760065_Compliance Evaluation Inspection_20231120

Division of Water Resources
Facility Number - 0 Division of Soil and Water Conservation
0 Other Agency
Type of Visit: 0 Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: *Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
ZD�P"✓ ��,� �
Date of Visit: C� Arrival Time: (�<< Departure Time:L�J�I County: Region:wWo
Farm Name: Om J,kb _VRA�Vlp C(4WV1\j Owner Email:
Owner Name: 2c>>nc`ID�pr V&10 Phone: 331.E-Q1 a-N41D
Mailing Address: (�� 1PS� ��1\�( �l� 1 1�r L. � �`� 2_103
Physical Address:
Facility Contact:lyn1,) P�. Title: Phone:
Onsite Representative: C� Integrator:
Certified Operator: N` Certification Number: �—
Back-up Operator: Certification Number:
Location of Farm: Latitude: Longitude:
US a D0 S S p , E�+•► �� L '(Z �a1 f�v r lire ci l;ty an�
Design Current Design Current Design Current
Swine Capacity Pop. Wet Poultry Capacity Pop. Cattle Capacity Pop.
Wean to Finish La er Dairy Cow
Wean to Feeder Non-La er Dairy Calf
Feeder to Finish Dairy Heifer
Farrow to Wean Design Current Dry Cow
Farrow to Feeder Dry Poultry Capacity Pop. Non-Dairy
Farrow to Finish Layers Beef Stocker
Gilts Non-Layers Beef Feeder a�JU
Boars Pullets Beef Brood Cow
Turkeys
Other Turkey Poults 11
Other LjOther
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes �No ❑ NA ❑ N E
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State?(If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State(gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system?(If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Yes �o ❑ NA ❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page I of 3 21412015 Continued

20 16cylp
Facili Number: - 1,p Date of Inspection: \\, �
Waste Collection&Treatment
4. Is storage capacity(structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall)less than adequate? ❑ Yes 9No ❑ NA ❑ NE
a.If yes,is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard(in):
Observed Freeboard(in):
5.Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? 0 Yes �No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(i.e.,large trees,severe erosion,seepage,etc.)
6.Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes -No ❑ NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes,and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat,notify DWR
7.Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? [:] Yes RNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes ❑ No gNA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits,dry stacks,and/or wet stacks)
9.Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require [-] Yes K o ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10.Are there any required buffers,setbacks,or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes ❑'No 'PNA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes,check the appropriate box below. [:] Yes [:] No (� ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals(Cu,Zn,etc.) T\
❑ PAN ❑ PAN> 10%or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s):
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes ❑ No A ❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes ❑ No fZNA 0 NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes ❑No ANA ❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ❑ No ONA ❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes ❑ No fRNA ❑ NE
Required Records&Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage&Permit readily available? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?If yes,check [:] Yes [:] No 'XNA ❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑WUP ❑Checklists ❑Design ❑Maps [:] Lease Agreements ❑Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement?if yes,s4erk the nnrnnriata h�•s—�;� ❑ Yes 15�rNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑Waste-App ieatiea ❑ KWaste Analysis ❑Sei' :^.!ysis Waste Transfers ❑Weat e
Rainfall EEktocking ❑C-'rap-*ie4 ❑1 'XrMonthly and 1"Rainfall Inspections ❑Sludge-S•�
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes XNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected,did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes ❑ No 5NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 511212020 Continued

�2b "RL9
Facility Number: jDate of Inspection:
24.Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? [:] Yes [:] No �_?(NA ❑ NE
25.Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes,check ❑ Yes ❑ No RNA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es)below.
❑Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑Non-compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s)and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26.Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes ❑ No WA ❑ NE
27.Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments(PLAT)certification? ❑ Yes ❑ No ONA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28.Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes ANo ❑ NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal? I.P� k� w
29.At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes �No ❑ NA ❑ NE
If yes,contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the ❑ Yes `R[No ❑ NA ❑ NE
permit?(i.e.,discharge,freeboard problems,over-application) �\
31.Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ❑ No P�NA ❑ NE
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32.Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes W No ❑ NA ❑ NE
33.Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on-site representative? ❑ Yes J4 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? ❑ Yes qNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments(refer to question#): Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations(use additional pages as necessary).
ill piny end ; no c�,, cony
P-bym) - 'Y� "'�c ��C'e �h l � M W P�*Yak
40 it
wq- cve
�4rVIIILW
flyW VAN�s" ,VAA aA� MW MW4�1 t
Reviewer/Inspector Name: Phone:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: J Date: 1 14 f�3
Page 3 of 3 21412015