030005_Compliance Evaluation Inspection_20231026

40 Division of Water Resources
Facility Number U - ® O Division of Soil and Water Conservation
p Other Agency
Type of Visit: ® Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Structure Evaluation Q Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: 0 Routine O Complaint O Follow-up O Referral O Emergency O Other O Denied Access
Date of Visit: Arrival Time:11,00 Departure Time: County: Region: \NJT4)
Farm Name-'IV � — � `�( Owner Email:
Owner Name: Phone:
Mailing Address: 3, Q6 Vbwi r rni(_t , V�C, -�:Xt`)U a 3
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: Q Qf„'�/Q Title: Phone: 2 '' p—aw Uj) Q\
Onsite Representative: Integrator:
Certified Operator: ()-Apa paws Certification Number:
Back-up Operator: Certification Number:
Location of Farm: Latitude:; Vl ;3a t 91 Longitude:
��.14 hl > 11 N -> NC �1wy 10601 A NWy 1(6% 40`cE , VA,V-ay
Design Current Design Current Design Current
Swine Capacity Pop. Wet Poultry Capacity Pop. Cattle Capacity Pop.
Wean to Finish I 11-ayer I I I X Dairy Cow
Wean to Feeder I INon-Layer I I I Dairy Calf
Feeder to Finish Dairy Heifer
Farrow to Wean Design Current Dry Cow
Farrow to Feeder Dry Poultry Capacity Pop. Non-Dairy
Farrow to Finish Layers Beef Stocker
Gilts Non-Layers Beef Feeder
Boars Pullets Beef Brood Cow
Turkeys
Other Turkey Poults
Other
Dischar1jes and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes 'oNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structw•e ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No DNA ❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State?(If yes, notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State(gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system?(If yes, notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes fZNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page I of 3 511212020 Continued

Facili Number: - Date of Inspection: 1D JRQ
Waste Collection&Treatment
4.Is storage capacity(structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall)less than adequate? [:] Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
a.If yes,is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes [:] No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: _
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard(in): 1 �t
Observed Freeboard(in): t'
5.Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes A�No ❑ N A ❑ N[:
(i.e.,large trees,severe erosion,seepage,etc.)
6.Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes AqNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes,and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat,notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes KNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
8.Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes Jq No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits,dry stacks,and/or wet stacks)
9.Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes F7,11 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers,setbacks,or compliance alternatives that need [:] Yes allo ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes 5Z 1%No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals(Cu,Zn,etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN> 10%or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s):
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? 0 Yes ❑ No RNA ❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes KNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes ❑ No WNA ❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes JRJ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes 54�No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Required Records&Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage&Permit readily available? ❑ Yes CKNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?If yes,check ❑ Yes FXLNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑WUP ❑Checklists ❑Design ❑Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? ❑ Yes KNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
no a hr
❑ Weekly Freeboard A ❑Wa3tcT17tnsfcrs ❑Ap r
Rainfall ❑Steekilrg❑Gmfq*iel ❑1 9Monthly and V Rainfall Inspections ❑Slodge,9ar-N-ep-
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes �ZNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected,did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes ❑ No RNA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 511212020 Continued

Facility Number: - Date of Inspection: a
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes 1<No ❑ NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes,check ❑ Yes ❑ No ;KNA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es)below.
❑Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑Non-compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s)and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26.Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes ❑ No RNA ❑ NE
27.Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments(PLAT)certification? ❑ Yes KNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes ❑ No J<NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes [No ❑ NA ❑ NE
If yes,contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the ❑ Yes 5No ❑ NA ❑NE
permit?(i.e.,discharge,freeboard problems,over-application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ❑ No ;�JNA ❑ NE
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes ZNo ❑ NA ❑NE
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on-site representative? ❑ Yes 0 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? ❑ Yes AfNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments(refer to question#): Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations(use additional pages as necessary).
{YCc Y7�YO� Y-euurd5 r00C %Vcj
k'e-MC& r "nn� avt� W M a0a':'�'.
Reviewer/Inspector Name: CtMld ITW ` pC VIS�fl�l�p `01'pl_ Phone:
• Reviewer/Inspector Signatur • Date:
Page 3 of 3 511212020