790005_Compliance Evaluation Inspection_20190805

Division of Water Resources
Facility Number ® - o4j 0 Division of Soil and Water Cv,mservation
0 Other Agency
Type of Visit: '§D Compliance Inspection Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reas for Visits: l .Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: Arrival Time: Q Departure Time:r(M. County: egion:
Farm Name: {vQiji-i r Owner Email:
Owner Name: �h�ny �Clnacr �S I �I� Phone:
Mailing Address: ( V l/(Ct �G� � c-
Physical Address: 2:7 , V( I P—Q�J's6 ( I L 'ZJ?'.Z�
i_
e
Facility Contact: JOkljy�V + I� Title: Phone:
Onsite Representative: Integrator:
Certified Operator: Certification Number:
Back-up Operator: Certification Number:
Location of Farm: Latitude: Longitude:
Design Current Design Current Design Current
Swine Capacity Pop. Wet Poultry Capacity Pop. Cattle Capacity Pop.
Wean to Finish Laver Dairy Cow
Wean to Feeder I INon-Layer I I Dairy Calf
Feeder to Finish Dairy Heifer
Farrow to Wean Design Current Dry Cow
Farrow to Feeder Dry Poultry Capacity Pop. jNon-Dairy
Farrow to Finish La ers Beef Stocker
Gilts Non-Lavers Beef Feeder
Boars 1pullets Beef Brood Cow
Turkeys
Other Turkey Poults
Other Other
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes 6 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State?(If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State(gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system?(If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes dN o ❑ NA ❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Yes FdN o ❑ NA ❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page I of 3 21412015 Continued

lFacility Number: '�� - �)� Date of inspection:
Waste Collection&Treatment
4. Is storage capacity(structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes ZNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard(in):
Observed Freeboard(in): �1 II
5.Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes E3XNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion,seepage,etc.)
6. Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes [�J/No ❑ NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes,and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat,notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes VNo
J" ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits,dry stacks,and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes n/No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers,setbacks,or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes g/No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes [�lo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals(Cu,Zn,etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN> 10%or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12.Crop Type(s): Q I�
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes Eg�<o ❑ NA ❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes Yo ❑ NA ❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes L Z ❑ NA ❑ NE
Required Records& Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage& Permit readily available? ❑ Yes EKNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes,check ❑ Yes [A/No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑WUP ❑Checklists [—]Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Other:
21. oes record keeping need improvement? If yes,ch;�Wt
e appropriate box below. ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Waste Application [� eekly FreebX120
d aste Analysis [Soil Analysis Dvmn=Fis}us.fers Weather Code
[Rainfall [�Stocking Crop Yield Minute Inspections [ Monthly and I" Rainfall Inspections ❑S�ttdge-3rrtvey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected,did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes ❑ No E2 NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 21412015 Continued

Facility Number: f_�� �1�_� Date of Inspection I'
�4�id the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as b required q y the permit?
es ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes,check
the appropriate box(es)below. El Yes [] No NA ❑ NE
❑Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑Non-compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes ' No NA NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments(PLAT)certification? ❑ ❑
❑ Yes ❑ No �NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or d
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal? document Yes []�No ❑ NA ❑ NE
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air uality concern? ❑ Yes ZNo NA NE
If yes,contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately. ❑ ❑
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the ❑ Yes 0 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
permit?(i.e.,discharge, freeboard problems,over-application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes,check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes [RfNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on-site representative? ❑ Yes [�No NA NE
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? ❑ ❑
❑ Yes F3/No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments(refer to question#): Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations(use additional pages as necessary).
l I h►2t� 61 e Ito Z`bl 2
� '��✓1� Cct.��� ��k� ear ,
M-a- ;�Oerlt_'
LC11 2b-
Reviewer/Inspector Name: V Q � �-7
Phone:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Page 3 of 3 r
21412015