1 Historical

C, Progress Energy
March 26, 2012
Ms. Karen Higgins
North Carolina Division of Water Quality
1650 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699
Re: Progress Energy Carolinas
Franklinton 115kV Substation Expansion
Franklin County, North Carolina
401 Water Quality Certification
Dear Ms. Higgins,
We have enclosed the Pre -Construction Notification (PCN) for the above referenced project.
The PCN includes the required form, supplemental information and construction site plan.
Additional information which may not be provided in the form is included in this cover letter.
The proposed project will expand an existing substation site to accommodate "looping" of the
adjacent transmission line into the substation. Two (2) circuit breakers and a line trap will be
added within the fenced area of the substation facility. The minor expansion (20' south and 30'
north) is required in this area of the site due to existing infrastructure and overhead lines,
limiting available area for the additional equipment. Every effort has been made to minimize the
project expansion footprint.
The project area was delineated for wetlands and streams in February 2012 by Environmental
Services, Inc. (Mr. Jeff Harbour). The February 15, 2012 site meeting with IJSACOE, DWQ,
ESI and Progress Energy representatives confirmed the jurisdictional areas, including the
segments of stream channel which are subject to the Tar -Pamlico buffer rules.
Due to the limited area and physical site constraints, the following impacts are proposed:
0.012 acres wetland impact (permanent due to placement of fill)
60 linear feet of "unbuffered" stream impact (due to placement of fill and channel
relocation)
410 square feet of Zone 2 Riparian Buffer impact (temporary disturbance to be re -
vegetated)
Progress Energy Carolinas, Inc.
P.O. Box 1551
Halaigh, NE 211302

We trust the enclosed information is complete and will allow you to issue approval at an early
date. Should you have any questions or require additional information please do not hesitate to
contact our office.
Sincerely,
�` `"r
Richard A. Brown
General Manager, Transmission &
Construction Engineering
RAB/cts
cc: USACOE — 404
Mr. Martin Richmond, NCDWQ Raleigh Regional
Ms. Sarah Puffer, PEC
Mr. Cliff Sauls, PEC

Office Use Only:
Corps action ID no.
DWQ project no.
Form Version 1.3 Dec 10 2008
Pre -Construction Notification PC Form
A. Applicant Information
1.
Processing
la.
Type(s) of approval sought from the
Corps:
®Section 404 Permit ❑Section 10 Permit
1b.
Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: 12 or General Permit (GP) number:
1c.
Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?
® Yes ❑ No
1d.
Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply):
® 401 Water Quality Certification — Regular ❑ Non-404 Jurisdictional General Permit
❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Express ® Riparian Buffer Authorization
le.
Is this notification solely for the record
because written approval is not required?
For the record only for DWQ 401
Certification:
❑ Yes ®No
For the record only for Corps Permit:
❑ Yes ® No
1f.
Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation
of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank or in -lieu
fee program.
El ® No
1 g.
Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1 h
below.
❑ Yes N No
1h.
Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)?
❑ Yes ® No
2.
Project Information
2a.
Name of project:
Progress Energy Carolinas Franklinton 115kV Substation Expansion
2b.
County:
Franklin
2c.
Nearest municipality / town:
Franklinton
2d.
Subdivision name:
N/A
2e.
NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state
project no:
N/A
3.
Owner Information
3a.
Name(s) on Recorded Deed:
Carolina Power & Light Co. d/b/a Progress Energy Carolinas
3b.
Deed Book and Page No.
Not shown on county web site
3c.
Responsible Party (for LLC if
applicable):
Richard Brown, General Manager, Transmission Construction & Engineering
3d.
Street address:
410 South Wilmington Street, PEB 2
3e.
City, state, zip:
Raleigh, NC 27601
3f.
Telephone no.:
919-546-3122
3g.
Fax no.:
919-546-7552
3h.
Email address:
[e-mail]
L�t APR`2-2
Page 1 of 11 — -
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

4.
Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a.
Applicant is:
❑ Agent ❑ Other, specify:
4b.
Name:
4c.
Business name
(if applicable):
4d.
Street address:
4e.
City, state, zip:
4f.
Telephone no.:
4g.
Fax no.:
4h.
Email address:
5.
Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable)
5a.
Name:
William (Buzz) Bryson
5b.
Business name
(if applicable):
Progress Energy Carolinas, Environmental Permitting & Compliance
5c.
Street address:
410 South Wilmington Street, TPP 14
5d.
City, state, zip:
Raleigh, NC 27601
5e.
Telephone no.:
919-546-6637
5f.
Fax no.:
5g.
Email address:
buzz. [e-mail]
Page 2 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

B. Project Information and Prior Project History
1. Property Identification
la. Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID): 1855-54-2506
1b. Site coordinates (in decimal degrees):
Latitude: 36.0968 Longitude: - 78.4752
(DD.DDDDDD) (-DD.DDDDDD)
1 c. Property size:
5.59 acres
2. Surface Waters
2a. Name of nearest body of water (stream, river, etc.) to
UT to Cedar Creek
proposed project:
2b. Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water:
Cedar Creek is WS-Il, HQW, NSW
2c. River basin:
Tar
3. Project Description
3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application:
Existing site is electric substation. Site is bounded by road, overhead transmission line and undeveloped wooded space
from nearest residences..
3b. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property:
Less than 0.5 acre
3c. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property:
—200 feet
3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:
The project is an expansion of an existing substation to accommodate "looping" of the adjacent transmission line into the
substation. Two circuit breakers and a line trap will be added.
3e. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
The project involves a minor expansion of fencing to the north and south, on the western side of the existing substation to
allow the addition of the circuit breakers. Because of existing infrastructure and overhead lines, the expansion can only
occur at these location of the property. Every effort has been made to reduce the project footprint.
4. Jurisdictional Determinations
4a. Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property /
project (including all prior phases) in the past?
® Yes ❑ No ❑ Unknown
Comments: Both Corps and DWQ made on -site
determination.
4b. If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type
❑ Preliminary ® Final
of determination was made?
4c. If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Agency/Consultant Company: Environmental Services
Inc.
Name (if known): Jeff Harbour
Other:
4d. If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation.
February 15, 2012
S. Project History
5a. Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for
❑yes ® No ❑ Unknown
this project (including all prior phases) in the past?
5b. If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions.
Page 3 of 11
PCN Form —Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project? ❑ Yes ®No
6b. If yes, explain.
Page 4 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1 a. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply):
® Wetlands ® Streams - tributaries ® Buffers
❑ Open Waters ❑ Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted.
2a.
2b.
2c.
2d.
2e.
2f.
Wetland impact
Type of jurisdiction
number —
Type of impact
Type of wetland
Forested
(Corps - 404, 10
Area of impact
Permanent (P) or
(if known)
DWQ — non-404, other)
(acres)
Temporary T
W1 ®P ❑ T
Fill
❑ Yes
® No
® Corps
❑ DWQ
0.012
W2 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W3 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W4 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W5 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W6 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
2g. Total wetland impacts
0.012
2h. Comments:
3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted.
3a.
3b.
3c.
3d.
3e.
3f.
3g.
Stream impact
Type of impact
Stream name
Perennial
Type of jurisdiction
Average
Impact
number -
(PER) or
(Corps - 404, 10
stream
length
Permanent (P) or
intermittent
DWQ — non-404,
width
(linear
Temporary (T)
(INT)?
other)
(feet)
feet)
S1 ®P ❑ T
Fill/piping
UT to Cedar Cr.
❑ PER
® INT
® Corps
❑ DWQ
1
60
S2 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
❑ Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
S3 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
❑ Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
S4 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
❑ Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
S5 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
❑ Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
S6 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
❑ Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
3h. Total stream and tributary impacts
60
3i. Comments:
Page 5 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

4. Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U.S. then individually list all open water impacts below.
4a.
Open water
impact number —
Permanent(P)
or Temporary
4b.
Name of waterbody
(if applicable)
4c.
Type of impact
4d.
Waterbody type
4e.
Area of impact (acres)
01 ❑P❑T
02 ❑P❑T
03 ❑P❑T
04 ❑P❑T
4L Total open water impacts
4g. Comments:
5. Pond or Lake Construction
If pond or lake construction proposed, the complete the chart below.
5a.
Pond ID
number
5b.
Proposed use or purpose of
pond
5c.
Wetland Impacts (acres)
5d.
Stream Impacts (feet)
5e.
Upland
(acres)
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
P1
P2
5f. Total
5g. Comments:
5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required?
❑ Yes ❑ No If yes, permit ID no:
5i. Expected pond surface area (acres):
5j. Size of pond watershed (acres):
5k. Method of construction:
Page 6 of 11
PCN Form —Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts
below. If any impacts require mitigation, then you MUST fill out Section D of this form.
6a.
❑ Neuse ®Tar -Pamlico ❑Other:
Project is in which protected basin?
❑ Catawba ❑ Randleman
6b.
6c.
6d.
6e.
6f.
6g.
Buffer impact
number—
Reason
Buffer
Zone 1 impact
Zone 2 impact
Permanent (P)
for impact
Stream name
mitigation
(square feet)
(square feet)
or Temporary
required?
T
B1 ❑ P ®T
Substation
UT to Cedar Cr
❑ Yes
0
336
expansion
® No
B2 ❑P❑T
El Yes
❑ No
B3 ❑P❑T
El Yes
❑ No
6h. Total buffer impacts
61. Comments:
D. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
1a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project.
Progress Energy has minimized the footprint of the expansion to the extent possible. However, the existing substation
infrastructure largely dictates the alignment and location of the proposed additional circuit breakers and line trap.
1 b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques.
Expansion was limited to minimal amount consistent with safe engineering standards and operation practices.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for
❑ Yes ®No
impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
2b. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply):
❑ DWQ ❑ Corps
❑ Mitigation bank
2c. If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this project?
❑ Payment to in -lieu fee program
❑ Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3. Complete If Using a Mitigation Bank
3a. Name of Mitigation Bank: N/A
3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter)
Type N/A
Quantity N/A
Page 7 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

3c. Comments: Based on field visit, both Corps' and DWQ's representatives determined that no mitigation was required.
4. Complete if Making a Payment to In -lieu Fee Program
4a. Approval letter from in -lieu fee program is attached.
❑ Yes
4b. Stream mitigation requested:
linear feet
4c. If using stream mitigation, stream temperature:
❑ warm ❑ cool ❑cold
4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only):
square feet
4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4f. Non -riparian wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4h. Comments:
5. Complete If Using a Perrnittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a. If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan.
N/A
6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) — required by DWQ
6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires
buffer mitigation?
❑ Yes ® No
6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the
amount of mitigation required.
Zone
6c.
Reason for impact
6d.
Total impact
(square feet)
Multiplier
6e.
Required mitigation
(square feet)
Zone 1
3 (2 for Catawba)
Zone 2
1.5
6f. Total buffer mitigation required:
6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank,
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in -lieu fee fund).
6h. Comments: DWQ made a field determination that the proposed impact was on a non -buffered section of stream
Page 8 of 11
PCN Form —Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

E. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1.
Diffuse Flow Plan
1a.
Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified
® Yes ❑ No
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
1 b.
If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why.
® Yes ❑ No
Comments: Sheet flow is provided from site
2.
Stormwater Management Plan
2a.
What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project?
35.8 %
2b.
Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan?
❑ Yes ®No
2c.
If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why: Below threshold (<1.0 acre)
2d.
If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative description of the plan:
❑ Certified Local Government
2e.
Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan?
❑ DWQ Stormwater Program
❑ DWQ 401 Unit
3.
Certified Local Government Stormwater Review
3a.
In which local government's jurisdiction is this project?
❑ Phase II
❑ NSW
3b.
Which of the following locally -implemented stormwater management programs
❑ USMP
apply (check all that apply):
❑ Water Supply Watershed
❑ Other:
3c. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
❑ Yes ❑ No
attached?
4.
DWQ Stormwater Program Review
❑ Coastal counties
❑ HOW
4a.
Which of the following state -implemented stormwater management programs apply
❑ ORW
(check all that apply):
❑ Session Law 2006-246
❑ Other:
4b.
Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
❑ Yes ❑ No
attached?
5.
DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
5a.
Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements?
❑ Yes ❑ No
5b.
Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met?
❑ Yes ❑ No
Page 9 of 11
PCN Form —Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

F. Supplementary Information
1.
Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
la.
Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the
❑ Yes
® No
use of public (federal/state) land?
1 b.
If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State
❑ Yes
❑ No
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
1c.
If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
letter.)
❑ Yes
❑ No
Comments:
2.
Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a.
Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards,
❑ Yes
®No
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)?
2b.
Is this an after -the -fact permit application?
❑ Yes
® No
2c.
If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s):
3.
Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a.
Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in
❑ Yes
®No
additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?
3b.
If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
4.
Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a.
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non -discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
N/A
Page 10 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or
❑ Yes ®No
habitat?
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act
❑ Yes ®No
impacts?
[I Raleigh
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted.
❑ Asheville
5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat?
Consultant's review of site habitat and species lists
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat?
❑ Yes ®No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation
❑ Yes ® No
status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
Previously disturbed area
B. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA-designated 100-year floodplain?
❑ Yes ❑ No
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements:
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination?
Vic Pd19 4 Ga0w
rJ3/28/20 2
Ll Applicafi gen 's Signature
Applicant/Agent's Printed Name
Date
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant
isprovided.)
Page 11 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

Plan Sheets 1 - 6

C, Progress Energy
Progress Energy Carolinas, Inc. Raleigh, NC
FRANKLINTON 115/24KV SUBSTATION EXPANSION
POCOMOKE ROAD, FRANKLINTON
FRANKLIN COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
I lib
I
P
SITE--„!>l'
I]
DAVIs • MARTIN • POWELL ^M
ENGINEERS& SURVEMORS Y p
OROM L51-
COVER SMELT
ROE'6OQ9.%T I
OVERALL SITE PLAN
ROE-EOV9:W ]
OMNSIRI WELL PLO
Roo-6O29.SN1 S
4NAPLAN
W 60Q9.SNT 1
ION [MT," PIAu
"SW
ROE Wv%SN1 5
.11m+[EMTRa EFTAIIS
w6ON9. SNT6

SIDE
i
__ -- t
x-i'---.p _--
CV.1s'1�lliWltllaa in �i
DAMS -MARTIN • POWELL f�R�fff
KEE�
exGnsssum�r�s _ Y���/
(
.n,u4 nru.�mn
•wnn
�.
i
i' .nfi
/I

/ f
a A
...,. ��� Progress Energy
DAvis MARTIN • POWELL p 0 5to v ra rn. n.c
— — ID FF ENGINEERS 6�RVEY�

6�
4
♦/,J
ei�
a
omn
DAMS •MARTIN • POWELL D *+ - -
yyu...m NGIIN RRSd SNRVEY0R3 qua.« ■ .i�.

4� /Wp
� � • �� SNOA3ANfIS 9 SN33N19N3 nrn.wn.
j ri od • nu.LUVW • sInaQ
nwnwMe.40
-_
• Ij/ I
�• I I � � •µ!II n�t
n � •

9 � ;0se�% pF9'¢Ca� ° EWa s' P E � s�p!°aE>,EF`-�g99.iESe�"d pE96iggW,j[ggidi:C _/�
[ a 5a= 9
T.3
IIEa 9_ ii9- 3G: E-viE G �e f _ yy Pa- g$
am ie�1'E ieaCcv: e r i 5.,,da=si °°E{OE 9.9^i gg#`s�AI sf gga E9S3 5pgs 1 p.. A R " pgE:3 W;.s9Eq"; �'f?�'s E9 -
Wa y iwh !1 w; i 94 [ E i 5 EdcESa'� ¢gE -Ea3:i S st
a �c �• i,u� 3i. ec ale ji @;:5 6 €a€ie'g _�,"W.9�a
E Ric 9 W �9.$9 8 E j c .a
" j`{ •, --•.g_s SR r §�.e3 `,! r a .a ; •�
1 ¢¢ y'=y O = 3 alpt
e:Rz$' e a l6� er;i Ea'�cAE�
g aPFed P
a C�1 Fa d59i3s. i nF F R
147 '
G � �o�s1CL
a•
g� i9e i.i
tali
c ]EE f
8�dig j SS�iaj s _ -
-
s:
-50qIt I
:. q. � ie a�4�•,. a of
Sal
Ir
fla 155
a
r e A �`.� rE p � a�e� •i-- .�

Aerial Site Map

ACMR Mapper 2.0 - 1.5 km WxS W of Franklinton NC
Thnlee Academy
The Community
School Currently
Enrolling for 2012
www thalesacademv_.
AdChoices>
W 1l�hLU f•i
�'aOr�k
Terrain
DOQ INEXRAD
ACME Mapper 2.0 4 aPrint S Email as Link to this page
N 36.09695 W 78.47440 I ""
1.5 km WxSW of Franklinton NC, 8.0 km N of Youngsville NC,
13.4 km NAE ofWak Foriest N
142 pocomokc id, franklioton, tic
/1 M.hm LH. UpIW
http://mapper_acmacmn/[3/28/2012 1:18:41 PM]

Soil Survey

W 6' 6"
36. 530'
Soil Map —Franklin County, North Carolina
(Franklinton Substation)
Wp Scale, 1.7.920 if "ted on A size (8.5"x 11") ghe L
N Melers
r� 0 100 200 400 600 6
N Feet
0 400 800 1.600 2,400
USDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 3/28/2012
Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 1 of 3
36- 6' 5"
36. 5' 29'

Soil Map —Franklin County, North Carolina
(Franklinton Substation)
MAP LEGEND
MAP INFORMATION
Area of Interest (AOI)
(d Very Stony Spot
Map Scale: 1:7,920 if printed on A size (8.5" a 111 sheet.
O
Area of Interest (AOI)
V Wet Spot
The soil surveys that comprise your ACI were mapped at 1:24,000.
Solis
Other
Soil Map Units
blaming: Soil Map may not be valid at this scale.
Special
Point Features
Special Line Features
Enlargement of maps beyond the scale of mapping can cause
Blowout
Gully
misunderstanding of the detail of mapping and accuracy of soil line
Short Steep Slope
placement. The maps do not show the small areas of contrasting
®
Borrow Pit
soils that could have been shown at a more detailed scale.
n . Other
X
clay spot
Political Features
Please rely on the bar scale on each ma sheet for accurate ma
Y P P
Closed Depression
Cities
measurements.
X
Gravel Pit
water Features
Source of Map: Natural Resources Conservation Service
A
Gravelly Spot
Streams and Canals
Web Soil Survey URL: http://"bsoilsuNey.nres.usda.gov
Coordinate System: UTM Zone 17N NAD83
®
Landfill
Transportation
This product is generated from the USDA-NRCS certified data as of
A
Lava Flow
+++ Rails
the version dale(s) listed below.
, k
Marsh or swamp
N Interstate Highways
Soil Survey Area: Franklin County, North Carolina
R
Mine or Quarry
US Routes
Survey Area Data: Version 10, Feb 12, 2010
po
Miscellaneous Water
Major Roads
Date(s) aerial images were photographed: 7/1/2006
p
Perennial Water
N Local Roads
The orthopholo or other base map on which the soil lines were
compiled and digitized probably differs from the background
v
Rock Outcrop
imagery displayed on these maps. As a result, some minor shifting
of map unit boundaries may be evident.
t
Saline Spot
Sandy Spot
Severely Eroded Spot
p
Sinkhole
Slide or Slip
b
Sodic Spot
i
Spoil Area
Q
Stony Spot
USDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 3/28/2012
r Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 2 of 3

Soil Map —Franklin County, North Carolina
Map Unit Legend
Franklinton Substation
Franklin County, North Carolina (NC069)
Map Unit Symbol
Map Unit Name
Acres In AO1
Percent of AOI
CeB2
Cecil clay loam, 2 to 6 percent slopes,
moderately eroded
1.5
27.2%
HeB
Helena sandy loam, 2 to 6 percent slopes
0.4
7.8%
WeC
Wedowee sandy loam, 6 to 10 percent slopes
3.5
65.0%
Totals for Area of Interest
6.6
100.0%
Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 3/28/2012
Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 3 of 3

Topographic Map

ACME Mapper 2.0 - 0.7 km WxSW of Fmnklinton NC
C = -
I, tE
w«lain L:. 7000 fl
GO`-'Sle 2001—m r�
Athlk�
Field -
ACME Mapper 2.0 Print Email ca Link to this page
N 36.09835 W 78.46539
0.7 km WxSW of Franklinton NC, 8.2 km N of Younasy lie N
12.4 km WxNW of Franklin County NC,
142 puconwkc id, f anklintun, nc
Mrken LYif
ArcGIS - _! t m �;.. of 1, >s
http://mapper.acme.com/[3/28/2012 1:15:20 1'M [

Topograhic Survey

3�e

TO:
FROM:
DATE:
RE:
ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC.
524 New Hope Road
Raleigh, NC 27610
919-212-1760 / Facsimile 919-212-1707
www.environmentalservicesinc.com
MEMORANDUM
Martin Richmond
NC Division of Water Quality
3800 Barrett Drive
Raleigh, NC 27609
Jeff Harbour
February 2, 2012
Franklinton 115kV Substation, Franklin County, NC
ESI is respectfully requesting a riparian buffer determination for a +/- 5 acre site located on
Pocomoke Road in Franklinton, NC. The site is currently a 115kV substation owned and
operated by Progress Energy. The Soil Survey of Franklin County, NC depicts one stream
feature as originating near the southern property line of the site. We would like for NCDWQ to
review this feature to determine if a riparian buffer is applicable.
I have enclosed copies of the USGS quad, soil survey map, aerial photograph, and the NCDWQ
stream ID forms.
� G_NR
v;i-� y -r '-nal

vt- u vv V .3tream jumncutcation rorm version q.tt `,J I"/ (;yGPM
Date: a - / _ ��) a.
Project(Site: F IVLatitude:
31, p 9 & 7
Evaluator. £ 52_
County: rtr 'I^
Longitude: - 77/$_ q?S 3
Total Points: l..
Stream is at least intermittent
if z 19 orperennial if z 30•
Stream De circle one)
Ephemer Intermitten Perennial
Other Frs..
e.g. Quad Name: M
A. Georno holo (Subtotal =
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1' Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2,
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
0
1
2
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
3
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
1
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
1
2
3
8. Headcuts
0
1
2
3
9. Grade control
0
0.5
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
o = 0
Yes = 3
R- Hvfiminnv (6uhtntRl
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
gq
1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
1
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
es = 3
C. Bioloav (Subtotal = LO 1
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0
1
2
3
22. Fish
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0.5
1
1.5
25. Algae
0
0.5
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5 0 er = 0
.perennial streams may also be Identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
Sketch:
SHp
W�
S V 5���!d11
SN$
LU -�

NC DWO Stream Identification Form Version 4.11 5 H A A LrMd-
Date: - - I a
Project/Site: FrA41,A S15kV
Latitude: 3�, 0g67
Evaluator: f'Sr_ J
County: /,�
Longitude: - %8. 175-3
Total Points: �1
Stream r at least intermittent J'
Stream Dete!pinatlaD circle one)
Ephemeral ntermittent erennial
Other FM^ I,r
Quad Name:
d 2 19 or e2nnial H>_ 30' Q� �
30*
e.g.
A. Geotno holo Subtotal =
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1"Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
2
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
0
1
2
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
3
5. Activelrelict floodplain
1
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2
3
8. Headcuts
0
2
3
9. Grade control
0
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
0.
1 1.5
Yes = 3
11. Second or greater order channel
No = 0
aNfiGal ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology (Subtotal = C{, 5 )
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5
1
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0.5
1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
0.5
1
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
"Yes = 3
C. Biology Subtotal = 5
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
r
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
_?
-0
1
2
3
22. Fish
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
0.
1
1.5
25. Algae
0
0.5 1
FACW = 0.75; OBL ='1.5 Ot r = 0
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
'perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes: n,,e
Sketch:
SMA
Wti1.d
M'k

EZELL BANK SITE
N OVERALL PROPOSED NEU
NT E BUFFER [EalEcoEngineering
NUTRIENT OFFSET RESTORATION AREAA
0 200 400 800 A division of The John R. McAdams Company, Inc.
Feet
inch =400 feet Figure 2A

/Z-oTT
ti EZELL BANK SITE
USGS SITE MAP
0 300 600 1,200
Feet
I inch 600 (Cel
[JEcoEngineering
A division of The John R. McAdams Company, Inc.
Figure 4

IZ-C'cf$
N EZELL BANK SITE
VICINITY MAP
0 5,000 10,000 20,000
Feet
1 inch = 10,000 feet
[jEcoEngineering
A division of The John R. McAdams Company, Inc.
Figure 1

Z-0 r8
NC DWO Stream Identification Form Version 4.11 g
Date:
Projectisite: 9telij
Latitude:
Evaluator: l Lt
County:
Longitude:
Total Points:
Stream Determination (circle one)
Other
Stream is at least intermittent ,
I
Ephemeral Intermittent Perennial
e.g. Quad Name:
7/t 19 orperennial if> 30•
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal =_LL_j
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1e- Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1,
2
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
0
1
2
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
1
2
3
5. Active/relict floodplain
1
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
1
2
3
B. Headcuts
1
2
9. Grade control
0.5
1
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1
.1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
o = 0
Yes = 3
artifiaal ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology Subtotal = r
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1
0.
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0.5
1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
0.5
1
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
Yes = 3
C. BiologySubtotal =
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
C 0
1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0
1
2
3
22. Fish
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
0.5
1
1.5
25. Algae
0
0.5
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; OR = 1.5 Other = 0
*perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
Sketch:

ice•% ..i"..:v £R'/"".�.'•.4�:
y♦♦� y Y
t�4a r.b ` i
10
e
sr ew yg�! Rr'.
4,
�asl,
00
�♦ t ♦
� ',Vk }.r, u%i-rv°i�fvA eif�ic
U
HATLEY MITIGATION SITE AERIAL SITE MAP FE1EcoEnglneering
0 500 1,000 2.000 A division of The John R. McAdams Company, Tnc.
Feet
t inch= 1,000 feat Figure 3 J

HATLEY MITIGATION SITE
VICINITY MAP
0 5,000 10,000 20,000
Feet
1 inch = 10,000 feet
[jEcoEngineering
A division of The John R. McAdams Company, Inc.
Figure 1

12-109
St. Maron Church
Wetland Delineations
Wake County, North Carolina
Prepared for:
Elie Batouli
1039 Dunsford Place
Cary, North Carolina 27511
Prepared by:
The
Cco) tenc
Group
The Catena Group, Inc.
410-B Millstone Drive
Hillsborough, NC 27278
Tel [phone] Fax [phone]
May 2010

St. Maron Church
Wetland Delineations
Wake County, North Carolina
1.0 Purpose
The Catena Group (TCG) was contracted by Mr. Elie Batouli to conduct wetland
delineations on the 3.01-acre St. Maron Church parcel located at 909 Church Street (SR
1637) in Morrisville, Wake County, North Carolina. The purpose of this investigation
was to determine the location and extent of wetlands subject to protection under Section
404 of the Clean Water Act.
2.0 Project Description
The project study area is located between Church Street on the east and Barbee Road on
the west. The site is mostly wooded and there is an overgrown pond in the approximate
middle of the site.
3.0 Methodologies
Research was conducted prior to field investigations. Information sources used in pre -
field investigations were the Natural Resources Conservation Service (MRCS - formally
SCS) soils map of Wake County (sheet 36) and the US Geologic Survey (USGS)
quadrangle map (Cary). TCG conducted the field investigations on January 13 and April
23, 2010. All drainage features and potential wetland areas were evaluated to determine
if they met the criteria for jurisdictional wetland status.
Jurisdictional delineations were performed using the three -parameter approach as
prescribed in the 1987 US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) Wetlands Delineation
Manual (Environmental Laboratory 1987). The Draft Interim Regional Supplement for
Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region describing the parameters of hydrophytic
vegetation, hydric soils, and hydrological indicators was also utilized. The USACE
wetland determination form -Eastern Mountains and Piedmont (DRAFT) was completed
for the wetland system (Appendix II).
Wetland boundaries were marked with pink and black striped flagging. All flags were
surveyed using a hand-held GPS unit with sub -meter accuracy.
4.0 Qualification of Investigators
The representatives of TCG conducting this investigation were Chris Sheats and Michael
Wood. Mr. Sheats is a project manager for TCG with seven years of experience
conducting natural resource investigations. His experience includes wetland and stream
mitigation, jurisdictional wetland and stream delineations, environmental permitting,
threatened and endangered species surveys, natural systems assessments, stream
classifications, and graphics mapping. Michael Wood has nineteen years of experience in
St. Maron's Church May 2010
TCG Job #2144

>ho
the environmental field. He is a North Carolina Licensed Soil Scientist (NCLSS) and has
experience mapping and delineating soils for a variety of purposes. In addition, he has
experience in jurisdictional wetland and stream delineations, stream identification, and
GIS mapping and analysis.
5.0 Results
5.1 Jurisdictional Wetlands
One jurisdictional wetland was delineated with flags numbered 1-12. The wetland
surrounds the pond. There is also an upland dike within the wetland. The approximate
areas of each of feature are as follows and also noted on Figure 1:
Wetland = 0.38 acre
Pond = 0.05 acre
Upland dike = 0.04 acre
The soil in the wetland meets field indicator F3 as noted in the Field Indicators of Hydric
Soils in the United States (USDA, NRCS 2003), which states:
F3. Depleted Matrix. A layer that has a depleted matrix with 60 percent
or more chroma of 2 or less and has a minimum thickness of either:
a.) 2 inches entirely within the uppers 6 inches of the soil surface
MR
b.) 6 inches starting with 10 inches of the soil surface
6.0 Summary
This report is provided for preliminary planning purposes only. One wetland was noted
and delineated / located in the project study area. It is the opinion of TCG that this
features are regulated by the either/or the USACE or NCD WQ under Section 404 of the
Clean Water Act. The jurisdictional determination will need to be verified by the
regulatory agency prior to obtaining permits to impact any jurisdictional features. Any
concurrence with the results of this investigation will be made at that time.
St. Maron's Church May 2010
TCG Job #2144

REFERENCES
Environmental Laboratory. 1987. "Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual,"
Technical Report Y-87-1. US Army Engineer Waterways Experiment Station.
Vicksburg, MS.
NC Division of Water Quality (NCDWQ). 2005. Identification Methods for the Origins
of Intermittent and Perennial Streams. Version 3.1 North Carolina Department of
Environment and Natural Resources, Division of Water Quality. Raleigh, NC.
Soil Survey Staff, Natural Resources Conservation Service (MRCS), United States
Department of Agriculture (USDA). Web Soil Survey. Available online at
http://websoilsurvey.nres.usda.gov/. [Accessed April 5, 2010].
USDA, NRCS, 2003 Field Indicators of Hydric Soils in the United States, Version 5.01.
G.W Hurt, P. M. Whited, and R. F. Pringle (eds.) USDA, NRCS in cooperation
with the National Technical Committee for Hydric Soils, Fort Worth, TX.
US Army Corps of Engineers. 2010. Interim Regional Supplement to the Corps of
Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual: Eastern Mountains and Piedmont
Region, ed. J.S. Wakeley, R.W. Lichvar, and C.V. Noble. ERDC/EL TR-10-XX.
Vicksburg, MS: US Army Engineer Research and Development Center.
St. Maron's Church May 2010
TCG Job #2144

V
N II:
---
1
EIP I' N�
CAE
BELOW
NIF
1 RENEE CASANDRA CARTER
1
1 DEED BOOK IWIT PAGE 624
1
If l 1
Ill / 1
EARRIE LGRICOLEMAN,
WIWBESIE GRIMSLEV,
GROUND BESSIE GRAY,
1
1
Ig$ f 411 '
FLUSH
JAMES GRIMSLEV,
1
WFPH h t
ROSERTGRIMSLEY,
1 --
CHESTERGRIMSLEY,-�'',--
Z LINDA FORD.
N JANICE TURNER AND
l IS B FLUSH
RONALD GRIMSLEY
1 WI OROUIiO
DEED BOOK 4483 PAGE 783
�r / 1
I l
EIP FLUSH. R `B ER 06767
t
R fSAMRA
EIP 2' W7TH \ /
GROUND
BELOW i\�
/W- - ...: c W_� 1
1
) wl 1
GROUND 021 )�- F. "31(ST., 1
32
\..ti.. ♦ .1
/ I 1 �1
? I1 1 / /
/ ix; .:::[:�:j:-Ul([i:i_';. � ._i.:_i � ♦ 1
I
/ I 1 I I
Q \ \ � 1
1 ...1 .th1u,,. _:.:_.: ULi _r: ?� ..� .� is ♦ II 1
II /
1
d\ 1
w51
/
a ♦ I1
.; /
r '\
L79
/ %I;iT_21YY08.11.Ri�:C • ;
/ m
LLr
SECCI
oFtPuND, TOP 300J)
„acres
`.\
__3,01
130899.65
1\
sq
t '
'1491-IE
Ems.
BELO
\ \
Wetland: 0.38 acre
\\ 1\ 4a0
S TT 2ti?5\�
N/F
SHILOM GROVE COMMUNI
I -- \
ASSOCIATION. INC,
® Pond. 0.05 acre
` -- �- -— ---='_
DEED BOOK 13810 PAGE
upland. 0.04acre
The
St. Maron Church
Dd1e May 2010
Figure
Catena
Wetland Delineation
I�
0 25
Feel
Grou P
I I
i
I
Wake County, North Carolina
Job No
2144

36 (Joins sheet 26)
WsB2 WsC Crc2., 11
Gu SpL spy CrB2' Gu
54 CrE
Ilk `\ \ WsB2 WvD3 CrB2
e WsC2
Y' Gu CrB2 WvD3, �� MyB2,... Gu.
2 <Lf
i Ws82 MyC2 Guy
Gu WsC2 \,\ C
c, I WsC2 WsB2 ` MYC2 Gu MY�
u PkF— ! / MyB2
o— Me f V,C2 wvD3 CrB2 MYB2
0 1
Ln WsE`, V CrB2
WsC2 WsC2 WsE MYB2 Gu Gu
MYC2
=—_ 'Ws62 I CrB2 awl
WvD3— \ '
WsB2 /...
WsC2
V� WvD3 CcWy WYi \
y� WsE ;
i WsE ` WsC2. L—
MYC2 hiloh MYB2
WsC2 WS/Ws Ch 7W r
Gu 9� MYC2
• \.
WsE WsC2 82 '
\ . Cm Me Is • WsB2
Gu \ WsC2 �\ Ws CrB2 °c
\
\ Me
WsC2 Ws62
Ct
to WsE WsC CrB2 WY • ..
cn
WvD3 Ma
v WsB Cn
WsC2
WsC2 WsC2
c �
'N s6CN 2 � I ,
.t Z Wwy " Gu CrB2; \ yy,
CIV
� WvD3 \ CO
(D r; i WsB2 � � • •
sE WY WsB2 \ `Vti WsB2
WsC V
u WsC2 / •• O
U) WsE' wY P2 WSC?
WsC2
0 Gu WsC2
00 WsC2 WsB2 WsB \ WvD3 CrB2'
D3� WsC2
v

1� i►w • �� • %was IIIII j,
a ISO
11111111) � • 1\\� � ` i �� � � �
- ■ = 111111111 = w 1� -/,, ♦ IIIII\\�
WE
NINE 11111.111M
_daGreen Green _M
Elementary I
mn
WIN
������1�� ►�
High Park School
Park
MEN
Green 1c
Hope Z
Elementary JL
gem 126011+7
A o aoa
I I I
VOW :f1S(lei
Disclaimer
'Maps makes every effort to produce and publish
800 1,600 Feet fhe most currant and accurate information possible.
I I I I 1 However, the maps am produced for information purposes.
1 inch = 800 feet and are NOT surveys. No warrenffes, expressed or implied
.are provided for the data therein. its usedr its infenvetaffon.