410019_Compliance Evaluation Inspection_20231221

Division of Water Resources
Facility Number - l i` J O Division of Soil and Water Conservation
O Other Agency
Type of Visit: ®Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review O Structure Evaluation O Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: ® Routine O Complaint O Follow-up O Referral O Emergency O Other O Denied Access
?1 e'E, i
Date of Visit:112 i I!W 2 Arrival Time:I JO-QC y,,,-] Departure Time: -i County: I 1 \ Region: f
Farm Name: Owner Email: ')ocy„P"I\ 6) u cura'),(_c Ym
Owner Name: Koji a"L6\ Phone: ? 'f)U "le 3 Q 3
Mailing Address: U(W) KI C.
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: �N,\\►Clrn SOlKvck1� Title: Phone:
Onsite Representative: Integrator:
Certified Operator: Certification Number: 0 YS
Back-up Operator: Certification Number:
Location of Farm: Latitude: W° \�' 115 Longitude: `1 cl { ;,")� '
Design Current Design Current Design Current
Swine Capacity Pop. Wet Poultry Capacity Pop. Cattle Capacity Pop.
Wean to Finish La er Dairy Cow \0
Wean to Feeder Non-Layer Dairy Calf
Feeder to Finish Dairy Heifer
Farrow to Wean Design Current Dry Cow a
Farrow to Feeder Dry Poultry Capacity Pop. Non-Dairy
Farrow to Finish ILayers Beef Stocker
Gilts Non-Layers Beef Feeder
Boars Pullets Beef Brood Cow
Turkeys
Other Turkey Poults
Other I I LlOther
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? [:] Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made? [] Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State?(If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State(gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system?(If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes �KNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Yes FZf No ❑ NA ❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page 1 of 3 21412015 Continued

'Q Iec
Facili Number: 41 - Date of Inspection:
Waste Collection&Treatment
4.Is storage capacity(structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall)less than adequate? ❑ Yes %No ❑ NA ❑ NE
a.If yes,is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard(in):
Observed Freeboard(in):
5.Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes ;4,No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(i.e.,large trees,severe erosion,seepage,etc.)
6.Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes J&No ❑ NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes,and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat,notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes �KNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes Et No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits,dry stacks,and/or wet stacks)
9.Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes ';3.,No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10.Are there any required buffers,setbacks,or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals(Cu,Zn,etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN> 10%or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s): SC �_
13. Soil Type(s):
14.Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes 0 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes .�No ❑ NA ❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes 'Z No ❑ NA ❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes '�No ❑ NA ❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes 10 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Required Records&Documents
19.Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage&Permit readily available? ❑ Yes ]R(No ❑ NA ❑ NE
20.Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?If yes,check ❑ Yes 'RNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑WUP ❑Checklists ❑Design ❑Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Other:
21.Does record keeping need improvement? �3 ❑ Yes g No ❑ NA ❑ NE
�(Waste Application Rweekly Freeboard lowaste Analysis oil Analysi ❑Waste Trans' Weather Code
Rainfall Stocking Crop Yield ❑ 20 Min„tP rn, +: Monthly and 1"Rainfall Inspections ❑%idge ey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes *0 No ❑ NA ❑ N E
23. If selected,did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes [:] No :EZNA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 21412015 Continued

vLc
Facility Number: jDate of Inspection:
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes J No ❑ NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes,check ❑ Yes ❑ No �A ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es)below.
❑Failure to complete annual sludge survey []Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑Non-compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s)and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes `RNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
27.Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments(PLAT)certification? ❑ Yes ❑ No 5NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28.Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes ❑ No 'NJ NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29.At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes :KNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
If yes,contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the [] Yes 0 No ❑NA ❑ NE
permit?(i.e.,discharge,freeboard problems,over-application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ❑ No Er NA ❑ NE
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32.Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ YesNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on-site representative? ❑ Yes `f;�No [] NA ❑ NE
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? ❑ Yes �No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments(refer to question ft Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other continents.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations(use additional pages as necessary).
(' \�b fCA1Ln A da Jne 011V1Z3 dw A,Vl
*D�SC�� d�� S��c,O ( rc�u wk of� v ie Sew `P 1 inn �i�xk a t, cix;�
T Cl�c i�� (WWII) ern'► �1ua'1 �� �r,�►,�n 1
� Z� i3 1G �3
Reviewer/Inspector Name: Phone:
Phone:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:
Page 3 of 3 511212020