NC0088897_Permit Issuance_20140411

A 4
n4
NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Pat McCrory
Governor
Mr. T. Scott Barrow, City Engineer
City of King
P.O. Box 1132
King, North Carolina 27021
Dear Mr. Barrow:
John E. Skvarla, III
Secretary
April 11, 2014
Subject: Issuance of NPDES Permit NCO088897
City of King Water Treatment Plant (WTP)
Forsyth County
The Division of Water Resources (the Division) hereby issues the attached NPDES permit for the subject facility.
This permit is issued pursuant to the requirements of North Carolina General Statute 143-215.1 and the
Memorandum of Agreement between North Carolina and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency dated
October 15, 2007, or as subsequently amended.
The changes between this permit and the previous permit include the following:
• The latitude and longitude listed on the previous permit facility map was located approximately a mile to
the west on the opposite side of the Yadkin River, which is not the correct position. The corrected
coordinates are:
Latitude: 36° 13' 22" Longitude: - 80° 25' 39"
These coordinates place the outfall on the eastern side of the City of King's property along Old Richmond
Creek.
• The subbasin number (03-07-01) listed in the previous permit was not correct. The correct subbasin
number is 03-07-02.
• Total Manganese monitoring will no longer be required.
• The Division has included a permit re -opener clause in the permit for Whole Effluent Toxicity Monitoring
[Section A. (4.)]. The Division includes this condition if the permittee has demonstrated toxicity failures
during the past permit cycle. We note that this facility has failed 2 of 7 quarterly tests during the past 2
years.
Proposed federal regulations require electronic submittal of all discharge monitoring reports (DMRs) and specify
that, if a state does not establish a system to receive such submittals, then permittees must submit DMRs
electronically to the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). The Division anticipates that these regulations will
be adopted and is beginning implementation.
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
Phone: [phone] Internet: www.ncwaterquality.org
An Equal Opportunity 1 Affirmative Action Employer- Made in part by recycled paper

Mr. Barrow
April 11, 2014
Page 2 of 2
The requirement to begin reporting discharge monitoring data electronically using the NC DWR's Electronic
Discharge Monitoring Report (eDMR) internet application has been added to your NPDES permit. [See Special
Condition A (3.)] For information on eDMR, registering for eDMR and obtaining an eDMR user account, please
visit the following web page:
http://portal.ncdenr.or web/wq/admin/boe/ipuedmr.
For information on EPA's proposed NPDES Electronic Reporting Rule, please visit the following web site:
http•//www2.epa. ovp /compliance/proposed-npdes-electronic-reportin -rule.
If any parts; measurement frequencies, or sampling requirements contained in this permit are unacceptable, you
have the right to an adjudicatory hearing, upon written request submitted within thirty (30) days after receiving this
letter. Your request must take the form of a written petition conforming to Chapter 150B of North Carolina
General Statutes, and you must file it with the Office of Administrative Hearings, 6714 Mail Service Center,
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-6714. Unless such a demand is made, this permit shall remain final and binding.
This permit is not transferable except after notifying the Division of Water Resources. The Division may require
permit modification, or revocation and re -issuance. Please note that this permit does not affect your legal
obligation to obtain other permits required by the Division of Water Resources, the Division of Land Resources,
the Coastal Area Management Act, or other federal or local governments.
If you have questions, or if we can be of further service, please contact Derek Denard at
[[e-mail]] or call [phone].
espec ully,
Thomas A. Reeder, Direc
Division of Water Resources, NCDENR
Enclosure: NPDES Permit NCO088897 (Issuance Final)
hc: Central Files
NPDES Program Files
WSRO Files/ Attn: Corey Basinger
ec: ESS/Aquatic Toxicology Unit, Susan Meadows [[e-mail]]

NPDES Permit NC0088897
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
DIVISION OF WATER RESOURCES
PERMIT
TO DISCHARGE WASTEWATER UNDER THE
NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM
DES)
In compliance with the provisions of North Carolina General Statute 143-215.1, other lawful standards
and regulations promulgated and adopted by the North Carolina Environmental Management
Commission, and the Federal Water Pollution Control Act, as amended, the
City of King
is hereby authorized to discharge treated wastewater from a facility known as
City of King Water Treatment Plant (WTP)
6949 Donnaha Road, Tobaccoville
Forsyth County
to receiving waters designated as Old Richmond Creek, within the Yadkin -Pee Dee River Basin, in
accordance with effluent limitations, monitoring requirements, and other applicable conditions set forth
in Parts I, II, III, and IV hereof.
The permit shall become effective June 1, 2014.
This permit and the authorization to discharge shall expire at midnight on October 31, 2018.
Signed this day April 11, 2014.
T40as A. Reeder, Director C�
ivision of Water Resources
By Authority of the Environmental Management Commission
Page 1 of 7

NPDES Permit NCO088897
SUPPLEMENT TO PERMIT COVER SHEET
All previous NPDES Permits issued to this facility, whether for operation or discharge are hereby
revoked, and as of this issuance, any previously issued permit bearing this number is no longer effective.
Therefore, the exclusive authority to operate and discharge from this facility arises under the permit
conditions, requirements, terms, and provisions described herein.
The City of King
is hereby authorized to:
1. continue to operate a conventional technology water treatment plant [coagulation, flocculation,
sedimentation, and filtration] with discharge of wastewaters from media filter backwash and
sedimentation basins with a design potable flowrate of 3.0 MGD and a maximum, monthly average
wastewater. discharge of 0.283 MGD, with water and wastewater treatment consisting of;
• three (3) clear wells [0.135 MG, 0.235 MG and 1.0 MG]
• high service pump station
• generator
• chemical storage tanks
• a decant sludge holding tank [0.300 MG ]
• wastewater pumping station
• filter belt press
• dechlorination equipment
located at the City of King Water Treatment Plant (WTP), 6949 Donnaha Road, Tobaccoville,
Forsyth County; and
2. discharge from said treatment works via Outfall 001 at a location specified on the attached map,
into Old Richmond Creek [Stream Segment 12-79], currently a Class WS-IV waterbody within
Subbasin 03-07-02 of the Yadkin -Pee Dee River Basin.
Page 2 of 7

NPDES Permit NCO088897
PART I
A. (1.) EFFLUENT LIMITATIONS AND MONITORING REQUIREMENTS
During the period beginning on the effective date of this permit and lasting until expiration, the
Pen-nittee is authorized to discharge filter backwash via Outfall 001. Such discharges shall be limited
and monitored' by the Permittee as specified below:
EFFLUENT `
HAXA,C1'ERISTIC
[P,ARAMET,ERkCODES`J .. -
j'= , - Y LVlITS
MONI�ORIN REQUI)IMENTaS
Month'
- .. ,y
Average
Dail
. � y :.
Maximum
Measurement
, �
F`recuency
Sam 'le'e
� ,p -
Type'
�bSam le
P, . .
Locatwn'
Flow (MGD)
50050
Continuous
Recording
Effluent
Total Suspended Solids (mg/L)
C0530
30.0 mg/L
45.0 mg/L
2/month
Grab
Effluent
Turbidity (NTU)
00070
2/month
Grab
Effluent
Total Residual Chlorine 2 (µg/L)
50060
28 µg/L 2
2/month
Grab .
Effluent
pH (su)
00400
Not < 6.0 or > 9.0
standard units
2/month
Grab
Effluent
Total Aluminum 3 (mg/L)
01105
Quarterly
Grab
Effluent
Total Fluoride 3 (mg/L)
00951
Quarterly
Grab
Effluent
Total Zinc 3 (mg/L)
01092
Quarterly
Grab
Effluent
Total Copper 3 (mg/L)
01042
Quarterly
Grab
Effluent
Total Iron 3 (µg/L)
01045
Quarterly
Grab
Effluent
Total Phosphorous (TP) 3 (mg/L)
C0665
Quarterly
Grab
Effluent
Total Nitrogen (TN) 3 (mg/L)
C0600
Quarterly
Grab
Effluent
Chronic WET Testing 4
TGP3B
Quarterly
Grab
Effluent
Footnotes:
1. No later than February 26, 2015 begin submitting discharge monitoring reports electronically using
NC DWR's eDMR application system. See Special Condition A. (3.).
2. The Division shall consider TRC effluent values reported below 50 µg/L to be compliant with
the permit. However, the Permittee shall continue to record and submit all values reported by a
North Carolina -certified laboratory method (including field certified), even if these values fall
below 50µg/L.
3. Samples shall be collected concurrently with WET -test samples.
4. Whole Effluent Toxicity (WET) testing - testing of Ceriodaphnia dubia shall be performed as 7-day
pass/fail test at 59% effluent concentration, during January, April, July and October [See A. (2)].
Comments:
Samples shall be taken at the outfall but prior to mixing with the receiving waters.
There shall be no discharge of floating solids or foam in other than trace amounts.
Page 3 of 7

NPDES Permit NCO088897
A. (2.) CHRONIC TOXICITY PASS/FAIL MONITORING (QUARTERLY)
The permittee shall conduct quarterl chronic toxicity tests using test procedures outlined in the "North
Carolina Ceriodaphnia Chronic Effluent Bioassay Procedure," Revised December 2010, or subsequent
versions.
The effluent concentration defined as treatment two in the procedure document is 59%. The testing shall
be performed as a Ceriodaphnia dubia 7-day pass/fail test. The tests will be performed during the
months of January, April, July and October. These months signify the first month of each three
month toxicity testing quarter assigned to the facility. Effluent sampling for this testing must be
obtained during representative effluent discharge and shall be performed at the NPDES permitted final
effluent discharge below all treatment processes.
All toxicity testing results required as part of this permit condition will be entered on the Effluent
Discharge Monitoring Form (MR-1) for the month in which it was performed, using the parameter code
TGP3B. Additionally, DWR Form AT-1 (original) is to be sent to the following address:
Attention: North Carolina Division of Water Resources
Environmental Sciences Section
1621 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, N.C. 27699-1621
Completed Aquatic Toxicity Test Forms shall be filed with the Environmental Sciences Section no later
than 30 days after the end of the reporting period for which the report is made.
Test data shall be complete and accurate and include all supporting chemical/physical measurements
performed in association with the toxicity tests, as well as all dose/response data. Total residual chlorine
of the effluent toxicity sample must be measured and reported if chlorine is employed for disinfection of
the waste stream.
Should there be no discharge of flow from the facility during a month in which toxicity monitoring is
required, the permittee will complete the information located at the top of the aquatic toxicity (AT) test
form indicating the facility name, permit number, pipe number, county, and the month/year of the report
with the notation of "No Flow" in the comment area of the form. The report shall be submitted to the
Environmental Sciences Section at the address cited above.
Should the permittee fail to monitor during a month in which toxicity monitoring is required, then
monthly monitoring will begin immediately. Upon submission of a valid test, this monthly test
requirement will revert to quarterly in the months specified above.
Should any test data from this monitoring .requirement or tests performed by the North Carolina Division
of Water Resources indicate potential impacts to the receiving stream, this permit may be re -opened and
modified to include alternate monitoring requirements or limits.
If the Permittee monitors any pollutant more frequently than required by this permit, the results of such
monitoring shall be included in the calculation & reporting of the data submitted on the DMR & all AT
Forms submitted.
Page 4 of 7

NPDES Permit NCO088897
NOTE: Failure to achieve test conditions as specified in the cited document, such as minimum control
organism survival, minimum control organism reproduction, and appropriate environmental controls,
shall constitute an invalid test and will require immediate follow-up testing to be completed no later
than the last day of the month following the month of the initial monitoring.
A. (3.) ELECTRONIC REPORTING OF DISCHARGE MONITORING REPORTS
Proposed federal regulations require electronic submittal of all discharge monitoring reports (DMRs)
and specify that, if a state does not establish a system to receive such submittals, then permittees must
submit DMRs electronically to the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). The Division anticipates
that these regulations will be adopted and is beginning implementation in late 2013.
NOTE: This special condition supplements or supersedes the following sections within Part II of this
permit (Standard Conditions for NPDES Permits):
• Section B. (11.) Signatory Requirements
• Section D. (2.)
• Section D. (6.)
• Section E. (5.)
Reporting
Records Retention
Monitoring Reports
1. Reporting (Supersedes Section D. (2.) and Section E. (5.) (a)1
Beginning no later than 270 days from the effective date of this permit, .the permittee shall begin
reporting discharge monitoring data electronically using the NC DWR's Electronic Discharge
Monitoring Report (eDMR) internet application.
Monitoring results obtained during the previous month(s) shall be summarized for each month and
submitted electronically using eDMR. The eDMR system allows permitted facilities to enter
monitoring data and submit DMRs electronically using the internet. Until such time that the state's
eDMR application is compliant with EPA's Cross -Media Electronic Reporting Regulation
(CROMERR), permittees will be required to submit all discharge monitoring data to the state
electronically using eDMR and will be required to complete the eDMR submission by printing,
signing, and submitting one signed original and a copy of the computer printed eDMR to the
following address:
NC DENR / DWR / Information Processing Unit
ATTENTION: Central Files / eDMR
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
If a permittee is unable to use the eDMR system due to a demonstrated hardship or due to the facility
being physically located in an area where less than 10 percent of the households have broadband
access, then a temporary waiver from the NPDES electronic reporting requirements may be granted
and discharge monitoring data may be submitted on paper DMR forms (MR 1, 1. 1, 2, 3) or
alternative forms approved by the Director. Duplicate signed copies shall be submitted to the
mailing address above.
Page 5 of 7

NPDES Permit NCO088897
Requests for temporary waivers from the NPDES electronic reporting requirements must be
submitted in writing to the Division for written approval at least sixty (60) days prior to the date the
facility would be required under this permit to begin using eDMR. Temporary waivers shall be valid
for twelve (12) months and shall thereupon expire. At such time, DMRs shall be submitted
electronically to the Division unless the permittee re -applies for and is granted a new temporary
waiver by the Division.
Information on eDMR and application for a temporary waiver from the NPDES electronic reporting
requirements is found on the following web page:
http://portal.ncdenr.org/web/wg/admin/bog/ipu/edmr
Regardless of the submission method, the first DMR is due on the last day of the month following .
the issuance of the permit or in the case of a new facility, on the last day of the month following the
commencement of discharge.
2. Signatory Requirements [Supplements Section B. (11.) (b) and supersedes Section B. (11.) (d)l
All eDMRs submitted to the permit issuing authority shall be signed by a person described in Part II,
Section B. (11.)(a) or by a duly authorized representative of that person as described in Part H,
Section B. (11.)(b). A person, and not a position, must be delegated signatory authority for eDMR
reporting purposes.
For eDMR submissions, the person signing and submitting the DMR must obtain an eDMR user
account and login credentials to access the eDMR system. For more information on North
Carolina's eDMR system, registering for eDMR and obtaining an eDMR user account, please visit
the following web page:
http://portal.ncdenr.org/web/wq/admin/bo iipu/edmr
Certification. Any person submitting an electronic DMR using the state's eDMR system shall make
the following certification [40 CFR 122.22]. NO OTHER STATEMENTS OF CERTIFICATION
WILL BE ACCEPTED:
"I certify, under penalty of law, that this document and all attachments were prepared under my
direction or supervision in accordance with a system designed to assure that qualified personnel
properly gather and evaluate the information submitted. Based on my inquiry of the person or
persons who manage the system, or those persons directly responsible for gathering the information,
the information submitted is, to the best of my knowledge and belief, true, accurate, and complete. I
am aware that there are significant penalties for submitting false information, including the
possibility of fines and imprisonment for knowing violations. "
3. Records Retention [Supplements Section D. (6.)1
The permittee shall retain records of all Discharge Monitoring Reports, including eDMR submissions. These
records or copies shall be maintained for a period of at least 3 years from the date of the report. This period
may be extended by request of the Director at any time [40 CFR 122.41].
Page 6 of 7

NPDES Permit NCO088897
A. (4.) PERMIT RE -OPENER: WHOLE EFFLUENT TOXICITY
Whole Effluent Toxicity monitoring results indicating aquatic toxicity may result in the Division of
Water Resources re -opening this permit or requesting by letter that further action be taken. Additional
metals testing, a toxicity identification evaluation, a toxicity reduction evaluation, and/or an assessment
of discharge treatment alternatives may be requested.
Page 7of7

0
Approximate
Facility Boundary
Water Supply
Intake
0
Old Richmond Creek
[flows southwest]
Yadkin River
[flows south]
Reynolda Rd
NC Hwy 67
Outfall 001
(flows east)
Donnaha Rd
City of King
Water Treatment Plant (WTP) Facility
6949 Donnaha Road, Tobaccoville 27050 Location
AAW
Receiving Stream: Old Richmond Creek Stream Segment: 12-79 Scale 1:24,000
Drainage Basin: Yadkin -Pee Dee River Basin Sub -Basin: 03-07-02
Latitude: 36° 13' 22" Looeitude: 80° 25' 39° NPDES Permit NC0088897
Stream Class: Ws-1V HUC: 03040101 North
State Grid/USGS Ound: C17NW/Vienna,NC Forsyth County

DENR / DWR / NPDES
EXPEDITED FACT SHEET - NPDES PERMIT DEVELOPMENT
NPDES Permit NCO088897
Derek Denard. Compliance & Exnedited Permittine Unit / 919-807-6307 11Apr2014
Facility Information
Applicant/Facility Name
City of King Water Treatment Plant (WTP)
Applicant, Address
P.O. Box 1132, King, NC 27021
Facility Address,'
6949 Donnaha Road, Tobaccoville, NC 27050
Permitted Flow (MGD) ..
Not limited
T e of Waste
Water Plants and Water Conditioning Discharge — dechlorinated
filter -backwash - Conventional WTP System
Facility Class
Physical Chemical 1
County
Forsyth
Permit Status
Renewal
Regional
Office
WSRO
Stream Characteristics.
Receiving Stream
Old Richmond Creek
Stream Classification
WS-IV
Stream Segment
[12-79]
Drainage basin-
Yadkin -Pee Dee
Summer 7Q1.0 (eft).
0.3
SubbasIn_ _ "
03-07-02
Winter 7Q 10 (cfs)
0.3
Use Support "
No Data (ND)
30Q2 (cfs)
1.1
303(d) Listed. r
Not Listed
Average Flow (cfs) > ;
4.5
'State'Grid
C 17NW
C. %
59.41%
Q..
USGS'ToP
Vienna, NC
Facility Summ@U
This facility is a conventional technology water treatment plant [coagulation, flocculation, sedimentation,
and filtration] with discharge of wastewaters from media filter backwash and sedimentation basins with a
design potable flowrate of 3.0 MGD and a maximum monthly average wastewater discharge of
0.283 MGD. Because the waste flow is >50k gpd, continuous flow monitoring is required. The facility
consists of the following water and wastewater treatment units:
• three (3) clear wells [0.150 MG, 0.230 MG and 1.0 MG]
• high service pump station
• generator
• chemical storage tanks
• a decant sludge holding tank [0.300 MG ]
• wastewater pumping station
• filter belt press
• dechlorination equipment
Monthly average FLOW (MGD) — Last 36 months Jan2011-Dec2013:
[Ave 0.134 MGD; Maximum, Monthly average flow = 0.283 MGD]
Fact Sheet
Renewal 2014 -- NPDES Permit NCO088897
Page 1

Toxici — With an IWC >0.25%, this permit requires Chronic Whole Effluent Toxicity (WET) testing
using Ceriodaphnia dubia to be performed as a 7-day pass/fail test at 59% effluent concentration, during
January, April, July and October [TGP3B]. Two (2) out of the seven (7) toxicity tests over the past two
years were reported as "fail". Therefore, DWR had inserted a toxicity re -opener clause [Section A. (4.)].
Renewal Summary — This permit reflects discharge at Outfall 001. DWR updated the facility description
and Map; added parameter codes to Section A. (L); added Electronic Reporting - Discharge Monitoring
Reports page [Section A. (3.]. Added Permit Re -Opener for Whole Effluent Toxicity Monitoring
[Section A. (4.)] because of TOX test failure within two years; and removed Fluoride and Manganese
monitoring.
Stream — Discharge from WTP for Outfall 001 is into Old Richmond Creek [Stream Segment 12-79].
The segment [12-79] from source to the Yadkin River is not currently listed as impaired in the 2012 North
Carolina 303(d) List.
RPA — A Reasonable Potential Analysis (RPA) was conducted on Copper, Fluoride, Zinc, Aluminum, Iron
and Manganese effluent parameters data because Discharge Monitoring Reports (DMRs) reported
concentration above method -detection levels (MDLs) for the past four and one half (4 1 /2) years (Jul 2009-
Dec 2013). [See attached RPA summary sheets.]
• Copper did not show reasonable potential to violate state water quality standards (WQS); however,
since the predicted maximum effluent concentration was greater than 50% of the allowable
concentration, quarterly monitoring will be required.
• Fluoride did not show reasonable potential to violate state WQS; however, since the City
backwashes with fluoridated finished water fluoride should be monitored quarterly with no limit.
• Zinc showed reasonable potential to violate state water quality standards (WQS). Since Zinc has an
action level standard, quarterly monitoring will be maintained in conjunction with toxicity testing.
• Aluminum effluent data did not show reasonable potential to exceed the EPA Human Health
standard of 8000 µg /L; however, since the predicted maximum effluent concentration was greater
than 50% of the allowable concentration, quarterly monitoring will be required.
• Iron showed reasonable potential to exceed state water quality standards (WQS); however, since the
predicted maximum effluent concentration was greater than 50% of the allowable concentration,
quarterly monitoring will be required.
• Manganese did not show reasonable potential to violate state WQS; however, since the predicted
maximum effluent concentration was less than 50% of the allowable concentration, no monitoring
will be required.
Fact Sheet
Renewal -- NPDES NCO082949
Page 2

NORTH CAROLINA
FORSYTH COUNTY
AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION
Before the undersigned, a Notary Public of said County and State, duly
commissioned, qualified, and authorized by law to administer oaths, personally
appeared D.H. Stanfield, who being duly sworn, deposes and says: that he is
Controller of the Winston-Salem Journal, engaged in the publishing of a
newspaper known as the Winston-Salem Journal, published, issued and
entered as second class mail in the City of Winston-Salem, in said County and
State: that he is authorized to make this affidavit and sworn statement: that the
notice or other legal advertisement, a true copy of which is attached hereto,
was published in the Winston-Salem Journal on the following dates:
March 1, 2014
and that the said newspaper in which such notice, paper document, or legal
idvertisement was published was, at the time of each and every such
?ublication, a newspaper meeting all the requirements and qualifications of
iection 1-597 of the General Statutes of North Carolina and was a qualified
iewspaper within the meaning of Section 1-597 of the General Statutes of
Nrth Carolina.
leis 3rd day of March, 2014,
(signature ofpe so making affidavit)
*om to and subscribed before me, this 3rd day of Marc 2014
Nota P lic
Iy Commission expires: September 28, 2015
=KIMALEypt�STATE OF RTH CARR�I-r~'-S
�SE'ui
ter
PUBLIC NOTICE
North Carolina Environmental
Management Commission/NPDES Unit
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699.1617
Notice of Intent to Issue
NPDES Wastewater Permit
orth Carolina Environmental Manar
ission proposes to Issue a NPDES wi
notice.
on NY
n our
be
Yadkin F
old
has
mq uucoaiges [rearea oomesuc ano commer.
wastewater to an unnamed tributary to the
Ikin River in the Yadkin -Pee Dee River Basin.
rently ammonia nitrogen, dissolved oxygen
total residual chlorine are water dqualittyy imit-
This discharge may affect future allocaflons In
WSJ: March 1. 2014

i
CCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Resources
Water Quality Programs
Pat McCrory Thomas A. Reeder John Skvada III
Governor Director Secretary
February 21, 2014
ti tt Ls_►ll h7
To: Eric Hudson (DWMWSS)
Regional Engineer
Winston-Salem Regional Office
From: Derek C. Denard�
DWQ / NPDES Program
919-807-6307; Fax [phone]; [e-mail]
Subject: Review ofDischarge to a UT to the Old Richmond Creek (WS-IV), Yadkin -Pee Dee River Basin
Renewal of Individual NPDES Permit for Existing conventional technology Water Treatment Plant
for: NPDES NCO088897
City of King WTP
located at 6949 Donnaha Road, Tobaccoville 27050
Forsyth County
Please provide your comments, if possible, by April 4, 2014 [email OK]
RESPONSE:
I have reviewed the draft permit and determined that the proposed discharge is not located
sufficiently close to any existing or known proposed public water supply intake so as to create an
adverse effect on water quality. The DWR concurs with the issuance of this permit provided the
Permittee properly operates and maintains the facility; the Permittee meets the stated effluent limits
prior to discharge; and the discharge does not contravene the designated water quality standards.
I concur with issuance of the above permit provided the following conditions are met:
I oppose the issuance of the above permit based on reasons stated below, or attached:
Signed:
cc: file
1617 Mail Service Center, Ralegh, North Carolina 27699-1617
Location: 512 N. Salisbury St Raleth, North Carolina 27604
Phone: [phone]I FAX: [phone] Customer Service:1-877-623-6748
Internet www.naralerquaRy.org
An Equal Opportunityl,AennesveActlon Employer
Date: Y/2- c--/ y

lfoL-1 4Act C. t e ot5
Denard, Derek
From: Boone, Ron
Sent: Wednesday, March 12, 2014 1:10 PM
To: Denard, Derek
Subject: RE: Renewal Draft City of King WTP NC0088897
Derek,
I have no questions or concerns about reissuance of the subject permit, NC0088897, King WTP.
Thanks,
Ron
Ron Boone
NC DENR Winston-Salem Regional Office
Division of Water Resources, Surface Water Protection
585 Waughtown Street
Winston-Salem, NC 27107
Email: [e-mail]
Voice: [phone]
FAX: [phone]
E-mail correspondence to and from this address may be subject to the North Carolina Public Records Law and may be
disclosed to third parties.
From: Denard, Derek
Sent: Wednesday, March 12, 2014 12:01 PM
To: Boone, Ron
Subject: Renewal Draft City of King WTP NC0088897
Not sure if this got passed on to you. You have Forsyth County? I had to correct the coordinates and subbasin
number. Let me know how it looks. Thanks.
Derek
Derek C Denard
ROM EfM=menWUeda&t
NMEM DbW= at water Resewces
water Qua v Pernittfi g section
Wastewater emrg h
Cbmpbm &UM
(919) 807 M7
derelcdenwd@nCMW4ar
1Q7 Ma3 s=ViC=eadV- wed9h. "C ZM9_1W
btW/pondricdmr orglkab/wq/snpAWnpda
E-mail correspondence to and from this address may be subject to the North Carolina Public Records Law and may be
disclosed to third parties.
1

Pe V ,n fe C C 6 &""egjl's
Denard, Derek
From: Denard, Derek
Sent: Monday, March 10, 201412:13 PM
To: 'Scott Barrow'
Subject: RE: Draft NPDES Permit NC0088897
Attachments: Derek C Denard.vcf
Scott,
I was using the clear well volumes -used on the April 30, 2013 diagram, if this was the right one, titled "City of King WTP —
Existing Facility, Including Division I". If 0.135, 0.235 and 1.0 MGD are correct, I will use these to update the draft. You
may want to update this diagram for any future use.
As for the monthly average discharge of 0.283 MGD, it is not meant to be a limit in this permit. According to our
permitting strategy for Water Treatment Plants, we are not giving limits. If you look carefully at the limits page 3 of the
draft, there is not a limit indicated for flow. The 0.283 MGD monthly average discharge is being used as a facility
description, along with the potable flowrate of 3.0 MGD, in the permit. Nothing regarding flow monitoring has changed
from you previous permit.
I will make the changes for the clear wells. If you have anything else to add, please let me know by April 4, 2014.
Thanks,
Derek
AM Derek C Denard
rlhiammem lSpaaaut
NWEWWsiWGfWaWRM=w
Water Quargr Pemut ft Setidw
Waste raw 8raech
eogfam & B pecow Petnutti I Umt
dw*A mard@r,Ww.gm
1W MO UW=Cantor, Ug4h, HC MOO-=
��%o�nala^rot9����Ddas
E-mail correspondence to and from this address may be subject to the North Carolina Public Records law and may be
disclosed to third parties.
From: Scott Barrow [mailto:sbarrow@)ci.king.nc.usl
Sent: Monday, March 10, 2014 11:43 AM
To: Denard, Derek
Cc: Kenneth Gentry
Subject: Draft NPDES Permit NC0088897
Derek,
We have reed and reviewed your draft permit and have only a couple of comments:
1) The 3 clear wells are 0.135MG, 0.235MG and 1.0 MG;
2) Monthly average discharge of 0.283 MGD may be hard to meet. With the existing conditions of the WTP. Once
the new WTP is complete it may not be an issue. We have looked at the last 5 months discharge of 0.255, 0.178,

0.283, 0.397 and 0.252 and see that we would match one and exceed another. The City would hate to get a NOV
for exceeding this discharge amount on the old WTP when the new WTP is under construction. Could this
amount be raised or left out completely? Our previous permit did not have a discharge amount.
Thanks,
Scott Barrow
City of King
NOTICE: Please be advised that this electronic mail transmission, along with any other electronic mail transmissions for which I am the recipient, is subject to
disclosure in accordance with the North Carolina Public Records Act, N.C.G.S. 132-1 et. seq. unless the information contained therein falls within one of the limited
number of exceptions to the North Carolina Public Records Act. Before transmitting any personal information or any information which you deem confidential,
please consider that the contents of your electronic transmission, and my responses thereto, will be subject to disclosure to any and all persons, including the
media, who may request a copy of my e-mails.

Denard, Derek
From:
Denard, Derek
Sent:
Wednesday, March 12, 2014 12:07 PM
To:
Meadows, Susan
Subject:
Renewal Draft City of King NCO088897
Attachments:
Derek C Denard.vcf,, NCO08887 City of King Draft.pdf, NCO08887 City of King Fact
Sheet.pdf
Please find an attached copy of the draft permit and fad sheet for the renewal of the City of King permit NCO088897 for
your review. They have failed toxicity for 2 out of 7 quarterly samples (with an 8th waived) in the past 2 years. This draft
permit has a re -opener clause.
�Q Derek C Denard
Errraonm MW Spedaf tt
NCDENR D-VWW of Wats Reww
Water quality POrMdting section
Wastewatergranch
Compfame& bpe&Ed Permitting Unrt
(919)W-M7
&aekdenardpncderv-9m
1517AW Soma Cants, Ratagh, NC27699-1617
httpYtparbin W anroyM�MVhaprCF'ntds
E-mail correspondence to and from this address may be subject to the North Carolina Public Records Law and may be
disclosed to third parties.

City of King 2014 Freshwater RPA - 95% Probability/95% Confidence
NCO088897 MAXIMUM DATA POINTS = 58
Qw(MGD)= 0.28
WWTP/WTP Class: PC
1QIOS(cfs)= 0.26
IWC @ iQ10S = 62.81%
7QIOS(cfs)= 0.30
IWC 07QIOS= 59.41%
7QIOW(cfs)= 0.30
1WC@7QIi 59.41%
30Q2 (cfs) = 1.10
IWC @ 30Q2 = 28.53%
Avg. Stream Flow, QA (cfs) = 4.50
IWC @ QA = 8.89%
Receiving Stream: Old Richmond Creek
Stream Class: WS-IV
Outfall 001
Ow = 0.283258 MGD
PARAMETER
STANDARDS & CRITERIA (2)
REASONABLE POTENTIAL RESULTS
RECOMMENDED ACTION
TYPE
J
r
(1)
NC WQS / Applied V2 FAV /
a
�
Pried
Pd
n # Del. Allowable Cw
Chronic Standard Acute
Cw
Acute: 12
Copper (AL)
NC
7 FaV(7Q105) 7.3
5
ug/L
9 2 9
_ _ _______ ____
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
Note: n59 Default C.V.
Chronic: 12
___
No RP. Predicted Max 250% of Allowable Cw
Limited data set
No value> Allowable Cw
apply Ouarterly Monitoring
Acute: NO WQS
Fluoride
INC
1800 FW(7Q10s)
100
ti
14 10
1120
__ _ ___ ___
_ _ _ _
__
Chronic: 3030
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
No RP Predicted Max <50 % of Allowable Cw - No
No value> Allowable Cw
Monitoring required
Acute: 107
Zinc (AL)
NC
50 FW(7Q10s) 67
10
ug/L
9 6 1003
__ _ _____ _ ____
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ___
Note: n<9 Default C.V.
Chnic: 84
ro
FP for AL(Cu,Zn,Ag,Fe,CO-apply Quarterly
Limited data set
2 valuc(s)> Allowable Cw
Monitoring in conjunction with TOX Test
Acute: NO WQS
Aluminum
NC
S000 HH(7QIOs)
itVL
I II
7"0
_
_ _ __
Chronic: 13466
_ _ Pr_ ___
No RP , edicted aMax 50 %of Allowable Ow
No value> Allowable Cw
apply Quarterly Monitoring
Acute: NO WQS
Iron
NC
1000 FW(7QIOs)
pg/L
11 11
1650
_ _ _____ ____
Chronic: 1683
__
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ —Cw—
No RP, PretliIXetl Max '- 50% of Allowable
No value> Allowable Cw
apply Quarterly Monitoring
Acute: NO WQS
htanganesc
NC
200 WS(7QIOs)
pg/L
8 8 139
Note: n < 9 Default C.V.
Chronic: 337
'lue>
_
No RP Predicted Max <50%of Allowable Cw - No
Limited date set
No Allowable Cw
Monitoring required
NC0098897 King WTP 9595 FRESHWATER RPA20141.xlsm, rya
Page 1 of 1 2/19/2014

2014 Freshwater RPA - 95% Probability/95% Confidence
MAXIMUM DATA POINTS = 58
REQUIRED DATA ENTRY
Table 1. Project Information
❑ CHECK IF HQW OR ORW w
Facility Name
W WTP/WTP Class
NPDES Permit
Outfall
Flow, Ow (MGD)
Receiving Stream
Stream Class
7010s (cfs)
7010w (cfs)
30C12 (cfs)
CIA (cfs)
1010s (cfs)
Data Source(s)
❑ CHECK TO APPLY MODEL
To appy Model IWC %:
Flow, Ow (MGD) entered
adjust 7010s (cfs) value
until chronic IWC %
obtained. 1010s (cfs)
defined by program.
City of King
PC
NC0088897
001
0.283
Old Richmond Creek
WS-IV
0.30
0.30
1.10
4.50
C.26
Follow directions for data entry. In some cases a
comment menu list the available choices or a
dropdown menu will provide a list you may select
from. Error message occur if data entry does not
meet input criteria.
Par01
Par02
Par03
Par04
C Parts
ParO6
Par07
C Pares
C Par09
C ParlD
C Parl1
Par12
Par13
Par14
Pails
Par16
Par17
Parts
Paris
Par20
Par21
Par22
Table 2. Parameters of Concern
Name Type Chronic Modifier Acute
0
w
a
POL Units
ff
Ll
❑
Copper (AL)
NC
7
FW
7.3
5
ug/L
❑
EJ
Fluoride
NC
1,800
FW
100
ug/L
❑
El
El
El
11
Zinc (AL)
NC
5o
FW
67
10
ug/L
❑
Aluminum
NC
8000
HH
µg/L
❑
Iron
NC
1000
FW
µg/L
❑
Manganese
NC
200
WS
µgtL
❑
NCO088897 King WTP 9595 FRESHWATER RPA20141.xism, input
2tl8/2014

REASONABLE POTENTIAL ANALYSIS
9
Copper (AL)
Use PASTE
SPECIAL -Values"
men"COPY".
11
U.o"PASTE
SPECIAL.Values"
than•corY•'.
18
Zinc
(AL)
Use"PASTE
SPECIAL -Values"
then "COPY".
Fluoride
Maximum data
Maximum data
Maximum data points
point. _5a
_56
points =58
Date
Data
BDL=1/2DL
Results
Date
Data
BDL=1/2DL
Results
Date
Data BDL_t/2DL
Results
1
7/12/2011
2
2.5
Sid Dev.
t2500
1
10/27/2010
100
50
Sid Dev.
233.1627
1
7/12/2011
554
554
Sid Dev.
215.2510
2
10/14/2011
2
2.5
Mean
3.3333
2
1/5/2011
100
50
Mean
284.2857
2
10/14/2011
439
439
Mean
120.6667
3
1/2412012
2
2.5
C.V.(default)
0.6000
3
4/5/2011
100
50
C.V.
0.8202
3
1/24/2012
5
5
C.V.(default)
0.6000
4
4/3/2012
5
5
n
9
4
7/12/2011
300
300
n
14
4
4/3/2012
10
10
IT
9
5
7/10/2012
10
5
5
1/6/2012
590
59D
5
7/10/2012
10
5
6
10/2/2012
10
5
Mull Factor =
1.81
6
1/16/2012
640
640
Mull Factor.
1.75
6
1002012
10
5
Mull Factor =
1.81
7
1/8/2013
5
2.5
Max. Value
5.0 ug/L
7
1/24/2012
610
610
Max. Value
640.0 ug/L
7
1/8/2013
16
16
Max. Value
554.0 ugrL
8
4/2/2013
5
I
2.5
Max. Pred Cw
9.1 ug/L
8
4/3/2012
590
590
Max. Pred Cw
1120.0 ug/L
8
4/2/2013
38
38
Max. Prod Cw
1002.7 ug/L
9
10/8/2013
5
2.5
9
4/18/2012
4 330
330
-
9
10/812013
14
14
10
10
7/10/2012
300
300
10
11
11
10/2/2012
100
100
11
12
12
1/8/2013
150
150
12
13
13
4/2/2013
< 100
50
13
14
14
10/8/2013
170
170
14
NCO088897 King WTP 9595 FRESHWATER RPA20141.xism, data
- 1 - 2/19/2014

19
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
REASONABLE POTENTIAL ANALYSIS
Usa"PASTE 20
SPECIAL -Values"
Aluminum rnan"copy". Iron
Maxlmum tlata
Dale Data BDL-1/2DL Results points = SB Date Data BDL-1/20L Results
10/17/2010 2680 2680 Sid Dev. 1248.4765 1 10/27/2010 794 794 Sid Dev.
1/5/2011 494 494 Mean 1680.6364 2 1/5/2011 143 143 Mean
4/5/2011 2960 2960 C.V. 0.7429 3 415/2011 744 744 C.V.
7/12/2011 928 928 n 11 4 7/12/2011 419 419 n
10/14/2011 634 634 5 1/24/2012 249 249
1/24/2012 789 789 Mutt Factor = 1.86 6 4/4/2012 80 80 Mutt Factor=
4/3/2012 390 390 Max. Value 4000.0 pg/L 7 7/10/2012 265 265 Max. Value
7/10/2012 742 742 Max. Pred Cw 7440.0 pg/L 8 10/2/2012 776 776 Max. Fred Cw
10/2/2012 2540 2540 9 1/8/2013 450 450
1/8/2013 2330 2330 10 4/2/2013 574 574
4/2/2113 4000 4000 11 10/8/2013 982 982
12
13
14
Use "PASTE
21
USa"PASTL-E
SPECIA
SPECIAL.Valuas"
Iran 'COPY,.
Manganese
Values'"them
"COPY".
Maximum dam
points _ 58
maximum data
1
Date
7/12/2011
Data BDL-1/2DL
73
Results
73 Sid Dev.
paints=se
23.1513
298.5015
497.8182
2
1/24/2012
16
16 Mean
33.3750
0.5996
3
4/3/2012
13
13 C.V. (default)
0.6000
11
4
7/10/2012
48
48 n
8
5
10/2/2012
20
20
1.68
6
1/8/2013
20
20 Mutt Factor=
1.90
982.0 pg/L
7
4/2/2013
18
18 Max. Value
73.0 pg4
1649.8 pgtL
8
10/812013
59
59 Max. Fred Cw
138.7 pg4
9
10
11
12
13
14
NCO088897 King WTP 9595 FRESHWATER RPA20141.xism, data
-2- 2/19/2014

IWC Calculations
Facility: City of King
NCO088897
Prepared By: Derek Denard
Enter Design Flow (MGD): 0.283258
Enter s7Q10 (cfs): 0.3
Enter w7Q10 cfs : 0.3
Total Residual Chlorine (TRC) Ammonia (Summer)
Daily Maximum Limit (ug/1) Monthly Average Limit (mg NH3-N/1)
s7Q10 (CFS)
0.3
s7Q10 (CFS)
0.3
DESIGN FLOW (MGD)
0.283258
DESIGN FLOW (MGD)
0.28326
DESIGN FLOW (CFS)
0.43905
DESIGN FLOW (CFS)
0.43905
STREAM STD (UG/L)
17.0
STREAM STD (MG/L)
1.0
Upstream Bkgd (ug/1)
0
Upstream Bkgd (mg/1)
0.22
IWC (%)
59.41
IWC (%)
59.41
Allowable Conc. (ug/1)
29
Allowable Conc. (mg/1)
1.5
Ammonia (Winter)
Monthly Average Limit (mg NH3-N/1)
Fecal Coliform
w7Q10 (CFS)
0.3
Monthly Average Limit:
200/100m1
DESIGN FLOW (MGD)
0.28326
(If DF >331; Monitor)
DESIGN FLOW (CFS)
0.43905
(If DF<331; Limit)
STREAM STD (MG/L)
1.8
Dilution Factor (DF)
1.68
Upstream Bkgd (mg/1)
0.22
IWC (%)
59.41
Allowable Conc. (mg/1)
2.9
Total Residual Chlorine
1. Cap Daily Max limit at 28 ug/I to protect for acute toxicity
Ammonia (as NH3-N)
1. If Allowable Conc > 35 mg/l, Monitor Only
2. Monthly Avg limit x 3 = Weekly Avg limit (Municipals); capped at 35 mg/I
3. Monthly Avg limit x 5 = Daily Max limit (Non-Munis); capped at 35 mg/I
4. BAT for Minor Domestics: 2 mg/I (summer) and 4 mg/I (winter)
5. BAT for Major Municipals: 1 mg/I (year-round)
Fecal Coliform
1. Monthly Avg limit x 2 = 400/100 ml = Weekly Avg limit (Municipals) = Daily Max limit (Non -Muni)
NPDES Server/Current Versions/WLA; TB 1/16/2009

--rok 1) �/�
Permit Version Facility Outfa Month Day Year Comment Parameter
NC0088897 1.00
City of King - 001
7 12
2011 Wail
TGP3B - P/F STATRE May Chr Ceriodaphnia
NC0088897 1.00
City of King - 001
1 24
2012 2-fail
TGP3B - P/F STATRE May Chr Ceriodaphnia
NC0088898 1.00
City of King - 001
10 2
2012 Wail
TGP3B - PIF STATRE May Chr Ceriodaphnia
NC0088897 1.00
City of King - 001
4 3
2012 Wall
TGP3B - P/F STATRE May Chr Ceriodaphnia
NC0088897 1.00
City of King - 001
7 10
2012
TGP3B - P/F STATRE May Chr Ceriodaphnia
NC0088897 1.00
City of King - 001
1 8
2013
TGP36 - P/F STATRE May Chr Ceriodaphnia
NC0088897 1.00
City of King - 001
4 2
2013 pass =1
TGP3B - P/F STATRE May Chr Ceriodaphnia
NC0088897 1.00
City of King - 001
7 2
2013 pass =1
TGP3B - P/F STATRE May Chr Ceriodaphnia
NC0088897 1.00
City of King - 001
10 8
2013 pass = 1
TGP3B - P/F STATRE May Chr Ceriodaphnia
UoM
Value Cell Type Loc date
pass/fail
2. DLYVALUE Effluent
pass/fail
2. DLYVALUE Effluent
pass/fail
2. DLYVALUE Effluent from DMR
pass/fail
2. DLYVALUE Effluent
pass/fail
1. DLYVALUE Effluent
pass/fail
1. DLYVALUE Effluent
pass/fail
1. DLYVALUE Effluent
pass/fail
1. DLYVALUE Effluent
pass/fail
1. DLYVALUE Effluent

TY OF KING
P.O. Drawer 1132
King, NC 27021-1132
8/22/2013
Re: NPDES Permit renewal
To Mr. Charles H. Weaver:
The purpose of this letter is to request the
permit, all construction of Phase 1 of
icoral
�; .r
operation. Construction included the°hstall4,
Jack Warren, Mayor
Jerry Rothrock, Interim City Manager
Scott Barrow, City Engineer
229 S. Main Street
Telephone [phone]
Fax [phone]
nit NC0088897. Since issuance of the previous
60rovements project are complete and in
and building, a wastewater pumping station, a
300,000 gallon decant tank and --"a- ipin .All of this project`replaced where the�old sludge drying beds were once
located. Please see attached diag'ra, ': s. a have :also installed- a'! -me, er and' SCAQA to monitor our wastewater
volumes. Our sludge manage i'e lan .consist _of hauling=`theedewater'ed_'slud ,e' ro_9 the belt filter press to the
landfill. ,L
Sincerely, ° T°
T. Scott Barrow
. r J a 1J l 1 y
City Engineer
z .,* � C t ..L �`C .* , y . �» t ' r .f .l• tt`. ti'�t
z
jj f `-» iRJ .,' n�ii'11. 'Yfir ��1 � �{rtt �t 1""'K.1 '� ♦e 4T � 3
= Jt _ -.i y, C" '•32 9 rz �}� a t ttoa $' .+. . �:.(• ,
F. -i1 .�; rs,� i ;r<✓ o F�", _ -tad
� � 1 s' ] Z y:'� ��x.y.--.^^.� �-'rs.�XC•ti LCZ t 3^F
\r .•.. V
COUNCILMEN
Mayor ProTem Dillard Burnette — Charles Allen — Brian Carico — Wesley Carter

NPDES PERMIT APPLICATION - SHORT FORM C - WTP
1101.4
For discharges associated with water treatment plants
�� f i
zz
Mail the com
complete application to:
P PP
N. C. Department
c�nj°
Q�
?I
of Environment and Natural Resources
C.
Division of Water Quality / NPDES Unit
°0D
L
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
-
w
NPDES Permit Number INCO088897
If you are completing this form in computer use the TAB key or the up - down arrows to moue from one
field to the next. To check the boxes, click your mouse on top of the box. Otherwise, please print or type.
1. Contact Information:
Owner Name
City of King
Facility Name
City of King Water Treatment Plant
Mailing Address
P.O. Box 1132
City
King
State / Zip Code
NC / 27021
Telephone Number
[phone]
Fax Number
[phone]
e-mail Address
[e-mail]
2. Location of facility producing discharge:
Check here if same as above ❑
Street Address or State Road 6949 Donnaha Road
City
Tobaccoville
State / Zip Code
NC / 27050
County
Forsyth
3. Operator Information:
Name of the firm, consultant or other entity that operates the facility. (Note that this is not referring to the
Operator in Responsible Charge or ORC)
Name
Mailing Address
City
State / Zip Code
Telephone Number ( )
Fax Number ( )
4. Ownership Status:
Federal ❑ State ❑ Private ❑ Public
Page 1 of 3 Version 5/2012

NPDES PERMIT APPLICATION - SHORT FORM C - WTP
For discharges associated with water treatment plants
5. Type of treatment plant:
® Conventional (Includes coagulation, flocculation, and sedimentation, usually followed by
filtration and disinfection)
❑ Ion Exchange (Sodium Cycle Cationic ion exchange)
❑ Green Sand Filter (No sodium recharge)
❑ Membrane Technology (RO, nanofiltration)
Check here if the treatment process also uses a water softener ❑
6. Description of source water(s) (i.e. groundwater, surface water)
Surface water from the Yadkin River
7. Describe the treatment process (es) for the raw water:
Conventional treatment; coagulation, flocculation, sedimentation, filtration and disinfection.
S. Describe the wastewater and the treatment process(es) for wastewater generated by the
facility
Filter backwash water uses treated finished water to wash filters. NOW, Phase 1 of our WTP
improvements is complete, which included wastewater pumping station, 300,000 gallon decant
tank, yard piping, belt filter press and dechlorination equipment. The existing drying beds were
converted to the Phase 1 improvements. The dewatered sludge is then hauled to the landfill for
final disposal.
9. Number of separate discharge points: 1
Outfall Identification number(s)
10. Frequency of discharge: Continuous ❑ Intermittent
If intermittent:
Days per week discharge occurs: 7
11. Plant design potable flowrate 3.0 MGD
Backwash or reject flow 0.1 MGD
Duration: 25 minutes
12. Name of receiving stream(s) (Provide a map showing the exact location of each outfall, including
latitude and longitude):
Old Richmond Creek - 36 deg. 13' 15" latitude and 80 deg. 26' 51" longitude
13. Please list all water treatment additives, including cleaning chemicals or disinfection
treatments, that have the potential to be discharged.
Alum / aluminum sulfate Yes x No
Page 2 of 3 Version 5/2012

NPDES PERMIT APPLICATION - SHORT FORM C - WTP
For discharges associated with water treatment plants
Iron sulfate / ferrous sulfate Yes No x
Fluoride Yes x No
Ammonia nitrogen / Chloramines Yes No x
Zinc -orthophosphate or sweetwater CP1236 Yes x No
List any other additives below:
Chlorine gas
14. Is this facility located on Indian country? (check one)
Yes ❑ No
15. Additional Information:
Provide a schematic of flow through the facility, include flow volumes at all points in
the water treatment process. The plan should show the point[s] of addition for
chemicals and all discharges routed to an outfall [including stormwater].
Solids Handling Plan
16. NEW Applicants
Information needed in addition to items 1-15:
New applicants must contact a permit coordinator with the NCDENR Customer
Service Center.
Was the Customer Service Center contacted? ❑ Yes ❑ No
Analyses of source water collected
Engineering Alternative Analysis
Discharges from Ion Exchange and Reverse Osmosis plants shall be evaluated using a
water quality model.
17. Applicant Certification
I certify that I am familiar with the information contained in the application and that to the
best of my knowledge and belief such information is true, complete, and accurate.
T. Scott Barrow City Enizineer
Printed -name of Perso nina Title
of Applicant
t6-zz 13
Date
Math Carolina General Statute 143-215.6 (b)(2) provides that Any person who knowingly makes any false statement representation, or certification in any application,
record, report, plan, or other document files or required to be maintained under Article 21 or regulations of the Environmental Management Commission implementing that
Article, or who falsifies, tampers with, or knowingly renders Inaccurate any recording or monitoring device or method required to be operated or maintained under Article 21
or regulations of the Environmental Management Commission implementing that Article, shall be guilty of a misdemeanor punishable by a fine not to exceed $25,000, or by
imprisonment not to exceed six months, or by both. (18 U.S.C. Section 1001 provides a punishment by a fine of not more than $25,000 or imprisonment not more than 5
years, or both, for a similar offense.)
Page 3 of 3 Version 5/2012

City of King WTP - Existing Facility, Including Division I
Existing Chemical
Storage Tanks
Existing
Filter Building
as
�o
,ca
ca
oc
O
-K
Wastewater
Pumping
Station
(Div. 1) k
Existing
Generator
(Div. 1)
Existing Sodium
Hypochlorite
Building z .
Existing
Utility Shed
Existing Flash Mixer,
Flocculation &
Sedimentation Basins
150,000 Gal
Clearwell
230,000 Gals
Clearwell
�J
1.0 MG
Clearwell
Existing
High Service
1
Pump Station
New Sludge New Filter Belt
Holding Tank Press Building
(Div. 1) (Div.I
Cityof King WTP April 30, 2013 Page 2 A_COM

�., T_ /
J,a+ 1 t �M`" r .� ,.. I N � �� i ice;.
rS�`. 1, 1 �� � � da
� ,P
'z,:w�.. � . , A :., "A :�

City of King WTP - Division III
City of King WTP April 30, 2013 Page 3
AXOM

�M
-r
1983
CITY OF KING
SLUDGE MANAGEMENT PLAN
2012
Division I construction will contain all process wastewater handling facilities and
equipment including: upgrade to the existing wastewater pump station, a filter belt press
building which will house a 1.0 meter belt press and ancillary equipment, new 300,000
gallon sludge decant/thickening tank, de -chlorination equipment, seven new manholes,
new controls, and electrical modifications. Pipeline extensions and reroutes will be
constructed to carry the wastewater to the existing discharge point. After Division I is
complete and the new process wastewater handling facilities and equipment are online,
the WTP will be discharging a maximum of 285,000 GPD of decant water to Old
Richmond Creek in accordance with a new NPDES permit. This flow will only occur
when an entire sedimentation basin is drained to clean out the sludge and the existing
filters are being backwashed. Otherwise, only 45,000 gallons of filter backwash water
and belt press wash water will be discharged to the creek. The dewatered sludge will be
transported to the City of Winston-Salem landfill for disposal.
6/21/2012