20150843 Ver 1_Application_20150820

•
, *
��
.
August 17, 2015
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Asheville Regulatory Field Office
151 Patton Avenue, Room 208
Asheville, North Carolina 28801-5006
Attention: Ms. Tasha Alexander
N.C. Division of Water Resources
401 Wetlands Unit
512 North Salisbury Street
Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
Attention: Ms. Karen Higgins
Reference: Pre-Construction Notification: NWP No. 12
PNG Line 209 NCDOT 2519B Relocation
Spruce Pine, North Carolina
S&ME Project No. 7335-15-004
Action ID No. 2015-00708
Dear Ms. Alexander and Ms. Higgins:
On behalf of Piedmont Natural Gas (PNG), S&ME, Inc. (S&ME) hereby submits this Pre-
construction Notification (PCN) for temporary impacts to waters of the U.S. in accordance with
Nationwide Permit (NWP) No. 12.
PNG is planning to relocate an approximately 0.65-mile segment of their existing natural gas
pipeline (Line 209) west of Spruce Pine in Mitchell County, North Carolina. Submission of this
PCN is required because the project will take place within one of North Carolina's designated
Trout Counties. The project as proposed also requires written authorization from the North
Carolina Division of Water Resources (NCDWR), because the gasline will not cross one of the
streams at a near perpendicular angle, due to topographic and constructability constraints.
Otherwise, the work will be performed in accordance with the applicable conditions of Water
Quality Certification (WQC) No. 3884.
The project will involve no loss of waters of the U.S. In support of this application, please find
enclosed the following:
• Figures: Site Vicinity Map (Figure 1), USGS Topographic Map (Figure 2), a 2014 Aerial
Photograph (Figure 3) and Additional Detail Drawings (Figures 4 through 9)
S&ME, Inc. � 9751 Southern Pine Boulevard � Charlotte, NC 28273 � p 704.523.4726 � f 704.525.3953 � www.smeinc.com

Pre-Construction Notification: NWP No. 12 August 17, 2015
PNG Line 209 NCDOT 2519B Relocation Page 2
• Appendix I: Completed PCN and PNG Authorization to Act as Agent
• Appendix II: Site Photographs
• Appendix III: Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination (JD) Authorization
• Appendix IV: Agency Scoping Responses
• Appendix V: Restoration Plan
A copy of this PCN will also be provided to the North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission
(NCWRC) office in Swannanoa, N.C., and to the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) in
Asheville, N.C, in order to further coordinate potential effects to designated trout waters and
protected species, respectively.
`��� GENERAL PROJECT INFORMATION
PNG is planning to relocate an approximately 0.65-mile segment of their existing natural gas
pipeline (Line 209) west of Spruce Pine in Mitchell County, North Carolina. The purpose of the
relocation is to accommodate proposed NCDOT work that is scheduled to occur along U.S.
Highway 19 East, along which the current gasline is located. The replacement project will
originate on the south side of the highway, just west of Ned Hughes Road
(35.903217°N,82.111516°W) and extend generally southwest, where it will tie back into the
existing gasline north of Hinson Thomas Road (35.899219°N,82.117985°W). The approximate
location of the project area is depicted on the Site Vicinity Map (Figure 1), the 1994 Spruce Pine,
N.C. USGS Topographic Quad Sheet (Figure 2) and a recent Aerial Photograph dated 2010
(Figure 3).
The gasline will be relocated to a new right-of-way (ROW) that crosses primarily through
agricultural land and undeveloped woodland. The tie-in points will be located within PNG's
existing, maintained ROW. Surrounding land use is limited to low density residential areas and
undeveloped forest. The new gasline will cross two unnamed tributaries to Brushy Creek, as well
two small wetland areas. Representative photos of the project area are included in Appendix II.
�'t:�`� DESCRTPTION OF THE PROPOSED WORK
Installation of the new pipeline will first involve identification of the clearing limits, followed by
preparation of a suitable work surface where necessary. PNG will limit the proposed work to a
50-foot corridor. At stream crossings, an equipment bridge will be installed over the stream
along one side of the easement to allow equipment to work from. Removal of bank vegetation
will be conducted in a manner that minimizes soil disturbance and exposure. Appropriate
sediment and erosion control measures will be employed as necessary to prevent sedimentation
outside of the work area. To prepare a"dry" work surface for the stream crossings, a clean water
bypass will be established by constructing coffer dams upstream and downstream of the
proposed work area. A pump will then be used to convey clean water from upstream of the
coffer dam to down-stream of the work area. Water between the coffer dams will be pumped
up through a filter bag in a vegetated high ground area.
S&ME, Inc.

Pre-Construction Notification: NWP No. 12 August 17, 2015
PNG Line 209 NCDOT 2519B Relocation Page 3
A trench will then be excavated using a small trackhoe. The top six inches of streambed material
will be segregated from the subsurface material are temporarily stockpiled on high ground.
Following installation of the new pipe, the excavated area will be backfilled, with segregated
streambed material replaced last. Affected streams and wetlands will be reconstructed and
restored as closely as possible to pre-disturbance contours and conditions, seeded with a
customized riparian seed mix and stream banks will be stabilized with coir matting. PNG does
not anticipate that the work will temporarily impact more than 110 linear feet (Ifl of streambed,
including those portions affected by placement of the coffer dams. No more than 0.008 acre of
wetlands will be temporarily disturbed. Details of the proposed work are included on Figures 4
through 9.
°�� JURISDICTIONAL AREAS
On January 21, 2015, S&ME conducted a pedestrian review of the proposed project area to
delineate jurisdictional surface waters located therein. S&ME followed the procedures set forth
in the 1987 US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) Wetlands Delineation Manual and the Eastern
Mountains and Piedmont Region Supplemental Guidance. Field conditions were documented
using USACE Routine Wetland Determination Data Forms, as appropriate. The field review also
included identification of tributaries (streams orjurisdictional ditches) within the project area.
Drainage features identified during the field review were assessed to determine the jurisdictional
status of the tributary. Drainage features were classified as either non-jurisdictional or
jurisdictional. S&ME used the NCDWR Stream Classification Form to document characteristics
of identified drainage features on the day of the assessment.
Jurisdictional areas located within the proposed disturbance limits include two perennial streams
and small areas of riparian wetlands. The streams and wetlands were delineated by S&ME and
subsequently surveyed and mapped. The delineated boundaries were reviewed and approved in
the field by the USACE (Tasha Alexander) on April 7, 2015. Thejurisdictional limits are depicted
on Figure 3, and the Pre-JD approval letter is included in Appendix III.
The proposed project will temporarily impact two perennial stream channels (SX2 = 50 If, and
SX5 = 60 Ifl and two wetland areas (WX4 = 0.004 ac, and WX6 = 0.004 acre), as depicted on
Figures 4 and 5. The project will not result in permanent stream impacts or loss of waters of the
U.S. Permanent impacts are limited to the conversion of 0.004 acre of Wetland WX6 from
forested to emergent vegetation. Typical impact details are depicted on Figures 6 and 9.
Following construction, the temporarily affected jurisdictional area will be returned to their pre-
construction grade and contour, seeded and stabilized.
•:' ADDITIONAL REGULATORY CONSIDERATIONS
Federally-Protected Species
To comply with applicable sections of the Endangered Species Act (ESA) of 1973 (16 USC 1531-
1543), S&ME provided scoping letters to the N.C. Natural Heritage Program (NCNHP) and the
USFWS on January 27, 2015. The scoping letters included project information and maps
S&ME, Inc.

Pre-Construction Notification: NWP No. 12 August 17, 2015
PNG Line 209 NCDOT 2519B Relocation Page 4
detailing the location of the proposed relocation. The NCNHP responded with a February 11,
2015 letter stating that their database does not show any records of rare species, important
natural communities, natural areas, or conservation/managed areas within the proposed project
area. Within one mile of the project area, the NCNHP database showed a historical element
occurrence record of superb jewelwing (Ca(opteryx amata), a state-listed rare species carrying
no federal protection.
The USFWS responded with a February 27, 2015 letter stating that they believed the project area
contained suitable habitat for the northern long-eared bat (Myotis septentriona(is). During the
summer, northern long-eared bats typically roost singly or in colonies in a wide-variety of
forested habitats, underneath bark or in cavities/crevices of both live trees and snags. Northern
long-eared bats have also been documented roosting in man-made structures (i.e., buildings,
barns, etc.) during the summer. Northern long-eared bats predominately winter in hibernacula
that include caves and abandoned mine portals.
The USFWS went on to say that a conservation measure included in the 4(d) rule states that
incidental take from forest clearing activities will not be prohibited if the activity is conducted in
a manner that avoids cutting or destroying known, occupied maternity roost trees during the
pup season (June 1-July 31). Because at that time, a final determination decision had not been
made, the USFWS recommend that no tree clearing/cutting occur between May 15 and August
15 to minimize potential impacts to the northern long-eared bat. Accordingly, PNG amended
their proposed construction schedule to avoid tree clearing until October 2015. As such, we
anticipate that a"not likely to adversely affect" determination is the appropriate conclusion, and
further consultation on the northern long-eared bat is not necessary.
Copies of the aforementioned NCNHP and USFWS letters are included in Appendix IV, and a
copy of this PCN will be submitted to the USFWS Asheville Regional Office, with a request that
they provide any additional comment directly to your office.
Historic and Archaeological Resources
On January 27, 2015, S&ME provided a scoping letter and project information to the N.C. State
Historic Preservation Office (SHPO). The SHPO responded with a February 16, 2015 letter stating
that they were aware of no historic resources that would be affected by the project, and
therefore had no comment on the project as proposed. A copy of the SHPO letter is included in
Appendix IV.
Trout Resources
On January 27, 2015, S&ME provided a scoping letter and project information to the NCWRC.
The NCWRC responded with a February 23, 2015 letter stating that there are wild rainbow trout
in the vicinity of the project area, and that stream work should be avoided between January 1
and April 15. Accordingly, PNG plans to observe the rainbow trout moratorium and avoid
conducting the necessary stream work during that timeframe. A copy of the NCWRC letter is
S&ME, Inc.

Pre-Construction Notification: NWP No. 12 August 17, 2015
PNG Line 209 NCDOT 2519B Relocation Page 5
included in Appendix IV, and a copy of this PCN will be provided to the NCWRC, with a request
that they provide any additional comment directly to your office.
��� AVOIDANCE AND MINIMIZATION
PNG originally explored pipe installation beneath the two affected stream channels by use of
horizontal directional drill (HDD) or conventional boring methods. However, it was determined
that these options were not feasible at either location.
The Stream SX2 crossing is located on the west side of Golf Drive, approximately 1,240 feet
south of Highway US-19E. Geotechnical borings performed on either side of Golf Drive indicate
that bedrock will be encountered when crossing under the stream by either HDD or open trench
construction. An HDD of this crossing was extensively studied but ultimately determined to be
unfeasible at this location. The HDD could not be designed within acceptable entry and exit
angles due to the existing mountainous terrain and length of the drill that would be required.
To accommodate the necessary angles, the drill would need to exit near the peak of the
mountain, requiring additional wooded land that would need to be acquired and cleared in
order to string pipe for welding and pullback operations.
The Stream SX5 crossing is located just south of Highway US-19E and approximately 125 feet
from the proposed pipeline tie-in to the existing gas main, with a proposed 38-degree bend
located 50 feet beyond that. The pipeline alignment was chosen to cross the stream as
perpendicular as possible, and to minimize encroachment into the landowner's property by
locating the gas easement along the property line. An HDD is not possible in this location due
to space constraints at the tie-in location. There is not enough space to set the drill rig and get
the HDD under the stream and exit before the proposed bend in the pipe alignment. The
geotechnical report indicates the presence of partially weathered rock and bedrock at elevations
where an HDD would need to traverse through beneath the stream.
Accordingly, PNG plans to install the pipe at these locations "in the dry" through conventional
isolation and clean-water bypass methods. To further minimize impacts to waters of the U.S.,
PNG will limit the work to a 50-feet wide corridor at the stream crossings, and the width of the
permanent maintenance corridor will be reduced to 30 feet at these locations. Additionally,
construction equipment operating near the streams and wetlands will be limited to that
necessary for excavation, pipe installation and restoration activities. Vegetation near the stream
will be cut at ground level, leaving existing root systems in place to promote re-growth.
Appropriate sediment and erosion control practices outlined in the most recent version of the
"North Carolina Sediment and Erosion Control Planning and Design Manual" and approved by
the local governing authority shall be in compliance with specifications governing the proper
design, installation, operation and maintenance of such Best Management Practices (BMPs) to
comply with the appropriate turbidity water quality standard.
As proposed, the project will comply with applicable conditions of NWP No. 12 and WQC No.
3884. Following the work, the affected stream banks and wetland areas will be restored to their
S&ME, Inc.

Pre-Construction Notification: NWP No. 12 August 17, 2015
PNG Line 209 NCDOT 2519B Relocation Page 6
original grade and contour. As proposed, the project will not result in permanent changes to
the ground surface elevation(s) in the area or affect dimension, pattern or profile of the affected
streams. Affected areas are proposed to be restored in accordance with the attached
Restoration Plan (Appendix V) following completion of the work.
�<'` CLOSING
By copy of this correspondence and completed PCN, we are requesting your written
concurrence with this NWP No. 12 permit application. If you have questions or need additional
information, please feel free to contact us at 704.523.4726.
Sincerely,
S&ME
� '-�
Joey Lawler, P.W.S.
Project Manager
Senior Review by Chris Daves, P.W.S
Attachments
cc. N.C. Wildlife Resources Commission
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
� �" s� !/�
�
``P; � ��"`'�� ����~ �:;" °6^� ._ mm..,.,__.e�
l,, �..'�°° � v'' . �,�
D. David Homans
Peer Review
S&ME, Inc.

Figures

r � � r _ ` '— y ���C�.� - -�a
,,,''...� �p�R-0 , _ ° �Y
�. � ' , r! fiQ��P� 4♦� '��. � ��+` . �, _� � \
� _ f i f -� t�. � � _ � � ' � , `}y 1'�t , �
' J.� � � 1� i 1
�f . r � }� e My� � 1 _
'r� - * � ' � � ir %
• � a� , ` � � �i .ti
� � r�� . � �' � ,r� ��--
� ' A
� !
•/` � �
�� '. r� I � �� �Ge�:� �'�. �` �r��� ' ` \.�^ . /
, ,�j� � � �. I -n �/ � /y� ' � II* .
f � 1 �� - � r ..
. � � r � � �, �
< < � � � >� �'
� �"� . , � o ' ' � r � -_���"�� ��.1����� " � ,
�
_ , � ,� , � ���� �'"�, o. . � . -,�+
• I' . " � o ' z , � � � � z �,.,1�►� ' .,
� ` w �r � �� "S � J� I ` O�� -'� �'� *' '� ljw Q � � . �
f
��._ _M �' �� 1 �,]�^^^ � � � �� � ���� � � Q�� - — !' _ _ -�
� �w• �� � f ��JA - _ �f i r� � I6� � � -��
'I � - _ �d � �� � �. =
� i . a.� �, \ r. 4 h qq , //- _ . .
f 'L.(.U- �. �4 • • i ' � � f ! � ! / :
� � �Q � • � `O=0 L D U S`1 g E ' � � • /� ,� � �/
� � 4 � �` � � • � � � a s � �� � ' � ' � �� = �•
O - � . _�f. .� '` � • - -
-- — �. ,. ��- � �' � - �� ■
t
� �
� �_ � � � HWY ��
� � ��
-�__ _
� . � � _ + _ � i Q-�! �-- 19 E � • r�
— _ „��,,, � � % .• .
* OLD�US19E , � + w - - `9� a + Z -
�/ �y, ��w � � � � � �
a � �� \! lyc� � z � `` � �� • � �'�=F{U_ � r
- � �_i��f "r �z�' �` ^+y� � � � � �+y� " ��..� - _
oE��� � � . � w �
� Q 9�' w ' � , • ` ���_� � � � • �
� 7� ♦ � Q I
� - + S O ' �+_ ��� �-
i�'e p� �i,'� � �� '-. - if 1 i �4 • y� - .
�` � � �
S�P� �� � � ° � � '� ��O � F � � �
� � - w. � { � �' - , �� - � -- � � �.
� � � ��, i� �
� � i ,�_�-� - _ _ � �, �
� ,/ � �
�
I � � � P � � !'�`i _ � � `��� - - � 'r✓
�- � .,� � !� �fF — *' `. ` �P �•' '��„� :;_. .
� ` �
1 � +i � . ��'{ ; . r� ° '- R �- �`` +.
,� ,,� � r �
� � y � , �.�i '. +� � , � � � �
/ �
f' . _ / �
P ��` - ��'' � S� N-T H O M_q=gsFt�� �
� ti4 � \�. ��I - _ ` - 1y � i
�, I � . �" �"
����II 44 _ y ` iR �
c=sT-� . ',�. "� �r� �g , ;�"� �;
�.' -- ,�\,', ' �� _ � .
' ��� ,, : . � . � � � ;,� ' .
N'� . _ _ — ` ' - _ .
� �q � / " - pIJN-TAIN=�R �.' � r `�_ � _
S;,T° • N�O�RT-H-M �' +
� 1 � �� / � s , _�_ _� f �` ` .
w��
'w'.+ � , � '�� 2 . Y �� .� � �"�
� �� 50U� ��' 1,000 � =�� ��, � ,� � " p `- �\, i l� ,�— _ �
� J �. j� � Vr �� , a �y � ,
(IN FEET) � '�S s;� �� `�J vo � �
H
REFERENCE: 1994 SPRUCE PINE [NC] 1:24,000 QUAD SHEET � Proposed Pipeline Relocation
GIS DATA LAYERS WERE OBTAINED FROM USGS. THIS MAP IS FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY. ALL
FEATURE LOCATIONS DISPLAYED ARE APPROXIMATED. THEYAND ARE NOT BASED ON CIVIL SURVEY -��� Existin PI eline
INFORMATION, UNLESS STATED OTHERWISE .�� g P
SCALE: � " = 833 '
FIGURE NO.
oATE: 08-13-15 „ S&ME USGS TOPOGRAPHIC MAP
DRAWN BY: DDH 2
PNG Line 209 NCDOT 25196 Relocation
PROJECT NO:
� 7335-15-004 Spruce Pine, North Carolina ,

�, . ; ,� :.:..� :�; _ 's' ���--'.sx+` . _ 1-� a^` � *r �, m^ , Q
�>.'., ; ' - _- �`k
. - - . . rfi� - �tic`°j.""`.'� �
REFERENCE: 1�9E HW�Y�� � , _ � - � �,, y � �`�:��.� �r � �"�� �� � � �
GIS DATA LAYERS WERE OBTAINED FROM ESRI AND MA ENGINEERING. THIS MAP IS POR WFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY. ALL � i, � � � . "� Ri'�I�, '�,j�� � �' �� �'�,'�i , -- � 3, . . .�� "� p �- J
FEATURE LOCATIONS DISPLAYED ARE APPROXIMATED. THEYARE NOT BASED ON CIVIL SURVEY INFORMATION, UNLESS STATED 'J'�'�7 ` � � � - '� �"' 'll # ��. ����i+sT"� ,-� } �\ - � - � ° ' �j . � � J � . n1 Z �
OTHERWISE. .N ' � .� � _ . . �-,� � �3,(`jf� �� � � �7' ,. , r �' -Z M
_ . ' . / a t . � W �
A � ,� / �r � � . Q pp
: • /
,
. �M qu . ;.e ' j � Q'
.
t � �
,
' ' �� + . ` � ' ' . . , � - _ �''I� . ��r ' � 0
�t
.. , . i .� .,'
- , u� • �
�. . . � ' r . . / . _ � � , .. � . . - .
�
i . r =. J . � � ' a-�'°' . :. � . , / '�. y _. • r ,. � i . �.. O r
,..., ,. ' • r
- - ' ` a� �+`. y � � � :
� �,. �`� ;
;, ..
€. . ; : � � �� -. ��. , r � : S. � - o �. ��� �i � ���.,n. , ���
,
�' � � ;
�. , � � . . �. w
i' � r � Y •�'� � 4 � � � �ANE�N1 � �� � -�q � ; � ����� ��' ��r;
� � � ' ,� , , �
.
� ,
�N a
� � �
, , ,: �.�. ��L �, i � � r_ �
' �r f , `
�;:� , � ,�, � .� . : - - _ " 4, : � _
• �
, �4
, . _� � ,
,, .
.
.y �, ,� r � ��'��" � ���':y � � - �� , � � ��� �'+ � �„ s,�' �d� � o
� /NE I
�` " �` "� :
�: ... , .
r.,� �" ��! + � �, , ' ,:� �. :, / ; , ; �,: ' , . . �
,
� w � �
�s s� � , , �� - r
��`' l� � � 1 + a, ! �'�
� " ,,.
,� � � `A.+�� �Cd{�� l,l� 4 . , �+ ,. ` ix y� �i � � y' �" I1 f II � �
�
. �"
' .';-r ,. ' . . � . . ' _ � . � ; ..., � . � � , s� � .i . p �
�
c
j ,: .
,, . ' . .�5, ., �. , . �. . '., _ '�?, h� y�. t f" . x.. . , �{���� Z
. ' .'' � ?s q r' V i ' + ' � `' 7 , �d d ` � � � � �. :a� � � � c � L()
, �.
. ; . �� ._. , . � ..
, '
.
. ., �._.� �„ , , 4 . . ., , �
� �
r+Ed �
�: ,:i ��' }�g' ="E • � i�' i. �'� �� .' � U �
. � . - : .. � 1 , r , r- �: . �� 6 � � � +. !�. . Wla� �' .�,i � '�1. �. u �y�s �; u1 � I�
r
t . ik [h} ro �� +� � � J
-;s�' . ,E . . A p�\ 'R r r� .�." �a-=,:� �y�� �,., `,� ,. ,. �r t .'� ? r . 6�:.� � . ;,''�� �.ti, Q �
"�� 'A?�� � �,''1(j�� � J ��P�� , ;j� �,:s � Y'"� � I��� � ,I" � � , � �''� 'F,� ,i� �~ S.r - - ' - (n d
" -s�SS�;�� '� ! � #C.. . F' _N . 'ar: ',l I� � .,. M1 � ' r i � .
� ' :��_ � ...1=..� ,:.., ' � :,.' ��1 • ��t � -�.. .r ,�� � C�.."� ,!, � M1 �� '. . ��L "�' .... ,.
r � i � � - i
. .�'� . :�. ,p..�I � . "Oa6' +,� � ��.2' �� 'h F� �, w. y� ti;� ` � a. ^�yf ,k,r. �.. . � .
�i �;� ��G ?��� f F1S ' , . �� �� ' � ��;� f �,� Y� • �... ,
.
�
.
.
� .
��
_ ,y �L
.
Ir.� �. Yly.. °� ' .. (y� l .!. : I q,`i �. � ��, .v. .A9'� � `T� �y� f . �t..
Y �y'
� I
!llli
, A
..: �. � . � . r #a r ,
� al 'llp . � � _ - ' . .
� .�. , . . �, p � . r �.JF w� ��', � °+i: 1� 1 1� , .
1�`
� .�� t, :` 't � �� � e` '�'b.-.^ � ,�1 .�y�i ?�'i� wZ �ia4'
,
z_
_ � •�,
'� • � �a,.� ��` ' �i'� ._. ';� :
�� � � W
{�1 ''1�� � � .� � � � �:� � �S�{ � , � .
� '� r _ � ' M�s �e�. � , t�, y e I r '�",��,.y',w�' � I . . ^� �, � �f 4 k,S ..7 ,};�e, �� ` � , y. � A � �f:
�' ���'j `^` -1 � � $�.� +�,, "� - +r' s,,^* +� ;^ � ;
.�,, ��: �-� ��; tr � P:�" � � ,�. . � , • �}� s�_ .a�. �'j'„ , �
. � .. ':R N �Z✓� �y,� ,.� ° � (� .�i��.4. �"i . -"� ,�. { ��.�r . F � :.� f,+ �
� �� -.'� . �. � I ' i�x 'L',a.I '�, � '� .�'_ .� �X'S� � !,N'. .�2"'". � _ , . I �« f"�F I.. ��.PA� �!' ' � (f' `'�
t.::
i
6�
w !
•, �,.,<., ,,� �.,.: . � �,: �� �� t���, �.� �. . e,,,�, r a ,a'_ �+ �`; �t�r ��y �
� : •-
+�r` , .p � � , ¢
_ f,..:.' . � _ I R �'tf�.i -..ti . .� I. . I .�' �. �.� `I�� 2=.9- � � ! r � . � � ��\', . . 4j' � � y .4 � � �� -R 'y � - '" ..
'V �y�`.�:r ` _ �. Al�" ,�"�' ..�i �'�. `' �� ` �. � I . � iii `'#ti� '" i,� a. .., -a ��� 4 ,.�_l: � .i.. �. i\ I��'. � t i �. i
�.�• _ �,�1�� +,'.., �'_ ...d.�,�t:^�� . .� �.r �,1'�':.�'r(-.� . .'.tA�t al�''' .� :.� �� �+��.I ��� I �
',.�. � . .. » . .
,. :t- R °Y , ., -.. , '� y.le',. _ ,'I �.� , ' 'ti . w, I �, �
.,,�cP $" �i � ��.r,� - i•: , �,;��� y +�.�,�,.; -1�.. ' . . . t �r' � .�' 1 � y.
`. "` � '� `d.��� ' � , , �'��;,� }`'" �� � �:^� r, �:;, j.. Y�` �4.�: ��p 4 .'� "�� 1
�
. .
; �� � , . };:.
y� i
,
: � • � " • .: �. ), � , a - i � � { 3. ' ; � �_ O� . :��, ��.
:
_
� • . � �.' . aF I� .., ' . �.i a . �_ � yt � �7�' C � p,L . . .
': ., . , . * � . „ . , �, .
, 1
,s �, -
3.
_,, � ;, . ��";' , _ 91 . a '.� ��:;_'� . '�[' �. �,f,�i' . � .��?�'i �,r �'� I�` rF �,T,'�� °;.1 . , ,� f d,sA �� a ' y �eT'i1ta� . '., .� � 1. � u.. ' {
,.. � . . . . . . - i , �, ( G x . r � . � �1l, . yi { �. 1 �'.r _ + +Y °�� I ��t � '
�- ;��{ *,.,��t , , � �� , ; � �� f'� '�t'. �. .�. r.r - � , �r„ � . ,
i :
' ;�� ,��. .... .�,.,',«,- ' ! � ..; •�.:.)�:�- ' ' � .... � -�'��,...� �'�' �..� , h � ,�'�J �1 :�,:. -���e� - '� i\i� „ �, i1�" ; i
�a�'. >,. � �., �. _ �.. � .. . ,."'•��y..� .. .:.; 1i : ,,� �,. . .- .hlr . . . r � �.".i'' a - . X�-� -, i,� . �rr � x,S.�f� � �q
,. ��- . ., � „ ' ' .;.
� . � �. . � #. . , • .:. � _. �.
,,r� .� .. . a .4� .. ! i' � '�.,� I ..
�p ,
, �, . �.vC' ( 'h} ' . i. 'it� ; � s . �.µ'. � . H � ✓ � � �
. _
' . .. ;. . `� . , .
+ �J 4� � - % !� ��� �i �:. ',{�� �\
, a �
i , ,
�x ��'+ ,'._., "4x TI .-�� �j� �;�.. ,'.' .y ��.� . �� �� . �..� 4 +�` ;"��.�(� ye �'ta�.�.t ��+.....r � �_ r � � '�+a 9 �^R�. � d R �A. . ��� t;. .:�. '�', � r = y � �t
,
.
,�y� , �'.� :,�. .. ,. !F �, .",�., . � .. .: ',� r..},.. . � sr _ ���; . . r�^'�.a} �-��'� ¢,Y. '`� " _'�p" .�:� � ;?,ti. .. f
� ; t �, �i •«
_
- fi � e�� , • . �� - � A, �1 , . �, �, ,�, . „,M, J.
. _„ . .. . . , `� ; :' '�. � �
�_ , . �... ,�r � �� *��', r � , '������
; f'. ' 1 '°, , �Y° i� ` �i� ' �rr� � . ., _ . 'i't." �: _ � �l' , �,�r� � � l ,� . . _ . _. �
. � r. .i' - . � �
, � . . , .� ,.' . . -
• , � .. �
u �„ d
�a� he+�'Fa�-'�$ �,J.. ..-. ..a . � .. „
� .. . � �• . . .:. . . .. � � ` � �� : �.
. .. . � ; , :w �' ,,. _ , . nTle� a j� 1 - 9 j .
t '� � � _ � . : -�' � . . . . ., i r ) 1 � i � r � f� A+ '�d'� .
, . ,
„ ^
„4 ,s7,. ,
_
i
� ,�
. �,� �� �.'.� ' � , ..� .�c. 7�. .. � �ir. 7 ��i . ,a .`X �l� �� I�� �a�� � ���'�h_ �.� �� 7 .d
�+� r ��r � � � �+��� ,��.
�"' `�,�:�*�`��:�.��{. �R�� � � �1t� :,.-'�'� �` � ;i� �� y ri� �''� i "'', Y "ap'3��, ,� �S a '}° r�'` !� ��_ �;>��
> „ ,�., �{
7 , h+ "p'.r� � ?. y,�� o tl�'• r, ��' " t` �• '����,k'r,�a ` � ��� ���'� ` '� � 1��- j ,J� ����,
� ��. - R ,,, �;.'ist. ;_s�„
,:�t� � � 4� ��M' ��� a , �.�: , � Yi"�
i :�,?ffi�: � i ,G r '"x 5 x� �4 '�g
� �1 •s�� .t i 1 � r �; �� �,,.. -a� �' � - ,i, +' .
,
. .
�� �. �.
. �.
,
r ��;� �� ` ����� d. ���
_� �. � :. �
�' , ,
.�, �, . , . �
.
�
, ��
,'�r�� .,�,. �, °�� ,, � `.� ��� ���;,�: � �. ;� �;:��. _ ����� ����
� �� .y�, �.r �;��` . F �� �i° �•, w � t:µ �;� r.., s 'n�.. k .
F j�'� i f;� ar, � �� aF- ��! �' �J '���d�''� i r� �. P' s:� �b ��� �.
� , , ,
. ,
fy.r a � F �. 1 ' !,
� � e`' F�i - ° ���. f �. I � '� �.�I, i� . ..�.. .:� '�'. Y +, �. � r �Y � ,� r�' Z 7�.'
� �r �
� � v.t'
� -: .�p�1 � ::,, � • . f, .l� �{
�� . YV g�
'° �-..�, T'•. '� i:,_ ��._ �.��� �. � . ���� � ,�w „ . i i R' .�. �.,�p:s�:` � �i1� s.s..:; n .��'"Y't � Ns A::'/�} �.�.'^i"+ i
-.���".�n.I� { ..,�.:� .:. ,.: ' � � .,•.: . , .. : � „ .�}�! - C �.�e:�.� _ .
..-. � . , , '. i� � -�..'t , � .. J�
...- � ,. �r� r r y . �t� � . .� . � �� �' �.r . . tv.,.; ��,r:�.r' .' . i� f ,a,� � •�..�' . '�, � J ?�
� j J �y
M. ",: . ... -:,�_�! . �. r,,.��, ,. �. ..'.. t: . �`��:�y .,� - .: ' . " :. �r. t � 7, ?� �t, N.� F y r _t ,� j�,, , .
, �`� t 11 1 . � ' ;�{
� � • � r , � . .,I,' ; .�:,. �.,� : "'a,- . . ,�, . .;r .�. . . ; -' ' p.. . y � ,��' � "�* y r,� ' �y, s, 3��i _ �'� \
� � ,
. M�
�yr�:'.�� I� " 1�� I . 9� .�r,���� f �� �.� � . �,� 9�fS.' ti :�'��,� "� - l, i�.t ' '�I• ,i ' t 'F�• .f� f . �. .
a y � i
a y�� r+
.....1.: , . .� •:, .",. , ., :. ...: �'. �� , t . - � ,5 �. . �^
f .-�'r.. . ;��.. ���� 'f �4•. .'f. '�'��';i;, 9 ��/ QY ;�:��,��?-'.'�; �.'� �pA�l ' ,ju; t fi��'�- +�� � �{, +
- - .r -r{r���.-j. c "°�, '+T5 � . ��r �,�� .sa ..;1 r' ..�, ''t. . �7� '�� t �� ' _ . � .
''�' y.. ��9�. � `� . �'y.�Y � .��#� �a r� rru ,i �. n� t4 i'r;F= �'�"I►�. G �Y -
..... �.. , . '' � . j. .,. ...
� y � , _
.
� +
' �.'i '�.. �f,, . p�f !!�' ,l ,, q,'� ' f .Y. �.t �� �� '�^`4 Mi� .'..4!, FD
�
, , :
1
� .. _ ,. �. �, . �::'�: .�` � T , , � ., � �' t� i u .�. _ � �. R - . � �' = C
fi � � I �i � _
'_�' .'��,-�.� i� , `'�°�, � ,�� � r dl S;FT�� �. ;�- �°, .��7Gt.. O� .+y 4�� O
.�1�. �� , f ��'�M �.�,: . ,
. ,
. . � � �. a:. . .. , . . . .
. �
, .- . �� � � ,� A
Y' 4 ' p �p "\
� ' :.�i i � ����i . . .. � �. . , . ' n • � . ..� �� . � . ' ,. �� rt�" `�• �. i�� . � I �� � � .' . ;°��i _ . y� �
, .
�.. , t, : ,. �o�.: d! �4. �". . ' � � �� . i. ��� ��� '. " ':"�.�� � . �, i ... U �
) .
, ; �, r I� . . , , . � -
.,,, , ' � �.
��?" i'i� r!�.. -., : ,'�', . r ; ��.K:,. �,. , `.' . . , �,'. �_ . : ., r... { , �.., �., �.< J�r ,t�., ;,,, . „ �? - ... \� � q p o
+, � �. . F,� .. , r. , ,-; �a . � , +,� �.. > *+`: ;, •�, d. � +rV � - co N
;, . r � ,, _ a,. ,�, k�, _.� F � ?, � .� ,'- � .'n LL
. •, :r rt �'�' '�� h t, `�;�1' �` •c .� 'u .'S:' _ _ + ��y . y 1' °`e7 , N C r�
! �.,, '� � . ,Pf
,' ' � ", '". , " ' � ,�� } � ~ � ,
� � �'F - �.. � .��; , ? . ^f A�� 1 r��'� ��� . G ?t f F � . y� � � _
,� t. -:$ �; v-, . 1 - �` •� - �� r" C7
� .i.. K �{ i� �` %�� !� -<- ,I�. w ��,( 'o �
.
r u � °E> -
�y�' � � � �a ti� � °,� , � ..,
. ',K' .'T. �., "�A' C. . . . F"y�{ L O
, � v� '.'�� ' . .1. �F`/+� , i '. • y �(�.' , • , .
� '$ �~��` �y ����� I % ��1.. '�T,';� ,r� "1 '� � }� �"�' m
.�,: �'� !��I,. � 1t .N..'� . \ O :6
�
. �
F �
q�i `� � ..
7 1 y �.
+r��- .Y 1�5u��� �n1 �i'�i+ .�t� { '4�. '.� �."FC; . .. ,�h �["� �h' 6: N
,., � .9 ,., " .�.., t ^ •� .., � � .
--..� �� R �� � ,. ..'; . :4. ; .-,.` ��� , S �..
��, i . . � i ! t ,r . '� Y ;'�' �' : '.�3 . . . � \ . .,�.�� � �����' ,�:�. . � U 3
'` �
..
; , : , ,� -���',
° . �, � � ° �qv �r,.� �t,} , 1�7� t 3. .�7 +..(� ��.� i ,�«cY �...� �r+ - �'.n,..�'�.�, � . . (v ..'.�s� ( \, '�� '( ,�° ' �.�, If7 L �
. ��. J! '.t ' r,� . �s -N� i,� l �,}"t,.�,�y .�: i;���7 ��,. � :d' i! ��d"�„�il4l� ,�+:' �i' '�. a�,.r'� . \j . , . O N
�' , .' 4 i � � ry �'P _ 'tx- � � 1' �yl�. � �} . � "e1 - f�r, '# . 1�rp � ,` r �, � � p �� � � , _ � >.
+ �l. _ . ' ♦ ,�, . �� �4 I� � . F t7#.. � d,, � i�� �.�'p` _ f �� n�v $ ,5 i �� +� Y . . . ' 1S �� � ��9 �. . . '! . a O Z 'o
, �y
- - _-� � . t , �. V ��-. .:�{;.' . :.� `�'1•. � p��,� "� i ,+'1�,:" ,�r �Yf�. �' r , a,� s ..��& ;s ,k, , . �� ,,""�' + g �' , _ . , �. Q a�
`' � ��,.. �, .. . � . , ��c » -� , �SP-3. � .,y[• y`'��" � � i. � � \ - J aS o
. , •,
��� , �p.%�' J� �'� � .. �7.� �,.. t e� 1�E' t . �� �'� . . A?� Ny. �� U C a
. f. � ee1 �� �i*,���# ; �' � �,i ��y� r��, ',� 'i t(y i j; `�� � � �y .� " •,�� � - �\ � +`, n �� Q Z � �
_�` 't.1�� Si� ��_- «�$�'. *k! 'Ik�� '� i . ��T�1 . � r � �' !
t t L'��+'#i•. � �. � # ' R: ' : f n,.;t �`. " ,.• ° .. . � , Y� ,:.. . ��� �' � .. ��, y �„ � � � V E
`� � '.,' . � , _ . � _ . � . ,�,,''t ._ . . _ .' �y, (,� � ti ,�,'j ;� �. b 1'1 O � m
i;'�.2 ,�' �, r.' _� . . , . . . . . . . . 7' � � . 7,:'� \ � .M �� . 4 W UJ
� } � m
� . - �� �` �� .4 . - 'i�' /� � °i Q � d �,.��
'� - , ' '� * .Q � ' ."� .; � J � m
.. � .. `r :...,. ' . .. . . . . . . M . � O � N
.
; dip� '� !t ;^ . . �i �, � . . � . � . . �� µ 7:,� O r . ,.� � O
,, � � 200 4 �
- �a, ' ;�w_ �,� .1i �, �y �a�t�+t , 1 :,�5 � ti '"w, •.,�; , � • N °
� 4 ' „ � , (IN FEET)R � z
;, ., .
, �. ��
„ , ; , ;�� �� . �
,
.� . . . . . . ,. 4u:� �• r , . ' o
, � �. �T � �� �
, . : i ° ', , ". ' } , ` , � � .. , - ';t �,
.;� ... . � . . .iDy.� -� d�� �R- c
r , t � `' �� �
��a�� ���� f 1y�r� ,�;,� �s�''�i . � � ° � r ; �� K��` Existing Pipeline �
,, �`'�,� � , � �: o
�. � � ' ; �
� � ': � � '�##"�,y'��:�� ; `� � Proposed Pipe Centerline FIGURENO. r
. . . . . µ �' - Y„' �
r
. . I �:•�� � . `,+c /�
q ; � r ,�; �r : treams _'l"�
' t � � r � � .p� � � s � , �,.�� S V
. . � . , ' �1 � r. . � ^f.p, f+�lr+; y�' ��� �� k �"
f ' r �'�-° � 1 {�g + ( . i ,,I
. '1� � f ", i,'�4". �'� ./4 � 4 � J, i �?AP )-r � +��` !�� J � . �h',. i R t i, i � '?7 i .:�..� ��°�r� Y '�; }'� J � j�'•�s .*d �. +!d � �� y � � �3 � F'�t. �. ���! � �iet�anU$
, � �, r. ;. • p '.
.
„ ,. tl I y I�,,
` A _,.. . �� �.. I �� _�S'a'i� ' G' .i . � i, 1� °7.' . � d� .1'.W: �.�A..� ��rC7�+�"t".�� • :�. l�Y. '�.' ' �-`1' � f I�� �i''�t� �p:� 1�..R'� . .17'��� .dr �i.� A� � �+�k �'.�;:G_Li-- � r: � �;��:��'�.� "�:'� � I `flAdll�����.���� . �1�.� htV �

NTS
SOURCE: EROISON & SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN IMPACT DETAIL FIGURE NO.
PREPARED BY MA ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS STREAM SX2 AND WETLAND WX4 ^
�i•

�I
�
��
t�]
�
SOURCE: EROISON $ SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN IMPACT DETAIL
PREPARED BY MA ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS STREAM SX5 AND WETLAND WX6 FIGURE NO.
5

i�o
�
L ,��
i
�I
�i
dl �
SPOIL PILE
PRO�d�,FD F'S°ELINE
SOURCE: EROISON & SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN
PREPARED BY MA ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS
PNG EASEMEN7
�
35' I
i
� �I
� ��
� ��
�� Q I
��.
CORDUROY QR TIME�R
MATS (SEE NdTE 2}
NQTFS:
1. THE FULL 5d FT WIDTH OF THE PRbPOSED EASEMENT WILL
BE CLEARED. GRUBB!NG WILL BE f'ERFCftME� !N ALL OPEN
TRElVCH INSTALLATI�N AREAS.
2. CdNTRACTOR SHALL EMPLDY THE USE dF TIMBER MATS TO
LIMIT THE DISTURBRNGE TO 1NETLAND AREAS OR STREAM
BUFFER AREAS WITH!.N THE PRO.i'cCT.
TYPICAL EASEMENT DISTURBANCE
PNG LINE 209B NCDOT 2519B RELOCATION
SPRUCE PINE, NORTH CAROLINA
FIGURE NO.
6

C�IR MF�TTING
E�ISTI�•� GRAaE
TR�NC�i BR�AK�R
SOURCE: EROISON & SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN
PREPARED BY MA ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS
�' h�lN.
STREANII�HA�BNEL
�X I�I�Iy.
�i" GAS LINE
EX�ST�NG GRADE
TREfVCH BREAKER
TYPICAL STREAM CROSS-SECTION VIEW
PNG LINE 209B NCDOT 2519B RELOCATION
SPRUCE PINE, NORTH CAROLINA
FIGURE NO.
7

�
z
w
�
�
�
¢
w
rr3
Q
C7
a
�� —
G
f►[��I��A
51LT
��
w`�
��
��
DGE DR MATTING
G �i G -�� � �i
�
�
�
�
r
�
HATCMED AF�EA �ELINEATES
STfiE14M [11STUR9�ANCE
E3f�A11ATI�D
5' C�ITCH
-� �W C3AS LI�IE
nni ir�u�n �r �ovFr�
1. FC]R STREAMS �Rt]SSED B4' HDD, �LEARIN�G c]F THE EASEMENT �HALL BE LI�IITED TO H►4ND !CLE►4RING FQR A LINE OF SIGHT 1�11THIN TME SQ Ff STREAM
�UF'f`FR LIMffS. TH� h"FFLMANENT liAAINTENANCL� CC3Y�F+'JDOR �HALL R� LII411T�D TO A WIDTH +DF TBD FT.
2. FUR �TR�1� CRU55ED BY !DPE!rl CUi E3fCAVATION, MECHpNIZED GLF�ARING AN� GRUBBING UP TC� A TC�i� WI[7TH OF 50 FT WITHIM THE SE FT STREAAA
BUFFER LIMffS IS PERAAfTTEU. REFER TO THE DETAlLS INCLUDED HEREIhI FaR C}PEN CIJT GRUSSINC,a i3F STREAMS. THE PERI�1AMENT MAIMTENANCE
CQRRIU�R SFiALL BE LIMfTEC1 T� WIDTH OF 50 FT.
SOURCE: EROISON & SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN
PREPARED BY MA ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS
TYPICAL STREAM CROSSING CONSTRUCTION
PNG LINE 209B NCDOT 2519B RELOCATION
SPRUCE PINE, NORTH CAROLINA
FIGURE NO.
8

aiJ��}
� �
�
�
S TRCJa1:'� �
Ft J'in'
TEMFUfi1�.RV �=G��
'�.�N�69A�S
qCi��FERDAM.iI
PR�PUSEC
.EAFSTtI BEftM
NTYP.I
ra �•��r.�r-
s r -.
�x�sT�r�c�
sTf<CaS,i GC�
T�ta� _='rasr�u�.Te��rw
S i �=,ira "R�',��!N�
ruv=s�. �
49ik
R�.U� _��C�_'
�.;�r�. 0�?4.� �a z ��a�
, � Y��.� ss�T e,�:�
_ F.�ud
'
"v tJ•V
_aca :v�� .
-1 +�P
-:7=i uir-L�r.C.�C� �07RIGGfi
P_nf°!
TOP f1F
6ANlt
a r�iw �i
� H.`JYU��tU CC}rllA
=1�.1}TI ���CRhi r r���.aavi
Tv= � PUMP
�P�.Fe�R. 2e•
Tu dt° i��91� r
, ..�,
� � -;,-}r'
A" f.ii4-
„� rr�r.e:.M��
� �d�N. �TEMPrJR,ARY
SANO�AG
TL'�iPC�RhRS" dA�i
S.1LH 6R�..G
L1kM 5` %,aJkS
14Ak1 SAi IS� 10 N
rn�air�
�t: NS �. S.G4LiENC � f4 R 6v PR'3.v� PUf.7P� `a �
1 14�STALL PUAiP a,y�SkINETil.F�MF fR��h1
:1 RCI6 UPSTREAM GF TE AiP{}RARY
ST4EAM ��R�'JSS�fNC T�J�REl4
u�J'iPN�TR€Ald 4f C4NSTRt1CTIflN ,4RFJl.
uC G IN �pU��.UPIV G ANO C4MTINL�E PUMmIN G
�,'1i�ILE L4s7R9CIMG Yo'IT411�N TPiE STREh.ii.
� IV�STALL t1P�STREAh1 COFFER Q�.�IMAN�
TC�i�POFYARY £1�1P�, ��OVEfi PiPC INtLT�
:FiTF1 fh9RIC �iM6 5AN00AG5 AFs SHUWN
i'a aETAIL WHIL€ °�+14R?CIwG iH TF-I�
STRCAhi. l.��fa4V3TRERU FL4W
Ti7ROUC-!I CFAP1r1'kiCN N+3T W'6RKING
��VITMiNTHE STREhM. i?vSTA�i�
❑'JWN.STRCR41 TEMPORARY CflFF£R 6AM
TO R�RE:�ENT E3ACF[FL6iW' IPIiO
C{]NBTR:l1CTI0H AREA�.
?. IM;;TRLL PF2QPQ9E6 [ARTH i3ERM J4iCiWC--
T4P Oi [3,t.ttilS 4N LACN SIQ€ s]F TME
CC�NSTRJCTI4H AR�h.
a. LIPGNC4H�TRLICTIC.h�1^_-OAlPiETION
RCMC7vE C�FFER DAMS. afPE RN6 S]TMEFi
TEki?OFL4RY +AEA�LiR[S ANU I NSTALi
TEM,�i7RARY STR[A�M CF245SIFJG IF
14EE6E6 �'OR. C4NSTR�CTI44 f�CCESS
T4 4THE,R SECTI4 N� OF TNE: PROJ ECT.
ir tio� !����:�,�, �Ra��ro wirh �-rrz�a��r
�ftr,K rE�roa�;ns�r�. s�� 4�rn�� aau
�C @E FCSR STREAM CRO�.SCING P�OST
�v°'�IVSTRUCT�ION F�JR REST�*R7�.TIfSN
i 4 �O�R.M1lTIdFJ
_ U�4N STA61�12hT14N i7F �LEhRElI�
11R.GAU. REM4VE TEMPf]RAR'd Ef4RTM
6E RFhS.
r�u � �s:
' PRO'�e'iQEBYPASS�U�kIFINGE4L�IPM€hTQ�F�UFFICI@�HT�AfiACITYTC?M,hN�LE
T�IC 6A:SE FLaY4 4FTH€ STFiERM.
2. PFiO'JICSE CiftSS 6 F21P RAP PAdS 14fTH �EDTEYTILE FABRIC 11Nfl�CRLINER fOR
PUMP INT&IS� AN� OISCHAFeGE �Y?JES Tt7 PR6"5FE1YT �TREAM �E6 S£O�R.
�3. E:FFLl1ENTFRQMUEW�{TERING9ET4VE€N�GOFFERIAR?�ISSMALiBEPLiMP'ETrT6
k SILT @AG h5 SHQNfN ON THE DCTkIL, AN6 tiOT dIRECTLY TD THE SiREkM.
A�. TME FL01V� TM3LU PlP€i�15MALL 9�E THE SAM€ S12E AN� NUY�i9€Fe,43 StItJWN
F4 R TM E TEMPOP.AftY '�iRL-AMti C R+�S9IHGS.
TEMPORARY PUMP-AROUND DETAIL
PNG �INE 2096 NCDOT 2519B RELOCATION FIGURE NO.
SOURCE: EROISON & SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN SPRUCE PINE, NORTH CAROLINA �
PREPARED BY MA ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS

Appendix I: Completed PCN and PNG Authorization to
Act as Agent

I 1
r���i
D�a� w n r�,�Q�
� �
� y
a �
Office Use Only:
Corps action ID no.
DWQ project no.
Form Version 1.3 Dec 10 2008
Pre-Construction Notification (PCN) Form
A. Applicant Information
1. Processing
1a. Type(s) of approval sought from the
Corps: � Section 404 Permit ❑ Section 10 Permit
1 b. Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: 12 or General Permit (GP) number:
1c. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps? � Yes ❑ No
1d. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply):
❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Regular ❑ Non-404 Jurisdictional General Permit
❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Express ❑ Riparian Buffer Authorization
1 e. Is this notification solely for the record For the record only for DWQ 401 For the record only for Corps Permit:
because written approval is not required? Certification:
❑ Yes � No ❑ Yes � No
1f. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in-lieu fee program proposed for mitigation � Yes � No
of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank or in-lieu
fee program.
1g. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1 h ❑ Yes � No
below.
1 h. Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)? ❑ Yes � No
2. Project Information
2a. Name of project: PNG Line 209 NCDOT 2519B Relocation
2b. County: Mitchell
2c. Nearest municipality / town: Spruce Pine
2d. Subdivision name: N/A
2e. NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state N/A
project no:
3. Owner Information
3a. Name(s) on Recorded Deed: See below
3b. Deed Book and Page No.
3c. Responsible Party (for LLC if
applicable):
3d. Street address:
3e. City, state, zip:
3f. Telephone no.:
3g. Fax no.:
3h. Email address:
Page 1 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

4. Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a. Applicant is: ❑ Agent � Other, specify: Utility Company
4b. Name: Aaron Weldon
4c. Business name Piedmont Natural Gas
(if applicable):
4d. Street address: 4720 Piedmont Row Drive
4e. City, state, zip: Charlotte, NC 28210
4f. Telephone no.: 704.731.4598
4g. Fax no.:
4h. Email address: [e-mail]
5. Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable)
5a. Name: Joey Lawler, PWS.
5b. Business name S&ME, Inc.
(if applicable):
5c. Street address: 9751 Southern Pine Boulevard
5d. City, state, zip: Charlotte, N.C. 28723
5e. Telephone no.: 704.523.4726
5f. Fax no.: 704.525.3853
5g. Email address: [e-mail]
Page 2 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

B. Project Information and Prior Project History
1. Property Identification
1a. Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID): Multiple - utility line project
Latitude:35.899150 Longitude: -
1 b. Site coordinates (in decimal degrees): 82.114275
(DD.DDDDDD) (-DD.DDDDDD)
1 c. Property size: 5.1 acres
2. Surface Waters
2a. Name of nearest body of water (stream, river, etc.) to UT to Brushy Creek (Index No. 7-2-29)
proposed project:
2b. Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water: C; Tr
2c. River basin: French Broad
3. Project Description
3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application:
A portion of the Line 209 natural gas pieline will be relocated to a new right-of-way (ROW) that crosses primarily through
agricultural land and undeveloped woodland. The tie-in points will be located within PNG's existing, maintained ROW.
Surrounding land use is limited to low density residential areas and undeveloped forest.
3b. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property:
Less than 0.10-acre.
3c. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property:
600 linear feet of stream was delineated. Less than 110 will be affected.
3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:
To relocate a segment of gasline that conflicts with a pending NCDOT improvement project.
3e. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
Construction of the new line and station will first involve identification of the work limits, followed by preparation of a
suitable work surface where necessary. PNG anticipates that the proposed work will be conducted within a corrdior not
exceeding 70 feet wide. At the stream crossings, the workspace will be reduced to 50 feet, and a"dry" work surface will
be established by constructing coffer dams upstream and downstream of the proposed work area. A pump will then be
used to convey clean water from upstream of the coffer dam to downstream of the work area. Water between the coffer
dams will be pumped up through a filter bag in a vegetated high ground area.
Efforst will be made to remove bank surface vegetation in a manner that minimizes soil disturbance and exposure.
Appropriate sediment and erosion control measures will be employed as necessary to prevent sedimentation outside of
the work area.
A narrow trench will then be excavated through the dry work area using a small trackhoe, and the new pipe installed. The
top six inches of streambed material will be segregated from any subsurface material. Following installation of the pipe,
the excavated area will be backfilled, with segregated streambed material replaced last. The affected streams and
wetlands will then be restored as closely as possible to pre-disturbance contours and conditions, seeded with a
customized riparian seed mix and banks will be stabilized with coir matting. PNG does not anticipate that the work will
cumulatively impact more than 110 linear feet (If) of streambed, including those portions affected by placement of the
coffer dams.
Page 3 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

4. Jurisdictional Determinations
4a. Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property /
project (including all prior phases) in the past? � Yes ❑ No ❑ Unknown
Comments: See Appendix III
4b. If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type
of determination was made? � Preliminary ❑ Final
4c. If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas? Agency/Consultant Company: S&ME
Name (if known): Tasha Alexander Other:
4d. If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation.
Action ID No. 2015-00708, June 19, 2015
5. Project History
5a. Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for � Yes ❑ No � Unknown
this project (including all prior phases) in the past?
5b. If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions.
N/A
6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project? ❑ Yes � No
6b. If yes, explain.
N/A
Page 4 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1a. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply):
� Wetlands � Streams - tributaries ❑ Buffers
❑ Open Waters ❑ Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted.
2a. 2b. 2c. 2d. 2e. 2f.
Wetland impact Type of jurisdiction
number — Type of impact Type of wetland Forested (Corps - 404, 10 Area of impact
Permanent (P) or (if known) DWQ — non-404, other) (acres)
Tem orar T
W1 ❑ P� T Utility installation Seep ❑ Yes � Corps 0.004
� No � DWQ
W2 � P❑ T Utility installation Headwater Forest � Yes � Corps 0.004
❑ No � DWQ
W3 ❑ P❑ T ❑ Yes ❑ Corps
❑ No ❑ DWQ
W4 ❑ P❑ T ❑ Yes ❑ Corps
❑ No ❑ DWQ
W5 ❑ P❑ T ❑ Yes ❑ Corps
❑ No ❑ DWQ
W6 ❑ P❑ T ❑ Yes ❑ Corps
❑ No ❑ DWQ
2g. Total wetland impacts 0.008
2h. Comments:
3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted.
3a. 3b. 3c. 3d. 3e. 3f. 3g.
Stream impact Type of impact Stream name Perennial Type ofjurisdiction Average Impact
number - (PER) or (Corps - 404, 10 stream length
Permanent (P) or intermittent DWQ — non-404, width (linear
Temporary (T) (INT)? other) (feet) feet)
Temporary
S1 ❑ P� T excavation for SX2 � PER � Corps 10 50
pipe installation ❑ INT � DWQ
Temporary
S2 ❑ P� T excavation for SX5 � PER � Corps 15 60
pipe installation ❑ INT � DWQ
S3 ❑ P❑ T ❑ PER ❑ Corps
❑ INT ❑ DWQ
S4 ❑ P❑ T ❑ PER ❑ Corps
❑ INT ❑ DWQ
S5 ❑ P❑ T ❑ PER ❑ Corps
❑ INT ❑ DWQ
S6 ❑ P❑ T ❑ PER ❑ Corps
❑ INT ❑ DWQ
3h. Total stream and tributary impacts 110
3i. Comments: Streams will be temporarily impacted.
Page 5 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

4. Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U.S. then individually list all open water impacts below.
4a. 4b. 4c. 4d. 4e.
Open water Name of waterbody
impact number — (if applicable) Type of impact Waterbody type Area of impact (acres)
Permanent (P) or
Temporar T
01 ❑P�T
02 ❑POT
03 ❑P�T
04 ❑P�T
4f. Total open water impacts
4g. Comments: No open-water impacts will occur.
5. Pond or Lake Construction
If pond or lake construction proposed, then complete the chart below.
5a. 5b. 5c. 5d. 5e.
Wetland Impacts (acres) Stream Impacts (feet) Upland
Pond ID Proposed use or purpose (acres)
number of pond
Flooded Filled Excavated Flooded Filled Excavated Flooded
P1
P2
Sf. Total
5g. Comments:
5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required?
❑ Yes ❑ No If yes, permit ID no:
5i. Expected pond surface area (acres):
5j. Size of pond watershed (acres):
5k. Method of construction:
6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts
below. If any impacts require mitigation, then you MUST fill out Section D of this form.
6a.
❑ Neuse ❑ Tar-Pamlico ❑ Other:
Project is in which protected basin? ❑ Catawba ❑ Randleman
6b. 6c. 6d. 6e. 6f. 6g.
Buffer impact
number — Reason Buffer Zone 1 impact Zone 2 impact
Permanent (P) or for Stream name mitigation (square feet) (square feet)
Temporary T impact required?
B1 ❑P❑T ❑Yes
❑ No
B2 ❑P�T ❑Yes
❑ No
B3 ❑POT ❑Yes
❑ No
6h. Total buffer impacts
6i. Comments: No buffer impacts will occur.
Page 6 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

D. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
1a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project.
See cover letter for details
1 b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques.
See cover letter for details.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for ❑ Yes � No
impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
2b. If yes, initigation is required by (check all that apply): ❑ DWQ ❑ Corps
❑ Mitigation bank
2c. If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this
project? ❑ Payment to in-lieu fee program
❑ Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a. Name of Mitigation Bank:
3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter) Type Quantity
3c. Comments:
4. Complete if Making a Payment to In-lieu Fee Program
4a. Approval letter from in-lieu fee program is attached. ❑ Yes
4b. Stream mitigation requested: 0 linear feet
4c. If using stream mitigation, stream temperature: ❑ warm ❑ cool ❑cold
4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only): 0 square feet
4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested: acres
4f. Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested: 0 acres
4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested: 0 acres
4h. Comments:
5. Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a. If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan.
N/A
Page 7 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) — required by DWQ
6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires ❑ Yes � No
buffer mitigation?
6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the
amount of mitigation required.
6c. 6d. 6e.
Zone Reason for impact Total impact Multiplier Required mitigation
(square feet) (square feet)
Zone 1 3(2 for Catawba)
Zone 2 1.5
6f. Total buffer mitigation required:
6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank,
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in-lieu fee fund).
BufFer mitigation is not required.
6h. Comments:
Page8of11
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

E. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1. Diffuse Flow Plan
1 a. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified � Yes � No
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
1 b. If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why.
❑ Yes ❑ No
Comments: .
2. Stormwater Management Plan
2a. What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project? %
2b. Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan? ❑ Yes � No
2c. If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why: Project will not result in additional
impervious surface.
2d. If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative description of the plan:
N/A
❑ Certified Local Government
2e. Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan? ❑ DWQ Stormwater Program
❑ DWQ 401 Unit
3. Certified Local Government Stormwater Review
3a. In which local governmenYs jurisdiction is this project?
❑ Phase II
3b. Which of the following locally-implemented stormwater management programs ❑ NSW
apply (check all that apply): ❑ USMP
❑ Water Supply Watershed
❑ Other:
3c. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been ❑ Yes ❑ No
attached?
4. DWQ Stormwater Program Review
❑ Coastal counties
❑ HQW
4a. Which of the following state-implemented stormwater management programs apply � ORW
(check all that apply): ❑ Session Law 2006-246
❑ Other:
4b. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
attached? ❑ Yes ❑ No
5. DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
5a. Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements? ❑ Yes ❑ No
5b. Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met? ❑ Yes ❑ No
Page 9 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

F. Supplementary Information
1. Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
1a. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the � Yes � No
use of public (federal/state) land?
1 b. If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State ❑ Yes ❑ No
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
1 c. If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
letter.) ❑ Yes ❑ No
Comments: N/A
2. Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a. Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ SurFace Water or Wetland Standards, ❑ Yes � No
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)?
2b. Is this an after-the-fact permit application? ❑ Yes � No
2c. If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s): N/A
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a. Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in � Yes � No
additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?
3b. If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
The project is not considered "growth-inducing" in that its purpose to relocate a segment of existing natural gas pipleine.
4. Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a. Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
The project will not generate waste water.
Page 10 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or � Yes � No
habitat?
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act � Yes � No
i m pacts?
❑ Raleigh
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted.
� Asheville
5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat?
See attached letter for details. A copy of this PCN will be submitted to the U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service Asheville Regional
Office, with a request that they provide comment directly to the USACE.
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat? ❑ Yes � No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
http://ocean.floridamari ne.org/efh_coral/ims/viewer. htm
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation � Yes � No
status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
S&ME conducted a review of the National Historic Preservation Act GIS database, which indicated that there are no sites
eligible for listing within greater than a one-mile radius of the project area. The project has also been cleared by the North
Carolina State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) - see Appendix IV.
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA-designated 100-year floodplain? ❑ Yes � No
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements:
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination? FEMA mappping
Joey Lawler, PWS 08.17.15
ApplicanUAgent's Printed Name Applicant/Agent's Signature Date
(AgenYs signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant
is provided.)
Page 11 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

�,.a c � *. �,€� �,.:�:
� � ��
x 2�► '� �
�� . � �:r.
AGENT AUTHORIZATION FORM
Date: 07.11.2014
Project Information
S&ME Project Name: Piedmont Natural Gas Pipeline Integrity /Assessment/Maintenance
Type of Project: Permit Authorization(s}, Agency Communication/Coordination
Location: Multiple NC/SC locations
Property Owner/Representative Information
Business Name:
Mailing Address:
City, State, Zip Code:
Telephone No.
Contact:
Agent Information
Business Name
Street Address:
� City, State, Zip:
ITelephone No.
Contact:
Piedmont Natural Gas
4720 Piedmont Row Drive
Charlotte, NC 28210
704.731.4598
Jim Kalish
S&ME, Inc.
9751 Southern Pine Boulevard
Charlotte, NC 28273
704.523.4726
Joey Lawler
Authorization: I, ��� �'�} �'-;-� J�--C'�,I/J� of Piedmont Natural Gas ,
hereby authorize S&ME, Inc. to act as agent with the U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers and the N.C. Division of Water Resources pursuant to
communications, coordination and obtaining the necessary Section
10I404/401/Buffer permits, if applicable, related to the above-referenced
on-going projects.
Signature:
�
S&ME, INC. / 9751 Southern Pine Blvd / Charlotte, NC 28273 / p 704.523.4726 f 704.525.3953 / www.smeinc.com

Appendix II: Site Photographs

N
,r
� a
. irP ��r �f � �,
�� �_� �;:,�
"'� ° �,
� �_`� � . - . , . l ,.
� v ` y
- .�, . �? c
*� 'r- + �T , "'- �,� � p y �v f .1 �:n � . �}; , F �(" � _�,
�- � � r i',�*� - � � �"� I.+ {� ��'�I'�.�*" �
/R. + 7e �, � ,�Y �. a = � �s �, �,a
�ryY ^.h""��f�" � :•y� "� Sr a M
-S ,r� r. A''a � � � ��' i ��^w �„ � .
�� �� � �` � � -�. �r �� � �. �� �� �_�
.
�-. 3� � �a_ A.�'.
�'�� '°„s� 'r'*� ` ,�,-�45� �:' +,- e.
�~ ��r �
w w.
�2,R.�,'�.�' � °.� y, � es' - ,.#.
�h�. ;-� �L� y� ��.k- l-,' � - - •y..
� �41-'� � �„ -, f�� ' ��,,_ -:�.� ��} 'L y . u
P h � i 1+F•��` �;1 - r� r
.,�., - ,�.-�.,,y . '�,, a�� •,+,syL . � _
Photo 1. View of existing ROW facing north at the proposed
western tie-in point.
,� ��� � �� � f � , , , 4�
���� � � � ���'�
T.4 +c.i.�����"Y���� ��� ��� r���.
r�+X�`l � �rr�. � ��..: � � 7 �� i ' "
'� � � I t �>„ �4 -�" `} .. `.
d,m. � 1' � ''�.4 � �i�+� � '�h i� �
� � �� �`; y� ��. 3r�T � � 4 '+1 r -�
�� �°F �y '�y,� Y � a 4
� �'�� -' ���'°` ...' '#�' � ��� � �- -'� �'"o��
3i { Y +�.'f 1` h� ���M'�t 4. �y.`�� � `� . ,.iM ��,�. .� F-s�` �'t
��y�r IA 4
�� - �� :� � +_�. ��4 "� �� �''I :�Q,�+�r� ' � 1fa �� ..
� +„r—; ."'3�.I�_' � =� � + ="" p5 : � a T � � ,
�� �` � '��' w:;�► • ... } . Q �
�,".�'�`.w ;� `� ."1� �k �.�,s� '�.�',
�.� '�"�� �}�a.. � � p yry��� ` �}! ` `��
� � �j �I � ���'S' � a � S � f / �
i�� Y °`_ ' `' ` � �� �. � �.� # � ���
�` # � - �"�'�' � c�� # ' f
.
�`�� f�" � "� � �F. e r ' { s �`!�i`"'"� � - �_ `
��f � �!"r `'4 . -�*iy,'� .--�
�'!�!'��� ���.c �` �� �4,;�,(,, � Ww-W i.l ��� _
* �, . � i •. R} n� 1 * `��,�' .iR���� �.. f�' 9C�.,��
,� Ir � ' � , - -
,.� a �-+' -
Photo 3. View of Wetland WX2 (seep wetland). Impacts to
this wetland will be avoided.
. �'' _ � ' �° ����
� _ = i - " �'
- � i -7— 2.er;�'y.
,k '. . . i . -, t k��
I ': � 1� � ' ' '�� 0 : 4� �A � t ,� ;.
�r il`e a t� pi� �� r;t' �..r +
" �" � ��� y.�y _ � '�,.ay ', _ :.
# � �jt� � �.. ,��R'�� � �� i` � - . � 'l. � .
9` �v,�r,�� ,, y �.� � �•- �py�+t `.e �s�;•
�#•-- ~y �i��.�,�.-- � � �e �� 'i �''� �i.e.? � � , �{�{."V
=� . ' �� C�'�
°�' �� ��i�" � � ��� � ���� �� ��� .
��' � .. _ ,� � � � �-
� *�'"���:���j� "�,�'�'��'' �,� ` w � 4 '� �:��*:
� � 4Wo �S � 4 r ..s".}
��1.�3 . � -_;7G`'`°�� � �,aC,,���'i(� a:�, ��h ��+4�-:
�" ,� ;'�'`'�: � �_ �.:
� S' '�
d ; -� � "� ��'�t �� '' f`° P �" N��` '�`p4
t ��' � � � . 3 � �.,:.. rt`�,,� .;�i�,s �h '►�` � + K� � ;� .
� i�4"�a'- f��f� � J� ���,. r7-A; �_'�t,��.
M�� r ` � x y �.° �� '�li �� �` ,�
���`� �s� r re� ':""�' � _ � � 14U.�'�}�'��_
��
�': '� 'A�.'. .�.�"T' �,���i � �S� ����'4} � '
� `�.1� '�ti L. �'�.� "�� y`��C'�ik�'�,-���'*'. �����
.� 'r"{P ��,.—. � . � }.�.• �� ��� A •._ �.
Photo 5. View of WX4 (seep wetland). Impacts to this
wetland total 192 sf ( 0.004 acl.
��� F�� �, ',� � ` � � ��: -i -�e °' _ ��,� J.t,- � '
.�,.� �+ 1 � � � �l . rl�' �1
�,��� � 1y � _ ,. {
F � � ..� t _�'+r � � .
,,�� 1 - I�I ,h � ., ") � � _
�,, N� �c �� � "' ' � �S- ,,: �
�' � � r ) ;�u �-� r
*,' �� �.,. .o ' _",r � � -M
.� . ��� � '� ��" � - � 'i � =1�
e��" �� �. �'k�sJ , i' f �•. ' . ,,. �'
1F t �a�
� ' � � ��. !' . �e ' ' r � �- � � .��
� ".- � +� �' i+s � Y�� . Jr .F+t�.l�� n ,.�.
�. .xd
.*�i' �. �. ,r
�?r.� � � � ,a, ,� i*�' r . . � � � � '
ii ,. . . �" s
+t . � ��, � �C,,, s,� `e�' _`�"��• �,�,-`
1�`' �� ; y
*-� .M � � �� ,� �_`� y6y� _� ;��� '-w, _
, �'� � ��}� -F �y �• ;?�. , a-.:,� � F..
="��.'--� ��'"� � "�-"+�'� -��3' �^ ��';.-�t .t�
- ��,, �. ��„ ��a' �+1���� '� � �"�t� � �- � . - -
���� .{'i'���. � r '�= �"1'i ���- �j� ,f... ���.',�'��v.
Photo 2. View of typical wooded upland area along the
proposed ROW.
Photo 4. View of Wetland WX3 (seep wetland). Impacts
to this wetland will be avoided.
�A � ;, ";
. � �,y �'�t �I
} tii
�{X�? ,�� �` , � �.i �y� � �� � '� ,
r b 4 .
� �� � r� i�i�°� � �� � �� � , -
s-_ o �
� ' �,�'���". " -.'� ry;�� j ' �
"' �
i ''a Ju' � _ � � � , �F + e
i1-� �r -i'` �, : " -�'�� . �t: ��p �ri{� J � �` w __r��,: ;
i#"`�,�� M r � ..y
�1a i�h�:��Y�S,g�a„'�r� � �� `r��y�.����yl"��.,.r 6
" "/j �7 V � '� .�y I b .� k ' ., ; � - �
„lr 1� r,° '� ,�r» t..§ �V+"i, �: � ,.
� S� .. �a � '� ,.� �, Y � £ 9 . � �
��r'� i� � �'15�r64rt�L����i� �
���� � '�""- ' ,�� f''�'�'�►��,,�' ` < � '° ��
�S �,�_ _ �� _ �� �, >,.,p. � ,�, s . .
� ; y��� !� .
\�"�t'p+'k�, ., j `_A�� , '�"�j+'� �4 � '�
'!_ ,�F ,�, ,� '�'� 3+,� f .-� � �"� �'
���; �'- }�� � �
�'o ��A��d4l:• � '� .a. � �� �+,. �� �•` ,��,+. �`
,.�m` ti Ji�r... ._� �� r i v.�
f *'� + � �;R, }� .�j, �,.`�'"�,�- � "�+�f i �'�-� i".� � `rr �. I� .
y . 1, �` `� r �� �'ti�d ,��+Y� L*�
� . � � ��'� �``� � iI .
�4��` ,� ' �, a�+-G u 'IF'� ''"�s� �tF .,�",� �`T'� �
� 4 �M1� S y 'MI �,yl !r `�{ � �
� .R �� _ � *�#�.' `fy.� �- A . h
.F
Photo 6. View of WX5 (headwater forest). Impacts to
this wetland will be avoided.
� SITE PHOTOGRAPHS
� PNG Line 209 NCDOT 2519B Relocation
- Spruce Pine, North Carolina
Project No.: 7335-15-004 Photo Page 1 of 2

Photo 6. View of Wetland WX6 (riparian fringe abutting SX5)
Photo 8. View of SX3 (perennial RPW draining to SX2).
Photo 11. View of SX5 (perennial RPW) facing upstream.
Impacts to this stream will not exceed 60 LF.
Photo 7. View of SX2 (perennial RPW) facing upstream.
Impacts to this stream will not exceed 50 LF.
` ' m� e►"" � ' , . �J'�.{� ='�'`�,: R ��f'+ �,rq �4� -•
��'���1� � �1��`R�� �!°�LM�' � A�`5 �� !�J� w4���A����, � �i
�.
; ���r I ��i'� ��,� �� �.�i� �i
��'" ����, a � s �a� `�,1,°�,� ` i� •.3 4`
, �.
- , �y,� � . 4'�} � ���� �,;�' , � r
�_•q � ��s � � , � ,�+ '� ���C _� F ��, r,.
a'��' ��:+�,��,��r� � �'� �� �'�� � ��1�'� '� 6�'�� � n
. . y, �r� i�' .L �' . "�� y��
._�� , � ��� `�`'r' e4 ., t r �.f �,_. , a .'
F�� r 1� �
�4��, '+Iy , ,`�- , �'� C�c ' �.� �•
M � � � ��` '�y~'�r , R +T��f
T y� �[` �
.� � =�t .�ST" �,.�}� � I�,T � � �
I��*q�}�� ����` ��'�'T,� r "'�'• . ��"����p'.
Ir: � -�R'�'� �a.�� � �, r � k.' -, __�.1► � �: . a,'�� M
�,'L � }.�� .�� �i, � r' �'�a`i�i�" ��7�`��r�p,s R�� "-� �',� +� ,,,%�-�
a .?�' �y„ "�iA � i'I� _ q_ �i► � - T_.�� �".. �� a{'
�� �7' '� ." . � ,! �r � � .. _ ��;�
..�.. ,. . � r � . ..
�. -� 'ti i ' r� h p � ,.. � e
+ � Y' �` � r� i � �+,� � F'"� ��
��- '� � � �i'�.-r�'' �7�`'• � "a�,� �� ' ��,, ^,��. �
.
4��
'�° � .` , a�'p.P�. • �.r�— �:
��' r,�"rt ,-, �9�+.n -r� ,� � � �•+�!�i _- `'�� +e
,:�� 'R ����+�� .�' '���"��'���������w � �i
I�I/M. �` �1' '�._� �.'�� J' s� ,�,q'� ���'� `� ti�•°., �z.`,�' �'�,, '
3Y
Photo 9. View of SX4 (intermittent RPW) draining to SX3).
Imqacts to this stream will be avoided.
_ ,.
�
�����., '; ��� ,�y ° '� �
6`r`''�``�'. .. - ___�;•!�` _ �_ "-
- . � '� ' �
.,. � F.•�''`r ���r'1" � �,'a�a ,�� �
?FT E� +������ "� { � �� �5�' �..
. J � . �d � l �. ��Ar . � ti ' Y,� ' . k' � .
�je � �
. . ; y; � ylk : � 1 � � � il Y-{'��� �fl�: �� �"�-y ` ..
� ' S t b �e �
� r ; u�' .�M�',y'yT,.��fy j�,�,,�' "` '`�"�"�" -.
s � +� -w - w�.R- �' ,
�'" ���l�=s.���,�"X� e �� �. ���� � �`, S ',� y � �.�.
`r �: �;��� t ��
.. � .
¢; • �
� �,
,. , � .- , � � �. .�it��, �
.� � ti . s ,: .
� �� ,. . , : ' �" �k ,�
, �l.- `' ',��5 y� *� ..-
� t ,�_�*
�' �W� ��1- '� %�"K,'r � y�
Photo 12: View of typical open field through which a
portion of the route passes.
SITE PHOTOGRAPHS
PNG Line 209 NCDOT 2519B Relocation
Spruce Pine, North Carolina
Photo Page 2 of 2 I

Appendix III: Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination
(JD) Authorization

U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
WILMINGTON DISTRICT
Action ID: 2U1 �5-0071)�3 County: Mifchcil U.S.G.S. Quad: P+lC-SPr-�ece 1'ine
NOTIFICATION OF JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION
Property Owner: Pie�inicrvik l�I�ttuf'al G�s {PN+G) 1 Aarcm Wel�ian
Address: 4720 Piedmont Row Drive
Ct�aa-Ioite, NC.` �8210
Telephone Number: 704-731-4598
Size (acres): 4 Nearest Town: Saruce Pine
Nearest Waterway: Brtrshv Cr�ee�C Coordinates: 3>.�39�l5U�� l�z__-BZ.I_1�#275� W
River Basin/ HUC: French Broad / 06010108
Location description: Tt�e nrniecf is Icrc�rted within a PNG rial�t-�f-rvay, line ?!}�J, off CJS Hwv 19 E.�r�ECe Pi��ez
�Vi�tc}�elE Caa.�nty, NT�rth Carolina.
Indicate Which of the Followin� AAply: �
A. Preliminary Determination
X Based on preliminary information, there may be waters of the U.S. including wetlands on the above project area. We
strongly suggest you have this property inspected to determine the extent of Department of the Army (DA) jurisdiction.
To be considered final, a jurisdictional determination must be verified by the Corps. This preliminary determination is not
an appealable action under the Regulatory Program Administrative Appeal Process (Reference 33 CFR Part 331). If you
wish, you may request an approved JD (which may be appealed), by contacting the Corps district for further instruction.
Also, you may provide new information for further consideration by the Corps to reevaluate the JD.
B. Approved Determination
_ There are Navigable Waters of the United States within the above described property subject to the permit requirements of
Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act and Section 404 of the Clean Water Act. Unless there is a change in the law or
our published regulations, this determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this
notiiication.
_ There are waters of the U.S. including wetlands on the above described properiy subject to the permit requirements of
Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (CWA)(33 USC § 1344). Unless there is a change in the law or our published
regulations, this determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this notification.
_ We strongly suggest you have the wetlands on your properiy delineated. Due to the size of your property and/or our
present workload, the Corps may not be able to accomplish this wetland delineation in a timely manner. For a more timely
delineation, you may wish to obtain a consultant. To be considered final, any delineation must be verified by the Corps.
_ The waters of the U.S. including wetlands on your project area have been delineated and the delineation has been
verified by the Corps. We strongly suggest you have this delineation surveyed. Upon completion, this survey should be
reviewed and verified by the Corps. Once verified, this survey will provide an accurate depiction of all areas subject to
CWA jurisdiction on your property which, provided there is no change in the law or our published regulations, may be
relied upon for a period not to exceed five years.
The waters of the U.S. including wetlands have been delineated and surveyed and are accurately depicted on the plat
signed by the Corps Regulatory Official identified below on . Unless there is a change in the law or our published
regulations, this determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this notification.
mm There are no waters of the U.S., to include wetlands, present on the above described project area which are subject to the
permit requirements of Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (33 USC 1344). Unless there is a change in the law or our
published regulations, this determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this
notification.

_ Tl�e property is located in one of the 20 Coastal Counties subject to regulation under the Coastal Area Management Act
(CAMA). You should contact the Division of Coastal Management to determine their requirements.
Placement of dredged or fill material within waters of the US and/or wetlands without a Deparhnent of the Army permit may
constitute a violation of Section 301 of the Clean Water Act (33 USC § 1311). If you have any questions regarding this
determination and/or the Corps regulatory program, please contact Tasha Alexander at 828-271-7980, ext. 226 or
[e-mail].
C. Basis for Determination:
D. Remarks: A site visit was conducted on April 7, 2015 with Joey Lawler, S&ME. The waters of the U.S. are
accurately depicted on the maps provided.
E. Attention USDA Program Participants
This delineation/determination has been conducted to identify the limits of Corps' Clean Water Act jurisdiction for the
particular site identified in this request. The delineation/determination may not be valid for the wetland conservation
provisions of the Food Security Act of 1985. If you or your tenant are USDA Program participants, or anticipate participation
in USDA programs, you should request a certified wetland determination from the local office of the Natural Resources
Conservation Service, prior to starting work.
F. Appeals Information (This information applies only to approved jurisdictional determinations as indicated in
B. above)
This correspondence constitutes an approved jurisdictional determination for the above described site. If you object to this
determination, you may request an administrative appeal under Corps regulations at 33 CFR Part 331. Enclosed you will find a
Notification of Appeal Process (NAP) fact sheet and request for appeal (RFA) form. If you request to appeal this
determination you must submit a completed RFA form to the following address:
US Army Corps of Engineers
South Atlantic Division
Attn: Jason Steele, Review Officer
60 Forsyth Street SW, Room 1OM15
Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8801
In order for an RFA to be accepted by the Corps, the Corps must determine that it is complete, that it meets the criteria for
appeal under 33 CFR part 331.5, and that it has been received by the Division Office within 60 days of the date of the NAP.
Should you decide to submit an RFA form, it must be received at the above address by
**It is not necessary to sub�rri� an RFA form to the I}��isia�i Office ifyou do iu7t object to the determination in this
correspondence. * * ,
`' _ �
Corps Regulatory Official: _ .
asha Alexander
Issue Date of JD: .1ia i�e i�, 20l S Expiration llate: Five years from Issue Date
The Wilmington District is committed to providing the highest level of support to the public. To help us ensure we
continue to do so, please complete our Customer Satisfaction Survey, located online at
��tt ;Clr� r�rlatc�rv.us��esu.�ve .�;o�zll.
Copy fumished:
Joey Lawler, P.W.S, S&ME, 9751 Southern Pine Boulevard, Charlotte, NC 28273

NOTIFICATION OF ADMINISTRATIVE APPEAL OPTIONS AND PROCESS AI�iD
REQUEST FOR APPEAL
_._. . �_— —___._ __ . �v _ w __._-- _ _._..� --- ---- .- --
Applicant: Piedmont Natural Gas (PNG) / Aaron �File Number: SAW-2015-00708 Date: June 19, 2015
Weldon
Attached is:
[� INITIAL PROFFERED PERMIT (Standard Permit or Letter of permission
PROFFERED PERMIT (Standard Permit or Letter of permission)
PERMIT DENIAL
APPROVED JTJRISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION
PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION
See Section below
I�]
�
�
�
SECTION I- The following identittes your righYs and options regardia�� an adn�inistrative appea] of the above decision.
Additional info�Tnation may be found at �t.tt�:l?��wr�v u:�acc.arrn�_.ciiilfMissions/CivilVw'�?rksliZc��i�l�itt�r��f'r�raioi<�rtclPc;r�liits.�x or
Co s re�ulatioi�s at 33 CFR Part 331. � ____ _ _���_
A: INITIAL PROFFERED PERMIT: You may accept or object to the permit.
= ACCEPT: If you received a Standard Permit, you may sign the permit document and return it to the district engineer for final
authorization. If you received a Letter of Permission (LOP), you may accept the LOP and your work is authorized. Your
signature on the Standard Pennit or acceptance of the LOP means that you accept the permit in its entirety, and waive all
rights to appeal the permit, including its terms and conditions, and approved jurisdictional determinations associated with the
permit.
OBJECT: If you object to the permit (Standard or LOP) because of certain tenns and conditions therein, you may request
that the pennit be modified accordingly. You must complete Section II of this forin and return the form to the district
engineer. Your objections must be received by the district engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice, or you will
forfeit your right to appeal the pennit in the future. Upon receipt of your letter, the district engineer will evaluate your
objections and may_ (a) inodify the permit to address all of your concerns, (b) inodify the permit to address some of your
objections, or (c) not modify the permit having determined that the pennit should be issued as previously written. After
evaluating your objections, the district engineer will send you a proffered permit for your reconsideration, as indicated in
Section B below.
B: PROFFERED PERMIT: You may accept or appeal the pennit
ACCEPT: If you received a Standard Permit, you may sign the permit document and return it to the district engineer for final
authorization. If you received a Letter of Permission (LOP), you may accept the LOP and your work is authorized. Your
signature on the Standard Permit or acceptance of the LOP means that you accept the permit in its entirety, and waive all
rights to appeal the permit, including its tenns and conditions, and approved jurisdictional determinations associated with the
permit.
• APPEAL: If you choose to decline the proffered permit (Standard or LOP) because of certain terms and conditions therein,
you may appeal the declined permit under the Corps of Engineers Administrative Appeal Process by completing Section II of
this form and sending the fonn to the division engineer. This form must be received by the division engineer within 60 days
of the date of this notice.
C: PERMIT DENIAL: You may appeal the denial of a pennit under the Corps of Engineers Administrative Appeal Process by
completing Section II of this form and sending the form to the division engineer. This form must be received by the division
engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice.
D: APPROVED JiJRISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION: You may accept or appeal the approved JD or provide new
information.
ACCEPT: You do not need to notify the Corps to accept an approved JD. Failure to notify the Corps within 60 days of the
date of this notice, means that you accept the approved JD in its entirety, and waive all rights to appeal the approved JD.
• APPEAL: If you disagree with the approved JD, you may appeal the approved JD under the Corps of Engineers
Administrative Appeal Process by completing Section II of this form and sending the form to the district engineer. This form
must be received by the division engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice.

E: PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION: You do not need to respond to the Corps regarding the
preliminary JD. The Preliminary JD is not appealable. If you wish, you may request an approved JD (which may be appealed),
by contacting the Corps district for further instruction. Also you may provide new information for further consideration by the
Corps to reevaluate the JD.
S�:C;''�'[(lN �I - REQUEST FOR APPEAL or OBJECTIONS TO AN INfTIAL PROFFERED PERMIT
REASONS FOR APPEAL OR OBJECTIONS: (Describe your reasons for appealing the decision ar your objections to an initial '
proffered permit in clear concise statements. You may attach additional information to this form to clarify where your reasons or
objections are addressed in the administrative record.)
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: The appeal is limited to a review of the administrative record, the Corps memorandum for the
record of the appeal conference or meeting, and any supplemental information that the review officer has determined is needed to
clarify the administrative record. Neither the appellant nor the Corps may add new information or analyses to the record.
However, you may provide additional information to clarify the location of information that is already in the administrative
record.
POQ�1T OF CONTACT FOR ��.� }?S"i��C}i�� OR INFORMATiON:
--_ _._.y �_ --------- — _T._.� _______ _ _____� --- —
If you have questions regarding this decision and/or the If you only have questions regarding the appeal process you may
appeal process you may contact: also contact:
District Engineer, Wilmington Regulatory Division, Mr. Jason Steele, Administrative Appeal Review Officer
Attn: Tasha Alexander CESAD-PDO
828-271-7980 U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, South Atlantic Division
60 Forsyth Street, Room 1OM15
Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8801
Phone: [phone]
RIGHT OF ENTRY: Your signature below grants the right of entry to Corps of Engineers personnel, and any government
consultants, to conduct investigations of the project site during the course of the appeal process. You will be provided a 15 day
notice of any site invc;sti��t"rn��, and will have the o ortunitv to articipate in all site investigations.
Date: Telephone number:
Signature of appellant or agent. �
For appeals on Initial Proffered Permits send this form to:
District Engineer, Wilmington Regulatory D'avision, Attn.: Tasha Alexander, 69 Darlington Avenue, Wilmington,
North Carolina 28403
For Permit denials, Proffered Permits and approved Jurisdictional Determinations send this form to:
Division Engineer, Commander, U.S. Army Engineer Division, South Atlantic, Attn: Mr. Jason Steele,
Administrative Appeal Officer, CESAD-PDO, 60 Forsyth Street, Room 1OM15, Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8801
Phone: [phone]

PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION FORM
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
A. REPORT COMPLETION DATE FOR PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL
DETERMINATION (JD): 02.27.15
B. NAME AND ADDRESS OF PERSON REQUESTING PRELIMINARY JD:
JOEY LAWLER, PWS
S&ME, INC.
9751 SOUTHERN PINE BOULEVARD
CHARLOTTE, N.C. 28273
C. DISTRICT OFFICE, FILE NAME, AND NUMBER: WILMINGTON DISTRICT
—ASHEVILLE REGULATORY FIELD OFFICE — PIEDMONT NATURAL GAS
(PNG) PNG LINE 209 NCDOT 2519B RELOCATION
D. PROJECT LOCATION(S) AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION:
PNG IS PROPOSING TO RELOCATE OF AN APPROXIMATELY 0.65-MILE
SEGMENT OF THEIR EXISTING NATURAL GAS PIPELINE (LiNE 209)
WEST OF SPRUCE PINE IN MITCHELL COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA.
THE PURPOSE OF THE RELOCATION IS TO ACCOMMODATE
PROPOSED NCDOT WORK THAT IS SCHEDULED TO OCCUR ALONG
U.S. HIGHWAY 19 EAST, ALONG WHICH THE CURRENT GASLINE IS
LOCATED. THE REPLACEMENT PROJECT WILL ORIGINATE ON THE
SOUTH SIDE OF THE HIGHWAY, JUST WEST OF NED HUGHES ROAD
(35.903217N,-82.1115161/� AND EXTEND GENERALLY SOUTHWEST,
WHERE IT WILL TIE BACK INTO THE EXISTING GASLINE NORTH OF
HINSON THOMAS ROAD (35.899219N,-82.1179851/1n.
(USE THE ATTACHED TABLE TO DOCUMENT MULTIPLE WATERBODIES
AT DIFFERENT SITES)
State: f�C7(�TH CARf7LINA Countyf�arish/borough: MITCHELL
City: �l��T�E--, �f f u�� ���,,���
Center coordinates of site (lat/long in degree decimal format):
35.899150 N, -82.114275 W
Universal Transverse Mercator: 17N, NAD83 NC STATE PLANE
Name of nearest waterbody: BRUSITY CREEK
Identify (estimate) amount of waters in the review area:
Non-wetland waters: SEE TABLE
Cowardin Class: SEE TABLE
Stream Flow: SEE TABLE

Wetlands: SEE TABLE
Cowardin Class: SEE TABLE
Name of any water bodies on the site that have been identified as Section 10
waters: NONE
Tidal: N/A
Non-Tidal: N/A
E. REVIEW PERFORMED FOR SITE EVALUATION (CHECK ALL THAT
APPLY):
❑ Office (Desk) Determination. Date:
,-�]C Field Determination. Date(s) i-� �— ��--�� �
1. The Corps of Engineers believes that there may be jurisdictional waters of the
United States on the subject site, and the permit applicant or other affected party
who requested this preliminary JD is hereby advised of his or her option to
request and obtain an approved jurisdictional determination (JD) for that site.
Nevertheless, the permit applicant or other person who requested this
preliminary JD has declined to exercise the option to obtain an approved JD in
this instance and at this time.
2. In any circumstance where a permit applicant obtains an individual permit, or
a Nationwide General Permit (NWP) or other general permit verification requiring
"pre-construction notification" (PCN), or requests verification for a non-reporting
NWP or other general permit, and the permit applicant has not requested an
approved JD for the activity, the permit applicant is hereby made aware of the
following: (1) the permit applicant has elected to seek a permit authorization
based on a preliminary JD, which does not make an official determination of
jurisdictional waters; (2) that the applicant has the option to request an approved
JD before accepting the terms and conditions of the permit authorization, and
that basing a permit authorization on an approved JD could possibly result in less
compensatory mitigation being required or different special conditions; (3) that
the applicant has the right to request an individual permit rather than accepting
the terms and conditions of the NWP or other general permit authorization; (4)
that the applicant can accept a permit authorization and thereby agree to comply
with all the terms and conditions of that permit, including whatever mitigation
requirements the Corps has determined to be necessary; (5) that undertaking
any activity in reliance upon the subject permit authorization without requesting
an approved JD constitutes the applicant's acceptance of the use of the
preliminary JD, but that either form of JD will be processed as soon as is
practicable; (6) accepting a permit authorization (e.g., signing a proffered
individual permit) or undertaking any activity in reliance on any form of Corps
permit authorization based on a preliminary JD constitutes agreement that all
wetlands and other water bodies on the site affected in any way by that activity
are jurisdictional waters of the United States, and precludes any challenge to

such jurisdiction in any administrative or judicial compliance or enforcement
action, or in any administrative appeal or in any Federal court; and (7) whether
the applicant elects to use either an approved JD or a preliminary JD, that JD
will be processed as soon as is practicable. Further, an approved JD, a proffered
individual permit (and all terms and conditions contained therein), or individual
permit denial can be administratively appealed pursuant to 33 C.F.R. Part 331,
and that in any administrative appeal, jurisdictional issues can be raised (see 33
C.F.R. 331.5(a)(2)). If, during that administrative appeal, it becomes necessary
to make an official determination whether CWA jurisdiction exists over a site, or
to provide an official delineation of jurisdictional waters on the site, the Corps will
provide an approved JD to accomplish that result, as soon as is practicable.
This preliminary JD finds that there "may be" waters of the United States on the
subject project site, and identifies all aquatic features on the site that could be
affected by the proposed activity, based on the following information:
SUPPORTING DATA. Data reviewed for preliminary JD (check all that
apply) - checked items should be included in case file and, where checked
and requested, appropriately reference sources below):
� Maps, plans, plots or plat submitted by or on behalf of the
applicant/consultant: SEE ATTACHED FIGURES.
� Data sheets prepared/submitted by or on behalf of the
ap�licanticor�sultant.
�O�fi�� cflncurs with data sheetsJ�elin�atiQn report.
Of�ice does not concur with data sh�etsJdelin�ation report.
❑ Data sheets prepared by the Corps:
[] Corps navigable waters' study:
� U.S. Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas: �
❑ USGS NHD data.
❑ USGS 8 and 12 digit HUC maps.
� U.S. Geological Survey map(s). Cite scale & quad name: SPRUCE PINE,
NC 1:24,000
� USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey. Citation:
MITCHELL COUNTY
0 National wetlands inventory map(s). Cite name:
❑ State/Local wetland inventory map(s):
�] FEMA/FIRM maps:
❑ 100-year Floodplain Elevation is: (National Geodectic Vertical Datum of
1929)
� Photographs: � Aerial (Name & Date): 2013 AERIAL PHOTOGRAPH.
or � Other (Name & Date): S&ME REPRESENTATIVE SITE
PHOTOGRAPHS
❑ Previous determination(s). File no. and date of response letter:
� Other information (please specify): SEE ATTACHED WATERS UPLOAD
SHEET.
3

IMPORTANT NDTE: The information recorded on this form has not
necessat'i#y b��n �verified bY,,,th�,e CQrps and shc�uld nvt ka� relie�! upnn for
fate�r jurisc#ictic�na� determinations.
-!�'t�� r` ����.�� See att�ched Aq�r�t Aut#��arixatior�„
�jignature and date of Signature and date of
R�gulatory Project Manager person requesting preliminary JD
(REQUIRED) (REQUIRED, unless obtaining the
signature is impracticable)
4

��
0
00
�'� N
� r
� N
M N
� O
0
Z
U
N
O
a`
�, m
��
L �
� N
U �
o O
n0
� U
y Z
��
�°
��
W=
U J
� Z
� d
A N N N N N N
l5i N N N N N N
� U X X X U U U U U
� t � � � � t � � t
� � N N N N N
` O O O � L �� �
� 0o F— F-- F— o0 00 00 00 00
46 0���00000
a�. �. �. ... .. �.
J H HHHHF-
� � > > � �
� c`7 I� OO � � V' M N� 00
Z7 pp � CO I� CO � M� (O I�
�� N � � � N N � �'�
�r � r r r r r r T T' r�
'� � T r r r r' r\ r� r
C N N N N N N N N N
'4 � 00 oD o0 00 00 00 a0 00 a0
J
�M N I� N O� O r') � O�n
� M N o0 N � U� N a0
a'C� O O O N O O� O N�
,�. fT1 O O O O O O� O O
a;, C. W W���� CO W�
�'�. lI') Lf� �� ki �li �A L(') �
�. c7 M M M M C7 c7 M M
0 Z Z p 0
� � � � � � � � � � �
� an.��..�����
� F � � � � d � � d d
� � � � �
�
�. o 0 0
�a o�n°o
G7 N <— � N
C
�
'� � M tn � Ch
d% � O O O O O
�Q � O O O O O
� W W W W W W
a Z Z Z Z W W W Z Z
�I ����OOO��
� i i'. i i J J J�. i
i� .� � � � � � � � �
�
�
� N N � � N � �
� �
i� m m m m
�A t3��fn�'DOw��
av����aaa'��
c�
41
�
�
�� N`��`"XXXXX
����������
�
�

Appendix IV: Agency Scoping Responses

United States Department of the Interior
FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE
Asheville Field Office
160 Zillicoa Street
Asheville, North Carolina 28801
February 27, 20l 5
Mr. David Homans
S&ME, Inc.
9751 Southern Pine Boulevard
Charlotte, North Carolina 28273
Subject: Listed Species Assessment, Proposed PNG Line 209/NCDOT 2519B Relocation, located in
Spruce Pine, Mitchell County, North Carolina
Dear Mr. Homans:
On January 27, 20l 5, we received (via e-mail) a letter from you requesting our comments about the
subject project. We have reviewed the information you presented and are providing the following
comments in accordance with the provisions of the Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act, as amended
(l6 U.S.C. 661-667e), and section 7 of the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended (16 U.S.C.
1531-1543) (Act).
According to the information that you presented, PNG is proposing to relocate a 0.65-mile long
segment of existing natural gas line to accommodate proposed North Carolina Department of
Transportation (NCDOT) work where the current natural gas line exists. The existing gas line,
currently within NCDOT right-of-way, will be relocated to a new right-of-way that crosses through
agricultural and forested areas. About ],800 feet of new right-of-way will be created within forested
areas. The new gas line will cross multiple un-named tributaries to Brushy Creek and several small
wetland areas.
Endangered Species. We believe there is suitable habitat within the project area for the northern
long-eared bat (Myotis septent�^ionalis). On October 2, 2013, the northern long-eared bat was
proposed for listing as an endangered species and the project site occurs within its published range
(per the United States Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) — Northern Long-Eared Bat Interim
Conference Planning Guidance). i During the summer, northern long-eared bats typically roost singly
or in colonies in a wide-variety of forested habitats, underneath bark or in cavities/crevices of both
live trees and snags. Northern long-eared bats have also been documented roosting in man-made
structures (i.e., buildings, barns, etc.) during the summer. Northern long-eared bats predominately
winter in hibernacula that include caves and abandoned mine portals. It should be noted that the
' Information for this guidance can be found at the following web site:
http://www. fws.gov/northeast/virginiafield/pdf/NLEB interimGuidance6Jan2014.pdf

general habitat types described above may not be all-inclusive, and additional habitat types may be
identified as new information is obtained.
Section 7(a)(4) of the ESA of 1973 states that "Each Federal agency shall confer with the Secretary
on any agency action which is likely to jeopardize the continued existence of any species proposed to
be listed ... or result in the destruction or adverse modification of critical habitat proposed to be
designated for such species (please note that, at this time, no designated critical habitat has been
proposed for the northern long-eared bat). This paragraph does not require a limitation on the
commitment of resources as described in subsection (d)." Section 7(a)(4) was added to the ESA to
provide a mechanism for identifying and resolving potential conflicts between a proposed action and
proposed species or proposed critical habitat at an early planning stage. While consultations are
required when the proposed action may affect listed species, a conference is required only when the
proposed action is likely to jeopardize the continued existence of a proposed species or destroy or
adversely modify proposed critical habitat. However, Federal action agencies may request a
conference on any proposed action that may affect proposed species or proposed critical habitat. The
USFWS also can request a conference after reviewing available information suggesting a proposed
action is likely to jeopardize proposed species ar destroy or adversely modify proposed critical
habitat. Please be aware that while the lead federal agency for this project is not prohibited from
jeopardizing the continued existence of a proposed species until the species becomes listed, as soon
as the listing becomes effective, the prohibition against jeopardy applies, as does the prohibition
against taking a listed species under section 9 of the ESA, regardless of the proposed action's stage
of completion. We anticipate a final listing decision for the northern long-eared bat by April 1,
2015.
On January l 6, 20l 5, the USFWS entered a proposal in the Federal Register titled "Listing the
Northern Long-Eared Bat With a Rule Under Section 4(d) of the Act". Although the USFWS has not
yet made a final determination for the northern long-eared bat, the USFWS published the 4(d)
proposal in the event that the final determination is to list northern long-eared bat as a threatened
species. A Conservation Measure included in the proposed 4(d) rule states that incidental take from
forest clearing activities will not be prohibited if the activity is conducted in a manner that avoids
cutting or destroying known, occupied maternity roost trees during the pup season (June 1-July 31).�
Because a final determination decision has not been made, and these dates may change due to public
comments, we recommend that no tree clearing/cutting occur between May 15 and August 15 to
minimize potential impacts to the northern long-eared bat. If your client will be implementing the
aforementioned tree cutting restrictions, once the northern long-eared bat is placed on the endangered
and threatened species list, our concurrence with a"not likely to adversely affect" determination can
be assumed from this letter and further consultation on the northern long-eared bat "post-listing" is
not necessary as long as circumstances remain the same. Similarly, if all tree clearing is conducted
before the species is placed on the endangered species list, the action is not likely to jeopardize the
species existence and no further consultation is necessary.
WetlandlStream Protection and Erosion Control - We are concerned with the stream-crossings
that are being proposed for this project. We assume, because a Section 404 permit is required, that
your client is proposing an open-cut/trench method far the stream crossings. From our past
experiences with similar projects, we believe this technique increases the likelihood of future lateral
movement of the stream (which could undercut or erode around the gas pipeline), and the correction
Z The initial NLEB Interim Guidance issued in January 2014 recommended avoiding clearing of trees from April 1-
August 31.
2

of these problems could result in additional future maintenance and impacts to the stream. Just this
year, we have reviewed several projects where PNG is conducting (and financing) stream-bank
stabilization activities because of past pipeline projects where open-cut/trenching was used for
stream crossings. Therefore, we recommend the use of directional boring under the stream to prevent
stream impacts, and we recommend that vegetated riparian buffers (a minimum of 100 feet wide on
perennial streams and 50 feet wide on intermittent streams) be restored and preserved. Directional
boring under streams significantly minimizes impacts to aquatic resources, and forested riparian
buffers serve as filters for contaminants, lessen storm-water velocities, provide thermal cover, and
protect stream-bank stability. If this method cannot be used and trenching is determined to be the
only viable option, we recommend the development of a stream-bank monitoring and maintenance
program that would allow for the prompt stabilization of stream banks near the pipeline crossing
(should any stream-bank erosion or destabilization occur) throughout the life of this project.
We strongly recommend that stringent measures to control erosion be implemented prior to any
ground disturbance and that these measures be maintained throughout project construction. Any
disturbed areas should be reseeded with seed mixtures that are beneficial to wildlife. Fescue-based
mixtures should be avoided. Native annual small grains appropriate for the season are preferred and
recommended. Biodegradable erosion-control matting should be used in conjunction with
appropriate seeding on disturbed soils in steep slope and riparian areas. Matting should be secured in
place with staples, stakes, or live stakes of native trees (whenever possible). The vegetation should
be monitored, and subsequent plantings should be installed when needed. Fertilizers and pesticides
should not be used near streams.
We also recommend that construction equipment be kept out of the stream by operating from the
banks in a fashion that minimizes disturbance to woody vegetation. Equipment should be inspected
daily and should be maintained to prevent the contamination of surface waters from leaking fuels,
lubricants, hydraulic fluids, or other toxic materials. All fuels, lubricants, and other toxic materials
should be stored outside the riparian management area of the stream, in a location where the material
can be contained. Equipment should be checked for leaks of hydraulic fluids, cooling system liquids,
and fuel and should be cleaned before fording any stream.
We appreciate the opportunity to provide these comments. If we can be of assistance or if you have
any questions, please do not hesitate to contact Mr. Bryan Tompkins of our staff at 828/258-3939,
Ext. 240. In any future correspondence concerning this project, please reference our Log Number
4-2-15-143.
Sincerely,
- - o�iginal signed - -
Janet Mizzi
Field Supervisor
3

�� � �� 4��f
� P V
�� �m,�a,m �2C
r� �� N�•
North Carolina Department of Cultural Resources
State Historic Preservation Office
Ramona M. Bartos, Administrator
Governor Pat n4cCror}
Secxetary Susan I�luttz
February 16, 2015
Joey Lawler
S&ME, Inc.
9751 Southern Pine Boulevard
Charlotte, NC 28273-5560
Office of Archives and History�
Deputy Secretaxy Kevin C6exry
Re: PNG Line 209 NCDOT 2519B Relocation, Spruce Pine, S&ME 7335-15-004, Mitchell County,
ER 15-0197
Dear Mr. Lawler:
Thank you for your letter of January 27, 2015, concerning the above project.
We have conducted a review of the project and are aware of no historic resources which would be affected by
the project. Therefore, we have no comment on the project as proposed.
The above comments are made pursuant to Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act and the
Advisory Council on Historic Preservation's Regulations for Compliance with Section 106 codified at 36 CFR
Part 800.
Thank you for your cooperation and consideration. If you have questions concerning the above comment,
contact Renee Gledhill-Earley, environmental review coordinator, at 919-807-6579 or
environmental.review(a�ncdcr.gov. In all future communicaeion concerning this project, please cite the above
referenced tracking number.
Sincerely,
' � �f � (��, Yl.c, f' �-y����C� �i' ��,
,�-�-�_� i:�?
, ,.
�✓Ramona M. Bartos
{�
Location: ] 09 Easti Jones Stxeeti, Raleigh NC 27601 Mailing Addcess: 4617 Mail Service Centex, Raleigh NC 27699-4617 Telephone/Fax: [phone]-6599

�
�. ;
�
p •��
� � i
��•1 ���
L *•.
• � r'�
�
� North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission �
Gordon Myers, Executive Director
February 23, 2015
Mr. Joey Lawler
S&ME
9751 Southern Pine Boulevard
Charlotte, NC 28723
SUBJECT: Input for PNG Line 209 NCDOT 2519B Relocation
UT to Brushy Creek, Mitchell County
Dear Mr. Lawler:
Biologists with the Narth Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission (NCWRC) received your January 27,
2015 letter about the PNG Line 209 Relocarion Project. You requested input from NCWRC regarding
interests of this agency with respect to trout waters. Our comments are offered for your consideration
under provisions of the Clean Water Act of 1977 (33 U.S.C. 466 et. seq.) and Fish and Wildlife
Coordination Act (48 Stat. 401, as amended; 16 U.S.C. 661-667d).
PSNC intends to relocate a 0.65-mile segment of natural gas pipeline in conjunction with NCDOT
upgrades to US 19 E. This pipeline will cross an unnamed tributary (UT) to Brushy Fork. There are wild
Rainbow Trout in the vicinity of the project, and work should be avoided between January 1 and April 15.
We have the following additional recommendations:
1. Effective erosion controls should be used to minimize losses of sediment downstream. Coir matring
over seed and straw should be used on stream banks that have erodible soil. Matting used for bank
stabilization should be free of nylon mesh; nylon mesh netting frequently entangles wildlife and is
slow to degrade resulting in a hazard that may last for years.
2. The stream channel at the utility crossing should be restored to near pre-disturbance conditions.
Thank you for the oppartunity to review and comment on this project. Please contact me at (828) �00-
4223 if you have any quesrions
Sincerely,
(�,,�,�.�,���e���
J, __
Andrea Leslie
Mountain Region Coordinator, Habitat Conservarion Program
Mailing Address: Division of Inland Fisheries • 1721 Mail Service Center • Raleigh, NC 27699-1721
Telephone: [phone] • Fax: [phone]

���
����
N+CaEI�R
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Office of Land and Water Stewardship
Pat McCrory
Governor
Mr. Joey Lawler
S&ME, Inc.
9751 Southern Pine Boulevard
Charlotte, North Carolina 28273
[e-mail]
Bryan Gossage
Director
February 11, 2015
RE: PNG Natural Gas Pipeline - Line 209 NCDOT 2519B Relocation
Off US-19E, Spruce Pine, Mitchell County, North Carolina
S&ME Project No. 7335-15-004
Dear Mr. Lawler:
Donald R. van der Vaart
Secretary
Thank you for the opportunity to provide information from the North Carolina Natural Heritage Program
(NCNHP) database for the proposed project referenced above. The NCNHP database does not show any
records for rare species, important natural communities, natural areas, or conservation/managed areas
within the proposed project area.
Within one mile of the project area, the NCNHP database shows element occurrence records for the
following rare species:
ELEMENT
OCCURRENCE STATE FEDERAL
SCIENTIFIC NAME COMMON NAME STATUS ACCURACY STATUS STATUS
Calopteryx amata Subperb Jewelwing Historical Very Low SR ---
*For status and accuracy definitions, please see the Rare Species Status Definitions and Element Occurrences documents at
https://ncnhde.natureserve.org/content/help.
The occurrence record for Subperb Jewelwing has very low accuracy due to the lack of site-specific
locational information associated with the record, but this species has been documented in Mitchell
County.
In addition, the NCNHP database shows a record for a high-quality Montane Oak Hickory Forest (Basic
Subtype) located ca. one mile southeast of the project area, as well as a record for the Graveyard Creek
Forests natural area. The location of the Graveyard Creek Forests natural area may be viewed by
accessing the Natural Heritage Data Explorer online map viewer, or by downloading and using
Geographic Information System (GIS) data; both options are available from the NCNHP Data Services
webpage (www.ncnhp.or�).
Please note that although the NCNHP database may not show records for rare species within the
proposed project area, it does not necessarily mean that they are not present; it may simply mean that
the area has not been surveyed. Occurrences of rare species documented within one mile of the
proposed project area increase the likelihood that these species may be present within the project area
1601 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1601
Phone: [phone] Internet: www.ncdenr.gov
An Equal Opportunity 1 Affirmative Action Employer — Made in part by recycled paper

PNG Natural Gas Pipeline - Line 209 NCDOT 2519B Relocation
Off US-19E, Spruce Pine, Mitchell County, North Carolina
S&ME Project No. 7335-15-004
February 11, 2015
Page 2
if suitable habitat exists. The use of Natural Heritage Program data should not be substituted for actual
field surveys if needed, particularly if the project area contains suitable habitat for rare species. If rare
species are found during field surveys, the NCNHP would appreciate receiving this information so that
we may update our database.
Thank you for your inquiry, and please feel free to contact me at Allison.Weakley@ncdenr.�ov or 919-
707-8629 if you have questions or need additional information.
Sincerely,
i� +� • , ,
Allison Schwarz Weakley, Conservation Planner
NC Natural Heritage Program

Appendix V: Restoration Plan

RESTORATION PLAN
PNG Line 209 NCDOT 2519B Relocation
Spruce Pine, North Carolina
The proposed project has been designed to avoid and minimize jurisdictional impacts
where practicable. As part of mitigation for unavoidable impacts, the following plan
shall be implemented to restore temporarily-affected wetlands and streams. This plan
entails restoration of temporarily-disturbed areas to their original contours and
conditions to the degree practicable upon project completion. No fills or spoils of any
kind will be placed within wetlands or along the stream banks. Further, disturbed
wetland areas and streambanks will be permanently stabilized with a native vegetative
cover. The measures outlined below will be specified in the contract documents
prepared for construction of the proposed project.
Proposed restoration activities will include the removal of placed fill material and
restoration of original pre-disturbance contours. Excavated material shall be returned to
the trench to the extent possible, and remaining material relocated and retained on an
upland site. Excavated topsoil will be stockpiled separately, kept viable, and then
replaced uniformly over the area of excavation from which it was removed. The native
seed mix identified in Table 1 below will be utilized within temporarily-disturbed
portions of the ROW comprised of wetlands and along streambanks.
Table 1: Riparian Seed Mix*
Species Common Name Percentage of Mix
Elymus virginicus Virginia wild rye 15
Panicum virgatum Switchgrass 15
Agrostis sto(inifera Creeping bentgrass 10
Rudbeckia hirta, NC ecotype Black-eyed Susan 10
Coreopsis lanceolata Lance leaf tickseed 10
Panicum c(andestinum Deer tongue 10
Andropogon gerardii Bi bluestem 05
Juncus effusus Soft rush 05
Echinochloa muricata Awned barnyard grass 05
Schizachyrium scoparium Little bluestem 05
Sorghastrum nutans Indian grass 05
Tripsacum dacty(oides Gamma 05
100
• Riparian Seed Mix to be applied to all disturbed streambanks, extending 50 feet landward and within high
ground portions of the buffer. Recommended application rate: 20-25 Ibs. per acre
Substitutions to the species identified in Table 1 may be made based on availability and
approval of an S&ME Biologist.
S&ME, Inc. � 9751 Southern Pine Boulevard � Charlotte, NC 28273 � p 704.523.4726 � f 704.525.3953 � www.smeinc.com

Restoration Plan August 10, 2015
PNG Line 209 NCDOT 2519B Relocation Page 2
To provide quicker cover, the mixes specified in Tables 1 should also be augmented with
the appropriate cover/companion species, as identified in Table 2.
Table 2: Cover/Companion Crops
Species Common Season
Secale cerea(e Cereal or Early Spring
Winter rye or Fall
Lo(ium Perennial Early Fall or
perenne rye Spring
Uroc(oa Brown Top Spring,
ramose Millet Summer
Mix Notes•
30 Ibs/acre Grows 3-4' tall, but not a strong a
competitor.
20-50% Shorter rye; lasts about 2 years, then
dies out.
20-50% Good germination; dies off with frost;
does not tolerate mowinq.
Additional information related to streambank restoration activities is included on the
Typical Stream and Wetland Crossing Details.
Restoration Plan Prepared By:
S&ME, Inc.
9711 Southern Pine Blvd.
Charlotte, N.C. 28273
704.523.4726
Contact: Joey Lawler, PWS
i IawlerCc�smei nc.com
Local Suppliers of native seed and plant material:
Mellow Marsh Farm
1312 Woody Store Road
Siler City, N.C. 27344
919.742.1200
919.742.1280 fax
www.mel lowmarshfarm.com
Natives
550 East Westinghouse Boulevard
Charlotte, N.C. 28273
688.527.1177
688.527.1133
[e-mail]
S&ME, Inc.