu. 11-28-13 Manure 131 238 191 66 4 3 1 0 P Removal Rating 43 lbs/ac. Unknown BALANCE 0 238 161 66 4 3 1 0 Tract I Field 540 1 Req'd Nutrients 186 0 0 01 0 0 0 0 Acres App.Period 7.40 4/1-9/15 Supplied By: CROP Soybeans,Manured,Full Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Season Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Soil Series Georgeville Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RYE I Sample Date 48 bu. 11-28-13 Manure 186 336 272 92 4 4 1 0 P Removal Rating 38 lbs/ac. Medium BALANCE 0 336 272 921 4 4 1 0 Tract Field 540 2 Req'd Nutrients 186 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 Acres App.Period 15.59 4/1-9/15 Supplied By: CROP Soybeans,Manured,Full Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Season Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Soil Series Georgeville Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RYE I Sample Date 48 bu. 11-28-13 Manure 186 336 272 92 4 4 1 0 P Removal Rating 38 lbs/ac. Low BALANCE 0 336 262 92 4 4 1 0 Tract Field 540 4 Req'd Nutrients 186 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Acres App.Period 2.70 4/1-9/15 Supplied By: CROP Soybeans,Manured,Full Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0' Season Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Soil Series Chorgeville Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RYE I Sample Date 48 bu. 11-28-13 Manure 186 336 272 92 4 4 1 0 P Removal Rating 38 lbs/ac. Medium BALANCE 0 336 272 92 4 4 1 0 Preview Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 2/13/2019 NMR Page 42 of 45 Nutrient Management Recommendations Test YEAR 2 N P205 K20 Mg Mn Zn Cu Lime (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (tons/A) Tract F Field 540 5 Req'd Nutrients 186 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Acres App.Period 8.80 4/1-9/15 Supplied By: CROP Soybeans,Manured,Full Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Season Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Soil Series Georgeville Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RYE I Sample Date 48 bu. 1 11-28-13 Manure 186 336 272 92 4 4 1 0 P Removal Rating 38 lbs/ac. Medium BALANCE 0 336 272 92 4 4 1 0 Tract Field 540 8 Req'd Nutrients 210 0 40 0 0 0 0 0 Acres App.Period 6.20 4/1-9/15 Supplied By: CROP Soybeans,Manured,Full Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Season Commercial Fert. 78 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Soil Series Appling Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RYE I Sample Date 54 bu. 11-28-13 Manure 132 239 193 66 4 3 1 0 P Removal Rating 43 lbs/ac. Medium BALANCE 0 239 153 66 4 3 1 0 Tract Field 540 9 Req'd Nutrients 210 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Acres App.Period 5.30 4/1-9/15 Supplied By: CROP Soybeans,Manured,Full Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Season Commercial Fed. 78 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Soil Series Appling Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RYE I Sample Date 54 bu. j 11-28-13 Manure 132 239 193 66 4 3 1 0 P Removal Rating 43 lbs/ac. Kledium BALANCE 0 239 193 66 4 3 1 0 Tract Field 551 1 Req'd Nutrients 210 0 40 0 0 0 0 0 Acres App.Period 7.30 4/1-9/15 Supplied By: CROP Soybeans,Manured,Full Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Season Commercial Fert. 79 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Soil Series Appling Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RYE Sample Date 54 bu. 11-28-13 Manure 131 238 191 66 4 3 1 0 P Removal Rating 43 lbs/ac. Unknown BALANCE 0 238 151 66 4 3 1 0 Tract Field 551 2 Req'd Nutrients 210 0 30 0 0 0 0 0 Acres App.Period 6.60 4/1-9/15 Supplied By: I_ - CROP Soybeans,Manured,Full Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Season Commercial Fert. 79 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Soil Series Appling Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RYE I Sample Date 54 bu. 11-28-13 Manure 131 238 191 66 4 3 1 1 0 P Removal Rating 43 Ibs/ac. Unknown BALANCE 0 238 161 66 4 3 1 0 'ereview Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 2/13/2019 NMR Page 43 of 45 Nutrient Management Recommendations Test YEAR 2 N P205 K20 Mg Mn Zn Cu Lime (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (tons/A) Tract Field 551 3 Req'd Nutrients 210 0 40 0 0 0 0 0 Acres I App.Period 3.40 4/1-9/15 Supplied By: CROP Soybeans,Manured,Full Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Season Commercial Fert. 79 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Soil Series Appling Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RYE I Sample Date 54 bu. 1 11-28-13 Manure 131 238 191 66 4 3 1 0 P Removal Rating 43 lbs/ac. f nknown BALANCE 0 238 151 66 4 3 1 0 Tract Field 551 4 Req'd Nutrients 190 0 01 0 0 0 0 0 Acres App.Period 4.00 4/1-9/15 Supplied By: CROP Soybeans,Manured,Full Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Season Commercial Fert. 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Soil Series Georgeville Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RYE I Sample Date 49 bu. 11-28-13 Manure 189 341 276 94 4 4 1 0 P Removal Rating 39 lbs/ac. L nknown BALANCE 0 341 276 94 4 4 1 0 Tract Field 551 6 Req'd Nutrients 190 0 0 01 0 0 0 0 Acres App.Period 9.50 4/1-9/15 Supplied By: CROP Soybeans,Manured,Full Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Season Commercial Fert. 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Soil Series Georgeville Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RYE I Sample Date 49 bu. 11-28-13 Manure 189 341 276 94 4 4 1 0 P Removal Rating 39 lbs/ac. Unknown BALANCE 0 341 276 94 4 4 1 0 Tract Field 551 7 Req'd Nutrients 190 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Acres I App.Period 2.60 4/1-9/15 Supplied By: CROP Soybeans,Manured,Full Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Season Commercial Fert. 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Soil Series Herndon Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RYE I Sample Date 49 bu. 11-28-13 Manure 189 341 276 94 4 4 1 0 P Removal Rating 391bs/ac. Unknown BALANCE 0 341 276 94 4 4 1 0 FAc, act Field 568 1 Req'd Nutrients 190 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 es App.Period 13.50 4/1-9/15 Supplied By: CROP Soybeans,Manured,Full Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Season Commercial Fert. 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Soil Series Herndon Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RYE Sample Date 49 bu. 11-28-13 Manure 189 341 276 94 4 4 1 0 P Removal Rating 39 lbs/ac. lJnknown BALANCE 1 0 341 276 94 4 4 1 0 rreview Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 2/13/2019 NMR Page 44 of 45 Nutrient Management Recommendations Test YEAR 2 N P205 K20 Mg Mn Zn Cu Lime (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (tons/A) Tract Field 569 1 Req'd Nutrients 166 50 0 0 0 0 0 0 Acres App.Period 4.60 4/1-9/15 Supplied By: CROP Soybeans,Manured,Full Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Season Commercial Fert. 166 50 0 0 0 0 0 0 Soil Series Nanford Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RYE I Sample Date 43 bu. 11-28-13 Manure 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 P Removal Rating 34lbs/ac. Unknown BALANCE 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Tract Field 569 10 Req'd Nutrients 186 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Acres App.Period 7.20 4/1-9/15 Supplied By: CROP Soybeans,Manured,Full Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Season Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Soil Series Georgeville Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RYE I Sample Date 48 bu. 1 11-28-13 Manure 186 336 272 92 4 4 1 0 P Removal Rating 38 lbs/ac. Unknown BALANCE 0 336 272 92 4 4 1 0 Tract Field 569 11 Req'd Nutrients 186 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Acres App.Period 51.90 4/1-9/15 Supplied By: CROP Soybeans,Manured,Full Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 •0 Season Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Soil Series Georgeville Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RYE I Sample Date 48 bu. 11-28-13 Manure 186 336 272 92 4 4 1 0 P Removal Rating 38 lbs/ac. Unknown BALANCE 0 336 272 92 4 4 1 0 Tract Field 569 5 Req'd Nutrients 186 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Acres App.Period 2.90 4/1-9/15 Supplied By: CROP Soybeans,Manured,Full Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Season Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ERemoval il Series Georgeville Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 mple Date 48bu. 11-28-13 Manure 186 336 272 92 4 4 1 0 Rating 38 lbs/ac. tInknown BALANCE 0 336 272 92 4 4 1 0 NOTE: Symbol*means user entered data. rr6view Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 2/13/2019 NMR Page 45 of 45 The Required Soil Test Values shown in the following table provide a summary of recommended actions that should be taken if soil tests indicate excessive levels of copper or zinc. Fields that receive manure must have an annual soil analysis for these elements. High levels of zinc and copper can adversely affect plant growth. Alternative crop sites must be used when the concentration of these metals approach excessive levels. Site life can be estimated by dividing the amount of copper and zinc to be applied in lbs/acre by 0.036 and 0.071,respectively and multiplying the result by 0.85. By adding this quantity to the current soil index for copper or zinc, we can predict life of the site for waste disposal. In addition to copper and zinc indices,this table also provides a summary of lime recommendations for each crop based on the most recent soil sample. Application of lime at recommended rates is necessary to maintain soil pH in the optimum range for crop production . Re uired Soil Test Values Lime Recom. Tract Field Crop pH (tons/acre) Cu-I Copper Recommendation Zn-I Zinc Recommendation 10309 1 Corn,Silage 6.5 0.0 206 None 221 None 10309 1 Small Grain,Silage 6.5 0.0 206 None 221 None 10309 1 Soybeans,Manured,Full Season 6.5 0.0 206 None 221 None 10309 2 Com,Silage 6.5 0.0 206 None 221 None 10309 2 Small Grain,Silage 6.5 0.0 206 None 221 None 10309 2 eason Soybeans,Manured,Full S 6.5 0.0 206 None 221 None 10309 3 Com,Silage 6.5 0.0 206 None 221 None 10309 3 Small Grain,Silage 6.5 0.0 206 None 221 None 10309 3 Soybeans,Manured,Full Season 6.5 0.0 206 None 221 None 10309 4 Corn,Silage 6.5 0.0 206 None 221 None 10309 4 Small Grain,Silage 6.5 0.0 206 None 221 None 10309 4 Soybeans,Manured,Full Season 6.5 0.0 206 None 221 None 10385 2 Fescue Pasture 1 6.0 1 0.0 171 None 143 None 10385 3 Fescue Pasture 6.0 0.0 171 None 143 None 10386 6 Corn,Silage 6.8 0.0 147 None 269 None 10386 6 Small Grain,Silage 6.8 0.0 147 None 269 None 10386 6 Soybeans,Manured,Full Season 6.8 0.0 147 None 269 None 10386 7 Corn,Silage 6.8 0.0 231 None 402 None 10386 7 Small Grain,Silage 6.8 0.0 231 None 402 None 10386 7 Soybeans,Manured,Full Season 6.8 0.0 231 None 402 None 10386 8 Com,Silage 6.3 0.0 86 None 107 None 10386 8 Small Grain,Silage 6.3 0.01 86 None 107 None -- ------ ------ ------- -------- ------- ------- ------- - - - --- ------------ review Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: STV Page 1 of 8 Rea uired Soil Test Values Lime Recom. Tract Field Crop pH (tons/acre) Cu-I Copper Recommendation Zn-I Zinc Recommendation 10386 8 Soybeans,Manured,Full Season 6.3 0.0 86 None 107 None 10497 7 Corn,Silage 5.9 0.0 137 None 289 None 10497 7 Small Grain,Silage 5.9 0.0 137 None 289 None 10497 7 Soybeans,Manured,Full Season 5.9 0.0 137 None 289 None 10497 8 Com,Silage 6.5 0.0 292 None 603 None 10497 8 Small Grain,Silage 6.5 0.0 292 None 603 None 10497 8 Soybeans,Manured,Full Season 6.5 0.0 292 None 603 None 10497 9 Corn,Silage 6.4 0.0 221 None 305 None 10497 9 Small Grain,Silage 6.4 0.0 221 None 305 None 10497 9 Soybeans,Manured,Full Season 6.4 0.0 221 None 305 None 10499 5 Com,Silage 6.0 0.0 237 None 518 None 10499 5 Small Grain,Silage 6.0 0.0 237 None 518 None 10499 5 Soybeans,Manured,Full Season 6.0 0.0 237 None 518 None 10499 6 Corn,Silage 6.0 0.0 149 None 391 None 10499 6 Small Grain,Silage 6.0 0.0 149 None 391 None 10499 6 Soybeans,Manured,Full Season 6.0 0.0 149 None 391 None 10499 8 Corn,Silage 6.5 0.0 292 None 603 None 10499 8 Small Grain,Silage 6.5 0.0 292 None 603 None 10499 8 Soybeans,Manured,Full Season 6.5 0.0 292 None 603 None 10514 5 Fescue Pasture 5.3 1.1 57 None 126 None 10514 6 Com,Silage 5.8 0.4 108 1 None 237 1 None 10514 6 Small Grain,Silage 5.8 0.0 108 None 237 None 10514 6 Soybeans,Manured,Full Season 5.8 0.0 108 None 237 None 10514 8 Com,Silage 5.8 0.4 108 None 237 None 10514 8 Small Grain,Silage 5.8 0.0 108 None 237 None 10514 8 Soybeans,Manured,Full Season 5.8 0.0 108 None 237 None 10514 9 Fescue Pasture 5.3 1.1 77 None 144 None 10569 1 Corn,Silage 5.8 0.4 97 None 238 None 10569 1 Small Grain,Silage 5.8 0.0 97 None 238 None 10569 1 Soybeans,Manured,Full Season 5.8 0.0 97 1 None 238 1 None --- ------- -------- ------ --------- -------- --------- --------- --------- ------------------------------------------------------------- review Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: STV Page 2 of 8 Re tfired Sail Test Values Lime Recom. Tract Field Crop pH (tons/acre) Cu-1 Copper Recommendation Zn-I Zinc Recommendation 1074 1 Fescue Pasture 5.8 0.4 85 None 135 None 1074 2 Fescue Pasture 5.8 0.4 97 None 238 None 1074 3 Fescue Pasture 5.8 0.3 66 None None 1074 5 Corn,Silage 5.8 0.4 122 None 68 68 None 1074 5 Small Grain,Silage 107 5.8 0.0 122 None 107 None 1074 5 Soybeans,Manured,Full Season 5.8 0.0 122 None 107 None 1074 6 Corn,Silage 5.5 0.8 86 None 102 None 1074 6 Small Grain,Silage 5.5 0.0 86 None 102 None 1074 6 Soybeans,Manured,Full Season 5.5 0.0 86 None 102 None 2383 3 Com,Silage 5.8 0.0 343 None 589 None 2383 3 Small Grain,Silage 5.8 0.0 343 None 589 None 2383 3 Soybeans,Manured,Full Season 5.8 0.0 343 None 589 None 2383 3A Fescue Pasture 5.4 0.7 49 None 272 None 2383 5 Fescue Pasture 6.0 0.0 45 None 195 None 2384 6 Corn,Silage 6.0 0.0 391 None 440 None 2384 6 Small Grain,Silage 6.0 0.0 391 None 440 None 2384 6 Soybeans,Manured,Full Season 6.0 0.0 391 None 440 None 2392 1 Com,Silage 6.2 0.0 202 None 204 None 2392 1 Small Grain,Silage 6.2 0.0 202 None 204 None 2392 1 Soybeans,Manured,Full Season 6.2 0.0 202 None 204 None 2392 2 Corn,Silage 6.0 0.0 171 None 143 None 2392 2 Small Grain,Silage 6.0 0.0 171 None 143 None 2392 2 Soybeans,Manured,Full Season 6.0 0.0 171 None 143 None 2392 3 Com,Silage 6.7 0.0 220 None 384 None 2392 3 Small Grain,Silage 6.7 0.0 220 None 384 None 2392 3 Soybeans,Manured,Full Season 6.7 0.0 220 None 384 None 2392 4 Corn,Silage 6.7 0.0 389 None 570 None 2392 4 Small Grain,Silage 6.7 0.0 389 None 570 None 2392 4 Soybeans,Manured,Full Season 6.7 0.0 389 None 570 None 2392 5 Corn,Silage 6.0 0.01 202 1 None 192 1 None ------ ------ ------- ------- ------- ------- ------------------------- - - ---------- ---- review Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: STV Page 3 of 8 Re lured Soil Test Values Lime Recom. Tract Field Crop pH (tons/acre) Cu-I Copper Recommendation Zn-I Zinc Recommendation 2392 5 Small Grain,Silage 6.0 0.0 202 None 192 None 2392 5 Soybeans,Manured,Full Season 6.0 0.0 202 None 192 None 2392 6 Corn,Silage 6.5 0.0 363 None 537 None 2392 6 Small Grain,Silage 6.5 0.0 363 None 537 None 2392 6 Soybeans,Manured,Full Season 6.5 0.0 363 None 537 None 2392 7 Corn,Silage 6.7 0.0 180 None 199 None 2392 7 Small Grain,Silage 6.7 0.0 180 None 199 None 2392 7 Soybeans,Manured,Full Season 6.7 0.0 180 None 199 1 None 2415 1 Com,Silage 6.0 0.0 485 None 453 None 2415 3 Corn,Silage 5.8 0.3 264 None 213 None 2415 3 Small Grain,Silage 5.8 0.0 264 None None 213 2415 3 Soybeans,Manured,Full Season 5.8 0.0 264 None 213 None 2415 3a Fescue Pasture 5.8 0.3 264 None 213 None 2415 5 Fescue Pasture 5.9 0.0 507 None 297 None 2415 6 Fescue Pasture 6.3 0.01 192 None 686 None 2415 6A Fescue Pasture 6.0 0.0 485 None 453 1 None 2415 7 Com,Silage 6.0 0.0 485 None 453 None 2415 7 Small Grain,Silage 6.0 0.0 485 1 None 453 None 2415 7 5oybeans,Manured,Full Season 6.0 0.0 485 None 453 None 30369 1 Corn,Silage 6.0 0.0 291 None 269 None 30369 1 Small Grain,Silage 6.0 0.0 291 None 269 jNone 30369 1 Soybeans,Manured,Full Season 6.0 0.0 291 None 269 None 30369 2 Corn,Silage 6.0 0.0 286 None 276 None 30369 2 Small Grain,Silage 6.0 0.0 286 None 276 None 30369 2 Soybeans,Manured,Full Season 6.0 0.0 286 None 276 None 30369 3 Corn,Silage 5.1 1.6 235 None 245 None 30369 3 Small Grain,Silage 5.1 0.0 235 None 30369 3 Soybeans,Manured,Full Season 5.1 0.0 235 None 245 None 30370 1 Corn,Silage 6.0 245 None 0.0 291 None 269 None 30370 1 Small Grain,Silage 6.0 0.0 291 None 269 None --------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------- ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Preview Database Version 3.1 ----------- --------------- -- Date Printed: STV Page 4 of 8 Re ulred Soil Test Values Lime Recom. Tract Field Crop pH (tons/acre) Cu-I Copper Recommendation Zn-I Zinc Recommendation 30370 1 Soybeans,Manured,Full Season 6.0 0.0 291 None 269 None 30370 2 Corn,Silage 6.0 0.0 322 None 273 None 30370 2 Small Grain,Silage 6.0 0.0 322 None 273 None 30370 2 Soybeans,Manured,Full Season 6.0 0.0 322 None 273 None 30370 3 Corn,Silage 5.2 1.4 247 None 283 None 30370 3 Small Grain,Silage 5.2 0.0 247 None 283 None 30370 3 Soybeans,Manured,Full Season 5.2 0.0 247 None 283 None 30370 5 Com,Silage 6.7 0.0 99 1 None 115 None 30370 5 Small Grain,Silage 6.7 0.0 99 None 115 None 30370 5 Soybeans,Manured,Full Season 6.7 0.0 99 None 115 None 30370 6 Com,Silage 6.4 0.0 104 None 134 None 30370 6 Small Grain,Silage 6.4 0.0 104 None 134 None 30370 6 Soybeans,Manured,Full Season 6.4 0.0 104 None 134 None 53 1 Com,Silage 6.4 0.0 157 None 406 None 53 1 Small Grain,Silage 6.4 0.0 157 None 406 None 53 1 Soybeans,Manured,Full Season 6.4 0.0 157 None 406 None 53 2 Com,Silage 6.4 0.0 160 None 342 None 53 2 Small Grain,Silage 6.4 1 0.0 160 None 342 None 53 2 1 Soybeans,Manured,Full Season 6.4 0.0 160 None 342 None 53 3 Corn,Silage 6.2 0.0 183 None 408 None 53 3 Small Grain,Silage 6.2 0.0 183 None 408 None 53 3 Soybeans,Manured,Full Season 6.2 0.0 183 None 408 None 53 4 Corn,Silage 6.2 0.0 183 None 408 None 53 4 Small Grain,Silage 6.2 0.0 183 None 408 None 53 4 Soybeans,Manured,Full Season 6.2 0.0 183 None 408 None 53 6 Corn,Silage 6.2 0.0 156 None 334 None 53 6 Small Grain,Silage 6.2 0.0 156 None 334 None 53 6 Soybeans,Manured,Full Season 6.2 0.0 156 None 334 None 53 7 1 Com,Silage 6.2 0.0 156 None 334 None 53 7 1 Small Grain,Silage 1 6.2 0.0 156 None 334 None ----------------- ----------------- ---------------------- -------------------------- ---------------------------- Preview Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: STV Page 5 of 8 Reauired Soil Test Values Lime Recom. Tract Field Crop pH (tons/acre) Cu-I Copper Recommendation Zn-I Zinc Recommendation 53 7 Soybeans,Manured,Full Season 6.2 0.0 156 None 334 None 53 9 Corn,Silage 6.2 0.0 156 None 334 None 53 9 Small Grain,Silage 6.2 0.0 156 None 334 None 53 9 1 Soybeans,Manured,Full Season 6.2 0.0 156 None 334 None 534 1 Corn,Silage 5.9 0.0 210 None 548 None 534 1 Small Grain,Silage 5.9 0.0 210 None 548 None 534 1 Soybeans,Manured,Full Season 5.9 0.0 210 None 548 None 534 2 Com,Silage 5.9 0.0 210 None 548 None 534 2 Small Grain,Silage 5.9 0.0 210 None 548 None 534 2 Soybeans,Manured,Full Season 5.9 0.0 210 None 548 None 534 3 Corn,Silage 6.2 0.0 213 None 432 None 534 3 Small Grain,Silage 6.2 0.0 213 None 432 None 534 3 Soybeans,Manured,Full Season 6.2 0.0 213 None 432 None 540 1 Corn,Silage 6.2 0.0 341 None 402 None 540 1 Small Grain,Silage 6.2 0.0 341 None 402 None 540 1 Soybeans,Manured,Full Season 6.2 0.0 341 None 402 None 540 2 Corn,Silage 5.9 1 0.0 223 None 262 None 540 2 Small Grain,Silage 5.9 0.0 223 None 262 None 540 2 Soybeans,Manured,Full Season 5.9 0.0 223 None 262 None 540 1 3 Fescue Pasture 5.6 0.6 239 None 309 None 540 4 Com,Silage 6.3 0.0 337 None 417 None 540 4 Small Grain,Silage 6.3 0.0 337 None 417 None 540 4 Soybeans,Manured,Full Season 6.3 0.0 337 None 417 None 540 5 Com,Silage 5.7 0.5 342 None 420 None 540 1 5 Small Grain,Silage 5.7 0.0 342 None 420 None 540 1 5 Soybeans,Manured,Full Season 5.7 0.0 342 None 420 None 540 6 Fescue Pasture 6.4 0.0 188 None 351 None 540 7 Fescue Pasture 5.8 0.0 354 None 597 None 540 8 Corn,Silage 6.3 0.0 342 None 587 None 540 8 Small Grain,Silage 6.3 0.0 342 None 587 None ---------- ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------- --------------- ---------------------------------------- Preview Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: STV Page 6 of 8 Re aired Soil Test Values Lime Recom. Tract Field Crop pH (tons/acre) Cu-1 Copper Recommendation Zn-I Zinc Recommendation 540 8 Soybeans,Manured,Full Season 6.3 0.0 342 None 587 None 540 9 Corn,Silage 6.3 0.0 239 None 293 None 540 9 Small Grain,Silage 6.3 1 0.0 239 1 None 293 None 540 9 Soybeans,Manured,Full Season 6.3 0.0 239 None 293 None 551 1 Com,Silage 6.1 0.0 164 None 320 None 551 1 Small Grain,Silage 6.1 0.0 164 None 320 None 551 1 Soybeans,Manured,Full Season 6.1 0.0 164 None 320 None 551 2 Corn,Silage 6.2 0.0 188 None 441 None 551 2 Small Grain,Silage 6.2 0.0 188 None 441 None 551 2 Soybeans,Manured,Full Season 6.2 0.0 188 None 441 None 551 3 Corn,Silage 6.3 0.0 201 None 377 None 551 3 Small Grain,Silage 6.3 0.0 201 None 377 None 551 3 Soybeans,Manured,Full Season 6.3 0.0 201 None 377 None 551 4 Com,Silage 6.3 0.0 337 None 417 None 551 4 Small Grain,Silage 6.3 0.0 337 None 417 None 551 4 Soybeans,Manured,Full Season 6.3 0.0 337 None 417 None 551 6 Com,Silage 5.9 0.0 294 None 579 None 551 6 Small Grain,Silage 5.9 1 0.0 294 None 579 None 551 6 Soybeans,Manured,Full Season 5.9 0.0 294 None 579 None 551 7 Corn,Silage 6.3 0.0 337 None 417 None 551 7 Small Grain,Silage 6.3 0.0 337 None 417 None 551 7 Soybeans,Manured,Full Season 6.3 0.0 337 None 417 None 568 1 Com,Silage 5.9 0.0 294 None 579 None 568 1 1 Small Grain,Silage 5.9 0.0 294 None 579 None 568 1 Soybeans,Manured,Full Season 5.9 0.0 294 None 579 None 569 1 Corn,Silage 6.1 0.0 90 None 291 None 569 1 Small Grain,Silage 6.1 0.0 90 None 291 None 569 1 Soybeans,Manured,Full Season 6.1 0.0 90 None 291 None 569 1 10 jCorn,Silage 6.7 0.0 156 None 480 None 569 1 10 1 Small Grain,Silage 6.7 0.0 156 None 480 None ----- --------------- ---------------- ----------------- --------------------- -------------------- Preview Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: STV Page 7 of 8 Re uired Soil Test Value Lime Recom. Tract Field Crop pH (tons/acre) Cu-I Copper Recommendation Zn-1 Zinc Recommendation 569 10 Soybeans,Manured,Full Season 6.7 0.0 156 None 480 None 569 11 Corn,Silage 6.7 0.0 156 None 480 None 569 11 Small Grain,Silage 6.7 0.0 156 None 480 None 569 11 Soybeans,Manured,Full Season 6.7 0.0 156 None 480 None 569 5 Corn,Silage 6.6 0.0 96 None 368 None 569 5 Small Grain,Silage 6.6 0.0 96 None 368 None 569 5 Soybeans,Manured,Full Season 6.6 0.0 96 None 368 None 575 1 Fescue Pasture 5.4• 0.9 67 None 133 None 580 3 Fescue Pasture 6.7 0.0 318 None 656 None 580 4 Fescue Pasture 6.3 0.0 125 None 237 None 618 1 Fescue Pasture 4.9 1.4 28 None 89 None 618 2 Fescue Pasture 5.7 0.5 60 None 621 None 618 3 Fescue Pasture 4.7 1.8 60 None 132 None 618 4 Fescue Pasture 6.0 1 0.0 38 None 40 None 618 5 Fescue Pasture 6.0 0.0 79 None 273 None 618 6 Fescue Pasture 6.3 0.0 36 None 36 None 618 7 Fescue Pasture 6.0 0.0 46 None 100 None 618 8 Fescue Pasture 6.0 0.0 53 1 None 99 None --------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------- ----------- ------------------ ------------------- -------------------- review Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: STV Page 8 of 8 The Available Waste Storage Capacity table provides an estimate of the number of days of storage capacity available at the end of each month of the plan. Available storage capacity is calculated as the design storage capacity in days minus the number of days of net storage volume accumulated. The start date is a value entered by the user and is defined as the date prior to applying nutrients to the first crop in the plan at which storage volume in the lagoon or holding pond is equal to zero. Available storage capacity should be greater than or equal to zero and less than or equal to the design storage capacity of the facility. If the available storage capacity is greater than the design storage capacity,this indicates that the plan calls for the application of nutrients that have not yet accumulated. If available storage capacity is negative, the estimated volume of accumulated waste exceeds the design storage volume of the structure. Either of these situations indicates that the planned application interval in the waste utilization plan is inconsistent with the structure's temporary storage capacity. Available Waste S ra e Canacity Source Name I Dairy(Milk Cow)Liquid Manure Slurry Design Storage Capacity(Days) Start Date 12/1 100 Plan Year Month Available Storage Capacity(Days) 1 1 39 1 2 100 1 3 100 1 4 70 1 5 39 1 6 9 1 7 -22 1 8 -53 1 9 100 1 10 69 1 11 39 1 12 8 2 1 -23 2 2 80 2 3 100 2 4 100 2 5 69 2 6 39 2 7 8 2 8 -23 2 9 100 2 10 69 2 11 39 2 12 8 *Available Storage Capacity is calculated as of the end of each month. Preview Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: Capacity Page 1 of 1 Required Specifications For Animal Waste Management 1. Animal waste shall not reach surface waters of the state by runoff, drift, manmade conveyances, direct application, or direct discharge during operation or land application. Any discharge of waste that reaches surface water is prohibited. 2. There must be documentation in the design folder that the producer either owns or has an agreement for use of adequate land on which to properly apply the waste. If the producer does not own adequate land to properly dispose of the waste, he/she shall provide evidence of an agreement with a landowner, who is within a reasonable proximity, allowing him/her the use of the land for waste application. It is the responsibility of the owner of the waste production facility to secure an update of the Nutrient Management Plan when there is a change in the operation, increase in the number of animals, method of application, receiving crop type, or available land. 3. Animal waste shall be applied to meet, but not exceed, the nitrogen needs for realistic crop yields based upon soil type, available moisture, historical data, climatic conditions, and level of management, unless there are regulations that restrict the rate of applications for other nutrients. 4. Animal waste shall be applied to land eroding less than 5 tons per acre per year. Waste may be applied to land eroding at more than 5 tons per acre per year but less than 10 tons per acre per year provided grass filter strips are installed where runoff leaves the field (see USDA, NRCS Field Office Technical Guide Standard 393 -Filter Strips). 5. Odors can be reduced by injecting the waste or by disking after waste application. Waste should not be applied when there is danger of drift from the land application field. 6. When animal waste is to be applied on acres subject to flooding, waste will be soil incorporated on conventionally tilled cropland. When waste is applied to conservation tilled crops or grassland, the waste may be broadcast provided the application does not occur during a season prone to flooding (see "Weather and Climate in North Carolina" for guidance). Preview Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 2/13/2019 Specification Page 1 7. Liquid waste shall be applied at rates not to exceed the soil infiltration rate such that runoff does not occur offsite or to surface waters and in a method which does not cause drift from the site during application. No ponding should occur in order to control odor and flies. 8. Animal waste shall not be applied to saturated soils, during rainfall events, or when the soil surface is frozen. 9. Animal waste shall be applied on actively growing crops in such a manner that the crop is not covered with waste to a depth that would inhibit growth. The potential for salt damage from animal waste should also be considered. 10. Nutrients from waste shall not be applied in fall or winter for spring planted crops on soils with a high potential for leaching. Waste/nutrient loading rates on these soils should be held to a minimum and a suitable winter cover crop planted to take up released nutrients. Waste shall not be applied more than 30 days prior to planting of the crop or forages breaking dormancy. 11. Any new swine facility sited on or after October 1, 1995 shall comply with the following: The outer perimeter of the land area onto which waste is applied from a lagoon that is a component of a swine farm shall be at least 50 feet from any residential property boundary and canal. Animal waste, other than swine waste from facilities sited on or after October 1, 1995, shall not be applied closer that 25 feet to perennial waters. 12. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 100 feet to wells. 13. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 200 feet of dwellings other than those owned by the landowner. 14. Waste shall be applied in a manner not to reach other property and public right-of-ways. Preview Database Version 3.1 Date Printed:2/13/2019 Specification Page 2 15. Animal waste shall not be discharged into surface waters, drainageways, or wetlands by a discharge or by over-spraying. Animal waste may be applied to prior converted cropland provided the fields have been approved as a land application site by a "technical specialist". Animal waste shall not be applied on grassed waterways that discharge directly into water courses, and on other grassed waterways, waste shall be applied at agronomic rates in a manner that causes no runoff or drift from the site. 16. Domestic and industrial waste from washdown facilities, showers, toilets, sinks, etc., shall not be discharged into the animal waste management system. 17. A protective cover of appropriate vegetation will be established on all disturbed areas (lagoon embankments, berms, pipe runs, etc.). Areas shall be fenced, as necessary, to protect the vegetation. Vegetation such as trees, shrubs, and other woody species, etc., are limited to areas where considered appropriate. Lagoon areas should be kept mowed and accessible. Berms and structures should be inspected regularly for evidence of erosion, leakage, or discharge. 18. If animal production at the facility is to be suspended or terminated, the owner is responsible for obtaining and implementing a "closure plan" which will eliminate the possibility of an illegal discharge, pollution, and erosion. 19. Waste handling structures, piping, pumps, reels, etc., should be inspected on a regular basis to prevent breakdowns, leaks, and spills. A regular maintenance checklist should be kept on site. 20. Animal waste can be used in a rotation that includes vegetables and other crops for direct human consumption. However, if animal waste is used on crops for direct human consumption, it should only be applied pre-plant with no further applications of animal waste during the crop season. 21. Highly visible markers shall be installed to mark the top and bottom elevations of the temporary storage (pumping volume) of all waste treatment lagoons. Pumping shall be managed to maintain the liquid level between the markers. A marker will be required to mark the maximum storage volume for waste storage ponds. Preview Database Version 3.1 Date Printed:2/13/2019 Specification Page 3 22. Waste shall be tested within 60 days of utilization and soil shall be tested at least annually at crop sites where waste products are applied. Nitrogen shall be the rate-determining nutrient, unless other restrictions require waste to be applied based on other nutrients, resulting in a lower application rate than a nitrogen based rate. Zinc and copper levels in the soils shall be monitored and alternative crop sites shall be used when these metals approach excessive levels. pH shall be adjusted and maintained for optimum crop production. Soil and waste analysis records shall be kept for a minimum of five years. Poultry dry waste application records shall be maintained for a minimum of three years. Waste application records for all other waste shall be maintained for five (5) years. 23. Dead animals will be disposed of in a manner that meets North Carolina regulations. Preview Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 2/13/2019 Specification Page 4 J®seph Johnson Dairy - Proposed Second Waste Storage Pond Estimates For Cost PJC 4/27/15 Share Planning Proposed for present Cond ition. OPERAT90N AND STORAGE VOLUMES. Expansion 750 head EQIP 330 head Storage Time of Waste in WSP (worse case Oct-May) 100 Number of Cows 180 days PUMP-Out Storage to store in Pond 750 330 head 101,286 78,505 cu.ft. Storage Volume for the 25 year 24 hour Storm 757,669 587,261 gal 12,013 9,113 cu.ft. Total Design Storage to crest of ESW 89,860 68,166 gal. (includes pump out storage + storm storage) 113,298 87,618 cu.ft. 847,529 c 29% 65o,428 gal. ICi,AY i_iiu�� ®�� -STinoi�-rE -T'® CREST OF Eft: �®te: 131911 liner clay material to be hauled fr®m, borrow site across road a r® Compacted Clay Liner Thickness pp 800 tt• away and treated with Soy Estimated Yardage for Full Clay Liner up to crest ESW 1 1 ft. thick Clay Liner surface area 994 750 cu.yd. volume of Soda Ash 23,345, 17,612 sq.ft. volume of Soda Ash 4,669 3,522 cu.ft. weight of Soda Ash 173 - 130 cy.yd. weight of Soda Ash ;r 298,822 225,427 lb. 149 113 tons staff have justified the 100-day storage interval in their updated Nutrient p Mgt. ian g Dairy Waste Storage Pond P, Engineering Design Worksheet for:Joseph Johnson in Alamance County,NC Description: Updated numbers for Pondl from As bo,i" ', ,c,7 Still need soils from lab report for liner K, a,�a;Jt ninon NOTES:cost share Is only for the 330 head existing herd size Revised 5-13-2015 Spread sheet Instructions:enter blue vales only. Land Owner Name County Name Joseph Johnson Designed by Alamance Date: PJC 6/14/2016 OPERATION DETAILS WASTE PRODUCTION: Storage Time of Waste in WSP(worse case Oct-May) 180 days = 6 months Number of Cows Required Pump Storage=107289cf Number of Heifers 330 head Combined Storage available= 110,248 cf. Percentage of Time Confined to Lot 0 head (Pond 1=28784cf+Pond2=81464cf) Cow Waste Production Rate 33 Heifer Waste Production Rate 1.82 cu.ft./animal/day . (AWMFHB 1.3cf/au for 14001b cow=1400/1000 x 1.3=1.82) Percentage of waste that separates into Pond3 as liquid 50 Wash Water Rate o of waste production For skimmer pipe situation Sand Bedding lost from freestalls 5 gal/day/caw 5 gal/day/head is typical default Sileage Leachate from Silos 0 cu.ft./cow/day fine furniture co saw dust in pack barn only,no sand Skimmer Pipe gravity flow from Pondl to Pond2(Y/N) N cu.ft./day 1.5 x cf/day from original silos to account for the'half-size new ones DRAINAGE AREAS: With skim pipe,all storm water from Pond flows into Pond2 Undiverted Concrete Area-small unroofed comer feed barn Undiverted Unpaved Area-Silos half runoff captured,no storm 864 sq.ft. 1864 Undiverted Roofed Area 0 sq.ft. Old silos 13690 sf.+new silos 4950 sf Pond 1 Srface Area measured at top of dam 0 sq.ft. Pond2 Srlace Area measured at top of dam 8,20 sq.ft.from talcs below 0.41838843 Old silos 13690 sf.+new silos 4950 sf Combined Pond Top Surface Area 26,345 sq.ft.from talcs below 0.41838843 ac. (pondl+Pond2) 26.345 sq.ft. RAINFALL WATER for STORAGE PERIOD. see_Runo_ff__and Eva Exam, le.xls"a d" ainfall-M n Ignore summer SPRINKLER water in barn,because Winter rainfall is much greater Normal LotRunoff-Concrete-small unroofed comer feed bamo va rational r," than summer-rainfall+sprinkler-runoff. Normal Lot Runoff-UnpavedSSurllos half runoff captured small s 11.5 in. 6 months 5.62 in. 6 months Small auto-pump Leachate sump captures half rain,no storm runoff Normal Runoff from Undiverted Roofs Excess Rainfall on Pond(Rainfall Less Evaporation) 0 in. 6 months 8.82 in. 6 months STORM WATER 2 -YEAR 24-H_OUR: s "Rainfall•Mb n i11 torms Eva oration.doc"] Concrete Lot Runoff from 25-year 24-hour Storm Unpaved Runoff from 25-year 24-hour Storm 6.0 in. 0.0 in. Small auto-pump leachate sump captures half rain,no storm runoff Roof Runoff from 25-year 24-hour Storm Rainfall on Pond from 25-year 24-hour Storm 6.0 in. 6.0 in. SAND SEPARATOR EFFICIENCY: [ nter 0 if no sAQd separator use) 0.0 %removed (80%typical for good auger separator) Dairy Waste Storage Pond 6/14/16 Engineering Design Worksheet for:Joseph Johnson in Alamance County,NC STORAGE WORKSHEET Design basis:330 cows;0 Heifers; 6 Months Storage; Runoff Areas:Concrete 975sf,Unpaved 18640sf,Roofed Osf STORAGE CALCULATIONS 1.Waste Generated: 330 Cows x 1.82cu.ft/cow/day x 180 days x 33%/100= 35,676 Cu.ft 0 Heifers x Ocu.f thefr/day x 180 days x 33%/100= 0 cu.ft 2.Sand Bedding Entering Pondl (after sand separator): 100%x 330 Cows x 0 cf/cow/day x180 days = 0 cu.ft 3.Wash Water: (5gals./day/cow)1(7.48 gals./cu.ft.)x 330cows x 180 Days= 39,706 Cu.ft 4.Sileage Leachate sump pumped into WSP1: 16 cu.ft.per day.x 180days = 2,880 cu.ft 5.Lot Run-off Concrete&Unpaved(Oct:May.): 11.5/12 x 975sf Conc+5.62/12 x 18640sf unpaved= 9,664 cu.ft 6.Undiverted Roof Run-off for storage period(worse case): 0 in.Undiverted Runoff/12in.x Osq.ft.Roof Area = 0 cu.ft 7.Excess Rainfall on Both WS Ponds during storage period: 8.82 in.Excess Rain/12in.x 26345 sq.ft.Pond Surface A= 19,364 cu.ft 8.25-year 24-hour Storm on Paved&Unpaved Areas: 6 in.Storm/12in.x 975 sf+0 in.Storm/12in.x 18640 = 488 cu.ft 9.25-year 24-hour Storm on Undiverted Roofed Area: 0 in.Storm/12in.x 0 sq.ft.Undiverted Area= 0 cu.ft 10.25-year 24-hour Storm on Both Waste Storage Ponds: 6in.Storm/12in.x 26345sq.ft.Pond Top Area= 13,173 cu.ft STORAGE NEEDS-both oonds combined: 0%Total storage safety factor 0.00 decimal% as concurred by Area Engr.for this project TOTAL STORAGE VOLUME(both ponds to crest ESW Storage Volume for the 25 year 24 hour Storm(Pond l+lot+roof) 14 548g cu.ft All undi erted runoff goes t o cu.ft 904700 gal. (storms anPonds dI 1+2 total= Storage Volume for the 25 year 24 hour Storm(pond 2 only) 9,113 cu.ft. 68162 gal. Storage"Pump Vol"ponds combined(total less 25 yr storm) 107,289 cu.ft. 802523 gal. Combined Storage available= 110,248 cf. 4458 gal/day storage total Storage Volume at"Start Pump"w/o wash and auger water 64,703 cu.ft. 483981 Sand being removed from waste by auger(doesn't enter pond) 0 cu.ft. gal. (Pond 1=28784cf+Pond2=81464cf) (note-if most remaining sand is very fine,it should pump out with solids) Animal waste liquid aQ 50%max skimmer pipe separation 17,838 Solids to store in Pondl(Solids Sand-liquid) 17,838 cu.ft. ASSIGN STORAGE TQ PONDS Solids to store in Pondl(if only removing liquids to Pond2 a Capacity ) 17,838 cu.ft. Stoma 9 p ty in Pondl(at start pump,from Vol calc below) 28,784 cu.ft. >All scuds fit t*to Pondl Remainder of start-pump Storage to store in Pond2 78,505 cu.ft. 25year storm storg for pondl(St Pmp or skimmer pipe to ESW) 4,548 cu.ft. (lot+pond1) (pondl must store storms with or without the skimmer pipe) 25 year storm storage(Pond2 only) Pond2 Total Design Storage to crest of ESW 9,113 cu.ft. No skimmer pipe 12W cu.ft. 655428 gal. Dairy Waste Storage Pond 6/14/16 Engineering Design Worksheet for:Joseph Johnson in Alamance County,NC POND#1 STORAGE VOLUME SIZING based onjmoida'hnmula from EFH 11-44] Dimenss from exislin rectan ular la oon: To of D Elevation 662.00 ft. Inside tolew the 116.00 ft. Inside towidth: 70.00 ft. Inside Si Slo a avera a 2.00 -to-one Total De 10.00 ft ESW crest elev 660.80 ft. Skimmer Pipe Invert Elev Start Pump EI if i skimmer ipe 659.10 ft. Has skimmer pipe Y/N7 N Head on skimmer of a invert trom Crest ESW elev. 1,70 ft 1 Freeboard from to dam to invert skimmer I e 2.90 ft. ESW de th to to of dam 0.00 ft. tmerqeF',cy Saillwav Too Width 0 ft results: Available temo 25 vr Storm Store a min=4548 cu.k. 9.851 Storage Volume = A+46+C x D/6 solids '=17837.82 c.f.) 28,784 cu.ft. nore skimmer pipe oulflowl calculations• Store a De th ir❑ 7.10 ft. MMdth Acrea a 0.19 acres ation 659.10 ft. tion 652.00 ft. th 76.00 ft. h 30.00 ft. C 2,280.00 s .ft. Mid storage Le th 90.20 ft. Mid Store a Width 44.20 ft. Mid Storage Area B 3,986.84 s .ft. To Stora a Len th 104.40 ft. To Stora a Width 58.40 ft. To Stora a Area IAN 6,096.96 s .ft. Top of Dam Area 81120.00 s .ft. TemLwary Stoyn Storgge fr m Pipe invert tor start eump marker to crest ESW: Bottom Len th 104 ft. Bottom Width 58 ft. Bottom Area C 6097 s A. Storage Depth D 2 ft Mid Store ja Length 108 ft. Mid Store Width 62 ft. Mid Stora a Area a 6662 To -Storage Length 116 ft. Top Store a Width 70 ft. i op Store a Area A 8120 sq.ft. Temp.Storm Storage Volume =(A+48+C)x /a I 9,851 cu.ft. EMERGENCY SPWY DESIGN for Pond#1: Peak Discharge through Emergency Spillway Q from EFIi2 10 cfs. Max.Velocity in Emergency Spillway v 4 Us Bottom Width of ESW(Assume 3:1 Side Slopes) B 10 ft. Design flow Depth in ESW(Based on A=QN) d 0 ft. 0=4x0`(10+3x0) = 0 cfs. Dairy Waste Storage Pond 6/14/16 Engineering Design Worksheet for:Joseph Johnson in Alamance County,NC STRUCTURE DESIGN for Pond#1 Inside Top Dimensions:116 x 70 ESW Dimensions:10 ft bottom,0 ft top,0 ft deep with 3:1 sides discharge 25yrstorm» Top EL 662.00 ESW Crest EL 660.80 _ 25yr St.Pump EL 659.10 Peel esess rain on pond bsanlcment normal runoff,waste,sand wash water,leachate Liner Bottom EL 652.00 CROSS SECTION OF STRUCTURE POND#2 STORAGE VOLUME SIZING PRISMOIDAL POND SIZING (based on prismoidal formula from EFH 11-44) Volume-deptfJ6 area of t00)•14 x area of midsections-{area of bottom 11 DIM NSI NS To of Dam Elevation 65 Inside to len the 00 ft 15.5. ft. Inside to width: smallest reasonable EQIP pond for 330 head dairy is 135 x 135 x 10'deep,3:1 ss Inside Side S 135 ft. lo a avers a Pond De th 10 to of dam 3.00 -to-one Pum de t 1,10 start um elev 10.00 ft (also used in liner des.) Re uired Freeboard ab0va sta a in ESW 8.10 ft 1.00 ft RES TS: SA w =L Total Stora a to Crest ESW Min re uired=87618 cu.ft. 90,900 cu.ft. lok 19500 100 195 Start Pum Stora a Min re uired=78505 cu.ft. 81,464 cu.ft. ok Storm Stora e•Pand2 onl Min re uired=9113 cu.ft. 9,436 cu.ft. ok Emer r S i4wa TO Width 18 ft. Flow de th sta a 1n eme Acy s illwa 0.30 Total Emer enc S tltwa i De th Start Pum Elevation 1.30 ft. De th to Crest EmerqencvS i11wa 653 D th of Storm Sto 8.70 age(slo pump to crest ESW 0.60 AL ULATICN Bottom Len th Bottom Width 75.00 ft. Bottom Area C 75.00 ft. 5,625.00 s .ft. To of Dam Area 18:225 00 ft To of Dam Acrea e Sotra a Elevation 0.42 acres Bottom Elevation 645.00 .00 TOTAL TORAGE TO CRE T OF ESW: Stora a De Ih D 8.70 Mid Storage Len to Mid Sto 101.10 ft. re a Width 10 Mid Store a Area 13 10 ft. 10 1.1. 21 ft To Store a Len th To Stora a Width 127.20 ft. To Storage Area A 127.20 ft. Total Storage Volume =(A+4B+C)x �a 16 s .ft. 90,90000 cu.ft. PUMP-OUT ORAGE Irom tart m elev Stora a De th ❑ 8.10 Mid Store a Len th 9.1 0 ft. Mid Stora o Width Mid Store a Area g 99.30 ft. To Store a Lenalh 9,860.49 s .ft. To Stora a Width 123.60 ft. To Store a Area A 123.60 ft. Pump Storage Volume =(A+4g+C)x �6 15,276.96 s A 81,464 cu.ft. Storm Store e=Iolaj stora e-pum store e= 9 436 cu.ft. For the borrow clay CH,Optimum moisture for compaction is 27%, CLAY LINER DESIGN for Pond#2 (See Tech.Note 716,Rev 1) but must be min.30%during comp.for soda ash process to work. Normal Pool Depth(at start pump El.) H 8 Natural sample moisture was 34% .10 (form design above) Allowable Specific Discharge 5,000 g Defalal/ac/da-(5,000 Defalt) Specific Liner Discharge(Allowable S.D.above in ft/day) v 0.01535 ft./day Hydraulic Conductivity of Liner(from lab test report) k 0.000219 ft./day (from adding 0.1lb/sf soda ash at 30%moisture and compacting to 95%) head depth from start pump liquid level to bottom of clay liner h=H+d Darcy's Law for specific discharge v=k(h/d).Substitute in h=H+d&solve for d: Calculated Liner Thickness d=k H/ v-k ( ) d 0.12 ft. min thickness for required discharge,so a full 1 ft will allow a lot of leeway Min allowed liner thickness from FOTG std 621 B 1 ft. (min 1 ft.based on pond depth) Design Liner Thickness for the storage depth of 8.1 ft. 1.0 ft.thick this des thickness matches soils mach.Report and is min in standard actual specific discharge H at design thickness 649 gal/ac/day,which is far less than the 5000 min requirement EMERGENCY SPWY DESIGN for Pond#2: Peak Discharge through Emergency Spillway Q from EFH2 9 cfs. Max.Velocity in Emergency Spillway v 4 Us Bottom Width of ESW(Assume 3:1 Side Slopes) B 10 ft. Design flow Depth in ESW(Based on A=QN) d 0.3 ft. Q=4 x 0.3 TO+3 x 0.3) = 13.08 cfs. Dairy Waste Storage Pond 6/14/16 Engineering Design Worksheet for:Joseph Johnson in Alamance County,NC STRUCTURE DESIGN for Pond#2 Inside Top Dimensions:135 x 135 ESW Dimensions:10 ft bottom,17.8 ft top,1.3 ft deep with 3:1 sides Top EL 655.00 discnarge 25yrstor— ESW Crest EL 653.70 25yr St-Pump EL 653.10 Pool s rain on pond bonicment aanofTdlrunoff•wasta,sand A water,ieachhate Liner eottom EL 646.90 Liner Cut EL 645.90 CROSS SECTION OF STRUCTURE Engineering Design Worksheet for:Joseph Johnson CLAY LINER YARDAGE ESTIMATE-TO CREST OF ESW: Subtractin storage val from total cut vol at crest ES This calculi was venhea rnahicall and b two esdmed Len h at ESW meNods Width at ESW 127.2 ft. horizontal liner thickness=thickness/cos ArcTan side slo a 127.2 ft. Cut to Leif ith at ESW= LenI ith+2 x horiz thikcness 3.16 ft. Cut to Widti at ESW= Width+2 x horiz thikcness 133.52 ft. Cut De th at ESW D 133.52 ft. To Store a Area A 9.70 ft. Bottom Len th 17,828... s .n. Bottom Width 75.32 ft. Bottom Area 75.32 s A. Mid Store a Len th 5,673.79 ft. Mid Store a Width 104.42 ft. Mid Store a Area g 104.42 ft. Cut Volume to crest ESW=(A+4g+C)x /e 10,904.49 s .ft. 108,512 cu.ft. Volume of Liner Foil=Cut Vol-Store a Vol at ESW 17612 , Volume of Liner Fiil in cubic ards 61 cu.ft. Increase to allow for for.material loss and com action 152 c o Estimated Yarda a for Full Cla Liner u to crest ESW (typical 10 to 15/) Ballpark check-top dam area as if pond was Flat+10%for sioPes 750 743 (s(s d, hould be close to the above) Estimated Soda Ash,if required for the clay liner by lab tests Density of Soda Ash Required Additive Rate from soils lab report 64 Ib/cu.ft. Mfgr.website 57 to 701b/cu.ft.http://www.ansac.com/products/dense-soda-ash/ Number of lifts in clay liner(6"-9"loose material) 0.10 Ib/sq.ft- over surface of clay. Liner surface area(volume clay/liner thickness) 17,612 s ft. Weight of Soda Ash q• volume of Soda Ash 3,522 lb. 55 cu.ft. Longest Acres Cleve U c � Tea Wellsgo 9v \ rape mWolf Toro G a� Gre 0 0 U n o Griffin m0 c Orama `� yW Scho I yy mCc Workman ut Grove 6, 0 P/ sant olf ///Z/benY Damascus me c i m Pog/ernan U 0 `�mc a Old Dam C H Q N L o C- o :: J CO U Staley Store o 0 a f U w 3 R P Cox m x � 5 � y Dairy Location Map s fD N 0 9501,900 3,800 Feet I I I I I I I ALAMANCE COUNTY ® Cultural Resource Map. Producer: Joseph Johnson Quad= Crutchfield Crossroads T 2415 April 28, 2016 Angela Dobbins Al lu - rf _ fr ..1 I•r was • � ..`. ` f�� •q .• I f^ rGa� y. LAI�ANC_E .CO — t GHATHA-M CO _ —�_'` - y,'—��:f,� s.�•�—�j i 7tR �. C ; e Gopynght.-O2.13 National Geographic Soci-tyj7cubed N Legend 0 1,000 2,000 4,000 Feet I I I I I I I I I A 0 APE= Dairy Waste Storage Pond f.• 11 `/ - Y: I ,51,' tom-'-�) t - � v 70 �\�� - ✓_ LJ �,J /r ) � q._= � is 1 ��-_a ,�: �r1l � •.�, �: _,�_ _ � -_� •�["r�.-/,�— - � .%' r ' `T r � } : 1 t1�• II' .,..— - � is wA-7-C— --7z)tIyC PONY- \ 1 . ,.. J � - _/�o° �jJ/ ��/1 � � ''I� - % � �f O i�/ � • \ ° t •% - �1 23.76 tin I I - �;: >'•.— 1 ALAMANCE �0 J _—_ _�_�._— �-! i 4-- -- f si+,—'� CHATHAIVI V 666 lint Ridge Ch✓. °/� ll// I(�'_Chlatha / ,: < I 68 • 626 zn �- � C 11 _ � �/� •, ' � • —626632 —`-- r �; J � � �°G1352'•j� _' � .� !L/ ' :/ �ll/// e \\�• �' USDA United States Natural NC-CPA-17 Department of Resources Rev. Dec. 2000 Agriculture Conservation Page 1 of 2 Service WASTE MANAGEMENT FACILITY SITE EVALUATION GENERAL INFORMATION Name �G ,: fiAl a1�i✓` Location J. G I- •(Nd:'j } Y SS Fes. �- `�* ,; ,Ir• t.3 c, rJ-t:�� Address G.!rr r's� _ AJ.G. 2-7Aei 9 y;•_ =s:,�. Cv. �3.��c: Telephone f: J r 3 f ' ?,) -'1'10 Size of Operation(animal units) '77 LOCATION DATA DISTANCE.FROM NEAREST RESIDENCE NOT OWNED BY PRODUCER a U6` F' DISTANCE FROM NEAREST PUBLIC FACILITY(school,church;etc...)_?1VAS4r5=J4` A if�'CIV1440 ( (, if 6 FT IS SITE WITHIN 100-YEARFLOODPLAIN? YES—NO V' If yes,NRCS cannot provide assistance. IS SITE AT LEAST 100 FT.FROM A"BLUE LINE"PERENNIAL STREAM? YES V NO If no,site must be relocated. DOES SITE MEET MINIMUM STATE SETBACK REQUIREMENTS FROM A YES I✓ NO WELL SUPPLYING WATER FOR HUMAN CONSUMPTION? If no,NRCS cannot provide assistance. 'p t*5*1.','cC 4Z, Q-c"C IS SITE WITHIN I-MILE ZONING JURISDICTION OF A MUNICIPALITY? YES_NO If yes,landowner should consult with a local zoning board about required permits. Permits must be obtained prior to design approval. ARE UTILITY LINES LOCATED IN THE CONSTRUCTION AREA? YES_NO If yes,see Part 503 of the National Engineering Manual for policy. (Copies of maps or other reference material may be attached to site evaluation.) WETLANDS WILL PROJECT INVOLVE CLEARING VEGETATION,IMPROVING DRAINAGE,OR FILLING LOW GROUND? If yes,producer should have a"Certified Wetland Determination"on file for the work site. YES_NO 1'� Producers shall complete fortis CPA-038 and AD-1026 to obtain Certified Wetland Determinations. WILL THE PROJECT INVOLVE DIRECT OR INDIRECT MANIPULATION OF WETLAND SOILS, PLANTS,OR HYDROLOGY? YES NO 4" IF WETLANDS WILL BE MANIPULATED,HAS THE PRODUCER BEEN ADVISED THAT THEY MUST NOT WORK IN WETLANDS UNTIL THEY HAVE RECEIVED INFORMATION FROM THE U.S.ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS AND THE NC DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY CONCERNING PERMIT REQUIREMENTS? kJ/k YES NO NRCS WILL PROVIDE TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE FOR PROJECTS IMPACTING WETLANDS ONLY UNDER THE FOLLOWING CIRCUMSTANCES: a.)NRCS has determined that a suitable non-wetland site is not available YES_NO b.)The most practical site for the project involves wetlands. NRCS has determined this site to be most practical considering the change of wetland functions,the suitability of the resource for this project,the costs,and best available technology. The producer, according to a mitigation plan provided or approved by NRCS,shall mitigate unavoidable impacts to wetlands. I YES_NO_ ODOR CONTROL 1 HAS ODOR CONTROL BEEN DISCUSSED WITH PRODUCER: PREDOMINANT WIND DIRECTION? YES !ji NO PRE-CHARGING LAGOON WITH FRESH WATER TO AT LEAST%z OF THE CAPACITY? y,VA-YES NO USING GOOD SOUND JUDGEMENT INLAND APPLICATION OF WASTE? YES_/NO NC-CPA-i7 Rev. Dec.2000 Page 2 of 2 OTHER ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS If the answer to any of the following is YES,NRCS may provide technical assistance according to its General Manual policies. Contact the resource specialisYfor assistance,if needed. USING THE FOTG LIST OF ENDANGERED&THREATENED SPECIES AS A GUIDE,IS IT OBVIOUS THAT THE SITE PROVIDES HABITAT FOR A LISTED SPECIES? YES NO V, IS A DESIGNATED NATURAL SCENIC AREA INCLUDED IN THE PLANNING AREA,OR YES NO LZ WILL PLANNED ACTIONS IMPACT ON AN ADJACENT NATURAL SCENIC AREA? HAS A CULTURAL RESOURCES REVIEW BEEN PERFORMED FOR THE AREA,PRIOR TO STARTING ANY GROUND DISTURBING ACTIVITIES? YES ;:' NO ARE THERE PRIME,UNIQUE,STATE OR LOCALLY IMPORTANT YES NO ✓ FARMLANDS IN THE OPERATING UNIT? WILL THE ACTION RESULT IN SODBUSTING? YES NO I/ F STE MANAGEMENT S PRODUCER OWN ENOUGH LAND TO PROPERLY APPLY ALL WASTE INCLUDING YES >'NO DGE,EVEN THOUGH SLUDGE MAY BE ONLY APPLIED INFREQUENTLY? IF NO,DOES PRODUCER HAVE ACCESS TO MORE LAND? 'YES NO IF LAND IS NOT OWNED BY PRODUCER,CAN PRODUCER GET AN AGREEMENT FOR YES NO LAND ON WHICH WASTE WILL BE APPLIED? 1) (Attach Waste Utilization Plan to site evaluation.) SOIL INVESTIGATION(VALID ONLY IF SOIL INVESTIGATION SHEET ATTACHED) IS SOIL SUITABLE FOR LAGOON? (:•'a 3a^' Stifd si C ��= ' YES ENO G' IS A LINER REQUIRED? / YES NO TYPE OF LINER TO BE USED: CLAY t/ BENTONITE SYNTHETIC IF CLAY LINER IS TO BE USED,IS SUITABLE CLAY AVAILABLE ON SITE? YES VINO IF CLAY IS NOT AVAILABLE ON SITE,DOES LANDOWNER HAVE ACCESS TO CLAY? �1,11'YES NO IS A CORE TRENCH REQUIRED?(Attach soil investigation sheet to site evaluation.) YES 11 NO IS SUBSURFACE DRAIN TILE PRESENT?(If yes,tile must be removed or plugged.) YES 1\10 of SITE APPROVED �/ YES1/ NO CONDITIONAL COMMENTS This site investigation is valid for twelve months from the date shown below. If construction has not been started within twelve months,a new si�e investigation will be required./I Signature ! rl ,�� 'i``ls t- .: Date "� Changes in the local or state law or changes in the standard could require-a new site investigation. NG-,:�A-52 I,v. 2001 (p.1) INVENTORY C SOURCE CONCERNS TO BE ,- ..SSED IN PLAN Prepared for: FarTn[Tract: Prepared by: RESOURCE CONCERN FIELDS PRESENT RESOURCE THREATS (List others as needed) RUSLE (Sheet&Rill) >T Erosion Classic Gully Erosion Erosion Streambank Erosion Damaging Soil Deposition Excessive Wind Erosion Restrictive Layer/ Plow Pan Compaction "'A, Low Orqanic, Matter Improper pH Quality ?4 Surface Crusting Salt Buildup Buildup of Toxic Metals Pesticide/Chemical Residue Buildu Inadequ te Nutrient Availability Sedimentation Nutrient Runoff from-Manure(Point Source) Nutrient Runoff/Leaching from Manure Application Areas Quality Buildup of Excessive P in Soil Uj Pesticide Runoff Inadnuate Water for Livestock _ _ Quantity inadequate Water for Irrigation/ Plant Growth Excess Surface/Subsurface Water iT Dust from Airborne Soil Particles/Smoke Potential for Dam in Pesticide Drift Quality Odor, Animal Waste Storage Odor, Animal Waste Application Plant Damage from Animal/Insect Pests Invasive, Noxious, or Undesirable Plants Plant Damage Due to Soil Contaminant Plant Damage from Excessive Traffic Plant Damage from Airborne Contaminant Reduced Yields from Inadeguate Nutrients Condition Reduced Yields from Inadeguate Water Pasture Vegetation Overgrazed Woodland Overstocked Understocked ri Plants Unsuited to Site Intended Use U( I toss or De 2dation of Native Plant Communities I NC CPA-52 ,. Nov.2001 (p.2) Reseurce Concern ::. ..�s Present Resource-- .a, ;(List Others as needed) y Inadequate Food for Desired Species Inadequate Cover for Desired Species Inadequate Water for Wildlife v� Wildlife & Excessive Habitat Fra mentation Fisheries Excessive Monoculture CLow Habitat Diversit Barriers to Migration, Natural Movement Poor Water Quali : Low Oxygen, High Tem erature Inadequate Forage Available or Nutrition Provided Inadequate/ Poor Quality Water Supplied Domestic Inadequate Shading for Grazed Animals Unsafe Conditions for.Animals WHEN DURING THREAT RESOURCE CONCERN INSTALLED L_IFESPAN (YIN) (YIN) ,{ Extensive Ca ital Re uired? r� Extensive or Specialized Labor Required? Very High Operation & Management Level Re uired? ' Economic �\} High Economic Risk Involved? System Compatible with Client's Objectives, Well-Being, and Safetv? Social System Compatible with Community Well-Being & Environmental Protection? Environmental Justice Considered During Plannin ? WILL THE SYSTEM TO 13E PLANNED: (YIN) FIELDS Negatively im act any prime or unique farmland or scenic beauty of the area? Include any earth disturbin activities near i elines, electrical, or other utilities? ,1;` z Have a high likelihood of cousin a ublic controvers ? LU Affect any suspected threatened or endangered species, or their habitat? + positive, 0 neutral/none, - ne ative 0 Result in the drainage, filling, or stumping of any wetlands? 0 (Will this cause °Swampbusting"? Y/Nf / ; Landowner advised to contact COE& NCDWQ concerning permit requirements? Y/N 1! Al Negatively impact riparian vegetation in areas regulated by state/ local law? (Landowner advised to contact NCDWQ, NCDFR, or other authority concerning BMPs or permit requirements? YIN t� 0 Result in the modification of a stream channel, or fill material being placed in any natural or modified stream channel? z (Owner advised to contact COE&NCDWQ for permit requirements? YIN--di uU LU Contain.any practices considered as Undertakings (Sect I FOTG)? ;ss(✓ s+L -; �. (Request for CR Review submitted? Y/N�R surve completed? YIN Y w Fall within an area regulated under the Coastal Zone Management Act? " cn (Owner advised to contact NCDCM for permit requirements? YIN_24i r Negatively impact water quality and/or visual aesthetics of the Lumber River, the , New River, or other Dasi noted Wild & Scenic Rivers? _ _ a Result in loss of floodplain capacity? n� In my opinion, the system to be planned will not have a negative impact on special environmental concerns. The plan for this system will be completed in accordance with NRCS policy. In my opinion, the system to be planned may have negative impacts related to one or more of the listed special environmental concerns. (See attached notes.) Prior to completing the conservation plan, the area office will be contacted to ensure NRCS policy is followed in mitigating possible negative impacts. Sirenafi ira of r'artifiP.d ('nncarvatinn Plnnnar TitiP data REQUEST FOR CULTURAL RESOURCE REVIEW (Ver. 19/98) (This document is Freedom of Information Exempt) MAIL TO: Jim Errante, CRS, MRCS, 1835 Assembly St., Room 950, Columbia SC 29201 Ph. (803) 253-3937 FAX (803)253-3670 Date: ",--92 - County: /l"Gd} ,f&z� Program Type: L- J:p Owners-Name(s): ,166 A/,)S D List Practice(s): Size of Practice(s): %age of Ground Surface Visible: Type of Ground Cover: S Noteworthy Characteristics (i.e. soil drainage/terrain): Name of USGS Quad(s): �; •elr� ��Os�a+-� s /�C. (Attach a photocopy of the practice area taken from a topo map and clearly note the location(s). 'ny cultural resources (prehistoric or historic) are known to exist in the immediate vicinity of the practice za briefly describe: I t7GU•-f v �N If cultural resources are present, how did you acquire this information? National Register of Historic Places Recollections of customer and/or adjacent land owner(s). Historian, museum, or historical society. Visual cues, such as artifacts, buildings, chimneys, walls, foundations/footing stones, bridges, abutments, depressions, mounds, earthworks, or other landscape features etc. Field survey will be conducted by (circle one): FO- Staff CR Specialist Name of contact person submitting this request: ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- - (TO BE COMPLETED BY SHPO AND/OR CRS) ER# archaeological sites have been previously recorded within the APE of this practice. Comments: Signature: __ Date: - • �i r, ■i fw ' -WI .V•� h• 'f �l' l s'o ri lk I , '� q ti FOGLEMAN DAIRY WASTE STORAGE POND 2 (NEW) 4OPf Y 7 5 G 4 � �r FOGLEMAN DAIRY WASTE STORAGE POND 2 (new) 0 9501,900 3,800 Feet a J1. LJ Y� T7 ir r old waste storage pond no. 1 i _ FOGLEMAN DAIRY WASTE STORAGE POND 1 (old) , = r 3 L Al 0 9501,900 3,800 Feet z I��il j s �`�! x 11` r + i rok VOL I - 3 =CL a v l n = 11) mg o n w y ry a m CD 3 7 CD Y y 9 a � S a 3 m m m n s m m n m HCo. m�m nay nv3.d m A 3 0 o o-- N o m c�m o 7 m I N '.m m d p m m m n C o m m Ph m o h ' �N N� N O 110 J Oo M N ID O 'II g a z z z -� !) r -6p - � ro I - c .� } , j y er ML O N r � � ,a � ma.tea Ar a R . s � � o a 0�00 C N ■ ■ a 3 m m r m '•r ��3,m m D> n N m m N D m m o 3 o m P."o s } m o m N -m i m s 6 � 1 m m M N CD •/ y 9 st U1 --1 10 i1I r� 0 CML z z z � r 7y ro. co , - CL 67 CL Y11 1 ` i M - A ran kk a 7 BLS f 5 - 0 C. O A +13 Z,5 N A • K�s m fD r1�R• � m a rn cn � w N r V O N � m N N .ON �C �-C �C �C �C •G ro t 1 /co - y CL r i •. .a umi 7 rF 3r v 7 r � » / m y J•� pC coop c� � a�•m r Imo r �a l' IA X C S N N O N n� N �d v 00 J 61 co ® r N Ff F' (P 'CO CD ir.•_ Pal Ae..T g r ro V ID ML ML •T r x 3, N M o m 3 9� n � R N _ o �soo i m yr N g J �?aa 301� O N m p / a 7N � -v N f"It d O N ia• N IY N - � c �- $ na y y k QO heA c N r n ro 91 to fy •F• �'j; _-��'� i'1►1r,1r=-_.tit �:*... �� _7!{�. - ■ �f• � umi 7 m a Y1 Y O •�•� 11- �• if�n 1 j � O CD 3 M }� n A - ti� •� o m: 0 yI tl3`a • omp10 • � CA m o x i � OI t a a f m J� W N F, 0 n N to (P m CD N F-• F-� F' .0� � n 6D r. N ro leg Yf yg+yy �®qq]� 00 i m d � " 3 H 7 a _ C m AFV 0 o a > > m m N o' 0 C N N _ o'gnm m �s n•o�m hh 3 ➢1 3 O 6�Ip N PLO N m N O f .. � o� Ae�G3 O y 10 W-1 . W N 'a Q /®� CP W m N N yO CD 'C O „ n 0 a n COL. <p r CT I 5j ro s � m-3 x•;7 a N 7 7 CL N C ^ _ m * •�s i r N m r 1 1-� •� � anmm y �3 m N w Z�=� n9 m N � sa F3 �� ✓� CoCD Ul o N N w N a N r' 5 _ 4."W> to • .d _ IS: ■ o m c 3 C Cb M. cD ^� A M. m c .�r� i Ian � 7• EL CD 77 } .I _• r R- t fff iiii I C A n m .� �iY titi•� N DN O. J 0 � m m y VI m m N _ om010 n m a m F, yxc� m � no rn m_T n rip, r n /. J W to N N kp J W O In •� rA m .' ry O C ro .p dr.r� �} � f �� ;-. �.., a yq► � � 3.4 CD f� rY �kk 3 CD cco C CD CD _ o m a�Ad r a m i7�•�� o,�m m a U5. 5 r m . N O m j C S i A m d C O G A� m � a m m Z��w A c-0 N o m 0 5 1O.m m c. d—� m a � d � co 0 roL N Ln Ln w CO M ` 1—` {✓ N O O O y 0 3 � Q7 n t - v Ln � m9 y i y 0 n 0 r e r� m � v k 06 m m y D.-�2 �i mmo � tir` �3mm f �I` ' -- - f•�1` l �K CS N ID s An re. W � N 61 V Crl J W UN Ur lO n' l0 N W l0 0 W O ko C. Fl Q_ Cl 3 6 l7 � r ro CD t j F*• rr m.. CL v J ■ e fD a 3�m a _ J m4 a'3 m �N 6 RL�6 O a a O = rna m O n�aaiJ �a = J m3m-o- n a a fY !nX C? a a +N- ' J v Q tY tl Ol (P l0 W 01 N 4 N l0 l0 —1 O —i y _= a c t 4 r:. I ro ' w eJ w 65 P a � CA oa 40' A A n m Gf if 6 . � ��aaa�♦ m 7 r, o - o .. Yet • N 1171 nm cc bL 4� 1} ca a -• I � �Noa cn ■. � _ -'--- �';• `�" •—Rya _ -aC`a 3 a.a i u rnq�o� 3 � C m CJ N N royUntj 4t � r =fD � N •a a 3 m 7 a � a�« 3 _ C m A n m O � 0 7 2 rt v� O� 7 n O. o m 3 7 CD a a =i +" a 4• ie m 3 n 01 Ra,�•� m 9�a �6 a m� m al m�o _ _ • . W��. N d m N • rM m d m y ? n o 00 Ni"o • • i� n N 1 e m 7 m a r L • -_ � m �.. 1 W w n H ry m y Na ri v � . fD r n y W gg ' W'TI 'ice'-�L T O S� '�' � Lt. - r�•.=�.-..�y� ALn .- "`+�" is� � .•e„-a�t:>,+c� .f�(`.�`a5 �.¢ -- 1 � � �� r s �.�+.--.:flr`-' _ .4 L 71��' IT Syy ..�-^ �.r i:iFi'_� �_ -f� __•"-� ice::-'..'S.-`SfPr��-Y.' _�11 � •<.�� ;y -- �. - ` sow Ul C5 O to �i r. 3 3 e. Q n G = _ ry d nM Q _ 7 7 n a v to 3 7 m y o' N O N� ? y m anm o s d _ o a -.s�� • �. G�m ry m m O n � ma 3 i 4r A0m / � s � �v o m• .�.• - �I yx� m a � Ol Ln N •c w N n � N W N 61 � . Q C Ot o = ro a ' ro ?� 0 m C— ZZ z :'o-n K, w � p qL t � �• a `' j. :.� ��'- .s m `' � � a•. Llr,." ti'Y,i roof r f.• r. G_.e�}'.-rf;•� a'�• :� .;}�y ii- - `mil.,{ CL �•xs o m Ica—, IL Ax m ! 42 C3 FT o dpfm r � may R - - Y w ZTL Yi Ea o �• ❑ L� ,L Oaf rn 0 0 � 7•-' � r'r'��t7w f _ � 3 .-s ? t 'S • -tee O to lb C) m cL ■ o �f 7 �- ! ADacu n ; ■ N ex `� f` e �• ter' CD •� ' WOOIC iD @ LD cl- 0 0 » Y� dd s �• •• �� D ,� �a 63 ' b Ow a ors -�; i •� •� o rpy p n > in 13 v 'a. 3` e vF i i c �m D aS' Ci -T ae r_L An D Q li W�a S O. LY , 2 7: ',�► S 4A - dD e3 lh rn 09 C{ _ f3 � 3 m {— - z ' .r. w. l a m m 4} D b S 1 71 �• o °« ;1 o _Q z7 mop, -0 m r m Z' C t Z M. O Q4 }� ,® b eA m 3 0 3 _ hXD J O CD c p' CL 0c a 36 ry r4epoop* m c� �d h mss � s o _ . a ob w. m C- 0 0) VJ r ,j its -n v Mr T, 0 R, -4 0 :zl 0 Iq 3 CL ell > 41 CL am CL AR 1,0A to Ul m Lo (J'I to Fr m �xl Ul to Z37 a, ip Eq ci :3 c ID 7c 0 0 0-0 M-P-- 10 ItiA6 -410 El <1 % 0 c go O-S oj C-3 c-x Ck C)O 0 51 CD Q3 a. Net a. CL 13 06 4:1 a. ;* -- lb �! CD 0 � ..� i r- i �►: y r t��, ml r �y� jab _ _-• -.its' -'�r '•� �� - -_ '�': .. - �"''i{ :,��F��i•�•�.�ti`7• `+`ate � � itE. w�r',�ic ` •' *Z 31�y T a:5 - .. .t _ti fir.-�;' r .S•;�'..L�a�L••r , Az {.,=e4a r'■ Lea' �■�s'try ►.r," :��. ..}�!�";��y - •� �s�.+.�� .•} '�- ••r'�i;[ 'Li• �t � .�j1•:�•�s•`��.t�'Ji•J�,•"�a�h`-�a.�,.�sycY„�+Y.-, _.ti � ��7..� :y� �^yj +rR (4,Stiq�Y:•s�,t,.'-Ate-�?�J'•,Y• ..�.•• �:• �I�i.-�• � :t�;t�_rt .� .� f•aa�i'l�,r.• wtia'•��.:..•" �+p� %rs:.>c_,'��r.' . ." •i! x - _i .. ..�7�-:�:=.: may,,•�.=;er-�. -r _d. .T ,,Jw _ 3a� •F+ :air �y�fv-•�V.. �,:,;�J-t..'S��;'=�'--�: - _ L s.��- - .=-- rA'�� {ram;•�''�R.;;s°;fi:. ti - . - ;tom � xi::.-�. _ - ,y -"�3'. f�.r it ��-_' •. - wc�" �,.!'��3��t-l:: 71 ��--•-•�•'.-: i ,}��.,y-*-"�:d•; �`.a� �+�;... ..-ram. ti • "fe`��`+1'`. _�%-'r'ram^� � y�J'�i rr'�j �-� .• ^� ty.Y •r ' �1. y,.� •4 44 io jr • " f h,;,i ■ .+ Kati • Y y �* / r r 1ir �" a4 E t �v��~ .wy.~,"'1•. hteo .t tip. It i �r 61, rR +mot "4Y 10 , 40 , •'* � �'C r J {fit � �a . I r Y• 7 pT•-��•. rS. �• ' J �. -� . . . , ►fir{�`�� + ��C/K�'��.v.`.�c. ■ A�� ' •'fir r.�, .ter. y � - ►a• •{ . # '.�f x.=: a •4 y, • r s r+'. • r �r r �� ' L 4L � il ro_NZ WSW 4 46 411 ■ IN # !t. c4 �3:� - Version—November 26,2018 Mortality Management Methods Indicate which method(s)will be implemented. When selecting multiple methods indicate a primary versus secondary option. Methods other than those listed must be approved by the State Veterinarian. Primary Secondary Routine Mortality Burial three feet beneath the surface of the ground within 24 hours of knowledge of animal 0 41 death. The burial must be at least 300 feet from any flowing stream or public body of water (G.S.106-403). The bottom of the burial pit should beat least one foot above the seasonal high water table.Attach burial location map and plan. Landfill at municipal solid waste facility permitted by NC DEQ under GS 15A NCAC 13B .0200. Rendering at a rendering plant licensed under G.S. 106-168.7 Complete incineration according to 02 NCAC 52C .0102. a A composting system approved and permitted by the NC Department of Agriculture&Con- sumer Services Veterinary Division (attach copy of permit). If compost is distributed off-farm, additional requirements must be met and a permit is required from NC DEQ. QIn the case of dead poultry only, placing in a disposal pit of a size and design approved by the El NC Department of Agriculture&Consumer Services(G.S. 106-549.70). Any method which, in the professional opinion of the State Veterinarian,would make possible the salvage of part of a dead animal's value without endangering human or animal health. (Written approval by the State Veterinarian must be attached). Mass Mortality Plan Mass mortality plans are required for farms covered by an NPDES permit. These plans are also recommended for all animal operations. This plan outlines farm-specific mortality man- agement methods to be used for mass mortality. The NCDA&CS Veterinary Division sup- ports a variety of emergency mortality disposal options; contact the Division for guidance. • A catastrophic mortality disposal plan is part of the facility's CAWMP and is activated when numbers of dead animals exceed normal mortality rates as specified by the State Veterinarian. • Burial must be done in accordance with NC General Statutes and NCDA&CS Veterinary Division regulations and guidance. • Mass burial sites are subject to additional permit conditions(refer to facility's animal waste management system permit). • In the event of imminent threat of a disease emergency,the State Veterinarian may enact additional temporary procedures or measures for disposal according to G.S. 106-399.4. Signature of FarOwner/Manager Dat Signature of Technical Specialist Date Joseph Johnson Dairy Animal Waste Utilization Plan rev.11/14/14 Narrative Joseph Johnson presently has three manure types on the farm, dairy slurry, dairy solid and poultry solid. For planning purposes, all fields are shown as being able to receive all three sources: using '/4 poultry, 1/4 dairy slurry, and '/2 dairy solids. The plan also shows that there is sufficient acreage to receive all of the manure generated, BUT that Joseph reserves the right to use these sources in whatever combination he needs to meet the Nitrogen needs of the crop based on RYE'S. The poultry litter cleanout or Dry stack may or may not time with a particular crop need,therefore Joseph will be able to use the manure that is available when a particular crop needs it. This should work well, because we want the nutrients to be used for agronomic needs (Not disposal). Also taking into consideration that wet wastes are more expensive to haul, Joseph may choose not to apply this type of waste on fields that are farther away. There is a greater potential for Phosphorus accumulation when the N needs of a crop met with poultry versus dairy manure. Both sources may lead to P accumulation, and the extra P that comes with the poultry litter could certainly have consequences for his permitted dairy operation. Therefore, it would be a good idea to monitor the soil tests, and make adjustments to his operation schedule, to avoid any possible nutrient accumulations in the fields that he presently has in his plan. Silage Leachate 11/14/14 Due to runoff of silage leachate from silage pits near the road into the road ditch and nearby creek, all leachate now is being captured and pumped to waste pond. The volume amount varies based on the age of the silage and moisture content. An electric sump pump automatically pumps the leachate as volume's rise. New Soil T e Info 7/2012 Alamance County is in the process of having an updated Soil Survey. The original Soil Survey was completed in 1960 and the soil types in this plan are based on that soil mapping. This has caused some concern for this operation limiting the N applications rates based on RYE'S predominately on the Durham and Callison soil types that are shown in the 1960 survey. We are currently getting updated soils information,because of this we looked at the preliminary new soils data and these soil types appear not to be present in the new mapping. Areas that were mapped Durham/Callison now are showing Appling and Vance soil types. This allows for a greater N application rate to meet crop yield needs. Caution should be taken not to over apply P if using Poultry Litter. The N rates are listed below for these soil types: Vance Soil Appling Soil Corn Silage 192 lbs/ac Corn Silage 267 lbs/ac Small Grain Silage 87 lbs/ac Small Grain Silage 125 lbs/ac Fescue pasture 135 lbs/ac Fescue pasture 135 lbs/ac It is recommended that you use the hates for the Vance soil type for Durham and Callison soil types shown in this plan until the soil survey data is finalized for this area. Your Waste plan will then be revised to the accurate soil types. Manure Application Windows' for Common Crops Bermudagrass Small Grain Overseed(Bermuda) Corn Cotton Cucumber(direct consumption) Cucumber season 1 (processing) Cucumber season 2(processing) Rye Barley, Oats, Triticale Wheat — - Peanuts Sorghum/Sudan Grass Hay Soybeans f Tobacco (flue cured) Tobacco(burley) Fescue2 - - Jan Feb Mar Apr May June July Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 1 Dates shown represent statewide limits. Planting and harvesting dotes vary across the state and from year to year.Actual values shall reflect site specific conditions and in no case allow application more than either 30 days prior to plantinglbreaking dormancy or less than 30 days before harvest. See General Permit forfood crops z Mountains—limit N application during June and July/no nitrogen in December and January. Piedmont&Coastal Plain—limit N application during June and Julylno nitrogen in Dec and Jan during severe winters. Crop Notes The following crop note applies to field(s): 6, 6A Fescue: Piedmont Adaptation: Well-adapted. In the Piedmont,tall fescue can be planted Aug. 20 to Oct. 10 (best) and Feb. 15 to Mar. 20. For pure-stand broadcast seedings use 20 to 30 lb/ac., for drilled use 15 to 20 lb/ac. seed.Use certified seed to avoid introducing weeds or annual ryegrass.Plant seed 0.25"to 0.5"deep for pure stands, 0.25"in mixture with clovers. Soil test for preplant and maintenance lime,phosphorus, and potassium recommendations.Apply 40 to 60 lb/ac nitrogen at planting for pure stands only. Do not apply N for mixtures with clovers but use proper legume inoculation techniques.Apply 150 to 200 lb/ac.N to pure-stand fescue for hay production; reduce N rates by 25%for grazing.Apply N Feb. 1 to Mar. 20 and Aug. 20 to Sept. 30, with equal amounts in each window.Refer to NCSU Technical Bulletin 305 Production and Utilization of Pastures and Forages in North Carolina for additional information or consult your regional agronomist or extension agent for assistance. The following crop note applies to field(s): 3, 5 Fescue: Piedmont Adaptation: Well-adapted. In the Piedmont,tall fescue can be planted Aug. 20 to Oct. 10 (best) and Feb. 15 to Mar. 20.For pure-stand broadcast seedings use 20 to 301b/ac., for drilled use 15 to 20 lb/ac. seed.Use certified seed to avoid introducing weeds or annual ryegrass.Plant seed 0.25"to 0.5"deep for pure stands, 0.25"in mixture with clovers. Soil test for preplant and maintenance lime,phosphorus, and potassium recommendations.Apply 40 to 60 lb/ac nitrogen at planting for pure stands only. Do not apply N for mixtures with clovers but use proper legume inoculation techniques.Apply 150 to 200 lb/ac.N to pure-stand fescue for hay production;reduce N rates by 25%for grazing.Apply N Feb. 1 to Mar. 20 and Aug. 20 to Sept. 30, with equal amounts in each window.Refer to NCSU Technical Bulletin 305 Production and Utilization of Pastures and Forages in North Carolina for additional information or consult your regional agronomist or extension agent for assistance. -------------- --------------- Preview Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: Crop Note Page 1 of 9 The following crop note applies to field(s): 3, 7 Fescue: Piedmont Adaptation: Well-adapted. In the Piedmont,tall fescue can be planted Aug. 20 to Oct. 10 (best) and Feb. 15 to Mar. 20. For pure-stand broadcast seedings use 20 to 301b/ac., for drilled use 15 to 20 lb/ac. seed. Use certified seed to avoid introducing weeds or annual ryegrass.Plant seed 0.25"to 0.5"deep for pure stands, 0.25"in mixture with clovers. Soil test for preplant and maintenance lime,phosphorus, and potassium recommendations.Apply 40 to 601b/ac nitrogen at planting for pure stands only.Do not apply N for mixtures with clovers but use proper legume inoculation techniques. Apply 150 to 200 lb/ac.N to pure-stand fescue for hay production; reduce N rates by 25% for grazing.Apply N Feb. 1 to Mar. 20 and Aug. 20 to Sept. 30, with equal amounts in each window.Refer to NCSU Technical Bulletin 305 Production and Utilization of Pastures and Forages in North Carolina for additional information or consult your regional agronomist or extension agent for assistance. The following crop note applies to field(s): 1,2, 3, 3a, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 Fescue: Piedmont Adaptation: Well-adapted. In the Piedmont,tall fescue can be planted Aug. 20 to Oct. 10 (best) and Feb. 15 to Mar.20.For pure-stand broadcast seedings use 20 to 301b/ac., for drilled use 15 to 20 lb/ac. seed.Use certified seed to avoid introducing weeds or annual ryegrass.Plant seed 0.25"to 0.5"deep for pure stands, 0.25"in mixture with clovers. Soil test for preplant and maintenance lime,phosphorus, and potassium recommendations.Apply 40 to 601b/ac nitrogen at planting for pure stands only. Do not apply N for mixtures with clovers but use proper legume inoculation techniques. Apply 150 to 200 lb/ac.N to pure-stand fescue for hay production; reduce N rates by 25%for grazing.Apply N Feb. 1 to Mar. 20 and Aug. 20 to Sept. 30, with equal amounts in each window.Refer to NCSU Technical Bulletin 305 Production and Utilization of Pastures and Forages in North Carolina for additional information or consult your regional agronomist or extension agent for assistance. The following crop note applies to field(s): 3A, 5 Fescue: Piedmont Adaptation: Well-adapted. In the Piedmont,tall fescue can be planted Aug. 20 to Oct. 10 (best)and Feb. 15 to Mar. 20. For pure-stand broadcast seedings use 20 to 30 lb/ac., for drilled use 15 to 20 lb/ac. seed.Use certified seed to avoid introducing weeds or annual ryegrass.Plant seed 0.25"to 0.5"deep for pure stands, 0.25"in mixture with clovers. Soil test for preplant and maintenance lime,phosphorus, and potassium recommendations.Apply 40 to 60 lb/ac nitrogen at planting for pure stands only.Do not apply N for mixtures with clovers but use proper legume inoculation techniques. Apply 150 to 200 lb/ac.N to pure-stand fescue for hay production;reduce N rates by 25%for grazing.Apply N Feb. 1 to Mar.20 and Aug.20 to Sept. 30, with equal amounts in each window. Refer to NCSU Technical Bulletin 305 Production and Utilization of Pastures and Forages in North Carolina for additional information or consult your regional agronomist or extension agent for assistance. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ---------- Preview Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: Crop Note Page 2 of 9 The following crop note applies to field(s): 7 Corn Silage: Piedmont and Mountains In the Piedmont, corn should be planted when soil temperature reaches 52 to 55 degrees fahrenheit. Plant 1-2" deep. Adequate depth control is essential. Review the NCSU Official Variety"green book" and information from private companies to select a high yielding variety with the characteristics needed for your area and conditions. Apply 10 to 12 lbs.nitrogen per ton of expected yield. All nitrogen can be applied at planting.Also acceptable is to apply 2/3 to 3/4 of the nitrogen at planting and the rest when corn is in the 7 to 9 leaf stage. Tropical corn for silage needs about 6-8 lbs nitrogen per ton of expected yield applying no more than 100 to 120 lbs total nitrogen. Research has shown that nitrogen can be reduced by approximately 15 percent when soil injected. The total N is dependent on the soil type and expected yield. Apply phosphorus and potassium according to a soil test before planting. Phosphorus is best utilized when banded with the planter as a starter. Plant samples can be analyzed during the growing season to monitor the nutrient status of the corn. Timely management of weeds and insects is essential in profitable corn silage production. Plant a cover crop after harvest. The following crop note applies to field(s): 4 Corn Silage: Piedmont and Mountains In the Piedmont,corn should be planted when soil temperature reaches 52 to 55 degrees fahrenheit. Plant 1-2" deep. Adequate depth control is essential. Review the NCSU Official Variety"green book" and information from private companies to select a high yielding variety with the characteristics needed for your area and conditions. Apply 10 to 121bs. nitrogen per ton of expected yield. All nitrogen can be applied at planting. Also acceptable is to apply 2/3 to 3/4 of the nitrogen at planting and the rest when corn is in the 7 to 9 leaf stage. Tropical corn for silage needs about 6-8 lbs nitrogen per ton of expected yield applying no more than 100 to 120 lbs total nitrogen. Research has shown that nitrogen can be reduced by approximately 15 percent when soil injected. The total N is dependent on the soil type and expected yield. Apply phosphorus and potassium according to a soil test before planting. Phosphorus is best utilized when banded with the planter as a starter. Plant samples can be analyzed during the growing season to monitor the nutrient status of the corn. Timely management of weeds and insects is essential in profitable corn silage production. Plant a cover crop after harvest. ----------------- Preview Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: Crop Note Page 3 of 9 The following crop note applies to field(s): 1, 2, 3,4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 Corn Silage: Piedmont and Mountains In the Piedmont,corn should be planted when soil temperature reaches 52 to 55 degrees fahrenheit. Plant 1-2" deep. Adequate depth control is essential. Review the NCSU Official Variety"green book" and information from private companies to select a high yielding variety with the characteristics needed for your area and conditions. Apply 10 to 121bs.nitrogen per ton of expected yield. All nitrogen can be applied at planting.Also acceptable is to apply 2/3 to 3/4 of the nitrogen at planting and the rest when corn is in the 7 to 9 leaf stage.Tropical corn for silage needs about 6-8 lbs nitrogen per ton of expected yield applying no more than 100 to 120 lbs total nitrogen. Research has shown that nitrogen can be reduced by approximately 15 percent when soil injected. The total N is dependent on the soil type and expected yield. Apply phosphorus and potassium according to a soil test before planting. Phosphorus is best utilized when banded with the planter as a starter. Plant samples can be analyzed during the growing season to monitor the nutrient status of the corn.Timely management of weeds and insects is essential in profitable corn silage production. Plant a cover crop after harvest. The following crop note applies to field(s): 1, 10, 11,2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 Corn Silage: Piedmont and Mountains In the Piedmont, corn should be planted when soil temperature reaches 52 to 55 degrees fahrenheit. Plant 1-2" deep. Adequate depth control is essential. Review the NCSU Official Variety"green book" and information from private companies to select a high yielding variety with the characteristics needed for your area and conditions. Apply 10 to 121bs.nitrogen per ton of expected yield. All nitrogen can be applied at planting. Also acceptable is to apply 2/3 to 3/4 of the nitrogen at planting and the rest when corn is in the 7 to 9 leaf stage. Tropical corn for silage needs about 6-8 lbs nitrogen per ton of expected yield applying no more than 100 to 120 lbs total nitrogen. Research has shown that nitrogen can be reduced by approximately 15 percent when soil injected. The total N is dependent on the soil type and expected yield. Apply phosphorus and potassium according to a soil test before planting. Phosphorus is best utilized when banded with the planter as a starter. Plant samples can be analyzed during the growing season to monitor the nutrient status of the corn.Timely management of weeds and insects is essential in profitable corn silage production. Plant a cover crop after harvest. ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Preview Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: Crop Note Page 4 of 9 The following crop note applies to field(s): 3 Corn Silage: Piedmont and Mountains In the Piedmont, corn should be planted when soil temperature reaches 52 to 55 degrees fahrenheit. Plant 1-2" deep. Adequate depth control is essential. Review the NCSU Official Variety"green book" and information from private companies to select a high yielding variety with the characteristics needed for your area and conditions. Apply 10 to 12 lbs. nitrogen per ton of expected yield. All nitrogen can be applied at planting. Also acceptable is to apply 2/3 to 3/4 of the nitrogen at planting and the rest when corn is in the 7 to 9 leaf stage. Tropical corn for silage needs about 6-8 lbs nitrogen per ton of expected yield applying no more than 100 to 120 lbs total nitrogen. Research has shown that nitrogen can be reduced by approximately 15 percent when soil injected. The total N is dependent on the soil type and expected yield. Apply phosphorus and potassium according to a soil test before planting. Phosphorus is best utilized when banded with the planter as a starter. Plant samples can be analyzed during the growing season to monitor the nutrient status of the corn. Timely management of weeds and insects is essential in profitable corn silage production. Plant a cover crop after harvest. The following crop note applies to field(s): 7 Soybeans-Full Season: Piedmont The suggested planting date for soybeans in the Piedmont is April 25-May 25.Review the NCSU Official Variety"green book" and information from private companies to select a high yielding variety with the characteristics needed for your area and conditions. Plant 2-4 seed/row foot for 7-8" drills; 4-6 seed/row foot for 15" rows; 6-8 seed/row foot for 30"rows and 8-10 seed/row foot for 36"rows. Increase the seeding rate by at least 10% for no-till planting. Seeding depth should be 1-1 1/2" and adequate depth control is essential. Phosphorus and potash recommended by a soil test report can be applied at planting. Soybeans produce their own nitrogen and are normally grown without additions of nitrogen. However, applications of 20-30 lbs/acre N are sometimes made at planting to promote early growth and vigor. Tissue samples can be analyzed during the growing season to monitor the overall nutrient status of the soybeans. Timely management of weeds and insects are essential for profitable soybean production. The following crop note applies to field(s): 4 Soybeans-Full Season: Piedmont The suggested planting date for soybeans in the Piedmont is April 25-May 25. Review the NCSU Official Variety"green book" and information from private companies to select a high yielding variety with the characteristics needed for your area and conditions. Plant 2-4 seed/row foot for 7-8" drills; 4-6 seed/row foot for 15" rows; 6-8 seed/row foot for 30"rows and 8-10 seed/row foot for 36"rows. Increase the seeding rate by at least 10%for no-till planting. Seeding depth should be 1-1 1/2" and adequate depth control is essential. Phosphorus and potash recommended by a soil test report can be applied at planting. Soybeans produce their own nitrogen and are normally grown without additions of nitrogen. However, applications of 20-30 lbs/acre N are sometimes made at planting to promote early growth and vigor. Tissue samples can be analyzed during the growing season to monitor the overall nutrient status of the soybeans.Timely management of weeds and insects are essential for profitable soybean production. ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Preview Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: Crop Note Page 5 of 9 The following crop note applies to field(s): 1,2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 Soybeans-Full Season: Piedmont The suggested planting date for soybeans in the Piedmont is April 25-May 25.Review the NCSU Official Variety"green book" and information from private companies to select a high yielding variety with the characteristics needed for your area and conditions.Plant 2-4 seed/row foot for 7-8"drills; 4-6 seed/row foot for 15"rows; 6-8 seed/row foot for 30"rows and 8-10 seed/row foot for 36"rows. Increase the seeding rate by at least 10%for no-till planting. Seeding depth should be 1-1 1/2" and adequate depth control is essential. Phosphorus and potash recommended by a soil test report can be applied at planting. Soybeans produce their own nitrogen and are normally grown without additions of nitrogen. However, applications of 20-30 lbs/acre N are sometimes made at planting to promote early growth and vigor. Tissue samples can be analyzed during the growing season to monitor the overall nutrient status of the soybeans. Timely management of weeds and insects are essential for profitable soybean production. The following crop note applies to field(s): 1, 10, 11,2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 Soybeans-Full Season: Piedmont The suggested planting date for soybeans in the Piedmont is April 25-May 25.Review the NCSU Official Variety"green book" and information from private companies to select a high yielding variety with the characteristics needed for your area and conditions.Plant 2-4 seed/row foot for 7-8" drills; 4-6 seed/row foot for 15" rows; 6-8 seed/row foot for 30"rows and 8-10 seed/row foot for 36"rows. Increase the seeding rate by at least 10%for no-till planting. Seeding depth should be 1-1 1/2" and adequate depth control is essential. Phosphorus and potash recommended by a soil test report can be applied at planting. Soybeans produce their own nitrogen and are normally grown without additions of nitrogen. However, applications of 20-30 lbs/acre N are sometimes made at planting to promote early growth and vigor. Tissue samples can be analyzed during the growing season to monitor the overall nutrient status of the soybeans. Timely management of weeds and insects are essential for profitable soybean production. The following crop note applies to field(s): 3 Soybeans-Full Season: Piedmont The suggested planting date for soybeans in the Piedmont is April 25-May 25.Review the NCSU Official Variety"green book" and information from private companies to select a high yielding variety with the characteristics needed for your area and conditions.Plant 2-4 seed/row foot for 7-8" drills; 4-6 seed/row foot for 15" rows; 6-8 seed/row foot for 30"rows and 8-10 seed/row foot for 36"rows.Increase the seeding rate by at least 10%for no-till planting. Seeding depth should be 1-1 1/2" and adequate depth control is essential. Phosphorus and potash recommended by a soil test report can be applied at planting. Soybeans produce their own nitrogen and are normally grown without additions of nitrogen. However, applications of 20-301bs/acre N are sometimes made at planting to promote early growth and vigor. Tissue samples can be analyzed during the growing season to monitor the overall nutrient status of the soybeans.Timely management of weeds and insects are essential for profitable soybean production. ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Preview Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: Crop Note Page 6 of 9 The following crop note applies to field(s): 7 Small Grain Silage,Piedmont and Mountains In the Piedmont, small grain silage should be planted from October 10 to November 3. In the Mountains, small grain silage should be planted from September 15 to October 31. Plant 18 to 22 seed/drill row foot at 1-1 1/2" deep and increase the seeding rate by 5% for each week seeding is delayed beyond the optimum time frame. See the seeding rates table for applicable seeding rate modifications in the current NCSU"Small Grain Production Guide".Also, increase the initial seeding rate by at least 10%when planting no-till. Adequate depth control when planting the small grain is essential. Review the NCSU Official Variety"green book" and information from private companies to select a high yielding variety with the characteristics needed for your area and conditions. Apply approximately 30 lbs N at planting. Increase N at planting by 20%for no-till. Phosphorus and potassium should be applied according to a soil test at this time. The remaining N should be applied during February-March. Apply 10 to 12 lbs.N per ton of expected yield. The total N is dependent on soil type and expected yield. Plant samples can be analyzed during the growing season to monitor the nutrient status of the small grain.Timely management of diseases,weeds and insects are essential for profitable small grain silage production. Plant a cover crop after harvest. The following crop note applies to field(s): 4 Small Grain Silage,Piedmont and Mountains In the Piedmont, small grain silage should be planted from October 10 to November 3. In the Mountains, small grain silage should be planted from September 15 to October 31. Plant 18 to 22 seed/drill row foot at 1-1 1/2" deep and increase the seeding rate by 5% for each week seeding is delayed beyond the optimum time frame. See the seeding rates table for applicable seeding rate modifications in the current NCSU"Small Grain Production Guide".Also, increase the initial seeding rate by at least 10%when planting no-till. Adequate depth control when planting the small grain is essential. Review the NCSU Official Variety"green book" and information from private companies to select a high yielding variety with the characteristics needed for your area and conditions. Apply approximately 30 lbs N at planting. Increase N at planting by 20%for no-till. Phosphorus and potassium should be applied according to a soil test at this time. The remaining N should be applied during February-March. Apply 10 to 121bs.N per ton of expected yield. The total N is dependent on soil type and expected yield. Plant samples can be analyzed during the growing season to monitor the nutrient status of the small grain.Timely management of diseases,weeds and insects are essential for profitable small grain silage production. Plant a cover crop after harvest. ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Preview Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: Crop Note Page 7 of 9 The following crop note applies to field(s): 1, 2, 3,4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 Small Grain Silage,Piedmont and Mountains In the Piedmont, small grain silage should be planted from October 10 to November 3. In the Mountains, small grain silage should be planted from September 15 to October 31. Plant 18 to 22 seed/drill row foot at 1-1 1/2" deep and increase the seeding rate by 5%for each week seeding is delayed beyond the optimum time frame. See the seeding rates table for applicable seeding rate modifications in the current NCSU"Small Grain Production Guide".Also, increase the initial seeding rate by at least 10%when planting no-till. Adequate depth control when planting the small grain is essential. Review the NCSU Official Variety"green book" and information from private companies to select a high yielding variety with the characteristics needed for your area and conditions. Apply approximately 301bs N at planting. Increase N at planting by 20%for no-till. Phosphorus and potassium should be applied according to a soil test at this time. The remaining N should be applied during February-March. Apply 10 to 12 lbs.N per ton of expected yield. The total N is dependent on soil type and expected yield. Plant samples can be analyzed during the growing season to monitor the nutrient status of the small grain. Timely management of diseases,weeds and insects are essential for profitable small grain silage production. Plant a cover crop after harvest. The following crop note applies to field(s): 1, 10, 11, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 Small Grain Silage,Piedmont and Mountains In the Piedmont, small grain silage should be planted from October 10 to November 3. In the Mountains, small grain silage should be planted from September 15 to October 31. Plant 18 to 22 seed/drill row foot at 1-1 1/2" deep and increase the seeding rate by 5% for each week seeding is delayed beyond the optimum time frame. See the seeding rates table for applicable seeding rate modifications in the current NCSU "Small Grain Production Guide".Also, increase the initial seeding rate by at least 10%when planting no-till. Adequate depth control when planting the small grain is essential. Review the NCSU Official Variety"green book" and information from private companies to select a high yielding variety with the characteristics needed for your area and conditions. Apply approximately 30 lbs N at planting. Increase N at planting by 20% for no-till. Phosphorus and potassium should be applied according to a soil test at this time. The remaining N should be applied during February-March. Apply 10 to 12 lbs.N per ton of expected yield. The total N is dependent on soil type and expected yield. Plant samples can be analyzed during the growing season to monitor the nutrient status of the small grain. Timely management of diseases, weeds and insects are essential for profitable small grain silage production. Plant a cover crop after harvest. -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Preview Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: Crop Note Page 8 of 9 The following crop note applies to field(s): 3 Small Grain Silage,Piedmont and Mountains In the Piedmont, small grain silage should be planted from October 10 to November 3. In the Mountains, small grain silage should be planted from September 15 to October 31. Plant 18 to 22 seed/drill row foot at 1-1 1/2" deep and increase the seeding rate by 5% for each week seeding is delayed beyond the optimum time frame. See the seeding rates table for applicable seeding rate modifications in the current NCSU "Small Grain Production Guide".Also, increase the initial seeding rate by at least 10%when planting no-till. Adequate depth control when planting the small grain is essential. Review the NCSU Official Variety"green book" and information from private companies to select a high yielding variety with the characteristics needed for your area and conditions. Apply approximately 30 lbs N at planting. Increase N at planting by 20% for no-till. Phosphorus and potassium should be applied according to a soil test at this time. The remaining N should be applied during February-March. Apply 10 to 12 lbs.N per ton of expected yield. The total N is dependent on soil type and expected yield. Plant samples can be analyzed during the growing season to monitor the nutrient status of the small grain. Timely management of diseases, weeds and insects are essential for profitable small grain silage production. Plant a cover crop after harvest. REC&W1)1NCDr'QIDWR mm, 14 Z019 Water Quality Regional OPeretons 8eCtldn ----------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------------- g ----- Preview Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: CropNote Page 9 of 9 590- 1 NATURAL RESOURCES CONSERVATION SERVICE CONSERVATION PRACTICE STANDARD NUTRIENT MANAGEMENT (Ac.) CODE 590 irrigation water. DEFINITION Enhanced efficiency fertilizers, used in the state Managing the amount(rate), source, placement must be defined by the Association of American (method of application), and timing of plant Plant Food Control Officials(AAPFCO) and be nutrients and soil amendments. accepted for use by NCSU and NCDA experts with responsibility for verification of product PURPOSE guarantees, ingredients (by AAPFCO definition) • To budget, supply, and conserve nutrients and label claims. for plant production. To avoid salt damage, the rate and placement of • To minimize agricultural nonpoint source applied nitrogen and potassium in starter pollution of surface and groundwater fertilizer must be consistent with NCSU/NCDA& resources. CS guidelines,or industry practice recognized • To properly utilize manure or organic by- by NCSU/NCDA&CS specialists. products as a plant nutrient source. For nutrient risk assessment policy and procedures see Title 190, General Manual (GM), • To protect air quality by reducing odors, Part 402, Nutrient Management, and Title 190, nitrogen emissions(ammonia, oxides of National Instruction (NI), Part 302, Nutrient nitrogen), and the formation of atmospheric Management Policy Implementation. particulates. To assess the risk of nitrogen leaching loss,the • To maintain or improve the physical, nitrogen Leaching Index, obtained through use chemical, and biological condition of soil. of current Soil Hydrologic Group(SHG)-based LI index maps in Section II of the NC FOTG OR CONDITIONS WHERE PRACTICE APPLIES RUSLE 2 field-specific soil loss calculations, This practice applies to all lands where plant must be completed on all planned fields. nutrients and soil amendments are applied. This In North Carolina,the Phosphorus Loss standard does not apply to one-time nutrient Assessment Tool (PLAT) is utilized to assess P applications to establish perennial crops. loss risk on a field specific basis. CRITERIA To assess the field specific risk of phosphorus loss, PLAT evaluations are applicable to General Criteria Applicable to All planned fields that meet either of the following Purposes conditions: A nutrient budget for nitrogen, phosphorus, and Condition 1: the phosphorus application potassium must be developed that considers all rate for manure or commercial nutrients— potential sources of nutrients including, but not including applied starter P--exceeds soil test limited to, green manures, legumes, crop report rate guidelines for the planned residues, compost, animal manure, organic by- crop(s), or products, biosolids, waste water,organic matter, soil biological activity, commercial fertilizer,and • Condition 2: the planned area is within the watershed for a 303d-listed water body, and Conservation practice standards are reviewed periodically and updated if needed. To obtain NRCS, NC the current version of this standard,contact your Natural Resources Conservation Service State Office or visit the Field Office Technical Guide. December 2014 590-2 ag-related P loss is identified by NC DENR ditches, or surface inlets) must receive nutrients DWR as a likely contributor to the consistent with the setback restrictions, such as impairment. (A current parameter indicating those described by current Senate Bill 1217 potential nutrient-related impairment is Committee Guidance and state law for manure. Chlorophyll A.)The most current version of Applications of irrigation water must minimize the NC 303d list is available on the NC DWR the risk of nutrient loss to surface and website at: groundwater. hftp://portal.ncdenr.org/web/wglpslmtulassessment. PLAT is not required when neither Condition 1 Soil pH must be maintained in a range that nor Condition 2 applies to the planned field. enhances an adequate level for crop nutrient availability and utilization. When PLAT is determined applicable to the Soil, Manure,and Tissue Sampling and planned field by meeting Condition 1 or Laboratory Analyses (Testing). Condition 2, it will not be required when NRCS, through coordination with the NC Interagency Nutrient management plans must be developed Nutrient Management Committee(INMC), has utilizing current soil test results, no more than 3 determined conditions where the risk of years old. phosphorus loss in a planned field is low. Soil samples shall be collected and prepared PLAT is not required if all of the following 'low in accordance with North Carolina State risk'conditions apply to the planned field(s): University or the North Carolina Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services • 5 years old or less PLAT field assessment (NCDA&CS)Agronomic Division standards or recommendations. Standards and recommendations for collection and preparation • Manure sludge (as is typical with lagoon of soil samples are outlined in pertinent NCSU sludge maintenance or lagoon closures) has Dept of Soil Science Soil Facts publications. not been applied since the last PLAT field assessment; Current soil tests are those that are no older than 3 years, but may be taken on an interval • The previous PLAT Total P rating score is recommended by NCSU/NCDA crop and soils 45 or less for the planned field(s). specialist guidance or as required by state law. The area represented by a soil test must be • The planned field is not to be included in consistent with soil testing procedures land application of lagoon sludge through recommended by NCSU and/or NCDA&CS. closure or maintenance Soil test analyses can be performed by any laboratory or program that is certified by the NC PLAT rating categories commensurate with North Carolina Department of Environment national 590 P-loss risk categories are noted in and Natural Resources(NCDENR), Division the"Manure Nutrient Application Rates"section of Water Quality, Laboratory Section. of this standard, (See Table 590-1), and are NCDA&CS Agronomic Division uses the considered to have equivalent criteria for Mehlich-3 extractant process for soil testing. purposes of P application planning. Producers who utilize non-NCDA Agronomic State or Federally permitted animal operations Division soil testing labs must obtain nutrient are required to complete PLAT assessments at recommendations made using Mehlich-3 intervals required by the regulatory entity. methodology or NCDA-equivalent conversion equations. This is to ensure laboratories provide consistent soil test-based nutrient rate On organic operations, the nutrient sources and recommendations made using guidelines and management must be consistent with the methodologies similar to NCDA&CS Agronomic USDA's National Organic Program. Division, supported by available NC field research and reference information, and are Areas contained within minimum application compatible with North Carolina nutrient setbacks(e.g., sinkholes,wellheads, gullies, NRCS, NC December 2014 590-3 management planning tools and nutrient risk objectives and capabilities. Sufficiently assessment tools. documented actual yield information per Soil and tissue testing shall include analyses for NCSU/NCDA guidelines may be utilized by a any nutrients for which specific information is qualified specialist to develop a crop RYE for available and/or needed to develop the nutrient planned fields. Established RYE data for plan. Request analyses pertinent to monitoring common crops in each NC county, based on soil or amending the annual nutrient budget, e.g. pH, productivity information, yield data, and research electrical conductivity(EC), soil organic matter, with NC soils and cropping systems is available nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium. at the NCSU Nutrient Management in NC Nutrient values of manure, organic by-products website: and biosolids must be determined prior to land http:Hnutrients.soil.ncsu.edu/yields/index.vho application. In North Carolina, the most current nutrient values of manure are posted on the If established RYE values or sufficiently NCSU Nutrient Management in North Carolina documented yield information does not exist for websiwebsite tnutrients.soil.ncsu.edulindex.html. a crop, a nitrogen fertilization rate recommended by NCSU or NCDA&CS agronomy and nutrient Manure analyses must include, at minimum, management specialists may be developed in total nitrogen (N), ammonium N, total coordination with the NC INMC. In the absence phosphorus(P) or P205,total potassium (K)or of this recommendation, or until documented KZO, percent solids, Copper(Cu), and Zinc yield information has been collected, the nutrient (Zn), or follow NCSU and/or NCDA&CS management planner may infer a realistic yield guidance regarding required analyses. ,from a similar crop on a soil with similar physical Samples must be collected, prepared, stored, and chemical features.The same procedure and shipped following NCSU and NCDA&CS applies when establishing a RYE for a new crop. recommended procedures, outlined in the NCSU The nutrient management plan should document Dept of Soil Science Soil Facts publication the source of the RYE. Waste Analysis. When planning for new or modified livestock Estimates of yield response must consider operations, available standard information, factors such as low soil crop RYEs, drainage, recognized by NRCS, such as manure nutrient pH, salinity, etc., prior to assuming that nitrogen source and production values posted on the and/or phosphorus are deficient. NCSU Nutrient Management in NC website, and Nutrient application rates lower than those those included in NC nutrient management recommended are permissible if the grower's planning software, may be used if they objectives are met. accurately estimate nutrient output from the Applications of biosolids or pop-up fertilizers proposed operation. Manure testing analyses must be accounted for in the nutrient budget. must be performed by laboratories successfully meeting the requirements and performance Liming material shall be applied as needed to standards of the NCDA&CS Agronomic adjust soil pH to the specific range required Division. by the crop or crops in the rotation for Planned Nutrient Application Rates optimum availability and utilization of nutrients. Planned nutrient application rates for nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium must not exceed The recommended rates of N/P/K application NCSU-recommended guidelines or NCSU from all sources, as documented in the planned recognized industry practice. nutrient budget, must be determined based on Determination of planned nutrient application the following guidance: rates must consider crop/cropping sequence, . Nitrogen Application—Planned nitrogen current NCDA or similarly based soil test results, application rates for must match the RYE- NC Realistic Yield Expectations(RYEs), crop based or specialist recommended rates as yield response to applied nutrients, nutrient risk closely as possible for the predominant soil assessment results, and producer management NRCS, NC December 2014 590-4 map unit in each planned field or cover crops is highly variable and site management zone. condition dependent. Where manure or organic by-products is a Starter Fertilizers-When starter fertilizers source of land applied nutrients, see"Additional are used,they shall be included in the Criteria to Properly Utilize Manure and Organic overall nutrient budget, and applied in By-Products—Manure Nutrient Application accordance with NC State University or Rates"for further guidance on N rates. NCDA&CS recommendations. Current Where intensely managed prescribed grazing NCSU recommendations are that no starter systems facilitate enhanced manure nitrogen P is to be applied to soils or sites that rate recycling, see the"Considerations"section of Very High through NCDA Soil Tests or this standard for further guidance on N rates. PLAT. Phosphorus Application -Planned Implementation of Recommended Nutrient phosphorus application rates for planned fields Application Rates must match the soil test recommended rates as Actual nutrient application rates for nitrogen, closely as possible. When manure or organic phosphorous, and potassium must match by-products is a source of land applied nutrients, planned/recommended rates as closely as possible, and may not exceed those established see `Additional Criteria to Properly Utilize Manure and Organic By-ProductsL—Manure through criteria attributed to risk assessment results Nutrient Application Rates for further guidance on P rates. Actual nitrogen application rates may not exceed • Potassium Application—Planned planned/recommended rates. potassium application rates for planned Actual Phosphorous or potassium application fields must match the soil test recommended rates may exceed planned/recommended rates rates as closely as possible except in when custom blended fertilizers and precision manure application situations. Potassium application technology are not available, and shall not be applied in situations in which when manure or other organic by-products are excess(greater than soil test potassium used as a nutrient source in accordance with recommendation)causes unacceptable Planned Manure Nutrient Application Rates nutrient imbalances in crops or forages. criteria in this standard. When forage quality is an issue associated Exceeding the recommended nutrient rates with excess potassium application,state (from soil test/RYE) using manure or inorganic standards shall be used to set forage quality fertilizer on a long term basis is potentially guidelines. harmful to crop production and water quality. • Other Plant Nutrients-The planned rates Nutrient Sources. of application of other nutrients shall be consistent with NCSU or NCDA&CS Nutrient sources utilized must be compatible guidance recommendations. High levels of with the application timing, tillage and planting soil Copper and Zinc may be toxic to system, soil properties, crop, crop rotation, soil production crops. Copper and zinc soil test organic content, and local climate to minimize index levels must be monitored, and risk to the environment. planned land application of copper and zinc Nutrient Application Timing and Placement. must be in accordance with NCSU/NCDA crop toxicity guidelines. Timing and placement of all nutrients must • Legume Cover Crops—When legume correspond as closely as practical with plant cover crops are grown to serve as a nitrogen nutrient uptake (utilization by crops), and consider nutrient source, cropping system source for the subsequent production crop, limitations, soil properties, weather conditions, appropriate nitrogen credit must be given to drainage system,soil biology, and nutrient risk the production crop in accordance with available NCSU, CES, or NCDA&CS assessment results. recommendations. Planners should note Nutrients must not be surface-applied if nutrient that residual N availability from legume losses offsite are likely, such as with frozen and/or snow covered soils, and saturated soils. NRCS, NC December 2014 590-5 controlled by the producer must be accounted for in a nutrient management plan. Nutrient Management Plan Development Concentrated feeding area acreage in land In addition to NCDA soil test recommendations, application fields, where vegetation has been the nutrient management plan must be based on destroyed or severely damaged,should not be approved values for RYES, nitrogen factors, included in the nutrient management plan for phosphorus removal rates, default nutrient land application of additional nutrients. values for animal waste, plant availability In development of the nutrient management coefficients for N, P, and K, animal waste plan, planners must correctly identify the land generation volumes, and for manure, application application crop in order to ensure that proper timing windows per SIB 1217 Interagency Group nutrient application rates are specified in the guidance. Appropriate values, including nutrient plan. application rates, are those approved by the N.C. Interagency Nutrient Management Additional.Criteria to Minimize Committee(INMC) based on NCSU- Agricultural Nonpoint Source Pollution recommended guidelines. NC RYEs are found of Surface and Groundwater at: Planners must use the current NRCS-approved htGa.11nutrients.soil,ncsu.edu&ields17ndex.,pho. Historic farm records may also be used through nitrogen, phosphorus, and soil erosion risk use of a procedure provided in SB 1217 assessment tools to assess the risk of nutrient Interagency Group guidance. and soil loss. Identified resource concerns must be addressed to meet current planning criteria Historically accepted and approved NCSU (quality criteria). manure nutrient values can continue to be When PLAT categorical field ratings are HIGH, utilized in existing nutrient management plans OR when the Nitrogen LI > 10 for the planned unless a 'major modification'of the plan as field, appropriate conservation practices and/or defined in current SIB 1217 Interagency Group application techniques must be included in the guidance, is required or requested by the conservation plan and/or Comprehensive producer(see Operation &Maintenance section Nutrient Management Plan (CNMP)to control or of this standard for more information). trap nutrients before they can leave the field via surface or subsurface drainage(if present). The The most current values must be utilized for number of applications and the application rates newly developed nutrient management plans,for must also be considered to limit the transport of new application fields added to existing plans, nutrients to tile. See the document"Soil Rating for existing plans with SIB 1217 guidance- for Nitrate and Soluble Nutrients"in Section II of defined major modification revisions, or upon the FOTG for further technical guidance. producer request. When nutrients are applied to fields where For livestock classes or other types of waste erosion exceeds soil loss tolerance("T"), a site without default information on the NCSU assessment must be conducted to determine website, use available values from the USDA need for mitigation practices that reduce Agricultural Waste Management Field sediment delivery and surface runoff. If site Handbook, Chapter 4—Agricultural Waste assessment concludes that mitigation practices Characteristics, available at: are needed, appropriate practices must be ftp://ftp.wcc.nres.usda.gov/wntsc/AWM/handboo included in the conservation plan. k/ch4.pdf Nutrients must be applied with the right placement, in the right amount, at the right time, All manure waste applied on land owned by or and from the right source to minimize nutrient controlled by an Animal Feeding Operation losses to surface and groundwater. The (AFO)owner or operator must be included in a following nutrient use efficiency strategies must nutrient management plan.The volume be considered in accordance with NCSU and difference in total manure waste generated by NCDA recommendations: the AFO and waste applied to land not owned or NRCS, NC December 2014 590-6 • slow and controlled release fertilizers; may result in an application rate for other and nitrification and urease inhibitors nutrients that exceeds the soil test (for NC specific information, see NCSU recommendation. Soil Facts publication Alternative Manure phosphorus application rates must be Synthetic Nitrogen Fertilizer Products for planned based on criteria attributed to risk Row Crop Production, available at., assessment results as determined by the most http://www.soil.ncsu.edu/publications/So recent field-specific PLAT risk evaluation. The ilfacts/AG-439-74April7.ydt]. specific field conditions that require PLAT use is • incorporation or injection detailed in the General Criteria of this standard. Manure P application criteria are shown in • timing and number of applications Table 590-1. • coordinate nutrient applications with Where PLAT is utilized,the total rating will be optimum crop nutrient uptake calculated using the most erosive projected crop • tissue testing, chlorophyll meters, and in the P application planning period in order to spectral analysis technologies ensure manure P is not applied at a rate above the risk rating in the highest erosion year of the • adaptive nutrient management crop rotation where manure is applied. The soil techniques as recommended by NCSU erosion data input for the most erosive crop • other NCSU and NCDA supported must be derived from RUSLE 2 and stated as technologies that improve nutrient use tons/ac/year. efficiency and minimize surface or Table 590-1. PLAT Rating Categories and groundwater resource concerns. Manure Nutrient Application Criteria Additional Criteria Ap2licable to Pro erl PLAT Equivalent NC Manure Utilize Manure or Organic By-Products RATING National 590 P- Nutrient as a Plant Nutrient Source (Total loss risk Application The total single irrigation event application of PLAT category Criteria liquid manure: rating score • must not exceed the soil's infiltration or LOW(0- LOW Nitrogen- water holding capacity 25) based • must be based on crop rooting depth, manure utilizing available information in the application NRCS NC Irrigation Guide MEDIUM LOW Nitrogen- (26-50) based • must be adjusted to avoid runoff or loss manure to subsurface tile drains. application • must meet conditions of the applicable HIGH MODERATE P-based permit for the animal operation. (51-100) manure application Crop production activities and nutrient use (limited to P efficiency technologies as recommended by uptake in NCSU and NCDA must be coordinated to take harvested advantage of mineralized plant-available biomass). nitrogen losses due to denitrification or ammonia VERY HIGH No additional volatilization. HIGH manure OR Planned Manure Nutrient Application Rates (>100) starter P application to Manure nitro en application rates must be be specified planned based on RYE-based nitrogen needs of in plan the application crop, or NCSU/NCDA&CS specialist recommendation in the absence of RYE information. The plan must include the For planning requirements and documentation 1 where PLAT is completed, see"Post PLAT Leaching Index value. Nitrogen-based rates NRCS, NC December 2014 590-7 Planning Requirements"section included in caLquidancelfbrestrX application uidance. d "Planning and Specifications"part of this for application criteria. standard. Heavy Metal Monitoring for Biosolids and Single event manure phosphorus applications Manures. When sewage sludge(biosolids) is A single event application of phosphorus applied applied,the accumulation of potential pollutants in manure (such as when lagoon sludge is (including arsenic, cadmium, copper, lead, applied during a lagoon closure or lagoon mercury, selenium, and zinc) in the soil must be storage maintenance)or organic by-product may monitored in accordance with the US Code, be made at a rate equal to the recommended Reference 40 CFR, Parts 403 and 503, and/or phosphorus application or estimated phosphorus any applicable state and local laws or removal in harvested plant biomass for the crop regulations. rotation or multiple years in the crop sequence. Additional information on heavy metal criteria for When such single manure-based applications of sewage sludge and biosolids may be found at: phosphorus are made for multiple-year crop http_//water.epa.gov/polwaste/wastewater/treatm sequence P needs, the rate must: ent/biosolids/index.cfm • not exceed the recommended nitrogen Additional Criteria to Protect Air quality application rate during the year of by Reducing Odors, Nitrogen Emissions application, or and the Formation of Atmospheric • not exceed the estimated nitrogen Particulates removal in harvested plant bio-mass To address air quality concerns caused by odor, during the year of application when nitrogen, sulfur, and/or particulate emissions;the there is no recommended nitrogen source,timing, amount, and placement of application, and nutrients must be adjusted to minimize the negative impact of these emissions on the • not exceed the application criteria environment and human health. One or more of required by PLAT rating table 590-1, the following may be used: and not be made on sites with a Very High PLAT risk rating. • slow or controlled release fertilizers; and nitrification and urease inhibitors (see On PLAT"High"fields, where P application "Additional Criteria to Minimize criteria requires manure P to be applied at a rate Agricultural Nonpoint Source Pollution of not to exceed crop P uptake rate, single multi- Surface and Groundwater"section of year based crop sequence P manure this standard for more information) applications may be made. However, no additional P can be applied until crop P uptake • nutrient enhancement technologies for the multi-year crop sequence equals the • incorporation amount of manure P applied in the single year application. • injection Manure or organic by-products must not be • stabilized nitrogen fertilizers applied more than 30 days prior to planting of . residue and tillage management the crop or forages breaking dormancy, and for NC permitted animal operations, must be • no-till or strip-till applied within approved crop application windows as noted in the Certified Animal Waste • other technologies that minimize the Management Plan. Also, manure or organic by- impact of these emissions products may be applied on legumes at rates Do not apply poultry litter, manure, or organic equal to the estimated removal of nitrogen in by-products of similar dryness/density when harvested plant biomass, not to exceed NCSU there is a high probability that wind will blow the recommendations. material offsite. Operators will handle and apply When land receiving manure is predominantly poultry litter or other dry types of animal pine forest, refer to NC INMC Issue Guidance manures when the potential for wind-driven loss "Animal Waste Application on Forest Land" is low and there is less potential for transport of (htt ://nutrients.soil.ncsu.eduflntera enc ftechni particulates into the atmosphere. NRCS, NC December 2014 590-8 Additional Criteria to Improve or application rates. To identify a RYE based on Maintain the Physical, Chemical, and actual yield data, determine the average of the Biological Condition of the Soil to highest three yields of the last five consecutive Enhance Soil Quality for Crop specific crop or forage harvests. Production and Environmental Use no-till/strip-till in combination with cover Protection crops to sequester nutrients, increase soil Time the application of nutrients to avoid periods organic matter, increase aggregate stability, when field activities will result in soil compaction. reduce compaction, improve infiltration, and enhance soil biological activity to improve In areas where salinity is a concern, select nutrient use efficiency. nutrient sources that minimize the buildup of soil salts. Use nutrient management strategies such as cover crops, crop rotations, and crop rotations CONSIDERATIONS with perennials to improve nutrient cycling and reduce energy inputs. Third Party Applicators/Manure Haulers Use variable-rate phosphorus and potassium General information on manure waste generated application rates based on site-specific by an AFO to be applied to land not owned or variability in crop yield, soil characteristics, soil controlled by the AFO owner or operator may be test values, and other soil productivity factors. recorded as specified in the NC CNMP Develop site-specific yield maps using a yield Certification Sheet and Documentation Checklist monitoring system. Use the data to further or other supplemental documentation to the diagnose low-and high-yield areas, or zones, nutrient management plan. NRCS CNMP and make the necessary management changes. technical criteria require documentation of See Title 190,Agronomy Technical Note (TN) manure exports off the farm. The AFO 190.AGR.3, Precision Nutrient Management owner/operator should provide the third party Planning. applicator with a current waste analysis in order to facilitate agronomic crop application of the Use manure management conservation facility's generated waste. Should land not practices to manage manure nutrients to limit owned or controlled by the AFO owner or losses prior to nutrient utilization. operator be included in a nutrient management Apply manure at a rate that will result in an plan, the complete plan must meet 590 criteria. "improving"Soil Conditioning Index(SCI)without exceeding acceptable risk of nitrogen or phosphorus loss. Nitrogen application rates in intensely Use legume crops and cover crops to provide managed prescribed grazing systems nitrogen through biological fixation and nutrient For pasture fields implementing an intensely recycling. managed prescribed grazing system, additional Modify animal feed diets to reduce the nutrient applied nitrogen recommendations to meet content of manure following guidance contained RYE-based crop needs or producer yield in Conservation Practice Standard (CPS) Code objectives may be based on an estimated 592, Feed Management. quantity of recycled livestock manure nitrogen. This recommendation may be made upon Excessive levels of some nutrients can cause producer requested grazing specialist analysis induced deficiencies of other nutrients, e.g., high of grazing system efficiency and manure nutrient soil test phosphorus levels can result in zinc distribution. The recycled manure nitrogen deficiency in corn. portion of the overall RYE-based N Use soil tests, plant tissue analyses, and field recommended rate will not exceed an amount observations to check for secondary plant attributed to crop nitrogen availability through a nutrient deficiencies or toxicity that may impact determined level of manure distribution plant growth or availability of the primary uniformity in prescribed grazing systems. nutrients. Consider using documented actual yield data Use the adaptive nutrient management learning from the planned site to determine nitrogen process to improve nutrient use efficiency on NRCS, NC December 2014 590-9 farms as outlined in the NRCS' National Nutrient grazing plan balancing forage produced with Policy in GM 190, Part 402, Nutrient herd nutritional need,while preserving the grass Management. forage stands included in the nutrient Potassium should not be applied in situations management plan as a land application where an excess(greater than soil test receiving crop. potassium recommendation)causes nutrient Considerations to Protect Air Quality by imbalances in crops or forages. Reducing Nitrogen and/or Particulate Considerations to Minimize Agricultural Emissions to the Atmosphere. Nonpoint Source Pollution of Surface and Avoid applying manure and other by-products Groundwater. upwind of inhabited areas. Use conservation practices that slow runoff, Use high-efficiency irrigation technologies (e.g., reduce erosion, and increase infiltration, e.g., reduced-pressure drop nozzles for center pivots) filter strip, contour farming, or contour buffer to reduce the potential for nutrient losses. strips. These practices can also reduce the loss For manure applications, consider location of of nitrates or soluble phosphorus. nearby residences, or other locations where NCSU research indicates that acidic soil humans may be present on a regular basis, conditions contribute to high levels of water and any identified meteorological (e.g., solubility of soil P reactive products when prevailing winds at different times of the organic waste P is applied. Thus,when soil year), or topographical influences that may tests show that pH is below soil target pH and affect the transport of odors to those lime is recommended, soils should be limed to locations, increase soil pH to soil target levels prior to application of organic waste materials.Target PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS pHs as established by NCDA Agronomic For NC DWR or NPDES permitted animal Division are 5.0 for Organic soil class(ORG), 5.5 for Mineral-Organic soil class(M-O), and operations,the plan and specifications must range from 6.0 to 6.5 for Mineral soil class (MIN) include all elements required by the Certified depending on the crop. Animal Waste Management Plan and Permit. Use application methods and timing strategies The following components must be included in a that reduce the risk of nutrient transport by nutrient management plan typical of ground and surface waters, such as: `conventional'fertilizer and manure application methods. Where precision ag/variable rate • split applications of nitrogen to deliver application technology is utilized, see next nutrients during periods of maximum section for additional guidance. crop utilization, . aerial site photograph(s)/imagery or site • banded applications of nitrogen and/or map(s), and a soil survey map of the phosphorus to improve nutrient site availability, . A listing of nutrient application land • drainage water management to reduce application areas, ie'fields'or nutrient discharge through drainage management zones'. systems,and • Planned nitrogen application rates • incorporation of surface-applied based on the RYE where available. manures or organic by-products if The Nitrogen Leaching Index for precipitation capable of producing runoff planned fields. or erosion is forecast within the time of planned application. • Planned P& K application rates based Use bioreactors and multistage drainage on soil test results(not applicable where strategies when approved by the land-grant P&K applied through variable rate university. technology). When land application fields are grazed by • Sufficient soils information—such as livestock, consider development of a prescribed dominant soil map unit for each planned NRCS, NC December 2014 590- 10 field—needed to apply nutrients at RYE estimated recycled and planned and Soil Test Report determined rates additional nitrogen application amount. as appropriate; and to not exceed rates Documentation method used to assess determined by nutrient risk assessment manure distribution uniformity and then planning criteria. determine recycled N included in the • location of designated sensitive areas overall nitrogen rate recommendationmust be included in the nutrient and the associated nutrient application management plan. restrictions and setbacks, • results of any applicable approved risk When determining actual application rates, a assessment tools for nitrogen, laboratory analysis is the preferred method to determine nutrient values of manure and phosphorus, and erosion losses. In NC, organic by-products to be applied, and is. most recent PLAT results are a required required by state laws or rules for regulated part of the nutrient management plan operations. Waste reports from the NCDA&CS where manure is applied. Agronomic Division, or equivalent, are • current and/or planned plant production acceptable sources of information for sequence or rotation, determining applied nutrient amounts for recordkeeping or crop budgeting purposes. • soil,water, compost, manure, organic by-product, and plant tissue sample Precision/Variable Rate Nutrient Application analyses applicable to the plan, Planning and Verification • realistic yield goals for the crops, In precision ag/variable rate nutrient application • complete nutrient budget for nitrogen, situations, some required planning components phosphorus,and potassium for the of the preceding section,such as aerial photos, plant production sequence or crop site maps, and soils information may be rotation provided by the overall conservation plan. • land application timing specifications The following components must be included in based on crop needs and growth precision/variable rate nutrient management response. For manure, land application planning and/or verification that actual . must be based on approved crop application rates for nitrogen, phosphorous,and specific waste application windows potassium application match the recommended rates as closely as possible. • listing and quantification of all nutrient PLANNING sources and form, •• in accordance with the nitrogen and RYE-based nitrogen application rate recommendations must be provided to the phosphorus risk assessment tool(s), producer on each planned field. Planned specify the recommended nutrient application rates may be made per soil application source,timing, amount testing 'zone' or per more conventional crop (except for precision/variable rate management field. applications specify method used to determine rate), and placement of plant • The Nitrogen Leaching Index value for each nutrients for each field or management planned field. . unit, and • The 590 Nutrient Management Job • guidance for implementation, operation Sheet/Supplemental Information and maintenance, and recordkeeping as specified by the CNMP or applicable NC In non-variable rate situations, planned P& DWR or NDPES permit. K rates based on soil test results as specified in Soil Testing section of this • On intensely managed grazed pasture standard must be provided to the producer fields where quantity of assessed for each planned field. P&K soil test-based recycled N is included in the N rate recommendations may be provided to recommendation, a RYE-based the producer by NRCS or a producer complete nitrogen budget that includes consultant. The source of the NRCS, NC December 2014 590- 11 recommendation must be retained by NRCS for each field or sub-field, and as part of overall nutrient management planning documentation. ♦information about conservation practices VERIFICATION and management activities that can reduce the potential for phosphorus • Documentation per field nitrogen application movement from the site. rates do not exceed RYE-based recommended rates Where increases in Soil Test P levels are expected (typically where manure is applied with • Documentation of the geo-referenced field Nitrogen as the limiting nutrient), the nutrient boundary and data collected that was management plan must document: processed and analyzed as a GIS layer or layers to generate nutrient or soil Information on the NC PLAT rating amendment recommendations. categories that will require P-based • Documentation of the nutrient manure application (HIGH)AND where recommendation guidance and no additional manure can be applied recommendation equations used to convert (VERY HIGH)will be specified in the the GIS base data layer or layers to a plan. Future manure P application nutrient source material recommendation within 590 criteria will be based on site GIS layer or layers. specific resource conditions,which will facilitate data input into PLAT. • Documentation if a variable rate nutrient or soil amendment application was made. Information on a P drawdown strategy (reduction in soil phosphorus)for the • Where variable rate application is done, manure application site. Should a P documentation that phosphorous and drawdown be desired or necessary, the potassium application rates do not exceed only proven method of reducing soil P is rates specified by soil sampled zone based to not apply manure-based P and to test results.Application records per plant and harvest crops that utilize P management/soil sampled zone and geo- currently present in the soil surface. referenced field must be provided. •• For non variable rate 'zone based' When phosphorus is applied in excess of crop requirement, and where a PLAT application of P& K, provide applied map assessment is not conducted in within individual field boundaries (or conjunction with providing assistance in electronic records)documenting source, applying this standard, documentation timing, method, and rate of all applications establishing the application site meets that resulted from use of the precision 'low risk'conditions as approved by the agriculture process for nutrient or soil NC INMC and detailed in General amendment applications. Criteria. • Maintain the electronic records of the GIS Conservation practices and/or data layers and nutrient applications for at management activities or techniques least 5 years. used to reduce the potential for P • Where'chlorophyll' reader technology is transport and loss must be documented utilized for real time, crop-need based in the conservation plan. nitrogen application,application records that • for AFOs, a quantification of manure nitrogen rates match RYE-based N rates as produced in excess of crop nutrient closely as possible. requirements if applicable. Post PLAT Planning Requirements OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE When PLAT field evaluations are completed, the The owner/client is responsible for safe nutrient management plan must include: operation and maintenance of this practice, including all equipment. Operation and ♦a record of the PLAT assessment rating NRCS, NC December 2014 590- 12 maintenance guidance provided to the client . all enhanced efficiency fertilizer must address the following: products used. 1. The producer is encouraged to review the • Additional records for precision/variable plan periodically to determine if adjustments rate sites must include: or modifications to the plan are needed. In NC, animal operations permitting provisions maps identifying the variable application may specify more frequent review periods. source,timing,amount, and placement For NPDES permitted animal operations, of all plant nutrients applied, and plan revisions could trigger a permit revision . GPS-based yield maps for crops where process that includes public review of the yields can be digitally collected. plan. Planning requirements for Plan "Amendments"(minor modifications)and 5. State laws or regulations may define record- "Revisions" (Major Modifications)are keeping requirements for some operations. clarified by SB 1217 Interagency Group 6. Workers should be protected from and avoid Guidance Sections 1.4, 1.5, and 1.6. unnecessary contact with inorganic 2. Protection of fertilizer and organic by- fertilizers and organic by-products. product storage facilities from weather and Protection should include the use of accidental leakage or spillage. protective clothing when working with plant nutrients. Extra caution must be taken when 3. Proper calibration of application equipment handling ammonia sources of nutrients, or to ensure uniform distribution of material at when dealing with organic wastes stored in planned rates. unventilated enclosures. 4. Maintaining records to document plan 7 The disposal of material generated by the implementation. Records should be cleaning of nutrient application equipment maintained for five years, or for a period.as should be accomplished properly. Excess required by NC DWR General or NPDES material should be collected and stored or Permits. To ensure adequate information field applied in an appropriate manner. exists to support sound nutrient Excess material should not be applied on management, NRCS recommends the areas of high potential risk for runoff or following records be included: leaching. • soil, plant tissue,water, manure, and 8. The disposal or recycling of nutrient organic by-product analyses resulting in containers should be done according to recommendations for nutrient state and local guidelines or regulations. application, 9. Document the nutrient application rate. • quantities, analyses and sources of When the applied rate.differs from the nutrients applied, planned rate, provide appropriate • dates, and method(s)of nutrient documentation for the change. applications, source of nutrients, and 10. Changes in animal numbers, management, rates of application, and feed management will necessitate • weather conditions and soil moisture at additional manure analyses to establish a the time of application; lapsed time to revised average nutrient content. manure incorporation; rainfall or 11. Field receiving animal manures and/or irrigation event, biosolids must be monitored for the • crops planted, planting and harvest accumulation of heavy metals and dates, yields, nutrient analyses of phosphorus in accordance with NCSU harvested biomass, and crop residues guidance and NC law. removed, REFERENCES • dates of plan review, name of reviewer, NCSU Nutrient Management In North Carolina and recommended changes resulting website: httr)://nutrients:soil.ncsu.edu/index.htm from the review, and NRCS, NC December 2014 590- 13 North Carolina Agricultural Nutrient Assessment U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Tool (NCANAT)supporting literature: Resources Conservation Service. 2011, Title htti,://nutrients.soil.ncsu.edu/index.htm 190, National Instruction (NI), Part 302, Nutrient NC Interagency Nutrient Management Management Policy Implementation. Committee technical guidance: Washington, DC. http://nutrients.soil.ncsu.edu/guidance/ SB 1217 Interagency Group information and guidance: htto://www.ncaar.qov/SWC/tech/1217commiftee. htm I T NC DENR DWR Animal Feeding Operations website: http://Portal.ncdenr.org/web/wqlaps/afo United States Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, 2006. Best Management Practices to Minimize Agricultural Phosphorus Impacts on Water Quality: hftp://www.ars.usda.gov/is/n:--,/BestMqmtPractice s/BestMgmtPracticeslntro.htm USDA NRCS Agricultural Waste Management Field Handbook online: hftp://www.info.usda.qovlviewerFS.aspx?hid=21 430 Follett, R.F. 2001. Nitrogen transformation and transport processes. In Nitrogen in the environment; sources, problems, and solutions, (eds.) R.F. Follett and J. Hatfield, pp. 17-44. Elsevier Science Publishers. The Netherlands. 520 pp. Schepers, J.S., and W.R. Ruan, (eds.)2008. Nitrogen in agricultural systems.Agron. Monogr. no.49, American Society of Agronomy(ASA), Crop Science Society of America (CSSA), Soil Science Society of America (SSSA). Madison, WI. Sims, J.T. (ed.)2005. Phosphorus: Agriculture and the environment.Agron. Monogr. no. 46. ASA, CSSA, and SSSA, Madison,WI. Stevenson, F.J. (ed.) 1982. Nitrogen in agricultural soils.Agron. Series 22.ASA, CSSA, and SSSA, Madison,WI. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service. 2010. Agronomy Technical Note, (TN) 190-AGR-3, Precision Nutrient Management Planning. Washington, DC. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service. 2011. Title 190, General Manual, (GM), Part 402, Nutrient Management.Washington, DC. NRCS, NC December 2014 USDA i NRCS United States Department of Agriculture tiaturalRe,uwcetCoos-,vewn5eivks NUTRIENT MANAGEMENT PLAN SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION N.C. Practice Job Sheet: NC-590 Prepared for: By: Farm:__ Tract(s): Date:— WHAT IS NUTRIENT MANAGEMENT? Nutrient Management is applying nutrients from all sources with the right placement, in fertilizer and manure application methods. the right amount, at the right time, and from When precision ag/variable rate application the right source to minimize nutrient losses to technology is utilized, see the next section of surface and groundwater. This practice is this Job Sheet for additional guidance on plan accomplished through development and requirements. implementation of a Nutrient Management Plan, which can be part of a broader • aerial site ph otog rap h(s)/imagery or site Conservation Plan or CNMP that addresses map(s), and a soil survey map of the site, multiple resource concerns. • Sufficient soils information—such as dominant soil map until for each planned field—needed PURPOSE OF NUTRIENT MANAGEMENT to apply nutrients at RYE and Soil Test Report determined rates as appropriate; and to not A nutrient management plan is intended to exceed rates determined by nutrient risk accomplish one or more of the following assessment planning criteria. objectives: • location of designated sensitive areas and the associated nutrient application restrictions and • To budget, supply, and conserve nutrients for setbacks, plant production. • results of approved risk assessment tools for • To minimize agricultural nonpoint source any necessary evaluations for nitrogen, pollution of surface and groundwater phosphorus, and erosion losses. resources. • current and/or planned plant production • To properly utilize manure or organic by- sequence or rotation, products as a plant nutrient source. • soil, water, compost, manure, organic by- • To protect air quality by reducing odors, product, and plant tissue sample analyses nitrogen emissions (ammonia, oxides of applicable to the plan. Where non-NCDA soil nitrogen), and the formation of atmospheric testing labs are used, nutrient particulates. recommendations must be made using NCDA- • To maintain or improve the physical, chemical, similar guidelines and methodologies. Note: and biological condition of soil. high levels of soil copper and zinc may be toxic to production crops. Land application of these nutrients must be accordance with CONTENTS OF THE NUTRIENT NCSU/NCDA crop toxicity guidelines. MANAGEMENT PLAN . Realistic yield goals for the crops planned for The following components are included in nutrient application, nutrient management plan specifications typical of more 'traditional' NC-590 Job Sheet May 2015 page 1 • Planned nitrogen application rates based on rates must be provided as specifications prior NC Realistic Yield Expectations (RYEs) or to application. sufficiently documented yield records, • Note—where Diammonium phosphate(18-46- • The Nitrogen Leaching Index for planned 0) is the primary variable rate P fertilizer fields, source applied on legume crops, additional N • Planned P& K application rates based on soil will likely be needed to achieve RYEs. test results(see next section where P& K The plan was developed based on the current applied through variable rate technology). NRCS 590 standard and Federal, state, or • listing and quantification of all nutrient sources local regulations or policies. Changes in laws and form, including starter fertilizer or regulations may require a plan modification. applications and legume-based cover crop This Job Sheet is a required supplement to mixes. - the Nutrient Management Plan. • in accordance with the nitrogen and phosphorus risk assessment tool(s), specify NC Permitted Animal Operations: For NC the recommended nutrient application source, DENR-DWR or NPDES permitted animal timing, amount(except for precision/variable operations, the waste utilization portion of the rate applications specify method used to Certified Animal Waste Management Plan determine rate), and placement of plant (CAWMP) must meet requirements specified by nutrients for each field or management unit, the Permit. The NC 1217 Interagency Group and provides guidance on the required minimum elements of a CAWMP. This guidance is found in • guidance for implementation, operation and Sec 1.1 of the latest 1217 Guidance Document, maintenance, and recordkeeping as specified located at: by the CNMP or applicable NC DWQ or http://www.ncagr.gov/SWC/tech/guidancedocumen NDPES permit. ts.html. Where precision/variable rate nutrient application applications are planned and Nitrogen Leaching Index Values made, some required planning components of Nitrogen Leaching Index values, obtained through the preceding section may be provided by the use of current Soil Hydrologic GroupSHG)-based overall conservation plan. In addition, the LI index maps in Sec II of the NC FOTG or RUSLE 2 field-specific soil loss calculations. are included following components are required in nutrient in the Nutrient Management Plan. SHGs per soil management planning. map unit are available through selection of the Soil Data Explorer and Soil Properties and Qualities • The geo-referenced field boundary and data (then select"Soil Qualities and Features")tabs collected that was processed and analyzed as once an Area of Interest has been defined in a GIS layer or layers to generate nutrient or NRCS Web Soil Survey. soil amendment recommendations. If the Nitrogen Leaching Index> 10 for planned • Planned nitrogen application rates based on fields, appropriate conservation practices must be NC RYEs or sufficiently documented yield included in a conservation plan to prevent nitrogen records from leaving the field via surface or subsurface • The Nitrogen Leaching Index for planned runoff. fields. Below are conservation crop management • The nutrient recommendation guidance and techniques and practices recommended for recommendation equations used to convert the mitigation of nitrate losses (practices also GIS base data layer or layers to a nutrient documented in conservation plan): source material recommendation GIS layer or layers. • Soil testing documentation that crop Phosphorus(P205) and Potassium (K20) nutrient or soil amendment application will be made per soil test results similar to NCDA guidelines. Where P&K will not be applied via variable rate application technology, but by basic GPS guidance, recommended P & K NC-590 Job Sheet May 2015 page 2 NUTRIENT MANAGEMENT PLAN PLAT Categorical Ratings Information DEVELOPMENT When soil test phosphorus continues to increase The nutrient management plan has been on a long term basis, PLAT may produce results developed to meet nutrient application rate criteria that require P-based manure application planning for all sources of nitrogen, phosphorus, potassium and planning for no additional manure P. as specified by NRCS 590 Nutrient Management Conditions that will require P-based or no-P standard criteria. planning will be based on site specific resource conditions, which will facilitate data input into In addition to NCDA Agronomic Division soil test PLAT. PLAT categorical ratings that will require recommendations, or soil test recommendations enhanced P application planning are: made through similar guidelines,the plan is based on NC INMC approved values for realistic yield HIGH: P-based manure application is required goals, nitrogen factors, phosphorus removal rates, (limited to P uptake in harvested crop biomass) default nutrient values for animal waste, plant availability coefficients for N, P, and K, and animal VERY HIGH: No additional manure P or starter P waste generation volumes where applicable. application to be specified in nutrient management Approved values are found at: plan. http J/nutrients.soil.ncsu.edulindex.htm Where manure is applied,farm records may also Phosphorus Drawdown Strategy be used through a procedure provided in SIB 1217 Information: Interagency Group guidance, available at: Implementation of a phosphorus 'drawdown' htt�•1Avw&v.ncaor.gov/SWG/tech/1217committee.ht strategy may be a consequence of PLAT results, ml or may be requested in order to lower soil test phosphorus levels. For NC permitted animal operations, planning Should a reduction in soil test P be desired or requirements for Plan"Amendments" (minor necessary,the only currently proven method of modifications)and"Revisions" (Major substantial P 'drawdown' is to not apply manure- Modifications)are clarified by SIB 1217 Interagency based P and to plant and harvest crops that utilize Group Guidance. P currently present in the soil surface. Crop specific estimated annual P removal amounts ADDITIONAL PHOSPHORUS-RELATED are available on the NCSU Nutrient Management PLAN INFORMATION (Applicable when in NC website: increases in Soil Test P are expected on htt; ://nutrients.soil.ncsu.edu/yields/index.phg the I)lanned area) Conservation Practices and Mana ement In NC, a field-specific Phosphorus Loss Techniques to Reduce P Loss Potential: Assessment Tool (PLAT)evaluation is completed Conservation practices, especially those that in accordance with 590 Nutrient Management prevent soil particle detachment and trap sediment standard General Criteria requirements, and at field edges are effective in preventing phosphorus must be applied in accordance with phosphorus movement from the planned site: 590 standard Manure Phosphorus Ai3:Dlication Manure application techniques can also be applied Rates. to reduce P loss risk. These practices must be In addition to the basic plan components, plan included in the conservation plan where information on PLAT categorical ratings, P determined PLAT risk= HIGH for planned fields. drawdown strategies, and conservation practices Consult the conservation plan developed in to reduce P loss risk is required when increases in conjunction with the nutrient management plan for Soil Test P are expected on the planned area. information on practices recommended to reduce Typically, this could occur when manure is phosphorus AND nitrogen loss risks. Application consistently applied at Nitrogen-based rates. High management techniques to reduce nutrient loss levels of phosphorus in the surface soil layer have risk may be prescribed below: been linked to increasing risk of P loss through surface runoff and leaching. ❑ Increases in Soil Test P are expected on the planned area(not typical if P application made per soil test results). NC-590 Job Sheet May 2015 page 3 Lone Term Strategy for Reduction of Soil P RECORDKEEPING Levels: Waste reports from the NCDA&CS Agronomic As noted in the P drawdown strategy section, the Division, or equivalent, are acceptable sources of only currently proven method for reducing high information for determining applied manure nutrient levels of soil P is not applying P, paired with amounts for recordkeeping or crop budgeting producing crops on the planned site that use purposes. existing soil P. Where soil P and PLAT evaluations indicate an increasing risk to water Records must be maintained for at least 5 years, or quality, substantially reducing soil P levels through for time and manner required by Permit for animal crop uptake can take many years of operations to document plan implementation and implementation. When P is not applied, and maintenance.As applicable, records include: existing soil P is used by crops, eventually, soil will • soil, plant tissue, water, manure,and become P deficient. Consult CES or NCDA organic by-product analyses resulting in Regional Agronomy specialists for additional recommendations for nutrient application, information soil test P reduction timelines. . quantities, analyses and sources of nutrients applied, Manure P produced in excess of crop requirements: dates, and method(s)of nutrient Consult the nutrient management plan for a applications, source of nutrients, and rates quantification of manure generated by the animal of application, feeding operation that may exceed crop P • weather conditions and soil moisture at the requirements. time of application; lapsed time to manure incorporation; rainfall or irrigation event, "Manure Hauler" Information . crops planted, planting and harvest dates, All manure waste applied on land owned by or yields, nutrient analyses of harvested controlled by the Animal Feeding Operation (AFO) biomass, and crop residues removed, owner or operator must be included in the nutrient 0 dates of plan review, name of reviewer, management plan.The volume difference in total and recommended changes resulting from manure waste generated by the AFO and waste the review, and applied to land not owned or controlled by the . all enhanced efficiency fertilizer products producer must be accounted for in a nutrient management plan. used. General information on manure waste generated Additional records for precision/variable rate by an AFO to be applied to land not owned or sites must include: controlled by the AFO owner or operator may be . maps identifying the variable application recorded as specified in the NC CNMP source, timing, amount, and placement of Certification Sheet and Documentation Checklist or all plant nutrients applied, and other supplemental documentation to the nutrient management plan. NRCS CNMP technical criteria • GPS-based yield maps for crops where r_enuire documentation of manure exports off the yields can be digitally collected. farm [this can be done belok. The AFO • Documentation per field nitrogen owner/operator should provide the third party application rates do not exceed RYE- applicator with a current waste analysis in order to based recommended rates facilitate agronomic crop application of the facility's generated waste. Should land not owned or • Documentation that applied phosphorus controlled by the AFO owner or operator be and potassium recommendations do not included in a nutrient management plan, the exceed recommended rates specified by complete plan must meet 590 criteria. soil tests. Type and Quantity of Animal Feeding Operation . For non-variable rate application of P & K, (AFO)manure generated by the facility: provide applied map with field boundaries indicating source, timing, method, and rate of all applications. Quantity of AFO manure generated to be exported . Where'chlorophyll reader'technology is off the farm for third party application: utilized, application records that nitrogen rates match RYE-based N rates as closely as possible. NC-590 Job Sheet May 2015 page 4 OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE The producer is responsible for safe operation and maintenance of this practice, including all equipment. Review the plan periodically to determine if adjustments or modifications to the plan are needed. In NC, animal operations permitting provisions may specify more frequent review periods. Adhere to the following operation and maintenance provisions: • Protect fertilizer and organic by-product storage facilities from weather and accidental leakage or spillage. • Properly calibrate application equipment to ensure uniform distribution of material at planned rates. • Workers should be protected from and avoid unnecessary contact with inorganic fertilizers and organic by-products. Extra caution must be taken when handling ammonia sources of nutrients, or when dealing with organic wastes stored in unventilated enclosures. • The disposal of material generated by the cleaning of nutrient application equipment should be accomplished properly. Excess material should be collected and stored or field applied in an appropriate manner. Excess material should not be applied on areas of high potential_risk for runoff or leaching. • Disposal or recycling of nutrient containers should be done according to state and local guidelines or regulations. NC-590 Job Sheet May 2015 page 5