760052_Compliance Evaluation Inspection_20190822

Division of Water Resources
Facility Number � - rj j, 0 Division of Soil and Water Co..servation
0 Other Agency
Type of Visit: $1,Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: OjRoutine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: 22 Arrival Time:: Departure Time:I � � I County: �� Region: (}3sto-,0
Farm Name: I L m Owner Email: ,e5
Owner Name: M ( 1(,Q P0l.2S Phone:
Mailing Address: ���1 �Q(� G( �vhld�C NC C 2-72-3
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: M( �Q P� l/� Title: Phone:l(�j�j o `"7U�j- 6�7
Onsite Representative: Integrator:
Certified Operator: Certification Number:-,V ,/-' 1 5 7
Back-up Operator: Certification Number:
Location of Farm: Latitude: JJ �, (0(4)I I Longitude: �9 l (Joi1
22� 3v Pyo (
Design Current Design Current Design Current_
Swine Capacity Pop. Wet Poultry Capacity Pop. Cattle Capacity Pop.
Wean to Finish La er Dairy Cow
Wean to Feeder Non-Layer Dairy Calf
Feeder to Finish Dairy Heifer
Farrow to Wean Design Current Dry Cow
Farrow to Feeder Dry Poultry Capacity Pop. Non-Dairy
Farrow to Finish Layers Beef Stocker
Gilts Non-Layers Beef Feeder
Boars Pullets Beef Brood Cow
Turkeys
Other Turkey Poults
Other Other
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes 6 No ❑ NA ❑ NF,
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ N F
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State?(If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State(gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system?(If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes [0 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Yes �No ❑ NA ❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page I of 3 21412015 Continued

Facility Number: - Date of Inspection: —
Waste Collection&Treatment
4. Is storage capacity(structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes IgNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard(in):
Observed Freeboard(in):
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes �No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(i.e., large trees,severe erosion,seepage,etc.)
6.Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes r4 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes,and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat,notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes [19 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ® Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits,dry stacks,and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes r" No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement? Y21
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers,setbacks,or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes [Po ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes O� No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals(Cu,Zn,etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN> 10%or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window np ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s): Cv Sl 1�Il�l�, (A`t �(�� '5\ I u O L
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes KI No ❑ NA ❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes 9No ❑ NA ❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage&Permit readily available? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes,check ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑WUP ❑Checklists ❑Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvemenl9 If yes,check the appropriate box below: Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
[�WastSal
pplicationWeekl"y F� oard Waste Analysis [�-Sei ❑�dte'`Fransfe�r Weather Code
*Pa
j�inStockingCropYield n' '^" �`- -- Monthl}�n'd 1 Rainfall Inspections
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes �Q No ❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected,did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes [:] No 5(NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 21412015 Continued

Facili Number: - Date of inspection: iTJ
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes N No ❑ NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes,check ❑ Yes ❑ No W NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es)below.
❑Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑Non-compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s)and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes � No ❑ NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments(PLAT)certification? ❑ Yes ❑ No q NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hoprs and/or document ❑ Yes ] No ❑ NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal? reV1jean\
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? [:] Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
If yes,contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the ( Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
permit?(i.e.,discharge, freeboard problems,over-application) 7�
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes 9No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes EA No ❑ NA ❑ NE
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on-site representative? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments(refer to question ft Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comme ts.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations(use additional pages as necessary). )
CCJ I�XX
v XFta��A_Qj W __T
s ,
'I;Q lsl U�9U� r4 - 'r
�1.'� 11- (Ceav�;►n�e� {�r kr�c, n CNPN f w�.�
(��rl Fo✓ 1 0�l Z'rC\�,��i CCU�1 6-YA �,16� IP ccwm-- C� cj _
UI \ ky-\ Apy­ v'4 u rbk: �`,c ,4, c,�,� ��;�-CCU—
kftt6orn_4 , rco n�0' k' \�i \1-6 e C��sv�s , �ktC.k An
PCob'
_l
�I
Reviewer/Inspector Name: `, C� el✓C(� � Phone:�3` ` 7 t�
f �
Reviewer/Inspector Signatu Qa e. 27-
Page 3 of 3 21412015