430032_Routine_20231009

Facility No. _93, i� Time in r Time Out �O
_ � uata
Farm Name _ integrate -
Owner Site Re;: f 1p, < ()
stator P'l __. No. L t i ` c��, �� L�
fsacic-up No. _ p (SDI M ke, MON%
aC Circle: General
wGau — rinisn
Feed � Finish
Farrow —.Wean 'C Epp
FREEBOARD: Design
Observed
Crop Yield
Rain Gauge (� S
Soil Test 4%5 2� Wettable Acres
Weekly Freeboard Daily Rainfall e S
Spray/Freeboard Drop _
Weather Codes
or NPDES
Farrow — Feed
Firrow Finial
120 min Inspections -
Waste Analysis:
Date Nitrogen (N)
`7 2
Sludge Survey onz-%
Calibration/GPM
Waste Transfers
Rain Breaker
PLAT
1-in .Inspections
Date Nitrogen (N)
hn%I�

Divisibn of Water.. Resources
FaCality Nuanber 0 brvisibn' of Soil and Water Conservation
p`0, Other> Agency
type of visit: i� Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
2eason for Visit: (! jRoutine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: 021 Arrival Time: Departure Time: County:
Farm Name: (92. Owner Email:
Owner Name: Rp'' t (1 nC Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: J M e� 1 A M� Title:
Onsite Representative: CA Me
Certified Operator: �1 � ne wV u S
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Latitude:
Region: ff0
Phone:
Integrator:.P jeLfAg
Certification Number: i FA
Certification Number:
Longitude:
3. Des n Current
} g
Desi n Current
'� g
Design Current
Swine m
Capacity Pop �,
Wet Poultry,
-
Capacity Pap
Cattle
Capacity I'op
_
.; .3
Wean to Finish
Layer
Dairy Cow
8
Wean to Feeder
Non -Layer
,�
Dairy Calf
Feeder to Finish
Dairy Heifer
_
arrow to Wean
Design Current
Dry Cow
Farrow to Feeder
,r „ Poultr^ .
Ca iaci -,Po
Non -Dairy
Farrow to Finish
Layers
Beef Stocker
Gilts
Non -Layers
Beef Feeder
Boars
Pullets
Beef Brood Cow
�
Other
Turkeys
e
Turkey Poults
.a
Other
-`
a
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
of the State other than from a discharge?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
No
No
❑ NA
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ NE
❑ Yes No ❑ NA 0 NE
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑`No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page I of 3 511212020 Continued

Facility Number: - Date of Inspection:
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
❑ Yes] No
❑ NA ❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
❑ Yes No
❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
❑ Yes RNo
❑ NA ❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
❑ Yes N No
❑ NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health
or environmental threat,
notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑ Yes 'RNo
❑ NA 0 NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit?
❑ Yes 'qNo
❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑ Yes �No
❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ Yes JgNo
❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes �-Q No
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into
Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s):
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes
[�] No
❑ NA
❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
N Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
N No
❑ NA
❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
q No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
I No
❑ NA
❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
❑Yes
❑ NA
El NE
the appropriate box.
❑WUP ❑Checklists ❑Design ❑Maps ❑ Lease Agreements El Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes 0No
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Trans"fers
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? 0 Yes \ No
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes R No
❑ NA ❑ NE
0 Weather Code
[:]Sludge Survey
❑NA ❑NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 511212020 Continued

Facility Number: I Date of Inspection:
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes h] No ❑ NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes b No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
Vvm �- it Mv2 q good b(t of
MAh-19 100K 4(7
Reviewer/Inspector Name:
Reviewer/Inspector Signatur
Page 3 of 3
as necessarv). ,'
❑ Yes
[�,No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
'�LNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
n No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
N No
❑ NA
❑ NE
[-]Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Grub9lgss V) fi'lds'
Phone: v1LT_V12
Date:
511212020