20151005 Ver 1_Preservation Baseline Doc. Report_20150722

FINAL
PRESERVATION PROJECT AND
BASELINE DOCUMENTATION REPORT
FLINT ROCK FARM
ROCKINGHAM COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
EEP Project No. 440
Cape Fear River Basin
Cataloging Unit 03030002
Prepared for:
r�
iaoi sotem
d ROM
PROGRAM
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Ecosystem Enhancement Program
217 West Jones Street, Suite 3000A
Raleigh, North Carolina 27603
Prepared by:
Axiom Environmental, Inc.
Axiom Environmental, Inc.
218 Snow Avenue
Raleigh, NC 27603
March 2015

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The Flint Rock Farm Site (Site) is located in southwest Rockingham County, approximately 8.5
miles west of the Town of Reidsville and 9.5 miles north of the City of Greensboro within the
Cape Fear River Basin along Troublesome Creek. The Site contains headwater streams in the
Troublesome Creek stream system, which is currently affected by numerous stressors causing
stream channel erosion and habitat degradation. Current agricultural and stormwater runoff, and
increasing growth and development pressures within the watershed are becoming of greater
concern making preservation of Site streams, wetlands, and riparian areas vital to maintaining
water quality of water supply reservoirs and aquatic habitat.
This preservation report has been written in conformance with the requirements of the following:
Federal rule for compensatory mitigation project sites as described in the Federal Register Title
33 Navigation and Navigable Waters Volume 3 Chapter 2 Section § 332.8 paragraphs (c)(2)
through (c)(14) and 332.3(h); and NCDENR Ecosystem Enhancement Program In -Lieu Fee
Instrument signed and dated July 28, 2010.
Site Description
Project Name and EEP Project Number
County
General Location
Basin
Physiographic Region
USGS Hydro Unit
NCDWQ Sub -basin
Watershed Planning Information
Preservation Mechanism
Conservation Values
Deed Recordation Date
Total Credit Linear
Footage /Acreage
Total Mitigation Units
Flint Rock Farm Preservation Project
EEP ID 440
Flint Rock Farm - Project #440
Rockingham
9.5 miles north of Greensboro
Cape Fear
Piedmont
03030002
03 -06 -01
TLW 03030002010010
Troublesome and Little Troublesome Creek LWP
Conservation Easement
Permanently preserves headwater streams, wetlands,
and riparian buffers of the Troublesome Creek stream
system within the Lake Reidsville and Jordan Lake
Watersheds (two water supply reservoirs).
April 08, 2005
Mitigation Assets
Warm Riparian Non - riparian
Stream Wetland Wetland
5427.901f 31.54 acres 0.19 acres
1086 SMUs 6.31 WMUs 0.04 WMUs
Riparian Buffer
736,062.99 sq. ft.
88,675 BMUs
Executive Summary Page i

Conservation values for this Site include the following.
• Permanently preserves headwater streams, wetlands, and riparian buffers of the
Troublesome Creek stream system within the Lake Reidsville and Jordan Lake
Watersheds (two water supply reservoirs).
A conservation easement deed was recorded on April 08, 2005 and is included in Appendix B.
Flint Rock Farm Preservation Project
EEP ID 440 Executive Summary Page ii

TABLE OF CONTENTS
EXECUTIVESUMMARY .............................................................................. ............................... i
1.0 PRESERVATION PROJECT GOALS AND OBJECTIVES .................. ............................... 1
2.0 SITE DESCRIPTION ............................................................................... ............................... 1
2.1 General Description .............................................................................. ............................... 1
2.2 Directions ............................................................................................... ..............................2
3.0 SITE SELECTION ................................................................................... ............................... 2
4.0 BASELINE INFORMATION .................................................................. ............................... 2
4.1 Physical Features .................................................................................. ............................... 2
4.2 Plant and Wildlife Communities ........................................................... ............................... 2
4.3 Jurisdictional Streams ........................................................................... ............................... 3
4.4 Jurisdictional Wetlands ......................................................................... ............................... 3
5.0 SITE PROTECTION INSTRUMENT ..................................................... ............................... 4
5.1 Encumbrances ....................................................................................... ............................... 4
6.0 DETERMINATION OF CREDITS .......................................................... ............................... 4
7.0 LONG -TERM MANAGEMENT PLAN .................................................. ............................... 6
8.0 FINANCIAL ASSURANCES .................................................................. ............................... 6
9.0 REFERENCES ......................................................................................... ............................... 6
APPENDICES
Appendix A. Figures and Photographs
Figure 1. Site Protection Instrument
Figure 2. Vicinity Map
Figure 3. Site Watershed Map
Figure 4. Site Mitigation Assets Map
Site Photographs
Appendix B. Site Protection Instruments
Appendix C. Stream Forms
Appendix D. Wetland Forms
Flint Rock Farm Preservation Project
EEP ID 440 Table of Contents Page i

1.0 PRESERVATION PROJECT GOALS AND OBJECTIVES
The Flint Rock Farm Preservation Site (Site) is located in the 03030002 Cataloging Unit (CU), in
the Cape Fear River Basin. The Site is located within Targeted Local Watershed (TLW)
03030002010010 and the Troublesome and Little Troublesome Creeks Local Watershed Plan
Summary (NCEEP 2004). Based on the Local Watershed Plan and the Cape Fear River Basin
Restoration Priorities (NCEEP 2009) stressors within the Troublesome Creek watershed include
the following.
• Stream Channel Erosion
• Sedimentation
• Fecal Coliform Bacteria
• Habitat Degradation
• Stormwater and Agricultural Runoff
• Increasing Growth and Development Pressures
The Flint Rock Farm Preservation Site addresses watershed stressors /issues with the following
goals.
• Protection of water quality in the Lake Reidsville and Jordan Lake Watersheds (two
water supply reservoirs) by preserving wetlands and riparian buffers within the Site in a
permanent conservation easement.
• Permanent preservation of headwater streams and associated wetlands and riparian
buffers in the Troublesome Creek stream system and Lake Reidsville watershed, which is
affected by stormwater and agricultural runoff, and increasing development pressure
making the TLW a priority for stream and wetland preservation (NCEEP 2009).
• Permanent preservation of headwater streams and associated wetlands and riparian
buffers in the Troublesome Creek stream system and Lake Reidsville watershed, where
water quality and aquatic habitat are threatened by continued growth and expansion of
the Triad Metropolitan Region, which has a significant potential to increase nutrient
loading in Lake Reidsville and cause degrading stream erosion and instability due to the
highly erodible soils in the watershed (NCEEP 2004).
2.0 SITE DESCRIPTION
2.1 General Description
The North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (EEP) has established the Flint Rock
Farm Preservation Site located off of U.S. Highway 158 in the southwest portion of Rockingham
County. The Site is located in one parcel within 14 -digit Cataloging Unit 03030002010010 (sub -
basin 03- 06 -01) of the Cape Fear River Basin, and is part of the Lake Reidsville and Jordan Lake
Watersheds (two water supply reservoirs) (Figures 1 -3, Appendix A). The Site is protected by a
permanent conservation easement recorded in Deed Book 1238 Page 286 -294. Current land use
at the Site is comprised of mixed hardwood forest, and land surrounding the Site consists
primarily of horse pasture and residential development. The conservation easement boundary is
well- marked with signs at each corner.
Flint Rock Farm Preservation Project
EEP ID 440 Page 1

2.2 Directions
Directions to the Site from Raleigh (Figure 2, Appendix A):
➢ Take I -40 West to exit 140 (University Drive),
➢ Turn right onto University Drive and travel 1.9 miles,
➢ Turn left onto Westbrook Avenue and travel 0.6 miles,
➢ Take a right onto Springwood Avenue followed by an immediate left onto Burke Street,
➢ Turn left onto Main Street then right onto Wharton Avenue/NC -61 N,
➢ Follow NC -61 N for 9.7 miles, then turn left onto Osceola - Ossipee Road (NC -150 W),
➢ Follow NC -150 W for 10.9 miles, then turn right onto N Church Street,
➢ After 4.1 miles, turn left onto US -158 W,
➢ The Site is on the right after 2.2 miles on Flintrock Trail.
➢ Site Latitude, Longitude: 36.28335, - 79.81317 (NAD83/WGS84)
3.0 SITE SELECTION
The Site contains headwater streams in the Troublesome Creek stream system and Lake
Reidsville Watershed, which is currently affected by numerous stressors including increased
fecal coliform bacteria, bank erosion, sedimentation, and habitat degradation resulting primarily
from current agricultural runoff and expanding development.
Conservation Values
Permanently preserves headwater streams, wetlands, and riparian buffers of the Troublesome
Creek stream system and Lake Reidsville and Jordan Lake Watersheds (two water supply
reservoirs).
Threats of Adverse Modification
Adjacent agricultural land and increasing growth and development pressures adjacent to the Site
threaten Site streams, wetlands, and buffers; therefore, preservation of the Site is important to
maintaining water quality and habitat in the Troublesome Creek watershed, and ultimately within
the Lake Reidsville and Jordan Lake Watersheds.
4.0 BASELINE INFORMATION
4.1 Physical Features
The Site lies within the Northern Inner Piedmont ecoregion of the Piedmont physiographic
region of North Carolina. Topography within the ecoregion is generally comprised of dissected
irregular plans, low to high hills, ridges, and isolated monadnocks, and low- to moderate -
gradient streams with mostly cobble, gravel, and sandy substrates. Topography within the Site is
moderate with elevations ranging from 760 feet on Troublesome Creek to 800 feet above sea
level at the top of the Site.
4.2 Plant and Wildlife Communities
The natural communities dominating the Site are Piedmont Bottomland Forest within the
floodplains and Mesic Mixed Hardwood Forest (Piedmont subtype) on the upland side slopes.
The vegetation is mature with a relatively full canopy throughout. Dominant canopy species
include northern red oak (Quercus rubra), white oak (Quercus alba), tulip tree (Liriodendron
tulipifera), hickory (Carya sp.), Virginia pine (Pious virginiana), persimmon (Diospyros
virginiana), and river birch (Betula nigra). Dominant understory species include ironwood
Flint Rock Farm Preservation Project
EEP ID 440 Page 2

(Carpinus caroliniana), common greenbrier (Smilax rotundifolia), Japanese honeysuckle
(Lonicera japonica), false nettle (Boehmeria cylindrica) and soft rush (Juncus effuses).
4.3 Jurisdictional Streams
Watershed Summary
The Site provides water quality function to a 0.58- square mile (374 -acre) watershed at the Site
outfall into Troublesome Creek (Figure 3, Appendix A). The Site drainage area is primarily
composed of horse pasture and residential land.
Reach Summary
The Site borders Troublesome Creek and contains 6 jurisdictional stream reaches (3 perennial
and 3 intermittent), which total 5427.90 linear feet of stream; the table below gives information
for each reach. Buffer widths vary for each reach ranging from buffer on one side of the stream
only to greater than 100 feet from the top of bank on both sides of the stream; more detailed
buffer width information is included in Section 6.0 (Determination of Credits) below. Site
streams drain to Troublesome Creek, which is listed as Water Supply — III and Nutrient Sensitive
Waters by the North Carolina Division of Water Resources (NCDWR 2013). No areas of
concern were observed; all stream reaches within the Site are stable.
Jurisdictional Stream Characteristics
4.4 Jurisdictional Wetlands
The Site contains 13 jurisdictional wetland systems, which total 31.73 acres; the table below
gives information for each system.
Jurisdictional Wetland Characteristics
Type (Riparian, non-
Depicted on
Depicted on
Drainage Area
USACE
Length
Acreage
Type
USGS
NRCS Soil Map
(acres)
Form Score
(linear Feet)
UT1
Perennial
Yes
Yes
300
59/77
2815.94
UT2
Perennial
No
Yes
100
73
767.99
UT3
Intermittent
No
No
2
51
373.49
UT4
Perennial
No
No
75
73
971.49
UT5
Intermittent
No
No
8
43
407.68
UT6
Intermittent
No
No
8
43
91.31
Wetland 12
Riparian Non - riverine
Floodplain Depression
0.040
Wetland 13
Total
5427.90
4.4 Jurisdictional Wetlands
The Site contains 13 jurisdictional wetland systems, which total 31.73 acres; the table below
gives information for each system.
Jurisdictional Wetland Characteristics
Flint Rock Farm Preservation Project
EEP ID 440 Page 3
Type (Riparian, non-
Description
Riparian, etc.)
(Floodplain depression,
Acreage
seepage slope, etc.)
Wetland 1
Riparian Non - riverine
Floodplain Depression
30.692
Wetland 2
Non - riparian
Seepage Slope /Springhead
0.014
Wetland 3
Non - riparian
Seepage Slope /Springhead
0.019
Wetland 4
Riparian Non - riverine
Floodplain Depression
0.251
Wetland 5
Riparian Non - riverine
Floodplain Depression
0.143
Wetland 6
Non - riparian
Seepage Slope /Springhead
0.153
Wetland 7
Riparian Non - riverine
Floodplain Depression
0.250
Wetland 8
Riparian Non - riverine
Floodplain Depression
0.033
Wetland 9
Riparian Non - riverine
Floodplain Depression
0.013
Wetland 10
Non- riparian
Seepage Slope /Springhead
0.005
Wetland 11
Riparian Non - riverine
Floodplain Depression
0.005
Wetland 12
Riparian Non - riverine
Floodplain Depression
0.040
Wetland 13
Riparian Non - riverine
Floodplain Depression
0.112
Total
31.73
Flint Rock Farm Preservation Project
EEP ID 440 Page 3

5.0 SITE PROTECTION INSTRUMENT
The land required for stewardship of this mitigation project includes portions of the following
parcel. A copy of the recorded conservation easement deed is included in Appendix B.
Site
Deed
Date
Book and
Acreage
Parcel Landowner PIN County Protection
Deed
Instrument
Page
Signed
protected
Number
Bk 1238
Bradsher Annette A. 795200532146 Conservation
April 8,
45.477
Rockingham
P _
Parcel Bradsher Easement
2946
2005
acres
All site protection instruments require 60 -day advance notification to the Corps and the State
prior to any action to void, amend, or modify the document. No such action shall take place
unless approved by the State.
5.1 Encumbrances
A pile of organic debris, composed of fallen and cut up trees and branches was observed at the
top of UT -4. This area is depicted on Figure 4 (Appendix A) and will not generate mitigation
credit. Additionally, an off -site beaver dam was observed on Troublesome Creek. This dam is
contributing to hydrology on the Site.
6.0 DETERMINATION OF CREDITS
Project mitigation assets were delineated in February 2015 using Global Positioning Systems.
(Figure 4, Appendix A; Stream Data forms, Appendix C; Wetland Dataforms, Appendix D). The
following tables summarize Site stream reaches and mitigation assets.
All credits will be released upon IRT approval. The project service area will be in compliance
with the EEP In -Lieu Fee Instrument.
Flint Rock Farm, Rockingham County, Cape Fear River Basin, 03030002 Cataloging Unit
EEP Project Number 440
Mitigation Credits
Non - riparian Riparian Nitrogen Phosphorous
Warm Stream Riparian Wetland Wetland Buffer Nutrient Nutrient
Offset Offset
Type R RE R
Totals NA 1086 NA
Flint Rock Farm Preservation Project
EEP ID 440
RE R RE
6.31 NA 0.04 88,675 NA NA
Page 4

Stream Mitigation Unit
Component Summation
Wetland Mitigation Unit
Component Summation
Preservation
Riparian Wetland
Warm Stream
Mitigation Ratio
Rural Non - Subject Streams with 30 -100 foot Buffer from TOB
Non - riparian Wetland
(linear feet)
162,033.89
Preservation
10:1
Riverine Non- riverine
59,039.14
components
Buffer <50 feet from
Buffer 50 -100 feet from Buffer >100 feet
Wetland 2 5:1
-- --
one or both TOB
both TOB from both TOB
Total Stream by Reach
0.019
(5:1)
(5:1) (5:1)
736,062.99
UT 1
970.27
1026.68 818.99
2815.94
UT2
24.54
322.99 420.46
767.99
UT3
100.55
196.95 75.99
373.49
UT4
530.31
190.91 250.27
971.49
UT5
--
-- 407.68
407.68
UT6
--
27.84 63.47
91.31
Total
1625.67
1765.37 2036.86
5427.90
(linear feet)
0.19
(acreage)
Total SMUs
325.13
353.07 407.37
1086 SMUs
Wetland Mitigation Unit
Component Summation
Preservation
Riparian Wetland
Buffer
(square feet)
Mitigation Ratio
Rural Non - Subject Streams with 30 -100 foot Buffer from TOB
Non - riparian Wetland
Components
162,033.89
Rural Non - Subject Streams with 100 -200 foot Buffer from TOB
10:1
Riverine Non- riverine
59,039.14
Wetland 1 5:1
-- 30.692
492,293.01
Wetland 2 5:1
-- --
0.014
Wetland 3 5:1
-- --
0.019
Wetland 4 5:1
-- 0.251
736,062.99
Wetland 5 5:1
-- 0.143
Mitigation Units
Wetland 6 5:1
-- --
0.153
Wetland 7 5:1
-- 0.250
Wetland 8 5:1
-- 0.033
Wetland 9 5:1
-- 0.013
Wetland 10 5:1
-- --
0.005
Wetland 11 5:1
-- 0.005
Wetland 12 5:1
-- 0.040
Wetland 13 5:1
-- 0.112
Total
31.54
0.19
(acreage)
Total WMUs
-- 6.31
0.04
Riparian Buffer Mitigation Unit
Component Summation
Preservation components
Mitigation Ratio
Buffer
(square feet)
Buffer Receiving
Credit (square feet)
Rural Non - Subject Streams with 30 -100 foot Buffer from TOB
5:1
162,033.89
162,033.89
Rural Non - Subject Streams with 100 -200 foot Buffer from TOB
10:1
59,039.14*
59,039.14
Rural Subject Streams with 3 0- 100 foot Buffer from TOB
10:1
492,293.01
492,293.01
Rural Subject Streams with 100 -200 foot Buffer from TOB
20:1
103,994.91 *
22,696.95
Total (square feet)
817,360.95
736,062.99
Total Buffer
Mitigation Units
88,675
*The area of mitigation beyond 100 feet from the TOB may comprise no more than 10 percent of the total mitigation area.
Flint Rock Farm Preservation Project
EEP ID 440 Page 5

7.0 LONG -TERM MANAGEMENT PLAN
Upon approval for close -out by the Interagency Review Team (IRT), the Site will be transferred
to the NCDENR Division of Natural Resource Planning and Conservation's Stewardship
Program. This party shall be responsible for periodic inspection of the Site to ensure that
restrictions required in the conservation easement or the deed restriction document(s) are upheld.
The NCDENR is currently evaluating the endowment model. Until the evaluation is complete
and any changes resulting from the model are implemented, the long -term management of this
project will be funded annually.
8.0 FINANCIAL ASSURANCES
Pursuant to Section IV H and Appendix III of the Ecosystem Enhancement Program's In -Lieu
Fee Instrument dated July 28, 2010, the North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural
Resources has provided the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Wilmington District with a formal
commitment to fund projects to satisfy mitigation requirements assumed by EEP. This
commitment provides financial assurance for all mitigation projects implemented by the
program.
9.0 REFERENCES
Griffith, G.E., J.M. Omernik, J.A. Comstock, M.P. Schafale, W.H. McNab, D.R. Lenat, T.F.
MacPherson, J.B. Glover, and V.B. Shelbourne. 2002. Ecoregions of North Carolina and South
Carolina. U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia.
NC Division of Water Resources (2013), Cape Fear River Basin Surface Water Classifications,
online (December 12, 2014). httn: / /Dortal.ncdenr.or2 /web /wa /Ds /csu /classifications. Department
of Environment and Natural Resources, NC Division of Water Resources, Raleigh, NC
NC Ecosystem Enhancement Program (2004),
Local Watershed Plan Summary, Department
Ecosystem Enhancement Program, Raleigh, NC
Troublesome and Little Troublesome Creeks
of Environment and Natural Resources, NC
NC Ecosystem Enhancement Program (2009), Cape Fear River Basin Restoration Priorities,
Department of Environment and Natural Resources, NC Ecosystem Enhancement Program,
Raleigh, NC
Schafale, M.P. and Weakley, A. S. (1990), Classification of the Natural Communities of North
Carolina, Third Approximation, NC Natural Heritage Program, Raleigh, NC
Flint Rock Farm Preservation Project
EEP ID 440 Page 6

APPENDIX A
FIGURES AND PHOTOGRAPHS
Flint Rock Farm Preservation Project
EEP ID 440 Appendices

t �
0 250 500 1,000 1,500
Feet
kk
T°
� �"41
Legend
0 Parcels
MConservation Easement Boundary
y
ap, N e
Prepared for: Project: Title: Drawn by:
KRJ FIGURE
FLINT ROCK FARM Date:
PRESERVATION SITE SITE PROTECTION MAR 2015
INSTRUMENT I Scale:
cos�stem 1:3500
Rockingham County, NC
Axiom ems, Im. En a einent 9 y I Project No.:
°° 14 -018

Directions to the Site from Raleigh: N
f
- Take 1 -40 West to exit 140 (University Drive),
- Turn right onto University Drive and travel 1.9 miles,`_ /' 1
- Turn left onto Westbrook Avenue and travel 0.6 miles,+
- Take a right onto Springwood Avenue followed by an immediate left onto Burke Street,
- Turn left onto Main Street then right onto Wharton Avenue /NC -61 N, as°
- Follow NC -61 N for 9.7 miles, then turn left onto Osceola - Ossipee Road (NC -150 W), 1 Axiom Erkmanmenl In
- Follow NC -150 W for 10.9 miles, then turn right onto N Church Street, j
- After 4.1 miles, turn left onto US -158 W, The Site is on the right after 2.2 miles on Flintrock Trail. ,' �' I {{ -' Prepared for:
- Site Latitude, Longitude: 36.28335, - 79.81317 (NAD83 /WGS84) {f��t .`�
R os stem
Ear ement
PROGRAM
Copyright:© 2013 NationOGeo'T'g ph`i'e�
Society, i- cubed` •
_ - • ; � ',•�•� w _ Project:
4
FLINT ROCK
FARM
PRESERVATION
SITE
a
w .
creek f Rockingham
_ County, C
•, . - o u y
I '
Title:
;4
r4r4 • \'y r'rJ
VICINITY
F. — MAP
-. 1 r
f — rTi 58
158 u y, - o •*
i
1y
' 111 .... •. , b- ., �� �
i
Drawn by:
KRJ
Date.
j i'? t k ;•r MAR 2015
r 14 ,r s a� f `�� `.✓ : Scale:
e:
150 ca
r _ Jam.
r, _ g1� 1:25000
I
1
, r =- '-` '�+�'- ; ., y •`, ..- _ � � �+� � � ----' Project No.:
J 14 -018
FIGURE
• .. pe yHY +k - l...sp1�`'�y.�! lei. % y
pyright.© 2013 National G:eographic
I U%UJJ
c 1 1/J
a ho C _
II
Society, i cubed
` v Copyright:© 2013 National Geographic- Society; i -cubed

Legend
Site Watershed - 0.58 sq mi (373.6 ac)
Conservation Easement Boundary
NCEEP TLW: 03030002010010
C3 Troublesome and Little Troublesome Creek LWP
y� y J-
y
r.
r
i
� vti jj
L xf uF L
'Opp"
N
Creek_
Ok
Nor
1\
�s
B
i
C34; ' 0
D
I IF
N
Axiom Enkrronmenia9, Inc.
Prepared for:
os stem
E ar�ement
PROGRAM
Project:
FLINT
ROCK
FARM
PRESERVATION
SITE
Rockingham
County, INC
Title:
SITE
WATERSHED
MAP
Drawn by:
4 Date:
M
Scale:
Project No.:
KRJ
MAR 2015
1:8000
14 -018
FIGURE
�- USGS Topographic Map - Bethany, NC Quad
0 1,000 2,000 4,000 3
Feet
Copyright:© 2013 National Geographic Society, i -cubed

photo.26
' F4
Wet \and 2 ;�
Wetland
to.1�
3 V
p "° • Wet \arid p"oto.20
k�
Wet \and 4 t
- , .. asement Boundar`1
photo 16
Le end
g °rserq &on E
Wet \ar`d 6 . d
Stream loB s
Wet \ar`
Form
10 ph °. -g Wet \ar`d
8 photo- °rrr1S
Wet \ar'd hoto.11 Stream
p - d 9
Wet \an potos
ph °to;$ • • h
d 10 0 of,`hoto.9 6 Wet \an PreseNat \or`
oto YY s
JN J� p" et \and 11 Wet\ar`d `t`gat�On Both Ban
12 oto.5 one Or
photo • "oto 4 p" \ -- a, * ; c ,c ream Gente er X50 leek om Both X08
3 St uifi fr
m
B 0 leek photo Stream 5010
Both ToB
1a oto.z ,z: n y44. tfrom
oto 1 photo ph • .:;° r Stream 100 fee
p" photoo�r1 �: x Buller der
p oto.13,,°`� ' Stream B 0 foot Bu
Stream 0,10 foot Bu er
r 3 ff
12 &j3 #��� `.p r`. R�par�an Sublet Stre w \th 100200 of Bu{fer
RUra\ 100 loot
Wet \ar`ds s Sublet Stream eam ,N\th 30, 0 foot Buller
ai 4
ura\ Str 0,20 -4
R ra N °r`.suble°t ,N \th 10 1500
Ru \ sub\ect Stream
Feet
RUra\ Nort" Board
. .. A Pou any 1
5pp Geogra `GYRE
.�: :•e� �, �_•. 5o P N� Gen`er {O` awn by: �,F?J F
,� � � Tit \e'• Q
o
M \T \GP S Soa \e 135
':'Y� PS`jE� ProleotNo.; 14,818
0
Project IF L \r\1 RO 1 \ON S \TE
area for pRES'elk
prep
C
Ingham c °ur`ty N
pR
UG�M

Photo 1. Southwest end of the easement,
facing north
Photo 3. Between UT -1 and UT -2, facing
north
Photo 5. Wetland 10 draining into UT -1
Photo 2. UT -1 entering site from pond
drainage, large splash pool
Photo 4. Between UT -1 and UT -2, facing east
Photo 6. Wetland 9, facing north
Flint Rock Farm Preservation Project
EEP ID 440 Appendices

Photo 7. View of upland from Wetland 9
Photo 9. Wetland 7, facing northeast
Photo 11. Wetland 8, facing northeast
Photo 8. Wetland 7, facing north
Photo 10. Wetland 8, facing southwest
Photo 12. Left bank of UT -2, facing
downstream
Flint Rock Farm Preservation Project
EEP ID 440 Appendices

Photo 13. Wetland 12, facing southeast
Photo 15. Old metal feeder on left bank of
Photo 17. Wetland 3, facing south
Photo 14. Wetland 13
Photo 16. Easement crossing, facing west
Photo 18. Easement marker on northwest side
of easement
Flint Rock Farm Preservation Project
EEP ID 440 Appendices

Photo 19. Dumping /debris at top of UT -4
Photo 21. Troublesome Creek, facing
downstream
Photo 23. Recently downed tree by beaver
near Troublesome Creek
Flint Rock Farm Preservation Project
EEP ID 440
Photo 20. UT -4, facing downstream
Photo 22. Area in Wetland 1 where beaver
activity has increased hydrology, facing north.
Photo 24. Center of Wetland 1
Appendices

Photo 26. Western edge of Wetland 1, facing
Photo 25. UT -1, facing upstream south
Photo 27. Standing water in beaver impacted
area, facing north
Flint Rock Farm Preservation Project
EEP ID 440 Appendices

APPENDIX B
SITE PROTECTION INSTRUMENTS
Recorded Conservation Easement
Flint Rock Farm Preservation Project
EEP ID 440 Appendices

FILED
ROCKINGHAM COUNTY
286 REBECCA B. CIPRIANI
REGISTER OF DEEDS
Apr 08. 2005 02:36: i 0 pm
Ir RECORDING ' 1.00
PROBATE �'� $2.00
EXCISE TAX $444.,0 0
NONSTAND
BOOK
PAGES 0286 -02994
INSTRUMENT # 04733
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
CONSERVATION EASEMENT
Rockingham COUNTY
SPO File Number 079 -F
Prepared by: Office of the Attorney General
Property Control Section
Return to: Ken Eckenroth, State Property Office
1321 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699 -1321
THIS CONSERVATION EASEMENT DEED, made this 7 day of
p Y i , 2005, by Annette A. Bradsher & husband Jav W. Lankford,
( "Grantor "), to the State of North Carolina, ( "Grantee "), whose mailing address is State
of North Carolina, Department of Administration, State Property Office, 1321 Mail
Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699 -1321. The designations Grantor and Grantee as used
herein shall include said parties, their heirs, successors, and assigns, and shall include
singular, plural, masculine, feminine, or neuter as required by context.
WITNESSETH:
WHEREAS, pursuant to the provisions of N.C. Gen. Stat. § 143 -214.8 et seq.,
the State of North Carolina has established the Ecosystem Enhancement Program
(formerly known as the Wetlands Restoration Program.) within the Department of
Environment and Natural Resources for the purposes of acquiring, maintaining, restoring,
enhancing, creating and preserving wetland and riparian resources that contribute to the
protection and improvement of water quality, flood prevention, fisheries, aquatic habitat,
wildlife habitat, and recreational opportunities; and /
r
WHEREAS, The State of North Carolina is qualified to be the Grantee of a
Conservation Easement pursuant to N.C. Gen. Stat. § 121 -35; and
WHEREAS, the Ecosystem Enhancement Program in the Department of
Environment and Natural Resources has approved acceptance of this instrument; and

28'7
WHEREAS, the Department of Environment and Natural Resources, the North
Carolina Department of Transportation and the United States Army Corps of Engineers,
Wilmington District entered into a Memorandum of Agreement, (MOA) duly executed
by all parties in Greensboro, NC on July 22, 2003. This MOA recognizes that the
Ecosystem Enhancement Program is to provide for compensatory mitigation by effective
protection of the land, water and natural resources of the State by restoring, enhancing
and preserving ecosystem functions; and
WHEREAS, the acceptance of this instrument for and on behalf of the State of
North Carolina was granted to the Department of Administration by resolution as
approved by the Governor and Council of State adopted at a meeting held in the City of
Raleigh, North Carolina, on the 8th day of February 2000; and
WHEREAS, Grantor owns in fee simple certain real property situated, lying, and
being in New Bethel Township, Rockingham County, North Carolina (the "Property "),
and being more particularly described as that certain parcel of land containing
approximately 242.71 acres and being conveyed to the Grantor by deed as recorded in
Deed Book 82 at Page 538 of the Rockingham County Registry, North Carolina; and
WHEREAS, Grantor is willing to grant a Conservation Easement over the herein
described areas of the Property, thereby restricting and limiting the use of the included
areas of the Property to the terms and conditions and purposes hereinafter set forth, and
Grantee is willing to accept such Conservation Easement.
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants, terms,
conditions, and restrictions hereinafter set forth, Grantor unconditionally and irrevocably
hereby grants and conveys unto Grantee, its successors and assigns, forever and in
perpetuity, a Conservation Easement of the nature and character and to the extent
hereinafter set forth, over a described area of the Property, referred to hereafter as the
"Easement Area ", for the benefit of the people of North Carolina, and being all of the
tract of land as shown on a plat of survey entitled "SPO FILE NUMBER 79 -F,
ANNETTE A. BRADSHER & JAY W. LANKFORD(MARRIED) PROPERTY,
AKA: FLINT ROCK FARM, ECOSYSTEM ENHANCEMENT PROGRAM
CONSERVATION EASEMENT" dated October 19., 2004, certified by C. E.
Robertson, PLS L -1421, and recorded in Map Book 55, Page 95, Rockingham
County Registry.
The purposes of this Conservation Easement are to maintain, restore, enhance,
create and preserve wetland and/or riparian resources in the Easement Area that
contribute to the protection and improvement of water quality, flood prevention, fisheries,
aquatic habitat, wildlife habitat, and recreational opportunities; to maintain permanently
the Easement Area in its natural condition, consistent with these purposes; and to prevent
any use of the Easement Area that will significantly impair or interfere with these
purposes. To achieve these purposes, the following conditions and restrictions are set
forth:
2

..l
i T ft
DURATION OF EASEMENT
This Conservation Easement shall be perpetual. It is an easement in gross, runs
with the land, and is enforceable by Grantee against Grantor, their personal
representatives, heirs, successors, and assigns, lessees, agents, and licensees.
II. GRANTOR RESERVED USES AND RESTRICTED ACTIVITES
The Easement Area shall be restricted from any development or usage that would
impair or interfere with the purposes of this Conservation Easement. Unless expressly
reserved as a compatible use herein, any activity in, or use of, the Easement Area by the
Grantor is prohibited as inconsistent with the purposes of this Conservation Easement.
Any rights not expressly reserved hereunder by the Grantor have been acquired by the
Grantee. The following specific uses are prohibited, restricted, or reserved as indicated:
A. Recreational Uses. Grantor expressly reserves the right to undeveloped
recreational uses, including hiking, bird watching, hunting and fishing, and access to the
Easement Area for the purposes thereof. Usage of motorized vehicles in the Easement
Area is prohibited, except as they are used exclusively for management, maintenance, or
stewardship purposes, and on existing trails, paths or roads.
B. Educational Uses. The Grantor reserves the right to engage in and permit
others to engage in educational uses in the Easement Area not inconsistent with this
Conservation Easement, and the right of access to the Easement Area for such purposes
including organized educational activities such as site visits and observations.
Educational uses of the property shall not alter vegetation, hydrology or topography of
the site.
C. Vegetative Cutting. Except as related to the removal of non - native plants,
diseased or damaged trees, and vegetation that obstructs, destabilizes or renders unsafe
the Easement Area to persons or natural habitat, all cutting, removal, mowing, harming,
or destruction of any trees and vegetation in the Easement Area is prohibited.
D. Industrial, Residential and Commercial Uses. All are prohibited in the
Easement Area.
E. Agricultural Use. All agricultural uses within the Easement Area including
any use for cropland, waste lagoons, or pastureland are prohibited.
F. New Construction. There shall be no building, facility, mobile home,
antenna, utility pole, tower, or other structure constructed or placed in the Easement
Area.
G. Roads and Trails. There shall be no construction of roads, trails, walkways,
or paving in the Easement Area. Existing roads or trails located in the Easement Area
may be maintained by Grantor in order to minimize runoff., sedimentation and for access
3

r•
to the interior of the Property for management, maintenance, stewardship purposes, or
undeveloped recreational and educational uses of the Easement Area. Existing roads,
trails or paths may be maintained with loose gravel or permanent vegetation to stabilize
or cover the surfaces. The Grantor reserves the right to construct a road crossing within
the area labeled "A -A" and "B -B" as indicated on the previously referenced plat prepared
by C. E. Robertson, PLS L -1421, dated October 19�', 2004, recorded in Book 421, Page
570, of the Rockingham County Registry.
H. Signs. No signs shall be permitted in the Easement Area except interpretive
signs describing restoration activities and the conservation values of the Easement Area,
signs identifying the owner of the Property and the holder of the Conservation Easement,
signs giving directions, or signs prescribing rules and regulations for the use of the
Easement Area may be allowed.
I. Dumping or Storing. Dumping or storage of soil, trash, ashes, garbage,
waste, abandoned vehicles, appliances or machinery, or other material in the Easement
Area is prohibited.
J. Grading, Mineral Use, Excavation, Dredging. There shall be no grading,
filling, excavation, dredging, mining, or drilling; no removal of topsoil, sand, gravel,
rock, peat, minerals, or other materials.
K. Water Quality and Drainage Patterns. There; shall be no diking, draining,
dredging, channeling, filling, leveling, pumping, impounding or diverting, causing,
allowing or permitting the diversion of surface or underground water. No altering or
tampering with water control structures or devices, or disruption or alteration of the
restored, enhanced, or created drainage patterns. All removal of wetlands, polluting or
discharging into waters, springs, seeps, or wetlands, or use of pesticide or biocides is
prohibited. In the event of an emergency interruption or shortage of all other water
sources, water from within the Easement Area may temporarily be used for good cause
shown as needed for the survival of livestock and agricultural production.
L. Subdivision and Conveyance. No further subdivision, partitioning, or
dividing of the Easement Area is allowed. Unless agreed to by the Grantee in writing, any
future conveyance of the Easement Area and the rights as conveyed herein shall be as a
single block of property. Any future conveyance of the remaining fee simple rights shall
be subject to this Conservation Easement. Grantor agrees for itself, its successors and
assigns, that in the event it transfers the Property, or any portion thereof, such transfer is
subject to the Grantee's right of ingress, egress, and regress over and across the Property
to the Easement Area for the purposes set forth herein.
M. Development Rights. All development rights are removed from the
Easement Area and shall not be transferred.
4

290
N. Disturbance of Natural Features. Any change, disturbance, alteration or
impairment of the natural features of the Easement Area or any intentional introduction
of non - native plants, trees and/or animal species by Grantor is prohibited.
The Grantor may request permission to vary from the above restrictions for good
cause shown, provided that any such request is consistent with the purposes of this
Conservation Easement. The Grantor shall not vary from the above restrictions without
first obtaining written approval from the N.C. Ecosystem Enhancement Program, whose
mailing address is 1652 Mail Services Center, Raleigh, NC 27699 -1652.
III. GRANTEE RESERVED USES
A. Ingress, Egress, Regress and Inspection. The Grantee, its employees
and agents, successors and assigns, receive the perpetual right of general ingress, egress,
and regress to the Easement Area over the Property at reasonable times to undertake any
activities to restore, manage, maintain, enhance, and monitor the wetland and riparian
resources of the Easement Area, in accordance with restoration activities or a long -term
management plan. Unless otherwise specifically set forth in this Conservation Easement,
the rights granted herein do not include or establish for the public any access rights.
B. Restoration Activities. These activities include planting of trees, shrubs
and herbaceous vegetation, installation of monitoring wells, utilization of heavy
equipment to grade, fill, and prepare the soil, modification of the hydrology of the site,
and installation of natural and manmade materials as needed to direct in- stream, above
ground, and subterraneous water flow.
IV. ENFORCEMENT AND REMEDIES
A. Enforcement. To accomplish the purposes of this Conservation
Easement, Grantee is allowed to prevent any activity within the Easement Area that is
inconsistent with the purposes of this Easement and to require the restoration of such
areas or features of the Easement Area that may have been damaged by such activity or
use. Upon any breach of the terms of this Conservation Easement by Grantor, their
successors or assigns, that comes to the attention of the Grantee, the Grantee shall, except
as provided below, notify the Grantor, their successors or assigns in writing of such
breach. The Grantor shall have ninety (90) days after receipt of such notice to correct the
conditions constituting such breach. If the breach remains uncured after ninety (90) days,
the Grantee may enforce this Conservation Easement by appropriate legal proceedings
including damages, injunctive and other relief. The Grantee shall also have the power and
authority, consistent with its statutory authority: (a) to prevent any impairment of the
Easement Area by acts which may be unlawful or in violation of this Conservation
Easement; (b) to otherwise preserve or protect its interest in the Property; or (c) to seek
damages from any appropriate person or entity. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the
Grantee reserves the immediate right, without notice, to obtain a temporary restraining
order, injunctive or other appropriate relief if the breach of the term of this Conservation
Easement is or would irreversibly or otherwise materially impair the benefits to be
5

291
derived from this Conservation Easement. The Grantor and Grantee acknowledge that
under such circumstances damage to the Grantee would be irreparable and remedies at
law will be inadequate. The rights and remedies of the Grantee provided hereunder shall
be in addition to, and not in lieu of, all other rights and remedies available to Grantee in
connection with this Conservation Easement.
B. Inspection. The Grantee, its employees and agents, successors and
assigns, have the right, with reasonable notice, to enter the Easement Area over the
Property at reasonable times for the purpose of inspection to determine whether the
Grantor, their successors or assigns are complying with the terms, conditions and
restrictions of this Conservation Easement.
C. Acts Beyond Grantor's Control. Nothing contained in this Conservation
Easement shall be construed to entitle Grantee to bring any action against Grantor, their
successors or assigns, for any injury or change in the Easement Area caused by third
parties, resulting from causes beyond the Grantor's control, including, without limitation,
fire, flood, storm, and earth movement, or from any prudent action taken in good faith by
the Grantor under emergency conditions to prevent, abate, or mitigate significant injury
to life, damage to property or harm to the Property resulting from such causes.
D. Costs of Enforcement. Beyond regular and. typical monitoring, any costs
incurred by Grantee in enforcing the terms of this Conservation Easement against
Grantor, their successors or assigns, including, without limitation, any costs of restoration
necessitated by Grantor's acts or omissions in violation of the terms of this Conservation
Easement, shall be borne by Grantor.
E. No Waiver. Enforcement of this Easement shall be at the discretion of the
Grantee and any forbearance, delay or omission by Grantee to exercise its rights
hereunder in the event of any breach of any term set forth herein shall not be construed to
be a waiver by Grantee.
V. MISCELLANEOUS
A. This instrument sets forth the entire agreement of the parties with respect
to the Conservation Easement and supersedes all prior discussions, negotiations,
understandings or agreements relating to the Conservation Easement. If any provision is
found to be invalid, the remainder of the provisions of the Conservation Easement, and
the application of such provision to persons or circumstances other than those as to which
it is found to be invalid, shall not be affected thereby.
B. Any notices shall be sent by registered or certified mail, return receipt
requested to the parties at their addresses shown above or to other address(es) as either
party establishes in writing upon notification to the other.
C. Grantor shall notify Grantee in writing of the name and address and any
party to whom the Property or any part thereof is to be transferred at or prior to the time
6

292
said transfer is made. Grantor further agrees to make any subsequent lease, deed, or other
legal instrument by which any interest in the Property is conveyed subject to the
Conservation Easement herein created.
D. The Grantor and Grantee agree that the terms of this Conservation
Easement shall survive any merger of the fee and easement interests in the Property or
any portion thereof.
E. This Conservation Easement may be amended, but only in a writing
signed by all parties hereto, and provided such amendment does not affect the
qualification of this Conservation Easement or the status of the Grantee under any
applicable laws, and is consistent with the purposes of the Conservation Easement.
F. The parties recognize and agree that the benefits of this Conservation
Easement are in gross and assignable provided, however, that the Grantee hereby
covenants and agrees, that in the event it transfers or assigns this Conservation Easement,
the organization receiving the interest will be a qualified holder under N.C. Gen. Stat. §
121 -34 et seq. and § 170(h) of the Internal Revenue Code, and the Grantee further
covenants and agrees that the terms of the transfer or assignment will be such that the
transferee or assignee will be required to continue in perpetuity the conservation purposes
described in this document.
VI. QUIET ENJOYMENT
Grantor reserves all remaining rights accruing from ownership of the Property,
including the right to engage in or permit or invite others to engage in only those uses of
the Easement Area that are expressly reserved herein, not prohibited or restricted herein,
and are not inconsistent with the purposes of this Conservation Easement. Without
limiting the generality of the foregoing, the Grantor expressly reserves to the Grantor,
and the Grantor's invitees and licensees, the right of access to the Easement Area, and the
right of quiet enjoyment of the Easement Area.
TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the said rights and easements perpetually unto the
State of North Carolina for the aforesaid purposes.
AND Grantor covenants that Grantor is seized of said premises in fee and has the
right to convey the permanent Conservation Easement herein granted; that the same are
free from encumbrances and that Grantor will warrant and defend title to the same against
the claims of all persons whomsoever.
7

293
IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, the Grantor has hereunto set his hand and seal,
the day and year first above written.
(SEAL)
i (SEAL)
NORTH CAROLINA
COUNTY OF" CDC.. inka(Y-,
I, J it a Notary Public in and for the County and
Aile"c4f A. 8x4114 s kt1 r 12ACk
State aforesaid, do hereby certify that .ja.1 L�'j . L':X0,L41"I , Grantor,
personally appeared before me this day and acknowledged the execution of the
foregoing instrument.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and Notary Seal this
the day of 200J.
My commission expires:
8
otary Public
Sp
pTAA j-
V

294
NORTH CAROLINA
COUNTY OF
a Notary Public in and for the County and
State aforesaid, do hereby certify that Grantor,
personally appeared before me this day and acknowledged the execution of the
foregoing instrument.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and Notary Seal this
the day of , 200_
My commission expires:
NORTH C;;ROLINA - ROCKINGHAM COUNTY
The fore_goinq certificate(s) of
JILL M G'AULDIN
Notary Pr+bhC is (are) certified to be correct.
Ouiy registered this date and hour shown
herein.
REBECCA B. CIPRIANI
Register of heeds
er, c).iei
A,,,,,lard 77)
9
Notary Public

APPENDIX C
STREAM FORMS
Flint Rock Farm Preservation Project
EEP ID 440 Appendices

VFN
NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11 A d i
Date: _ i __ 1 15- ProjeetlSite: ` r �r �� Latitude: 3G.
Eva Iuator: lki County: 9-01 Longitude: �A3307�
Total Points: Stream Determination (circle Other ba i.-d- ,.f
Stream is at feast lnteimittent Ephemeral Intermittent` erenrn e.g. Quad Name:
if k 19 or perennial if ? 30'
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal = � �I q' _)
Absent
1` Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
3. In- channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
0
ripple -pool sequence
0
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
5. Activelrelict floodplain
0
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
{ 7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
8. Headcuts
0
9. Grade control
0
10. Natural valley
0
Weak
1
1
11. Second or greater order channel
3
a artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
,1)
B. Hydrology (Subtotal I b • )
0
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
14. Leaf litter
;1,V
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
IT Soil -based evidence of hiah water table?
No = 0
C. Biology ( Subtotal
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
,1)
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
21, Aquatic Mollusks
0
22, Fish
0
23. Crayfish
0
24. Amphibians
1 0
25, Algae
3
26. Wetland plants in streambed
3
`perennial streams may also be identified using other methods.
See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
( }
Sketch:
1
1
1
1
0.5
0.5
Moderate
Strong
2
2
1
3
}
l/
3
3
3
2
3
0.5
3
2
3
2
3
0
1,5
1
( }
Yes = 3
1.5
1 2 4
_z? 2 3
1 0.5 0
0.5 CCU' 1.5
0.5 1.5
a
1
0-
2
1
0
2
3
1
2
3
0.5
1
1.5
0.5
1
1.5
0.5
1
1.5
0.5
1
1.5
FACW = 075;
OBL = 1.5 Other = 0

', I I , D%4-1) 1. ti i': VFj f indicate on attacliecd map)
FE-11 STREAM (,3U A LlTY ASSESS EN I NN 0Rh`SFII':FT `.
Finn ide the fullmN ing, infornralum For the stream reach under assessment:
1. Appiwani's name )Veep 2. 1 valualor's nallic: P- 'Ektes-sdl✓1
3. Date ofevaltl.ulow ao15- 1. Fiore (afcvalualton - Aµ —
*. Name of sireaane / _) ti. River halsin C. pe Fa.—
`. 1ppr + +v1matc drainage area �47rt4' :�>���� N. `tr0a m order:
�. I +f Iv ach C' ,Iltmlcd M. Count\ L�����4�
1 I. tine r.•oordulatcs t if knot%n v 1I,r ct mi ur ticcananl dcgrec, 12. Strbtbvrsion mule III ,in.\ r
I �r11wd, i.A A X°'±I_'I p,_ ij'tf L t.Clli�Ir61[t114\ -'"" 1411(.1 I -71„ 1-3 3 e -7,�
4016 ld i01,M ,rr! 14c10111111m"l iur�l�- r t il°S l upnr Yheel (lrllau f Acriall t'Ioelrnt J1 Otheta till l Mher
13. Location of re.rch under ev"rha.alrrnr (note laearhw much neap, aderuil.0m4 strearntsl location)
L� JAw -t4"; -
�.r 11. I'ropw;cd channel %cork ilfan}
15. Recent wcatatcr i :onditrolts
Ith. Silt: t:ondrllcrnsat lime of viso! (dkd 1 �4 �
I'. ldcnufc am slwclal s%merwar) classifications knimn "ection III fldAl'4\.lter, 1 sselniaal Fislserics Ilahnarl
trout \%4ICTI 0I.W.1431dinf:llesource Nalers Nutrient Serlsmvc Waters WaterSuppl\ Watershed ltl It
18, Is there a pond or lake located upvlrcana ol'tt]e evalu: :lion 110tnl" C-;�, No byes. estimate 1110 +seater tiu1•l "arse MCd It - 9.3 C�f�¢
19. DOD',, chAnncl appear on l SW quad 1Mill' N4 1 20, flocs channel appeal ran t ISDA weed Surac� �{ I
21. 1 stlmaawd \%alelshed lased uw, oo Residenfinl V "r Commercial �`ra Industnal qO Agricultural
"'o I-OlesiLed IW Cleared 1. 1.igged "'a tatlaar t
22. flanklull es kith ` '} 23 Bank height I from bcd I +r tut± * t Kink)
24. C hanncl slob down center- it stzemn � I list M to --l") t will le r2 to -1 °'" ") _ivloderaatc to to Ile " " "I slecp I 10"")
5. Channel sunaositt tilr.11_lal -4—1 lccastnnal bends -- I reyueni meander �%Ier% sinuous Braalded channel
instructions for completion of worksheet (located can p ale ?): liet±in by deiennining she mo-o "ippi- oprime ecareeion ha,Ld .+u.
d,+catit,n. IMAM. tiL etlkrUfY. ,lrC;tlta Classification, etc I vrr-\ characivristll' must be 5cim -ed using the same ccoregton Assl_n perm,
to each c11ar:tclerrsllc ewithm the raiwe hown for the ecoresion Page ? provides a brief description rrf }seem' to leviee Iles
characteristic., rdentrlled in [lie workshcet. Sevres should reflect an overall assessinew of the stricam reach under evalualion If .r
characterisuc cannot be ev'altiated due to site or weather conditinns, enter tl in the xoring box and provide an 0vp1anatitm in Ilse
colnlraetat section. kidlere there me uh, nius changes in flee character of a strown wider review le.g.,. the stream Ilne+"'s firom a pasture
Into a forvio1, the strearn may be decided inlo smaller reach" Iltat distilm more contented\. anel d separate (Oren used to evaalumv e.fe:ll
re.kr , file t(it tl score assigned to a stream reach must r,angc between Il and 100, m1h a score of 1011 representing a %iteafm !el the
11Yv11e51 t1U :Ylit }.
F�dat'�core (frtom reverse): t'torttnaentx:
I.c aItt ator', Silvia Iure hate _ Ilem ) , _ h i+ rltxrrnel eti',tlu :atlian forrrl is intended teo be used onit sac :a wide to assist lanito s ers airrinfotentul jariaFce,irraa.rh ioa
a-mlic iq! flu" data required by the Unilcd States .arm) Corps of Engineers to make a preliminary. assessment ul• slorim
Llimlrtt. Fhe tolal score resulting, from the completion rrf this form is subject to USACIF :approval and dues not imply :a
p:rciicillar rniligalio"n r:alio gar requirenivol. I torril \211

STitEAM QUALIT1 1� l.titi`►l t: \" 44 [?RICtiFI ;ET
N
4('f)R .
t
+1
1
1.
59
lr['i)I'ZEGION POINT
RANGE
CHARACTERISTICS
Entrenchment f flondplam access
Coastal
Piedmont
Mountain
Presence of flow � perslsictit pools in stream
ls'
Presence of adjacent wetlands
tl - 6
(no llosv or iaturatio:on (r: Stron" OEM taaax points(
�
(rat) %�elI and s 0_ large adjacent N%ethnds m:LN porintO
Evidence oof past bunaan alteration
0 - 6
0 - ;
3
-
(extensive fialtermion 0, no alteration max points)
i
temensive ch:anncli /alnon 1.1 natural nieander max points)
Riparian /.fine
F)•ca
Sediment input
(no huffier = 0' Continuous, o% ode buffer max promos)
(extensive derioNition t). little or fio sediincnt ni,iv pamtsi
Evidence of nutrient or chemical discharges
1 I
I Sire diversity of channel bed substrate
NA'
(Cxtcnsivc- discharges - 0; no dlscharkes IMA point")
(lane, homaL-rno)us 0: larp;e. diverse sitvs max paints)
Groundwater diseli ar e
Evidence orcitannel incision or widening
no discharge t), springs. ,reps. tvelktnds. vtc nt:aN points?
1
0 - 5
Presence of adjacent Floodplain
tdeeplV incised - 0; stable bond., banks - ma\ points
'
to
ti - -I
t1.a
t) -
N
4('f)R .
t
+1
1
1.
59
(no tiaodplain = 0. emettsrve flood lain = rna tx points)
Entrenchment f flondplam access
7
®
ideeph- entrenched 0. frequent dkaadnag inux points)
ti
tt l 6?
ls'
Presence of adjacent wetlands
tl - 6
d1 - At 1)
�
(rat) %�elI and s 0_ large adjacent N%ethnds m:LN porintO
Channel sinuositc
i
temensive ch:anncli /alnon 1.1 natural nieander max points)
i t Y
Sediment input
0 - -1 0- -1
(extensive derioNition t). little or fio sediincnt ni,iv pamtsi
1 I
I Sire diversity of channel bed substrate
NA'
0 - 4 1) - {
(lane, homaL-rno)us 0: larp;e. diverse sitvs max paints)
Evidence orcitannel incision or widening
1
0 - 5
0 - q t1 -
tdeeplV incised - 0; stable bond., banks - ma\ points
I ,
Presence of major bank Failures
fseveae crosit,ii 11. tit) erosion, stable hanks max points)
l 1
li000it depth and densitN on banks
0- ;
o - d {) .
(nog %Ysihtc rI i,i: dense roots throaughoul max points)
III l
Impact hF agriculture livestock. or timber production
tl
(r - a
(Substantial impact =0. no evidence nr tz Point")
In
Presence of riffle- poollripple -pool complcves
U -?
(no ri h1ev ri rip les or pools - 0. well - developed - inax points)
L^
Habitat complexity
fl -fi
C) - h
(hitle or no habitat - 0: frcgnent, varied habitat: - max points)
�8
Canop► co i,evar -c o%cr slrearnbed
fl
Il-
(nary shading - getaiion 0 continuous can()p� - ntax paints(
19
Substrate embeddedness
NA*
i! 1
(dcepl\ embedded +'t: loose structure - ma:ti I
,Il
Prccence of stream inverlebrales (see page 41
-
(nc+ e>. Ydence 1), :o inino)n. numerous types - max paints)
Presence of amphibians
0- a
0 - -1 )
Imo ev ideucc: I)_ cconinion. numerous [v,pes max points)
Presence of Fish
�
0 -4
U -q Q -1
- _
(no e\ idence t1. ciImmon. nunterouis 1N pes max points)
©
Evidence of wildlife use
(1 -Cs
(no evidence 0. abundant t ,idencc tna\ points)
Total 1'104115 Possible
)Oil
100 100
,FM ;11, SC011F, (a Isit) eider 4m III-St Pig
0
I hese characterktics Sire not assessed in 400%tiai streams_
N
4('f)R .
t
+1
1
1.
59

NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11'
(1)
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
Date:
Project/Slte: �l�k4rvr.iC TA- ."
Latitude: 9.Y32
Evaluator: J �,,, �� - �;aN
1i
County: *.c1k.�,�ylr.,�
Longitude:
r
Total Points: -
Stream Determination jc
ether !�
Stream is at least intermittent
if z 19 or perennial rf a 3D'
n
Ephemeral Intermitte Perennial
e.g. Quad Name:
25. Algae
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal= a
Absent Weak
Moderate
Strong
1' Continuity of channel bed and bank
0 1
2
{ 2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0 1
2
3
3. In- channel structure; ex. riffle -pool, step -paol,
0 1
2
C
ripple -pool sequence
--
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0 1
( -�
3
5. Active/relict foodplain
0 1
2
(3y)
6. Depositional bars or benches
0 1
?,,)
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
2
3
8. Headcuts
0, 1
2
3
9. Grade control
0 0.5
(J2
1.5
{ 10. Natural valley
0 0.5
(V
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
No, 4 )
Yes = 3
a afficial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology (Subtotal
12. Presence of 6aseflow 0 1
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria 0 (1)
14. Leaf litter c 1
15. Sediment on plants or debris 0 0.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles 0 0.5
{ 17. Soil -based evidence of high water table? No = 0
C. Biology (Subtotal
(1)
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
19 Rooted upland plants in streambed
( 3
{ 20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
'd
21 Aquatic Mollusks
r
22. Fish0
23, Crayfish
9)
24. Amphibians
0)
25. Algae
26. Wetland plants in streambed
'perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See
p. 35 of manual.
Notes: f'-el . r J) - .f ;• o4 t•,,•,1
Sketch:
2
(1)
2
3
0.k
0
,_ij
1.5
(1)
1.5
Yes Je 3)
2 1 0
2 1 0
1 ,'I.) 3
1 2 3
0.5 1 1.5
0.5 1 1.5
0.5 1 1.5
0.5 1 1.5
FACW = 0,75, OBL = 1.5 Other = 0

LISACE AID# DWQ # Site # (indicate on attached map)
F1711 STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET -AQP
Provide the following information for the stream reach under assessment:
1. Applicant's name: W 66? 2. Evaluator's name: [^k — Ao4p+
AA,
3. Date of evaluation: it /15 4. Time of evaluation:. 11 AA,
5. Name of stream: 1 ` 2I- lei - 1 b. River basin: ,f fr r11z
7. Approximate drainage area: 000 c c rG y S. Stream order: I
9. Length of reach evaluated: I'DD r
11. Site coordinates (if known), prefer in decimal degrees.
Latitude (ex. 34.872312):
10.. County: IL.ailr4 ►
12. Subdivision name (if any):
36. 2It 1 1 1
Longitude (ex. -77 556611):
Method location determined (circle): GP 'ropo Sheet Ortho (Aerial) PhotolGIS Other GIS Other
13. location of reach under evaluation (note nearby roads and landmarks and attach map identifying streams) location):
14. Proposed channel work (if any): tj a A e-
15. Recent weather conditions: F70knMs F, JE/
rr ;o r
16. Site conditions at time of visit: f -ov( / �u
17. Identify any special waterway classifications known:
_Section 10 Tidal Waters _Essential Fisheries Habitat
Trout Waters ..Outstanding Resource Waters
Nutrient Sensitive Waters Water Supply Watershed (l -IV)
18. Is there a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluation paint ?(: NO If yes, estimate the water surface area:
19. Does channel appear on USGS quad map y� NO
24. Does channel appear on USDA Soil Survey? ES NO
21. Estimated watershed land use: % Residential
_% Commercial _% Industrial fl % Agricultural
0io Forested
e% Cleared I Logged ,% Other f
22. Bankfull width: % " !� #r l
23, Bank height (from bed to top of bank): S `
24. Channel slope down center of stream: Flat (0 to 2 %)
,Gentle (2 to 4 %) ,Moderate (4 to 10 %) _Steep (>100w1n)
25. Channel sinuosity: _Straight Occasional bends !Frequent meander Very sinuous ^Braided channel
Instructions for completion of worksheet (located on page 2): Begin by determining the most appropriate ecoregion based on
location, terrain, vegetation, stream classification, etc. Every characteristic must be scored using the same ecoregion. Assign points
to each characteristic within the range shown for the ecoregion. Page 3 provides a brief description of how to review the
characteristics identified in the worksheet. Scores should reflect an overall assessment of the stream reach under evaluation. If a
characteristic cannot be evaluated due to site or weather conditions, enter 0 in the scoring box and provide an explanation in the
comment section. Where there are obvious changes in the character of a stream under review (e.g., the stream flows from a pasture
into a forest), the stream may be divided into smaller reaches that display more continuity, and a separate form used to evaluate each
reach. The total score assigned to a stream reach must range between 0 and 100, with a score of 100 representing a stream of the
highest quality.
Total Score (from reverse): -;;X Comments:
Evaluator's Signature DateI
This channel evaluation form is to 'fo bed o l�y`as a guide to assist landowners and environmental professionals in
gathering the data required by the United 'States Army Corps of Engineers to make a preliminary assessment of stream
duality. The total score resulting from the completion of this form is subject to USACE approval and does not imply a
particular mitigation ratio or requirement. Form subject to change - version 06/03. To Comment, please call 919 - 875 -8441 x 26.

STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKStiLET
* These characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams.
ECOREGION POINT
RANGE
#
CHARACTERISTICS
SCC
Coastal
Piedmont
Mountain
1
Presence of flow 1 persistent pools in stream
0-5
0 - 4
0-5
no flow or saturation = 0• strong flow = max points)
Evidence of past human alteration
0-6
0 -5
Q -s
2
extensive alteration = 0; no alteration = max points)
1
3
Riparian zone
0-6
0-4
0-5
(�
no buffer = 0; contiguous, wide buffer = max
points)J
Evidence of nutrient or chemical discharges
0-5
0 - 4
D 4
L�
4
(extensive discharges = 0; no discharges = max points)
5
Groundwater discharge
0-3
0-4
0-4
no discharge = 0, springs, s, see s, wetlands, etc. = max points)
6
Presence of adjacent floodplain
0_ 4
0_ 4
0- 2
no flood lain = 0• extensive flood lain = max points)
_ ..
y„
Entrenchment 1 fioodplain access
0-5
0 - 4
0-2
ts�
Q'
(deeply entrenched = 0; frequent flooding = max points)
4
Presence of adjacent wetlands
0-6
0-4
0-2
no wetlands = 0; large adjacent wetlands = max points)
9
Channel sinuosity
0-5
0-4
0-3
extensive channelization = 0; natural meander = max points)
10
Sediment input
0-5
0-4
0-4
I
extensive deposition= 0; little or no sediment = max oints
_
I 1
Size & diversity of channel bed substrate
NA*
0 -- 4
0 - 5
(fine, homogenous = 0• large, diverse sizes = max oints
1
Evidence of channel incision or widening
0-5
0 - 4
0-5
r
(deeply incised = 0; stable bed & banks = max pints
i'
Presence of major bank failures
0-5
0 - 3
0-5
�? 13
severe erosion = 0; no erosion, stable banks = max oints
.r
14
Root depth and density on banks
0-3
0 -4
0-5
c.l
_f
(no visible roots = 0; dense roots throughout = max points)
l 5
Impact by agriculture, livestock, or timber production
0-5
0 - 4
0-5
substantial impact =0; no evidence = max points)
Presence of riffle-pool/ripple-pool complexes
0-3
0 - 5
0-6
16
no riffles/ripples or pools = 0; well-developed = max points)
Q
17
Habitat complexity
0 - 6
0 - ti
Q - 6
little or no habitat = 0; frequent, varied habitats = max points)
l8
Canopy coverage over streambed
0 -5
0 -5
0 -5
(no shading vegetation = 0; continuous canopy = max points)
19
Substrate embeddedness
NA*
0-4
0-4
1
(deeply embedded = 0; loose structure = max)?
20
Presence of stream invertebrates (see page 4)
0-4
0 - 5
0 - 5
no evidence = 0• common numerous types = max oints
21
Presence of amphibians
0-4
0-4
0-4
O
no evidence = 0• common, numerous types = max oints
22
Presence of fish
0-4
0 - 4
0-4
no evidence = 0- common, numerous types = max oints
23
Evidence of wildlife use
0-6
0 - 5
0 -5
no evidence = 0• abundant evidence = max points)
Total Points Possible
100
100
100
_ TOTAL SCORE (also enter on first page)
* These characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams.

NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date: IC
Project/Site:
�+
Latitude:
Evaluator: r.�;+��." _ yrr.N^
County: i�nc'4��r`
Longitude:
Total Points:
3
Stream (ci�
Other
Stream is at least interanittent
if a 19 or Decennial if ? 30'
ra Inter ittei
Ephemeral Intermittent � erenrt�a
( _-
:
e.g. Dual Name:
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal= a
Absent
Weak
Moderate Strong
18 Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
A )
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2
3. In- channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
0
1
2
, '7
:"
ripple -pool sequence
_
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
(
3
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
#
," 2.- `
3
5. Depositional bars or benches
0
('1)
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
!'
2
3
8 Headcuts
t
1
2
3
9. Grade central
0
0.5
1)
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
0.5?
y1
1.5
11 Second or greater order channel
N O
Yes = 3
artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions In manual
B. Hydrology (Subtotal
12. Presence of Baseflow
I 0
1
2
63�1
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
1 0
'
2
3
14. Leaf litter
5t'
1
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0.5
1.5 1
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
0.5
1.5_
17. Soil - based evidence of high water table?
No 0
Yes
C. Biology (Subtotal = _ (_ 1
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
( 3)
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
14�1
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0)
1
2
3
21 Aquatic Mollusks
n
1
2
3
22. Fish
0'
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
t}
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
l3
0.5
1
1.5
25. Algae
0,1
0.5
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75: OBL = 1.5 Other = 0
'perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. Seep. 35 of manual.
Motes:
Sketch:

USAGE AID# DWQ # Site # yf-(indicate on attached map)
STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET -AQP
Provide the following information for the stream reach under assessment:
1. Applicant's name; r 2. Evaluator's name: A'r,►oA
3. Date of evaluation: �z {iS' 4. Time of evaluation: It! So AO)
5. Name of stream: % ��'ni �1- F5 " Z 6. River basin: tf, f
7. Approximate drainage area: 1.00 &E 8. Stream order: f
9. Length of reach evaluated: <b 10. County: fc, Ltr1�I•rri
W
11. Site coordinates (if known): prefer in decimal degrees. 12. Subdivision name (if any):
I
Latitude (e1 34.872312): �6 s 7 F14 Longitude (ex. - 77.556611):
Method location determined (circle) Topo Sheet Ortho (Aerial) Photo {GIS Other GI5 tither
13. Location of reach under evaluation (note nearby roads and landmarks and attach map identifying streams) location):
14. Proposed channel work (if any): 000,e
15. Recent weather conditions: 15novi 111*11 1"7z krs forrie
16. Site conditions at time of visit: stAAAI I CZ01
17. Identify any special waterway classifications known: ____Section 10 _Tidal Waters Essential Fisheries Habitat
Trout Waters _Outstanding Resource Waters Nutrient Sensitive Waters Water Supply Watershed (I -IV)
18. is there a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluation point? r NO If yes, estimate the water surface area:g
19. Does channel appear on USGS quad map? 'YES 63) 20. Does channel appear on USDA Soil Survey? 0 NO
21. Estimated watershed land use: 10 % Residential _% Commercial ,% Industrial -11% Agricultural
20% Forested —% Cleared 1 Logged _% Other i
22. Bankfull width: S ;s
24. Channel slope down center of stream: _Flat (0 to 2 %)
25. Channel sinuosity: Straight — Occasional bends
23. Bank height (from bed to top of bank): �4
Gentle (2 to 4 %) _Moderate (4 to 10 %) Steep ( }10,6)
-/-Frequent meander _Very sinuous ,Braided channel
Instructions for completion of worksheet (located on page 2): Begin by determining the most appropriate ecoregion based on
location, terrain, vegetation, stream classification, etc. Every characteristic must be scored using the same ecoregion. Assign points
to each characteristic within the range shown For the ecoregion. Rage 3 provides a brief description of how to review the
characteristics identified in the worksheet. Scores should reflect an overall assessment of the stream reach under evaluation. If a
characteristic cannot be evaluated due to site or weather conditions, enter 0 in the scoring box and provide an explanation in the
comment section. Where there are obvious changes in the character of a stream under review (e.g., the stream flows from a pasture
into a forest), the stream may be divided into smaller reaches that display more continuity, and a separate form used to evaluate each
reach. The total score assigned to a stream reach must range between 0 and 100, with a score of 100 representing a stream of the
highest quality.
Total Score (from reverse): 3 Comments:
Evaluator's Signature s' Date '3 4f 15
This channel evaluation form is in ndqWdzire used o6ras-a guide to assist landowners and environmental professionals in
gathering the data required by a United States Army Corps of Engineers to make a preliminary assessment of stream
quality. The total score result g from the completion of this form is subject to USAGE approval and does not imply a
particular mitigation ratio or requirement. Form subject to change - version 06103, To Comment, please call 919- 876 -8441 x 26.

STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSnhh i
* These characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams.
ECORECION POINT
RANGE
#
CHARACTERISTICS
SCORE
Coastal
Piedmont
Mountain
1
Presence of flow 1 persistent pools in stream
0 _ 5
0-4
0 - 5
no flow or saturation = 0; strong flow = max points
Evidence of past human alteration
0-6
0 - 5
0-5
2
extensive alteration = 0; no alteration = max points)
3
Riparian zone
0-6
0-4
0-5
�I
(no buffer = 0• contiguous, wide buffer = max Dints
Evidence of nutrient or chemical discharges
0-5
0 - 4
0 - 4
4
{extensive discharges = 0• no discharges = max points)
5
Groundwater discharge
0-3
0-4
0- 4
no dischar e = 0; springs, sees wetlands, etc. = max Dints}
_
Presence of adjacent floodplain
0_ 4
0- 4
0- 7
no floodplain = 0• extensive floodplain = max points)
�
Entrenchment 1 floodplain access
0-5
0-4
0-2
96"
(deeply entrenched = 0; frequent flooding = max
points)_
8
Presence of adjacent wetlands
0-6
0-4
0-2
no wetlands = 0; large adjacent wetlands = max points)
9
Channel sinuosity
0-5
0-4
0- 3
l�
extensive channelization = 0; natural meander = max oints
10
Sediment input
0-5
0-4
0-4
(extensive deposition= fl: little or no sediment = max Dints
I I
Size & diversity of channel bed substrate
NA*
0-4
0 - 5
fine homogenous = 0; large, diverse sizes = max points)
Evidence of channel incision or widening
0-5
0 - 4
0-5
Lq
y,
12
(deeply incised = 0, stable bed & banks = max points)
Presence of major bank failures
0 -5
0-5
0 -5
S-
13
severe erosion = 0; no erosion, stable banks =coax points)
14
Root depth and density on banks
0-3
0 -4
0-5
L
(no visible roots = 0; dense roots throughout = max points)
COD
15
Impact by agriculture, livestock, or timber production
0-5
0 - 4
0-5
substantial impact =0• no evidence = max points)
16
Presence of riffle- pooUripple -pool complexes
0-3
0 - 5
0-6
no riffles/ripples or pools = 0; well-developed = max dints}
I
Habitat complexity
0-6
0-6
0-6
(little or no habitat = 0; frequent, varied habitats = max points)
18
Canopy coverage over streambed
0-5
0 - 5
0-5
no s ading vegetation = 0; continuous canopy = max oints
19
Substrate embeddedness
NA*
0-4
0 -4
(deeply embedded = 0• loose structure = max
Presence of stream invertebrates (see page 4)
0-4
0 - 5
0-5
20
no evidence = 0; common numerous es = max points)
21
Presence of amphibians
0-4
0-4
0-4
C
no evidence = 0; common numerous types = max points)
O
22
Presence of fish
0 -4
0 -4
0 -4
no evidence = 0• common numerous types = max points)
231
Evidence of wildlife use
0-6
0 -� 5
0 --- 5
ho evidence = 0. abundant evidence = max oints
Total Points Possible
100
100
100
TOTAL SCORE (also enter on first page)
* These characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams.

C. Biology {Subtotal = ✓ )
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2�)
1
0
NC DWQ Stream Identification Form
Version 4.11
J2
1
0
Date: ; ° `- %
Projectl8ite: (L1�1'!� P5
Latitude:
-
Y 1 ��-�•
Evaluator: AX'S
County:
d��
Longitude:, aEj
Total Points:
Stream is at feast intermittent
Stream Determine ort (circle one)
Other
fZI eo-a_ i
if � 99 or Perennial +f a 8c' �
Ephemeral lrrte`rm�
a Perennial
e.g. Quad
Name:
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal=
Absent
Weak
Moderate Str
1' Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
26. Wetland plants in streambed
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2'
"perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
- -
3. In- channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
0
2
3
ripple -pool sequence
4. Particle size of stream substrate
f''1
2
3
5. Active/relict floodplain
(
1
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
'0
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2
3
8. Headcuts
0 )
1
2
3.�
9. Grade control
0.5
10. Natural valley
0
-0.5
(` 1
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
No ='b
Yes = 3
a artificial ditches are not rated; see di u"ns in manual
B. Hydrology (Subtotal
12. Presence of Basefiow
0
1 ��
2
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
, 1 ) -
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1a5
1
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0.5
1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
0.5
1
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
yes(--3D
C. Biology {Subtotal = ✓ )
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2�)
1
0
19. Footed upland plants in streambed
V
J2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
1
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
6;1�
1
2
3
22. Fish
1. r
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
-
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
0.5
1
-
1.5
{ 25. Algae -
�0
0.5�-
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = OZ
1.5 Other = 0
"perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
- -
Notes;
Sketch: �I,
AV CAP

USACE AID# DWQ # - -- Site #_ on attached map)
ins STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
Provide the following information for the stream reach under assessment: �}
1. Applicant's name: sk Ec p 2. Evaluator's name: i' V k-l­s ow
3. Date of evaluation: 3-3 4. Time of evaluation: o,'If4,,,
5. ]Name of stream: Y� � �� � 6. River basin: 640 e- t.'(A —
7. Approximate drainage area: 8. Stream order: C
9. Length of reach evaluated: 10. County: 11<et k + wt 4u •
11. Site coordinates (if known).
l�`- 3 _�� i; ' 12. Subdivision name (if any):
13. location of reach under evaluation (note nearby roads and landmarks and attach map identifying stream(s) location):
14. Proposed channel work (if any): W B 6- e
15. Recent weather conditions: wed --ut_ to_%kkti.. 4% lA&e =4 lvl-� vi k_*&6y l —c., r -el�r u. y wo•�lrt e
16. Site conditions at time of visit: I154--1
1.7. Identify any special waterway classifications known: Section 10 Tidal Waters Essential fisheries Habitat
Trout Waters Outstanding Resource Waters Nutrient Sensitive Waters Water Supply Watershed (I -IV)
18. Is there a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluation point? YES NO If yes, estimate the water surface area:
19. Does channel appear on USGS quad map? YES � 20. Does channel appear on USDA Soil Survey? YES 6 O
21. Estimated watershed land use: 8/0 Residential % Commercial % Industrial I0 % Agricultural
22. Bankfuil width: `
a_°,j % Forested GO % Cleared 1 Logged 5% Other [
23. Bank height (from bed to top of bank):
24. Channel slope down center of stream= to 2O/ Gentle (2 to 4 %) Moderate (4 to 10%) Steep (>I 0%)
25. Channel sinuosiry� `5`�traigiiL_---�' Occasional bends Frequent meander Very sinuous Braided channel
Instructions for completion of worksheet (located on page 2): Begin by determining the most appropriate ecoregion based on
location, terrain, vegetation, stream classification, etc. Every characteristic must be scared using the same ecoregion. Assign points to
each characteristic within the range shown For the ecoregion. page 3 provides a brief description of how to review the characteristics
identified in the worksheet. Scores should reflect an overall assessment of the stream reach under evaluation. if a characteristic cannot
be evaluated due to site or weather conditions, enter 0 in the scoring box and provide an explanation in the comment section. Where
there are obvious changes in the character of a stream under review (e.g., the stream flows from a pasture into a forest), the stream may
be divided into smaller reaches that display more continuity, and a separate form used to evaluate each reach. The total score assigned
to a stream reach must range between 0 and 100, with a score of 100 representing a stream of the highest quality.
Total Score ( from reverse): Comments;
Y' Vi.a; a--t -r 64 M r —dS ;jam {t, 1404, 00"C.
Evaluator's Signature — date f
This channel evaluation torm is intended to be used only as a guide to assist landowners and environmental professionals in
gathering the data required by the United States Army Corps of Engineers to make a preliminary assessment of stream
quality. The total score resulting from the completion of this form is subject to USACE approval and does not imply a
particular mitigation ratio or requirement. Form subject to change — version 036103. To Comment, please call 919 -876 -8441 x 26.

STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
* These characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams.
2
SCORE
'I
J,
4
0
3
l
I
"1
D
ECOIREGION POINT
RANGE
#
CHARACTERISTICS
Coastal
Piedmont
Mountain
1
Presence of flow f persistent pools in stream
0-5
0 - 4
0-5
no flow or saturation = 0; strong flow = max points)
2
Evidence of past human alteration
0-6
0-5
0-5
extensive alteration = 0; no alteration = max points)
3
Riparian zone
0-6
0-4
0-5
no buffer = 0; contiguous, wide buffer = max points)
4
Evidence of nutrient or chemical discharges
0-5
0-4
0-4
extensive discharges = 0; no discharges = max 2oi nts
a
5
Groundwater discharge
0-3
0 - 4
0-4
U
no disc har e = 0; springs, seeps, wetlands, etc. = max points)
Presence of adjacent floodplain
0-4
0-4
0-2
ti,
no flood lain = 0• extensive floodplain = max points)
Entrenchment 1 floodplain access
0- 5
0- 4
0_
C61
(deeply entrenched = 0; frequent flooding = max points)
_7
8
Presence of adjacent wetlands
0-6
0-4
0-2
no wetlands = 0; lar a adjacent wetlands = max points)
9
Channel sinuosity
0-5
0- 4
0-3
extensive channelization = 0; natural meander = max points)
10
Sediment input
0-5
0-4
0-4
extensive deposition= 0; little or no sediment = max points)
1 I
Size & diversity of channel bed substrate
NA*
0 - 4
0 - 5
5
fine, homogenous = 0; lar ge, diverse sizes = max points)
12
Evidence of channel incision or widening
0-5
0 - 4
0-5
�+
(deeply incised = 0; stable bed & banks = max points)
13
Presence of major bank failures
0-5
0 - 5
0-5
severe erosion = 0; no erosion, stable banks = max points)
14
Root depth and density on banks
0 -3
0-4
0 - 5
no visible roots = 0; dense roots throughout = max points)
15
Impact by agriculture, livestock, or timber production.
0 5
0 4
0 - S
substantial impact =0; no evidence = max points)
16
Presence of riffle- pooUripple -pool complexes
0 --3
0-5
0 - 6
no riffles/ripples or pools = 0; well-developed = max points)
d
17
Habitat complexity
0-6
0 - 6
0-6
little or no habitat = 0; frequent, varied habitats = max points)
1
Canopy coverage over streambed
0-5
0 - 5
0-5
no shading vegetation = 0; continuous canopy = max points)
19
Substrate embeddedness
ILIA
0-4
0 - 4
(deeply embedded = 0; loose structure = max
20
Presence of stream invertebrates (see page 4)
0-4
0-5
0-5
no evidence = 0; common, numerous types = max points)
l
Presence of amphibians
0-4
0-4
0-4
Q
no evidence = 0; common, numerous types = max points)
d
2?
Presence of fish
0 -4
0 -4
0 -4
no evidence = 0; common, numerous es = max points)
r23
Evidence of wildlife use
0 - 6
0-5
0-5
no evidence = 0; abundant evidence = max points)
Total Paints Passible
loo
100
100
TOTAL SCORE (also enter on first page)
* These characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams.
2
SCORE
'I
J,
4
0
3
l
I
"1
D

NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4,1 t'
Date: J� +c�
r
Projectl5ite:
Latitude:
f
Evaluator: �c ivo± w,n - A y rew+^
County:
;r
Longitude: -7'1,
$19 5
Total Points;
Stream is at least intermittent ?
Stream is at least rote
- f°
'
Stream Determination (cir
Ephemeral Intermitten erennia,
outer
e,g. Quad Name: Px l
3itt
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal = i
Absent
Weak
Moderate
String
1 a Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
(/3)
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
!r
3
3. In- channel structure: ex. riffle- pool, step -pool,
0
1
0
3
ripple -pool sequence
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
(2-)
3
5 Activelrelict floodplain
0
r
2
3
0 6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
(2,)
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
`
2
3
8. Headcuts
0
2
3
9. Grade control
0
0.5
1 -5
10. Natural valley
0
- 0.5
1
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
No 0)
Yes = 3
a artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. H drolo y {Subtotal = b }
12. Presence of Baseflow - =
0
1
2
CID
13. iron oxidizing bacteria
0
(P
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5
;/iD
0 -5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0.5
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
0.5
Tr i�) -
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
Yes 3
C. Biology {Subtotal
18 Fibrous roots in streambed
(3 )
2
1
0
19 Rooted upland plants in streambed
(3)
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
1
2
3
22, Fish
0.5
1
1.5
23- Crayfish
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians}
0.5
1
1.5
25. Algae
Q
0.5
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5 Other = 0
'perennial streams may also be identified using other methods, See p. 35 of manual
I Notes:
Sketch:

LISACE AID# DWQ # Site # (indicate on attached map)
W STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET -AQO
Provide the following information for the stream reach under assessment:
1. Applicant`s name: 2. Evaluator's name:
3. Date of evaluation:� 4. Time of evaluation: I '�
S. Name of stream: fej;,i i ` ' zo ur- 4 6. River basin: K, (,e f ,%�*`
7. Approximate drainage area: 8. Stream order:
9. Length of reach evaluated: #. 10. County:`
1
11. Site coordinates (if known): prefer in decimal degrees. 12. Subdivision name (if any):
Latitude (ex 34 872312): -3(. »sq ( 3 1 �Z, Longitude (ex. -77 556611): ` $
Method location determined (circle): GP T'opo Sheet Ortho (Aerial) PhotolGIS Other t_;1S Other
13. Location of reach under evaluation (note nearby roads and landmarks and attach map identifying stream(s) location):
14. Proposed channel work (if any): �Jotj r
IS. recent weather conditions: jn4uD A1.QA /•;( ors rt� r
16. Site conditions at time of visit: %t"" p' `) , 6061
17. Identify any special waterway classifications known: Section 10 !Tidal Waters aEssential Fisheries Habitat
_"Trout Waters _outstanding Resource Waters _Nutrient Sensitive Waters _Water Supply Watershed (I -IV)
18. Is there a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluation point? YES If yes, estimate the water surface area:
19. Does channel appear on USGS quad map? YES � 20. Does channel appear on USDA Soil Survey? YES .N!W
21. Estimated watershed land use: I0% Residential ,% Commercial �% Industrial _L01/a Agricultural
-Lo a /a Forested —% Cleared f Logged �% Other ( 1
22. Bankfull width: 14 Q 23. Bank height (from bed to top of bank): r r�
24. Channel slope down center of stream: ,Flat (0 to 2 %) _Gentle (2 to 4 %) Moderate (4 to 10 %) _Steep (> 10%)
25. Channel sinuosity; Straight _Occasional bends X Frequent meander !Very sinuous _ _Braided channel
Instructions for completion of worksheet (located on page 2): Begin by determining the most appropriate ecoregion based on
location, terrain, vegetation, stream classification, etc. Every characteristic must be scored using the same ecoregion. Assign points
to each characteristic within the range shown for the ecoregion. Page 3 provides a brief description of how to review the
characteristics identified in the worksheet. Scores should reflect an overall assessment of the stream reach under evaluation. If a.
characteristic cannot be evaluated due to site or weather conditions, enter 0 in the scoring box and provide an explanation in the
comment section. Where there are obvious changes in the character of a stream under review (e.g., the stream flows from a pasture
into a forest), the stream may be divided into smaller reaches that display more continuity, and a separate form used to evaluate each
reach. The total score assigned to a stream reach must range between 0 and 100, with a score of 100 representing a stream of the
highest quality.
Total Score (from reverse): T� Comments:
_ l
Evaluator's Signature Date S/Z115
This channel evaluation form is i/d�ed4fwmed an gu di a to assist landowners and"environmental professionals in
gathering the data required by t States Army Corps of Engineers to make a preliminary assessment of stream
quality, The total score resulting from the completion of this form is subject to USA10E approval and does not imply a
particular mitigation ratio or requirement. Form subject to change - version 06103. To Comment, please call 914 -876 «8441 x 26.

STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
* These characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams..
ECOREGION POINT
RANGE
#
CHARACTERISTICS
SCORE
Coastal.
Piedmont
Mountain
1
Presence of flow 1 persistent pools in stream
0-5
0 - 4
0-5
no flow or saturation = 0• strong flow = max poi nts
2
Evidence of past human alteration
0_ 6
0- 5
0- 5
Y
extensive alteration = 0; no alteration = max points)
3
Riparian zone
0-6
0-4
0- 5 `
no buffer = 0• contiguous, wide buffer = max points)
Evidence of nutrient or chemical discharges
0 - 5
0-4
0 - 4
r�
4
extensive discharges = 0; no discharges = max
points)
Groundwater discharge
0-3
0-4
0-4
5
(no discharge = 0• springs, see s, wetlands, etc. = max points)
Presence of adjacent floodplain
0-4
0-4
0-2
2
ti
no flood lain = 0, flood lain = max points)
Entrenchment / floodplain access
0-5
0-4
0-2
3
a
(deeply entrenched = 0• frequent flooding = max points)
Presence of adjacent wetlands
0-6
0 - 4
0-2
S
no wetlands = 0; large adjacent wetlands = max p Dints)
9
Channel sinuosity
0-5
0-4
0-3
extensive channelization = 0• natural meander = max points)
to
Sediment input
0-5
0-4
0-4
extensive deposition= 0; little or no sediment= max oints
1 I
Size & diversity of channel bed substrate
NA*
0-4
0 - 5
(fine homogenous = 0; large, diverse sizes = max points)
Evidence of channel incision or widening
0 - 5
0-4
0 - 5
..
12
(deeply incised = 0• stable bed & banks = max po ints
Presence of major bank failures
0 -5
0 -5
0 -5
`
1'
severe erosion = 0; no erosion stable banks = max points)
14
Root depth and density on banks
0-3
0 - 4
0-5
L
(no visible roots = 0; dense roots throughout = max points)
ron
Impact by agriculture, livestock., or timber production
0-5
0 - 4
0-5
15
substantial impact =0; no evidence = max points)
Presence of riffle-pool/ripple-pool complexes
0-3
0-5
0-6
u
16
no riffles/ripples or pools = 0• well-developed = max points)
f
Habitat complexity
0-6
0-6
0-6
17
little or no habitat = 0; frequent, varied habitats = max points)-�
1$
Canopy coverage over streambed
0-5
0 - S
0-5
,r
no shading vegetation = 0: continuous canopy = max points)
19
Substrate embeddedness
NA*
0-4
0 - 4
(deeply embedded = 0; loose structure = max
Presence of stream invertebrates (see page 4)
0-4
0 -- 5
0-5
I Q
20
no evidence = 0• common numerous types = max oints
21
Presence of amphibians
0-4
0-4
0-4
Q
no evidence = 0; common numerous es = max points)
O
22
Presence of fish
0 -4
0 -4
0 -4
[1
no evidence = 0; common, numerous types = max points)
�
Evidence of wildlife use
0-6
0 - 5
0 -5
no evidence = 0; abundant evidence = max points)
Total Points Possible
too
100
100
TOTAL SCORE (also enter on first page)
* These characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams..

NC RWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date: ?�� � Project/Site: �,,,1 f < ,; ,Y Latitude:
Evaluator: ��j,,, ��, � �f'oM County: � � ,�. Longitude:
Total Points: Stream Dete circle one) Other f7,1��w,�
Stream is at least intermittent 1Zq Ephemeral I ntermittent Perennial e.g. hued Name: �
if ?_19 or perennial it z 30"
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal = 10 ] Absent Weak Moderate Strong
1a. Continuity of channel tied and bank 0 1 2 K3�
2- Sinuosity of channel along thalweg 0 2 3
3- In- channel structure: ex, riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence `-j' 0 2 3
4. Particle size of stream substrate 0 (t 2 3
5. Activelrelict fkoodplain 0 1 C2) 3
6. Depositional bars or benches (0) 1 2 3
7. Recent alluvial deposits 0 /1) 2 3
8. Headcuts 40) 1- 2 3
9- Grade control 0 0 1 1.5
10. Natural valley 0 l 1 1.5
11. Second or greater order channel N9`= 0_) Yes = 3
s artificial ditches are not rated: see discussions in manual v
B. hydrology (Subtotal = ]
' 12. Presence of Baseflow 0 1 { 2.� - 3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria 0 1 •( 31 3
14. Leaf litter 1.5 1 0.5} 0
15, Sediment on plants or debris 0 0.5 7D 1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles 0 i]?3 1 1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table? No = 0 Y
C. Biology (Subtotal = a ]
18. Fibrous roots in streambed 3 1 0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed 3 2 1 0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity_ and abundance) 4 1 2 3
21- Aquatic Mollusks 0'' 1 2 3
2.2, Fish D 0.5 1 1.5
f 23. Crayfish D., 0 -5 1 1.5
C 24. Amphibians 0) 0.5 1 1.5
25. Algae 0 0.5 1 1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed FACW = 0.75, OBL = 1.5 Other 1 0
'perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual
Motes;
Sketch:

USACE AID# _ DWQ # - Site # (indicate on attached map)
r d r STREAM 'QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
r i
Provide the following information for the stream reach under assessment:
].Applicant's name: #f [ E p 2. Evaluator's name:
3. Date of evaluation: �' _` i 4. Time of evaluation:
5. Name of stream: D' (, / ) 0 6. River basin:
7. Approximate drainage area: t k4 -�5 S. Stream order©
9. Length of reach evaluated: r 10. County: kit-X. LLc- �.
l 1. Site coordinates (if known): - ;�$ �'�� ��, 12. Subdivision name (if any):
13. Location of reach under evaluation (note nearby roads and landmarks and attach map identifying stream(s) location):
14. Proposed channel work (if any): a%dw/+-
15. Recent weather conditions: 43'-d", .4-4 l 1,4 r, 1.1. W ". » 4A f f s r- s
1.6. Site conditions at time of visit: w v ' "/,i f.- _ 4 + t a n — d
17. Identify any special waterway classifications known: Section 14 Tidal Waters Essential Fisheries Habitat
Trout Waters Outstanding Resource Waters Nutrient Sensitive Waters Water Supply Watershed - (I -IV)
IS. is there a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluation point? YES 60 If yes, estimate the water surface area:
19. Does channel appear on USGS quad map? YES NO 20. Does channel appear on USDA Soil Survey? YES
21. Estimated watershed land use: % Residential % Commercial % Industrial % Agricultural
% Forested % Cleared 1 Logged % Other [
22. Bankiuil width: { 23. Bank height (from bed to top of bank):
CIL
24. Channel slope down center of stream: 1, Flat �tc�?.'�iv') Gentle (2 to 4 %) Moderate (4 to 10%) Steep (>I 0°1a)
25. Channel sinuosity: trai Occasional bends Frequent meander Very sinuous Braided channel
Instructions for completion of worksheet (located on page 2): Begin by determining the most appropriate ecoregion; based on
location, terrain, vegetation, stream classification, etc. Every characteristic must be scored using the same ecoregion. Assign points to
each characteristic within the range shown for the ecoregion. Page 3 provides a brief description of how to review the characteristics
identified in the worksheet. Scores should reflect an overall assessment of the stream reach under evaluation_ if a characteristic cannot
be evaluated due to site or weather conditions, enter 0 in the scoring box and provide an explanation in the comment section. Where
there are obvious changes in the character of a stream under review (e.g., the stream flows from a pasture into a forest), the stream may
be divided into smaller reaches that display more continuity, and a separate form used to evaluate each reach. The total score assigned
to a stream reach must range between 0 and 100, with a score of 100 representing a stream of the highest quality.
Total Score (from reverse): q Comments:
Evaluator's Signature late -3
This channel evaluation form is intended to be used only as a guide to assist Landowners and environmental professionals in
gathering the data required by the United States Army Corps of Engineers to make a preliminary assessment of stream
quality. The total score resulting from the completion of this form is subject to USACE approval and does not imply a
particular mitigation ratio or requirement. Form subject to change - version 06/03. To Comment, please call 919 -876 -8441 x 26.

STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
* These characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams.
CHARACTERISTICS
POINT
RANGE
SCC]RE
Coastal
Coastal
Piedmont
Mountain
I
Presence of flow 1 persistent pools in stream
0-5
0 -4
0-5
no flow or saturation = 0; strong flow = max points)
2
Evidence of past human alteration
0-6
0-5
0-5
extensive alteration = 0; no alteration = max points)
3
Riparian zone
0-6
0-4
0-5
no buffer = 0; contiguous, wide buffer = max points)
Evidence of nutrient or chemical discharges
0-5
0 4
0-4
4
extensive discharges = 0; no discharges = max poi nts
-
5
Groundwater discharge
0-3
0-4
0-4
f
4
no discharge = 0; springs, see s, wetlands, etc. = max
points)I
I '
6
Presence of adjacent floodplain
0-4
0-4
0-2
no floodplain = 0; extensive flood lain = max points)
7
Entrenchment 1 floodplain access
0-5
0-4
0-2
p"
(deeply entrenched = 0• frequent flooding = max points)
8
Presence of adjacent wetlands
0-6
0 - 4
o-2
no wetlands = 0; large adjacent wetlands = max points)
9
Channel sinuosity
0-5
0-4
0-3
extensive channelization = 0; natural meander = max points)
10
Sediment input
0-5
0-4
0-4
extensive dc position= 0; little or no sediment = max points)
11
Size & diversity of channel bed substrate
NAB`
0-4
0-5
fine, horno enous = 0; large, diverse sizes = max
12
points
Evidence of channel incision or widening
0-5
0 - 4
0-5
Ma+
(deeply incised = 0; stable bed & banks = max points)
...... _
13
Presence of major bank failures
0-5
0 - 5
0-5
`
severe erosion = 0; no erosion, stable banks = max
points)
Q
1.1
Root depth and density on banks
0-3
0 - 4
0-5
no visible roots = 0, dense roots throughout = max points)
cc
15
Impact by agriculture, livestock, or timber production
0-5
0 - 4
0-5
,
substantial im act =0; no evidence = max points)
16
Presence of riffle-pool/ripple-pool complexes
0-3
0 - 5
0-6
'
no riffles/ripples or pools = 0; well-developed = max points)
1
Habitat complexity
0-6
0 - 6
0-6
i
little or no habitat = 0; fre uent, varied habitats = max points)
GL7
18
Canopy coverage over streambed
0-5
0 -- 5
0-5
no shading vegetation = 0; continuous canopy = max points)
x
19
Substrate embeddedness
NA
0-4
0-4
(deeply embedded = 0; loose structure = max
.yo
Presence of stream invertebrates (see page 4)
0-4
0 - 5
0-5
no evidence = 0; common. numerous types = max points)
->]
Presence of amphibians
0-4
0-4
0-4
no evidence = 0. common, numerous types = max points)
0
Presence of fish
0-4
0-4
0-4
C1
(no evidence = 0; common, numerous types = max oints
�3
Evidence of wildlife use
0-6
0 - 5
0-5
no evidence = 0; abundant evidence = max points)
Total Points Possible
100
100
100
TOTAL SCORE (also enter on first page)]
* These characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams.

APPENDIX D
WETLAND FORMS
Flint Rock Farm Preservation Project
EEP ID 440 Appendices

ot 4••� - We4r
�A
WE=TLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Pro)ectlSite P1 — 111-0 tS tGt ° -41 CitylCounty: ���GI� t �,4�lfe �" Sampling Date:
ApplicanttOwner IV tiee— state: A/6- Sampling Point: '.'),4::0 = 4/Cl
Investigator(s). Ar k...vo — Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Local relief (concave, convex, none): Stop[! ( %):
Subregion (LRR or MLRA) . M L LA )L ti 0 Lai- Long, 7 , f)11 q b S Datum'. �VA 1913
Soil Map Unit Name: W.-f 4rj a/I - t,. NWI classification-.
Are climatic I hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation t1 , Soil , or Hydrology A/ significantly disturbed? Are "Normai Cacumstances° present? Yes _ % No
Are Vegetation A/ , Solt , or Hydrology -&/— naturally pwtilem atic? (II needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc,
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes 4� No is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes )r No within a Wetland? Yes i No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
Remarks: -
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimurn of one is required:
check all that aoply)
_ Surface Soil Cracks (86)
Surface Water (Al)
_ True Aquatic Plants (1314)
Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (BS)
X High Water Table (A2)
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1)
_ Drainage Patterns (610)
Saturation (A3)
Oxidized Riuxospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_ Moss Trim Lines (316)
eX Water Marks (131)
Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
Dry- Season Water Table (C2)
Sediment Deposits (B2)
_ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Sells (C6)
_ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
Drift Deposits (53)
� Thin Muck Surface (C7)
� Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Algal Mat or Crust (B4)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
_ Iron Deposits (85)
Geomorphic Position (132)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7)
Shallow Aquitard (D3)
Water - stained Leaves (69)
_ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (813)
FAG - Neutral Test (1)5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes -1.— No
,,11
Depth (inctles). lJ
Water Table Present? Yes No
Depth (inches).
�
Saturation Present? Yes No
Depth (inches). Wetland
Hydrology Present? Yes No
jinclude% capillary binge)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections). if available:
Remarks
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2 0

Lk),- K.r, d I- lick, 5 ki I W?' T
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2 0
Sampling Point: 50!tI104e -,L
VEGETATION (Five Strata) - Lfse scientific
names of plants.
Absolute: Dorinant Indicator
Dominance Test worksheet:
6 rep Stralum (Plot Sete:,
36 cover 5 cies7 Status
Number of Dominant Species
1 i4 P'L U 5 0 "Ql *
�,d _
That A,, 08L FACVW'. or FAC (A)
_a
4A4flr4,a^
� � ��LW
Total Number of Dominant
3.
Species Across All Strata (B)
4
percent of Dominant Species 7
5
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC. (A/B)
6
i= Total Cover
Prevalence Index worksheet:
f otal % Cover of Mutu ary by:
5f1e 6 of fatal rover,
20'9 cad total Craver:
t:)BL Species x 1 =
Saralina Stratum (plot size
1
f A C W sprxcers x 2 =
1. 1-
iZ
2. f"- .�lhr t. *
!� � i�g�
FAC species x 3 _
/4,f
FACU spei;rt;s x4 =
3.
UPL species x 5 =
4.
Culunua Ttrlals (A) (B)
5.
6.
Prevalence Index = BfA =
= Total Cover
Hydrophytec Vegetation Indicators:
50%. of total cowir
20`34, of total cover:^
— I - Rapid T esl for Hydrophyiic Vegetation
Shrub Stratum (Plot size:
r
_ 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
1
_ 3 - Prevatenr_e Index is 53.17'
2
__ 4 - Morphological AdaptaUans' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
3.
_ Problematic IJydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
4.
5.
'indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
6
be present, unless disturbed or problematic-
- Total Cover
Definitions of Five Vegetation Strata:
50`th of total cover
20% of total cover:
Free - Woody planL4, excluding woody VIr1eS,
Herb S ralum (Plot size:
)
approximately 20 it (6 m) or more in height and 3 in.
fi. i11 I L - 5 ��y ! 4 h�f
i' Iwr►w�� �l
(7 6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH).
2
Sapling - Woody plants, excluding woody vines.
3
approximately 24 It (6 m) or more in height and less
than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DOH.
4
5,
Shrub - Woody piar,is. excluding woody vines,
6
approximately 3 to 20 It (1 to 6 m) in height.
7.
Herb - Ail herbaceous (non - woody) plants. including
8
herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody
plants. except woody vines, less than approximately 3
9.
If (l m) in height
rq
Woody vine - All woody vines, regardless of height
11
= Total Cover
50% of total cover:
20% or total cover:
Woodv Vine Stra um (Plot situ
5 IG1
}
i` �4t
1 fai a4
2
3.
4
5
Hydrophytic
= Total Cover
Vegetation
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover: 15
Present? Yes No
Remarks. (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheael.)
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2 0

SOIL
Profile Description: (Describ
Depth Mpirix
linchesl color fmoistl
- 1� 7 t qIH
e to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirr
Redox Features
4, Color fmorstl `9h Type' Loc`
Ir 0 /0 0 Al
Vj csk,n� I - wf� � - 44,z- 7
Sampling Paint: 54X6
1 the absence of indicators.)
Texture Remarks
5, i:,
SL
'Type: C= Concentration. D =Deplefion, RM =Reduced Matrix, MS= Ma3ked5and Grams, FLocation: PL =Pare Lminq, M =Matrix,
Hydric Soil Indicators: Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils':
Histosol (A1)
bark Surface (S7)
, 2 cm Muck (A101 (MLRA 147)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
_ Polyvalue Betow Surface (58) (MLRA 147, 148)
_ Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
Black Histic (A3)
_ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
(MLRA 147,148)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (f 2)
Piedmont F loodpiam Sols (F 19)
Stratified Layers (A5)
Depleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136, 147)
2 con Muck (A10) (LRR N)
Redox Dark Surface (F5)
_ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
i Othw (Explain in Remarks)
Thick Dark Surface (Al2) _ Redox Depressions (FE)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (51) (LRR N, _ Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 147, 14 8) MLRA 136)
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) IUmbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122) 'Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Sandy Redox (55) Piedmont Floodplarn Soils IF 19) (MLRA 148) wetland hydrology must be present,
_ Stripped Matrix (S6) Red Parent Matenat (ia1) (MLRA 127, 14 7) unless disturbed r:r problematic
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type
Depth (inches) Hydric Soil Present? Yes No
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

Il.,A N - UP
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region �p
Pro)ectlSite: pkrw+ A-do: � q Cily&ounty . Sampling Dole
ApplicanVOwner, State: M Sampling Point- f r6, V/G
Inve3tigator(s): Section. Township, Range. $IR&-, b P 4 LA e I
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.). p i Ad, tai r. , Local m4ef (concave, convex. none) : _SpeA�-w%& fip Slope (%) 'l
Subregion (LRR or MI_RA): 'A L?1-4 )- C{ Q Lat: ZG- ex�" a Long:- 19, p [t'/b r Datum: ?-`Al+ i3
Spit Map unit Name: P ov r r' f{ f44v - d W a 1- f, n ,f 44 -„4y NWI classification
Are climatic 1 hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes —" ,_ Not (If no. explain in Remarks.)
Are VegeWtion __N_, Soil ___A1 _, or Hydrology N significantly disturbed,? Are 'Normal Circumstances° present? Yes -,—k— No
Are Vegetation rY Sail --- +4-- -, or Hydrology naturally problematic? (II needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transacts, important features, etc.
Hydrophytrc Vegelation Present? Yea
Hydric Soil Present? Yes
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes
Remarks
HYDROLOGY
No '/ is the Sampled Area
No__ within a Wetland?
No )(
Yes No k'
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two reouired)
Primary Indicators (minimurn at one is reounvo chi-ck ail that a©DIv)
Surface Soil Cracks (86)
Surface Water (Al)
_ True Aquatic Plants IBl4)
— Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
High Water Table (A2)
— Hydrogen 'Sulfide Cider (Cl )
— Drainage Patterns (RIO)
Salurmlinn (A3)
— Oxidized Rhizospheres oil Living Roots (C3)
_ Moss Trim Lines (B16)
_ Water Marks (131)
_ Presence of Reduced Iron (GA)
Dry - Season Water Table (C2)
_ Sediment Deposits (62)
_ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
— Drill Deposits (133)
Thin Muck Surface (U)
_ Saturation Visrb[e on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Algal Mat or Crust (84)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Stunted or Stressed Plants (DS)
Iron Deposits (65)
Goomorphic Position (02)
Inundation Visible on Aerial imagery (B7)
_ Shallow Aquitard (173)
Water-Stained Leaves [139)
_ Microtopographic Relief (04)
Aquatic Fauna (1313)
FAG- Neutral Test (135)
Field Observmions:
v
f
Surface Water Present? Yes
No Depth (inches).
Water Table Present? Yes
No ,— Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes
NoT Depth (inches), Wetland
Hydrology Present? Yes No
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections). if available.
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

VEGETATION (f=ive Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Absolute
Doninam
Indicator
freest turn (dPbt size:
t Cover
species?
Status
1 I"r tf- t14&7y IA�(y1
P14C
�y
2. Nip r�tt[ti • li °�4
/�y
(G�
yY
/
� A
3. Q ­t._ k t "m-4.t (_
4
5
A
%anli Stratum [Plot size:
2.
3
4,
5.
6.
Shrub Stratum (Plot size.
1 Ar.�
2
3.
4
5.
6
Herb Stratum (Plot size
I Pt t t 6 -t4 f ", I -C
2
3
4.
5.
6.
7
8.
10.
11.
W,��,td 1-OP 5� - (Ap
Sampling Point:+��`F'
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL. FAC_W. or FAC (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: (�l
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are 06L, FACW, or FAC- IAJET)
7 ` = Toiaf Cover Prevalence Index worksheet;
Total % Cover of Multiofv by
50°% of total cover: 20% of total cover OBL species x t
1
FACW species x :.•
FAC species x 3
f ACU species x 4
UPL species x 5
Column Totals (A) ()
50`36 of total cover
I
501A of total cover:
V l
50% of total cover:
_Wpody Vine Stratum (Plot size: )
1. VL,xa
3.
4.
5,
Total Cover
20`k of total cover. 3
e
10 - = Tolat cover
20% of t tat over
Prevalence Index = DA
Hydrophyrtic Vegetation Indicators:
I - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
_ 2 - Dominance T est is - 50%
3 - Prevalence Index is s3.0'
_ 4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet}
Problematic Hydrophylie Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic,
Definitions of Five Vegetation Strata,
o c Tree - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 rri) or more in height and 3 in.
%- (7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DOH).
= Total Cover
t.
20% of total cover:
Total Cover
50% of total cover, 20% of total cover.
Remarks. (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet )
Sapling - Woody plants, excluding woody vines.
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less
Ihan 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH.
Shrub - Woody plants. excluding woody vines.
approximately 3 to 20 It (1 to 6 m) m height.
Herb - All herbaceous (non- woody) plants. including
herbaceous vines. regardless of size, and woody
plants, except woody vines. less than approximately 3
fl (1 m) in height
Woody vine - All woody vines. regardless of height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes No
US Army Corps of Engineers L. v tem Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL
1"je41,j I -ve �io-qp
Sampling Point:
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Mavix Redox Features
finches) Color fmoist) X" Color (moist) % Type' Lnc` Texwre Remarks
'T Yoe: C= Concentration, D =Delrlelion, IRM- Reduced Matrix, MS= Masked Sand Grains.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Ilistosol (A1)
H,isloc Epipedon (A2)
BInck Histic (A3)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Stratified Layers (A5)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
Depleted Below Dark Suifact! (A11)
_ Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N.
MLRA 147, 148)
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (54)
Sandy Redox (S5)
Stripped Matrix (S6)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type
Depth (indivs)
Remarks.
'Localiori. PL =Pore Lining, M= Matrix.
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils':
Dark Surface (S7)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
Coast Prairie. Redox (A16)
T hin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
(MLRA 147, 148)
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (f2)
Pledrnont tloodplain Stills IF 19)
Depleted Matrix If 3)
(MLRA 136, 147)
_ Redox Dark Surfaa:e IFS)
_ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
Depleted Dark 5urface(F7)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Redox Depressions (FE)
Iron - Manganese Masses (F 12) (LRR N.
MLRA 136)
Urnbnc Surface (1 13) (MLRA 136, 122) 'Indicators of hydrophylic vegelation and
_ Piedmont F londplain Soils (F 19) (MLRA 14 8) wetland hydrology most be present.
_ Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147) unless disturbe=d or problematic
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

wcki,nd
[� WETt..f/#�iNG DETERMINATION DATA FORM Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Projecilsite t` iti.._',/ I Q t� LA, --1 cifyrCounty: 1 c Klw �'tu ^ Sampling Date: v r rj
4'. ApplicantlOwnef: X L -erj State: 11r— Sampling Poinu/9k`0 3
Investigator(s): pe -k 0,5,f t. pp+ d � I Section, Township, Range: 11/f w f
Landform (h(iislope, terrace, etc.); F Ls 0 )rl of w Local relief (concave, convex. none). Slope ( %?
Subregion (LRR ar MLRA)-. kt/ -A gQ Lat: 3+0- Long: '7q. 53 3 �-14 � oatum- 3 f
Soil Map Unit Name: �'-i­r 114— (041 -t NWI classification: '.
Are climatic f hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes ?C- No (If no. explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation . Sod V or 'Hydrology f� significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes _y_ No
Are Vegetation r . Soil !11/ , or Hydrology �_ naturally problematic? (11 needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transacts, important features, etc.
Hydrophylic Vegetation presunt '
Hydric Soil Present?
Wetland Hydrology Present?
Remarks
HYDROLOGY
Yes No Is the Sampled Area
Yes No within a Wetland?
Yes No
Yes No
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators {minimum of two reouired)
Primary Indicators kninimum of one is reouired:
check all that anoIvl
_ Surface Soil Cracks (86)
Surface Water (A1)
_ True Aquatic Plants (B14)
Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (Bg)
High Water Table (A2)
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1)
Drainage Patterns (B10)
X Saturation (A3)
oxidized Rtwzospheres on Living Roots (C3)
� Moss Trim Lines (B16)
T Water Marks (131)
_ Presence of Reduced Iron (C9)
pry - Season Water Table (C2)
Sediment Deposits (B2)
Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_ Crayfish Burrows (CO)
_ Drift Deposits (63)
chin Muck Surface (U)
_ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_ Algal Mat or Crust (134)
_ Other (Explain in Reinarks)
Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
_ Iron Deposits (85)
Goomorphic Position (D2)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7)
Shallow Aquitard (D3)
_ Water - Stained Leaves (B9)
_ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (613)
j FAG - Neutral Test (p5)
rield Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No
Depth (inches).
Water Table Present? Yes ' Nci
Depth (inches): c4
Saturation Present? Yes No
_ _ Depth (inches): _ Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
sincludes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring vtjl, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available.
Remarks
U5 Army Corps of Engineers Easiern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2 0
. If

V..je 104 y - WC-IT
VEGETATION (Five Strata) — Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point: A/- 03&__R_ f-
r yy Absolute Dominant Indicator Dominance Test. worksheet:
Tree Stratum (Plot size: Cover Cover Spe�.ccies? St at ss Number of Dominant Species
1 � �'� %�+ML7/ a�+�' - -1_ -- F r*ti That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC (A)
2.
Total Number of Dominant
3. Species Across All Strata: (f3)
4
Percent of Dominant Species 7
5. That Are OBL FACW, or FAC (A43)
6.
5an4no Stratum (Plot size:
1.
2..
3.
4.
5.
6
50% of total cover:
Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 1
1 I'i tt i�%I� rYi4;�r �rf s -u c, tf', ti
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
50% of total cover:
Herb Stratum (plot size:
1.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
50% of total cover:
Woodv Vine Stratum (Plot sire: )
1. 1pirlLF,� �RI)rtlwrfu
2._
3
4.
s
Prevalence Index - B A -
Total Cover Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
20% of total cover: _ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
_ 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
Ag- Y 3 - Prevalence Index is S3.0'
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sherrt)
_ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
Prevalence Index worksheet:
= Total hover
Definitions of Five Vegetation Strata:
20% of total cover
Tree - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
Total % Cover of:
Multiply by:
30% of total cover. 20% of total cover:
L]BL species
x 1 =
I
F,f r
L
FACW species
x 2 =
1
FAC species
x 3 =
than 3 in. (7 6 cm) DSH.
FACU species
x 4 =
UPL species
x 5 =
Herb - AN herbaceous (non - woody) plants. including
Colunnr Tulals-
(A) (fa)
50% of total cover:
Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 1
1 I'i tt i�%I� rYi4;�r �rf s -u c, tf', ti
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
50% of total cover:
Herb Stratum (plot size:
1.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
50% of total cover:
Woodv Vine Stratum (Plot sire: )
1. 1pirlLF,� �RI)rtlwrfu
2._
3
4.
s
Prevalence Index - B A -
Total Cover Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
20% of total cover: _ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
_ 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
Ag- Y 3 - Prevalence Index is S3.0'
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sherrt)
_ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
5— Y 4(
1�
10 - Total Cover
50% of total cover- 20% of total cover:
Remarks. (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet -)
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes No
US Army Corp; of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2 0
be present. unless disturbed or probtematic
= Total Cover
Definitions of Five Vegetation Strata:
20% of total cover
Tree - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 It (6 m) or more in height and 3 in.
(7 -6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH).
+
Sapling - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 It (6 m) or more in height arid less
than 3 in. (7 6 cm) DSH.
Shrub - Woody plants. excluding woody vines.
approximately 3 to 20 It (1 to 6 m) in height.
Herb - AN herbaceous (non - woody) plants. including
herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody
plants, except woody vines, less than approximately 3
fl (1 m) in freight..
Woody vine - All woody vines, regardless of height.
= ToW Cover
20% of total cover•
5— Y 4(
1�
10 - Total Cover
50% of total cover- 20% of total cover:
Remarks. (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet -)
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes No
US Army Corp; of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2 0

i
�je �,IA d q - �,f 1
SOIL Sampling Point!
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Deptli IM §Irix Redox Features
Mich —.Lolor (mots[) `sa Color fntgi ) % Type' Lor_ Texture Remarks
C
M
�j 'TvM: C= Concentration. D= Depletion, RM= Reduced Matrix, MS= Masked Sand Grains. 'Location. PL= f ore Lining. M =Matrix
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Indicators For Problematic Hydric Soils':
Histosol (Al)
park Surface (S7)
2 crn Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
_ Polyvalue Below Sutface (S8) (MLRA 147, 14 8)
_ Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
Black Histic (A3)
_ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147. 148)
(MLRA 147,148)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_ Loarny Gleyed Matrix (f 2)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
Stratified Layers (A5)
X Depleted Matrix (T3)
(MLRA 136, 147)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
— Redox park Surlace (Flit
Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
Depleted Below Bark Surface (A 11)
_ Depleted (lark Surface (F7)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
"thick park Surface (Al2)
_ Redox Depressions (FE)
i Sandy Mucky Mineral (Sl) (LRR N.
_ - lion-Manganese Masses (F 12) (LRR N.
r?'
MLRA 147, 148)
MLRA 136)
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122)
'Indicators of hydrophytic vege[a[krn and
Sandy Redox (S5)
Piedmont Flood plain Soils (F19) (MLRA 14 8)
wetland hydrology rnust be present,
_ Stopped Matrix (S6)
Red Parent Material (F71) (MLRA 127, 147)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches)
Hydric
Soil Present? Yos f" No—
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2 0

Ilk �"' OZ fi/1 -w
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Project/Site: Y l t wA 4"k b ylCounty fLOL k�I —S LMs -1 Sampling Date-
Applicant/Owner: Alf- Le 0 State: All( Sampling Point-,
Investigator(s): PP -k,^,-Aw iA-Yk�tlrh Section. Township, Rnnge: Wet,- 6rf -,P(
Landform (hillsiope, terrace, etc.): Maas �l4i �— Local relief (concave. convex, none) fdLA✓ Slope (96)
Subregion (LRR or MLRA) _6 L.I+ & - �,HQ__ Lai. 56. )-j 05-SP Long! -7 'f '33 D-4—q— Datum-
Soil Map Unit Name 4 -" ov...., .t e4 , NWI classdication-
Are climatic 1 hydrologic condition on the site typical for this time of year? Yes 4— No (Il no. explain in Remarks.) f
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology 14 significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes — No
Are Vegetation —A. Soil —AL-1 or Hydrology —0— naturally problematic? (II needed, explain any answers In Remarks,)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Prcjsent -' Yes
Ilydnc Sod Present? Yes
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes
Remarks
HYDROLOGY
No__Y_ Is the Sampled Area
No V within a Wetland?
Nom
Wetland Hydro logy Indicators:
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is reouired.
check all that aotaly)
_ Surface Water (Al)
— True Aquatic Plants 16 14)
— High Water Table (A2)
— Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
Saiuratton (A3)
— Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
® Water Marks (81)
Presence of Reduced Iro
�(C6)
Sediment Deposits (82)
_ Recent I tton in Titled Soils
Drift Deposits (B3)
uck Surface (C7)
Algal Mat or Crust (84)
— Other (Explain in Remarks)
._ iron Deposits (135)
inundaq eon Aerial Imagery (87)
W er Stained Leaves (83)
i
Aquatic Fauna (813)
Field Observations.
�c�
Yes No l
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two reouiredl
Surface Soil Cracks (86)
T Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
Drainage. Patterns (B10)
_ Moss Trim Lines (B16)
_ Dry - Season Water Table (C2)
Crayfish Burrows (C8)
Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (0)
_ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D 1)
Geomorphic Position (02)
Shallow Aquitard (03)
Microlopographic Relief (D4)
FAC- Neutral Test (D5)
Surface Water Pretwnt? Yes _ No Depth (inches):
Water Table Pres p47 Yes No Depth (inches):
Satwat er rr P esent? Yes ft Depth (inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes
Concludes capdtary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, moniloring yell, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks.
No t�
US Army Corp; of Engineers Eastern Mourttairn and Piedmont - Version 2 0

VEGETATION (Five Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Absolute Dorunant ImN -dlor
Tree S,,,,t✓,r�ptu (Plot size. I `3E Cover srxcivs% Status
1 �.d, R i� 4 � y Gx
2.�, ZQilAt+�
3
4.
5.
6.
Sanlino Stratum (Plot size
2.
3
4.
5.
8.
Shrub Stratum (Plot size:
1. 3%$_1,�+Ptvs tJs�
2.
3,
4.
5.
6.
Herb Stratum (Plot size:
1
2
3
4
6
7
a
9.
10.
11.
Li t ti.,, J, W - 4P
sampling Point:
Dominance Test worksheet;
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW or FAC (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata- (B)
Percent of Dominant Species L
That Are OBL, FACW. or FAC: (A/B)
50% of total cover
I
= Tola1 Cover
20"x, of total cover:
X
Prevalence Index BiA -
Hydrophytic Vegetation lndicators:
.� 1 • Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
_ 2 - Dommance Test is s50%
3 - Prevalence Index is s10'
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supponing
data in Remarks or on a separate sherrt)
_ Problematic flydrophytrc Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be preserrt, unless disturbed or problematic
= Total Cover Definitions of Five Vegetation Strata:
50`7U of total cover: 20% of total cover.
Tree - Woody plant!i, excluding woody Vines,
approximately 20 It (6 m) or more In height and 3 In.
(7.6 cm) or larger In diameter at breast height (DBH)
= Total Cover
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: -
Woody Vine Stratum Mot size: 1
1.
2.
3.
4.
t = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 20`3rt of total cover �1
Remarks. (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet-)
Sapling - Woody plants, excluding woody vrne5,
,Ilrproximately 20 It (6 m) or more in height and less
than 3 in (7 6 cm) DBH.
Shrub - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height
Herb - All herbaceous (non - woody) plants. Including
herbaceous vines. regardless of size, and woody
plants, excerpt wordy vines, less than approximately 3
fl (1 m) in height.
Woody vine - All woody vines, regardless of height
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes No
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2 0
Prevalence Index worksheet:
= Total Cover
Total `/, Cover o[
Multiply fSy.
50'f. of total cover: 209Y, of total cover:
OBL Species
x 1
IFc�
FACW species
x 1
FAC species
x 3
FACU species
x 4 -
UPL species
x 5 =
Ce)lur'rrn Tolals:
(A) (f3j
50% of total cover
I
= Tola1 Cover
20"x, of total cover:
X
Prevalence Index BiA -
Hydrophytic Vegetation lndicators:
.� 1 • Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
_ 2 - Dommance Test is s50%
3 - Prevalence Index is s10'
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supponing
data in Remarks or on a separate sherrt)
_ Problematic flydrophytrc Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be preserrt, unless disturbed or problematic
= Total Cover Definitions of Five Vegetation Strata:
50`7U of total cover: 20% of total cover.
Tree - Woody plant!i, excluding woody Vines,
approximately 20 It (6 m) or more In height and 3 In.
(7.6 cm) or larger In diameter at breast height (DBH)
= Total Cover
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: -
Woody Vine Stratum Mot size: 1
1.
2.
3.
4.
t = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 20`3rt of total cover �1
Remarks. (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet-)
Sapling - Woody plants, excluding woody vrne5,
,Ilrproximately 20 It (6 m) or more in height and less
than 3 in (7 6 cm) DBH.
Shrub - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height
Herb - All herbaceous (non - woody) plants. Including
herbaceous vines. regardless of size, and woody
plants, excerpt wordy vines, less than approximately 3
fl (1 m) in height.
Woody vine - All woody vines, regardless of height
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes No
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2 0

S 01L Sampling Point: Pj` Pa /-1 4"o
Profile Description: (Describe to she depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth MVix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) Color (moist) % Tyne, Loc` iextL1W Remarks
Lr
r.
'Type: C= Concentration, D= Deplebon. RM- Reduced Matrix, MS= Masked Sand Grains. 'Location: PL =fore Lininq, M.= Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils':
Histasol (Al)
_ Dark Surface (S7)
_ 2 rm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
Histrc Epipedon (A2)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 1474 148)
Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
Black Histic (A3)
_ 1 him Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
(MLRA 147, 148)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (f 2)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
_ Stratified Layers (AS)
Depleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136, 147)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
— Redox Dark Surface (F5)
_ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
_ Depleted Dark Surface(F7)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
1 hick Dark Surface 012)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (SI) (LRR N.
MLRA 147, 148)
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
Sandy Redox (551
_ 5lnplred Matrix (S6)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
I`ype
Redox Depressions (F E)
lron-Mancganese Masses (F 12) (LRR N,
MLRA 136)
UITOIC Surface (F 13) (MLRA 136, 12 2)
Piedmont Fioodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147)
'Indicators of hydrophyti-c vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be. present.
unless disturbed or problematic
Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes
Remarks:
Noy
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.4

\NJ1ah4 IIf I()f 11 — Ofd
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
r� j q r ,7,�'/ P C, _© 7
Pro)ectlSite F°it.�:� l flr�C �%� -mot Cityfcounty: /Lee '/_J(t.f tU[�'tii~+JS�*r'1 Sampling Date: -13-1�
App4cantlOwner Ae L {� I1 State A C/ Sampling Poinl:l"���
lnvesligr-tlor(s)' C `*�� 4 �! 1¢ Section. Township, flange- kr-* ' be �'kt
Lai dform (hillslope. terrace, etc.). Local relief (concave, convex, none): 61—t" v Slope
Subregion (LRR or MLRA)• I.I�rLP V14A -c_`t Lai- �tfj- a74$�0 Lang ` Y33SS7 Datum
I-- Map Unit Name ri GJa,*r` NWI clasirricaCron
Are climatic) hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? 1'es %, No (If no. explain in Reir arks.)
Are Vegetation h/ . Soil Al , or Hydrology r significantly dislurbed? Are "Normal Circumstances' presenl? Yes t� No
Are Vegetation jV_ Soil or Hydrology / naturally problematic? fit needed. explain any answers in Remarks)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling paint locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation fre,,ent?
Hydric Soil Present')'
Welland Hydrology Present?
Remarks
HYDROLOGY
Yes , No
Yes No
Yes No
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
i'r imai v Indicators (minimum of one is reouired: check all that arioly)
Is the Sampled Area
within a Wetland?
_ Surface Water (Al)
_ True Aquatic Plants (B74)
High Water Tattle (A2)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1)
Saturation (A3)
Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_ Water Marks (81)
T Presence of Reduced Iron (G4)
Sediment Deposits (132)
_ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Sails (C6)
Drift Deposits (B3)
` Thin Muck Stitlace (0)
Algal Mat or Crust (64)
Other (Explain in Rernarks)
Iron Deposits (135)
Inundation Visible an Aerial Imagery (67)
_ Water - Stained Leaves (139)
Aquatic: Fauna (1313)
Field Observations:
Yes ` No
Secondary Indicators (minimum of Iwo rertuired)
Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
_ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (BB)
Drainage Patterns (610)
Moss Trim Lines (816)
Dry�Season Water Table (G2)
Craylish Burrows (C8)
Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_ Stunted or Stressed Plarns (01)
Geomorphic Position (132)
_ Shallow Aquilaid (D3)
Microtopographic Relief (L)4)
FAC•Neutrat test (05)
Surface~ Water Present? Yes No Depth (inches):
Water Table Prevent? lies Y No Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes _)�, No Depth (inches): Wetland Hydrology' Present? Yes J1_ No
(includes capillary irintfe)
Duscube Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos. prtvious inspections), if available
Remarks
d dt. I #,Me 1' riiWalltL{ . J L4T
IBS Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2 0

VEGETATION (Fiore Strata) — Use scientific names of plants.
Absolute Dordntant indicator
Tree 5traf In (Plot size I )b Cover S cie ? status
✓/
3.
4..
5.
6
anlrnn Sirriti,na ('Plot size:
1.
2.
3
4.
5.
6
JIJ Vl qj f Q,' t
Sampling Point _ -7 4/,!Fr
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
'Thal Are OBL. FACW. or FAC (A}
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata. (B)
Percent of Dominant Sper:ies ,�3
That Are OBL FACW, or FAC. V 0 (ArB)
Prevalence Index worksheet:
- Tola'l Cover
Total lyn Cover of Multiniv bv-
50% of total cover: ' � 20% of tolad cover: 7
C}BC species x 1 =
} f ACW species x 2 =
FAC specioS x 3
FACU species x 4 =
UPC species x 5 -
Column Tutalb: (A) (B)
50% of total cover:
Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 1
2.
3,
4
5
6
50`36 of total cover
Herb Stratum (Plot Size. )
I i'l r r a p S� q' L-L P-1
2 H 4 7 V5
3 C (A 'It 5,0
4,
5.
6,
7,
8.
9
10.
11
- Total Cover
2036 of total cover:
1
/'� f
Prevalence Index = B!A =
Hydrophytfc Vegetation Indicators:
I - Rapid Test (or Hydrophytic Vegetation
2 - Dominance Test is -50%
_ 3 - Prevalence Index is, 53.0'
4 - Morphoiogicai Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks, or on a separate sheet)
Problematic Hydrophytrc Vegetation' (Expfitrnl
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
4 = Total Cover
50% of total cover1717 20'1x of total cr)ver,?
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot sire: )
1
2.
3.
4,
5
Total Cover
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
Woody vine - All woody vines. regardless of height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes No
U5 Ariny Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2 0
be present. unless disturbed or problematic
- Total Cover
Definitions of Five Vegetation Strata.
— 20% of total cover:
free -Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 It (6 m) rx more in height and 3 in.
rr 1�
(7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at brow-4 height (DBH)
---7— �L`
Id
Sapling - Woody plants, excluding woody vines.
approximately 20 It (6 m) or more in height and less
than 3 in, (7 6 cm) DBH.
Shrub - Woody plants, excluding woody vines.
approximately 3 to 20 If It to 6 m) in height.
Herb - All herbaceous (non•woodyl plants, including
herbaceous Vines, regardless of size. and woody
plants. except woody vines, less than approximately 3
It (t fn) in height.
4 = Total Cover
50% of total cover1717 20'1x of total cr)ver,?
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot sire: )
1
2.
3.
4,
5
Total Cover
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
Woody vine - All woody vines. regardless of height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes No
U5 Ariny Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2 0

' "hype: C= Concentralion.. D= Depletion, RWReduced Matrix, MS= Masked Sarni Grains. `Location. PL =Pore Lininct. M -Witnx
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils'.
siislosol (,A1)
Dark Surface (S7)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 14 7)
SOIL
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
_ Coast Prairie Redox 016)
Black Hisfic (0
_ 1hin Dark Surfara (S9) (MLRA 147, 14 8)
SarTlpi ng Point'�����'k
Profile Description:
(Describe
to She depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence
of indicators.)
[ Dada
Matrix
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
Redox Features
_ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
(inches)
Color lmoltiti
01,1
Cake[ (molsil 11% Type' Loc'
Texture
Remarks
_ Iron - Manganese Masses (F 121 (LRR N,
lad
MLRA 136)
_ Sandy Gleyed Marlrix (54)
UnOFIC Surfaice (F13) (MLRA 136, 12 2)
'Indicators of hydrophylic vegetation and
4 5-
� �r
I' ®,�i�� 7
L
Stripped Matrix (S6)
_ Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147)
unless disturbed or problematic
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
/0 111-
{� -
_
f J - + - 4r n �1
I r 'z *�,VA.p- V
' "hype: C= Concentralion.. D= Depletion, RWReduced Matrix, MS= Masked Sarni Grains. `Location. PL =Pore Lininct. M -Witnx
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils'.
siislosol (,A1)
Dark Surface (S7)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 14 7)
Histic Epipeclon (A2)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
_ Coast Prairie Redox 016)
Black Hisfic (0
_ 1hin Dark Surfara (S9) (MLRA 147, 14 8)
(MLRA 147, 148)
Hydrogen Suilide (A4)
_ Lmimy Gieyed Matrix (f 2)
� Piedmont l-itarxlplaain'Soils (F 1 J)
Stratified Layers 0151
� Depleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136, 147)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
_ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
— Depleted Dark Surface (F 7)
� Other (Explain in Remarks)
i I flick Dark Surface (Al2)
_ Redox Depressions (FE)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (51) (LRR N,
_ Iron - Manganese Masses (F 121 (LRR N,
MLRA 147, 148)
MLRA 136)
_ Sandy Gleyed Marlrix (54)
UnOFIC Surfaice (F13) (MLRA 136, 12 2)
'Indicators of hydrophylic vegetation and
Sandy Redox ('S5)
� Piedmont Floodplain Sails (F 19) (MLRA 148)
wetland hydrology must ix? present.
Stripped Matrix (S6)
_ Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147)
unless disturbed or problematic
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
I y {x:
Deplh (inches) Hydric Soil Present? Yes ✓' No
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineer,-, Eastern Mciuniains and Piedmont - Version 2 0

\jV0Iald gf to, II-
-cep up
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Eastern Mountains
r�ounittai fn�js, and Piedmont Region
Pro)ectlsite 11.1V ILd11 -,� 1t' ` � CltylCai. my: Lei A V.,ll -rl `r-trL6 Sampling Date eat � ` �• r ��
Applicantlgwner: n T 1 State: A" `— Sampling Point 12," tw —W1
Inve.ligntor(i) L,/1#kt,0AA Section. Town*p,Range, flvetu VetN-ei
Landlorm (hillslope, terrace, etc): Local relief (concave. convex, crone). e,0 r+j.�. sl slope ( )
+(� Subregion (LRR ar MLRA)' '-RA A Lance - 7 q -`63.1 �'f 7 oattlm: )WOs,-3—
Soil Map Unit Name. NWI classification.
Are climatic r hydrologic condition on the site typical for his time of year? Yes �— No (If no, explain in Remarks.')
Arc Vegetation _. -oil . or Hydrology V significantly disturbed? Are 'Normal Circumstances" present? Yes Y No
Any Vegetatrnn, Soil —W, or Hydrology naturally problematic? (II needed, explain arty answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS -- Attach site map showing sampling point locations„ transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophyuc Vegetation Present`
Hydric Sall Present's
Wetland Hydrology Present?
Remarks.
HYDROLOGY
Yes No
Yes No
Yes No
Is the Sampled Area
within a Wetland? Yes No
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary tndicators (minimum of two rec urrecil
PrlrtiaFV Indicators frninimurn of one is required check all that ar olvl
Surface Soil Cracks (86)
Surface Water (Al)
_ True Aquatic Plants 1814)
Sparsely Vegetated Concave 'Surface (B8)
High Water Table (A2)
� Hydrogen Sulkiv (]drrr (C1)
_ Drainage Patterns (810)
_ Saturation (A3)
Clxidued Rln - . on Living Boots (C3)
i_
T Moss, Trim Lines (B16)
_ Water Marks (131)
P e of Reduced Iron (CSI)
T Dry - Season Water Table (C2)
Sediment Deposits (82)
r Recent Iran Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_ Crayfish Burrows (CO)
Draft Deposits (83)
_ Thin Muck 5urfaCe (0)
_ Saturation Visible on Arlal Imagery (C9)
J Algal Mat or Crust (84)
_ Other (Exp #ain in Remarks)
_ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
_ Iron Dope
_ Geomorphic Position (D2)
Inundation Visible an Aerial Imagery (B7)
_ Shallow Aquitard (03)
Water-Stained Leaves (89)
_ Microtopographic Relief (04)
T Aquatic fauna (B13)
FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
T field observations:
Surface Water Pteseni? Yes No Depth (incites).
Water Table Present? Y No Depth (inches):.
Saturation Present? Yes No Depth (incites). Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
(includes capillary" fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available
Remarks,
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2 0

50115 oil total Cover.
sanlin Stratum (Plan size- 1
1 2 t_f
3
4.
5.
6.
909E of total cover:
Shrub Stratum (Plat size:
I . low
2.
3.
4
5
6
50% of total cover:
Herin 5 alum (Plot size:
I A) I I "t b."
2 ,vti r t1 `I4'c7 l 4 01
3
4
5
G
7
8
9.
10.
1 1.
50% of total cover: I
C;Z" - Total Cover
20DA of total cover: 10
/ �kA
r.` T 5�c
- Tolal Cover
20%, of tonal cover:
fir? / rAc
- Tonal Cover
20`x, of total cover
SAC
1L Total Cover
20'x, of lotal cover:
Woody Vine 'Stratum ;Plot size- )
2 � wit -P-+d )ct;'%U90ZILU
3.
4
= Talal cover
50% of total cover: ( 20% of total cover: '
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
Prevalence Index worksheet:
uTaI 'r, Cover olL dvlultsnly by:
08L species x 1
FACW species x 2 =
FAC species x 3 =
FACU 5pecles x 4 -
UPL species X5 -
COILJtnrn Totals (A) (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A -
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
1 - Rapid Test (or Hydrophytic Vegetation
_ 2 - Dominance Test is X50%
3 - Prevnionce. Index is 53 0'
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Reniiuks r]r on a separate sheel)
Problematic I#ydtophytre Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology roust
be present, unlr*ss disturbed or problenialic.
Definitions of Five Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding woody vines.
approximately 20 It (6 in) or more in height and 3 in,
(7,6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast (height (D8H)
Sapling - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) rx more in height and less
th�[n 3 in. (7 6 crn) DBH.
Shrub - Woody plants. excluding woody vines.
approximately 3 to 20 It (1 to 6 m) in height
Herb - All herhaceaUS (non - woody) plants, including
herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody
plants, except woody vines, less than approximately 3
(t (1 m) in height.
Woody vine All woody vines, regardless of height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation %
Present? Yes No
US Army Corps of Engineers L Nern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2 0
m ak/14 1 10,14 - 01,
AZ_— —to
VEGETATION (Five Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point:
Absolute
Dominant indicator
Dominance Test worksheet:
Tree
Stratum (Plot site I
96 Cover
Species? Status
Number of Dominant 5pucies
T
1
Z r+ r/ �� 1 .A j .1
j_�_
_ �tl
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC (A)
2
f� r ✓rl 's trr�J"
3.
3 u w, erp- -0•, A.
—
fd
Total Number of dominant
Species Across All Strata: (B)
4.
4
Percent of Dominant Species o
r
That Are OBL. FACW, or FAC y (PL/B)
6.
50115 oil total Cover.
sanlin Stratum (Plan size- 1
1 2 t_f
3
4.
5.
6.
909E of total cover:
Shrub Stratum (Plat size:
I . low
2.
3.
4
5
6
50% of total cover:
Herin 5 alum (Plot size:
I A) I I "t b."
2 ,vti r t1 `I4'c7 l 4 01
3
4
5
G
7
8
9.
10.
1 1.
50% of total cover: I
C;Z" - Total Cover
20DA of total cover: 10
/ �kA
r.` T 5�c
- Tolal Cover
20%, of tonal cover:
fir? / rAc
- Tonal Cover
20`x, of total cover
SAC
1L Total Cover
20'x, of lotal cover:
Woody Vine 'Stratum ;Plot size- )
2 � wit -P-+d )ct;'%U90ZILU
3.
4
= Talal cover
50% of total cover: ( 20% of total cover: '
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
Prevalence Index worksheet:
uTaI 'r, Cover olL dvlultsnly by:
08L species x 1
FACW species x 2 =
FAC species x 3 =
FACU 5pecles x 4 -
UPL species X5 -
COILJtnrn Totals (A) (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A -
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
1 - Rapid Test (or Hydrophytic Vegetation
_ 2 - Dominance Test is X50%
3 - Prevnionce. Index is 53 0'
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Reniiuks r]r on a separate sheel)
Problematic I#ydtophytre Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology roust
be present, unlr*ss disturbed or problenialic.
Definitions of Five Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding woody vines.
approximately 20 It (6 in) or more in height and 3 in,
(7,6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast (height (D8H)
Sapling - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) rx more in height and less
th�[n 3 in. (7 6 crn) DBH.
Shrub - Woody plants. excluding woody vines.
approximately 3 to 20 It (1 to 6 m) in height
Herb - All herhaceaUS (non - woody) plants, including
herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody
plants, except woody vines, less than approximately 3
(t (1 m) in height.
Woody vine All woody vines, regardless of height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation %
Present? Yes No
US Army Corps of Engineers L Nern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2 0

SOIL
z�
Sampling Point: &_--07,
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
tinches) Color (moist) Color (mois) % Type' Lac' Texture Remarks
7 Izl, f-3 MV $ L
(cs )r' �'_ 6 f 00 s Cf— -
'Type. C= Concentration, D= Depletion, RM =Reduced Matrix, MS=MaskedSond Grains. "Location: PL7Pore Lininp, M =Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Indicators for Problematic Hydric SoiW:
Hislasol (Al l
Dark Surface (S7)
2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
i Histic Epipedon (A2)
_ Polyvalue Below Suriace (SW (MLRA 147, 148)
_ Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
_ Black Histic (A3)
_ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
(MLRA 147, 148)
Hydrogen Serlfirlp (A4)
Loamy G$eyed Matrix (F2)
Piedmont Floodpimn Sails (F19)
i Stratified Layers (AM)
, Deploted Matrix (l"x)
(MLRA 136, 147)
2 cn1 Muck (AI0) (LRR N)
_ Redox Dark Surface (Fri)
_ Very Slial tow Dark Surface (TF12)
Doeted Below Dark Surface (At 1)
_ Depleted bark Surface (F7)
: Other (Explain in Remarks)
thick Dario Surface (Al2)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (5 1) (LRR N.
MLRA 147, 148)
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
Sandy Redox (55)
_ Stripped Matrix (S6)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type.
Redox Depressions (FE)
Iron - Manganese MassEs (F 12) (LRR N,
MLRA 136)
Umbnc Surface (F 13) (MLRA 136, 122)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA, 148)
Red Parent Material (F21J (MLRA 127, 147)
'Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must he present,
unless disturbed at problematic
Depth (inches) Hydric Soil Present? Yes
Remarks:
No
US Array Corp —, of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.17

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region Q=
Plogecl6ite P I, " 4 k CitylCounty. 1�t,Av� iWllkw)'490 Sampling Date. --)` / I— I
Applicant/Owner. # n State: /1" Li Sampling Point
Inve Agator(s) PP- iCtwAi o+�' I l l�� �+�^` Section, To wnship, Range: 1vew, 6ti"e k
Landform (hillslrpe. terrace. etc.) 190 V a 'al. Local Tebef (concave, convex. none) trVf' < 1619,_ Slope
SubWgidn (LRR or MLRA)• i,Q\ A i A+lr y 131- eG Long- r7 p 6 Datum -
Soil Map Unit Name - R--h. \ .Soon NWI classibication.
Are climatic I hydrologic condition on the site typical for this time of year? Yes __.r No (I( no, e=xplain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation S'r or Hydrology In / signifieanliy distuibed' Are "Normal Circumstances' present? Yes —Z— No
Are Vegetation find , or Hydrology nmurally problem,( ic-,' (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach[ site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydiophylic Veget anon f'resciit? Yes No Is the Sampled Area
Iiydric Soil Present? Yes No within a Wetland?
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
Re=mark,;,
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators-
Pnmary IndiCators (minimum of one is reouired: check all that apniv)
yK- Surface Water (Al)
_ True Aquatic Plants (6141
Y High water TaW, (AZ)
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor 1 C1 y
Saturation tA3)
K Oxidized Rhitospheres on Ltving Roots (C3)
Water Maas (B1I
v Presence a) Reduced tron (C4)
Sediment Deposits (132)
_ Recent Iron Reducticn in Tilled soils (C6)
Drift Deposits (1313)
T thin Muck Surface (0)
Algal Mat of Crust (84)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Iron Deposits (85)
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery IBT)
Water - Stained Leaves (139)
_ Aquatic Fauna (B13)
r; Id a
Yes No
Secondary indicators (minimum of two imuired)
Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
Sparsely Vegetated Concave SLO.Ice (88)
�.Y Drainage Patterns (1310)
Moss Trim Lines (1316)
Dry- Season water Table (C2)
Crayfish Burrows (Ca)
Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Stunled or Stressed Plants (D1)
Geomorphic Position (02)
Shallow Aquitard (D3)
_ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
FAC - Neutral Iesl (D5)
t L ' (I I v a vatlU"5: • 4
surface Water Preser l? Yes � No Depth (inches).
Water Table Present? Yes No Depth (inches): f y
Saturation Present? Yes No Depth (inches). air Weiland Hydroiogy Present? Yes No
(ineludes ramlLjry funne)
Describe Recorded Data (strearn gauge, monitoring wr_II, aerial photos. previous inspectionsl, it availabfe:
Remarks.
'7 th cA,; e iii ��� I� Lt +w� J cep .r S r le- r � �,�'�'tC SGT ` f
Lty�'fdla`71f /wit',S It -t •05tRk"_' PeiI4[or- d
US Army Corps of Engineers Lastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

4.
5.
6.
50% of total cover
Sanlinn Strattim (Plot 54e: t
1. LLir(1 +A"�!1 r.*.+w
2
3.
4
5.
6.
50% of total cover
Shrub Stratum {Plot size: t r
1. Lt4 ^()f.141, a'rf 1l6"6 61
3.
4
5
6.
I lorb Stratum (Plot site:
I C JR — 5'0
2 Vii I lr r7 life� J 4 o "
3.
4,
5.
6.
7.
8.
9,
10.
11,
Percent of Dominant Species
Thal Are OBL. FACW, or FAC (A1t31
u = T01,11 Cover Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total 2LCOver of Multroly bv.
20% of total cover: 013L species x 1 =
FACW species x 2 =
FAC species x 3 =
FACU species x 4 =
UPL species x 5 =
Column Tulals (A) (t3)
= Total Cover I
f 20% of total cover: y
50% of total cover: 1 ,7,
)
Prevalence index - BIA -
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
1 • Rapid Test for Hydroplytic Vegetation
_ 2 - Dominance Test is -50%
3 - Prevalencp Index is S3.0'
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporling
data to Remarks of on a separate sheet)
_ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
IIndicators of hydra soil and wetland hydrology muss
be present, unless disturbed or problematic
Total Cover Definitions of Five Vegetation Strata:
20% of total cover:
Tree -Woody plants, rrxcludrrrg woody vines.
approximately 20 It (6 m) or more in height and 3 in
(7.6 crn) or larger in diameter at tyeast height (DBH)
TAL -� Sapling - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 I1 (6 m) or more rn height and 10
than 3 in (7 6 cm) DBH.
Tola l Cover
50% of total coven �� 20% or total t.ovi:r ,
Wrxsdv Vine Stratum (Plot size!: fr )
I. 17 N, r lay !WI -0-I rJt 446ur
2
3,
4
Q
Shrub - Woody plants, excluding %voody vine-,.
approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) it, height
Herb - All herbaceous (non - woody) plants, inr:iuding
herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody
plants, except woody vines, less than approximately 3
It (1 m) in height
Woody vine - Ai$ woody vines. regardless of height.
5.
Hydrophyt ac
- Total Cover Vegetation
50`16 of total rover: 20% of total cover.^ Present? Yes No
Remarks. (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0
l}3c K&AA 1 if' 3 - vff
03-05 _WLT
VEGETATION (Five Strata) — Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point:
pp Absolute Doninant
O'+^adr % Cover SpgCies
Indicator
Slztus
Dominance Test worksheet:
Tree Stratum (Plot size: wS )
Number of Dorn pant species
/
(A)
1 �"}Q��te IVIrr�i_
that Are OBL. FACW, or FAC
t^9
2 A r o r R Ft r rt r^✓� �}
F>p
Total Number of Dominant
3.
Species Across All Strata:
(B)
4.
5.
6.
50% of total cover
Sanlinn Strattim (Plot 54e: t
1. LLir(1 +A"�!1 r.*.+w
2
3.
4
5.
6.
50% of total cover
Shrub Stratum {Plot size: t r
1. Lt4 ^()f.141, a'rf 1l6"6 61
3.
4
5
6.
I lorb Stratum (Plot site:
I C JR — 5'0
2 Vii I lr r7 life� J 4 o "
3.
4,
5.
6.
7.
8.
9,
10.
11,
Percent of Dominant Species
Thal Are OBL. FACW, or FAC (A1t31
u = T01,11 Cover Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total 2LCOver of Multroly bv.
20% of total cover: 013L species x 1 =
FACW species x 2 =
FAC species x 3 =
FACU species x 4 =
UPL species x 5 =
Column Tulals (A) (t3)
= Total Cover I
f 20% of total cover: y
50% of total cover: 1 ,7,
)
Prevalence index - BIA -
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
1 • Rapid Test for Hydroplytic Vegetation
_ 2 - Dominance Test is -50%
3 - Prevalencp Index is S3.0'
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporling
data to Remarks of on a separate sheet)
_ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
IIndicators of hydra soil and wetland hydrology muss
be present, unless disturbed or problematic
Total Cover Definitions of Five Vegetation Strata:
20% of total cover:
Tree -Woody plants, rrxcludrrrg woody vines.
approximately 20 It (6 m) or more in height and 3 in
(7.6 crn) or larger in diameter at tyeast height (DBH)
TAL -� Sapling - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 I1 (6 m) or more rn height and 10
than 3 in (7 6 cm) DBH.
Tola l Cover
50% of total coven �� 20% or total t.ovi:r ,
Wrxsdv Vine Stratum (Plot size!: fr )
I. 17 N, r lay !WI -0-I rJt 446ur
2
3,
4
Q
Shrub - Woody plants, excluding %voody vine-,.
approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) it, height
Herb - All herbaceous (non - woody) plants, inr:iuding
herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody
plants, except woody vines, less than approximately 3
It (1 m) in height
Woody vine - Ai$ woody vines. regardless of height.
5.
Hydrophyt ac
- Total Cover Vegetation
50`16 of total rover: 20% of total cover.^ Present? Yes No
Remarks. (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Sails':
Histosol (Ai)
Sampling Pointy � �S
Profile Description.
(Describe
to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm
the absence of indicators.)
Depth
Migrix
(MLRA 147, 148)
Redox Features
_ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (f 21
(iinche5l
Galva (n9 jst)
%
Color (moist) 1t Type' Loc'
Texlu/re% Remarks
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
f
^ Depleted Dark Surface (F 7)
, Other (Explain in Remarks)
1 hick Dark Surface (Al2)
Redox Depressions (FE)
f.�
f d It f r l lr1 '`�1
�j (L
MLRA 147, 148)
MLRA 136)
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (54)
Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122)
'Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Sandy Redox (55)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Sails (F 19) (MLRA 148)
wetland hydrology must be present.
'Type. C= Concentration, D= Depletion, RM= Reduced Matrix, MS= Masked Sand Grains- 2Location: PL =Pore Lininq, M= Matrix
Hydric Sail Indicators:
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Sails':
Histosol (Ai)
_ Dark Surface (S7)
2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
Hishc Epipedon (A2)
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
_ Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
Black Hisfic (A3)
i Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
(MLRA 147, 148)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (f 21
_ Piedmont F loodplain Soils (F 19)
Stratified Layers (A5)
Depleted Matrix (r3)
(MLRA 1311, 147)
2 cm Muck (AID) (LRR N)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
^ Depleted Dark Surface (F 7)
, Other (Explain in Remarks)
1 hick Dark Surface (Al2)
Redox Depressions (FE)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N,
_ Iron-Manganese Masses (F 12) (LRR N,
MLRA 147, 148)
MLRA 136)
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (54)
Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122)
'Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Sandy Redox (55)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Sails (F 19) (MLRA 148)
wetland hydrology must be present.
_ Stripped MaInx (S£)
_ Red Parprit Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147)
unless disturbed or problematic
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
ryw
Depth (inches)
Hydric Soil Present? yes No
Remarks.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2,0

L'kA,4 +f, 13 -- Uf
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region P7! '/A to
Pro)eclisite P � I �♦� -rte ri''G k i[-ra r " CityiCounty lt-plUsu'� elLo1 kw;k" Sampling Date: �lS���Y��
Applicant/Dwne( IV C E e19 State: t'C Sampling Point:
Investigator(,) AY I ca*H% %!- UCtrr.�c7c- Section, Township. Rangw 0(e4_ I f'4.'4
Landform (hillslape. terrace, etc_): tiiel'7/.� Local re1e (concave. convex. none). �uC ce -- Slope {��jl _may - -
Suhregion (LRR or MLRA)- LML-0 ikL(lA -1W Lar. $G. �� 3+�c Long 4 �' Datum , JA% VJ If)
Soil Map Unit Name: .. kr4." NWI classification:
Are climatic I hydrologic conditions on the site typical [ this time of year? Yes � No (I[ no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation _/y , or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are `Normal Circumstances' present? Yes _�_ No
Are Vegetation A, Soil A . or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transacts, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No---- Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Stall Present? Yes No within a Wetland?
Weiland Hydrology Present? Yes No 1r..
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Welland Hydrology Indicators_
Primary Indicators frninimum of one is required: check all that aoolvl
Surface Water (A1) _
True Aquatic Plants (614)
High Water Table (A2)
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
Saturation (A3) �
Oxidized Rhizospheras an Living Roots (0)
Water Marks (8))
Presence of Reduced Iron (CI)
_ Sediment Deposits (82)
Iran F2edUCtlGn -- OrlS {C}
Drift Deposits (133) �Recent
ur ace (0)
Algal Mat or Crust (B4)
er (Explain in Remarks)
Iron Deposits (gs)
loundalion Visible rial Imagery (B7)
Water - Leaves (139)
_ Aquatic Foom (1313)
Field Qbsr Lions:
Surtece Wole3r Present? Yes No
DoIAh (niches):
Water Table Present? Yes No 4
Depth (incdies)
Yes No
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
_ Surface Soil Cracks (86)
Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (BB)
_ Drainage Pattefns (13101
Moss Trirn Lines (B16)
}
Dry-Season Water Table (C2)
Crayfish Burrows (C8)
Saturation visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
_ Goomorphic Position (132)
_ Shallow Aquilard (D3)
_ Microtapographic Relief (D4)
FAC- Neulrai rest (()5)
Saturation Present? Yes No ' _ Depth (inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes
! [includes capllafy Iringej
escribe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks
No_L/_
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2 (l

Sanlina Stratum (Pl01 Sias:
1
2.
3
4.
5,
6.
I`1 � • Total Cover
50% of total cover: � 20% of total cover:_
)
5094 of total cover
Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 1
1 CA -01f -W 5 C-Wld f,.4 r fa 1-0,
3. uv jr1J -O'S
4
5.
6
20 - Total Cover 4f
—
Herb of total cover 10 20% of total cover r
}
Herb Stratum (Plat swe:
I. C -c�
2 M4ti- �94��L�aiM
3 U 4 1(l 1A Wit
4.
5.
6.
7.
t3
9.
10
1t
= Total Cover
20% of total cover:
TWO
1.
ILE-
Total Cover
5096 of total waver: I Q 2o% of total cover:
Wood Vine. tratum (Plot size- ) V
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
Total Cover
50% of total cover-, 20% of total cover
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total -% Gnvr =r of
MuFaoly bv:
121 13 - U P
x 1
FACW species
/ T /?,k 4"o
x 2 =
3o
FAC species
Sampling Point:
VEGETATION (Five Strata) - Use scientific
names of
plants.
x4 -
r
Absolute
Roninant Indicator
Dominance Test worksheet:
Tree S[raturn (Plot size �uu r.1, I
%C
/
S ci Status
Number of Dominant Species
1 .• a C0 ,A
i
7
That Are DBL. FACW. or FAC
iA)
2
* �0 j 419! 11✓
3, W r % -P-r9 S +,$k
I/
Dominant
Species Across All Sirata
(B)
5 i
Percent of Oominant Species
'7 y�`y9
/
That Are 08L. FACW, or FAC.
(AJB)
6.
Sanlina Stratum (Pl01 Sias:
1
2.
3
4.
5,
6.
I`1 � • Total Cover
50% of total cover: � 20% of total cover:_
)
5094 of total cover
Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 1
1 CA -01f -W 5 C-Wld f,.4 r fa 1-0,
3. uv jr1J -O'S
4
5.
6
20 - Total Cover 4f
—
Herb of total cover 10 20% of total cover r
}
Herb Stratum (Plat swe:
I. C -c�
2 M4ti- �94��L�aiM
3 U 4 1(l 1A Wit
4.
5.
6.
7.
t3
9.
10
1t
= Total Cover
20% of total cover:
TWO
1.
ILE-
Total Cover
5096 of total waver: I Q 2o% of total cover:
Wood Vine. tratum (Plot size- ) V
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
Total Cover
50% of total cover-, 20% of total cover
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total -% Gnvr =r of
MuFaoly bv:
QBL species
x 1
FACW species
d
+7-
x 2 =
3o
FAC species
x 3
f 0
FACU spectes
x4 -
UPL Species
x 5 =
Colunin Tislals:Cx
(A)
(13)
Prevalence Index = B1A - 3• Q 5-
Hydrophytic Vegetaemn Indicators:
I • Rapid Insl for Hydrophytic Vegetation
2 - Dominance Test is >50`f@
3 - Prevalence Index is $30'
_ 4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
_ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation" (Explain)
'indicators of hyddc soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Five Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding woody vines.
approximately 20 fl (6 m) or more in helgtmt and 3 in.
(7 -6 cm) or larger In dlarneter at breast height (138H)
Sapling - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 2011 (6 m) or more in height and less
than 3 in (T 6 crn) DBH
Shrub - Woody plants. excluding woody vines,
approximately 3 to 20 It (1 to 6 m) to height
Herb - All herbaceous (non-woody) plants including
herbaceous vines, regardless of sire. and woody
plants, except woody vines. less than approximately 3
fi (1 m) In Insight.
Woody vine - All woody vines, regardless of height
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes No
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL
kl' e H'..4) 1 f d 3+ V
Sampling Point: '/0j/ +- 4/0
Profple Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
f hest Color moist Color fmoistl % Tv[-e' l tac` Texture Remarks
X61) C,C-
�e�� Ir U to y' f d a C. i-
`Tyne: C- Concentration, D =Depletion, RWReduced Matrix, MS=MaskedSand Grain:. Location, PL =Pore Lining, M= Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Indicators For Problematic. Hydric 'Soils':
Iivstosoi (A1)
_ Dark Surface (S7)
_ 2 can Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
Histic Epipecfon (A2)
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
_ Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
_
Black Histic (A3)
_
_ Than Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
(MLRA 147, 148)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_ Loamy Gieyed Matrix (F2)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F 19)
Stratified Layers (A5)
_ Depleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136, 147)
c 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
I hick Clark Surface (Al 2)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (51) (LRR N.
MLRA 147, 148)
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
_ Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Stripped Matrix (S6)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type.
Redox Depressions (FE)
Iron - Manganese Masses (F 12) (LRR N.
MLRA 135)
Umbnc Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 12 2)
Piedmont Floodplain Sails (F19) (MLRA 148)
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127. 147)
'Indicators of hydiophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present.
unless disturbed or problematic
Depth (inches]. Hydric Soil Present? Yes
Remarks:
Nge-
US ,Army Corps of Engineers. Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

Mitigation Project Name
Flintrock Farm
EEP IMS ID
440
River Basin
CAPE FEAR
Cataloging Unit
03030002
Applied Credit Ratios:
Beginning Balance (feet and acres)
Beginning Balance (mitigation credits)
NCDOT Pre -EEP .leads (reef ana acres): 1 14ot Applicable
EEP Debits (feet and acres):
DWQ Permit No
USACE Action IDs Impact Project Name
NCDOT TIP U- 2524BA / BB -
2001 -1318
2002 -21216 Greensboro Western Loop
NCDOT TIP 1 -2402A / B / D - 1-
1998 -0349
1995 -02886 85 Greensboro Bypass
2004 -0565
2004 -20288 Burlington Commercial Site
NCDOT TIP U -3110 - Cook
2002 -1105
1997 -00602 Road
1997 - 00923/ 1997
UI :c
+
00924/ 1997-
1997 -0588
00925 Ashley Downs, Olive Chapel
Lake Townsend Dam
2007 -0410
2007 - 00895 -241 Replacement
1998 -1002
Durham Regional Mall
E -22 Elementary School
2007 -0503
2008 -00035 Access /Mills Park Drive
.2
2' N
0
NCDOT TIP 1 -2402A / B / D - 1-
1998 -0349
1995 -02886 85 Greensboro Bypass
Remaining Balance (feet and acres)
O U
Remaining Balance (mitigation
credits)
*NOTE: Buffer breakdown:
= c
W W
Rural non - subject
30 - 100 feet 162,034 @ 5:1 = 32,406.8
100 - 200 feet 59,039 @ 10:1 = 5,903.9
Rural subject
30 - 100 feet 492,293 @ 10:1 = 49,229.3
1:1 1.5:1 2.5:1 5:1 1:1 3:1 2:1 5:1 1:1 3:1 2:1 5:1 1:1 3:1 2:1 5:1 Various
100 - 200 feet 22,697 @ 20:1 = 1,134.85
736,063 sq ft = 88,674.85 credits
3,000.00
86.00
304.00
417.24
1,620.66
324.130
22.590
0.002
2.175
3.884
2.890
0.000
0.000
0.19
0.038
736,063.00
88,674.85
Information from EEP Debit Ledger dated 04/20/2015
'« E C
E E E
E
C
o
C p
UI :c
+
m ?
m
d
L
it
y N q
y L
y N
d
.2
2' N
0
O
U!
O N
O U
C M
O
C N
O `
N
O N M Vl m y N
U @ L M d
d`
= c
W W
a
�
=
W
a`
zit
z
z =
W
za
oIr o o c oa
U U U W U
736,063.0
5,427.90
31.54
0.19
1,085.58
�
6.308
0.038
88,674.85
I
100 - 200 feet 22,697 @ 20:1 = 1,134.85
736,063 sq ft = 88,674.85 credits
3,000.00
86.00
304.00
417.24
1,620.66
324.130
22.590
0.002
2.175
3.884
2.890
0.000
0.000
0.19
0.038
736,063.00
88,674.85
Information from EEP Debit Ledger dated 04/20/2015