HomeMy WebLinkAbout760060_Compliance Evaluation Inspection_20230726 Division of Water Resources
Facility Number - �� 1 0 Division of Soil and Water Conservation
0 Other Agency
Type of Visit: KCompliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: 0,Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: 71I—try Arrival Time: ay`n Departure Time: ►T� _am County: Region:
Farm Name: `(�;c) 'fwur\ lxiwey ,�( , Owner Email:
Owner Name: Nd Phone:
Mailing Address: n11A VA %" ak`mw>_ NC. Qy)w'o)e
Physical Address: 41UG kAeVtde\\ SUM 9A , ��bt�-hA WC Q191Y)
Facility Contact: e6 (`(�(�(\ Title: Phone:
Onsite Representative: Integrator:
Certified Operator: Certification Number: f\ecda h1'`\m l
�0� —
Back-up Operator: ( Certification Number 12 IN I
Location of Farm: Latitud\e1:1'?�Cj" COV ku" Longitude: 56' 24"
Design Current Design Current Design Current
Swine Capacity Pop. Wet Poultry Capacity Pop. Cattle Capacity Pop.
Wean to Finish Layer Dairy Cow
Wean to Feeder I jNon-Layer Dairy Calf
Feeder to Finish Dairy Heifer
Farrow to Wean Design Current Dry Cow
Farrow to Feeder Dry Poultry Capacity Pop. Non-Dairy
Farrow to Finish Layers Beef Stocker
Gilts Non-Layers Beef Feeder
Boars Pullets Beef Brood Cow
Turkeys
Other Turkey Poults
Other
Discharees and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes S�No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State?(If yes, notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State(gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system?(If yes, notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation`? ❑ Yes -�Rj No ❑ NA ❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Yes jo"No ❑ NA ❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page I q0 511212020 Continued
Facilit Number: j U - Date of Inspection:
Waste Collection&Treatment
4. Is storage capacity(structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall)less than adequate? ❑ Yes \No ❑ NA ❑ NE
a.If yes,is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: 1 UQuuww
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard(in): 52A —
Observed Freeboard(in):
5.Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes 'KNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
(i.e.,large trees,severe erosion,seepage,etc.)
6.Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes Jallo ❑ NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes,and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat,notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes E;�No ❑ NA ❑ NE
8.Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes �No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits,dry stacks,and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10.Are there any required buffers,setbacks,or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes KNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes IRZNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals(Cu,Zn,etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN> 10%or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s): C (� P Tms-A m
13. Soil Type(s):
14.Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes f No ❑ NA ❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes ZNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes KNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes RNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes KNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
Required Records&Documents
19.Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage&Permit readily available? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
20.Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes,check ❑ Yes 3<No ❑ N A ❑NE
the appropriate box.
❑WUP ❑Checklists ❑Design ❑Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? @40 ❑ Yes [:] No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Waste Application Weekly Freeboard ,Waste Analysis ❑Soil Analysis =TrancfPrc Weather Code
Rainfall Stocking 'Crop Yield aMonthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections S Sl '_
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes MNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected,did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes ❑ No 5�NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 511212020 Continued
Facilit Number: - Date of Inspection: "1 1n210
1 24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes J<No ❑ NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes,check ❑ Yes ❑ No 'NA ❑ N E
the appropriate box(es)below.
❑Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑Non-compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s)and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes XNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments(PLAT)certification? [:] Yes KNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28.Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal? I l)(IyWjrC�AW
29.At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
If yes,contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the ❑ Yes ONo ❑ NA ❑ NE
permit?(i.e.,discharge,freeboard problems,over-application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes '15Z'No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes KNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on-site representative? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? ❑ Yes KNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments(refer to question#): Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other continents.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations(use additional pages as necessary).
a 1 .So�l� ►r1 a00 3
Cal�brofitx�•icy a��� .�-:�n� , d���o:� a�aS
3 . n�►C�Sr' � o�cx,c cLtL` rl�,r� -
J va rv\ds� c on S�rv -c dt,
PC 6c>, r,5"y\ MCA. LL ( ��� -�-� �
4,
�13 �3 Pep
a.a.a i.R4
Reviewer/Inspector Name: `(Ck Phone: 3� vll U
Reviewer/Inspector Signatui Date: 010 1021
2020
Page 3 of 3 51121