760022_Compliance Evaluation Inspection_20231214

Division of Water Resources
Facility Number - F7771 0 Division of Soil and Water Conservation
0 Other Agency
Type of Visit: 0 Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: fO Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: Arrival Time: Departure Time: Z Q County: ' r, !j Region: '_3z
Farm Name: nvI ey' \fic'\1 il�"�"(�1 Owner Email:
Owner Name: ,�1 1 T, (:C,�' Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: Title: Phone:
Onsite Representative: VPOCW� t Integrator:
Certified Operator: LMA%) {(;Cie-.k- Certification Number: U�v
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Design Current
Swine Capacity Pop.
Wean to Finish
Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finish
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
Gilts
Boars
Other
Other
Certification Number:
Latitude: �jCjt C� )v U L` Longitude: �� u CjC)' \ L
Design Current
Wet Poultry Capacity Pop.
Layer I EE]
Non -Layer
Design Current
Dry Pnultry Canacitv Pon.
Layers
Non -Layers
Pullets
Turkeys
Turkey Poults
Other
1)('i►►N Q�
Design Current
Cattle Capacity Pop.
Dairy Cow
Dairy Calf
Dairy Heifer
Dry Cow
Non -Dairy
Beef Stocker
Beef Feeder
Beef Brood Cow
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Discharge originated at: Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
❑ Yes JeNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR)
'U71 Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
AM.%la
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR)
Oyes
[:]No
❑ NA
❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
Wes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page I of 3 21412015 Continued

Facility Number: -1 - Date of Inspection: 1 2 22
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? XYes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes �No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?: y
Designed Freeboard (in): 1 z
Observed Freeboard (in): )a 1 u l `
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes ANo ❑ NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ' f Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement? \
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes $No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes )No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s): JY'S�,(��r m Rill
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes 4 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes -0 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA J<NE
acres determination? ��\\
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes 'KNo
❑ NA ❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes '�No
❑ NA ❑ NE
Reauired Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ NA E
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ NA 'JZNE
the appropriate box.
❑WUP ❑Checklists ❑Design ❑Maps ❑ Lease Agreements
❑Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
[]Yes [:]No
❑ NA NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis
❑ Waste Transfers
❑ Weather de
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and V Rainfall Inspections
❑ S4e4ge-Sttrv-9y
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ Yes qNo
❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
[]Yes []No
_5�NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3
21412015 Continued

Facility Number: -22
jDate of Inspection: Z 1
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA �NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ Yes ❑ No �'NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification?
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes [:]No ❑ NA �E
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
�NE
❑ Yes
;EjZNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
—9Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
RNA
❑ NE
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
❑ Yes
10No
❑ NA
❑ NE
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
❑ Yes
-gNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Comments (refer to question ft Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations (use additional pages as necessary).
6R � • '6 >, lj C�� ao 3,b
� . ��e�\�C;�V d 5}G��,�5 � Wbuf2 d•R� -Crc�r-�I fix U�e�r �'��ew �� .��d nod h v - . J � (?�-�
'AL.G
1 • ('N�x=� � � UJ� �c�nce �� � � �nl�dS cxtie�,boun�,�ne�- � m i�
3 , Dash 6WN 6�- COA
M 6d D*Obco ; cleoano '
Reviewer/Inspector Name: I]U,
1�
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Phone:
Date: I � 412-^
Page 3 of 3 1/' 21412015