The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About20151022 Ver 1_Application_20150929aM.STAT�'o� � . , � � � � �J� a� Quun �• STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION PAT L. MCCRORY GOVEILVOR September 30, 2015 U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Regulatory Field Office 151 Patton Avenue, Room 208 Asheville, NC 28801-5006 ATTN: Mr. Steve Kichefski NCDOT Coordinator ANTHONY 1. TATA SECRETARY Subject: Application for Section 404 Nationwide Permits 23, 33, Section 401 Water Quality Certification and Catawba River Mainstem Buffer Certiiication for the Proposed Bridge Replacement on SR 1302 over Lake Norman, Iredell County, Federal Aid Project No. BRZ-1302(41); Division 12; TIP No. B-5142; $570.00 debit WBS No. 42303.1.1. Dear Madam: The North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) proposes to replace bridge number 57 on SR 1302 over Lake Norman/Cornelius Creek in Iredell County with a 3 span, 200' concrete girder bridge on a new alignment to the north. The existing bridge will be utilized as an onsite detour during construction. There will be 162 lf (0.67ac) of permanent impacts to surface waters consisting of rock embankment and excavation for the new bridge. There will be no temporary impacts to surface waters resulting from this action. This project will result in 12,598 square feet of allowable impacts to the Catawba River Mainstem riparian buffer from roadway fill. No mitigation is required for the permanent surface water impacts nor for the buffer impacts for this project. Please see enclosed copies of the Pre-Consh�uction Notification (PCN), US Fish and Wildlife Concurrence Letter, Stormwater Management Plan, Permit Drawings, Buffer Drawings and Roadway Plansheets. A Categorical Exclusion (CE) was completed in April 2014 and distributed shortly thereafter. Additional copies are available upon request. MAILING ADDRESS: LOCATION: NC DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION TELEPHONE: 919-707-6000 CENTURY CENTER, BUILDING B PROJECT DEVELOPMENT S� ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS UNIT FAX: 919-212-5785 "I OZO BIRCH RIDGE DRIVE 1598 MAIL SERVICE CENTER RALEIGH NC 27610 Rn�ei�tt NC 27699-1548 WEBSITE:NCDOT.GOV This project calls for a letting date of January 19, 2016 and a review date of December 1, 2015; however, the let date may advance as additional funding becomes available. A letter from USFWS dated September 17, 2015, granted concurrence for the northern long-eared bat and Indiana bat with a call of May Affect, Not Likely to Adversely Affect for both species and a tree cutting moratorium was issued for the project extending from April 15 to August 15. A copy of this permit application and its distribution list will be posted on the NCDOT Website at: http://connect.ncdot.gov/resources/Environmental. If you have any questions or need additional information, please call Jeff Hemphill at (919) 707-6126. Sincerely, �,`�`�=-.__. . _ -- _ _ ___.�.� __a.._._...._ _ _ � �r Richard W. Hancock, P.E., Manager Project Development and Environmental Analysis Unit cc: NCDOT Permit Application Standard Distribution List �o� vvArE�,� Office Use Only: � � 4 � Corps action ID no. i�. � i � r DWQ project no. ° � Form Version 1.3 Dec 10 2008 Pre-Construction Notification (PCN) Form A. Applicant Information 1. Processing 1 a. Type(s) of approval sought from the Corps: � Section 404 Permit ❑ Section 10 Permit 1 b. Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: 23,33 or General Permit (GP) number: 1c. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps? � Yes ❑ No 1d. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply): � 401 Water Quality Certification — Regular ❑ Non-404 Jurisdictional General Permit ❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Express � Riparian Buffer Authorization 1 e. Is this notification solely for the record For the record only for DWQ 401 For the record only for Corps Permit: because written approval is not required? Certification: � Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes � No 1f. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in-lieu fee program proposed for mitigation � Yes � No of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank or in-lieu fee program. 1g. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1 h ❑ Yes � No below. 1 h. Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)? ❑ Yes � No 2. Project Information 2a. Name of project: Replacement of Bridge 57 over Cornelius Creek (Lake Norman) on SR 1302 (Cornelius Road) 2b. County: Iredell 2c. Nearest municipality / town: Mooresville 2d. Subdivision name: not applicable 2e. NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state g_5142 project no: 3. Owner Information 3a. Name(s) on Recorded Deed: North Carolina Department of Transportation 3b. Deed Book and Page No. not applicable 3c. Responsible Party (for LLC if not applicable applicable): 3d. Street address: 1598 Mail Service Center 3e. City, state, zip: Raleigh, NC 27699-1598 3f. Telephone no.: (919) 707-6126 3g. Fax no.: (919) 212-5785 3h. Email address: jhemphill@ncdot.gov 4. Applicant Information (if different from owner) 4a. Applicant is: ❑ Agent ❑ Other, specify: 4b. Name: not applicable 4c. Business name (if applicable): 4d. Street address: 4e. City, state, zip: 4f. Telephone no.: 4g. Fax no.: 4h. Email address: 5. Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable) 5a. Name: not applicable 5b. Business name (if applicable): 5c. Street address: 5d. City, state, zip: 5e. Telephone no.: 5f. Fax no.: 5g. Email address: B. Project Information and Prior Project History 1. Property Identification 1a. Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID): not applicable 1 b. Site coordinates (in decimal degrees): Latitude: 35.62640 Longitude: - 80.86650 (DD.DDDDDD) (-DD.DDDDDD) 1 c. Property size: 8.5 acres 2. Surface Waters 2a. Name of nearest body of water (stream, river, etc.) to Cornelius Creek (Lake Norman) proposed project: 2b. Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water: WS-IV; B;CA 2c. River basin: Catawba 3. Project Description 3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this application: Forest communities, agriculture, historic mill site, minor residential development 3b. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property: 0.0 acre 3c. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property: N/A 3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project: To replace a structurally deficient and functionally obsolete bridge. 3e. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used: The project involves replacing a 5 span 200-foot I beam bridge with a 200-foot, 3-span concrete girder bridge on a new alignment to the north with the existing bridge utilized as an onsite detour. Standard road building equipment, such as trucks, dozers, and cranes will be used. 4. Jurisdictional Determinations 4a. Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property / project (including all prior phases) in the past? ❑ Yes � No ❑ Unknown Comments: 4b. If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type of determination was made? ❑ Preliminary ❑ Final 4c. If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas? Agency/Consultant Company: Name (if known): Other: 4d. If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation. 5. Project History 5a. Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for � Yes � No ❑ Unknown this project (including all prior phases) in the past? 5b. If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions. 6. Future Project Plans 6a. Is this a phased project? ❑ Yes � No 6b. If yes, explain. C. Proposed Impacts Inventory 1. Impacts Summary 1a. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply): ❑ Wetlands ❑ Streams - tributaries � Buffers � Open Waters ❑ Pond Construction 2. Wetland Impacts If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted. 2a. 2b. 2c. 2d. 2e. 2f. Wetland impact Type of jurisdiction number — Type of impact Type of wetland Forested (Corps - 404, 10 Area of impact Permanent (P) or (if known) DWQ — non-404, other) (acres) Tem orar T Site 1❑ P � T ❑ Yes ❑ Corps ❑ No ❑ DWQ Site 2❑ P❑ T ❑ Yes ❑ Corps ❑ No ❑ DWQ Site 3❑ P � T ❑ Yes ❑ Corps ❑ No ❑ DWQ Site 4❑ P � T ❑ Yes ❑ Corps ❑ No ❑ DWQ Site 1❑ P❑ T ❑ Yes ❑ Corps Utility Impacts ❑ No ❑ DWQ 2g. Total wetland impacts 2h. Comments: 3. Stream Impacts If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this question for all stream sites impacted. 3a. 3b. 3c. 3d. 3e. 3f. 3g. Stream impact Type of impact Stream name Perennial Type of Average �mpact length number - (PER) or jurisdiction stream (linear feet) Permanent (P) or intermittent (Corps - 404, 10 width Temporary (T) (INT)? DWQ — non-404, (feet) other) Site 1❑ P � T ❑ PER � Corps ❑ INT ❑ DWQ Site 1❑ P 0 T ❑ PER ❑ Corps ❑ INT ❑ DWQ Site 2❑ P❑ T ❑ PER ❑ Corps ❑ INT ❑ DWQ Site 3❑ P � T ❑ PER ❑ Corps ❑ INT ❑ DWQ Site 4❑ P � T ❑ PER ❑ Corps ❑ INT ❑ DWQ Site 5❑ P 0 T ❑ PER ❑ Corps ❑ INT ❑ DWQ 3h. Total stream and tributary impacts 0 Perm 0 Temp 3i. Comments: 4. Open Water Impacts If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of the U.S. then individuall list all o en water im acts below. 4a. 4b. 4c. 4d. 4e. Open water Name of impact number— waterbody Type of impact Waterbody type Area of impact (acres) Permanent (P) or (if applicable) Temporary T 01 � P � T Lake Norman Roadway fill Lake 0.67 02 ❑POT 03 ❑P�T 04 ❑P�T 4f. Total open water impacts 0.67ac Permanent 0 Temporary 4g. Comments: 5. Pond or Lake Construction If pond or lake construction roposed, then complete the chart below. 5a. 5b. 5c. 5d. 5e. Wetland Impacts (acres) Stream Impacts (feet) Upland Pond ID Proposed use or (acres) number purpose of pond Excavat Flooded Filled ed Flooded Filled Excavated Flooded P1 P2 5f. Total 5g. Comments: 5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required? ❑ Yes ❑ No If yes, permit ID no: 5i. Expected pond surface area (acres): 5j. Size of pond watershed (acres): 5k. Method of construction: 6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ) If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer im acts below. If an im acts re uire miti ation, then ou MUST fill out Section D of this form. 6a. ❑ Neuse ❑ Tar-Pamlico ❑ Other: Project is in which protected basin? � Catawba ❑ Randleman 6b. 6c. 6d. 6e. 6f. 6g. Buffer impact number — Reason for impact Buffer Zone 1 impact Zone 2 impact Permanent (P) or Stream name mitigation (square feet) (square feet) Tem orar T) re uired? B1 � P❑ T Bridge/Roadway ❑ Yes g,356 4,242 Embankment � No B2 ❑P❑T ❑Yes ❑ No B3 ❑P❑T ❑Yes ❑ No 6h. Total buffer impacts 8,356 4,242 6i. Comments: D. Impact Justification and Mitigation 1. Avoidance and Minimization 1a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project. See Stormwater Management Plan. Existing roadway drainage consists of grass shoulders with ditches. Existing ditches flow through buffers in grass swales to lake. Proposed roadway includes hazardous spill basin / dry detention basins that collect roadway drainage and discharge on each side of bridge. The existing bridge will be utilized as an onsite detour. 1 b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques. Best Management Practices for Surface Waters will be used during all phases of construction. 2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State 2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for ❑ Yes � No impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State? ❑ DWQ ❑ Corps ❑ Mitigation bank 2c. If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this project? ❑ Payment to in-lieu fee program ❑ Permittee Responsible Mitigation 3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank 3a. Name of Mitigation Bank: not applicable 3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter) Type Quantity 3c. Comments: 4. Complete if Making a Payment to In-lieu Fee Program 4a. Approval letter from in-lieu fee program is attached. ❑ Yes 4b. Stream mitigation requested: 0 linear feet 4c. If using stream mitigation, stream temperature: ❑ warm ❑ cool ❑cold 4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only): 0 square feet 4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested: 0 acres 4f. Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested: 0 acres 4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested: 0 acres 4h. Comments: 5. Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan 5a. If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan. 6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) — required by DWQ 6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires ❑ Yes � No buffer mitigation? 6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the amount of mitigation required. 6c. 6d. 6e. Zone Reason for impact Total impact Multiplier Required mitigation (square feet) (square feet) Zone 1 Zone 2 6f. Total buffer mitigation required: 6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank, permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in-lieu fee fund). 6h. Comments: E. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ) 1. Diffuse Flow Plan 1 a. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified � Yes ❑ No within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules? 1 b. If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why. � Yes ❑ No Comments: 2. Stormwater Mana ement Plan 2a. What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project? N/A 2b. Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan? � Yes ❑ No 2c. If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why: 2d. If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative description of the plan: See attached. ❑ Certified Local Government 2e. Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan? ❑ DWQ Stormwater Program � DWQ 401 Unit 3. Certified Local Government Stormwater Review 3a. In which local governmenYs jurisdiction is this project? not applicable ❑ Phase II 3b. Which of the following locally-implemented stormwater management programs ❑ NSW apply (check all that apply): NA ❑ USMP ❑ Water Supply Watershed ❑ Other: 3c. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been ❑ Yes NA ❑ No attached? 4. DWQ Stormwater Pro ram Review ❑ Coastal counties 4a. Which of the following state-implemented stormwater management programs apply ❑ HQW (check all that apply): ❑ ORW ❑ Session Law 2006-246 ❑ Other: 4b. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been attached? ❑ Yes ❑ No NA 5. DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review 5a. Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements? ❑ Yes ❑ No NA 5b. Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met? ❑ Yes ❑ No NA F. Supplementary Information 1. Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement) 1 a. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the � Yes ❑ No use of public (federal/state) land? 1 b. If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State � Yes ❑ No (North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)? 1 c. If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter.) � Yes ❑ No Comments: 2. Violations (DWQ Requirement) 2a. Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards, ❑ Yes � No or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)? 2b. Is this an after-the-fact permit application? ❑ Yes � No 2c. If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s): 3. Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement) 3a. Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in ❑ Yes additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality? � No 3b. If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description. Due to the minimal transportation impact resulting from this bridge replacement, this project will neither influence nearby land uses nor stimulate growth. Therefore, a detailed indirect or cumulative effects study will not be necessary. 4. Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement) 4a. Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility. not applicable 10 5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement) 5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or � Yes ❑ No habitat? 5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act � Yes ❑ No impacts? ❑ Raleigh 5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted. � Asheville 5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical Habitat? N.C. Natural Heritage Program database; USFWS-website; biological surveys for protected species listed for Iredell County, which includes Dwarf-flower heartleaf. Biological Conclusions of "No EffecY' were rendered for this species. Habitat for the species exists, but surveys conducted in the study area in 2009, 2011 and 2014 resulted in no specimens being found. An eagle survey was conducted in 2014 with no nests observed. Concurrence was received for the NLEB from USFWS on September 17, 2015 with a call of MANLTAA and a tree cutting moratorium from April 15 to August 15. 6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement) 6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat? ❑ Yes � No 6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat? NMFS County Index 7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement) 7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation � Yes � No status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in North Carolina history and archaeology)? 7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources? NEPA Documentation 8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement) 8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA-designated 100-year floodplain? � Yes ❑ No 8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements: NCDOT Hydraulics Unit coordination with FEMA 8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination? FEMA Maps � - � . . � �,�� -- �..� � _... . ( Richard W. Hancock, P.E. �----�`� ` " ' � :° --_. _.1V ... . Applicant/Agent's Printed Name Applicant/AgenYs Signature Date (AgenYs signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant is rovided. 11 United States Department of the Interior FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE Asheville Field Office 160 Zillicoa Street Asl�eville, North Carolina 28801 September 17, 2015 Mr. Richard W. Hancock North Carolina Department of Transportation Project Development and Environmental Analysis Unit 1598 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1598 Subject: Endangered Species Concurrence for the Proposed Replacement of Bridge No. 57 on SR 1302 over Lake Norman, Iredell County, North Carolina. TIP B-5142, WBS No. 42303.1.1. Dear Richard: We have reviewed your concurrence request and supporting documentation regarding impacts to the federally listed threatened northern long-eared bat (NLEB) (Myotis septentrionalis) for the subject project. We provide the following comments in accordance with the provisions of section 7 of the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended (16 U.S.C. 1531-1543) (Act). The North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) proposes to replace Bridge No 57 over Lake Norman. Some habitat for the NLEB exists in the vicinity of the project and has been evaluated for potential impacts from project implementation. According to the information provided, a search for mines and caves was conducted in the project footprint and within a quarter mile of the project and none were found. The existing bridge was checked for bat use and none was observed. Potential summer roosting habitat clearing is estimated at 0.56 acres. Based on the absence of wintering habitat, no evidence of bat use on the existing structure, and NCDOT's commitment to restrict tree cutting to the time from August 15 to April 15 (of any year) we agree that implementation of this project is "not likely to adversely affect" NLEB in the project area. In view of this, we believe the requirements under Section 7(c) of the Act are fulfilled. However, obligations under Section 7 of the Act must be reconsidered if: (1) new information reveals impacts of this identified action that may affect listed species or critical habitat in a manner not previously considered, (2) this action is subsequently modified in a manner that was not considered in this review, or (3) a new species is listed or critical habitat is determined that may be affected by the identified action. If you have questions about these comments, please contact Ms. Marella Buncick of our staff at 828/258-3939, Ext. 237. In any future correspondence concerning this project, please reference our Log No. 4-2-15-137. Sincerely, - - o�^iginal signed - - Janet Mizzi Field Supervisor E lif;lltt �l)' North Carolina Department of Transportation St[�a 1ZI�vi�t+f'!' Highway Stormwater Program � STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PLAN (Version 2.0; Released April 2014) FOR NCDOT PROJECTS WBS Element: 42303.1.1 TIP No.: B-5142 County ies): Iredell Page 1 of 2 General Project Information WBS Element: 42303.1.1 TIP Number: B-5142 Project T pe: Brid e Replacement Date: 3/5/2015 NCDOT Contact: Shawn Harris Contractor / Designer: Steven Bondor, Stantec Consultin Inc Address: NCDOT Hydraulics Unit Address: 5565 Centerview Drive, Suite 107 1020 Birch Ridge Road Raleigh, NC 27606 Ralei h, NC 27610 Phone: 919-707-6725 Phone: 919-532-2305 Email: shawnharris ncdot. ov Email: steven.bondor stantec.com Cit /Town: Mooresville Count ies : Iredell River Basin(s): Catawba CAMA County? No Wetlands within Project Limits? No Pro'ect Description Project Len th lin. miles or feet : 2300 ft Surrounding Land Use: rural / residential Proposed Pro'ect Existin Site Pro'ect Built-U on Area ac. 2.3 ac. 1.3 ac. Typical Cross Section Description: two 12' travel lanes with 4' paved shoulder two 11' travel lanes Annual Avg Daily Traffic (veh/hrlday): Design/Future: 10,884 / 17,800 Year: 2016 / 2035 Existing: Year: General Project Narrative: Existing roadway drainage consists of grass shoulders with ditches. Existing ditches flow through buffers in grass swales to lake. Existing bridge includes 3" diameter deck drains (Description of Minimization of Water at approximate 6' spacing. Proposed roadway includes hazardous spill basin / dry detention basins that collect roadway drainage and discharge on each side of bridge. Quality Impacts) Proposed bridge does not include deck drains. Roadway includes shoulder berm gutter, pipe system, and ditches directing runoff to the basins. Outfall structure at the basins include sluice gates and pipes with riprap aprons located upstream of buffer zones. Remainder of roadway drainage consists of grass ditches draining to existing outfalls. Waterbod Information Surface Water Body (1): Lake Norman / Cornelius Creek NCDWR Stream Index No.: 11-88- 2) NCDWR Surface Water Classification for Water Body Primar Classification: Water Su I IV WS-IV Supplemental Classification: None Other Stream Classification: Impairments: ThreatenedlEndan ered S ecies? Comments: NRTR Stream ID: Buffer Rules in Effect: Catawba Pro'ect Includes Brid e S annin Water Bod ? Yes Deck Drains Dischar e Over Buffer? No Dissi ator Pads Provided in Buffer? N/A Deck Drains Discharge Over Water Bod ? No (If yes, provide justification in the General Project Narrative) (If yes, describe in the General Project Narrative; if no, justify in the (If yes, provide justification in the General Project Narrative) General Project Narrative) 1 li,t;l�\�'i11,' North Carolina Department of Transportation Sii]Y11Y�v`dt�Y Highway Stormwater Program _. �" STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PLAN (Version 2.0; Released April 2014) FOR NCDOT PROJECTS WBS Element: 42303.1.1 TIP No.: B-5142 County(ies): Iredell Page 2 of 2 Other Best Management Practices New Built-Upon Precipitation Depth Stations (Road Projects) or Surface Drainage Area Area Volume Treated Treated over NBUA BMP Associated Sheet No. Coordinates (Non-Road Projects Water Body BMP Type (ac) (ac) (ac-ft) in w/ Buffer Rules? 5 -L- 17+34 RT (1)Lake Norman Dry Detention Basin 2.3 0.8 0.07 1.06 Yes / Cornelius 5 -L- 24+50 RT (1)Lake Norman Dry Detention Basin 1.2 0.6 0.05 1.05 Yes / Cornelius Additional Comments P Q' � m m � � Ki :A � � � � � � � � v, � z �� v�° � �� v� ��w � ��a �n�z >c�� n�nw �� n�� sr, f» v, �� N ch � I � ., � V W O � � � � N �O �O O V • � � V � � O V See Sheet 1-A For Index of Sheets � ' I ' �v ' I � I � (�l I �� \► � (�l l�' ' I ' I_I ( � �v I�' (�l I I V � �\ ..'....'T .......,..... I 9TAT6 I 61'ATB P0.018CT 0.6P6RSNC8 N0. � DP1CR1%'ION PE rW, UTIL �ONST. �� `' �,�� PLANS lVCT10N Prepo�ed in tl� Office of: �'DRAULICS ENGINEER GRAPHIC SCALES DESIGN DATA PROJECT LENGTH ADT 2016 = l0,saa DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS $� 2$ 0 $0 ��0 7000 Birch Ridge Or., Ra[eigh NC, 27610 p��Y� ADT 2036 = 18,164 LENGTH OF ROADWAY TIP PROJECT B-5142 = 0.405 MILES ,��.� c,� K= 12 % zoiz szaNnnrzD srec�Ficazioxs �a � �� PLANS � g D= 70 % LENGTH OF STRUCTURE TIP PROJECT B-5142 = 0.038 MILES srcNazuas: PE � � 50 25 0 50 l00 T= 4 %* RIGHT OF WAY DATE: JASON MOORE. P.E. � � V= 60 MPH JANUARY 29, 2015 PROlECr sxcrNeen ROADWAY DESIGN ° PROFILE HORIZONTAL * ENGINEER ��°�.� �� ( ) TTST = 3 DUAL 1 TOTAL LENGTH OF TIP PROJECT B-5142 = 0.443 MILES r �o 5 2.5 0 l0 20 FUNC CLASS = LETTING DATE: BRYAN KEY, P.E. �� pA�� COII@CtOf JANUARY 19, �LO�6 PROJECT DESIGN ENGINEER PROFILE (VERTICAL) SUB—REGIONAL TIER PE SIGNAT[/RE: �DENOTES IMPACTS IN SURFACE WATER � � O ,/- / / //' �� j / �� - 4\ �e �, \ ". � � o � �\ � a (V N / /// ��1 i� i� � 1 ��.. f j �.� - y � � O N� i" NC GRID NAD 83/NSRS 2007 O PERMIT DRAWING SHEET 2 OF 8 � ..� = C � C � � � � A�i / � � C F �d � c � � ` � �� - � � � � � �A GF � �F i - - �� F � - - - � F F �;� �// �� c � � GRADE TO D2AIN TO E%ISTING DITCH / � � � F` f`—' /� ./ g q u�. uiau+ cawsiE, O V _ � ' . ylOEn CONSifi1C1qN � ` � � m � �/ / � O C��a*� � T inE� uoEp ca+s,nucra" �14��t ,�y � � DRY DETENTIOI� !NAZARDOUS SPILL BASIN / _� /r �� SEE DETAIL SF{f@�T 2D-Ol DDE=226CY � / d�� ,,�`' ; �, � � �� / �pS N��EIb�F��"�,��` �'\ �/ � � / \ � '' \ `/ / � � � /� %' \\ / / \ �-� / � , � / / � `�\ / /// .� \ / �\ ��/ � �� \� / � � - - --- � �� i � �i � � �� i \ � \�� : !� �� . . ,, ;�'; - '. �\ �� -v�� m^' , L! �c mti P(� �JS �` •.. /,y PU� h / �ti , � �ti i / � O m ^ I I � ILW SHEET NO. DWAY DESIGN ENGINEER O �� SHEET NO. ENGINEER SEE DRAWING 2G-1 FOR ROCK PLATING AND ROCK EM$ANKMENT DETAI U� E _ J � ��O �� o V �� O � � � � �� v � / � V / �Q � N O �DENOTES IMPACTS IN SURFACE WATER __t)9 . ��. -�� 9\ ,99� ' � �)89 . ... . . . 1 � 'e0 �e� � O\ >>g \��. � � . . � ��77 � \ ` � F � \�774_ a S"�`,�,�� -, 0Q /� / '� 77' 7 7 59L 99L —99L i.L � v O � � - � � �('I \ a (V N m �� • � „b- i�, Lbii— [LL ,� � —774 —773 —772 771 9L � N� i" NC GRID NAD 83/NSRS 2007 PERMIT DRAWING SHEET 3 OF 8 ,r - - , 30 ' �� _�_ . 80 /// " ,: � .. __ . 9 � O /�98 g0 � �99� ro / � m1� � �� j �0 x/ - ..-._. .. ��. . . O :' �AB� � �. / r"�." � � C C � �� _ � AG . �� - � � � c � `\`� � .r�' — — '� _ • �--,•- AGF',` � �F i� --.: _ � �- �� _ . �� .J / �� ' /// )JECT REFERENCE NO. SHEET NO. ILW SHEET NO. DWAY DESIGN HYDRAULICS ENGINEER ENGINEER O SEE DRAWING 2G-1 FOR ROCK PLATING AND ROCK EM�JKMENT DETAI U, ::�� — � �_ —i:s 1 �o�' F F � �•� ` �� c ��_ a' � �Ra� E � _ � � � F F �- — F Pj, G '", RfMOV , 1 � F ll \ �� - '�oe 10 oeniN � � F � - ' . �� 1 `98��\--E%ISTING �DITCH �_.. F � ` � � \ � \ � � /�� ` M � � CL B RIP RAP _ ` ' o `� m p � � � � � ' � n 8 � `-. CL B RIP RA�� O ^ 8� � ` ` ` �� ` � m � "�► \'r�"� °"s� 2 G \ � o �—� =f � � � � �n - : — 2 „a „� � 7 ' O • Lf. � —776 _�� _ _ . ,�4 �� = �,3 ,,,— „z „� �,0 - 769 � � 8.q. � �7 [LL �LL4LL .. ._-�9LL . �7 771- L9L 7 --- 49L— 59L 9 i ILL LbLL 9LL� ---- „!— 7 L � �� J� m" �F . m m�v � P� �. � T `✓S �� O � _ . / F��, �, � �' P�� Y DEFENTIO /HAZARDOUS SPILL BASIN - SE DETAfG 5 T 2D-Ol DDE=228CY �� /� �� 9 �` �~ " � �� , v � - _� ��— ti - � i [� i � \; �� - / \ .. �. � � � £ S � ,: m _ � O V � m [ ` ' I 76! � � � � S '` V S � �� Q. / � �`'—� � � r9� 75a� ��9� �� — �9g� bsC � . .. ._\�. Zg� .._. _.. / � / �9 b9L r9L \\ . 8 � �9C 766 � 765 764 762 763 761 .. n^ 762 761 °-- ILL zL £LLq�L z� £LLbLL - - 9LLUL.,. . 9LL�LL— � Z O > � ; o` E �nw` a�� DENOTES IMPACTS IN SURFACE WATER SEE DRAWING 2G-1 FOR ROCK PLATING AND ROCK EMBANKMENT �ETAIL. SBG -L- STA. 17+30 RT � TO END OF BRIDGE / SBG -L- STA. 20+79 LT �TO END OF BRIDGE E � �e 2 G� SITE 1 E E CL. II RIP RAP CL II RIP RP,P TO EL.760.0 TO EL.760.0 175 TONS 175 TONS �21+94) (23-18) � - PUE T PUE�r PUE ��UE E �E ' SBG END OF BRIDGE � TO -L- STA 25+40 RT DRY DETENTION /HAZARDOUS SPILL BASIN SEE DETAIL SHEET 2D-Ol DDE=585CY O SEE DRAWING 2G-1 FOR ROCK PLP.TING AND ROCK EMBANKMENT DETAIL. E '�fl � GRADE TO� F � J � DRAIN l�I 4 � O / S/ /, �5/ 01, ti � 0ti i' _ _E_ _ � F F� DETAIL A LATERAL 'V' DITCH i na� �o s�oie7 �� p - �'��_ slopa d Mln. D�� I.5 Ft. Max. d - 1.5 Ft. 6= 5.0 Ft. Type ofLiner�- PSRM FROM -L- STA 26+50 TO 28-�00 RT FROM -L- STA 28+00 TO 37 �-00 LT PERMIT DRAWING SHEET 4 OF 8 �� , e3 � DETAIL B SPECIAL NT DITCH � Noi ro s�olei —Gio�„ � �� Siop= �Min. D= 1.5 Ft. FROM -L- STA. 31 '� 20 TO STA. 32 :-50 LT O LATERAL V DITCH CI.EAN SEDIMENT -L- STA 28+00 TO 31+00 LT FROM PIPE LINE WITH PSRM SEE DETAIL A PpE _ PDE PDE � PDE pp� = VE �� — � � t LATERAL V DITCH � ' -L- STA 26-50 TO 28+-00 RT F� LINE WITH PSRM SEE DETAIL A � B "C/ / / PDE... ... :� ��:.%g RI% �SPPDE RETAIN F Q E%ISTING `dGF ��* N DUE DUE E w PUE PUE PUE oiicH pUE �� PDE m CL 6 F � RIP RAP � e �� B F O �+: �+,,:,-,.. OO Y ' � LLC FP�E � m m � ��'_ 1 � ��w �� i �� \ `P�M I \ ` .1 � � �\ � �. PDE �PDE SPECIAL CUT DITCH -L- STA 29-00 TO 31 �T00 RT LINE WITH PSRM SEE DETAIL C O ILW SHEET NO. DWAY DESIGN ENGINEER SPECIAL CUT DITCH -L- STA 31-20 TO 32+50 LT SEE DETAIL B � F � — f F PDE� , SPKIAL CUT DITCH -L- STA 37 �.25 TO 32 . 50 RT LINE WITH PSRM SEE DETAIL C DETAIL C SPECIAL GUT DITCH � Noi io s�aie� r.o e,� o on�i, siocE roun p d Min.��- 1.5 Ff Type of Liner= PSRM Mox d= 1.5 Ft FROM -L- STA.29+00 TO STA.31+00 RT FROM -L- STA.31+25 TO STA. 32+50 RT SHEET NO. ENGINEER Z O � ; o` E �nw` a�� DENOTES IMPACTS IN SURFACE WATER SEE DRAWING 2G-1 FOR ROCK PLATING AND ROCK EMBANKMENT �ETAIL. \ \ � S6G\4�STA.17+��70 RT � TO END `OF BRID4E / �� SBG -L- STA.20+79 LT e�'TO END OF BRIDGE E — TB 2c� SITE 1 \ E E CL. II RIP RAP CL II RIP RAP TO EL. 760.0 TO EL. 760 0„ 775 TONS 175 TONS (21-9a) (23-78) � � �� - PUE T PUET�— PUE ��UE �E � E 4 � SEE DRA1^IING ?�1FDH RO - --- - " -- - AND ROCK EM$.4N MEI�T�f7 _ % / / �....� � /: ; ��'� � � 1, 0 �f �� - srn. 2 E+t2 �r E � ! GF De T � F � � c'r :',N J7� m � �� CL��B RIP RAP� L � PDE n� . n• x t.s' PDE RerniN —DUE DUE� CL 6 F RIP RAP SBG END OF BRIDGE � \, \ \ O TO -L- $TA 25+40 RT J( \ � �� ` � / \ \ �-g y� �, 1 �. 1 - DRY DETEjJTION �/,HAZARDQU515PIL BASIN / SEE DETAII SNEET 8D-Ol C�OE-585 Y\ � � m m % � ��, _A \� , � � L \ /� ��19L� �� 1 .. > by 05L ZS� - „ ..,/ �` .ar.c raz�.rs� 9c; � ` . — ,. 5 �-- ` \ ..�ZSL _ il �y� �j. ; � ,` \ --95L' 7 �. %�a�� 9 /... '^�` :�� O �by� 2�g1. v�:' \ / � :�� ts/t7 / /`�� / / L9� b9� �L � �5 // / .� �� a�� L Z��tl�� //��g�� 2a� as �%,L �299� y91. 99L / \8� / ... �///$9� �/ //� � j' pDE _ — � PERMIT DRAWING SHEET 5 OF 8 � �'�,�, DETAIL A � e� LATERAL'V' DITCH � DETAIL B � Na �o s o�e7 SPECIAL NT DITCH � Noi ro s�oiei 1":Ft. SIoPC 1 � o e� SlopP nu� d p ro�� D Min. D 1.5 Ff. Min. D= 1.5 Ft. ^ Max. d 1 5 Ft - — - / 3 � 6= 50 Ff __ __—. _-- _ �� . --: �- � - �—�- � L- STA, 31;-20 TO STA.32+5�LL_. _,. . TYPe f�Lner. PSRM � �- � --' /• '�� —` FROM -L- STA 26+50 TO 28+00 12T 3 ' FRO' L STA 28+00 T� 31 00 4fi �� SHEET NO. ILW SHEET NO. DWAY DESIGN HYDRAULIC ENGINEER ENGINEER M __ Q / I �� , � �� .' r � ;' � ! ' i - . . . - ; -� .,—; v� � i ,' / I '.s � ' � PECIA�CUT R�ITCH / y�� ` �fLEAN,SfDIME T . �, ._ - 0 l� FLQM �PIPE -L- $?�A 31 � T 32�50 LV . , �' L- ST � 8+00 TO � 1+0� �j .\... � / I ^ SEFjbETA B r � / / / � an� v. i _ UNF/WITH PSRM SEE ETAI A •• , _ � � � i.a , � —�� — � � � _ � _. � LATERAL V DITCH � -L- STA 26-50 TO 28+-00 RT LINE WITH PSRM SEE D[TAIL A W RETAIN F O EXIDITCH �y— PUE PUE ��• PUE w (� /%/I r� � O � / / nbL / // / PUE '� PDE PDE �-� pDE PDE /� � F � �� F F — PDE ° PD � •• PDE � - AL CUT DITCH � SPECIAt CUT DITCH �A 29-00 TO 31'-00 RT L STA 37-�25 TO 32..50 RT WITH PSRM SEE DETAIL�- � LINE WITH PSRM� S f DEiAI� C ��i�_J � o � a�-� �...;�j� �.. / . DETAIL C SPECIAL GUT DITCH � Noi io s�aie� r.o�� p,� om, siocE roun p d Min.��- 1.5 Ff Type of L ner= PSRM Mox d= 1.5 Ft FROM L- STA.29+00 TO STA.31+00 RT FROM L- STA.31+25 TO STA. 32+50 RT END ROCK EMBANKMENT AND ROCK PLATING � � F� � / F �/ NOTE:PROPOSED uPPER uMITS OF ROCK EAIBANKAIENT BASED ON 76rCONTOUR ELEVaTION wICHIIS rABOVE NORMAL POOL. / ACTUAL LIAIIT WILL VARY BASED ON WATER ELEVATION AT TlAIE OF CONSTRUCTION. I��, � E� � Q .. Rr -L- 57A,Zi+��2 -L- Sr�t,P3+(�Zt! x ` LIMITS OF CLASS VII � �S/ PERMiT ORAWING SHEET 7 0F 8 I � �� e LIMITS OF CLASS VII C / L ��+�� ENDROCKEMBANKMENT � F F F BEGIN ROCK EMBANKMENT F F �—. F � � !� � _ AND ROCK PLATING _ F �� F F F �I � F � �� — � � F � F �J5 ... 15 ... J5 /: � �, / Lpli�'(I/S CNEERI urc .omau GEOTExrI�E TrPE 2 1•�80YE ��iER LEYEL , � � --- � � � NATURAL GROUNDLINE ; 0 E �� a�m � i i j � :J � �B S�� .,� s. PLANVIEW ` lp = 1�0� CLA55 II RIP RAP fEE NEIKODCED MlIOCE � i vi ■ � = F _ \ F _ � F � ` _ _ END ROCK PLATING — �_ — �t� F ` � F` � F� PLANS �M�O� f1�L �LI� tl�i j 2. �f � R��' ROADNIAY EMBANKMENT t.5 p, � �v . .D°. .°. i�� ` `� � �� o0C o0[ .57 3TONE.��:��'�.�'.''0�� CLASS VII �C�O :, oo�� oo�C � 0 0 � � . .. .. .. .. . CC� r a��:��`:�:':��;�` :�: �� - - Q=- - � � - -�=-- -_ 4IN. __ _= _ � ..,.. == = SE C T I ON A� A \ HP 12x53 STEEL PILE NaT�s (SEE STRUCTURE PLANS) 1'�BOYE M�TER SxOULpER POINT� C��ss tr SE�ECr �rpn �e� o. n C��SS II RIP R�n �' r �tw,� � �� r �rwr ROADWAY EMBANKMENT � O �QTExTILE 7YPE 2 SECTION C—C N.T.S ?� � 57 I�E TtrPE ? No.s'r sroNE c�rrrPa i � � � � / � � IF ► IF I I .F . � ;;:, ; ��'. CLASS iY SELECT tiOP 1!'f � GEOTExr��E T�E 2 —. a�ss �� B�n r �eove r�TCS �cve� r'�m'' ROCK EMBANKMENT 18 + 85 TO 21 + 34 & 23 + 78 TO 25 + 59 -L- � ESTIMATED Q UANTITIES SELECT MATERIAL, CLASS VII ..............................9,200 TONS SELECT MATERIAL, CLASS VI (N0. 57 STONE)...8,200 TON GEOTEXTILE TYPE 2 FOR DRAINAGE............3,900 SY ROCK PLATING 18+85 TO 21+34 & 23+78 TO 25+28 -L- =� ESTIMATED Q UANTITIES PLAIN RIP RAP, CLASS 77 ..........................950 TONS GEOTEXTILE TYPE 2 FOR DRAINAGE............900 SY � ESTIMATED QUANTITIES BASED ON WATER ELEVATION OF 760' i-5M011LpER PO�NT ��/. �-, , .;�•�' •. / p � i'�� II' ��'I' � � SECTION B—B N.T.S ?� � �►nrES av �ur� CdVSTRIIiCT AOCK EMBANKMENT r ABOVE WATER SuRFACf AT T�pE OiF CQIVSTRUC17qN AND ACCARdMG TO THE SPEC�A[ PRW�SIiAN FQR A�GC EI/BAA►KUEIVT, CQNSTRlKT ROCK PLATING fAqil TQP QF ROCK EMBANKMENT TO THE SHbULQER PU►NT AND ACCARQIMG TO SECTpN 275 qF TyE STANDARD SPEpFKAT�qMS. WETLAND PERMIT IMPACT SUMMARY Hand Existing Existing Permanent Temp. Excavation Mechanized Clearing Permanent Temp. Channel Channel Natural Site Station Structure Fillln Fillln in Ciearing in SW SW Impacts Impacts Stream No. (From/To) Size / Type Wetlands Wetlands Wetlands in Wetlands Wetlands impacts impacts Permanent Temp. Design (ac) (ac) (ac) (ac) (ac) (ac) (ac) (ft) (ft) (ft) -L STA. 18+86 TO ROCK EMBANKMENT & 1 25+58 EXCAVATION 0.67 162 TOTALS": 0.67 162 *Rounded totals are sum of actual impacts NOTES: Impacts from Pipe Piles @Interior Bents: Total Area = 2(bents) x 4(pipe piles) x 3.14= 25.12 sq.ft. �� P Q' � m m � � Ki :A � � � � � � � � v, � z �� v�° � �� v� ��w � ��a �n�z >c�� n�nw �� n�� sr, f» v, �� N ch � I � ., � V W O � � � � N �O �O O V • � � V � � O V See Sheet 1-A For Index of Sheets � ' I ' �v ' I � I � (�l I �� \► � (�l l�' ' I ' I_I ( � �v I�' (�l I I V � �\ _ -_-_ _ _ . . . . - I 9TAT6 I 61'ATB P0.018CT 0.6P6RSNC8 N0. � DP1CR1%'ION PE rW, UTIL �ONST. �� `' �,�� PLANS lVCT10N Prepo�ed in tl� Office of: �'DRAULICS ENGINEER GRAPHIC SCALES DESIGN DATA PROJECT LENGTH ADT 2016 = l0,saa DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS $� 2$ 0 $0 ��0 7000 Birch Ridge Or., Ra[eigh NC, 27610 p��Y� ADT 2036 = 18,164 LENGTH OF ROADWAY TIP PROJECT B-5142 = 0.405 MILES ,��.� c,� K= 12 % zoiz szaNnnrzD srec�Ficazioxs �a � �� PLANS � g D= 70 % LENGTH OF STRUCTURE TIP PROJECT B-5142 = 0.038 MILES srcNazuas: PE � � 50 25 0 50 l00 T= 4 %* RIGHT OF WAY DATE: JASON MOORE. P.E. � � V= 60 MPH JANUARY 29, 2015 PROlECr sxcrNeen ROADWAY DESIGN ° PROFILE HORIZONTAL * ENGINEER ��°�.� �� ( ) TTST = 3 DUAL 1 TOTAL LENGTH OF TIP PROJECT B-5142 = 0.443 MILES r �o 5 2.5 0 l0 20 FUNC CLASS = LETTING DATE: BRYAN KEY, P.E. �� pA�� COII@CtOf JANUARY 19, �LO�6 PROJECT DESIGN ENGINEER PROFILE (VERTICAL) SUB—REGIONAL TIER PE SIGNAT[/RE: �` �"", :it:t,s�,s�,s�,s��l ""` � � O ALLOWABLE IMPACTS ZONE 1 ALLOWABLE IMPACTS ZONE 2 i � //` ;� / ��/ ,i� � . a�_ / �� v��/_. a� � � o � �\ � a (V N \� � \, � � e � � �� p� b 1 1 is r. O NC GRID NAD 83/NSRS 2007 � � O PERMIT DRAWING SHEET 2 OF 5 ..._= C � C � � � � A�i �� — � � c c � ```� �__—� � �A GF � �F i - - �� F F � - F - � � F �II �I/ // � � C � � � � � - _ c � I GRADE TO D2AIN TO E%ISTING DITCH �r NK� � � , F f. � j� � ` � 1RE� 110ER GONS��+'��-.. O _ � g ..;�. � ��rn ua[a cpbiNUC�p� \ .:� O � �� r,�� ,�„a, � � �' 2 =��t'a•��►.«< °� �-f � �ORY DETENTIOI� !NAZARDOUS, $PILL BASIN � /� � � � SEE DETAIL SF{£@�T 2D-01� . �=��226CY � / a�,�' � / � �,�y,,� \a: �i �ww�E' � / ��►�'� `a� a, �� f,. � ; / / '° �`'��`j��a� � , / �_ / \ � .r �� /' / / ' ° � � � � /i' ' ` \\ / / \ �—� � i w `�\ �/ /�/ / \ / �� / � �� \ �� '� —�, �_-- --F' �� /�� \\ ��i \ �i� � `\ �i�� i ,`� \// ` � RfM��F � ` B RIP RAP ` _ ` f CL B RIP RA� � P�f � G..C7� � m� �� ti j �,ti . �ti , � / m - � � m I► / ILW SHEET NO. DWAY DESIGN ENGINEER O ry j. � m�' / � �F. � SHEET NO. ENGINEER SEE DRAWING 2G-1 FOR ROCK PLATING AND ROCK EM$A�JKM[N1 DETAI U, � \ � ��O �s� �... s � � C� ��° P��S`... ��O � \,S � �1, � PUE a O ` ,\� �V � / � V � Q. / � � N Z O � � ; o` E �nw` a�� -�7777` ��/�� i��i,�li�� ALLOWABLE IMPACTS ZONE 1 ALLOWABLE IMPACTS ZONE 2 � SITE 1 � SEE DRAWING 2G-1 FOR ROCK PLATING SEE DRAWING 2G-1 FOR ROCK PLP.TING AND ROCK EMBANKMENT DETAIL AND ftOCK EMBANKMENT DETAIL. � E��wK:ze SBG -L- STA. 17+30 RT TO END OF BRIDGE � SBG -L- STA 20+79 LT .� � .� � • � • : • � � /.a _ i:�i��% \\"V��' . • liii'��!�.� ''1 ��n�-� � F�� . ��... 15 /: — PUE T PUE �� PUE �� E � SITE 1 J s SBG END OF BRIDGE TO -L- STA 25+40 RT DRY DETENTION /HAZARDOUS SPILL BASIN SEE DETAIL SHEET 2D-Ol D�E=585CY ,1PP�OUWAdg - * P,t,yES!�p3 iP,'.�u = - TYPE III 0 m � � � F � AT-1 F ... :CL'8 RIP kAP PDE tt�. ti• x ts' PDE RETAiN —DUE DUE CL 6 F RIP RAP 1 �� m m �- R7 � ^ \ O �S/ / 1, 0 .y �°� S 29'.'�'�#`w ---E � �_ S�'�i _ � _F F� DETAIL A LATERAL 'V' DITCH i na� �o s�oie7 �� p - �'��_ slopa d Mln. D�� I.5 Ft. Max. d - 1.5 Ft. 6= 5.0 Ft. Type ofLiner-- PSRM FROM -L- STA 26+50 TO 28-�00 RT FROM -L- STA 28+00 TO 37 �-00 LT PERMIT DRAWING SHEET 3 OF 5 �� ,►o �' � DETAIL B SPECIAL NT DITCH � Noi ro s�olei � . o a� Siope �o�� p F Min. D= 1.5 Ft. FROM -L- STA. 31 '� 20 TO STA. 32 :-50 LT O LATERAL V DITCH CLEAN SEDIMENT -L- STA 28+00 TO 31+00 LT FROM PIPE LINE WITH PSRM SEE DETAIL A PpE _ PDE . ` PDE � PDE pp� = VE � — '—._�_� � � -L- STA 26-50 TO 28,�00 RT � � � LINE WITH PSRM SEE DETAIL A �� RETAIN F � EXID TCH E PUE PUE PU w �N ,ap .� e �f B F � O eoE 5 �( ai: e � 0.UY- JCR ��,°1 � � �"�� %: �� ..1 �� ; �, � PDE PDE PDE � � SPECIAL CUT DITCH d�� -L- STA 29-00 TO 31 �T00 RT LINE WITH PSRM SEE DETAIL C O ILW SHEET NO. DWAY DESIGN ENGINEER S 6PPI'.;t�E SPECIAL CUT DITCH -L- STA 31-20 TO 32+50 LT SEE DETAIL B E �'�� - F � f . . i PDE x�� SPKIAL CUT DITCH -L- STA 37 �.25 TO 32 . 50 RT LINE WITH PSRM SEE DETAIL C DETAIL C SPECIAL GUT DITCH � Noi io s�aie� r.o e,� o on�i, siocE roun p d Min.��- 1.5 Ff Type of Liner= PSRM Mox d= 1.5 Ft FROM -L- STA.29+00 TO STA.31+00 RT FROM -L- STA.31+25 TO STA. 32+50 RT SHEET NO. ENGINEER END ROCK EMBANKMENT AND ROCK PLATING � � F� � / F �/ NOTE:PROPOSED uPPER uMITS OF ROCK EAIBANKAIENT BASED ON 76rCONTOUR ELEVaTION wICHIIS rABOVE NORMAL POOL. / ACTUAL LIAIIT WILL VARY BASED ON WATER ELEVATION AT TlAIE OF CONSTRUCTION. I��, � E� � Q .. Rr -L- 57A,Zi+��2 -L- Sr�t,P3+(�Zt! x ` LIMITS OF CLASS VII � �S/ PERMiT ORAWING SHEET 4 OF 5 I � �� e LIMITS OF CLASS VII C / L ��+�� ENDROCKEMBANKMENT � F F F BEGIN ROCK EMBANKMENT F F �—. F � � !� � _ AND ROCK PLATING _ F �� F F F �I � F � �� — � � F � F �J5 ... 15 ... J5 /: � �, / Lpli�'(I/S CNEERI urc .omau GEOTExrI�E TrPE 2 1•�80YE ��iER LEYEL , � � --- � � � NATURAL GROUNDLINE v m ; 0 E c�� s�m � i i j � :J � �B S�� .,� s. PLANVIEW ` lp = 1�0� CLA55 II RIP RAP fEE NEIKODCED MlIOCE � i vi ■ � = F _ \ F _ � F � ` _ _ END ROCK PLATING — �_ — �t� F ` � F` � F� PLANS �M�O� f1�L �LI� tl�i j 2. �f � R��' ROADNIAY EMBANKMENT t.5 p, � �v . .D°. .°. i�� ` `� � �� o0C o0[ .57 3TONE.��:��'�.�'.''0�� CLASS VII �C�O :, oo�� oo�C � 0 0 � � . .. .. .. .. . CC� r a��:��`:�:':��;�` :�: �� - - Q=- - � � - -�=-- -_ 4IN. __ _= _ � ..,.. == = SE C T I ON A� A \ HP 12x53 STEEL PILE NaT�s (SEE STRUCTURE PLANS) 1'�BOYE M�TER SxOULpER POINT� C��ss tr SE�ECr �rpn �e� o. n C��SS II RIP R�n �' r �tw,� � �� r �rwr ROADWAY EMBANKMENT � O �QTExTILE 7YPE 2 SECTION C—C N.T.S ?� � 57 I�E TtrPE ? No.s'r sroNE c�rrrPa i � � � � / � � IF ► IF I I .F . � ;;:, ; ��'. CLASS iY SELECT tiOP 1!'f � GEOTExr��E T�E 2 —. a�ss �� B�n r �eove r�TCS �cve� r'�m'' ROCK EMBANKMENT 18 + 85 TO 21 + 34 & 23 + 78 TO 25 + 59 -L- � ESTIMATED Q UANTITIES SELECT MATERIAL, CLASS VII ..............................9,200 TONS SELECT MATERIAL, CLASS VI (N0. 57 STONE)...8,200 TON GEOTEXTILE TYPE 2 FOR DRAINAGE............3,900 SY ROCK PLATING 18+85 TO 21+34 & 23+78 TO 25+28 -L- =� ESTIMATED Q UANTITIES PLAIN RIP RAP, CLASS 77 ..........................950 TONS GEOTEXTILE TYPE 2 FOR DRAINAGE............900 SY � ESTIMATED QUANTITIES BASED ON WATER ELEVATION OF 760' i-5M011LpER PO�NT ��/. �-, , .;�•�' •. / p � i'�� II' ��'I' � � SECTION B—B N.T.S ?� � �►nrES av �ur� CdVSTRIIiCT AOCK EMBANKMENT r ABOVE WATER SuRFACf AT T�pE OiF CQIVSTRUC17qN AND ACCARdMG TO THE SPEC�A[ PRW�SIiAN FQR A�GC EI/BAA►KUEIVT, CQNSTRlKT ROCK PLATING fAqil TQP QF ROCK EMBANKMENT TO THE SHbULQER PU►NT AND ACCARQIMG TO SECTpN 275 qF TyE STANDARD SPEpFKAT�qMS. BUFFER IMPACTS SUMMARY IMPACT BUFFER TYPE ALLOWABLE MITIGABLE REPLACEMENT STRUCTURE SIZE / STATION ROAD PARALLEL ZONE 1 ZONE 2 TOTAL ZONE 1 ZONE 2 TOTAL ZONE 1 ZONE 2 SITE NO. TYPE (FROM/TO) CROSSING BRIDGE IMPACT (ft2) (ft2) (ftz) (ftz) (ftz) (ft2) (ft2) (ftZ) Rock Embakment & -L- STA. 18+50 TO X 1 Roadway Fill 19+41 2268 1475 3743 Rock Embakment & -L- STA. 23+30 TO X 1 Roadway Fill 25+58 6088 2767 8855 TOTAL: ssss 4242 12598 � � � 6 9 � � L � T � s N � m� ,� - o �r M � {ff p��W /� � Ta � OZ N 3W � Cf] O� � o� �� ,�� N��A N � � � � .� � V W O � � � � N � �O O V � � � V � � O V See Sheet 1-A For Index of Sheets ��1T° �6 °l�' Tf� �/li 1T� � i�/1i 1T� °iT° l�Tl el� � 1� O10 Tf Tf 1\ Y,� SI'ATe V0.0JacT R8P6R6NC6 N0. � OB9CRIP'IYON PE NJ, UTIL �� #; ' i � PLANS 2UCTION Prepared In Me 0/flce of: �'DRAULICS ENGINEER GRAPHIC SCALES DESIGN DATA PROJECT LENGTH ADT 2016 = l0,ssa DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS 50 25 � 50 �0� /000 Birch Ridge Dr., Ra[eigh NC, 27610 r�O�P� ��J ADT 2036 = 18,164 LENGTH OF ROADWAY TIP PROJECT B-5142 = 0.405 MILES ,��° c� PLANS K — �2 % 2072 STANDARD SP6C/FlCATIONS �9� �� D= 70 % LENGTH OF STRUCTURE TIP PROJECT B-5142 = 0.038 MILES sicxazuaE: PE r� � 50 25 0 50 100 T= 4 %* RIGHT OF WAY DATE: JASON MOORE, P.E. s � V= 60 MPH JANUARY 29, 2015 PRO�FCT ENC�NFEn ROADWAY DESIGN ° PROFILE (HORIZONTAL) * TTST = 3 DUAL 1 TOTAL LENGTH OF TIP PROJECT B-5142 = 0.443 MILES ENGINEER ��.�� 5 2.5 0 l0 2o FUNC CLASS = LETTING DATE: BRYAN KEY, P.E. �� g�� COII@CtOf JANUARY 19, 2016 PROJECT DESIGN ENGINEER PROFILE (VERTICAL) SUB—REGIONAL TIER PE SIGNATURE: �� N Note: Not to Scale *S. U.E. = Subsurface Utility Engineering BOUNDARIES AND PROPERTY.• State Line County Line Township Line City Line Reservation Line Property Line Existing Iron Pin Property Corner Property Monument Parcel/Sequence Number Existing Fence Line Proposed Woven Wire Fence Proposed Chain Link Fence Proposed Barbed Wire Fence Existing Wetland Boundary Proposed Wetland Boundary Existing Endangered Animal Boundary Existing Endangered Plant Boundary 0 EiP � O E[M i23 —x x x- e e � — — — — w L B — — — — wLB EeB Known $oil Contamination: Area or $ite � Potential Soil Contamination: Area or Site — � BUILDINGS AND OTHER CULTURE.• � ��r .�. Gas Pump Vent or U�G Tank Cap O Sign � WB�� w Small Mine 'SZ� Foundation � Area Outline 0 Cemetery 0 Building � School � Church � Dam HYDROLOGY.• Stream or Body of Water Hydro, Pool or Reservoir Jurisdictional Stream Buffer Zone 1 BufFer Zone 2 Flow Arrow Disappearing Stream Spring Wetland Proposed Lateral, Tail, Head Ditch False Sump �----J �s — BZ 1 BZ 2 5�'�°]�]C �iF�° 1�C��°]�i�[ �C��$�]Ie�1�� 1[�� ]F �[��iE�I�� CONVENTIONAL PLAN SHEET SYMBOLS RAILROADS.• Standard Gauge RR Signal Milepost Switch RR Abandoned RR Dismantled RIGHT OF Wf1Y.• Baseline Control Point Existing Right of Way Marker Existing Right of Way Line Proposed Right of Way Line Proposed Right of Way Line with Iron Pin and Cap Marker Proposed Right of Way Line with Concrete or Granite WW Marker Proposed Control of Access Line with Concrete C1A Marker Existing Control of Access Proposed Control of Access Existing Easement Line Proposed Temporary Construction Easement - Proposed Temporary Drainage Easement Proposed Permanent Drainage Easement Proposed Permanent Drainage / Utility Easement Proposed Permanent Utility Easement Proposed Temporary Utility Easement Proposed Aerial Utility Easement � CSX TRANSPoRTATION MILEPo T 35 �0 � � 0 W W i� 0 W �� J J TDE PDE DUE PUE TUE AUE Proposed Permanent Easement with O Iron Pin and Cap Marker � ROADS AND RELATED FEATURES.• Existing Edge of Pavement Existing Curb ----- Proposed Slope Stakes Cut --- �--- Proposed $lope Stakes Fill - - - F - - - Proposed Curb Ramp CR Existing Metal Guardrail Proposed Guardrail T T T r Existing Cable Guiderail n n � P d C bl G'd 'I n n n n ropose a e ui erai E Equality $ymbol � Pavement Removal °� �" ^ i�EGET�ITION.• � Single Tree �� Single Shrub � Hedge '�" �� # Woods Line �""'-' Orchard Vineyard EXISTING STRUCTURES.• MAJOR: Bridge, Tunnel or Box Culvert Bridge Wing Wall, Head Wall and End Wall MINOR: Head and End Wall Pipe Culvert Footbridge Drainage Box: Catch Basin, DI or JB Paved Ditch Gutter Storm Sewer Manhole $torm $ewer UTILITIES.• POWER: Existing Power Pole Proposed Power Pole Existing Joint Use Pole Proposed Joint Use Pole Power Manhole Power Line Tower Power Transformer WG Power Cable Hand Hole H-Frame Pole Recorded WG Power Line Designated U/G Power Line (S.U.E.*) TELEPHONE: WATER: Water Manhole OO Water Meter o Water Valve � �? Q f? Q Water Hydrant � vtnerora Recorded l!/G Water Line • Designated WG Water Line (S.U.E.*� - - - -•- - - - Above Ground Water Line A�c wa,a� CONC - J CONC WW I � CONC HW �--------� �CB OO s • • O /1 r �� Existing Telephone Pole � Proposed Telephone Pole � Telephone Manhole OO Telephone Booth ❑' Telephone Pedestal ❑T Telephone Cell Tower � U/G Telephone Cable Hand Hole HH Recorded U/G Telephone Cable � Designated U/G Telephone Cable (S.U.E.*) - - - - -'- - - - Recorded WG Telephone Conduit '� Designated U/G Telephone Conduit (S.U.E.*� - - - -T�- - - - Recorded U/G Fiber Optics Cable T�� Designated U/G Fiber Optics Cable (S.U.E.*� - - - -T °°- - - rv: N Satellite Dish CC TV Pedestal ❑O TV Tower � WG N Cable Hand Hole HH Recorded U/G N Cable �° Designated U/G N Cable (S.U.E.*) - - - -*�- - - - Recorded U/G Fiber Optic Cable �° F� Designated U/G Fiber Optic Cable (S.U.E.*� ----T� F�- -- GAS: Gas Valve � Gas Meter � Recorded U/G Gas Line � Designated U/G Gas Line (S.U.E.*) - - - -°- - - - Above Ground Gas Line A�c co� SANITARY SEWER: Sanitary Sewer Manhole OO Sanitary Sewer Cleanout 0+ U/G Sanitary Sewer Line s� Above Ground Sanitary Sewer A�c sa�,+o�Y Sewer Recorded SS Forced Main Line Fss Designated SS Forced Main Line (S.U.E.*) — - - - -�ss- - - - MISCELLANEOUS: Utility Pole Utility Pole with Base Utility Located Object Utility Traffic $ignal Box Utility Unknown U/G Line U/G Tank; Water, Gas, Oil Underground Storage Tank, Approx. Loc. — A/G Tank; Water, Gas, Oil Geoenvironmental Boring U�G Test Hole (S.U.E.*) Abandoned According to Utility Records End of Information • O O ❑s ��.� � 0 � AATUR E.O.I. N� GSP Zop'l g3�N Np� \ -BL- 7 N=688108.3810 E=1443077.7580 ELEV.=765.88' �0 '1 P�� /e�. .�o � BM3 N 688004.9660 E I442975.2640 ELEV.= 772.67' rn � � U � � N N 80' 50' 26f E - PT Sto.9+9954 � -BL- 8 N=688337.3839 ``��,� E=1443937.3508 y° ELEV.=784.62j �o � i' . �° o \ / % / �s� \, � � '\ �s'\ �. � ' � EL � ;,,� �-%�<� 5 � \� �'w i (x0`�� . i ; �J5 0 \�; � i i F.�'\ o / � i i � Gp�oo 0 % �� /�� o o ° � i i ��\ � i � / i / � \�i I � � i i \�>�i / � / > i %;y�� : �� `, ;� , i�' / �/ // i i �i / , .� � � ,._.._ % j� �P�.-_ �/ �pe' (\�P�� \ S UR VEY C01�TROL SHEET B-5I42 -ri- r r ii+� _ \ -L- POC S�o.17+9583 -r2- Por sro. io+oo.00 = GPS 65142-I TP�i,� o.i�6�'� 80��N=688343.842� E=1445084.602 ELEV.=770.18' -BL- 4 N=688403.0723 E=1444617.2951 ; = :;_ � �.ELEV.=781.06'�.�-� ,= '; = ' ` �` -BL- 3 N=688381,1589 E=1444342.7525 ELEV.= 785.69' DATUM DESCRIPTION THE LOCALIZED COORDINATE SYSTEM DEVELOPED FOR THIS PROJECT IS BASED ON THE STATE PLANE COORDINATES ESTABLISHED BY NCDOT FOR MONUMENT "65142-1" WITH NAD 83/NSRS 2007 STATE PLANE GRID COORDINATES OF NORTHING: 688343.842(ftl EASTING: 1445084.602(ftl ELEVATION: 770.18'(ft) THE AVERAGE COMBINED GRID FACTOR USED ON THIS PROJECT (GROUND TO GRID1 IS: 0.99986215 TNE N.C. LAMBERT GRID BEARING AND LOCALIZED HORIZONTAL GROUND DISTANCE FROM "'B5142-1" TO -L- STATION 9+00.00 IS N 87°07'48.33" W 854.24' ALL LINEAR D[MENSIONS ARE LOCALIZED HOR[ZONTAL DISTANCES VERTICAL DATUM USED IS NAVD 88 0 � o ° w � p �n Q � p � z 0 � � iW .i � / 0 � � ! i o �� 1 0 0° o �� o �� -BY- 6 N=688444.6845 E=1445170.8132 �ELEV.=773.67' �-S 23' 45' 29.7' W BEGIN BRIDG! °� -L-STA.2/+pE o� 5 6/' 24' 341' ---- --=-" � -L - �. _ � -- ----------------- . aoinr.r s s� E -i�-� �a� �ic �2 CORNELIUS CREEK/ �5 /3' LAKE NORMAN EN� - - PT Sto.20+00.48 l\LS' � -BL- 5 N=687950.5444 E=1445820.3799 -t- ELEV.=769.32' � -r,s- rui sro. iu+w.uv = -L- POC S1o.25+g946 5 29' 3r 58T W 8M"2 ; yy N=687823.3653 1 E=1445783.6589 ION o � � � ELEV.=770.92' � � �, i -Y3- ,� z � 0 � o � m � g � m\ � o; w � PROJECT REFERENCE NO. B-5142 Location an -L- PT S�o.30+76J8 � TO HWY 2/ LIUS RD SR 1302 SHEET NO. 1C-01 GPS 65142-2 N=687539.681C E=1446581.1530 ELEV.=806.55' � END TIP PROJECT B-SI42 -L- POT STA.33+38.79 -BL-POINT DESCe NORTH EAST ELEVATION -L STAIION OFFSET 3 BL-3 688381e1589 1444342e7525 785e69 1��9e12 26a71 RT 4 BL-4 6884��3,�723 1444617,2951 781oP6 12�89033 34,94 RT 1 GPS B5142-1 688343,842� 1445�84a6�2� 770018 17�72,�J4 19,41 RT 5 BL-5 68795D,5444 144582�,3799 769,32 26�11,55 3�,53 RT 2 GPS B5142-2 687539,681� 14465810153� 806a55 OUTSIDE PROJECT LIMITS 7 BL-7 6881�80381� 1443�77a758� 765a88 OUTSIDE PROJECT LIMITS 8 BL-8 G8B;�t37o383� 1443937a35�� 7B4a62 OUTSIDE PROJCCT LIMITS 6 BY-6 �8844406845 14a517�a8132 773067 1�7�6�oE2 16012 LT BM�1 ELEVATION = 785aF,9' N 688381 E 1444343 L STATION l�i-�9o�� 27' RIGFIT NCDOT TRRVERSE STATION BL-3 BM=2 ELEVATION = 77�e92' N 687823 E 1445784 L STATiON 26�49e�� 158' RIGHT CHISELFD S�URRE IN CONC GUTTER ON E(ST SIDE OF PINTO ROADe t/- 58' NE OF SUBDIVISION SIGN ,._>�,�.,��>�_��,,.>��.�,..,,=x�.>�=<_>� F3M�3 ELEVATION = 77?_a67' N 688��5 E 1442975 L STATION 1��0�� S 73°3�'�5" W DIST 1412a3��' RGILROAD SPIKE IN NORTH ERSi� ROOT OF R 48" WILLOW C�AK NOTE: DRAWING NOT TO SCALE NOTES: 1. THE CONTROL DATA FOR THIS PROJECT CAN BE FOUND ELECTRONICALLY BY SELECTING PROJECT CONTROI. DATA AT: HTTPSI/CONNECT.NCDOT.GOU/RESO URCES/GOCATION/ THE FILES TO BE FOUND ARE AS FOLLOWS: B5142 LS_CONTROL.TXT SITE CALIBRATION INFORMATION HAS NOT BEEN PROVIDED FOR THIS PROJECT. IF FURTHER INFORMATION IS NEEDED, PLEASE CONTACT THE LOCATION AND SURVEYS UNIT. �INDICATES GEODETIC CONTROL MONUMENTS USED OR SET FOR HORIZONTAL PROJECT CONTROL BY THE NCDOT LOCATION AND SURVEYS UNIT. PROJECT CONTROL ESTABLISHED USING GLOBAL POSITIDNING SYSTEM. � N � � J, � TYPE Pc PT PC Pi PC PRc PT POT ST�`TION � � �� a �� 054 1��1�26 2��io48 25�66071 28�21074 30�76078 ��3�74�66 -i - NORTH 6g8386o613� 6884�60��6 68842�05��8 68826�0�216 687��80�58� 6878560�6�1 6877140�8�2 F�g7572o4321 -Y1- S UR VEY C01�TROL SHEET B-5I42 E�ST 144423104354 144432�0�4�1 144441�05��6 14452��06587 14457`�6 0 837� 1446��802587 144621�068�3 14464810235� TYPE ST�TION NC�RTH E�ST POT 1�� o�� 6�851 4 0`��3� 1 445184 0 1�8`� POT 11�7505� 68835401��1 1445113036�4 DATUM DESCRIPTION THE LOCALIZED COORD[NATE SYSTEM DEVELOPED FOR TH[S PROJECT IS BASED ON THE STATE PLANE COORDINATES ESTABL[SHED BY NCDOT FOR MONUMENT "B5142-1" WITH NAD 83/NSRS 2007 STATE PLANE GRID COORDINATES OF NORTHING: 688343.842(ftl EAST[NG: 1445084.602(ft) ELEVATION: 770.18(ft) THE AVERAGE COMBINED GRID FACTOR USED ON THIS PROJECT (GROUND TO GRID) IS: 0.99986215 THE N.C. LAMBERT GRID BEARING AND LOCALIZED HORIZONTAL GROUND DISTANCE FROM "B5142-1" TO —L— STATION 9+00.00 IS N 87° 07' 48.33" W 854.24' ALL LINEAR DIMENSIONS ARE LOCALIZED HORIZONTAL DISTANCES VERT[CAL DATUM USED IS NAVD 88 PROJECT REFERENCE NO. SHEET NO. B-5142 1G02 Location and Survevs -Y�- TYPE ST�TION NORTH E�1ST POT 1��0�� 6g83B`�o3838 1445��30�483 PC 1��330�7 68835705�54 1444��402�73 PT 11�65013 688243014�4 1445�3�06�57 POT 12�430��3 6882�2055�1 14451�604437 -Y3- TYPE ST�1T I ON NORTH E�1ST I�Of 1��0�� 687�870��48 14458160726� P� 1��15031 687�7405816 14458��0178� PT 1��770�2 687�1605453 14457860244�� POT 11�6�io37 6878��603�78 144576608685 NOTES: 1. THE CONTROL DATA FOR THIS PROJECT CAN BE FOUND ELECTRONICALLY BY SELECTING PROJECT CONTROL DATA AT: HTTPS✓/CONNECT.NCDOT. GOU/RESO URCES/LOCATION/ THE FILES TO BE FOUND ARE AS FOLLOWS: B5142 LS_CONTROL.TXT SITE CALIBRATION INFORMATION HAS NOT BEEN PROVIDED FOR THIS PROJECT.IF FURTHER INFORMATION IS NEEDED, PLEASE CONTACT THE LOCATION AND SURVEYS UNIT. � INDICATES GEODETIC CONTROL MONUMENTS USED OR SET FOR HORIZONTAL PROJECT CONTROL BY THE NCDOT LOCATION AND SURVEYS UNIT. PROJECT CONTROL ESTABLISHED USING GLOBAL POSITIONING SYSTEM. NOTE: DRAWING NOT TO SCALE � �, � U J, � S UR VEY C01�TROL SHEET B-5I42 PRELIMII�ARY ROW M�R��:�� CONC��T�%C��N I. T� I�iONUM�N i RL I GN ST�T I ON 0� FSI=.T NORTH ER �T � 1��0�� -3�0�� 88435a6�1� 144432407256 � 1��91026 -3�0�� 68845�a2173 144441408181 � 17�37078 -3�0�� 6884�1a5726 1445�J67o5622 � 18�52049 -3�0�� 68836103728 144517706229 L 2��048 -3�0�� 6882�602635 14453140�151 � 25�66071 -3Qo�� 68802502�98 144581101934 L 28�21n74 -3�0�� 68788�a2242 1446�2702112 � 3� � 76 0 7�i - 36� o�C 687741 a 322�! i 4462��4 0��S(� 7 ROW M�RKEI� PCRM�INENT E�SEMENT - i �LIGN ST�IION Oi=�SET NORTH E�ST "2 1�^ 76 0�� 26 0�(� 6�,�'� 1 1 ��i�4� I 444`�5r �� 1 i 1 ROW M�RKER PERM�NENT E��EMENT-E �� I GN � ST� I I C�N C�1= �SET NORTH � E�ST Y3 11�52e�� 3�e�� 6g7�51o5869 144573�a6763 Y3 � 11��52e�� -2�e71 ��7837a5556 14457�1707157 DATUM DESCRIPTION THE LOCALIZED COORDINATE SYSTEM DEVELOPED FOR THIS PROJECT IS BASED ON THE STATE PLANE COORDINATES ESTABL[SHED BY NCDOT FOR MONUMENT "B5142-1" WITH NAp 83/NSRS 2007 STATE PLANE GR[D COORDINATES OF NORTHING: 688343.842(ft) EASTING: 1445084.602(ft) ELEVATION: 770.18(ft) THE AVERAGE COMBINED GRID FACTOR USED ON THIS PROJECT (GROUND TO GRID) IS: 0.99986215 THE N.C. LAMBERT GRID BEAR[NG AND LOCALIZED HORIZONTAL GROUND DISTANCE FROM "B5142-1" TO -L- STATION 9+00.00 IS N 87° 07' 48.33" W 854.24' ALL LINEAR DIMENSIONS ARE LOCALIZED HORIZONTAL D[STANCES VERTICAL DATUM USED IS NAVD 88 NOTES: ��W Ma�K�-�� M�N�N- ��M�NT - � PROJECT REFERENCE NO. SHEET NO. B-5142 1 G03 Location and Survevs �1�I�N ST�TION OFFSET NORTH E�ST � ��850�� -3�0�� 68843301722 1444��9a�16� � 9�850�� -7�0�� 68�47205�56 14443�208318 � 13�4�JaG� -730�� 68851�0893� 1444668a8853 � 16��`�0�� -950�� 68849�01368 1444�5404�57 � 16�48a�� 64074 68833406358 144495604725 L 17��60�� -3�a0� 6884110�788 1445�i36n5147 L 17�980�� 71027 68828605618 1445�9�n8153 � 18�45oD� 73042 68826804774 144513105714 � 18�45e�i� 89e�� 688254e�47� 1445125e7�15 � 1��73a5�i �8e5� � 688235e�i235 1445146e53�4 � 2�4��a4� 1�40�� 688178e6GJ32 144524�088�� 24��5�� 77�� 688��8073�� 1445618a��12 � 24��5a�� 1�40�� 6879850�232 14456�50�8�4 � 25�73a1�� 1�40�� 6g79�4o8428 1445752a172P � 26�5305� 74042 6878920�778 1445832oJ423 � 25�53a5� �90�� 68787102759 14458180`�456 _ 27�85n�� -5400� 68792205533 1446�1204575 � 27�85n�� -3�00� 68790305522 144599707962 � 2��0�� 41065 6877750552� 1446�4508485 � 29�250�� 650�� 68774104766 1446C�53o4814 � 27�5�e�i� -47a�� 6�7819e7�34 1446137e48�� 3��26a�i� 3�e96 � E87713e4761 1446159e74�� 31 � C�C� �� - 3� e�� 6�3773� e 212� 1446254 e 422� � �1�63a�� -460�� 68771401125 1446317a3�67 � �2�650�� -420�� 58766107885 14464�5a�448 � 32�65a�� -3Pa��i 68765102518 144639�a3�23 � 32�73oD� 3�0�4 68759407397 14463770614� � 32�730�� 560�� 687571091�1 1446365a1718 1. THE CONTROL DATA FOR THIS PROJECT CAN BE FOUND ELECTRONICALLY BY SELECTING PROJECT CONTROL DATA AT: HTTPS://CONNECT.NCDOT. GOV/RESO URCES/LOCATION/ THE FILES TO BE FOUND ARE AS FOLLOWS: B5142 LS_CONTROL.TXT SITE CALIBRATION INFORMATION HAS NOT BEEN PROVIDED FOR THIS PROJECT.IF FURTHER INFORMATION IS NEEDED, PLEASE CONTACT THE LOCATION AND SURVEYS UNIT. � INDICATES GEODETIC CONTROL MONUMENTS USED OR SET FOR HORIZONTAL PROJECT CONTROL BY THE NCDOT LOCATION AND SURVEYS UNIT. PROJECT CONTROL ESTABLISHED USING GLOBAL POSITIONING SYSTEM. NOTE: DRAWING NOT TO SCALE PRELIMIIVAR Y PA VEMENT SCHED ULE CI AT A1V AVERAGE RATEAOF 3�NLBS. PER SQ yD COURSE, TYPE S9.SB, RI 2�_6" COIVCRETE CURB AND GUTTER, STD. 846.O1 PROP. VAR. DEPTH ASPHALT CONCRETE SURFACE COURSE, TYPE S9.SB, C2 AT AN AVERAGE RATE OF 112 LBS. PER SQ. YD. PER 1" DEPTH, TO BE PLACED 71V LAYERS NOT LESS THAN I" IN DEPTH OR GREATER jZ2 1'-6" CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER, STD. 846.01 THAN I 1/2" IN DEPTH. PROP. APPROX. 4" ASPHALT CONCRETE IIYTERMEDIATE COURSE, DI TYPE I19.OB, AT A1V AVERAGE RATE OF 456 LBS. PER sQ. Yn. R3 COIVCRETE SHOULDER BERM GUTTER, STD. 846.01 PROP. VAR. DEPTH ASPHALT CONCRETE INTERMEDIATE COURSE, TYPE D2 719.OB, AT A1V AVERAGE RATE OF 114 LBS. PER SQ. YD. PER 1" DEPTH, TO T EARTH MATERIAL. BE PLACED IN LAYERS NOT LESS THAT 2/2" IN DEPTH OR GREATER THAN 4" IN DEPTH. El PROP. APPROX. S" ASPHALT CONCRETE BASE COURSE, TYPE B25.OB, AT AN AVERAGE RATE OF 570 LBS. PER SQ. YD. U EXISTING PAVEMENT. E2 PROP. APPROX. 4" ASPHALT CONCRETE BASE COURSE, MILLING ASPHALT PAVEMEIVT, VARIABLE DEPTH TYPE B25.OB, AT AN AVERAGE RATE OF 456 LBS. PER SQ. YD. V PROP. VAR. DEPTH ASPHALT CONCRETE BASE COURSE, TYPE E3 B25.OB, AT AN AVERAGE RATE OF II4 LBS. PER SQ. YD. PER I" DEPTH, TO W VARIABLE DEPTH ASPHALT PAVEMEIYT (SEE DETAIL SHOWING BE PLACED IN LAYERS NOT LESS THAT 3" IN DEPTH OR GREATER METHOD OF WEDGING). THA1V S 1/2" I1V DEPTH. 37.5' MILLING 1" EVERY 25' 0" TO 1.5" C2 y L--- ------- U MILLING DETAIL USE MILLING DETAIL AT RESURFACING TIES s � � > � � � N v NOTE: PAVEMEIVT EDGE SLOPES ARE l:l UNLESS SHOWN OTHERWISE. -L- 34'-0" 5'-0" 12'-0" 1 GRADE 0.02 POINT 12'-0" � 0.02 TYPICAL SECTION ON STRUCTURE � SURVEY PROIECT REFERENCE NO. SHEET NO. B-5/42 2A-Ol ROADWAY DESIGN PAVEMENT DESIGN ENGINEER ENGINEER PRELIMINARY PLANS DO NOT USE FOR CONSTHUCTION DETAIL SHOWING METHOD OF WEDGING USE IN CONJUNCTION WITH TYPICAL SECTION NO. 1& 3 6'7Q�YI USE TYPICAL SECTION ON STRUCTURE -L- STA. 21 + 06.00 TO STA. 23 + 06.00 RE BRi CONS ASPHL TYPI� PROIECT REFERENCE NO. � SHEET NO. PRELIMINARY PLANS DO NOT USE FOR CONSTRUCTION CONCRETE HEADER R=�s„ � /8" > PROPOSED a � EXISTING � ASPHALT BRICK � PAVEMENT ��2„ I PAVERS �1 v i SECT lON A -A ��, ��,,,�� (LT & RT ) SEE SHEET 2A-03 FOR -Y3- TYPICAL SECTION SEE SHEET 5 FOR -Y3- PLAN VIEW Z O > z 0 m � Q � a� m � 4� � � C � DETAIL DRY DETENTIONhiAZARDOUS SPILL BASIN DRAWDOWN STRUCTURE SIDE 1 SIDE 2 ....._. w,�K\ f—.:"".'ew�-1 lxw�E �,�K N�,Ft � SIDE 3 DETAIL HAZARDOUS SPILLBASIN TOTAL CAPACITY REQUIRED: 4495 cf TOTAL CAPACITY PROVIDED: 5368 cf @ ELEV. 766.0 w/1.0 FT. FREEBOARD � -- --- � 4' 1 �� . � `y' � 55' %� � � 2 7' 11' � FROM —L— STA. 24 + 50 TO STA. 25 + 05 RT DETAI L HAZARDOUS SPILLBASIN TOTAL CAPACITY REQUIRED: 5895 cf TOTAL CAPACITY PROVIDED: 5940 cf @ ELEV. 766.0 w/1.0 FT. FREEBOARD �3� -�--- ti � .. %8� � 34' 22' � FROM —L— STA. 17 + 34 TO STA. 18 + 00 RT PROIECT REFERENCE NO. � SHEET NO. WW SHEET NO. z � w � � Q � � C � a s a s N a DRAWING 2G-1 FOR ROCK PLATING � ROCK EMBANKMENT DEfAIL. SBG -L- STA. 17+30 RT TO END OF BRIDGE SBG -L- STA. 20+79 LT �TO END OF BRIDGE Q � � W E w � = O50 N (� + R� PAP R O W N W o (n _ Qw �_r zc N z �-�- s o J � _ -r —y — J U �� — — __ Q RIP-RAP � PUE � m 0 �� DuKE ENERGr OB 3�8 PG 2H � ie Pe 15 CORNFIJUS CREEK/ LAKE NONMNV BEGIN BRIDGE -L- STA2/+06A0 E E CL II RIP RAP CL. II RIP RAP TO EL.760.0 TO EL.760.0 175 TONS 175 TONS (21+94) (23+18� �isTEF� —Hk�a�E ��_ � / E%CAVATE EXISTING F -L- Pi Sto 26+9459 Pl 5/0 29+49.63 �_/0' 35' 20.0' !RT! p=/0' 35' 2C1A' fLT1 D= 4 09' 06T D= 4 09' 06T L = 255.04' L = 255A4' r = 12788' r = 12788' R = I.380.Oi0' R = 1.380.00' SE _ .06 SE = Ab ✓a = 60 mph ✓o = 60 mpA . g � � N SEE DRAWING 2G-7 FOR ROCK PLATING AND ROCK EMBANKMENT DETAIL. aROPEaTV i.we Fo��ows 7b0'CONTOUR (NGVD 291 PER �B 360 PG 290 •55 -L- zo• �r S 8z��4 zs�� E,5 i 30.20' +66.7i-L- a' END BRIDGE so• �r � a �, -L- STA23+06A0 27, � � l p� eti /NC. �' � �' � � s SBG -L- STA. 24+12 LT E ' 6 TO END OF BRIDGE / 5 a3 A�- � �� 5 F — F F I � �C WW �X�AVATION=730CY PUEN-HA'� oe � YU w �E�'�� E 29 L- 52 -L- 104' RT 104' RT III' RT III' RT +66 -L- 104' RT � 122' RT I GT LINC PER PB 52 �G I!9 DRY DETENTION /HAZARDOUS SPILL BASIN � SEE DETAIL SHEET 2D-Ol DDE=585CY naPROxiMnre 750'CONTOUR MGVD 291 SEE PB 16 PG I80 58G END OF BRIDGE — TO -L- STA. 25+40 RT CORNEIJUS CRF_EK/ LAKE NORMAN DUKEO RCY DB 3�8 PC r9 OB '/B PG i5 � '� � jll' x it x 7.5' '�R —DUE/ DU c� s / 52 -I RIP RAP +i� ' 4- PT c�� in.c» o: � � � �$LF III�yr.- \�_ MA�NOLIA BAYS�JV.LLC \9, r +p5 -�- DB b7� a' i392 �^ r x. /W PB 60 � �32 ➢µ� m 104' RT LOi f�v �1 �J 2�2841 W Z�,'. +104' R�� 3 & GUTTER (-Y3- LT & BEGIN BRIDGE —L— $TA2/tp6.0 -Y,3�'�\ Pl S�a 10+4682� � p=/5' S6' 32l fL d�T D = 25' 27' 53.2' „�" 45-� �,�6r _ z ��0 3i5r Li = 99�ilYY 4�Zr� % S P�v�30 DETAIL A wl� LATERAL'V' DITCH , Na� �a s�a�ei ural F'ill Ground p �'iFt. Slopa d Min.D= 1.5 Ft. � Max. d= 1.5 Ft. � b = 5.0 F+. � CORNELIU$ FANILY, LLC TYPB of Liner=� PSRM / DB �977 PG EEB FROM -L- STA 26+50 TO 28+00 RT DB 360 PG 290 FROM -L- STA 28+00 TO 37+00 LT / -L- PC Sto.25+�J1 � -Y3- POT 510.10+00.00 = -L- PRC Sto. 28+2/74 -L- PC Sto.25+8946 5 �.3/'�.%w •21.74 -L- ..__.... �_ � E _F � � � w \\ �F\ Q3 �z II � _� �� II e�r�l \��R��K ) COLUMN, ROCKG\ N ROCK COLUMN � ^� \\ BKIGNII �,�\PAVENS II } �� Z � esr\ \ � DEAO ENO T — — _ �� 0514 __i_ 579 26+50 TO 28+00 RT MoN �� ZINE WITH PSRM S E DETAIL A _ xistwc Riw RETAIN � � R / �"-`"tir��.1C'.`�'lvf�r^ DIT PUE s,. � � -Y3- PC Sto. l0+153/ � - C.PRESiON CORNEUUS ' \ �P�Z P �,920 � 5 � N� GSRS Zoo� Np0 03�N 8 n�j DETAIL B SPECIAL CUT DRCH ( No� fo Scale) Lro �i��h urol p� �� Slope G.ound 7� p f��e� Min. D= 1.5 Ff. FROM -L- STA. 37+20 TO STA. 32+50 LT CORNELIU �FAMILY, LLC p6 1977 PG 66B OB 360 PC 290 -L - PT Sta. 30+76J8 �H CLEAN SEDIMENT 1 TO 31+00 LT FROM PIPE M SEE DETAIL A 27' /NC I -L- +76.78 -L- +00 -l- t63 -L- '�LT�,�. E�� : EX.R/W _ ' - � � PDE P�S PD o C a UE�s PDE PDE�PDE 051 --" -L- �26 -L- SPECIAL CUT DITCH �� X• �W -L- STA 29 �I� 00 TO 31 +00 RT LINE WITH PSRM SEE DETAIL C C.PREST�ORNEUUS DB i669 PC 2�92 v �/�ItHS LN Y PINTD LANE SR 14331 +rj2 'Y3- PeR Pe e� Pc z� �_29.71I4' LT -i.3- P�% 510. //+6�.,37 END BRIDGE —L— STA23+06A0 � � %/I I— • I/I �� BEGIN APPROACH SLAB \ �"' / END APPROACH SLAB COFNEIJUS CREEK/ —L— STA20+8/83 �KE "oR"'A" —L— STA23+30J7 SKETCH SHOWIN� BRIDGE WITH RELATIONSHIP TO ROADWAY PROIECT REFERENCE NO. SHEET NO. B-5/42 5 WW SHEET NO. :OADWAY DESIGN HYDR.4ULIC5 ENGINEER ENGINEER PRELIMINARY PLANS DO NOT USE FOR CONSTRUCTION -L- POT STA33+74,66 5 6/' 24' 34l E SPECIAL CUT DITCH -L- STA 31+20 TO 32+50 LT SEE DETAIL B F "- F I — �. _ TC FiWI' 2l O N CORNFl.IUS RD SR 1302 22' fiST F F —�.7� -i - SPECIAL CUT DITCH -L- STA 31+25 TO 32+50 RT LINE WITH PSRM SEE DETAIL C E111D TIP PROJECT B—S142 L— POT STA. 33 + 38.79 DETAIL C SPECIAL NT DITCH �No,m s�aiei F,o�, NoNr I P'� °( �� cn Sio Ground Z:I p F\ �e Pe d Min. D= 1.5 Ff Type of Llner= PSRM Max d= 1.5 Ff. FROM -L- STA. 29+00 TO STA. 31+00 RT FROM -L- STA.31�i�25 TO STA.32+50 RT SEE SHEET 28-OIFOR -Y3- BRICK PAVER TRANSITION AND CONCRETE HEADER SEE SHEET 2D-01 FOR DRY DETENTION/ HAZARDOUS SPILL BASIN DETAIL PAVEMENT REMOVAL �LL�.I� SEE SHEET 6 FOR -L- PROFILE SEE SHEET 7 FOR -Y3- PROFILE