760059_Compliance Evaluation Inspection_20231109

Division of water Resources
Facility Number 0 Division of Soil and Water Conservation
0 Other Agency
V
pe of Visit: ®Compliance Inspection Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
ason for Visit: 19 Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: Arrival Time: Departure Time:%I1),j County: �(�� Region:L&CL_
Farm Name: Owner Email:
Owner Name: 0i Yl ire Phone: 2j5jX
Mailing Address: �{ Yn n` n �11 l 12Cx�t(T (]�w')',n� C'1C11f(�1(1 K� C 1 i�
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: Title: M(ooarApa/ Phone: _ 3t0 -216-145 7
Onsite Representative: Integrator:
Certified Operator: Certification Number:U
Back-up Operator: V41 1:b,,q oe Certification Number: la
Location of Farm: Latitude: Longitude:
S a00 `> >1tve1 CLASS Qck -�'( P3ankzm ' d =��1-jo 4 lm Pd >arm orv(J
Design Current Design Current Design Current
Swine Capacity Pop. Wet Poultry Capacity Pop. Cattle Capacity Pop.._; �u
Wean to Finish La er .ZDairy Cow Vj)
Wean to Feeder I INon-Layer I Dairy Calf
Feeder to Finish 'Dairy Heifer
Farrow to Wean Design Current Dry Cow
Farrow to Feeder Dry Poultry Capacity Pop. Non-Dairy
Farrow to Finish Layers Beef Stocker
Gilts Non-Layers Beef Feeder
Boars Pullets Beef Brood Cow
Turkeys
Other Turkey Poults
Other 10ther
DischarEes and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes VNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State?(If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State(gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system?(If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page 1 of 3 21412015 Continued

Facility Number: - CboLA jDate of Inspection:
Waste Collection&Treatment
4.Is storage capacity(structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall)less than adequate? ❑ Yes X No ❑ NA ❑ NE
a.If yes,is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard(in):
Observed Freeboard(in): 30t '
5.Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(i.e.,large trees,severe erosion,seepage,etc.)
6.Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a [:] Yes QNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes,and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat,notify DWR
7.Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes allo ❑ NA ❑ NE
8.Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes Eallo ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits,dry stacks,and/or wet stacks)
9.Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes EJLN o ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10.Are there any required buffers,setbacks,or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes ;KNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes 'E(No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals(Cu,Zn,etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN> 10%or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12.Crop Type(s): - ,_ 1I i " , cf)j C1 �i 1�u
13. Soil Type(s):
14.Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes O No ❑ NA ❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes 5Z'N0 ❑ NA ❑ NE
16.Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes 0 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes MNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
_Required Records&Documents
19.Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage&Permit readily available? ❑ Yes P&,No ❑ NA ❑ NE
20.Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?If yes,check ❑ Yes KNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑WUP ❑Checklists ❑Design ❑Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? ❑ Yes 5kTNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
Waste Application Weekly Freeboard Waste Analysis ❑Soil Analysis El W�nst"r-8-s€e s W eather Code
Rainfall aStockingXCrop Yield R120 Minute Inspections Monthly and I"Rainfall Inspections ❑%*e-Im�
22.Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes 15;LNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected,did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes [:] No 'RNA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 21412015 Continued

Facility Number: - Date of Inspection:
24.Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes jK'No ❑ NA ❑ NE
25.Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes,check ❑ Yes ❑ No EK NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es)below.
❑Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑Non-compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s)and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26.Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes KNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
27.Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments(PLAT)certification? ❑ Yes %No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes KNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?wkNAk
29.At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes 'RNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
If yes,contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the ❑ Yes f;e'No ❑ NA ❑ NE
permit?(i.e.,discharge,freeboard problems,over-application) TT��
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ❑ No O_NA ❑ NE
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32.Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes &No ❑ NA ❑ NE
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on-site representative? ❑ Yes R No ❑ NA ❑ NE
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? ❑ Yes 5d No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments(refer to question#): Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations(use additional pages as necessary).
. Calll)ralow
0 3;21 1 tw al"I'LCf - �\j an,e V {
1 1_
1.WU 9- 11
Reviewer/Inspector Name: Vh4ey, Phone: M(,"1 1 U -q U q 7
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:
Page 3 of 3 21412015