760012_Compliance Evaluation Inspection_20230726

Division of Water Resources
Facility Number - F a 1 0 Division of Soil and Water Conservation
O Other Agency
Type of Visit: Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Structure Evaluation O Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: ($(Routine O Complaint O Follow-up O Referral O Emergency O Other O Denied Access t 1 `
Date of Visit: �� Arrival Time: '.y '� Departure Time:� County: \��� Region: W 5
Farm Name:—bkkk Owner Email:
Owner Name: �`') (�}� �—���n1�',u Phone:
Mailing Address: ")1q(Q U War * Q6. Qu,&-o 1 U(— a1--'�n
Physical Address: Ub391 maf tk\ d Q lULMU) W C )-13(1
Facility Contact: fi�� 1 r'(n� Title: Phone:
Onsite Representative: Integrator:
Certified Operator: Certification Number: `nPPC� JQVwf'T—
�a
Back-up Operator: t(�� $ �( `�� Certification Number:
Location of Farm: Latitude: �jU� �L9a Longitude: -AgL) C�U` 3�1�
v� MxN eat- -iwm
Design Current Design Current Design Current
Swine Capacity Pop. Wet Poultry Capacity Pop. Cattle Capacity Pop.
Wean to Finish Layer Dairy Cow WAN) IP591 ()
Wean to Feeder Non-Layer Dairy Calf
Feeder to Finish Dairy Heifer
Farrow to Wean Design Current Dry Cow
Farrow to Feeder Dry Poultry Capacity Pop. Non-Dairy
Farrow to Finish Layers Beef Stocker
Gilts Non-Layers Beef Feeder
Boars Pullets Beef Brood Cow
Turkeys
Other Turkey Poults
Other
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes �q No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State(gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system?(If yes, notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes gNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Yes ANo 0 NA ❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge'?
-e 1 of 3 511212020 Continued

Facility Number: - Date of Inspection: -1 JaU ji
Waste Collection&Treatment
4. Is storage capacity(structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall)less than adequate? ❑ Yes
No ❑ NA ❑ NE
a.If yes,is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard(in):
Observed Freeboard(in): 1`
5.Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes �qNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
(i.e.,large trees,severe erosion,seepage,etc.)
6. Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes PZNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes,and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat,notify DWR
7.Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? Ryes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
8.Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA NE
(not applicable to roofed pits,dry stacks,and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes TKNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers,setbacks,or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes MNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes '9 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals(Cu,Zn,etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN> 10%or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s): C f)yn Z;\(IW
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes PNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
16.Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes No 0 NA ❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes CKNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes X No ❑ NA ❑NE
Required Records&Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage&Permit readily available? ❑ Yes `54,No ❑ NA ❑ NE
20.Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?If yes,check ❑ Yes 5<No ❑ NA ❑NE
the appropriate box.
❑WUP ❑Checklists ❑Design [:]maps ❑Lease Agreements ❑Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? a appr ❑ Yes R[No ❑ NA ❑ NE
,Waste Application Weekly Freeboard I—'I Waste Analysis coil ^,,.ly&ir lgweather Code
Rainfall ':&tocking Crop Yield r1 120 Minute hispeetie"s Monthly and V Rainfall Inspections r]sludge`ur-voy
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes ❑ No RNA ❑ NE
23. If selected,did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes ❑ No WA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 511212020 Continued

Facility Number: jDate of Inspection:
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes gNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes,check ❑ Yes ❑ No RNA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es)below.
❑Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑Non-compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s)and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes `KNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments(PLAT)certification? ❑ Yes JNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes ZNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal? PICyCed UAO
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes %QNo 0 NA ❑ NE
If yes,contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30.Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the ❑ Yes '�No ❑ NA ❑ NG
permit?(i.e.,discharge,freeboard problems,over-application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes PR'No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes ® No ❑ NA ❑ NE
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on-site representative? ❑ Yes No 0 NA ❑ NE
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments(refer to question#):Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to 11b11ettnner explain situations(use additional pages as necessary).
a . Ca,11babOn l W a093. (P�,d" GL a0a5
�. �jl)O�e &LCMkt SAtftS? ftHfih�Q e&tS,WWCYM9 �Ovr9 dam"laj'
�. (;b\s aa-,�A
marV,\/ ltvo ar Or -6m.S& WWI? COM }et1 ftic V1exA-
MOV0 -&mall side `
413!a3
4 tj
4,ILP
Reviewer/Inspector Name: V' QVGk Phone: &3U--mu—gim
A
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:' Date: 1 iau lad
-r -�-v�-
Page 3 of 3 511212020