760038_Compliance Evaluation Inspection_20210714

Division of Water Resources
LFacility Number ® - F J 0 Division of Soil and Water Cc rvation \n
0 Other Agency U vl m
Type of Visit: IRCompliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: t Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: Arrival Time:y Departure Time: County: Region:VIA S Z0
Farm Name: �&YgS nal Owner Email:
Owner Name: a UeA- y) Q Phone:
Mailing Address: C)60 I �UQ nfi h 7JS� )
Physical Address:
UC_ off-- oo79
Facility Contact: Q n Title: Phone: Q 1-7Ci _ 365'a'
Onsite Representative: Integrator:
Certified Operator: Certification Number:
Back-up Operator: Certification Number:Location of Farm: Latitude: o t 45 t, Longitude:
'Ivnn
l C) JA
(A E s� Icy �{2' a � t3 --) CC) ke me m;ti
Design Current Design Current Design Current
Swine Capacity Pop. Wet Poultry Capacity Pop. Cattle Capacity Pop.
Wean to Finish La er Dairy Cow p r
Wean to Feeder Non-Layer Dairy Calf
Feeder to Finish Dairy Heifer
Farrow to Wean Design Current Dry Cow
Farrow to Feeder Dry Poultry Capacity Pop. Non-Dairy
Farrow to Finish Layers Beef Stocker
Gilts Non-Layers Beef Feeder
Boars Pullets Beef Brood Cow
Turkeys
Other Turkey Poults
Other
_DischarEes and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes D� No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State?(If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State(gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes [N No ❑ NA ❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Yes X No ❑ NA ❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page I of 3 511212020 Continued

Facili Number: ' - Date of Inspection:
Waste Collection&Treatment
4. Is storage capacity(structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall)less than adequate? ❑ Yes X No ❑ NA ❑NE
a.If yes,is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes [:] No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: s p Q
Spillway?: \�
Designed Freeboard(in): }
Observed Freeboard(in): / I
5.Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes A No ❑ NA ❑NE
(i.e.,large trees,severe erosion,seepage,etc.)
6.Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes ® No ❑NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan? p`
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes,and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat,notify DWR
7.Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
8.Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits,dry stacks,and/or wet stacks)
9.Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes N No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10.Are there any required buffers,setbacks,or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes [�No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes �No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals(Cu,Zn,etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN> 10%or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12.Crop Type(s): �j a!vr c 0.�Xt. _
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes I No ❑ NA ❑ NE
15.Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes [�No ❑ NA ❑ NE
16.Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes `�No ❑ NA ❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes 1� No ❑ NA ❑ NE
18.Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Required Records&Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the rtificate of Cove ag Permit readily available? Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?If yes,check ❑ Yes No ❑NA ❑NE
the appropriate box.
❑WUP ❑Checklists ❑Design ❑Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Other:
21.Does record keeping need improvement?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ` �Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Waste Application �j Weekly Freeboard Waste Analysis I—I c s ❑ Weather Code
%Rainfall ❑Stocking Crop Yie [ 120 Minute Inspections n Monthly and V Rainfall Inspections +
y 1
22. Did the facility�fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes A No ❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected,did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes ❑ No rA NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 511212020 Continued

Facilit Number: z14, jDate of Inspection:
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste applicu..on equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes,check ❑ Yes No �6 NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es)below.
❑Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑Non-compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s)and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments(PLAT)certification? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal? LW Il 11
29.At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes EX No ❑ NA ❑ NE
If yes,contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the ❑ Yes % No ❑ NA ❑ NE
permit?(i.e.,discharge,freeboard problems,over-application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ❑ No NA ❑ NE
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑NE
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on-site representative? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments(refer to question ft Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations(use additional pages as necessary).
Ova. �a`Y-1 C-Ovi ' « t.6
TY� es Y-tO v eol . �� �av�-� 940e ( \'v\ONN� �4\NeA-;OY hnov t
(J .
cy-o I? y e'
la*
b.00(2 s 11 �\Ju A 4-7 'C'e-rr-) C�
Reviewer/Inspector Name: � � Phon _CO VG
Reviewer/Inspector Sign to Date:"-114
Page 3 of 3 511212020