760050_Compliance Evaluation Inspection_20190903

Division of Water Resource,
,acility Number ��� - 0 Division of Soil and Water k- ,servation ���
/ 0 Other Agency k 0
fype of Visit: Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit�Roouutine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: �Il c� I Arrival Time: q Departure Time:E� County: Region: S
Farm Name: W `t kn-ts 06 t%_1
\ Owner Email:
Owner Name: Q(�N�,�{Q, Vv° 1 C'rnS Phone:
Mailing Address: �j��� �/�l`�1 ,k(YlS C)CA- Ck-l-A Iy G
Physical Address:
3ba��1 C
Facility Contact: �NA`k 1CJIyv%S Title: Phone: y 3
Onsite Representative: r Integrator:
Certified Operator: y Certification Number:
Back-up Operator: Certification Number:
Location of Farm: Latitude: Longitude:
A a,
vS q 21 S
cik'c M COIN � J
Design Current Design Current Design Current
Swine Capacity Pop. Wet Poultry Capacity Pop. Cattle Capacity Pop.
Wean to Finish Layer Dairy Cow
Wean to Feeder Non-Layer Dairy Calf
Feeder to Finish Dairy Heifer
Farrow to Wean Design Current Dry Cow
Farrow to Feeder Dry Poultry Capacity Pop. Non-Dairy
Farrow to Finish Layers Beef Stocker
Gilts Non-La ers Beef Feeder
Boars 1pullets ABeef Brood Cow
Turkeys
Other Turkey Poults
Other Other
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ N 1:
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State?(If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State(gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system?(If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Yes Ix No ❑ NA ❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page 1 of 3 21412015 Continued

y Number: of Inspection:
,te Collection&Treatment
,s storage capacity(structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: Sio�C'.K-
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard(in):
Observed Freeboard(in): �011 tl
5.Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes [X No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion,seepage,etc.)
6. Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes,and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat,notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits,dry stacks,and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10.Are there any required buffers,setbacks,or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes V] No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes [� No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals(Cu,Zn,etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN> 10%or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12.Crop Type(s): d )
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes CgNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Reauired Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage& Permit readily available? ❑ Yes jn No ❑ NA ❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes,check ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑WUP ❑Checklists ❑Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement?-}€�cs e►eel else Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
[Waste Application �Weekly Freeboard ❑Waste Ana —�—}Ser� ❑�a �Tr -Weather Code
❑Rainfall Stocking Crop Yield ❑Monthly and V Rainfall Inspections ❑-6�d�P Smvev
p v-/l'v►S ��'
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes [ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected,did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes ❑ No NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 21412015 Continued

Facility Number: jDate of Inspection: Li 131 _n
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes _N No ❑ NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes,check ❑ Yes ❑ No NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es)below.
❑Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑Non-compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s)and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes ] No ❑ NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments(PLAT)certification? ❑ Yes �kNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes [� No ❑ NA ❑ NE
If yes,contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
permit?(i.e.,discharge,freeboard problems,over-application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes,check the appropriate box below. Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on-site representative? ❑ Yes IV T No ❑ NA ❑ NE
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? ❑ Yes M No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments(refer to question#): Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations(use additional pages as necessary).
1 r&Vk-b f4- a.�rtd 7 C i 3 -- Il,�t i i1 U�- I t11t> wo vsz to {=*r-e.
a-O��1 \m c am" �� �`: c�► c.l ba-c jn tv\s7
�, ral r� 'jj�C�f1c � ' J
V\�C�", J A CaJ 5,? N 0� ���1vd-a��► 1D�� �o� platlnr crn t n e i
�
��. U fc`c* S-bC-aCI 11 � W
(� tF �tttgDA to �►q
q �6h F � w .• N av
w,l SO _Vy0X:"L CO K) rvj P ut.s i tl
0vv;v`cW ho CcAA Wig Y-evt!41 (l e a,\ Mwxty -
�1��I1h Ck
Reviewer/Inspector Name: CCAWA LU PhonZ: k--116`— QJ
Reviewer/Inspector Signat Date: ot
Page 3 of 3 21412015