030021_Compliance Evaluation Inspection_20230906

ivision of Water Resources
Facility Number i)�-; - 1 0 Division of Soil and Water Conservation
0 Other Agency
Type of Visit: XCompliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: 0 Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: V 1Q3 I Arrival Time:IQ:15pM I Departure Time: m County Region:
Farm Name: �()\Y}( l,\ A �Q��(y� Owner Email:
Owner Name: Phone:
Mailing Address: o�1�\Q S�0\c er1�►�`(1�('i\n �(�,. _�UQ �1 1� � jlQ1�
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: M�'m Title: Phone:
Onsite Representative: Integrator:
Certified Operator: Certification Number:
Back-up Operator: Certification Number:
Location of Farm: Latitude: Longitude:
US59is \�—,>S-115 \A11-A C\(t)�4 7 NCa1N awe Creek. Q-a- > favynon
Design Current Design Current Design Current
Swine Capacity Pop. Wet Poultry Capacity Pop. Cattle Capacity Pop.
Wean to Finish I 11-ayer 1 Dairy Cow p
Wean to Feeder I jNon-Layer I Dairy Calf
Feeder to Finish Dairy Heifer
Farrow to Wean Design Current Dry Cow
Farrow to Feeder Dry Poultry Capacity Pop. Non-Dairy
Farrow to Finish Layers Beef Stocker
Gilts Non-Layers Beef Feeder
Boars Pullets Beef Brood Cow
Turkeys
Other Turkey Poults
Other
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1.Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State?(If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State(gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system?(If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
3.Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page 1 of 3 511212020 Continued

Facili Number: - Date of Inspection: Ok I U l
Waste Collection&Treatment
4. Is storage capacity(structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall)less than adequate? 0 Yes 'WNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
a.If yes,is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes T❑No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: �iSR
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard(in):
Observed Freeboard(in): �L
5.Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes ''I No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(i.e., large trees,severe erosion,seepage,etc.)
6.Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes�No ❑ NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes,and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat,notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes M No ❑ NA ❑ NE
8.Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes �No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits,dry stacks,and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require 0 Yes RNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application KNA
10.Are there any required buffers,setbacks,or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes [:] No RT'NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals(Cu,Zn,etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN> 10%or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12.Crop Type(s):
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes ❑ No JKNA ❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes allo ❑ NA ❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes "k No ❑ NA ❑ NE
acres determination? �\
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes gNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes RR ❑ NA ❑ NE
Required Records&Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage&Permit readily available? ❑ Yes K'No ❑ NA ❑ NE
20.Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?If yes,check ❑ Yes �Z No ❑ NA ❑NE
the appropriate box.
❑WUP ❑Checklists ❑Design ❑Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? ❑ Yes ANo ❑ NA ❑NE
❑Waste ArpitnTiarr 0 Weekly Freeboard ❑wnte�is• ❑Sail-Aa3ah}s ❑`ras` rs ❑Weather Cad—
'Rainfall Stocking ❑Erer-*ield ❑129 Mimrte-Irispee"ens Monthly and V Rainfall Inspections ❑R[ttigefrrvey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes XNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected,did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes ❑ No KNA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 511212020 Continued

Facilit Number: - Date of Inspection: Gj I U
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes qNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes,check ❑ Yes [] No J;�NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es)below.
❑Failure to complete annual sludge survey []Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑Non-compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s)and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes JEJNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments(PLAT)certification? ❑ Yes jg�No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28.Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes �No ❑ NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal? loxaT v
29.At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes -§K'No ❑ NA ❑ NE
If yes,contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the ❑ Yes XNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
permit?(i.e.,discharge,freeboard problems,over-application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes,check the appropriate box below. [:] Yes [] No -KNA ❑ NE
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes 4 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
33.Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on-site representative? ❑ Yes §;<—['No ❑ NA ❑ NE
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? ❑ Yes [Z—No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments(refer to question ft Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations(use additional pages as necessary).
Ccxwofa'�cx�
C IU�UY�
Reviewer/Inspector Name: Phone: p��1(,Q—g1( j_
Reviewer/Inspector SignA Date: f(Q/az>
Page 3 of 3 511212020