990031_Compliance Evaluation Inspection_20230816 (2)

Division of Water Resources
Facility Number - ?j j O Division of Soil and Water Conservation
O Other Agency
Type of Visit: 0 Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review O Structure Evaluation O Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: 0 Routine O Complaint O Follow-up O Referral O Emergency O Other O Denied Access
Date of Visit: Su ► a$ Arrival Time: .'!a Departure Time:�� County: ki Region:W Sep
Farm Name: �nUdtlYYYIS Owner Email:
Owner Name: Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address: Ms.t'(00% 'Q ,AaAk nv►1� k"�c
Facility Contact: I lllayeW C('"K (W\`CbaC\, Title: Phone:
Onsite Representative: Integrator:
Certified Operator: Certification Number: 4WS bJ A \Z I3_ 12-5
Back-up Operator: Certification Number:
Location of Farm: Latitude: �j1p" oo " Longitude: `bo t'
US�QC\ N from yCtdUnville ©tia;fe `CA Cen+er QA CasSkNenS
Design Current Design Current Design Current
Swine Capacity Pop. Wet Poultry Capacity Pop. Cattle Capacity Pop.
Wean to Finish I 11-ayer Dairy Cow
Wean to Feeder I INon-Layer I I I Dairy Calf
Feeder to Finish Dairy Heifer
Farrow to Wean Design Current Dry Cow
Farrow to Feeder Dry Poultry Capacity Pop. Non-Dairy
Farrow to Finish I Layers Beef Stocker
Gilts Non-Layers Beef Feeder
Boars Pullets Beef Brood Cow
Turkeys
Other Turkey Poults
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes J�Q No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State?(If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State(gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system?(If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes XNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
3.Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Yes N No ❑ NA ❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page I of 3 511212020 Continued

Facili Number: - 3 Date of Inspection:
Waste Collection&Treatment
4.Is storage capacity(structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall)less than adequate? [:] Yes 154,No ❑ NA ❑ NE
a.If yes,is waste level into the structural freeboard? [:] Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: fi=h In_
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard(in):
Observed Freeboard(in):
5.Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes r&No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(i.e.,large trees,severe erosion,seepage,etc.)
6.Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes [&'No ❑ NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes,and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat,notify DWR
7.Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? [:] Yes gi No ❑ NA ❑ NE
8.Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes 5a No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits,dry stacks,and/or wet stacks)
9.Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes ® No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10.Are there any required buffers,setbacks,or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes N(No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes X No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals(Cu,Zn,etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN> 10%or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s): - �WY l
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
15.Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes I—\No 0 NA ❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes CNo 0 NA ❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes KNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes F<[No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Required Records&Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage&Permit readily available? ❑ Yes 9No ❑ NA ❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?If yes,check ❑ Yes IVI No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑WUP ❑Checklists ❑Design ❑Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement?If yes, ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
�aste Application Weekly Freeboard Waste Analysis ❑Seii A4�g ❑Wiite =:afisfer-s_ 1541weather Code
Rainfall 159,Stocking r'�l Crop Yield 5�l av ry i ` - J LMonthly and V Rainfall Inspections 14 Sludge Survey
22.Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes MNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected,did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes allo ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 511212020 Continued

Facili Number: 019 - Date of Inspection: lbf I LP/0
24.Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes 9No ❑ NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes,check ❑ Yes X No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es)below.
❑Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑Non-compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s)and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes 5�No ❑ NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments(PLAT)certification? ❑ Yes �VI'No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28.Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal? bv),�"
29.At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
If yes,contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the ❑ Yes KNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
permit?(i.e.,discharge,freeboard problems,over-application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes Vs, ❑ NA ❑ NE
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on-site representative? ❑ Yes ®No ❑ NA ❑ NE
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? ❑ Yes tKNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments(refer to question#):Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations(use additional pages as necessary).
,94 aWbMV(A dui in o 094-
oil• r�01�� o2fJ��}•
wose,w & s ii%ila - 111 jai
c� S. ►udbe need gSuds 1�oY �-9W-6 w-6S- e
-`I• �e�,�nt Y�uw��o�
Reviewer/Inspector Name: a ChUIXI�`�Q� �.Y)SAeY1 �o a - Phone: 331p-1�LQ''1 (JS
l
Reviewer/Inspector Signa ! � —�— Date:
Page 3 of 3 511212020