760022_Compliance Evaluation Inspection_20240117

Division of Water Resources
Facility Number "! - ,' 0 Division of Soil and Water Conservation
0 Other Agency
Type of Visit: 0 Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: 0 Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: pj Arrival Time: Departure Time: Z' p County: `1 Region:
Farm Name: Y4'f't�l yl���RVrYI Owner Email:
Owner Name: Phone: ?p3kk -U-14-
Mailing Address: \otm
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: �� �- .� �( _ Title: Phone:3?)ll.'4-G1 -CG42-
Onsite Representative: 40k) �\ oc\_ek _A(;c L4 Integrator:
Certified Operator: V—ekvyl )�uocm Certification Number: U\'1y S�' )Z 131 12_4
Back-up Operator: Certification Number:
Location of Farm: Latitude: ?�O ' �J 3' �k Longitude: _.q
�S C)2 1� > C: >z.-1 '5 k aVf-kCYDss ►2d Uvv� ®>OL I3W 22U> (DNCcICe bat�y�d
Design Current Design Current Design Current
Swine Capacity Pop. Wet Poultry Capacity Pop. Cattle Capacity Pop.
Wean to Finish I ILayer I I X Dairy Cow C ')
Wean to Feeder I INon-Layer Dairy Calf
Feeder to Finish X Dairy Heifer 'JCAO 0
Farrow to Wean Design Current Dry Cow +
Farrow to Feeder Dry Poultry Capacity Pop. Non-Dairy
Farrow to Finish Layers Beef Stocker
Gilts Non-Layers Beef Feeder
Boars Pullets Beef Brood Cow
Turkeys
Other Turkey Poults
Other L I Other
Discharues and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes A No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State(gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system?(If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? aYes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters tkYes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page I of 3 21412015 Continued

Facility Number: - 9 L Date of Inspection: 1
Waste Collection&Treatment
4.Is storage capacity(structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall)less than adequate? Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
a. If yes,is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes M\No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: k ki N w
Spillway?:
S CfLIVA-Q
Freeboard(in): 2" 12" ( 2`1
Observed Freeboard(in): Z.I Z)
5.Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes M No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(i.e.,large trees,severe erosion,seepage,etc.)
6.Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes g No ❑ NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes,and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat,notify DWR
7.Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
8.Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits,dry stacks,and/or wet stacks)
9.Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require Yes [:] No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers,setbacks,or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes &No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes allo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals(Cu,Zn,etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN> 10%or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window 1❑\j Evidence`�m off Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s): MnUQ VW (,P(Y1 Z` 1' . 1'N\j
D "
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes V No ❑ NA ❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes ZNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes M No ❑ NA ❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes �kNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
Required Records&Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage&Permit readily available? ❑ Yes MNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
20.Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?If yes,check ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑WUP ❑Checklists ❑Design [:]Maps ❑Lease Agreements ❑Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? ❑ Yes A No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Waste Application Weekly Freeboard Waste Analysis JZLSoil Analysis ❑W-a�*tea Id Weather Code
-Rainfall %Stocking` Crop Yield ❑120 Minate hiSPIM6011 )KMonthly and V Rainfall Inspections ❑S}nd�
22.Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes ;f�j No ❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected,did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes ❑ No )ANA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 21412015 Continued

Facility Number: - 27 Date of Inspection:
24.Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes JkNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
25.Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes,check ❑ Yes `'❑�NoNA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es)below.
❑Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑Non-compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s)and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26.Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes R1 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
27.Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments(PLAT)certification? ❑ Yes'"ZNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28.Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes 'ErNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal? gw"p j
29.At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes'-0 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
If yes,contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the 'Yes 0 No 0 NA ❑ NE
permit?(i.e.,discharge,freeboard problems,over-application)
31.Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ❑ No '�NA ❑ NE
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/storage Pond ❑ Other:
32.Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes�No ❑ NA 0 NE
33.Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on-site representative? ❑ Yes 'No ❑ NA ❑ NE
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA 0 NE
Comments(refer to question ft Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations(use additional pages as necessary).
Q OUW 1111 2,3 dui
4. CCL iwafi�dw Cuy rpkRd 412s1)-3 A"Y'w ,A'aw A'
4. eeb�Qrd vaa�o 9 Rhw mlgm Fre 4.fV &\1 3 W ldna ntv Yolfi,• 3D)
Silage 1MVWt c j+s 'rD' e&AVA\-V fMa CILMS Mh V ~ 1W-
`b,S-i 11 no ukpk me aus-hcea Ab f0cw v 6mA %wco .
q •�eur�,la�, c�rev�V,w�^ �e� it �,��a� bafsi�G��u�' c�eax�a,� P
111 1 d COY " J)
11w� o�t'Ne,� �'e+nc�,me�-� °rce�t'''
Ii� Iy�ZZ 2f 1�41-3 t¢ 1 2V12,3 11126�Z3
Cb
�,��1 l ti �i I LLB— 1•�d Z 24
Reviewer/Inspector Name: ����M A�(�,(j� Phone:2j3�-��(pq�p�7
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: D►I I 1 I a4
Page 3 of 3 21412015