030033_Compliance Evaluation Inspection_20230315

Division of Water Resources
Facility Number - � Division of Soil and Water Conservation
0 Other Agency
Type of Visit: Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: 15 Arrival Time: Departure Time: County: r) Region:
Farm Name: Qd t)ar Owner Email:
Owner Name: A+VJ 6 0� Phone:
Mailing Address: Ch.
Physical Address: 3 (`n")L czy
Facility Contact: �/`/� i L� --Wo p Title: Phone:
Onsite Representative: Integrator:
Certified Operator: `z Certification Number:
Back-up Operator: Certification Number:
Location of Farm: Latitude:J2ji�l� 16 J I' Longitude: �� r
Design Current Design Current Design Current
Swine Capacity Pop. Wet Poultry Capacity Pop. Cattle Capacity Pop.
Wean to Finish Layer Dairy Cow
Wean to Feeder HNon-Layer Dairy Calf
Feeder to Finish Dairy Heifer
Farrow to Wean Design Current Dry Cow
Farrow to Feeder Dry Poultry Capacity Pop. Non-Dairy
Farrow to Finish Layers Beef Stocker
Gilts Non-Layers Beef Feeder .
Boars Pullets Beef Brood Cow
Turkeys
Other Turkey Poults
Other
Discharp,es and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes �No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State'? (If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State(gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system?(If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes [Z No ❑ NA ❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page 1 of 3 511212020 Continued

Facility Number: - Date of Inspection:
Waste Collection&Treatment
4. Is storage capacity(structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall)less than adequate? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
a.If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: _
Spillway?: ✓
Designed Freeboard(in):
Observed Freeboard(in): 'f'
5.Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes XNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
(i.e., large trees,severe erosion,seepage,etc.) �' "�v 1_U.k1a1."C ,
6.Are there structures on-site which are not properly�addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes 4
No ❑ NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes,and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat,notify DWR
7.Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? (y�('V�j�(�IAC%E j- Yes [:] No ❑ NA ❑ NE
8.Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? J Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits,dry stacks,and/or wet stacks)
9.Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require [:] Yes [%"No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste An»lication
10.Are there any required buffers,setbacks,or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes (�] No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals(Cu,Zn,etc.
❑ PAN ❑ PAN> 10%or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12.Crop Type(s): � Cl(;� I
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ] Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
15.Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes '" No ❑ NA ❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes Ix No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Required Records& Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage&Permit readily available? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?If yes,check ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑WUP ❑Checklists ❑Design ❑Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Other:
21.Does record keeping need improvement?_Uyes,o1wel 1' ❑ Yes No NA ❑ NE
Waste Application Weekly Freeboard lysis DSoil-Anal:)i4s ❑-W4i rs �Weather Code
Rainfall Stocking Crop Yield D44 ".- :�� 0 Monthly and 1"Rainfall Inspections E °•�
22.Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected,did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes ❑ No K] NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 511212020 Continued

Facility Number: - Date of Inspection:
24.Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes DqNo 0 NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes,check ❑ Yes [:] No NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es)below.
❑Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑Non-compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s)and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
27.Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments(PLAT)certification? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28.Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29.At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
If yes,contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the ❑ Yes Z No ❑NA ❑NE
permit?(i.e.,discharge,freeboard problems,over-application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑NE
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? 0 Yes [;'No ❑ NA ❑ NE
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on-site representative? ❑ Yes RNo ❑ NA ❑NE
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? ❑ Yes 4No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments(refer to question ft Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations(use additional pages as necessary).
Sol (S , �khcu\-IL
I vv'l
41
A e csr-, .
\pin u(J� +2S ? �� G v f in c�� A d
pomo::5rs(cvm oAc� ed
Reviewer/Inspector Name: ��_ (.�I tc.� La
- Phone:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: "—'—"— ' " Date:
Page 3 of 3 511212020