Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout310338_Compliance Evaluation Inspection_20230914in for Visit: ® Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access Date of Visit: Arrival Time: Departure Timefl_0_171� County: -ttFarm Name: j r�r �-� y� r..<3„Z Owner Email: Owner Name: Phone: Mailing Address: Physical Address: Facility Contact: �� �; c�� +� ►"���ftitle: Phone: Onsite Representative: Integrator: Certified Operator: Certification Number: Back-up Operator: Certification Number: Location of Farm: Latitude: Longitude: Region: s n De ign :Current i Design Current Des gu Swme wit Pop Wet Poultry Capacity fop .Current Cattle ~ Capacity, _- �., . - - „Pog Wean to Finish ILayer Wean to Feeder I INon-Layer " Feeder to Finish Heifer Discharges and Stream Impacts 1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other: a. Was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes El No NA ❑ NE b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No `�- - - ❑ NE c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)? d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ N NA ❑ NE 2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ID Yes [7NN ❑ NA ❑ NE 3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters El Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE of the State other than from a discharge? Page I of 3 - � 511212020 Continued Facility Number: - 3 Date of Inspection: 1 2 Waste Collection & Treatment 4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No E'-N'A ❑ NE Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6 Identifier: Spillway?: Designed Freeboard (in): Observed Freeboard (in):� 5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes �Noo ❑ NE (i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.) 6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes E 2, Ko❑ NA ❑ NE waste management or closure plan? If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWR 7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes _4"v ❑ NA ❑ NE 8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes El ❑ NA ❑ NE (not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks) 9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes I I Xo ❑ NA `7 ❑ NE maintenance or improvement? Waste Application 10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE maintenance or improvement? 11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ❑4o ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.) ❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil ❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area 12. Crop Type(s): 13. Soil Type(s): 14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes F,,_j'No ❑ NA ❑ NE 15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes []lo ❑ NA ❑ NE 16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes �o ❑ NA ❑ NE acres determination? 17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes OXo 0 NA ❑ NE 18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes EKNo ❑ NA ❑ NE Required Records & Documents � 19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? ❑ Yes LJ l<o ❑ NA ❑ NE 20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check ❑ Yes ❑,No ❑ NA ❑ NE the appropriate box. ❑WUP ❑Checklists ❑Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Other: 21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. es ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Waste Applicatio - ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Weather Code ❑ Rainfall tocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections ❑ Sludge Survey 22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes [?r<o ❑ NA ❑ NE 23. If selected, did the facility fail to 'install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes LS o ❑ NA ❑ NE Page 2 of 3 511212020 Continued Facility Number: Date of Inspection: ! Z 24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes To ❑ NA ❑ NE 25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ Yes To ❑ NA ❑ NE the appropriate box(es) below. ❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels ❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance: 26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes ❑ ❑ NA ❑ NE 27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes ❑ No <A ❑ NE Other Issues / 28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes ❑ IC ❑ NA ❑ NE and report mortality rates that were higher than normal? 29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? [:]Yes E] ' o ❑ NA ❑ NE If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately. 30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the [:]Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application) 31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑,Nlr ❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other: 32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes 12 <o ❑ NA ❑ NE 33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative? ❑ Yes rrNo"" ❑ NA ❑ NE 34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE Comments (refer to que`,st�on`#): Explain any YES.auswers and/or.any additwnalzreeoriimendationg.or any other comments Use drawiu s of facil '_ to better 0 lain situations use, additional` a es as necess g- tY p - f P_g _ ° y Reviewer/Inspector Name. Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Page 3 of 3 T �_ a- y-t�UJ6O S S QA rv-.e r Phone: Date: � 7,3 511212020