NC0003433_Compliance Evaluation Inspection_20070601

Enclosure 1. Results from duplicate samples collected by NC Division of Water Quality at the Cape Fear Steam Electric Plant
(NPDES Permit NC0003433), September 2009.
Outfall007 Outfall005 Outfall005
PEC DWQ PEC DWQ PEC DWQ
Is
s

ti
M
�42 Progress Energy
December 21, 2009
Mr. Ken Pohlig, P. E.
Division of Water Quality
Construction Grants and Loans Section
1633 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1633
sl)� 2S 2AG?Q
Subject: Carolina Power & Light Co. d/b/a Progress Energy Carolinas, Inc.
Cape Fear Steam Electric Plant NPDES Permit NC000343
A to C No. 003433AOI
Ash Sluice Piping Professional Engineer Certification
File Point: 12520B-1
Dear Mr. Pohlig:
In April 2009, Progress Energy Carolinas, Inc. requested approval to replace the ash sluice
pumps servicing Units 5 and 6 and replace a portion of the ash sluice piping from Unit 6 at the
Cape Fear Steam Electric Plant in Moncure, North Carolina. Please note that a mistake was
made in the original ATC application submittal package. The application described the
replacement of approximately 1,500 linear feet of existing 13-inch pipe with 16-inch HPDE pipe
from Unit 6 to the East Ash Pond. The pipe replacement is actually for Unit 5 and not for Unit 6.
All other details remain the same. The plant is sorry for any confusion that this may have
caused.
Cape Fear Steam Electric Plant received authorization to construct from your office on
July 16, 2009.
The Cape Fear Steam Electric Plant has now completed the installation of all piping components
for Unit 5. The approval to construct requires that the following two conditions be met prior to
operation of the piping components:
(1) Notify the Raleigh Regional office at least 48-hours in advance of piping operation.
Mr. Barry Herzberg was emailed on Monday, December 14, 2009, for the notification of the
scheduled operation date of Wednesday, December 16, 2009. Please see attached email.
(2) Upon completion of construction a certification must be received from a professional
engineer certifying the permitted facility. The attached Certification Form fulfills this
requirement.
Progress Energy Carolinas, Inc.
Cape Fear Steam Plant
500 CP&L Road
Moncure, NC 27559
�0�
A

Mr. Ken Pohlig, P.E. % 2
Cape Fear Steam Electric Plant has now completed all approved construction activities approved
under ATC No. 003433AOL
If there are any questions about this information please contact Ms. Robin Bryson by telephone
at [phone] or by email at [e-mail].
I certify, under penalty of law, that this document and all attachments were prepared under
my direction or supervision in accordance with a system designed to assure that qualified
personnel properly gather and evaluate the information submitted. Based on my inquiry of
the person or persons who manage the system, or those persons directly responsible for
gathering the information, the information submitted is, to the best of my knowledge and
belief, true, accurate, and complete. 1 am aware that there are significant penalties for
submitting false information, including the possibility of fines and imprisonment for knowing
violations.
Sincerely,
Hershell McCarty, Plant Manager
Cape Fear Steam Electric Plant
HM/lb
Enclosures
c: Robin Bryson (PEB4)
Bill Forster (West FGD)
Bob Miller, MACTEC Engineering and Consulting

Barr, Leigh
From: Barr, Leigh
Sent: Monday, December 14, 2009 2:03 PM
To: '[e-mail]'
Cc: Bryson, Robin R., Forster, Bill, McCarty, Hershell
Subject: Cape Fear Plant ATC No. 003433A01 48-hour Notification
Importance: High
Mr. Herzberg:
The replacement of Unit 6 ash sluice piping as part of the work authorized under ATC No. 003433A01 at the Cape Fear Plant is expected to be operational on
Wednesday, December 16, 2009 after 2:30 pm. The Engineer's Certification will be completed and submitted (electronically) prior to operation of the piping. An
original copy of the certification will be overnighted to your office. Please note that this replacement, completes all approved work under ACT No. 003433A01.
Please let me know if you have any questions.
Sincerely,
Leigh Barr
Sr. Environmental Specialist
Progress Energy
Cape Fear Steam Electric Plant
500 CP&L Road
Moncure, NC 27559
W wk:919-774-5208
W cell:919-384-5830
Tracking:
8

40 M
Progress Energy Carolinas, Inc.
Cape Fear Steam Electric Plant
A To C No. 003433A01
Replacement Ash Sluice Pumps and Pipeline
Issued July 16, 2009
Engineer's Certification
(n rn )'t e r _ AR a duly registered Pmfessional Engineer in
the State of North Carolina, having been authorized to observe (periodically/weekly/full time)
the construction of the modifications and improvements to the Cape Fear Steam Electric Plant,
located on 500 CP&L Road, Moncure in Chatham County for Progress Energy, hereby state that,
to the best of my abilities, due care and diligence was used in the observation of the following
construction:
'uierpurrrp�etvig Unit 6 wi t zm ..
replacement of approximat ly 1,500 linear feet of existing 13-inch pipe with 16-inch
HPDE pipe from Unit tthe East ("New") Ash Pond, and associated yard piping and
appurtenances, in conformity with the project plans, specifications, and other supporting
data subsequently filed and approved by the Department of Environment and Natural
Resources.
1 certify that the construction of the above referenced project was observed to be built within
substantial compliance and intent of the approved plans and specifications.
Signature Registration
Date
Send to: Construction Grants & Loans
DENR/DWQ
1633 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1633
/7/q-7
42_2j-0C

r � f
NaMS
,. PIID9TIPE 1090 VILIAATMIL9 WFAE IMCE V911q,1E NILY-N£AMLWCgEBPWtMENbA'
o9T wS
WVAI-
dfIHxaTNK FITNG9 A9
EDIGE'0.WCa VJIFIYM MLPNaK'MrA
11<N ml1pN.1W2 POIK+xDfE9a-6-L ENT9OF o" D.Wl FOIIalE6Ft 6WVl1)Fgl TM[CFMAMGCN
IHO6lCWJD Fg11,lE IbF4 PPE NEPE M149VMEU.
1. EIE/ATRM9AIE MBEs GIN19NE0 RCCM ELEYALIpL9 FRpxCPll CONBiPWT]NdNN1Y19.
PNQPLTE�E1m1 pINE F1EVAPCN OF @iNIIC)IOM pUNBga. FlE1BMMBlIREAEtIIe NM 1NE
GLCW)1l11B PpEM DNwA) ATbT
.. aPEGFK dNw1YOF I.IAaBIIMFD idi 9LLM'F.
a. /� XFM CF Nf AIA A RON OF ]N)fPM CdIN1O W)(FT1E GIVP WENE /39NtlE➢. M9EBpITIff
TEIICMVA RMP UPNE.
0
Hydraulic Prorll•
t w.ma w
—� ENVSItY PmFNNmOW y D Dl V
ImtA OM1M�C�.
3SECTOR ,
i
I
I I _ _
xrm NID W fW
♦llrClbbrl.
�b
:,,ke CAROM: -+Va
47
t
�4tttltaltil

UNITOSFITTINGS
uGT9N
FRllp
mwoPeuow
_ 9
IPMRVM.VB
e
1 rmwa
e
1PMy'91pN
a
iartmo Ra
a
iPuweuow
1PLIEp(VKVE
e
�Nu aFnum�
e
4N M
w
rePwevcw
n
rwwFuor
v
rwaeaow
t]
]'9Aee'QBCM
N
W]e Mlgr101te
is
r]rNBa®1
Is
rMK=VXV
n
ramAeea�
n
no]]FFdIW314a
H
PMRVKVE
y
PwlPE11PM
]1
ra'flFMrlA
a
rwT mw
x
w m
PlBnna INDFP WNMN.p1FiE _• _-_
: _ WITH I,egO LF. NEW E �Sa.
)08GTp141im
i
,
"'a ��+ nw ..a aw wa as a.a m.a ar aw aw ao a.a as as a•a
AS-BUILT
DRAWING
Unit 5 -ASH SLUICE PUMP AND PIPE SYSTEM
FROM PUMP TO ASH POND
PROGRESSENERGY
CAPE FEAR PLANT, MONCURE, NC
omA w.]nn
itMACTEC
aaiiuve�a`iwaru`�`e�m�anr
DATE imm
acne raexoax
Re�EO�'r
]orNa
S]860iQ50a
mnvmq
P

F
�nn
f
R
1
r
o
.�
fb
s
!�
1644
(�
r
lb
s
0
1..
h
�
�
s
?
a
,
14
O
-h-
N
A
n
0
0
H
"
T

Hoban, Autumn
From: Herzberg, Barry
Sent: Tuesday, August 25, 2009 9:16 AM
To: Webb, Vicki; Hoban, Autumn
Subject: FW: Cape Fear Plant ATC003433A01 48-hour notification
FYI
From: Bryson, Robin R.(mailto:robin. [e-mail]
Sent: Tuesday, August 25, 2009 9:12 AM
To: Herzberg, Barry
Cc: Barr, Leigh
Subject: Cape Fear Plant ATC003433AOI 48-hour notification
The second of the two pumps being replaced as part of the ash sluice pumps and pipeline work authorized under
ATC003433A01 at the Cape Fear Plant is expected to be operational on Friday, August 28, 2009. In accordance with the
ATC requirement, please accept this email as our 48-hour notification for this portion of the work. We understand that
a 48-hour notification will be required for each phase that is completed and put into operation (i.e., the installation of
the piping is next).
Robin R. Bryson
Progress Energy Carolinas, Inc.
Environmental, Health and Safety Services
Bell [phone]
Vnet 8-770-3962

1.2 Project Background
The Cape Fear Plant has five basins (ash ponds) that have received or currently receive coal
combustion waste (CCW). The location of the ash ponds are shown in Figures 2A and 2B and
are identified by the year during which they were substantially completed: 1956, 1963, 1970,
1978, and 1985. Two of these basins, the 1963 Ash Pond and the 1970 Ash Pond are often
considered as one structure because the 1970 Ash Pond was constructed as an extension of the
1963 Ash Pond as discussed later in this document. As a result, there may be question as to how
the combined present 1963/1970 Ash Ponds are regulated with respect to North Carolina Dam
Safety Act of 1967. At a minimum, CHA understands that the 1970 portion is subject to this
regulation. The 1978 and 1985 Ash Ponds are currently permitted to receive sluiced CCW with
the 1985ASh Pond actively receiving CCW. None of the impoundments are listed on the
National Inventory of Dams (NID) database or the North Carolina Dam Inventory. In the State
of North Carolina, because of the association with electric power generation, the North Carolina
Utilities Commission (NCUC) has regulatory jurisdiction over the permitted impoundments and
the 1970 Ash Pond. As a consequence, the hazard classification given the impoundments in the
past has been based on United State Corps of Engineers' criteria. The permitted ash ponds have
been given a "significant" hazard rating based on property damage but not loss of life, while the
older 1970 Ash Pond has been given a `low" rating based on lower potential property damage
and no loss of life by Mactec Engineering and Consulting, Inc.
1.2.1 State Issued Permits
Progress Energy has received the following state issued permits for the 1978 and 1985 Ash
Ponds:
,AIWJW-Ash Pond - North Carolina State Permit No. NC0003433' has been issued to
Progress authorizing discharge under the USEPA National Pollutant Discharge
Elimination System (NPDES) to the Cape Fear River in accordance with effluent
a A — -2- Draft Report
Assessment of Dam Safety of
Coal Combustion Surface Impoundments
Progress Energy Carolinas
Cape Fear Plant
Moncure, North Carolina

limitations, monitoring requirements and other conditions set forth in the permit. The
permit became effective on August 11, 2006 and will expire on July 31, 2011. (Note this
permit also covers the 1978 Ash Pond and other surface runoff locations not containing
coal combustion waste controlled by Progress Energy on the site).
1978 Ash Pond - North Carolina State Permit No. NC0003433 has been issued to
Progress authorizing discharge under the USEPA National Pollutant Discharge
Elimination System (NPDES) to the Cape Fear River in accordance with effluent
limitations, monitoring requirements and other conditions set forth in the permit. The
permit became effective on August 11, 2006 and will expire on July 31, 2011. (Note this
permit also covers the 1985 Ash Pond and other surface runoff locations not containing
coal combustion waste controlled by Progress Energy on the site).
1.3 Site Description and Location
The Cape Fear Plant is a 400 Megawatt facility located in a generally forested, rural area
adjacent to the confluence of the Haw and Deep Rivers in southern Chatham County, North
Carolina. It was constructed in 1923. During the early stages of its existence, a system of
levees, flood walls, and flood gates was constructed around the plant as protection against high
river levels, problem since controlled with the construction of B. Everett Jordan Dam on the Haw
River. Since the mid to late 1950's, five CCW disposal basins (ash ponds) have been
constructed and have operated for a period of time accepting liquid home waste ash material.
They are in varying states of activity and vegetative overgrowth as summarized in Sections 1.3.1
to 1.3.5.
A map of the region indicating the location of the Cape Fear Plant and identifying schools,
hospitals, or other critical infrastructure located within approximately five miles down gradient
of the primary and secondary ash ponds is provided as Figure 4.
a-K- -3- Draft Report
Assessment of Dam Safety of
Coal Combustion Surface Impoundments
Progress Energy Carolinas
Cape Fear Plant
Moncure, North Carolina

1.3.1 1985 Ash Pond
The 1985 Ash Pond is the second of the two permitted CCW impoundments at the Cape Fear
Plant and is located south of CP&L drive between a railway service spur and SR 1916 (Corinth
Road), roughly 500 feet northeast of the 1978 Ash Pond. It has a surface area of approximately
65 acres and an approximate capacity of 1,764 acre-feet. Figure 3A shows a typical cross section
of a 1985 Ash Pond dike. Currently the ash pond impounds roughly 1,188 acre-feet of waste
material and water and actively receives sluiced CCW. In 2007, Progress Energy decided to
construct an interior ash pond on top of the sedimented CCW in a "Pond within a Pond" concept
to increase the overall pond capacity.
Available documents indicate that the 1985 Ash Pond is a stand-alone diked structure with a
maximum height of 28 feet. It was designed with 2:1 slopes on the dikes however, during
construction, excess unsuitable soil material was wasted on the northern and eastern slopes.
Based on historical information, this effectively reduced the slopes in these areas to
approximately 3:1 or flatter. Design information on the "Pond within a Pond" concept was not
available at the time this report is written, but engineering inspection reports suggest that the
interior pond dikes are on the order of about 10 feet high.
1.3.2 1978 Ash Pond
The 1978 Ash Pond is one of the two permitted CCW impoundments on the Cape Fear facility.
It is located south of the existing generation facility between the inactive 1963/1970 Ash Ponds
and the effluent discharge canal. Figure 3B shows a typical cross section of a 1978 Ash Pond
dike. Available documentation indicates that the ash pond has a surface area of approximately
43 acres and currently impounds roughly 864 acre-feet of its estimated 1,161 acre-foot capacity.
Based on a fairly recent aerial photo, it appears that roughly one-half to two-thirds of the pond
area is vegetated with grass and light to moderate tree growth. The pond currently does not
receive any CCW and serves as a receptacle for the storm water, coal pile run off, and low -
volume categorical waste water the plant generates.
-4- Draft Report
Assessment of Dam Safety of
Coal Combustion Surface Impoundments
Progress Energy Carolinas
Cape Fear Plant
Moncure, North Carolina

Historical design information and facility operation documents indicate that the 1978 Ash Pond
has a maximum dike height of 27 feet and was constructed with 2:1 slopes. It shares a common
dike with the 1963/1970 Ash Ponds and incorporates part of the steam plant's pre-existing flood
control levee system in its design. A height increase of approximately 11 feet in these older
structures was required to accommodate the final operating elevation at 197 feet and
discontinued any overflow into the older pond structure that had been taken out of service.
1.3.3 1963/1970 Ash Pond
The 1963/1970 Ash Pond is located south of the steam generation facilities and constructed so
that the west dike walls are essentially parallel to the Cape Fear River. Its configuration was
developed by extending the west and east dikes of the 1963 Ash Pond, constructing the southern
dike at the current location, and breaching the south dike of the 1963 Ash Pond to allow sluiced
CCW flow to fill the added pond area. The ash pond dikes range in height from 22 feet in the
original 1963 section to about 27 feet in the 1970 section. Figure 3B shows a typical cross
section of a 1970 Ash Pond dike. These dikes, particularly those along the Cape Fear River, are
generally heavily vegetated with trees and brush cover on the upstream and downstream slopes.
Available documentation Progress Energy provided indicates that the 1963/1970 Ash Ponds have
a surface area of approximately 50 acres, most of which is forested with trees in a similar fashion
to the dikes. Presently there is roughly 2 acres of open standing water that collects in a low area
at the southern extremity of the pond. This water is generally storm water runoff from the
present pond area and generally maintains a surface elevation approximately 7 to 10 feet below
the southern dike crests. According to previous engineering reports, this ability to pond water
and the likelihood of CCW in the pond bottom being exposed and transported via erosion or a
dike failure is the basis for continued NCUC regulatory jurisdiction as a utility impoundment.
1.3.4 1956 Ash Pond
The 1956 Ash Pond is the oldest of the Cape Fear Plant's liquid bome CCW impoundments and
was in service impounding sluiced CCW until 1963. It is located to the north of the power
U-Ll%r- -5- Draft Report
Assessment of Dam Safety of
Coal Combustion Surface Impoundments
Progress Energy Carolinas
Cape Fear Plant
Moncure, North Carolina

generation structures adjacent to the Haw River, and was constructed so that the southeast wall
of the pond was a portion of the plant's flood control levee system. Its dike walls are on the
order of about 20 feet tall from toe to crest and appear to have been constructed with fairly steep
exterior slopes from 1.5:1 to approximately 1:1 (horizontal to vertical). At the time it was in
operation, the CCW sluiced into the pond was primarily bottom ash and boiler slag because the
technology to capture the lighter fly ash and fume materials did not exist. No documents were
available detailing the basis of design or construction specifications. At present, the pond no
longer impounds water and is overgrown with trees and heavy vegetation.
1.3.5 Other Impoundments
There are no other impoundments at the Cape Fear Plant.
1.4 Previously Identified Safety Issues
There have not been any documented unpermitted releases of CCW at the Cape Fear Plant
facility associated with dike failures. There have been, however, some seepage, slope stability,
and erosion issues in the past. These are identified in the following sections.
1.4.1 1985 Ash Pond
The 1985 Ash Pond exhibited longitudinal cracking along the crest centerline in the north dike
shortly after the pond was constructed but prior to being put into service. As much as a 2-inch
vertical displacement between the center and outside of the dike was observed. Concurrently,
numerous holes and subterranean tunnels were observed adjacent to the top of the slope in areas
where unsuitable soil was wasted during construction. The centerline cracking was attributed to
foundation soil consolidation beneath the embankment. A compacted clay cap above the cracks
and an impervious roadway surface was the recommended and implemented repair. Erosion due
rainwater infiltration was deemed to be the cause of the holes in the slope surface.
a -Mr— -6- Draft Report
Assessment of Dam Safety of
Coal Combustion Surface Impoundments
Progress Energy Carolinas
Cape Fear Plant
Moncure, North Carolina

Longitudinal cracking along with slope surface erosion was also noted on the west and southwest
dikes in 1990. The slope surface erosion and instability continues to be present. These areas
have been repaired intermittently with compacted gravel. An independent slope stability study
indicated that the factor of safety (about 1.35) is lower than typical design requirements (1.5)
possibly giving rise to the continued distress in this area
Ground cover loss, erosion, and excessive moisture has been observed along the west dike toe,
adjacent to the railroad spur. According to Progress Energy's engineering consultant, the wet
area is typically intermittent and associated with an old drainage swale that traversed that area of
the dike, and caused some difficulty during construction. The consultant does not deem it to be a
threat to embankment stability. The ground cover loss and erosion has been attributed to
ineffective drainage in this area that causes water to back up prior to going beneath the double
culverts under the railway spur. This is considered a maintenance issue and also not a threat to
embankment stability.
1.4.2 1978 Ash Pond
The 1978 Ash Pond has had an issue with shallow groundwater at the north dike toe in the area
of the plant cooling towers. According to available documentation, this area was originally
observed during pond construction as the subgrade was being stripped for the dike fill and noted
after the pond was completed since 1986. In 1990, plant personnel installed a trench drain in this
location to capture groundwater and convey it to a point beyond the dike toe adjacent to the
cooling towers. Details regarding this construction are not available but a historical site
observation of the open trench suggests that it is approximately 15 feet beyond the dike toe and 5
feet deep, excavated in what appeared to be alluvium. A 6-inch diameter pipe functions as the
trench drain outlet. Periodic inspections have noted clear seepage from the pipe since it was
installed and the facility's independent engineering consultant is of the opinion that the seepage
does not pose a stability problem for the dike.
a-w- -7- Draft Report
Assessment of Dam Safety of
Coal Combustion Surface Impoundments
Progress Energy Carolinas
Cape Fear Plant
Moncure, North Carolina

The discharge canal adjacent to the toe of the ash pond had a large tree fall and rupture the soil in
late 2006 — early 2007. This required placing a geotextile with rip -rap annoring in the area of
the fall to stabilize the bank and protect against continued erosion. Though the dike toe is very
close to discharge canal in this area, the tree fall and resulting soil rupture was not believed to be
a detriment to the dike stability. Other large trees adjacent to the canal in this area were
subsequently removed as a precautionary measure.
Beaching erosion along the upstream face of the dikes in the open pond areas has been cited in
previous field inspection reports. In some cases this erosion appears to have been linked to
rodent burrowing activities. Typically the recommendation has been to repair these areas with
compacted granular material or rip -rap.
1.4.3 1963/1970 Ash Pond
In 1982, a slope failure occurred on the north end of the west dike in the 1963/1970 ash pond
adaject to the Cape Fear River. According Progress Energy's engineering consultant
(MACTEC), at that time it was proposed to repair the failure with a rip -rap berm placed at the
dike toe on the banks of the river channel. As the repair was being implemented, construction
activity initiated additional instability and deformation (possibly localized vibratory induced
liquefaction) and the work was halted with only a portion of the proposed rip -rap being placed at
the river's edge and base of the dike. An independent engineering review and analysis of the
failure was completed after the partial repair construction was halted and concluded that the dike
was acceptable because the pond had been inactive since 1970 and the dike was impounding
mostly sedimented ash.
1.5 Site Geology
Based on a review of available surficial and bedrock geology maps, and reports by others, the
site is of the Upper Triassic age. Chemical weathering of the sedimentary rock (sandstones,
a-w- -8- Draft Report
Assessment of Dam Safety of
Coal Combustion Surface Impoundments
Progress Energy Carolinas
Cape Fear Plant
Moncure, North Carolina

I"
QV J0JED srgr�S
U. S. Environmental Prot (�tiionnAAgencyorej
jb or
i; o
v
f � • J 1 FHr4( PNOAW
j C al Combustion Waste (CCW)
/ Impoundment Inspection
Impoundment NPDES Permit # NC0003433 INSPECTOR Adnams/Hargraves
Date June 16, 2009
Impoundment Name 1963 Ash Pond
Impoundment Company CP&L d/b/a I
EPA Region 4
State Agency (Field Office) Addresss
NC Dept. of Environment and Natural Resources
401 Oberlin Road, Suite 150; Raleigh, NC 27699-1646
Name of Impoundment 1963 Ash Pond
(Report each impoundment on a separate form under the same Impoundment NPDES
Permit number)
New Update x
Yes No
Is impoundment currently under construction? x
Is water or ccw currently being pumped into
the impoundment? x
IMPOUNDMENT FUNCTION• Fly Ash, Bottom Ash, Boiler Slag, low volume wastewater
Nearest Downstream Town: Name LiIlington, North Carolina
Distance from the impoundment 20+ miles
Impoundment
Location: Longitude 79 Degrees 3 Minutes 0.54 Seconds
Latitude 35 Degrees 35 Minutes 16.86 Seconds
State NC County Chatham
Does a state agency regulate this impoundment? YES x NO
If So Which State Agency? North Carolina Utilities Commission (part of 1970 pond)
EPA Form XXXX-XXX, Jan 09
1

HAZARD POTENTIAL (In the event the impoundment should fail, the
following would occur):
LESS THAN LOW HAZARD POTENTIAL: Failure or misoperation of
the dam results in no probable loss of human life or economic or environmental
losses.
LOW HAZARD POTENTIAL: Dams assigned the low hazard potential
classification are those where failure or misoperation results in no probable loss of
human life and low economic and/or environmental losses. Losses are principally
limited to the owner's property.
X SIGNIFICANT HAZARD POTENTIAL: Dams assigned the significant
hazard potential classification are those dams where failure or misoperation results
in no probable loss of human life but can cause economic loss, environmental
damage, disruption of lifeline facilities, or can impact other concerns. Significant
hazard potential classification dams are often located in predominantly rural or
agricultural areas but could be located in areas with population and significant
infrastructure.
HIGH HAZARD POTENTIAL: Dams assigned the high hazard
potential classification are those where failure or misoperation will probably cause
loss of human life.
DESCRIBE REASONING FOR HAZARD RATING CHOSEN:
An uncontrolled release of CCW from this impoundment could possibly impact the Cape
Fear River. Environmental impacts to the river and aquatic life is probable if any CCW
would escape and reach the river. Any impact is likely to be low due to the completely
vegetated and forested condition of the basin, and would have to occur as a result of an
erosion of the dike and now dry CCW material, then transport via storm water runoff.
EPA Form XXXX-XIM Jan 09

Has there ever been a failure at this site? YES x NO
If So When? 1982
If So Please Describe :
A slo ccurred on the north end of the west dike adaject to the Cape FeaLRiyxb.No
coa col mbustion waste was released. At the time the failure was to be repaired with a rip -rap at
the toe of the failure on the banks of the river channel. As the repair was being implemented,
construction activity initiated additional instability (possibly localized vibratory induced
liquefaction) and the work was halted with only a portion of the proposed rip -rap being placed
at the river's edge and base of the dike. An independent engineering review and analysis of the
failure was completed after the repair construction was halted and concluded that the dike was
acceptable because the basin had been inactive since 1970 and the dike was impounding mostly
sedimented ash. The scarp, slough, and toe bulge features of this failure area is currently visible
but is weathered and overgrown with vegetation. Evidence of recent movement is not readily
observable.
EPA Form XXXX-XXX, Jan 09

used: Np /t,p
��
68
6111 \
Toe of 1970 Ash Pond east dike, south end looking north,Road is at toe of dike.
Example of tree coverage on 1978 pond east dike.
PROGRESS ENERGY CAROLINAS
CAPE FEAR PLANT
1978 ASH POND
MONCURE, NC
11 \ Ao.: 20085.3000.1510 1 June 15"' & 16"', 2009

1970 Ash Pond east dike downstream slope. Note photographer is standing
at the toe of the dike and the person in the photograph is standing at the crest.
1970 Ash Pond east dike toe looking south. Note road runs along toe of dike in this area.
C PROGRESS ENERGY CAROLINAS
CAPE FEAR PLANT
1963/1970 BOTTOM ASH POND
MONCURE, NC
CHA Project No.: 20085.3000.1510 June 15" & 16'", 2009

71
Upstream slope of 1970 Ash Pond east dike looking north.
Southern portion of 1970 Ash Pond contains water. Looking west from east dike.
C PROGRESS ENERGY CAROLINAS
CAPE FEAR PLANT
1963/1970 BOTTOM ASH POND
MONCURE, NC
CHA Project No.: 20085.3000.1510 June 15'b & 16t°, 2009

L.
v-`..,1
Upstream slope of south dike at 1970 Ash Pond looking southwest from east dike.
1970 Ash Pond south dike downstream slope looking east.
CIHVVPROGRESS ENERGY CAROLINAS
CAPE FEAR PLANT
1963/1970 BOTTOM ASH POND
MONCURE,NC
CHA Project No.: 20085.3000.1510 June 15"' & 16s, 2009

'0
1970 Ash Pond looking north across the pond from the south dike.
•
1�
� ,
- Z ,.
.•
.A 'y •a
- _
-:
'', ate!
,>;, �� may. h ' _
R. '. � 1 -e
w
•
1970 Ash Pond downstream slope near southwest comer.
M
PROGRESS ENERGY CAROLINAS
CAPE FEAR PLANT
1963/1970 BOTTOM ASH POND
MONCURE, NC
ICHA Project No.: 20085.3000.1510 I June L5°i & 16`s, 2009 lProject No.: 20085.3000.1510 I June 15°i & 16`s, 2009

1970 Ash pond outlet control structure. Note: water level in
south end of pond was several feet lower than outlet during our visit.
Close up of 1970 Ash Pond outlet control structure.
C PROGRESS ENERGY CAROLINAS
CAPE FEAR PLANT
1963/1970 BOTTOM ASH POND
MONCURE, NC
CHA Project No.: 20085.3000.1510 June 15' & 16`s, 2009

IN
79
80
Downstream end of 1970 Ash Pond outlet.
>• '. j�4�rr'' hy�'i. A' fL
4
1970 Ash Pond downstream slope near outlet structure..
C PROGRESS ENERGY CAROLINAS
CAPE FEAR PLANT
1963/1970 BOTTOM ASH POND
MONCURE, NC
CHA Project No.: 20085.3000.1510 June 15th & 16`s, 2009

S
N I
4�t�M
t 1
Typical condition of 1970 Ash Pond west dike downstream slope. (looking north)
Erosion feature along 1970 Ash Pond west dike toe. Work
glove placed below 4' probing rod supported at edge of featurefor scale purposes.
C
PROGRESS ENERGY CAROLINAS 4- CAPE FEAR PLANT
1963/1970 BOTTOM ASH POND
MONCURE, NC
CHA Project No.: 20085.3000.1510 June 15°i & 16`h, 2009

FAN

M
Downstream slope of 1963 Ash Pond west dike. fat. ;ub,irbain p),i I,t aT, : e;r for .;,le.
mcepcned condition, on lvh: ,Ash Pond dihr on; sundce erosion and sloughing.
C PROGRESS ENERGY CAROLINAS
CAPE FEAR PLANT
1963/1970 BOTTOM ASH POND
MONCURE, NC
CHA Project No.: 20085.3000.1510 June 15`b & 16ih, 2009

T]
Steepened conditions on 1963 Ash Pond west dike from surface erosion and sloughing.
4
Y
Jf � t �1ti•.w � "„'v � � 1 i_ ��
Steepened conditions on 1963 Ash Pond west dike from surface erosion and sloughing from th(artially repaired1982 slide)
C PROGRESS ENERGY CAROLINAS
CAPE FEAR PLANT
1963/1970 BOTTOM ASH POND
MONCURE, NC
CRA Project No.: 20085.3000.1510 June 15`s & 16t6, 2009

\9
90
adjacent to the 1982 slide area. Water in background is the Cape Fear River.
North end of 1963 Ash Pond west dike looking northeast. Water is Cape Fear River.
C PROGRESS ENERGY CAROLINAS
CAPE FEAR PLANT
1963/1970 BOTTOM ASH POND
MONCURE, NC
CHA Project No.: 20085.3000.1510 June 15" & 16ie, 2009

O1
North end of 1963 Ash Pond.
PROGRESS ENERGY CAROLINAS
CAPE FEAR PLANT
1963/1970 BOTTOM ASH POND
MONCURE, NC
CHA Project No.: 20085.3000.1510 1 June 15m & 16", 2009 1

ON
9z
c tafu
Flood control dike which contained the south side of the 1956 Ash Pond, looking northeast.
Flood control dike which contained the south side of the 1956 Ash Pond, looking southwest.
PROGRESS ENERGY CAROLINAS
CAPE FEAR PLANT
1956 BOTTOM ASH POND
MONCURE, NC
CHA Project No.: 20085.3000.1510 1 June 15- & 16m, 2009 1

�)4
t V30 Asn t'Ono trOm me South Ui Ke, IOOKing north.
Note: This pond does not contain free water and is over grown with trees.
M
l'
Remains of outlet structure at southwest comer of 1956 Ash Pond.
C PROGRESS ENERGY CAROLINAS
CAPE FEAR PLANT
1956 BOTTOM ASH POND
MONCURE,NC
CHA Project No.: 20085.3000.1510 June 15' & 16t°, 2009

')6
Former outlet pipe from 1956 .Ash Pond. Pond no longer contains fee water.
Downstream slope of the west Dike, looking north.
C PROGRESS ENERGY CAROLINAS
CAPE FEAR PLANT
1956 BOTTOM ASH POND
MONCURE,NC
CHA Project No.: 20085.3000.1510 June 15th & 16d, 2009

9 7;
• l
Typical of frequent areas of erosion on the downstream slopes of the 1956 Ash Pond Dikes.
i
Same location as the previous photo with a person for scale.
C PROGRESS ENERGY CAROLINAS
CAPE FEAR PLANT
1956 BOTTOM ASH POND
MONCURE, NC
CHA Project No.: 20085.3000.1510 June 15`a & 16`s, 2009

V
IS
�df �
mod J(e 0f
l Rs(o Ask Prr�
Typical size of fallen trees on the 1956 Ash Pond Dike slopes.
Uprooted tree on the 1956 Ash Pond Dike,?
(e, A >6
e o
05
k r 9
�
Al bj
64, o A (5�
C444PROGRESS ENERGY CAROLINAS
CAPE FEAR PLANT
1956 BOTTOM ASH POND
MONCURE, NC
CHA Project No.: 20085.3000.1510 June 15' & 16i6, 2009

101
lug
n m-
I op of probable stormwater outlet pipe on the 1956 Ash Pond Dike.
.<
mzm
Tcpic.I ,iope ,,o.ighing and cto�ion oi: the 1956 Ash Pond Dikes
C PROGRESS ENERGY CAROLINAS
CAPE FEAR PLANT
1956 BOTTOM ASH POND
MONCURE, NC
CHA Project No.: 20085.3000.1510 June 15th & 16ih, 2009

104
Crest of the 1956 Ash Pond Dike.
Note: Some areas the ash surface inside the pond was approximately equal to the top of thr 1F.kc.
Typical forest cover on the 1956 Ash Pond.
C PROGRESS ENERGY CAROLINAS
CAPE FEAR PLANT
1956 BOTTOM ASH POND
MONCURE,NC
CRA Project No.: 20085.3000.1510 June 15t° & 16'b, 2009

106
... ........
Exposed ash at the ground surface within the 1956 Ash Pond.
0
g5
C PROGRESS ENERGY CAROLINAS
CAPE FEAR PLANT
1956 BOTTOM ASH POND
MONCURE, NC
CHA Project No.: 20085.3000.1510 June 150'& 16i°, 2009

Coi�,+"�e
41
42
0
North end of 1978 Ash Pond Dike, downstream slope is covered with large brush.
North end of 1978 Ash Pond Dike crest. Brush and small Pine trees are in the left of the photo and are
on the downstream slope. Tall Pine trees on the right of the photo are in deposited ash within the pond.
C PROGRESS ENERGY CAROLINAS
CAPE FEAR PLANT
1978 ASH POND
MONCURE, NC
CHA Project No.: 20085.3000.151, June 150 & le, 2009 1

4"
Apparent trench/field drain outlet at north dike toe on 1978 pond adjacent to cooling towerg*
44
Example of poor vegetative cover, erosion, and probable human activity on the downstream slope of the 1978 Ash Pond Dike.
C PROGRESS ENERGY CAROLINAS
CAPE FEAR PLANT
1978 ASH POND
NIONCURE, NC
CHA Project No.: 20085.3000.1510 1 June 15" & 16'°, 2009

1<
46
General vegetation conditions on the north end of the 1978 Ash Pond Dike downstream slope.
Toe of the 1978 Ash Pond Dike at the north corner, looking west.
C—HvvPROGRESS ENERGY CAROLINAS
CAPE FEAR PLANT
1978 ASH POND
MONCURE, NC
CHA Project No.: 20085.3000.1510 June 15"' & 16", 2009 1

1-
.d
Y
TIK
P t 1
-
.�tif_=.. i ...._ �_
Rip Rap till at the toe of the 1978 Ash Pond Dike along the discharge canal.
Erosion/surface sloughing around the tree stump on the 1978 Ash Pond Dike.
I
PROGRESS ENERGY CAROLINAS
CAPE FEAR PLANT
1978 ASH POND
MONCURE, NC
CRA Project No.: 20085.3000.1510 1 June 15`° & 16m, 2009 1

41)
50
Erosion at the toe of the 1978 Ash Pond at discharge canal. Also note the fallen tree.
Crest of the 1978 Ash Pond Dike approaching the east comer of the Dike,
looking south. Note: Taller trees are on the downstream slope in the left
of the photo and shorter brush is on the upstream slope in right of the photo.
Aim
PROGRESS ENERGY CAROLINAS
CAPE FEAR PLANT
1978 ASH POND
MONCURE, NC
CHA Project No.: 20085.3000.1510 1 June 15- & 16 2009 1

1�
:a.
Irregular ground surface on the downstream slope at the east side of the 1978 Ash Pond Dike.
Animal slide (likely beaver or muskrat) on the downstream slope of the 1978 Ash Pond Dike.
C PROGRESS ENERGY CAROLINAS
CAPE FEAR PLANT
1978 ASH POND
MONCURE,NC
CHA Project No.: 20085.3000.1510 1 June 15m & 16m, 2009

�4
Generally wooded conditions along the east side of the 1978 Ash Pond Dike downstream slope.
Slough on the downstream slope, east side of the 1978 Ash Pond Dike.
c PROGRESS ENERGY CAROLINAS
CAPE FEAR PLANT
1978 ASH POND
MONCURE, NC
CHA Project No.: 20085.3000.1510 1 June 150 & 16m, 2009 1

�O
d_ e
y7.
f �
r
fi v
6.." {.
• - al 'l►''1 �s LAW
Discharge end of outlet pipe in the 1978 S,h Pend.
i
Y r, -,
N 11-k V
Discharge end of the outlet pipe in the 1978 Ash Pond. r
001
00
PILL c��u
C�- PROGRESS ENERGY CAROLINAS
CAPE FEAR PLANT
1978 ASH POND
MONCURE,NC
CHA Project No.: 20085.3000.1510 June 15' & 16'", 2009
u

:`
)Lit IC[ structure is 'I')-N ,Ash Pond.
aG��All
t e a
1 .t
Ponded area south of the discharge pipe at the toe of the 1978 Ash Pond Dike.
Reportedly excavated area from former adjacent property owner, who was a brick manufactura:7
C PROGRESS ENERGY CAROLINAS
CAPE FEAR PLANT
1979 ASH POND
MONCURE, NC
CHA Project No.: 20085.3000.1510 June 15' & 16', 2009
0

59
I �
Af�" �►
f/-
Surface erosion southeast of the downstream slope of the 1978 Ash Pond Dike.
00
y
?,L ..:,..
Surface erosion southeast of the downstream slope of the 1978 Ash Pond Dike.
C+A- PROGRESS ENERGY CAROLINAS
CAPE FEAR PLANT
1978 ASH POND
MONCURE, NC
CHA Project No.: 20085.3000.1510 June 15th & 16i6, 2009

fi
ZAR
Downstream slope of the 1978 Ash Pond Dike.
Note: Rows of trees are immediately beyond the toe.
,t i 4
'i `_�4 � Dom..' .•. = 4 i� I_ , I
Downstream slope at the south end of the 1978 Ash Pond Dike is devoid of vegetation.
PROGRESS ENERGY CAROUNAS
CAPE FEAR PLANT
C+W
1978 ASH POND
MONCURE,NC
CHA Project No.: 20085.3000.1510 June 15" & 16'", 2009

M
04
♦_
c%idcncc of jr.imtil burn)vk at the SOL,th e',d o(the I 'Wi Pond Dike.
�1�'Y•'
f.
' Q
i•'
r
Example of erosion around sparse surface vegetation at the south end of the 1978 Pond.
C PROGRESS ENERGY CAROLINAS
CAPE FEAR PLANT
1978 ASH POND
MONCURE, NC
CHA Project No.: 20085.3000.1510 June 15te & 16'", 2009

66
L 3 Q^�
West Dike of 1978 Ash Pond shared with 1963/1970 Ash Ponds. Looking north, ) 4 I
trees on either side are growing in deposited ash within the 1970 (left) and 1978 (right) ponds. tO '
1978 Ash Pond From west dike looking southeast.
PROGRESS ENERGY CAROLINAS
CAPE FEAR PLANT
1978 ASH POND
MONCURE,NC
CHA Project No.: 20085.3000.1510 1 June 15' & 16m, 2009 1

6-
1978 Ash Pond from west dike looking east.
PROGRESS ENERGY CAROLINAS
CAPE FEAR PLANT
1978 ASH POND
MONCURE,NC
CHA Project No.: 20085.3000.1510 1 June 15"' & 160', 2009 1

Northwest end oWWA&Wiam"Wooking southeast.
1985 Ash Pond West Dike toe along the northern Portion of Dike
C� PROGRESS ENERGY CAROLINAS
CAPE FEAR PLANT
1985 ASH POND
MONCURE, NC
CHA Project No.: 20085.3000.1510 June 15' & 16'", 2009

Erosion at the toe of the 1985 Ash Pond West Dike in an area of poor drainage.
1985 Ash Pond West Dike approaching bend, looking southeast.
CmA PROGRESS ENERGY CAROLINAS
CAPE FEAR PLANT
1985 ASH POND
MONCURE, NC
CHA Project No.: 20085.3000.1510 1 June 15m & 16m, 2009 1

h
c
F {.;•
6'
Woody growth along the West Dikeof the 1985 Ash Pond.
J
Double culvert under railroad spur for ditch line along West Dike of 1985 Ash Pond.
G PROGRESS ENERGY CAROLINAS
CAPE FEAR PLANT
1985 ASH POND
MONCURE, NC
CHA Project No.: 20085.3000.1510 June 15' & 16t6, 2009

1l4w6f the 1985 Ash Pond West Dike.
d.
V
t �.Jy t � 2+� • � , � r A
1 a
d r,
Soft soil at the toe of the 1985 Ash Pondgl� Probe pushed into the ground about 2 feet.
o PROGRESS ENERGY CAROLINAS
CAPE FEAR PLANT
1985 ASH POND
MONCURE, NC
CRA Project No.: 20085.3000.1510 1 June 15° & 16", 2009

10
Possible seepage at the toe of the 1985 Ash Pond West Dike.
Stone filled erosion and/or abandoned rodent hole on the t9n Ash Pond West Dike.
Progress Energy reports filling rodent holes and erosion features with gravel.'
G PROGRESS ENERGY CAROLINAS
CAPE FEAR PLANT
1985 ASH POND
MONCURE, NC
CHA Project No.: 20085.3000.1510 June 15t6 & 16*, 2009

12
Sparse and weedy vegetation cover on the 1985 Ash Pond West Dike.
r
il.
'fir
i t� •v�, r
Rodent hole on the 1985 Ash Pond West Dike.
PROGRESS ENERGY CAROLINAS
CAPE FEAR PLANT
1985 ASH POND
MONCURE, NC
CHA Project No.: 20085.3000.1510 1 June 15- & 16-, 2009 1

13
14
Scarp about 3 to 4 feet high near the top of the 1985 Ash Pond West Dike.
.'A� ,, x
G
Culvert under the access road at the toe of the 1985 Ash Punt \t'csi Dike nutlet channel.
C PROGRESS ENERGY CAROLINAS
CAPE FEAR PLANT
1995 ASH POND
MONCURE, NC
CHA Project No.: 20085.3000.1510 June 15� & 160, 2009 1

I�
10
Drainage Swale/channel adjacent to toe of 1985 Ash Pond.
Southeast corner of the 1985 Ash Pond Dike, looking southwest.
C PROGRESS ENERGY CAROLINAS
CAPE FEAR PLANT
1985 ASH POND
MONCURE,NC
CHA Project No.: 200853000.1510 1 June 15' & 16`°, 2009 1

Iti
South Dike of the 1985 Ash Pond, looking northeast.
East Dike of the 1985 Ash Pond, looking south.
C PROGRESS ENERGY CAROLINAS
CAPE FEAR PLANT
1995 ASK POND
MONCURE, NC
CHA Project No.: 20085.3000.1510 June 15'b & 16'b, 2009

iQ
20
East Dike of the 1985 Ash Pond, looking southeast.
Comer at the north and northeast Dike of the 1985 Ash Pond looking east.
c PROGRESS ENERGY CAROLINAS
CAPE FEAR PLANT
1985 ASH POND
MONCURE,NC
CHA Project No.: 20085.3000.1510 1 June 15' & 16m, 2009

North Dike of the 1985 Ash Pond, looking southwest.
Toe of the North Dike of the 1985 Ash Pond, looking northeast.
Note: Bare patch at the toe of the Dike
C PROGRESS ENERGY CAROLINAS
CAPE FEAR PLANT
1985 ASH POND
MONCURE, NC
CHA Project No.: 20085.3000.1510 1 June 15' & 16m, 2009 1

�4
North Dike of the 1985 Ash Pond, looking southwest.
Dike crest at the north comer of the 1985 Ash Pond, near the ash line crossing.
C+W PROGRESS ENERGY CAROLINAS
CAPE FEAR PLANT
1985 ASH POND
MONCURE, NC
CHA Project No.: 20085.3000.1510 I June 15" & 16", 2009 1

'6
North Dike crest of the 1985 Ash Pond, looking northeast.
Note: Ash level is approximately at the crest of the Dike.
West Dike crest of the 1985 Ash Pond, looking southeast. Note: "Pond within a pond" to
the upstream side of the crest. Ash in 1985 Ash Pond approximately at the crest of the dike.
AM
rift =M
PROGRESS ENERGY CAROLINAS
CAPE FEAR PLANT
1985 ASH POND
MONCURE, NC
CHA Project No.: 20085.3000.1510 1 June 15" & 16d, 2009 1

1985 Ash Pond, looking north.
\ote: stacked ash in the "Pond within a pond
South end of west Dike crest at the 1985 Ash Pond, looking southeast.
C PROGRESS ENERGY CAROLINAS
CAPE FEAR PLANT
1985 ASH POND
MONCURE, NC
CHA Project No.: 20085.3000.1510 1 June 15t' & 16", 2009 1

;0
Looking east across the 1985 Ash Pond at the east Dike.
Outlet structure in the 1985 Ash Pond.
C PROGRESS ENERGY CAROLINAS
CAPE FEAR PLANT
1985 ASH POND
MONCURE, NC
CHA Project No.: 20085.3000.1510 June 15"' & 16"', 2009 1

31
South end of the 1985 Ash Pond, looking southeast.
Crest of the east Dike of the 1985 Ash Pond, looking north.
C PROGRESS ENERGY CAROLINAS
CAPE FEAR PLANT
1985 ASH POND
MONCURE, NC
CIIA Project No.: 20085.3000.1510 June 15t6 & 16ih, 2009

Northeast Dike crest of the 1985 Ash Pond, looking west.
Current ash disposal in a "Pond within a pond". Pond was constructed
with earthen dikes placed on top of ash in 1985 Pond, looking northwest.
PROGRESS ENERGY CAROLINAS
CAPE FEAR PLANT
1985 ASH POND
MONCURE, NC
I CHA Project No.: 20085.3000.1510 1 June 15' & 16m,2009 1

Close up of the outlet control structure in "Pond within a pond".
�6
Outlet of"Pond within a Pond" into 1985 Ash Pond, looking southeast. Notice ash stockpiles within the pond.
C PROGRESS ENERGY CAROLINAS
CAPE FEAR PLANT
1985 ASH POND
MONCURE, NC
CHA Project No.: 20085.3000.1510 1 June 150 & 160, 2009 1

Close up of "Pond within a Pond" outlet.
Last Dike of "Pond within a Pond" upstream slope, looking northeast.
cj PROGRESS ENERGY CAROLINAS
-0c_-- CAPE FEAR PLANT
1985 ASH POND
MONCURE,NC
CHA Project No.: 20085.3000.1510 June 15" & 16'", 2009

S
40
North Dike of "Pond within a pond' crest. Notice ash stockpiles within the pond.
Space between "Pond within a pond' north Dike and 1985 Ash Pond northeast Dike, looking northwest.
c PROGRESS ENERGY CAROLINAS
CAPE FEAR PLANT
1985 ASH POND
MONCURE, NC
UHA Project No.: 20085.3000.1510 June 15' & 16t°, 2009

LTIMA
NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Beverly Eaves Perdue Coleen H. Sullins Dee Freeman
Governor Director Secretary
August 18, 2009
luMLVJ[$It7ffl,IIII] uI
To: Mr. Jim Kohler, P.E.
Environmental Engineer LT, U.S. Public Health Service
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Office of Resource Conservation and Recovery
From: Autumn Hoban-Romanski
Raleigh Regional Office, Surface Water Protection Section
Division of Water Quality
Through: Danny Smith
Raleigh Regional Office, Surface Water Protection Section
Division of Water Quality
Subject: Impoundment Inspection Comments
!pe Fear Steam Electric Power Plant
NPDES Wastewater Discharge
Permit No. NC0003433
On June 15, 2009, Autumn Hoban-Romanski of the Raleigh Regional Office Surface Water Protection
Section (SWP) Division of Water Quality (DWQ) participated in the Coal Combustion Waste (CCW)
Surface Impoundment Assessment conducted at the Cape Fear Plant Site. This memorandum is
provided in response to your request for comment on the draft report regarding the subject facility.
Additionally, it is noted that the Raleigh Regional Office of DWQ is scheduled to conduct an annual
NPDES Wastewater Discharge Permit Inspection at the Cape Fear Steam Electric Power Plant on
September 23, 2009. This inspection will be conducted to verify/determine the compliance status of this
facility with the conditions and limitations specified in NPDES Wastewater Permit No. NC0003433
(this permit includes stormwater).
Prior to the June 15, 2009 EPA visit at this facility, the Cape Fear Plant was inspected by DWQ staff on
June 5, 2008 and January 5, 2006. While the facility was reported to be compliant with DWQ-SWP
NPDES permit conditions, the 1985 ash pond was observed full of product/solids with little freeboard
during both inspections. A facility response and attention to this issue was required and noted in (2)
below.
Northa Carolina
Natura!!y
North Carolina Division of Water Quality Raleigh Regional Office Surface Water Protection Phone [phone] Customer service
Internet: w .ncwaterquality.org 1628 Mail service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1628 FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity/Afrirmath a Action Employer— 50% Recycled/10% Post Consumer Paper Page 1 of 3

Cape Fear Impoundment RRO C ients
With respect to the 2006 and 2008 NPDES inspection reports, and the results of the June 15, 2009
impoundment inspection, please see the below listed items:
(1) The impoundment inspection provided an opportunity for DWQ staff to better understand
the NPDES stormwater outfalls at this site. The inspection of the impoundment dike at the
1956 inactive ash impoundment revealed evidence of concentrated stormwater flow to the
Cape Fear River/Haw River, this area is located near confluence of these rivers. This
impoundment is currently forested, densely covered by a trees and woody/shrub understory.
However, storm -event overland flows have been allowed to concentrate and produce gullies
and rills. These areas are eroding through the berm such that both stormwater and possibly
CCW is conveyed to surface waters in response to storm event flows. These outfalls are not
currently permitted, the closest permitted stormwater outfall to this area is SW-1 (to Shaddox
Creek). This area must be addressed by the facility and this issue will be revisited during the
2009 annual NPDES Wastewater Inspection scheduled for September 23, 2009.
(2) The impoundment inspection was also an opportunity to follow up on past observations
noted in NPDES Wastewater Inspections from 2006 and 2008 on the active 1985
impoundment/ash pond. In 2007 work was completed to construct a "pond within a pond"
at the active 1985 impoundment (historically referred to as the East/West Ash Pond). It was
noted that this change would give an additional 4-6 years of storage capacity. However, as
noted above, in the 2008 DWQ NPDES inspection it was reported that this may not be the
case, because the pond was filling up quicker than anticipated. In a written response to the
NPDES inspection Progress Energy Cape Fear facility responded as follows:
(a) the pond will likely fill up between 1 to 2 years, which is dependent on generation
and ash content of coal;
(b) we will be adding a 10 Foot vertical extension to the ash pond that will add between 2
or 4 additional years based on generation and ash content of the coal;
(c) there is currently an effort underway to determine areas where ash can beneficially be
reused (such as industrial parks).
It is evident that the active 1985 impoundment/ash pond is continuing to fill up to capacity
and is cause for concern to the Raleigh Regional Office.
(3) In keeping with the findings of your report, DWQ observed 3 inactive ash ponds that are
located adjacent to Hall River that combines with the Deep River to form the main -stem
Cape Fear River. We also observed 2 permitted ash ponds, one of which is the currently
active ash pond that discharges under the current NPDES Discharge Permit. Accordingly,
the landscape position of this facility includes Triassic Basin Soil System [Soils formed
from sandstone and siltstone parent materials, with typically low infiltration rates, and high
shrink swell potential] as well as floodplain-alluvial soils.
Page 2 of 3

Cape Fear Impoundment RRO C cents
As stated above, this facility is located immediately adjacent to the Cape Fear River. Also, a water
supply watershed - critical area (the location of the City of Sanford surface water supply intake) is
located approximately 3 miles downstream. Another water supply intake for the Town of Lillington is
located approximately 18 miles downstream.
The cover, side slopes and toe of ash ponds varied with respect to vegetation cover. Some areas had
even aged growth of pine/hard woods, with shrub/herbaceous understory, while other areas had thick
layer of Elaeagnus and Blackberry Briers. That said, certain portions of the site and berm walls were
well maintained and stable, with a thick grassy cover. It was clear that large portions of the berms and
side slopes are not maintained such that routine confident/detailed inspection of structural stability can
be readily determined.
If you have any questions or if I can be of further assistance, please do not hesitate to contact me.
Attachments
Cc: Raleigh Regional Office — DWQ SWP and DLQ Files
Page 3 of 3

Hoban, Autumn
From: Hoban, Autumn
Sent: Monday, August 17, 2009 4:03 PM
To: '[e-mail]'
Cc: Werner, Elizabeth, Little, Geof; Holley, John, Smith, Danny; McEvoy, Steve
Subject: Raleigh Reg ionalOfficeSurface W aterP rotection D W QComments_CapeFearl mpoundmentl nspe
ction08-2009
Attachments: image001.gif; image002.gif. CopeFeartmpoundmem"OComments08-2009.PDP
Mr. Kohler:
Attached please find the Raleigh Regional Office, Surface Water Protection Section comments and feedback
requested by August 18, 2009 regardingthe t*3e Fear Steam"Electric, Plant impoundment•Inspection:
Please do not hesitate to contact us, if we can be of further assistance.
Sincerely,
Autumn Hoban-Romanski
A.�/
Environmental Senior Specialist
Division of Water Quality
Surface Water Protection
3800 Barrett Drive
Raleigh, NC 27609
http:/lh2o.enr.state.nc.us/
Office: 919-791-4247
Mobile: [phone]
Please note my e-mail address has changed.
E-Mail: [e-mail]
E-mail correspondence to and from this address may be subject to the North Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to
third parties.

'+� 4 9 i se F4 d➢ Sy 4
S �� y Z •jay �1
' �i ii iY? � EE EE •i - �uBo
Q UM tt cA
ai axa x xxz _
g A33i
�i
< F
ii iii #f3:a i e= ia` :`�' a _
ii €e, i ao eo <i e aR
--t € :i la SPzod
V 3 0 3
V Zi et 3 !
.-yJ� f• '�V 8 d 8 8 '. A i 3 91

Anticipated Dates for CCW Surface Impoundment Assessments:
CHA Companies, Inc.
Site 3 Duke Energy
Buck, NC
June 9-12, 2009
Site 6 Duke Energy
Riverben
June 1-5, 2009
ite 8 Progress Energy C
June 15-17, 2009
Site 10 Georgia Power
Bowen, GA
May 26-27, 2009
Site 13 AEP
General James Gavin, OH
June 1-3, 2009
Dewberry & Davis, LLC
Site 7 Progressive Energy Carolinas Asheville, NC i I i ry 27--28,
ite 9 Progressrve nergy Carolinas Mayo, NC June 3-4, 2009
Site 18 Dynergy Havana, IL May 27, 2009
Site 19 Dynergy Wood River, IL May 28, 2009
GEI Consultants, Inc
Site 20
Arizona Public Service
Four Comers, NM
May 19-21, 2009
Site 21
Tri-State G&I
Escalante, NM
June 2-5, 2009
Site 22
Westar Energy
Jefferson Energy Center, KS
May 19-20, 2009
Site 23
PacifiCorp
Jim Bridges, WY
May 27-29, 2009
Site 24
PPL Montana
Colstrip, MT
June 2-5, 2009
GZA GeoEnvironmental, hic.
Site 2
Duke Energy
Allen Steam, NC
June 11-12, 2009
Site 5
Duke Energy
Marshall Steam, NC
May 27-28, 2009
Site 16
Indiana Kentucky Electric
Clifty Creek, IN
June 10-11, 2009
Paul C. Rizzo, Associates, Inc.
Site 4
Duke Energy
Dan River, NC
May 27-28, 2009
Site 11
Alabama Power
Gorgas, AL
June 2-3, 2009

O'Brien & Gere
Site 12
Site 15
Site 17
Louisville Gas & Electric
AEP
Vectren
Trimble County, KY
Tanners Creek, IN
May 27-29, 2009
June 1-3, 2009
June 2-4, 2009

Air
NC6 R
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Beverly Eaves Perdue Coleen H. Sullins Dee Freeman
Governor Director Secretary
August 18, 2009
Mr. Jim Kohler, P.E.
Environmental Engineer
LT, U.S. Public Health Service
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Office of Resource Conservation and Recovery
Subject: Impoundment Inspection Comments
Cape Fear Steam Electric Power Plant
NPDES Wastewater Discharge
Permit No. NC0003433
Dear Mr. Kohler:
I, Autumn Hoban-Romanski of the Raleigh Regional Office Surface Water Protection Section
participated in the CCW Surface Impoundment Assessment conducted at the Cape Fear Plant
Site on June 15, 2009. The EPA Impoundment Condition Assessment was poor for the Cape
Fear Plant Site. I agree with the poor rating for this facility, based on my knowledge, and my
observations the day of the impoundment inspection.
The Surface Water Protection Section of the Raleigh Regional Office of the North Carolina
Division of Water Quality is scheduled to conduct the annual NPDES Wastewater Discharge
Permit Inspection at the Cape Fear Steam Electric Power Plant on September 23, 2009. This
inspection will be conducted to verify that the facility is operating in compliance with the
conditions and limitations specified in NPDES Wastewater Permit No. NC0003433 (this
permit includes stormwater).
The facility was inspected by Stephanie Brixey on June 5, 2008 and reported compliant with
Division standards for the 2008 NPDES Wastewater Inspection. A summary of the findings
and comments noted during this inspection is available upon your request.
I have the following comments:
(1) The dam inspection provided an opportunity to better understand the NPDES
stormwater outfalls at this site. We observed rills and erosion of the impoundment
dike at the 1956 inactive ash impoundment that revealed evidence of concentrated
stormwater flow to the Cape Fear River. This impoundment is currently covered
by a mature forest of trees and brush. The closest permitted stormwater outfall to
this area is SW-1. This area must be addressed by the facility and will be observed
Page-1

again during the 2009 annual NPDES Wastewater Inspection scheduled for
September 23, 2009.
(2) The impoundment inspection was also an opportunity to follow up past
observations noted in NPDES Wastewater Inspections from 2007 and 2008 on the
active 1985 impoundment/ash pond. In 2007 work was completed to construct a
pond within a pond at the active 1985 impoundment, then referred to as the East
Ash Pond. It was noted that this change would give an additional 4-6 years of
storage capacity, but in the 2008 inspection it was noted that this may not be the
case, because the pond was filling up quicker than anticipated. The facility
responded to the inspection findings as follows: (1) the pond will likely fill up
between 1 to 2 years, which is dependent on generation and ash content of coal; (2)
we will be adding a 10 Foot vertical extension to the ash pond; This will add
between 2 or 4 additional years based on generation and ash content of the coal; (3)
There is currently an effort underway to determine areas where ash can beneficially
be reused (such as industrial parks).
In regards to my observations the day of the impoundment inspection it was
evident that the active 1985 impoundment/ash pond is continuing to fill up to
capacity and is cause for concern to the Raleigh Regional Office and cause for
concern as expressed by the CHA Company Inspectors with a rating of poor.
If you have any questions or if I can be of further assistance, please do not hesitate to contact
me.
Sincerely,
Autumn Hoban-Romanski
Environmental Senior Specialist
Attachments
Cc: Raleigh Regional Office — DWQ S WP and DLQ Files
Page-2

COAL ASH IMPOUNDMENT INSPECTIONS
Location: Progress Energy — Cape Fear Pant
Chatham County
Date: June 15-16, 2009
In response to the ash impoundment failure at the TVA Kingston facility, EPA used an existing contract with
Lockheed -Martin to arrange inspections of coal ash impoundments at power plants having a rating of `Significant' or
worse. Of 11 such sites in EPA Region 4, 8 are located in North Carolina. However, EPA staff noted that the ratings
given the impoundments were by the N.C. Utilities Commission and based on severity IF a failure occurred, and not
whether a failure was eminent.
Solid Waste Section staff accompanied inspectors from Clough Harbour & Associates, LLP, (CHA), Albany, NY,
during their inspection of ash impoundments at Progress Energy Cape Fear Power Plant on the above referenced date.
Below is a summary of the visit.
People present
Progress Energy Subcontractor Ash Dike Inspectors
Bill Forster Malcolm Hargraves—CHA
John Toepfer Katy Adnams — CHA
Robin Bryson
Danny Wimberly
Leigh Barr
Others
Davy Simonson — EPA, Region 4
Autumn Hoban —DWQ, Surface Water
Protection (approved the NPDES permits)
Elizabeth Werner —DWM, Solid Waste k
�Geof Little — DWM, Solid Waste )
The Cape Fear plant ash impoundments have a `Significant' rating based on their proximity to the Cape Fear River.
The EPA ordered the inspections to determine the condition of the active impoundment dikes and whether failure of
the dikes is eminent.
Cape Fear Power Plant has five ash impoundments. Three are closed while two are permitted and only one is actively
receiving slurried ash. The impoundments are designated according to their date of construction: 1956, 1963, 1970,
1978 and 1985 (see attached figure). The '78 and '85 impoundments are permitted with the '85 impoundment being
active. The two permitted ponds are inspected annually with a more detailed inspection every five years.
The '56, '70 and '63 impoundments have established forests on top. The closed and permitted '78 impoundment has
a vigorous growth of cat tails and a significant amount of standing water in the south end due to underutilization of
storage capacity. The active '85 impoundment is constructed as a 'pond within a pond' where the upper portion,
which receives slurried ash from the plant for dewatering, is diked higher than the lower portion, which receives
supernatant water from the upper portion.
The CHA inspectors verbally expressed concerns about the maintenance of all the dike slopes including the active '85
impoundment. They suggested mowing more frequently to remove tree growth, discourage the growth of reedy
vegetation that do not improve erosion control, discourage burrowing animals, and to better detect potential problems.
The southern and eastern slopes of the '85 dike are thick with undesirable brush and significant numbers of small
trees. Of concern is a marshy area at a point in the western toe of the dikes and places in the northern toes that do not
support vegetation. Cape Fear staff scheduled their consultants to view the areas Wednesday, June 17, 2009.
Although not in the mandate, the CHA subcontractors also inspected the closed ash impoundment dikes and found
numerous areas of sloughing and erosion rills particularly adjacent to the plant's process water discharge canal along
the 1978 impoundment dike and along the western edge of the 1963/1970 impoundment dikes adjacent to the Cape
Fear River. Those impoundments are inactive and are not threats to wash out with slurried ash. Those areas are to be
inspected by Progress Energy's consultants as well.
In general, no immediate threat to human health, safety the a viro pnt as noted at the active or
inactive ponds.

0
PROGRESS ENERGY CAPE FEAR POWER PLANT IIDRAWN: _
MONCURE, NC NDFT CHECK:
�"MACTEC
rx�iiarr z

Hoban, Autumn
From: [e-mail]
Sent: Tuesday, August 11, 2009 8:10 AM
To: Little, Geof
Cc: Hoban, Autumn; Mussler, Ed; Werner, Elizabeth; Lorscheider, Ellen; Frost, Larry
Subject: RE: FW: Request for Review: Progress Energy - Cape Fear Plant
Thank you for the comments below. We will forward them to the contractor to improve the
quality of the report. We will let you know if any questions come up. Have a great day -
Jim Kohler, P.E.
Environmental Engineer
LT, U.S. Public Health Service
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Office of Resource Conservation and Recovery
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
*************************************************************
------------>
From:
------------>
>------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------�
I"Little, Geof" <[e-mail]>
>------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------I
----------->
To:
>------------------------------------------------------ 1-----------------------------------
------------------------------------------------�
James Kohler/DC/USEPA/US@EPA
>------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------�
------------>
cc:
------------>
>------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------I
1"Werner, Elizabeth" <[e-mail]>, "Hoban, Autumn"
<[e-mail]>, "Mussler, Ed" <[e-mail]>,
I"Lorscheider, Ellen" <[e-mail]>, "Frost, Larry"
<[e-mail]>
>-------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------I
----->
Date:
----->
i

>------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------I
108/07/2009 03:10 PM
>------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------�
------------>
Subject:
------------>
>---------------------------------------- ----------------------------------
---------------------------------------I
IRE: FW: Request for Review: Progress Energy - Cape Fear Plant
>---------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------I
An impressive amount of information was evaluated and compiled for the report. Neither
Elizabeth nor I have any objections to the conclusions of the report.
Below are items that may or may not need to be corrected, but no item affects the report
outcome.
Please contact us with any questions or comments
including us in your review.
Geof Little
Geoffrey H. Little
Solid Waste Section
NC-DENR Division of Waste Management
401 Oberlin Road, Suite 150
1646 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1646
Tel:
919-508-8498
Fax:
919-733-4810
Email:
[e-mail]
Web:
http://wastenotnc.org/swhome
on behalf of Elizabeth, thanks again for
Email correspondence to and from this sender may be subject to the N.C.
Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties.
General Corrections: NC-DENR (not NC EPD)
Elizabeth Werner (not Warner)
Geof Little (not Jeff)
Report Page 2: Spelling: 1.2 10th Line: 1985 Ash Pond
(1985Ash Pond)
2

Report Page 23: Spelling 3.3.1: First Sentence: Performed
(preformed)
CCW Impoundment Inspection Form for 1985 Ash Pond: The response to
question `Is water or ccw currently being pumped
into the impoundment' is marked `No.' Is this
correct?
Coal Combustion Dam Inspection Checklist Form for 1970 Ash Pond:
Question 6
regarding instrumentation is marked `Yes.' Is this
correct?
Coal Combustion Dam Inspection Checklist Form for 1963 Ash Pond:
Footnote for
17, 18: Misspelled word `Vegated'
regarding instrumentation is marked `Yes.' Is this
correct?
Photograph No. 39: Is the picture of the East interior dike?
(labeled North)
Photograph No. 90: Is the direction northwest? (labeled
northeast)
Photograph No. 97: Spelling: Free (Fee)
3.0 Data Evaluation Page 19/20: Refers to the requirement to safely store or pass as 1/3 of
the Probable Maximum
Precipitation (PMP) [p.19] and 1/2 PMP [p.20]
3.2.3 1963/1970 Ash Ponds Page 21: Refers to the storage requirement as
1/3 and 1/2 PMP
4.8 Hydraulic Analysis Recommendations Page 34: Refers to the storage requirement as 1/3 and
1/2 PMP
3

Hoban, Autumn
From: Little, Geof
Sent: Friday, August 07, 2009 3:10 PM
To: [e-mail]
Cc: Werner, Elizabeth; Hoban, Autumn; Mussler, Ed; Lorscheider, Ellen; Frost, Larry
Subject: RE: FW: Request for Review: Progress Energy - Cape Fear Plant
An impressive amount of information was evaluated and compiled for the report. Neither Elizabeth
nor I have any objections to the conclusions of the report.
Below are items that may or may not need to be corrected, but no item affects the report
outcome.
Please contact us with any questions or comments. On behalf of Elizabeth, thanks again for
including us in your review.
Geof Little
Ve.... ey «r
Solid Waste Section
NC-DENR Division of Waste Management
401 Oberlin Road, Suite 150
1646 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1646
Tel: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]
Web: htto://wastenotnc.orct/swhome
Email correspondence to and from this sender may be subject to the N.C. Public Records law and may be disclosed to third parties.
General Corrections: NC-DENR (not NC EPD)
Elizabeth Werner (not Warner)
Geof Little (not Jeff)
Report Page 2: Spelling: 1.2 101h Line: 1985 Ash Pond (1985Ash Pond)
Report Page 23: Spelling 3.3.1: First Sentence: Performed (preformed)
CCW Impoundment Inspection Form for 1985 Ash Pond: The response to
question 'Is water or ccw currently being pumped
into the impoundment' is marked 'No.' Is this correct?
Coal Combustion Dam Inspection Checklist Form for 1970 Ash Pond: Question 6
regarding instrumentation is marked 'Yes.' Is this correct?
Coal Combustion Dam Inspection Checklist Form for 1963 Ash Pond: Footnote for
17, 18: Misspelled word 'Vegated'
regarding instrumentation is marked 'Yes.' Is this correct?
Photograph No. 39: Is the picture of the East interior dike? (labeled North)
Photograph No. 90: Is the direction northwest? (labeled northeast)
Photograph No. 97: Spelling: Free (Fee)

3.0 Data Evaluation Page 19/20: Refers to the requirement to safely store or pass as 1 /3 of the
Probable Maximum
Precipitation (PMP) [p.19] and 1 /2 PMP [p.20]
3.2.3 1963/1970 Ash Ponds Page 21: Refers to the storage requirement as 1 /3 and 1 /2 PMP
4.8 Hydraulic Analysis Recommendations Page 34: Refers to the storage requirement as 1 /3 and
1 /2 PMP
z

-- ----1�SeC : • f _L_ �itu.e—rgn5e r
Pw.. K4Av I�vG
61+A.d aos I
f I'ilr II�,_I.tS S�i.fr �U /nS�t<� -.
ehsik ok C. k.a k"el _ T
Jt% -i.r Ct last 3rfb oQ c�cfy
,�sK ch
�' •^/5 RGN aro»� S�+. c(u•` —_ 11,2 '�'r..� !inee Om clvsar�
_Ac+ At dorej by ik� pa»d AU/0 -
2� STs.k"S m° 16
Ja
LOW w ,it
aIIJ.-, " C. el.kl a PCo 9_d.� Aral 1 LiL,

I
—-
r -v v r • w e >
41
- ems,----
ly
TO
— — --
sp ivr�r as
5
k�O/ sy�

TI
Yit

Aft

_ ALA
_1 .1 0.
,
-� iam ,�� ,r .
•� -..�
mwl
Lill' lWI� I i !, P/%ll
'.
i�
TOCIT S���1

0
5 L�(R 0'''`• yvl o �,��
PROGRESS ENERGY CAPE FEAR POWER PLANT
MONCURE, NC
OMACTEC
BIT 2
Ml

a
. _ 4

.'
I
3t•
fee
.0
Jt t

0 -7 5'e'e N
ct
kv
nJ
C, ace �`• �.� �-•� �� •: •
Joe
r
oLin
Oct- /L",
q

~AA*"
't� ,3S)
AA wl �v
�'°U r

t7

id
�u
sew-,
009
0

s �rai
r4 Fes. bQ �-�' % n •
r�
1

`� Progress Energy
August 17, 2009
Mr. Ken Pohlig, P. E.
Division of Water Quality
Construction Grants and Loans Section
1633 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1633
Subject: Carolina Power & Light Co. d/b/a Progress Energy Carolinas, Inc.
Cape Fear Steam Electric Plant NPDES Permit NC000343
A to C No. 003433A02
Alum Treatment Delivery System Professional Engineer Certification
File Point: 12520B-1
Dear Mr. Pohlig:
In June 2009, Progress Energy Carolinas, Inc. requested approval to construct an alum treatment
delivery system to discharge into the East Ash Pond at the Cape Fear Steam Electric Plant in
Moncure, North Carolina. On July 16, 2009 Cape Fear Steam Electric Plant received
authorization to construct from your office.
The approval to construct requires that the following two conditions be met prior to operation:
(1) Notify the Raleigh Regional office at least 48-hours in advance of operation. On August 13,
2009, Ms. Autumn Hoban with the Raleigh Regional office was notified by Ms. Robin Bryson
with the advance 48-hour notification.
(2) Upon completion of construction a certification must be received from a professional
engineer certifying the permitted facility. The attached Certification Form fulfills this
requirement.
If there are any questions about this information please contact Ms. Robin Bryson by telephone
at [phone] or by email at [e-mail].
Progress Energy Carolinas, Inc.
Cape Fear Steam Plant
500 CP&L Road
Moncure, NC 27559
`Fa Li
ti
t

Mr. Ken Pohlig, P.E. 2 August 17, 2009
I certify, under penalty of law, that this document and all attachments were prepared under
my direction or supervision in accordance with a system designed to assure that qualified
personnel properly gather and evaluate the information submitted. Based on my inquiry of
the person or persons who manage the system, or those persons directly responsible for
gathering the information, the information submitted is, to the best of my knowledge and
belief, true, accurate, and complete. I am aware that there are significant penalties for
submitting false information, including the possibility of fines and imprisonment for knowing
violations.
/Sincerely,
Hershell McCarty, Plant Manager
Cape Fear Steam Electric Plant
HM/lb
Enclosures
c: Robin Bryson (PEB4)
Leigh Anne Casavant (West FGD)

Progress Energy Carolinas, Inc.
Cape Fear Steam Electric Plant
A To C No. 003433A02
Alum Treatment Delivery System
Issued July 16, 2009
Engineer's Certification
RECEIVED
I. .U.4 1 t4anip ec=qsn a +_, as a duly registered Professional Engineer in
the State of Nord? Carolina, having been authorized to observe (periodically/weekly/full time)
the construction of the modifications and improvements to the Cape Fear Steam Electric Plant,
located on 500 CP&L Road, Moncure in Chatham County for Progress Energy, hereby state that,
to the best of my abilities, due care and diligence was used in the observation of the following
construction:
A 275 gallon Alum chemical storage tank with feed pump and delivery system into the
East ("New") Ash Pond (prior to Internal Outfall 005), in conformity with the project
plans, specifications, and other supporting data subsequently filed and approved by the
Department of Environment and Natural Resources.
I certify that the construction of the above referenced project was observed to be built within
substantial compliance and intent of the approved plans and specifications.
Signature strationNo._ 020SrSr4ct
Datekb il (9 1
Send to: Construction Grants & Loans
DENR/DWQ
1633 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1633
i
'. 3• ^tea rr P .•

Asia •
NCDERR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Beverly Eaves Perdue Coleen H. Sullins Dee Freeman
Governor Director Secretary
July 2, 2009
5101
Mr. Danny Hedgepeth - 9
Progress Energy Carolinas - Cape Fear Steam Electric Plant
500 CP&L Road
Moncure, NC 27559-
Subject: North Carolina Wastewater/Groundwater Laboratory Certification (NC WW/GW LC)
Maintenance Inspection
Dear Mr. Hedgepeth :
Enclosed is a report for the inspection performed on June 16, 2009 by Mr. Jeff Adams. No findings are
cited in this report, a response is not required. We appreciate the fine job you and your staff are doing.
As a certification requirement, your laboratory must continue to carry out the requirements set forth in
15A NCAC 211.0800.
Copies of the checklists completed during the inspection may be requested from this office. Thank you
for your cooperation during the inspection. If you wish to obtain an electronic copy of this reportby
email or if you have questions or need additional Information, please contact us at 919-733-3908.
,--.Sincerely,
Dana S �tterwhite
Certification Unit Supervisor
Laboratory Section
Enclosure
cc: Jeff Adams
Raleigh Regional Office
DENR DwQ Laboratory Section NC Wastewater/Groundwater Laboratory Certification Branch
1623 Mail Service Center, Ralegh, North Carolina 27699-1623
Location: 4405 Reedy Creek Road- Raleigh, North Carolina 27607-6445
Phone: [phone] FAX [phone]
Internet: www.dwglaborg
an Equal Opporunity I Alflrmabv Amon Employ, Customer Service: 1-877-623-6748 "m nmalerqualilyorg
One
NorthCarojina
✓VW 11MI&

r
LABORATORY NAME:
NPDES PERMIT #:
ADDRESS:
CERTIFICATE #:
DATE OF INSPECTION:
TYPE OF INSPECTION:
AUDITOR(S):
LOCAL PERSON(S) CONTACTED:
IV
INTRODUCTION:
On -Site Inspection Report
Progress Energy — Cape Fear Plant
NC0003433
500 CP&L Road
Moncure, NC 27559
5101
June 16, 2009
Field Maintenance
Jeffrey R. Adams
Danny Hedgepeth
This laboratory was inspected to verify its compliance with the requirements of 15A NCAC 2H .0800 for the
analysis of environmental samples.
GENERAL COMMENTS:
The laboratory was neat and equipment appeared well maintained. Records were well maintained and
organized. This laboratory continues to meet or exceed requirements of the certification program.
The laboratory was given copies of the Technical Assistance Documents of all field parameters during the
inspection.
FINDINGS REQUIREMENTS COMMENTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS:
No findings were cited during this inspection.
PAPER TRAIL INVESTIGATION:
The paper trail consisted of comparing field testing records and contract lab reports to Discharge Monitoring
Reports (DMRs) submitted to the North Carolina Division of Water Quality. Data were reviewed for NPDES
permit #NC0003433 for January, March, and May, 2009. No transcription errors were detected. The facility
appears to be doing a good job of accurately transcribing data.
V. CONCLUSIONS:
No findings were noted during this inspection. The inspector would like to thank the staff for its assistance in
the inspection and data review process. No response is required.
Report prepared by: Jeffrey R. Adams
Report reviewed by: Jason Smith Date: June 22, 2009
Date: June 26, 2009

k4�o4 Progress Energy
July 28, 2009
Mr. Ken Pohlig, P. E.
Division of Water Quality
Construction Grants and Loans Section
1633 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1633
Subject: Carolina Power & Light Co. d/b/a Progress Energy Carolinas, Inc.
Cape Fear Steam Electric Plant NPDES Permit NC000343
A to C No. 003433AOI
Ash Sluice Pump Professional Engineer Certification
File Point: 12520B-1
Dear Mr. Pohlig:
In April 2009, Progress Energy Carolinas, Inc. requested approval to replace the ash sluice
pumps servicing Units 5 and 6 and replace a portion of the ash sluice piping from Unit 6 at the
Cape Fear Steam Electric Plant in Moncure, North Carolina. On July 16, 2009 Cape Fear Steam
Electric Plant received authorization to construct from your office.
At this time, the Cape Fear Steam Electric Plant has installed one 2,300 gallon pump for Unit 6.
The approval to construct requires that the following two conditions be met prior to operation:
(1) Notify the Raleigh Regional office at least 48-hours in advance of operation. Mr. Barry
Herzberg was called, with a follow-up email, on Tuesday, July 21, 2009, for the notification of
the scheduled operation date of Friday, July 31, 2009. Please see attached email.
(2) Upon completion of construction a certification must be received from a professional
engineer certifying the permitted facility. The attached Certification Form fulfills this
requirement.
If there are any questions about this information please contact Ms. Robin Bryson by telephone
at [phone] or by email at [e-mail].
t
Progress Energy Carolinas, Inc. t '--)L"
Cape Fear Steam Plant
500 CP&L Road t
Moncure, NC 27559 ,''r

Mr. Ken Pohlig, P.E. 2 July 28, 2009
I certify, under penalty of law, that this document and all attachments were prepared under
my direction or supervision in accordance with a system designed to assure that qualified
personnel properly gather and evaluate the information submitted Based on my inquiry of
the person or persons who manage the system, or those persons directly responsible for
gathering the information, the information submitted is, to the best of my knowledge and
belief, true, accurate, and complete. I am aware that there are significant penalties for
submitting false information, including the possibility of fines and imprisonment for knowing
violations.
Sincerely,
Hershell McCarty, Plant Manager
Cape Fear Steam Electric Plant
HM/lb
Enclosures
c: Robin Bryson
Bob Miller, MACTEC Engineering and Consulting

Barr, Leigh
From: Bryson, Robin R.
Sent: Tuesday, July 21, 2009 3:00 PM
To: '[e-mail]'
Cc: Barr, Leigh
Subject: Cape Fear Plant ATC003433A01 48-hour notification
As discussed via telephone earlier today, one of the pumps scheduled for replacement as part of the ash sluice pumps and pipeline work authorized under
ATC003433A01 at the Cape Fear Plant is expected to be operational next Friday, July 31,2009. In accordance with the ATC requirement, please accept this email
as our 48-hour notification of this portion of the work. We understand that a 48-hour notification will be required for each phase that is completed and put into
operation (i.e., the installation of the second pump and the installation of the piping).
Robin R. Bryson
Progress Energy Carolinas, Inc.
Environmental, Health and Safety Services
Bell [phone]
Vnet 8-770-3962

Progress Energy Carolinas, Inc.
Cape Fear Steam Electric Plant RECEIVED
A To C No. 003433A01
Replacement Ash Sluice Pumps and Pipeline
Issued July 16, 2009 JUL : 2mg
Engineer's CertificatioLOAN SEM
n5I
11 la � / ' L f ill ` le (/ , as a duly registered Professional Engineer in
the State of North Carolina, having been authorized to observe (periodically/weekly/full time)
the construction of the modifications and improvements to the Cape Fear Steam Electric Plant,
located on 500 CP&L Road, Moncure in Chatham County for Progress Energy, hereby state that,
to the best of my abilities, due care and diligence was used in the observation of the following
construction:
Replacement of--'4.gAual4 rs�-^^br sh sluice pumpi servicing-dmff5-vVAW-daal
Unit 6 with cKa,300 gpm pumpt$ (Pumps#A and 6B),
_ •.�.�e'� r „ ---------J
agpunewmees in conformity with the project plans, specifications, and other supporting
data subsequently filed and approved by the Department of Environment and Natural
Resources.
1 certify that the construction of the above referenced project was observed to be built within
substantial compliance and intent of the approved plans and specifications.
Signature 100 '� Registration No.
-4/2P1,5 9
Send to: Construction Grants & Loans
DENR/DWQ
1633 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1633
"rT ltA. tVc
ocaowuaa

NOTES:
1. LOCKOUT, TAG OUT AND DISCONNECT ALL ELECTRICAL
CONNECTIONS TO PUMP.
2. REMOVE EXISTING LONG RADIUS FLANGED ELBOW & VALVES.
3. REMOVE EXISTING MOTORS.
4. UNBOLT AND REMOVE EXISTING PUMPS.
5. FILL PREVIOUS BOLT HOLES WITH GROUT/CONCRETE.
6. INSTALL NEW PUMPS ON PADS IN ACCORDANCE WITH
MANUFACTURER'S RECOMMENDATIONS. NEW PUMPS TO BE
TENCARVA MACHINERY COMPANY MODEL VIT-FFFM WITH
9.625-INCH IMPELLER, 1770 RPM, 4160 VOLT, 400 HP MOTOR, AS
PROVIDED TO CONTRACTOR BY PROGRESS ENERGY.
7. REPLACE PREVIOUSLY REMOVED PIPING AND VALVES.
8. SHORTEN EXISTING SPOOL PIECE AS NECESSARY TO FIT
VALVES.
9. WELD NEW FLANGE ON PIPE. PERFORM NON-DESTRUCTIVE
TESTING OF WELDS ASME B31.
10. REINSTALL VALVES.
11. ELECTRICAL CONNECTIONS TO NEW PUMP SHALL BE FIELD RUN
BY PROGRESS ENERGY PERSONNEL.
10" GATE
I VALVE
AS -BUILT DRAWING
NEW PUMP
& MOTOR
♦♦
FESSIp 9 J/
t 7 47
p
g a�T M.
e0agwseN
CONCRETE —
PEDESTAL
L_ 02W
24"
10" CHECK
VALVE
NEW 10" LONG RADIUS
FLANGED ELBOW
DRAWN: DATE: DRAWING
6B ASH PUMP R.R. JULY 2009
MACTEC CAPE FEAR ASH SLUICE PUMP REPLACEMENT ENG CHECK: SCALE:
MACTEC ENoNEERING AND CONSMnNG. INC. PROGRESS ENERGY N.T.S.
3WI Ai IC AVENUE CAPE FEAR PLANT, MONCURE, NC APPROVAL: JOB No.:
R BGKNGRI CVIOLINA 6468-09.2361.02
REFERENCE:

r
Progress Energy
August 27, 2009
Mr. Ken Pohlig, P. E.
Division of Water Quality
Construction Grants and Loans Section
1633 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1633
Subject: Carolina Power & Light Co. d/b/a Progress Energy Carolinas, Inc.
Cape Fear Steam Electric Plant NPDES Permit NC000343
A to C No. 003433AOI
Ash Sluice Pump Professional Engineer Certification
File Point: 12520B-1
Dear Mr. Pohlig:
41&- 28 k
Mwoumt
In April 2009, Progress Energy Carolinas, Inc. requested approval to replace the ash sluice
pumps servicing Units 5 and 6 and replace a portion of the ash sluice piping from Unit 6 at the
Cape Fear Steam Electric Plant in Moncure, North Carolina. On July 16, 2009 Cape Fear Steam
Electric Plant received authorization to construct from your office.
The Cape Fear Steam Electric Plant has now completed the installation of the second 2,300
gallon pump for Unit 6. The approval to construct requires that the following two conditions be
met prior to operation of the pump:
(1) Notify the Raleigh Regional office at least 48-hours in advance of operation. Mr. Barry
Herzberg was emailed on Tuesday, August 25, 2009, for the notification of the scheduled
operation date of Friday, August 28, 2009. Please see attached email.
(2) Upon completion of construction a certification must be received from a professional
engineer certifying the permitted facility. The attached Certification Form fulfills this
requirement.
If there are any questions about this information please contact Ms. Robin Bryson by telephone
at [phone] or by email at [e-mail].
Progress Energy Welinas, Inc.
Cape Fear Steam Plant
500 CP&L Road
Moncure. NC 27559

00
Mr. Ken Pohlig, P.E. 2 NAugust 27, 2009
1 certify, under penalty of law, that this document and all attachments were prepared under
my direction or supervision in accordance with a system designed to assure that qualified
personnel properly gather and evaluate the information submitted. Based on my inquiry of
the person or persons who manage the system, or those persons directly responsible for
gathering the information, the information submitted is, to the best of my knowledge and
belief, true, accurate, and complete. I am aware that there are significant penalties for
submitting false information, including the possibility of f nes and imprisonment for knowing
violations.
Sincerely, ''//
joa'^" a % �- A7e,� $Xe%1 In cCA,eTr
Hershell McCarty, Plant Manager
Cape Fear Steam Electric Plant
HM/lb
Enclosures
c: Robin Bryson
Bob Miller, MACTEC Engineering and Consulting

Barr, Leigh
From: Bryson, Robin R.
Sent: Tuesday, August 25, 2009 9:12 AM
To: '[e-mail]'
Cc: Barr, Leigh
Subject: Cape Fear Plant ATC003433A01 48-hour notification
The second of the two pumps being replaced as part of the ash sluice pumps and pipeline work authorized under ATC003433A01 at the Cape Fear Plant is
expected to be operational on Friday, August 28, 2009. In accordance with the ATC requirement, please accept this email as our 48-hour notification for this
portion of the work. We understand that a 48-hour notification will be required for each phase that is completed and put into operation (i.e., the installation of
the'pipirtg-is next).
Un4 5 PumPS O(P00
-
Robin R. Bryson
Progress Energy Carolinas, Inc.
Environmental, Health and Safety Services
Bell [phone]
Vnet 8-770-3962

so M
r
Progress Energy Carolinas, Inc.
Cape Fear Steam Electric Plant
A To C No. 003433AOI VIP %' = 2009
Replacement Ash Sluice Pumps and Pipeline
Issued July 16, 2009 ?IBC
1 M
Engineer's Certification
1,
as a duly registered Professional Engineer in
the State of North Carolina, having been authorized to observe (periodically/weeldy{fuil time)
the construction of the modifications and improvements to the Cape Fear Steam Electric Plant,
located on 500 CP&L Road, Moncure in Chatham County for Progress Energy, hereby state that,
to the best of my abilities, due care and diligence was used in the observation of the following
construction: n�
Replacement of oexisttag aatt'ti9 ash sluice pump$ servicing Uff44W itlrtlttat PL
Unit 6 with dag2,300 gpm pumpj'('(Pumps 6A axdw613,
approxim
—1.1PB£ prpe"from-tJ ,
--appurtenaneea, in conformity with the project plans, specifications, and other supporting
data subsequently filed and approved by the Department of Environment and Natural
Resources.
I certify that the construction of the above referenced project was observed to be built within
substantial compliance and intent of the approved plans and specifications.
Signature / Registration No. ` ` / Y 4
Date OA"( ! ,o
Send to: Construction Grants & Loans
DENR/DWQ
1633 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1633
a9099*0"
CAP; ,'%
••anoaa�••

so
7_A�
iI
u
NOTES:
1. LOCKOUT, TAG OUT AND DISCONNECT ALL ELECTRICAL
CONNECTIONS TO PUMP.
2. REMOVE EXISTING LONG RADIUS FLANGED ELBOW & VALVES.
3. REMOVE EXISTING MOTORS.
4. UNBOLT AND REMOVE EXISTING PUMPS.
5. FILL PREVIOUS BOLT HOLES WITH GROUT/CONCRETE.
6. INSTALL NEW PUMPS ON PADS IN ACCORDANCE WITH
MANUFACTURER'S RECOMMENDATIONS. NEW PUMPS TO BE
TENCARVA MACHINERY COMPANY MODEL VIT-FFFM WITH
9.625-INCH IMPELLER, 1770 RPM, 4160 VOLT, 400 HP MOTOR, AS
PROVIDED TO CONTRACTOR BY PROGRESS ENERGY.
7. REPLACE PREVIOUSLY REMOVED PIPING AND VALVES.
8. SHORTEN EXISTING SPOOL PIECE AS NECESSARY TO FIT
VALVES.
9. WELD NEW FLANGE ON PIPE. PERFORM NON-DESTRUCTIVE
TESTING OF WELDS ASME B31.
10. REINSTALL VALVES.
11. ELECTRICAL CONNECTIONS TO NEW PUMP SHALL BE FIELD RUN
BY PROGRESS ENERGY PERSONNEL.
AS -BUILT DRAWING lJ
17147 j
q %
a
CONCRETE
a PEDESTAL
MALT EC
IMVIE1:E3XI AIIANf G�:EW NGGA VEM
R}Llth IIRi.11i�:
I
MLEIGH WiGIIG�LIIN
NFFERENCE:
10' GATE
VALVE
I
NEW PUMP
6 MOTOR
62tr —
ARIL
'V Vw+1R.� Ilrpl
I �:"AN aEC,TI N
10" CHECK
VALVE
—NEW 10' LONG RADIUS
FLANGED ELBOW
DRAWN; DATE: DRAWING
6A ASH PUMP R.R. AUGUST 2W9
CAPE FEAR ASH SLUICE PUMP REPLACEMENT END CHECK SCALE:
PROGRESS ENERGY N.T.S.
- -
CAPE FEAR PLANT, MONCURE, NC APPROVAL: JOB No.:
6468-M-2361.02

ff-jLA
NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Beverly Eaves Perdue
Governor
Coleen H. Sullins
Director
July 16, 2009
Mr. Hershell McCarty, Plant Manager
Progress Energy Carolinas, Inc.
Cape Fear Steam Electric Plant
500 CP&L Road
Moncure, North Carolina 27559
SUBJECT:
Dear Mr. McCarty:
Dee Freeman
Secretary
Authorization to Construct
A to C No. 003433A02
Progress Energy Carolinas, Inc.
Cape Fear Steam Electric Plant
Alum Treatment Delivery System
Chatham County
A letter of request for an Authorization to Construct was received June 11, 2009, by the
Division of Water Quality (Division), and final plans and specifications for the subject project
have been reviewed and found to be satisfactory. Authorization is hereby granted for the
construction of modifications at the existing East ("New") Ash Pond at the Cape Fear Steam
Electric Plant, with discharge of treated wastewater (via Internal Outfall 005 of NPDES Permit
NC0003433) into the combined wastewater Outfall 007, which flows into an unnamed tributary
of the Cape Fear River in the Cape Fear River Basin.
This authorization results in no increase in design or permitted capacity and is awarded
for the construction of the following specific modifications:
A 275 gallon Alum chemical storage tank with feed pump and delivery system into the
East ("New") Ash Pond (prior to Internal Outfall 005), in conformity with the project
plans, specifications, and other supporting data subsequently filed and approved by the
Department of Environment and Natural Resources.
This Authorization to Construct is issued in accordance with Part III, Paragraph A of
NPDES Permit No. NC0003433 issued August 11, 2006, and shall be subject to revocation
unless the wastewater treatment facilities are constructed in accordance with the conditions and
limitations specified in Permit No. NC0003433.
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617 One
512 N. Salisbury St. Raleigh, North Carolina 27604 rf0 Carolina
Phone: 91 M07-63001 FAX: [phone] Customer Service: 1.877-623-6748
Internet:w .ncwaterqualily.org
An Equal Opponurtily 1 Affirmative Action Employer Naturally

Mr. Hershell McCarty, Flant Mb...rer
July 16, 2009
Page 2
The sludge generated from these treatment facilities must be disposed of in accordance
with G.S. 143-215.1 and in a manner approved by the Division.
In the event that the facilities fail to perform satisfactorily, including the creation of
nuisance conditions, the Permittee shall take immediate corrective action, including those as may
be required by the Division, such as the construction of additional or replacement wastewater
treatment or disposal facilities.
The Raleigh Regional Office, telephone number [phone], shall be notified at least
forty-eight (48) hours in advance of operation of the installed facilities so that an on site
inspection can be made. Such notification to the regional supervisor shall be made during the
normal office hours from 8:00 a.m. until 5:00 p.m. on Monday through Friday, excluding State
Holidays.
Upon completion of construction and prior to operation of this permitted facility, a
certification must be received from a professional engineer certifying that the permitted facility
has been installed in accordance with the NPDES Permit, this Authorization to Construct and the
approved plans and specifications. Mail the Certification to: Construction Grants & Loans,
DWQ/DENR, 1633 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1633.
Upon classification of the facility by the Certification Commission, the Permittee shall
employ a certified wastewater treatment plant operator to be in responsible charge (ORC) of the
wastewater treatment facilities. The operator must hold a certificate of the type and grade at
least equivalent to or greater than the classification assigned to the wastewater treatment
facilities by the Certification Commission.
The Permittee must also employ a certified back-up operator of the appropriate type and
grade to comply with the conditions of T15A:8G.0202. The ORC of the facility must visit each
Class I facility at least weekly and each Class II, III and IV facility at least daily, excluding
weekends and holidays, must properly manage the facility, must document daily operation and
maintenance of the facility, and must comply with all other conditions of T15A:8G.0202.
A copy of the approved plans and specifications shall be maintained on file by the
Permittee for the life of the facility.
During the construction of the proposed additions/modifications, the permittee shall
continue to properly maintain and operate the existing wastewater treatment facilities at all times,
and in such a manner, as necessary to comply with the effluent limits specified in the NPDES
Permit.
You are reminded that it is mandatory for the project to be constructed in accordance
with the North Carolina Sedimentation Pollution Control Act, and when applicable, the North

Mr. Hershell McCart. _ ant Manager •
July 16, 2009
Page 3
Carolina Dam Safety Act. In addition, the specifications must clearly state what the contractor's
responsibilities shall be in complying with these Acts.
Prior to entering into any contract(s) for construction, the recipient must have obtained all
applicable permits from the State.
Failure to abide by the requirements contained in this Authorization to Construct may
subject the Permittee to an enforcement action by the Division in accordance with North
Carolina General Statute 143-215.6A to 143-215.6C.
The issuance of this Authorization to Construct does not preclude the Permittee from
complying with any and all statutes, rules, regulations, or ordinances which may be imposed by
other government agencies (local, state, and federal) which have jurisdiction.
One (1) set of approved plans and specifications is being forwarded to you. If you have
any questions or need additional information, please contact Seth Robertson, P.E. at telephone
number [phone].
Sincerely,
rColeen H. Sullins
kp:sr
cc: Leigh Anne Casavant, P.E., Progress Energy, 7001 Pinecrest Road, Raleigh, NC 27612
Chatham County Health Department
DWQ Raleigh Regional Office, Surface Water Protection
DWQ, Technical Assistance and Certification Unit
DWQ, Point Source Branch, NPDES Program
Ken Pohlig, P.E.
ATC File

Progress Energy Carolinas, Inc.
Cape Fear Steam Electric Plant
A To C No. 003433A02
Alum Treatment Delivery System
Issued July 16, 2009
Engineer's Certification
I, , as a duly registered Professional Engineer in
the State of North Carolina, having been authorized to observe (periodically/weekly/full time)
the construction of the modifications and improvements to the Cape Fear Steam Electric Plant,
located on 500 CP&L Road, Moncure in Chatham County for Progress Energy, hereby state that,
to the best of my abilities, due care and diligence was used in the observation of the following
construction:
A 275 gallon Alum chemical storage tank with feed pump and delivery system into the
East ("New") Ash Pond (prior to Internal Outfall 005), in conformity with the project
plans, specifications, and other supporting data subsequently filed and approved by the
Department of Environment and Natural Resources.
I certify that the construction of the above referenced project was observed to be built within
substantial compliance and intent of the approved plans and specifications.
Signature
Registration No
Send to: Construction Grants & Loans
DENR/DWQ
1633 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1633

AjZA
NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Beverly Eaves Perdue
Governor
Division of Water Quality
Coleen H. Sullins Dee Freeman
Mr. Hershell McCarty, Plant Manager
Progress Energy Carolinas, Inc.
Cape Fear Steam Electric Plant
500 CP&L Road
Moncure, North Carolina 27559
Dear Mr. McCarty:
Director
July 16, 2009
SUBJECT:
Secretary
Authorization to Construct
A to C No. 003433AOI
Progress Energy Carolinas, Inc.
Cape Fear Steam Electric Plant
Replacement Ash Sluice Pumps and Pipeline
Chatham County
A letter of request for an Authorization to Construct was received June 11, 2009, by the
Division of Water Quality (Division), and final plans and specifications for the subject project
have been reviewed and found to be satisfactory. Authorization is hereby granted for the
construction of modifications at the existing East ("New") Ash Pond at the Cape Fear Steam
Electric Plant, with discharge of treated wastewater (via Internal Outfall 005 of NPDES Permit
NC0003433) into the combined wastewater Outfall 007, which flows into an unnamed tributary
of the Cape Fear River in the Cape Fear River Basin.
This authorization results in no increase in design or permitted capacity and is awarded
for the construction of the following specific modifications:
Replacement of existing dual 1,150 gpm ash sluice pumps servicing Unit 5 with dual
2,300 gpm pumps (Pumps 5A and 5B), replacement of existing dual 1,150 gpm ash
sluice pumps servicing Unit 6 with dual 2,300 gpm pumps (Pumps 6A and 6B),
replacement of approximately 1,500 linear feet of existing 13-inch pipe with 16-inch
HPDE pipe from Unit 6 to the East ("New") Ash Pond, and associated yard piping and
appurtenances, in conformity with the project plans, specifications, and other supporting
data subsequently filed and approved by the Department of Environment and Natural
Resources.
1617 Mail Service Canter, Raleigh, North Carolina 276WI617 One
Location: 512 N. Salisbury St. Raleigh, North Carolina 27604 OCarolina
Phone:: www.ncwqOOaterqual4.org
\ ual4 919-807-64921 Customer Service: 1-677 623 6748 Naturally
Inlemet: viww.ncwalerquality.org
An Equal Opportunity 1 APimiaSs Action Employer

Mr. Hershell McCarty, Plant Manager
July 16, 2009
Page 2
This Authorization to Construct is issued in accordance with Part III, Paragraph A of
NPDES Permit No. NC0003433 issued August 11, 2006, and shall be subject to revocation
unless the wastewater treatment facilities are constructed in accordance with the conditions and
limitations specified in Permit No. NC0003433.
The sludge generated from these treatment facilities must be disposed of in accordance
with G.S. 143-215.1 and in a manner approved by the Division.
In the event that the facilities fail to perform satisfactorily, including the creation of
nuisance conditions, the Permittee shall take immediate corrective action, including those as may
be required by the Division, such as the construction of additional or replacement wastewater
treatment or disposal facilities.
The Raleigh Regional Office, telephone number [phone], shall be notified at least
forty-eight (48) hours in advance of operation of the installed facilities so that an on site
inspection can be made. Such notification to the regional supervisor shall be made during the
normal office hours from 8:00 a.m. until 5:00 p.m. on Monday through Friday, excluding State
Holidays.
Upon completion of construction and prior to operation of this permitted facility, a
certification must be received from a professional engineer certifying that the permitted facility
has been installed in accordance with the NPDES Permit, this Authorization to Construct and the
approved plans and specifications. Mail the Certification to: Construction Grants & Loans,
DWQ/DENR, 1633 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1633.
Upon classification of the facility by the Certification Commission, the Permittee shall
employ a certified wastewater treatment plant operator to be in responsible charge (ORC) of the
wastewater treatment facilities. The operator must hold a certificate of the type and grade at
least equivalent to or greater than the classification assigned to the wastewater treatment
facilities by the Certification Commission.
The Permittee must also employ a certified back-up operator of the appropriate type and
grade to comply with the conditions of T15A:8G.0202. The ORC of the facility must visit each
Class I facility at least weekly and each Class II, III and IV facility at least daily, excluding
weekends and holidays, must properly manage the facility, must document daily operation and
maintenance of the facility, and must comply with all other conditions of T15A:8G.0202.
A copy of the approved plans and specifications shall be maintained on file by the
Permittee for the life of the facility.

6
Mr. Hershell McCarty, Plant Manager
July 16, 2009
Page 3
During the construction of the proposed additions/modifications, the permittee shall
continue to properly maintain and operate the existing wastewater treatment facilities at all times,
and in such a manner, as necessary to comply with the effluent limits specified in the NPDES
Permit.
You are reminded that it is mandatory for the project to be constructed in accordance
with the North Carolina Sedimentation Pollution Control Act, and when applicable, the North
Carolina Dam Safety Act. In addition, the specifications must clearly state what the contractor's
responsibilities shall be in complying with these Acts.
Prior to entering into any contract(s) for construction, the recipient must have obtained all
applicable permits from the State.
Failure to abide by the requirements contained in this Authorization to Construct may
subject the Permittee to an enforcement action by the Division in accordance with North
Carolina General Statute 143-215.6A to 143-215.6C.
The issuance of this Authorization to Construct does not preclude the Permittee from
complying with any and all statutes, rules, regulations, or ordinances which may be imposed by
other government agencies (local, state, and federal) which have jurisdiction.
One (1) set of approved plans and specifications is being forwarded to you. If you have
any questions or need additional information, please contact Seth Robertson, P.E. at telephone
number [phone].
Sincerely,
Coleen H. Sullins
kp:sr
cc: Robert M. Miller, P.E., MACTEC Engineering and Consulting, 3301 Atlantic Avenue,
Raleigh, NC 27604
Chatham County Health Department
DWQ Raleigh Regional Office, Surface Water Protection
DWQ, Technical Assistance and Certification Unit
DWQ, Point Source Branch, NPDES Program
Ken Pohlig, P.E.
ATC File

Progress Energy Carolinas, Inc.
Cape Fear Steam Electric Plant
A To C No. 003433AOI
Replacement Ash Sluice Pumps and Pipeline
Issued July 16, 2009
Engineer's Certification
I, , as a duly registered Professional Engineer in
the State of North Carolina, having been authorized to observe (periodically/weekly/full time)
the construction of the modifications and improvements to the Cape Fear Steam Electric Plant,
located on 500 CP&L Road, Moncure in Chatham County for Progress Energy, hereby state that,
to the best of my abilities, due care and diligence was used in the observation of the following
construction:
Replacement of existing dual 1,150 gpm ash sluice pumps servicing Unit 5 with dual
2,300 gpm pumps (Pumps 5A and 5B), replacement of existing dual 1,150 gpm ash
sluice pumps servicing Unit 6 with dual 2,300 gpm pumps (Pumps 6A and 6B),
replacement of approximately 1,500 linear feet of existing 13-inch pipe with 16-inch
HPDE pipe from Unit 6 to the East ("New") Ash Pond, and associated yard piping and
appurtenances, in conformity with the project plans, specifications, and other supporting
data subsequently filed and approved by the Department of Environment and Natural
Resources.
I certify that the construction of the above referenced project was observed to be built within
substantial compliance and intent of the approved plans and specifications.
Signature
Registration
Send to: Construction Grants & Loans
DENR/DWQ
1633 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1633

NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and N
Division of Water Quality
Beverly Eaves Perdue Coleen H. Sullins `- ' f
Governor Director
June 4, 2009
MEMORANDUM
TO: Danny Smith, Regional Water Quality Supervisor
Raleigh Regional Office, Division of Water Qu4lit
FROM: Ken Pohlig, P.E, Project Review Engineer
Q�
Design Management Unit J
SUBJECT: Request for an Authorization to Construct No. 003
Cape Fear Steam Electric Plant, Replacement Ash
NPDES Permit No. NC0003433
Plans, specifications and supporting documents have been received for the subject
project. It is requested that comments and recommendations, including the items listed below, be
received by June 19, 2009 from the Regional Office Staff-
CAMA
Compliance With NC Well Construction Standards
Groundwater Comments
_X_Recommendations for inclusion in the Authorization to Construct
Recommendations for inclusion in the Non Discharge Permit
Schedule for Issuance of the NPDES Permit
SOC, or Other Schedules Which Must be Met 1
Standby Power Needs j
Status of Stormwater Permit 1�u1
Plan documents are submitted as follows for your reference, review, and comments on the above items:
_X_Plans and Specifications
Subsurface/Soils Report
Power Outage Information
Other
If you have any questions, please contact me at [phone].
Attachment
cc: Ken Pohlig, P.E.
ATC Files
1633 Mail Service Center, Ralegh, North Carolina 27699-1633 One
Location: 2728 Capital Blvd. Raleigh, North Carolina 27604 O C8I'011lla
Phone: [phone]
water FAX: [phone] Customer Service: 1-877b23.6748 ��Nn���
Internet: vrvrx.nniny%A nnab .org si
An Equal Opportunity 1 AlfirtnaM1ve Action Employer

4 Tc -4:�-- zP�P 30 �) n I --
North Carolina Division Of Water Quality
Construction Grants & Loans Section 28 2009
APR
Authorization To Construct (ATC) Application Forrn(o M
(To Be Used On and After August 1, 2007) , _° MOP
Date: 4/27/2009
Permittee/Owner Name: Carolina Power & Light Co. d/b/a Professional Engineer of Record: Robert M. Miller, P.E.
Progress Energy Carolinas, Inc. Cape Fear Steam Electric
Plant
Contact Person: Robin Bryson Engineering Firm: MACTEC Engineering and Consulting
Address: 410 S. Wilmington Street Address: 3301 Atlantic Avenue
Raleigh, North Carolina 27601 Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
Telephone Number: 9( 19) 554 -3962 Telephone Number: (919)01-8019
Please Note: The following items and information must be
Information Is
submitted to be considered a complete application
Provided
Remarks/Explanation
package. If any applicable item is missing the package will
be returned as incomplete.
1
Letter of request for ATC from Permittee/Owner or
authorized agent with written authorization.
2
Brief description of the proposed project.
3
Complete copy of the NPDES permit or public notice of
a draft NPDES permit.
4
Design capacity in Million Gallons per Day (MGD).
®
per pump 3.3 MGD
5
If new or expanding design capacity is greater than or
to 0.5 MGD, include Finding Of No
❑
N/A Overall design capacity of system
equal a copy of
is not changing
Significant Impact (FNSI).
Two sets of plans: signed, sealed, and dated by a NC
6
Professional Engineer and stamped "Final Drawing -
®
Drawings 1-5
Not Released For Construction".
7
Two sets of technical specifications: signed, sealed,
®
Drawings 1-5
and dated by a NC Professional Engineer.
Two sets each of process, design, buoyancy, and
8
hydraulic profile calculations: signed, sealed, and dated
®
Tables 1-2
by a NC Professional Engineer.
8
Hydraulic profile and a flow schematic with sizes of
®
Drawings 1-2
major components on 8%" X 11" paper.
Documentation that a Soil & Erosion Control permit
10
application has been submitted to the Division of Land
❑
N/A
Resources.
Residuals Management Plan for all new or expanding
11
facilities producing residuals, or when modifying
❑
N/A
residual facilities.
12
Construction Sequence Plan for all modifications.
®
Notes on appropriate drawings

Please Note: The following items and information must be
Information Is
submitted to be considered a complete application
provided
RemarkslExplanation
package. If any applicable item is missing the package will
be returned as incomplete.
YJ
13
110 volt GFCI receptacle and potable water source
El
N/A
included on plans.
14
Hydrogeologic information must be provided if a
❑
N/A
potential for groundwater contravention exists.
15
For abandonment of WWTPs: a statement that the
❑
N/A
facility will be properly disconnected.
16
All property lines, construction easements, permanent
❑
N/A Project within property boundary
easements, and ROW shown.
17
All wells within 200 feet of project shown.
®
One monitoring well within 200 feet of
above -grade piping replacement
18
All houses and places of public assembly within 100
❑
N/A
feet shown.
Wetlands, watercourses, and drainage features within
19
50 feet of all wastewater treatment or storage facilities
shown.
20
Identify on the plans each water body's watershed
®
Two water courses identified on map
classification.
21
Plan sheets for all applicable disciplines.
❑
N/A
22
Reliability per NCAC 2T .0505 (1).
®
Compliance statement in proposed
project description
23
Identify 100 year flood elevation on plans.
®
Separate flood map provided
24
North arrow on each plan sheet.
®
Provided as appropriate
25
Horizontal and vertical control.
❑
N/A
26
Subsurface investigation for new structures.
❑
N/A
Municipal/Public Facilities, also include the following:
Engineer's Certification signed, sealed, and dated by
27
the Engineer Of Record stating that the project
❑
N/A
complies with G.S. 133-3.
28
Minority Business Forms for Local Government
El
N/A
Projects.
29
Minority Business Guide.
❑
N/A
30
Dispute Resolution with mediation for Local
El
N/A
Governments.
31
Contract Duration included.
❑
N/A
Projects funded through CG&L must include the
32
Submittal Checklist, found under Plans &
❑
N/A
Specificiations at:
http://www.nccql.net/Engineering/i)lans.html

0
0 Progress Energy
April 28, 2009
Mr. Ken Pohlig, P. E.
Division of Water Quality
Construction Grants and Loans Section
1633 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1633
FECOM
4
APR 28 UP'
O
LOM
Subject: Carolina Power & Light Co. d/b/a Progress Energy Carolinas, Inc.
Cape Fear Steam Electric Plant NPDES Permit NC000343 r1
Replacement Ash Sluice Pumps and Pipeline
3 3 �}3 �/
Authorization to Construct Application
File Point: 12520B
Dear Mr. Pohlig:
Progress Energy Carolinas, Inc. proposes to replace the ash sluice pumps servicing Units 5
and 6 and replace a portion of the ash sluice piping from Unit 6 at the Cape Fear Steam
Electric Plant in Moncure, North Carolina. Enclosed is the completed Authorization to
Construct Application for this project.
Currently, each unit operates two pumps (1,150 gallons per minute design capacity each) to
supply water for sluicing coal ash from the unit to the ash settling pond. Progress Energy
Carolinas, Inc. proposes to replace each pump with a higher capacity pump (2,300 gallon
per minute design capacity each). The new ash sluice pumps will have sufficient pumping
capacity with only one pump operating per unit, allowing a second pump to serve as a
back-up. Thus, the overall capacity of the system will not change. The replacement ash
sluice pumps will be installed in the same locations in the plant as the existing ash sluice
pumps 5A/5B and 6A/6B.
This application also includes the replacement of 1,500 linear feet of above -grade ash sluice
piping from Unit 6 to the ash pond. The piping is being changed from the existing 13-inch
nominal outside diameter (10-inch inside diameter) Ceramcor pipe to new 16-inch nominal
outside diameter (13-inch inside diameter) High Density Polyethylene (HDPE) pipe. The
new piping will be installed in the same location as the existing above -grade piping.
Required information and catalogue cuts of the new pumps (including pump curves) and
the new pipe section material are enclosed. We thank you in advance for your attention to
our permitting needs. If there are any questions about this information please contact Ms.
Robin Bryson by telephone at [phone] or by email at [e-mail].
Progress Energy Carolinas, Ins.
Cape Fear Steam Plant
500 CP&L Road
Moncure, NC 27559

Mr. Ken Pohlig, P.E. 2 • April 28, 2009
I certify, under penalty of law, that this document and all attachments were prepared under
my direction or supervision in accordance with a system designed to assure that qualified
personnel properly gather and evaluate the information submitted. Based on my inquiry of
the person or persons who manage the system, or those persons directly responsible for
gathering the information, the information submitted is, to the best of my knowledge and
belief, true, accurate, and complete. I am aware that there are significant penalties for
submitting false information, including the possibility of fines and imprisonment for knowing
violations.
Sincerely,
Hershell McCarty, Plant Manager
Cape Fear Steam Electric Plant
HM/rrb
Enclosures
c: Robin Bryson
Bob Miller, MACTEC Engineering and Consulting

Fr -I
Proposed Project Description

Project Description i 'APR 28 2009
Progress Energy Carolinas, Inc. is submitting this Authorization to C atioIn
for replacement of the ash sluice pumps and a portion of existing asr-4dice' pip Cape
Fear Steam Electric Plant. Below is the description of the proposed project.
Background
The Cape Fear Steam Electric Plant is located on the east side of the Cape Fear River
approximately 2 miles Southeast of Moncure, North Carolina in Chatham County. The latitude
and longitude coordinates of the site are 35°35'30" north latitude and 78°57'20" west longitude,
respectively (Figure 1). The plant is a coal fired steam electric plant.
As a byproduct of burning coal, ash is produced. For both functioning power units at the plant
(referred to as Unit 5 and Unit 6), the ash is sluiced with water and the sluice mixture is pumped
to an ash settling pond in accordance with NPDES permit number NC000343 (enclosed).
This ATC application addresses the installation of replacement ash sluice pumps for both Units 5
and 6, and 1,500 linear feet of above grade ash sluice piping from Unit 6. The existing ash sluice
pumps, which are approximately 20 years old, are being replaced with newer pumps with
sufficient hydraulic capacity to convey ash sluice to the existing ash pond. The existing 13-inch
nominal outside diameter (10-inch inside diameter) Ceramcor pipe will be replaced with 16-inch
nominal outside diameter (13-inch inside diameter) high density polyethylene (HDPE) pipe.
Further, the new piping will be consistent with the size and material for the existing piping
leading from Unit 5.
Proposed Project Information
Spent ash from Units 5 and 6 is generated, both as bottom ash and fly ash depending on where
the ash is collected from. For each unit, bottom ash from each unit is directed through a jet
eductor nozzle which receives water from one of two vertical turbine water -supply pumps. The
jet nozzle boosts the pressure of the bottom ash sluice sufficiently to transport the bottom ash
sluice to a jet booster pump and ultimately to the ash pond.
Fly ash is collected from the top of the units by inducing a vacuum through the hydroveyor using
a water connection. The fly ash is then entrained in the water as an ash sluice. From the
hydroveyor, the ash sluice mixture travels through an air separator where entrained air is
removed. The ash sluice then flows by gravity to a jet booster pump (the same booster pump
used for bottom ash) where additional water supply is used to facilitate transport of the fly ash
sluice to the ash pond approximately 2,600 feet from the jet pump.
Bottom ash and fly ash conveyance systems are not operated simultaneously. Either bottom ash
or fly ash is collected and transported to the ash pond at one time.
Water supply to facilitate the jet nozzle and booster operations and hydroveyor operation is
currently supplied from the two sets of vertical turbine pumps (one set of two pumps for each of
Units 5 and 6). These pumps draw their water ultimately from the Cape Fear River and are

currently capable of pumping 1,150 gallons per minute each at a total dynamic head of 450 feet.
These pumps are the subject of this ATC application. Due to flow requirements to properly
operate the hydroveyor and jet booster pumps, it is necessary to have both existing pumps
operating simultaneously for each system when pumping ash sluice, thus leaving the facility
without redundant back-up capability. Automatically activated standby power supply onsite will
provide power reliability as required by NCAC 2T .0505 (1).
The proposed replacement ash sluice pumps for Unit 6 are manufactured by Tencarva, and each
pump conforms to model number VIT-FFFM with a 9.625 inch impeller diameter and 4160V,
400 HP motor. Each pump is capable of producing up to 2,300 gallons per minute at 546 feet of
total dynamic head. For Unit 5, the same pump model will be used except that the pump motor
will be 575V and 400 HP. Automatically activated standby power supply onsite will provide
power reliability as required by NCAC 2T .0505 (1). Electrical power and wiring will be field
run through existing conduits by Progress Energy Carolinas, Inc. personnel.
The replacement ash sluice pumps will be installed in the same locations in the plant as the
existing ash sluice pumps 5A/5B and 6A/6B. The existing pump pedestal for pump 5B will be
replaced so that the pump discharge elevation for pump 5B is the same as pump 5A. This is
being done to facilitate easier maintenance.
In addition, this ATC application also includes the replacement of the last 1,500 feet of ash sluice
discharge piping leading from Unit 6 to the ash pond. The existing 13-inch nominal outside
diameter Ceramcor piping is being replaced with new 16-inch nominal outside diameter HDPE
piping with a 160 psi pressure rating. The new pipe will correspond to ISCO Industries, LLC
pipe model PE 3608/3408 DR 1 I pipe. The new piping will be installed in the same location as
the existing above -grade piping. New pipe section material information is enclosed.
No other changes will be made to the ash sluice systems under this project.
Hydraulic Evaluation
Drawings 1 and 2 show hydraulic profiles of ash sluice piping systems for Units 5 and 6,
respectively. These drawings demonstrate that the proposed pumps are of sufficient size and
capacity to convey ash sluice to the pond. Drawing 2 also shows where existing Ceramcor piping
will be replaced with new HDPE piping.
Tables 1 and 2 present the hydraulic model calculations associated with these drawings. Table 3
presents detailed hydraulic calculations demonstrating that the pumps and piping are adequate to
convey ash sluice to the ash pond.
Drawings 3, 4 and 5 provide installation details for the four replacement ash sluice pumps (5A,
513, 6A, and 613) and the replacement pedestal for pump 5B.

Table 3
Hydraulic Equation Calculation -Unit 5 Fly Ash
Part l: Pump to Flow Split
Based on pump flow rate and head (see attached pump curve) of 2300 gpm and 546 feet total dynamic head at pump
discharge, verify that sufficient head exists to transport the water supply to the 8" tee where flow splits to supply the
jetpulsion pump and hydroveyor.
Constants used:
p=62.4 Ibf/fY' Density of water at 60*F
v=0.00001217 0% Kinematic Viscosity of Water at GOOF
R=0.0002 ft Roughness of Pipe for Steel Pipe
W_orkine-Eouations usjnr_Darcv-Weisbach/Colebrook Method
1. wQ*0.002228(ft'/sec/gpm)/A Velocity
2. RR= R/D Relative Roughness
3. Re=v*D/v Reynolds Number
4. H,=(fRL*v2)/(2*D*g) Friction Head
5. Hp2= H.,+ (Et-E,)-Ht Resulting Head Pressure after flictio»/elevation/velocity loss
Variables
Total Length of Pipe: 289.4' from field measurements
Total Equivalent Length of Fittings: 251.54' front Ingersoll's Rands Cameron Hvdraulir Data, 17"i ed., 1992
Q=2300 gpm Flow Rate-Requiredf/ow rate from phmtp
D=0.6651 ft Pipe Diameter -Field measurements, nominal thickness
A=0.3474 fie Pipe Area -Based on Schedule. 40 nominal thickness qll ipe
Calculate velocity using equation 1:
v,=2300gpm*0.002228ft'/sec/gpm/0.3474 ft'-=14.75 ft/s
Calculate Relative Roughness using equation 2:
RR=0.0002 ft/0.6651 ft--•.000301
Calculate Reynolds' Number using equation 3:
Re=14.75 fl/s*0.6651 fl/0.00001217 fl%=8.06xlO'
Calculate friction factor from Moody Diagram with Re and RR
f-0.0154
Calculate friction head using equation 4:
Hr-0.0154*540.94ft*(14.75ft/s)2/(2*0.6651*32.2ft/s2)=42.31 ft
E,=167.5ft
E2=185 ft
Total Static Head to overcome:
HS 1 85ft- 1 67.59= 17.5ft
Pump Discharge elevation
6" Tee -Flow Splits elevation
Total Dynamic Head Loss
Ht+ Hi-17.5+42.31=59.81 ft@2300gptn
Total dynamic head loss is less than total available head. OK
Total Remaining Dynamic =546-59.81=486.19 fl
Vttifftdpe .
Al CAPOI
. �'r: la�ttl •,. may,.
�tleti*ti+4•i +4

PaW. Flow Split to Hydroveyor
After the flow splits, a total flow of 1520 gpm with a head of 486.2 ft remains. Verify that sufficient head exists to
transport water to hydroveyor.
Constants used:
p=62.4 Ibf/ft' Density of water at 60°F
v=fl.00001217 ftZ/s Kinematic Viscosity of Water at 60*F
R=0.0002 ft Roughness of Pipe for Steel Pipe
Wo •kit Equations usinst Darev-Weisbach/Colebrook Method
1. s•=Q*0.002228(ft'/sec/gpnn)/A Velocity
2. RR= R/D Relative Roughness
3. Re=v*D/v Reynolds Number
4. Hf—(f*L*v2)/(2*D*g) Friction Head
5. I.10= Hvi+ (EI-En)-FIr Resulting Ilead Pressure after friction/elevation/velocity loss
Variables
Total Length of Pipe: 124ft from field measurements
Total Equivalent Length of Fittings: 173.92ft from Ingersoll's Rand's Cameron Hydraulic Data. 17°' ed.. 1992
Q-- 1520 gpm Flow Rate -Required f/mv rate from pump
D--0.6651 ft Pipe Diameter -Field measurements, rwminal Ihial-necs
A=0.3474 ft' Pipe Area -Based on Schedule 40 nominal thicknevs gl'pipe
Calculate velocity using equation 1:
vi=1520gpnn*0.002228ft'/sec/gpm/0.3474 fl =9.75 fl/s
Calculate Relative Roughness using equation 2:
RR=0.0002 ft/0.6651 ft=.000301
Calculate Reynolds' Number using eration 3:
Re=9.75 ft/s*0.6651 W0.00001217 R /s=5.33x10`
Calculate friction factor from Moody Diagram with Re and RR
f=0.0158
Calculate friction head using a uation 4:
H(=0.0158*297.92ft*(9.75f1/s) /(2*0.6651 ft*32.2ft/s') =10.45 fi
Ej=185 ft Flow Split elevation
E2=254.75 ft Hvdroveyor elevation
Total Static I -lead to overcome:
Hx 254.75ft-185fi-= 69.75fl
Total Dynamic Head Loss
HJ+ Ht=69.75+10.45=80.20R@l520gpm
Total dynamic head loss is less than total available head. OK
SlosUM..
�OJIJHNµii ,�

Part3: Hydroveyor to Ash Sluice Pond
After the hydroveyor the ash sluice drops to the separator tank and the pressure head is gone. Shoilly after the
separator tank, the flow is recombhted at the jetpulsion pump. Verify that the head from the elevation and from the
jetpulsion pump is sufficient to transport 2300 GPM of ash sluice to the pond.
Constants used:
p=62.4 lbf/ft'
Density of water at 607
µ=0.00002359 lbf*sec/ft2
Absolute Viscosity of Water at 60°F
R= 0.000017 ft
Roughness of Pipe for Fiberglass Pipe
R=0.000005 ft
Roughness of Pipe for Plastic Pipe
Workiuu Equations using Darcy-Weisbach/Colebrook Method
1. r—Q*0.002228(ft''/sec/gpm)/A Velocity
2. RR = R/D Relative Roughness
3. Re=v*Dp/) Reynolds Number
4. Ht=(f*L*\ )/(2*D*g) Friction Head
5. HI,,= Hvr+ (F,r-E2)-Hr Resulting Head Pressure after friction/elevation/velocity loss
Variable
Total Length of 10"Pipe: 91511
Total Length of 13" ID Pipe: 1500ft
Q=2300 gpm
Dr=0.8350 ft
D2=1.083 ft
AI=0.5476 fl2
A,=0.9217 f12
S6=1.2
from others.>ield measurements
.from others field measurements
Flow Rate -Required (low rate,f •om pump
Pipe Diameter -Field measurements, nominal thickne.s
Pipe Area -Based on Schedule 40 nominal thickness ofpipe
Assume specific gravity of ash -sluice slurry
Calculate velocity using equation 1:
vi=2300gpm*0.002228ft'/sec/gpm/0.5476 ft2=936 ft/s
v2=2300gpm*0.002228ft'/sce/gpm/0.9217 f12=5.56 ft/s
Calculate Relative Roughness using equation 2:
RR=0.000017 ft/0.8350 ft=.000020
RR=0.000005 11/1.0830 ft=.000005
Calculate Reynolds' Number using equation 3:
Re=9.36 ft/s*0.8350 ft*1.2*62.41bf/fr/(0.00002359 ft2/s*32.2fUs2)=7.70x10`
Re=5.56 ft/s*1.0830ft*1 2*62.41bf/ft'/(0.00002359 ft2/s*32.2fl/s2)=5.94xW
Calculate friction factor from Moody Diagram with Re and RR
f=0.0126
f=0.0128
Calculate friction head using equation 4:
Hr=0.0126*915ft*(9.36ft/s)2/(2*0.8350ft*32.2ft/s2) =18.78 ft
HI-0.0128*1500ft*(5.56ft/s)2/(2*1.083ft*32.21Vs2)=8.51 ft
Ei=204 fl
E,=215 ft
Total Static Head to overcome:
Hx 215ft-204ft= I I
Separator Tank Discharge elevation
Ash Sluice Pond elevation
Total Dynamic Head Loss
H,+ Hr=18.78+8.51+11=38.29ftCa,2300gpm
Total Head Added by Jetpulsion Pump= 82 ft @2300gpm
Total dynamic head loss is less than total available head. OK
V11r I".
t CAR0 e'
ESSIn..t ^p' °
TM M
4e1M44;440 ,,`,

Fable 3
Hydraulic Equation Calculation -Unit 6 Flv Ash
Pahl 1: Pump to Flom Split
Based on pump flow rate and head (see attached pump curve) of 2,300 gpm and 546 feet total dynamic head at
pump discharge, verify that sufficient head exists to transport the water supply to the 6" tee where flow splits to
supply the jetpulsion pump and hydroveyor.
Constants used
p=62.4 lbf/ft' Density of water at 607
v=0.00001217 t1% Kinematic Viscosity of Water at 60*F
R=0.0002 ft Roughness of Pipe for Steel Pipe
Workine Eauations usitut Darcv-Weisbach/Colebrook Method
1. v==Q*0.002228(ft'/sec/gpm)/A Velocity
2. RR= R/D Relative Roughness
3. Re=v*D/v Reynolds Number
4. Idr=(f*L*v2)1(2*D*g) Friction Head
.5. Hp,= Hi,ri- (Er-E2)-Hr Resulting Hcad Pressure after frictionfelevation/velocity loss
Variables
Total Length of Pipe: 167' from field measuremets
Total Equivalent Length of Fittings: 390.58'.fiom Ingersall's Rands Cameron Hydraulic Data, 17 * ed., 1992
Q=2300 gpm Flow Rate -Required flox- rate from pump
D=0.8350 ft Pipe Diameter -Field measurements, nominal lhicknety
A=.5476 f12 Pipe Area -Based on Schedule 40 nominal ihicknnT of pipe
Calculate velocity using equation 1:
vr=2300gpm*0.002228ft'/sec/gpm/.5476 frz=9.36 fl/s
Calculate Relative Roughness using equation 2:
RR=0.0002 ft/0.8350 ft=.000240
Calculate Reynolds' Number using equation 3:
Re=9.36 ft/s*0.8350 ft/0.00001217 ft /s=6.42x10'
Calculate friction factor from Moody Diagram with Re and RR
f=0.0156 ne,eeea, e°
Calculate friction head using a nation 4: a°"��� „4•"°S '°°° °'a
Hr0.0156*557.58ft*(9.3611/s)q'/(2*0.8350ft*322ftls) =14.17 If
Er=179ft Pump Discharge elevation 17147
E2=184 If 6" Tee -Flow Splits elevation
L e
Total Static Head to overcome: „gQQT M. �'�veYq
H 184ft-1790- 5ft
Total Dynamic Head Loss
H,+ H(=5+14.i7=19.17fl@2300gpm
Total dynamic head loss is less than total available head. OK
Total Remaining Dynamic =546-19.17=526.83 ft

ParO:Flow Split to Hydroveyor
After the flow splits: a total remaining flow of 1211 gpm remains. A head of 526.8 ft remains after floe, splits.
Verify that sufficient lead exists to transport ash sluice to hydroveyor.
Constants used:
p=62.4 lbf/ft' Density of water at 60`F
v=0.00001217 ft2/s Kinematic Viscosity of Water at 60°F
R=0.0002 ft Roughness of Pipe for Steel Pipe
Workine Eouations usine Darcv-Weisbach/Colcbrook Method
1. v=Q*0.002228(ft'/sec/gpm)/A Velocity
2. RR= R/D Relative Roughness
3. Re=v*D/v Reynolds Number
4. Hr=(f*L*v')/(2*D*g) Friction [lead
5. Hn2= Hpl+ (Ei-E2)-Hr Resulting Head Pressure after friction/elevation/velocity loss
Variables
Total Length of Pipe: 48.5' .from field measurements
Total Equivalent Length of Fittings: 120.42',fiom Ingersoll's Rands Cameron Hydraulic Data, 17" ed., 1992
Q=1211 gpm Flow Rate -Required flow ralefiom pump
D=0.5054 ft Pipe Diameter -Field measurements, nominal thid-mess
A=0.2006 ft' Pipe Area -Based on Schedule 40 nominal thickness gfpipe
Calculate velocity using equation 1:
vj=121lgpm*0.002228fl'/sec/gpm/0.2006 ft2=13.45 fVs
Calculate Relative Roughness using equation 2:
RR=0.0002 ft/0.5054 ft=.000396
Calculate Reynolds' Number using equation 3:
Re=13.45 ft/s*0.5054 ft/0.00001217 ft2/s =5.59x 10'
Calculate friction factor from Moody Diagram with Re and RR
f--0.0169
Calculate friction head using equation 4:
Hf=0.0169*168.92ft*(13.45ft/s)2/(2*0.5054ft*32.2fi/s2) =15.87 ft
Ei=194 ft Flow Split elevation
E2=223.5 ft Hydroveyor elevation
Total Static Head to overcome:
H, 223.5ft-184ft=39.5ft
Total Dynamic [lead Loss
H,t Hr=39.5+ 15.R7=55.37ft@ 1211 gpm
Total dynamic head loss is less than total available head. OK
.,urrrpr-
/.kn rI
V
( M
®I4+jflfipYY Y

Pard: Hydroveyor to fish Sluice Pond
After the hydroveyor the ash sluice drops to the separator tank and the pressure head is gone. Shortly after the
separator tank, the flow is recombined at the jetpulsion pump. Verify that the head from the elevation and from the
jetpulsion pump is sufficient to transport 2300 GPM of ash sluice to the pond.
Constants used:
p=62.4 Ibf/ft Density of water at 607
v=0.00001217 ft'/s Absolute Viscosity of Water at 60OF
R=0.000017 fl Roughness of Pipe for Fiberglass Pipe
R=0.000005 fl Roughness of Pipe for Plastic Pipe
Working Etmatioms usine Darcy-Weisbach/Colebrook Method
1. v=Q*0.002228(ft'!sec/gpm)tA Velocity
2. RR= R/D Relative Roughness
3. Re=v*D/v Reynolds Number
4. Hf=(f*L*v2)/(2*D*g) Friction Head
5. Hp2= Hrt+ (E,-E,)-Hr Resulting Head Pressure after friction/elevation/velocity loss
Variables
Total Length of 10"Pipe: 1032ft from ahersfield measurements
Total Length of 13" ID Pipe: 1500ft .iron, o1hersfeld measurements
Q=2300 gpm Flow Rate -Required flow r ate from pump
Di=0.8350 ft Pipe Diameter -Field measurements, nominal thickness
Dz=1.083 ft
AI=0.5476 62 Pipe Area -Based on Schedule 40 nominal thickness ofpipe
A,=0.9218 W
S6=1.2 Assume specific gravity of ash -sluice slurry
Calculate velocity using equation 1:
vl=2300gpm*0.002228ft'/sec/gpm/0.5476 R'=9.36 fl/s
v2=2300gpm*0.002228ft'/sec/gpm/0.9218 fP=5.56 ft/s
Calculate Relative Roughness using equation 2:
RR=0.000017 ft/0.8350 fl=.000020
RR=0.000005 ft/1.0830 fl=.000005
Calculate Reynolds' Number using equation 3:
Re=9.36 ft/s*0.8350 ft*1.2*62.4lb9fe/(0.00002359 ft2/s*32.2ft/s2)=7.70x10'
Re=5.56ft!s*1.0830ft*1.2*62.41bflft3/(0.00002359f2/s*32.2ft/s2) 5.94x10'
Calculate friction factor from Moody Diagram with Re and RR
P=0.0126 ,
f=0.0128 say �vft
Calculate friction head using equation 4:
Hr-0.0126*1032ft*(9.36ft/s)2/(2*0.8350ft*32.2f /s') 21.19ft
Hr-0.0128*1500ft*(5.56ft/s)2/(2*1.083ft*32.2ft/s2)=8.51 ft
Et=226.25 ft
E,=215 ft
Total Static Head to overcome:
HS 215ft-226.25fl=-11.25 ft
Separator Tank Discharge elevation
Ash Sluice Pond elevation
Total Dynamic Head Loss
H,+ Ht=21.19+8.51-11.25=19.45 ft@2300gpm
Total Head Added by lelpulsion Pump= 78 A CZ03006,pm
Total dynamic head loss is less than total available head. OK

Well Location and Water Body Features and Classifications

',L' i aI I
I r
d v L G
r � '
or
Ca r Plant Site 4 +
4
Monitoring Well `a ♦ �~ 9
Style 1" _drnate) _�.� N j►�
Well Location and Water Body C�
Features and Classifications
Carolina Power &Light Co. , Ash Pond
d/b/a Progress Energy Carolinas, Inc. P
Cape Fear Steam Electric Plant ;' 10
Chatham County, NC ""

100-year Flood Elevation Map

.....
/010 . . . . . . .
01
ZONE ....
' • V.
IL�MlII
GRID NORTH
MAP SCALE 1" = 500' (1 : 6,000)
ZONE X
PANEL 9687K
FIRM
e FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP
�, NORTH CAROLINA
`. :1:DI
. • 10306 • . . • • . . • . . . . .
...........= ..........................................
=.. ...................................
............ ..................
................ .ZONE X.....
w`
1019E . . GQ.
::.::::::. : ZONE ......::: :::.ZONE.)
K.....
:.. 176. 176 ....
..........: .. ::(ZONEA.. .....
PANEL 9687
ISEE LGCAi OR DIAGRAM OR MAP INET a FOR FIRM PPNEL
LAYOUT
CONTAINS
COMMUNITY
CID No
PANEL SUFFIX
CHATAM COUMv
370399
.7 K
LEECWWY
SofTr
KV N
Ndru'r '.r. ".Map N,urnEe, ttrvni .. r.; yi r it
Wren PI... aq maR orcl.r a` ConmWly Nunpl,rI.r
Ywlrp f rrsN m imu,.rv.e apMrcalror.. Iw S,Ne�•u[rle�l
MAP REVISED MAP NUMBER
FEBRUARY 2, 2007 3710968700K
State of North Carolina
Palcral limcrgcncy Managentcnt Agency
copy or a oomon oFme aorne Feamet.. too. mapn
a extracted using F-MIT Onilne. This map does notrefiect changes
amendments which may hate Evan made subsequent to the date on the
a block. Far the latest product m1crmation .lout National Flood Insurance
ogram flood maps check the FEMA Flood Map Store at w+++v msc.fema.g

Pump and Pipe Catalogue Cuts

LARVA
YAOMINOtY COMPANY
sell NDUOTRYO W1111WO
Telephone Mailing Address
Shipping Address
[phone] P.O. Box 35865
1115 Pleasant Ridge Road
Fax [phone] Greensboro, NC 27425-5865
Greensboro, NC 27409-9753
575v Option - (DI Double Bolted)
VERTICAL TURBINE PUMP DATA SHEET
Pump PROPOSAL NO.
Date:
Aril 8, 2009
CUSTOMER INFORMATION
Customer:
Progress Energy
Inquiry No.:
April 7 Phone Call
Client:
Jack Webster / Kumar Mani
Project:
Cape Fear Plant
PUMPING CONDITIONS
Quantity:
2
Pumped liquid:
River Water
Temperature:
Ambient
Specific gravity:
1.0
Pit depth:
To suit 210 inch TPL
Viscosity:
1.0 cP
Rated ow:
2300
Rated head:
546 236psi)
PUMP DESCRIPTION
Model:
VIT-FFFM
Size/stages:
14RHHO / 6
RPM:
1770
Efficiency:
82.20%
Pump length:
210 Inches
BHP(rated):
386
Impeller Diameter:
9.625
BHP NOL :
398
PUMP MATERIALS
Bowl:
DI double bolted
Impeller(config.):
Open
Bowl wear ring:
none
Impeller wear ring:
none
Bowl bearing:
Bronze
Suct. Bell bearing:
Bronze
Bowl shaft (size/mat'I):
2.19 inch / 416ss
Line shaft (size/mat'I):
1.94 inch / 416ss
Column (size/type/mat'I):
10 inch / Flanged CS
Line shaft bearing:
Bronze
Driver coupling type:
NRR
Discharge head:
300N 10x24.5 Fab CS
Suction Strainer:
30O SS
Features
SS bowl and column bolting
High Pressure Packing Box
DRIVER
HP rating:
400
RPM:
1800
Manufacturer:
USEM
Frame:
447TPB
VHS or VSS7
VHS
Enclosure:
WP-1 Std Eff
Voltage:
575v
Phase/Hertz:
3/60
BD
24.5
Features
300%EHT, Steady Bush, NRR
PRICES & WEIGHTS
U.S. Dollars
Weight (lbs):
4970
Unit price:
$51,570.00
Leadtime (ARO):
14-16 weeks
No. of Units:
2
TOTAL
$103,140
Quote Validity 30 Days
Comments: Price and Delivery FOB Southhampton, MO
Price includes motor space heaters, motor 100 ohm bearing RTDs, and motor 100 ohm winding RTDs.
- deduct $130 NET if space heaters are not required.
- deduct $1,840 NET If bearing RTDs are not required.
- deduct $2,215 NET if winding RTDs are not required.

Tencarva Machinery DIMENSIONAL OL . _1NE
George Ceelen IOxI4R
6 Stagege 1Ox14RHH0 Iq
Pump Data
AD: 1.75
DD AG: Size: 14RHHO
xC B: 5 Stages: 6
BL: 104.24.25
AG
CD CD: BowlShaft: 2.19"
CL: N/A
COL: 105.75" LineShaft: 1.94"
DD: 17.50 LineShaft Type: Open
° ® MIN SUB: 40.4 Column: Standard
DH: 12.00 Column: 10" Flanged
HH G: 25.00 Bearing Spacing: 5 feet
H: 22.75 Section Length: 5 feet
AD DH HH: 34.00 Head: F:VIT
J; 1.25 Flange (Disch.): 10"-300# RF
R: 14.60 Inlet:
R S S: 1.13
SL: 7.87 Seal: Packing
TPL: 210.0" Strainer: Bolt -On Basket
COL UG: N/A SubBase: None
V:
W:
TPL X:
XC:
BL Y:
T Z:
MIN SUB MAX: 15.38
- "J" OIA FOUR PLCS
EO SP ON "H" BC
OG ---Q
DISC HEAD
Hydraulic Data Miscellaneous Motor Data
Flow (gpm): 2300 Thrust At Design (lb): 13453 Model: VHS type RU
Pump Head (ft): 539.8 Thrust At Shutoff (lb): 16261 Make: USEM
TDH (ft): 546.0 Pumping Level(in): 48 HP: 400
Speed (rpm): 1770 RPM: 1800
Fluid: Water Weight Type: NRR, 300% EHT
Temperature (F): 60 Pump (lb): 2770 Efficiency: 93.0
Viscosity: 1.105 Motor (lb): 2200 Frame: 447TPB
Spec.Grav: 1 Total (lb): 4970 Ratchet: NRR
Version: 4.05P Customer: Progress Energy 575v Option Date: 04-07-2009

Tencarva Machinery
George Ceelen
Overall Pump Parameters
Size and Model:
14RHHO
Capacity, GPM:
2300
Total Pump Length, In.:
210.0
Pump Type:
OpenSump
Pump K-Factor:
24
LineShaft-Related Data
HYDRAULIC ANA. ■ dIS
VIT0xI4R 19
6 Stage IOx14Ri1H0 '
Pump Operating Speed, RPM:
Total Dynamic Head, Ft.:
Impeller Trim, In.:
Head Type:
Number of Stages:
Pumping Level, In.:
1770
546.0
9.6
F: VIT
6
48.0
Shaft Diameter, In.:
1.94
Shaft Limit, HP:
574
Shaft Material:
416SS
Matt Correction Fact:
1.18
LineShaft Length, In.:
105.75
Shaft Elongation, w/o Adder:
0.02
LineShaft Type:
Open
Impeller Running Clearance:
0.00
Bowl Data
Total Bowl Length, In.:
104.25
Bowl Diameter, In.:
14
Bowl Shaft Dia, In.:
2.19
Bowl Shaft Limit, HP:
862
Bowl Shaft Material:
416SS
Column Data
Column Diameter, In.:
10
Column Load, Lb.:
3221.4
Wall Thickness, In:
0.365
Column Elongation, In.:
0.00
Shutoff Column Elongation, In.:
0.00
Horsepower Data
Shaft Friction Loss, Hp.:
0.16
Thrust Load Loss, Hp.:
1.79
Bowl HP At Design, Hp.:
386
Motor Horsepower, Hp.:
400
Other Data
Hydraulic Thrust, Lb.:
13104.0
Thrust at Design, Lb.:
13453.0
Thrust at Shutoff, Lb.:
16260.8
Actual Head above Grade, Ft.:
539.78
Available Lateral, In.:
0.75
Design Lateral, In.:
0.02
Shutoff Lateral, In.:
0.02
Suction Pressure, psi:
0.0
Shutoff Disc Pressure, psi:
285.3
Column Loss, Ft.:
0.47
NPSHa, Ft.:
44.99
Head Loss, Ft.:
1.75
NPSHr, Ft.:
21.00
Total Loss, Ft.:
2.22
NPSH margin, Ft.:
23.99
Efficiency Data (Efficiencies estimated
not guaranteed)
Bowl Efficiency:
82.20
Pump Efficiency:
81.46
Motor Efficiency:
93.00
Overall Efficiency:
75.75
KWH/1000 gallons:
2.26
Component Weights
Bowl Weight, Lbs.:
1468
Column Weight,Lbs.:
567
Head Weight, Lbs.:
735
Can Weight,Lbs.:
0
Motor Weight, Lbs.:
2200
Total Pump Weight,Lbs.:
4970
Version: 4.05P
Customer: Progress Energy 575v Option
Date: 04-07-2009

Iq
Tencarva Machinery
George Ceelen
n
SECTIONA..
VIT-FFFM
6 Stage IOxI4RHHO
DISCHARGE HEAD ASSEMBLY
ITEM
NAME
HEAD- DISCHARGE --
NUT -ADJUSTING
HEADSHAFT
HOUSING
BEARING -HOUSING
GLANO- SPUR
PACKING
SLINGER
code
MATERIAL
ASTM
600
9845
CARBON STEEL FAB
A53
604
2130
BRASS C36000
B16M-00
608
616
Gil
618
620
622
2227
SST 06
A582M-95b
1003
CAST IRON CL30
A48.94801
1109
FEDERALLOY BISMUTH BRZ
B584.00
1203
SST 318
A744MJX1
5026
GRAPHITE PACKING
ML402-99
5121
RUBBER EPDM
D3568-98
730
KEY- MOTOR GIB
2242
CARBON STEEL 1018
A108-99
757
SCREW -GLAND ADJUSTING
2229
SST 318
A278-00e
779 -
GASKET -HOUSING
5136
ACRYLICINITRILE
5136 REV
COLUMN AND LINESHAFT ASSEMBLY
642
COLUMN PIPE
8501
BLACK PIPE SCH 40
A 5340
648
LINESHAFT
2227
SST 416
A582M45b
649
LINESHAFT COUPLING
2265
SST 416
A583-96b
652
RETAINER- BEARING
1003
CAST IRON CL30
A48.94081
656
LINESHAFT BEARING
1109
FEDERALLOY BISMUTH BRZ
as"
760
CAPSCREW-HEX
2229
SST316
A276-0Oe
BOWL ASSEMBLY
660
SHAFT- BOWL
2227
SST 416
A563445b
670
BOWL- INTERMEDIATE
BOW
DUCTILE IRON ENAMEL
1 1
_
672
BEARING. INT BOWL
1109
FEDERALLOY BISMUTH BRZ
8584.00
673
IMPELLER
1102
_
SILICON BRONZE C876M
8584.00
677
COLLET- IMPELLER
2242
CARBON STEEL 1018
A10BM
688
BOWLIBEL.L. SUCTION
1018
DUCTILE IRON 65.45.12
1999 1
ON
BEARING -SUCTION
1109
FEDERALLOY BISMUTH BRZ
B584-00
692
SANDCOLLAR
1109
FEDERALLOY BISMUTH BRZ
B51"
698
STRAINER- SUCTION
6913
SST 316 XPND METAL FL
A585-97
747
PLUG -PIPE
1046
MALLEABLE IRON
A197
760
CAPSCREW- HEX
2229
SST 316
A276.000
Version: 4.05P Customer: Progress Energy 575v Option Date: 04-07-2009

Tencarva Machinery ADDERS
George Ceelen VIT-FFFM
6 Stage IOxI4RHHO 19
ADDITIONAL PUMP COMPONENTS
The following is a list of the additional components you ordered.
Consult factory for any other components or services.
Component
Strainer
SST Strainer
Bowl SS Bolting
Flang Col SST Bolt
Ductile Iron Bowl
Version: 4.05P Customer: Progress Energy 575v Option Date: 04-07-2009

Company: Tencarva Machinery
Name: George Ceelen
Date: 04/07/09
PUMP DATA SHEET Turbine 60 Hz
Customer: Progress Energy 575v Option
Order No:
Pump:
Size: 14RHHO (6 stages)
Type: Lineshaft Speed: 1770 rpm
Synch speed: 1800 rpm Dia: 9.625 in
Curve: E6414RRPC0
Specific Speeds: Ns: 3300
Pump Notes for Standard Sizes:
Suction Size-10" Discharge Sizes-10",12". Curves are certified for
water at 60°F only. Consult factory for performance with any other
fluid.
Vertical Turbine: Bowl size: 14 in
Max lateral: 0.75 in
Thrust K factor: 24 Ib/fl
Pump Limits for Standard Construction:
Temperature: 120 °F Pressure: 330 psi g
Sphere size: 1.18 in
--- Data Point --
Flow: 2300 US gpm
Head: 546 ft
Eff: 82.2%
Power: 386 hp
NPSHr: 21 it
— Design Curve --
Shutoff Head: 663 ft
Shutoff dP: 287 psi
Min Flow: --- US gpm
BEP: 84.8% eff
@ 2688 US gpm
NOL Pwr. 398 hp
@ 2968 US gpm
— Max Curve --
Max Pwr: 436 hp
@ 3098 US gpm
9.88 in
700
600
500
a
m
d
= 400
300
200
Search Criteria:
Flow: 2300 US gpm
Fluid:
Water
SG: 1
Viscosity: 1,105 cP
NPSHa: -- It
Motor:
10P
Head: 546 ft
Temperature: 60 °F
Vapor pressure: 0.2563 psi a
Ampressure: 14.7 psi a
Standard: NEMA Size: 400 hp
Speed: 1800
Sizing criteria: Max Power on Design Curve
500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500
70
4000
50
r
25
a.
rn
Z
z
0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500 4000
500
250
ao 0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500 4000
US gpm
Performance Evaluation
Flow
Speed
US gpm
rpm
2760
1770
2300
1770
1840
1770
1380
1770
920
1770
Head
Efficiency
Power
NPSHr
ft
%
hp
ft
480
84.6
395
27.9
546
82.2
386
21
578
74.9
359
16.1
599
64.6
323
13.2
621
48
297
12.1
Turbine V9 Selected from catalog: Goulds Lineshaft 60H7. Vers: 3.30

T l..ARVA
MACNINIfaY CONPNNV
Tdepl... Mailing Address Shipping Add.,
[phone] P 0. Box 35865 1115 Picasant Ridgc Road
Fax [phone] Greensboro, INC 27425-5865 Greensboro, NC 27409-9753
Option One - As Specified - (DI Double Bolted)
VERTICAL TURBINE PUMP DATA SHEET
Pump PROPOSAL NO.
I Date:
CUSTOMER 1111FORMATlON
_
Customer:
Progress Energy
Inquiry No.:
Phoned in Conditions of Service
Client:
Project:
Cape Fear Plant
PUMPJNG CONDITIONS
Quantity:
2
Pumped liquid:
River Water
Temperature:
Ambient
Specific gravity:
1.0
Pit depth:
To suit 210 inch TPL
Viscosity:
1
1.0 cP
Rated flow:
2300
Rated head:
548 236psi)
PUMP DESCRIPTION
Model:
VIT-FFFM
Size/stages:
14RHHO 16
RPM:
1770
Efficiency:
82.20%
Pump length:
210 inches
BHP(raled):
386
Impeller Diameter:
9,625
BHP NOL :
398
PUMP MATERJALS
Bowl:
Of double bolted
Impeller(config.):
Open
Bowl wear ring:
none
Impeller wear ring.
none
Bowl bearing,
Bronze
Sucl. Bell bearing:
Bronze
Bowl shaft (size/mal'I):
2.19 inch / 416ss
Line shaft (size/mat'I):
1.94 inch / 416ss
Column (size/lype/mal'I).
10 inch / Flanged CS
Line shaft bearing:
Bronze
Driver coupling type:
NRR
Discharge head:
300N 10x24.5 Fab CS
Suction Strainer:
300 SS
Features
SS bowl and column bolting
High Pressure Packing Box
DRIVER
HP rating:
400
RPM:
1800
Manufacturer:
USEM
Frame:
5008P
VHS or VSS?
VHS
Enclosure:
WP-1 Sid Eff (93.5%)
Voltage:
4160
Phase/Hertz:
3/60
BD
24.5
Features
300%EHT, Steady Bush, NRR
PRICES & WEIGHTS
U.S. Dollars
Weight (Ibs):
5920
Unit rice:
$50,940.00
Leadtime ARO :
14-16 weeks
No. of Units:
2
TOTAL
$101,880
Comments: Price and Delivery FOB Lubbock, Texas
Price includes September 1, 2008 price increase.
GOULDS C'F.NTRIFUGAI. PUMPS, GORMAN-RUPP SELF -PRIMING GLAR PUMPS. WILDEN AIER PUMPS, CARVER CENTRIFUGAL PUMPS,
SEEPEX PC PUMPS, ROSEDALE FILTERS, MD BLOWERS. BURGMANN SEALS, SOUTUWORTII I.IFTS, ROTH PUMPS, MARCH PUMPS

Tenearva Machinery
George Ceelen
Overall Pump Parameters
HYllRAULIC ANALYSIS
VIT-FFFM
6 Stage IOx14RHHO 19
Size and Model:
14RRHO
Pump Operating Speed, RPM:
1770
Capacity, GPM:
2300
Total Dynamic Head, Ft.:
546.0
Total Pump Length, In.:
210.0
Impeller Trim, In.:
9.6
Pump Type:
OpenSump
Head Type:
RVIT
Pump K-Factor:
24
Number of Stages:
6
Pumping Level, In.:
48.0
LineShaft-Related Data
Shaft Diameter, In.:
1.94
Shaft Limit, HP:
584
Shaft Material:
416SS
Matt Correction Fact:
1.18
LineShaft Length, In.:
105.75
Shaft Elongation, w/o Adder:
0.02
LineShaft Type:
Open
Impeller Running Clearance:
0.00
Bowl Data
Total Bowl Length, In.:
104.25
Bowl Diameter, In.:
14
Bowl Shaft Dia, In.:
2.19
Bowl Shaft Limit, HP:
862
Bowl Shaft Material:
416SS
Column Data
Column Diameter, In.:
10
Column Load, Lb.:
3221.4
Wall Thickness, In:
0.365
Column Elongation, In.:
0.00
Shutoff Column Elongation, In.:
0.00
HorsePower Data
Shaft Friction Loss, Hp.:
0.16
Thrust Load boss, Hp.:
1.79
Bowl HP At Design, Hp.:
386
Motor Horsepower, Hp.:
400
Other Data
Hydraulic Thrust, Lb.:
13104.0
Thrust at Design, Lb.:
13453.0
Thrust at Slmtofi Lb.:
16260.8
Actual Head above Grade, Ft.:
539.78
Available Lateral, In.:
0.75
Design Lateral, In.:
0.02
Shutoff Lateral, In.:
0.02
Suction Pressure, psi:
0.0
Shutoff Disc Pressure, psi:
285.3
Column Loss, Ft.:
0.47
NPSHa, Ft.:
44.99
Head Loss, Ft.:
1.75
NPSHr, Ft.:
21.00
Total Loss, Ft.:
2.22
NPSH margin, Ft.:
23.99
Efficiency Data (Efficiencies estimated not guaranteed)
Bowl Efficiency:
82.20
Pump Efficiency:
81.46
Motor Efficiency:
93.50
Overall Efficiency:
76.16
KWH/1000 gallons:
2.25
Component Weights
Bowl Weight, Lbs.:
1468
Column Weight,Lbs.:
567
Head Weight, Lbs.:
735
Can Weight,Lbs.:
0
Motor Weight, Lbs.:
3150
Total Pump Weight,Lbs.:
5920
Version: 3.94P
Customer: Progress Energy
Date: 08-28-2008

/ram Tencarva Machinery
►(��.I� George Ceelen
SECTIONAL
VIT-FFFM
6 Stage IOxl4RHHO
DISCHARGE HEAD ASSEMBLY
ITEM
NAM _
Ca
MATERIAL
AMU
600
_
VZDSCHARGE
9645
CAFUNSTEELFAB
A53
004
_
NUT -ADJUSTING
2130
BRASS C38000
B18M00
ON
HEADSHAFT
H27
89416
A582M95M
616
HOUSING
1003
CAST IRON CL30
A48,948611
617
BEARING HOUSING
1109
FEDERNIAY NSMURH BRZ
B584-00
618
GLAND- SPLIT
1203
SST 318
A7441400
6M
PACKING
5026
GRAPMM PACKING
ML402.09
622
SLINGER
5121
RUBBER@DM
D3588.98
730
KEY -MOTOR GE
2242
CARBON SfEEL 1018
A108A8
757
SCREW -GLAND ADJUSTING
2229
SST318
6-0Oe
779
GASKET -HOUSING
6136
ACRYLICINITRIE
5136REV4
UU UW
642 _
646
MNU ZINC ri na WET
COLUMN PIPE_ _ ___
LINESHAFT
6501
BLACK PPE 8Gi 40
A 6SY8
2227
SST 416
A58210140
_
649
LINESHAFT COUPLING
2265
SST 418
92
RETAINER. BEARING
1003
CAST OWN
656
LINESHAFT BEARING
1109
FEOERAILOY BR2
05"
760
CAPSCRIEW-HEX
2229
SST 316
BOWL ASSEMBLY
660
SHAFT- BOWL
BOWL- INTERMEDIATE
2227
SST 418
AS82M956
A53684L999Uo1
670
N17
DUCTILE IRON ENAMEL
672
673
BEARING- INT BOWL--
IMPELLER _—
1109
FEDERALLDY BISMUTH BRZ
8564-00
8584-00
A708.99-
1102
7142
SILICON BRONZE C87600
CARBON STEEL 1018
677
COLLET -IMPELLER
NO
BOWL/8ELL-SUCTION
1018
DUCTILE IRON 65.45.12
A536A41
690
BEARING SUCTION
1109
FEDERALLOY BISMUTH BRZ
8584-00
692
SANDCOLLAR
THIS
FEOERALI.OYBISMUTHBRZ
B%4-00
B98
STRAINER -SUCTION
6913
SST 316XPND METAL FL
A555.97
747
PLUG -PIPE
1046
IMALLEABLE IRON
A197
7W
CAPSCREW-HEX
2229
SST 316
A27600a
Version: 3.94P Customer: Progress Energy Date: 08-28-2008

Tencarva Machinery
George Ceelen
HH
AD
R
i
TPL
Hydraulic Data
Flow (gpm):
Pump Head (ft):
TDH (ft):
Speed (rpm):
Fluid:
Temperature (F)
Viscosity:
Spec.Grav:
Version: 3.94P
DO
O
DIMENSIONAL OUTLINE
VIT-FPFM
6 Stage 1Ox14RHH0
Iq
Pump Data
AD:
1.75
AG:
Size:
14RHHO
BD:
24.5
Stages:
6
BL:
104.25
CD:
BowlShaft:
2.19"
CL:
N/A
COL:
105.75"
LineShaft:
1.94"
DD:
17.50
LineShaft Type:
Open
MTN SUB: 39.3
Column:
Standard
DH:
12.00
Column:
10" Flanged
G:
25.00
Bearing Spacing:
5 feet
H:
22.75
Section Length:
5 feet
HH:
34.00
Head:
F:VIT
J:
1.25
Flange (Disch.):
10"-300# RF
R:
14.60
Inlet:
S:
1.13
SL:
7.87
Seal:
Packing
TPL:
210.0"
Strainer:
Bolt -On Basket
UG:
N/A
SubBase:
None
V:
W:
X:
XC:
Y:
Z:
MAX:
15.38
"J" DIA FOUR PLCS
EO SP ON "H" BC
DISC HEAD
Miscellaneous
Motor Data
2300
Thrust At Design (lb):
13453
Model:
WP-1
539.8
Thrust At Shutoff(Ib):
16261
Make:
USEM
546.0
Pumping Level(in):
48
HP:
400
1770
RPM:
1800
Water
Weight
Type:
VHS, 300°/,EHT
60
Pump (lb):
2770
Efficiency:
93.5
1.105
Motor (lb):
3150
Frame:
5008P
1
Total (lb):
5920
Ratchet:
NRR
Customer: Progress Energy
Date: 08-28-2008

eorge Machinery ADDERS
George Ceelen VIT-FFFM
6 Stage I0x14RHHO '
ADDITIONAL PUMP COMPONENTS
The following is a list of the additional components you ordered.
Consult factory for any other components or services.
Component
Strainer
SST Strainer
Bowl SS Bolting
Flang Col SST Bolt
Ductile Iron Bowl
High Pressure Packing Box
Version: 3.94P Customer: Progress Energy Date: 08-28-2008

Company: Tencarva Machinery
Name: George Ceolen
Date: 08/28/08
PUMP DATA SHEET Turbine 60 Hz
Customer: Progress Energy
Order No:
Pump:
Size: 14RHHD (6 stages)
Type: Lineshaft Speed: 1770 rpm
Synch speed: 1800 rpm Dia: 9.625 in
Curve: E6414RRPCO
Specific Speeds: Ns: 3300
Pump Notes for Standard Sizes:
Suction Size-10" Discharge Sizes-10",12". Curves are certified for
water at 60°F only Consult factory for perfomwnce with any other
fluid.
Vertical I umine: Bowl size: 14 in
Max lateral: 0.75 in
Thrust K factor: 24 Ib/ft
Pump Limits for Standard Construction:
Temperature: 120 °F Pressure: 330 psi g
Sphere stze: 1.18 in
--- Data Point --
Flow: 2300 US gpm
Head: 546 ft
Elf: 82.2%
Power: 386 hp
NPSHr: 21 ft
-- Design Curve --
Shutoff Head: 663 ft
Shutoff dP: 287 psi
Min Flow: --- US gpm
BEP: 84.8% eH
@ 2688 US gpm
NOL Pwr: 398 hp
@ 2968 US gpm
-- Max Curve --
Max Pwr: 436 hp
@ 3098 US gpm
D
A
x°1 ,
50
Search Criteria:
Flow: 2300 US gpm
Fluid:
Water
Density: 62.25 Ib/lP
Viscosity: 1.105 cP
NPSHa:---fl
Motor:
Head: 546 ft
Temperature: 60 °F
Vapor pressure: 0.2563 psi a
Alm pressure: 14.7 psi
Standard: NEMA Size: 400 hp
Speed: 1800
Sizing criteria: Max Power on Design Curve
70
500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3600
= 25
N
a
0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3600
500
250
3
d 0 500 1000 1600 2000 2500 3000 3500
70
US gpm
Performance Evaluation:.
Flow Speed
Head
Efficiency
Power
NPSHr
US gpm rpm
ft
%
hp
ft
2760 1770
480
84.6
395
27.9
2300 1770
546
a2.2
386
21
1840 1770
578
74.9
359
16.1
1380 1770
599
64.6
323
13.2
920 1770
---
—
---
--
4000
4000
4000
Turbine V9 Selected from catalog: Goulds Lineshaft 60HZ Vers: 3.22

HDPE Product
Catalog
> Pipe
> Fittings
> Fusion Equipment
> Electrofusion
> Mechanical Connections
> Accessories
Version 2.2 2007

ISCO HDP6 Proderf Catalog
High -Density
Polyethylene Pipe
Introduction
ISCO industries, LLC is the largest high -density polyethylene pipe distributor in North
America. ISCO can serve your needs anywhere in the USA and internationally. ISCO
offers a complete package of HDPE piping products. Butt fusion machines are offered fm
sale or rental. Fusion technicians are available to provide on -site training or assistance to
your project. Please call 1500.345-ISCO for all your HDPE piping needs
Some of The Characteristics of HDPE Pipe are:
Economical
Flexible and Coilable
Corrosion Resistant
Heat Posed
Zero Leak -Rate
Mechanically Joined (As Needed)
Hydraulically Smooth
Strong and Ductile
Fatigue and Surge Resistant
Weather Resistant
Long Design Life
Impact Resistant.
Tappable
Freeze Resistant
Chemically Resistant
Durable
Easily Installed
Abrasion Resistant
Small to Large Diameters
Inert
Non -Toxic, Nmi- asting
Self Restrained Pipe (Monolithic)
Lightweight
Listed and Approved
Reliable
© Copyright 2007 ISCO Industries, LLC. NI Rights Rew"ed.
ISCO

ISCO HDPE Product Catalog
Important Standards for High Density Polyethylene (HDPE) Pipe
Standards important for HDPE pipe relate to the resin the pipe is made from and the scan
dards related to manufacturing sizes and tolerances. The American Society of Testing
Materials (ASTM) standard for resin from which the pipe is made is ASTM D 3350.05,
Standard Specification for Polyethylene Plastics Pipe and Fittings Materials. This standard
defines the physical properties of the resin that the pipe is made from.
Pipe dimensions and manufacturing requirements:
ASTM F 714-06 Standard Specification for Polyethylene (PL) Pipe (SDR-PR) Based on
Outside Diameter. This standard is used for most large diameter HDPE pipe (4" to 63")
applications other than gas pipe.
ASTM D 2613.05 Standard Specification for Thermoplastic Gas Pressure Pipe jubing and
Fittings. Polyethylene pipe and other plastic for natural gas distribution are described in
great detail in this standard.
ASTM D 3036-03a Standard Specification for Polyethylene (PE) Plastic Pipe (DR -PR)
Based on Controlled Outside Diameter. Most HDPE water tubing (1/2 inch to 3") is made t,,
the dimensions in this standard. While pipe sizes up to 24" are provided, very little large
diameter pipe is made to this standard.
Intailation Standards:
ASTM D 2321-06 Standard Practice for Underground Installation of Thermoplastic Pipe for
Sewers and Other Gravity Flow Applications
ASTM D 2774-04 Standard Practice for Underground Installation of Thermoplastic Pressure
Piping
AS'rM F 1962 Standard Guide for Use of Maxi -Horizontal Directional Drilling for Placement
of Polyethylene Pipe or Conduit under Obstacles, Including River Crossings
ASTM F 585-94 Standard Practice for Insertion of Flexible Polyethylene Pipe into Existing
Sewers
American Water Works Association Standards
ANSVAWWA C 901-2005 Polyethylene Pressure Pipe and Tubing, ri in (13 nun) Through :1
in. (76 mm) for Water Services
ANSVAWWA C 906-2006 Polyethylene Pipe and Fittings, 4 in (100 mm) Through 6:3 In
(1,575 mm) for Water Distribution
Pipe Joining Standards:
ASTM F 2620 -- Standard Practice for Heat Fusion of Polyethylene Pipe and Fittings
ASTM D 2657 -- Standard Practice of Heat Fusion Joining of Polyolefin Pipe and Fittings
ASTM F 1290 - Standard Practice for Electrnfusion Joining Polvolefn Pipe And Fittings
Fitting Standards
ASTM D 3261 Standard Specification for Butt Heat Fusion Polyethylene (PE) Plastic
Fittings for Butt Fusion Polyethylene (PE) Plastic Fittings for Polyethylene (PE) Plastic Pipe
and'ILbing
ASTM F 1066 Standard Specification for Ctectrofusion Fittings for Outside Diameter
Controlled Polyethylene Pipe and Tubing
t�
0) Copyright'2007 ISCn Industries, LLC. All Rights Reamed.
IsCO
HDPE Pipe
1-800-345-ISCO

HDPE Pipe
1-800-345-ISCO
ISCO HDPF IWMuct CataloU
Specifications for HOPE Pipe
The physical properties of high -density polyethylene pipe are described using ASTM 1) 3360-
05, "Standard Specification for Polyethylene Plastic Pipe and Fittings Materials". Recently
this standard was changed. The two key areas changed are, density and slow /rack growth.
In the 05 version, the cell classifications for density were increased howl fbut l ells to seven
cells defining the density ranges for various resins.
New high performance bimodal resins, PE 4710 resins, have higher PENT test values. Slow
crack grow properties can now be defined using eight. cells.
As of December 2006, most 11DPE pipe is made from resin with a cell classification of PE
3454640. The pipe is labeled as PE3403/3608. The physical properties for PE 345464C are,
PROPERTY VALUE SPECIFICATION UNIT NOMINAL VALUE,
Material Designation
Material Designation
Cell Classification
Density
(3)
Melt Index
(4)
Flexural Modulus
(5)
Tensile Strength
(4)
Slow Crack Growth
PPI/ASTM
PE3408
PPI /ASTM
PE 3408/361L8
ASTM D 3360
345464C
ASTM D 1505
g/cm3
0.941-943
ASTM D 1238
gm/ 10 min
0.05 .I1
ASTM D 790
psi
110,000 to 140,000
ASTM D 638
psi
3,200
ESCR
ASTM D 1693
hours in 100'% igepal
>5,000
PENT
(6)
ASTM F 1473
howl
>100
HIDE @ 73 deg F
(4)
ASTM D 2837
psi
1,600
IJV Stabilizer
(C)
ASTM D 1603
%C
2 to 2.5'%
The dauiyy provided ktwhhonl tulam him k, 7Mpltal ant'F, pile hay a dmily of 9551n II57, wilh rarlam W,ek
Types of Polyethylene Pipe
All polyethylene (PE) is not the same. In ASTM D 3360.06, low density PE is defined as hav-
ing a density range of 0.919 to 0.925 g/cc; medium density has a range of 0.926 to 0,940 glee
and high density is defined with a range from 0.941 to 0.966. All densities are without car-
bon black.
Density influences key properties In polyethylene materials. As the density increases, the
tensile strength increases; also chemical resistance increases.
Medium density PE resins have been used for gas distribution. This original selection was
made based on superior slow crack growth properties of medium density resins. Medium
density pipe is designated as PE 2406 and PE 2708.
Today new bimodal resins are being used in gas distribution because of higher pressure rat-
ings plus superior slow crack growth. These resins are designated PE 3408, PE 3608, PE
3708, PE 3710 and PE 4710.
® Copyright 2007 ISCO Industries, I.I.C. All Rights Renem&
I
ISCO

/SCO 9DP8 Product Catalog
Slow Crack Growth
The Pent test is used to determine stress crack resistance for PE resins. The PENT test is
conducted in accordance with ASTM F 1473, "Standard That Method for Notch Tensile Test
to Measure the Resistance to Slow Crack Growth of Polyethylene Pipes and Resins". This
test uses a solid sample of material which is notched and tested.
The PENT test is a good test of slow crack growth. Scratches and gouges can cause crack
propagation. Materials with high PENT numbers are less likely to fail because of slow crack
growth.
Traditional PE 3408/3608 resins have PENT test values of about 100 hours. New bimodal
resins used to make PE 3710 and PE 4710 pipes have values ranging from 600 hours to sever-
al thousand hours.
Physical Properties of PE 4710
HDPE pipe with a designation of PE 4710 is made from resin with a cell classification of PE
446474C or PE 445574C. We suggest using a specification calling for a minimum cell classifi-
cation of PE 445474 C or higher. Both cell classifications can be used if specified in this way.
The pipe is labeled as PE 4710. The physical properties for PE 446474C are provided below:
PROPERTY VALUE
SPECIFICATION
UNIT
NOMINAL VALUE
Material Designation
PPI / ASTM
PE 4710
Cell Classification
ASTM D 3350
445474 C
Density
(4)
ASTM D 1505
g/cmS
0.947-955
Melt Index
.
(4)
ASTM D 1238
gm/ 10 min
<.16
Flexural Modulus
(5)
ASTM D 700
psi
110,000 to 160,000
Tensile Strength
(5)
ASTM D 638
psi
3500-4000
Slow Crack Growth
ESCR
ASTM D 1693
hours in 100% igepal
>5,000
PENT
(7)
ASTM F1473
hours
>500
HDB @ 73 deg F
(4)
ASTM D 2837
psi
1,600
UV Stabilizer
(C)
ASTM D 1603
%C
2 to 2.5 %
Fla- dmssily pimidrd w eilhout ewbon hlaek. Npical PE 47111 HDPE pip has it density of 0.060In 0.064 with earlwn black.
11. ho eall'd a IT. 17In. the pipe and n shI has,ubslsuliatlon at 50 yea,,.
hJ Copyright 2007 1.400 Indusi. LLC. All Rights Reserved.
ISCO
HDPE Pipe
1-800-345-ISCO

I'll' SbOd/3-ill I P`-� I1111`l. 1'iir >;l/P'.
HDPF Pipe
• hems highlighted
Blue indicates stxndary
stocking items that arc - _ more readily available.
• Pressures are based ou .. -
using water ai E3-
(73-r)
• Average inside diameter
calculated using nomi-
nal OD and minimum
wall plus WY ror use ill
estimating fluid flows. - - - - - -
Actual ID will vans. ..
• Other piping sizes of -
DR's may be available -- -
upuu request.
• Standard UngWls:
40' for 2"-24" -
50 for Eli" and larger
Coils available tor 3/4'
ll'(8' by special 4,rderi
i
i
1-800-345-ISCO
www.isco-pipe.com
'9 Cnptrighl 2(107 IS('O Indn,Vis, I.M . All Right, Nc rn.d.
ISCO
1;

NPDES Permit

ern
r NCDENR
ti
Y
Michael F. Easley
Governor
William G. Ross, Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
August 11, 2006
Mr. Gauq Whisnant, Plant Manager
Carolina Power and Light d/b/a/ Progress Energy Carolinas, Inc.
Cape Fear Steam Electric Plant
500 CP&L Road
Moncure, North Carolina 27559
Subject:
Dear Mr. Whisnant:
Alan W. Klimek, P.E., Director
Division of Water Quality
AUc 1 S 200
$
'Pe FEAR PLAN-r
Issuance of NPDES Permit
NC0003433
Cape Fear Steam Electric Plant
Chatham County
Division personnel have reviewed and approved your application for renewal of the subject permit.
Accordingly, we are forwarding the attached NPDES discharge permit. This permit is issued pursuant to
the requirements of North Carolina General Statute 143-215.1 and the Memorandum of Agreement
between North Carolina and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency dated May 9, 1994 (or as
subsequently amended).
This final permit includes the following major changes from the draft permit sent to you on
March 29, 2006:
Outfall 008 and stormwater outfalls SW-1, SW-2, SW-3, and SW-4 were added back to the pen -nit.
The monitoring frequencies for Total Arsenic and Total Selenium have been reduced to semi-
annually for Outfall 001 to be consistent with the monitoring requirements for Outfall 005.
After additional review of the RPA, the Division made a decision to add a weekly average
limit for selenium (5.6 ug/L) for Outfall 007. However, because of the limit addition the
selenium speciation and fish tissue monitoring requirements are eliminated. In addition, the
facility is allowed 18 months from the effective date of the permit to comply with the Total
Selenium limit. This time period is allowed in order for the facility to budget and
design/construct the treatment system. The Division believes that allowed time is sufficient
to comply with the newly imposed selenium limit.
The Division has reviewed your request to reduce monitoring frequency for selenium for
Outfall 007 and remove the selenium weekly average limit. These requests cannot be granted.
The Division appreciates corrections made by the Progress Staff in the selenium data used for the
Reasonable Potential Analysis (RPA). However, it is necessary to emphasize that these corrections were
already considered by the Division after they were communicated to us by Mr. Cahoon of Progress Energy
Letter to Nlr. Whisnant, pagvI
N. C. Division of Water Duality / NPDES Unit Phone: (919) 733,M
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1617 fax: [phone]
Internet: h2o.enr.state.naus DENRCustomer Service Center. 1800623.7748

on April 18, 2006. During the extended telephone conversation on April 18, 2006 between Mr. Cahoon of
Progress Energy and Dr. Sergei Chernikov of DWQ it was conveyed to Mr. Cahoon that even after
corrections have been made, the RPA still indicates potential for violation of the selenium water quality
standard. The number calculated by Progress Energy is 22.7 µg/L, it significantly exceeds the allowed
concentration for selenium, which is 5.6 µg/L. Therefore, based on the RPA results, the Division increased
monitoring frequency for selenium, and added the weekly average selenium limit. Your latest request to
remove one of the data points (6.6 µg/L) cannot be granted. EPA guidance allows removal of the data
point from RPA only in cases of laboratory or sampling errors. In this case, the data point was obtained as a
result of the conditions that actually have occurred at the plant. In addition, even if the 6.6 µg/L is removed
from the consideration, the RPA still predicts potential violation of the water quality standard.
Your request to remove monitoring requirements for fecal colifomms at Outfall 005 cannot be
granted These requirements were added at the insistence of the Division of Environmental Health, which
has a concern that your discharge might have a negative effect on the water intake downstream.
If any parts, measurement frequencies or sampling requirements contained in this permit are
unacceptable to you, you have the right to an adjudicatory bearing upon written request within thirty (30)
days following receipt of this letter. This request must be in the form of a written petition, conforming to
Chapter 150B of the North Carolina General Statutes, and filed with the Office of Administrative Hearings
(6714 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-6714). Unless such demand is made, this
decision shall be final and binding.
Please note that this permit is not transferable except after notice to the Division. The Division
may require modification or revocation and reissuance of the permit. This permit does not affect the legal
requirements to obtain other permits which may be required by the Division of Water Quality or permits
required by the Division of Land Resources, the Coastal Area Management Act or any other Federal or
Local governmental permit that may be required. If you have any questions concerning this permit, please
contact Sergei Chernikov at telephone number [phone], extension 594.
cc: Central Files
NPDES Files
Raleigh Regional Office / Surface Water Protection Section
Aquatic Toxicology Unit
Mr. Roosevelt Childress, EPA Region IV
Environmental Sciences Section, Biological Assessment Unit

Permit NC0003433
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
PERMIT
TO DISCHARGE WASTEWATER UNDER THE
NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIDIINATION SYSTEM
In compliance with the provisions of North Carolina General Statute 143-215.1, other lawful standards and
regulations promulgated and adopted by the North Carolina Environmental Management Commission, and the
Federal Water Pollution Control Act, as amended,
Carolina Power and Light d/b/a/ Progress Energy Carolinas, Inc.
is hereby authorized to discharge wastewater from a facility located at the
Cape Fear Steam Electric Generating Plant
500 CP&L Road
Moncure
Chatham County
to receiving waters designated as an unnamed tributary to the Cape Fear River (outfalls 001, 003, 005, 007,
and SW-4), the Cape Fear River (outfall 008) and Shaddox Creek (outfalls SW-1, SW-2, and SW-3) in the
Cape Fear River Basin in accordance with effluent limitations, monitoring requirements, and other
conditions set forth in Parts I, II and III hereof.
This permit shall become effective September 1, 2006.
This permit and authorization to discharge shall expire at midnight on July 31, 2011.
Signed this day August 11, 2006.
W. Klimek, P.E., Director
ivision of Water Quality
By Authority of the Environmental Management Commission

Part I Permit NC0003433
SUPPLEMENT TO PERMIT COVER SHEET
All previous NPDES Permits issued to this facility, whether for operation or discharge are hereby revoked, and as of
this issuance, any previously issued permit bearing this number is no longer effective. Therefore, the exclusive authority
to operate and discharge from this facility arises under the permit conditions, requirements, terns, and provisions
included herein.
Progress Energy Carolinas, Inc, is hereby authorized to:
1. Continue to operate the following systems located at the Cape Fear Steam Electric Generating
Plant at 500 CP&L Road near Moncure in Chatham County:
• West Ash Pond (Internal Outfall 001). This outfall discharges the following treated
wastewaters to outfall 007; ash sluice waters (bottom and fly), coal pile runoff, No. 2 fuel oil
tank runoff, settling basin drains, sand bed filter backwash, parking lot drains, equipment cooling
tower blowdown and drain, boiler blowdown, oil unloading area drains, softener regenerate,
demineralizer regenerate, add/caustic sump wastewater, yard and floor drains, and ash trench
drain wastewater.
• Once -Through Cooling Water and Stormwater (Internal Outfall 003).
• East Ash Pond (Internal Outfall 005). This outfall discharges the following wastewaters to
outfall 007; ash sluice waters (bottom and fly), runoff from yard drains, air pteheater washes,
electrostatic precipitator washes, metal cleaning wastes, spent sandblast material, and treated
sanitary wastewater.
• Combined Wastewater to the Cape Fear River (Outfall 007). This outfall is a combination
of all internal outfalls.
• Stormwater from an abandoned ash pond (Outfall 008).
• Stormwater Outfalls (Outfalls SW-1, SW-2, SW-3, SW-4).
2. Discharge from said treatment works and/or outfalls into an unnamed tributary to the Cape Fear
River classified WS-IV waters in the Cape Fear River Basin.

-� Progress Ener;e, Cape Fear Plant
„
��...
• • Y , �K 4 4fi
'ny
IJ C�
i' iY1 1
\ T
BoIf
ckhorn Dam
M1 �i l
� .�
i
Progress Energy, Cape Fear - NC0003433 Facility Fir'; will
LocationUSGS Quad Name: Moncure
Receiving Stream: UT Cape Fear River
Stream class: WS-iv Not to SCALE
Subbasin: Cape Fear - 030607 lYorth

ire
r JJ
N {/i
i
Outfall ,SW I • __ �a�
t / r Outfall SW-3
s 'Q' - • 1 .
1 � � Outfall 003:�
Sub to tl0f3�7..
�, Outfall SW-2
Al
Outfall001
l\
� t
c 1 �� ���
- Outfall SW-4
a �\
x:\
eel
• 1� A 4 /��i
,
y 4..- , � 1il( ; � -�{�� � \�:. 1 -"• i._� ail l _: -.i "�: / � i i r /�.�
Outfall 0��
st
Progress Energy, Cape Fear - NC0003433 Facility
USGS Quad Name: Moncure Location
Receiving Stream: UT Cape Fear River, UT Shaddox Creek
Stream Class: WS-IV
Subbasin: Cape Fear - 030607 North I Not to SCALE

Part I
Permit NC0003433
SECTION A: FINAL LIMITATIONS AND CONTROLS
1. Effluent Limitations and Monitoring Requirements (Outfall 001)
During the period beginning on the effective date of this permit and lasting until expiration, the Permittee is authorized
to discharge from Internal Outfall 001 (Ash Sluice, low volume wastewater, stormwater, and coal pile runoff
from the West Ash Pond to Outfall 007). Such discharges shall be limited and monitored by the Pemrittee as
specified below:
DISCHARGE
LIMITATIONS
MONITORING REQUIREMENTSEFFLUENT
0-1-APACTERISTICS
Monthly
Daily E
~Maximum
Measurement Freyuenc.y
Sample
Avera e
Sa�
�. .Location
Flow, MGD
Weekly
Pump Logs
Influent Effluent
Oil and Grease
15.0 mg/L
20.0 mg/L
Monthly
Grab
Effluent
Total Suspended Solids
30.0 mg/L
100.0 mg/L
Monthly
Grab
Effluent
Total Arsenic
Semi-annually
Grab
Effluent
Total Selenium
Semi-annually
Grab
Effluent
Ammonia -Nitrogen
Quarterly
Grab
Effluent
Onceidischarge of
Total Iron
1.0 mg/L
1.0 mg/L
Grab
Effluent
metal cleaning waste
Onceldischarge of
Total Copper
1.0 mg/L
1.0 mg/L
Grab
Effluent
metal cleaning waste
NOTES:
1. Metal Cleaning Waste means any wastewater resulting from cleaning (with or without chemical clearing
compounds) any metal process equipment including, but not limited to, boiler tube cleaning, boiler fireside
cleaning, and air preheater cleaning.
Samples taken in compliance with the monitoring requirements listed above shall be taken prior to mixing with other
sources of wastewater.
Sampling during the discharge of metal cleaning wastes will be determined based on the time the metal cleaning wastes
enter the ash pond and the detention time of the ash pond.
There shall be no discharge of polychlorinated biphenyls.

Part I
2. Effluent Limitations and Monitoring Requirements (Outfall 003)
Permit NC0003433
During the period beginning on the effective date of this permit and lasting until expiration, the Permittee is authorized
to discharge from Internal Outfall 003 (Once -Through Cooling Water and Stormwater to Outfall 007). Such
discharges shall be limited and monitored by the Permittee as specified below.
EFFLUENT
CIiAIL�CTERISTICS
DISCELLRGE LIMITATIONSrMlIONITORINGREQUIREMENTS
Monthl Averaoc
Daf1`-Afa.�-unnmernc
emcnt
�amtiople
Sam leTv e
Location
Pump Logs or
Influent or
Flow, MGD
similar readings
Effluent
TES:
Samples taken in compliance with the monitoring requirements listed above shall be taken prior to mixing with other
sources of wastewater.
There shall be no discharge of polychlorinated biphenyls.
This permit prohibits the use of any chemicals used for maintenance of the once -through cooling system that contain
chromium, zinc, or copper.
This permit prohibits the use of chlorine, or chlorine -containing compounds, in the once -through cooling system.
The Permittee shall obtain authorization from the Division of Water Quality prior to using any biocide in the cooling
water.

Part I
Permit NC0003433
3. Effluent Limitations and Monitoring Requirements (Outfall 005)
During the period beginning on the effective date of this permit and lasting until expiration, the Peunittee is autborized
to discharge from Internal Outfall 005 (Ash Sluice, Sanitary Wastewater, Low Volume Wastewater, Stormwater,
and Metal Cleaning Waste' from the East Ash Pond to Outfall 007). Such discharges shall be limited and
monitored by the Permittee as specified below:
DISCII.4itGF
EFFLUENT
MONI'FORING REQUIREMENTS
LI�II'I'r+`"PIONS
CHARACTERISTIC$
! 2+lonthh-
Daily lfeasueuiintFregvenc�'
'.Sample
- dvcragr -
- Maxmmm ;
Saviple Type
Location
Floe,, Mr-
Weekly
Pump Loos
Influent or
Effluent
Oil and Grease
15.0 mg/L
20.0 mg/L
Monthly
Grab
Effluent
Total Suspended Solids
30.0 mg/L
100.0 mgiL
Monthly
Grab
Effluent
Total Arsenic
Semi-annually
Grab
Effluent
Total Selenium
Semi-annually
Grab
Effluent
Fecal Cofrforms
Quarterly
Grab
Effluent
Ammonia -Nitrogen
Quarterly
Grab
Effluent
Onceldischarge of
Total Iron
1.0 mg/L
1.0 mg/L
Grab
Effluent
metal cleaning waste
Onceldischarge of
Total Copper
1.0 mg/L
1.0 mg/L
Grab
Effluent
metal cleaning waste
NOTES:
1. Metal Cleaning Waste means any wastewater resulting from cleaning (with or without chemical cleaning
compounds) any metal process equipment including, but not limited to, boiler tube cleaning, boiler fireside
cleaning, and air preheater cleaning.
Samples taken in compliance with the monitoring requirements listed above shall be taken prior to mixing with other
sources of wastewater.
Sampling during the discharge of metal cleaning wastes will be determined based on the time the metal cleaning wastes
enter the ash pond and the detention time of the ash pond.
There shall be no discharge of polychlorinated biphenyls.

Pan I Permit NC0003433
4. Effluent Limitations and Monitoring Requirements (Outfall 007)
During the period beginning on the effective date of this permit and lasting until expiration, the Permittee is authorized
to discharge from Outfall 007 (Combined Wastewaters and Stormwater from Outfalls 001, 003, and 005). Such
discharges shall be limited and monitored by the Permittee as specified below:
EFFLUENT CHARACTERISTICS
.
DISCiL' : -'-
LIMITATIONS
MONITORING REQUIREMENTS
- W'eldy
.Average
Dash
Maximum
iMeasurcment
Prequenet
.` :;;t "=
Sam
•Sa�m4.ple
xFt�q' itbn�
Flow, MGD
Daily
Instantaneous
Effluent
Total Chromium (pg/L)
Quartery
Composite
Effluent
Total Arsenic (Ng/L)
Quarterly
Composite
Effluent
Total Selenium (Ng/L) z
5.6
Weekly
Composite
Effluent
Total Mercury (Ng/L)
Quarterly
Composite
Effluent
Total Nickel (Ng/L)
Quarterly
Composite
Effluent
Total Copper (Ng/L)
Quarterly
Composite
Effluent
Total Nitrogen (NO2tNO3+TKN) (mg/L)
Quarterly
Composite
Effluent
Total Phosphorus (mg/L)
Quarterly
Composite
Effluent
Temperature
32^C
Daily
Grab
Effluent
pH
Between 6.0 and 9.0
Standard Units
Daily
Grab
Effluent
Chronic ToxiCity3
Quarterly
Composite
Effluent
NOTES:
1. Effluent sampling point shall be located on the discharge canal at the point of discharge into the unnamed tributary
to the Capc Fear River.
2. Facility is allowed 18 month from the effective date of the permit to comply with the Total Selenium limit.
This time period is allowed in order fox the facility to budget and design/construct the treatment system.
3. Chronic Toxicity (Ceriodaphnia) Pass/Fail at 90%; February, May, August, November. See condition A. 5. of this
permit.
There shall be no discharge of polychlorinated biphenyls.
There shall be no discharge of floating solids or visible foam in other than trace amounts.

Part I Permit NC0003433
5. Quarterly Chronic Toxicity Limit
The pemrittee shall conduct quarterly chronic toxicity tests using test procedures outlined in the "North Carolina
Ceriodapbnia Chronic Effluent Bioassay Procedure," Revised February 1998, or subsequent versions.
The effluent concentration defined as treatment two in the procedure document is 90%. The permit holder shall
perform gNarJtllY monitoring using this procedure to establish compliance with the permit condition. The tests will be
performed during the months of February, May, August and November. Effluent sampling for this testing shall
be performed at the NPDES permitted final effluent discharge below all treatment processes.
All toxicity testing results required as part of this permit condition will be entered on the Effluent Discharge
Monitoring Form (MR-1) for the month in which it was performed, using the parameter code TGP3B. Additionally,
DWQ Form AT-1 (original) is to be sent to the following address:
Attention: North Carolina Division of Water Quality
Environmental Sciences Section
1621 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, N.C. 27699-1621
Completed Aquatic Toxicity Test Forms shall be Sled with the Environmental Sciences Section no later than 30 days
after the end of the reporting period for which the report is made.
Test data shall be complete and accurate and include all supporting chemical/physical measurements performed in
association with the toxicity tests, as well as all dose/response data. Total residual chlorine of the effluent toxicity
sample must be measured and reported if chlorine is employed for disinfection of the waste stream.
Should there be no discharge of flow from the facility during a month in which toxicity monitoring is required, the
permittee will complete the information located at the top of the aquatic toxicity (AT) test form indicating the facility
name, permit number, pipe number, county, and the month/year of the report with the notation of "No Flom' in the
comment area of the form. The report shall be submitted to the Environmental Sciences Section at the address cited
above.
Should the permittee fail to monitor during a month in which toxicity monitoring is required, then monthly monitoring
will begin immediately. Upon submission of a valid test, this monthly test requirement will revert to quarterly in the
months specified above.
Should any test data from this monitoring requirement or tests performed by the North Carolina Division of Water
Quality indicate potential impacts to the receiving stream, this permit may be re -opened and modified to include
alternate monitoring requirements or limits.
NOTE: Failure to achieve test conditions as specified in the cited document, such as minimum control organism
survival, minimum control organism reproduction, and appropriate environmental controls, shall constitute an invalid
test and will require immediate follow-up testing to be completed no later than the last day of the month following the
month of the initial monitoring.
6. Intake Screen Backwash
The discharge of intake screen backwash is permitted without limitations or monitoring requirements.
7. Biocide Condition
The Permittee shall not use any biocides except those approved in conjunction with the permit application. The
Pernittee shall notify the Director in writing not later than ninety (90) days prior to instituting use of any additional
biocide used in cooling systems which may be toxic to aquatic life, other than those previously reported to the Division

Part I
Permit NC0003433
of Wirer Quality. Such notification shall include completion of Biocide Worksheet 101 and a map locating the discharge
point and receiving stream.
8. Domestic Wastewater Treatment Plant
The domestic wastewater treatment plant shall be properly operated and maintained to ensure treatment of sanitary
effluent to secondary standards.
SECTION B: SCHEDULE OF COMPLIANCE
The Permittee shall comply with final effluent limitations by the effective date of the permit.
The Permittee shall at all times provide the operation and maintenance necessary to operate the existing
facilities in accordance with Part II.C.2 of this peraut.
SECTION C• FINAL MONITORING REQUIREMENTS FOR STORMWATER DISCHARGES
During the period beginning on the effective date of the permit and lasting until expiration, the per ittee is authorized
to discharge stormwater associated with industrial activity from outfalls 008, SW -I, SW-2, SW-3, and SW-4. Such
discharges shall be controlled, limited, and monitored as specified below.
Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plans
The pemmittee shall develop, within one year of the effective date of this permit, and continue to update a Stormwater
Pollution Prevention Plan, hereinafter referred to as the Plan, for direct discharges of stormwater to surface waters.
The Plan shall be considered public information in accordance with Part U, Standard Conditions, Section E.10. of this
permit The Plan shall include, at a minimum, the following items:
Site Plan: The site plan shall provide a description of the physical facility and the potential pollutant
sources which may be expected to contribute to contamination of regulated stormwater discharges.
The site plan shall contain the following:
(1) A general location map (USGS quadrangle map, or appropriately drafted equivalent reap),
showing the facility's location in relation to transportation routes and surface waters, and the
name of the receiving water(s) to which the stormwater outfall(s) discharges. If the discharge
is to a municipal separate storm sewer system, the name of the municipality and the ultimate
receiving waters, and accurate latitude and longitude of the point(s) of discharge must be
shown.
(2) A narrative description of storage practices, loading and unloading activities, outdoor process
areas, dust or particulate generating or control processes, and waste disposal practices.
(3) A site map (or series of maps) drawn to scale with the distance legend indicating location of
industtial activities (including storage of materials, disposal areas, process areas, and loading
and unloading areas), drainage structures, drainage areas for each outfall and activities
occurring in the drainage area, building locations and impervious surfaces, the percentage of
each drainage area that is impervious. For each outfall, a narrative description of the potential
pollutants which could be expected to be present in the regulated stormwater discharge.
(4) A list of significant spills or leaks of pollutants that have occurred at the facility during the 3
previous years and any corrective actions taken to mitigate spill impacts.

Part I
Permit NC0003433
(5) Certification that the stormwater outfalls have been evaluated for the presence of non-
stormwater discharges. The certification statement will be signed in accordance with the
requirements found in Part II, Standard Conditions, Section B.11.
b. Stormwater Management Plan: The stormwater management plan shall contain a narrative description
of the materials management practices employed which control or minimize the exposure of
significant materials to stormwater, including structural and non-structural measures. The stormwater
management plan, at a minimum, shall incorporate the following:
(1) A study addressing the technical and economic feasibility of changing the methods of
operations and/or storage practices to eliminate or reduce exposure of materials and
processes to stormwater. Wherever practicable the pemuittee should consider covering
storage areas, material handling operations, manufacturing or fueling operations to prevent
materials exposure to stormwater. In areas where elimination of exposure is not practicable,
the stormwater management plan shall document the feasibility of diverting the stormwater
runoff away from areas of potential contamination.
(2) A schedule to provide secondary containment for bulk storage of liquid materials, storage of
Section 313 of Title III of the Superfund Amendments and Reauthorization Act (SARA)
water priority chemicals, or storage of hazardous materials to prevent leaks and spills from
contaminating stormwater runoff. If the secondary containment devices are connected
directly to stormwater conveyance systems, the connection shall be controlled by manually
activated valves or other similar devices (which shall be secured with a locking mechanism)
and any stormwater that accumulates in the containment area shall be at a minimum visually
observed prior to release of the accumulated stormwater. Accumulated stormwater shall be
released if found to be uncontaminated. Records documenting the individual malting the
observation, the description of the accumulated stormwater and the date and time of the
release shall be kept for a period of five years.
(3) A narrative description of Best Management Practices (BMPs) to be considered such as, but
not limited to, oil and grease separation, debris control, vegetative filter strips, infiltration and
stormwater detention or retention, where necessary. The need for structural BMPs shall be
based on the assessment of potential of sources contributing significant quantities of
pollutants to stormwater discharges and data collected through monitoring of stormwater
discharges.
(4) Inspection schedules of stormwater conveyances and controls and measures to be taken to
limit or prevent erosion associated with the stormwater systems.
Spill Prevention and Response Plan: The Spill Prevention and Response Plan shall incorporate a risk
assessment of potential pollutant sources based on a materials inventory of the facility. Facility
personnel (or team) responsible fox implementing the plan shall be identified in the plan. A
responsible person shall be on -site at all times during facility operations that have the potential to
contaminate stormwater runoff through spills or exposure of materials associated with the facility
operations.
d. Preventative Maintenance and Good Housekeeping Program: A preventative maintenance program
shall be developed. The program shall document schedules of inspections and maintenance activities
of stormwater control systems, plant equipment and systems. Inspection of material handling areas
and regular leaning schedules of these areas shall be incorporated into the program.
C. Training schedules shall be developed and training provided at a minimum on an annual basis on
proper spill response and cleanup procedures and preventative maintenance activities for all personnel
involved in any of the facility's operations that have the potential to contaminate stormwater runoff.
Facility personnel (or team) responsible for implementing the training shall be identified in the plan.

Part I Permit NC0003433
i The Stomawater Pollution Prevention Plan shall identify a specific position(s) responsible for the
overall coordination, development, implementation, and revision to the Plan. Responsibilities for all
components of the Plan shall be documented and position(s) assignments provided.
g. Plan Amendment: The permittee shall amend the Plan whenever there is a change in design,
construction, operation, or maintenance which has a significant effect on the potential for the
discharge of pollutants via a point source to surface waters. The Stormwater Pollution Prevention
Plan shall be reviewed and updated on an annual basis.
The Director may notify the permittee when the Plan does not meet one or more of the minimum
requirements of the permit Within 30 days of such notice, the permitter shall submit a time schedule
to the Director for modifying the Plan to meet minimum requirements. The permitter shall provide
certification in writing (m accordance with Part II, Standard Conditions, Section B.11.) to the Director
that the changes have been made.
h: Facility Inspections: Inspections of the facility and all stonrawater systems shall occur at a minimum
on a semiannual schedule', Once in the fall (September - November) and once during the spring (April -
June). The inspection and any subsequent maintenance activities performed shall be documented,
recording date and time of inspection, individual(s) making the inspection and a narrative description
Of the facility's stormwater control systems, plant equipment and systems. Records of these
inspections shall be incorporated into the Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan.
Implementation: Implementation of the Plan shall include documentation of all monitoring,
measurements, inspections, maintenance activities and training provided to employees, including the
log of the sampling data Activities taken to implement BMPs associated with the industrial activities,
including vehicle maintenance activities, must also be recorded. All required documentation shall be
kept on -site for a period of five years and made available to the Director or his authorized
representative immediately upon request.
SECTION D: STORMWATER DEFINITIONS
1. Best Management Practices (BMPs)
Schedules of activities, prohibitions of practices, maintenance procedures, and other management practices to
prevent or reduce the pollution of waters of the United States. BMPs also include treatment requirements,
operation procedures, and practices to control plant site runoff, spillage or leaks, sludge or waste disposal, or
drainage from raw material storage.
2. Bulk Storage of Liquid Products
Liquid raw materials, manufactured products, waste materials or by-products with a single above ground
storage container having a capacity of greater than 660 gallons or with multiple above ground storage
containers having a total storage capacity of greater than 1,320 gallons.
3. Point Source DiscbgW
Any discernible, confined and discrete conveyance, including but specifically not limited to, any pipe, ditch,
channel, tunnel, conduit, well, discrete fissure, container, rolling stock, or concentrated animal feeding
operation from which pollutants are or may be discharged to waters of the state.
4. Runoff Coefficient
The fraction of total rainfall that is not infiltrated into or otherwise retained by the soil, concrete, asphalt or
other surface upon which it falls that will appear at the conveyance as nmoff.
5. 5eoadw Containment
Spill containment for the contents of the single largest tank within the containment structure plus sufficient
freeboard to allow for the 25-year, 24-hour storm event.

Pat[ I
Permit NC0003433
6. Section 313 Water Pnonty Chemical
. A chemical or chemical category which:
a. Is fisted in 40 CFR 372.65 pursuant to Section 313 of Title III of the Superfund Amendments and
Reauthorization Act (SARA) of 1986, also titled the Emergency Planning and Community Right -to -
Know Act of 1986;
b. Is present at or above threshold levels at a facility subject to SARA title III, Section 313 reporting
requirements; and
C. That meet at least one of the following criteria:
(1) Is listed in appendix D of 40 CFR part 122 on either Table II (organic priority pollutants),
Table III (certain metals, cyanides, and phenols) or Table )V (certain topic pollutants and
hazardous substances);
(2) Is listed as a hazardous substance pursuant to section 311(b)(2)(A) of the CWA at 40 CFR
116.4; or
(3) Is a pollutant for which EPA has published acute or chronic water quality criteria.
7. Significant Matemal�
Includes, but is not limited to: raw materials; fuels; materials such as solvents, detergents, and plastic pellets;
finished materials such as metallic products; raw materials used in food processing or production; hazardous
substances designated under section 101(14) of CERCI.A; any chemical the facility is required to report
pursuant to section 313 of Title III of SARA, fertilizers; pesticides; and waste products such as ashes, slag and
sludge that have the potential to be released with stormwater discharges.
8. Significant sping
Includes, but is not limited to: releases of oil or hazardous substances in excess of reportable quantities under
section 311 of the Clean Water Act (Ref 40 CFR 110.10 and CFR 117.21) or section 102 of CERCLA (Ref: 40
CFR 3024).
9 Stormwater Runoff
The flow of water which results from precipitation and which occurs immediately following rainfall or as a
result of snowmelt.
10. Total Flow
The flow corresponding to the time period over which the sample collection occurs. The total flow calculated
based on the size of the area draining to the outfall, the amount of the built -upon (impervious) surfaces within
the drainage area, and the total amount of rainfall occurring during the sampling period.
11. Visible Sedimentation
Solid particulate matter, both mineral and organic, that has been or is being transported by water, air, gravity,
or ice from its site of origin which can be seen with the unaided eye.

NPDES Permit Requirements
Page 1 of 16
PART II
STANDARD CONDITIONS FOR NPDES PERMITS
Section A. Definitions
2/Monui
Samples are collected twice per month with at least ten calendar days be�Leen sampling events.
3 eek
Samples are collected three tunes per weekon three separate calendar days.
Act or "the Act"
The Federal Water Pollution Control Acy also ]mown as the Clean Water Act; as amended, 33 USC 1251, et. seq.
Annual Avetaae
The arithmetic mean of all "daily discharges" of z pollutant measured during the calendar year. In the case of fecal
coliform, the geometric mean of such discharges.
Arithmetic Mean
The summation of the individual values divided by the number of individual values.
Bvpass
The known diversion of waste streams from any portion of a treatment facility including the collection system, which
is not a designed or established or operating mode for the facility.
Calendar Dav
The period `tom midnight of one day until midnight of the nest day. HOwecer, for purposes of this permit may
consecutive 24-hour period that reasonably represents the calendar day may be used for sampling.
Calendar Quarto
One of the following distinct periods: January through Max* April through June, Jury through September, and
October through December.
Composite Samule
A sample collected over a 24-hour period by continuous sampling or combining grab samples of at least 100 ml in
such a manner as to result in a total sample representative of the wastewater discharge during the sample period. The
Director may designate the most appropriate method (specific number and size of aliquots necessary, the time
in[ervai between grab samples, etc) on a case -by -case basis. Samples may be collected manually or automatically.
Composite samples may be obtained by the following methods:
(1) Continuous; a single contnuous sample collected over a 24-hour period proportional to the rate of flow-
(2) Constant time/variable volume: a series of grab samples collected at equal time intervals over a 24 hour
period of discharge and combined proportional to the ate of flow measured at the time of individual sample
collection, or
(3) Variable time/constant volume: a series of gab samples of equal vohtme collected over a 24 hour period
with the time intervals between samples determined by a preset number of gallons passing the sampling
point Flow measurement between sample intervals shall be determined by use of a flow recorder and
totalizer, and the preset gallon interval between sample collection fixed at no greater than 1/24 of the
expected total daily flow at the treatment system, or
(4) Constant rime/constant volume: a series of grab samples of equal volume collected over a 24-hour period at
a constant time interval- This method may only be used in situations where effluent flow rates vary
less than 15 percent The grab samples shall be taken at intervals of no greater than 20 minutes apart
during any 24-hour period and must be of equal size and of no less than 100 milliliters. Use of this method
requires prior approval by the Director.
Version 62012003

NPDES Permit Requirement:
Page 2 of It
In accordance with (4) above, influent grab samples shall not be collected more than once per hour.
Effluent grab samples shall not be collected more than once per hour except at wastewater treatment system
having a detention time of greater than 24 hours. In such cases, effluent grab samples may be collected a
intervals evenly spaced over the 24-hour period that are equal in number of hours to the detention time of th,
system in number of days. However, the interval between effluent grab samples may not exceed six hours no,.
the number of samples less than four during a 24-hour sampling period -
Continuous flow measurement
Flow monitoring that occurs without interruption_ throughout the operating hours of the facility. Flow shall b,
monitored continually except for the infrequent times when there may be no flow or for infrequent maintenanu
activities on the flow device.
Daily Discharge
The discharge of a pollutant measured during a calendar day or any 24-hour period that reasonably represents rh<
calendar day for purposes of sampling. For pollutants measured in units of mass, the "daily discharge' is calculated 2--
the total mass of the'pollutant discharged over the day. The "daily discharge" cotcentration comprises the mear
concentration for a 24-hour sampling period as either a composite sample concentration or the arithmetic mean of al
grab samples collected during that period. (40 CFR 1223)
Dail Maximum
The highest "daily discharge" during the calendar month.
Daily Sampling
Parametcs requiring daily sampling shall be sampled 5 out of every 7 days per weep unless otherwise specified in the
permit. The Division expects that sampling shall be conducted on weekdays except where holidays or other
disruptions of normal operations prevent weekday sampling. If sampling is required for all seven days of the week
for any permit parameter(s), that requirement will be so noted on the Effluent T.im;nrions and Monitoring Page(s).
DWQ or "the Division"
The Division of Water Quality, Department of Environment and Natural Resources.
Facility Closure
The cessation of wastewater treatment at a permitted facility, or the cessation of aIl activities that require coverage
under the NPDES. Completion of facility closure will allow this permit to be rescinded.
Geometric Mean
The Nth root of the product of the individual values where N = the number of individual values. For purposes o
calculating the geometric mean, values of "0" (or "< [detection leve]j'� shall be considered = L
Grab Sample
Individual samples of at least 100 mil collected over a period of time not exceeding 15 minutes. Grab samples can b.
collected manually. Grab samples must be representative of the disci+' a (or the receiving stream, for instrean
samples).
Hazardous Substance
Any substance designated under 40 CFR Part 116 p rsuant to Section 311 of the Clean Water Act.
Instantaneous flow measurement
A measure of flow taken at the time of sampling, when both the sample and flow will be representative of the tots
discharge.

NPDFS Permit Requimnencs
Page 3 of 16
Monthly Average (concentration limit)
The arithmetic mean of all "daily discharges" of a pollutant measured during the calendar month. In the case of fecal
coiform, the geometric mean of such discharges.
P m-,itIssuingAurhority
The Director of the Division of Water Quality.
Quarterly Average (concentration limit)
The average of all samples taken over a calendar quarter.
R"
Severe oroverty damage
Substantial physical damage to property, damage to the treatment facilities which causes them to become inoperable,
or substantial and permanent loss of =rural resources which can reasonably be expected to occur in the absence of a
bypass. Severe property damage excludes economic loss caused by delays in production.
Toxic Pollutant.
Any pollutant listed as toazc under Section 307(a)(1) of the Clean Water Act.
Upset
An incident beyond the reasonable control of the Permicee causing unintentional and temporary noncompliance with
permit effluent limitations and/or monitoring requirements. An upset does not include noncompliance caused by
operational error, improperly. designed treatment facilities, inadequate treatment facilities, lack of preventive
maintenance, or careless or improper operation.
Weekly Ave (concentration limit
The arithmetic mean of all "daily discharges" of a pollutant measured during the calendar week-. In the cue of fecal
coliform, the geometric mean of such -discharges.
Section B_ General Conditions
1. Duty to Comely
Tne Permirtee must comply with all conditions of this permit. Any Permit noncompliance constitutes a violation
of the Clean Water Act and is grounds for enforcement action; for permit termination, revocation and reissuance,
or modification; or denial of a permit renewal application 140 CFR 12241).
a. The Petmittee shall comply with effluent standards or prohibitions established under section 307(a) of the
Clean Water Act for toxic pollutants and with standards for sewage sludge use or disposal established under
section 405(d) of the Clean Water Act within the time provided in the regulations that establish these
standards or prohibitions or standards for sewage sludge use or disposal, even if the permit has not yet been
modified to incorporate the requirement
b. The Clean Water Act provides that any person who violates section 301, 302, 306, 307, 308, 318 or 405 of the
Act, or any permit condition or limitation implementing any such sections in a permit issued under section
402, or any requircment imposed in a. pretreatment program approved under sections 402(a)(3) or 402(b)(8)
of the Act, is subject to a civil penalty not to exceed $25,000 per'dzy for each violation. (40 CFR 122.41 (a)
(2))
c. The Clean Water Act provides that any person who negEgendy violates sections 301, 302, 306, 307, 308, 318, or
405 of the Act, or any condition or limitation implementing any of such sections in a permit issued under
section 402 of the Act, or any requirement imposed in a pretreatment program approved under section
402(a)(3) or 402(b)(8) of the Act, is subject to mminal penalties of $2,500 to $25,000 per day of violation, or
imprisonment of not more than 1 year, or both. In the case of a second or subsequent conviction for a
negligent violation, a person shall be subject to criminal penalties of not more than $50,000 per day of
violation, or by imprisonment of not more than 2 years, or both. (40 CFR 122.41 (a) (2))
Version 6/2W008

NPDES Permit Requirements
Page 4 of 16
d. Any person who knoviugly violates such sections, or such conditions or limitations is subject to mmirlal
penalties of $5,000 to $50,000 per day of violation, or imprisonment for not more than 3 years, or both. In
the case of a second or subsequent conviction for a ]mowing violation, a person shall be subject to c6minal
penalties of not more than $100,000 per day of violation, or imprisonment of not more than 6 years, or both.
[40 CFR 122.41 (a) (2)]
Any person who knowingly violates section 301, 302, 303, 306, 307, 308,318 or 405 of the Act, or any permit
condition or limitation implementing any of such sections in a permit issued under section 402 of the Act,
and who knows at that time that he thereby places another person in imminent danger of death or serious
bodily injury, shall, upon conviction, be subject to a fine of not more than $250,000 or imprisonment of not
more than 15 years, or both. In the case of a second or subsequent conviction for a wowing endangerment
violation, a person shall be subject to a fine of not more than $500,000 or by imprisonment of not more than
30 years, or both. An organization, as defined in section 309(c)(3)(B)(rit) of the CWA, shall, upon conviction
of violating the imminent danger provision, be subject to a fine of not more than $1,000,000 and can be fined
up to $2,000,000 for second or subsequent convictions. [40 CFR 122-41 (a) (2)]
f. Under state law, a oval penalty of not more than $25,000 Des violation may be assessed against any person
who violates or fails to act in accordance with the terms, conditions, or requirements of a permit. [North
Carolina General Statutes § 143-215.6A]
g. Any person may be assessed an administrative penalty by the Administrator for violating section 301, 302,
306, 307, 308, 318 or 405 of this Act, or any permit condition or limitation implementing any of such
sections in a permit issued under section 402 of this Acr. Administrative penalties for Class I violations are
not to exceed $10,000 per violation, with the m'timum amount of any Class I penalty assessed not to exceed
$25,000. Penalties for Class II violations are not to exceed $10,000 per day for each- day during which the
violation continues, with the magmum amount of any Class II penalty not to exceed $125,000. [40 CFR
122.41 (a) (3)]
2. Dun to Mitigate
The Permirree shall take all reasonable steps to min;me or prevent any discharge or sludge use or disposal in
violation of this permit which has a reasonable likelihood of adversely affecting human health or the environment
[40 CFR 12241 (d)].
3. Civil and Criminal Liability
Except as provided in permit conditions on 'Bypassing" (Part II. C. 4), "Upsets" (Part II. C. 5) and "Power
Failures" (Part IL C. 7), nothing in this permit shall be construed to relieve the Permitree from any
responsibilities, liabilities, or penalties for noncompliance pursuant to NCGS 143-2153, 143-215.6 or Section 309
of the Federal Act, 33 USC 1319. Furthermore, the Permitme is responsible for consequential damages, such as
fish ]Dille, even though the responsibility for effective compliance may be temporarily suspended.
4. Oil and Hazardous Substance Liability
Nothing in this permit shall be construed to preclude the institution of any legal action or relieve the Pernitree
from any responsibilities, liabilities, or penalties to which the Permiree is or may be subject to corder NCGS 143-
215.75 et seq. or Section 311 of the Federal Act, 33 USG 1321. Furthermore, the Perminee is responsible for
consequential damages; such as fish kills, even though the responsibility for effective compliance may be
temporarily suspended
5. Property Rights
The issuance of this permit does not convey any property rights in either real or personal property, or any
exclusive privileges, nor does it authorize any injury to private property or any invasion o` personal rights, nor
any infringement of Federal, State or local laws or regulations [40 CFR 12241 (g)].
6. Onshore or Offshore Construction
This permit does not authorize or approve the construction of any onshore or offshore physical structures or
facilities or the undertaking of any work in any navigable waters.

NPDES Permit Requirements
PaF 5 of 16
7. Severability
'Ihe provisions of this permit are severable. If any provision of this permit, or the application of any provision of t
permit to any circumstances, is held invalid, the application of such provision to other circumstances, and the remain•
of this permit, shall not be affected thereby (NCGS 150B-23].
8. Dutyto Provide information
The Permimec shall furnish to the Permit Issuing Authority, within a reasonable time, any information which the
Permit Issuing Authority may request to determine whether cause exist for modifying, revoking and reissuing, or
terminating this permit or to determine compliance with this permit The Permittee shall also fvmish to the
Permit Issuing Authority upon requests copies of records required by this permit [40 CFR 12241 (h)].
9. Duty to Reanoly
If the Permittee wishes to continue an activity regulated by this permit after the expiration date of this permit, the
Permiaee must apply for and obtain a new permit [40 CFR 122 41 (b)].
i0. Erniratio
The Permittee is not authorized to discharge after the expiration date. In order to receive autornatic
authorization to discharge beyond the expiation date, the Permittee shall submit such information, forms, and
fees as are required by the agency authorized to issue permit no later than 180 days prior to the expiation date.
Any Permittee that has not requested renewal at least 180 days prior to expiration, or any Permittee that does not
_ have a permit after the expiation and has not requested renewal at least 180 days prior to expiation, will subject
Elie Permittee to enforcement procedures as provided in NCGS 143-213.6 and 33 USC MI et seq.
11. SiMatoZ Rnquirement
All applications, reports, or information submitted to the Permit Issuing Authority shall be signed and certified
[40 CFR 12241 (k)].
a. All permit applications shall be signed as follows:
(I) For a corporation: by a responsible corporate officer. For the purpose of this Section, a responsible
corporate officer means: (a) z president, secretary, measurer or vice president of the corporation in
charge of a principal business function, or any other person who performs similar policy or decision
malting function=_ for the corporation, or (b) the manager of one or more manufacturing, production, or
operating facilities, provided, the manager is authorized to make management decisions which govern the
operation of the regulated facility including having the explicit or imp -licit duty of making major capital
investment recommendations, and initiating and directing other comprehensive measures to assure long
term environmental compliance with environmental laws and regulations; the manages can ensure that
the necessary systems are established or actions taken to gather complete and accurate information for
permit application requirements; and where authority to sign document has been assigned or delegated
to the manager in accordance with corporate procedures
(2) For a partnership or sole proprietorship: by a general partner or the proprietor, respectively, or
(3) For a municipality, State, Federal, or other public agency: by either a principal executive officer or
ranking elected official (40 CFR 122-22).
b. All report required by the permit and other information requested by the Permit Issuing Authority shall be
signed by a person desmbed in paragraph a. above or by a duly authorized representative of that person. A
person is a duly authorized representative only if.
1. The authorization is made in writing by a person described above;
2 The authorization specified either an individual or a position having responsibility for the overall
operation of the regulated fadity or activity, such as the position of plant manager, operator of a well or
well field, supenntendent, a position of equivalent responsibility, or an individual or position having
overall responsibility for environmental matters for the company. (A duly authorized representative may
thus be either a named individual or any individual occupying a named position_); and
3. The written authorization is submitted to the Permit Issuing Authority [40 CFR 122223
Version 61202003

NPDHS Permit Requirement:
Page 6 of it
c. Changes to authorization: If an authorization under paragraph (b) of this section is no longer accaatc
because a different individual or position has responsibility for the overall operation of the facility, a new
authorization satisfying the requirements of paragraph (b) of this section must be submitted to the Director
prior to or together with any reports, information, or applications to be signed by an authorizer
represenmrive [40 CFR 12222]
d. Certification. Any person signing a document under paragraphs a or b. of this section shall make &c
following certification [40 CFR 122.22]:
'1 certify, under penafty of law, that this document and all attachments were prepared under my direction o
supervision in accordance with a system designed to assure that qualified personnel propedy gather and evaluatf
the information submitted. Based on my inquiry of the person orpersons who manage the system, or those person:
directly responsible for gathering the information, the information submitted is, to the best of my knowledge ant
belief, true, accurate, and complete. I am aware that there are significant penalties for submitting false information
including the possibifrty of fines and imprisonment for knowing violations.'
12 Permit Actions
This permit may be modified, revoked and reissued, or terminated for cause. The filing of a request by the
Pctmittee for a permit modification, revocation and reissuance, or termination, or a notification of planner
changes or anticipated noncompliance does not stay any per ait condition [40 CFR 12241 (f)].
13: Permit Modification_ Revocation and Ressuance, or Termination
The issuance of this permit does not prohibit the permit issuing authority from reopening and modifying th-
permit, revoking and reissuing the pezmt, or tem>;n'ting the permit as allowed by the laws, rules, and regulation:
contained in Title 40, Code of Federal Regulations, Parrs 122 and 123; Tide 15A of the North Carolin:
Administrative Code, Subchapter 2H .0100; and North Carolina General Statute 143-215.1 at. al.
14. Annual Administering and Co p6n-ce Monitoring Fee Reouirements
The Permiree must pay the annual administering and compliance monitoring fee within thirty days after bein;
billed by the Division. Failure to pay the fee in a timely manner in accordance with 15A NCAC 2H.0105 (b) (4
may cause this Division to initiate action to revoke the permit
Section C. • Operation and Maintenance of Pollution Controls
Certified Operator
Upon classification of the permitted facility by the Certification Commission, the Permittee shall. employ
cerdfied water pollution control treatment system operator in responsible charge (ORC) of the water pollutio
control treatment system. Such operator must hold a certification of the grade equivalent to or greater than th
classification assigned to the water pollution control treatment system by the Certification Commission. -rh
Pemmittee must also employ one or more certified Back-up ,ORCs who possess a currently valid certificate of th
type of the system. Back-up ORCs must possess a grade equal to (or no more than one grade less than) the gad
of the system [15A NCAC 8G_0201].
The ORC of each Class I facility must
➢ Visit the facility at least weekly
➢ Comply with all other conditions of 15A NCAC 8G.0204.
The ORC of each Class H, III and IV facility must:
➢ Visit the facility at least daily, excluding weekends and holidays
➢ Properly manage and document daily operation and maintenance of the facility
➢ Comply with all other conditions of 15A NCAC 8G.0204.
Once the facility is classified, the Permittee shall submit a letter to the Certification Commission designating d
operator in responsible charge:
a. Within 60 calendar days prior to wastewater being introduced into a new system

NPDES Permit Requirements
Page 7 of 16
b. Within 120 calendar days of:
➢ Receiving notification of a change in the classification of the system requiring the designation of a
new ORC and batty -up ORC
A vacancy in the position of ORC or back-up ORC.
2. pry ex Operation and Maintenance
The Permittee shall at all times provide the operation and maintenance resources necessary to operate the existing
facilities at optimum efficiency. The Permittee shall at all times properly operate and maintain all facilities and
systems of treatment and control (and related appurtenances) which are installed or used by the Permittee to
achieve compliance with the conditions of this permit Proper operation and maintenance also includes adequate
laboratory controls and appropriate quality assurance procedures. This provision requires the Permiaee to install
and operate backup or atria-lia y facilities only when necessary to achieve compliance with the conditions of the
permit [?o CFR 122.41 (e)j.
3. Need to Halt or Reduce not a Defense
It shall not be a defense for a Permrrtee in an enforcement action that it would have been necessary to halt or
reduce the permitted activity in order to maintain compliance with the condition of this permit (40 CFR =41
(CA.
4. Bypassing of Treatment Facilities
a. Bypass not exceeding limitations [40 CFR 122-41 (m) (2))
The Permittee may allow any bypass to occur which does not cause effluent limitations to be exceeded, but
only if it also is for essential maintenance to assure efficient operation- These bypasses are not subject to the
provisions of Paragraphs b. and c. of this section.
b. Notice [40 CFR 122.41 (m)"(3))
(1) Anticipated bypass. If the Perm ttee knows in advance of the need for a bypass, it shall submit prior
notice, if possible at least ten days before the date of the bypass; including an evaluation of the
anticipated quality and effect of the bypass.
(2) Unanticipated bypass- The pemrittee shall submit notice of an unanticipated bypass as required in Part
II. E. 6. (24-hour notice).
c. Prohibition of Bypass
(I) Bypass from the treatment facility is prohibited and the Permit Issuing Authority may take atforcement
action against a Permittee for bypass, unless:
(A) Bypass was unavoidable to prevent loss of life, personal injury or severe property damage;
($) There were no feasible alternatives to the bypass, such as the.use of auxiliary treatment facilities,
retention of untreated wastes or maintenance during normal periods of equipment downtime. This
condition is not satisfied if adequate backup equipment should have been installed in the exercise of
reasonable engineering judgment to prevent a bypass which occurred during normal petiods of
equipment downtime or preventive maintenance; and
(C) The Permittee submit --Led notices as required under Paragraph b. of this section.
(2) Bypass from the collection system is prohibited and the Permit Issuing Authority may take enforcement
action against a Permitted for bypass as provided in any current or future systemwide collection system
permit associated with the treatment faality-
(3) The Permit Issuing Authority may approve an anticipated bypass, after considering its adverse effects, if
the Permit Issuing Authority determines that it will meet the three conditions listed above in Paragraph c.
T of this section.
5. Upsets
a Effect of an upset [40 CFR 12241 (n) (2)): An upset constitutes an affirmative defense to an action
brought for noncompliance wish such technology based permit effluent }imitations if the
requirements of
paragraph b. of this condition are met. No determination made during administrative review of claims that
Version W012003

NPDES Permit Requirements
Pagc 8 of 16
noncompliance was caused by upset, and before an action for noncompliance, is final administrative action
subject to judicial review.
b. Conditions necessary for a demonstration of upset A Permittee who wishes to establish the
affianative defense of upset shall demonstrate, through properly signed, contemporaneous operating logs, or
other relevant evidence that
(1) An upset occurred and that the Permittee can identify the cause(s) of the upset;
(2) The Permittee facility was at the time being properly operated; and
(3) The Permittee submitted notice of the upset as required in Part E. E. 6. (b) (B) of this permit
(4) The Permittee complied with any remedial measures required under Part U. B. 2. of this permit.
d Burden of proof [40 CFR 122.41 (n) (4)]: The Permittee seeking to establish the occurrence of an
upset has the burden of proof in any enforcement proceeding.
6. Removed Substances
Solids, sludges, filtcr backwash, or other pollutants removed in the course of treatment or control of wastewaters
shall be utilized/disposed of in accordance with NCGS 143-2151 and in a manner such as to prevent any pollutant
from such matevals from entering waters of the State or navigable waters of the United States. The Permittee
shall comply with all emsting Federal regulations governing the disposal of sewage sludge -'Upon promulgation of
40 CFR Part 503, any permit issued by the Permit Issuing Authority for the utlizatioa/disposal of sludge may be
reopened and modified, or revoked and reissued, to incorporate applicable requirements at 40 CFR 503. Tne
Permittee shall comply -with applicable 40 CFR 503 Standards for the Use and Disposal of Sewage Sludge (when
promulgated) within the time provided in the regulation, even if the permit is not modified to incorporate the
requirement The Permittee shall notify the Permit Issuing Authority of any significant change in its sludge use
or disposal practices.
7. Power Failures
The Permittee is responsible for maintaining adequate safeguards (as required by 15A NCAC 2H.0124 —
Reliability) to prevent the discharge of untreated or inadequately treated wastes during electrical power failures
either by means of alternate power sources, standby generators or retention of inadequately treated effluent.
Section D. Monitoring and Records
R_ pe resentari a Sampling
Samples collected and measurements taken, as required herein, shall be characteristic of the volume and nature of
Elie permitted discharge. Samples collected at a frequency less than daily shall be taken on a day and time thar is
characteristic of the discharge over the entire period the sample represents. All samples shall be taken at tht
monitoring points specified in this permit and, unless otherwise specified, before the effluent joins or is dilute:
by any other wastestream, body of water, or substance. Monitoring points shall not be changed wirbou
notification to and the approval of the Permit Issuing Authority [40 CFR 12241 0)].
2. R_pc ocdnc
Monitoring results obtained during the previous month(s) shall be summaritrd for each month and reported on;
monthly Discharge Monitoring Report (DMR) Form (1VM 1, Ll, 2, 3) or alternative forms approved by tht
Director, postmarked no later than the 28th day following the completed reporting period.
The first DMR is due on the last day of the month following the issuance of the permit or in the case of a nev
facility, on the last day of the month following the commencement of discharge. Duplicate signed copies o
these, and all other reports required herein, shall be submitted to the following address:
NC DFNR / Division of Water Quality / Water Quality Section
AMMI, TON: Central Files
1617 Matt Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617

NPDES Permit Requirements
Pagc 9 of 16
3. Flow Measurements
Appropriate flow measurement devices and methods consistent with accepted scientific practices shall be selected
and used to ensue the accuracy and reliability of measurements of the volume of monitored discharges. The
devices shall be installed, calibrated and maintained to ensure that the accuracy of the measurements is consistent
with the accepted capability of that type of device. Devices selected shall be capable of measuring flows with a
maximum deviation of less than 10% from the true discharge rates throughout the range of expected discharge
volumes. Flow measurement devices shall be accurately calibrated at a minimum of once per year and rri2mmined
to ensue that the accuracy of the measurements is consistent with the accepted capability of that type of device.
The Director shall approve the flow measurement device and monitoring location prior to installation -
Once -through condenser cooling watei `flow monitored by pump logs, or pump hour metes as specified in Par, I
of this permit and based on the manufactures pump curves shall nor be subject to this requirement
4. Test Procedures
Test procedures for the analysis of pollutants shall conform to the EMC regulations (published pursuant to.
NCGS 143-215.63 et seq.), the Water and Air Quality Reporting Acts, and to regulations published pursuant to
Section 304(g), 33 USC 1314, of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act (as Amended), and 40 CFR 136; or in
the case of sludge use or disposal, approved under 40 CFR 136, unless otherwise specified in 40 CFR 503, unless
other test procedures have been specified in this permit [40 CFR 12241].
To meet the intent of the monitoring required by this pewit, all test procedures must produce minimum
detection and reporting levels that are below the permit discharge requirements and all data generated must be
reported doom to the minimum detection or lower reporting level of the procedure If no approved methods are
determined capable of achieving minimum detection and reporting levels below permit discharge requirements,
then the most sensitive (method with the lowest possible detection and reporting level) approved method must
be used_
5. Penalties for Lz=ering'
The Clean Water Act provides that any person who falsifies, tampers with, or knowingly renders inaccurate, any
monitoring device or method required to be maintained under this pewit shall, upon conviction, be punished by
a fine of not more than $10,000 per violation, or by imprisonment for not more than two years per violation, or
by both If a conviction of a person is for a violation committed after a first conviction of such person under this
paragraph, punishment is a fine of not more than $20,000 per day of violation, or by imprisonment of not more
than 4 yeas, or both [40 CFR 179 41]_
6. Records Retention
Except for records of monitoring information required by this permit related to the Petmittee's sewage sludge
use and disposal activities, which shall be retained for a period of at least five years (or, longer as required by 40
CFR 503), the P=nittee shall retain records of all monitoring information, including.
➢ all calibration and maintenance records
➢ all original strip chart recordings for continuous monitoring instrumentation
➢ copies of all reports required by this permit
➢ copies of aIl data used to complete the application for this permit
These records or copies shall be maintained fox a period of at least 3 years from the date of the sample,
measurement, report or application. This period may be extended by request of the Director at any time [40 CFR
179.41].
i. Recording Results
For each measurement or sample taken pursuant to the requirements of this permit, the Permittee shall record
the following information [40 CFR 122411: ,
a The date, enact place, and time of sampling or measurements;
b. The individual(s) who performed the sampling or mMsureMents;
c The date(s) analyses were performed;
d The individual(s) who performed the analyses;
Version 62012003

NPDES Permit Requirements
Page t o of ] e
e. The analytical techniques or methods used; and
f. The results of such analyses.
S. Inspection and Entry
The Permittee shall allow the Director, or an authorized representative (including an authorized contractor acting
as a representative of the Director), upon the presentation of credentials and other documents as may be requirec
by law, to;
a_ Enter upon the Petmittee's premises where a regulated facility or activity is located or conducted, or where
records must be kept under the conditions of this permit;
b. Have access to and copy, at reasonable times, any records that must be kept under the conditions of this
pest;
c Inspect at reasonable times any facilities, equipment (including monitoring and control equipment), practices.
or operations regulated or required under this permit; and
d_ Sample or monitor at reasonable times, for the purposes of assuring permit compliance or as otherwise
authorized by the Clean Water Act, any substances or parameters at any location [40 CFR 12241 ()].
Section E Rgportang Requirements
I Chang; in Dischug>
All discharges authorized herein shall be consistent with the terns and conditions of this permit. The discharge
of any pollutant identified in this permit more frequently than or at a level in excess of that authorized shal
constitute a violation of the permit
2. Planned Changes
The Perminee shall give notice to the Director as soon as possible of any planned physical alterations o;
additions to the peanitted facility [40 CFR 12241 (I]]. Notice is required only when:
a. The alteration or addition to a permitted facility may meet one of the criteria for new sources at 40 CFF
12229 (b); or
b. The alteration or addition could significantly change the nature or increase the quantity of pollutant
discharged- This notification applies to pollutants subject neither to effluent litnitarions in the permit, nor tt
notification requirements under 40 CFR 12242 (a) T.
c. The alteration or addition results in a significant change in the Pennittee's sludge use or disposal practices
and such alternation, addition or change may justify the application of permit conditions that are differen
from or absent in the existing permit, including notification of additional use or disposal sites not reporter
during the permit application process or not reported pursuant to an approved land application plan.
3. Antiaoated Noncompliance
The Permittee shall give advance notice to'the Director of any planned changes to the perinitted facility or othe
activities that might result in noncompliance with the permit [40 CFR 12241 (1) (2)],
4. Transfers
This permit is not transferable to any person except after notice to the Director_ The Director may requir
modification or revocation and reissuance of the permit to document the change of ownership. Any such acric,
may incorporate other requirements as may be necessary under the Clean Water Act [40 CFR 122.41 (1) (3)].
5. Monitoring Reports
Monitoring results shall be reported at the intervals specified elsewhere in this permit [40 CFR 12241 (1) (4)].
a. Monitoring results must be reported on a Discharge Monitoring Report (DMR) (See Part 11. D. 2) or fors
provided by the Director for reporting results of monitoring of sludge use or disposal practices.
b. If the Permittee monitors any pollutant more frequently than required by this permit, the results of suc
monitoring shall be included in the calculation and reporting of the data submitted on the DMR

NPDES Permit Requirements
Page 11 of 16
6. Twm4Lffour Flour Rgporrm
a. The permittee shall report to the Director or the appropriate Regional Office any noncompliance that
potentially threatens public health or the environment Any information shall be provided orally within 24
hours from the time the Permittee became aware of the circumstances. A written submission shall also be
provided within 5 days of the time the Pemrittee becomes aware of the circumstances. The written
submission shall contain a description of the noncompliance, and its cause; the period of noncompliance,
including exact dates and times, and if the noncompliance has not been corrected, the anticipated time it is
expected to continue; and steps taken or planned to reduce, eliminate, and prevent reoccurrence of the
noncompliance [40 CFR 122.41 (1) (6)].
b. The Director may waive the written report on a case -by -case basis for reports under this section if the oral
report has been received within 24 hours.
C. Occurrences outside normal business hours may also be reported to the Division's Emergency Response
personnel at [phone], [phone] or [phone].
7. Other Noncomoliance
The Pemaittee shall report all instances of noncompliance not reported under Part II. E. 5 and 6. of this permit at
the time monitoring reports are submitted. The reports shall contain the information listed in Part II. E. 6. of
this permit [40 CFR 12241 0) (7)].
8. Other Information
Where the Pe-ttnittee becomes aware that it failed to submit any relevant facts in a permit application or
submitted incorrect information in a permit application or in any report to the Director, it shall promptly submit
such facts or information [40 CFR 199 41 p) (8)].
9. Noncompliance Notificanon
The Permittee shall report by telephone to either the central office or the appropriate regional office of the
Division as soon as possible, but in no case more than 24 hours or on the next working day following the
occurrence or fast knowledge of the occurrence of any of the following.
a Any occurrence at the water pollution control facility which results in the discharge of significant amounts of
wastes which are abnormal in quantity or characteristic, such as the dumping of the contents of a sludge
d gester, the known passage of a slug of hazardougb the fa
hazardous substance drrcility; or any other unusual
circumstances.
b. Any process unit failure, due to known or unknown reasons, that reader the facility incapable of adequate
wastewater treatment such as mechanical or electrical failures of pumps, aerators, compressors, etc.
c Any failure of a pumping station, sewer line, or treatment facility resulting in a by-pass directly to receiving
waters without treatment of all or any portion of the influent to such station or facility.
Persons reporting such occurrences by telephone shall also file a written report within 5 days following first
knowledge of the occurrence-
10. Availability of Reoorts ()(�
Except for data determined to be confidential under NCGS 143 2L5.3 a or Section 308 of the Federal Act 33
uSC 1318, all reports prepared in accordance with the terms shall be available for public inspection at the offices
of the Division of Water Quality. As required by the Act, effluent data shall not be considered confidential.
Knowingly snaking any false statement on any such report may result in the imposition of rrim'ngl penalties as
provided for in NCGS 143-2151(b)(2) or in Section 309 of the Federal Act
71. Penalties for Falsification of Aeoorts
The Clean Water Act provides that any person who knowingly makes any false statement, representation, or
certification in any record or other document submitted or required to be maintained under this permit, including
monitoring reports or reports of compliance or noncompliance sh4 upon conviction, be punished by a fine of
Version 6202003

NPDFS Permit Requirements
Pagc 12 of 16
not more titan $25,000 per violation, or by imprisonment for not more than two years per violation, or by both
(40 CFR 122-41).
12. Annual Performance Reports
Pemvttees who own or operate facilities that collect or treat municipal or domestic waste shall provide an annual
report to the Permit Issuing Authority and to the users/customers served by the Permittee (NCGS 143-215.1 C).
The report shall summarize the performance of the collection or treatment system, as well as the extent to which
the facility was compliant with applicable Federal or State laws, regulations and rules p rtami mi g to water quality.
The report shall be provided no later than sixty days after the end of the calendar or fiscal year, depending upon
which annual period is used for evaluation.
PART III
OTHER REQUIREMENTS
Section A. Construction
The Pamittee shall not commence construction of wastewater treatment facilities, nor add to the planes treatment
capacity, nor change the treatment process(es) utilized at the treatment plant unless the Division has issued an
Authorization to Construct (AtC) permit Issuance of an AtC will cot occur until Final Plans and Specifications for
the proposed construction have been submitted by the Permittee and approved by the Division.
Section B. Groundwater Monitoring
The Permittee shall, upon written notice from the Director of the Division of Water Quality, conduct groundwater
monitoring as may be required to determine the compliance of this NPDFS permitted facility with the current
groundwater standards.
Section C. Changes inDischarg_es of Toxic Substances
The Permittee shall notify the Permit Issuing Authority as soon as it Imows or has reason to believe (40 CFR 12242):
a. That any activity has occurred or will occur which would result in the discharge, on a routine or frequent
basis, of any toxic pollutant which is not limited in the permit, if that discharge will exceed the highest of the
following "notification levels";
(I) One hundred micrograms per liter 000 µg/L);
(2) Two hundred micrograms per liter (200 µg/L) for acrolem and aaylonitrile, five hundred micrograms
per liter (500 pg/L) for 24-dinitrophenol and for 2-methyl-4.6-dinitrophenol; and one milligram per liter
(1 mg/L) for antimony;
(3) Five times the maximum concentration value reported for that pollutant in the permit application.
b. That any activity has occurred or will occur which would result in any discharge, on a non -routine or
infrequent basis, of a toxic pollutant which is not limited in the permit, if that discharge will exceed the
highest of the following "notification levels";
(I) Five hundred microgrms per liter (500 µg/L);
(2) One milligram per liter 0 mg/L) for antimony;
(3) Ten times the maximum concentration value reported for that pollutant in the permit application.
Section D. Evaluation of Wastewater Discharge Ahernatives
The Perrrittee shall evaluate all wastewater disposal alternatives and pursue the most environmentally sound
alternative of the reasonably cost effective alternatives. If the facility is in substantial non-compliance with the terms
and conditions of the NPDFS permit or governing rules, regulations or laws, the Permittee shall submit a report in
such form and detail as required by the Division evaluating these alternatives and a plan of action within 60 days of
notification by the Division.
Section E. Facility Closure Requirements
The Permittee must notify the Division at least 90 days prior to the closure of any wastewater treatment system
covered by this permit The Division may require specific measures during deactivation of the system to prevent

NPDES Permit Requirements
Page 13 of 16
adverse impacts to waters of the State. This permit cannot be rescinded while any activities requiring this petit
continue at the permitted facility -
PART IV
SPECIAL CONDITIONS FOR MUNCIPAL FACILITIES
Section.A. publiciv Owned Treatment Works (POTWsI
All POTWs must provide adequate notice to the Direaor of the following.
1, Any new introduction of pollutants into the POTW from an indirect discharger which would be subject to
section 301 or 306 of CWA if it were directly discharging those pollutants; and
2 Any substantial change in the volume or character of pollutants being introduced by an indirect discharger
as influent to that POTW at the time of issuance of the permit
3. For purposes of this paragmph, adequate notice shall include information on (1) the quality and quantity of
effluent introduced into the POTW, and (2) any anticipated impact of the change on the quantity or quality
of effluent to be discharged from the POTW.
Section B. Municipal Control of pollutants from Industrial Users.
1. Effluent limitations are listed in Part I of this peraut Other pollutants attributable to inputs from
industries using the municipal system may be present in the Permittee's discharge At such rime as
sufficient information becomes available to establish limitations for such pollutants, this Pemit may be
revised to specify effluent limitations for any or all of such other pollutants in accordance with best
practi�mble technology or water quality standards•
2 Under no arcnmstances shaLl the Perm:ttee allow introduction of the following wastes in the waste
aeatment system:
a pollutants whichcreatea fire or explosion hazard in the POTW, including, but not limited to,
wastestce ms with a dosed cup flashpoint of less than 140 degrees Fahrenheit or 60 degrees
Centigrade using the test methods specified in 40 CFR 26121;
b. Pollutants which will cause corrosive stmctutal damage to the POTW, but m no case Discharges
with pH lower than 5.0, unless the works is specifically designed to accommodate such Discharges;
c Solid or viscou�s
�cpollutants in amounts which will muse obstruction to the flow in the POTW
resulting in Intezfamc-
d Any pollutant, including oxygen demanding pollutants (BOD, etc) released in a Discharge at a flow
rate and/or pollutant concentration which will cause Interference with the POTW;
e Heat in amounts which will inhibit biological activity in the POTW resulting in Interference, but in
no case heat m such quantities that the temperature at the POTW Treatment Plant exceeds 40°C
(104°F) unless the Division, upon request of the POTW, approves alternate temperature limits;
f. Petroleum oil, nonhiodegradable carting oil, or products of mineral oil origin in amounts that will
cause interference or pass through;
g. Pollutants which result in the presence of toxic gases, vapors, or fumes within the POTW a
quanoty that may cause acute worker health and safety problems;
h. Any trucked or hauled pollutants, except at discharge points designated by the POTW.
3. With regard to the effluent requirements listed in Part I of this permit, it may be necessary 3 the
Permittee to supplement the requirements of the Federal Pretreatment Standards (40 CFI )
to
ensure compliance by the Pemhittee with all applicable effluent limitations. Such actions by the Perahittee
may be necessary regarding some or all of the industries discharging to the municipal system.
4. The Permimee shall require any industrial discharges sending influent to the permitted system to meet
Federal Pretreatment Standards promulgated n response to Section 307(b) of the Act Prior to acceptithg
wastewater from any significant industrial user, the Pemhirtee shall either develop and submit to the
Version &2W003

NPDES Permit Requiremen
Pagc 14 of
Division a Pretreatment Program for approval per 15A NCAC 2H .0907(a) or modify an er;stit.
Pretreatment Program per 15A NCAC 2H .0907(b).
5. This permit shall be modified, or altematively, revoked and reissued, to incorporate or modify an approve
POTW Pretreatment Program or to include a compliance schedule for the development of a POT"K
Pretreatment Program as required under Section 402(b)(8) of the Clean Water Act and implementin
regulations or by the requirements of the approved Stare pretreatment program, as appropriate.
Section C. Pretreatment Proorams
Under authority of sections 307(b) and (c) and 402(b)(8) of the Clean Water Act and implementing regulations 4
CFR Part 403, North Carolina General Statute 143-215.3 (14) and implementing regulations 15A NCAC 21
.0900, and in accordance with the approved pretreatment program, all provisions and regulations contained an
referenced in the Pretreatment Program Submittal are an enforceable part of this permit.
The Permirtee shall operate its approved pretreatment program in accordance with Section 402(b)(8) of the Clew
Water Act, the Federal Pretreatment Regulations 40 CFR Part 403, the Stare Pretreatment Regulations 15-,
NCAC 2H .0900, and the legal authorities, policies, procedures, and financial provisions contained in it
pretreatment program submission and Division approved modifications there of. Such operation shall includ
but is not limited to the implementation of the following conditions and requirements:
1. Sewer Use Ordinance (SUO)
The Permittee shall maintain adequate legal authority to implement its approved pretreatment program.
2. Industrial Waste SurvevT(IlY7S)
The Pennittee shall update its Industrial Waste Survey (IWS) to include all users of the sewer collectoot
system at least once every five yeas.
3. Monitoring Plan
The Penmirree shall implement a Division approved Monitoring Plan for the collection of facility specifi,
data to be used in a wastewater treatment plant Headworks Analysis (HWA) for the development o
specific pretreatment local limits. Effluent data from the Plan shall be reported on the DMRs (as require(
by Part II, Section D, and Section E5.).
4. Headworks Analysis (HWAI and Local Limits
The Permitree shall obtain Division approval of a Headworks Analysis (HWA) at least once every frrn
pears, and as required by the Division. Within 180 days of the effective date of this permit (or zn�
subsequent permit modification) the Permittee shall submit to the Division a written technical eoaivatiot
of the need to revise local limits CLe, an updated HWA or documentation of why one is not needed) [4t
CFR 122-42]. The Perminee shall develop, in accordance with 40 CFR 4035(c) and 15A NCAC 2H •.0909
specific Local I.imis to implement the prohibitions listed in 40 CFR 403.5(a) and (b) and 15A NCAC 21-
.0909.
5. Industrial User Pretreatment Pern its (IUPZ & Allocation Tables
In accordance with NCGS 143-215.1, the Pemmittee shall issue to all significant industrial users, permits fo.
operation of pretreatment equipment and discharge to the Permittees treatment works. These permit
shall contain limitations, sampling protocols, reporting requirements, appropriate standard and specia
conditions, and compliance schedules as necessary for the installation of treatment and contra
technologies to assure that their wastewater discharge will meet all applicable pretreatment standards an(
requirements. The Permittee shall maintain a current Allocation Table (AT) which summarizes the result
of the Headworks Analysis (HWA) and the limits from all Industrial User Pretreatment Perris PP)
Permitted IUP loadings for each parameter cannot exceed the treatment capacity of the POTW a
determined by the HWA.

NPDES Permit Regn:rene tts
Pagc 15 of 16
6. Authorization to Construct (A to Q
The Permittee shall ensure that an Authorization to Construct permit (-Ntq is issued to all applicable
industdal users for the construction or modification of any pretrea e e2t facility. Prior to the issuance of
an AtC, the proposed pretreatment facility and tre—nnmt process must be evaluated for its capacityto
comply with all Industrial User PretreatmentPetmit (IUP):limita"ons.. .
7. POZW Inspection & Monitorng of their SIUs The Permittee shall conduct in=cction, surveillance_ and monitoring acn ities as described in its Division
approved pretreatment program in order to determine, independeuc of information supplied by mdusttial
users, compliance with, applirubleptetreatment standards. The Permirt-- must -
a Inspect all Sigaifi�nt industrial Use (SIUs) ai lust once per c al=darye=,, and
b. Sample rill S �ni rent Ind aura a1 I is r (SNs) at least trice ca endar year for all pemmit-
limited peIlurants, once during the period from January 1 through )une 30 and once dui the
period from July 1 through December 31, except for organic compounds which shall be sampled
once per calendar year,
8. SN Self Monitoring and Reporting
The Petmittee shall require all industrial users to comply with the applicable monitoring and reporung
requirements outlined in the Division approved pretreatment program the'industry's pretreatment permit,
or in 15A NCAC 2H,.0908.
9. Enfo cement Response Plan (ERP
The Permitree shall,tmforce and obtain appropriate remedies for violations of all pretreatment standards
promulgated pursuant to section 307(b) and (c) of the Cle?si Water tact (40 CFR 403 et seq.), prohibitive
dishes standards as set forth in40.�CFR 403-5 and 133NCryC 2H .0909,and specific local limitations.
All mforcement,actions.shall be consistent with the Enforcement Response. Plan (ERP) approved by the
Division
10. P-etreatr ant Annual Repom IT
The Permittee shall report to rite Division in accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0908. In lieu of submitting
annual reports, Modified Pretreatment Programs developed under 15A NCAC 2H .0904 (b) may be
required to meet with Division personnel periodically to discuss enforcement of pretreatment requirements
and other pretreatment implementation issues.
For all other active pretreatment progr mc, the Permittee shall submit two copies o£ a Pretreatment Annual
Report (PAR) desoibing its pretreatment activities over the previous twelve months to the Division at the
following address:
NC Dln\TR / DWQ / Pretreatment Unit
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
These reports shall be submitted according to. a schedule established by the Director and shaII contain the
following.
a.) Nasauve
A'bzief-discussion of reasons for status of, and actions taken for allSignificant Industttal
Use (SIUs) in Significant Non -Compliance (SNC);
b.) Pretreatment -710 Suxnmaro (PPSI .
A pretreatmevtpropram summary PPS) on specific fours approved by the Division:
c) �i-ifi_cantNonComnlianceReoort(S?�7CRl
The nature of the violations and the actions taken or proposed to coaeet the violations on
speaEic forms approved by the Drvisiou;
d) Iadusuialll'�taSummzis'Forms
(IDSFi
Version fv2a2063

NPDFS Permit Requirements
Page 16 of 16
T4onitoang &m fromcollected by boar tre POTW and the Siia-aificant Industrial
User (SR-'- Tnese anah-uc aj results must be reported on -Industrial Data Summary Farms
(IDS i o othe spea5c format approved by the Vision;' '
e'i Othr, Tnfounarion: -
Cop s of the POTW4 s allo s oa 3bIS new or modi5ed enforccrn=r compliance schedules,
pubLc notice of SIUs m S\C2 and' other mflo�anon, upon request which in the
oninioa of the bilectoz is need
eu' to dttalTc..=e compliance with the pretreatment
impi.=.s=tvnon regnii=Cris o± tlti_, p:sr.ic
-nest: I users (SI3s) E'lat,mere in Significant
(.Qmp12n'e :S\'L" aopmved SL- t-- use Ordinance with
pret c —=- tnquin=crr and d" d lu v r he;n -:.o: s twelve month .period This list
..! tl xr pubL �e�i cr;_n four mo rlti - of the 'le:blc,.
12 Record Keening
The Permitiee shaIl renua for a muumum of three c_r c. c.- _aouirovng activities and results, along
with supportinforrnition including general zero�, -w t < _�L� t�--ecords, on the POand records of•industrial impactTW.
13_ Funding and Fu caal Repo —
Tile Permittee shaII maintain adequate funding and_safr"ag level= to accomplish the objectives of its
approved Pretreatment .prngram a.
14. Mo6fbcarion to Preae me t Pr s
Modifications to the'., approved . prctreatment prrigrarn Mclu=a" out .not limited to local limits
mod ficzeons, POTW monstonng of tbtnS1g^..incant Induce lis (SIIJs), and Monitoring Plan
modifications, shallbe eongdered a permit mo,_nE ztioa and shall'te governed by 13 NCAC 2H .0114 and
I5A NCAC 21l .0907. .

Drawings

NOTES:
1. REMOVE EXISTING LONG RADIUS FLANGED ELBOW & VALVES.
2. REMOVE EXISTING MOTOR.
3. UNBOLT AND REMOVE EXISTING PUMP.
4. REMOVE EXISTING STEEL FRAME.
5, INSTALL NEW PUMP AND MOTOR OVER PEDESTAL, BOLT TO
SHORTEN AS
PEDESTAL IN ACCORDANCE WITH MANUFACTURER'S
NECESSARY
RECOMMENDATIONS.
6. REPLACE PREVIOUSLY REMOVED PIPING AND VALVES. INCLUDE
8" x 10" REDUCING ELBOW TO JOIN NEW PUMP WITH EXISTING
PIPING.
TEMPORARILY REMOVE
T' PERFORM NON-DESTRUCTIVE TESTING ON ANY NEW WELDS
AS NECESSARY FOR
PER ASME B31.
_ INSTALLATION OF PUMP
/
/
I
8" GATE
I
VALVE I
I
I
I
MOTOR
�
1
8" CHECK \
1
\
VALVE \
\ NEW
PUMP HAS
\ 10" DISCHARGE
\
8" LONG RADIUS
\
FLANGED ELBOW
_
REPLACE WITH
8" x 10" REDUCING
ELBOW
i
DESIGN DRAWING
NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
a
32 yr
EXISTING STEEL PEDESTAL
WITH CONCRETE
i LIKE COATING
' 47147 �#
�CINEEQ
•.,.,Fk T ....••
M, M
I EXISTING ...•..
SHEETING
DRAWN: DATE: DRAWING
'MACTEC CAPE FEAR AS5AASHPUMP R.R. APRIL2009
H SLUICE PUMP REPLACEMENT ENG CHECK: SCALE:
nucTEC ENowEERwc ANR wusuLnNo. lwc PROGRESS ENERGY N.T.S. 3
=i ATUNLIC AVENUE CAPE FEAR PLANT, MONCURE, NC APPROVAL: JOB No.:
RALEIGH. NORTH CAROLINA 6468-09-2361
REFERENCE:

NOTES
� G40.WrtLPol GILUAIIGNIMFPE YMf WHOM MPCV.NE4%.rWtdFIPOOIYE}MO
Ew.AUYr ]EAvm n FmMov wAe aerA.m FROY EgEPBgy RAYY9 ClYEP011 XYOPNR C wrw
inX EgILN. M% PouawfEesmvR�ArteoF oam FCP srtei w�E. o o5oo�r Fw rXE QRAACCRF
AROppEV[Of Ftl1 M XOYE VR Wbl!/JLIJm
} EIEVAig10 ARE 9A�OFRRbEp R00P E]EVAlICx9 FIroYfPLL fGIl91PUL1M pPAMM3q,
E(MPEM F1E VAIgNB iNOY YLC LpOTI V ClpY qiA W Eqg. ilElO YEASU1El1EMR NE) M
RPOEO�FO %W pE.2 E{pyM1{pX q` }IS'
] C4ClUl10X9 ARE 6l5E0 pl WAIFAAi fY'f
A 5PEU'iL pRAN1Y Ci 1 ]ASy1Yfp FOR 4WM
5. A IIFAp Of 6y MgAROW Ci }.JW�GlM LOFIM'i ql} OF 1XE PIIYV MPE wg9VYEO.9w9EO M M
ifNCMVARAT LIMIVE.
aS
ry
Hydraulic Profile
f p
9a� m 54=
W W M ]J W ii NY YO

0
E
DESIGN DRAWING
NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
Cl pEV, PATE N NAI 00PN1M
,
rus•uor
e
ww�
•
raNtwaK
•
fwOfiWP
6
wMl�ll®1
•
rowr,ewrrx.K
,
rw.reawr
•
IOWIKLK
•
IwI,iRVV w
p
f\lOW
fF
w.
w
ti
2.1
FROM PINAP TO ASH POND
PROOMM ENERGY
CAPE FEAR PLANT, MONCURE. NC
Z JF MAC 1 r C
•1.1•A,IL M
•GYC MI OIO�M

NOTES
E`DII
MPREO6p1YY1R.qE LEUS,t GCtC1iIUTfiIHgN9 WWAEPO£ NLMNCEDDSvqW M (YACYWAA,gnetLgF9R(%MRL EF1ryI,
ryiA
"'I p.MRCFEKDOq9IIECI 11,oarIlICI61 TNMN
i(XI M NpPpWED
i FIEVAIVIISMEBFHEO i1Ng1FD f10011 E12VAil(nS iApI OPAL CPVSINVLigN OTUVfAGS.
EDWAEME A1101L9EROMOLCNN9TLVCTM IXUWWGS. 1`KL04EASIIHEIAENI9 AW TY
PRVIECnl)Fl.. Fl ATCM T)iIII
1 U'L TUM.q. µgfD M WATER AT W-1
E. EI'FCGC d4Wry OF 1 i AR9UMF➢FP4 BLIMRY
6, A LIADM W AAV A FLM O 2MD Cg1Yq WT I THE R.l WERE ASSOMED. BAYy ON T,E
TE�AP LIgYE
ap
E
TO W
q q q q
—� wE�RPAEW
� w.rWw.AR�.Nrw
y
Hydraulic Profile.
CAR014
i sue'
i7947 ' I k.
QVIh%
RT M.
EItIy UEpN �

i
'
1
BaawwBBfJ
IM ,M rw IM
EAv
DESIGN DRAWING
NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
U FBe FITTIM
ruraBow
a
rwwawaa
a
rwrraow
a
rwrraof
B
If m
e
rurBubv
rwOtf/lM
a
taiflOUw
a
antler
n
frwrwa
n
rwrriBa
n
fwrawf
b
rwr�ww
M
wNAYIbIB1fY
b
ffrlBLllf/1
n
fMBIObt MLYbi
n
rBlnwal
u
fbuBeb+oBrls
n
rwawABe
■
rrxreaow
w1®ucw
b
b
rMaBOOtvAIBFJSF
b
IwnValK
b
1NM R!
UM E. ASH SLUICE PUMP AND PIPE SYSTEM
FROM PUMP TO ASH POND
PROGRESSENERGY
CAPE FEAR PLANT, MONCURE. NO
OMACTEC
APYfWAI w
MT! B1pip W �aamwsrotaaaaPaq
.+ .usra�mxma
BGYI NBM]WB
AFPwBIQ SAW: JOB N0.-2BOPAWINO
wB60BB1 2

NOTES
z-z
1. REMOVE EXISTING LONG RADIUS FLANGED ELBOW S VALVES.
2. REMOVE EXISTING MOTOR.
3. UNBOLT AND REMOVE EXISTING PUMP.
4. REMOVE EXISTING STEEL FRAME PUMP PEDESTAL.
5. INSTALL NEW CONCRETE PEDESTAL AS SHOWN BELOW.
S, INSTALL NEW PUMP ON PAO IN ACCORDANCE WITH MANUFACTURER'S RECOMMENDATIONS.
T. REMOVE EXISTING SPOOL PIECE AS NECESSARY TO ALIGN WITH NEW PUMP DISHCARGE
S. REPLACE PREVIOUSLY REMOVED VALVES. INCLUDE S' x 10- REDUCER TO JOIN NEW PUMP WITH EXISTING PIPING.
B. WELD NEW FLANGE ON PIPE. PERFORM NONOESTRUCTIVE TESTING OF WELDS.
- S' GATE VALVE
S' CHECK VALVE
10'-8' LONG RADIUS
FLANGEDREOUCING VALVE
NEW PUMP HAS 10' DISCHARGE
-
II ,I
I, ,I
NEW CONCRETE j
PEDESTAL
I
fr-w
I I I I I
Iz¢ 1
I I r l I
II II
II II
I
4 I I I
I I I I
,I II
-1 il1d
u u
SEE PUMP PEDESTAL DETAIL (THIS SHEET)
DESIGN DRAWING
NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
(12) 1 1,,2'x12 ANCHOR SOLTS
5'
#3 4 12' O.C.
(6) MS
EQUALLY
SPACED
C
4'
5'
ra
SECTION A -A
(12)1 l rx12 ANCHOR BOLTS
'FA
- 93 012- O.C.
EQUALLY
ALLY
SPACED
PUMP PEDASTAL DETAILS
NOTES:
I. CONCRETE MINIMUM 28-DAY DESIGN COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH = 3,000 PSI,
2. REINFORCING STEEL MINIMUM GRADE 50.
CARO,
jIMACTEC ASH SLUICE PUMP RAISING DRAWN EMwJN DATE: APwL2aoe
SB ASH SCAPE FEAR PLANTLUICE PUMP IGNMENT ENG CHECK: JN SCALE: N.T.S. A
wcr[c excrtrmxe Av maamw,c+c
ATM ACAPE FEAR PLANT, MONCURE, NC IAPPROVAL RM I JOBNo.: 646&0➢=l

NOTES:
1. REMOVE EXISTING LONG RADIUS FLANGED ELBOW 8 VALVES.
2. REMOVE EXISTING MOTOR.
3. UNBOLT AND REMOVE EXISTING PUMP,
4. FILL PREVIOUS BOLT HOLES WITH GROUT/CONCRETE.
5. INSTALL NEW PUMP ON PAD IN ACCORDANCE WITH
MANUFACTURER'S RECOMMENDATIONS.
6. REPLACE PREVIOUSLY REMOVED PIPING AND VALVES.
7. SHORTEN EXISTING SPOOL PIECE AS NECESSARY TO FIT
VALVES.
8. WELD NEW FLANGE ON PIPE. PERFORM NON-DESTRUCTIVE
TESTING OF WELDS ASME 831.
9. INSTALL VALVES.
TEMPORARILY REMOVE
AS NECESSARY FOR
INSTALLATION OF PUMP
/E
DESIGN DRAWING I
NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
/y EXISTING
CONCRETE
PEDESTAL
10" GATE---7
VALVE
MOTOR
i
i
24'
Imo-- �p z6•--�i
i
I
L
SHORTEN AS
NECESSARY
10" CHECK
VALVE
10" LONG RADIUS
FLANGED ELBOW
DRAWN; DATE: DRAWING
6A & 613
ASH PUMP
R.R.
APRIL 2008
�' MACTEC
CAPE FEAR ASH SLUICE PUMP REPLACEMENT
ENO CHECK:
SCALE:
PROGRESS ENERGY
N.T.S.
IMCJEC ENo�NEERElS ANO CONSU.rwo, iNc,
t JJOt ATUNTIC AVENUE
CAPE FEAR PLANT, MONCURE, NC
APPROVAL:
JOB No.:
4 nALEmN. womN CANaIru
8488-09.2361
REFERENCE:

Tables

Table 1
Unit 5-Table 1
Elevation
Available
plus
Flow
Velocity
Pressure
Pressure
Elevation
Pressure
Node 1
Size
(GPM)
(ft/sec)
(Ibf/in2)
Head (ft)
(ft MSL)
Head (ft)
Horizontal
1: Pump Inlet
8"
2300
14.75
236.6
546.0
167.50
713.50
5.00
2: 5A and 5B Tee
8"
2300
14.75
230.6
532.2
172.00
704.15
25.00
3: 10" BF Valve in Basement
10"
2300
9.36
227.6
525.3
166.50
691.76
143.00
4: Gate valve above grade
8"
2300
14.75
213.7
493.1
180.00
673.13
190.00
5: Bottom Ash Tee
8"
1520
9.75
210.3
485.4
187.00
672.42
190.00
6: 8" BF Valve
8"
1520
9.75
196.1
452.4
214.00
666.44
242.00
7: Hydroveyor Exhauster Inlet
8"
1520
9.75
176.87
408.158
254.75
662.91
255.00
8: Separator Tank Outlet
8"
1520
9.75
0.00
0.000
226.25
226.25
260.00
9: Exit Jet Pulsion Pump
8"
2300
14.75
23.01
53.107
173.00
226.11
261.00
10: End of 1032' Run, 10" I.D. Pipe
8"
2300
9.36
52.03
120.075
174.50
294.58
1176.00
11: End of 1500' Run, 13" I.D. Pipe, At Pond
8"
2300
5.56
30.66
70.762
215.00
285.76
2676.00
12: Fly Ash Booster supply
4"
780
8.68
227.11
524.108
173.00
697.11
4176.00
13: Bottom Ash Booster Pump
8"
2300
57.79
192.30
443.774
173.00
616.77
192.00
Hydraulic Profile
m
800.00
700.00
w
600.00
N
FL500.00
a
400.00
m
x
300.00
d
�
200.00
N
�
100.00
0
0.00
m
1: Pump 2: 5A and 3: 10" BF 4: Gate 5: Bottom 6: 8" BF
7: 8: Separator
9: Exit Jet 10: End of 11: End of
Co
Inlet 5B Tee Valve in valve above Ash Tee Valve
Hydroveyor Tank Outlet
Pulsion 1032' Run, 1500' Run,
<
Basement grade
Exhauster
Pump 10" I.D. Pipe 13" I.D.
Inlet
Pipe, At
Pond
4 Elevation (ft MSL)
Elevation plus Pressure Head (ft)
.u.ohr,
-...yµ�s.•

a �
da
xQ
----------------------
o N
L 6 W
m 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 m
L >
0
!;OaTfMpppOMthpp �n ��Mnn �(N(�nn��fO M[O �O�tpp �-l0� �pn VA �n {Np Of l0
� N N�nN N in N�i(p1m InNN UmImNNN �� N A U ilf
y ONNAmA��o��uaaNO�N�N?°O'100n Op0
_ONmpm(�NOi op pp ��ppC pp��
y Q N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N
O` 00gN N[�
•N- mNM O NN
t O m 0 0L7 V c VV 1.
.� m N N C m O m m m m m m m •C 2(0 wM
.oq
m mrnrnrnmmmwrnmrnmrnmo+rn mmmmrn v
52 O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O
r R. O�Oyy OOOO O OOOOOOOOOOO OOO O
y (O�
D NNmm Nmm W mmmm W m W �N UNDwtSww mm N
a E rn m m m m m rn m m rn m rn rn m
w o w w w w W w
d z m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m M
y -.-,-.-.-.-.--O056 66E;
d woo0oo000���� �comNmmoom m
m nmm mmm m
>dMMMmmMmm
8p888$88§ 8p o
m�0000000$g8
pra0000000000000000000000 0
�
¢
a
QQ QQ QQ QQ
oo$2i��g���252"i,c0i,�i5 8
ay
mroo0oo00000000000000000 0
0
0
w
cc
cc�� ��pp ssyy yy ss}}
�..... UaN N i n n N t p N N M t O N N n l n A
N
� N N N N N N N [V !V [V N N N N N N N (V �-
z
�p >, mmmmmmmm°D OAD mA I�AnOAOOAO OAO mA m
AI:AAAAAA (O
p
------------
0
Q� O1OpO O
O{Op
O�(Onp
t(O�OOOOO�On �Op �OpO
�{On�(Op (Op
N m(mO tmON NfNO fO (Op �Op
mtO W N
d— m m m m m m m tO fO tmO !D �D tmO fD OD (O fD (D (O
a:�� 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 p 0 0 O
O
OCup pY)O qSOO NUi.. p.Iq ptNmppO� SpO S
tNtOp W am0 W
�R� NN' n ^ m0 rp 08 m
�
0>m
W
O mMtV OOOA }aMm0m mm M
az L6m
>
V
J N
LU J
m
O O
l
•yae2`
or �/
04
M
�
i11�
O
[�O
A O
h n
O O
O O
8 8
00
00
00
0 0
ti o
N
c y
J
v^WA_ .- P E a E �
t o -.�- -'
a v
m c c c (C W c
¢ rn ¢ > > m y o in 2
Z > O� OQ O'O O— CC Q m y y.0 NA
o>> w c M 0 2 c w a w C 2 A> v¢>¢ o a a
�y > O N O Off- N O O NF O1 Oa ? llim N- w
6 W 0 0 m O m C O W O m O m C LL .`0 � •� y� m 0 0 9 y 0
E� uN S[�1�2- 5p¢ IT aoca MH>m>f pT5$�o
2�m'[c w ecmF� mmm m-m m� 50 uo m'v oox _I t w0

'o m
d0
2 Q
o�mm mm a mw m8
R W
N N O T N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N
.-.-r.- r r r r r r.---r.-
E0000000000000000000000$00000000000000000000000
m m n
o a >
LL m y
.�OdNOMnvI.-MNmMm��Opp.-mrmnMN pmp�nM-aD .NN-mmdN W tmp mNmm and edpn lo�on�ym}�pn mo
.0 {0{pp!'T [9 � ON Oi aD NfV IAmmNN Ydl V d NNNq rm 00000Ooi °im S� tO V (O SOnD mm V � d d � V
m ON pNp �W�yy N Cnf V N Olr d ON rP NS� V {fyy{+7��0 {0yy tn����MOmN 10 NOOni W n � IO fD PMJ t� 00 V � l0 �l?
N �n} (ppp em} t(pp �fyppp� �p p� �(Gppp Epp pp
Ot00 Cl N (O lyd O q COmf0 tO Y1N d MCQ N N N NN f+10 NOO Vi m, nm 0 0 0 0 0 0 H MN tm�100
11 = ffpp ttpp {p {p �p fp ��pp tp �p {p ((pp typ (p
O NN(1 hN Yw1 Yml l�jN N Ym] NNNNNNNNNN NhfO fO m S S 0(mO m(O b(O Nl0 S tOS S tm0 �0m m f0S
O O
A O O O O O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 o C 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 G O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 G C O G O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
^-^^----^ M
m mp m m my m m ma m m m m m GO dm am and to OpD O
rom�mmmm mmm [O mm �n Inm Inm.[)N�Om mm N tOM NYf m Yl �O m1(!�Ry O
W'z mmmmmmmmmmmmmm(OmhtmONNNNaaavoaaaoaaeveavavvavaJm
/C
rr.-�-.-.- O r- r- 5-.-.-.-.-a-.-.-r r- r r r r e-5-.-.-.-'-'-gr r r
00100000000
Q mrn0008o008008o SSBoS000 088880S8000 o0$88887>8 88
m e 88o888 8S RSSRORg
S oB000 o`do $ $ o00000oM eS
o, mood d o o d o d o d o o o o o 0006666666666666 o h o 66666 o o o o o co
of-- o QQ �x�xii 55��
mr m 8088o88Y>88o825SS88888 o888885888888$0000eSeee88
F c 0 0 0
OO o o O G O 0 0 0 0 0 0 o G G o 0 8 0 0 o 0 0 0 o 8 0 8 8 8 0 8 8 0 a 0 o
R
Z'�NN mNN�IIl Y1N NNIONmNO N NN b�Odi dN Odi W Odi W m W W W Tq Odi W Nq Odi T O10T W NOdi
O� N N N lV NNNNNNNNNN lV N r N N N N IV o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
m N
>z
z m mm m m m m mm mmmmmmm-mmmmmmmm m mmmmmm m m m m m mmm mmm mmm
_ n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n .- n n n n n n n n n n n n n I,:n n n n r n F.:n n n n n n n n
x jGU fV""N^NN N^^'(V IV NCU"NNfV I�hl�l�lh l�lAnrirrr�r��nn hl�hl�l�hhA
N � r
lO
S lm�l M M M A CJ fm�l tm�I t.I l9 l7 Umf Cm) M Om) ttl f7 t�i 1.1 l'OJ l7 l7 M M M (O M f7 M (m'I Cf M C'f M f7 COJ t� Cl CN'! l9 M
lmO
m m mN fm00lD m(O 10 (O f0 tm000 W IONow tO tO {mOmNbOmlO lO fO fOm Nfm0 �0 [O .D IO tO tO fO ml�O (O m f0
m m.�mm
a Er0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000
m
pp p p p pp p ppp
Q ^ N N N N O S O � S�yy O ( SNy O m N m N H N �tOtlppf m m Nm $ p S B OO O O O O O m m N O O O O O O O O O O S O p Op n n A
mt0�no nnnnnrrnNNNmfmO
m r^ r r r r r- r^ r^ -- --^ r r r- N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N
W
VOON ri00 n N oMo-m M OO ri mniNao r O r Omdam N NNN MIM c;p In d O
� d m � M N M N d
O! j
J m
wJ
g
O m
a g
v W m
om o m
C C C Q N C C Si
g > } ¢ o a 3¢ ¢ ¢ io m H to T o5 ¢ o ,rmo 3 T 3 a ¢ m¢ a 3 a_mi 9 d x
Z o f > w O cO$ 9DD 2 o c W ap$ cpQ 2 m i `OO°a'¢>¢ 2 2 m w mCQ w mw�o w w,C';D> mam$¢8� o
W x S L 0 N �. c N Q S N r Fi > N N U> V 1- !- O N O ti O N to m F C j C 'C O C Q O E O O T
o, � 01 0 pp o E omcu. .c Ec2'Cmmm `o °' wo'odv yy S y Q H- mem N �
3m L m Q z¢ O N 2 L: O¢ 2 m OIL O O m m m m m> m= /C > z L- L- N O m 0 9 0 `o 2 j 2 O O
J U Mo D)I F-_ J _ J^ I-S - 2 y> M:> IT J J' J 0NF'S mm m z VJz J
L.Wmw In
GD�`m f� apNm�� 4D Of��QaD `m V'm GDOm� W r`m N�aD HIV ED N'm fM� Dmd`m O2

Table 1
5a-fly ash-1 0" Pipe
Length/
Pipe
Flow
Flow
Equivalent
Diameter
Area
Velocity
Velocity
Roughness
Relative
Reynolds
friction
Friction
Pressure
Rate
Rate Head
Node 1
Length (ft) Elevation
(ft)
(ff^2)
(f 1s)
Head (ft)
(ft)
Roughness
Number
factor
Head (ft)
(psi)
Head (ft)
Delivere
Exiting Added
Separator Tank
0
226.25
0.665
0.35
7.78
0.94
0.0002
0.000301
510013
0.0163
0.0000
0.00
0.0
0
1213
Jelloulsion Pump
0
173.00
0.665
0.35
12.78
2.54
0.0002
0.000301
837968
0.0167
0.0000
23.04
53.2
780
1993 90
Horizontal Piping Run
1032
174.50
0.835
0.55
8.11
1.02
0.000017
0.000020
667464
0.0129
16.2786
54.37
125.5
0
1993
Horizontal Piping Run
1500
215.00
0.835
0.55
8.11
1.02
0.000017
0.000020
667464
0.0129
23.8607
26.57
61.3
0
1993
,gun°+r
:SSro l/ s
0
4 ....°.... o,

v -o
=Q�QS!pp pp S �TT'pa� .��I Opp (�(py fpy pNp (py (p�(py (py R(py (py (py
LL¢ C `• N--- N N- N tN N- N- N N N if N- N N
O ro= NNNNNNNNNNfffYYY (�N NNN NNNr rrrr rrrr e-rrrr �-e-rr rrrr r
W �Ifit/f[iA.
m0000000000000b0000 0000W 00000000O000000000b000
3mm t;
o m >
IL ¢
O
yO �N} W N({(rp MtnNNh OR t(ppt�7t(op t0 toy W MN O0p. t0rndd Ot {Wpp �; WMW tO�f �tipn Md W ynO WOt0Qd gttOOd O 0. MONp
�1ANNN VINiO iOU HNION N It, W dY CO V Odd V OO Nd0O V V O V V dd O V d0 C
Ox pO oo pp �tyy �p tV �O tO tp
.`(ts((p�117) M NIS SN-0 d M 00W( O(N ((Wt(���� (ot ci f�6o ypOyp ppO pN Ot OWi� O Om1WD Q (9(p ((uppi ((Opp O 0 tW[i pWp Q,6m
m d N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N r W W OWl N S N W N OWi N OWf Ol
QC opop vy (V N ups �p
0,
tpO N tp OOp vpe tV
O MONO W tO ONGt yny NNyW Nt VaOMN�nff t W W tWp tO tNh to f� W 1r�fr�1WO �Ot)�d'O W hONC 'u Ot9 ONn I(1 V; W O W aaDDOn n0>N V Md d. M MM O�(.�M dO r Oo n NMd tO.-
O O O O O O O O O O O O O
ILS O Ve} <V Opdydasa} yyyy V Vp V V aa[ OpDp ((ppWW OOpp Oppp opDp OOpp
D ONtO tO ul ^Y1N' NNhtfWl SON iO In NYI N tWt1b W IW[Iw NI mNIWO 1N
•� 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
•��, •L O O O O O O O O O O O O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 G 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
m Ntn W NN W tOW VI on
'TO EE`SSapn 9�nOnnW WnW ppAOW nOWp WOW UOW1 pN((OWpptOWONONOWttOpp N0ttWpp NIWONfO NOreN�-aN--r rr('-�M-
MW--MN mr�O MN MW M-W M-W 'CNNS tNt'�(^NWyyN!W N!N IN^'
WWppmW
C,ZrWWw NWN
m- rrr W rMN r(NI�O ((nriOy� O r r ppr -p- rp rorr pr- ---p--- r r r r .- ---- r r r r
OCO,i OO S OM MM M MMMCbS NMIa'1 M MSMf7 M aMalh RaJ cai coi Mm�rai mm SM MM
�poaoao���sssgs����ososoS��ssga
¢ O O O O O O O O O O O O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 b 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
¢
§.so11.os s g § gsoo go80 sgoo
hm �zoO00000000000000000b0000000 060o60060000000000
W O0
a •� M M M (WO, (�l OJ M N N M M M M M M tW' �
00� HI MM MC) c7 Ml7 Oi Mf7 [V Pl lh (7MrMMMMM rrr - - e-.-.-.-r r r rrr r r r r r-- -
>m
S
` tII ION W W W IO ION NN ION N W W N W NIONNIONN NNtA IAN W NIOW W NNU[ W NNN iON
n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n thi n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n
q�'ovv����vovv����rn^aa�v mtri mtri of of of mtri to trim of of tri of tri to ai to trimm
v m ,o•[. m m IWn ou'•i, `t� � t�i. `�i, a'i• c� Ici chi r� `c� o�. M rW. t. m m, c�•
Q•rc00000OOO000O00000OOOOOOOOOOOOO00000OO00000OO
m ro
'aa ��000000a00000000000000000000000000000000000000
0 p MW Owwn n nN kOtWtfWaWwWtf,WSSSSOSp O
N N N NQa
- pO
Wnnnn
r rrrr - rrrrr -- - - rr- r --WNN NNNNN N NI
N L a o t,Mj to N N n^ OD Q' 0- N N M lh r O r O r O N O O 'NNN N M CMW O a^ d
C m '
J Q N
W J
3
n° - b
e w - o
y c c > > c c& I^ o > c w EL c m c c c
g 'm_nm$_� g, v0o¢ Oc (E mm '-'o¢p`"o¢B 3 a ¢'m¢ 6- .22 (.
Z o> m W o W c.`c o w `� w o t c m ro d¢>¢ 2 2 m w un'l. m cc w m 8 8 ti> m T'a B p W m
'9 Y> O N p O F- ` O p N F O> N y U> V I-- [- V O N O U N t� �O FL- O> O pC c O p O S O
W U y W C 01 N m$ O� 'C N C Of tT O V N N m tj _ N R C' N
a¢ ,c m¢ ¢ 'c m o o W '� E e p1 E m m m o m o m e m c >r c -c m •e
�Jo wcn otn=rm¢N¢x�iox yy'tyD>M>�� ¢N��¢mm tn�=1$xm x°N=�p?otnz
(L;D mO m r W I-;0 W W r W rto ED W 4ZOOp<M OOr 0 r W.r- W N W W m N GD N'<O io OO N'W V roO

Node 1
Hydroveyor Exhauster
Separator Tank
Jetpulsion Pump
Horizontal Piping Run
Horizontal Piping Run
Table 1
5a-fly ash
Length
Pipe
Flow
Flow
Equivalent
Diameter
Area
Velocity
Velocity
Roughness
Relative
Reynolds
friction
Friction
Pressure
Rate
Rate Head
Length (ft)
Elevation
(ft)
(ft^2)
(fVs)
Head (ft)
(ft)
Roughness
Number
factor
Head (ft)
(psi)
Head (it)
Delivered
Exiting Added
0
254.75
0.665
0.35
9.75
1.48
0.0002
0.000301
639093
0.0163
0.0000
173.33
400.0
0
1520
0
226.25
0.665
0.35
9.75
1.48
0.0002
0.000301
639093
0.0163
0.0000
0.00
0.0
0
1520
0
173.00
0.665
0.35
14.75
3.38
0.0002
0.000301
967048
0.0167
0.0000
23.01
53.1
780
2300 90
1032
174.50
0.835
0.55
9.36
1.36
0.000017
0.000020
770280
0.0129
21.6799
52.03
120.1
0
2300
1500
215.00
1.083
0.92
5.56
0.48
0.000005
0.000005
593708
0.0133
8.8380
30.66
70.8
0
2300
m

Table 1
5a-bottom ash
Length/
Pipe
Flow
Flow
Equivalent
Diameter
Area
Velocity
Velocity
Roughness
Relative
Reynolds
friction
Friction
Pressure
Pressure
Rate
Rate Head
Node 1
Length (ft) Elevation
(ft)
(ft^2)
(ft/s)
Head (ft)
(ft)
Roughness
Number
factor
Head (ft)
(psi)
Head (ft) Delivered
Exiting Added
Pump
0
167.50
0.665
0.35
14.75
3.38
0.0002
0.000301
806075
0.0159
0.0000
247.00
570.00
0
2300
8" LR Elbow
10.6
168.50
0.665
0.35
14.75
3.38
0.0002
0.000301
806075
0.0159
0.8560
246.20
568.14
0
2300
8" check Valve
33.3
170.50
0.665
0.35
14.75
3.38
0.0002
0.000301
806075
0.0150
2.6892
244.16
563.45
0
2300
8" gate valve
5.32
171.50
0.665
0.35
14.75
3.38
0.0002
0.000301
806075
0.0159
0.4296
243.54
562.03
0
2300
8" SR 90 Elbow
20
172.00
0.665
0.35
14.75
3.38
0.0002
0.000301
806075
0.0159
1,6151
242.63
559.91
0
2300
10' Horizontal Run
10
172.00
0.665
0.35
14.75
3.38
0.0002
0.000301
806075
0.0159
0.8076
242.28
559.10
0
2300
8" SR 90 Elbow
20
172.00
0.665
0.35
14.75
3.38
0.0002
0.000301
806075
0.0159
1.6151
241.58
557.49
0
2300
7' Horizontal Run
7
172.00
0.665
0.35
14.75
3.38
0.0002
0.000301
906075
0.0159
0.5653
241.33
556.92
0
2300
8" Tee-Thru
13.3
172.00
0.665
0.35
14.75
3.38
0.0002
0.000301
806075
0.0159
1.0741
240.87
555.85
0
2300
83' Horizontal Run
83
172.00
0.665
0.35
14.76
3.38
0.0002
0.000301
806075
0.0159
6.7029
237.96
549.14
0
2300
8" SR 45 Elbow
10.6
172.00
0.665
0.35
14.75
3.38
0.0002
0.000301
806075
0.0159
0.8560
237.59
548.29
0
2300
12' drop, 45 deg
13.4
166.50
0.665
0.35
14.75
3.38
0.0002
0.000301
806075
0.0159
1.0822
239.51
552.71
0
2300
8" SR 45 Elbow
10.6
166.50
0.665
0.35
14.75
3.38
0.0002
0.000301
806075
0.0159
0.8560
239.14
551.85
0
2300
11' Horizontal Run
11
166.50
0.665
0.36
14.75
3.38
0.0002
0.000301
806075
0.0159
0.8883
238.75
550.96
0
2300
8" Tee-Thru
13.3
166.50
0.665
0.35
14.75
3.38
0.0002
0.000301
806075
0.0159
1.0741
238.28
549.89
0
2300
9 Horizontal Run
9
166.50
0.665
0.35
14.75
3.38
0.0002
0.000301
806075
0.0159
0.7268
237.97
549.16
0
2300
10" BF Valve
29.2
166.50
0.835
0.55
9.36
1.36
0.0002
0.000240
642061
0.0159
0.7661
237.71
548.55
0
2300
8" Horizontal Run, -140'
140
166.50
0.665
0.35
14.75
3.38
0.0002
0.000301
806075
0.0159
11,3060
232.74
537.10
0
2300
Assumed (4) 8"SR90 Elbow
80
168.50
0.665
0.35
14.75
3.38
0.0002
0.000301
806075
0.0159
6.4606
229.94
530.64
0
2300
8" Vertical Rise, 5' (-11')
11
178.00
0.665
0.35
14.75
3.38
0.0002
0.000301
806075
0.0159
0,8883
224.58
518.25
0
2300
8" gate valve
5.32
180.00
0.665
0.35
14.75
3.38
0.0002
0.000301
806075
0.0159
0.4296
223.52
515.82
0
2300
5' Vertical Rise
5
186.00
0.665
0.35
14.75
3.38
0.0002
0.000301
806075
0.0159
0.4038
220.75
509.42
0
2300
8" Tee -Branch
39.9
186.50
0.665
0.35
14.75
3.38
0.0002
0.000301
806075
0.0159
3.2222
219.13
505.69
0
2300
V Horizontai Run
1
186M
0.665
0.35
14.75
3.38
0.0002
0.000301
806075
0.0159
0.0808
219.10
505.61
0
2300
8" gate valve
5.32
186.50
0.665
0.35
14.75
3.38
0.0002
0.000301
806075
0.0159
0.4296
218.91
505.18
0
2300
1' Horizontal Run
1
186.50
0.665
0.35
14.75
3.38
0.0002
0.000301
806075
0.0159
0.0808
218.88
$05.10
0
2300
8" Tee -Branch
39.9
186.00
0.665
0.35
14.75
3.38
0.0002
0.000301
806075
0.0159
3.2222
217.70
502.38
0
2300
12' Vertical Drop, 6 Tees
30
174.00
0.665
0.35
14.75
3.38
0.0002
0.000301
806075
0.0159
2.4227
221.85
511.96
0
2300
4" SR 90 Elbow
10.1
173.00
0.336
0.09
57.79
51.86
0,0002
0.000596
1595597
0.0177
27.5943
192.30
443.77
0
2300
Jetpulsion Pump
0
173.00
0.336
0.09
57.79
51.86
0.0002
0.000595
1914238
0.0158
0.0000
192.30
443.77
0
2300
43' Horizontal Run
43
173.00
0.665
0.35
14.75
3.38
0.0002
0.000301
967048
0.0158
3.4507
208.83
481.91
0
2300
Horizontal Piping Run
1032
17450
0.835
0.55
9.36
1.36
0.000017
0.000020
770280
0.0129
21.6799
198.85
458.88
0
2300
Horizontal Piping Run
1500
215.00
1.083
0.92
5.56
0.48
0.000005
0.000005
593708
0.0133
8.8380
177.48
409.57
0
2300
171
'qi r �,(a� •ifs �;j,\�'°°

Table 2
Unit 6-Table 2
Elevation
unr4r
0,
CA.4Cr��%,
Flow
Velocity
Pressure
Available
Pressure
Elevation
plus
Pressure
,••�F,�ft
:•••�� .......,' A� '•
FESStp''w 9�
Node 1
1: Pump Inlet
Size
10"
(GPM)
2300
(ft/sec)
9.36
(IbfM)
236.6
Head tt
()
546.0
(ft MSL )
179.0
Head ft
O
725.00
Horizontal
5.00
jJ�O ,
S 4
2: 6A-6B lines Tee
10"
2300
9.36
228.9
528.3
187.5
715.79
100.00
3: Bottom Jet Nozzles
10"
2300
9.36
229.0
528.6
184.0
712.56
170.00
4�
4: Tee-Hydroveyor Side
5: Hydroveyor Exhauster Inlet
6'
6'
1211
1211
13.47
13.45
224.6
201.1
518.4
464.0
184.0
223.5
702.41
687.49
192.00
216.00
F
��i--�Qj �"'�
6: Air Separator Tank
6"
1211
13.45
0.0
0.0
204.0
204.00
216.00
���.•�
7: Exit Jet Pulsion Pump
8°
2300
14.75
48.29
111.45
174.50
285.95
218.00
�" M.
�,rurrrrrr
8: End of 915' Run. 10' I.D. Pipe
10°
2300
9.36
40.22
92.82
174.50
267.32
1250.00
9: End of 1500' Run, 13" I.D. Pipe, At Pond
13"
1100
5.56
19.00
43.84
215.00
258.84
2750.00
10: Fly Ash Booster supply
4"
1100
27.72
201.18
464.25
174.50
638.75
208.00
C V/
11: Bottom Ash Booster Pump
4'
2300
57.97
192.26
443.67
174.50
618.17
220.00
Hydraulic Profile
800.0
700.0
m 600.0
w
n 500.0
m 400.0
m
= 300.0
m
� 200.0
m
a 100.0
d
a
i6 0.0
1: Pump Inlet 2: 6A-6B lines 3: Bottom Jet 4: Tee- 5: Hydroveyor 6: Air Separator 7: Exit Jet Pulsion 8: End of 915' 9: End of 1500'
a Tee Nozzles Hydroveyor Side Exhauster Inlet Tank Pump Run. 10' I.D. Pipe Run, 13" I.D.
Pipe. At Pond
Elevation (ft MSL)
Elevation plus Pressure Head (ft)

'6 ju $NNNg
w--
3
O
LL
00 00 0 0 00 00 0 0 0 r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r
N N N N N N N N- N- N N N- N- N- N N— N
m m O
¢ N
9 >_
m
a �y (M W
�J
���aS�app}} f��yyO}} fO st {tt'mp�), i�yO n-aC�{J ldy�O {ICN+�J� tNN�tD (alA Off � I�fay�� NONE. I((((���Orn �—IN��OO( NmO, pOppJl ppOR b 000D 0 mm (9
m �mlO NINl11(l NN�O �O SON N�mONNN IONNNNN�IMOm �NNN mNNtON a V a00 V d
a T VV tD a
m N�p0�00, n a((o((y�yOrnr umi, C mODmp�yy ��epp�yy {cOppyyi, tood��a�NO, vo(OpNp(��a, �pmp�yy lO UOi, a cgi, arn(c�v m umi_ . (e. . . W a mc^O, N-. u^i. gym. n
ago
a ppOoyymwoa�OON pp �O V yp y pp �y
�'001�0 �O Mc7 V lh Cl f�t7 Cl O V ^ O ^OaM t7000�NaON�N
M O m N
'$oo.=000000000000000000000000r�d000�0000r000000�
O 4O+� mN�milN NNNNN NaO NtmpN� SON mNN'.mm-NN�O U1NbbN NNmN�fOp t00N tOp fD tMp Ow
V O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O D O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
v� —�p —�ppgy�pp ttpD r �nm�m�OO m<o �m�OO ���(o(JJ m m m�m�Op �o �m�OOmm mm
a m0yy a00 p0p p0p0y0y y0y �0�{{ y0yy�yaO NaO (Opy yN aN} yN sN�N} yN (pO�yN yN SNP pN eN} yN pm �mmGmD mfpmmOmO OmOm OmDm N�NmNO Ompw
d z N m lap m �D (ap m �p fp m (D ftOV m (O fD t0 t0 t0 t0 t0 tO fD fD fD fO (O tO ID O V�I N N N N ENO N U N N N N � N N N
¢
m2SSvvpppvovSvNNNN oovvvvppopvSaSS��vSaSvppepvcppppSvSornrnb°mmm8rnpprnpppp�p�8$$b°n°Smm
N N d 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 S 0 0 0 O O S O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O p O 0 0 0 0 0 S. 0 0 O S O S
ma¢000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000d
a' ¢
~ca�ssssogosgsso�ssosaoss
a,�0000000000d0000000000000000000000000000000000
0
m
¢
m o1Oi, ai, cmi, mi, M ani, % rmi, a�i, a�i, i9i, cv%i_ �i, chi, `�i, cmi. chi, �i mi 7 CR m co a? ao ip m Iq . . . . m m m ip
O r r r r r r r r r .- r .- .- r r r r r r- r .- .- .- r r r r C7 O N H N N N N N fV N N fV N OV N N N
>°
x ��pp �tpO (�pp {�pp ��pp ttpp ��pp ttpp (tpp (�pp t�pp Q0pp ��OO �O In 1O
.a.Om�I CJ NmMM MMMMMMmM mVI M V tq�V V d O (7 (al f�t'�0� f'mj C� (�fOM1 tO V V Q V V V V V V C Q O
� O)Of O)Oi 0)CU Oi OI m W mOi O) W T O10 Of Ol Dl 0)m 01 O1m 001 V N---------t ---M-M
r r r r p p p p p Uq � N H N N N N N N Imo fmaj N N N N N N( N N N N N N N N N N
dNNm �O Ul m �ffll
Q ,'r (oh�o o�(oOO�JJ otf0O�0�(0O�(0�((0O� (0�00{0J �y0y� 0 t(00�0�(00�00000(oJ boy �(oOpooc o0000 000 p00�p0O �0pO0�p0O
m CI ,..,m W �m W W NmOJ UD W OD NOmD m OD Nm N [ONmONO, OMDm O�OD IO tOONN N�Omw NtOO tOO NNNHH
a Emrdddddddd000dddddddooBd0000dododddddodddddd000
'o ulQOppNNNpp NN S. pp Ntgq Lp
ppp 8
8y. �Sp{OOOOOOO aO{�O}�O�}} ONN �}.'00, S�OmpppNONSmm 41
m mNO W OnO mmm mm—m mmmm----CDm�mNO� mYNNNNNNN N
> r r r r r �- r .- r � r r r r r r r r r r r r r
W r
�i E O MmmM66 NOO��
�-
c > �
m 7 c
J O m
W J
m
m 3 3 2 3 0¢ 2 Q 3 2 3 3¢ 2 c LL m m
> g 0 g p Q 0 0 m 3 3 3 3 m 3 3 m 3
O> m w w w w :? p >' 2 N W O w W— W N N >___ j IL 6 .pp
Z .8 � c pop c �n �n o c $ ON o�n 10 mO o0 of c H > m c$ 88 (¢m1{$ mw CiCi ro Ciw mw
W m Y N Oi ,Q b 0 N W W N V Op O 0 C W N m N m E o a m m m y �O �O V O
a¢ 'ro C¢¢ m¢¢ o¢¢ o m o¢ o¢¢ O¢ m m e i m "m m c o mp"j�aa vrn
E J W>JJT mNT J JSF-T J!�JJxJ xl- Of� CAC m¢¢¢ m¢ a%¢tt¢¢a ¢¢ CL
O• x a bin l-NtnN >y'qy ^ mrn 60 co (n
a OOOb OOipOONOOTbbDO 00 O b�Ob mip ip ip ip ip <p i0 V - rip f0 (V ip (p0 N

Table 2
68-Fly Ash
length/
Pipe
Equivalent
Diameter
Area
Velocity
Velocity
Roughness
Relative
Reynolds
friction
Friction
Pressure
Pressure
Flow Rate
Flow Rate Head
Node 1
Length (ft)
Elevation
(ft)
(W)
(ftfs)
Head (ft)
(11)
Roughness
Number
factor
Head (ft)
(psi)
Head (ft)
Delivered
Exiting Added
8' Horizontal Piping
8
223.50
0.505
0.20
13.45
2.81
0.0002
0.000396
558526
0.0169
0.7514
203.46
469.51
0
1211
4' Horizontal Piping
4
223.50
0.505
0.20
13.45
2.81
0.0002
0.000396
558526
0.0169
0.3757
203.29
469.14
0
1211
6" SR 90 Elbow
152
223.50
0.505
0.20
13.45
2.81
0.0002
0.000396
558526
0.0169
1.4276
202.67
467.71
0
1211
1' Horizontal Piping
1
223.50
0.505
0.20
13.45
2.81
0.0002
0.000396
558526
0.0169
0.0939
202.63
467.62
0
1211
Hydroveyor Exhauster
0
223.50
0.505
0.20
13.45
2.81
0.0002
0.000396
670064
0.0167
0.0000
130.00
300.00
0
1211
Separator Tank
0
204.00
0.505
0.20
13.45
2.81
0.0002
0.000396
670064
0.0167
0.0000
0.00
0.00
0
1211
Jetpulsion Pump
0
174.50
0.835
0.55
9.36
1.36
0.0002
0,000240
770280
0.0154
0.0000
48.32
111.50
1089
2300 82
Horizontal Piping Run
915
174.50
0.835
0.55
9.36
1.36
0.000017
0.000020
770280
0.0126
18.7750
40.18
92.73
0
2300
Horizontal Piping Run
1500
215.00
1.083
0.92
5.56
0.48
0.000005
0.000005
593708
0.0129
8.5722
18.92
43.65
0
2300
.CARO
u•araa.
714
.rwr1A.
�e®raea.raaet ��

-'n
.y
pm mM888 MN�88F
CL C N N N N N N N N N N
3 '4
ow
LL
N MMMMM ScO+]CIMMMC'1m MNN NNNNNNN
N NNNNNNN N N N N N N N r r r r r r r r .-
y�
N B
¢ N
3 >
O N
rL m p �p
dq 1d0� - W f0 W NV OIDN N� tfINN (mDN pOWpINN OMmUND d cq OD OW NOIOpW��
y m N N tO N N N N N N tmn N N N N N N N N N N N N N m(� N N N N N N N N N Mr .d- Wp mMp p rp O I���pp
a x 0p 4 N O , , _ N M
ppp NQO4O
NN(
N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N
aC0. mOMO�NONCO uriNOdN OO1�ONrNNpp Nr{pp �Vyy -,��-,dM{ mci m W ol� No mm m;m
ppOVV CNOOMNO Oa mnnnOIm
yoo�oo00000000000r0000r000000000000rm000r0000r
O O CO Ot0 t0 CDM(D NCO N UOiw COwww VOi CON VOi i0(1 i0wwww i0(1 i�N wwwNNwt�O t00 W w�f�O mm
t O N W- b- b
O O O O O O O O ww
O O O O O O
O O
E
c--�p �pn NO�ttOO t0 t0 �tD0 {D (Ot0 t0
D E O O O O O a a 0 0 0 O N N N N N Nd N N N N N a N N N N N N N N N O " m N N N N N T M m
O D y Ny N y N y N y N N N Ndd a Nd{ N�{{ N N aa p p pp p y V' d yy pp pp pp eeyy ss{{ pp ss}} yy 0�{ a p
Z (O f0 f0 (O (D (O t0 CO f0 t0 N t0 t0 �O !D fO tD t0 0 tO l0 f0 fO lO f0 t0 t0 f0 tp tp f0 N O N N N N N N N N N
¢
O v O ooOoO0000�aavaovavvvvaoaaovom
2mrnmmwmmmm
j N N N 9N N N N N N N N N N N N N Q NQ N N N NQQ N N Q Ng N N N N N N N N M M M M M m m m m m
n w�000go$0000$o �o�o oog�ggg�o25 wo$8�oe wo ooego 000000
m¢ ¢p0000000oo o0000oo 00000oo000OO000000OOOOOOOOOoo
g , ¢
0 Jilin pig
c O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 l> 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0
. Cf COJ (7 M l`� i M M M COq ) M t. Ci Cl Cl M M (7 lh . l'. l? M t�9 th . m . M Cl w N w m OD 00 00 CD O� GO CD OO
r r- r r r r r r .- r .- r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r m O N N N N N N fV N N
> m
{p
' M Cm7, N Noi ; of f lh (� wCO'I,wMNM(�N Nmt�m COjMNmNwN wN w N�n V
� Oi mm Oi tD 0) W N(T (n IDlT NlD (T Oi OI W N OCR A AO)-N------------
a�OOONNNNNN
o'OE Mm� Omt(O(��O{wO�OW �tmy?OOp ON O1O O0D OW OmOCO lCOO9 OW OOJOOOWOWOOOO.{OO��{OyOO �(OOJOmOOO�tOtOp0 O
mmNM22 WmwmWy
F000000
0000000000000000000�ptOO 0pOSO0pON p0oN0p0NO 0p0N0poIn 0�pO�Ol1�pON0O0O� a m
a
€0$$$$8$88o$88SS888S$8��$�S$5888$S$S$o$$�888$S
>nmmwwwwmm��mw�mmwmwm��^�m��m������m��w �i `8irno
r r r r r .- r r r r r r r r r r r .- r r r r r N
W p p ttpp pp�� pp��
N OCi wmN N N CJ N NW N mN OT d InOM MCvb dj N wNN OOymOd O
5 2r. r d l C m N r m r r r r W N r m M r f O M
WJ
O ON
N
t >
U N
c > > c c > 55> > c >
> 3 3 3 3¢ p 3p ¢ 3 ¢ m¢ o o S o¢ 2 m 3 3 3 3 w 3
lU i m> y a D,�D D�.O 10 ¢ D U� C�V ID DO-D N- N i `> V O pp O C O O
O>- .� m- C 3 p W_ W W- W ry ` n n n O S¢ D
Z ny -W W �W W �W �W �W Cpc> OG 0 OcWN 51�O p OO OH cis- i W ,U WLL7 W¢W CaM
W m W pp p N N N N O N O O N m y N W W Q O O d W ,C N N N d O C~ a a w d o d (C O N (n 'L d dC fA 'C OI N d
O 'C N '.. > O 0 0¢¢¢ O¢ O 0 L m N fU W m N
J U w m¢¢ x¢¢ S¢ x¢ ¢ 0 0 N 2¢ 2 J J J S J S F- O F- f T C N¢¢¢ ¢ W¢-
OOO ?NNb (n t_tpp toot' N1-2 Cp Co JO aGO OO ((ppO tV O=OO G Cn F-to NIn >0)�to�
h m00 aD NM IO M ow M(O 6 m io (fi r-W rr �}r m' Nrr mtO(O tO tOm W WV ZOO

Table 2
6A•Fly Ash
Length/
Pipe
Equivalent
Diameter
Area
Velocity
Velocity
Roughness
Relative
Reynolds
friction
Friction
Pressure
Pressure
Flow Rate
Flow Rate Head
Node 1
Length (ft)
Elevation
(it)
(ft^2)
(ft/s)
Head (it)
(ft)
Roughness
Number
factor
Head (ft)
(psi)
Head (it)
Delivered
Exiting Added
6" SR 45 Elbow
8.09
208.50
0.505
0.20
13.46
2.81
0.0002
0.000396
558526
0.0169
0.7598
210.83
486.52
0
1211
6" SR 45 Elbow
8.09
209.00
0.505
0.20
13.45
2.81
0.0002
0.000396
558526
0.0169
0.7598
210.28
48526
0
1211
2'-6" Rise
2.5
211.50
0.505
0.20
13.45
2.81
0.0002
0.000396
558526
0.0169
0.2348
209.10
482.63
0
1211
6" SR 45 Elbow
8.09
212.00
0.505
0.20
13.45
2.81
0.0002
0.000396
558526
0.0169
0.7598
208.55
481.27
0
1211
6" SR 45 Elbow
8.09
212.50
0.505
0.20
13.45
2.81
0.0002
0.000396
558526
0.0169
0.7598
208.00
480.01
0
1211
10' Vertical Rise
10
222.50
0.505
0.20
13.45
2.81
0.0002
0.000396
558526
0.0169
0.9392
203.26
469.07
0
1211
6" SR 90 Elbow
15.2
223.50
0.505
0.20
13.45
2.81
0.0002
0.000396
558526
0.0169
1.4276
202.21
466.64
0
1211
8' Horizontal Piping
8
223.50
0.505
0.20
13.45
2.81
0.0002
0.000396
558526
0.0169
0.7514
201.89
465.89
0
1211
4' Horizontal Piping
4
223.50
0.605
0.20
13.45
2.81
0.0002
0.000396
558526
0.0169
0.3757
201.72
465.51
0
1211
6" SR 90 Elbow
15.2
223.50
0.505
0.20
13.45
2.81
0.0002
0.000396
558526
0.0169
1.4276
201.10
464.09
0
1211
1' Horizontal Piping
1
223.50
0.505
0.20
13.45
2.81
0.0002
0.000396
558526
0.0169
0.0939
201.06
463.99
0
1211
Hydroveyor Exhauster
0
223.50
0.505
0.20
13.45
2.81
0.0002
0.000396
670064
0.0167
0.0000
0.00
0.00
0
1211
Separator Tank
7265
204.00
0.605
0.20
13.45
2.81
0.0002
0.000396
670064
0.0167
67.4262
0.00
0.00
0
1211
Jetpulsion Pump
0
174.50
0.665
0.35
14.75
3.38
0.0002
0.000301
967194
0.0157
0.0000
48.29
111.45
1089
2300 82
Horizontal Piping Run
915
174.50
0.835
0.55
9.36
1.36
0.000017
0.000020
770280
0.0126
18.7750
40.22
92.82
0
2300
Horizontal Piping Run
1500
215.00
1.083
0.92
5.56
0.48
0.000005
0.000005
593708
0.0128
8.5057
19.00
43.84
0
2300
ai!4i tanr
°Rae..a.4ee•i �

MYooN.
m 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8
¢ .N NNN NNNN
OW
LL
cs--
m a O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O Q O O O O O O O O
¢
1SS
m
9 '
'm
u a �p {p (� N
N N m(p�y?�(pDy�tO QQ(0 �(?gip OOOD N GMO, IOO Nm N (q ..N . PA a yyy� ry opv"p�i,rn ry
y m N N YMf N N N N N N N N N t (I N N N N N N N N lN(1 n N N N N tNl1 N l A l A �0(f N a V d' O V
06
aS y M�D pp qq�CpOyV aV�
1OD O(pnCyn�(pgp O6 n 66000606 ONi-�nV 6(6 Om iO NN �ONi COD f� ((ayO (NyyN GOO n � CM'). OI�OOi, nC�
y 4 NNN N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N
a` Oppp Vy {{pp ropGpp aGppp CGppp O ttOO C� �Cy�
a O M O O N WON
N N A N 8 O r N O N O d O O (O tOO d 0 0 Or W U y N O O M
'C m 00 000000 0000000 OO O O �- OOOO C 0000 00 0 . o r O N CO MO tT of
4� U N NNN�N�06 NiONNN�O NUINNNN NNbiONNNN iO �ONNNUOj� VOj tMp ww w wwo W MO
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
w w 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
(- Epp t-Epp Epp Epp Epp {---(- Epp t- - -- {--0mmm m mm0 m m
Epp ttO
a N pN N} N N Npp pN eNJ aNa}} yNy yNy N yN eNaJ {N�}} N yNy (y�y yN N µN N pN qN aN{ C)yN ao yN N ow
Ny cN� yN a (e�y} Ny �N a eN}
T y Z m t0 (O m N fp t0 t0 f0 (O (O O fD b t0 fD t6 t0 t0 tD N f0 (O tD tD tCt �O t0 N (O t0 �O t0 f0 GOO O (AO ^ ^ tA0 n N� lA0 tA0 tA0
a
m y a v v a e a v a v a a o w o v a a v a v v a oa a v v o rn rn m m rn m rn m `�
Na m,8888888888888oil88888888888888 880088888888888
mo ¢aooOodooOod00000d000 oaa000000000 ooO000doo 00600
NNN
Is Rig 0
as ¢
88
>` M- O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O o 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
LL
O
a6 ¢
cii, chi, ccii, G�i. c. . . cii, m ci . M % chi. c�. �i. �i. c. cmi. cmi. G cii, �i. cmi. chi. c i, v(Oi, m m �i. . S. . �i. . q----------------------------------
oNi, m
{p ��pp
.>. Mfg cl MM f7 l7 lh C'l (OMMMCO (O l'gci MM 88 MMCOD Ga'JM fOOMM MM GOJM fOn �m6 r n n r n r rt�A
O y 6 f m Ol C A C U m m m a; C T C A O f O i Oi T W m m O. . O. C A m t T (i C A C T C A M C A m W 0. . A A A A A A A A A
yN N N N N N N N N N
NN ��6O ��6O
yN I NN N N �NHNNN0NN0 Ui q UNI N In 00FOCI N I6� 004n 1? �N N�l� 000000000
Q O O O O O O O O O O O O o O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
m ` db WcS iE id`�mm`r�dd`aam `elm "c�roWmWW`�db `u�i6 hS a5 "aim cq OR c? m tM').
n d E�0o000000000000000000000000000000000oo0oooo OOOm"
0
opoqp8$oSS$8SS88$$$$S8SSS80o98t{{y$y8yySeJJy8ySa�8}}$y$ySa$C$�+DBS.,q WOO 0
m nN m-mm m mm-NN-OWDm mm m W -m O----[O NCO Ol� f00 mn nPnA n
W
O V vMbM00000 fGQNON OO MNNOM MfAO p 666 NN _AN6gNN N "i OHO o'
qi
(V �D
W L
J � m
lL J
m
G >
c c3 c c c c
m>m o= ¢o¢3¢o.c(C ¢ m¢$e$a¢a2 2 mm to. ai i¢
mo.o �D�Lam$ nm_ m3 O__!9 9'-2>m mQiQa¢ mi
o n,G ww pu-Sw p W W w La c > o� ouwi 'D uwio 00 �F c F > t6 'c°� `D� W c$ o m
w m ro -,a 6 m c v v 8 8 z m Q v OJ N c W X C v p v m` O N pp .oi m y < Gp > V o >
O'J u m m¢¢ Z¢¢_¢_¢ O¢ N O m S¢ 0 Q g 0 0 0¢ O 0'C m m m m N C C¢ C¢ O E
E_ >mfn- co In N_ mSmF- :r Wa: o0 mm m o S
❑ 000_ - o, ((pp O. S iD �; o No OO �noN o=0 0 0.NF^>C9>(4 S(n NU'
Oo M OD e- w N N CD Co 0 m- V M .- N t0 fO OD � H V V' Zr) 4 - 4

Table 2
6A-Fly Ash booster supply
Length!
Pipe
Equivalent
Diameter
Area
Velocity
Velocity
Roughness
Relative
Reynolds
friction
Friction
Pressure
Pressure
Flow Rate Flow Rate Head
Node 1
Length (ft)
Elevation
(ft)
(W)
(f7s)
Head (ft)
(ft)
Roughness
Number
factor
Head (ft)
(psi)
Head (ft)
Delivered
Exiting Added
i' Horizontal Run
1
177.50
0.336
0.09
27.72
11.93
0.0002
0.000596
764249
0.018
0.6403
203.51
469.64
0
1100
4" SR 90 Elbow
10.1
177.00
0.336
0.09
27.72
11.93
0.0002
0.000596
764249
0.018
6A667
201.20
464.32
0
1100
4" SR 90 Elbow
10.1
177.00
0.336
0.09
27.72
11.93
0.0002
0.000596
764249
0.018
6.4667
200.93
463.67
0
1100
3' Vertical Drop
3
174.50
0.336
0.09
27.72
11.93
0.0002
0.000596
764249
0.018
1.9208
201.18
464.25
0
1100
.eef s:rvy,
i (` fi v1vv
L J
✓ VV A'j i1f1 ,yt11.�e�,
edFvsbua>N 9D

= Q
¢ �N N NN NN NNNN N •`�� N�S M NS mMMt�N t7N1 �'+N NN M NN
3 R V V
ow
cc
T 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
LL pp U� �ly� yy �lpp �lpp
EI OIWyD,b V (? W �CI(O unl, lN'/ V W lo0 pppppp 0NOl�00�N W iOlnN�ml(QW(�1, 0{pppOy���(WWWWONN W NO Iq Iq ORtvRN WW ONi Obi
y diMtt YMf N lfI N M N l N N lm h W N N A N A N N N n N W O Q C M M P)
a x WW cp aa
6 NNOlp Mr CWiM� WQ I� tpnmyN Opm GOi n N00040 h �I� lO l�Dp 00�O � W mCMI. M W MO�NN Q Nm
y d N N 22222 N NNNN N N N N N N W
N N N N N N N N
a` 88OOyy mpmpmpmpGGGGGGpppppp oo pp MCI (� QQ Sb
0— OCOO�ONN� N NO�MNHNNOO MNO V o�On^, W l0� V O�O eqNmbIMO,O
(l�oo�0000000000000 0000�00000o0000M.on.r4 Wc;
li = rrpp �lpp �lpp �lpp ��pp WW ��pp ^
c OON NNMi(I NN N M NNM iWfl NMYOI I�NNNNNNNNNYI ONNYO] NOOn� A n nN N
O O
.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
'f A O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O- M
clpp ��pp �_lpp t_tpp _�pp t§lpp{p{pp (Op {{pwo
Epp§-yp n n W W N W OOO O
D 0 0 0 V OV O v Ov O O v Ov N O NO N R NR O NO N N N tv N N V NV V NV NVV NVV N O NO V NV t OtVV a N N N N WOES
N n r r r OM
NZ0t�OOw Otero lO t�O (a0 f0 mOOIaO�NIaO tip � 101D f0100t010�� �� �NmOM N m N N buWi
¢ o0p 0p 0pop Op op ��pp
m N K O V V P V 4 p dppp Opp V88 O d88 dpp �881' VSS d"WN OV C V OOOODOSS Op OSS O88 OSS d V88 O Vpp O 8 V d88 O OpOp OOi w NSS Opp Nppp O W N88 g
ro p10 S S O S O O O O O O O O O O 88888 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
p 6 6 6 6 6 0 6 6 6 6 o 6 0 0 0 0 6 6 6 6 0 6 0 6 0 6 6 6 6 0 0 0 6 0 o 0 0 6 0 o 6 o 6
ssassssoogss$s�
c ONO coo s§ooso 000o0oaos
MYOOOOo0oo0000006000000000000$ 00
O
m
¢ p p p p p p p p p Q MNNN
p Wp
.>+�MMMMMMMMMM�,M COI MMMmMCMMli MMMMCOO,MMM
"�jL .-�.-� � � � � �.-.- �.-.- � � � �.- �.- � �.--�.-.-.-.-M MOO uNi NNOINn •-O
� Z tp 1p ((pp �p pp �lpp
a MMMMCI MM MMMMMMMMM�MMMMMMMMMMMCI M InM�nNYfNAm�WMtt7
m0 Oi O� Oi W W W W W W W W W W W W W W Oi !n Oi Oi W W W W W W W 6i W W W N N N N N 19 M W N
y
> Qm WN M tglq OM IAMMMO NNOHIYOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOpp011 O0O Opp011 qpO0�
ONNONOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOQO
l
EK ci 00600 ci 0 0 06 o 0 o O O 6 6 o o o o 66 WO o o o 06060006-
0
aOmDO OW ooqW $W W W oWgSW ms8oa O$ omm Ooui_uoi. voi.^ W
WO W $ga$g gpp gW o((ayy0 oO upophi.. 'W opppp gpmp �i, v v�8
n n N
Wm pppp m 8
M'1 '-O6-6 O (7MtoN l0N M6CO�NIIfOMO M�e
`aroL N
c � �
m J C
J O m
W J
C c
C C C C C c L LL Cc cc
S 3 2 3p 3¢ 3 ¢' 3 ¢_ o L ¢' ¢ m` ¢$$ o$¢ g 2 2 A m `> 3 Q E¢ S"co.
3 m> 8O 8O ys OGp a ro a m nOpp n o- m m m- O- a- 2- m c> �..g a
$> I4 c W W c W IL C W C W-S LL1 cm ro m c p m W_ W W C W L m F, ro m W W m c
Y>_ o o o c c> a/-�W �Wo�SiQF"o� >yloln�Qmm
w and �Nm c`�a ca c�iHam Qi6sMm�a Wa W.c 'c 61 nl t-� % vo mg c c
¢ m e o o m �> o` o o¢ m¢¢ 0 U) ~ ro x¢¢> o o roa w
PQJ r(i amid W gccC X x=m cc rm i $¢ i=J a�� SNS� S m b F30 M- ¢='c
3000_ - o. o= m W O W O. o0 oNo. o. - '^ m o 0
a.- Mc0 D1N W �M ZW W 60 C0 Go t70 •'10 V' Mom" -N�- W t010 V V M-'I NSS

W ArF9
Michael F. Easley, Governor
16'
July 1, 2008
Teresa Wilson tt-°
Plant Manager l.a •
Cape Fear Steam Electric Plant
500 CP&L Road
Moncure, NC 27559
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Coleen H. Sullins, Director
Division of Water Quality
RE: Renewal of the Middle Cape Fear River Basin Association's Memorandum of Agreement
NPDES Permit Notification for Instream Monitoring
NC0003433 Cape Fear Steam Electric Plant
Chatham County
Dear Ms. Wilson:
For the past ten years, the members of the Middle Cape Fear River Basin Association (MCFRBA) have
broadened understanding of the watershed through water quality monitoring. The Division of Water Quality
(DWQ) greatly appreciates the association's continued support of the monitoring and the time and expertise
contributed by its members.
By this letter the DWQ confirms the waiving of instream monitoring requirements within your individual NPDES
permit in exchange for the MCFRBA's monitoring of the watershed as specified within the renewed
Memorandum of Agreement (MOA) effective July 1, 2008. The agreement identifies the stations, parameters,
and frequency of monitoring required of the association in order to maintain the instream monitoring waivers for
your individual permits. Effluent monitoring requirements are not affected. Should your membership in the
association be terminated, you must notify DWQ immediately and the instream monitoring requirements in your
permit will be reinstated.
All other terms and conditions in the original permit remain unchanged and in full effect. These modifications are
issued pursuant to the requirements of North Carolina General Statute 143-215.1 and the Memorandum of
Agreement between North Carolina and the US Environmental Protection Agency.
If you have any questions regarding this letter or the coalition, please contact Jennie Atkins at [phone] or
[e-mail].
Sincerely,
'PA owc
Coleen H. Sullins
Director, Division of Water Quality
cc: Raleigh Regional Office, Surface Water Protection
NPDES Eastern Unit
Jennie Atkins, Environmental Sciences Section
Central Files
NQQa"� hCaroI ina
.AWura!!y
North Carolina Division of Water Quality 1617 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1617 Phone [phone] Customer Service
http://h2o.mr.state.nc.m 512 N Salisbury Street Raleigh, NC 27604 Fax [phone]
An Equal Opporhmity/Al8miative Acton Empbrer-50%Recycled/10 h Post Consumer Paper

Algaecide use at Cape Fear Plant
Subject: Algaecide use at Cape Fear Plant
From: "Bryson, Robin R." <[e-mail]>
Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2008 13:29:47 -0400
To: <[e-mail]>
As discussed this afternoon, a Biocide/Chemical Treatment Worksheet—Form 101 is not required for approval to
use an algaecide in the low water retention basin at the Cape Fear Steam Electric Plant on an infrequent,
as -needed basis.
To treat the algal bloom, about 1.2 gallons of algaecide would be added to the basin (approximately 712,000
gallons). The discharge from this basin flows to the west ash pond where additional dilution will occur before
flowing into the effluent channel and ultimately to the Cape Fear River.
A letter is being submitted to the NPDES Unit for approval to add two potential algaecides to Attachment 4 of
the NPDES Permit application.
Please respond with a concurrence of my understanding. Thanks for your time.
Robin R. Bryson
Progress Energy Carolinas, Inc.
Environmental, Health and Safety Services
Bell [phone]
Vnet 8-770-3962
1 of 1 7/25/2008 10:20 AM

Re' Algaecide use at Cape Fear Plant
Subject: Re: Algaecide use at Cape Fear Plant
From: "[e-mail]" <[e-mail]>
Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2008 08:07:53 -0400 (EDT)
To: <[e-mail]>
The Raleigh Regional Office concurs with the statement. Please note
that if the amount being added increases or is added more frequently,
we will need to re-evaluate at that time.
1 of 1 7/25/2008 10:20 AM

0
C. Progress Energy
June 25, 2008
Stephanie Brixey
Senior Environmental Specialist
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
North Carolina Division of Water Quality
1628 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1628
Subject: Cape Fear Steam Electric Plant
Response to Compliance Evaluation Inspection
File Point: 12520J
Dear Ms. Brixey:
OR
JUN 3 0�
FICF
On June 6, 2008, the Cape Fear Steam Electric Plant received a letter from your office noting
observations made during a compliance evaluation inspection regarding the plant's NPDES Permit.
Specifically, item number 6 asked for a written response to the following questions:
How much time does the facility have before the ash pond is full with the ash pond as is?
Answer: The pond will likely fill up between 1 to 2 years, which is dependent on
generation and ash content of the coal.
2. Does the facility plan to do additional work to extend the life of the pond before cleaning?
Answer: We will be adding a 10 foot vertical extension to the ash pond. This will add
between 2 or 4 additional years based on generation and ash content of the coal.
3. When the ash pond is cleaned how will the ash be disposed?
Answer: There is currently an effort underway to determine areas where ash can
beneficially be reused (such as industrial parks).
Should you have any questions please do not hesitate to contact Ms. Leigh Barr at
[phone].
"I certify, under penalty of law, that this letter was prepared under my direction or supervision in
accordance with a system designed to assure that qualified personnel properly gather and evaluate the
information submitted. Based on my inquiry of the person or persons who manage the system, or those
persons directly responsible for gathering the information, the information submitted is, to the best of my
knowledge and belief, true, accurate, and complete. I am aware that there are significant penalties for
submitting false information, including the possibility of fines and imprisonment for knowing violations."
Siinc--ere''ly,
C,,
Teresa Wilson
Plant Manager
Progress Energy Carolinas, Inc.
Cape Fear Steam Plant
500 CP&L Road
Moncure, NC 27559

w
47'PSNC'ENERGY
A SCANA COMPANY
November 2, 2007
Monte Matthews
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Raleigh Regulatory Field Office
6508 Falls of the Neuse Road
Suite 120
Raleigh, NC 27615
Dale Suiter
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
Raleigh Field Office
P.O. Box 33726
Raleigh, NC 27636-3726
RE: Proposed Stream Crossings for Natural Gas Pipeline in Chatham County
PSNC Energy, Manns Chapel Road, Tobacco Road, River Forest Road, Chapel
Hill, NC (Project Site)
PSNC Energy, Gastonia, NC (Corporate Office)
Dear Monte and Dale:
PSNC Energy, a natural gas utility based in Gastonia, NC, is proposing to construct a
natural gas pipeline along Manns Chapel Road, Tobacco Road, and River Forest Road
just southwest of Chapel Hill in northern Chatham County. As part of this construction,
there are two known or identified stream crossings, Wilkinson Creek and an umaamed
tributary to Wilkinson Creek, which are necessary to cross to provide natural gas service
to proposed new customers along this route. This new natural gas pipeline will provide
service to newly proposed residential subdivisions to be located off of Maims Chapel
Road and River Forest Road known as Manns Crossing and Harrison Pond. The crossing
of these streams will be accomplished using horizontal directional drilling or HDD
technology. The use of HDD technology is more environmentally friendly and causes
fewer disturbances than other conventional methods. As with any crossing, if there is
sufficient soil coverage on top of the roadway culvert, then trenching across the top of the
culvert, between the culvert and the roadway, may also be an option; however, no actual
trenching across the stream will occur.

w a
As you may know, this area is located within the Cape Fear River Basin. The Cape Fear
River Basin does not have a riparian buffer rule; however, perpendicular stream crossings
are exempt from such buffer rule requirements. It is my understanding of the Corps of
Engineers (COE) Water Quality Regulations, including the 401/404 regulations, that no
permitting is required for HDD-type stream crossing nor open -cut trenching projects less
than 150 linear feet in width (which would qualify for coverage under the NWP-12
Permit without a mitigation proposal). There is a Regional Permit Condition which
states: "Pipeline/utility line construction through jurisdictional waters and wetlands will
be accomplished utilizing directional drilling/boring methods to the maximum extent
practicable." If PSNC determines that drilling is not practicable, we will notify the
Corps prior to any such change.
Wilkinson Creek and the unnamed tributary to Wilkinson Creek would not be considered
commercial navigable waterways. In addition, HDD-type crossings are not regulated as
well. There is one known endangered species of aquatic life, the Cape Fear shiner, that
may be located in or along Wilkinson Creek or the tributary to Wilkinson Creek.
However, since HDD technology is being used for this stream crossing, no impacts to any
potential habitat or population is expected. If there is any change to the type of stream
crossing, such as trenching rather than HDD, a formal Endangered Species Survey would
be performed in these stream areas. The following species' are listed as either
endangered or threatened in Chatham County: red -cockaded woodpecker (endangered),
Cape Fear shiner (endangered), the bald eagle (threatened), and Harperella (endangered
plant). In addition, the following are listed as federal species of concern: American eel,
Bachman's sparrow, Carolina darter, Carolina redhorse (all vertebrates), Atlantic pigtoe,
Brook Floater, Carolina creekshell, Septima's clubtail, and yellow lampmussel (all
invertebrates), Buttercup phacelia, sweet pinesap, and Virginia quillwort (all vascular
plants). It is not expected that any species besides possibly the Cape Fear shiner is within
the proposed project site; however, if any of these species is encountered, work will be
stopped and the habitat evaluated. Using HDD technology will not disturb any aquatic
life. No trees will be removed during this project. PSNC has an aggressive
environmental compliance program and specific policies and procedures in place to
address such stream crossings. PSNC is submitting this letter as information only
regarding our proposed project; this letter is also being submitted to NCDENR's Water
Quality Section Regional Office in Raleigh, NC for informational purposes as well.
PSNC has submitted our Erosion and sedimentation Control (E&SC) Plan to NCDENR's
Raleigh Regional Office — Land Quality Section for review and approval.
PSNC will adhere to the requirements outlined in the Nationwide 12 Permit issued and
regulated by the Corps of Engineers, Wilmington District as well as the conditions
outlined in WQC #3374 as issued by NCDENR. PSNC has a strict management policy
with regard to erosion control measures and procedures. While these proposed stream
crossings do not require a specific Erosion and Sedimentation Control (E&SC) Plan from
NCDENR's Land Quality section, PSNC will follow all applicable erosion and
sedimentation control measures and install appropriate erosion control measures (i.e., silt
fences, etc.) to minimize sedimentation impacts to the area, specifically from the drilling
equipment and associated ancillary equipment.

n-I
a
Should you have any questions or require additional information regarding this proposed
stream crossing or submittal, please feel to contact me at [phone] or you can also
contact me by e-mail at keniohnson(@,scana.com Thank you for your assistance with these
matters.
Sincerely,
Ken Aimson
Environmental Program Manager
CC. Frances Grimsley
Reid Crane
Billy Miller
Scott Swindler
Bill Rayner
Charles Wakild
Surface Water Protection Supervisor
NCDENR - Raleigh Regional Office
3800 Barrett Drive
Raleigh, NC 27611