Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout760008_Compliance Evaluation Inspection_20210726 Division of Water Resources Facility Number - Division of Soil and Water Co vation 0 Other Agency M isit: Compliance Inspection Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance or Visit: Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access Date of Visit: Arrival Time:� Departure Time: tl�jn-1 County: Q Region: Farm Name: Owner Email:: Owner Name: � Phone: Mailing Address: �-� ��j m Kth M tl to-4-A , 0nY) v y Physical Address: Facility Contact: Title: Phone: Onsite Representative: Integrator: Certified Operator: Certification Number: Back-up Operator: Certification Number: Location of Farm: Latitude:�j� Longitude: vS TAD —2 Nc/- hW j 4' " q 5 P�Ls+- Cal t,r,o(cti-, ? UL_ �,p�rvUbe h A, l( � Design Current Design Current Design Current Swine Capacity Pop. Wet Poultry Capacity Pop. Cattle Capacity Pop. Wean to Finish Layer DairyCow Wean to Feeder Non-Layer Dairy Calf Feeder to Finish Dairy Heifer Farrow to Wean Design Current Dry Cow Farrow to Feeder Dry Poultry Capacity Pop. Non-Dairy Farrow to Finish Layers Beef Stocker Gilts Non-Layers Beef Feeder Boars Pullets Beef Brood Cow Turkeys Other Turkey Poults Other Discharges and Stream Impacts 1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ] No ❑ NA ❑ NE Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other: a. Was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State?(If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State(gallons)? d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system?(If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE 2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE 3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE of the State other than from a discharge? Page I of 3 511212020 Continued lFacility Number: - 0 jDate of Inspection: Waste Collection&Treatment 4. Is storage capacity(structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall)less than adequate? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE a.If yes,is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6 Identifier: Spillway?: Designed Freeboard(in): Observed Freeboard(in): 5.Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes M No ❑ NA ❑ NE (i.e.,large trees,severe erosion,seepage,etc.) fy 6.Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes P No ❑ NA ❑ NE waste management or closure plan? If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes,and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat,notify DWR 7.Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE 8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE (not applicable to roofed pits,dry stacks,and/or wet stacks) 9.Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes E3 No ❑ NA ❑ NE maintenance or improvement? Waste Application 10.Are there any required buffers,setbacks,or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes KNo ❑ NA ❑ NE maintenance or improvement? 11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes K No ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals(Cu,Zn,etc.) ❑ PAN ❑ PAN> 10%or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil ❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area 12. Crop Type(s): ee.Su� (��c--. Cor(a 0`f Q''� . sog,f'Jea'ns 13. Soil Type(s): 14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE 15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE 16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE acres determination? 17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE 18.Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE Required Records&Documents 19.Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage&Permit readily available? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE 20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?If yes,check ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE the appropriate box. ❑WUP ❑Checklists ❑Design ❑Maps ❑Lease Agreements ❑Other: 21. Does record keeping need improvement?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes 1)4 No ❑ NA ❑ NE Waste Application Weekly Freeboard 1XWaste Analysis I 4 Soil Analysis Weather Code Rainfall [Stocking Crop Yield [X120 Minute Inspections Monthly and V Rainfall Inspections ev 22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes rA No ❑ NA ❑ NE 23. If selected,did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes E j No 3�NA ❑ NE Page 2 of 3 511212020 Continued Facility Number: - Date of inspection: 24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE 25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes,check [:] Yes ❑ No NA ❑ NE the appropriate box(es)below. ❑Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels ❑Non-compliant sludge levels in any lagoon List structure(s)and date of first survey indicating non-compliance: 26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE 27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments(PLAT)certification? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE Other Issues 28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE and report mortality rates that were higher than normal? (no aiz�tir- 29.At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE If yes,contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately. 30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE permit?(i.e.,discharge,freeboard problems,over-application) 31.Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ( No ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other: 7� 32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE 33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on-site representative? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE 34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE Comments(refer to question#): Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments. Use drawings of facility to better explain situations(use additional pages as necessary). (u S a 1 �S C�v� �•• �bin-ems �I� , �� o�n c�J•�a,� c1A z r rc�rn Vkw y-As look j ram, a'00 J Cl Reviewer/Inspector Name: IBC O(C((A CJ�6�V t l e Y Phone: ' Reviewer/Inspector Signature. Date: Page 3 of 3 S/ 2/2020