20030570 Ver 6_Application_20150831

L h C! N E C R S & Cut. E= U t_'tA iv T c
PO Box 331 27
RALEIGH, NC 27636
PHONE: [phone]
FAX: 919-B51-1918
LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL
To: Date: August 27, 2015
NC Division of Water Resources
512 N. Salisbury Street
Raleigh, NC 27609
From: Brian Dustin
Re: PCN, Ligon Mill Rd. Extension
Wake Forest, NC Job No.. 2011076.00
1 am sending you the following Item(s).
COPIES DATE DESCRIPTION
5 03/19/15 Pre - Construction Notification Form and supporting documents
5 03/19/15 Project maps and proposed Impacts.
These are transmitted as checked below:
❑ As requested ❑ For your use
® For approval ❑ For Signatures
® For review and comment ❑ ��1,!
AUG 2 7
2015
Remarks:
DI=N - 4,A7E,: r cSG� RCE
Mr. Smith, 401 8 St
F-FER PERMITTING
If you have any questions or concerns, please call me at (919) 858 -1926.
Signature bz_r�
Brian Dustin
Senior Scientist

O�O� W AT �9QG
?�
To
A. Applicant Information
1. Processing
0063os3cl U Co
Office Use Only:
Corps action ID no.
DWQ project no.
Form Version 1.4 January 2009
Pre - Construction Notification (PCN) Form
1a. Type(s) of approval sought from the
®Section 404 Permit El Section 10 Permit
Corps:
1b. Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: 14 or General Permit (GP) number
1c Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps? ® Yes
1d Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply).
® 401 Water Quality Certification — Regular ® Non -404 Jurisdictional General Permit
❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Express ® Riparian Buffer Authorization
1 e Is this notification solely for the record For the record only for DWQ 401
because written approval is not required? Certification.
❑ Yes ® No
1f. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation
of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank or in -lieu
fee program.
❑ No
For the record only for Corps Permit.
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
1 g. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties If yes, answer 1 h ❑ Yes
below.
1h Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)? ❑ Yes
2. Project Information
2a Name of project. Ligon Mill Road Extension
2b. County: Wake
2c Nearest municipality / town Town of Wake Forest
2d. Subdivision name.
2e. NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state N/A
project no.
3. Owner Information
3a Name(s) on Recorded Deed
3b
Deed Book and Page No.
3c.
Responsible Party (for LLC if
applicable)
3d
Street address-
3e.
City, state, zip,
3f.
Telephone no..
3g
Fax no..
3h
Email address
►1
►/ •
DCF Family LLC (property is in the process of being dedicated to the Town of Wake
Forest)
13007 PG 2041
1605 Valley Rd
Sanford NC 27330 -9453
Page 1 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

4. Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a. Applicant is
❑ Agent ® Other, specify Town of Wake Forest
4b. Name-
Eric Keravuon
4c. Business name
(if applicable).
Town of Wake Forest
-
4d. Street address.
301 S Brooks St.
4e. City, state, zip:
Wake Forest, NC, 27587 -2932
4f. Telephone no.
919 - 435 -9400
4g Fax no -
919 - 435 -9419
4h Email address.
ekeravuon @ci.wake- forest nc us
5. Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable)
5a. Name:
Brian Dustin
5b. Business name
Mulkey, Inc
(if applicable)-
5c Street address.
6750 Tryon Road
5d. City, state, zip.
Cary, NC 27518
5e. Telephone no •
919 - 858 -1926
5f. Fax no..
919 - 851 -1918
5g. Email address
bdustin @mulkeyinc.com
Page 2 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

B. Project Information and Prior Project History
1. Property Identification
1a Property identification no (tax PIN or parcel ID) 1830 -85 -0298
1 b. Site coordinates (in decimal degrees)- Latitude 35.576648 Longitude: - 78.781936
(DD DDDDDD) ( -DD DDDDDD)
1 c. Property size. 8 59 acres
2. Surface Waters
2a. Name of nearest body of water (stream, river, etc.) to Richland Creek
proposed project
2b. Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water. WS- IV;NSW
2c. River basin• Neuse
3. Project Description
3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application-
The existing site topography is moderate with slopes from 5% to 15% The existing tree coverage ranges from young
pines (< 10 years old) to mature hardwoods adjacent to the creek that traverses the site. Surrounding area consists of
residential development.
3b List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property,
0.22 acres
3c. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property -
357.78 linear feet
3d Explain the purpose of the proposed project:
The purpose of the Ligon Mill road extension is too allow access to a residential subdivision (Reynolds Mill).
3e. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used.
The extension of Ligon Mill road will be approximately 1,600 LF The road requirements are identified in the Town of
Wake Forest Transportation Plan. To date there have been no wetlands impacted during the previous phases of the
project Traditional construction equipment will be utilized including, backhoes, excavators and bulldozers.
4. Jurisdictional Determinations
4a. Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property /
project (including all prior phases) in the past?
Comments. The Notification of Jurisdictional ® Yes ❑ No ❑ Unknown
Determination was signed on July 24, 2012 (SAW -2005-
21377) Wetland WA and stream SA were extended
approximately 226 ft. to the west after the final JD notice
was issued.
4b If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type
of determination was made? Preliminary ®Final
4c. If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas? Agency /Consultant Company. Mulkey, Inc.
Name (if known): Brian Dustin Other:
4d If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation.
Field visit was on 6/22/12 with James Lastinger of the USACE.
Page 3 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

5. Project History
5a. Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for ❑ Yes ❑ No ® Unknown
this project (including all prior phases) in the past?
5b. If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions
6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project? ❑ Yes ® No
6b. If yes, explain.
Page 4 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
la Which sections were completed below for your protect (check all that apply)'
® Wetlands ® Streams — tributaries ® Buffers ❑ Open Waters ❑ Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted.
2a 2b 2c 2d. 2e 1 2f
Wetland impact Type of jurisdiction
number —
Type of impact Type of wetland Forested
(Corps - 404, 10 Area of impact
Permanent (P) or
(if known)
DWQ — non -404, other) (acres)
Temporary (T)
question for all stream sites impacted
W1 ®P ❑ T
Fill PFO ® Yes
❑ No
® Corps 0 056
❑ DWQ
W2 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
3f
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W3 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
Impact
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W4 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
Permanent (P) or
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W5 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
(INT)?
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W6 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
2g. Total wetland impacts 0.056
2h. Comments Less
than 1/10'h of an acre will be filled in for the Ligon Mill rd
extension.
3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including
temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted
3a 3b. 3c
3d.
3e.
3f
3g.
Stream impact Type of impact Stream name
Perennial
Type of jurisdiction
Average
Impact
number -
(PER) or
(Corps - 404, 10
stream
length
Permanent (P) or
intermittent
DWQ — non -404,
width
(linear
Temporary (T)
(INT)?
other)
(feet)
feet)
S1 ®P ❑ T I Culvert
S2 ❑P ❑T
S3 ❑P ❑T
S4 ❑P ❑T
S5 ❑P ❑T
S6 ❑P ❑T
31. Comments-
SA ® PER
❑ INT
❑ PER
❑ INT
❑ PER
❑ INT
❑ PER
❑ INT
❑ PER
❑ INT
❑ PER
❑ INT
® Corps 2 127.00
® DWQ
❑ Corps
❑ DWQ
❑ Corps
❑ DWQ
❑ Corps
❑ DWQ
❑ Corps
❑ DWQ
❑ Corps
❑ DWQ
3h. Total stream and tributary impacts 127.00
Page 5 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

4. Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U S then individually list all open water impacts below
4a 4b. 4c 4d 4e.
Open water Name of waterbody
impact number — (if applicable) Type of impact Waterbody Area of impact (acres)
Permanent (P) or type
Temporary (T)
01 ❑P ❑T
02 ❑P ❑T
03 ❑P FIT
04 ❑P ❑T
4f. Total open water impacts
4g. Comments-
5. Pond or Lake Construction
If pond or lake construction proposed, then complete the chart below.
5a. 5b. 5c. 5d.
Wetland Impacts (acres) Stream Impacts (feet)
Pond ID number Proposed use or
purpose of pond Flooded Filled Excavated Flooded Filled Excavated
P1
P2
5f. Total
5g Comments-
5e.
Upland
(acres)
Flooded
5h Is a dam high hazard permit required? ❑ Yes ❑ No If yes, permit ID no.
5i. Expected pond surface area (acres).
5j. Size of pond watershed (acres):
5k Method of construction
6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts
below. If any impacts require mitigation, then you MUST fill out Section D of this form.
6a. Project is in which protected basing ® Neuse ❑ Tar - Pamlico ❑ Catawba ❑ Randleman ❑ Other.
6b 6c 6d. 6e 6f. 6g.
Buffer impact Buffer Zone 1 Zone 2
number — Reason for impact Stream name mitigation impact impact
Permanent (P) or required? (square (square
Temporary (T) feet) feet)
Liner road
61
®P ❑ T crossing
B2
❑P ❑T
B3
❑P ❑T
B4
❑P ❑T
B5
❑P ❑T
B6 ❑P ❑T
Total buffer impacts = 0 291 acres
SA ❑ Yes
® No
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
❑ No
6h. Total buffer impacts
Page 6 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009
6334 6342
6334 6342

D. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
1a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project.
The road crossing has been designed to cross the stream and buffer as near to perpendicular as possible. Retaining
walls have been incorporated into the road design to reduce the overall impacts.
1 b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques.
Silt fence and tree protection fence will be installed around the wetlands to ensure that construction equipment avoids
these areas. All temporary and finished slopes will be seeded to prevent erosion and the discharge of sediment into the
streams
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for impacts to Waters of
the U S or Waters of the State?
2b If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply).
2c. If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this project?
3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a. Name of Mitigation Bank.
3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter)
3c. Comments-
4. Complete if Making a Payment to In -lieu Fee Program
4a Approval letter from in -lieu fee program is attached.
4b. Stream mitigation requested*
4c If using stream mitigation, stream temperature*
4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only):
4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested:
4f. Non - riparian wetland mitigation requested:
4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested:
4h Comments:
5. Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
❑ Yes ® No
❑ DWQ ❑ Corps
❑ Mitigation bank
❑ Payment to in -lieu fee program
❑ Permittee Responsible Mitigation
Type Quantity
❑ Yes
linear feet
❑ warm ❑ cool
square feet
acres
acres
acres
5a. If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan
Page 7 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009
❑cold

6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) — required by DWQ
6a Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires buffer I ❑ Yes ® No
mitigation?
6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the
amount of mitigation required.
6c. 6d. 6e
Zone Reason for impact Total impact (square feet) Multiplier Required mitigation
(square feet)
Zone 1 3 (2 for
Catawba)
Zone 2 1.5
6f Total buffer mitigation required:
6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank,
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in -lieu fee fund).
6h. Comments:
Page 8 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

E. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1. Diffuse Flow Plan
1 a. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified ® Yes ❑ No
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
1 b. If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why.
❑ Yes No
The Diffuse flow plan is currently under review by the Town of Wake Forest.
2. Stormwater Management Plan
2a What is the overall percent imperviousness of this protect? 35%
2b. Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan? ® Yes ❑ No
2c. If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why
2d If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative description of the plan.
Structural Stormwater BMP's in the form of two (2) bioretention areas are being proposed to provide treatment for water
quality and quantity
® Certified Local Government
2e. Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan? ❑ DWQ Stormwater Program
❑ DWQ 401 Unit
3. Certified Local Government Stormwater Review
3a In which local government's jurisdiction is this protect? Town of Wake Forest
® Phase II
3b Which of the following locally - implemented stormwater management programs ❑ NSW
apply (check all that apply)- ❑ USMP
❑ Water Supply Watershed
❑ Other:
3c. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been ❑ Yes ® No
attached?
I
4. DWQ Stormwater Program Review
❑ Coastal counties
❑ HQW
4a. Which of the following state - implemented stormwater management programs apply ❑ ORW
(check all that apply)- ❑ Session Law 2006 -246
❑ Other: Phase II
4b Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
attached?
❑ Yes ❑ No
Stormwater plans are currently under review by the Town of Wake Forest.
5. DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
5a. Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements? ❑ Yes ❑ No
5b. Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met? ❑ Yes ❑ No
Page 9 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1 4 January 2009

F. Supplementary Information
1. Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
1 a. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal /state /local) funds or the ❑ Yes ® No
use of public (federal /state) land?
1 b If you answered `yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State ❑ Yes ❑ No
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA /SEPA)?
1c If you answered `yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
letter.) ❑ Yes ❑ No
Comments:
2. Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a. Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H 1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards, ❑ Yes ® No
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 213 .0200)?
2b Is this an after - the -fact permit application?
❑ Yes ® No
2c If you answered `yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s):
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in ❑ Yes ® No
additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?
3b If you answered `yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description
4. Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non- discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility
There will be no sewage from the Ligon Mill Road extension
Page 10 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or ❑ Yes
habitat?
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act ❑ Yes
Impacts?
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted. El Raleigh
❑ Asheville
►1 •
►.1 •
5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat?
Mulkey Biologist noted that there was no habitat present for Rhus Michauxii.
National Heritage Program data was reviewed, on July 24, 2015, within 1 mile of the study area and no Federally or State
listed species were found in the area.
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. WIII this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat? I ❑ Yes ® No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
NOAA National Marine Fisheries Service Essential Fish Habitat Mapper v3.0
hftp://www.habitat.noaa.gov/protection/efh/habitatmapper.htmi
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. WIII this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation ❑ Yes ® No
status (e g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
NC National Register of Historic Places
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a Will this project occur in a FEMA - designated 100 -year floodplain? I ❑ Yes ® No
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements:
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination? NC Floodmaps GIS Data, NC Floodplain Mapping
Program
NC Floodmaps: Firm map 3720183000J, Zone X (effective date May 2 "d, 2006).
rl
DIJJ�
August 201520
Applicant/Agent's Printed Name Applicant/ gent's Signature Date
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant
is provided )
Page 11 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1 4 January 2009

O%op
IIS
. . ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
WILMINGTON DISTRICT
Action Id. SAW- 2005 -21377 County: Wake U.S.G.S. Quad: NC -WAKE FOREST
NOTIFICATION OF JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION
Pronerty Owner: Orleans Homebuilders Inc. Agent: Mulkey Engineers and Consultants
Mark Miller Brian Dustin
Address: 211 James Jackson Dr. Address: 6750 Tryon Rd.
Cary. NC 27513
Cary, NC 27518
Property description:
Size (acres) 19 Nearest Town Wake Forest
Nearest Waterway Richland Creek River Basin Neuse
USGS HUC 03020201 Coordinates Latitude: 35.9612 Longitude: -78.53
Location description: The site is located adiacent to Forbes Rd. and Reynolds Mill Rd., in the existing Rvnolds Mill
Subdivision, in Wake Forest. Wake County. North Carolina, and contains a tributary, and impoundment (pond), and
wetland that flows to Richlands Creek in the Neuse River basin.
Indicate Which of the Following Anply:
A. Preliminary Determination
Based on preliminary information, there may be wetlands on the above described property. We strongly suggest you have
this property inspected to determine the extent of Department of the Army (DA) jurisdiction. To be considered final, a
jurisdictional determination must be verified by the Corps. This preliminary determination is not an appealable action
under the Regulatory Program Administrative Appeal Process ( Reference 33 CFR Part 331). If you wish, you may
request an approved JD (which may be appealed), by contacting the Corps district for further instruction. Also, you may
provide new information for further consideration by the Corps to reevaluate the JD.
B. Approved Determination
_ There are Navigable Waters of the United States within the above described property subject to the permit requirements of
Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act and Section 404 of the Clean Water Act. Unless there is a change in the law or
our published regulations, this determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this
notification.
X There are waters of the U.S. including wetlands on the above described property subject to the permit requirements of
Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (CWA)(33 USC § 1344). Unless there is a change in the law or our published
regulations, this determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this notification.
We strongly suggest you have the wetlands on your property delineated. Due to the size of your property and/or our
present workload, the Corps may not be able to accomplish this wetland delineation in a timely manner. For a more timely
delineation, you may wish to obtain a consultant. To be considered final, any delineation must be verified by the Corps.
X The waters of the U.S. including wetlands on your property have been delineated and the delineation has been verified
by the Corps. We strongly suggest you have this delineation surveyed. Upon completion, this survey should be reviewed
and verified by the Corps. Once verified, this survey will provide an accurate depiction of all areas subject to CWA
jurisdiction on your property which, provided there is no change in the law or our published regulations, may be relied
upon for a period not to exceed five years.
_ The waters of the U.S. including wetlands have been delineated and surveyed and are accurately depicted on the plat
signed by the Corps Regulatory Official identified below on _. Unless there is a change in the law or our published
regulations, this determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this notification.
_ There are no waters of the U.S., to include wetlands, present on the above described project area which are subject to the
permit requirements of Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (33 USC 1344). Unless there is a change in the law or our
Page 1 of 2

published regulations, this determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this
notification.
_ The property is located in one of the 20 Coastal Counties subject to regulation under the Coastal Area Management Act
(CAMA). You should contact the Division of Coastal Management in Morehead City, NC, at (252) 808 -2808 to
determine their requirements
Placement of dredged or fill material within waters of the US and/or wetlands without a Department of the Army permit may
constitute a violation of Section 301 of the Clean Water Act (33 USC § 1311). If you have any questions regarding this
determination and/or the Corps regulatory program, please contact James Lastinger at 919 -554 -4884
x32 / James .C.Lastineer(a),usace.armv.mil.
C. Basis For Determination
Jurisdictional stream channel on site exhibits an established OHWM. Wetland on site exhibits criteria as described in,
the Corns 1987 Wetland Delineation Manual and appropriate Regional Supplement.
D. Remarks
Site visit made on June 22, 2012
E. Attention USDA Program Participants
This del ineation/determination has been conducted to identify the limits of Corps' Clean Water Act jurisdiction for the
particular site identified in this request. The delineation/determination may not be valid for the wetland conservation
provisions of the Food Security Act of 1985. If you or your tenant are USDA Program participants, or anticipate participation
in USDA programs, you should request a certified wetland determination from the local office of the Natural Resources
Conservation Service, prior to starting work.
F. Appeals Information (This information applies only to approved jurisdictional determinations as indicated in
B. above)
This correspondence constitutes an approved jurisdictional determination for the above described site. If you object to this
determination, you may request an administrative appeal under Corps regulations at 33 CFR Part 331. Enclosed you will find a
Notification of Appeal Process (NAP) fact sheet and request for appeal (RFA) form. If you request to appeal this
determination you must submit a completed RFA form to the following address:
US Army Corps of Engineers
South Atlantic Division
Attn: Jason Steele, Review Officer
60 Forsyth Street SW, Room 1OM15
Atlanta, Georgia 30303 -8801
In order for an RFA to be accepted by the Corps, the Corps must determine that it is complete, that it meets the criteria for
appeal under 33 CFR part 331.5, and that it has been received by the Division Office within 60 days of the date of the NAP.
Should you decide to submit an RFA form, it must be received at the above address by September 24, 2012.
* *It is not necessary to submit an RFA form to the Division Office if you do not object to the determination in this
correspondence.
Corps Regulatory Official �irvv�n C ion Date: Julv 24.2012 C/ En Date: July 24. 2017
The Wihnington District is committed to providing the highest level of support to the public. To help us ensure we continue to
do so, please complete the attached customer Satisfaction Survey or visit htti):H pert. nvm.usace.arniv.mil /survev.htmi to
complete the survey online.
Copy furnished:

Applicant: Orleans Homebuil_ders Inc. File Number: SAW
Attached is:
Ell INITIAL PROFFERED PERMIT (Standard Permit or Letter of permission)
❑I PROFFERED PERMIT (Standard Permit or Letter of permission)
❑f PERMIT DENIAL
® APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION
Ell PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION
3_77 1 Date: July 24, 2012
See Section below
I A
1 B
C
I D
I E
A: INITIAL PROFFERED PERMIT: You may accept or object to the permit.
e ACCEPT: If you received a Standard Permit, you may sign the permit document and return it to the district engineer for final
authorization. If you received a Letter of Permission (LOP), you may accept the LOP and your work is authorized. Your
signature on the Standard Permit or acceptance of the LOP means that you accept the permit in its entirety, and waive all
rights to appeal the permit, including its terms and conditions, and approved jurisdictional determinations associated with the
permit.
OBJECT: If you object to the permit (Standard or LOP) because of certain terms and conditions therein, you may request
that the permit be modified accordingly. You must complete Section II of this form and return the form to the district
engineer. Your objections must be received by the district engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice, or you will
forfeit your right to appeal the permit in the future. Upon receipt of your letter, the district engineer will evaluate your
objections and may: (a) modify the permit to address all of your concerns, (b) modify the permit to address some of your
objections, or (c) not modify the permit having determined that the permit should be issued as previously written. After
evaluating your objections, the district engineer will send you a proffered permit for your reconsideration, as indicated in
Section B below.
B: PROFFERED PERMIT: You may accept or appeal the permit
ACCEPT: If you received a Standard Permit, you may sign the permit document and return it to the district engineer for final
authorization. If you received a Letter of Permission (LOP), you may accept the LOP and your work is authorized. Your
signature on the Standard Permit or acceptance of the LOP means that you accept the permit in its entirety, and waive all
rights to appeal the permit, including its terms and conditions, and approved jurisdictional determinations associated with the
permit.
APPEAL: If you choose to decline the proffered permit (Standard or LOP) because of certain terms and conditions therein,
you may appeal the declined permit under the Corps of Engineers Administrative Appeal Process by completing Section II of
this form and sending the form to the division engineer. This form must be received by the division engineer within 60 days
of the date of this notice.
C: PERMIT DENIAL: You may appeal the denial of a permit under the Corps of Engineers Administrative Appeal Process by
completing Section II of this form and sending the form to the division engineer. This form must be received by the division
engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice.
D: APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION: You may accept or appeal the approved JD or provide new
information.
o ACCEPT: You do not need to notify the Corps to accept an approved JD. Failure to notify the Corps within 60 days of the
date of this notice, means that you accept the approved JD in its entirety, and waive all rights to appeal the approved JD.
APPEAL: If you disagree with the approved JD, you may appeal the approved JD under the Corps of Engineers
Administrative Appeal Process by completing Section II of this form and sending the form to the district engineer. This form
must be received by the division engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice.

yE: PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION: You do not need to respond to the Corps regarding the
preliminary JD. The Preliminary JD is not appealable. If you wish, you may request an approved JD (which may be appealed),
by contacting the Corps district for further instruction. Also you may provide new information for further consideration by the
Corps to reevaluate the JD.
., 7-77
, -^; �' 1,r1 s ,
^� �E:y .sy •c w =�„ "` `,:�. s.G n. ° ��. ,- ;, , - ., t' r ,:tea. a
..
'� s'.. "_s��_ '�S,F. iI� +! "r'' .Y S '; '•'a . �3 b Z •R, i,3
EC ON IEI - �RE�Q�br,_S�T`�F RjA�P A; 1L or ®BJECTip ONSrT® A�"N�INIT4 °IAL PROD FFERE© PERTM T4 ,
REASONS FOR APPEAL OR OBJECTIONS: (Describe your reasons for appealing the decision or your objections to an initial
proffered permit in clear concise statements. You may attach additional information to this form to clarify where your reasons or
objections are addressed in the administrative record.)
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: The appeal is limited to a review of the administrative record, the Corps memorandum for the
record of the appeal conference or meeting, and any supplemental information that the review officer has determined is needed to
clarify the administrative record. Neither the appellant nor the Corps may add new information or analyses to the record.
However, you may provide additional information to clarify the location of information that is already in the administrative
record.
t'P®'bNiT OF CONTi ffAC} F�©R Q'IUES1TIONS 0 .1NFO'RX4A,
If you have questions regarding this decision and/or the If you only have questions regarding the appeal process you may
appeal process you may contact: also contact:
District Engineer, Wilmington Regulatory Division, Mr. Jason Steele, Administrative Appeal Review Officer
Raleigh Regulatory Field Office CESAD -PDO
Attn: James Lastinger, Regulatory Specialist U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, South Atlantic Division
3331 Heritage Trade Dr., suite 105 60 Forsyth Street, Room 1OM15
Wake Forest, NC 27587 Atlanta, Georgia 30303 -8801
919 -554 -4884 ext 32 Phone: [phone]
RIGHT OF ENTRY: Your signature below grants the right of entry to Corps of Engineers personnel, and any government
consultants, to conduct investigations of the project site during the course of the appeal process. You will be provided a 15 day
notice of any site investigation, and will have the opportunity to participate in all site investi rations.
Date: Telephone number:
Signature of appellant or agent.
For appeals on Initial Proffered Permits send this form to:
District Engineer, Wilmington Regulatory Division, Attn: James Lastinger, 69 Darlington Avenue, Wilmington,
North Carolina 28403
For Permit denials, Proffered Permits and approved Jurisdictional Determinations send this form to:
Division Engineer, Commander, U.S. Army Engineer Division, South Atlantic, Attn: Mr. Jason Steele,
Administrative Appeal Officer, CESAD -PDO, 60 Forsyth Street, Room 10M15, Atlanta, Georgia 30303 -8801
Phone: [phone]

5
NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Beverly Eaves Perdue Charles Waklld PE
Governor Director
August 2, 2012
Brian Dustin
Mulkey Engineers & Consultants, Inc.
6750 Tryon Road
Cary, NC 27511
Determination Type*
Buffer Call Isolated or EIP Call
® Neuse (15A NCAC 2B.0233)
Dee Freeman
Secretary
NBRRO# 12 -124
Wake County
❑ Ephemeral /Intermittent/Perennial Determination
El Tar - Pamlico (15A NCAC 26 .0259)
❑ Isolated Wetland Determination
❑ Jordan (15A NCAC 2B 0267)
Project Name- Reynolds Mill
Location/Directions: Located at the end of Reynolds Mill Road
Subject Stream. UT to Richland Creek
Date of Determination: 6/22/12
Feature E/I/P* Not Subject Start@ I Stop@ Soil Survey USGS
Subject Topo
A X At pond outfall X X
B (pond) X X (as stream) X
*E/1 /P = EphemeraUlntermrttent/Perennra!
Explanation. The feature(s) listed above has or have been located on the Soil Survey of Wake County, North
Carolina or the most recent copy of the USGS Topographic map at a 1:24,000 scale. Each feature that is checked
"Not Subject" has been determined not to be a stream or is not present on the property. Features that are checked
"Subject" have been located on the property and possess characteristics that qualify it to be a stream There may be
other streams located on your property that do not show up on the maps referenced above but, still may be
considered jurisdictional according to the US Army Corps of Engineers and /or to the Division of Water Quality.
one Carolina
NNaturally
North Carolina Division of Water Quality Raleigh Regional Office Surface Water Protection Phone [phone] Customer Service
Internet www ncwaterqualrty org 1628 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699 -1628 FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity /Affirmative Action Employer — 50% Recycled/10% Post Consumer Paper

Wake County
Page 2 of 2
This on -site determination shall expire five (5) years from the date of this letter. Landowners or affected parties that
dispute a determination made by the DWQ or Delegated Local Authority may request a determination by the
Director. An appeal request must be made within sixty (60) days of date of this letter or from the date the affected
party (including downstream and /or adjacent owners) is notified of this letter.
A request for a determination by the Director shall be referred to the Director in writing c/o Karen Higgins, DWQ
WeBSCaPe Unit, 1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699.
If you dispute the Director's determination you may rile a petition for an administrative hearing. You must file the
petition with the Office of Administrative Hearings within sixty (60) days of the receipt of this notice of decision. A
petition is considered filed when it is received in the Office of Administrative Hearings during normal office hours.
The Office of Administrative Hearings accepts filings Monday through Friday between the hours of 8:00 am and 5:00
pm, except for official state holidays. To request a hearing, send the original and one (1) copy of the petition to the
Office of Administrative Hearings, 6714 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699 -6714. The petition may also be
faxed to the attention of the Office of Administrative Hearings at (919) 733 -3478, provided the original and one (1)
copy of the document is received by the Office of Administrative Hearings within five (5) days following the date of
the fax transmission. A copy of the petition must also be served to the Department of Natural Resources, c/o William
Cary, General Counsel, 1601 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699 -1601.
This determination is final and binding unless, as detailed above, you ask for a hearing or appeal within sixty (60)
days.
The owner /future owners should notify the Division of Water Quality (including any other Local, State, and Federal
Agencies) of this decision concerning any future correspondences regarding the subject property (stated above). This
project may require a Section 404/401 Permit for the proposed activity. Any inquiries should be directed to the
Division of Water Quality (Central Office) at (919) -733 -1786, and the US Army Corp of Engineers (Raleigh
Regulatory Field Office) at (919) -554 -4884.
Respectfully,
Lauren Witherspoon
Environmental Senior Specialist
cc: WeBSCaPe — 1650 Mail Service Center
RRO /SWP File Copy

�ONiil
Project Area
!,�►
R_ _ / lA
ecreation 5 %•
11 Area p 1 ' ♦ New I
1 4
R¢s. r 2 98 4 Pert
1 �2W ke Pot
6 est .. 2 +, 11 Rile
3 4 Project Vicinity
T
•
1
Rale � gh
96
'r 3
Lizard 4
2. v I 3
Lick
Figure 1
Project Vicinity
Reynolds Mill
Wake Forest, NC
Wake County, North Carolina
MULKEY
ENGINE ERF C LJ r, ° LI LTA ITS

This Exhibit is for planning purposes only and Information shown hereon does not
meet NC 47 -30 Requirements and therefore is not for design, construction. or 1 inch = 150 feet FIELD VERIFICATION MAP FIELD VISIT 1 FIELD VISIT 2 FIGURE
recording or transfer of title The Exhibit was compiled from available information
obtained from the sources Wed below. Streams and Wetlands PJI features
located in the feltl were recortletl using a mapping grade Trimble GeoX7 or
GRAPHIC SCALE STREAM AND WETLAND DETERMINATIONS CREW: BRIAN DUSTIN MULKEY INC. CREW: L. DUSTIN, J. LATSINGER,
G-XH GPS receiver with supposed sub -meter accuracy r
Sources.. 0 75 150 300 L. WITHER SPOON 2
Wake County Data Wake County GIS REYNOLDS MILL
Aerial Photography ESRI Imagery Prime World Feet DATE: JUNE 18, 2012 DATE: JUNE 22, 2012

STREAM I DWQ SCORE*
SA 1 2625
STREAM TABLE
CLASSIIFICTT I N I SOILSEMAP I TOPO YES MAP I NO CI CHANGE
JD REVIEW DATE
6/22/2012

WETLAND TABLE
WETLAND I O HEADWATER ACRES I DWQ RATING I FOREST I Verified as beaver impoundmOMM COMMENT
small area near origin of
JD REVIEW DATE
6/22/2012

POND TABLE
PON
PAD I A0 29S , MAN -MADE I Y, NnTHE FIELD
COMMENT
NO CHANGE
JD REVIEW DATE
6/22/2012

USACE AID# DWQ# Site # (indicate on attached map)
STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET SA
Provide the following information for the stream reach under assessment:
IDrleans Homebuilders Inc.
1 Applicant's name 2. Evaluator's name
3 Date of evaluation I6 -18 -12 4 Time of evaluation
IUT to Richland Creek (SA)
5 Name of stream. 6 River basin
7 Approximate drainage area
9 Length of reach evaluated.
I� 55 ac
358 ft
11 Site coordinates (if known). refer in decimal degrees
Latitude (ex 34 872312) x35.961433
Method location determined 0 GPS P& Topo Sheet
8 Stream order
10 County
lnan Dustin, Mulkey, Inc
I12.04pm
INeuse
II st
IlWake
12 Subdivision name (if any). I
Longitude (ex —77 556611). I -78 532347
J Ortho (Aenal) Photo /G1S r- Other GIS Other I Previous delme"
13 Location of reach under evaluation (Note nearby roads and landmarks and attach map identifying stream(s) location)
ISouth west of the terminus of Reynolds Mill rd.
one
14. Proposed channel work (if any) ( -N ---- -- - - -- ---- - - - - -- - - - - - - --
(Overcast 79 degrees F
15 Recent weather conditions
INo rain in last 48 hours
16 Site conditions at time of visit
17 Identify any special waterway classifications known
J Section 10 � Tidal Waters rl Essential Fisheries Habitat
Trout Waters r
J Outstanding Resource Waters J Nutrient Sensitive Waters r Water Supply Watershed IV
(I -IV)
j5X YES r NO I�1.25 dC
18 Is there a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluation pomt9 If yes, estimate the water surface area
PZ YES r NO YES J NO
19 Does channel appear on USGS quad maps
85 .
21 Estimated watershed land use: -!% Residential
F10 r
Forested
22. Bankfull width I4 20 ,
24. Channel slope down center of stream*
25. Channel sinuosity r Straight
i Flat (0 to 2 %)
�20. Does channel appear on USDA Soil Surve
L� - - - - -- --i1% Commercial I %o Industnal ��% Agricultural
71 (Impervious
____�% Cleared / Logged % Other
23 Bank height (from bed to top of bank) 12-3
J Gentle (2 to 4 %) r Moderate (4 to 10 %) r Steep ( >10 %)
Occasional bends ❑ Frequent meander Very smuous r Braided channel
Instructions for completion of worksheet (located on page 2): Begin by determining the most appropriate ecoregion based on
location, terrain, vegetation, stream classification, etc. Every characteristic must be scored using the same ecoregion. Assign points
to each characteristic within the range shown for the ecoregion. Page 3 provides a brief description of how to review the
characteristics identified in the worksheet Scores should reflect an overall assessment of the stream reach under evaluation If a
characteristic cannot be evaluated due to site or weather conditions, enter 0 in the scoring box and provide an explanation in the
comment section. Where there are obvious changes in the character of a stream under review (e.g , the stream flows from a pasture
into a forest), the stream may be divided into smaller reaches that display more continuity, and a separate form used to evaluate each
reach The total score assigned to a stream reach must range between 0 and 100, with a score of 100 representing a stream of the
highest quality '
Total Score (from reverse): I 51 ( Brian Dustin Comments-
Evaluator's Signature: Date: i ..... __ 6Y 18-12
This channel evaluation form is intended to be used only as a guide to assist landowners and environmental professionals in
gathering the data required by the United States Army Corps of Engineers to make a preliminary assessment of stream
quality. The total score resulting from the completion of this form is subject to USACE approval and does not imply a
particular mitigation ratio or requirement. Form subject to change—'version 06/03 To Comment, please call 919- 876 -8441 x 26.

STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
ECOREGION POINT RANGE
CHARACTERISTICS
SCORE
Coastal'
Piedmont Mountain
1 Presence of flow / persistent pools in stream
0 -5
0 -4
0 -5 1
(no flow or saturation = 0, strong flow = max points)
Evidence of past human alteration
2 -
- 0 -6 -'
0 -5'•
0 -5 5
(extensive alteration = 0; no alteration = max points)
_
3 Riparian zone
0 -6
= 0 =4
0 -5 3
(no buffer = 0, contiguous, wide buffer; = max points) ,
4_ Evidence of nutrient or chemical dischar" ges
0 -50
-4"
0 -4 3
(extensive discharges = 0, no discharges = max points) -
Groundwater discharge ,
5 ` ` -
0 -3 `
- . ' 0 -4 . ' � .
0 -4 3
da
"(no discharge'= 0, springs, seeps, wetlands, etc. = max points)
r�
-Presence, of adjacent floodplain
6'
0-4- -
h
�0` =4
(no, floodplain = 0; extensive floodplain = max points)
. -_
Entrenchment'/ flo(idplain access ' k
`,
05�`
- 2, ' � '.
4° r
0 -2` n; 2
(deeplyentrenched =�0; frequents flooding = max points)
�0- r
8 °;(no,wetlandPr
012 2
0, large adaJ entnwetlandnasmax points)
" n r - Channel. sinuosity
-yy
0 -°
;
:0 =4
0 -3 2
- -a r (extensive.e�iannehzation = 0, natural' meander =max points) a
-5
- Sediment input
0 =5 �
" -, 0 =4 = - ti'.' �
0 -4 1
(eztensiveadeposition = 0; little or no sediment =max points)
.
Size & diversity of channel bed substrate
(fine; homogenous = 0, large, diverse sizes = max points)
Evidence of channel incision or widening
12 :
0 -5
0=4 F`
0 -5 2
(deeply incised = 0; stable bed & banks = max points)
H
..
% ' Presence of major bank failures
13 -
0 -5
0 -5
0 =5 4
,.�
(severe erosion.= 0; no erosion, stable banks = max points)
�
14 ,Root depth and density on banks
� , `
`throughout
�
- 0
- ` �
0 -4
•
0 -5
E•
(no'visible roots= 0; dense roots = max points)
-3
. -
2
I S Impact by agriculture, livestock, or timber production
0 -5
-•- 0 -4 =�
0 -5 4
e (-substantial impact' =0, no evidence= max points)
16 of riffle - pool/ripple- pool - complexes
0-3,,-'-
0 -3 .•
0 -5 =$
0 -6 ` p
_ .(no riffles /ripples or pools = 0, well - developed = max points)
F"
E
Habitat complexity
(little or no habitat = 0; frequent, varied habitats = max points)
"0"'
- _
0 -6 "°
18 Canopy coverage over streambed
0 -5,-
;0, --5
5
(no- shading�vegefation = ,O;,continuous canopy = max,points)
Substrate embeddedness
`(deeply,embedded
N /A*
4,7'--f- t -�
0 -4 " " 2
= 0. loose structure`s max)
,
°' Pcesence;of stream invertebrates_(see page 4)
20�
= 0;
0 -4
0 -5
(no.eyiiiencp common,,'numerous'types,= max points), t
y n
s:w- ;:= Preserice'of amphibians
' "
0 4 2
=' (no`evidence'� .0;'common, numerous types = max'pomts)
.
._
_, Presence offish ,`, ,°
22
',(no-
0 -4
0 =4' `. •' i.
_0, =4� 4' 0
Pa
. evidence~= 0;- common, numerous types = max,p6mts)
se
23 �� :.: ; °Evidence of wildlife use'
0 -6 -
' 0 5`��w - °,0
-5 2
.(no evidence = 0, abundant evidence =.max points)
." Total Points Possible
100-
'100., `-
100
TOTAL SCORE (Also.enter on first page) ,
51
*These characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams.

NC DWO Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date. June 17, 2012 Project /Site: Reynolds Mill
Evaluator:Brian Dustin, Mulkey, Inc County: Wake
Total Points:
26.25' Stream Determination:
Stream is at least intermittent if r
>19 or perennial if >302t " Intermittent
I SA
Latitude: 35 961433
Longitude: - 78.532347 1
Other: Wake Forest
e.g. Quad Name
A.
Geomorphology (Subtotal =14 )
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1a.
Continuous bed and bank
0
1
2
3
2.
Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2
3
3.
In- Channel structure ex riffle -pool, step -pool, ripple-
0
1
2
3
poolsequence
4.
Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
3
5
Active /relic floodplain
0
1
2
3
6.
Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
3
7
Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2
3
8
Headcuts
0
1
2
3
9
Grade controls
0
0 5
1
1.5
10.
Natural valley
0
0 5
1
1 5
11
Second or greater order channel
I No
= 0
Yes
= 3
a artificial
ditches are not rated, see discussions in manual
B.
Hydrology (Subtotal =4.5)
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
12
Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
3
13.
Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1
2
3
14.
Leaflitter
1 5
1
0.5
0
15.
Sediment on plants or debris
0
0 5
1
1.5
16
Organic debris lines or piles
0
0 5
1
1.5
17.
Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No =
0
Yes=
1 5
C.
Biology (Subtotal = 7.79
Absent
Weak
Moderate
I Strong
18.
Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
1
0
19.
Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2
1
0
20.
Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
1
2
3
21.
Aquatic Mollusks
0
1
2
3
22
Fish
0
0.5
1
1 5
23
Crayfish
0
0.5
1
1 5
24
Amphibians
0
0.5
1
1 5
25.
Algae
0
0 5
1
I 1 5
26
Wetland plants in streambed
FACW =O 75; OBL =1 5 Other =0
"perennial stream may also be identified using other methods See p 35
of manual
Notes:
I Bank Height
(feet)
2 -3
SA contains
a series of beaver dams and therefore a ponded
Bankfull Width (feet)
4 -20
wetland
Water Depth (inches)
8 -24
Channel Substrate
Sand
Velocity-
lone - weak
Clarity-
turbid
Sketch:
SCORE
3
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
1
0 I
SCORE
1
1
1
0
0
15
SCORE
2
3
1
0
0
0
1
0
0.75

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont
Protect/Site Reynolds Mill City /County Wake Sampling D6te 6 -18 -12
Applicant/Owner Orleans Homebuilder, INC State NC Sampling Point WA 16
Investigator(s) Brian Dustin, Mulkey, Inc. Section, Township, Range Wake Forest
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc ) drainage way Local relief (concave, convex, none) concave Slope ( %) 2
Subregion (LRR or MLRA) MLRA136 of LRR P Lat 35.96147 Long - 78.532213 Datum NAD83
Soil Map Unit Name Wilkes Soils 20 -45% slope NWI classification PEM
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks )
Are Vegetation Sod or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No—
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks )
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No
Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No within a Wetland? Yes X No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
Remarks
Wetland is a ponded stream due to multiple beaver dams.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two reouired)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is reouired. check all that aooly)
_ Surface Sod Cracks (136)
_X Surface Water (Al)
_ True Aquatic Plants (614)
_ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
_X High Water Table (A2)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
_ Drainage Patterns (1310)
_X Saturation (A3)
_ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_ Moss Trim Lines (B16)
Water Marks (61)
_ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry- Season Water Table (C2)
Sediment Deposits (62)
_ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Sods (C6)
_ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
Drift Deposits (63)
_ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
_ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_ Algal Mat or Crust (64)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
Iron Deposits (65)
_ Geomorphic Position (D2)
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (67)
_ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
_X Water - Stained Leaves (69)
_ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (613)
_X FAC- Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes X No
Depth (inches) 1
Water Table Present? Yes X No
Depth (inches) 0
Saturation Present? Yes X No
Depth (inches) 0 Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring
well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available
Remarks
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Interim Version

VEGETATION (Four Strata) — Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point WA 16
30 ft
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Dominance Test worksheet:
Tree Stratum (Plot size )
% Cover Species? Status
Number of Dominant Species
1
5
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC 1 (A)
2
Total Number of Dominant
1
3
2
Species Across All Strata (B)
4
7
Percent of Dominant Species , 100%
5
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC (A/B)
6
7
Prevalence Index worksheet:
8
Total % Cover of Multiolv by
12
OBL species x 1 = 0
15 ft
= Total Cover
0
Saolina /Shrub Stratum (Plot size
)
FACW species x 2 =
1
FAC species x 3 = 0
2
FACU species x 4 = 0
3
UPL species x 5 = 0
4
Column Totals (A) 0 (B)
5
6
Prevalence Index = B/A =
6
= Total Cover
Remarks (Include photo numbers here or on a separate
sheet )
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
7
1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
8
_
X 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
9
9
3 - Prevalence Index is :53 0'
_
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
5 ft
= Total Cover
_
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Herb Stratum (Plot size )
POI onum ces itosum
80 X FACW
— Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
1 yg P
2 Microstegium vimineum FAC
10
FAC
3 Carex sp
5
4
5 Boehmeria cylindnca FACW
2
FACW
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
_
97
= Total Cover
Woodv Vine Stratum (Plot size 30 ft )
1
2
3
4
5
6
= Total Cover
Remarks (Include photo numbers here or on a separate
sheet )
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Tree – Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in (7 6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height
Sapling /Shrub – Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in DBH and greater than 3 28 ft (1 m) tall
Herb – All herbaceous (non- woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3 28 ft tall
Woody vine – All woody vines greater than 3 28 ft in
height
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes X No
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Interim Version

SOIL Sampling Point WA 16
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type' Loc` Texture Remarks
0 -12+ 10 YR 3/1 100 sil Fine sand, silty loam
'Type C= Concentration, D= Depletion, RM= Reduced Matrix, MS= Masked Sand Grains
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Histosol (Al)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
Black Histic (A3)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Stratified Layers (A5)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N,
MLRA 147, 148)
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Stripped Matrix (S6)
Restrictive Layer (if observed).
Type
Depth (inches)
Remarks
2Location PL =Pore Lining, M =Matrx
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils':
Dark Surface (S7)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
_ Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
(MLRA 147, 148)
_ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
Depleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136, 147)
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
_ Red Parent Material (TF2)
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
Redox Depressions (F8)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Iron - Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 136)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122) 3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
_ Piedmont Floodplam Soils (F19) (MLRA 148) wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Interim Version

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont
Project/Site Reynolds MITI City /County Wake Sampling Date 6 -18 -12
Applicant/Owner Orleans Homebullders, INC State NC Sampling Point WA UP
Investigator(s) Brian Dustin, Mulkey, Inc. Section, Township, Range Wake Forest
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc ) hillSlope Local relief (concave, convex, none) none Slope ( %) 4
Subregion (LRR or MLRA) MLRA136 of LRR P Lat 35.96152 Long - 78.532173 Datum NAD83
Sod Map Unit Name Wilkes soils 20 -45% slope NWI classification Upland
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks )
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed'? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No—
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks )
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present?
Hydnc Sod Present?
Wetland Hydrology Present?
Remarks
HYDROLOGY
Yes X No Is the Sampled Area
Yes No X
within a Wetland? Yes No X
Yes No X
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is reauired. check all that aoolvl
_ Surface Soil Cracks (66)
_ Surface Water (Al)
_ True Aquatic Plants (614)
_ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
_ High Water Table (A2)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
_ Drainage Patterns (610)
_ Saturation (A3)
_ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_ Moss Trim Lines (B16)
Water Marks (61)
_ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry- Season Water Table (C2)
Sediment Deposits (62)
_ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
Drift Deposits (133)
_ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
_ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Algal Mat or Crust (64)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
Iron Deposits (135)
_ Geomorphic Position (D2)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
_ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
Water - Stained Leaves (139)
_ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (613)
_ FAC- Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No X Depth (inches)
Water Table Present? Yes No X Depth (inches)
Saturation Present? Yes No X Depth (inches) Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available
Remarks
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Interim Version

VEGETATION (Four Strata) — Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point WA UP
30 ft
Absolute
Dominant Indicator
Dominance Test worksheet:
7
Tree Stratum (Plot size
)
% Cover
Species?
Status
Number of Dominant Species
10
1 Liriodendron tulipifera
FAC
35
X
FAC
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC
6
(A)
2 Prunus serotina
FACU
15
X FAC
FACU
2
FACU
4 Festuca spp
5
3 Acer rubrum
FAC
40
X
FAC
Total Number of Dominant
7
8
9
Species Across All Strata
10
(B)
4
11
12
_
77
= Total Cover
Woodv Vine Stratum (Plot size )
1 Vitis rotunddolia FAC
Percent of Dominant Species
X FAC
860 °
5
3
4
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC
5
(A/B)
6
6
10
= Total Cover
Prevalence Index worksheet:
7
Total % Cover of
MUItIDIV
by
8
90
OBL species
x 1 =
0
15 ft
= Total Cover
0
Saolma /Shrub Stratum (Plot size
)
FACW species
x 2 =
1 Prunus seroUna
FACU
30
X
FACU
FAC species
x 3 =
0
2 Liquidambar styraciflua
FAC
45
X
FAC
FACU species
x 4 =
0
3 Lindera benzoin
FACW
15
FACW
UPL species
x 5 =
0
4 Llgustrum slnense
FAC
10
FAC
Column Totals
(A)
0
(B)
5
6
7
8
9
10
_
100
=Total Cover
Herb Stratum (Plot size 5 ft )
1 Boehmeria cylindrica FACW
25
X FACW
2 Microstegium vimineum FAC
45
X FAC
3 Asplenium platyneuron
2
FACU
4 Festuca spp
5
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
_
77
= Total Cover
Woodv Vine Stratum (Plot size )
1 Vitis rotunddolia FAC
10
X FAC
2
3
4
5
6
10
= Total Cover
Remarks (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet )
Prevalence Index = B/A =
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
X 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
_ 3 - Prevalence Index is <_3 0'
_ 4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
_ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Tree — Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in (7 6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height
Sapling /Shrub — Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in DBH and greater than 3 28 ft (1 m) tall
Herb — All herbaceous (non- woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3 28 ft tall
Woody vine — All woody vines greater than 3 28 ft in
height
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes X No
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Interim Version

SOIL Sampling Point WA UP
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type' Loc` Texture Remarks
0 -12+ 10 YR 3/6 100 1
'Type C= Concentration, D= Depletion, RM= Reduced Matrix, MS= Masked Sand Grains 2Location PL =Pore Lining, M =Matrix
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils':
Histosol (A1)
_ Dark Surface (S7)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
_ Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
_ Black Histic (A3)
_ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
(MLRA 147, 148)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
Stratified Layers (A5)
_ Depleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136, 147)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
_ Red Parent Material (TF2)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N,
_ Iron - Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 147, 148)
MLRA 136)
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
_ Umbric Surface (1713) (MLRA 136, 122)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
wetland hydrology must be present,
Stripped Matrix (S6)
unless disturbed or problematic
Restrictive Layer (if observed)
Type
Depth (inches) Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X
Remarks
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Interim Version

WETLAND RATING WORKSHEET (4th VERSION) kA
Project Name Reynolds Mill County Wake
Nearest Road Reynolds Mill rd Date 6 -18 -12
Wetland Area (ac) —014 Wetland Width (ft): 10-30
Name of Evaluator(s) Brian Dustin, Mulkey, Inc
WETLAND LOCATION: WA
on sound or estusuary, pond or lake
on perennial steam
X on intermittent stream
within mterstream divide
other
SOILS:
Soil Series Wilkes soils 20 -45% slope
predominantly organic (humus, muck or peat)
X predominantly mineral (non- sandy)
predominantly sandy
HYDRAULIC FACTORS:
ADJACENT LAND USE:
(within 1/2 mile upstream, upslope or radius)
X forested /natural vegetation 35 %
agricultural/ urbanized 60 %
impervious surface 5 %
Adjacent Special Natural Areas
DOMINANT VEGETATION:
I Polygonum cespitosum
2 Festuca sp
3
4
FLOODING AND WETNESS:
X freshwater
X semipermanently to permenently flooded or inundated
brackish
seasonally flooded or inundated
steep topography
intermittently flooded or temporary surface water
ditched or channelized
no evidence of flooding or surface water
total wetland width >= 100 feet
WETLAND TYPE: (select one)*
Bottomland Hardwood Forest
Bog/Fen
Swamp Forest
Headwater Forest
Carolina Bay
Bog Forest
Pocosm
Ephemeral Wetland
Pine Savannah
X Other. Ponded stream
Freshwater Marsh
The rating system cannot be applied to salt and brackish marshes or stream channels
DEM RATING
WATER STORAGE
I X 4 = 4
BANK, SHORELINE STABILIZATION
I X 4 = 4
POLLUTANT REMOVAL
I * X 5 = 5
WILDLIFE HABITAT
I X 2 = 2
AQUATIC LIFE HABITAT
3 X 4 = 12
RECREATION /EDUCATION
0 X 1 = 0
TOTAL WETLAND SCORE = 27
* Add one point if in sensitive watershed and
>10% nonpomt disturbance within 1/2 mile upstream, upslope, or radius

"ALL CONSTRUCTION TO SE IN ACCORDANCE WITH ALL TOWN OF WAKE FOREST, CITY OF RALEIGH AND / OR NCOOT STANDARDS AND SPECIFICATIONS"
w
H
CORPORATE CHAPLAIN$ J D
DCF FAMILY LLC OF AMERICA INC. m %Ofj
D.E. 13007, PG. 2041 D.B. 73740 PG 1347 rr• Z 11 4U
BOW 7008 PG. 703 1 w - U D
PM N0. 1830- 66 -S6Bt PIN NO 7640 -06 -0307 Y D ❑t`Nm
ZONED: CV HE ZONED. CU NO
U ?z
r KY' LAND USE: VACANT d
c T+A LAND USE: VACANT ZDaPwN
ww
r. B
JW
ow--
w mc__3G
5
� I EP: 25 +36., I
FUTURE LIGON MILL EXTENSION
90' PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAV g -
OWNED BY OTHERS 9 PENSTOCK ORNE I
,
�(' - "• F D.B. 13007. P& 2011
DCF FAMILY LLC - — - -- - -- -
PIN NO. 1830 -85-02 -
TI MAP ZONED: CU HB
VICINITY 1 t7 MAP LAND USE VACANT
UN -NAMED TRIBUTARY TO RICHLAND CREEK M7. �. 111 I 'g CORPORATE CHAPLAINS Q,-I
(TOP OF BANK SHOWN - MEASURE BUFFER FROM BAN ' z7� I # : OF AMERICA INC.
D.B. 13740 7 PG. 7347
PHASE 3 AREA TO BE DEVELOPED EOM 2008 PG. 704
PIN NO 1830-95-9819
GR5
PIN 1830 -95 -9819 O
: T
DL FAMILY LLC I € LANZOD USE: VACANT I�
STREAM BANK U.B. 13007, PG 2041 U
S NESE C V ACANT
HE
LAND ZO U 298 60 0 40 � 90 160 ,1
/ : V 3 _ I• �T
�`e GRAPHIC SCALE
i naL - eo n.
a
B THE HANRA L /1
GATHERING G, 257 ICI 2 . -:
BYPASS STRUCTURE (111) j D.P. 11032 PG. 2512
STREAM INV IAt 29100 PIE
IN NO19830 95188 5f
` _
J WEIR lR:29275 l ZONED GR5 G
( WE RAND
FEATURE WEIR ELEVATION: 296.00 ' I LANG USE: RESIDENTIAI. 17�y'a., � z
NE RNERBUFPER s _ EX. An]h ElSi
MEASURED FROM m e� �se> r4. Cleo �f C SL
L n i, _ TOP OF BANK CLEANOUT - __ �' P„yk 7 MCI ,.1 (, U
II�A_ I U
[YO #) I - - DCF lAMILY LLL �
! KF US -1, LLC D.6. 13007, PC 2041 R Ip (a
j _ , • _y D.6. 6184, PG. 801 PIN N0. 7830- 85 -029b W- B'$CHEDULEdO - E r/1 to UUU
TRACT i ZONED: CU HE PVC 00.50%
q 1- B.M. 1994, PG. 661 LAND USE VACANT
PIN NO. 1830.11- 75 -04 -1 76 LF LEVEL SPREADER
ZONED: GRID UP ELEVATION• 292.50 q
LAND USE RESIDENTIAL
1
PERMANENT IMPACT AREA
119- 8•SCHEDULE40 IPELEVEVATION13E;OER __ I EXISTING DEVELOPMENT
PVC 1110.67%
BYPASS .3STRUCTURE 121 ll - \Q
VIN
8'INV UT:3 - \ — I _ t - RC/: p
WEIR ELEVATION?.: 315-25
CLEANOUT
NEUSE RIVER BUFFER
MEASURE FROM
TOP OF BANK EX
DCF FAMILY LLC a Ro I� w
D.B. 13007, PG 2041 / to' WN WAKE REST e�• �,. d
PIN NO, 1830 -B5 -0298 I — S CK
ZONED: CU HB WETLAND --
LAND USE: VACANT FEATURE I POND \- -
FUTURE LIGON MILL EXTENSION
0
90'PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY \ LWF M RIPARIAN BUFFER hh1lEEAAR5 BAN
A I�
OWNED BY OTHERS \ FRO TOP OF STREAI. I
B \ e x \ B
SITE DATA
\ POND \ AREA IN PHASE 3:19.68 AC. Z m
1! D Um
\ LESS AREA IN RAN: 3.27 AC. w Y
WAKE ELECTRICAL MEMBERSHIP LESS AREA IN OPEN/PARK SPACE: 3.80 AC. w
CORPORATION
D.B. 9650, PG. 7302 € \ \� \ NET AREA (LOTS): 12.61 AC.
TRACT I -C
B.W. 2002, PG. 1536 \ NUMBER OF LOTS: 66
PIN NO 1830.04-74 -7569
ZONED: GRID / AVERAGE LOT SIZE: 8,323 SQ. FT.
LAND USE. SUB STATION PARKER k ORLEANS HOMEBUILD£RS INC.
D.6. 12004 PG. 2268 UN -NAMED TRIBUTARY TO RICHLAND CREEK AVERAGE LOT SIZE: 0.19 AC.
PC: 10+60 PIN ZONED30 -84 -7947 (TOP OF BANK SHOWN- MEASURE BUFFER FROM BANK) I J
CU GR5
LAND USE: VACANT AVERAGE LOT WIDTH: 56 LF Q
7
HOME TARGET PRICE: $245,000
P AVERAGE HOME SIZE: 2,600 SQUARE FEET Z
�Egs_F s LENGTH OF PUBLIC ROAD EXTENSION: 2,778 LF Paoascr 2011076.00
TOTAL PERMANENT IMPACTS_:
co ,y LEGEND: IMPORTANT /PERENNIAL STREAM IMPACT= 127 LF LENGTH OF PUBLIC WATERLINE EXTENSION: 5,012 LF A -RA— a. TSG
I STREAM IMPACT IMPORTANT /PERENNIAL STREAM IMPACT= 254 SOFT LENGTH OF PUBLIC SEWER EXTENSION: 3,781 LF owo........ ay.
MDA
WETLAND IMPACT WETLAND IMPACT = 2427 SOFT = 0.056 ACRES PRELIMINARY IMPERVIOUS SURFACE AREA: 35% a ASE' SEE PLAN
WiNEGARTEN' BUFFER IMPACT °ATE' MARCH 25TH. 2015
INVESTMENTS, INC I ZONE 1 ISA OPTION: HIGH DENSITY (70% IMPERVIOUS ALLOWED)
D.B. 17778. PG. 1481 ZONE 1 =6334 SOFT 0.145 ACRES
B.W. 2007, PG. E7 j ZONE 2 ZONE 2 = 6342 SOFT= 0.146 ACRES ZONING (TOWN OF WAKE FOREST): CU GR5 (CASE NO. RZ-04 -11), OVER.S1.1-
TOTAL = 0.291 ACRES
PIN N0. 1830 -73IOT I SH2 -0 AND RC- WMA(PHASE 3 ONLY)
ZONED: CU GRIN "
LANG USE. VACANT I � — — 54' RCP
B -100
15

LEGEND:
STREAM IMPACT
WETLANDIMPACT
ZONE 1
ZONE2
50' RCP
TOTAL PERMANENT IMPACTS:
IMPORTANT /PERENNIAL STREAM IMPACT • 127 LF
IMPORTANT /PERENNIAL STREAM IMPACT• 250 SOFT
WETLAND IMPACT • 2427 SOFT =0.056 ACRES
BUFFERIMPACT
ZONE 1 : 6330 SOFT • 0.145 ACRES
ZONE 2 • 6342 SOFT • 0.146 ACRES
TOTAL • 0.291 ACRES
'ALL CONSTRUCTION TO BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH ALL TOWN OF WAKE FOREST, CITY OF RALEIGH AND / OR NCOOT STANDARDS AND SPECIFICATIONS"
C
m
F
2
F N
J O
W m QOo
z o- m WU.
4m -VO
Y U D�Nm z
� BAN_ -=
JZOPP
m OZ - -YZ WN
W tO_m_mIJ
Z
OW
E z raP ;G'art
TI W ADC P3�
I
30' 60' izo'
GRAPHIC SCALE _
Ih& -60 n.
STREAM SANK {,
�! \JItiD�
r
NEUSE RIVER BUFFER
MEASURED FROM
TOP OF BANK 5_PI
(2)54 - RC
\ 11B.OLF,
149.6'SCREDULE40 -
PVC Q 0.67X,
BYPASS LKANNElI
iW?
661f LEVEL SPREADER J
LIP ELEVATION • 313
NEUSE RIVER BUF ER
MEASURED FR
TOP OF BANK
1
- Y
BYPASS CHANNELS:
BOTTOM WIDTH = 1 FT
DEPTH • 1.75 FT
SIDE SLOPES = 2:1
LINE WITH ROLLMAX VMAX C350 TURF REINFORCEMENT MAT OR EQUAL
F
(/n� �
I�
D T
M �
Q
- P-4z
1 l
✓°�
y m .. ..
u
L Si
v/
C ✓) � r
C
V
O
l
W
w
h�1
B
m m
Z Y
❑ T
m 4
0: C
w
p
Z I I
2Ot ID76.OD
A T5G
MDA
6EE PLAN
owr[[ MARCN 25TH. 201 S
I \II'A('Iti
B -200

a
a1 1-1 `M swf
".P'LEa N NB3aa' \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \
LAND USE VACANT
FO E —N MILL EXTENSION
eaRPUeuc weRTorwev
owNEDD. oTNER3
OCF F1111
PINp-
�
UNE vACyJr
TO B
DB 1- M7..`P -Y C fl \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \\ \ \\ \ \ \\ \\ y \�q _ �II�
IIPW
Na Ia.JO -a3-a o1111IIIIIIIII I / IO r J
auNr 1111 \111111\ \I \Il`1�{1"k 1 \ \ \ \ ���III III�IIIIII ) m ��
ywN MED TRRDT — TDRKR
I_ OF BANK SHUNrI MEASURE BUFFER ERw auaal - -� II I / / \ \ \ IIII -
\ \ /� \ \ \\ 1 - -\ /,k i11j111\./ Lh14•-
1 I 1 I \ \ \ \ \
�\REAM
\
EAN" — J IIIIIIII \11111
s REAM�N._/ IIII 1 \\ \ \\
\\
\
NEDaDEEE \
�' _ 11 \ \� �
aF,tAN� \ Tlab. 11� I I I 1 / \ \\ / //r �'i.11 �,A,.„I o`° — JIII�IJ��` __xa • //
REAiuRE
suREDEROM�`•�
opa eAre<
> — _ 1WI.\• -W I / // /i/ / fE�q>°�
1L. R� 7FE
- -
aN f991TPG en PoN raNCO'o-�rla
LAND USE IPoSgp1TL1l � Ghb USE` \. "\ \ 1 \ \L ✓� /
zaEa rano � \\ // � � �� — II \ ✓ r —+� ,op, k tati a��
> —_ \ \ \�� ;,� �,��� �� \�_ —_ - -_ \ �. ll\'��J o�•I�o.�l `��IJ.'I�,AI'I ®JI��°y. j
\ \NDt I FD \ /
sPOwIWNMIIL EXTENSION
°\
IIII
X� — \ \ \VAGWI\�
}1LER� WANE E1ECCaRf+d \ \\ li
TRACT
D B Pf'J"a20 PD `1163 B N 10D1. PG° IS.Ia" \\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ I I I I I I I \
BPMT PG 1]'I PIN N0.1=0f-]1-
PW N0. i6TD -). -060.1 LAND US
ULYaCtr DRID �Yb \, \ \\ \ \\ \� \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \\ \ \I \ \ \ \\\ \\,x/71
LAND USE -mo ----
DEDICAIE
\
Uop utS4xBm >n�Rr io PocnLAN
a � / j Ar[„SNBE\uffE� b+L
R _
aN Ra Nl'yM Na1C DG ELTEN 200 H4 MEN�YLC 1 \I \ \ \ IP wP"m I1E°
aLL 2 - az— \ Da asap Po — /ll}91a`
PP' Na 1610 -]3 -3310 \ \ IRADT a
z— CU w,L \ \ \ \ PW NQ 18�'laM &Y16aJ \ - ^ -J P6 JB s .HT JI S` pQ S pp ,)p � R�NI MI !a
1.1110 USE vACANi .. \ \ \ \ \ \? zd@ Cu ORT. M3
\
Df CQP IE CNAPLAWS _ „\
f\ AMERICA 1 �y
S\ 0.B 137I0 Po 1312
�\ 90M T00a Po zua -�
ND t6T0- BS -BBID
\ \\ LANGLASE VACANT 4
IIII
IIII
IIII
III ,n w
pk Dr
A.
R[r P
/i! ­—;a`EEMNE
-The EngMear roes rot guarantee Mel all azlsl4g faaflroes such
as gpdines ekcMUl IMes wneuh telephone re01e saMCe
edbns adner laditles are ah„wn on lm Rms Il shill
BenIM Cmheaa'• raspgsldey to nave ell uNhbs lot'aleE q
Nab ieepastiva wvMn flda meM im udM loratlorss am
dl auto ezNltrp ladhtlee pAq to Be9M✓2nB mrttn,KOan
TireC U. aNI rasppnstdaM- 20'dluWay omierz
Maeowaance wiM. Gereral Slalule- C,Mpler BT ANdee
Tm Un°ergoum OamaOe Prevenaon A0.
-No pwWnof Mew018 qoJ 6I"aE —. D.. LU,p area
Poi map nunMei022010J000J ZmaX (Eflective Dale MM 2m 2000)
0ai0 map was Owmba°m m °6]0.2012 hqn Me idlw.hg wsDShe
vxnv NCFL000MAPS co.
EdslYq vepelatlpn am tawnl areas stu0 ro gdege0 b Me
vi�elesl Beam po::d •.I,pm daamvdlam slwm
M mf—gh n NC wrt R, xl& iwmawakeFwesl
Gy of RalelOh em/q NCDOT Sbmeras a 0peaflmtlms
con°asds buAP asurana rorav°ww.oy powo USACOE rsa
All Neusa Rlvx RlpeiMn BuXen are measure0 M1pm ttp of stream Bank
- Na phservada avuena� of . cemetery has I� foam
- No ezistltp svudures were rourvm on waea popery
Stream Oanks are sltowm em sheam Buffers have Been meawrm
Odl Types — Wma2 — —C2 W — V.M£' a vy
11 /J =t III
Ra 10
pr pan Ra v far zr
M f![F N .RCr ffi
IIII IiI
1111 \ \\ �r1 \ \\ \ \�IIIII� • \ \ \\ \ \u\ \\\A41 \i� \\
\ 1
v
I \\
���� I I li��� � \i 1 111 \\I i \�\ •� a >>��� \\ \.
\ \ \ \ \ \\ \\ \,
,� p \ \ 111 l I -'�• \\\\
MT IT
5
D
'ALL CONSTRUCTION TO BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH ALL TOWN OF WAKE FOREST, CITY OF RALEIGH AND / OR NCOOT STANDARDS AND SPECIFICATIONS"
/
F
Z
100 0' S0' 100' 200' >- - a
Y
° a
\ I I LLwEYHAR nlwwwS
(F AYFPoG NC
f
� � W N m Q❑f]
1 DB IJJM FG t31)
\ Pw "a tz00°e.o-°GDa?a°'io
Z QN .0
GRAPHIC SCALE ° 0mod ° °0
DEC!lwOUS TREE
\ \ T\ AV USE CV Na
\ AI LAND USE VAGNT
kSS
1 ntll = 1W K pN "?
0 Z
r CONIFEROUS TREE
D6 fAMtl.Y LLC
\\ \
W ❑ Z
D=NN]V
w f
— — — — — •'
_ —�� -I -
LAND USE
5v^
E w rQPP3D
_
a1 1-1 `M swf
".P'LEa N NB3aa' \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \
LAND USE VACANT
FO E —N MILL EXTENSION
eaRPUeuc weRTorwev
owNEDD. oTNER3
OCF F1111
PINp-
�
UNE vACyJr
TO B
DB 1- M7..`P -Y C fl \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \\ \ \\ \ \ \\ \\ y \�q _ �II�
IIPW
Na Ia.JO -a3-a o1111IIIIIIIII I / IO r J
auNr 1111 \111111\ \I \Il`1�{1"k 1 \ \ \ \ ���III III�IIIIII ) m ��
ywN MED TRRDT — TDRKR
I_ OF BANK SHUNrI MEASURE BUFFER ERw auaal - -� II I / / \ \ \ IIII -
\ \ /� \ \ \\ 1 - -\ /,k i11j111\./ Lh14•-
1 I 1 I \ \ \ \ \
�\REAM
\
EAN" — J IIIIIIII \11111
s REAM�N._/ IIII 1 \\ \ \\
\\
\
NEDaDEEE \
�' _ 11 \ \� �
aF,tAN� \ Tlab. 11� I I I 1 / \ \\ / //r �'i.11 �,A,.„I o`° — JIII�IJ��` __xa • //
REAiuRE
suREDEROM�`•�
opa eAre<
> — _ 1WI.\• -W I / // /i/ / fE�q>°�
1L. R� 7FE
- -
aN f991TPG en PoN raNCO'o-�rla
LAND USE IPoSgp1TL1l � Ghb USE` \. "\ \ 1 \ \L ✓� /
zaEa rano � \\ // � � �� — II \ ✓ r —+� ,op, k tati a��
> —_ \ \ \�� ;,� �,��� �� \�_ —_ - -_ \ �. ll\'��J o�•I�o.�l `��IJ.'I�,AI'I ®JI��°y. j
\ \NDt I FD \ /
sPOwIWNMIIL EXTENSION
°\
IIII
X� — \ \ \VAGWI\�
}1LER� WANE E1ECCaRf+d \ \\ li
TRACT
D B Pf'J"a20 PD `1163 B N 10D1. PG° IS.Ia" \\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ I I I I I I I \
BPMT PG 1]'I PIN N0.1=0f-]1-
PW N0. i6TD -). -060.1 LAND US
ULYaCtr DRID �Yb \, \ \\ \ \\ \� \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \\ \ \I \ \ \ \\\ \\,x/71
LAND USE -mo ----
DEDICAIE
\
Uop utS4xBm >n�Rr io PocnLAN
a � / j Ar[„SNBE\uffE� b+L
R _
aN Ra Nl'yM Na1C DG ELTEN 200 H4 MEN�YLC 1 \I \ \ \ IP wP"m I1E°
aLL 2 - az— \ Da asap Po — /ll}91a`
PP' Na 1610 -]3 -3310 \ \ IRADT a
z— CU w,L \ \ \ \ PW NQ 18�'laM &Y16aJ \ - ^ -J P6 JB s .HT JI S` pQ S pp ,)p � R�NI MI !a
1.1110 USE vACANi .. \ \ \ \ \ \? zd@ Cu ORT. M3
\
Df CQP IE CNAPLAWS _ „\
f\ AMERICA 1 �y
S\ 0.B 137I0 Po 1312
�\ 90M T00a Po zua -�
ND t6T0- BS -BBID
\ \\ LANGLASE VACANT 4
IIII
IIII
IIII
III ,n w
pk Dr
A.
R[r P
/i! ­—;a`EEMNE
-The EngMear roes rot guarantee Mel all azlsl4g faaflroes such
as gpdines ekcMUl IMes wneuh telephone re01e saMCe
edbns adner laditles are ah„wn on lm Rms Il shill
BenIM Cmheaa'• raspgsldey to nave ell uNhbs lot'aleE q
Nab ieepastiva wvMn flda meM im udM loratlorss am
dl auto ezNltrp ladhtlee pAq to Be9M✓2nB mrttn,KOan
TireC U. aNI rasppnstdaM- 20'dluWay omierz
Maeowaance wiM. Gereral Slalule- C,Mpler BT ANdee
Tm Un°ergoum OamaOe Prevenaon A0.
-No pwWnof Mew018 qoJ 6I"aE —. D.. LU,p area
Poi map nunMei022010J000J ZmaX (Eflective Dale MM 2m 2000)
0ai0 map was Owmba°m m °6]0.2012 hqn Me idlw.hg wsDShe
vxnv NCFL000MAPS co.
EdslYq vepelatlpn am tawnl areas stu0 ro gdege0 b Me
vi�elesl Beam po::d •.I,pm daamvdlam slwm
M mf—gh n NC wrt R, xl& iwmawakeFwesl
Gy of RalelOh em/q NCDOT Sbmeras a 0peaflmtlms
con°asds buAP asurana rorav°ww.oy powo USACOE rsa
All Neusa Rlvx RlpeiMn BuXen are measure0 M1pm ttp of stream Bank
- Na phservada avuena� of . cemetery has I� foam
- No ezistltp svudures were rourvm on waea popery
Stream Oanks are sltowm em sheam Buffers have Been meawrm
Odl Types — Wma2 — —C2 W — V.M£' a vy
11 /J =t III
Ra 10
pr pan Ra v far zr
M f![F N .RCr ffi
IIII IiI
1111 \ \\ �r1 \ \\ \ \�IIIII� • \ \ \\ \ \u\ \\\A41 \i� \\
\ 1
v
I \\
���� I I li��� � \i 1 111 \\I i \�\ •� a >>��� \\ \.
\ \ \ \ \ \\ \\ \,
,� p \ \ 111 l I -'�• \\\\
MT IT
5
D
M U
V /
Q
J
Z
H W - j U
7
/-1
�66
I�/ N
w
„ a
I tY \\ 1 R—EcT rvo 201 1076 00
1°
1 4
A DN Dw c.lcc XCO ev TS0
MOA
SEE PLAN
oniE
1\ \ I I MARCH 25TH 2015
r s1snNG
CONDMONS
\\ \\ \ B -300
e
N N
Z
Y
° a
N Q
> u
w
w
D D
R09CRTF aRrI
1pL Po 1396
DB OT
DT 6a
d.ARRW PHASE 3
6M PD 83B
1.
PIN Na fa10W -DI -1a
M U
V /
Q
J
Z
H W - j U
7
/-1
�66
I�/ N
w
„ a
I tY \\ 1 R—EcT rvo 201 1076 00
1°
1 4
A DN Dw c.lcc XCO ev TS0
MOA
SEE PLAN
oniE
1\ \ I I MARCH 25TH 2015
r s1snNG
CONDMONS
\\ \\ \ B -300

�11�III
' I1
"ALL CONSTRUCTION TO BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH ALL TOWN OF WAKE FOREST, CITY OF RALEIGH AND / OR NCDOT STANDARDS AND SPECIFICATIONS"
\ I
\W
i
E
I D
XI W IN191oo y,/ Y 1• �/� _ / / / / /// / / / / //i / —� \\ ��\
C„ a IOII
WEIR ELEVNVATION T 19409
Jso
348
346 119n rat Ji r[�1 o 346
344 HIOh Poln(v 335 6 \ 3u C
\I.
342 I 5 & v \ \ '.nib tiOtw -. 342
340
40
338
m l 85; y ED J P O
336 POSE I G
t� I^ _ _ \ \ P OPOSE uGRADB OVER PI STA= 8 +99 !0 336
3:' y W _ _ E J34
RREL SEV l� ,y,'.� K =8( 000
332 w m - �� _ t IA
DI T 8 BL F CO R > 332
330 RM 333701 FEEL, % % - - - - 1 -
INVWT32795 C &3] \\ :1m o�" 330
326 / _ FM M97 / /'� . - '� Low Polnt EIv 30106
INVIN 72293 I L836 % / \ R m 328
326 ' . - - INVOUi 32213 RIM 3,973
WIN 3913 326
324 LATER I STOR;A _ NV OU7 31957 / / / N\W
/ FTINf.f VFNFC. FdR1AC / �_ / V 9O \ RM�31992 �/1 32a
320 Yi7�E MI. IWRL ®661 %-� uGe INVIN 15 /C 322
`` INV OUI 31599 320
I 1 WaTE BSTORIht _CB 34A EXISTI GGRAdE
Z CONN�CTT0�ISTING117WA RUNE 24 lF IB'R pkfa s RM 32041
Q 318 L(X:AIIONISAPPROXIBIAIE /i \ INV IN 31562
B I� 1 318 o OOT B
316 -. 11-1 smEwu,c swsEmENr WV 3542 O _ ^•�',
rias °$ I _ 316
J 314 -. 1111 -.. uwN �aF wn °$ / - C&19A . J J v_ 114 J
W �cv cac Y ie C6G \ $ �R11A 30644
312 - os c6ass sr6p �' c s, 11 owl CO GO^ R o REYN XDS IW Wi 701.. 312 W
.s svuNnNa . 7o xwcE 1
Ilw
PROPO ED GRd )E C637 < rc PROPO`ED GAAOE OVEA
orvc
Jto- wa�a �� � ./ �� pu 36r6u 310
wNCc
onwwnL c6ouuo rover I / ery IN 298A9 17d TEE —/ .. / 7 BLON JFF
308 - \ \ —` /I NJ OUi 7]fiAO — 308
306
3030a 306 - car u
302 - 302
300 -
_
N N
Z Y
❑ 0
N a
> i
W U
a a
N
XE'
O a❑U
❑ -
aN ❑
❑N L Z
Iy._�?
ZCPPWN
0 JZ
R i f]
FIJmmEJ
��mm3i
ca ^ -3a:
MU
cn �
�Z z
� G
7
a
O
W
ryW
�1
m�
1�
w
IW IN 29955 wo F
SSNH IO1 I \ INV W729955
298 RM 311.95 •41l 6 P @069% 296 p
1 1 1 1 1 WV 211 \ 164L? 6 mpooI % li I I C5 32 1 1 1
296 $SMN 11 IS)
294 29]00' GONC'tETE / / RM 30976 1WWT W057 296 ❑
KVOUT 29496 �"��
INJ IN 29760 i Z
292 \ nEEC� FTI r_ 1/ NJOU 295 698 �RIM1 W591 294
292 201 1 ❑76 00
rAO ECr o
\ ' 774F R° ®20 N N W11
91 IN 0929
290 290 A TSG
286
I 9 la 1 120 owo c.EC "EO a. M ❑A
I ( I —266 s�A E SEE PLAN
EXISTI GGMDc HOT", A SCALE 1' =60 onrc
286 1\ I .. ... .... ... .. l./t =0 266 MARCH 25ii -, 2015
284 1 `� °' "^ 7 I 2e4 IGU V MILL_ RD
262 PIriN & PROT71J,
, I 2az
9 +00 9 +50 10 +00 10- 50 1100 11 50 12 00 12 +50 1 } +00 1J [phone] [phone]+00 16-50 17 +00 17 +50 18 +00 18 +50 19 +00 19 +50 20 +00 20 +50 21 +00 21 +50 22 +00 22 +50 23 +00 23 +50 24 +00 24 +50 25 +00 25 +50 26 +00
B -400
E