20150917 Ver 1 _401 Application Attachments _20150904

i
2
4
Mc,kf)A��;3
AGENT AUTHORIZATION FORM
All Blanks To Be Filled In l3v The Crrrrentpr•oner•ty Owner
Name: Stephen 1 -1. Clark
Address: 1 125 F1olt Rd, Apex, FDIC' 2 ?523
Phone: [phone]
Project Name /Description: Middleton Subdivision I Residential Subdivision
Project Number: Project Manager: Ke vin Yates _
Date: Januai)
U.S. Army Corps of I;rngineers
Attn: James I..astinger
Raleigh Regtdatory Field Office
3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105
Wake Forest, NC 27587
Re: Wetlands Related Consulting and Permitting
To Whom It May Concern:
I hereby designate and authorize. The John R. McAdams Company, [tic. to stet in my behalf as
my agent in the processing of permit applications, to furnish upon request supplemental
information in support of applications, etc. from this clay forward.
I, the undersigned, a duly authorized owner of record of the property /properties identified herein,
do authorize representatives of the Wilmington District, U.S. Army Corps of Fngineers (Corps)
to enter upon the property herein described for the purpose of conducting on -site investigation
and issuing a determination associated with Water of the U.S. subject to I"ederal jurisdiction
under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act anti /or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of
1899.
This notification SriperSedeS any preViOLIS correspondence concerning the agent for this project.
NOTICE: This authorization, for liability and professional courtesy reasons, is valid only
for government officials to enter the property wizen accoinpanied by 1•11c John R.
McAdams Conipany, Inc. staff. ,
r
Stephen H. Clark
Print Property Owner Sif;neturc -
Raleigh- Durham Charlotte
2905 Meridian Parkway 11301 Carmel Commons Blvd., Suite 111
Durham, North Carolina 27713 Charlotte, North Carolina
(919) 361 -5000 (704) 527 -0800
Designing Tomorrow's Infrastructure & Communities
McAdamsCo.com

il��
W ADAMS
AGFN'I' AUTHORIZATION FORM
All Blanks To Be Filled In By The CurrentPronerty Owner
Name: Richard J. Gray
Address: 6308 Old Jenks fed Apex, NC 27523
Phone: [phone]
Project Name/Description: Middleton Subdivision/ Residential Subdivision
Project Number: Project Mari eer: ( Kevin Yaies
Date:
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Attn: James Lastinger
Raleigh Regulatory Field Office
3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105
Wake Forest, TNrC 27587
Re: Wetlands Related Consulting and Permitting
To Whom It May Concern:
I hereby designate and authorize The John R. McAdams Company, Inc. to act in my behalf as
my agent in the processing of permit applications, to furnish upon request supplemental
m
inforation in supl oil of applications, etc.. from this day forward.
1, the undersigned, a duly authorized owner of record of the property /properties identified herein,
do authorize representatives of the Wilmington District, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps)
to enter upon the property herein described for the purpose of conducting on -site investigation
and issuing a determination associated with Water of the U.S. subject to Federal jurisdiction
under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of
1899.
This notification supersedes any pteviotts correspondence concerning the agent for this project.
NOTICE: This authorization, for liability and professional courtesy reasons, is valid only
for government officials to enter the property when accompanied by The John R.
McAdams Company, Inc. stuff.
Richard J. Gra
Print Property �wner ignature
Al P '1e_ ,e erg
Rasletgh- Durham / Charlotte
2905 Meridians Parkway 1.1301 Carmel Commons Blvd., Suite 11:.
Durham, North Carolina 27713 Charlotte, North Carolina
[phone] (704)527 -O800
Designing Tomorrow's Infrnstructure & CornMuflitie5
McAdamsCo.com

Ut
AGENT AU`l'FfORIZATION FORM
All Blanks To Ile Filled In llr 'F'Fic C :uarcntl'r�amatr t)rincr
Name: Albeit R. flux .1r.
Address: 1 121 Twin Creek Rd, Apex. NC 2752:3
Phone: _i)19- 362 -541
('roject Na11le /iFc4crlptioil; MiClollctoll St1bd1Vision / Residential Subdivision
Proliec( Number: 1 }I'UICCt k viil Yates
Fhte:
U.S. Arley Corps ol'h:nginecrs
Awl: James 1.astingcr
Raleigh Regulatory Ficid 01'11ce
3 331 1lcritage "Trade Drive, Suite 105
Wakc !direst, NC 27587
Re: Wetlands Related Consulting and Perillitting
TO Whom It May ('011CC1'11:
I hereby designate alld authorize The John R. McAdams Company, hic. to stet in illy behall' as
Illy sigent ill the processing of permit <lpplicationS, to iiu'nish 111)011 reri11cSt Supplcnlcntal
initlri ation ill Support oCapplications, etc. froill this day forward.
1, the undcrsigiled, a duly autllorizcd owneroCrecord of the property /properties identified herein.
d0 authorize representatives 01'tlle Wilmington District, U.S, Army Corps ol'l?nginuers (Corps)
to enter upon the property herein described lilr the purpose of conducting,, on -site investigation
and issuing it oIC:tC l- iltinatioil associated with Water oftlte U.S. subject to VCdel"a( jurisdiction
tuider Section 404 (1I the Clean Wafter Act acid /or Section 10 i11 the Rivers and I larliors Act of`
1899.
This notificattion Supersedes any previous correspondence conceriling the Igent 161' this pro ?jcCt.
NOTICE: This authorization, lira• liability and pi-vfessioinal aoertes11 r•caasolis, is v4did Only
for government Officials to enter the property W11Cn aecoaalpanied by The John R.
McAdams Company, file. stuff.
Albert R. Flux ,lr.
i'l -int Property Owilur
Raleigh- purham
2905 Meridian Parkway
Durham, North Carolina 27713
(919) 361 -5000
Signatul"c
Charlotte
11301 Carmel Commons Blvd., Suite Ill
Charlotte, North Carolina
(704)5"2'7 -0800
Designing Tomorrow's infrastructure & Communities
McAdamsCo.com

L..
M.isADAM.
AGENT AUTHORIZATION FORM
All Blanks To Be Filled In By The CurrentProoerty Owner
Name: Regina McLaurin
Address: 305 Glen Betio Ln. Apt C Cary, NC 27518
Phone:
Project Name /Description: Middleton Subdivision / Residential Subdivision
Project Number; Project Manager: I Kevin Yatcs
Date: X /,q9 / 2-o /-5r __.. .
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Attn: James Lastinger
Raleigh Regulatory Field Office
3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105
Wake forest, NC 27587
Re: Wetlands Related Consulting find Permitting
To Whom It May Com,- rn:
I hereby designate and authorize The John R, McAdams Company, Inc. to act in my behalf as
my agent in the processing of permit applications, to furnish upon request supplemental
information in support of applications, cto. front this clay forward.
1, the undersigned, a duly authorized owner of record of the property /properties identified herein,
do authorize representatives of the Wilmington District, U.S. Army Corps of )ngiueers (Corps)
to enter upon the property herein described for the purpose of conducting on -site investigation
and issuing a determination associated with Water of the U.S. subject to Federal jurisdiction
under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act and /or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of
1899.
This notification supersedes any previous correspondence concerning the agent for this project.
NOTICE: This authorization, for liability and professional courtesy reasons, is valid only
for government officials to enter the property when necompnnied by Tito John R.
McAdams Company, Inc. staff.
lZeRina MGLaurin
Print Property Owner
Raleigh-Durham
2905 Meridian Parkway
Durham, North Carolina 27713
(91.9) 361 -5000
q igm tire
Charlotte
11301 Cannel Commons Blvd., Suite 111
Charlotte, North Carolina
(704) 527 -0800
Designing Tomorrow's infrastructure & Communities
McAdamsCo.com

J
Mc;ADAMS
AGENT AUTHORIZATION FORM
All Blanks To Be Filled In By The CurrentProneety Owner
Name: William. L. McLaurin Jr
Address: 1204 I-Ioft Rd, Apex, NC 27523
Phone: [phone]
Project Name /Description: Middleton Subdivision / Residential Subdivision
Project Number: Project Manager: ( Kevin Yates
Date:
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Attn: James Lastinger
Raleigh Regulatory Field Office
3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105
Wake Forest, NC 27587
Re: Wetlands Related Cansulting and Permitting
To Whom It May Concern:
I hereby designate and authorize The John R. McAdams Company, Inc. to act in my behalf as
my agent in the processing of permit applications, to furnish upon request supplemental
information in support of applications, etc. from this day forward.
1, the undersigned, a duly authorized owner of record of the property /properties identified herein,
do authorize representatives of the Wilmington District, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps)
to enter upon the property herein described for the purpose of conducting on -site investigation
and issuing a determination associated with Water of the U.S. subject to Federal jurisdiction
under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act and /or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of
1899.
This notification supersedes any previous correspondence concerning the agent for this project.
NOTICE: This authorization, for liability and professional courtesy reasons, is valid only
for government officials to enter the property when accompanied by The John R.
McAdams Company, Inc. staff.
William L. McLaurin Jr
Print Property Owner
Raleigh- Durham
2905 Meridian Parkway
Durham, North Carolina 27713
(919) 361 -5000
Signature
Charlotte
11301 Carmel Commons Blvd., Suite 111
Charlotte, North Carolina
(704) 527 -0800
Designing Tomorrow's Infrastructure & Communities
McAdamsCo.com

=A
M c A DA INA. S
AGENT Au'fiioRIZATiON I'£)RM
All Blaanlcs To Be Filled In By The Cua•a-entProuerty Owner
Nance: -Me(an M.. Poole
Address: 1208 Hold Rd, Apex, NC 27523 _
Phone: w�e'
Project Nam&Description: Middleton Subdivision / Residentia.l Subdivision
Project Number: .. ............_.___.._.�._Prgject Manager: Kevin Yates
Date:
U.S. Array Corps of laagineers
Attn: James Lastinger
Raleigh Regulatory Field Office
3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105
Wake Forest, NC 27587
Re: Wetlands Related Consulting and Permitting
To Whom It May Concern:
I hereby designate and authorize The John R. McAdams Company, Inc. to act in illy behall' as
my agent in the processing of permit applications, to rurntsh upon request supplemental
information in support of applications, etc. from this day forward.
1, the uradcrMignW, a duly authorized owner o('record of the property /properties identified herein,
do authorize representatives of tile Wilmington District, U.S. Array Corps of Engineers (Corps)
to enter upoaa the property herein described for the purpose of conducting on -site investigation
and issuing a determination associated with Water of the U.S. subject to Federal jurisdiction
under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act and /or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of
1899.
This notification supersedes any previous correspondence concerning the agent for this project.
NOTICE: This authorization, for liability and professional courtesy a-easons, is valid only
for government officials to enter the property when accompanied by The John R.
McAdams Company, Inc. staff.
Mep, an M. Poole
Print int I roperty Owner SigpltUre
Raleigh- Durham Charlotte
2905 Meridian Parkway 11301 Carmel Commons Blvd„ Suite 111
Durham, North Carolina 27713 Charlotte, North Carolina
(919) 361 -5000 (704) 527 -0800
Designing Tomorrow's Infrastructure & Communities
McAdamsCo.com

or
McADAM.
AGENT' AurtiORIZATION FORM
All Blanks To Be Filled In By The CurrentPronerty Owner
Namc: John C. Stanton _
Address: 1201 Davis Dr, Apex, NC 27523
Phone: [phone]
Project Name /Description: Middleton Subdivision / Residential Subdivision
Project Number: _ Project Manager: I Kevin Yates
Uatc:
U.S. Army Corps of tinginccrs
Attn: James Lastinger
Raleigh Regulatory Field Office
3331 I- leritagc "Trade Drive, Suite 105
Wake Forest, NC 27587
Re: Wetlands Related Consulting and Permitting
"1'0 Whom It May Concern:
I hereby designate and authorize The John It. McAdams Company, Inc. to act in my behalf as
my agent in the processing of permit applications, to furnish upon request supplcmcntal
information in support of applications, etc. from this day forward.
1, the undersigned, a duly authorized owner of record of the property /properties identified herein,
do authorize representatives of the Wilmington District, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps)
to enter upon the property herein described for the purpose of conducting on -site investigation
and issuing a determination associated with Water of the U.S. subject to Federal jurisdiction
under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act and /or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of
1899.
'I'his notification supersedes any previous correspondence concerning the agent for this project.
NOTICE: This authorization, for liability and professional courtesy reasons, is valid only
for government officials to enter the property when accompanied by The John R.
McAdams Company, Inc. staff.
John C. Stanton ,�
Print Property Owner �� — S' nature
Raleigh- Durham Charlotte
2905 Meridian Parkway 11301 Carmel Commons Blvd., Suite 111
Durham, North Carolina 27713 Charlotte, North Carolina
(919) 361 -5000 (704) 527 -0800
Designing Tomorrow's Infrostructure & Communities
McAdamsCo.com

g i2i 11
IVA
AGENT AUTHORIZATION FORM
All Blanks To Be Filled In IIv The CurrentPronerty Owner
Name: Jesse R. Newsome
Address: 1133 Twin Creek Rd Apex, NC 27523
Phone: [phone]
Project Name /Description: Middleton Subdivision / Residential Subdivision
Project Number: Project Manager: ( Kevin Yates
Date: / _5"// s'
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Attn: James Lastinger
Raleigh Regulatory Field Office
3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105
Wake Forest, NC 27587
Re: Wetlands Related Consulting and Permitting
To Whom It May Concern:
I hereby designate and authorize The John R. McAdams Company, Inc. to act in my behalf as
my agent in the processing of permit applications, to furnish upon request supplemental
information in support of applications, etc. from this day forward.
I, the undersigned, a duly authorized owner of record of the property /properties identified herein,
do authorize representatives of the Wilmington District, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps)
to enter upon the property herein described for the purpose of conducting on -site investigation
and issuing a determination associated with Water of the U.S. subject to Federal jurisdiction
under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act and /or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of
1899.
This notification supersedes any previous correspondence concerning the agent for this project.
NOTICE: This authorization, for liability and professional courtesy reasons, is valid only
for government officials to enter the property when accompanied by The John R.
McAdams Company, Inc. staff.
Jesse R. Newsome
Print Property Owner
<-• ''' '
Signature '
Raleigh -Du r ham
Charlotte
2905 Meridian Parkway
11301 Carmel Commons Blvd., Suite 111
Durham, North Carolina 27713
Charlotte, North Carolina
(919) 361 -5000
(704) 527 -0800
Designing Tomorrow's Infrastructure & Communities
McAdamsCo.com

9J
AGENT AUTHORIZATION FORM
All Blanks To Be Filled In By The CurrentProverty Owner
Name: Timothy K. Medlin
Address: 6517 Roosondall Ct. Apex, NC 27523
Phone: [phone]
Project Name/Description: Middleton Subdivision / Residential Subdivision
Project Number: Project Manager: I Kevin Yates
Date: 9 f /s
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Attn: James Lastinger
Raleigh Regulatory Field Office
3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105
Wake Forest, NC 27587
Re: Wetlands Related Consulting and Permitting
To Whom It May Concern:
I hereby designate and authorize The John R. McAdams Company, Inc. to act in my behalf as
my agent in the processing of permit applications, to furnish upon request supplemental
information in support of applications, etc. from this day forward. f*
I, the undersigned, a duly authorized owner of record of the property /properties identified herein,
do authorize representatives of the Wilmington District, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps)
to enter upon the property herein described for the purpose of conducting on -site investigation
and issuing a determination associated with Water of the U.S. subject to Federal jurisdiction
under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act and /or Section 10 of the Rivcrs and Harbors Act of
1899.
This notification supersedes any previous correspondence concerning the agent for this project.
NOTICE: This authorization, for liability and professional courtesy reasons, is valid only
for government officials to enter the property when accompanied by The John R.
McAdams Company, Inc. staff.
Timothy K. Medlin
Print Property Owner
ign a;ui ee
Raleigh- Durham Charlotte
2905 Meridian Parkway 11301 Carmel Commons Blvd., Suite i11
Durham, North Carolina 27713 Charlotte, North Carolina
(919) 361 -5000 (704) 527 -0800
Designing Tomorrow's Infrastructure & Communities
McAdamsCo.com

10 11
!!Yjj
WADAMS
AGENT AUTHORIZATION FORM
All Blanks To Be Filled In By The Currentl'ronerty Owner
Name: Jacob L. Sig
Address: 6521 Roosondall Ct. Apex, NC 27523
Phone: [phone] _ _
Project Name(Description: Middleton Subdivision / Residential Subdivision
Project Number: — �TProject Mana Ser:1 Kevin Yates _
Date: _.
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Attn: James Lastinger
Raleigh Regulatory Field Office
3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105
Wake Forest, NC 27587
Re: Wetlands Related Consulting and Pennitting
To Whom It May Concern:
1 hereby designate and authorize The John R. McAdams Company, Inc. to act in my behalf as
my agent in the processing of permit applications, to furnish upon request supplemental
information in support of applications, etc. from this day forward. This authorization will expire
on December 31, 2015
I, the undersigned, a duly authorized owner of record of the property /properties identified herein,
do authorize representatives of the Wilmington District, U.S. Army Corps of E-ngineers (Corps)
to enter upon the property herein described for the purpose of conducting on -site investigation
and issuing a determination associated with Water of the U.S. subject to Federal jurisdiction
under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act and /or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of
1899.
This notification supersedes any previous correspondence concerning the agent for this project.
NOTICE: This authorization, for liability and professional courtesy reasons, is valid only
for government officials to enter the property when accompanied by The John R.
McAdams Company, Inc. staff.
Jacob L. Su u `�( ! .1 -
Print Property Owner _ Sidi ure
Raleigh- Durham Charlotte
2905 Meridian Parkway 11301 Carmel Commons Blvd., Suite 111
Durham, North Carolina 27713 Charlotte, North Carolina
(919) 361 -5000 (704) 527 -0800
Designing Tomorrow's Infrastructure & Communities
McAdamsCo.com

Yates, Kevin it
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Kedi n,
I'll send you his form next week.
Christian
Christian Sheppard <CSheppard @MIHOMES.com>
Wednesday, February 25, 2015 10:07 AM
Yates, Kevin
Finch, Jeremy; <lee @leebunn.com>
FW: Wetland Agent Authorization Form
From: Donald Street [mailto :streetdonll @gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, February 24, 2015 11:38 AM
To: Christian Sheppard
Subject: Re: Wetland Agent Authorization Form
Christian Sheppard,
I'm out of town, but will sign the attached document when I return next week. As for now I hereby designate and
authorize the Mc Adams Co. to act in my behalf in the processing of a permit application and obtaining wet lands related
information. I also authorize representatives of the US Corps of Eng's to enter upon my property for the purpose
of conducting a site investigation relating to the information stated.
Thanks,
Don Street
Sent from my iPhone
On Feb 23, 2015, at 2:51 PM, Christian Sheppard <CSheppard @MIHOMES.com> wrote:
Mr. Street,
If your able to sign this form and email it back to me this week, please do so. If you can't send it this
week, may I pick it up next week when you get back into town or you can mail it to me. I'm trying to find
out, if you respond to this email will be authorization enough for now.
Thank you,
Christian
Christian L. Sheppard, PLS Land Development Manager
MII Homes of Raleigh, LLC
Office: (919) 233 -5739 1 Mobile: [phone] Fax: [phone]
1511 Sunday Drive 100 Raleigh, NC. 27607
cshepoard(@mihomes.com

l �
Legend
AGENT AUTHORIZATION FORM ID
.
— SUBJECT PROPERTY
-
M IH 14010,arcel_labels
1
PROPERTY BOUNDARIES
M
EXISTING STREAMS
`
— PERENNIAL
r 7 -
- —••— INTERMITTENT
SEWER LINE
POTENTIAL EXISTING WETLANDS
I
_.I
MIDDLE TON PRO PE --
RTY
z PRELIMINARY WETLAND ASSESSMENT ' I'
FIGURE 3. EXISTING CONDITIONS
o z5o 500 �,000
Feet PROJECT #: MIH -14010
I inch =500 feet APEX, NORTH CAROLINA
.1:

O�O� W A TF'q
7
�
r
1. Processing
Office Use Only:
Corps action ID no.
DWQ project no.
Form Version 1.3 Dec 10 2008
Pre - Construction Notification (PCN) Form
A. Applicant Information
1 a. Type(s) of approval sought from the
® Section 404 Permit El Section 10 Permit
Corps:
1 b. Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: or General Permit (GP) number: NWP: 29 / GP: 3890
1c. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps? ❑ Yes
1 d. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply):
® 401 Water Quality Certification — Regular ❑ Non -404 Jurisdictional General Permit
❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Express ❑ Riparian Buffer Authorization
1 e. Is this notification solely for the record For the record only for DWQ 401
because written approval is not required? Certification:
❑ Yes ® No
1f. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation
of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank or in -lieu
fee program.
/1
For the record only for Corps Permit:
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ❑ No
1 g. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1 h ❑ Yes
below.
1 h. Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)? ❑ Yes
2. Project Information
2a. Name of project: Middleton subdivision
2b. County: Wake
2c. Nearest municipality / town: Apex
2d. Subdivision name: Middleton
2e. NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state
project no:
3. Owner Information
3a. Name(s) on Recorded Deed: See Supplemental Property Owner Information (Appendix A)
3b. Deed Book and Page No. See Supplemental Property Owner Information (Appendix A)
3c. Responsible Party (for LLC if
applicable):
3d. Street address: See Supplemental Property Owner Information (Appendix A)
3e. City, state, zip:
3f. Telephone no.:
3g. Fax no.:
3h. Email address:
/1 •
// •
Page 1 of 16
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

4. Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a. Applicant is:
® Agent ❑ Other, specify:
4b. Name:
Jeremy Medlin
4c. Business name
MI Homes of Raleigh, LLC
(if applicable):
4d. Street address:
1511 Sunday Drive, Suite 100
4e. City, state, zip:
Raleigh, NC 27607
4f. Telephone no.:
(919) 233 -5740
4g. Fax no.:
(919) 828 -0663
4h. Email address:
jmedlin @mihomes.com
5. Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable)
5a. Name:
Kevin Yates
5b. Business name
(if applicable):
McAdams Company
5c. Street address:
P.O. Box 14005
5d. City, state, zip:
Research Triangle Park, NC 27709
5e. Telephone no.:
919 - 361 -5000
5f. Fax no.:
919 - 361 -2269
5g. Email address:
[e-mail]
B. Project Information and Prior Project History
1. Property Identification
1a. Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID):
1 b. Site coordinates (in decimal degrees):
1 c. Property size:
2. Surface Waters
2a. Name of nearest body of water (stream, river, etc.) to
proposed project:
2b. Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water:
2c. River basin:
Based on Wake County, NC GIS information, the parcel
identification numbers are 0743413910, 0743428445,
0743522024, 0743217577, 074311569, 0743029713,
0743025688, 0743227106, 0743221421, 0743127298,
0743122592, 0743121427, 0743029498, 0743021481, and
0743414096.
Latitude: 35.761714 N Longitude: - 78.854035 W
(DD.DDDDDD) (- DD.DDDDDD)
73 acres
Beaver Creek & White Oak Creek
WS-V, NSW
Cape Fear / HUC: 03030002
Page 2 of 16
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

3. Project Description
3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
The subject property and project area is located off of Holt Road approximately 0.25 miles north of its
intersection with Old Jenks Road in Apex, Wake County, North Carolina (hereinafter referred to as "the subject
property "). The subject property consists of an assemblage of 9 on -site parcels totaling approximately 73- acres,
and easement acquisition on 6 off -site parcels to be utilized for off -site utility connections.
The subject property is approximately 73 -acres of large residential lots and pasture land, with Holt Road bisecting
the subject property. Approximately 60 percent of the subject property can be characterized as forested, mainly the
eastern and western portions, with a mix of loblolly pine (Pinus taeda), tulip poplar (Liriodendron tulipifera), red
maple (Ater rubrum), and oak species (Quercus sp.), with an understory of blueberry (Vaccinium sp.), Chinese
privet (Ligustrum sinense), and greenbrier (Smilax sp.). The central areas currently being utilized as cow and horse
pasture grasslands. The pond in the southwestern portion of the project area has been recently drained. The
surrounding properties are primarily rural residences and woodland, with a school and some commercial areas to
the south. Several new housing developments appear to be under construction in the surrounding area.
The subject property lies within the Cape Fear River Basin. Eastern portions of the subject property drain north
and west to White Oak Creek (HUC 03030002060150), while the rest of the property drains west and south to
Beaver Creek (HUC 03030002060160). Both White Oak Creek and Beaver Creek are designated WS -V and
NSW, and located within the Jordan Lake watershed. The subject property is located within the Town of Apex's
secondary watershed protection overlay district.
A jurisdictional wetland /stream delineation was performed by McAdams Company in the spring of 2015, and
verified by Mr. James Lastinger (USACE representative) on March 27 and May 12, 2015. The jurisdictional
wetland areas within the project area consists of three types, Bottomland Hardwood Forest, Seep, and
Headwater Wetland systems. Wetland areas A and B key out to be Bottomland Hardwood Forest, with wetland
B containing a small seep on the western section, according to the NC Wetland Assessment Methodology
(NCWAM). Wetlands C -G key out to Headwater Wetland systems according to NCWAM. There are 6
perennial stream features totaling 3,781 if and 5 intermittent stream features totaling 1,797 if within the project
area (See Figure 4 — Stream Classification Table). All stream features were deemed important, except stream
feature J, which was deemed unimportant intermittent, by the USACE. In addition stream feature J was deemed
intermittent on May 12, 2015, by Mr. James Graham of the NC Division of Resources (DWR). Stream features
A -G are mapped on the USGS quadrangle and /or the Wake County Soils Survey, therefore, are subject to the
Town of Apex Riparian Buffer Ordinance and Jordan Lake Riparian Buffer Rules. Stream features H -1 are
present in the field, however are not depicted on the USGS quad or Soils Survey, therefore are not subject to the
Town of Apex or Jordan Lake Riparian Buffer Rules. The stream features subject to the riparian buffer rules
were verified by Mr. Mike Deaton, on March 10th and April 22, 2015, per the June 4, 2015 determination letter
(Apex 15 -006).
The limits of the stream features and jurisdictional waters have not changed since the original determinations.
See Figures 1 -4, depicting the jurisdictional stream features, wetlands, riparian buffers, and existing conditions.
Page 3 of 16
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

3b. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property:
Riparian: 1.71 acres
3c. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property:
3,781 l.f. of Perennial Stream / 1,797 U. of Intermittent Stream
3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:
The purpose of the proposed project is to provide residential housing to Apex and Wake County, NC.
Page 4 of 16
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

3e. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
The proposed residential subdivision project known as Middleton, will be located on 73 -acres and consist of 111 single -
family residential homes and 62 townhomes to be constructed in several phases. The entire property will eventually be
owned and developed by MI Homes of Raleigh, LLC, until individual lots are platted and sold to new home owners. As of
the date of this application there are currently, 10 different property owners, including on -site and off -site owners, within the
project area. Holt Road, which runs south to north, bisects the project area to eastern and western portions. Both the eastern
and western portion of the Middleton project will be supported by on -site and off -site utilities, greenway trail, recreational
facilities, stormwater management, and roadway improvements.
The entire site was designed to minimize impacts to aquatic resources while utilizing the remaining parcel. Proposed
perennial stream impacts associated with the Middleton project have been reduced by 469 linear feet through two revisions to
the original roadway network and lot layout (Appendix B: Original Layout enclosed). There are a total of 0.071 acre of
jurisdictional wetland impact, 118 linear feet of temporary stream impact, 288 linear feet of permanent stream impact, and
spanning 47 linear feet for greenway construction. The Middleton project is proposed as a medium - density subdivision, but
all sedimentation and erosion control measures will be implemented before construction to minimize runoff. A network of
stormwater management facilities will be strategically placed throughout the site to treat and detain storm flows coming from
the site. Typical construction equipment to be utilized will be front end loaders, trackhoes, graders, dump trucks, and bull
dozers. Below is a description of stream and wetland impacts (See Figure 4/5, Insets 1 -13). Riparian buffer impact maps are
included with the 404/401 application, however will be reviewed and approved through the Town of Apex.
Roadway Impacts: In order to provide internal vehicular access for residents and safety vehicles there is a network of roads
and access points. As stated previously, two road crossings were eliminated, one of which crossed stream C, impacting 2341f
of perennial stream. The second road crossing eliminated proposed crossing stream G, which avoids 2351f of perennial
stream channel. In addition, an existing access road off of Holt Road is being utilized as part of the main entrance to the
western portion of the project, which will minimize impacts to streams E and F. Although efforts have been made to avoid
impacts to jurisdictional waters, there are several permanent stream impacts associated roadway impacts. There is one
roadway stream impact in the southwestern section of the project area, impacting 125 linear feet of unimportant intermittent
stream J (Fig. 5- Inset 6). There are three roadway impacts on the eastern portion of the project. Utilizing the existing gravel
access road, the existing culverts at streams E and F are being replaced and properly sized to accommodate the new road and
meet the Town of Apex road - section design standards. This will result in 82 linear feet of additional stream impact to stream
E (Inset 7) and 81 linear feet of additional impact to stream F (Inset 8). These new culverts will be properly sized, a dissipater
added to each, and be buried to allow for aquatic life passage. In addition, wing walls were designed and added in efforts to
reduce the culvert lengths, and impacts to streams and riparian buffers in this location. There is also one internal roadway
impact on the western portion which avoids stream G, but does result in 0.06 -acre of headwater wetland impact to wetlands F
and G (Inset 9). All of these proposed roadway impacts cross between 75 and 105 degrees to the jurisdictional resource type.
Compensatory mitigation for permanent stream impacts associated with stream and wetland fill associated with the roadway
crossings is proposed at a 2:1 ratio, in the form of payment to the NC Division of Mitigation Services (NCDMS) In -Lieu -Fee
program.
Sewer/Water Line Impacts: There are two off -site sewer and water lines proposed to be constructed to service the
Middleton project. The sewer, forcemain, and water line easement corridors have been combined where
practicable to reduce overall associated impacts. West: The western sewer and water lines will parallel the
riparian buffer zones of stream C, until it reaches Twin Creek Rd., the water line then parallels Twin Oak Rd. until
it ties in to an existing Town of Apex water line, adjacent to stream section B. The sewer continues to parallel
stream C, until it ties into an existing Town of Apex sanitary sewer manhole, adjacent to stream section A. There
is one sewer /water line impact area within the interior of the western portion of the project, which has been placed
into a combined easement totaling 40 linear feet of Ragpcfrwfyltnpact (continued on Page 5a).
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

4. Jurisdictional Determinations
4a. Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property / ® Yes El No ❑ Unknown
project (including all prior phases) in the past?
Comments:
4b. If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type
of determination was made? El Preliminary El Final
4c. If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas? Agency /Consultant Company: McAdams Company
Name (if known): Kevin Yates / Kelly Roth Other:
4d. If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation.
• An on -site concurrence meeting for the project was conducted with Mr. James Lastinger, of the USACE on March 27, 2015 and
May 12, 2015 ( USACE Action ID # SAW- 2015 - 00899).
. On -site stream buffer concurrence meetings with Mr. Mike Deaton, Town of Apex, on March 10, 2015, and April 22, 2015. They
documented their findings in a letter dated June 4, 2015 (Town of Apex Project No. 15 -006).
5. Project History
5a. Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for ❑ Yes ® No ❑ Unknown
this project (including all prior phases) in the past?
5b. If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions.
6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project? ❑ Yes ® No
6b. If yes, explain.
Page 6 of 16
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1 a. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply):
® Wetlands ® Streams - tributaries ® Buffers
® Open Waters ❑ Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted.
2a. 2b. 2c. 2d. 2e. 2f.
Wetland impact Type of jurisdiction
number — Type of impact Type of wetland Forested (Corps - 404, 10 Area of impact
Permanent (P) or (if known) DWQ — non -404, other) (acres)
Temporary (T)
Sewer
Inset 4 (perm.) (Trench & Backfill)
Seep ® Yes
No
® Corps 0.011
® DWQ
Forested Conversion to
❑
Herbaceous
Roadway
Inset 9 (perm.) (Fill)
Headwater Yes
Wetland ❑ No
Corps 0.06
® DWQ
2g. Total wetland impacts
0.0171 ac
2h. Comments: (See Figure 4.0
3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary
impacts) proposed on the site, then complete
this
question for all stream sites impacted.
3a. 3b.
3c.
3d.
3e.
3f.
3g.
Stream impact
Type of impact
Stream name
Perennial
Type of jurisdiction
Average
Impact
number -
(PER) or
(Corps - 404, 10
stream
length
Permanent (P) or
intermittent
DWQ — non -404,
width
(linear
Temporary (T)
(INT)?
other)
(feet)
feet)
Inset 2 (temp.)
Sewer
(Trench & Backfill)
Stream C
PER
Important
® Corps
® DWQ
4 ft
31
Inset 5 (temp.)
Sewer & Water
(Trench & Backfill)
Stream C
PER
Important
® Corps
® DWQ
3 ft
40
Inset 5 (span)
Greenway
(Span)
Stream C
PER
Important
® Corps
® DWQ
3 ft
17
Inset 6 (perm.)
Roadway
Stream J
Unimportant
® DWQ
1 ft
125
Roadway
PER
® Corps
Inset 7 (perm.)
Culvert: 47 If
Stream E
Important
® DWQ
4
82
Dissipator. 351f
Roadway
PER
® Corps
Inset 8 (perm.)
Culvert: 53 If
Stream F
Important
® DWQ
5
81
Dissipator: 28 If
Sewer
PER
® Corps
Inset 10 (temp.)
Force Main & Gravity
Stream G
Important
4
47
(Trench & Backfill)
® DWQ
Inset 10 (span)
Greenway
(Span)
Stream G
INT
Important
® Corps
® DWQ
4 ft
17
Inset 11 (span)
Greenway
(Span)
Stream H
INT
Important
® Corps
® DWQ
2
13
Page 7 of 16
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

P1
P2
K Total N/A
5g. Comments:
5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required?
❑ Yes ❑ No If yes, permit ID no:
5i. Expected pond surface area (acres):
5j. Size of pond watershed (acres):
5k. Method of construction:
Page 8 of 16
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
Total: 453 If
3h. Total stream and tributary impacts
Temp: 1181f /Perm:2881f /Spanning: 471f
3i. Comments: (See Figure 4.0)
4. Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of the
U.S. then individually list all open water impacts below.
4a. 4b. 4c.
4d. 4e.
Open water Name of waterbody
impact number (if applicable) Type of impact
Waterbody type Area of impact (acres)
— Permanent
(P) or
Temporary (T)
01 ❑P ❑T
02 ❑P ❑T
03 ❑P ❑T
04 ❑P ❑T
4f. Total open water impacts
N/A
4g. Comments:
5. Pond or Lake Construction
If pond or lake construction proposed, then co nplete the chart below.
5a. 5b. 5c.
5d. 5e.
Wetland Impacts (acres)
Stream Impacts (feet) Upland
Pond ID Proposed use or purpose of
(acres)
number pond
Flooded Filled
I Excavated
Flooded Filled
I Excavated Flooded
P1
P2
K Total N/A
5g. Comments:
5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required?
❑ Yes ❑ No If yes, permit ID no:
5i. Expected pond surface area (acres):
5j. Size of pond watershed (acres):
5k. Method of construction:
Page 8 of 16
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ) — BUFFER IMPACTS REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY TOWN OF APEX
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts
below. If any impacts require mitigation, then you MUST fill ou : Section D of this form.
6a.
❑ reuse F1 Tar-Pamlico ®Other: Jordan
Project is in which protected basin? ❑ Catawba ❑ Randleman
6b. 6c. 6d. 6e. 6f. 6g.
Buffer impact
number — Reason for Buffer Zone 1 impact Zone 2 impact
Permanent (P) impact Stream name mitigation (square feet) (square feet)
or Temporary required?
(T)
6h. Total buffer impacts
6i. Comments: BUFFER IMPACTS REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY TOWN OF APEX
D. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
1 a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project.
Impacts to jurisdictional stream, wetlands, and riparian buffers have been avoided and minimized to the
maximum extent practicable. The entire site was designed to minimize impacts to aquatic resources while
utilizing the remaining parcel. Proposed perennial stream impacts associated with the Middleton project have
been reduced by 469 linear feet through two revisions to the original roadway network and lot layout (Appendix
B: Original Layout enclosed). There are a total of 0.071 acre of jurisdictional wetland impact, 118 linear feet of
temporary stream impact, 288 linear feet of permanent stream impact, and spanning 47 linear feet for greenway
construction, which avoids 96% of the wetlands and 92% of the streams within the project area. In addition, an
existing access road off of Holt Road is being utilized as part of the main entrance to the western portion of the
project, which will minimize impacts to streams E and F. Wing walls were also designed and added in efforts to
reduce the culvert lengths, and impacts to streams and riparian buffers in this location. The roadway wetland
impact on the eastern portion was designed to utilize the upland portion between wetlands F and G, in efforts to
minimize wetland impacts in this area. All of these proposed roadway impacts cross between 75 and 105
degrees to the jurisdictional resource type. There are two off -site sewer and water lines proposed to be
constructed to service the Middleton project. The sewer, forcemain, and water line easement corridors have been
combined where practicable to reduce overall associated impacts. The greenways will be spanned with bridges
instead of using traditional culverts and retaining walls are incorporated throughout the site to avoid impacting
jurisdictional wetlands, streams, and riparian buffers.
1 b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques.
All proper sedimentation and erosion control measures will be implemented, and there is a network of
stormwater management facilities strategically placed throughout the site to treat and minimize runoff.
Proper sedimentation and erosion control methods will be utilized during all phases of construction and
installation, as described in the Erosion Control Plan sheets to be reviewed and approved by the Town of
Apex. All work will take place during dry conditions and can be facilitated from high, non jurisdictional,
stable ground adjacent to the shoreline. The contractor shall install silt fence, inlet protection, sediment traps,
diversion ditches, tree protection, and other measures as shown on the erosion control plans, clearing only as
necessary to install these devices. All erosion and sediment control measures will be checked for stability and
Page 9 of 16
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

operation following every runoff producing rainfall, but in no case less than once every week. Any needed
repairs will be made immediately to maintain all measures designed. An erosion control inspections report is
required and will be kept by the owner's representative. All slopes shall be graded no steeper than the angle
that can be retained by vegetative cover or other adequate erosion control devices or structures. No material
for construction will be placed in wetlands, streams, or Jordan Buffers at any time. Excavation will be limited
to the area necessary for site preparation; all excavated material will be placed and retained on high ground
above the flood pool elevation. All excavated material will be placed landward of the normal pool elevation
contour on high ground and confined by adequate dikes or other retaining structures to prevent erosion and
sedimentation into adjacent waters, wetlands, or Jordan Buffers.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for impacts ® Yes ❑ No
to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
2b. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply)
2c. If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this project?
3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a. Name of Mitigation Bank:
3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter)
3c. Comments:
4. Complete if Making a Payment to In -lieu Fee Program
4a. Approval letter from in -lieu fee program is attached.
4b. Stream mitigation requested:
4c. If using stream mitigation, stream temperature:
4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only):
4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested:
4f. Non - riparian wetland mitigation requested:
4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested:
® DWQ ® Corps
❑ Mitigation bank
® Payment to in -lieu fee program
❑ Permittee Responsible Mitigation
Type
® Yes
200 SMUs
Quantity
® warm ❑ cool ❑cold
square feet
0.04 acres
acres
acres
4h. Comments: Compensatory mitigation for permanent stream impacts associated with stream and wetland fill associated with
the roadway crossings is proposed at a 2:1 ratio, in the form of payment to the NC Division of Mitigation Services (NCDMS) In-
Lieu -Fee program. NC Division of Mitigation Services acceptance letter enclosed. If before construction begins WMU's
become available from a private mitigation bank, the permittee may purse this option.
5. Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a. If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan.
Page 10 of 16
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) — required by DWQ
6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires ❑ Yes ® No
buffer mitigation?
6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the
amount of mitigation required.
6c. 6d. 6e.
Zone Reason for impact Total impact Multiplier Required mitigation
(square feet) (square feet)
Zone 1 3 (2 for Catawba)
Zone 2 1.5 l�
6f. Total buffer mitigation required:
6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank,
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in -lieu fee fund).
6h. Comments: Per the Jordan Watershed Riparian Buffer Rules Table of Uses the proposed acitivities are deemed
an allowable use.
Page 11 of 16
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

E. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1. Diffuse Flow Plan
1a. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified ® Yes ❑ No
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
1 b. If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why.
Comments:
The proposed project is located within the Jordan Lake watershed and will
be subject to the Jordan Lake Riparian Buffer Rules. Multiple stormwater ® Yes ❑ No
management facilities with level spreaders are proposed for use on this site.
The proposed stormwater management facilities are designed in accordance
with the N.C. Stormwater Best Management Practices manual (NCDENR).
Page 12 of 16
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

2. Stormwater Management Plan
2a. What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project? New Proposed Impervious: 31%
2b. Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan? ® Yes ❑ No
2c. If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why:
2d. If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative description of the plan:
The proposed development is located within the Cape Fear River basin with all stormwater runoff draining
into Beaver Creek and White Oak Creek, also located in the Jordan Lake watershed. Per the Town of Apex
regulations, stormwater management on this site shall meet the stormwater management performance
standards for development set forth in the Town Unified Development Ordinance (UDO) sections 6.1.4
General and 6.1.7 High Density Development Option.
To meet the above Town of Apex standards, six stormwater management facilities, are proposed, five
stormwater wetlands and one 90% TSS removal wet ponds.
Peak Runoff Control Requirements
The proposed project will result in a significant increase in peak flow rates. To mitigate this impact, the
proposed facilities have been designed such that post - development peak flow rates resulting from on -site
development are no greater than pre - development levels in the 1- and 10 -year storm events.
Pollutant and Nutrient Control Requirements
The site is treated for water quality per 6.1.7(A)(3) and 6.1.12 using structural water quality ponds and a
stormwater wetland to capture runoff from the developed areas of the site. The ponds are designed to provide
90% TSS removal, and the wetland is designed for 85% TSS removal. The stormwater management facilities
meet the design requirements of the Town of Apex and the North Carolina Division of Water Resources
Stormwater Best Management Practices manual.
A copy of the final stormwater management plan and approval letter from the Town of Apex will be provided
to NCDWR upon approval.
2e. Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan?
3. Certified Local Government Stormwater Review
3a. In which local government's jurisdiction is this project?
3b. Which of the following locally - implemented stormwater management programs
apply (check all that apply):
3c. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
attached?
4. DWQ Stormwater Program Review
4a. Which of the following state - implemented stormwater management programs apply
(check all that apply):
® Certified Local Government
❑ DWQ Stormwater Program
❑ DWQ 401 Unit
Town of Apex
❑ Phase II
❑ NSW
❑ USMP
❑ Water Supply Watershed
❑ Other:
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Coastal counties
❑ HQW
❑ ORW
Page 13 of 16
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

❑ Session Law 2006 -246
❑ Other:
4b. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
attached? ❑ Yes ❑ No
5. DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
5a. Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements? ❑ Yes ❑ No
5b. Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met? ❑ Yes ❑ No
F. Supplementary Information
1. Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
1 a. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal /state /local) funds or the ❑ Yes ® No
use of public (federal /state) land?
1 b. If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State ❑ Yes ® No
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA /SEPA)?
1 c. If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
letter.) ❑ Yes ❑ No
Comments:
2. Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a. Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards, ❑ Yes ® No
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)?
2b. Is this an after - the -fact permit application? ❑ Yes ® No
2c. If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s):
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a. Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in ❑ Yes ® No
additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?
3b. If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
There are appropriate land use control and stormwater measures in place, and there will be no further
impacts to surface waters, than what is currently proposed.
4. Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a. Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non- discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
Waste water will be directed into an existing Town of Apex maintained sewer line.
Page 14 of 16
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or ® Yes ❑ No
habitat?
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act ® Yes ❑ No
impacts?
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted. ® Raleigh
❑ Asheville
5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat?
The USFWS web page (httn: / /www.fws.jzov /endangered /) and the Natural Heritage virtual workroom
( httD : / /www.nenhn.orv-/web /nhn /nhn -man- viewer) were accessed on June 4, 2015 to determine if the
project would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical Habitat. Based on this research, the red -
cockaded woodpecker (Picoides borealis), dwarf wedgemussel (Alasmidonta heterodon), Michaux's
sumac (Rhus michauxii), and Northern long -eared bat (Myotis septentrionalis) are federally listed species
that occur in Wake County. Based on field inspections and correspondence from US Fish & Wildlife
dated August 21, 2015, it is believed that no adverse impacts to threatened and endangered species and
their known habitat will occur due to the construction of the proposed project.
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat? I ❑ Yes ® No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
An interactive map called the Essential Fish Habitat (EFH) Mapper
(httD: / /www. habitat. noaa. 2ov /Drotection/eth/efhma_n_ner /) was accessed on June 4, 2015 to determine if the
project will impact Essential Fish Habitat.
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation ® Yes ❑ No
status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
A review of the North Carolina State Historic Preservation Office interactive map, which shows the
locations of properties and districts in Wake County, North Carolina entered in the National Register of
Historic Places (http: / /gis.ncdcr.gov /hpoweb /) was conducted on June 3, 2015. It did not reveal any
listings within the project area. One structure to the south of the subject property (WA0776 Triple A
Cottage) has been surveyed, but is not listed as a historic property. Additionally, there are two other
surveyed locations within 0.5 mile of the subject property. As these properties are surveyed, but not listed,
it is believed the proposed project will not occur in or near an area that has been designated as having
historic or cultural preservation status by the state, federal, or tribal governments.
Page 15 of 16
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA- designated 100 -year floodplain? I ® Yes ❑ No
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements: The proposed off -site sewer connection on the western side of
the project will tie into an existing manhole and sewer system that is currently located in the FEMA 100 -yr
floodplain. This project will be designed to meet FEMA requirements and reviewed by the local delegated
Floodplain Manager within the Town of Apex.
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination? North Carolina Flood Insurance Rate Map Panel
3720074300J depicts the 100 -year floodplain on this far western side of the project area.
Kevin Yates �� U G /5
Dat
Applicant/Agent's Printed Name Applicant/ t's ature
(Agent's signature is valid only i letter from the applicant
is provided.)
Page 16 of 16
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

J
N
0
1\
N MIDDLETON PROPERTY
PRELIMINARY WETLAND ASSESSMENT
FIGURE 1. VICINITY MAP
500 1,000 2,000
Feet PROJECT #: MIH -14010
i inch = 1,000 feet APEX, NORTH CAROLINA
1
WADA.MS/

STREAM •�
SUBJECT PROPERTY
STREAM B,
Da STREAM C E+ .
POND A )
_ ` B STREAM D d
•
STREAM E
r iJ
STREAM F
r O
C
NO
O Q '
STREAM
POND Br - --
°
3�
STREAM I
i STREAM H
IY
i i re C�
USGS• SOIL SURVEY SHEET 55 & 56 WAKE COUNTY.; NORTH CAROLINA
LAT: 3.761714 N, LONG: - 78.854035 W
� MIDDLETON PROPERTY 1
z PRELIMINARY WETLAND ASSESSMENT 2j
FIGURE 2. SOIL SURVEY EXHIBIT
0 375 750 1,500 Feet PROJECT #: MIH -14010
i► A C /� DA S
� 1 inch = 750 feet APEX, NORTH CAROLINA lvl ry. ,

IL
Legend ' � , t -
t ! -
'l
STREAM FEATURE A
PARCEL NUMBERS .,�
SUBJECT PROPERTY ' �� � �p r •� .
1" Q 'r' .,/{�' ��► t1f STREAM FEATURE B \
PROPERTY BOUNDARIES ::' ,�, 4 7 at Will
� a1�
SEWER LINE r .w "'; �• i
� Y - J• w \
y '
PERENNIAL STREAM
rr
- — INTERMITTENT STREAM
i 50 -FT STREAM BUFFER\..: 1'
100 FT STREAM BUFFER A
y a . � � yy _ ' . � 7 it � '• +
i
EXISTING WETLANDS
AS }� STREAM FEATURE C t
SUBJECT PROPERTY �
POND A ,
- 1 APPROXIMATE
STREAM FEATURE
D START y
STREAM FEATURE K
STREAM FEATURE J
STREAM FEATURE E
STREAM FEATURE I
STREAM FEATURE F : li? N�
1
-
STREAM FEATURE G
J
5 Y
L ! STREAM FEATURE H
NOTES:
1. ON -SITE STREAM BUFFER CONCURRENCE MEETINGS
CONDUCTED WITH MR. MIKE DEATON ON 03/10/2015 AND
04/22/2015. TOWN OF APEX STREAM BUFFER DETERMINATION
POND FEATURES RECEIVED 06/04/2015.
2. ON -SITE WETLAND CONCURRENCE MEETING CONDUCTED
LOCATED OFFSITE WITH MR. JAMES LASTINGER ON 03/27/2015. FINAL USACE
JURISDICTIONAL WETLAND DETERMINATION HAS NOT BEEN
RECEIVED AS OF 07/20/2015.
LAT: 35.761496)N, LONG: - 781853341 W e�� r, e gray i I rm a I ly
/00 MIDDLETON PROPERTY
z WETLAND, STREAM, & STREAM BUFFER ASSESSMENT
FIGURE 3. EXISTING CONDITIONS (GIS BASED)
0 250 500 1,000 PROJECT #: MIH -15000
Feet
f inch =500 feet APEX, NORTH CAROLINA McADAM

HCDETVR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Pat McCrory Division of Mitigation Services Donald R. van der Vaart
Governor Secretary
September 1, 2015
Jeremy Medlin
MI I lomes of Raleigh, LLC
1511 Sunday Drive Suite 100
Raleigh, NC 27607 Expiration of Acceptance: March 1, 2016
Project: Middleton County: Wake
The purpose of this letter is to notify you that the NCDENR Division of Mitigation Services (DMS) is willing to accept payment for
compensatory mitigation for impacts associated with the above referenced project as indicated in the table below. Please note that this
decision does not assure that participation in the DMS in -lieu fee mitigation program will be approved by the permit issuing agencies
as mitigation for project impacts. It is the responsibility of the applicant to contact permitting agencies to determine if payment to the
DMS will be approved. You must also comply with all other state, federal or local government permits, regulations or authorizations
associated with the proposed activity including G.S. § 143-214.11.
This acceptance is valid for six months from the date of this letter and is not transferable. If we have not received a copy of the
issued 404 Permit /401 Certification /CAMA permit within this time frame, this acceptance will expire. It is the applicant's
responsibility to send copies of the permits to DMS. Once DMS receives a copy of the pennit(s) an invoice will be issued based on
the required mitigation in that permit and payment must be made prior to conducting the authorized work. The amount of the in -lieu
fee to be paid by an applicant is calculated based upon the Fee Schedule and policies listed at www.nceep.net.
Based on the information supplied by you in your request to use the DMS, the impacts that may require compensatory mitigation are
summarized in the following table. The amount of mitigation required and assigned to DMS for this impact is determined by
permitting agencies and may exceed the impact amounts shown below.
River Basin CU Stream (feet) Wetlands (acres) Buffer I Buffer 11
Location (Sq. Ft.) I (Sq. Ft.)
Cold Cool Warm I Riparian Non - Riparian Coastal Marsh l
Impact I Cape Fear I 03030002 0 0 I 200 I 0.04 I 0 , 0 0 I 0
Upon receipt of payment, DMS will take responsibility for providing the compensatory mitigation. The mitigation will be performed
in accordance with the In -Lieu Fee Program instrument dated July 28, 2010.
Thank you for your interest in the DMS in -lieu fee mitigation program. If you have any questions or need additional information,
please contact Kelly Williams at (919) 707 -8915.
Sincerely, �I
Jame B Stanfill
Asset anagement Supervisor
cc: James Lastinger, USAGE- Raleigh
Kevin Yates, agent
1652 °Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699 -1652
Phone: 919 -7D7 -8976 t Internet: wwm,nceep,net
An Egttal Opportunity 1 Affirmative Action Erployer— Made in port from recycled paper

Jurisdictional Determination Request
,r
US Army Corps
of Engineers
Wilmington District
This form is intended for use by anyone requesting a jurisdictional determination (JD) from the
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Wilmington District (Corps). Please include all supporting
information, as described within each category, with your request. You may submit your request
to the appropriate Corps Field Office (or project manager, if known) via mail, electronic mail, or
facsimile. A current list of county assignments by Field Office and project manager can be
found on -line at: htty: / /www.saw.usace.armv. mil / Missions /Re"latoryPermitPro2ram.ast)x , by
telephoning: 910- 251 -4633, or by contacting any of the field offices listed below:
ASHEVILLE REGULATORY FIELD OFFICE
US Army Corps of Engineers
151 Patton Avenue, Room 208
Asheville, North Carolina 28801 -5006
General Number: (828) 271 -7980
Fax Number: (828) 281 -8120
RALEIGH REGULATORY FIELD OFFICE
US Army Corps of Engineers
3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105
Wake Forest, North Carolina 27587
General Number: (919) 554 -4884
Fax Number: (919) 562 -0421
Version: December 2013
WASHINGTON REGULATORY FIELD OFFICE
US Army Corps of Engineers
2407 West Fifth Street
Washington, North Carolina 27889
General Number: (910) 251 -4610
Fax Number: (252) 975 -1399
WILMINGTON REGULATORY FIELD OFFICE
US Army Corps of Engineers
69 Darlington Avenue
Wilmington, North Carolina 28403
General Number: 910- 251 -4633
Fax Number: (910) 251 -4025
Page 1

Jurisdictional Determination Request
INSTRUCTIONS:
All requestors must complete Parts A, B, C, D, E and F.
NOTE TO CONSULTANTS AND AGENCIES: If you are requesting a JD on behalf of a
paying client or your agency, please note the specific submittal requirements in Part G.
NOTE ON PART D — PROPERTY OWNER AUTHORIZATION:, Please be aware that all JD
requests must include the current property owner authorization for the Corps to proceed with the
determination, which may include inspection of the property when necessary. This form must be
signed by the current property owner to be considered a complete request.
NOTE ON PART D - NCDOT REQUESTS:, Property owner authorization/notification for JD
requests associated with North Carolina Department of Transportation ( NCDOT) projects will be
conducted according to the current NCDOT /USACE protocols.
NOTE TO USDA PROGRAM PARTICIPANTS:. A Corps approved or preliminary JD may not
be valid for the wetland conservation provisions of the Food Security Act of 1985. If you or
your tenant are USDA Program participants, or anticipate participation in USDA programs, you
should also request a certified wetland determination from the local office of the Natural
Resources Conservation Service, prior to starting work.
Version: December 2013 Page 2

Jurisdictional Determination Request
A. PARCEL INFORMATION
Street Address: 1125 Holt Road
City, State: Apex, North Carolina
County: Wake
Directions: located on Holt Road approximately 0.25 miles north of Old Jenks Road
Parcel Index Number(s) (PIN): 0743413910,074342 6445, 0743522024, 0743217577, 074311569,0743029713,0743025688
0743227106, 0743221421, 04312 7296.0743122592,0143121421. 0743029496 ,0743021461.0743414098
B. REQUESTOR INFORMATION
Name: Kevin Yates
Mailing Address: 2905 Meridian Parkway, Durham, NC 27713
Telephone Number: 919 - 361 -5000
Electronic Mail Address': Yates @mcadamsco.com
Select one:
❑ I am the current property owner.
❑✓ I am an Authorized Agent or Environmental Consultant
❑ Interested Buyer or Under Contract to Purchase
❑ Other, please explain.
C. PROPERTY OWNER INFORMATION
Name: M/I Homes of Raleigh, LLC
Mailing Address: 1500 Sunday Drive, Suite 113
Raleigh, NC 27607
Telephone Number: ----- ----
Electronic Mail Address 3:
❑ Proof of Ownership Attached (e.g. a copy of Deed, County GIS /Parcel /Tax Record data)
1 If available
2 Must attach completed Agent Authorization Form
3 If available
Version: December 2013 Page 3

Jurisdictional Determination Request
D. PROPERTY OWNER CERTIFICATION
I, the undersigned, a duly authorized owner of record of the property /properties identified herein,
do authorize representatives of the Wilmington District, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps)
to enter upon the property herein described for the purpose of conducting on -site investigations
and issuing a determination associated with Waters of the U.S. subject to Federal jurisdiction
under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of
1899.
see attached Agent Authorization Forms
Property Owner (please print) Date
Property Owner Signature
E. JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION TYPE
Select One:
I am requesting that the Corps provide a preliminary JD for the property identified herein.
This request does include a delineation.
F] I am requesting that the Corps provide a vreliminary JD for the property identified herein.
This request does NOT include a delineation.
I am requesting that the Corps investigate the property /project area for the presence or
absence of WoUS5 and provide an approved JD for the property identified herein. This
request does NOT include a request for a verified delineation.
❑ I am requesting that the Corps delineate the boundaries of all WoUS on a property /project
area and provide an approved JD (this may or may not include a survey plat).
I am requesting that the Corps evaluate and approve a delineation of WoUS (conducted
by others) on a property /project area and provide an approved JD (may or may not
include a survey plat).
4 For NCDOT requests following the current NCDOT /USACE protocols, skip to Part E.
5 Waters of the United States
Version: December 2013 Page 4

Jurisdictional Determination Request
F. ALL REQUESTS
Map of Property or Project Area (attached). This Map must clearly depict the boundaries
of the area of evaluation.
Size of Property or Project Area 120 acres
❑ I verify that the property (or project) boundaries have recently been surveyed and marked
by a licensed land surveyor OR are otherwise clearly marked or distinguishable.
G. JD REQUESTS FROM CONSULTANTS OR AGENCIES
(1) Preliminary JD Requests:
❑ Completed and signed Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination Form6.
❑ Project Coordinates:
Latitude
Longitude
Maps (no larger than 11x17) with Project Boundary Overlay:
❑ Large and small scale maps that depict, at minimum: streets, intersections, towns
❑ Aerial Photography of the project area
❑ USGS Topographic Map
❑ Soil Survey Map
❑ Other Maps, as appropriate (e.g. National Wetland Inventory Map, Proposed Site
Plan, previous delineation maps, LIDAR maps, FEMA floodplain maps)
6 See Appendix A of this Form. From Regulatory Guidance Letter No. 08 -02, dated June 26, 2008
Version: December 2013 Page 51

Jurisdictional Determination Request
Delineation Information (when applicable):
Wetlands:
Wetland Data Sheets8
❑0
A
F
Upland Data Sheets
Landscape Photos, if taken
Tributaries:
F_J USACE Assessment Forms
Field Sketch overlain on legible Map that includes:
Other Assessment Forms
(when appropriate)
■ All aquatic resources (for sites with multiple resources, label and identify)
■ Locations of wetland data points and /or tributary assessment reaches
■ Locations of photo stations
■ Approximate acreage /linear footage of aquatic resources
(2) Approved JDs including Verification of a Delineation:
F✓ Project Coordinates: 35.761365 Latitude "78.854976 Longitude
Maps (no larger than 11x17) with Project Boundary Overlay:
❑✓ Large and small scale maps that depict, at minimum: streets, intersections, towns
❑✓ Aerial Photography of the project area
F✓ USGS Topographic Map
n Soil Survey Map
❑ Other Maps, as appropriate (e.g. National Wetland Inventory Map, Proposed Site Plan,
previous delineation maps)
1987 Manual Regional Supplements and Data forms can be found at:
http: / /www.usace.armv.mil/ Missions/ CivilWorks/ RegulatorvProgramandPermits /res supp.aspx
Wetland and Stream Assessment Methodologies can be found at:
http: / /i)ortal.ncdenr.org /c /document library /get file ?uuid= 76f3c58b -dab8- 4960- ba43- 45b7faf06f4c &erouold =38364 and,
http: / /www. saw.usace.armv.mil/ Portals /59 /dots /regulatory /publicnotices /2013 /NCSAM Draft User Manual 130318.pdf
8 Delineation information must include, at minimum, one wetland data sheet for each wetland /community type.
Version: December 2013 Page 6

Jurisdictional Determination Request
Delineation Information (when applicable):
Wetlands:
Wetland Data Sheets9
❑
✓
F07
Upland Data Sheets
Landscape Photos, if taken
Tributaries:
USACE Assessment Forms
Field Sketch overlain on legible Map that includes:
Other Assessment Forms
(when appropriate)
• All aquatic resources (for sites with multiple resources, label and identify)
• Locations of wetland data points and /or tributary assessment reaches
• Locations of photo stations
• Approximate acreage /linear footage of aquatic resources
Supporting Jurisdictional Information (for Approved JDs only)
FApproved Jurisdictional Determination Form(s) (also known as "Rapanos
Form(s)")
F] Map(s) depicting the potential (or lack of potential) hydrologic connection(s),
adjacency, etc. to navigable waters.
9 Delineation information must include, at minimum, one wetland data sheet for each wetland /community type.
Version: December 2013 Page 7

1.
Jurisdictional Determination Request
REQUESTS FOR CORPS APPROVAL OF SURVEY PLAT
Prior to final production of a Plat, the Wilmington District recommends that the Land
Surveyor electronically submit a draft of a Survey Plat to the Corps project manager for
review.
Due to storage limitations of our administrative records, the Corps requires that all hard -
copy submittals include at least one original Plat (to scale) that is no larger than 11 "x17"
(the use of match lines for larger tracts acceptable). Additional copies of a plat, including
those larger than 11 "x 17 ", may also be submitted for Corps signature as needed. The
Corps also accepts electronic submittals of plats, such as those transmitted as a Portable
Document Format (PDF) file. Upon verification, the Corps can electronically sign these
plats and return them via e-mail to the requestor.
(1) PLATS SUBMITTED FOR APPROVAL
F] Must be sealed and signed by a licensed professional land surveyor
❑ Must be to scale (all maps must include both a graphic scale and a verbal scale)
❑ Must be legible
❑ Must include a North Arrow, Scale(s), Title, Property Information
Must include a legible WoUS Delineation Table of distances and bearings /metes
and bounds /GPS coordinates of all surveyed delineation points
MUSt clearly depict surveyed property or project boundaries
Must clearly identify the known surveyed point(s) used as reference (e.g. property
corner, USGS monument)
❑ When wetlands are depicted:
• Must include acreage (or square footage) of wetland polygons
• Must identify each wetland polygon using an alphanumeric system
Version: December 2013 Page 8

Jurisdictional Determination Request
FWhen tributaries are depicted:
• Must include either a surveyed, approximate centerline of tributary with
approximate width of tributary OR surveyed Ordinary High Water Marks
(OHWM) of tributary
• Must identify each tributary using an alphanumeric system
• Must include linear footage of tributaries and calculated area (using approximate
widths or surveyed OHWM)
• Must include name of tributary (based on the most recent USGS topographic
map) or, when no USGS name exists, identify as "unnamed tributary"
all depicted WoUS (wetland polygons and tributary lines) must intersect or tie -to
surveyed project/property boundaries
Must include the location of wetland data points and/or tributary assessment
reaches
F1Must include, label accordingly, and depict acreage of all waters not currently
subject to the requirements of the CWA (e.g. "isolated wetlands ", "non-
jurisdictional waters "). NOTE: An approved JD must be conducted in order to
make an official Corps determination that a particular waterbody or wetland is not
jurisdictional.
Must include and survey all existing conveyances (pipes, culverts, etc.) that
transport WoUS
Version: December 2013 Page 9

Jurisdictional Determination Request
(2) CERTIFICATION LANGUAGE
When the entire actual Jurisdictional Boundary is depicted:
include the following Corps Certification language:
"This certifies that this copy of this plat accurately depicts the boundary of the jurisdiction
of Section 404 of the Clean Water Act as determined by the undersigned on this date.
Unless there is a change in the law or our published regulations, the determination of
Section 404 jurisdiction may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five (5) years from
this date. The undersigned completed this determination utilizing the appropriate Regional
Supplement to the 1987 U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual."
Regulatory Official:
Title:
Date:
USACE Action ID No.:
RWhen uplands may be present within a depicted Jurisdictional Boundarv:
include the following Corps Certification language:
"This certifies that this copy of this plat identifies all areas of waters of the United States
regulated pursuant to Section 404 of the Clean Water Act as determined by the
undersigned on this date. Unless there is change in the law or our published regulations,
this determination of Section 404 jurisdiction may be relied upon for a period not to exceed
five years from this date. The undersigned completed this determination utilizing the
appropriate Regional Supplement to the 1987 U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Wetlands
Delineation Manual."
Regulatory Official:
Title:
Date:
USACE Action ID No.:
Version: December 2013 Page 10

Jurisdictional Determination Request
(3) GPS SURVEYS
For Surveys prepared using a Global Positioning System (GPS), the Survey must include
all of the above, as well as:
❑ be at sub -meter accuracy at each survey point.
❑ include an accuracy verification:
One or more known points (property corner, monument) shall be located with the
GPS and cross - referenced with the existing traditional property survey (metes and
bounds).
❑ include a brief description of the GPS equipment utilized.
Version: December 2013 Page 11

APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION FORM
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
This form should be completed by following the instructions provided in Section IV of the JD Form Instructional Guidebook.
SECTION I: BACKGROUND INFORMATION,
A. REPORT COMPLETION DATE FOR APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (JD):
B. DISTRICT OFFICE, FILE NAME, AND NUMBER:
C. PROJECT LOCATION AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION: The project includes approximately 100 -110 acres and is located
off of Holt Road just north of Old Jenks Road in the Town of Apex and lies within the Cape Fear River Basin. The wetland delineation was
conducted on seven parcels of land (PIN Numbers 0743025688, 0743121427, 0743127298, 0743029713, 0743021481, 0743122592,
0743029498) within the eastern portion of Wake County.
State:NC County/parish/borough: Wake City: Apex
Center coordinates of site (lat/long in degree decimal format): Lat. 35.761714° N, Long. - 78.854035° W.
Universal Transverse Mercator:
Name of nearest waterbody: Beaver Creek
Name of nearest Traditional Navigable Water (TNW) into which the aquatic resource flows: Jordan Lake
Name of watershed or Hydrologic Unit Code (HUC): 03030002060160
E Check if map /diagram of review area and /or potential jurisdictional areas is /are available upon request.
Check if other sites (e.g., offsite mitigation sites, disposal sites, etc...) are associated with this action and are recorded on a
different JD form.
D. REVIEW PERFORMED FOR SITE EVALUATION (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):
Office (Desk) Determination. Date:
Field Determination. Date(s):
SECTION II: SUMMARY OF FINDINGS
A. RHA SECTION 10 DETERMINATION OF JURISDICTION.
There Are no "navigable waters of the U.S." within Rivers and Harbors Act (RHA) jurisdiction (as defined by 33 CFR part 329) in the
review area. [Required]
Waters subject to the ebb and flow of the tide.
Waters are presently used, or have been used in the past, or may be susceptible for use to transport interstate or foreign commerce.
Explain:
B. CWA SECTION 404 DETERMINATION OF JURISDICTION.
There are and are not "waters of the U.S." within Clean Water Act (CWA) jurisdiction (as defined by 33 CFR part 328) in the review area. [Required
1. Waters of the U.S.
a. Indicate presence of waters of U.S. in review area (check all that apply): t
TNWs, including territorial seas
Wetlands adjacent to TNWs
Relatively permanent waters' (RPWs) that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
Non -RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
Wetlands directly abutting RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
Wetlands adjacent to but not directly abutting RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
Wetlands adjacent to non -RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
Impoundments of jurisdictional waters
Isolated (interstate or intrastate) waters, including isolated wetlands
b. Identify (estimate) size of waters of the U.S. in the review area:
Non - wetland waters: 2,295 linear feet: 2.5 width (ft) and/or acres.
Wetlands: 0.44 acres.
c. Limits (boundaries) of jurisdiction based on: 1987 Delineation Manual
Elevation of established OHWM (if known):
2. Non - regulated waters /wetlands (check if applicable):3
Potentially jurisdictional waters and /or wetlands were assessed within the review area and determined to be not jurisdictional.
Explain:
Boxes checked below shall be supported by completing the appropriate sections in Section III below.
z For purposes of this form, an RPW is defined as a tributary that is not a TNW and that typically flows year -round or has continuous flow at least "seasonally"
(e.g., typically 3 months).
I Supporting documentation is presented in Section III. F.

SECTION III: CWA ANALYSIS
A. TNWs AND WETLANDS ADJACENT TO TNWs
The agencies will assert jurisdiction over TNWs and wetlands adjacent to TNWs. If the aquatic resource is a TNW, complete
Section III.A.1 and Section III.D.1. only; if the aquatic resource is a wetland adjacent to a TNW, complete Sections III.A.1 and 2
and Section III.D.1.; otherwise, see Section III.B below.
1. TNW
Identify TNW:
Summarize rationale supporting determination:
2. Wetland adjacent to TNW
Summarize rationale supporting conclusion that wetland is "adjacent ":
B. CHARACTERISTICS OF TRIBUTARY (THAT IS NOT A TNW) AND ITS ADJACENT WETLANDS (IF ANY):
This section summarizes information regarding characteristics of the tributary and its adjacent wetlands, if any, and it helps
determine whether or not the standards for jurisdiction established under Rapanos have been met.
The agencies will assert jurisdiction over non - navigable tributaries of TNWs where the tributaries are "relatively permanent
waters" (RPWs), i.e. tributaries that typically flow year -round or have continuous flow at least seasonally (e.g., typically 3
months). A wetland that directly abuts an RPW is also jurisdictional. If the aquatic resource is not a TNW, but has year -round
(perennial) flow, skip to Section III.D.2. If the aquatic resource is a wetland directly abutting a tributary with perennial flow,
skip to Section III.D.4.
A wetland that is adjacent to but that does not directly abut an RPW requires a significant nexus evaluation. Corps districts and
EPA regions will include in the record any available information that documents the existence of a significant nexus between a
relatively permanent tributary that is not perennial (and its adjacent wetlands if any) and a traditional navigable water, even
though a significant nexus finding is not required as a matter of law.
If the waterbody° is not an RPW, or a wetland directly abutting an RPW, a JD will require additional data to determine if the
waterbody has a significant nexus with a TNW. If the tributary has adjacent wetlands, the significant nexus evaluation must
consider the tributary in combination with all of its adjacent wetlands. This significant nexus evaluation that combines, for
analytical purposes, the tributary and all of its adjacent wetlands is used whether the review area identified in the JD request is
the tributary, or its adjacent wetlands, or both. If the JD covers a tributary with adjacent wetlands, complete Section III.B.1 for
the tributary, Section III.B.2 for any onsite wetlands, and Section III.B.3 for all wetlands adjacent to that tributary, both onsite
and offsite. The determination whether a significant nexus exists is determined in Section IILC below.
1. Characteristics of non -TNWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNW
(i) General Area Conditions:
Watershed size: 227acres
Drainage area: t76 acres
Average annual rainfall: inches
Average annual snowfall: inches
(ii) Physical Characteristics:
(a) Relationship with TNW:
® Tributary flows directly into TNW.
® Tributary flows through 2 tributaries before entering TNW.
Project waters are 10 -15 river miles from TNW.
Project waters are 1 (or less) river miles from RPW.
Project waters are 5 -10 aerial (straight) miles from TNW.
Project waters are 1 (or less) aerial (straight) miles from RPW.
Project waters cross or serve as state boundaries. Explain:
Identify flow route to TNW5: Project waters flow northwest through Beaver Creek for approximately 12 miles, and then
enter the New Hope River Arm of Jordan Lake.
° Note that the Instructional Guidebook contains additional information regarding swales, ditches, washes, and erosional features generally and in the and
West.
5 Flow route can be described by identifying, e.g., tributary a, which flows through the review area, to flow into tributary b, which then flows into TNW.

Tributary stream order, if known: 1 st.
(b) General Tributary Characteristics (check all that ann_ I_v):
Tributary is: ® Natural
❑ Artificial (man- made). Explain:
® Manipulated (man- altered). Explain: Ponds have been constructed at the top of Streams A & B.
Tributary properties with respect to top of bank (estimate):
Average width: 2.5 feet
Average depth: 1 feet
Average side slopes: 2I.
Primary tributary substrate composition (check all that apply):
❑ Silts ® Sands ❑ Concrete
❑ Cobbles ® Gravel ❑ Muck
® Bedrock ❑ Vegetation. Type /% cover:
❑ Other. Explain:
Tributary condition /stability [e.g., highly eroding, sloughing banks]. Explain: moderate erosion.
Presence of run /riffle /pool complexes. Explain: streams have moderately well developed run /riffle /pool complexes.
Tributary geometry: Relatively; straight
Tributary gradient (approximate average slope): %
(c) Flow:
Tributary provides for: Seasonal flow
Estimate average number of flow events in review area/year: Pick List
Describe flow regime:
Other information on duration and volume:
Surface flow is: Discrete. Characteristics:
Subsurface flow: Unknown. Explain findings:
❑ Dye (or other) test performed:
Tributary has (check all that apply):
® Bed and banks
® OHWM' (check all indicators that apply):
❑ clear, natural line impressed on the bank
®
the presence of litter and debris
❑ changes in the character of soil
❑
destruction of terrestrial vegetation
❑ shelving
®
the presence of wrack line
❑ vegetation matted down, bent, or absent
❑
sediment sorting
❑ leaf litter disturbed or washed away
❑
scour
® sediment deposition
❑
multiple observed orpredicted flow events
❑ water staining
❑
abrupt change in plant community
❑ other (list):
❑ Discontinuous OHWM.' Explain:
If factors other than the OHWM were used to determ
El High Tide Line indicated by:
❑ oil or scum line along shore objects
❑ fine shell or debris deposits (foreshore)
❑ physical markings /characteristics
❑ tidal gauges
❑ other (list):
me lateral extent of CWA jurisdiction (check all that apply):
Mean High Water Mark indicated by:
❑ survey to available datum;
❑ physical markings;
❑ vegetation lines /changes in vegetation types.
(iii) Chemical Characteristics:
Characterize tributary (e.g., water color is clear, discolored, oily film; water quality; general watershed characteristics, etc.).
Explain: water color is clear, no evidence of specific pollutants.
Identify specific pollutants, if known:
6A natural or man -made discontinuity in the OHWM does not necessarily sever jurisdiction (e.g., where the stream temporarily flows underground, or where
the OHWM has been removed by development or agricultural practices). Where there is a break in the OHWM that is unrelated to the waterbody's flow
regime (e.g., flow over a rock outcrop or through a culvert), the agencies will look for indicators of flow above and below the break.
'Ibid.

(iv) Biological Characteristics. Channel supports (check all that apply):
® Riparian corridor. Characteristics (type, average width):
❑ Wetland fringe. Characteristics:
® Habitat for:
❑ Federally Listed species. Explain findings:
❑ Fish /spawn areas. Explain findings: .
❑ Other environmentally - sensitive species. Explain findings:
® Aquatic /wildlife diversity. Explain findings:
2. Characteristics of wetlands adjacent to non -TNW that flow directly or indirectly into TNW
(i) Physical Characteristics:
(a) General Wetland Characteristics:
Properties:
Wetland size:0.44acres
Wetland type. Explain: riparian.
Wetland quality. Explain:
Project wetlands cross or serve as state boundaries. Explain:
(b) General Flow Relationship with Non -TNW:
Flow is: Intermittent flow. Explain:
Surface flow is: Overland sheetflow
Characteristics:
Subsurface flow: Unknown. Explain findings:
❑ Dye (or other) test performed:
(c) Wetland Adiacencv Determination with Non -TNW:
® Directly abutting
❑ Not directly abutting
❑ Discrete wetland hydrologic connection. Explain:
❑ Ecological connection. Explain:
❑ Separated by berm barrier. Explain:
(d) Proximitv (Relationship) to TNW
Project wetlands are 10 -15 river miles from TNW.
Project waters are 5 -10 aerial (straight) miles from TNW.
Flow is from: Wetland to navigable waters.
Estimate approximate location of wetland as within the Pick List floodplain.
(ii) Chemical Characteristics:
Characterize wetland system (e.g., water color is clear, brown, oil film on surface; water quality; general watershed
characteristics; etc.). Explain: water color is clear, the watershed is primarily forested and pasture with some residential
development in the lower part.
Identify specific pollutants, if known: know specific pollutants observed.
(iii) Biological Characteristics. Wetland supports (check all that apply):
® Riparian buffer. Characteristics (type, average width): 150 ft.
® Vegetation type /percent cover. Explain: Forested 90 %.
® Habitat for:
❑ Federally Listed species. Explain findings:
❑ Fish /spawn areas. Explain findings:
❑ Other environmentally - sensitive species. Explain findings:
® Aquatic /wildlife diversity. Explain findings:
3. Characteristics of all wetlands adjacent to the tributary (if any)
All wetland(s) being considered in the cumulative analysis: 5
Approximately ( 0.44 ) acres in total are being considered in the cumulative analysis.

For each wetland, specify the following:
Directiv abuts? (Y /N) Size (in acres) Directiv abuts? (Y /N) Size (in acres)
Y 0.008 Y 0.012
Y 0.125 Y 0.158
Y 0.124
Summarize overall biological, chemical and physical functions being performed: Wetland areas are primarily forested
and support wildlife diversity, aid in slowing storm flows, and allow pollutants to settle out before water flows downstream.
C. SIGNIFICANT NEXUS DETERMINATION
A significant nexus analysis will assess the flow characteristics and functions of the tributary itself and the functions performed
by any wetlands adjacent to the tributary to determine if they significantly affect the chemical, physical, and biological integrity
of a TNW. For each of the following situations, a significant nexus exists if the tributary, in combination with all of its adjacent
wetlands, has more than a speculative or insubstantial effect on the chemical, physical and /or biological integrity of a TNW.
Considerations when evaluating significant nexus include, but are not limited to the volume, duration, and frequency of the flow
of water in the tributary and its proximity to a TNW, and the functions performed by the tributary and all its adjacent
wetlands. It is not appropriate to determine significant nexus based solely on any specific threshold of distance (e.g. between a
tributary and its adjacent wetland or between a tributary and the TNW). Similarly, the fact an adjacent wetland lies within or
outside of a floodplain is not solely determinative of significant nexus.
Draw connections between the features documented and the effects on the TNW, as identified in the Rapanos Guidance and
discussed in the Instructional Guidebook. Factors to consider include, for example:
• Does the tributary, in combination with its adjacent wetlands (if any), have the capacity to carry pollutants or flood waters to
TNWs, or to reduce the amount of pollutants or flood waters reaching a TNW?
• Does the tributary, in combination with its adjacent wetlands (if any), provide habitat and lifecycle support functions for fish and
other species, such as feeding, nesting, spawning, or rearing young for species that are present in the TNW?
• Does the tributary, in combination with its adjacent wetlands (if any), have the capacity to transfer nutrients and organic carbon that
support downstream foodwebs?
• Does the tributary, in combination with its adjacent wetlands (if any), have other relationships to the physical, chemical, or
biological integrity of the TNW?
Note: the above list of considerations is not inclusive and other functions observed or known to occur should be documented
below:
1. Significant nexus findings for non -RPW that has no adjacent wetlands and flows directly or indirectly into TNWs. Explain
findings of presence or absence of significant nexus below, based on the tributary itself, then go to Section III.D:
2. Significant nexus findings for non -RPW and its adjacent wetlands, where the non -RPW flows directly or indirectly into
TNWs. Explain findings of presence or absence of significant nexus below, based on the tributary in combination with all of its
adjacent wetlands, then go to Section III.D:
3. Significant nexus findings for wetlands adjacent to an RPW but that do not directly abut the RPW. Explain findings of
presence or absence of significant nexus below, based on the tributary in combination with all of its adjacent wetlands, then go to
Section III.D:
D. DETERMINATIONS OF JURISDICTIONAL FINDINGS. THE SUBJECT WATERS/WETLANDS ARE (CHECK ALL
THAT APPLY):
1. TNWs and Adjacent Wetlands. Check all that apply and provide size estimates in review area:
TNWs: linear feet width (ft), Or, acres.
Wetlands adjacent to TNWs: acres.
2. RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs.
ED Tributaries of TNWs where tributaries typically flow year -round are jurisdictional. Provide data and rationale indicating that
tributary is perennial: RPWs of tributaries of TNW were determined based on the OHWM and the 1987 Delineation Manual
and the appropriate Regional Supplement.
ED Tributaries of TNW where tributaries have continuous flow "seasonally" (e.g., typically three months each year) are
jurisdictional. Data supporting this conclusion is provided at Section III.B. Provide rationale indicating that tributary flows

seasonally: RPWs of tributaries of TNW were determined based on the OHWM and the 1987 Delineation Manual and the
appropriate Regional Supplement.
Provide estimates for jurisdictional waters in the review area (check all that apply):
Tributary waters: 2,295 linear feet 2.5 width (ft).
Other non - wetland waters: acres.
Identify type(s) of waters:
3. Non -RPWss that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs.
Waterbody that is not a TNW or an RPW, but flows directly or indirectly into a TNW, and it has a significant nexus with a
TNW is jurisdictional. Data supporting this conclusion is provided at Section III.C.
Provide estimates for jurisdictional waters within the review area (check all that apply):
Tributary waters: linear feet width (ft).
Other non - wetland waters: acres.
Identify type(s) of waters:
4. Wetlands directly abutting an RPW that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs.
Wetlands directly abut RPW and thus are jurisdictional as adjacent wetlands.
Wetlands directly abutting an RPW where tributaries typically flow year- round. Provide data and rationale
indicating that tributary is perennial in Section III.D.2, above. Provide rationale indicating that wetland is
directly abutting an RPW: Approximately 0.20 acres of wetlands directly abutting an RPW that flows year round
were identified using the1987 Delineation Manual and the appropriate Regional Supplement.
Wetlands directly abutting an RPW where tributaries typically flow "seasonally." Provide data indicating that tributary is
seasonal in Section III.13 and rationale in Section III.D.2, above. Provide rationale indicating that wetland is directly
abutting an RPW: Approximately 0.24 acres of wetlands directly abutting an RPW that flows seasonally were identified
using the1987 Delineation Manual and the appropriate Regional Supplement
Provide acreage estimates for jurisdictional wetlands in the review area: 0.44 acres.
5. Wetlands adjacent to but not directly abutting an RPW that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs.
Q Wetlands that do not directly abut an RPW, but when considered in combination with the tributary to which they are adjacent
and with similarly situated adjacent wetlands, have a significant nexus with a TNW are jurisidictional. Data supporting this
conclusion is provided at Section III.C.
Provide acreage estimates for jurisdictional wetlands in the review area: 0.88 acres.
6. Wetlands adjacent to non -RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs.
Wetlands adjacent to such waters, and have when considered in combination with the tributary to which they are adjacent and
with similarly situated adjacent wetlands, have a significant nexus with a TNW are jurisdictional. Data supporting this
conclusion is provided at Section III.C.
Provide estimates for jurisdictional wetlands in the review area: acres.
7. Impoundments of jurisdictional waters?
As a general rule, the impoundment of a jurisdictional tributary remains jurisdictional.
Demonstrate that impoundment was created from "waters of the U.S.," or
Demonstrate that water meets the criteria for one of the categories presented above (1 -6), or
Demonstrate that water is isolated with a nexus to commerce (see E below).
E. ISOLATED [INTERSTATE OR INTRA- STATE] WATERS, INCLUDING ISOLATED WETLANDS, THE USE,
DEGRADATION OR DESTRUCTION OF WHICH COULD AFFECT INTERSTATE COMMERCE, INCLUDING ANY
SUCH WATERS (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY) :10
'See Footnote # 3.
9 To complete the analysis refer to the key in Section III.D.6 of the Instructional Guidebook.
10 Prior to asserting or declining CWA jurisdiction based solely on this category, Corps Districts will elevate the action to Corps and EPA HQ for
review consistent with the process described in the Corps /EPA Memorandum Regarding CWA Act Jurisdiction Following Rapanos.

which are or could be used by interstate or foreign travelers for recreational or other purposes.
from which fish or shellfish are or could be taken and sold in interstate or foreign commerce.
which are or could be used for industrial purposes by industries in interstate commerce.
Interstate isolated waters. Explain:
Other factors. Explain:
Identify water body and summarize rationale supporting determination:
Provide estimates for jurisdictional waters in the review area (check all that apply):
❑ Tributary waters: linear feet width (ft).
❑ Other non - wetland waters: acres.
Identify type(s) of waters:
Wetlands: acres.
F. NON - JURISDICTIONAL WATERS, INCLUDING WETLANDS (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):
If potential wetlands were assessed within the review area, these areas did not meet the criteria in the 1987 Corps of Engineers
Wetland Delineation Manual and/or appropriate Regional Supplements.
Review area included isolated waters with no substantial nexus to interstate (or foreign) commerce.
❑ Prior to the Jan 2001 Supreme Court decision in "SWANCC," the review area would have been regulated based solely on the
"Migratory Bird Rule" (MBR).
Waters do not meet the "Significant Nexus" standard, where such a finding is required for jurisdiction. Explain:
El Other: (explain, if not covered above):
Provide acreage estimates for non - jurisdictional waters in the review area, where the sole potential basis of jurisdiction is the MBR
factors (i.e., presence of migratory birds, presence of endangered species, use of water for irrigated agriculture), using best professional
judgment (check all that apply):
Non - wetland waters (i.e., rivers, streams): linear feet width (ft).
Lakes /ponds: acres.
Other non - wetland waters: acres. List type of aquatic resource:
Wetlands: acres.
Provide acreage estimates for non - jurisdictional waters in the review area that do not meet the "Significant Nexus" standard, where such
a finding is required for jurisdiction (check all that apply):
Non - wetland waters (i.e., rivers, streams): linear feet, width (ft).
Lakes /ponds: acres.
Other non - wetland waters: acres. List type of aquatic resource:
Wetlands: acres.
SECTION IV: DATA SOURCES.
A. SUPPORTING DATA. Data reviewed for JD (check all that apply -checked items shall be included in case file and, where checked
and requested, appropriately reference sources below):
Maps, plans, plots or plat submitted by or on behalf of the applicant/consultant:
Data sheets prepared /submitted by or on behalf of the applicant /consultant.
❑ Office concurs with data sheets /delineation report.
❑ Office does not concur with data sheets /delineation report.
Data sheets prepared by the Corps:
Corps navigable waters' study:
U.S. Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas:
❑ USGS NHD data.
® USGS 8 and 12 digit HUC maps.
U.S. Geological Survey map(s). Cite scale & quad name: i "= 2,000' Cary SW.
USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey. Citation: Wake Coounty.
National wetlands inventory map(s). Cite name:
State /Local wetland inventory map(s):
FEMA/FIRM maps:
100 -year Floodplain Elevation is: (National Geodectic Vertical Datum of 1929)
Photographs: ® Aerial (Name & Date):NC OneMap 2012.
or ❑ Other (Name & Date):
Previous determination(s). File no. and date of response letter:
El Applicable /supporting case law:
El Applicable /supporting scientific literature:

Other information (please specify):
B. ADDITIONAL COMMENTS TO SUPPORT JD:

NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date: 1' �s> <� =)1 Project/Site: ���,, <Js: , 1. .' �f Latitude: S.-T('o ­?j lo �
Evaluator: County: (i�a 2 Longitude: °°TU(0afl1qf
Total Points:
Stream is at least intermittent 1�
if ? 19 or perennial if z 30*
Stream Determination (c' one) Other
Ephemeral Intermitten Perenn! e.g. Quad Name:
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal=. c_) Absent
1 a. Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
3. In- channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
0
ripple -pool sequence
l
4, Particle size of stream substrate
0
5. Active /relict floodplain
0
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
8. Headcuts
( (0
9. Grade control
0
10. Natural valley
0
11. Second or greater order channel
No = 0
a artificial ditches are not rated,- see discussions in manual
2
B. Hydrology (Subtotal
0.5
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
14. Leaf litter
(�1.5�
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
17 Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
C. Biology (Subtotal = ,,n,,i }
Moderate
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
1
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
l
21. Aquatic Mollusks
1
22. Fish
( °0
F23. Crayfish
0
24. Amphibians
0
25. Algae
( (0
26. Wetland plants in streambed
I 2
`perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
M
Sketch:
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1
23�
0
1
2
3
1
2
V
1
2
(3)
0.5
t 1 1
1.5
1
I 2
;rte
1
M
1.5
1
2
3
0.5
1.5
­-_
1.5
("Yes = 3 ,�
1
1
2
2
3
1
0.5
0
0.51
1.5
0.51��
d'i'es = 3i
1.5
2
1
0
2
1
0
1
2
3
1
2
3
0.5
1
1.5
0.5
t 1 1
1.5
1
1.5
0.5
1
1.5
FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5�_bther =_o-)

J.l �-� __ t 6-0c)
NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11 y
Date: r 01, Project/Site.- A; A A Q J hr1 Latitude:
Evaluator: ? County: �sz . Longitude: �)0'
is2�> T
Total Points: Stream Dete att circle one) Other
Stream is at least intermittent
if? 19 or perennial if? 30" Ephemera ( Intermitteni)Perennial e.g. Quad Name:
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal= (t`7 )
Absent Weak
1a-Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
'Cl
3. In- channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
0
22. Fish
ripple -pool sequence
23. Crayfish
t
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
5. Active /relict flood lain
0
I 1
6. Depositional bars benches
P
, 0
�
1
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
' r1
8. Headcuts
�-b)
1
9. Grade control
0
1 03)
10. Natural valley
0
f m
11. Second or greater order channel
rN0 = 0)
U artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual�
B. Hydrology (Subtotal= )
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
( 0
1
14. Leaf litter
1.5
(.1�
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
0.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
C. Biology (Subtotal=
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
( f
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
C3
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0-)
21. Aquatic Mollusks
22. Fish
23. Crayfish
t
24. Amphibians
0
25. Algae
0
26. Wetland plants in streambed
- perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. Seep. 35 of manual.
Notes:
Sketch:
Moderate Strong
� ) 1 3
2 3
2 3
2D 1 3
CT) 1 3
2 3
2 3
2 3
1 1.5
1 1.5
Yes =3
2 `3
0.5 0
1 1.5
1.5
(Yes '= 3)
2 1
2 1
1 2
1 2
0.5 1
0.5 1
0.5
0.5 1
FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5 rher ='Oj
0
0
3
3
1.5
1.5
1.5
(9.5�

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
S 6 (- )� Sampling Date:
Project /Site: % � c',.�� �,k��!'� �,,r� k.a 0 <•�a .City /County: f ���.�„ :r�_aa p 9
Applicant/Owner. P' yv (' •. '' „” ` of - State: Sampling Point:
Investigator(s): i?�i?., KY ) Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Local relief (concave, convex, none): Slope ( %):
2 1 "� a� a _(alto 0
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): 33 Lat: � r � • 4 (u J i' �� .Long: Datum:
Soil Map Unit Name: <l�✓ F ,!�c�. s1 su,,vt ,l t v?• °r3 NWI classification:
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes °/` No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes ✓ No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (if needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present?
Hydric Soil Present?
Wetland Hydrology Present?
Remarks:
Yes V/ No Is the Sampled Area
Yes No within a Wetland? Yes No
Yes ✓ No
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two reouired)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is reouired: check
all that aoolv)
_ Surface Soil Cracks (136)
Surface Water (Al)
_ True Aquatic Plants (B14)
_ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
High Water Table (A2)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
— Drainage Patterns (1310)
✓Saturation (A3)
— Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_ Moss Trim Lines (1316)
Water Marks (131)
_ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry- Season Water Table (C2)
_
Sediment Deposits (132)
, Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_
_ Drift Deposits (B3)
_. Thin Muck Surface (C7)
_ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_, Algal Mat or Crust (134)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
Iron Deposits (135)
_ Geomorphic Position (D2)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
_ Shallow Aquitard (133)
_
Water- Stained Leaves (139)
_ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
_
Aquatic Fauna (B13)
_ FAC- Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No
Depth (inches): (o
/
Saturation Present? Yes No
Depth (inches): � 4— Wetland
Hydrology Present? Yes V No
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring
well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Five Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Tree Stratum (Plot size: :O )
1. \.l c'.,,x-u h a fO
V
2.
Absolute
% Cover
I S+
Dominant Indicator
Species? Staat�us
EA(
3.
4. (NOAAAC n,.L,. -.
/\j f'
5.
Total % Cover of:
Multiply
6.
50% of total cover.
Sampling Point: k 1-
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: �0 (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: (B)
Percent of Dominant Species �-
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (� (A/B)
5.
6.
50% of total cover:
Shrub Stratum (Plot size:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
50% of total cover:
Herb Stratum (Plot size: )
1. Co, r .
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
Total Cover
C) 20% of total cover: I
C) = Total Cover
20% of total cover:
ELL
= Total Cover
50% of total cover: 3 20% of total cover: i
Woodv Vine Stratum (Plot size: IS )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
0 = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
Prevalence Index = B/A = 0, S
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
_l1 -Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
v/2 - Dominance Test is >50%
_V" 3 - Prevalence Index is 53.0'
_ 4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
_ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Five Vegetation Strata:
Tree -Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in.
(7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH)
Sapling - Woody plants, excluding woody vines
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less
than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH.
Shrub - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height.
Herb -All herbaceous (non- woody) plants, including
herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody
plants, except woody vines, less than approximately 3
ft (1 m) in height.
Woody vine - All woody vines, regardless of height
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes / No
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0
6 5 = Total Cover
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of:
Multiply
bv:
50% of total cover.
r 20% of total covee��
OBL species
x 1 =
)
Saolino Stratum (Plot size:
,�-
��� )
_
�d
FACW species
�
x 2 =
1. r,4
2.R�x'_Y C�.. ilica,arb
` > ��
FAC species
� �'
x 3 =
,3.
FACU species
�7
x4=
fti
C)
UPL species
x 5 =
4"
Column Totals:
(A)
i j (r) (B)
5.
6.
50% of total cover:
Shrub Stratum (Plot size:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
50% of total cover:
Herb Stratum (Plot size: )
1. Co, r .
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
Total Cover
C) 20% of total cover: I
C) = Total Cover
20% of total cover:
ELL
= Total Cover
50% of total cover: 3 20% of total cover: i
Woodv Vine Stratum (Plot size: IS )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
0 = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
Prevalence Index = B/A = 0, S
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
_l1 -Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
v/2 - Dominance Test is >50%
_V" 3 - Prevalence Index is 53.0'
_ 4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
_ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Five Vegetation Strata:
Tree -Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in.
(7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH)
Sapling - Woody plants, excluding woody vines
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less
than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH.
Shrub - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height.
Herb -All herbaceous (non- woody) plants, including
herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody
plants, except woody vines, less than approximately 3
ft (1 m) in height.
Woody vine - All woody vines, regardless of height
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes / No
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

'Type: C= Concentration, D= Depletion, RM= Reduced Matrix, MS= Masked Sand Grains. 21-ocation: PL =Pore Lining, M= Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils':
_ Histosol (Al)
AA} 6� Si...iy� i
SOIL
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
_ Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
_ Black Histic (A3)
Sampling Point:
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth
(inches)
Matrix
Color (moist)
%
Redox
Color (moist)
Features
% Type, Loc`
Texture Remarks
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
_ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
q
6
11'
�
��'p �!0
t
,
l �P,.r�
`d °" i �
I.t'w� r'i ..5�
95
10 tf -p- (Pit
f 111";)
( 1INk"
'Type: C= Concentration, D= Depletion, RM= Reduced Matrix, MS= Masked Sand Grains. 21-ocation: PL =Pore Lining, M= Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils':
_ Histosol (Al)
_ Dark Surface (S7)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
_ Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
_ Black Histic (A3)
_ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
(MLRA 147, 148)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
_ Stratified Layers (A5)
_ Depleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136, 147)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
_ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Thick Dark Surface (Al2) Redox Depressions (F8)
_ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N, _ Iron - Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 147, 148) MLRA 136)
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) _ Umbric Surface (1`13) (MLRA 136, 122) 'Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Sandy Redox (S5) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148) wetland hydrology must be present,
— Stripped Matrix (S6) _ Red Parent Material (1721) (MLRA 127, 147) unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes \/ No _
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Project/Site: WArk6A(m &AIV° - V��O City /county: :Y. � tl�a• Sampling Date:
Applicant/Owner: M J? � ' ._(xVn,x'ot)"t LL-C- State: MC Sampling Point: TQ
Investigator(s): VN(? -1 Y_y Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Local relief (concave, convex, none): Slope ( %):
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): Lat: 36- ¢(o "� 9 R3 Long: f�. �i�� a � Datum:
Soil Map Unit Name: Oo rs, o ivy Cr ,7t�„ i -y-R i > NWI classification:
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical i for this time of year? Yes _V,' No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes v`� No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes f No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes NoT within a Wetland? Yes No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No °
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two reouired)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check
all that aooly)
_ Surface Soil Cracks (136)
Surface Water (Al)
_ True Aquatic Plants (1314)
_ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
High Water Table (A2)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
— Drainage Patterns (1310)
Saturation (A3)
_ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_ Moss Trim Lines (B16)
_ Water Marks (131)
_ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry- Season Water Table (C2)
_ Sediment Deposits (B2)
_ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_ Drift Deposits (B3)
_ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
_ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Algal Mat or Crust (134)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
Iron Deposits (135)
_ Geomorphic Position (D2)
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
_ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
Water- Stained Leaves (139)
_ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (B13)
_ FAC- Neutral Test (135)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No ✓ Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No v' Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No ` Depth (inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Five Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Tree -Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
FA 1
FA
Absolute Dominant
Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size:
% Cover Species?
Status
than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH.
2. Ukifi,l:'.t•_c: { "'
\1�
3. "."V' A., "r t S, ✓ xi~
a ,Nl
4. tif� tip;.. i . lln�✓:ro
T
JOEL
5.
6.
c
= Total Cover
=Total Cover
50% of total cover:
t 20% of total cover:
Shrub Stratum (Plot size:
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
1.
Saolina Stratum (Plot size: I �s 1
50% of total cover:
Herb Stratum (Plot size:
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
Total Cover
a
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:
Woodv Vine Stratum (Plot size:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
= Total Cover
t I
i -L-" -fir- L0( ") C>
Sampling Point: tN3J-
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species `
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: l0 (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: (B)
Percent of Dominant Species // _
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: �z� (A/B)
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of: Multiply bv:
OBL species _m x 1 =
FACW species x 2 =
FAC species L09 x 3 = 0'+
FACU species "( x 4 = c.'.,1 o
UPL species C7 x 5 = �7
Column Totals: 1Z (A) e�1= :> (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
V/ 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
\/"'3 - - Prevalence Index is < -3.0'
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
_ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Five Vegetation Strata:
- ° o o a cover.
Tree -Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
FA 1
FA
2.
))� 1.?�
Sapling - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
3.
than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH.
4.
5.
6.
c
= Total Cover
50% of total cover:
t 20% of total cover:
Shrub Stratum (Plot size:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
50% of total cover:
Herb Stratum (Plot size:
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
Total Cover
a
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:
Woodv Vine Stratum (Plot size:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
= Total Cover
t I
i -L-" -fir- L0( ") C>
Sampling Point: tN3J-
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species `
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: l0 (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: (B)
Percent of Dominant Species // _
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: �z� (A/B)
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of: Multiply bv:
OBL species _m x 1 =
FACW species x 2 =
FAC species L09 x 3 = 0'+
FACU species "( x 4 = c.'.,1 o
UPL species C7 x 5 = �7
Column Totals: 1Z (A) e�1= :> (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
V/ 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
\/"'3 - - Prevalence Index is < -3.0'
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
_ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Five Vegetation Strata:
- ° o o a cover.
Tree -Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
FA 1
FA
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in.
(7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH).
))� 1.?�
Sapling - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less
than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH.
C= Total Cover
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:
Remarks: (include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
Shrub -Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height.
Herb -All herbaceous (non- woody) plants, including
herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody
plants, except woody vines, less than approximately 3
ft (1 m) in height.
Woody vine - All woody vines, regardless of height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes No
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

11 �
SOIL Sampling Point:
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type' Log` Texture Remarks
" I (X ic) `ifs . s z iy _._ _.. -
il�� n/k
'Type: C= Concentration, D= Depletion, RM= Reduced Matrix, MS= Masked Sand Grains. 'Location: PL =Pore Lininq, M= Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Sandy Mucky Mineral (31) (LRR N,
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils':
_ Histosol (Al)
_ Dark Surface (S7)
_ 2 em Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
_ Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
_ Black Histic (A3)
_ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
(MLRA 147, 148)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
_ Stratified Layers (A5)
_ Depleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136, 147)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
e Redox Dark Surface (F6)
— Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
— Other (Explain in Remarks)
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (31) (LRR N,
— Iron- Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 147, 148)
MLRA 136)
_ Sandy Gieyed Matrix (S4)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122)
_ Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
v Stripped Matrix (S6)
_ Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
'Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic.
Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes
Remarks:
No
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
ProjecUSite: b\ ( A:.:.E. "u A_t)t"i. City /County: 1 'YS W o -c-_ Sampling Date: I I ao 1 �� /I s
Applicant/Owner: M 1: Vmw'VQS n 1Z > gyp.; { s L1..Q' . State: N C_ Sampling Point:
Investigator(s): KY. K Section, Township, Range: 4
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Local relief (concave, convex, none): Slope ( %):
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): Lat: � t Long: _ ?if0 q S Datum:
Soil Map Unit Name: U '.- Ffl�„,A ir_, e— k ?i( W., os a NWI classification:
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes ✓' No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes V- No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes �/` No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No within a Wetland? Yes V No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes e/ No
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two reouired)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is reouired:
check all that aoDlv)
_ Surface Soil Cracks (136)
_ Surface Water (Al)
_ True Aquatic Plants (1314)
_ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
High Water Table (A2)
— Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1)
_ Drainage Patterns (1310)
Saturation (A3)
_, Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
, Moss Trim Lines (B16)
_ Water Marks (131)
_ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry - Season Water Table (C2)
Sediment Deposits (132)
_ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
s Crayfish Burrows (C8)
Drift Deposits (133)
Thin Muck Surface (C7)
_ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_ Algal Mat or Crust (B4)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
Iron Deposits (85)
_ Geomorphic Position (D2)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7)
_ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
_ Water- Stained Leaves (139)
_ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
_ Aquatic Fauna (1313)
_ FAC- Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No
Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No
Jn
Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No
Depth (inches): c? Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes / No
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Five Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
0-) . = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 0 20% of total cover:
Saolino Stratum (Plot size:
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
50% of total cover: s
Shrub Stratum (Plot size:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
50% of total cover:
Herb Stratum (Plot size: )
1. n.( ::t,i'i` 1 rti: rii`i c3v.
2. A LNG
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
Total Cover
_ 20% of total cover: 0
0 = Total Cover
20% of total cover:
c-20 = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:
Woodv Vine Stratum (Plot size: )
2. �le,- iXvtiin.r� stM,.Cc ! Vit��nC C'
3. S _
4.
5.
= Total Cover
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:
Remarks: (include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
Sampling Point: TP Ji
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: + (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: (B)
Percent of Dominant Species Q ?) -/ r)
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: U (A/B)
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of: Multiolv bv:
OBL species � 0 x 1 = 1(')
FACW species x 2 =C
FAC species x 3 =�
FACU species x4= c0
UPL species « e)
rc- °° x 5 =
Column Totals: ( I'_" (A) �� (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A =
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
_ ✓2 - Dominance Test is >50%
,,/✓3 - Prevalence Index is <_3.0'
_ 4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
_ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Five Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in.
(7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH).
Sapling - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less
than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH.
Shrub - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height.
Herb - All herbaceous (non- woody) plants, including
herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody
plants, except woody vines, less than approximately 3
ft (1 rn) in height.
Woody vine - All woody vines, regardless of height
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes / No
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0
Absolute
Dominant Indicator
Tree
Stratum (Plot size: )
% Cover
Species? Status
1.
1
a �
2.
A-(---q- vt,6,, v%
i rJ
3.
LS2r.A :::rr���, try t�..
_�C-3
Oil_
4.
a n U.S (.�. c?
✓��
5.
6.
0-) . = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 0 20% of total cover:
Saolino Stratum (Plot size:
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
50% of total cover: s
Shrub Stratum (Plot size:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
50% of total cover:
Herb Stratum (Plot size: )
1. n.( ::t,i'i` 1 rti: rii`i c3v.
2. A LNG
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
Total Cover
_ 20% of total cover: 0
0 = Total Cover
20% of total cover:
c-20 = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:
Woodv Vine Stratum (Plot size: )
2. �le,- iXvtiin.r� stM,.Cc ! Vit��nC C'
3. S _
4.
5.
= Total Cover
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:
Remarks: (include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
Sampling Point: TP Ji
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: + (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: (B)
Percent of Dominant Species Q ?) -/ r)
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: U (A/B)
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of: Multiolv bv:
OBL species � 0 x 1 = 1(')
FACW species x 2 =C
FAC species x 3 =�
FACU species x4= c0
UPL species « e)
rc- °° x 5 =
Column Totals: ( I'_" (A) �� (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A =
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
_ ✓2 - Dominance Test is >50%
,,/✓3 - Prevalence Index is <_3.0'
_ 4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
_ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Five Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in.
(7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH).
Sapling - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less
than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH.
Shrub - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height.
Herb - All herbaceous (non- woody) plants, including
herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody
plants, except woody vines, less than approximately 3
ft (1 rn) in height.
Woody vine - All woody vines, regardless of height
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes / No
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: 1)P
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth
Matrix
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
Redox Features
(inches)
Color (moist)
%
Color (moist) % Type' Loc` Texture Remarks
AZ Depleted Matrix (F3)
life-,— �iIJ
IC)o
I
IOC
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
f „— (Si
�Y
J'S t (o 1 e>
1 ��
4
'Type: C= Concentration, D= Depletion, RM= Reduced Matrix, MS= Masked Sand Grains
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Histosoi (Al)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
_ Black Histic (A3)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_ Stratified Layers (A5)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
_ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N,
MLRA 147, 148)
_ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
_ Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Stripped Matrix (S6)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Remarks:
2Location: PL =Pore Lining, M= Matrix.
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils':
_ Dark Surface (S7)
y 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
_ Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
_ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
(MLRA 147, 148)
_ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
AZ Depleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136, 147)
— Redox Dark Surface (F6)
_ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
✓Redox Depressions (F8)
Iron- Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 136)
Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122) 'Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148) wetland hydrology must be present,
_ Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147) unless disturbed or problematic.
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Project/Site: c 'j (�'f�. 1v .. ( t' 0'13 City /County: Ap� 7C Sampling Date:
Applicant/Owner: f �21ff'.�: 0) , ulE'.�e;-� i .tom State: Nc- Sampling Point: �r� I l tR�i
Investigator( %): K Y. K R- °° Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Local relief (concave, convex, none): Slope ( %):
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): Lat: �_ ��o c; Cl Long: - '�. $l�C� )b Datum:
Soil Map Unit Name: (:J f istU orx0/a NWI classification:
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes ✓ No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes � No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No v within a Wetland? Yes No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No /
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required:
check all that aooly)
Surface Soil Cracks (66)
Surface Water (Al)
_, True Aquatic Plants (B14)
_ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
_ High Water Table (A2)
— Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
_ Drainage Patterns (610)
— Saturation (A3)
_ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_ Moss Trim Lines (1316)
_ Water Marks (131)
_ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry- Season Water Table (C2)
_ Sediment Deposits (132)
_ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
Drift Deposits (133)
_ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
_ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Algal Mat or Crust (134)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
_ Iron Deposits (135)
_ Geomorphic Position (132)
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
_ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
_ Water - Stained Leaves (139)
_ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
_ Aquatic Fauna (1313)
FAC- Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No
v,"-Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No
-
✓ Depth (inches):
"
Saturation Present. Yes V1- No
Depth (inches): I Wetland
y gy Present? Yes No
Hydrology
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

Saolina Stratum (Plot size:
1.
A-(,
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
Shrub Stratum (Plot size:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
= Total Cover
50% of total cover: 0 20% of total cover: I (Q
(� 1
= Total Cover
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: l
50% of total cover: _
Herb Stratum (Plot size:
C_
)
2. (-1 <- %� _S_irv-6 a
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
r_...
50% of total cover:
Woodv Vine Stratum (Plot size: i )
C !
2.
3.
4.
5.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of: MultIDIV bv:
OBL species x 1 = C)
FACW species -> x 2 = <)
FAG species i : a: x 3 =��
FACU species x4=
UPL species �.' x 5 = C
Column Totals: ( t.>
Prevalence Index = B/A = "�-
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
-"2 - - Dominance Test is >50%
_ 3 - Prevalence Index is < -3.0'
_ 4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
_ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
= Total Cover
Definitions of Five Vegetation Strata:
_ 20% of total cover:
VEGETATION (Five Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point:r�
J
Z,0
Absolute
Dominant Indicator
Dominance Test worksheet:
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less
Tree Stratum (Plot size: )
% Cover
Species? Status
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW,
_
}
2. i•F -2.� f'. /•.a tr, v +�
�d
{
or FAC:
. (A)
Total Number of Dominant
t
3
Species Across All Strata:
t (B)
4.
5.
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC:
t-Q, (A/B)
6.
Saolina Stratum (Plot size:
1.
A-(,
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
Shrub Stratum (Plot size:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
= Total Cover
50% of total cover: 0 20% of total cover: I (Q
(� 1
= Total Cover
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: l
50% of total cover: _
Herb Stratum (Plot size:
C_
)
2. (-1 <- %� _S_irv-6 a
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
r_...
50% of total cover:
Woodv Vine Stratum (Plot size: i )
C !
2.
3.
4.
5.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of: MultIDIV bv:
OBL species x 1 = C)
FACW species -> x 2 = <)
FAG species i : a: x 3 =��
FACU species x4=
UPL species �.' x 5 = C
Column Totals: ( t.>
Prevalence Index = B/A = "�-
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
-"2 - - Dominance Test is >50%
_ 3 - Prevalence Index is < -3.0'
_ 4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
_ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
k O = Total Cover
_ 20% of total cover: 114
f_
= Total Cover
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
Shrub - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 3 to 20 It (1 to 6 m) in height.
Herb -All herbaceous (non- woody) plants, including
herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody
plants, except woody vines, less than approximately 3
ft (1 m) in height.
Woody vine - All woody vines, regardless of height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes-Z No
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont -Version 2.0
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
= Total Cover
Definitions of Five Vegetation Strata:
_ 20% of total cover:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
J Jf lA
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in.
(7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH).
_Y
z_
-a FAC
Sapling - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less
than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH.
k O = Total Cover
_ 20% of total cover: 114
f_
= Total Cover
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
Shrub - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 3 to 20 It (1 to 6 m) in height.
Herb -All herbaceous (non- woody) plants, including
herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody
plants, except woody vines, less than approximately 3
ft (1 m) in height.
Woody vine - All woody vines, regardless of height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes-Z No
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont -Version 2.0

SOIL
M _UH - 4 r C) 0
Sampling Point: 01V4
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth
(inches)
�}
Matrix Redox Features
Color (moist) % Color (moist) % _ Type, Loc`
Texture
Remarks
Ash
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils':
_ Histosol (Al)
c)
t'(V�k�
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
'Type: C= Concentration, D= Depletion, RM= Reduced Matrix, MS= Masked Sand Grains. 2Location:
PL =Pore Lininq, M= Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils':
_ Histosol (Al)
_ Dark Surface (S7)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148) _ Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
_ Black Histic (A3)
— Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
(MLRA 147, 148)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
— Stratified Layers (A5)
_ Depleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136, 147)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
__._ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
— Other (Explain in Remarks)
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
— Redox Depressions (F8)
_ Sandy Mucky Mineral (81) (LRR N,
_ Iron - Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 147, 148)
MLRA 136)
_ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
— Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122)
'Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Sandy Redox (S5)
— Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
wetland hydrology must be present,
Stripped Matrix (S6)
_ Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont –Version 2.0

0
THE PEAK OR 6000 LIVING
June 4, 2015
Kevin Yates
John R. McAdams
2905 Meridian Parkway
Durham, NC 27713
Subject: Stream Buffer Determination
Middleton Property
Primary Watershed — Jordan Lake Watershed
Dear Mr. Yates,
Town O f G: x
P. O. BOX 250
APEX. NORTH CAROLINA 27502
Apex 15 -006
On March 20, 2015 and April 17, 2015, Town staff visited the subject site with you to review a
variety of drainage features as shown on the USDA Soil Survey and /or USES Topographic maps
and determined if they were subject to the Town of Apex (Town) riparian buffer rules. Based
on the information obtained during the site visit and per the requirements set forth in Section
6.1.11 of the Town Unified Development Ordinance (UDO), I have determined the following
riparian buffer widths as summarized in the table below and shown on the attached map titled,
"Middleton Property — Preliminary Wetland Assessment".
PQEk
1873
o�Ty � C Ago\?
Shown as
Shown as
Determination made
Determined
Drainage Feature
on USGS
on Soil
in the field
Buffer Width
Survey
Subject - Part of a
Pond A
Present
Present
100 Feet
Natural Drainage Way
Feature A
Intermittent
Perennial
Not Contested
100 Feet
Feature B
Not Present
Intermittent
Not Contested
50 Feet
Feature C
Intermittent
Perennial
Not Contested
100 Feet
Subject Off Site
Feature D
Not Present
Intermittent
0 Feet (On Site)
(24 pts)
Feature E
Intermittent
Perennial
Not Contested
100 Feet
PQEk
1873
o�Ty � C Ago\?

Town of Apex
Stream Buffer Determination (Apex 15 -006)
Page 2of2
Feature F Not Present Intermittent Perennial (30 pts) 50 Feet*
Feature G Intermittent Intermittent Intermittent — G Up 50 Feet*
Perennial — G Down
* The determined riparian buffer width on ponds and streams can only be as conservative as the depiction on the
USGS Topographic and USDA Soil Survey maps.
This on -site determination shall expire five (5) years from the date of this letter. Landowners or
affected parties that dispute a determination made by the Division of Water Quality (DWQ) or
delegated Local Authority in the Jordan Lake watershed may request a determination by the
DWQ Director.
An appeal request must be made within sixty (60) days of date of this letter or from the date
the affected party (including downstream and /or adjacent owners) is notified of this letter. A
request for a determination by the Director shall be referred to the Director in writing c/o Ian
McMillan, DWQ Wetlands /401 Unit, 1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699 -1650.
Otherwise the appeal procedure will be in accordance with UDO Section 6.1.11.
If you dispute the Director's determination, you may file a petition for an administrative
hearing. You must file the petition with the Office of Administrative Hearings within sixty (60)
days of receipt of this notice of decision. A petition is considered filed when it is received in the
Office of Administrative Hearings during normal office hours. The Office of Administrative
Hearings accepts filings Monday through Friday between the hours of 8:OOam and S:OOpm,
except for official State holidays. To request a hearing, send the original and one (1) copy of the
petition to the Office of Administrative Hearings, 6714 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-
6714. A copy of the petition must also be served to the Department of Natural Resources, c/o
Mary Penny Thompson, General Counsel, 1601 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699 -1601.
This determination is final and binding unless, as detailed above, you ask for a hearing or appeal
within sixty (60) days. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me at (919)
249 -3413.
Sincerely,
Michael S. Deaton, PE
Environmental Programs Manager
Attachments
PPEk
,a»
O Z
Any CPI

" MIDDLETON PROPERTY
PRELIMINARY WETLAND ASSESSMENT
FIGURE 1, VICINITY MAP
0 550 1,100 2,200
Feet PROJECT #: MIH -14010
h,ch 1.192.382132 tcct APEX, NORTH CAROLINA
FA
l

0 1 m
rte` O STREAM AA
u >> i SUBJECT PROPERTY �' " Q4 • `;�� ,;
STREAM B 0 I N r
f"
- STREAM C
t
PONDA
.... .. STREAM D
I to
• STREAM E - -
rn
STREAM F 9 ° r
a)
co
`r ! STREAM G _' '°
o r, >� 3
i
V USGS•\SOIL, SURVEY SHFFT 55 & 56 WAKE COUNTY. NORI I CAROLINA
LAT: 35.761711 N, LONG: - 78.85,1035
MIDDLETON PROPERTY �) 1
' PRELIMINARY WETLAND ASSESSMENT
FIGURE 2. SOIL SURVEY EXHIBIT
o 375 750 =,500 Feet PROJECT #: MIH -14010
i inch 7501ect APEX, NORTH CAROLINA

r STREAM FEATURE A 't
i
� p STREAM FEATURE B �
E. A
SUBJECT PROPERTY
1
PONDAi r,
� EA ST M u� t 4
D START %
rz
STREAM FEATURE K ryyL ' " v V w
FEATURE J 1
STREAM FEATURE E'
STREAM FEATURE I E1
i
STREAM FEATURE F •!r '.
s i �'tft
ol
,f "s STREAM FEATURE Q
STREAM FEATURE H
7 v
POND FEATURES :L
LOCATED OFFSTTE 4 ; ON -SITE STREAM BUFFER CONCURRENCE
r, IG MEETINGS CONDUCTED WITH MR. MIKE
■ r DEATON ON 03110/15 AND 04/22/15
L'AT 35.761496 N, -`LONG 78.353311'.W "� se i ei y (imnauaiyad dAialy is.
MIDDLETON PROPERTY
z PRELIMINARY WETLAND ASSESSMENT
FIGURE 3. EXISTING CONDITIONS
0 2e0 soo 1,000
Feet PROJECT #: MIH -15000
I inch =500 feet APEX, NORTH CAROLINA f
Legend
O AGENT AUTHORIZATION FORM ID
r_
—� SUBJECT PROPERTY
; t
SEWER LINE
'(
EXISTING STREAMS
1 "�
— PERENNIAL
--- INTERMITTENT
100 FT STREAM BUFFERS
50 FT STREAM BUFFERS
< d
POTENTIAL EXISTING WETLANDS
PROPERTY BOUNDARIES
t :
STREAM FEATURE C
r STREAM FEATURE A 't
i
� p STREAM FEATURE B �
E. A
SUBJECT PROPERTY
1
PONDAi r,
� EA ST M u� t 4
D START %
rz
STREAM FEATURE K ryyL ' " v V w
FEATURE J 1
STREAM FEATURE E'
STREAM FEATURE I E1
i
STREAM FEATURE F •!r '.
s i �'tft
ol
,f "s STREAM FEATURE Q
STREAM FEATURE H
7 v
POND FEATURES :L
LOCATED OFFSTTE 4 ; ON -SITE STREAM BUFFER CONCURRENCE
r, IG MEETINGS CONDUCTED WITH MR. MIKE
■ r DEATON ON 03110/15 AND 04/22/15
L'AT 35.761496 N, -`LONG 78.353311'.W "� se i ei y (imnauaiyad dAialy is.
MIDDLETON PROPERTY
z PRELIMINARY WETLAND ASSESSMENT
FIGURE 3. EXISTING CONDITIONS
0 2e0 soo 1,000
Feet PROJECT #: MIH -15000
I inch =500 feet APEX, NORTH CAROLINA f

XQ"5z'
f
NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
6A- -' e ok '
Date: �
Projec :
- -
a
Latitude:
Evaluator:
County: ��r� �sL.
Longitude: 60
Total Points: / r q
Stream is at least intermittent c.7�
Stream Dete circle one)
Ephemeral Intermittent erennial
Other
e.g. Quad Name:
if a 19 or perennial If i 30"
___
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal= , >> )
Absent
Weak
Moderate Strong
10- Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1-
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
(1)
_
2
-
3
3. In- channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
0
1
- -
('�
`J
3
ripple -pool sequence
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
2
3
5. Active /relict floodplain
A 0
1 _? 2 -)
3
- - -- - - -- -- -
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
(1-5
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2
3
8. Headcuts
0
(
2
3
_
9. Grade control
0
0.5
-� - - -i
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
9)
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
CINo =o
Yes = 3
_
a artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology (Subtotal =, t<n. -S )
12. Presence of Baseflow
(\�
1
2
3
1
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
2
3
Leaf litter
1.5
0.5 --
0
�14.
15. on plants or debris
0
J�-
_ (`65�
1
1.5
_Sediment
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
'O.S
(il . -� . `
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
_ ( Yes = 3,)
1
C. Biology (Subtotal=
�I
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
(2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
(3)
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
_
1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
- - - -__ _ -
kb)
1
2
3
22. Fish
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
(W)
0.5
1
1.5 1
24. Amphibians
0
l b 51
1
1.5
25. Algae
-----
0
0.5
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; OBI.
= 1.5 ('Other = 0
`perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
Sketch: �i Tit, f C�►?J�� kj i,; � t%pZ7erYlT•�C1% -P R -
�1�, " E"V j��m �- tTL T %� i - (� t (� t'F

NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11 &(ro,(A F
Date: , j / f / -� Project/Site: ` fo �� Latitude: (o JLf
Evaluator: _ -^ -_ - County: G 1A �.q .e - - Longitude:
Total Points: Stream Determination (circl f.onq� Other
Stream is at leastlntenniltent �'tiJ Ephemeral Intermitter e.g. Quad Name:
if?: 19 or perennial it a 30'
A. Geomorphology f t
p qy (Subtotal =,��, .J ) Absent Weak Moderate __._ T Strong
1° Continuity of channel bed and bank 0 1 (-2-) 3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg 0 2 3
3. In- channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple-pool sequence 0
4. Particle size of stream substrate 0 1 3
5. Active /relict floodplain 0 1 L _ 3
16. Depositional bars or benches 0 t •1) 2 3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
(' i)
2
3
_
8. Headcuts
0
(fD
2
3
9. Grade control `
0
(IM
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
QL)
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
�0_ =.0�
Yes = 3
e artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology (Subtotal
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
J
2
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
60
1
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5
t)
0.5
_
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0.5
1)
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
0.5
7�
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
("Yes = 3
)
C. Biology (Subtotal
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
t
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
- --
3 2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
_
1 -�
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
-� -- 1
2
3
22. Fish_ --
0
co-a-)
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0
ro -t
1
1.5
_
24. Amphibians
0
_ 6.5
_ 1
1.5
25. Algae
0
CTO
1
1.5
_
26. Wetland plants in streambed
_
FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5(Other = 0�-
"perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
Sketch:

NC DWQ Stream Identification Dorm Version 4.11
1
0
Date: '/fly
ProjectiSlte:
1
� {uk�
Latitude:vr'j
Evaluator:
County: (�7u t�_a_,
Longitude: = ftV4990
Total Points:
Stream is at feast intermittent
Stream Dete i n (circle one)
Ephemera Intermitten Perennial
Other
e.g. Quad Name:
1
if a 19 or perennial if z 30'
0.5
1
1.5
t 6:�
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal= a t
Absent
- Weak
- - 1 - - -
- 1.5
Moderate
Strong
V Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
�2)
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1 _
_� 2 --
3
3. in- channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step - pool,
0
1
�`�
3
ripple -pool sequence
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
J
2
3
5. Active /relict floodplain
0
(1�
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
-
(0 )
_
1
_
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
2
3
8. Headcuts
0�
2
3
- -- -- -
9. Grade control
_ _
0
--
0.5
-
(�1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
(,1�
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel 01
a artificial ditches are not rated: see discussions in manual
( J )
B. Hydrology Subtotal - �__
12. Presence of Baseflow �-n,*) 1
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria co 1
14. Leaf litter 1.5 1
15. Sediment on plants or debris 0
16. Organic debris lines or piles 0 0.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table? No = 0
C. Biology (Subtotal = , 5 )
18. Fibrous roots in streambed 3
r 19. Rooted upland plants in streambed -�
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
21. Aquatic Mollusks C�7j
22. Fish 07
23. Crayfish M
24. Amphibians 0
25. Algae -- - -- - - - -- - -
26. Wetland plants in streambed
- perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. Seep. 35 of manual
Notes:
Sketch:
Yes =3
2 3
2 3
CAD _ 0
1 1.5
Yes = 3
FACW = 0.75: OBL = 1.5 Ot er = 0,
1
0
2
1
0
- 1
2
__. 3
1
2
3
0.5
1
1.5
0.5
1
1.5
t 6:�
1
1.5
-- 0.5 --
- - 1 - - -
- 1.5
FACW = 0.75: OBL = 1.5 Ot er = 0,

NC DWQ Strca
Date:
Evaluator:
Total Points:
Stream Is at least intermittent
if 2 19 or perennial it t 30'
m ldentirication Form Version 4.11
Project/Site:
County: �)a�
Stream Determination (circle -one
Ephemeral Intermlttent(forennia)l
/L�W_
1'wls
Latitude:JJ
Longitude:
Other
e.g. Quad Name:
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal= 1,5 )
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
la Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
("L�
3
f 2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
(r2)
3
3. In- channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
0
1
L
3
ripple -pool seauence
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
(2�
3
5. Active /relict floodplain
0
_
1
(2 .S
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
(T.)
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
2
3
8. Headcuts
0
(f 1 --
2
3
9. Grade control
0
0.5
( }
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
CNO = 0 �)
Yes = 3
a artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology (Subtotal
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
2
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0}
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5
1 }
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0.5
S j
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
0.5
�,1� __ _
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No= 0
Yes= 3
C. Biology jSubtotal
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
(3)
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
-,�
2
1
1I
0 1
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
(T
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
('0)
1
2
3
22. Fish
-
0
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
I (0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
(`0.5
1
1.5
25. Algae __..._ __-
- --
('^ 0. -- - 1 r- _
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75:
6-BL = 1.5( Other = 0.
'perennial streams may also be Identified using other methods. See p. 35 or manual.
Notes:
Sketch:

P,Mre, tsT r F United States Department of the Interior
FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE
Raleigh ES Field Office
Post Office Box 33726
C" 3 �� Raleigh, North Carolina 27636 -3726
August 21, 2015
Kevin Yates
The John R. McAdams Company Inc.
2905 Meridian Parkway
Durham, NC 27713
Re: Middleton Property - Wake County, NC
Dear Mr. Yates:
This letter is to inform you that a list of all federally - protected endangered and threatened species
with known occurrences in North Carolina is now available on the U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service's (Service) web page at http: / /www.fws.gov /raleigh. Therefore, if you have projects that
occur within the Raleigh Field Office's area of responsibility (see attached county list), you no
longer need to contact the Raleigh Field Office for a list of federally - protected species.
Our web page contains a, complete and frequently updated list of all endangered and threatened
species protected by the provisions of the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended (16
U.S.C. 1531 et seq.)(Act), and a list of federal species of concern that are known to occur in
each county in North Carolina.
Section 7 of the Act requires that all federal agencies (or their designated non - federal
representative), in consultation with the Service, insure that any action federally authorized,
funded, or carried out by such agencies is not likely to jeopardize the continued existence of any
federally- listed endangered or threatened species. A biological assessment or evaluation may be
prepared f 'flit thug requirement n ^ g n ;:`:+ t
t:, u. ,. � re arc ,.e:�t a d i.. detcrminin v�h ther additional ca sult,.t'or. ,�h he
Service is necessary. In addition to the federally- protected species list, information on the
species' life histories and habitats and information on completing a biological assessment or
evaluation and can be found on our web page at http: / /www.fws.gov /raleigh. Please check the
web site often for updated information or changes.
I The term "federal species of concern" refers to those species which the Service believes might be in need of
concentrated conservation actions. Federal species of concern receive no legal protection and their designation does
not necessarily imply that the species will eventually be proposed for listing as a federally endangered or threatened
species. However, we recommend that all practicable measures be taken to avoid or minimize adverse impacts to
federal species of concern.

If your project contains suitable habitat for any of the federally - listed species known to be
present within the county where your project occurs, the proposed action has the potential to
adversely affect those species. As such, we recommend that surveys be conducted to determine
the species' presence or absence within the project area. The use of North Carolina Natural
Heritage program data should not be substituted for actual field surveys.
If you determine that the proposed action may affect (i.e., likely to adversely affect or not likely
to adversely affect) a federally- protected species, you should notify this office with your
determination, the results of your surveys, survey methodologies, and an analysis of the effects
of the action on listed species, including consideration of direct, indirect, and cumulative effects,
before conducting any activities that might affect the species. If you determine that the proposed
action will have no effect (i.e., no beneficial or adverse, direct or indirect effect) on federally
listed species, then you are not required to contact our office for concurrence (unless an
Environmental Impact Statement is prepared). However, you should maintain a complete record
of the assessment, including steps leading to your determination of effect, the qualified persormel
conducting the assessment, habitat conditions, site photographs, and any other related articles.
With regard to the above - referenced project, we offer the following remarks. Our comments are
submitted pursuant to, and in accordance with, provisions of the Endangered Species Act.
Based on the information provided and other information available, it appears that the proposed
action is not likely to adversely affect any federally- listed endangered or threatened species, their
formally designated critical habitat, or species currently proposed for listing under the Act at
these sites. We believe that the requirements of section 7(a)(2) of the Act have been satisfied for
your project. Please remember that obligations under section 7 consultation must be
reconsidered if: (1) new information reveals impacts of this identified action that may affect
listed species or critical habitat in a manner not previously considered; (2) this action is
subsequently modified in a manner that was not considered in this review; or, (3) a new species
is listed or critical habitat determined that may be affected by the identified action.
However, the Service is concerned about the potential impacts the proposed action might have
on aquatic species. Aquatic resources are highly susceptible to sedimentation. Therefore, we
recommend that all practicable measures be taken to avoid adverse impacts to aquatic species,
including implementing directional boring.inethods and stringent sediment and erosion control
measures. An erosion and sedimentation control plan should be submitted to and approved by
the North Carolina Division of Land Resources, Land Quality Section prior to construction.
Erosion and sedimentation controls should be installed and maintained between the constriction
site and any nearby down - gradient surface waters. In addition, we recommend maintaining
natural, vegetated buffers on all streams and creeks adjacent to the project site.
The North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission has developed a Guidance Memorandum (a
copy can be found on our website at (http: / /www.fws.gov /raleigh) to address and mitigate
secondary and cumulative impacts to aquatic and terrestrial wildlife resources and water quality.
We recommend that you consider this document in the development of your projects and in
completing an initiation package for consultation (if necessary).

We hope you find our web page useful and informative and that following the process described
above will reduce the time required, and eliminate the need, for general correspondence for
species' lists. If you have any questions or comments, please contact John Ellis of this office at
(919) 856 -4520 ext. 26.
Sincerely,
'etc Benjamin
Field Supervisor
3

List of Counties in the Service's Raleigh Field Office Area of Responsibility
Alamance
Perquimans
Beaufort
Person
Bertie
Pitt
Bladen
Randolph
Brunswick
Richmond
Camden
Robeson
Carteret
Rockingham
Caswell
Sampson
Chatham
Scotland
Chowan
Tyrrell
Columbus
Vance
Craven
Wake
Cumberland
Warren
Currituck
Washington
Dare
Wayne
Duplin
Wilson
Durham
Edgecombe
Franklin
Gates
Granville
Greene
Guilford
Halifax
Harnett
Hertford
Hoke
Hyde
Johnston
Jones
Lee
Lenoir
Martin
Montgomery
Moore
Nash
New Hanover
Northampton
Onslow
Orange
Pamlico
Pasquotank
Pender
11