790012_Compliance Evaluation Inspection_20211202

Division of Water Resour(
LFacility Number - Division of Soil and Water�.onservation
0 Other Agency
Type of Visit: Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit. Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: Arrival Time: Departure Time: County: �gion: cS
Farm Name: I Yr YV\,, Owner Email:
Owner Name: Q�- ��U Phone: � j � — � >
v cT-
Mailing Address:( Y Iwz _ T-ra` l d S�A P t �cl 2f
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: � Title: Phone:
Onsite Representative: \ / Integrator:
Certified Operator: V Certification Number:
Back-up Operator: Certification Number:
Location of Farm: Latitude: Longitude:
ravrn -ov1 9 u arc /VkM, +P'__'
Design Current Design Current Design Current
Swine Capacity Pop. Wet Poultry Capacity Pop. Cattle Capacity Pop.
Wean to Finish Layer Dairy Cow
Wean to Feeder on-Layer Dairy Calf
Feeder to Finish Dairy Heifer
Farrow to Wean Design Current Dry Cow
Farrow to Feeder Dry Poultry Capacity Pop. Non-Dairy
Farrow to Finish Layers Beef Stocker
Gilts Non-Layers Beef Feeder
Boars Pullets Beef Brood Cow
Turkeys
Ot er Turkey Poults
U Other
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State?(If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State(gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system?(If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page 1 of 3 511212020 Continued

Facility Number:-' jDate of Inspection:
Waste Collection&Treatment
4. Is storage capacity(structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall)less than adequate? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
a. If yes,is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure
, 3e 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: �J,r�r�
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard(in):
Observed Freeboard(in): r
5.Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes EXNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
(i.e.,large trees,severe erosion,seepage,etc.)
6.Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes �No ❑ NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes,and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat,notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes ZNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
8.Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? [:] Yes ❑ No �NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits,dry stacks,and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes �(No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10.Are there any required buffers,setbacks,or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application?If yes,check the appropriate box below. - ❑ Yes No ❑ NA 0 NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals(Cu,Zn,etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN> 10%or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12.Crop Type(s): Lc Utj
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
15.Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? 0 Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes No NA ❑ NE
acres determination? Rr
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? 0 Yes 4 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Required Records&Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage&Permit readily available? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?If yes,check ❑ Yes [ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑WUP ❑Checklists [:]Design [—]Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Waste Application beard K Waste Analysis [Soil Analysis Weather Code
Rainfall 1W
Stocking Q9"P*ie4+ n'^^�*-- --—ns Monthly and V Rainfall Inspections E " g e„ .P�.
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected,did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? [:] Yes ❑ No NA ❑ NE
S/�212020Page 2 of 3 Continued

Facility Number: I Date of Inspection: M ❑
� a
24.Did the facility fail to calibrate waste app.. .,ion equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
25.Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes,check ❑ Yes ❑ No NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es)below.
❑Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑Non-compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s)and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes Lam.No ❑ NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments(PLAT)certification? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29.At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes [ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
If yes,contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the ❑ Yes ] No ❑ NA ❑ NE
permit?(i.e.,discharge,freeboard problems,over-application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ❑ No 1% NA ❑ NE
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes 7� No ❑ NA ❑ Nl
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on-site representative? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NH
34.Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? ❑ Yes [ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments(refer to question#):Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations(use additional pages as necessary).
Cry
Reviewer/Inspector Name: Qlo"�Cc c�' Phone:
Reviewer/Inspector Signa Date: 13 3 ]
Page 3 of 3 21412015