NC0089061_NC0089061_Complete File_20150706_20150706

NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Pat McCrory Donald van der Vaart
Governor Secretary
July 6, 2015
Mr. John R. Townson
Environmental Management Director
PSC Box 20005
Camp Lejeune, NC 28542-0005
Laserfiche
Subject: Rescission of NPDES Permit NCO089061
Borrow Pits 2 & 3
Rescission of NPDES Permit NCO089079
Borrow Pit 10
Onslow County
Dear Mr. Townson:
The Division has reviewed your permit rescission requests received on
June 30, 2015. The Division has no objection to your request. Therefore,
NPDES permits NCO089061 and NCO089079 are rescinded, effective immediately.
If in the future your organization wishes to discharge wastewater to
the State's surface waters, it must first apply for and receive a new
NPDES permit.
If you have any questions concerning this matter, please contact Charles H.
Weaver at [phone] or via e-mail [[e-mail]].
S�,nc rely,
VVJayPimrmerman, Director
OF Division of Water Resources
cc: Central Files
Wilmington Regional Office / Jim Gregson
NPDES Unit
Teresa Revis / Budget
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617 512 North Salisbury Street, Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
Phone: [phone] / FAX [phone] / Internet: www.ncwaterquality.org
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer - 509/6 Recycled/101/6 Post Consumer Paper

r
Weaver, Charles
From: Bowden, Kevin
Sent: Tuesday, June 30, 2015 2:48 PM
To: Weaver, Charles; Chernikov, Sergei
Subject: permit rescission requests for NC0089061 and NC0089079 - Borrow Pits - Camp
Lejeune
Attachments: BORROW_PITS_2_3_10_RESCIS SION_PKG.pdf
Charles and Sergei,
Not sure who is supposed to receive this, but Page 2 of the attachment contains the rescission request for both permits,
along with additional information. For some reason, the request was addressed to Nathaniel. WIRO concurs with
permit rescission.
Thanks. kevin
Kevin Bowden
Division of Water Resources
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
(phone) 919.807.6397, (fax) 919.807.6494, (e-mail)
E-mail correspondence to and from this address maybe subject to the North Carolina Public Records Law and maybe disclosed to third parties unless the content
is exempt by statute or other regulation.

Official Document Inventory Jan 12015 to present-llbrrow Pits 2, 3, and 10 Permit Resc... Page 1 of 1
Official Document Inventory Jan 1 2015 to Present ►
Official Document Inventory Jan 1 2015 to present:
Borrow Pits 2, 3, and 10 Permit Rescission NCO089061 Tags&
NCO089079 Notes
ID# 21391
Document Type Correspondence
Document Title Borrow Pits 2, 3, and 10 Permit Rescission NCO089061 NCO089079
Date Received/Created 5/29/2015
Date Signed
Mail Status Outgoing
Document Status Final
Author MCBCL/EMD
Program 5090.20.1 Water Quality
Keywords NCO089079 NCO089061 Borrow Pit
Building/Room # Bldg 12/Rm 236
Storage Bookcase 6 1 1"1fl
C / V�
Route EQ Lowder Cant Woodall Townson
�•
Mailing Instructions Certifi d
Comments
Working File Link Lejeune Working Files - 5090_20.1 Water Quality - Borrow_Pits_2_3_10
Director Comments
Permament Yes
Attachments Enclosure_1_NC0089061_Cover Page.pdf
Enclosure 2_NC0089079 Cover_Page.pdf
Enclosure 3_NPDES_Insp_Rpt_NC0089061.pdf
Enclosure 9 NPDES_Insp_Rpt_NC0089079.pdf
Created at 5/29/2015 9:40 AM by Acosta CIV Lauren D
Last modified at 5/29/2015 9:40 AM by Acosta CIV Lauren D
Close
https://em.usme.mil/Siteslle/hd/Lists/Official%2ODocument%20Inventoiy%2OJan%201 %2... 5/29/2015

a
UNITED STATES MARINE CORPS
MARINE CORPS INSTALLATIONS EAST -MARINE CORPS BASE
PSC BOX 20005
• �� CAMP LEJEUNE NC 28542-0005
5090.20
BEMD
JUN 0 3 2015
Mr. Nathaniel Thornburg
North Carolina Department of Environment
And Natural Resources
Division of Water Resources
Water Quality Permitting Section-NPDES
Non -Discharge Permitting Unit
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
Dear Mr. Thornburg:
Marine Corps Installations East -Marine Corps Base Camp Lejeune
(MCIEAST-MCB CAMLEJ) was issued two National Pollutant Discharge
Elimination System (NPDES) individual permits associated with wet
mining/dewatering for borrow pits 2 and 3, permit number NC0089061,
and borrow pit 10, permit number NCO089079 on 23 June 2011 and 27
April 2011 respectively. Enclosures (1) and (2) contain the cover
page for each permit. MCIEAST-MCB CAMLEJ requests permit rescissions
for both of the aforementioned NPDES permits.
All site work within each of these borrow pits is complete,
Ms. Joanne Steenhuis, with the Division of Water Resources (DWR)
Wilmington Regional Office (WRO), conducted an inspection of borrow
pits 2, 3, and 10 on 27 May 2015. All borrow pits were considered to
be in compliance. Copies of these inspection reports are included as
Enclosures (3) and (4).
If you have any questions or need any clarification on the
information provided, contact Lauren Acosta, Environmental Quality
Branch, Environmental Management Division, G-F, at [phone].
Enclosure(s): 1. Permit NCO089061
2. Permit NCO089079
3. NPDES Compliance
Pits 2 & 3
4. NPDES Compliance
Pit 10
Sincerely,
OU R. TOWNSON
Director, Environmental Management
By direction of
the Commanding General
Cover Page
Cover Page
Inspection Report for Borrow
Inspection Report for Borrow

7)
NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Pat McCrory
Governor
May 28, 2015
Mr. Neal Paul, Deputy Public Works Officer
Public Works Division
MCB Camp Lejeune
1005 Michael Road
Camp Lejeune, NC 28542
Subject: NPDES Compliance Inspection Report
Borrow Pits 2 & 3
Brewster Boulevard, MCB Camp Lejeune
NPDES Individual Permit No. NCO089061
Dear Mr. Paul;
Donald R. van der Vaart
Secretary
A site Inspection was conducted for Borrow Pits 2 & 3 located off Brewster Boulevard In Camp Lejeune. I
conducted the inspection on May 27, 2015 and met with Mike Taylor from EMD. The Division of Water
Resources (Division) appreciates the assistance and information provided by Mike Taylor and information
provided by Carl Owen during the inspection procedure.
Borrow pits 2 & 3 are covered under an NPDES Individual Permit NC 0089061 for discharges of wastewater
associated with wet mining/dewatering. It is my understanding that during the mining of pit 3, there was
no discharge to Northeast Creek. It is also my understanding that the pit Is now reclaimed (although you
still will have to officially close it out with the Division of Energy, Mining and Land Resources). Pit 2 was
never excavated and it is my understanding that the MCB Camp Lejeune will not be using this site for
borrow.
I have enclosed a copy of the Inspection details. At this time, you are considered to be in compliance and
the Wilmington Regional Office recommends and supports Camp Lejeune requesting a rescission of the
NPDES Permit NC0089061. If you have any questions concerning this correspondence, please do not
hesitate to contact me at 910.796.7306. 1 will be glad to assist you. I have also enclosed a copy of the
inspection report.
Sincerely
Joanne Steenhuis
Senior Env(ronmental Specialist
Water Quality Regional Operations Section
Wilmington Regional Office
Division of Water Resources, NCDENR
Enclosure: Inspection report
127 Cardinal Drive Extension, Wilmington, North Carolina 28405
Phone: [phone]\ Internet: www.ncdenr.Kov
MEqualOppoduniA IArfirmaMAdknEmployer-Madeinparttryrecycledpow
Enclosure (3)

United States EnruorvneNal Protection Age"
Form Approved.
EPA wasw,glon, D.O.20460
OMB No. 2040.0057
Water Compliance Inspection Report
Approval expires8-31-98
Section A: National Data System Coding (i.e., PCS)
Transaction Code NPDES ydmolday Inspection Type Inspector Feo Type
1 IN 1 2 16 1 3 I NCO089061 111 12 15/oe/2e 17
18 I C I 191 t t 20[_j
211111 11111IIIIIIII I II I I I I I I IIII1
IIIIIILJi111I f
Inspection Work Days Facility Self -Monitoring Evaluation Rating Bt CIA
— • — — — —Reserved• —• -- ••-
671 7013 I 71 u 72 I N j
1—) �--�
73 L L I74 75 80
L _1__I
Section B: Facility Data
Name and Location of Facility Inspected (For Indusidal Users discharging to POTW, also include
Entry TlmolDato
Permit Effectivo Dale
POTW name and NPDES permit Numbed
09:10AM 16105128
11/08101
MOB Camp Lejeune Borrow Pits 2 and 3
Brewster Blvd
Exit Time/Date
permit Expiration Dale
Camp Lejaune NO 28542
09:35AM 15/05/28
le/07/31
Names) of Onsile Roprosentativo(syMes(s)/Phone and Fax Numbers)
Other Facility Data
Name, Address of Responsible OfIklaVrilla/Phone and Fax Number
Contacted
Neat Paul,1005 Michael Rd Camp Lejeune NC 2854725211Deputy Public Works
No
Offlced910.451.2212/
Section C: Areas Evaluated During Inspeciton (Check only those areas evaluated)
Permit M Facility Site Review
Section D: Summary of Finding/Comments (Attach additional sheets of narralive and checklists as necessary)
(See attachment summary)
Names) and Signature(,) of speclor(s) Agency/OMce/Phone and Fax Numbers
Dale
j`y/(���, lJ
Joanne H Steenhuie W1 RO MY
Signature of Management Reviewer Agency/OfliceWhono end Fax Numbers
Dale
James Gregson WIRO WQ///
D s -.�226
EPA Form 3560.3 tRev 94) Prev148 editions are obsolete.
Page#
Enclosure (3)

Permit, N00089081
Owner • Faoility: MCe Camp Leleune Borrow Pits 2 and 3
Inspootion Cato: OW28r2015
Inspectlon Type: Complance Evaivatlon
Perm]
Yoe No NA NE
(If the present permit expires in 6 months or less). Has the
permittee submitted a new ❑
❑
M
❑
application?
Is the facility as described in the permit?
N
❑
❑
❑
# Are there any special conditions for the permit?
❑
■
❑
❑
Is access to the plant site restricted to the general public?
❑
❑
❑
Is the Inspector granted access to all areas for inspection?
0
❑
❑
❑
Comment: The sites are borrow pits and site 2 was
partially cleared brat the pit was not excavated.
Page# 3
Enclosure (3)

NCDEWR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Pat McCrory
Governor
May 28, 2015
Mr. Neal Paul, Deputy Public Works Officer
Public Works Division
MCB Camp Lejeune
1005 Michael Road
Camp Lejeune, NC 28542
Subject: NPDES Compliance Inspection Report
Borrow Pit 10
Bougainville Dr, MCB Camp Lejeune
NPDES Individual Permit No. NCO089079
Dear Mr. Paul;
Donald R. van der Vaart
Secretary
A site inspection was conducted for Borrow Pit 10 located off Bougainville Drive In Camp Lejeune. I
conducted the inspection on May 27, 2015 and met on site with Mike Taylor from EMD and Carl Owen from
ROICC. The Division of Water Resources (Division) appreciates the assistance and information provided by
both Mike Taylor and Carl Owen during the Inspection procedure.
The borrow pit is covered under an NPDES Individual Permit NC 0089079 for discharges of wastewater
associated with wet mining/dewatering. It Is my understanding that during the mining of the pit, there was
no discharge to Northeast Creek. It is also my understanding that the pit is now reclaimed (although you
still will have to officially close it out with the Division of Energy, Mining and Land Resources).
I have enclosed a copy of the Inspection details. At this time, you are considered to be in compliance and
the Wilmington Regional Office recommends and supports Camp Lejeune requesting a rescission of the
NPDES Permit NC0089079. If you have any questions concerning this correspondence, please do not
hesitate to contact me at 910.796.7306, 1 will be glad to assist you. I have also enclosed a copy of the
inspection report.
Sin ely
oanne Steenhuls
Senior Environmental Specialist
Water Quality Regional Operations Section
Wilmington Regional Office
Division of Water Resources, NCDENR
Enclosure: Inspection report
127 Cardinal Drive Extension, Wilmington, North Carolina 28405
Phone: [phone]\ Internet: www.ncdenr.aov
M Equal OpWA(y 1 Mm M Action Employer - Wade In pad by recycled paper
Enclosure (4)

N
Scardina, Maureen
Subject: NCO089079 & NCO089061 Borrow Pits Reporting
-----Original Message -----
From: Hunkele, Dean
Sent: Tuesday, January 03, 2012 9:01 AM
To: Weaver, Charles; Scardina, Maureen
Cc: steven.whitedousmc.mil
Subject: FW: NCO089079 & NCO089061 Borrow Pits Reporting
Please see their request -- contact them with any questions or concerns. Thanks
Dean Hunkele, Senior Environmental Specialist Wilmington Regional Office
-----Original Message -----
From: Whited CIV Steven J rmailto:steven.whited(lausmc.mill
Sent: Thursday, December 29, 2011 10:14 AM
To: Hunkele, Dean
Subject: FW: NCO089079 & NCO089061 Borrow Pits Reporting
Dean,
Good morning. I hope you had a good Christmas. Please see the information below regarding
the subject borrow pits at MCB, Camp Lejeune. We would like to suspend reporting until we
get a better idea on when the dewatering/discharge operation will begin at these pits.
Please advise.
v/r
Steven
-----Original Message -----
From: Sleeper, Lonny A LTJG NAVFAC, OICC MCI East fmailto:lonny.sleeper(@navy.milj
Sent: Monday, December 19, 2011 9:40 AM
To: Whited CIV Steven J
Cc: Raper CIV Patricia H; Bulfer CIV Orathai; Sylvester CIV Emily M; Blair, Joseph; Wright,
Hubert D CIV NAVFAC MIDLANT, IPTNC; Hartman, Thomas M CIV NAVFAC, OICC MCI East
Subject: NCO089079 & NCO089061 Borrow Pits Reporting
Steve,
The Borrow Areas for the New Base Entry Road being utilized (Borrow Area 3 and 10) are
currently not dewatering and managing the water by pumping to cells within the existing pits.
Also, Pit 2 is not open at the present time.
When I spoke with Mr. Dean Hunkele a couple of weeks ago he recommended that a request for
the monitoring to be suspended until a date when operations will begin be submitted to them.
As of today the contractor has developed a plan which is not requiring any dewatering and
with no definite date when the reporting for the dewatering will need to be initiated.
Can an official request be made to suspend reporting until 30 days after the request for
authorization to construct is requested?
For Borrow Area 2 we need to wait until P-1382B is awarded to discuss with that contractor on
how they plan to operate that area.
1

.Ifs
NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Beverly Eaves Perdue Charles Wakild, P.E. Dee Freeman
Governor Director Secretary
January 4, 2012
Mr. Lonny Sleeper
MCB Camp Lejeune
OICC MCI East
1005 Michael Rd
Camp Lejeune, N.C. 28547-2521
Subject: Waiver of Monthly Reporting Requirement
NPDES Permits NC0089061 & NC0089079
Borrow Pits 2 & 3 / Borrow Pit 10
Onslow County
Dear Mr. Sleeper:
The Division has reviewed your request to suspend submission of monthly Discharge Monitoring Reports
(DMRs).
After considering the recommendations of the staff in the Wilmington Regional Office, I have agreed to
waive the requirement to submit monthly DMRs for the subject facilities, effective January 1, 2012. The
DMRs up through (and including) December 2011 should be submitted as usual.
Be advised that if and when any wastewater discharge occurs, the discharge must be monitored as per the
terms of the NPDES permits and other applicable rules or statutes. Please keep the Wilmington Regional
Office apprised of any pertinent developments that arise regarding either facility, especially if the
discharge is re -activated.
While requirements for operator visitation, monitoring and reporting are being waived, you are still
required to pay the Annual Administering and Compliance Monitoring Fee that is associated with this and
all NPDES permits.
If you have any questions, or if you wish to request rescission of either permit, contact Charles H. Weaver
at 919 807-6391.
Sincerely,
Coleen H.
t/
cc: Central Files
Wilmington Regional Office / Dean Hunkele
NPDES Files
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
512 North Salisbury Street, Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
Phone: [phone] / FAX [phone] / Internet: www.ncwaterquality.org
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer - 50%Recycled/10% Post Consumer Paper
C %
Sullins '
Nne
orthCarolina
Naturally

Weaver, Charles
From: Hunkele, Dean
Sent: Tuesday, January 03, 2012 9:01 AM
To: Weaver, Charles; Scardina, Maureen
Cc: [e-mail]
Subject: FW: NC0089079 & NC0089061 Borrow Pits Reporting
Please see their request -- contact them with any questions or concerns.
Thanks
Dean Hunkele, Senior Environmental Specialist Wilmington Regional Office Division
of Water Quality, Surface Water Protection Section http://www.ncwaterguality.org/
Direct Phone: [phone]
Main Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Address: 127 Cardinal Drive Ext
Wilmington, NC 28405-3845
To report a SSO, WWTP Bypass, or Spill after hours, holidays, or weekends call
The NC Division of Emergency Management @ 1-800-858-0368
E-mail correspondence to and from this address may be subject to the North
Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties.
-----Original Message -----
From: Whited CIV Steven J [mailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: Thursday, December 29, 2011 10:14 AM
To: Hunkele, Dean
Subject: FW: NC0089079 & NC0089061 Borrow Pits Reporting
Dean,
Good morning. I hope you had a good Christmas. Please see the information
below regarding the subject borrow pits at MCB, Camp Lejeune. We would like
to suspend reporting until we get a better idea on when the
dewatering/discharge operation will begin at these pits. Please advise.
v/r
Steven
-----Original Message -----
From: Sleeper, Lonny A LTJG NAVFAC, OICC MCI East
[mailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: Monday, December 19, 2011 9:40 AM
To: Whited CIV Steven J
Cc: Raper CIV Patricia H; Bulfer CIV Orathai;
Joseph; Wright, Hubert D CIV NAVFAC MIDLANT,
NAVFAC, OICC MCI East
Sylvester CIV Emily M; Blair,
IPTNC; Hartman, Thomas M CIV
1

Subject: NC0089079 & NC0089061 Borrow Pits Reporting
Steve,
The Borrow Areas for the New Base Entry Road being utilized (Borrow Area 3
and 10) are currently not dewatering and managing the water by pumping to
cells within the existing pits. Also, Pit 2 is not open at the present
time.
When I spoke with Mr. Dean Hunkele a couple of weeks ago he recommended that
a request for the monitoring to be suspended until a date when operations
will begin be submitted to them. As of today the contractor has developed a
plan which is not requiring any dewatering and with no definite date when
the reporting for the dewatering will need to be initiated.
Can an official request be made to suspend reporting until 30 days after the
request for authorization to construct is requested?
For Borrow Area 2 we need to wait until P-1382B is awarded to discuss with
that contractor on how they plan to operate that area.
If you have any further questions please feel free to contact me.
V/r,
Lonny Sleeper
LT, CEC, USN
Project Engineer
OICC MCI East
Camp Lejeune, NC
-------------------------
(0) 910.451.2581 ext 5272
(C) 910.376.0074
(F) 910.451.5899
(DSN) 751.2581 ext 5272
2

NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Beverly Eaves Perdue
Governor
Mr. Carl Baker, Deputy Public Works Officer
Public Works Division
MCB Camp Lejeune
1005 Michael Road
Camp Lejeune, North Carolina 28542
Dear Mr. Baker:
Division of Water Quality
Coleen H. Sullins
Director
June 23, 2011
Subject: Issuance of NPDES
Permit NCO089061
Borrow Pits 2 and 3
Onslow County
Facility Class I
Dee Freeman
Secretary
Division personnel have reviewed and approved your application for a new permit. Accordingly, we are
forwarding the attached NPDES discharge permit. This permit is issued pursuant to the requirements of North
Carolina General Statute 143-215.1 and the Memorandum of Agreement between North Carolina and the U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency dated October 15, 2007 (or as subsequently amended).
This Final Permit includes the following major changes from the Draft Permit:
• The daily maximum TSS limit has been increased to 15 mg/L.
If any parts, measurement frequencies or sampling requirements contained in this permit are unacceptable
to you, you have the right to an adjudicatory hearing upon written request within thirty (30) days following receipt
of this letter. This request must be in the form of a written petition, conforming to Chapter 150B of the North
Carolina General Statutes, and filed with the Office of Administrative Hearings (6714 Mail Service Center, Raleigh,
North Carolina 27699-6714). Unless such demand is made, this decision shall be final and binding.
1617 Mail Service Center, Ralegh, North Carolina 27699-1617
Location: 512 N. Salisbury St. Ralegh, North Carolina 27604 One
Phone: [phone] FAX: [phone] Customer Service: 1-877-623-6748 NorthCarohna
Internet: wwwmwaterquality.org
An Equal Opportunity l Affirmative Action Employer �/ ►�K ` LL

Please note that this permit is not transferable exceVt after notice to the Division. The Division may
require modification or revocation and reissuance of the permit. This permit does not affect the legal requirements
to obtain other permits which may be required by the Division of Water Quality or permits required by the
Division of Land Resources, the Coastal Area Management Act or any other Federal or Local governmental permit
that may be required. If you have any questions concerning this permit, please contact Sergei Chernikov at
telephone number [phone].
Sincerely,
au k"
oleen H. Sullins
cc: NPDES Files
Central Files
Wilmington Regional Office / Surface Water Protection
Louise Slate ([e-mail])
1617 Mail Service Center, Ralegh, North Carolina 27699-1617
Location: 512 N. Salisbury St. Raleigh, North Carolina 27604 One
Phone: [phone] FAX: [phone] Customer Service:1-877-623-6748 NorthCarohna
Internet: wwNr.ncwaterquality.org , �atura!!t� An Equal Opportunity 1 Affirmafive Action Employer

Pemut No. NCO089061
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
PERMIT
TO DISCHARGE WASTEWATER UNDER THE
NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM
In compliance with the provision of North Carolina General Statute 143-215.1,
other lawful standards and regulations promulgated and adopted by the North Carolina
Environmental Management Commission, and the Federal Water Pollution Control Act, as
amended,
MCB Camp Lejeune
is hereby authorized to discharge wastewater from a facility located at
Borrow Pits 2 and 3
Brewster Boulevard
MCB Camp Lejeune
Onslow County
to receiving waters designated as Northeast Creek in the White Oak River Basin
in accordance with effluent limitations, monitoring requirements, and other conditions set forth
in Parts I, II, III, and IV hereof.
This permit shall become effective August 1, 2011.
This permit and authorization to discharge shall expire at midnight on July 31, 2016.
Signed this day June 23, 2011.
een H. Sullins, Director
Division of Water Quality
By Authority of the Environmental Management Commission
4

s
Permit No. NCO089061
SUPPLEMENT TO PERMIT COVER SHEET
MCB Camp Lejeune Borrow Pits 2 and 3
is hereby authorized to:
1. Upon receiving an Authorization to Construct from the Division of Water
Quality, construct a 0.72 MGD groundwater treatment plant consisting of a
settling basin and pumps, located at MCB Camp Lejeune Borrow Pits 2 and 3,
Brewster Boulevard, MCB Camp Lejeune, Onslow County, and
2. After submitting an Engineer's Certification, operate 0.72 MGD treatment
plant located at MCB Camp Lejeune Borrow Pits 2 and 3, Brewster Boulevard,
MCB Camp Lejeune, Onslow County, and
3. Discharge from said treatment works at the location specified on the attached
map into Northeast Creek, which is classified as SC NSW HQW waters in the
White Oak River Basin.

;_i� Z_­ ft:,
7a -.7.
I ANV.
IN
Ow
Nf F7'^
ok
_r46_.
. . . . . . . . . ......
Ic

Permit NCO089061
A. (1) EFFLUENT LIMITATIONS AND MONITORING REQUIREMENTS [002]
During the period beginning on the effective date of this permit and lasting until
expiration, the Permittee is authorized to discharge from outfall 002. Such
discharges shall be limited and monitored by the Permittee as specified below:
PARAMETER
LIMITS
MONITORING REQUIREMENTS
[PCS Code]
Monthly
I
Daily
Measurement
Sample
Sample
Average
Maximum
Frequency
e
Location
Flow
0.72 MGD
Weekly
Instantaneous
Effluent
50050
Ethylbenzene (pg/L)
Quarterly
Grab
Effluent
34371
pH
> 6.8 and < 8.5 standard units
Weekly
Grab
Effluent
00400
Total Suspended Solids
10.0 mg/L
15.0 mg/L
Weekly
Grab
Effluent
C0530
Temperature ( °C)
Weekly
Grab
Effluent
00010
There shall be no discharge of floating solids or visible foam in other than
trace amounts.
A. (2) EFFLUENT LIMITATIONS AND MONITORING REQUIREMENTS [003]
During the period beginning on the effective date of this permit and lasting until
expiration, the Permittee is authorized to discharge from outfall 003. Such
discharges shall be limited and monitored by the Permittee as specified below:
PARAMETER
LIMITS
MONITORING REQUIREMENTS
[PCS Code]
Monthly
Daily
Measurement
Sample
Sample
Average
Maximum
__fre_quf-ncy
Type
Location
Flow
0.216 MGD
Weekly
Instantaneous
Effluent
50050
pH
> 6.8 and < 8.5 standard units
Weekly
Grab
Effluent
00400
Total Suspended Solids
10 mg/L
15 mg/L
Weekly
Grab
Effluent
C0530
Temperature ( °C)
Weekly
Grab
Effluent
00010
There shall be no discharge of floating solids or visible foam in other than
trace amounts.

ONSLOW COUNTY
NORTH CAROLINA
AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION
Before the undersigned, a Notary Public of County and State of said publisher, duly commissioned, qualified
and authorized by law to administer oaths, personally appeared ,
who being first duly sworn, deposes and says: that he (she) is Jimmy Williams, Editor
(Owner, partner or other officer or employee authorized to make this affidavit)
of THE CARTERET PUBLISHING CO., INC., Carteret County, N.C., engaged in the publication of a news-
paper known as Tideland News, published, issued, and entered as second class mail in the Town of Swansboro,
in said County and State; that he (she) is authorized to make this affidavit and sworn statement; that the notice
or other legal advertisement, a true copy of which is attached hereto, was published in Tideland News on the
following dates:
5/4/11
and that the said newspaper
in which such notice, paper, document, or legal advertisement was published was, at the time of each and every
such publication, a newspaper meeting all of the requirements and qualifications of Section 1-597 of the General
Statues of North Carolina and was a qualified newspaper within the meaning of Section 1-597 of the General
Statues of North Carolina.
This the 2nd
day of June , 2011.
Q., Signature of person making affidavit
Sworn to and subscribed before me, this 2nd
My commission expires August 24, 2014
day of June , 2011.
Notary Public

LEGAL NOTICES
Public Notice
North Carolina
Environmental
Management Commission/
NPDES Unit
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
Notice of Intent to
Issue a NPDES
Wastewater Permit
The North Carolina En-
vironmental Management
Commission proposes to
issue a NPDES wastewa-
ter discharge permit to the
person(s) listed below.
Written comments re-
garding the proposed .per-
mit will be accepted until
30 days after the publish
date of this notice. The Di-
rector of the NC Division of
Water Quality (DWQ) may
hold a public hearing
should there be a signifi-
cant degree of public inter-
est. Please mail comments
and/or information re-
quests to DWQ at the
above address. Interested
Persons may visit the
DWQ at 512 N. Salisbury
Street, Raleigh, NC to re-
view information on file.
Additional information on
NPDES permits and this
notice may be found on'
our website:
http://portal.ncdenr.org/web/w
q/swp/ps/npdes/calendar or
by calling [phone].
MCB Camp Lejeune re-
quested a new permit
NCO089079 for Borrow Pit
10 in Onslow County; this
facility discharge is treated
groundwater to Northeast
Creek, White Oak River
Basin.
MCB Camp Lejeune re-
quested a new permit
NCO089061 for Borrow
Pits 2 and 3 in Onslow
County; this facility dis-
charge is treated ground-
water to Northeast Creek,
White Oak River Basin.
My4

.,WMACTEC r
engineering and constructing a better tomorrow
May 27, 2011
Sergei Chemikov, PhD
NCDENR — Complex Permitting Unit
512 N. Salisbury Street, 9`s floor
Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
Subject: Letter Report of Natural Resources Support Services
MCB Camp Lejeune — Borrow Pits
Dear Dr. Chemikov:
There are some concerns regarding language included in the draft NPDES wastewater discharge permits
for Borrow Pits 2 and 3 and Borrow Pit 10. The 10 mg/L TSS effluent limit seems overly restrictive in
light of two facts. First, this is a short term discharge and second, the water being discharged is
groundwater from a surface aquifer where no contamination has been detected.
Construction time for the Base Entry Road is at a maximum 36 months total and 7 months of this have
already elapsed. Dewatering activities will only take place until borrow pit capacity is reached, which
reduces the discharge time further. Furthermore, the groundwater from each of these borrow pits has
been tested and it is shown that this is clear, uncontaminated groundwater being discharged as part of an
on -site construction project.
Wells will be installed so as to draw groundwater from beneath the borrow pits and have the existing soil
media act as a filter. It will also be run through a sediment filter bag to provide treatment and disperse
flow prior to it being discharged to surface water.
In light of this, we recommend that the effluent limit be raised slightly so that the discharge can be
achievable while maintaining acceptable discharge limits that reflect the short term nature of the operation
and the initial overall quality of the groundwater.
Respectfully,
MACTEC Engineering and Consulting, Inc.
Louise O. Slate
Senior Engineer
PA6470VMCamp lejeune\Borrow Pils\NPDES Individual Permit\Commenl Letter to DENR 5-27-11
Richard P. Leone
Principal Scientist
MACTEC Engineering and Consulting, Inc.
3301 Atlantic Avenue • Raleigh, NC 27604 • Phone: [phone] • Fax: [phone]
www.mactec.com

Chernikov, Sergei
From: Willis, Linda
Sent: Friday, April 29, 2011 1:51 PM
To: Chernikov, Sergei
Subject: RE: draft permits for your review
I don't have any comments concerning these permits. I would rather see a daily flow tracked since for other individual
mining permits we would need to see that, especially where we have 7Q10 issues (which we won't have that issue here
since they are going to discharge to the main stem of Northeast Creek.
Thanks
Linda
From: Chernikov, Sergei
Sent: Monday, April 25, 2011 8:53 AM
To: Willis, Linda
Cc: Pugh, James L.; [e-mail]
Subject: draft permits for your review
Sergei Chernikov, Ph.D.
Environmental Engineer II
Complex Permitting Unit
Phone: [phone], fax [phone]
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
Express mail: 512 North Salisbury St.
Raleigh, NC 27606
E-mail correspondence to and from this address may be subject to the North Carolina Public Records Law and may be
disclosed to third parties.
1

Note to File
MCB Camp Lejeune, Borrow Pits 2 and 3
Permit NC0089061
The proposed permit is for dewatering a borrow pits to construct the Base Entry point and road at
MCB, Camp Lejeune. Projected flow is based on the conservative assumption of the dewatering the
entire pit. Operationally, the pits will be excavated in cells, which will decrease the discharge because
some of the water will be stored in other cells. The plan is to remove the suitable fill from borrow
pit 3 and when that pit is exhausted to move to borrow pit 2.
The discharge will be to the Northeast Creek, which is classified SC NSW HQW. Therefore, the
TSS limit of 10 mg/L will be applied. The groundwater analysis at Borrow Pit 2 indicated the
presence of ethylbenzene at 0.8 µg/L , which is far less than EPA criteria of 130 Jig/L. However,
the quarterly monitoring will be added to insure the protection of the receiving stream.
The permits are needed for limited time period until construction projects are completed.

UNITED STATES MARINE CORPS
MARINE CORPS BASE
PSC BOX 20004
CAMP LEJEUNE NC 28542-0004
IN REPLY REFER TO:
5020.20
BEMD
APR 2 8 2011
North Carolina Department of
Environment and Natural Resources
Attention: Mr. Sergei Chernikov
Complex Permitting Unit
Point Source Branch
Surface Water Protection Section - NPDES
Division of Water Quality
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
Dear Mr. Chernikov:
Marine Corps Base (MCB), Camp Lejeune (CamLej) received a
Letter of Approval (ONSLO-2010-104) dated September 16, 2010 for
revised erosion and sedimentation control plans that include
on -site borrow areas (Borrow Pits 2, 3, and 10) for constructing
the Base Entry Road. On September 27, 2010, Linda Willis from
the North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural
Resources (NCDENR) Division of Water Quality (DWQ) sent an email
to a consultant for MCB CamLej stating that discharge from the
borrow pits without an NPDES permit would constitute a violation
of GS 143-215.1(a)l. Since that time, MCB CamLej explored
options for addressing water in the borrow pits and is pursuing
minor individual wastewater discharge permits for Borrow Pits 2,
3, and 10.
The purpose of this letter is to address issues related to
dewatering borrow pits necessary to construct the new Base entry
road to MCB CamLej. There are two wastewater discharge permits
being requested from NCDENR:
(1) One discharge permit for borrow pits 2 and 3
(2) One discharge permit for borrow pit 10
In evaluating options for dewatering these borrow pits to
facilitate excavation, one consideration was to connect the
wastewater streams to the wastewater collection system and
treat it at the Wastewater Treatment Plant (WWTP). However,
it is strongly recommended that the WWTP not accept this
additional discharge because adding large volumes of freshwater
to the wastewater stream is damaging to the balance of microbes
at the plant.

5020.20
BEMD
Groundwater from these borrow pits was sampled on
March 16, 2011. The enclosure forwards the results from this
sampling event. Ethyl benzene was the only constituent that was
detected and was well below the established limit for
groundwater.
Due to the reasons stated above, MCB CamLej will continue
with the original design plans and discharge to stormwater.
If you have any questions or need any clarification on the
information provided, please contact Mr. Steven Whited,
Environmental Quality Branch, Environmental Management Division,
Installations and Environment Department, at [phone].
Sincerely,
OHN R. TOWNSON
Director, Environmental Management
By direction of
the Commanding Officer
Enclosure: 1. March 16, 2011 Sampling Event Performed by
SGS North America Inc.
V,

SG�
Laboratory Report of Analysis
To: Kim Charles -Smith
MACTEC
5710 Oleander Drive
Suite 110
Wilmington, NC 28403
Report Number: 31100471
Client Project: Camp Lejeune
Dear Kim Charles -Smith,
Enclosed are the results of the analytical services performed under the referenced project for the received
samples and associated QC as applicable. The samples are certified to meet the requirements of the National
Environmental Laboratory Accreditation Conference Standards. Copies of this report and supporting data will be
retained in our files for a period of five years in the event they are required for future reference. All results are
intended to be used in their entirety and SGS is not responsible for use of less than the complete report. Any
samples submitted to our laboratory will be retained for a maximum of thirty (30) days from the date of this report
unless other arrangements are requested.
If there are any questions about the report or services performed during this project, please call Barbara A. Hager
at [phone]. We will be happy to answer any questions or concerns which you may have.
Thank you for using SGS North America Inc. for your analytical services. We look forward to working with you
again on any additional analytical needs.
! Sincerely,
SGS North America Inc.
j Digitally signed by Barbara A. Hager
DN: CN = Barbara A. Hager, C = US, O = SGS Wilmington, NC,
✓✓✓"`ary',/ OU = Project Manager
Date: 2011.03.24 16:02:51-04'00'
Barbara A. Hager Date
Project Manager
[e-mail]
Print Date: 03124/2011
SGS North America Inc.
Business Drive, Wilmington, NC 28405
N.C. Certification # 481
Member of SGS Group
Enclon

i
i
i
Laboratory Qualifiers
Report Definitions
DL Method, Instrument, or Estimated Detection Limit per Analytical Method
CL Control Limits for the recovery result of a parameter
LOQ Reporting Limit
DF Dilution Factor
RPD Relative Percent Difference
LCS(D) Laboratory Control Spike (Duplicate)
MS(D) Matrix Spike (Duplicate)
MB Method Blank
Qualifier Definitions
Recovery or RPD outside of control limits
B Analyte was detected in the Lab Method Blank at a level above the LOQ
U Undetected (Reported as NO or < LOD)
V Recovery is below quality control limit. The data has been validated based on a favorable signal-to-noise
and detection limit
A Amount detected is less than the Lower Method Calibration Limit
J Amount detected is between the Method Detection Limit and the Lower Calibration Limit
O The recovery of this analyte in the OPR is above the Method QC Limits and the reported concentration in
the sample may be biased high
E Amount detected is greater than the Upper Calibration Limit
S The amount of analyte present has saturated the detector. This situation results in an
underestimation of the affected analyte(s)
Q Indicates the presence of a quantitative interference. This situation may result in an
underestimation of the affected analyte(s)
I Indicates the presence of a qualitative interference that could cause a false positive or an
overestimation of the affected analyte(s)
DPE Indicates the presence of a peak in the polychlorinated diphenylether channel that could
cause a false positive or an overestimation of the affected analyte(s)
TIC Tentatively Identified Compound
EMC Estimated Maximum possible Concentration due to ion ratio failure
ND Not Detected
K Result is estimated due to ion ratio failure in High Resolution PCB Analysis
P RPD > 40% between results of dual columns
D Spike or surrogate was diluted out in order to achieve a parameter result within instrument calibration
range
M1 Mis-identified peak
M2 Software did not integrate peak
M3 Incorrect baseline construction (i.e. not all of peak included; two peaks integrated as one)
M4 Pattern integration required (i.e. DRO, GRO, PCB, Toxaphene and Technical Chlordane)
M5 Other - Explained in case narrative
Note Results pages that include a value for "Solids (%)" have been adjusted for moisture content.
Print Date: 03/24/2011
SGS North America Inc. 15500 Business Drive, Wilmington, NC 28405
N.C. Certification # 481
Member of SGS Group

SGS
SGS North America Inc. 5500 Business Drive, Wilmington, NC 28405
It 910.350.1903 f 910.350.1557 www.us.sgs.com
Member of SGS Graup

CGS
Results of BP-2
Client Sample ID: BP-2
Client Project ID: Camp Lejeune
Lab Sample ID: 31100471001-A
Lab Project ID: 31100471
Results by EPA 624
Collection Date: 03/16/2011 14:35
Received Date: 03/17/2011 15:25
Matrix: Water
Parameter
Result
Qwki
QL
LOQ/CL
vink
DF
1,1,1-Trichooroethane
ND
U
0.123
1.00
ug/L
1
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
ND
U
0.156
1.00
ug/L
1
1,1,2-Trichloroethane
ND
U
0.126
1.00
ug/L
1
1,1-Dichloroethane
ND
U
0.165
1.00
ug/L
1
1,1-Dichloroethene
ND
U
0.212
1.00
ug/L
1
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
ND
U
0.0697
1.00
ug/L
1
1,2-Dichloroethane
ND
U
0.167
1.00
ug/L
1
1,2-Dichloropropane
ND
U
0.163
1.00
ug/L
1
1,3-Dichlorobenzene
ND
U
0.140
1.00
ug/L
1
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
ND
U
0.107
1.00
ug/L
1
2-Chloroethylvinyl ether
ND
U
1.82
25.0
ug/L
1
Benzene
ND
U
0.113
1.00
ug/L
1
Bromodichloromethane
ND
U
0.110
1.00
ug/L
1
Bromoform
ND
U
0.0974
1.00
ug/L
1
Bromomethane
ND
U
0.237
1.00
ug/L
1
Carbon tetrachloride
ND
U
0.101
1.00
ug/L
1
Chlorobenzene
ND
U
0.116
1.00
ug/L
1
Chloroethane
ND
U
0.311
1.00
ug/L
1
Chloroform
ND
U
0.139
1.00
ug/L
1
Chloromethane
ND
U
0.448
1.00
ug/L
1
Dibromochloromethane
ND
U
0.134
1.00
ug/L
1
cis- 1,3-Dichloropropene
ND
U
0.0767
1.00
ug/L
1
trans-1,3-Dichloropropene
ND
U
0.0862
1.00
ug/L
1
Ethyl Benzene
0.800
J
0.0877
1.00
ug/L
1
Methylene chloride
ND
U
0.152
5.00
ug/L
1
Tetrachloroethene
ND
U
0.155
1.00
ug/L
1
Toluene
ND
U
0.133
1.00
ug/L
1
Trichloroethene
ND
U
0.125
1.00
ug/L
1
Trichlorofluoromethane
ND
U
0.137
1.00
ug/L
1
Vinyl chloride
ND
U
0.124
1.00
ug/L
1
m,p-Xylene
ND
U
0.182
2.00
ug/L
1
o-Xylene
ND
U
0.0874
1.00
ug/L
1
tert-Butyl methyl ether (MTBE)
ND
U
0.144
1.00
ug/L
1
trans-1,2-Dichloroethene
ND
U
0.223
1.00
ug/L
1
Surrogates
1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 100 63.5-140 % 1
4-Bromofluorobenzene 100 84.7-115 % 1
Toluene d8 100 81.8-117 % 1
Print Date: 03/24/2011 N.C. Certification # 481
SGS North America Inc. 5500 Business Drive, Wilmington, NC 28405
t 910.350.1903 f 910.350.1557 www.us.sgs.com
Member of SGS Group

SGS
Results of 13P-2
Client Sample ID: 13P-2
Client Project ID: Camp Lejeune
Lab Sample ID: 31100471001-A
Lab Project ID: 31100471
Results by EPA 624
Parameter
Collection Date: 03/16/2011 14:35
Received Date: 03/17/2011 15:25
Matrix: Water
Result Qual QL LOQ/CL Units PF
SGS North America Inc. �5500 Business Drive, Wilmington, NC 28405
1010.350.1903010.350.1557 f 910.350.1557 www.us.sgs.com
Member of SGS Group

SGS
Results of BP-2
Client Sample ID: BP-2
Client Project ID: Camp Lejeune
Lab Sample ID: 31100471001-D
Lab Project ID: 31100471
Results by EPA 625
Collection Date: 03/16/2011 14:35
Received Date: 03/17/2011 15:25
Matrix: Water
Parameter
Result
Qual
DL
LOQ/CL
Units
DF +
Phenol
ND
U
3.22
6.81
ug/L
1
1 s
Bis(2-Chloroethyl)ether
ND
U
3.01
6.81
ug/L
1 t'
2-Chlorophenol
ND
U
2.97
6.81
ug/L
1 4
Bis(2-Chloroisopropyl)ether
ND
U
2.78
6.81
ug/L
1 11
n-Nitrosodi-n-propylamine
ND
U
3.04
6.81
ug/L
1 I
Hexachloroethane
ND
U
1.91
6.81
ug/L
1
Nitrobenzene
ND
U
2.98
6.81
ug/L
1
Isophorone
ND
U
2.85
6.81
ug/L
1
2-Nitrophenol
ND
U
2.68
6.81
ug/L
1
2,4-Dimethylphenol
ND
U
3.01
6.81
ug/L
1 i
Bis(2-Chloroethoxy)methane
ND
U
2.89
6.81
ug/L
1
2,4-Dichlorophenol
ND
U
2.81
6.81
ug/L
1
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
ND
U
2.36
6.81
ug/L
1
Naphthalene
ND
U
2.64
6.81
ug/L
1
Hexachlorobutadiene
ND
U
2.07
6.81
ug/L
1
4-Chloro-3-methylphenol
ND
U
2.70
6.81
ug/L
1
Hexachlorocyclopentadiene
ND
U
1.07
13.6
ug/L
1
2,4,6-Trichlorophenol
ND
U
2.77
6.81
ug/L
1
2-Chloronaphthalene
ND
U
2.72
6.81
ug/L
1
Dimethyl phthalate
ND
U
2.92
6.81
ug/L
1
2,6-Dinitrotoluene
ND
U
2.56
6.81
ug/L
1
Acenaphthene
ND
U
2.81
6.81
ug/L
1
2,4-Dinitrophenol
ND
U
0.910
34.1
ug/L
1
4-Nitrophenol
ND
U
1.73
34.1
ug/L
1
2,4-Dinitrotoluene
ND
U
2.51
6.81
ug/L
1
Fluorene
ND
U
3.32
6.81
ug/L
1
Diethyl phthalate
ND
U
2.86
6.81
ug/L
1
4-Chlorophenyl phenyl ether
ND
U
3.35
6.81
ug/L
1
4,6-Dinitro-2-methylphenol
ND
U
0.673
34.1
ug/L
1
Diphenylamine
ND
U
2.75
6.81
ug/L
1
4-Bromophenyl phenyl ether
ND
U
2.78
6.81
ug/L
1
Hexachlorobenzene
ND
U
2.63
6.81
ug/L
1
Pentachlorophenol
ND
U
2.11
34.1
ug/L
1
Phenanthrene
ND
U
2.71
6.81
ug/L
1
Anthracene
ND
U
2.63
6.81
ug/L
1
Di-n-butyl phthalate
ND
U
2.60
6.81
ug/L
1
Fluoranthene
ND
U
2.75
6.81
ug/L
1
Pyrene
ND
U
2.74
6.81
ug/L
1
Butyl benzyl phthalate
ND
U
2.57
6.81
ug/L
1
Benzo(a)anthracene
ND
U
2.67
6.81
ug/L
1
3,3'-Dichlorobenzidine
ND
U
2.38
13.6
ug/L
1
Chrysene
ND
U
3.00
6.81
ug/L
1
Bis(2-Ethylhexyl)phthalate
ND
U
2.66
6.81
ug/L
1
Print Date. 03124i2011
N.C. Certification # 481
SGS North America Inc.
5500 Business Drive, Wilmington, NC 28405
It 910,350,1903
f 910,350,1557 www,us.5gs.com
Mender of SGS Gump

i
SGS
o-- Results of BP-2
Client Sample ID: BP-2
Client Project ID: Camp Lejeune
Lab Sample ID: 31100471001-D
Lab Project ID: 31100471
Results by EPA 625
Parameter
Result
Benzo(b)fluoranthene
ND
Benzo(k)fluoranthene
ND
Benzo(a)pyrene
ND
Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene
ND
Dibenz(a,h)anthracene
ND
Benzo(g,h,i)perylene
ND
Acenaphthylene
ND
Di-n-octyl phthalate
ND
Surrogates
2-Fluorophenol
80.8
Phenol-d6
85.4
Nitrobenzene-d5
90.2
2-Fluorobiphenyl
75.3
2,4,6-Tribromophenol
80.6
Terphenyl-d 14
55.8
Batch Information
i Analytical Batch. XMS1042
Analytical Method: EPA 625
Instrument: MSD10
Analyst: CMP
Analytical Date/Time: 03/22/2011
01:11
ual
DL
LOQ/CL
Units
U
2.67
6.81
ug/L
U
3.15
6.81
ug/L
U
2.53
6.81
ug/L
U
2.75
6.81
ug/L
U
2.75
6.81
ug/L
U
2.93
6.81
ug/L
U
2.72
6.81
ug/L
U
1.99
6.81
ug/L
Collection Date: 03/16/2011 14:35
Received Date: 03/17/2011 15:25
Matrix: Water
DF
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
33.1-118
% 1
49.0-120
% 1
46.0-118
% 1
50.0-107
% 1
29.3-152
% 1
22.1-142
% 1
Prep Batch: XXX1134
Prep Method: EPA 625
Prep Date/Time: 03119/2011 15:30
Prep Initial Wt./Vol.: 734 mL
Prep Extract Vol: 5 mL
Print Date: 03/24/2011 N.C. Certification # 481
SGS North America Inc. 5500 Business Drive, Wilmington, NC 28405
1903 f 910.350.1557 www.us.sas.com
Member of sG5 Group

SGS
Results of BP-3
Client Sample ID: BP-3
Collection Date: 03/16/2011 12:40
Client Project ID: Camp Lejeune
Received Date: 03/17/2011 15:25
Lab Sample ID: 31100471002-B
Matrix: Water
Lab Project ID: 31100471
Results by EPA 624
Parameter
Resul
Qual
DL
LOCUCL
units
DF
1,1,1-Trichloroethane
ND
U
0.123
1.00
ug/L
1
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
ND
U
0.156
1.00
ug/L
1
1,1,2-Trichloroethane
ND
U
0.126
1.00
ug/L
1
1,1-Dichloroethane
ND
U
0.165
1.00
ug/L
1
1,1-Dichloroethene
ND
U
0.212
1.00
ug/L
1
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
ND
U
0.0697
1.00
ug/L
1
1,2-Dichloroethane
ND
U
0.167
1.00
ug/L
1
1,2-Dichloropropane
ND
U
0.163
1.00
ug/L
1
1,3-Dichlorobenzene
ND
U
0.140
1.00
ug/L
1
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
ND
U
0.107
1.00
ug/L
1
2-Chloroethylvinyl ether
ND
U
1.82
25.0
ug/L
1
Benzene
ND
U
0.113
1.00
ug/L
1
Bromodichloromethane
ND
U
0.110
1.00
ug/L
1
Bromoform
ND
U
0.0974
1.00
ug/L
1
Bromomethane
ND
U
0.237
1.00
ug/L
1
Carbon tetrachloride
ND
U
0.101
1.00
ug/L
1
Chlorobenzene
ND
U
0.116
1.00
ug/L
1
Chloroethane
ND
U
0.311
1.00
ug/L
1
Chloroform
ND
U
0.139
1.00
ug/L
1
Chloromethane
ND
U
0.448
1.00
ug/L
1
Dibromochloromethane
ND
U
0.134
1.00
ug/L
1
cis- 1,3-Dichloropropene
ND
U
0.0767
1.00
ug/L
1
trans- l,3-Dichloropropene
ND
U
0.0862
1.00
ug/L
1
Ethyl Benzene
ND
U
0.0877
1.00
ug/L
1
Methylene chloride
ND
U
0.152
5.00
ug/L
1
Tetrachloroethene
ND
U
0.155
1.00
ug/L
1
Toluene
ND
U
0.133
1.00
ug/L
1
Trichloroethene
ND
U
0,125
1.00
ug/L
1
Trichlorofluoromethane
ND
U
0.137
1.00
ug/L
1
Vinyl chloride
ND
U
0.124
1.00
ug/L
1
m,p-Xylene
ND
U
0.182
2.00
ug/L
1
o-Xylene
ND
U
0.0874
1.00
ug/L
1
tert-Butyl methyl ether (MTBE)
ND
U
0.144
1.00
ug/L
1
trans-1,2-Dichloroethene
ND
U
0.223
1.00
ug/L
1
Surrogates
1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 100 63.5-140 %
4-Bromofluorobenzene 100 84.7-115 %
Toluene d8 100 81.8-117 %
Print Dale: 03/24/2011
N.C. Certification # 481
SGS North America Inc. 5500 Business Drive, Wilmington, NC 28405
t 910.350.1903 f 910.350.1557 www.us.sgs.com
Member of SGS Group

SGS
Results of BP-3
Client Sample ID: BP-3
Client Project ID: Camp Lejeune
Lab Sample ID: 31100471002-B
Lab Project ID: 31100471
Results by EPA 624
Parameter Result Qual
Batch Information -- -- --------
VMS1098
Analytical Method: EPA 624
Instrument: MSD3
Analyst: BWS
Analytical Daterrime. 03/21/2011 14:48
i
L..
Print Date. 0312412011
SGS North America Inc.
DL
Collection Date: 03/16/2011 12:40
Received Date: 03/17/2011 15:25
Matrix: Water
LO /CL Units DF
Prep Batch: VXX1204
Prep Method: EPA 624
Prep DalefTime: 03/21/2011 16:58
Prep Initial Wt.Nol.: 40 mL
Prep Extract Vol: 40 mL
S500 Business Drive, Wilmington, NC 28405
t 910.350.1903 f 910.350.1557 www.us.sgsxom
Member of SGS Group

W Q! Q) m a D T T S A a A A a Tt N A N D N a fJ N= A= Z N W N N N Z 2 7 W N = 70
3 S W m c_ E S m m ap rn n ip c a Z a rn n A m n m m Z - Z (�
p 1 O 0 7 m 7 K S O m 3 x x� N? N A � X .N•. .y-. m IM
0 O N O' O7 07 O COi O m 0 p •< m' 0 a a CD S O 0) S_ y� A D N a S Q 0) N S N 7
A! S S O 7 m •< W = S= O '� O m7 j� j' � 7• 'S p 7 S O S 6S1 7 S� 3 O O O N S O S O m
_ _ _ c n n
w,i 'G m O 01 N m S O O � O O� .5. O m O O •O y 7 0 W O m S O O g m O O n 0 0
7
N p 7 'G > m 7 0 Q m 3. N m S O O 7 m 0 S O n Q N O O O '< O m= N 7 0 N 0
N 3 m m y S m Sr m (7D `G m `G NCD N CD_ m O j m W 6S1 S0 ET.0 0 m 61 Q S S� O m S O 7
Z m m m c m n CD u
M m 'm m 3 CD
d m m m O � j
S m S O S 7 01 m :
y i m N m N
z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z
_._. 0 0 0 0 a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
8
s
v
�• C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C �p
c'
3
�a
0
2
!1
N
an W N V W (D O O W (O O O W O O N A
O -4 ID -4 O N O N A CDNN W
WW -4 W N AUAMN VOV(nO (OW V OV O VDOWO V W Ir
O) (D A V (n (O (n A O N N N O -4 A (D
4 to
(n Cn (n U1 (n N (n cn (n N OI U1 (n N (n (n (n 0 N N Cn Gn M M (n (n (n M Ot Ot N N Ot N Ot to N Ut U1 (n (n
O O 6 6 0 6 6 6 6 6 0 6 m O O O O(.n m 6 6 6 6 6 0 0 0 O O O O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 O
V V -1 -I V V V -1 J A V V V A V V V V A A V J -I v v V V V V V V -1 -1 -I v v J �I V -1 V
n
r
c C c C c c c c c c c c c c c c c C c c c c c c c c c c c c c c C c c c c c c c c C c
1
Z�
J J — J J J J — J — J J J J J J J — J J J — J J — J J — — J J J J f J J J J J — J J J
n T
O1
O
3
A
CD
m m c
Q Cr m mol N
y
O ol-a N N
O
l<
m
n
m C v ao
D
w
vo
N
n W
A 0
V
-• 4 r
N C
b'
s
ym O
X n
O j
v 0
a m m
m m
00
W W
4
N N
O O

SGS
Results of BP-3
Client Sample ID: BP-3
Client Project ID: Camp Lejeune
Lab Sample ID: 31100471002-D
Lab Project ID: 31100471
Results by EPA 625
Parameter
Result
Benzo(b) luoranthene
ND
Benzo(k)fluoranthene
ND
Benzo(a)pyrene
ND
Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene
ND
Dibenz(a,h)anthracene
ND
Benzo(g,h,i)perylene
ND
Acenaphthylene
ND
Di-n-octyl phthalate
ND
Surrogates
2-Fluorophenol
69.3
Phenol-d6
74.1
Nitrobenzene-d5
82.0
2-Fluorobiphenyl
73.3
2,4, 6-Tribromophenol
69.5
Terphenyl-d 14
91.1
Batch Information
Analytical Batch: XMS1042
Analytical Method: EPA 625
Instrument: MSD10
Analyst: CMP
Analytical Date/Time: 03/22/2011
01:34
S
Print Dale: 0312412011
SGS North America Inc.
Qual
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
DL
1.99
2.34
1.89
2.05
2.05
2.18
2.03
1.48
Business Drive, Wilmington, NC 28405
Collection Date: 03/16/2011 12:40
Received Date: 03/17/2011 15:25
Matrix: Water
LOQ/CL
nit
DF
5.07
ug/L
1
5.07
ug/L
1
5.07
ug/L
1
5.07
ug/L
1
5.07
ug/L
1
5.07
ug/L
1
5.07
ug/L
1
5.07
ug/L
1
33.1-118
%
1
49.0-120
%
1
46.0-118
%
1
50.0-107
%
1
29.3-152
%
1
22.1-142
%
1
Prep Batch: XXX1134
Prep Method: EPA 625
Prep Date/Time: 03119/2011 15:30
Prep Initial Wt.Nol.: 986 mL
Prep Extract Vol: 5 mL
N.C. Certification # 481
Member of SGS Group

SGS
Results of BP-10
Client Sample ID: BP-10
Client Project ID: Camp Lejeune
Lab Sample ID: 31100471003-A
Lab Project ID: 31100471
Results by EPA 624
Collection Date: 03/16/2011 16:15
Received Date: 03/17/2011 15:25
Matrix: Water
Parameter
Result
( -I
P-L
LOQ/CL
Units
DF
1, 1, 1 -Trichloroethane
ND
U
0.123
1.00
ug/L
1
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
ND
U
0.156
1.00
ug/L
1
1,1,2-Trichloroethane
ND
U
0.126
1.00
ug/L
1
1,1-Dichloroethane
ND
U
0.165
1.00
ug/L
1
1,1-Dichloroethene
ND
U
0.212
1.00
ug/L
1
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
ND
U
0.0697
1.00
ug/L
1
1,2-Dichloroethane
ND
U
0.167
1.00
ug/L
1
1,2-Dichloropropane
ND
U
0.163
1.00
ug/L
1
1,3-Dichlorobenzene
ND
U
0.140
1.00
ug/L
1
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
ND
U
0.107
1.00
ug/L
1
2-Chloroethylvinyl ether
ND
U
1.82
25.0
ug/L
1
Benzene
ND
U
0.113
1.00
ug/L
1
Bromodichloromethane
ND
U
0.110
1.00
ug/L
1
Bromoform
ND
U
0.0974
1.00
ug/L
1
Bromomethane
ND
U
0.237
1.00
ug/L
1
Carbon tetrachloride
ND
U
0.101
1.00
ug/L
1
Chlorobenzene
ND
U
0.116
1.00
ug/L
1
Chloroethane
ND
U
0.311
1.00
ug/L
1
Chloroforrn
ND
U
0.139
1.00
ug/L
1
Chloromethane
ND
U
0.448
1.00
ug/L
1
Dibromochloromethane
ND
U
0.134
1.00
ug/L
1
cis- 1,3-Dichloropropene
ND
U
0.0767
1.00
ug/L
1
trans-1,3-Dichloropropene
ND
U
0.0862
1.00
ug/L
1
Ethyl Benzene
ND
U
0.0877
1.00
ug/L
1
Methylene chloride
ND
U
0.152
5.00
ug/L
1
Tetrachloroethene
ND
U
0.155
1.00
ug/L
1
Toluene
ND
U
0.133
1.00
ug/L
1
Trchloroethene
ND
U
0.125
1.00
ug/L
1
Trichlorofluoromethane
ND
U
0.137
1.00
ug/L
1
Vinyl chloride
ND
U
0.124
1.00
ug/L
1
m,p-Xylene
ND
U
0.182
2.00
ug/L
1
o-Xylene
ND
U
0.0874
1.00
ug/L
1
tert-Butyl methyl ether (MTBE)
ND
U
0.144
1.00
ug/L
1
trans-1,2-Dichloroethene
ND
U
0.223
1.00
ug/L
1
Surrogates
1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 100 63.5-140 % 1
4-Bromofluorobenzene 100 84.7-115 % 1
Toluene d8 100 81.8-117 % 1
{
Print Date. 03/24/2011 N.C. Certification # 481
SGS North America Inc. 5500 Business Drive, Wilmington, NC 28405
t 10.350.19 3 f 910.350.1557 www.us.4s.com
Member of SGS Group

S-G
Results of BP-10
Batch Information
ialytical Batch VMS1098
Analytical Method: EPA 62,
Instrument: MSD3
Analyst: BWS
Analytical Date/Time: 03121
SGS North America Inc. �5500 Business Drive, Wilmington, NC 28405
1010.350.1903010.350.1557 f 910.350.1557 www.us.sgs.com
Member of SGS Group

C
u
i
G)
GI
P
S W 7 c O 7 0 ID o
0 �_ X 'O O (� O C A Z A N °i 3 ii ? x ci X N A N A Z O O Z Ci S D1
tV y 0 0' O N S S 7 y D7 'O O S S O v j N
m m fD c coi �_ ? a �_ '-► o' v m -'• 3 °-_ 32 p S° S o�i �_ n 3 ;0 cm, y
fD O C7 rV' m v cD m O o 3 o o CD o � pOj � o G' o ? ° ° ? NS m' o C•
CD v ir `G m S. O '° O j j' N j m C o j c S ° OG c O °� °m �^ O m°
7 CDCD N `G (D `G 01 (D 7 N CD O S O O M Q S S O S
-- N N y N 70 O? J NCD m O CD N D) OS -0 ,� D. ? O K J 7 O `G
N CD N �G � 0 0 0 CD (D 3ry N 3 7 9�
.O•. (D N 0_ O ((D
CD S O= j N O S
N (D O 7 m
(D
z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z I
O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O I0
c
c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c C c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c C c c c f
oci
N N -+ N N N N N -+ N N N O N N N -+ - O N N N N O N- N- N N N N N N- N N N N N O
O N) w O (D O w O O O O Ut (r m w w m• w N O (D O (r O 6- ; W O N A W� N W? Ir
W CD N A V (D O W V N O A O W A N N A M W O NO M W N O A O 0 -I W M N N V 0 M
U1 o (r U( o o N cn U1 rV o W o N m U o (n N N N o (n o V7 - o 0 Vi u, p p (n Cn o o Cn Cn m o Cn Ln
jr-
" N O N N" N N N N O N N N O N N IV N p O N" N" N O N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N
O
0 0 a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 n
In r
C C c c c C C C C c c c c C c c c c C c C C c c c c c c c C C c c c c C c c C c c c c IC
(O (O O (D f0 (D (e (D (D (D (D (D Q. O (D Q. (D (D (D O fe (O Q. V- (O (O O Q. (D O O CD O O tD (D (D Q. (D O O O fD >.
r f- r r r r r r r r r r r r, r r r r r r r r r r r r r r ri r- r- r- r r r r r= r r r- r r r y
z
n T
c1.
(D
w O) n %i fD
(A
Cr Cr m (D N
D 3 o
1
m
m COD a o0
a
oo=m
v
w q o
N
N
i
CD CD
v ? O
o
om
we
O �
m
N(D O
X LD• n
<
CL
O O
m m m
CD
00
w w
N N
00
tr �
0
CA
0
cn

SGS
Results of BP-10
Client Sample ID: BP-10
Collection Date: 03/16/2011 16:15
Client Project ID: Camp Lejeune
Received Date: 03/17/2011 15:25
Lab Sample ID: 31100471003-D
Matrix: Water
Lab Project ID: 31100471
Results by EPA 625
—
Parameter
Result
Qual
DL LO CL
Units
DF
Benzo(b)fluoranthene
ND
U
2.04 5.20
ug/L
1
Benzo(k)fluoranthene
ND
U
2.40 5.20
ug/L
1
Benzo(a)pyrene
ND
U
1.94 5.20
ug/L
1
Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene
ND
U
2.10 5.20
ug/L
1
Dibenz(a,h)anthracene
ND
U
2.10 5.20
ug/L
1
Benzo(g,h,i)perylene
ND
U
2.24 5.20
ug/L
1
Acenaphthylene
ND
U
2.08 5.20
ug/L
1
Di-n-octyl phthalate
ND
U
1.52 5.20
ug/L
1
Surrogates
2-Fluorophenol
68.1
33.1-118
%
1
Phenol-d6
73.5
49.0-120
%
1
Nitrobenzene-d5
77.6
46.0-118
%
1
2-Fluorobiphenyl
70.8
50.0-107
%
1
2,4,6-Tribromophenol
60.5
29.3-152
%
1
Terphenyl-d14
70.8
22.1-142
%
1
Batch Information
--
-�----
--
Analytical Batch: XMS1045
Prep Batch: XXX1134
Analytical Method: EPA 625
Prep Method: EPA 625
Instrument: MSD6
Prep Date/Time: 03/19/2011
15:30
Analyst: CMP
Prep Initial Wt./Vol.: 961 mL
Analytical Date/Time: 03/22/2011
15:26
Prep Extract Vol: 5 mL
s
Print Date: 03/24/2011
SGS North America Inc. 15500 Business Drive, Wilmington, NC 28405
Member of SGS Group

CHAIN OF CUSTODY RECORD
SGS North America Inc.
17t
Locations Natlonwlde
Alaska Maryland
• New Jersey New York
• North Carolina Ohio
www.us.sgs.com 101117
/fR �+ j� IU
`
SGS Reference:
)
l
PAGE OF
/ PHONE NO:(�►7)$3)..., g0G/
1•t0Preservatives
/ SIIE/PWSID31:
No
C�_'_
SAMPLE
TYPE
usedCf
:
L
SC.tirL-' FAXNO.:(I t) 6 ( �O
O
TOO
AIGRAB
COtdPC.—t
QUOTE #:
PA P.O. C- P.O. NUMBER:
N
E
R
S
`n
�1+
LAB NO.
SAMPLE IDENTIFICATION
DATE
TIME
MATRIX
�P- a
3r16t►I
1`f35
REMARKS
3
3 •ic , i
(-2y'o
��.>
5
G
3 3
- l U
r I b►►
lGa► S
G t,�
S
�
3�
5
4
Collected/Relinquis d (1
Date
Time
Received By:
Shipping Carrier:
Samples Received Cold? (Circl YE NO
Shipping Ticket No:
J�
Temperature°C:ztt
quis d By: (2)
Date
/ReceivedW..
Special Deliverable Requirements: Chain of Custody Seal: (Circle)
INTACT BROKEN ABSENT
Relinquished By: (3)
Date
Tme
Received By:
Special Instructions:
Relinquished By: (4)
Date
Time
Received By:
Requested Turnaround Time:
❑ RUSH it STD
Date Needed
j 200 W. roster unve Anchorage, AK 99518 Tel: [phone] Fax: [phone]
❑ 5500 Business Drive Wilmington, NC 28405 Tel: [phone] Fax: [phone]
Wtiite - Retained by Lab
Plrk - Retained by C',ent

SGS North America Inc.
Sample Receipt Checklist (SRC)
Client: �QC�Pr Work Order No.:
1. Shipped Notes:
Hand Delivered
2. h COC Present on Receipt
_ No COC
Additional Transmittal Forms
3. Custody Tape on Container
�C No Custody Tape
4. 'Samples Intact
_ Samples Broken / Leaking
5. _ZChilled on Receipt Actual Temp.(s) in °C: 5_ %° C
_Ambient on Receipt
_ Walk-in on Ice; Coming down to temp.
Received Outside of Temperature Specifications
6. Sufficient Sample Submitted
_Insufficient Sample Submitted
7. _Chlorine absent
_ HNO3 < 2
HCL < 2
Additional Preservatives verified (see notes)
8. Received Within Holding Time
Not Received Within Holding Time
9. )( No Discrepancies Noted
Discrepancies Noted
10. No Headspace present in VOC vials
Headspace present in VOC vials >6mm
Comments:
%3
Inspected and Logged in by:
MI_11.5

Chernikov, Sergei
From: Slate, Louise [[e-mail]]
Sent: Friday, April 08, 2011 3:15 PM
To: Chernikov, Sergei
Subject: Figure for borrow pits 2 and 3
Attachments: figure 1_BP2_3.pdf
Sergei,
Today is the first day back in the office since Monday. Here are the figures you requested. I will send the figure for borrow pit 10 in
a separate email. Please let me know if you need anything else.
Louise
Borrow Pit 2
Lat 34 43' 32" N Long 77 22' 58" W
Borrow Pit 3
Lat 34 43' 23" N Long 77 22' 11" W
Louise O. Slate, PE, LEED AP I Senior Engineer I Environmental Department
MACTEC Engineering and Consulting, Inc.
3301 Atlantic Avenue I Raleigh, North Carolina
Office 919.876.0416 1 Direct 919.831.8006 1 Fax [phone]
Email loslate(cDmactec.com I Web www.mactec.com

Date: March 29, 2011
To: Sergei Chernikov Al P 5�
From: Linda Willis, Env. Eng., DWQ, SWPS 4"ZQl D
Through: Rick Shiver, Wilmington Regional Supervisor, DWQ SWPS tZi(�J
Subject: NPDES Permit Applications NCO089079 MCB Camp lejeune Borrow Pit 10
And NCO089061 MCB Camp lejeune Borrow Pits 2 and 3
NPDES Permit Applications were received by the Division of Water Quality for three borrow pits for coverage
under individual NPDES wastewater permits. Camp Lejeune proposes a discharge of 410,000 gallons per day of pit
wastewater to the Northeast Creek from borrow pit #10 and up to 720,000 gallons per day from borrow pits #2
and #3 collectively. The classification of Northeast Creek in the vicinity of the discharge is class SC, NSW, HQW.
The application for Pits 2 and 3 indicate a TSS daily discharge of 100 to 1000 Ibs/day. The TSS will be restricted at
10 mg/L per day to meet HQW water quality limitations. This would result in less than 60 Ibs/day TSS. The
discharge needs to occur in the main stem of Northeast Creek since the input of freshwater to the small tidal
creeks would change the nature of the receiving streams adversely, potentially preventing their function as a PNA.
Salinity in the creek (as well as the mainstem of Northeast Creek) ranges from 0.47 parts per thousand to 24 ppt
depending upon the tide.
The following considerations are offered:
1. The receiving waters are classified HQW (along with SC) since this area of the Cape Fear River is a Primary
Nursery Area. TSS should be limited to 10 mg/L daily maximum as well as monthly average. Temperature
and pH should be required for monitoring.
2. A means to sample the discharge from the settling basin needs to be provided since the outfall to the
Northeast Creek may be difficult to access for sampling purposes. A diffuser should be used at the end of
the pipe.
Thank you for the opportunity to comment.
DWQ CO Files
DWQ WiRO NPDES
o c� awpm
MAR 31 2011
DENk-Ww A QUALITY

NPDES PERMIT APPLICATION - SHORT FORM C - Minor Industrial
Minor industrial, manufacturing and commercial facilities.
Mail the complete application to:
N. C. Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality / NPDES Unit
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
NPDES Permit Number INCOO
Please print or type.
1. Contact Information:
Owner Name
Facility Name
Mailing Address
City
State / Zip Code
Telephone Number
Fax Number
e-mail Address
Commanding Officer, US Marine Corps Base Camp Lejeune
MCB Camp Lejeune
Public Works Division PSC Box 20005
Camp Lejeune
NC, 28542
910-451-2213
910-451-2927
Carl. h. baker y,)u smc. mil
2. Location of facility producing discharge:
Check here if same as above ❑
Street Address or State Road
City
State / Zip Code
County
Brewster Boulevard
MCB Camp Lejeune
NC 28542
Onslow
3. Operator Information:
Name of the firm, consultant or other entity that operates the facility. (Note that this is not refer -ring to the
Operator in Responsible Charge or ORC)
Name Carl Baker, Public Works Division, MCB Camp Lejeune
Mailing Address 1005 Michael Road
City Camp Lejeune
State / Zip Code NC, 28542
Telephone Number 910-451-2213
Fax Number 910-451-2927
4. Ownership Status:
Page 1 of 5 C-MI 10108

NPDES PERMIT APPLICATION - SHORT FORM C - Minor Industrial
Minor industrial, manufacturing and commercial facilities.
Federal ® State ❑ Private ❑ Public ❑
5. Standard Industrial Classification (SIC) code(s): 1442
6. Number of employees: N/A
7. Describe the treatment system List all installed waste treatment components with capacities,
describe the processes that generate wastewaters. If the space provided is not sufficient attach a
separate sheet of paper with the system description.
As part of dewatering borrow pits 2 and 3, groundwater will be pumped to a stilling basin and
discharged into Northeast Creek. If necessary, pumped groundwater will be run through a silt
bag to reduce TSS before being otherwise treated and discharged.
8. Is facility covered under federal effluent limitation guidelines? No ❑ Yes
If yes, specify the category? 40 CFR 436 C
9. Principal product(s) produced: mineral soil for roadway fill
Principal raw material(s) consumed: no materials consumed in pit
Briefly describe the manufacturing process(es):
The borrow pits will be excavated to a depth of 20 feet below ground surface. Pits may be excavated in
a series of cells to manage groundwater. Groundwater discharge will be pumped from cell to cell or
from the cells to a stilling basin equipped with a skimmer and discharged to Northeast Creek.
Suitable soils excavated from the borrow pits will be used to construct the road bed for the Base Entry
Point and Road. Unsuitable soils will be spoiled within the borrow pit area and permanently stabilized
according to the approved plans. Side slopes of the borrow pits will be 3:1 down to the groundwater
table and then will be 2:1 to the bottom of the pit.
Page 2 of 5 C-MI 10108

NPDES PERMIT APPLICATION - SHORT FORM C - Minor Industrial
Minor industrial, manufacturing and commercial facilities.
10. Amount of principal product produced or raw material consumed
nl..+ 1, v. 41-1--itc of nrnrlvrtti'nn nnor tho Incf throo t/Pnr.Cf
Product Produced or Raw Material
Consumed
AVERAGE
Product Produced or Raw Material
Consumed
PEAK
per Day
1,000 CY per pit
1,500 CY per pit
per Month
120,000 CY per pit
25,000 CY per pit
per Year
168,000 CY pit 2; 132,000 CY pit 3
168,000 CY pit 2; 132,000 CY pit 3
11. Frequency of discharge: Continuous
If intermittent:
Days per week discharge occurs:
Intermittent ❑
Duration:
12. Types of wastewater discharged to surface waters only
Discharge
Flow
GALLONS PER DAY
Sanitary - monthly average
none
Utility water, etc. - monthly average
none
Process water - monthly average
none
Stormwater - monthly average
none
Other - monthly average
Explain:
Groundwater from borrow pit
Monthly Average
total discharge (all types)
720,000 gpd or less -> 21,600,000 gal/month
13. Number of separate discharge points: 1 Outfall Identification number(s) 2 and 3
14. Name of receiving stream(s) (Provide a map showing the exact location of each outfall, including
latitude and longitude):
Northeast Creek
Page 3 of 5 C-MI 10108

NPDES PERMIT APPLICATION - SHORT FORM C - Minor Industrial
Minor industrial, manufacturing and commercial facilities.
15. Effluent Data [for new or proposed discharges]
Provide data for the parameters listed. Temperature and pH shall be grab samples, for all other parameters 24-hour
composite sampling shall be used. If more than one analysis is reported, report daily maximum and monthly average.
If only one analysis is reported, report as daily maximum.
NOTE: Permittees requesting renewal should complete the table ONLY for the parameters
currently monitored- Summarize the oast 3 vears of effluent data.
Parameter
Daily
Maximum
Monthly
Average
Units of
Measurement
Biochemical Oxygen Demand (BODS)
Chemical Oxygen Demand (COD)
Total Organic Carbon
Total Suspended Solids
10
10
mg/1
Ammonia as N
Temperature (Summer)
Temperature (Winter)
pH
6-9
6-9
Fecal Coliform (If sanitary waste is
present)
Total Residual Chlorine (if chlorine is
used)
16. List all permits, construction approvals and/or applications (check all that apply and provide permit
numbers or check none if not applicabler
Permit
Type Permit Number
Type
Number
Hazardous Waste (RCRA) none
NESHAPS (CAA)
none
UIC (SDWA) none
Ocean Dumping (MPRSA)
none
NPDES *NCGO10000
Dredge or fill (Section 404 or
2010-00436
PSD (CAA) none
Other
Non -attainment program none
*ONSLO-2010-104 ESCP - Stormwater Discharge for
Construction Activities
17. List any chemicals that may be discharged (Please list and explain source and potential
amounts.)
No chemicals are anticipated to be discharged.
Page 4 of 5 C-MI 10108

NPDES PERMIT APPLICATION - SHORT FORM C - Minor Industrial
Minor industrial, manufacturing and commercial facilities.
18. Is this facility located on Indian country? (check one)
Yes ❑ No
19. Applicant Certification
I certify that I am familiar with the information contained in the application and that to the
best of my knowledge and belief such information is true, complete, and accurate.
Printed name of person Signing Title
of Applicant
Date
(CCe-
North Carolina General Statute 143-215.6 (b)(2) provides that: Any person who knowingly makes any false
statement representation, or certification in any application, record, report, plan, or other document files or
required to be maintained under Article 21 or regulations of the Environmental Management Commission
implementing that Article, or who falsifies, tampers with, or knowingly renders inaccurate any recording or
monitoring device or method required to be operated or maintained under Article 21 or regulations of the
Environmental Management Commission implementing that Article, shall be guilty of a misdemeanor punishable
by a fine not to exceed $25,000, or by imprisonment not to exceed six months, or by both. (18 U.S.C. Section
1001 provides a punishment by a fine of not more than $25,000 or imprisonment not more than 5 years, or both,
for a similar offense.)
Page 5 of 5 C-MI 10108

Beverly Eaves Perdue, Governor
Dee Freeman, Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Coleen H. Sullins, Director
Division of Water Quality
April 8, 2011
Mr. Carl Baker, Deputy Public Works Officer
Public Works Division
MCB Camp Lejeune
1005 Michael Road
Camp Lejeune, North Carolina 28542
Subject: Engineering Alternative Analysis (EAA)
Permit NCO089079
Permit NCO089061
Borrow Pits 2, 3, and 10
Onslow County
Dear Mr. Baker:
The Division of Water Quality (Division) has reviewed your Engineering Alternative Analysis (EAA) for
the Borrow Pits 2, 3, and 10. The Division concurs with the conclusions and recommendations of the
EAA. The EAA you have submitted is sufficient to meet the Alternative Analysis requirements for a new
discharge.
The Division will now proceed to the permitting of the discharge. The entire permitting process may take
between 60 and 120 days. If the draft permits causes significant protests from local citizens, governmental
organizations, and/or environmental groups a public hearing may be scheduled and issuance of the final
permit may be further delayed. In some cases the Division may modify or deny the request for a new
permit based on the public hearing results.
If you have any questions about the NPDES permit process, contact me at the following e-mail address -
sergei.chernikov Jncdenr.g_ov, or telephone number 919-807-6393.
cc: NPDES File
Wilmington Regional Office/Surface Water Protection
Louise Slater (e-mail copy)
MACTEC Engineering and Consulting
3301 Atlantic Ave., Raleigh, NC 27604
Mailing Address Phone [phone]
1617 Mail Service Center Fax [phone]
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
Sincerely,
. 7Sergei Chernikov, Ph.D.
Environmental Engineer II
Complex NPDES Permitting Unit -
Location ft
Carolina
512 N. Salisbury St. 1�Ca�i1,J
Raleigh, NC 27604
Internet: www.newaterouality.ore Customer Service 1-877-623-6748
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer - 50% Recyded/10% Post Consumer Paper

Engineering Alternatives Analysis
1. Determination that proposed discharge is allowed
Several potential restrictions exist to wastewater discharge to surface waters. These are:
• Zero flow stream restrictions
• Receiving stream classification restrictions
• Basinwide Water Quality Plans
• Impaired waters and TMDLs
• Presence of endangered species
Borrow pits 2 and 3 for construction of the new Base Entry Point and Road at Marine Corps Base (MCB)
Camp Lejeune are proposed to discharge to Northeast Creek in the White Oak River Basin, Onslow
County. The drainage area of Northeast Creek at the discharge points is approximately 50 square miles.
Northeast Creek is a tidally affected stream up to the highway 24 road crossing, approximately 1.5 miles
upstream of the discharge points. There are no zero flow stream restrictions on Northeast Creek.
Northeast Creek (19-16-(3.5)) is classified as an SC, HQW, NSW. It is also classified as a primary nursery
area (PNA). According to 15A NCAC 026 .0224 (1) (b) (ii), new or expanded wastewater discharges in
High Quality Waters have limitations on discharges of total suspended solids (TSS) of 10 mg/I for trout
waters and PNAs and 20 mg/I for all other High Quality Waters. Based on this Rule, effluent is limited to
10 mg/I for TSS.
Basinwide Water Quality Plans for the White Oak River Basin indicate that Northeast Creek is part of the
New River watershed, which is contained entirely within Onslow County. It drains portions of Hoffman
State Forest, the City of Jacksonville, the Village of White Oak, and MCB Camp Lejeune. The discharge
points for dewatering borrow pits 2 and 3 are located on Northeast Creek between ambient monitoring
stations PA 10 and PA 11. This is near the transition from impaired to non impaired water quality status
for aquatic life. The stream reach upstream of PA 10 at Highway 24 is rated impaired to its headwaters.
According to the state 303(d) list, Northeast Creek 19-16-(3.5)a is listed as impaired for aquatic life in
non -shellfish harvesting waters due to low pH and chlorophyll a and supporting for recreation.
Northeast Creek 19-16-(3.5)b is supporting for aquatic life. There is no TMDL developed for Northeast
Creek.
According to the 404/401 permit developed for the Base Entry Road, there are few Threatened/
Endangered (T/E) species in Northeast Creek. These are the manatee, American alligator, and short
nosed sturgeon. Of these manatee sightings are rare. Short nosed sturgeon sightings are historic,
meaning they haven't been seen in over 50 years in this location. The manatee and short nosed
MACTEC Engineering and Consulting, Inc.
MCB Camp Lejeune Base Entry Road
NPDES Individual Wastewater Discharge Permit Application
P:\6470\09\Camp Lejeune\Borrow Pits\NPDES Individual Permit\Engineering A ternatives Analysis
1

sturgeon are subject to section 7 of the Endangered Species Act (ESA). The alligator is listed as
threatened due to similarity of appearance. It is not subject to section 7 of the ESA.
2. Projections for population and flow
The discharge request is not due to wastewater generated by domestic populations. This is limited to
wastewater discharge to dewater a borrow pit to construct the Base Entry Point and Road at MCB Camp
Lejeune. Therefore population projections are irrelevant to this discharge. Flow projections have been
conservatively developed. It was assumed that the entire borrow pit would be dewatered from one well
located in the center of each pit in order to excavate in the dry. Operationally, the pits will be excavated
in cells, which discharge less water because some water may be stored in other cells. More water will
be pumped from borrow pit 2 because it is slightly larger than borrow pit 3 and the ground water table
is closer to the ground surface. Based on these conservative calculations, a maximum of 720,000 GPD
will be pumped from borrow pit 2 and a maximum of 216,000 GPD will be pumped from borrow pit 3. It
is highly unlikely that groundwater will be pumped from the pits simultaneously. The plan is to remove
suitable fill from borrow pit 3 and when that pit is exhausted to move to borrow pit 2; therefore, both
pits will not be operating simultaneously.
3. Evaluate technically feasible alternatives.
Borrow pits 2 and 3 are intended to be used for two years during the construction of the Base Entry
Road at MCB Camp Lejeune. These are not intended to be permanent discharges. Once borrow pits
have been excavated to their design depth, they are intended to be graded so there is a 3:1 slope or
flatter down to the water line and a 2:1 slope or platter below the water line. They will then be
permanently stabilized in place. No additional pumping from these pits is anticipated. Alternatives to
be considered include connecting to an existing wastewater treatment system, land application,
wastewater reuse, direct discharge, and a combination of alternatives.
It is not considered feasible to connect fresh groundwater from a borrow pit to an existing wastewater
treatment plant (WWTP). Adding too much freshwater would impair the media (i.e. kill the bugs) used
in digesting domestic wastewater. Furthermore, a new sewer line would need to be constructed to tie
the borrow pits to the existing sanitary sewer lines. The cost to direct this water from the borrow pits to
the WWTP on base is not supported by the short term nature of the dewatering operations, nor does
this quantity of freshwater into the system support the ability of the WWTP to treat domestic
wastewater.
Land application is not feasible. MCB Camp Lejeune currently does not have a permit to land -apply, nor
is there suitable land nearby where it could be applied because large spray areas are required. The land
surrounding the borrow pits is used for military operations. It is a shorter distance and less cost to
discharge to Northeast Creek than to an area that may be suitable to land -apply.
MACTEC Engineering and Consulting, Inc.
MCB Camp Lejeune Base Entry Road
NPDES Individual Wastewater Discharge Permit Application
P:\6470\09\Camp Lejeune\Borrow Pits\NPDES Individual Perm it\Enginee ring Alternatives Analysis
2

In general, wastewater reuse is not feasible because there is insufficient demand for the quantity of
water that will be removed from the borrow pits in the dewatering process. With that being said, some
of the water from the borrow pits could be used to control dust or moisten the soil as part of the road
bed construction process. Using water from the borrow pits for this operation conserves potable water
for domestic use on Base.
Direct discharge is the most feasible option. Dewatering is intended to keep the construction site
cleaner and operations running smoother by excavating fill material in the dry rather than in the wet.
The pollutant of greatest concern is total suspended sediment (TSS). To limit TSS, discharge will be
pumped from cells within the borrow pit to a stilling basin and from there to the bank of Northeast
Creek. Before the water is discharged into Northeast Creek, it will be run through a sediment filter bag
which will serve as another level of treatment and as a means of dispersing the flow and slowing it down
before it enters the creek. If necessary PAM can be added to the stilling basin to encourage settling of
sediment and produce cleaner discharge.
4. Evaluate economic feasibility of alternatives
If discharge were to be pumped to the WWTP serving MCB Camp Lejeune, an 8-inch force main would
be required to carry 500 gpm from the borrow pits to the sanitary sewer trunk line. This connector
provides a full flow velocity in the pipe of 3.2 ft/sec and a friction loss of 0.465 feet/100 feet. This
system would require additional design cost and a wastewater extension permit in addition to the
construction cost. Typical construction cost for an 8-inch ductile iron force main would average
approximately $42 per linear foot (source R.S. Means estimating guide 22nd annual edition — 2007). In
addition to cost, this process could add months to the schedule, potentially causing construction delays.
Adding this much freshwater to the WWTP could also be detrimental to treatment of domestic
wastewater.
Land application of wastewater from the borrow pits is not feasible for several reasons. First, a geologic
study is required to ensure soils are suitable for infiltration and that there is enough separation between
the soil surface and seasonal high water table. A permit to land apply wastewater is required and a
spray irrigation system would have to be designed. The permit and design process is estimated to cost
$50,000. In order to dewater 500 gpm seven days a week, two or three big spray irrigation guns are
needed at a cost of $40,000 per gun. Assuming 1 inch of wastewater can be applied per week, 186 acres
are needed for this volume of water. Even if soil infiltration capacity is such that it can handle more
than 1 inch per week, a very large area is required for the spray field. Large tracts of land are not readily
available near the borrow pits so significant cost and effort would be needed to pipe the water from the
borrow pit to the spray field and these areas would not be available for military tactical operations for a
period of time, which is detrimental to the mission of MCB Camp Lejeune.
The most economically feasible option is discharging into Northeast Creek. Costs related to this option
include the cost of pumping and maintaining the pump and associated intake and discharge lines, the
MACTEC Engineering and Consulting, Inc.
MCB Camp Lejeune Base Entry Road
NPDES Individual Wastewater Discharge Permit Application
P:\6470\09\Camp Lejeune\Borrow Pits\NPDES Individual Permit\Engineering Alternatives Analysis
3

stilling basin, and maintenance of the sediment filter bag at the end of the pipe serving as both a filter
and a level spreader. A potential cost is for polyacrylamide (PAM) application in the stilling basin to
encourage more settling of TSS.
Of these three options, discharging water from the borrow pits into Northeast Creek has the lowest
capital cost by far and lower recurring costs.
MACTEC Engineering and Consulting, Inc.
MCB Camp Lejeune Base Entry Road
NPDES Individual Wastewater Discharge Permit Application
P:\6470\09\Camp Lejeune\Barrow Pits\NPDES Individual Permit\Engineering Alternatives Analysis
4

BoYr-nv-) Pi-t Z
M C B Ca P Le
Predicting Radius of Influence Under Pumping Conditions
From Cooper & Jacob 1946 (See Driscoll pg 219)
s = [264Q/T] x log [0.3Tt/r2S]
Where: s = drawdown in ft at distance r from pumping well
Q = pumping rate in gpm
T = transmissivity in gpd/ft
t = time since pumping started in days
r = distance in ft from pumping well
S = storage coefficient (0.001 for confined, 0.2 for unconfined)
Proposed Well:
Q =
500 gpm
T =
5000 gpd/ft
S =
0.2
t (days) =>
1
10
100
365
r (ft)
s (ft)
s (ft)
s (ft)
s (ft)
1
102.30
128.70
155.10
169.95
10
49.50
75.90
102.30
117.15
20
33.61
60.01
86.41
101.25
30
24.31
50.71
77.11
91.95
40
17.71
44.11
70.51
85.36
50
12.60
39.00
65.40
80.24
60
8.42
34.82
61.22
76.06
70
4.88
31.28
57.68
72.52
80
1.82
28.22
54.62
69.46
90
-0.88
25.52
51.92
66.76
100
-3.30
23.10
49.50
64.35
200
-19.19
7.21
33.61
48.45
300
-28.49
-2.09
24.31
39.15
400
-35.09
-8.69
17.71
32.56
500
-40.20
-13.80
12.60
27.44
600
-44.38
-17.98
8.42
23.26
700
-47.92
-21.52
4.88
19.72
800
-50.98
-24.58
1.82
16.66
900
-53.68
-27.28
-0.88
13.96
1000
-56.10
-29.70
-3.30
11.55
2000
-71.99
-45.59
-19.19
-4.35
2250
-74.69
-48.29
-21.89
-7.05
2500
-77.11
-50.71
-24.31
-9.47
2750
-79.30
-52.90
-26.50
-11.65
3000
-81.29
-54.89
-28.49
-13.65
3250
-83.13
-56.73
-30.33
-15.48
3500
-84.83
-58.43
-32.03
-17.18
3750
-86.41
-60.01
-33.61
-18.76
4000
-87.89
-61.49
-35.09
-20.24
4250
-89.28
-62.88
-36.48
-21.63
4500
-90.59
-64.19
-37.79
-22.94
4750
-91.83
-65.43
-39.03
-24.18
5000
-93.00
-66.60
-40.20
-25.36
5250
-94.12
-67.72
-41.32
-26.48

based on Driscoll correlation with density from split -spoon
k= 106.5 gpd/ft^2 sampling
T=k"b b= 46.75 ft based on NCDENR hydro framework database
T= 4978.875 gpd/ft
T= 4979 gpd/ft Driscoll
If center of pit well
Need 16 ft of drawdown minimum
Further distance from pit is NE corner near C, approx. 820 ft
Therefore:
A = 1600 ft
B = 820 ft
C = 4020 ft (2xA+B)
Based on above, no discernible drawdown in image well
Note: negative drawdown values indicate no measureable drawdown is expected at these locations
Reference:
Driscoll, Fletcher G., 1986. Groundwater and Wells, 2nd edition. Johnson Division, St. Paul, MN, 1089 p.

0
Pjor�-ou> ��t 3
Predicting Radius of Influence Under Pumping Conditions
From Cooper & Jacob 1946 (See Driscoll pg 219)
s = [264Q/T] x log [0.3Tt/r2S]
Where: s = drawdown in ft at distance r from pumping well
Q = pumping rate in gpm
T = transmissivity in gpd/ft
t = time since pumping started in days
r = distance in ft from pumping well
S = storage coefficient (0.001 for confined, 0.2 for unconfined)
Proposed Well:
Q = 150 gpm
T = 3621 gpd/ft
S = 0.2
t (days) =>
1
10
100
365
r (ft)
s (ft)
s (ft)
s (ft)
s (ft)
1
40.85
51.78
62.72
68.87
10
18.97
29.91
40.85
47.00
20
12.39
23.33
34.26
40.41
30
8.54
19.47
30.41
36.56
40
5.80
16.74
27.68
33.83
50
3.69
14.62
25.56
31.71
60
1.95
12.89
23.83
29.98
70
0.49
11.43
22.36
28.51
80
-0.78
10.16
21.09
27.24
90
-1.90
9.04
19.97
26.12
100
-2.90
8.04
18.97
25.12
200
-9.48
1.45
12.39
18.54
300
-13.33
-2.40
8.54
14.69
400
-16.07
-5.13
5.80
11.95
500
-18.19
-7.25
3.69
9.83
600
-19.92
-8.98
1.95
8.10
700
-21.38
-10.45
0.49
6.64
800
-22.65
-11.72
-0.78
5.37
900
-23.77
-12.83
-1.90
4.25
1000
-24.77
-13.84
-2.90
3.25
2000
-31.36
-20.42
-9.48
-3.33
2250
-32.47
-21.54
-10.60
-4.45
2500
-33.48
-22.54
-11.60
-5.45
2750
-34.38
-23.44
-12.51
-6.36
3000
-35.21
-24.27
-13.33
-7.19
3250
-35.97
-25.03
-14.10
-7.95
3500
-36.67
-25.74
-14.80
-8.65
3750
-37.33
-26.39
-15.45
-9.31
4000
-37.94
-27.00
-16.07
-9.92
4250
-38.52
-27.58
-16.64
-10.49
4500
-39.06
-28.12
-17.19
-11.04
4750
-39.57
-28.64
-17.70
-11.55
5000
-40.06
-29.12
-18.19
-12.04
5250
-40.52
-29.59
-18.65
-12.50

Borrow Area 3
T=k*b
T=
T=
k= 106.5 gpd/ft^2
b= 34 ft
3621 gpd/ft
3621 gpd/ft Driscoll
based on Driscoll correlation with density from split -
spoon sampling
based on NCDENR hydro framework database
If center of pit well
Need 5 ft of drawdown minimum
Further distance from pit is S corner near D', approx. 760 ft
Therefore
A = 600 ft
B = 760 ft
C = 1960 ft (2xA+B)
With pumping at 150 gpm
Drawdown at B= 5.37
Drawdown at C= no discernible
So theoretical drawdown (B-C) = 5.37
Note: negative drawdown values indicate no measureable drawdown is expected at these locations
Reference:
Driscoll, Fletcher G., 1986. Groundwater and Wells, 2nd edition. Johnson Division, St. Paul, MN, 1089 p.

I
v
14
Z>
WATER HANDLED B)", STILLI BA AND SKIMMER lS PIMARI
D GROU A R STORMWATER) TO ACIL[TATE TION
B ER T
CONTRACTOR ANAGE WATER WITHIN THE PIT SELF TO T
T OSSIBLE USING TEMPORARY DIVERSIONS.IF ATE ST BE
EXI ING RO
EXCAVATION THROUGH PUMPED FROM PIT TO SPECIAL STILLING BASIN,CONTRAC SHALL PROTECT THE'
AD PUMP INLET (WET WELL OR SIMILAR) TO MINIMIZE ENTRAINED SEDIMENT.so 100
FLOW FROM S W, BASIN A-2 TO THE
BORROW PIT. ENCE TOWARDS THE END
E I (PI382) CONSTRUCTION. 3. SKIMMER ORIFICE TO BE SIZED BY CONTRACTOR USING NORTH_ CA'ROLINA
COORDINATE EXCAVATION AS NEEDED.
EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION CONTROL MANUAL DESIGN GUIDEAINES
PUMP RATE AS DETERMINED IN THE FIELD
EXCAVATION 4. CONTR OR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR DISCHARGING WATER IN COMPLIANCE
WITH T NC GENERAL STORYWATER PERMIT CRITERIA
14 In
5. CONTRACTOR SHOULD CONFIRM THAT UTILITIES WITHIN THE FOOT RINT','
STILLING POND
AVE BEEN RELOCATED OR ABANDONED PER PHASE I(PI382)
WISKIMMER I
DISCHARGE
15'X45'(APPROLS X) 6. fTE IS LOCATED IN ONSLOW COUNTY. NORTH SEE DETAI
u) Vl CO TOR SHALL CLEAR AND GRUB T 04:01:32 PUE-20-2011
4 WITHIN THE PERMIT
STABILIZED RIP RAP STILLING BOUNDLIMITS IN ACCORDANCE WIT THE BASE ENTRY ROAD (PI382)"\ (-05
ENTRANCE BASIN OUTFACE OR' "
, I ts!"s,
IFICA 430
r
0,
-DISTURBED BUFF 50'UN IRBED BUFF G U )WATER PRE -TREAT GROUND AND STORMWATER WITHIN THE
-S TH t4t Ijtk�
,,o�
FROM WETLANDS (TYP.) P CH M E7 QUALITY CRITERIA CAN BE DISCHARGED VIA
ORARY T G BASIN OR SPECIAL STILLING BASIN IN ACCORDANCE ctf,
E DETAILS.THE INTENT IS TO KEEP THE CLEAN AND SEDIMENT
N ATER STREAMS FROM MIXING.AND REDUCING THE LOAD ON THE
ASINS.
EXCAVATION AREA i E V N _WIU_�F T�E WIT H G GROUND WATER
e__ 15
MWATER EVENTS �
MACTEC I RK&K JV
STILLING
PERPERMITWISKIMME OND
w DISCHARGE
15'X45'(APTAJPL�) OX)
SEE DE
25'UN-EX AVATED
oes BUF f t Tt-.) Ln
A. X' a,r N61 rHn LOS
T P CULVERT lb
4* EQUIVALENT) �mw
MTM
C4
<
cv)
RIP RAP Q w
8
11101"Ill
0 __l
IEGFN v —
cl, 0 Z
PERMIT BOUNDARY
0
(14.34 AC)
CL
TEMP HAUL ROAD (0.32 AC) uj
Z
NEW BOY SCOU ROAD
LL
A T
z
AS NOTED
To
125593,,B
C
:r 39BG619
L_ 402
2 3 4

D 9 5
LEGEND
PERMIT BOUNDARY t
(16.74 AC)
lGIE N
TEMP HAUL ROAD (021 AC) o
Z TO Rr [
l
J/ PERMIT BOUNDARY `
r 1
_ I 03:59:03 PW,,ly2�0-2011
SEAL
/.
s
844
NOTES: 25'UN—EXCAVATED BUFFER
I. WATER HANDLED BY THE STILLING BASIN AND SKIMMER /S PRIMARILY 0 (TYP.) : / I r\1 { ' 1" •a� �
cv— ; / I C
PUMPED GROUNDWATER (NOT STORMWATER) TO FACILITATE EXCAVATION I G BELOW WATER TABLE. d, STILLING POND A
z`. W/SKIMMER E \
2. CONTRACTOR SHALL MANAGE WATER WITHIN THE PIT ITSELF TO THE T DISCHARGE
EXTENT POSSIBLE USING TEMPORARY DNERS/ONS.1F WATER MUST BE 15'X45' (APPROX) I '• \` \
PUMPED FROM PIT TO SPECIAL STILLING BASIN, CONTRACTOR SHALL < SEE DETAILll
PROTECT THE PUMP INLET (WET WELL OR SIMILAR) TO MINIMIZE ? ` \ \ MACTEC I RKSK JV
ENTRAINED SEDIMENT. RIP RAP STILLING BASIN 0 FALL <
71
3. SKIMMER ORIFICE TO BE SIZED BY CONTRACTOR USING NORTH CAROLINA e hl E
EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION CONTROL MANUAL DESIGN GUIDELINES TEMP STREAM C SS/NGl " / / . C I ? 1 e °a
�\
USING PUMP RATE AS DETERMINED 1N THE FIELD. LVERT-36' DIA EOU NT) j �1 \\,
\ e_He ii\
4. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR DISCHARGING WATER /N COMPLIANCE
WITH THE NC GENERAL STORMWATER PERMIT CRITERIA Il le i wa.00. ro ortc
ces .AC — NBE c"
l
5. SITE IS LOCATED IN ONSLOW COUNTY.NORTH CAROLINA EXCAVATION AREA sMw
6. CONTRACTOR SHALL CLEAR AND GRUB THE AREA WITHIN THE PERMIT cse
•��i ''' ___� oen:n ruiw MTM
BOUNDARY LIMITS IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE BASE ENTRY ROAD (P1382) '
SPECIFICATIONS. /%l LOO��I ' {�:� " 14
\�{
7. GROUNDWATER OR PRE-TREATED GROUND AND STORMWATER WITHIN THE aI
PIT WHICH MEETS THE WATER QUALITY CRITERIA CAN BE DISCHARGED
VIA A TEMPORARY STILLING BASIN OR SPECIAL STILLING BASIN IN
ACCORDANCE WITH THE DETAILS. THE INTENT IS TO KEEP THE CLEAN AND
SEDIMENT LADEN WATER STREAMS FROM MIXING. AND REDUCING THE STABILIZED ENTRANCE ��j
LOAD ON THE STILLING BASINS.
-- �
CL
8. POND ELEVATION WILL FLUCTUATE WITH CHANGING GROUND WATER � w - — I 1 n
LEVELS AND STORMWATER EVENTS. v+
9. LYNCHBURG FINE SANDY LOAM.
I
TEMP CULV RT
B (18'EQUN NT)
----- -• .. II �I ' 1 �' 1 II 11 � O m o G
Lo
1 1 III 1 11
II
I �jl 11 11 FI
'I 1 I w
I
�t> W , it D
11 I
11 n
"/l' i ii FI 4 z
N h 1 1 1 n 11 w a
to 11,
�� 1� i i� �cr as r
H� /' IU 1 % 11 1�1 jl I 1 cas*e. canM xo.
�> ................
NNVG oNewrw No.
•. /S'� / / J 111 1 ill II I2559342A
I I 11
✓� '/•'� �. / / IF i i 11 g ll II 39A
CG401
i C

G
1
3
T
TEMPORARY STREAM CROSSING
t
NATURAL
GROUND
VAR.
PLAN VIEW
12" MIN
SECTION A•A
NOT TO SCULL
INE IN ACCORDANCE
:ON 1005 OF NC DOT
1PECIFICATION
CROSS ►IPE(S): SIZE
DETERMINED BY
CONTRACTOR
B RIP RAP
N57 STONE, S" DEPTH (MIN.)
NATURAL
GROUND
10:1 1
.ASS B RIP RAP
(SEE NOTE)
NOTE: PIPE(S) FOR TEMPORARY STREAM CROSSING SHALL BE DESIGNED TO PASS THE PEAK OR
BANKFULL FLOW, WHICHEVER IS LESS, FROM A 2-YEAR PEAK STORM, WITHOUT OVER TOPPING.
SPECIAL STILLING BASIN
(FILTER BAG)
Existing Ground
Special Stilling Basin
Existing Terrain
/ 1
15.0' to 20.0' -- --
i
8" of Sediment Control Stone
Filter Fabric
1
AM
Not To Scale
NOTES:
1. Provide Stabilized Outlet to Existing Ground
2. Sediment bags should be sized based on the volume of
water being pumped (pump flow rate), quantity and type
of sediment and the permittivity of the given bag size per
manufacturer specifications.
3. Consideration should also be given to location. (Steep
sloped surfaces are typically not recommended as the bag
may roll.)
4. Each sediment bag can handle a 2", 3" or 4" discharge
hose. The hose can be placed along any edge by making
a small incision into the fabric, inserting the hose and then
clamping the fabric to the hose via wire, ties, clamp, rope
or similar to create a good seal.
5. To improve surface area and performance of the bag,
place it on a permeable/porous surface such as hay bales,
aggregate or similar. Take care to select a media that will
not damage the bag * use of a ground cloth can alleviate
damage from occurring.
6. Care should always be taken to properly monitor
performance to ensure that pump rates or concentrations
of sediment are not excessive. Failure to do so may
cause bag to fail.
7. Avoid multiple pipe discharges into one bag. One bag
per discharge is recommended.
8. Filtered water runoff from the bag should be dispersed.
Take care to avoid causing erosion.
9. Replace sediment bag when capacity as defined by the
manufacturer is reached. Properly dispose of used
sediment bag off site.
10. Routinely inspect sediment bag when pumping to
ensure it is functioning properly. Replace bags that are
torn, at capacity, or otherwise not performing effectively.
:55:08 PLI-0.1-20-2011
SEAL
028447
■[
MAAACTCTEC / RK&K JV
DES JOC IDRW
NBE cex LOS
JRB
sAxAua
SMW
asr D,ci.wcx
GSB
rerun Eu,ou
MTM
E
��a
J
z
0
_ 1
Ln
_
tV C
J
a
00 O
M a
L,i
CL
CL �
G
J
Z c
o
0W
F—
r
�
o
W
<U
`m
U
Z
0
W
LL
Z
O
a
X
Lu
m
0
z
scAiE.
AS NOTED
—IT xD,
P-1382
cONSMDO ar
•_s_
.—AD DRAlIM1G N0.
12559371A
e2m
1 � �
ra

Chernikov, Sergei
From: Chernikov, Sergei
Sent: Friday, January 28, 2011 11:04 AM
To: '[e-mail]'
Subject: FW: application for a new permit (Camp Lejeune)
Louise,
I have reviewed the new permit application that you submitted on January 27, 2011 and found several deficiencies that
have to be corrected.
1) Complete evaluation of discharge alternatives. The Division requires applicants for new and
expanding discharge permits to fully document all alternatives to surface water discharge (15A NCAC
2H.0105 (c)(2)). Each discharge alternative should be thoroughly evaluated and each conclusion
should be substantiated by appropriate documents and itemized budgets. The Alternatives Analysis
that you have submitted with your application is not sufficient to satisfy our requirements. You need to
provide itemized budget for each alternative, including land application, and wastewater reuse (this
option is currently missing from you analyses). One example of the supporting documentation is a
quote from the real estate agent/company with an estimate of cost for the land parcel needed for spray
irrigation. You can use a County Soil Survey to determine suitability of soil for land application, there
is no need for a geological study or for a soil consultant.
2) Please provide a list of any chemicals found in detectable amounts in the groundwater at the site, with
the maximum observed concentration reported for each chemical. Please include volatile organic
compound analysis, EPA method 624/625 should be performed.
Please let me know if you have any questions.
Thank you!
Sergei
Sergei Chernikov, Ph.D.
Environmental Engineer II
Complex Permitting Unit
Phone: [phone], fax [phone]
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
Express mail: 512 North Salisbury St.
Raleigh, NC 27606
E-mail correspondence to and from this address may be subject to the North Carolina Public Records Law and may be
disclosed to third parties.

NPDES Permit Rating Work Sheet
SCORE SUMMARY
Factor Description
1
Toxic Pollutant Potential
2
FlowlStreamflow Volume
3
Cornentiorwi Pollutants
4
Public Health Impacts
S
Water Quality Factors
6
Proximity to Near Coastal Waters
TOTAL (Factors 1 through 6)
Total Points
U
c;
t�1
Q
5
NPDES No.: I^!_I_I_I_I_i�l_!_�
Sl . Is the total score equal to or greater than 807 ❑ Yes (Facility is a major) [ No
S2. If the answer to the above question is no, would you like this facility to be discretionary major?
O No
❑ Yes (Add 500 points to the above score and provide reason below:
Reason:
NEW SCORE: 5
OLD SCORE:
4
Permit Reviewer's Name
Phone Number
Date

OutfAll,
3
0
Ou- all,2
J�
O '
BP-3
�O
t�
t 1-w
.�r
F
BREW_ _STD B�
f CO
ab CO
j t Z,
gT MARYS'D s i1"
rn
aCj
r/�VTE� �.
�� � SETH "vy
7J r� XS@ f
l� e
NCO089061 - Borrow Pits 2 and 3
Outfall #: 002
Outfall #:
003
Latitude: 34043'32"
Latitude:
34043'23"
Longitude: 77022'58"
Longitude:
77022'11"
Receiving Stream: Northeast Creek
Receiving Stream: Northeast Creek
Stream Class: SC -NSW HQW
Stream Class:
SC -NSW HQW
Subbasin: 03-05-02
Subbasin:
03-05-02
River Basin: White Oak
River Basin:
White Oak
Hydrologic Unit: 03020301
Hydrologic Unit:
03020301
Facility
Location
Onslow County
✓VC�L�L Map not to scale

ytST�:1'f�..�tLjl�. EW
H
sErw� ._
NCO089061 - Borrow Pits 2 and 3
Outfall #:
002
Outfall #:
003
Latitude:
34043'32"
Latitude:
34043'23"
Longitude:
77022'58"
Longitude:
77022'11"
Receiving Stream: Northeast Creek
Receiving Stream:
Northeast Creek
Stream Class:
SC -NSW HQW
Stream Class:
SC -NSW HQW
Subbasin:
03-05-02
Subbasin:
03-05-02
River Basin:
White Oak
River Basin:
White Oak
Hydrologic Unit:
03020301
Hydrologic Unit:
03020301
Facility
Location
__��11�� Onslow County
,Afirr
✓ ft& Map not to scale

4
1
Ghernikov, Sergei
From: Ghernikov, Sergei
Sent: Friday, January 28, 2011 11:04 AM
To: '[e-mail]'
Subject: FW: application for a new permit (Camp Lejeune)
Louise,
I have reviewed the new permit application that you submitted on January 27, 2011 and found several deficiencies that
have to be corrected.
1) Complete evaluation of discharge alternatives. The Division requires applicants for new and
expanding discharge permits to fully document all alternatives to surface water discharge (15A NCAC
214.0105 (c)(2)). Each discharge alternative should be thoroughly evaluated and each conclusion
should be substantiated by appropriate documents and itemized budgets. The Alternatives Analysis
that you have submitted with your application is not sufficient to satisfy our requirements. You need to
provide itemized budget for each alternative, including land application, and wastewater reuse (this
option is currently missing from you analyses). One example of the supporting documentation is a
quote from the real estate agent/company with an estimate of cost for the land parcel needed for spray
irrigation. You can use a County Soil Survey to determine suitability of soil for land application, there
is no need for a geological study or for a soil consultant.
2) Please provide a list of any chemicals found in detectable amounts in the groundwater at the site, with
the maximum observed concentration reported for each chemical. Please include volatile organic
compound analysis, EPA method 624/625 should be performed.
Please let me know if you have any questions.
Thank you!
Sergei
Sergei Chernikov, Ph.D.
Environmental Engineer II
Complex Permitting Unit
Phone: [phone], fax [phone]
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
Express mail: 512 North Salisbury St.
Raleigh, NC 27606
E-mail correspondence to and from this address may be subject to the North Carolina Public Records Law and may be
disclosed to third parties.
1

NPDFS Permit Rating Work Sheet ❑ Regular Addition
❑ Discretionary Addition
❑ Score change, but no
NPDES No.: I_I_t_I�I_I_I_I_I_I status change
❑ Deletion
Facility Name:
�101RIPIbIwI—i�I—LITISI_IZ1_IAIgIAI_131_I_1-1_1-1_1-1_i_I_I_I_I_!_1_'_1
City: IC IA I M1�1_I Li E I,Li �► u I �I EI_I_I_I rl_I--i-1—I—I—i—�—I
Receiving Water: I ► O Ii 4ILI A I S
Reach Number. I Ig1=4-1-,, 13 1 • II_I
is this facility a steam electric power plant (SJC=4911) is this permit for a municipal separate storm sewer
with one or more of the "lowing characteristics7 serving a population greater than 100,0007
1. Power output 500 MW or greater (not using a coding pond/lake)
2. A nuclear power plant ❑ �Y ;score is 700 (stop here)
3. Cooling water discharge greater than 25% of the receiving stream's 7Q1 D flow rate W NO (continue)
❑ YES; score is 600 (stop here) a NO (continue)
FACTOR t: Toxic Pollutant Potential
PCS SIC Code: I_I_I_I_I Primary SIC Code: 1 11 12-1
Other SIC Codes:
Industrial Subcategory Code: l 0 10 1 U 1 (Code 000 If no subcategory)
Determine the Toxicity potential from Appendix A. Be sure to use the TOTAL toxicity potential column and check one)
Toxicity Group Code Points Toxicity Group Code Points Toxicity Group Code Points
lJ No process ❑ 3. 3 15 ❑ 7. 7 35
waste streams 0 0 ❑ 4. 4 20 ❑ 8_ 8 40
❑ I. 1 5 ❑ S. 5 25 ❑ 9. 9 45
❑ 2. 2 10 ❑ 6. 6 30 ❑ 10. 10 SO
Code Number Checked:
Total Points Factor 1: 1 0 1 01
FACTOR 2: Flow/Stream FLOW Voiurrle (campleto oittserSoctbn A orSoctbn B; chock only one)
Section A Wastewater Flow Only Considered
Section B Wastewater and Stream Flow Considered
Wastewater Type
Code
Points
Wastewater Type
Percent of In; [ream
Code
Points
(See instructions)
(See Instructions)
Wastewater Concen-
Type I: Flow < 5 MOD
0
11
0
[ration at Receiving
Flow 5 to 10 MOD
❑
12
10
Stream Low Flow
Flow >10 to 50 MGD
❑
❑
13
14
20
30
TYPE I/Ill;
< 10%
❑
41
0
Flow> 50 MGD
Type It: Flow <1 MOD
❑
21
10
a 10% to c50%
D
42
10
Flow 1 to 5 MGD
❑
22
20
Z 50%
❑
43
20
Flow>5 to 10 MOD
❑
23
30
Flow >10 MGD
❑
24
5D
Type 11:
< 10%
❑
5 i
0
Type ill: Flow <1 MOD
^/
31
0
2 10% to <50%
❑
5Z
ZO
Flaw 1 to 5 MOD
(]
32
10
Flow >5 to 10 MOD
D
33
20
?509i
❑
53
30
Plow >10MCD
❑
34
30
Code Checked trap Section A or B: 1 � I i ra
Total Points Factor 2: 1 O 10

AIPOES Permit Rating Work Sheet
FAkcr0R 3: Conventional Pollutants NPDES No.: I, I_ I_I,Irl,i_I_I_I
(only whop X7ili'Vdb1 ^ P�o pormll)
A Gxyger Gp-ianding Pollular' imr- one) U 900 ❑ COD ❑ Other:
Code
Points
i erml: Umiu; (c,r'.I ne., 7
<100 tbslday
1
0
' OD to 1000lbs/day
2
5
>1000 to 1000 lbs/day
3
15
i�
>3000lbs/day
4
20
'roa! ;.+:pendtd 5-o!id. 'ASS'
Code
Points
Permit !:mi's: F' ='I' cK z? �
<100 Ibs/day
1
0
IC0 to 1000lbs/day
2
5
❑
.000 to SDOO Ibs/day
3
is
D
>SOOOlbs/day
4
20
C. NiL-�-gen Pollu o, tr`r.. t ❑ Ammonia �) Other:--
Nitrogen Equivalent
Permit him one; l:J e300lbs/day
100 to l 0001bs/day
D >1000 to 3000 lbs/day
C] >3000lbs/day
Code Points
1 0
2 5
3 15
4 20
Code Checked: I I I
Points Scored: I D I DI
Code Checked: I2-I
Pants Scored: f 0fal
Code Checked: I I I
Points Scored: I 0 ; O I
Total Points Factor 3: 1Ql5l
=A,r-7CiP 4: Put gk-- Health impact
ape, e a pcsrstic f.wakary wafer supply located witisir SO miles downstream of the effluent discharge (this includes any body of
rice to will: +t the receiving water /s a trlhutary)T A public drinking water supply may Include inflltradon galleries, or other
,rfhods of -wiveyontx that ultimately get tooter from the above referenced supply.
yes, cheer. taxi.:.• jtential number below)
nor, ga 4, Factor
oeterrnlie --•ke human heakh toxicity potential from Appendix A. Use the sane SIC code and subcategory reference as in Factor 1. (be
tier tc Jsc t`ie human hxeith toxicity group column .. • check one below)
�'r• fcf: f �.roup
cods Points
Toxicity Group
Code
Points
7oxadty Group Code
Prints
ij Nc, Fnxf-
0 3•
3
0
❑ 7. 7
15
.. strum:
0 0
❑ 4,
4
D
❑ 8. 8
20
❑
0
❑ 5
5
5
❑ 9. 9
25
u 2
2 0
(� ti
6
10
❑10. 10
30
Code Number Checked: 1
I I
total Points Factor 4: 1—'—[
2

a
NPDES Permit Rating Work Sheet
FACTOR b: Water Quality Factors NPDES No.: I_I+III�I_I_I_ I_f_I
A. Is (or will) one or more of the effluent discharge limits based on water quality factors of the receiving stream (rather than
technology -based federal effluent guidelines, or technology -based state effluent guidelines), or has a wastefoad allocation
been assigned to the discharge?
Code Paints
❑/Yes 1 10
Q No 2 0
B. is the receiving water In compliance with appllcabie water quality standards for pollutants that are water quality dtrnited in
the permit?
Code Points
(Yes 1 0
Q No 2 5
C. Does the effluent discharged from this facility exhibit the reasonable potential to violate water quality standards due to whole
effluent toxicity?
Code Points
❑ Yes 1 10
Cale -"No 2 0
Code Number Checked: A 12-1 B 1 I 1 C 1 -) I
Points Factor 5: A I d l 01 + B IQ! + C! 21 n I I U! TOTAL
FACTOR 6: Proximity to Near Coastal Waters
A. Base Score. Enter flow code here (from Factor 2): 13 1_( _I
Check appropriate facility HPRI Code (from PC5):
HPRI N
Code
HPRI Score
❑ 1
1
20
❑ 2
2
0
p 3
3
30
Q 4
4
0
D 5
5
20
HPRI code checked: 13 1
Base Score: (HPRI Score) 3G x (Multiplication Factor) O
B. Additional Points — NEP Program
For a facility that has an HPRI code of 3, does the facility
discharge to one of the estuaries enrolled In the National
Estuary Pratectfon (NEP) program (see Instructions) or
the Chesapeake Bay?
Enter the mult/pHcation factor that corresponds
to the flow code: I O t C_ f
How Code
Multiplication Factor
11, 31,or41
0. DO
12, 32, or 42
0.05
13, 33, or 43
0.10
14 or 34
0.15
21 or 51
0.10
22 or S2
0.30
23 or S3
0.60
24
1.00
0 (TOTAL POINTS)
C. Additional Points —Great Lakes Area of Concern
For a facility that has an HPRI code of S, does the facility
discharge any of the pollutants of concern Into one of the
Great Lakes' 3 i areas of concern (see instructions)
Code Points Code Points
p/Yes 1 10 _❑/Yes 1 )C
l� No 2 0 Ld No 2 0
Code N..unber checked A 13 1 B 12-1 C ; 2-1
Points Factor 6 A I d l 0' + 1510101 + CIO 101 = 1 1 TOTAL
3

I I r
r
NPDES Permit Rating Work Sheet
SCORE SUMMARY
NPDES No,:
Factor
Description
Total Points
1
Toxic Pollutant Potential
O
2
FlowfStreamflow Volume
0
3
Conventional Pollutants
U
4
Public Health impacts
5
Water Quality Factors
(?
6
Proximity to Near Coastal Waters
D
TOTAL (Factors 1 through 6)
15
51. Is the total score equal
to or greater than 807 ❑ Yes (Facility
is a major) D No
S2. If the answer to the above question is no, would you like this facility to be discretionary major?
0 No
❑ Yes (Add 500 points to the above score and provide reason below:
Reason:
NEW SCORE: 5
OLD SCORE:
4
Permit Reviewer's Name
U
Phone Number
Date

2_~
Outfall�2 oe-J
..A
M+
'° `��:"sErH wi��► �i
NCO089061 - Borrow Pits 2 and 3
Outfall #:
002
Outfall #:
003
Latitude:
34°43'32"
Latitude:
34043'23"
Longitude:
77°22'58"
Longitude:
77°22'11"
Receiving Stream:
Northeast Creek
Receiving Stream:
Northeast Creek
Stream Class:
SC -NSW HQW
Stream Class:
SC -NSW HQW
Subbasin:
03-05-02
Subbasin:
03-05-02
River Basin:
White Oak
River Basin:
White Oak
Hydrologic Unit:
03020301
Hydrologic Unit:
03020301
Facility =,
Location
Onslow County
Map not to scale

m
m„
rn.
�
m
NCO089061 - Borrow Pits 2 and 3
Outfall #:
002
Outfall #:
003
Latitude:
34043'32"
Latitude:
34°43'23"
Longitude:
77022'58"
Longitude:
77022'11"
Receiving Stream: Northeast Creek
Receiving Stream:
Northeast Creek
Stream Class:
SC -NSW HQW
Stream Class:
SC -NSW HQW
Subbasin:
03-05-02
Subbasin:
03-05-02
River Basin:
White Oak
River Basin:
White Oak
Hydrologic Unit:
03020301
Hydrologic Unit:
03020301
Facility
Location -�
�, --,,``//�� Onslow County
��//
✓ ft& Map not to scale