20151072 Ver 1_401 Application_20151015

t
October 7, 2015
NC Division of Water Resources Geothermal, Environmental,
Attn: Jennifer Burdette & Well Drilling
1650 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699 -1650 2 0 6 1
RE: Pre - Construction Notice: Kings Ransom Phase 2, Pender County, NC 0 ? 2
Ms. Burdette:
Enclosed are the following documents for your review;
Project Narrative Letter OCT g 4 2015
Pre - Construction Notice Form
Figure 1 Kings Ransom Phase 2 Site Vicinity Map
Figure 2 Kings Ransom Phase 2 Wetland Boundary/ Site Plan
Wetland Crossing Detail — Intracoastal Engineering
Data Forms- Wetland Determination- Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Agent Authorization Form with Deed Copy
If you have any questions or need additional information, please do not hesitate to contact
our office at (910) 270 -2919 or you can email me at gene_arm @bellsouth.net.
Sincerely,
Gene un , R. S.
Environmental Scientist
Enclosures
OCT 1 4
2015
D­�'!� - WATEF;
PUFFER FiESO' -r i„S _ r
Applied Rcoouroc Management, f C
F 0. Box 882, 257 Tranefer Station Road, Hampstead, NC 28443, 910.270.2919, Fax [phone]

October 7, 2015
NC Division of Water Resources
Attn: Jennifer Burdette
1650 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699 -1650
RE: Project Narrative
Kings Ransom Phase 2, Pender County, NC
Ms. Burdette:
ARM
Geothermal, Environmental,
& Well Drilling
On behalf of Daryl Burgess and Gairy Canady, Applied Resources Management, P.C. is providing
you with a project narrative for the above referenced site.
The project is located along Kings Landing Road in Pender County. The property is approximately
16.7 acres and is planned and preliminarily approved as a second phase to a current subdivision. In
order to access proposed residential lots, fill material and a culvert will be needed in a very small
portion of the noted wetlands; therefore the use of a Nationwide Permit 29 is being sought.
The proposed project consists of construction of a road across a small wetland area to access an
area of uplands where potential lots are proposed. The proposed impact has been minimized
significantly and is proposed to be approximately 0.098 acres.
This proposed wetland impact has been minimized by positioning the crossing perpendicular to the
wetland and crossing in one of the smallest areas. Also, DOT approval to reduce right of way
requirements has been obtained to further reduce the impact.
If you have any questions or require any additional information, please feel free to contact me at
(910) 270 -2919.
Sincerely,
_ l
Gen Xoun , R
Enviro ntal Scientist
Applied Rcoource Management, PC
P 0. Box 882, 257 Transfer Station Road, Hampstead, NC 28443, 910,270.2919, Fax [phone]

of w a rF9
J0. � �
r Office Use Only:
p Corps action ID no.
DWQ project no.
\+ Form Version 1.4 January 2009
Pre - Construction Notification (PCN) Form
A. Applicant Information
1. Processing
1 a. Type(s) of approval sought from the Corps: ❑X Section 404 Permit ❑ Section 10 Permit
1 b. Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: 29 or General Permit (GP) number:
1c. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps? ❑ Yes ❑ No
1 d. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply):
❑X 401 Water Quality Certification — Regular ❑ Non -404 Jurisdictional General Permit
❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Express ❑ Riparian Buffer Authorization
1 e. Is this notification solely for the record For the record only for DWQ
because written approval is not required? 401 Certification:
❑X Yes ❑ No
1f. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for
mitigation of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank
or in -lieu fee program.
1 g. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1 h
below.
1 h. Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)?
2. Project Information
2a. Name of project: Kings Ransom Phase 2
2b. County: Pender
2c. Nearest municipality / town: Hampstead, NC
2d. Subdivision name: Kings Ransom Phase 2
2e. NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state project no:
3. Owner Information
3a. Name(s) on Recorded Deed: Daryl Burgess et al
3b. Deed Book and Page No. 4565/313
3c. Responsible Party (for LLC if
applicable):
For the record only for Corps Permit:
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes X❑ No
❑X Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes X❑ No
3d. Street address: PO Box 915
3e. City, state, zip: Richlands, NC 28574
3f. Telephone no.: g,013;)4- 41P (o
3g. Fax no.: (4 39-4 - 94-3
3h. Email address: �C1ru����p�55��1e% /ga�r��'Analit"il /'9r✓I
Page 1 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

4. Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a. Applicant is: X❑ Agent ❑ Other, specify:
4b. Name: Gene Young, REHS
4c. Business name
(if applicable):
4d. Street address:
4e. City, state, zip:
4f. Telephone no.:
4g. Fax no.:
Applied Resource Management, PC
257 Transfer Station RD
Hampstead, NC 238443
910- 617 -4914
910- 270 -2988
4h. Email address: I gene_arm @bellsouth.net
5. Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable)
5a. Name: same as above
5b. Business name
(if applicable):
5c. Street address:
5d. City, state, zip:
5e. Telephone no.:
5f. Fax no.:
5g. Email address:
Page 2 of 10

B. Project Information and Prior Project History
1. Property Identification
1a. Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID):
1 b. Site coordinates (in decimal degrees): I Latitude: 34.3787
1c. Property size:
2. Surface Waters
2a. Name of nearest body of water to proposed project:
2b. Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water:
2c. River basin:
4203 -51- 2856 -0000
Longitude: - 77.655801
16.76 acres
Old Topsail Creek
Cape Fear
3. Project Description
3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application:
The site is currently undeveloped and wooded. The area is zoned residential and currently has an established neighborhood to the north and the east.
3b. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property: 2.5
3c. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property: 1,250
3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:
Thep rpose of this project is to ttabl('sh a 2nd phase to an existing approved subdivision. The purpose of this impact is to construct a road to access
�1(•.•. 104s m.atrvss -1,c werw�ts+LAk Use,4 P 1 , ..JJ
D
3e. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
A small crossing ( <.10 acre) is required to access lots on the opp site side of the wetland that bisects the property. Typical equipment for road building
"b L. A-.,ck C i e) &ner, d,,,,�,�cs� ba�k�scDre��A c..lvu � b -�a �x i�slyJle�) -j„ allow Flaw 4k 6, d s4rcgx�
p
4. Jurisdictional Determinations
4a. Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the ❑X Yes ❑ No ❑ Unknown
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property /
project (including all prior phases) in the past? Comments:
4b. If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type ❑X Preliminary ❑ Final
of determination was made?
4c. If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas? Agency /Consultant Company: Applied Resource Management
Name (if known): Gene Young, REHS Other:
4d. If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation.
Field visit scheduled for Oct. 8, 2015
5. Project History
5a. Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for ❑X Yes ❑ No ❑ Unknown
this project (including all prior phases) in the past?
5b. If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions.
A JD was done on phase one and did not include any impacts for roads, etc.
6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project?
6b. If yes, explain.
This is the 2nd phase of a 2 phase project.
❑X Yes ❑ No
Page 3 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1 a. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply)
❑X Wetlands ❑X Streams — tributaries ❑ Buffers ❑ Open Waters ❑ Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on
the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted.
2a. 2b.
2c. 2d. 2e.
2f.
Wetland impact Type of impact
Type of wetland Forested Type of jurisdiction
Area of
number
Corps (404,10) or
impact
Permanent (P) or
DWQ (401, other)
(acres)
Temporary (T)
____
W1 P Fill
Bottomland Hardwood Forest Yes Corps
0.098
W2 Choose one
Choose one Yes /No
W3 Choose one
Choose one Yes /No
W4 Choose one
Choose one Yes /No
W5 - Choose one
Choose one Yes /No
W6 - Choose one
Choose one Yes /No
2g. Total Wetland Impacts:
0.098
2h. Comments:
impact is to fill portion of a wetland crossing and
to install culvert in stream bottom as shown on attached plan from Intracoastal Engineering.
3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted.
3a. 3b.
3c. 3d. 3e. 3f.
3g.
Stream impact Type of impact
Stream name Perennial (PER) or Type of Average
Impact
number
intermittent (INT)? jurisdiction stream
length
Permanent (P) or
width
(linear
Temporary (T)
(feet)
feet)
S1 T Culvert
unamed PER Corps 3
48
S2 Choose one
-
S3 - Choose one
S4 Choose one
S5 - Choose one
S6 - Choose one
-
3h. Total stream and tributary impacts 48
3i. Comments:
Impact is to install culvert as shown on plan by Intracoastal Engineering
Page 4 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

4. Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U.S. then individually list all open water impacts below.
4a. 4b. 4c. 4d. 4e.
Open water Name of waterbody
impact number (if applicable) Type of impact Waterbody Area of impact (acres)
Permanent (P) or type
Temporary (T)
01 Choose one Choose l
02 Choose one Choose
03 Choose one Choose
04 - Choose one Choose
4f. Total open water impacts
4g. Comments:
5. Pond or Lake Construction
If pond or lake construction proposed, then complete the chart below.
5a. 5b. 5c. 5d. 5e.
Pond ID number Proposed use or Wetland Impacts (acres) Stream Impacts (feet) Upland
purpose of pond (acres)
Flooded Filled Excavated Flooded Filled Excavated
P1 Choose one
P2 Choose one
5f. Total:
59. Comments:
5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required? ❑ Yes ❑ No If yes, permit ID no:
5i. Expected pond surface area (acres):
5j. Size of pond watershed (acres):
5k. Method of construction:
6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts
below. If any impacts require mitiqation, ti-en you MUST fill out Section D of this form.
6a. Project is in which protected basin? ❑ Neuse ❑ Tar - Pamlico ❑ Catawba ❑ Randleman ❑ Other:
6b. 6c. 6d.
6e.
6f.
6g.
Buffer Impact Reason for impact
Stream name Buffer
Zone 1
Zone 2
number —
mitigation
impact
impact
Permanent (P) or
required?
(square
(square
Temporary (T)
feet)
feet)
B1
Yes /No
B2
Yes /No
B3
Yes /No
B4
Yes /No
B5
Yes /No
B6
Yes /No
6h. Total Buffer Impacts:
6i. Comments:
Page 5 of 10

D. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
1a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project.
The proposed impact was designed to cross the wetland perpendicular to minimize impact across wetland. It also attempted to cross wetland at one
of the narrowest points along the wetland line.
1 b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques.
A few engineering concepts were done to reduce the crossing as much as possible. The slope of the fill was engineered to the steepest slope that can
safely be installed to reduce the footprint. Also, a variance on the DOT right of way specifications was obtained to reduce the footprint of the impacted
area.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for ❑ Yes ❑ No
impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
2b. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply)
2c. If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this
project?
3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a. Name of Mitigation Bank:
3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter)
3c. Comments:
❑ DWQ ❑ Corps
❑ Mitigation bank
❑ Payment to in -lieu fee program
❑ Permittee Responsible Mitigation
Type: Choose one Quantity:
Type: Choose one Quantity:
Type: Choose one Quantity:
4. Complete if Making a Payment to In -lieu Fee Program
4a. Approval letter from in -lieu fee program is attached. ❑ Yes
4b. Stream mitigation requested: linear feet
4c. If using stream mitigation, stream temperature: Choose one
4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only): square feet
4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested: acres
4f. Non - riparian wetland mitigation requested: acres
4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested: acres
4h. Comments:
5. Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a. If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan.
Page 6 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) — required by DWQ
6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires E] Yes XD No
buffer mitigation?
6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the
amount of mitigation required.
6c. 6d. 6e.
Zone Reason for impact Total impact Multiplier Required mitigation
(square feet) (square feet)
Zone 1
3 (2 for Catawba)
Zone 2 1.5
6f. Total buffer mitigation required:
6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank,
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in -lieu fee fund).
6h. Comments:
Page 7 of 10

E. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1. Diffuse Flow Plan
1 a. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified ❑ Yes ❑ No
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
1 b. If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why.
❑ Yes ❑ No
2. Stormwater Management Plan
2a. What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project? 12%
2b. Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan? ❑ Yes ❑X No
2c. If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why:
this is below the impervious threshold in accordance with the PCN guidance document
2d. If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative description of the plan:
2e. Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan?
3. Certified Local Government Stormwater Review
3a. In which local government's jurisdiction is this project?
❑ Phase II
3b. Which of the following locally - implemented stormwater management programs ❑ NSW
apply (check all that apply): ❑ USMP
❑ Water Supply Watershed
❑ Other:
3c.
Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
❑ Yes ❑ No
attached?
4.
DWQ Stormwater Program Review
❑Coastal counties
❑HQW
4a.
Which of the following state - implemented stormwater management programs apply
❑ORW
(check all that apply):
❑Session Law 2006 -246
❑ Other:
4b.
Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
❑ Yes ❑ No
attached?
5.
DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
5a.
Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements?
❑ Yes ❑ No
5b.
Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met?
❑ Yes ❑ No
Page 8 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

F. Supplementary Information
1. Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
1a. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal /state /local) funds or the ❑ Yes No
use of public (federal /state) land?
1 b. If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State El Yes ❑ No
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA /SEPA)?
1 c. If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
letter.) ❑ Yes ❑ No
Comments:
2. Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a. Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards, ❑Yes ❑X No
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)?
2b. Is this an after - the -fact permit application? El Yes X❑ No
2c. If you answered 'yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s):
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a. Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in El Yes X❑ No
additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?
3b. If you answered `yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
4. Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a. Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non- discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
wastewater treatment and disposal is to be handled by on -site wastewater systems permitted by Pender County Environmental Health.
Page 9 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or
habitat? ❑ No
Yes ❑X LinjLh�K*Y1
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act X❑ Yes ❑ No
impacts?
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted. website-
5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat?
nc natural heritage program
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat? I ❑ Yes ❑ No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
property not near estunne enviornment
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation ❑ Yes ❑X No
status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
NC Historic Preservation map. HPOWEB
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA- designated 100 -year floodplain?
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements:
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination?
Pender County GIS Tax Map
C -� i�
Applicant/Agent's Printed Name
❑ Yes
plic ent's Signature
(Agent's si nature is valid only if an authorization
letter from the applicant is provided )
Page 10 of 10
X❑ No
Jn/-7/iS
Date

pr
V3
J, i" 71-
Project \%%
Area
Ti I
■Wetland Boundary
(Preliminary)
Is I(
40
04 "Z 00
4
-loop
Map adapted from USGS Topsail Quadranqle
Kings Ransom Phase 22 FIGURE:
Applied Resource Site Vicinity
Management, PC JOB: SCALE: DATE: DRAWN BY:
Hampstead, NC26:4431 14117 1 500' 8/10/15 GY

.,i
C
y
Wetland Boundary
(Preliminary)
N
Note: Wetlands have not been reviewed by the US Army Corps of Engineers, therefore,
the wetland areas are to be considered preliminary in nature,
Map adapted from survey by Gairy Canody Surveyinq dated 6/19/14 and Pender County GIs Tax Map
Kings Ransom Phase 2 FIGURE:
App lied Resource Preliminary Wetland Boundary
Management, PC JOB: SCALE: DATE: DRAWN BY:
Hampstead, 14117 1 °= 200 2/3/15 GY

- Izz, --**'
o.o98 AC PERMANENT
DISTURBED AREA
36" CLASS IV RCP WITH
NCDOT PRECAST ENDWALL �I
10'X12'Xl8" ED
I_
INV. 11.8o
1
WETLANDS
J
0.023 AC. TEMPORARY
DISTURBED AREA
2 .']
a• l- 4. / 1 r 1 �
_ WETLANDS
21.0 �-
20.3
I 43 L.F. 6" C .SS IV RCP }
36" CLASS I RCP ITH
DOT PRE A T NDWALL
I 2.0o
17---21.0
a
I �
o
2 O .']
I
200' V.C. #3
PVI STA. 5 +00
PVI ELEV. = 18.50
K = 30.0
M
a
0
0
0
+ 00
. .:
N
U �
� W
V
P OPOSED 6" Sr R -21 WATER AMN
WETLAND BOUNDAR
36" RCPT
I . @ ift =11.90
2 +00 3 +00 4 +00 5 +00 6 +oo
WETLANDS CROSSING PROFILE
HORIZONTAL - 1" = 50'
VERTICAL - 1" = 5'
14/0
PROPOSED 18'
6' SHOULDER PAVED ROAD
20
PROPOSED
43 LF 36" RCP
2:1 SLOPE INV IN: 12.00
INV OUT: u.8o
PROPOSED NCDOT 15 PROPOSED NCDOT
PRECAST ENDWALL PRECAST ENDWALL
1. EXISTING
Io'x12'x18" STREAM
E.D. GRADE
10
-0 +50 0 +00 0 +50
WETLANDS CROSSING
SECTION -A
HORIZONTAL - 1" = 50'
VERTICAL - 1" = 5' \
/ LEGEND
PERMANENT WETLANDS DISTURBANCE
100' V.C. #4
PVI STA. 6 +50
PVI ELEV. = 23.5
K = 52.1
o N 30
+ Z
+
�o
Q E,
_ E),.:istingGrade
25
20
TEMPORARY WETLANDS DISTURBANCE
7 +00
VICiNITY \LAP (NOT TO SCALE):
i
.i"
Z
~
loo' V.C. #i
z�
z
100' V.C. #2
Kt%l51VN5
PVI STA. 2 +35
PVI STA. 3 +50
�PVI
ELEV. = 25.0 —�
'PVI ELEV. = 24.0
_
0
tn C?
K = 46.1
V_ c`oo,
K = 35.8
+0
00 CV
0 N CV
I
Q N
NQ CC'..O
�O
U H
F.�
F.dFd
ad
ide w
— —
U'a—
awa,w
a
aw
a,w
Proposed Gr,
de
-o.8
\ prOAOSe
•
1
I
WETLAND B
UNDARY
I
200' V.C. #3
PVI STA. 5 +00
PVI ELEV. = 18.50
K = 30.0
M
a
0
0
0
+ 00
. .:
N
U �
� W
V
P OPOSED 6" Sr R -21 WATER AMN
WETLAND BOUNDAR
36" RCPT
I . @ ift =11.90
2 +00 3 +00 4 +00 5 +00 6 +oo
WETLANDS CROSSING PROFILE
HORIZONTAL - 1" = 50'
VERTICAL - 1" = 5'
14/0
PROPOSED 18'
6' SHOULDER PAVED ROAD
20
PROPOSED
43 LF 36" RCP
2:1 SLOPE INV IN: 12.00
INV OUT: u.8o
PROPOSED NCDOT 15 PROPOSED NCDOT
PRECAST ENDWALL PRECAST ENDWALL
1. EXISTING
Io'x12'x18" STREAM
E.D. GRADE
10
-0 +50 0 +00 0 +50
WETLANDS CROSSING
SECTION -A
HORIZONTAL - 1" = 50'
VERTICAL - 1" = 5' \
/ LEGEND
PERMANENT WETLANDS DISTURBANCE
100' V.C. #4
PVI STA. 6 +50
PVI ELEV. = 23.5
K = 52.1
o N 30
+ Z
+
�o
Q E,
_ E),.:istingGrade
25
20
TEMPORARY WETLANDS DISTURBANCE
7 +00
VICiNITY \LAP (NOT TO SCALE):
i
.i"
Z
~
_POINTER R1l
z�
z
k
Kt%l51VN5
U
l Y ,
U wI C G= E Z
�w vZ
J
E
w
�Q
CLIENT INFORMATION:
15 GAIRY CANADY
2780 KINSTON HIGHWAY
RICHLANDS, NC 28574
PHONE [phone]
FAX [phone]
DRN: JAE I SIZE: 11X17
CHKD: CDC I DATE: 9/22/15
APPR: I SCALE: I"= 50'
PROJECT #: 2015 -019
IDRAWING NUMBER:
WETLAND CROSSING
Z
~
z
O
o
F�
z
g
3
CLIENT INFORMATION:
15 GAIRY CANADY
2780 KINSTON HIGHWAY
RICHLANDS, NC 28574
PHONE [phone]
FAX [phone]
DRN: JAE I SIZE: 11X17
CHKD: CDC I DATE: 9/22/15
APPR: I SCALE: I"= 50'
PROJECT #: 2015 -019
IDRAWING NUMBER:
WETLAND CROSSING

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Project/Site: Kinos Ransom SID Phase It City /County: Pender Sampling Date: Auoust 10. 2015
Applicant/Owner. Darvi Burgess et at State: NC Sampling Point: wetland point
Investigator(s): Gene Youna. REHS- A.R.M. Section, Township, Range: Hampstead, NC
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Side slope Local relief (concave, convex, none): Linear Slope ( %): >1%
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR T Lat: 34.378700 N Long: - 77.6558019 W Datum:
Soil Map Unit Name: Muckalee - Autrvville complex NCWAM classification: Bottomland Hardwood Forest
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes x No (if no,explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? No Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes x No—
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? No (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks_)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present?
Hydric Soil Present?
Wetland Hydrology Present?
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Yes
X
No
Yes
X
No
Yes
X
No
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that aooty)
Surface Water (Al) x Water - Stained Leaves (69)
Is the Sampled Area
within a Wetland? Yes X No
x High Water Table (A2) _ Aquatic Fauna (1313)
_ Saturation (A3) _ Marl Deposits (1315)(LRR U)
_, Water Marks (Bi) _ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
____ Sediment Deposits (132) — Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots
(C3)
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two
required)
Surface Soil Cracks (136)
_ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface
(138)
Drainage Pattems (BID)
_ Moss Trim Lines (1316)
Dry- Season Water Table (C2)
X Crayfish Burrows (C8)
Drift Deposits (133) _ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) — Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (Cg)
Algal Mat or Crust (t34) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (08) _ Geomorphic Position (D2)
_ Iron Deposits (135) _ Thin Muck Surface (C7) _ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery _ Other (Explain in Remarks) _ FAC- Neutral Test (D5)
(137)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No x Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes x No Depth (inches):6"
Saturation Present? Yes x No Depth (inches):6" Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:

Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes X No
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below).vegetation strata are limited
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Dominance Test worksheet:
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30' )
% Cover Species? Status
1. Red Maple (Ater rubrum)
70
Y FACW
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 4 (A)
2. Redbav (Persea borbonia)
10
Y FACW
3.
Total Number of Dominant
4.
Species Across All Strata: 4 (B)
5.
Percent of Dominant Species
6
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 100 (A/B)
7.
80
= Total Cover
Prevalence index worksheet:
Sapling Stratum (Plot size: 30' )
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
1.
OBL species X1 =
2•
FACW species x 2 =
3.
FAC species x3=
4•
FACU species x4=
5.
UPL species x5=
6•
Column Totals: (A)
7.
(B)
= Total Cover
Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 30' )
1.
2•
Prevalence Index = B/A =
3'
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
4.
X Dominance Test is >50%
5.
Prevalence Index is s3.0'
B.
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation'
7
(Explain)
= Total Cover
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 30' )
must
1. Netted chainfern (Woodwardia areolata)
25
Y OBL
Definitions of Vegetation Strata:
2. Cinnamon fern (Osmunda cinnamomea)
15
Y FACW
3_ Lizard tail (Saururus cemuus)
5
N OBL
Tree — Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
4
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3
in.(7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height
5
(DBH).
6.
7.
Sapling —Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
g
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less
g
than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH.
10.
Shrub —Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
11.
approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height.
12.
40
= Total Cover
Herb — All herbaceous (non - woody) plants,
including
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30' )
herbaceous vines, regardless of size. Includes
1•
woody
2,
plants, except woody vines, less than approximately
3
3 ft (1 m) in height.
4.
Woody vine — All woody vines, regardless of
5.
height.
= Total Cover
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes X No
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below).vegetation strata are limited

SOIL
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Manx Redox Features
nnch�_ Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Tie Loc Texture
0-18 1OYR211
Sandy Loam Mucky
Type: C= Concentration, D= Depletion, RM= Reduced Matrix, CS= Covered or Coated Sand Grains.
Hydric Soil Indicator:
Histosol (A1)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8)(LRR S,
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
_ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U)
Black Histic (A3)
_ Loamy Mucky Surface (F1) (LRR O)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_ Stratified Layers (A5)
_ Depleted Matrix (F3)
_ Organic Bodies (A6)(LRR P, T, U)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7)(LRR P, T,
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
X Muck Presence (A8)(LRR P, T)
_ Redox Depressions (178)
_ 1 cm Mucky Mineral (A7)(LRR P, T,
_ Marl (F10) (LRR U)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
_ Depleted Ochric (1711) (MRLA 151)
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
_ Iron- Manganese Masses (F12)(LRR
Coast Prairie Redox (Al6)(MLRA
_ Unbric Surface (F13( (LRR P, T, U)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)(LRR O,S)
Delta Ochdo (F17) (MRLA 151)
_ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
_ Reduce Vertic (F18) (MRLA 150A, 1506
_ Sandy Redox (86)
Stripped Matrix (S6)
Dark Surface (S7)(LRR P. S. T, U)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (in&4s):
Remarks:
soils appear to be hydric.
SamDlinp Point: wettand
Remarks
Location: PL= Pore Lining, M= Matrix
_ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
Reduced Vertic (F18)(outside MLRA 150A,B)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
(MRLA 153B)
_ Red Parent Material ()'F2)
Very Shallow Dark Surface (fF12) (LRR T, U)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
3 Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation
and
wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic.
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (MRLA 149A)
_ Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MRLA 149A, 153C, 153D)
Hydric Soils Present? Yes x No _
i

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Project/Site: Kinas Ransom S/D City /County: Pender Sampling Date: Auoust 10. 2015
Applicant/Owner Daryl Burgess et al State: NC Sampling Point: Upland point
Investigator(s): Gene Younq, REHS- A.R.M. Section, Township, Range: Hampstead. NC
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Side slope Local relief (concave, convex, none): Linear Slope ( %): >1%
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR T Lat: 34.378700 N Long: - 77.658019W Datum:
Soil Map Unit Name: Muckalee - Autrvville complex NCWAM classification: Bottomland Hardwood Forest
Are climatic/ hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes x No (If no,explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil , or Hydrology significantly disturbed? No Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes x No
Are Vegetation Soil , or Hydrology naturally problematic? No (if needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present?
Hydric Soil Present?
Wetland Hydrology Present?
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Yes
X
No
Yes
No
X
Yes
No
X
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that a0Dly)
Surface Water (Al) _ Water - Stained Leaves (89)
High Water Table (A2)
Saturation (A3)
_ Water Marks (131)
Sediment Deposits (132)
Drift Deposits (133)
Algal Mat or Crust (134)
Iron Deposits (135)
— Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery
(137)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes N
Is the Sampled Area
within a Wetland?
Aquatic Fauna (1313)
_ Marl Deposits (B15)(LRR U)
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1)
Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots
(C3)
_ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
Thin Muck Surface (C7)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
o x Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes _ No x Depth (inches): 24" +
Saturation Present? Yes _ No x Depth (inches):24" + Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Yes No X
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two
required)
_ Surface Soil Cracks (136)
_ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface
(B8)
Drainage Patterns (610)
Moss Trim Lines (1316)
Dry- Season Water Table (C2)
_ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Geomorphic Position (132)
— Shallow Aquitard (D3)
FAG- Neutral Test (135)
Remarks:

Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30' }
1. Sweetgum (Liquidambar styraciflua)
2. American Holiv (Ilex ooaca)
3_ Loblollv Pine Minus taeda)
4. White Oak (Quercus albs)
5. Mockemut Hickory ( Carva tomentosa)
6.
7.
Sapling Stratum (Plot size: 30' )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 30'
1. Buckeve (Aesculus svlvatica)
2. Redbav (Persea borbonia)
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 30'
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30' }
1. Viroinia Creeoer (Parthenociccus ouinouefolia)
2. Poison Ivy (Toxicodendron radicans)
3. Grape (Vitis so.)
4. Greenbriar (Smilax sop.)
5.
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Dominance Test worksheet:
% Cover Species? Status
15 Y FAG
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAG: 8 (A)
10 Y FAC
30 Y FAG
Total Number of Dominant
5 N FACU
Species Across All Strata: 8 (B)
5 N FAC
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 100 (A/B)
65 = Total Cover
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total °% Cover of Multiply bv:
OBL species x 1 =
FACW species x2=
FAC species x3=
FACU species x4=
UPL species X5=
Column Totals: (A)
(B)
= Total Cover
10 Y FAC
10 Y FACW
Prevalence Index = B/A =
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
X Dominance Testis >50%
Prevalence Index is s3.0'
_
_ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation'
(Explain)
20 = Total Cover
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology
must
Definitions of Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3
in.(7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height
(DBH).
Sapling - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less
than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH.
Shrub -Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height.
= Total Cover
Herb - All herbaceous (non - woody) plants,
including
herbaceous vines, regardless of size_ Includes
35 Y FAC
woody
20 Y FAC
plants, except woody vines, less than approximately
20 Y FAC
3 ft (1 m) in height.
5 N FAC
Woody vine -All woody vines, regardless of
height.
80 = Total Cover
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes X No
Remarks: (if observed, list morphological adaptations below).vegetation strata are limited

SOIL Samplinq Point: upland
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Tye Loc Texture Remarks
0-10 10YR 411 Loamv Sand Uncoated sand arains
10 -14 10YR 612 Loamy Sand
14-24 2.5Y 614 Loamv sand
Type: C= Concentration, D= Depletion, RM= Reduced Matrix, CS= Covered or Coated Sand Grains.
Location: PL= Pore Lining, M= Matrix
Hydric Soil Indicator:
_ Histosol (Al)
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8)(LRR S,
_ i cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
_ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
_ Black Histic (A3)
_ Loamy Mucky Surface (Fl) (LRR O)
_ Reduced Vertic (1718)(outside MLRA 150A,B)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
_ Stratified Layers (A5)
_ Depleted Matrix (F3)
_ Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
_ Organic Bodies (A6)(LRR P, T, U)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
(MRLA 153B)
5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7)(LRR P, T,
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Red Parent Material (fF2)
— Muck Presence (A8)(LRR P, T)
— Redox Depressions (F8)
_ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) (LRR T, U)
_ 1 cm Mucky Mineral (A7)(LRR P, T,
_ Marl (F10) (LRR U)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (All 1)
_ Depleted Ochric (F11) (MRLA 151)
_ Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
— iron- Manganese Masses (F12)(LRR
' Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation
_ Coast Prairie Redox (A16)(MLRA
Unbric Surface (F13( (LRR P, T, U)
and
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)(LRR O,S)
Delta Ochric (1717) (MRLA 151)
wetland hydrology must be present,
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
_ Reduce Vertic (F18) (MRLA 150A, 150B)
unless disturbed or problematic.
_,.,_ Sandy Redox (S6) _ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (MRLA 149A)
_ Stripped Matrix (S6) _ Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (1720) (MRLA 149A, 153C, 153D)
Dark Surface (S7NLRR P. S, T. U)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches): Hydric Soils Present? Yes— No x
Remarks:
soils do not appear to be hydric.

Date: k' /o
To Whom It May Concern:
RE: Agent and Access Authorization letter
I authorize Gene Young or any employee of Applied Resource Management, PC to act
as an agent on my behalf in all matters dealing with wetland Jurisdictional
Determinations or permitting.
I furthermore authorize the US Army Corps of Engineers representative to access my
property as part of this process.
Sincerely,
Z�;�
Printed Name: 044 X4 9,.// e.--U
Property Address: ,��ivy s �, ,�{Q,�vq XdAo
U u