HomeMy WebLinkAbout760038_Compliance Evaluation Inspection_20231109 Division of Water Resources
Facility Number '� -
� 0 Division of Soil and Water Conservation
0 Other Agency
E
e of Visit: 0 Compliance Inspection Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: 0 Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: ("`�--`F=� Arrival Time: .4 C.M Departure Time: County: Region: ws l
Farm Name: llj � Own^e'r Email:
�
Owner Name: � ���1(ljln C S�1(�(1 RUM Phone: 7P%-gfl'1 A-G)AG
Mailing Address: F-"2(3( G\uwAin Q him m n-) \-�C 21 a D5
Physical Address: p
Facility Contact: Title: Phone: 3 - "
Onsite Representative: Integrator:
Certified Operator: Certification Number: 'm'wy yS
Back-up Operator: Certification Number:
Location of Farm: Latitude: )t �`� �5t� Longitude:
�Wy U4 � > G)4 wy 42 7 ( hwy 13 "- ker�n�O M�1�rr-d =-� j t���cXx�n o'w roc'
Design Current Design Current Design Current
Swine Capacity Pop. Wet Poultry Capacity Pop. Cattle Capacity Pop.
Wean to Finish La er Dairy Cow "Pj
Wean to Feeder I lNon-Layer Dairy Calf
Feeder to Finish Dairy Heifer
Farrow to Wean Design Current Dry Cow
Farrow to Feeder. Dry Poultry Capacity Pop. Non-Dairy
Farrow to Finish La ers Beef Stocker
Gilts Non-Layers Beef Feeder
Boars Pullets 113eef Brood Cow
Turkeys
Other -Turkey Poults
Other Other
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes KNo ❑ NA ❑ N F:
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State?(If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State(gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system?(If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes 10 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Yes rNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page 1 of 3 21412015 Continued
Facility Number: -"I lQ - Date of Inspection:
Waste Collection&Treatment
4.Is storage capacity(structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall)less than adequate? ❑ Yes �jo No ❑ NA ❑ NE
a.If yes,is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: V�IS/� CSC
Spillway?: Y
Designed Freeboard(in):
Observed Freeboard(in):
5.Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes �No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(i.e.,large trees,severe erosion,seepage,etc.)
6.Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes,and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat,notify DWR
7.Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes Dq"No ❑ NA ❑ NE
8.Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes ' ZNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits,dry stacks,and/or wet stacks)
9.Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes 5(No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10.Are there any required buffers,setbacks,or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes j<No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals(Cu,Zn,etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN> 10%or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s): 5 y i (1(�Z��fT R A
13. Soil Type(s): J
14.Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes )4 No ❑ NA 0 NE
15.Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes [ZNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
16.Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes RNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
acres determination?
17.Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes RNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes KNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
Required Records&Documents
19.Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage&Permit readily available? ❑ Yes 'No ❑ NA ❑ NE
20.Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?If yes,check ❑ Yes i4No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑WUP ❑Checklists ❑Design ❑Maps ❑Lease Agreements ❑Other:
21.Does record keeping need improvement? ❑ Yes JkNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
�aste Application Weekly Freeboard Waste Analysis ❑Soil Analysis ❑VK�m5f2is jgWeather Code
Rainfall E&tocking 5(Crop Yield 0120 Minute Inspections Monthly and 1"Rainfall Inspections ElS1w ge
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected,did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes ❑ No DR,,NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 21412015 Continued
Facility Number: - Date of Inspection:
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes 15�No ❑ NA ❑ NE
25.Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes,check ❑ Yes ❑ No F;j NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es)below.
❑Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑Non-compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s)and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26.Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes �No ❑ NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments(PLAT)certification? ❑ Yes RNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28.Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes K'No ❑ NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal? Lc" it
29.At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes J�:tNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
If yes,contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30.Did the facility fail.to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the [:] Yes �No ❑ NA 0 N E
permit?(i.e.,discharge,freeboard problems,over-application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ❑ No ;&NA ❑ NE
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32.Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on-site representative? ❑ Yes �ZNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? ❑ Yes �No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments(refer to question#): Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations(use additional pages as necessary).
a1. Sol la C�Kk r301)4
t 0�.05
Reviewer/Inspector Name: k\mkX)_0117yu Phone:' a -11tv
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: l �� Date: 1101113 —
Page 3 of 3 21412015