030026_Compliance Evaluation Inspection_20201201

Division of Water Resourcep
Facility Number - ] Division of Soil and Water iservation
0 Other Agency
Type of Visit: Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 10,, Denied Access
Date of Visit: -�I-=4-� Arrival Time: Departure Time: County: ��y Region:W�SLO_
Farm Name: ' �D lSfl b U-0 Owner Email:
Owner Name: G"C\ CYDUS C_,' Phone:
Mailing Address: �1 1�1 V\ H(\V u) <��Q(1-R , �" C)
Physical Address: GC1 C �y vl3 y yV6 l VU a01 1 yC)
Facility Contact: are&\ CXD��e_' Title: Phone:
Onsite Representative: Integrator:
Certified Operator: GyCo� GiCI,M to t Certification Number:
Back-up Operator: Certification Number:
/ U cQ o
Location of Farm: Latitude: i7 �� Longitude: 0
Design Current Design Current Design Current
Swine Capacity Pop. Wet Poultry Capacity Pop. Cattle Capacity Pop.
Wean to Finish L
ayer DairyCow
Wean to Feeder Dairy Calf
Feeder to Finish Dairy Heifer
Farrow to Wean Design Current Dry Cow
Farrow to Feeder Dry Poultry Capacity Pop. Non-Dairy
Farrow to Finish I Layers I.Beef Stocker
Gilts Non-Layers Beef Feeder
Boars Pullets Beef Brood Cow
Turkeys
Other Turkey Poults
Other
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes P!3,No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State(gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system?(If yes, notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Yes rVNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
of the State other than fi•om a discharge?
Page I of 3 511212020 Continued

Facili Number: - Date of Inspection: a' t
T
Waste Collection&Treatment
4. Is storage capacity(structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall)less than adequate? LA Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
a.If yes,is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes [:] No ❑ NA ❑ N E
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: smcx k -C_
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard(in):
Observed Freeboard(in):
it
5.Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes 0 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(i.e.,large trees,severe erosion,seepage,etc.)
6.Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a [:] Yes [A No ❑ NA ❑NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes,and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat,notify DWR
7.Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes N No ❑ NA ❑ NE
8.Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits,dry stacks,and/or wet stacks)
9.Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes % No ❑ NA ❑NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10.Are there any required buffers,setbacks,or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes 4 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals(Cu,Zn,etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN> 10%or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window '* �❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12.Crop Type(s): �XVLQCN_T_
13. Soil Type(s):
14.Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes t'No ❑ NA ❑ NE
15.Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes [S No ❑ NA ❑ NE
16.Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes ❑ No [PA ❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes r4-aAl,No ❑ NA ❑ NE
18.Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes k No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Required Records&Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have th ertificate of Coverag &Permit readily available? ❑ Yes [�No ❑ NA ❑ NE
20.Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?If yes,check ❑ Yes �No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑WUP ❑Checklists ❑Design ❑Maps ❑Lease Agreements ❑Other:
...Does record keeping need improvement? Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Waste Application Weekly Freeboard Waste Analys' s s ❑Weather Code
c ng PqCrop Yield [Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections
22.Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes [;K No ❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected,did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? [—] Yes ❑ No �NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 511212020 Continued

Facilit Number: - Date of Ins ection:
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste apt ation equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes 0No ❑ NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes,check ❑ Yes [:] No ®NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es)below. J�
❑Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑Non-compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s)and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes [g No ❑ NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments(PLAT)certification? ❑ Yes � No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes [A No ❑ NA ❑ NE
If yes,contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
permit?(i.e.,discharge,freeboard problems,over-application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes M No ❑ NA ❑ NE
El Application Field ElLagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes tNo ❑NA ❑ NE
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on-site representative? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments(refer to question#): Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations(use additional pages as necessary).
CJ-1 (rib
CXD
Q�e
0N�01
Vye.vi a)s �►-e Jos►+ il�%5� v,'�, `�i\ S �csr�� �n� ovi N%j '�"
woY1�Q a�wo \rj C ( un w�,��-� { o SVXOI V\Jck (ac)0')
UJCAS
Reviewer/Inspector Name: 33
�N l bojc I L-Q-- Phone:
Reviewer/Inspector Signat Date: 1
Page 3 of 3 511112020