030026_Compliance Evaluation Inspection_20190325

Division of Water Resource
Facility Number 0 Division of Soil and Water�, ..tservation V,
0 Other Agency u C
Type of Visit: P Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
! rs._
Date of Visit: Arrival Time: () Departure Time: County: IQ AVb Region:
Farm Name: "'-1� P�VISy 1'1� \/1JV Owner Email:
Owner Name: ��ea IN U US P� Phone: 5-1- 1A 3
Mailing Address: 3`�b ( V G/1 (� . S(JAr�o► C 9105
Physical Address: aC1 14 C) "i qJ w VIV�eyl COA 06 ��05
Facility Contact: Gre.0 Title: Phone:
Onsite Representative: � Integrator:
Certified Operator: C-tre01 Gnombi 6I Certification Number:
Back-up Operator: Certification Number:
Location of Farm: Latitude: ��b �` IN `k Longitude:
N ► CI)
C--arw, C& I-D.? o hi cI by, a
Design Current Design Current Design Current
Swine Capacity Pop. Wet Poultry Capacity Pop. Cattle Capacity Pop.
Wean to Finish I ILayer I I Dairy Cow (�
Wean to Feeder I INon-Layer I I Dairy Calf
lc-
Feeder to Finish Dairy Heifer
Farrow to Wean Design Current Dry Cow
Farrow to Feeder Dry oultr Capacity Pop. Non-Dairy
Farrow to Finish I Layers I I Beef Stocker
Gilts Non-Layers I Beef Feeder
Boars Pullets I Beef Brood Cow
Turkeys
Other Turkey Poults
Other Other
Discharees and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? [] Yes KNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State?(If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State(gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system?(If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? 1!� Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
3.Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Yes A No ❑ NA ❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page I of 3 21412015 Continued

Facili Number: - Date of Inspection: l'�l (�
Waste Collection&Treatment
4.Is storage capacity(structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall)less than adequate? Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
a.If yes,is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA � NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: S►r,CA,
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard(in): _
Observed Freeboard(in):
5.Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes �jNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
(i.e.,large trees,severe erosion,seepage,etc.)
6.Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes N No ❑ NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes,and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat,notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes (Z No ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits,dry stacks,and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes � No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10.Are there any required buffers,setbacks,or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes P No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application?If yes,check the appropriate box below. Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals(Cu,Zn,etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN> 10%or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift [ Application Outside of Approved Area
12.Crop Type(s): C L VrV\ Y1 1(A(� , W \It1/
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
15.Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes ❑ No 10 NA ❑ NE
acres determination?
17.Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes �No ❑ NA ❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes [� No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Required Records&Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage&Permit readily available? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
20.Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?If yes,check ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑WUP ❑Checklists ❑Design ❑Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Other:
21. Do ord keeping need i rovement?If yes,check t ate box below. Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ aste Application Weekly Freeboard Waste Analysi ®Soil Analysis Waste Transfers ❑Weather Code
Rain tocki Crop Yie Monthly an 1`' Rainfall Inspect�o
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? es � No ❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected,did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? [:] Yes [:] No T NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 21412015 Continued

Facili Number: 03 - Date of Inspection:
r-
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes N No ❑ NA ❑ NE
25.Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes,check ❑ Yes ❑ No NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es)below.
❑Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑Non-compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s)and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26.Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes ] No ❑ NA ❑ NE
27.Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments(PLAT)certification? ❑ YesLat
No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28.Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29.At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
If yes,contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the ❑ Yes [a No ❑ NA ❑ NE
permit?(i.e.,discharge,freeboard problems,over-application)
31.Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes P No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32.Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? � Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on-site representative? ❑ Yes �No ❑ NA ❑ NE
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? ❑ Yes �No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments(refer to question#):Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations(use additional pages as necessary).
�0110� v� on tnccd A* 2��►ltG 10lowiY\9 Wc6S+e 6�-� �,UUI�ev-. r;C�_ ` s `�— ctiv 1
1 FWbMvtA 00- M
r�L y s NY b1ow11,1 `cr" W � r
�. Crnloai'l vv�,v��- Coved b OnS on boi-h1. V� '� �`� a w�.s�rr�� :lt%;� cis+\ v;' Err` 1
1Vu� av1 lav�t Cctr�i-e� wS p? �� r'c's � T�fJ�:t�.
Croo w fm e S 1Ztf-v s I. PPt of aIPAOU -S ►v� of A V;. MW I( Cko-5.
#y CV( (c,•ylr.eCA \N c---kC4- �tY cvev CIVU C ba- .
pi -(-r(�C.� n� waS A-e, W1 VV" +YaC� F;Lid V^kVY\A tie rs )
NC, { VC,UCih� hu
O (XbV "s re.coy6ueV 9'o tl , \AS ("Vt
l� Cral�hrri Cows �s �� Who ec ��Yv �i-�
YV1,t�S lox %f d j �rvC faro 0 �C I -tlkV\^4
� I
Reviewer/Inspector Name: le'f Phone: -7-t
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: 7 r
Page 3 of 3 21412015