030002_Compliance Evaluation Inspection_20211224

ivision of Water Resources
Facility Number 1, - 1 ? 0 Division of Soil and Water Conservation
0 Other Agency
Type of Visit: ompliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: 316 Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: ( Arrival Time: Departure Time: County: Region: )'S
Farm Name: ( Owner Email:
Owner Name: 1A Ii tanrn gn & rno v c ( aten ne°"'�yl
� . o . /19 �3?31-i-4
Mailing Address: � n C I G(U Valley V-A �1�1 I .P ► Nc Z!214 7-�
Physical Address: �y -7 L4 (11 6 (V .Va+( to . C'O I t.P . NIL 7 l 07 z
Facility Contact: j r('d(A I 1`)n HAnu.(V Title: Phone:
Onsite Representative: `/ Integrator:
Certified Operator: 6! I e W QYY Q l I Certification Number:
Back-up Operator: Certification Number:
Location of Farm: Latitude: -1p p 3()` 3 '� Longitude: '�Va 5 91 ( (lam
_ S -� ��tiwy 89 CL\ G o,& Malley Pa
Design Current Design Current Design Current
Swine Capacity Pop. Wet Poultry Capacity Pop. Cattle Capacity Pop.
Wean to Finish Layer = I X Dairy Cow 0 L)
Wean to Feeder Non-Layer Dairy Calf
Feeder to Finish Dairy Heifer
Farrow to Wean Design Current Dry Cow
Farrow to Feeder Dry Poultry Capacity Pop. INon-Dairy
Farrow to Finish Layers Beef Stocker
Gilts Non-Layers Beef Feeder
Boars Pullets Beef Brood Cow
Turkeys
Other Turkey Poults
Other Other
Discharees and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State?(If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State(gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system?(If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ;�JNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
3.Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Yes 9No ❑ NA ❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page I of 3 21412015 Continued

Facility Number: - Date of Inspection: Z
Waste Collection&Treatment
4.Is storage capacity(structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall)less than adequate? ❑ Yes XNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
a.If yes,is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes JZ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structur1e, 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard(in):
Observed Freeboard(in): tc c
5.Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes %No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(i.e.,large trees,severe erosion,seepage,etc.)
6.Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes VfNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes,and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat,notify DWR
7.Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes XfNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
8.Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes %No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits,dry stacks,and/or wet stacks)
9.Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10.Are there any required buffers,setbacks,or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes gNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes X No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals(Cu,Zn,etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN> 10%or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12.Crop Type(s):
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes ZNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
15.Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes KNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
16.Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes � No ❑ NA ❑ NE
rm acres deteination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes 14 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Required Records&Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage&Permit readily available? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
20.Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?If yes,check ❑ Yes KNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑WUP [:]Checklists ❑Design ❑Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement?If yes,check the
��apppropriate box below. ❑ Yes 0 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Waste A#Ilclation Xweekly Freeboard �&asfe Analysis Xsoil Analysis KWaste Transfers Weather Code
Rainfall Stocking op ie n 120 Minnte inspections Monthly and V Rainfall Inspections ❑_S44� ;
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes �KNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected,did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes ❑ No PgNA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 21412015 Continued

Facility Number: - Z Date of Inspection: d
24.Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes X,No ❑ NA ❑ NE
25.Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes,check ❑ Yes ❑ No rZ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es)below.
❑Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑Non-compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s)and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26.Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
27.Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments(PLAT)certification? ❑ Yes ❑ No NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28.Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document 0 Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29.At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
If yes,contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30.Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the ❑ Yes XNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
permit?(i.e.,discharge,freeboard problems,over-application)
31.Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32.Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
33.Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on-site representative? ❑ Yes 14No ❑ NA ❑ NE
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? 7 Yes [] No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments(refer to question#): Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations(use additional pages as necessary).
jlllcts hrarA:���ir ' IO s„n (. lc�s� cv�r ,�,�y 1�,��e�ti ,,��,� :�«Y,\;��
r�Ih.�a1144;,e- boa A
6 CG ? (kre , bv�- n 6 cv l ct, o (Lk o f b m e(d >s M
g P, 1� ,anse 0\3 1'FLl ed led (JY\QMi Ca o e L�la1nt re�ec
-�wr�w►11�v�e be
ZC�. N1P 1��pc���ed Iasi ,qq �t able 4"a, e t�Y)�-i► to pc1 UkA
b e�?�-. W a n'� o-A !Sw C7
Oae1�[y s�cle try '1rtcruw ol\ a CC0Wc1a.r tom, U�n�v�l1 A- 1" ;r\5pr(,A,nS
:�1 �S �C�� b��, �Z�� ionf� i►�ct,�rvti
alib�� � Z(�Zo . p ct' ci\ Z6Z : Do+ne_ or Z e.xisAin k�uck�; 400
C 9 iLj 0 ; Z0
%'-5. 00) (Xh�r ��Q\�(�kl��n ,� rteo�3�ovuilu y AS
N 4.
�1� Z35$ Z �o can wask,fan, 4�v�� nOE ;A4;A vOLtWeS, ,mc�v 2-*
• � o, Qp\i��.ki�,r� i n zoZt, rCNi��ed Z,oZa ���n�¢.1us�-tr�sQcc:+;��,�a yie1�� � ���d on
Reviewer/Inspector Name: P �k _ e rn\ 1OUL, Phone: ?j`%.'V
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: { Date: 1,1
Page 3 of 3 21412015