760009_Compliance Evaluation Inspection_20180424

Division of Water ResourceF
Facility Number - 0 Division of Soil and Water C.,...servation Q n�
0 Other Agency
Type of Visit: Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: I Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: Arrival Time:® Departure Time: Z,0O County: Rio l ash Region: W SFC�
Farm Name: ` QC'LJL11 2' Fox rA_5 Owner Email:
Owner Name: Spe_ betCL1 0'o _x= Phone: L33 6) 924— ©ZZ 14 1
Mailing Address: PQ Bo)c 1090 &-ms 'e-ur N6, 'Z'7 3 /6 a zzI((iQ��
Physical Address: S. to ,,, oe., ��Q_3� I ro_t � )+.m5o.0 r, N� a 73 i �d
Facility ContacY:� �l (� 1 GD .Title: Phone:
Onsite Representative: g i 1 Integrator: PO r y is
Certified Operator: CO�C 33td� �J`��" Certification Number: '�f ZOC1 $ C es S
Back-up Operator: ! N Certification Number:
(3-:421
Location of Farm: Latitude: T 1 ,57trLongitude: ­79 c J 7
U 5 t ' 02 L*41 / Nvj.� So J-t ,i N C, 5o Otli , 3 miles c�n
Design Current Design Current Design Current
Swine Capacity Pop. Wet Poultry Capacity Pop. Cattle Capacity Pop.
Wean to Finish L
ayer Dairy Cow
Wean to Feeder Dairy Calf
Feeder to Finish Dairy Heifer
Farrow to Wean Design Current Dry Cow
Farrow to Feeder Dry Poultry Capacity Pop. Non-Dairy
Farrow to Finish Layers Beef Stocker
Gilts Non-Layers Beef Feeder
Boars Pullets Beef Brood Cow
Turkeys
Other Turkey Points
Other Other
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes U�'No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State(gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes WNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Yes 5�No ❑ NA ❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page I of 3 21412015 Continuer)

d`1
Facility Number: - Date of Inspection: 161
Waste Collection&Treatment
4.Is storage capacity(structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall)less than adequate? ❑ Yes Ur No ❑ NA ❑ NE
a. If yes,is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?: ny t)
Designed Freeboard(in):
Observed Freeboard(in): _
5.Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes W No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(i.e.,large trees,severe erosion,seepage,etc.)
6.Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes CK No ❑ NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes,and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat,notify DWR
7.Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? Yes N"o❑ NA ❑ NE
8.Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes ZfNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits,dry stacks,and/or wet stacks)
9.Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require 0 Yes 5;�No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10.Are there any required buffers,setbacks,or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals(Cu,Zn,etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN> 10%or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12.Crop Type(s): '.—AQj u
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes INo ❑ NA ❑ NE
15.Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes XNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
16.Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes [Q No ❑ NA ❑ NE
acres determination?
17.Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes /26 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes [�I�Io ❑ NA ❑ NE
Required Records&Documents 77��
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage&Permit readily available? ❑ Yes J)j�No ❑ NA ❑ NE
20.Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?If yes,check ❑ Yes 5a No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑WUP ❑Checklists ❑Design [:] Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Other:
21.Does record keeping neeZrovement?if-- A--1 ❑ Yes [�No ❑ NA ❑ NE
aste Ap��n ekly Freeb;'120
aste Analysis Soil Analysis s ED Weather Code
f ainfallcking Crop Yield Minute Inspections Monthly and V Rainfall Inspections Q Sludge Survey
22.Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes gNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
23.If selected,did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes ❑ No X/NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 21412015 Continued

Facility Number: - 69 jDate of Inspection: � .761
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes CRrNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes,check 1%Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es)below.
❑Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
Non-compliant sludge levels in any lagoon �
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance: 101 I$ 1 Z d 1 t
26. Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes ZNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments(PLAT)certification? ❑ Yes 5�No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes (0 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
7�`
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes [4 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
If yes,contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the ❑ Yes [-4—/No ❑ NA ❑ NE
permit?(i.e.,discharge, freeboard problems,over-application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes ]C No ❑ NA ❑ NE
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on-site representative? ❑ Yes E;J'No ❑ NA ❑ NE
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? ❑ Yes VNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments(refer to question#): Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations(use additional pages as necessary).
�I 5o'11 -es�s due- o_3c 'n by 12 3112-0 .
C'.OL �+ b r c; =1�11 d u €� 9 �� f-a n It �L
e v, p b a- 1 r r � d�
s
S1 Ui5e, 'I rn \3:5� be- 0_,v W*k i an-C- by 0 J-2-C)
�-' o` e.� r-ab o p -`) Z, �D was no s r,�a d;r Ca letel
19�I -ICA fir, V-e_ V�P_y 6f
/ao e = - �v (Zo��'►� = D, 1p
d
461
Reviewer/Inspector Name: CL I ose b r o cv__� Phone: ✓o �] 9
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: ,e�i�a �_ �L(+� Z Date: v2 �
Page 3 of 3 21412015 i ILA