NC0066150_Wasteload Allocation_19860520

sl
I
p r, NPDES WASTE LOAD ALLOCATION
Facility Name:Hof-e$-E—
Existing O v
Proposed & Permit No.: G Ob (O S C Pipe No.
ooI
Engineer
I Date Rec.
SFZ
1 3 9-7
30/
Date 3 — Z 76
County: Wa_b
Design Capacity (MGD) : a • l i Industrial (% of Flow) : 0 Domestic (% of Flow) : Its n
Receiving Stream: �JCAAR_ Class: Sub -Basin: U 3 o c(� 3 /� p
Reference USGS Quad: E ZY IV(v (Please attach) Requestor: L. Sn n�e ""1 Regional Office
Lo.c2. (A)
(Guideline limitations, if applicable, are to be listed on the back of this form.)
Design Temp.: Drainage Area (mi2): 'L_..-i Avg. Streamf low (cfs):
7Q10 (cfs) v,i Winter 7Q10 (cfs) S( 30Q2 (cfs)
Location of D.O. minimum (miles below outfall): 11-71 Slope (fpm)
Velocity (fps): 11Kl (base N, per day): /1,1
K2 (base e, oer day):
Effluent
Characteristics
Monthly
Average
Comments
r
f-ev
Effluent
Characteristics
;'onthly
1.verage
Comments
i
;u
Gc,7( CAI,
A
Comments:�wh��i d��e. 'J.t,.�.�.i,c,;( �. !�Y, U"(-.:�-�---'. � ��-1 '�. �.1.._:J �"fir c.,-� � �) ���1��</-(' �.(�C^ till
O
O
By: '�„, Reviewed By: Date: S i6

,
Furility Name
Type of Waste
Status
Receiving Stream
Stream Class
Sub basin
County
Regional Office
Requesxor
Date of Request
Quad
Request No
WASTELOAD ALLOCATION APPROVAL FOAM ----
� BRIGHTDN FOREST
� DOM
� PROPOSED
� MIDDLE CREEK
� C
� 090403
� WAKE
� PALEIGH
� CAEECH
E34NW
Drainage Area (sq mi)
7Q10 (cfs)
Winter 7Q10 (cfs)
30Q2 (cfs)
Average Flow (cfs)
36.25
.38
3.51.
: 40.8
RECOMMENDED EFFLUENT LIMITS ~~---~^~~~-----~--
^
as e ow
W t f�
�
< d)
mg �
SUMMER
� 117
WINTER
� 117
���
\��� f*
A,('
5-Day BOD
Ammonia Nitrogen
(mg/1)
(mg/1)
6
3
11
6
!
Dissolved
TS5 (mg/1)
OxVgen (mg/1)
5
30
5
BO
Fecal [�n]ifo/`/n
' ~ �
('V'/1VOm|)�
- - �
��OOO
-
10OO
-
u�k� `
,-`^^ /^�,��`�''
PH (Si])
... �`.... �... .... .... ����^-.^^���
:
......... ^~�
6-9
6~9
�'`... ������~^.
� �
`^'���
... .... �... �.... .... .... �.... �^���... .... �`^~... ��
.... ............... .......... .... .... ........ ........ ^'.... .... .... .... .... .... .... ~~.... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... - COMMENTS ----------~'~~~-~-----~~~^
LIMITS ARE SUBJECT TO REVISION PENDING OUTCOME OF MIDDLE CREEK STUDY.
Reviewed by:
MAY
�
Recommended by _.6-
Tech. Support S"pnrvi
Regional Supervi
ts & Engineer
so Date
sol atp_/�
�n Date