760003_Compliance Evaluation Inspection_20211213

0 Division of Water Resources
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 760003 Facility Status: Active Permit: AWS760003 ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Inactive Or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine County: Randolph Region: Winston-Salem
Date of Visit: 12/13/2021 Entry Time: 09:20 am Exit Time: 11:00 am Incident#:
Farm Name: Applefield Farm-Lower&Upper Owner Email: [e-mail]
Owner: Philip Faucette Phone: [phone]
Mailing Address: 7725 Friendship Rd Browns Summit NC 27214
Physical Address: 4599 Riverside Dr Ramseur NC 27316
Facility Status: ❑ Compliant 0 Not Compliant Integrator: N G Purvis Farms Inc
Location of Farm: Latitude: 35' 37' 15" Longitude: 79' 36'55"
Hwy 220 south from GSO.Take Hwy 64 east to Hwy 42 and turn right(east)towards Coleridge.Turn right onto Riverside Rd.
Exactly 1.2 miles turn left into farm. 3/4 mile down the road. Farm is at 4599 Riverside. Fam#336.879.6500
Question Areas:
Dischrge&Stream Impacts Waste Col, Stor, &Treat Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: Philip W Faucette Operator Certification Number: 20372
Secondary OIC(s):
On-Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Craig Wilson 336-465-5303
On-site representative Craig Wilson 336-465-5303
Primary Inspector: Rebecca D Chandler Phone: [phone]
Inspector Signature: Date:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Inspection Summary:
21. Soils due next year 2022
25. Check sludge survey-not at POA levels yet, but getting close.
7. More frequent mowing of lower,too much dead veg will choke out grass
2. &9. 1 st house in lower has corner washingout and leaking out downslope for long time. Pit still full, needs plug pulled to empty
house and prevent leak
7. House#13 and 1 house on upper both have full plug pits with evidence of overflow
Pigs left site Octber 15, 2021
Page 1 of 5

Permit: AWS760003 Owner: Philip Faucette Facility Number: 760003
Inspection Date: 12/13/21 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current promotions
Swine
Swine- Feeder to Finish 12,400 I 0
Total Design Capacity: 12,400
Total SSLW: 1,674,000
Waste Structures
Effective Built Closed Designated Observed
Type Identifier Date Date Date Freeboard Freeboard
Lagoon LOWER 05/31/2005 D3/16/1994 19.00 29.00
Lagoon UPPER 05/31/2005 10/13/1994 16.00 28.00
Page 2 of 5

Permit: AWS760003 Owner: Philip Faucette Facility Number: 760003
Inspection Date: 12/13/21 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts Yes No NA NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ 0 ❑ ❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure ❑
Application Field ❑
Other ❑
a. Was conveyance man-made? ❑ 0 ❑ ❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ 0 ❑ ❑
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ 0 ❑ ❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the ❑ 0 ❑ ❑
State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage &Treatment Yes No NA NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate? ❑ 0 ❑ ❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard? ❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (I.e./ larc ❑ 0 ❑ ❑
trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on-site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ 0 ❑ ❑
waste management or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicablE ❑ 0 ❑ ❑
to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ ❑ ❑
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application Yes No NA NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ 0 ❑ ❑
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? ❑ 0 ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding? ❑
Hydraulic Overload? ❑
Frozen Ground? ❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)? ❑
PAN? ❑
Is PAN > 10%/10 lbs.? ❑
Total Phosphorus? ❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil? ❑
Outside of acceptable crop window? ❑
Evidence of wind drift? ❑
Application outside of application area? ❑
Crop Type 1 Corn,Wheat,Soybeans
Page 3 of 5

Permit: AWS760003 Owner: Philip Faucette Facility Number: 760003
Inspection Date: 12/13/21 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application Yes No NA NE
Crop Type 2 Fescue(Hay)
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste ❑ 0 ❑ ❑
Management Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ 0 ❑ ❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre ❑ 0 ❑ ❑
determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ 0 ❑ ❑
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ 0 ❑ ❑
Records and Documents Yes No NA NE
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available? ❑ 0 ❑ ❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? ❑ 0 ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP? ❑
Checklists? ❑
Design? ❑
Maps? ❑
Lease Agreements? ❑
Other? ❑
If Other, please specify
21. Does record keeping need improvement? ❑ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application? ❑
Weekly Freeboard? ❑
Waste Analysis? ❑
Soil analysis? ❑
Waste Transfers? ❑
Weather code? ❑
Rainfall? ❑
Stocking? ❑
Crop yields? ❑
Page 4 of 5

Permit: AWS760003 Owner: Philip Faucette Facility Number: 760003
Inspection Date: 12/13/21 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents Yes No NA NE
120 Minute inspections? ❑
Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections ❑
Sludge Survey ❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ 0 ❑ ❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipmen ❑ 0 ❑ ❑
(NPDES only)?
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ 0 ❑ ❑
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check the ❑ 0 ❑ ❑
appropriate box(es) below:
Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑
Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels ❑
Non-compliant sludge levels in any lagoon ❑
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ 0 ❑ ❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment(PLAT) certification? ❑ ❑ ❑
Other Issues Yes No NA NE
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document ❑ 0 ❑ ❑
and report mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes, ❑ 0 ❑ ❑
contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit% ❑ 0 ❑ ❑
(i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over-application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? ❑ 0 ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Application Field ❑
Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑
Other ❑
If Other, please specify
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or ❑ 0 ❑ ❑
CAW M P?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative? ❑ 0 ❑ ❑
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑ 0 ❑ ❑
Page 5 of 5