990031_Compliance Evaluation Inspection_20230816

_ Division of Water Resources
Facility Number - j 1 O Division of Soil and Water Conservation
O Other Agency
Type of Visit: •Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Structure Evaluation O Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: 0 Routine O Complaint O Follow-up O Referral O Emergency O Other O Denied Access
Date of Visit: © Arrival Time: Departure Time:l ll' D County: Region.wsgO
Farm Name: �(�� 1-ow NQ,'om. �Ac Owner Email:
Owner Name: Phone:
Mailing Address: `
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: )RWW12 kny-5 Title: Phone:
Onsite Representative: Integrator:
Certified Operator: Certification Number: UQ ws\� e
Back-up Operator: Certification Number:
Location of Farm: Latitude: Longitude: T)D 0 4a, ':vu
ktore ctylkey cc - CaSs+e�,-ins
Design Current Design Current Design Current
Swine Capacity Pop. Wet Poultry Capacity Pop. Cattle Capacity Pop.
Wean to Finish I ILayer Dairy Cow
Wean to Feeder Non-La er Dairy Calf
Feeder to Finish Dairy Heifer
Farrow to Wean Qj 04C) Design Current Dry Cow
Farrow to Feeder Dry Poultry Capacity Pop. Non-Dairy
Farrow to Finish Layers Beef Stocker
Gilts Non-Layers Beef Feeder
Boars Pullets Beef Brood Cow
Turkeys
Other Turkey Poults
El Other
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes KNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State?(If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State(gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system?(If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes KXNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page 1 of 3 511212020 Continued

Facili Number: 061 - tj I :V' jDate of Inspection: 9)1�10I�
Waste Collection&Treatment
4. Is storage capacity(structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes 'F�!kNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
a.If yes,is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: vCi iQON?'r �LaCAW
L
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard(in):
Observed Freeboard(in): �
5.Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? [—] Yes S No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(i.e.,large trees,severe erosion,seepage,etc.) ^�
6.Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes &ZNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes,and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat,notify DWR
7.Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? fiRlyes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
8.Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? [:] Yes J4 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits,dry stacks,and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes RNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10.Are there any required buffers,setbacks,or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals(Cu,Zn,etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN> 10%or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12.Crop Type(s): -��[li 0 h n t 1 rnl 11 P�—
13. Soil Type(s):
14.Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes [No ❑ NA ❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes 5jNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes [RNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
Required Records&Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage&Permit readily available? ❑ Yes RNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?If yes,check ❑ Yes F�allo ❑ NA ❑NE
the appropriate box.
❑WUP ❑Checklists ❑Design ❑Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? . a;z ❑ Yes '�No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Waste Application M Weekly Freeboard [Waste Analysis ❑�s ❑�'--'--` ems Weather Code
[04ainfall Mtocking .Crop Yield �0 Minute Inspections Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections ❑age-&may
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes �No ❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected,did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes 2�No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 511212020 Continued

Facility Number: - Date of Inspection: ChJILO]:
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes,check ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA RNE
the appropriate box(es)below.
❑Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑Non-compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s)and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes allo ❑ NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments(PLAT)certification? ❑ Yes allo ❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes N�No ❑ NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal? �
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes N'u" No ❑ NA ❑ NE
If yes,contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the ❑ Yes No 0 NA ❑ NE
permit?(i.e.,discharge,freeboard problems,over-application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes D4 No ❑NA ❑NE
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? KYes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑NE
33.Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on-site representative? ❑ Yes KNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
34.Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? ❑ Yes N No ❑ N A ❑ NE
Comments(refer to question ft Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations(use additional pages as necessary).
C�Mgre SAatm .
NHI Need N`x. ' A ar c��uYe,'i�U�YL sie�n
I NeC6 Swdv CWky) A-rV\axn
- Y1eeG� Sut1s I;•n �fn6S �D y-'e- evI. C-Wd a A
- srd �c�rfiy t reemeni-s c l cessan�
a . uuk 0q Curno6mv, nod oreakbnj Qt dMZ Y,ed
-no ri:'W&Q. Sv�vVe
Reviewer/Inspector Name: Y" 1(�� Phone: �✓ly'�1�Q'017(�
Reviewer/Inspector Si a Date: 9)11 U 1 a3
Page 3 of 3 511212020