NCG080997_Email RE Outfall Updates_20230927

Cook, Brittany
From: Tiffanie Garner <[e-mail]>
Sent: Wednesday, September 27, 2023 10:31 AM
To: Cook, Brittany
Cc: Jose Valdovinos; Noah Parsons
Subject: [External] NCG08997 SDO Change Request
Follow Up Flag: Follow up
Flag Status: Flagged
CAUTION: External email. Do not click links or open attachments unless verified. Report suspicious emails with the Report Message
button located on your Outlook menu bar on the Home tab.
Good morning Brittany,
Thank you for taking my call yesterday. As discussed the City would like to amend its SDO locations at it's Operations
Center and are reaching out per the NCG08 permit, section E-4(b) stating, "Monitoring points as specified in the General
Permit shall not be changed without written notification to and approval by the Division[40 CFR 122.41(j)].
We would like to remove SD01 and SD02. We believe they are not representative of industrial activity of the
complex. As you can see on the newer map, the red outline depicts the drainage area of the complex and blue arrows
represent direction of flow.
Finally, we would like to add a new SDO that was discovered upon review of the current SWPPP. It is labeled OOF5
(meaning:Operations Outfall#5) on the new map.
1

STORU WATER
. - . DISCHARGE P014T ill
I NV. EL. = 1 _ 8
N=724445.03571
E= 3059.13-40 r
N4 x
� � � •'',ram'' f
STORM 'CATER
DISCHARGE POINT 1
INVY EL = 93.50
N=724.350.17
Lin jo
�' -
z

�..
a
» n ` f
- F %
� #
-
� � � / �ƒ ��■| %
a
�
� .
\-
.
� y �
v
inky ` ■
`
r �
� %� �z �� �� . � � /� � ■
. %4 ,
\ ��
. . e,
� . � ■
LONG-
� -77.8a610
��. � ,_■ ��
#
" � �/ ■
f , aea '
� � ® � * ■
§IF ` ■
�R ��
\ �\. . ■ w
. ' . #
', till
,w jp , . -
v
a . . .
:
� LONG;
. . ' . `% . . . \
. . . . . .. . . . ... . . . . ... . . . . . . . . . ._. . _ .. .
' . .
. . . . . . . .. .

Public Works I City of Wilson
O: 252-399-2434
Pursuant to North Carolina General Statutes, Chapter 132,et.seq., this electronic mail
message and any attachment hereto, as well as any electronic mail message(s) that may be
sent in response to it may be considered public record and as such are subject to requests for
review.
4