990005_Compliance Evaluation Inspection_20180425

Division of Water Resources
Facility.Number - 0 Division of Soil and Water. ,ervation
0 Other Agency
1
'lType of Visit: Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: Arrival Time: Q Departure Time: County:�(�(,�k j _ Region:\ELL
Farm Name: (l O I Q, C-n G e, Farm Owner Email: �
Owner Name: [_AAC,01 1'1 Phone:
NY15 r Sh(AnnalI Cass
Mailing Address: 3 n Ucj 91 2MQ Tj )6 l t ib n('l� �1UC-)-1)
Physical Address: 'We� �JS fi� Wlm dhl)VA l (✓ N C, IJ 010
Chris or Sharman CGsS 7o�1-y5a-`1051
Facility Contact: Title: Phone:
Onsite Representative: Integrator:
Certified Operator: Ch rls CCS Certification Number:
Back-up Operator: Certification Number:
Location of Farm: Latitude: ']�� b31 o) Longitude: �U
goi 0-o/I Cr
Design Current Design Current Design Current
Swine Capacity Pop. Wet Poultry Capacity Pop. Cattle Capacity Pop.
Wean to Finish La er DairyCow
Wean to Feeder Non-Layer Dairy Calf
Feeder to Finish Dairy Heifer
Farrow to Wean Design Current Dry Cow
Farrow to Feeder Dry Poultry Capacity Pop. Non-Dairy
Farrow to Finish Layers Beef Stocker
Gilts Non-Layers Beef Feeder
Boars Pullets Beef Brood Cow
Turkeys
Other Turkey Poults
Other Other
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State?(If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State(gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system?(If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
3.Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page I of 3 21412015 Continued

Facility Number: - jDate of Inspection:
Waste Collection&Treatment
4. Is storage capacity(structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall)less than adequate? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
a. If yes,is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: VV X w!9-Ups r U } 011
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard(in):
Observed Freeboard(in):
5.Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(i.e.,large trees,severe erosion,seepage,etc.)
6.Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes,and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat,notify DWR
7.Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? X Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
8.Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes I" No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits,dry stacks,and/or wet stacks) �C
9.Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require Yes' No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers,setbacks,or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes 10 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals(Cu,Zn,etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN> 10%or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12.Crop Type(s): _( 1'Gil �'l� JrA4_6' 1/e Y ^ S�CU� ►N��
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes �] No ❑ NA ❑ NE
15.Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes .� No ❑ NA ❑ NE
16.Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes ❑ No 0 NA ❑ NE
acres determination?
17.Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes [X No ❑ NA ❑ NE
18.Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes � No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Required Records&Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage&Permit readily available? ElYes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
20.Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?If yes,check ❑ Yes t4
No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑WUP [I Checklists ❑Design ❑Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement?If yes,check the appropriate box below. C� ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Waste Application Weekly Freeboard Waste Analysis �.� r�7, r �f Weather Code
Rainfall Wtocking KCrop Yield 0rP ins�e� Monthly and V Rainfall Inspections
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes "5(No ❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected,did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes ❑ No tA NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 21412015 Continued

Facility Number: 99 - 05 Date of Inspection:
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste app,_ .Zion equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes,check ❑ Yes ❑ No NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es)below.
❑Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑Non-compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s)and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments(PLAT)certification? ❑ Yes ❑ No NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes KNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
If yes,contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
permit?(i.e.,discharge,freeboard problems,over-application) 3K
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other: 91
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes ANo ❑ NA ❑ NE
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on-site representative? ❑ Yes 0 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments(refer to question#): Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations(use additional pages as necessary).
�5 tx I + E jUe/ 19y �k l a-o ,cq
C( l 9hUfion cAUC +1j(t5 yeCkV- nn
%� C��c,k lou�'(�r s t� vVd U�� beh,n� Sct-4-�i� i t-� -�-e��J I off-- � I�t�-�e►'S "f° � d�u-e' �"'" i g
U�Ve,�- — OtO sA +eJ -Ab be COK6
C' kO/t OYe.e'il- P-U+- (down -� LAB*
Na�
1 y .U'A
Reviewer/Inspector Name: � V Phone:�3�`1 6"- -I 05
Reviewer/Inspector iS ature: Date: t i6
Page 3 of 3 21412015