20150821 Ver 1_Application_20150813

hF
,w�i �..�
��
4r '
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTIVIEN I' OF TRANSPORTATION
PAT MCCRORY
GOVERNOR
August 11, 2015
Mr. John Thomas
US Army Corps of Engineers
3331 Heritage Trade Dr.
Suite 105
Wake Forest, NC 27615
NICHOLASJ.TENNYSON
ACT[NG SEC2ETARY
SUBJECT: Nationwide Permit #14
Bridge No. 103 on SR 1707 (Stewart Road) over Wood Benton Branch (Class C)
WBS project no.: 17BP.9.R.22 (DWQ permit fee $570)
Stokes County, NC
Dear Mr. Thomas,
We aze requesting a Nationwide 14 permit for replacement of Bridge No. ] 03 with an aluminum
box culvert on SR 1707 (Stewart Road) over Wood Benton Branch (Class C) in Stokes County. I
have attached a pre-construction notification application, a topography map with the project area
circled, a stormwater management plan, a No Survey Required forms from NCDOT Cultural
Resources for Historic Architecture and Archaeology, and a debit ledger for the Peters Creek
mitigation site. Also attached are the conslruction plans and erosion control plans. The project
will permanently impact 194 linear feet (128'- culvert, 66'-bank stabilization) and temporarily
impact 22 linear feet (dewatering) of Wood Benton Branch. Low flow will be isolated to the
center of the culvert, notched sills will be placed at the inlet, outlet, and midpoint of Yhe culvert
with floodplain benches at the inlet and outlet in order to prevent stream over widening and
facilitate aquatic passage. The culvert will be buried P below the stream bed to ensure aquatic
passage. The sills will be back-filled with native bed material to the maacimum extent practicable.
The culvert site will be dewatered during construction in accordance with NCDOT's Best
Management Pracrices.
There will be no effect on the James Spinymussel (Pleurobema collina), the Schweinitz's
Sunflower (Helianthus schweinitzit�, or the Small-anthered bittercress (Cardamine micranthera)
because of poor habitat. There is summer roosting habitat in the form of trees and the existing
bridge for the Northem Long-Eazed bat (Myotis septentrionalis). No bats were found on the
bridge. Regarding the trees, NCDOT will be working under a tree-cutting moratorium between
April I S"� and August 15t° (of any yeaz) for the subject project. See attached concurrence letter
from USFWS dated July 17, 2015.
Division ofHighways • Division Nine • 375 Silas Creek Parkway, Winston-Salem, NC 27127
Telephone [phone] • Fax [phone] • Courier Box 13-12-04

By copy of this letter, we also request 401 review and approval from the NC Division of Water
Resources with one copy of the application package provided to Amy Chapman, Transportation
Permitting Unit Superoisor, and Dave Wanucha, DOT Project Coordinator. Please charge the
application fee of $570 to WBS project no. 17BP.9.R.22.
By copy of this letter, we also request Mazla Chambers, NC Wildlife Resources Commission, to
comment directly to the Corps conceming the permit request.
If you have any questions, comments or need additional information after reviewing this material
please contact me at [phone]. Thank you for your cooperation in this matter.
�Stephanie Braquet %,
Division Environme�it�al Specialist
NCDOT Division 9��
Attachments: Application Package
CC: Kristi Carpenter, NCDENR-DWR, Administrative Assistant- e-copy
Dave Wanucha, NCDENR-DWR, Environmental Specialist- e-copy
Matt Jones, P.E, NCDOT- Division 9-Division Bridge Program Manager- e-copy
Phi] Suggs, NCDOT- Area Roadside Environmental Engineer e-copy
Marla Chambers, NCWRC- Projects Coordinator- e-copy
Marella Buncick, USFWS Asheville Field Office- Fish and Wildlife Biologist- e-copy
Brad Chilton, NCDOT-PDEA-Environmental Senior Specialist- e-cpoy
Division of Highways • Division Nine • 375 Silas Creek Parkway, Winston-Salem, NC 27127
Telephone [phone] • Fas [phone] • Courier Box 13-12-04

_ _ _ oEWATF9 Office Use Only:
�' o� �� Corps action ID no.
� �
i��� � o�� c DWQ project no.
J Form Version 1.4 January 2009
Pre-Construction Notification (PCN) Form
A. Applicant Information
1. Processing
1 a. Type(s) of approval sought from the
Corps: � Section 404 Permit ❑ Section 10 Permit
1 b. Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: 14 or General Permit (GP) number:
1 c. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps? ❑ Yes � No
1 d. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply):
� 401 Water Quality Certification — Regular ❑ Non-404 Jurisdictional General Permit
❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Express ❑ Riparian Buffer Authorization
1 e. Is this notification solely for the record For the record only for DWQ 401 For the record only for Corps Permit:
because written approval is not required? Certification:
❑ Yes � No ❑ Yes � No
1 f. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in-lieu fee program proposed for mitigation � Yes � No
of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank or in-lieu
fee program.
1 g. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1 h ❑ Yes � No
below.
1 h. Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)? ❑ Yes � No
2. Project Information
2a. Name of project: Bridge to culvert replacement of Brldge No. 103 on SR 1707- Stewart Road
2b. County: Stokes
2c. Nearest municipality / town: Walnut Cove
2d. Subdivision name: not applicable
2e. NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state 176P.9.R22
project no:
3. Owner Information
3a. Name(s) on Recorded Deed: NCDOT Division 9
3b. Deed Book and Page No.
3c. Responsible Party (for LLC if pat Ivey, P.E. Division Engineer
applicable):
3d. Street address: 375 Silas Creek Parkway
3e. City, state, zip: Winston-Salem, NC 27127
3f. Telephone no.: [phone]
3g. Fax no.: [phone]
3h. Email address: [e-mail]

4. Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a. Applicant is: ❑ Agent � Other, specify: DES
4b. Name: Stephanie Braquet
4c. Business name NCDOT Division 9
(if applicable):
4d. Street address: 375 Silas Creek Parkway
4e. City, state, zip: Winston-Salem, NC 27127
4f. Telephone no.: [phone]
4g. Fax no.: [phone]
4h. Email address: [e-mail]
5. AgenUConsultant Information (if applicable)
5a. Name: not applicable
5b. Business name
(if applicable):
5c. Street address:
5d. City, state, zip:
Se. Telephone no.:
5f. Fax no.:
5g. Email address:

B. Project Information and Prior Project History
1. Property Identifcation
1a. Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID):
1 b. Site coordinates (in decimal degrees):
Latitude: 36_3942 Longitude: - 80.1401
1 c. Property size: 0.2 acres
2. Surface Waters
2a. Name of nearest body of water (stream, river, etc.) to Wood Benton Branch
proposed project:
2b. Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water: C
2c. River basin: Roanoke
3. Project Description
3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application:
The existing site is a bridge. The surrounding area is a mix of agricultural, wooded, and residential land.
3b. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property:
0
3c. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property:
450 feet
3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:
Replace a timber bridge that has metal rails and creosote with a 24'-5" x 8'-11° aluminum box culvert with headwalls and
sills placed at the inlet, outlet, and midpoint of the culvert.
3e. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
Replace a bridge with a culvert using standard road equipment.
4. Jurisdictional Determinations
4a. Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the
Corps or State been requested or obtained fo�r this property / � yes � No ❑ Unknown
project (including all prior phases) in the past.
Comments:
4b. If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type
of determination was made? ❑ Preliminary � Final
4c. if yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas? Agency/Consultant Company:
Name (if known): Other:
4d. If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation.
5. Project History
5a. Have permits or certifcations been requested or obtained for �Yes � No ❑ Unknown
this project (including all prior phases) in the past?
5b. If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions.
6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project? ❑ Yes � No
6b. If yes, explain.

C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1 a. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply):
❑ Wetlands � Streams - tributaries ❑ Buffers
❑ Open Waters ❑ Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted.
2a. 2b. 2c. 2d. 2e. 2f.
Wetland impact
number— Type of impact Type of wetland Foreste Type ofjurisdiction Area of impact
Permanent (P) or (if known) d (acres)
Tem ora T
Site 1❑ P❑ T ❑ Yes ❑ Corps
❑ No ❑ DWQ
Site 2❑ P � T ❑ Yes ❑ Corps
❑ No ❑ DWQ
Site 3❑ P 0 T ❑ Yes ❑ Corps
❑ No ❑ DWQ
Site 4❑ P 0 T ❑ Yes ❑ Corps
❑ No ❑ DWQ
Site 5❑ P❑ T ❑ Yes ❑ Corps
❑ No ❑ DWQ
Site 6❑ P 0 T ❑ Yes ❑ Corps
❑ No ❑ DWQ
2g. Total wetland impacts
2h. Comments:
3. Stream Impacts
If there are peren�ial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted.
3a. 3b. 3c. 3d. 3e. 3f. 3g.
Stream impact Type of impact Stream name Perenni Type of Average Impact
number - al jurisdiction stream length
Permanent (P) or (PER) (Corps - 404, 10 width (linear feet)
Temporary (T) or DWQ — non-404, (feet)
intermitt other)
ent
(IN�?
Site 1❑ P� T dewatering Wood Benton Branch � PER � Corps 10 22
❑ INT � DWQ
Site 2� P 0 T Culvert Wood Benton Branch � PER � Corps 10 128
❑ INT � DWQ
Site 3� P❑ T Stabilization Wood Benton Branch � PER � Corps �0 66
❑ INT � DWQ
Site 4❑ P❑ T ❑ PER ❑ Corps
❑ INT ❑ DWQ
Site 5❑ P❑ T ❑ PER ❑ Corps
❑ INT ❑ DWQ
Site 6❑ P❑ T ❑ PER ❑ Corps
❑ INT ❑ DWQ
3h. Total stream and tributary impacts � 94 ft Perm
22 ft Temp
3i. Comments:

4. Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U.S. then individuall list all o en water im acts below.
4a. 4b. 4c. 4d. 4e.
Open water Name of
impact number — waterbody Type of impact Waterbody type Area of impact (acres)
Permanent (P) or (if applicable)
Tem ora
01 ❑P❑T
02 ❑POT
03 ❑P�T
04 ❑P�T
4f. Total open water impacts
4g. Comments:
5. Pond or Lake Construction
If ond or lake construction ro osed, then com lete the chart below.
5a. 5b. 5c. 5d. 5e.
Wetland Impacts (acres) Stream Impacts (feet) Upland
Pond ID Proposed use or (acres)
number purpose of pond
Flooded Filled Excavated Flooded Filled F�ccavated Flooded
P1
P2
5f. Total
5g. Comments:
Sh. Is a dam high hazard permit required?
❑ Yes ❑ No If yes, permit ID no:
5i. Expected pond surtace area (acres):
5. Size of pond watershed (acres):
5k. Method of construction:

6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
If project will impad a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer
im acts below. If an im acts re uire miti ation, then ou MUST fill out Section D of this form.
6a.
❑ Neuse ❑ Tar-Pamlico ❑ Other:
Project is in which protected basin? ❑ Catawba ❑ Randleman
6b. 6c. 6d. 6e. 6f. 6g.
Buffer impact
number — Reason for impact Buffer Zone � impact Zone 2 impact
Permanent (P) or Stream name mitigation (square feet) (square feet)
Tem ora T re uired?
B1 ❑POT ❑Yes
❑ No
B2 ❑P❑T ❑Yes
❑ No
63 ❑P❑T ❑Yes
❑ No
6h. Total buffer impacts
6i. Comments:
0

D. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
1a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project.
The aluminum box culvert with headwalls will have sills placed at the inlet, outlet, and midpoint. This will facilitate aquatic
passage and prevent the stream channel from over-widening. The culvert will be back filled with native bed material of a
suitable size. The culvert slope is 0.8%, so native bed material should be retained in the culvert. Furtherjustification is
provided in the storm-water management plan.
1 b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques.
Construction runoff has been minimized by designing the erosion control plan according to NCDOT's Best Management
Practices manual.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for � Yes ❑ No
impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State? �f no, ex lain:
2b. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply): � DWQ � Corps
❑ Mitigation bank
2c. If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this
project? ❑ Payment to in-lieu fee program
� Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a. Name of Mitigation Bank: not applicable
3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter) Type Quantity
3c. Comments:
4. Complete if Making a Payment to In-lieu Fee Program
4a. Approval letter from in-lieu fee program is attached. ❑ Yes
4b. Stream mitigation requested:
4c. If using stream mitigation, stream temperature: ❑ warm ❑ cool ❑cold
4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only):
4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested:
4f. Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested:
4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested:
4h. Comments:
Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a. If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan.
We will utilize credits from an existing NCDOT mitigation site in Stokes County. 194' of mitigation will be deducted from
the Peters Creek site (128' for the culvert and an additional 66' for bank stabilization for DWR). Mitigation is provided at a
1:1 ratio. See attached debit ledger.

6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) — required by DWQ
6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires ❑ Yes � No
buffer mitigation?
6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the
amount of mitigation required.
6c. 6d. 6e.
Zone Reason for impact Total impact Multiplier Required mitigation
(square feet) (square feet)
Zone 1 3(2 for Catawba)
Zone 2 1.5
6f. Total buffer mitigation required:
6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank,
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in-lieu fee fund).
6h. Comments:

E. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1. Diffuse Flow Plan
1a. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identifed ❑ Yes � No
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
1 b. �f yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If not, explain why.
Comments: ❑ Yes ❑ No
2. Starmwater Mana ement Plan
2a. What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project? 25%
2b. Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan? � Yes ❑ No
2c. If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why:
2d. If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative description of the plan:
See attached permit drawings.
❑ Certified Local Government
2e. Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan? ❑ DWQ Stormwater Program
❑ DWQ 401 Unit
3. Certified Locai Government Stormwater Review
3a. In which local govemmenYs jurisdiction is this project? not applicable
❑ Phase 11
3b. Which of the following locally-implemented stormwater management programs ❑ NSW
apply (check all that apply): ❑ USMP
❑ Water Supply Watershed
❑ Other:
3c. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been ❑ Yes ❑ No
attached?
4. DWQ Stormwater Pro ram Review
❑ Coastal counties
4a. Which of the following state-implemented stormwater management programs apply ❑ HQW
(check all that apply): ❑ ORW
❑ Session Law 2006-246
❑ Other:
4b. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
attached? ❑ Yes ❑ No
5. DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
Sa. Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements? � Yes ❑ No
5b. Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met? � Yes ❑ No
0'

F. Supplementary Information
1. Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
1 a. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the � Yes ❑ No
use of public (federal/state) land?
1 b. If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State � Yes ❑ No
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
1 c. If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
letter.) ❑ Yes ❑ No N/A
Comments: Minimum criteria are attached, and are not required to be submitted to
the State Clearing House.
2. Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a. Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards, ❑ Yes � No
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 26 .0200)?
2b. Is this an after-the-fact permit application? ❑ Yes � No
2c. If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s):
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a. Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result i� ❑ Yes
additional development, which could impact �earby downstream water quality? � No
3b. If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy. If you answered `no," provide a short narrative description.
The project involves replacement of a bridge with a culvert, which will not have an impact on additional development.
4. Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a. Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
N/A
10

5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
Sa. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or � yes ❑ No
habitat?
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS conceming Endangered Species Act � Yes ❑ No
impacts?
❑ Raleigh
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted.
� Asheville
5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat?
US Fish and Wildlife Foundation and National Heritage Data.
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. WiII this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat? ❑ Yes � No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
N/A
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation � Yes � No
status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
See attached cultural resource'no effects' letter, from historic architecture and archaeology.
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA-designated 100-year floodplain? ❑ Yes � No
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements:
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination? FEMA Maps
Stephanie Braquet
� ¢3 11�2bi5
Applicant/AgenYs Printed Name Date
pplican Ys Signature
(Agenfs signature is valid only "rf an thonzation letter from the applicant
is pr ded.)
11

MINIMUM CRITERIA DETERMINATION CHECKLIST
The following questions provide direction in determining when the Department is required to
prepare environmental documents for state-funded conshuction and maintenance activities.
Answer questions for Parts A through C by checking either yes or no. Complete Part D of the
checklist when Minimum Criteria Rule categories #8, #12 or #15 aze used.
TIP Project No.: N/A
State Project No.: 17BP.9.R.22
Project Location: Stokes
Project Description: Replace existing bridge with a three-barrel culvert
Anticipated Permit or Consultation Requirements: Nationwide 14 (GC 3886), May Affect
not likely to adversely affect Northern Long-eared bat (NLEB), NCDOT will be working under a
tree-cutting moratorium between April 15'�' and August 15th (of any year).
Special Project Information: Replace an existing bridge with a 1@ 24'-5" x 8'-11" aluminurr
box culverC with headwalls and sills. The sills will be placed at the inlet, outlet, and midpoint of
the culvert.

PART A: MINIMUM CRITERIA
Item 1 to be completed by the Engineer.
Is the proposed project listed as a type and class of activity allowed
under the Mimmum Criteria Rule in which environmental
documentation is not required?
If the answer to number 1 is `hd', then the proj ect does not qualify as a
minimum criteria project. A state environmental assessment is required.
If yes, under which category? 12
If either category #8 or # 15 is used complete Part D of this checklist.
PART B: MINIMUM CRITERIA EXCEPTIONS
Items 2— 4 to be eompleted by the Engineer.
2. Could the proposed activity cause significant changes in land use
concentrations that would be expected to create adverse air quality
impacts?
3. Will the proposed activity have secondary impacts or cumulative
impacts that may result in a significant adverse impact_to human
health or the environment?
4. Is the proposed activity of such an unusual nature or does the
proposed activity have such widespread implications, that an
uncommon concern for its environmental effects has been
expressed to the Deparhnent?
Item S-8 to be completed by Division Environmental Officer.
�S NO
� ❑
❑ �
❑ �
❑ �
5. Does the proposed activity have a significant adverse effect on � �
wetlands; surface waters such as rivers, streams, and estuaries;
parklands; prime or unique agricultural lands; or areas of
recognized scenic, recreational, archaeological, or historical value?
6. Will the proposed activity endanger the existence of a species on � �X
the Department of Interior's threatened and endangered species list?

7. Could the proposed activity cause significant changes in land use
concentrations that would be expected to create adverse water
quality or ground water impacts?
g. Is the proposed activity expected to have a significant adverse
effect on long-term recreational benefits or shellfish, finfish,
wildlife, or their natural habitats
❑ o
❑ �
If any questions 2 through 8 are answered "yes", the proposed project may not qualify as a
Minimum Criteria project. A state environmental assessment (EA) may be required. For
assistance, contact:
Manager, Project Development and Environmental Analysis Branch
P. O. Box 25201
Raleigh, NC 27611
(919) 733 —3141
Fa�c: [phone]
PART C: COMPLIANCE WITH STATE AND FEDERAL REGULATIONS
Items 9-12 to be completed by Division Environmental Officer.
9. Is a federally protected threatened or endangered species, or its
habitat, likely to be impacted by the proposed action? (habitat)
10. Does the action require the placement of temporary or permanent
fill in waters of the United States?
11. Does the project require the placement of a significant amount of
fill in high qualiTy or relatively rare wetland ecosystems, such as
mountain bogs or pine savam�ahs?
12. Is the proposed action located in an Area of Environmental
Concern, as defined in the coastal Area Management Act?
Itetns l3 — IS to be completed by the Engineer.
13. Does the project require stream relocation or channel changes?
Cultural Resources
14. Will the project have an"effecY' on a property or site listed on the
National Register of Historic Places?
15. Will the proposed action require acquisition of additional right of
way from publicly owned parkland or recreational areas?
YES NO
� �
� ❑
❑ ❑X
❑ ❑X
❑ 0
❑ �
❑ ❑X

Questions in Part "C" are designed to assist the Engineer and the Division Environmental Officer
in determnung whether a permit or consultation with a state or federal resource agency may be
required. If any questions in Part "C" are answered "yes", follow the appropriate permitting
procedures prior to beginning project constnxction.
PART D:( To be completed when either category #8, #12 or #15 of the rules are used.)
Items 16- 22 to be completed by the Engineer.
16. Project length: 450 feet (0.085 miles)
17. Right of Way width: Existing 60' (Proposed Permanent Drainage Easement will expand
to 90' left of center and 70' right of center at the proposed culvert location.)
18. Project completion date: July 2016
19. Total acres of newly disturbed ground surface: 0.1 acres
20. Total acres of wetland impacts: 0 acres
21. Total lineaz feet of stream impacts: Permanent stream impacts of 128' due to the
proposed aluminum box culvert and 66' due to rip-rap bank stabilization. There will be 22'
of temporary impacts due to dewatering for culvert construction.
22. Project purpose: Replace existing bridge No. 103 with a 24'-5" x 8'-11" Aluminum Box
Culvert with a total length of 124'. The existing bridge is constructed of steel plank flooring
on steel I-beams with a timber substructure and is structurally defcient, posted for weight,
and has a sufficiency rating of 54.45 out of 100. The existing roadway will be updated to
current design standards for Iane and shoulder width within the project limits. Sub
regional tier design guidelines have been used and a design exception is anticipated for the
sag vertical curve. Environmental impacts would have increased in order to meet the
design speed for this area.
Reviewed by:
Date: � � J"'�
, �
Date: c' ;___�_7 ' 2D l 5
L

Map Name: DANBURY Map Cen[er: 36.390129° N, 80.I42903° W
Scale: 1 inch = 2,000 H.
Print Date: P�i May 29 11:34:43 2015

A 1 N n o�

� ° E � = c
' o y m ; m ..
: a E o'o c
'�����',� H n 6^ N m d a� E .Z`
= w � o -
... . o m m`o 0 0"� ° u n Q¢�
` V t N N p� H= Z Z C
`m V � a ` y V
i 3 t a m q.. « y �y
d O1 `m E 3 C v °° � v
� DE Ea°_ o'o v m>
a` -
v a 3 a c `m m
v " �
a �a u �°m nE o �'u��
a �
�- m c' 0 55°°' a .�W"E'm
y y m t a n° A v N ? a a
d C W N v N y t q A y m v�
� - y Q N fC F d U R ' N N
_ W ' t= E"� 3 d� d
o q> 3 E 3 m aEi °�° ��
v '�° N._-�o�'v° ' ° o�
�
H n m m �' a` �-
.� O ��j � 2 OI l0 A E N C a �
C b 2 O N� O?� C _ q U
m �' rnn«a n� mv` = a v
'y ` = m°� m n 3 E � m m
d � � �yr EN�°ua°8 `u .-�
m aLL o.a o � yc
F� v o = F� a � z Q m� m O
0 q C A y Z q C n� T U e N>>
° .°1. ° 'c -� ° r e� '� m �n t 3
a` a° a W w � w10 �@ y° o >
.. < 3 N m E m" c° 9 �' x ¢`�°
o � L ~ 0 8 E 3� u � a � U � Z
� = N F U � C t O@� y=� E N �
� N O C q O
nEa � ��c aai o mxv'm�a�� �U a
a mi � 8 v'o o � gm°pt=°1�� y N
� y� ri m� � � Q o 3 E m� m� c m°m o. 2?i `m
o W i o€ c �� g� N°� c� o m m o � E cl �(7
c'a' Q� al � U U U -� 'z � o� � E m U° a 6 � �«
d ;2� � N «� dcnLm � �
E Eao-� u w E v�i¢3vmmm - c y� �
n E rc � m Q � D � i � c v°m a w E a a o ��
m N W � 6 m m � � m � t N c �� � O�
0 Tarcp3 q p7 �m �xwj'y t0°+ � c� uV
c 3�" o m i � u� 'o"' m'a„ � n a o
L U CQ N U P a O� y� C � q N t.l
R 2� Li J U � N N N v�i LL > L L(� Uq V
L O C O� 7i Y N C O R N O 3 q p g ❑ O
T H `u c o. w myt ao;¢�o W A � � a
o a � v y c� g L y N� m t V v '
:
� Z 3 � o Q 2 N F U�� O Y � q N p>`
fn O #'4 y.: �a � m E U v
H d - � v y� d m a o� q o 6 N O
� �°uv���awt ••
v �
a 10 €`u � o m� m ^�
m o u°n"�Om °o E
m w¢� v�!" a? E
a � v T°o £ o� d �' U >
- x - "' -� os °o� e 3a1° o o'-
q
'a o 0 0 � E u o o r�� 5`m.3 C3 z z�
v �p O q d ¢ N� J 9 C Z
�aN Q D K O N �'OL'�-'���}�N �
N K LL y j? b« Z' LN 'p d
z `� s t z � c a � 2 0° b " E:_ .- �O o 'o
� e `S' z u� m � c� q� m a`
F to O 0 m O N �' � O CN N O N+� O� r C• m
n n m
n'to�� mm 30 °mv.xuo°c�°" ?i m v
� U � K r m F a m 5 n_ a n� U,
m a
w d - �2 o m
� o E a� °J� 0 16 m£
,ao a w .. 'co g 3 � ?' � `
u c o
�� a � �1 6 L O b C?i N
E U U Y C � 'C' W d U
' � m u 1 W � V� N � A y m.?
d fl
L', ¢° � w E Q o m:�E A 15 m v a
y.' �'.. a - ow ~i� °0 3°m � mi 2
� « � N 2` i m u U a y m n
�C�� � mt � � w a m`o� «'�' E y a o '
;.: ' r u o�i a c'; c � o w Q o n n � m A b u u �"
q'w d c� €�q ,o � m ci a' ?'y E 3�n m a � c'W `
."Cf �. ` iL w pQ H m� d d � 3`�� ,� 3 `a m m C u Y
' Y ' C 3 v1 ' ' '
C C N � J f
u
�� .>., 3 z iS rc 3 i a` � ¢` c7 ° a r'n i o E 6 i n` c

/ '_
�L�
�:��
c �
O �
R
C Z N
N �5 E
C
i= ° Z r o �
w v
d � U N �
`o w w
� 3 Q a c
m = a �
� E a � v
� ;�S >°
m v, w i a
� q r a .. �
� L � LL d �
o rn � V
(j = O � E
L ~ O d
C N U ''°p[
_ �p
�; a
�_ �
'3 4 K
1`1
��I N
CCJ'i 3
— L� m
N
r
m
U
d J.
N �
aa0
a o
£ °�
�
= L
3 �
a o
� «
L
� E
N @
E d
N N
`m d
c =
p`o
0
m m
m y
D
� t
�
W
0
�
�
C �
� ;
9
C �
�? U
«
3
O
N
�
c
0
%
E
�
v
C
t
U
0
LL
O d
J
�N
c
d
�� «
nr 3
� j c° C
d � N
« U p �p
� a C y
D d. �
N
C o m N
O �
� 2 N 0
� = d R
N y � � d
� p a y v c
O
d � C C
d E N N
N N L X
N � � d
N C � >
O �
� a o d
3 a n 3
o c � j
J N
3
m o
7 L
d � T
� % �
v =
� w � 'm
d � m N
U N C
r�j O = m
o y y a
d 3 U
r 3 o d
j O � Y. N
d O N �� J ��
V �
�
L � W j C � G
� � E^p � � e E�e
° w.°'.oV m E y�
.. N " a
~ % N G Q C w c
w V � QY'°
D C C �
m 3 d
y= o o m ��
a
�m �°m iny m
� m o
a m '° " � �' m
i�3tH �mr
�� 3 3 V� c
— �
r�- N . L �
i � " � � d
= E F L V 0
� t
U Q
w m w 3 w w
t � � m n
m" � c n y
a 3 � c o
y� N L d C
� o� ci m m
� �� 3 � n
paj � O F d � r
N N C O p N N
N
O
6
N
d «
C
C O
m
u�
v
3 E
o rn
C C
3 m
o v
m �
C �
�°. �
� 3 R
E r
� �
�
2 a a d
� � o
o n p E
O. O
3 °
pd U N
E
= t n
`a m m
m ° o 0
= o E
d � d N
� m = i. w
d y � i U
m D V
D N jIl 0
n` a 3° 3
�n m� �
oLL � �
s � r m
C j R'
m
E<�ci �
m a a
�' ��a m
n V N m . �
� Y �. !C
q C V
C�' m C N O
°�' j C y 4 LL
a U °s `o m o
Nd y LL= LL
d � N '� O �i
� �
a
o c
E a
m �
:' ._
i
m
O
.�
m
N
m
3
m
O
N
�
0
N
E
F
� Y
o _
t
N J
V
m �
� y
n
o°
� a
dw
>
U �
y c
^ E
� �
a �
L p,
O
C �
�a
a o
o E
� v
a t
� --
o �
a �
o a
n�
m
£=
rn
c _
m
a
d m
� �
� U
d c
Sa
C y
N �
� U
a 3
ix
v a
Y �p

_—=_� �-
Z�`{��/RJ�1
' 1� ,n
.y;�rvy��»;/�
,tx
ProjectNo:
WBS No.:
Fed Aid No:
ProjeoG Tracking No. (Internal Ure�
15-06-0005
HISTORIC ARCHITECTURE AND LANDSCAPES
NO SURVEY REQUIRED FORM
This form only pertains to Historic Architecture and Landscapes for this project. It
is not valid for Archaeological Resources. You must consult separately with the
Archaeology Group.
17BP.9.R.22
Cl/:1
PROJECT
Federal �� Yes U No
County: I Stokes
Dncument Minimum Criteria
Funding:
Permit
State � � Federal
NWP14
Proiect Descrintion: Replace Bridge No. 103 on SR 1707 (Stewart Road) over Wood Benton
Branch.
SUMMARY OF HISTORIC ARCHITECTURE AND
Descrintion of review activities, results, and canclusions:
Review of HPO quad maps, HPO GIS information, historic designations roster, and indexes was
undeRaken on June 8, 2015. Based on this review, there are no existing NR, SL, LD, DE, or SS
properties in the Area of Potential Effects, which is 300' from each end of the bridge and 75' from the
centerline each way. A house northwest of the bridge within the APE, 2929 Stewart Road, was built 1971
based on Stokes County GIS/Tax Information. Two one-story frame tobac:co barns stand independently
southeast of the bridge; they are unremarkable and not eligible for National Register listing. Bridge No.
103, built 1975, is also not eligible. There are no National Register listed or eligible propetties, and no
survey is required. If design plans change, additional review will be required.
Why the avai[able information provides a relinb[e basis for reasonablv vredictinF tknl there
are no unirlentired sipniftcant historic architectura[ or lnndsenne resources in Hee nroiect
area:
HPO quad maps and GIS information recording NR, SL, LD, DE, and SS properties for the Stokes
County survey, Stokes County GIS/Tax information, and Google Maps are considered valid for the
purposes of determining the likelihood of historic resources being present. There are no National Register
�Map(s)
Historic
within the APE and no survev is
SUPPORT DOCUMENTATION
❑Previous Surveylnfo. �hotos ❑Conespondence
FINDING BY NCDOT ARCHITECTURAL HISTORIAN
and Landsc�pes -- NO SURVEY REQUIRED
NCDOT Architectural Historian
Date
❑Design Plans
�
His(oric Archileclvre mrALandsmpes NO SURVfiY R1i0U11Ui� forz ja' Minor7Yausporlalimr Projenr at Qrml fed inlhe 200] Progrnnnnatic Agreeinen(.
Page 1 of 4

��
�169i
�
U,
N
9
a
�oJ9°toWnl�d
�a
g
F
0
169i
/ mae
Qa
Uads GLapel .r. p C
♦
OJan¢
3
np
y,a
o�
a`
aa
0
IAeadrnvs Brplisi Church .d
Qa /;, ac
�6 q �
oa �., s
O
�oJN°�ow� Nd �.Bfa^ch— """�� __
�oo�
!
laAPd
�.,,
,_ : � 5`�
n� ane.,
s,
Yroject Location.
s�
�D�
i$
Stev��i�P�
C�UO���C
�a
_ , s „�,°.
>,
a
DoJgelo�'R`nd
�c��
yD
w����a����
Hi.rmric ArcGilech�re mid Lamlccopes NO SUAV1iY 12EQUIREUfarm forMinorTrmisporlo(ion Projectr as Qvnl fed iw tlie 200] R'agrqr�nnalic Ageemenl.
Page 2 of 4
<,,.
s

!� � ... �
/, ,
�__' .- f'4a4. ._ .
�IY.
� � � � <i�9
?', . „��`.�
� 4 I
~ �- � ��
4 - �'M4
9
r . �
, � a`TJ� ` � �: "*
� w^�+�t. .;�r�,� `�. � t
�c � ,
`* '� �
' ' ' � N
�r '
��7�{,:.a, � . � � . ..
. T, ��, . _' . . .R, , �: .
�,}
V
�� r.
��
�+' � ,
� .
\
� � k� ��� ' . .
� T �
`� ��:i� J � � .... .'
. _.�} %� WJfi .
1
�i1{
_ . . ,�'.'� �
. . .. . . _ '° '
\� ti
. .:•.' ... .
i .��i
� ��.
i� d�
q"" � � i _
� i .
1 . P��_������
j Z� ♦
�f �_ ''�'.., -i 21
� ,;.• �3

Google Street View looking south from Bridge No. 1Q3. Two structnres in distance are tobacco barns.
Google Street View looking north from Bridge No. ]03.2929 Stewart Road to the IePf.
Nismric Archilechne mvJLmidscapes NO SURVF.'Y f2liQU1XLD fw'm forMinorTrm�rpormlion Projecls as Qua/ fed in Ihe 1007ProgmnuualicAgreemenf.
Page 4 oF 4

Projeci Trackimg No.:15-06-0005
15-OG-0005 �
NO NATIONAL REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLACES
�� u�� ELIGIBLE OR LISTED ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITES :,��t'
, 1��,
�'^� `� � � PRESENT OR AFFECTED FORM � '
r�r ' �f .,; � ? .1`��� B;
"u� � Q �; This form only pertains to ARCI]AEOLOGICAL RESOURCES forthis project. It is not
�.`°� � valid for Historic Architecture and Landscapes. You must consult sepazately with the ��>-�_�a�
Historic Architecture and Landscapes Group.
PROJECT INFORMATION
ProjecE No: na
WBS No: 17BP.9.R.22
F.A. No: na
Federal Permit I�eguind?
County: Stokes
Document: MCC
Funding:
� Yes ❑ No
� State ❑ Fedexal
PermitType: NWP 14
PmjectDesctiptlon: NCDOT intends to replace Bridge No. 103 on SR 1707, Stewart Road, over Wood
Benton Branch. According to the Cultuxal Resouxces Review request the proposed project is 450 feet long
(137.16 meters) within a 60-foot (neaxly 18.29-meter) wide right of way (RO�. Additionally, the proposed
bridge replacement pxoject includes drunage easements along Wood Benton Branch upstream and
downsteeam of the bridge structure. Thus, far the puxposes of this review, the area of potential effeccs (APF.)
is esrimated to encompass an axea of nearly .85 acre (neazly .34 hectare), including proposed ROW and
permanent drainage easements.
Si7MMARY OF ARCI3AEOLOGICAL FINDINGS
The North Carolina Department ofTransportatlon (NCD07j Archaeology Gtvup mviemed the
subjectptoject and determiaed.•
� There are no National Registet listed ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITES within the project's atea
of potential effects.
❑ No subsurface archaeological investigarions are xequired for this pxoject.
� Subsucface investigations did not teveal the ptesence of any acchaeological tesoutces.
❑ SubsurEace investigauons did not reveal the presence of any axchaeological resouxces considered
eligible for the National Registex.
❑ All identified azchaeolo�cal sites lowted within the APE have been considexed and all compliance
fox archaeological reso�ces with Secdon 106 of the National Historic Pxeseroation Act and GS 121-
12(a) has been completed fos this project.
� There are no Narional Registet Eligible ot Listed ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITES present ot
affected by this ptoject. (Attach any noter or documenzr ar needer�
"NO NATlONAG REGIST6R I:'L/GBL6 0ft LISTl:D AXCHAEOLOr!('.AL SlTES PRESENTORAFFECTED
form forMinor Transpormtion Projects as Qva! fed in the 2007 Programmaiic Agreemen!
1 of 6

Project Tracking No.:l5-06-0005
BrieFdescriptron ofreviem activitres, results ofreview, and conclusions:
As noted on the Sutvey Required Form dated July 14, 2015, an eacaminarion of the files and mapping azchivcd
at the North Carolina Office of Stare Aichaeology revealed no previously recorded archaeological tesources
within the pxoposed APE. Large aschaeological sites have been located along the nearby Dan Rivex, including
two ]arge sites less than a mile to the north of Bridge No. 103. These sites aze located in Dan Riv� and
Comus soils (DaA), the same soil unit that dominates the proposed APE £ox the cuc�ent pxoject. Thus,
furthex axchaeological investigation was recommended.
On August 5, 2015, NCDOT azchaeologists, Shane Petexsen and Bsian Overton completed those
recommended invesrigations of the proposed APE. Acwxding to the pTeliminary designs submitted with the
Request for Cult�al Resoucces Review, most of the proposed APE temains within e�cisting ROW. These
areas, as expected, wexe observed to be genexally disturbed by �ading and highway construcuon. Closes to
the drainage, additional permanent dxainage easements are anticipated that extend well outside e�sting ROW.
These areas became the focus for the intensive axchaeological survey. The fust subsurface test (STT' No. 1)
was placed roughly 11 meters southwest of the edge of pavement for SR 1707 and 11 metexs fxom Wood
Benton Bxanch. This axea appeared to be a small elevated area outside e�cisting ROW and was origuially
thought to peihaps be a remnant second terrace s�Eace. The sorls in this axea wexe e�ctcemely compact and
&lled in the upper levels with road gravel and small pieces of asphalt, suggesting that this azea might have been
xelated to the consrruction (ox maintenance) of eithu the bridge or the highway faciliry. The second
subsuxface test was placed on the opposite side of the drainage in the open field neazly 18 metexs northeast of
the bridge and 15 metexs east of the drainage. This axea exhibited a soil pro5le doses to that e�tpected fox Dan
River or Comus soils, though the soil matrix was fairly stiff and dried out. No cultuxal material was
encountexed in either subsurface test.
No fiuther azchaeological investigations aze xecomxnended far the seplacement of Bridge No. 103 as
pxoposed. Should [he ptoject change further investigation may be necessaty. The project as described should
be considered to be compliant with Secrion 106 and NCGS121-12a.
Shovel Test Results:
Quadcant Shovel Level Depth Depth Munsell Color Soil �facis Notes
Test Pit (top) (base) Texture
Lots of road
I 0 23 7.SYR4/4 brown silry clay ao gcavel and
asphalt pieces.
Souihwes[ ]
75YFL7/6 reddish yellow silty clay
mottled Coastrucfioa
II 23 34 mottled with mottled no �
5��8 yellowish eed winc �lay �"
I 0 6 75YR5/4 bzown silt loam no Roohnat.
ll 6 38 7.SYR5/6 stiong brown silt no Very fcw
p,tavels.
Northeast Z 75YR6/3
mottled light 6iown motticd
III 38 4= wjth with strong Ucown silt �o
7.SYR5/8
"NO NATfONAL REGlSTER EL/GBLE OR LISTEDARCHAEOLOGICAL SIT&S PRESEMOR AFFECTED
forne for Minor fransporration Prajeas as Qva7 jed in rhe 200] Programmanc Agreement.
Zof6

SUPPORT DOCUMENTATION
See attached: � Map(s) ❑ Previous Survey Info
❑ Othes:
Signed:
� �
NCDOT ARCHAEOLOGIST II
� Photos
Project Tracking No.: /5-06-0005
❑Correspondence
August 7, 2015
Date
"NO NATlONAL RCG1577iR LLIGIRI,L OR LIS'1'GD ARCFIAEOLOGIGL S/TES PRESENTORAFFECTED
form for M+nor T�anspormtion Pro/ec[s as Qva/efied in the 200I Progromma/ic Agreement.
3 of 6

--r���_, �s/,�K� +� �aY;�� ,E�;f'_ ���'°i�"
l� � :Il � r�. �p
- "c1 ���.' l `�� ��'�� 7 �
��" >., ,.", �. ,
;,
' �« ;yf, a
u� � r �, `. �';;a
, � � ' �, � ' �� ?',�
�. '�' Y ` f �, ,�.
�j \. . r�
� 4 jl � � ' . ;. � x,..
� �� • � �`�� ��� .
. }. `F ' n ,
�`�� i /� ��i`
� `
i�t � � r gy . � I � _ '
tj� �
f
� ��r�� �\ , �� ��;���,� ,,
k +
\;' �a ��� . P \� �� � `�
_� f .� .��i ��,y�l` �\�\�R `.i' .•s
:, rt�` .{�il� �; _`�� � . 1� . STP�Vo.2
� i ��r , ��7� /; �.��'� ` a
� '� , �
t� . , �� �����_
r
�
�P�:o � �
, :
i�\� 1�`k-,kF n��' ) A O �\�"�:��3,� �.
'�� � .� ` ��` " \ v;�� � .�
. �� ` �ir � i�.�,+�'�Tj' � . ,��y ���T
� )p� �,.-9I !,c P�' ,
, i .� � H%���y-�;. �l ,��' -.. ' � .
' �i, , � � . �� .. ` .xi , � �.���•�
� '� � � t� �; �i<�' �Y`v+ a `�`,�
�i �p � 1; � �." X , J .. -� :, / ` ; � ```��;�
�4*�rl�..d�f���y `1 �
Project Tracking Na.: ]5-06-0005
E
�y
?
%
� .
!�" ,i
f!
li;
3 1
i
.�
�� .
�' f` �I
' , . I �: " .3 . . �� !�IT �� � A
l `
���� Y.I� ) l� ..,,�s- ��1
� �7 .. �}'� � � 'y�� ^ �� .. � � _ .
� i �� ✓, 4F� * r t y,_ .,
.Z�` � ,�. �'�` � . f bs
* Y � /�� � ��� �.
Y }'� � '�� !'� i. f � �✓:w:
, ��, � 3�.;".� � � .r�.
� 40 80 160-Feei '_ - �
� i � a �, �� a f
% t �:�'"_.
Aerial photograph of and 2-foot topographic map for Bridge No. 103 on SR 1707, illustrating subsurfacc test
locations fox thc pzoposed APE for the replacement of the bridge (xed line).
"NO NATlONAL REGlSTGR ELlGIBLE OR LISTED ARCHAEOLOGICAL S1TE5 PRESENTOR AFFECTED
farm jorMimor 7}ansportalian Projecrs as Om( fed in the ?007 Programmatic Agreement.
4 oF6

Prqect Tracking No.:15-06-0005
View of Biidge No. 103 ovcr Wood Benton Branch and held east of the bridge facuig narthwest.
Vie�v of Bridge No. 103 ovex Wood Benton Branch and ROW �vest of the bridge facing northwest.
"NO NATlONAL REGfSTER ELfGBLE OR LIST6D ARCHAEOLOGICAL SI%GS PRGSENf OR AFFECTED
form forMinor Tmnspormnon Projects as Qvalhed in the 2007 Programmatic Agreemenr
Sof6

Praject Tracking No.:l5-06-0005
'�'.'.,��- . 'n� � � .
�} rF`
n b' e . 1
� ..� � "A i� A�.,. � ./�, b y,.c.�jt.�i
' � . - � ' #. , . _. � �,^^`�4 , �`F,4�i ' "S' J ��� :�
S. � t '
5� 3 F.. s .'� r. • .,
> "' F T ,
ev �„�„� a 1�. � x�..?7 �
i � J�� 4 y i1 "
, — "� � ��.n '�' F„,
ul � t �
d � � � _. "
� ?l `5� in
yx
rz`.' � _' � . �
�' � F ��
�y, „,
......._ � ,,, . ,. _lY� . � . ,«.... . s
�c ;'.,.
View of tobacco bams southeast of Bridge No. 103 (facing southeast).
View of Bridge No. 103 on SR 1707 and ROW northwest of Wood Benton Branch facing southeast.
"NO NAT/ONAL REGISTER EL/GBLE OR!lSTED ARCHAEOLOGIGL SlTES PRESENT OR AFP7iCTL0
jorm jorMinor Tronspona�ion Pro�ecs as Qual�ed in !he ZOOI Progmmmatic Agreemertt.
6of6

P MENT Of TyF
fyQP � � � . '(•.�
o �-- � ,
y O
� a
__i .:. 9 .
MqRCN 9 �gp
�J�����[ �����s ��p��-t¢�►ea�� ���I�� Ilun���-IlO�°
F[Sii AND WILDLIFE SERVICE
Ashccillc Fitld Officc
IG�I Zillicnu Strrcl
9.hccillc. Aorth C�rnlina?A801
July 17, 2015
Ms. Amy Euliss
Division 9 Environmental Officer
North Cazolina Departrnent of Transportation
375 Silas Creek Pazkway
Winston-Salem, North Cazolina 27127
Dear Ms. Euliss:
Subject: Endangered Species Consultation for Potential Impacts to the Northern Long-eazed
Bat from the Replacement of Bridge No. 103 on SR 1707 (Stewart Road) in Stokes
County, North Carolina, WBS No. 17B.9.R.22.
As requested by the North Carolina Departrnent of Transportation (NCDOT) in your letter of
July 13, 2015, we have reviewed the natural resources information and biological conclusion
with regard to the federally threatened northern long-eared bat (NLEB) (Myotis septentrionalis)
for the subject project. The proposed project includes replacing Bridge No. 103 on SR 1707
(Stewart Road) in Stokes County, North Carolina. We provide the following comments in
accordance with the provisions of section 7 of the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended
(16 U.S.C. 1531-1543) (Act).
Habitat for the NLEB exists along the project corridor and has been evaluated for potential
impacts from project implementation. Acwrding to the information provided, no caves or mines
were found from a desktop seazch conducted for the project footprint and within one-half mile of
the project. The only siructure that will be demolished was checked for bat use and none was
observed. The closest summer record for the NLEB is more than 50 miles from the project
viciniTy. Potential summer roosting habitat (in the form of forested patches interspersed with
farm fields) does exist within the project area, and some trees will be cleazed during project
implementation.
Based on: (1) the negative surveys for wintering habitat, (2) the fact that no sign of bat use was
found during shucture surveys, and (3) a commitrnent by the NCDOT to conduct minimal
tree-clearing and their agreement to a tree-cutting moratorium between April 15�' and
August 15�' (of any yeaz) for the subject project, we agree that implementation of this project is
"not likely to adversely affecY' the NLEB in the project area. In view of this, we believe the
requirements under section 7(c) ofthe Act are fulfilled. However, obligations under section 7 of

the Act must be reconsidered if: (1) new information reveals impacts of this identified action
that may affect listed species or critical habitat in a manner not previously considered, (2) this
action is subsequently modified in a manner that was not considered in this review, or (3) a new
species is listed or critical habitat is determined that may be affected by the identified action.
If you haue questions about these comments, please contact Ms. Marella Buncick of our staff at
828/258-3939, Ext. 237. In any future correspondence conceming this project, please reference
our Log No. 4-2-15-390.
Sincerely,
ur�i�i�wl sr�'nc°r!- -
Janet A. Mizzi
Field Supervisor

Little Peters Creek Mitigation Site
ONEID 029-005
The Little Peters Creek Mitigation Site is located in Stokes County within the USGS hydrologic
unit 03010103 of the Roanoke River. NCDOT acquired the 720 lineaz foot stream enhancement
site to mitigate for unavoidable, jurisdictional impacts associated with future projects in the
Roanoke River Basin. Monitoring requirements were performed from 2008 to 2012 and the site
was closed out in 2013. Table 1 shows the final mitigation quantities approved for the site. The
site has been placed on the NCDOT On-site Debit Ledger for use within HUC 03010103. Table
2 indicates all mitigation debits that have occurred per regulatory agency approval.
In order to offset unauoidable impacts associated with Bridge #103 on Stewart Road, the Martin
Site/Little Peters Creek will be debited 1941inear feet of stream enhancement. The debit is listed
in table 2 below.
Table 1. Mitigation Quantities Approved
HUC Mitigation Starting
Type Amount (LN Ft.)
� 3010103 Stream 72C
� Enhancement
Table 2. Mitigation Debits
Mitigation
7ype
Strea m
'Enhancement
Strea m
Enhancement
DEBIT
AMOUNT Status
(LN.Ft)
265 Close Out
194 Close Out
Additional Notes
have lifted the hold.
SITE TIP
Bridge #58 on Highway 311 over
UT to Dan River (176P.9.R.5)
Bridge 103 on Stewart Road
(176P.9.R.22)
Action ID#

�
W
N
w
�
�
a;
s�
N
N
�
a
�
�
�
11
V
W
�
�1
�
�
�
v
�
�
O
U
See SIee7 7-A Fo� Index af Shsets
See Sheet i-B For Conventicnal Symbo�s
DETGJR ROC7E
GRAPHIC SCALES
sa zs o so ioo
PLANS
50 25 0 50 100
PROFILE �HORIZONTAL)
��L��� �ll' l�' �IlA ll � `l.l�l��lla�d°d �
�ll U' ���L�iV �� �ll�� V'V' ���
STOKES CO U1�TY
LOCATI0IV: REPLACE EXISTING BRIDGE 1YO.103 WITH ALUMINUM BO
SR 1707 (STEWART RD) OVER WOOD BE1VT01� BRAlYCH
TYPE OF WORK: GRADIIYG, DRAIIVAGE, WIDEI�ING, CULVERT,
A1VD PAVEMENT MARKINGS
SURFACE WATER IMPACTS PERMIT �
.�. VBP.9.R.22 �
-L- POC Sta.1Ot50.00
PERMIT DRAWING
SHEET 1 OF b
DESIGN DATA
ADT 2012 = 620
V = 60 MPH
FUNC CLASS = LOCAL
JI 1 L 1
PROJECT LENGTK Prqzre0 In Ih 0/fla o(r
LENGTH ROADWAY TIP PROJECT W-5209F = 0.085 MILE DIVISIOIV OF HIGHWAYS
TOTAL LENG77f TIP PROJECT W-5209F = 0.085 MlLE �ooa a�.�n nmee D.., RoleigA Nc, veia
za�z srnxn,�xn srecrricnnoxs
RIGHT OF WAY DATE:I
PROJ£Ci EVGlN66R
LETTING DATE: I
PROJ£CT DESIGN £NGIN+'Fe
XYDRAIILlCS ENGINEER
ROADWAY DESIGN
ENGlNEER
INCOMPLETE PLANS
OO NV! V R/v A
PRELIMINARY PLANS
00 NM 114 PoP Ctl.�'fTq11CIlON

/ / / ) \ / I I 1 � I � �
�� / / � I / I \ 1 L_ �� ` � `\ /
� / / / � 1 1 1 ` � � , 1
\ �, , �' .
�.� / I � � � .I 4' `-• � ��� � l` �, A., yti
� � I � � � ' ��,_ A � 1 i.,�
) \ \� �
� � ' \ � � � i � '� L: ,
__ i/-- - � � � \ � f, , � ��
I � h � ../�.. �
— . i , � � ��\ \ \ \ � ti ' /% \�2�
—-'_ ` �E1D0�5 BV�I CM/ICM�\ ��i I �'� y�y.
� / ' i wo�awn� d,N \
�.— I r— _ _— _ � �s���� ''\?,
� " �� � — ). _ — >ounerc� _
� /t ' _ _ � �t d�a, ( /�_._ — -_ � � oew� e �7'� - .
I � /' /� \�� _ — � . �ra`"" � iolIDy _ � d -�w•��
� l � _ � �, J � — =�f _ � -_ ,,T 1
I / � I l � ` . - - - � .`, " _ ` r-, rr;na . .
��>
�
I I l _� � � � ' i � �-'���-��� e� , -,� F _..
1 I ` � � , \ �� -\_ i"""',�= `,.� r�/ /_.,°p�.,, o �
-I � .`— �\ �\ - /;/ .�,����f" J/'S"��� `� � `
- � � i )� � — — . , % � �
�
I
�
�
1
/
/ J
\ � � — �
noH
—cuss i �
�O �
� —�— J
J
� % � — � \
1 � � � �w�rcnaunei� aI 1
I I � ) � / '_ , � -- ` . _� �.�'r � � � \ � 1ee oEia� e �
� � / y — � \
� � I 1 _ MiOYMU 6CY11ER � j�yi � QBM`2�CAVATON (
� � � i � � ��'\_ v �^ �^ —'� \ � I� G'�1v,
� �� \ \. � �� -'„\/ �
�� I � /� � Y � —\_� � ei, /\ I
\ � � � �- _�%��-�\ . �� \ \✓ �.� li
� ; . _ � - � `/
/ . /� \ \
SITE 1
\ � � J i
� � \.— l \
� � � � \
� �� -__,
� -�� �'! �\
� 1 ..
� _ �p���°� � � . \ \ /
J �0 `z ` r � / ,,
� �
HJGINfFA � ENGWEER
i ; � � PERMIT DRAWING
/� � — � � SHEET 3 OF 6
SgYM1Y4TY5NGE� / � / _ / .
\% � / � \ � '/ : .� � � /
\ �
I I / ��
i / � �
� � — � / D�IL9 � �
I � 1 �� V�ANp OOW�i SWFCM — J
I J fL�00PeI�BFNCX `
—� ` � — � / � peno i i �'d� ' — '
� - -�'
._ � _ . d � � , s� _ - —
� � ,o.��k�.�F � I H - ` '� - --
� -_ � _
�.-F �r��~'�'-� i �-� � � l I
SIASS I.\ ut� ��\ / �/� / J //� 1/LEf 6� N{�' 1
0.1P RAP / � IN01 i0 SGtE�� �
1 i
�n000rwrv eENCrI 2 � �� �u,o � -
$EE DEINI A . � \ / , � � ��-
m[� 6 C,wrFx Sx. ` � \ ) • / �
. � / � ee��E n�ai /
� � � � � \ �� � � � FST.116 �NS 41 RV PAP FSf 16 ] GU.TDS � �
�1 / / � I \ ' ( ESi.�3J�50TO5,GFOiF%i11F EYGV�➢ON �
' ' � � � °���E �� �n I� I 1 I I ( I �
\/ �,r
��� �1Mei,ns�m6u�c�wer�k� ��PO� �� o�� �� ioo��
r=ioo
� �.
.*
1 d5 MPN ra Poseo euo
X7/� -. � .
�aogaee.a>' � — — —
_ � -
NG lT 9/�-.�L I __ F1J GPAOf
O15=6 �9'J �
T
NW =6BI.6'
fE ]1' S" � 8'�Il' IIMINUM 0%- INIEi ��
10+00 11+00 12+00 13+00 14+00 75+00 16+00

.W
OUTLET CHANNEL
SEE DETAIL B
H �
r r n�� F �/
- --�i`-
F
�:
a
;�, :,� �
EXCAVATION
P c�nss i
��P
� -9
�\ � _ - -
� m
\ EXISTING R/W
�--F --- F--_ F F
- _ . . . . . �, ----- ---'
ST VftN H. TYSINGER
J
SITE 1
Q�'�--i=—�—
� ,L°'// i . F —'------ F � � �
�
� �
��W� � C' --
� � v ��
�',Q /, � F�
\_ .���
i ��
PD�
� I
DENOTES IMPACTS IN INLET CHANNEL
SURFACE WATER
�SEE DETAIL B
DENOTES TEMPORARY
IMPACTS IN SURFACE WATER EXCAVATION
��a�A�� �����y
� � �
■ ■ ■ ■ ■
■ ■ ■ ■ ■ �
�\
--- F --'
--- €zisr�nc ai��
— CLASS I
RIP RAP /
FLOODPLAIN BENCH �
SEE DEfAIL A
1V ��� ll
DIVtSION OF HIGHWAYS
STOKES COUNTY
PRO.1 ECT:I7BP.9.R.2Y
REPLACE EXIST[NG BRIDGE R103
WITH ALUM[NUM BOX SR 1707
SHEET � OF 6
/

N
O N
P 3
� V
PROIKt REFERfNCE NO. SXEEi NO.
FOMWqT OESIGN XYORAWCS
ENGINFER ENGINFFR
INCOMPL B PLANB
e wr r ,w • .Kairrew
PRBLIMIN RY PLANS
w xn u� mwunaM
PE IT RAW NG
2 0� � 0� � �� 2 0�
90 � — — �� � — Ql 0=6 :47'
— — � � �..
TB R TB T =
-- '—— -�= —� ----
— — - � ��.�
� �
.
` 80 —`_° ---- --- - — 62 �- �
rn —
v
? �� �� �� �� � 5 = 0. O8 F T
� � 67 , �� WS= 81.6'
a
v�
�
S
M�
O
O
V
mI
N
w
rn
c
.3
0
�
i
f
m
E «
c a
o ,„
C
W
NI w
sH
a �
6 uq
/ww
V'wiw
� i=»
O n»
= ww
/ww
� bM

WETLAND PERMIT IMPACT SUMMARY
WETLANDIMPACTS URFACE WATERIMPACTS
Hand Existing Existing
Permanent Temp. Excavation Mechanized Clearing Permanent Temp. Channel Channel Natural
Site Station Structure Fillln Fillln in Clearing in SW SW Impacts Impacts Stream
No. (From/To) Size / Type Wetlands Wetlands Wetlands in Wetlands Wetlands impacts impacts Permanent Temp. Design
(ac) (ac) (ac) (ac) (ac) (ac) (ac) (ft) (ft) (ft)
1 13+25 -L- 24.4'x8.9' AI. Box 0.03 128
Bank Stabliziation < 0.01 < 0.01 66 22
TOTALS`: 0.04 < 0.01 194 22 0
'Rounded totals are sum of actual impacts
NOTES:
2013 10 24

N
N
.
�
.
�
�
�\
�
• �
�
V
�
O'
�
�
�1�
�
GR.9PHIC SCALE
u0
188�
PLANS
�
PROFILE (HORIZONTAL�
0
�
PROFILE (VERTICAL)
����� ��� ����� ��������
��d������ �� �1�������
I" . I�� I'� I" I'� (� I� (1� � I�. II�
� �,I-I\V�_- " I�.N�i��l(�. � � (� �`I�"(�
STOK�S COUI�TY
LOCATIOAL• REPL�4CE EXISTIlYG BRIDGE 1V0. 103 WITH DUAL CULVERT
SR 1707 (STEWART RD) OVER DUCKL7IVGS SHOALS CREEK
TYPE OF WORK GRAD7IVG, DRA7IVAGE, WIDEIVING, CULVERT,
A1VD PAVEMENT MARKIIVGS
-L- POC Sto.10+50.00
ROADSfDH ENVIRONMEN7AL UN77
DIVfS/ON OF HIGHWAYS
STA]'E OF NORTH CAROLINA
THESE EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PIANS COMPLY
W1TH TXE REGULATIONS SET FORTH BY 7XE
NCG-0f0000 GENERAL CONSTApCTION PERhiJT EFFECT/VE d[/GUST 3,2011
/SSUED BY THE NORTX CAROLlNA DEPAATMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND
NAT(IRAL RESO[IRCES D/VlSION OF WATER QUAllf'Y.
\ I�\
Preynre0 in Jle Office ol:
ROADSIDE ENVIROIVMEIVTAL U1VIT
1 Sou�h Wiiminpron St.
Raleigh, NC 2I611
2012 STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS
Oesigned by:
Noelle Ring 3456
NAME L£VEL lll CfiRTfPICARON NO.
���'. IiBP.9R22 EC°I �
ER05ION AND 5ED[MENT CONTROL MEA5URE5
SeJ A o....,e�:,. � , ,
I630.03 Tempa...� Silt Dsm6 . .,,-
1630.05 T�mpone> D;o�..;,, _ ,.p _
1605.01 T�mn�..n Ss1e F�ec=.......__......_. -��
1606.01 Sr==;.I S.diment Cooe.ol Feo�e.._._ �
I6R2.01 T=mpa.e.� Re.m. e,A Slepe D..;�. T
I630.02 ffi]t B..fo T�e� B_....._._...._.._.__...� +
1633.01 T�mpo...� R>�L Silt C6«k T>prA �
Tsmno•.�� Ro=h Silt C6e�k T�prA ..:eL O
M.etas end Pelr.=nl.m;da (PAML_..._...._._ �
1633.OR T=mpe...� Ro�h Sil[C6.ck T�prB._..___.�
w.td�/ca�. F�be. w,td� � _ -
w.e�i�6ca�r e���. w.�e�� O
.k6 Polr.�.>1emld� (PAM)........_.__...
163A.01 T�mpo...� Ro�k S�d:m�e� D.m T�prA_.........�
1634.02 T�mn��••� Ro�k Sod�m.nt D,m T�pa-B ��
1635.01 Re=k Ptp� Iol�t S�d�m�ot T.,v T�oe-A �
1635.OR Ro�4 Ptp. lol�E Sed�meoe T..p T>p� S.._..�
1630.04 5[Jlfos B•�io �
1630.06 Sve=�.ISeWosB..io....._........._........__.�
Ro�6 Iolet Sedtment T..p:
I632.01 7'm� i1 ,f{ �
1632.02 T�p� B B �
1632.03 T>o� C (`�j
eca
Sk:mm�. B.A.. �
T�...d 54ime.e. Be.lo._ ........................ ��
]ofi�fufiev Auin.._....__..........._._._._.._.. �
TH1S PROJH:C'1' CO�TAI15
EROSION CONTROL PLAi\S
FOR CI,EARING AND
GRUBBING PfL4SF, OP
WNSTAtiCTION.
Roeb�ny Smnda.d Drm�ings
The falloni� roedway eMlisM1 e�nnduds es eppnr in 'Roedr.q� Stende�d D'm�ings"- Aoedm�� Desipp
Uni�- 9. G Deovnmen� of'freneparieuan - Nxlei&M1, �. �., dered Jenuen' 2013 �a me iw�.��
n iherem a.c arv���+ble �o ihis v�o�eci end b� rcferenee h.rcby ere eonsidereJ e pen of
�h.se rbm.
16U4.01 Neilroed F sion ConrtolUe�eil IG32.0] RocM InletSedimrntTrep T>ye A
1605AI Temporeq Sil� Fenec 1632.02 RneH Inlp SeJi�.rm Trep TyP� R
160fi.01 Specisl5edimcm Covvol Fenec 1632.03 RoeX Inlm Sediment Tw0 Tyye C
160].01 Grn'el Canvmetion F,mrenee Ifi33.01 ]'cmporery Roek Sile Chcd Tyyc A
1633.01 iempon� Bermsxnd Slope U�eim Ifi33.02 Scmpo�..y Rod SW CAeeL Typ� B
1630.01 Riser Honin I634.01 Tempore�y Roek Sedimme Uem T�ye d
1630.02 SileBasin Type U I634.02 Temyoror� RoeN SedimeneUem T�yc B
1630.W Temporeq SiID Dirch Ifi35.01 ftocM Pive In�a Scdimcn� Tnp T�yc A
1630.04 SfJling Basin 1635A2 RoeM Piv ���� Sedimem Trev T�pe fl
1630.05 Tempornry Divemion Ifi40.01 Co'v F.be. 9�Ic
1630.06 Soedel Siilling Basin 1645.OI TemPOre� Screem Cmse�ng
1631.0� �Iercin4 Insiel�nriov

EXAMPLE OF PUMP-AROUND
NOTES:
1) All excovotion shall be performed in only dry or isolated
areas of the work zone.
2� Impervious dikes are to be used to isolate work from
stream flow when necessary.
3) Mainienance of s}ream flow operotions sho116e incidenfal
to }he work. This includes polyethylene sheeting, diversion
pipes, pumps and hoses.
4) Pumps and hoses shall be of sufficienf size to dewafer
fhe work area.
J /
I
1
SPECIAL STILLING BASIN �
(SEE PROJECT SPECIAL PROVISIONS� ��
Utilize a Stobilized Ouflef Insiead of �
a Speciol Sfilling Basin If Pumping \�
Clean Wofer �
�,
I !
IMPERVIOUS DIKE
(SEE PROJECT SPECIAL PROVISIONS)
TEMPORARY
FLEXIBLE HOSE
i
I
i
I
I
i
i
i
i
1
i
1
I
OPERATION
\
1
I
i
r
i SPECIAL STILLING BASIN
� (SEE PROJECT SPECIAL PROVISIONS)
i/
I
'L— DEWATERING PUMP
1
1
1
� EXISTING STREAM
i
�CHANNEL
i
I
1
1
1 �- CULVERT
i �
i �
�
i
i �
i �
� �LOVr �
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 �
1 �
1 �
� � ♦
1 �
1
1
�
�
�
�
i \
i \
i
i
i
�
,�_ � �``
�
�
.
.\
\�.
SEQUENCE OF CONSTRUCTION FOR TYPICAL WORK AREA
1. WSTALL SPECIAL STILLING BASW(5).
2. INSTALL UPSTREAM PUMP AND TEMPORARY FLEXIBLE HOSE.
3. PLACE UPSTREAM IMPERVIOUS DIKE AND BEGIN PUMPING
OPERATIONS fOR STREAM DIVERSION.
4. PL4CE DOWNSTREAM IMPERVIOUS DIKE AND PUMPING
APPARATUS. DEWATER EN7RAPPED AREA.AREA TO BE DEWATERED SHALL
eE EqUAL TO ONE DAY'S WORK,
5. INSTALL NLVERT(5J IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PLANS.
6. E%CAVATE ANY ACCUMULATED SILT AND DEWATER BEFORE REMOVAL
OF IMPERVIOUS DIKES. REMOVE IMPERVIOUS DIKES, PUMPS, AND
TEA1POR4RY FLEXIBLE HOSE. (DOWNS7REAM IMPERVIOUS DIKES FIRST�.
7. REMOVE SPECIAL STILLING BASW�S) AND eACKFILL. STABIUZE DISTURBED AREA
WITH SEED AND MULCH.
IMPERVIOUS DIKE
�SEE PROJECT SPECIAL PROVISIONS)
`��." \\ �
\ �`�`�\\`````` ``�� ,
PUMP—AROUND PUMP �--___ �� �_
TOP OF BANK
� _—______ `______

���V����I�T �1F lH[���33[VyA��
�"I' ��"I'I� (�I ��(��I""I�I I � � � I':(�>I I ��� �
S OIL S TABILIZA TI01� TIMEFRAMES
SlT E DESCRIPT lON ST ABILIZAT lON T lME T IMEFRAME EXCEPT IONS
PERIMETER DIKES, SWALES, DITCHES AND SLOPES 7 DAYS NONE
HIGH QUALITY WATER (HOW) ZONES 7 DAYS NONE
SLOPES STEEPER THAN 3el 7 DAYS IF SLOPES ARE 10' OR LESS IN LENGTH AND ARE
NOT STEEPER THAN 2DI, 14 DAYS ARE ALLOWED,
SLOPES 3al OR FLATTER 14 DAYS 7 DAYS FOR SLOPES GREATER THAN 50' IN
LENGTH.
ALL OTHER AREAS WITH SLOPES FLATTER THAN 40l 14 DAYS NONE, EXCEPT FOR PERIMETERS AND HQW ZONES,

-L- SR(; 1707
3' SHOULDER VARIES 'C VARIES 3' SHOl1LDER
8' �6' WiGUARDRAIL) EXIST TO 11' � EXIST TO 1P �6' WiGUARDRAIL)
� I
C� I �C�
EXISTING GR4DE � ��5"n'P J�.
GROUND � C2) W POINT � �l ��
= �qR /� oz .o� T �
L� r � � oe .oe
I �
l:l l� � F%ISi1NG PAVEMENi IXISi1NG PpVEMENi —' qR7qTo
3�) EXISTING
T 3 GROUND
D� BO MP U ryP ttP 4„ D� E� 1
��RA�E TO E�J SHLDRS NP —
HIS LWE
TYPICAL SECTION #1
USE NPICAL SECTION NO. 1 AS FOLLOWS:
FBOM -L- 17+10 TO -L- STA.12+50
FROM -L- 13+75 TO d- $TA. 15+60
-L- SrR 1707
3' SHOULOER VARIES 'C VARIES 3' SHOl1LDER
8' �6' WiGUARDRAIL� EXIST TO 11' � EXIST TO 11' �6' WiGUARDRAIL�
I
I
EXISTING C2 GRAOE I��5"NP C2.
GROUND POINT �
GRADE TO
THIS LINE
� 02 01 T1
OB � 08 J
/ _� �4
� R7:�T
� �.I EXISTING
os^tta D� �D�� ��� 3�t GROUND
TYPICAL SECTION #2
USE NPICAL SECTION NO.1 AS FOLLOWS:
FROM -L- 12+50 TO -L- STA. 73+07.83
FROM -L- 13+42.01 TO -L- STA. 13+75
MINIMUM RESURFAQNG �W) PROP.GR.4DE
1.5„
r_________________ ________________ ______________________
1.5
L_______1 _________ ______ I
T�' __ ___ .... _� ______
� MILL TO
THIS LINE
�� Detail for Incidental Milling �
� � +/
-L- SR 1707
4
I
I
C7 D2) ! D2 �� ([
I �
_�T-!{�
/'' � 1j�IJ\I
' 25 ' ' � / � / ` 2.5 ` _
MIN. MIN.
Detail Showing Method of Wedging
-}--_ �
:`
\ 3"
1� MIN.
P0.01ECi REFfRENCE NO. SHE� NO.
l7BP.9.R.22 2
0.0ADWAT �ESIGN PAVFMENi �ESIGN
ENGWEER ENGINEER
,.op\H URa�i"..
.�2.o-oEt55la".,��i ':
_ �'. 1
- ¢ SEAL
�. 045499 e '
% y`/,� ,A ,�o �',:
-L- SR 1707
4
I
I
TYPICAL SECTION #3
USE NPICAL SECTION No. 2 AS FOLLOWS:
FROM -L- STA.13+07.83 (BEGIN CULVERn
TO -l- STA.13+4207 (END NLVERT�
PAVEMENT SCHEDULE
`..� PFOP. APPFOX. 1.5" ASPHALT CONCflETE SUFFACE COUFSE, TVPE 59.58,
AT AN AVERAGE FATE OF 168 LBS. PEF 50. VD.
`.,Z PFOP. APPqOX. 3" ASPHALT CONCFETE SURFFCE COOFSE, TYPE 59.58,
HT AN AVEPAGE NATE OF 16B LBS. PEIi 5�. VD. IN EACH OF TWO LAYEFS.
PROP. APPqOX. 2.5" ASPHALT CONCFETE INTEflMEDIATE COOFSE, TYPE I9.0B,
� 1 AT AN AVERAGE PATE OF 285 LBS. PEF 50. VD.
PFOP. VAF. DEPTH ASPHALT CONCFETE INTEFMEDIATE COUflSE, TVPE I19.OB,
pQ AT AN AVERAGE PATE OF 116 LBS. PEP S�. Y�. PEF 1" DEPTH, TO BE PLACEO
IN LAVEqS NOT LESS THAN 2�" IN DEPTH OF GFEATEF THAN 9" IN DEPTH.
E1 PpOP. APPqOX. 4" ASPHALT CONCPETE BASE COORSE, TYPE 625.OB,
AT AN AVEFAGE FATE OF 456 LBS. PEF 50. V0.
PFOP. VAR. DEPTH ASPHALT CONCflETE BASE COOflSE, TYPE B25.OB,
E2 AT AN qVEPAGE HATE OP 114 LBS. PEF 5�. Y�. PEF 1" OEPTH, TO
BE PLACED IN LAVEFS NOT LE55 THAN 3" IN DEPTH �F GFEATEF
THAN 5.5" IN DEPTH.
T EAFTH MATEPIAL
U EXISTING PAVEMENT
W VAflIABLE �EPTH ASPHALT PAVEMENT (SEE WEDGING DETAIL)
NOTE: PAVEMENT E�GE SLOPES ARE 1:1 IINLESS SHOWN OTNEFWISE.